Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is a growing disease with extensive health risks.1 Gliflozin represents a new class of medications in the treatment armamentarium for diabetes. Medications in this class include dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, and empagliflozin. Their primary mechanism of action is blocking sodium-glucose transporter protein 2 (SGLT)-2, which inhibits the reabsorption of glucose in the kidney, and therefore lowers systemic blood sugar levels.2 SGLT-2 inhibitors are known to have higher urinary glucose levels as a byproduct of lowering blood glucose levels. Not surprisingly, patients on gliflozins have an increased incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs), likely due to the associated glucosuria from the medication.3
Endoscopic urological interventions, particularly ones involving stone treatment, have a well-documented risk for causing UTIs. Prophylactic antibiotics are typically given in accordance with Canadian Urological Association guidelines and local resistance patterns to help reduce the risk of postoperative infections.4 Elevated urinary glucose levels can potentially increase the likelihood of post-endourological procedure infection. Urologists should, therefore, be aware of the higher risk of postoperative infections in patients on these novel agents and tailor their prophylactic antibiotics appropriately. Here, we report a case of a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus who returned to hospital five days following an uneventful ureteroscopy with sepsis.
Case report
A 59-year-old male presented to the emergency room with renal colic secondary to a distal 10 mm ureteric stone detected on computed tomography (CT) scan. His past medical history was remarkable for recurrent nephrolithiasis, previously treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, gastroesophageal reflux, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus (type 2). His medications included pantoprazole 40 mg orally daily, metformin 500 mg orally twice daily, empagliflozin 25 mg orally daily, and insulin (Lantus) 44 U QHS. His usual glucoscan readings were 5–6 mmol/L. He did not have a preoperative urine culture; however, his urinalysis was negative for nitrites and leukocyte esterases. He was hemodynamically stable, but his pain could not be controlled with medications. He was subsequently admitted and underwent an uneventful right ureteroscopy, laser lithotripsy, and insertion of right double-J ureteric stent. The patient received 2 g of intravenous cefazolin for prophylaxis as per our institution’s antibiogram recommendations. He was discharged home later that day on a short course of ciprofloxacin postoperatively with a plan to remove the stent in two weeks.
Five days following the procedure, he presented to the emergency room with a two-day history of a high-grade fever, chills, and nausea/vomiting. He denied any frequency, urgency, or flank pain. He was febrile, tachycardic, and mildly hypotensive, so the sepsis protocol was initiated. He was treated with intravenous (IV) fluids, piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 g IV every six hours and vancomycin 1 g IV every 12 hours. These were continued despite no major clinical improvement changes until blood cultures and urine cultures came back positive with yeast. No bacterial growth was identified. Fluconazole 400 mg IV daily was initiated and the infectious diseases (ID) service was consulted.
He underwent a local cystoscopy to remove the stent, as the ID team was worried the foreign body may harbor the fungal infection and make it difficult to eradicate. His fluconazole was switched to caspofungin 50 mg IV daily. He showed dramatic clinical improvement and the repeat cultures returned negative for yeast. He underwent a full fungal workup as a result of the positive blood cultures, including a transthoracic echocardiogram and ophthalmology consultation. Both assessments were negative for any fungal complications. The speciation finally returned revealing Candida Glabrata species (spp.). He was discharged from hospital 10 days after admission and completed four weeks caspofungin 50 mg IV daily via peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line followed by oral fluconazole 800 mg daily for two more weeks. His infection fully resolved without any further issues.
He has been seen in followup several times since. Eight months later, he developed another non-obstructing stone in the lower pole of left kidney, treated with an uneventful ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy. He had a negative preoperative urine culture and was not placed on any specific antifungal prophylaxis; however, he was encouraged to be well-hydrated before and after the procedure. His stent was removed two weeks after ureteroscopy, and he had no further issues with infections.
Discussion
According to Canadian statistics, in 2015 it was estimated that 3.4 million Canadians (9.3% of population) have diabetes. This is projected to increase to 44% by 2025.1 Traditional medications are often associated with adverse effects, increasing insulin resistance and deterioration of pancreatic B-cell insulin production with the disease progression.2,5 A novel class of medications called gliflozins have demonstrated impressive results in lowering blood glucose level with no direct effects on pancreatic B-cell function.3
SGLT-2 inhibitors target the proximal convoluted tubules in the kidney and inhibit glucose reabsorption. This increases urinary glucose excretion, resulting in antihyperglycaemic effects.2 Empagliflozin is a selective SGLT-2 inhibitor that has been shown to reduce glycated hemoglobin levels in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. It has also shown additional benefits of reducing body weight, blood pressure, and cardiovascular events.6–9
Increased urinary glucose level causes increased urinary frequency with electrolyte imbalance. Glucosuria associated with SGLT-2 inhibitors has also been shown to increase the risk of genital infections and UTIs, including mycotic infection in various studies.3,9–12
Overall, fungal UTIs, particularly Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., have been becoming increasingly common due to the increased overall use of antibiotics, as well as the increasing prevalence of immune-deficient states, including diabetes.13,14 In the study by Tong et al, analysis of clinical data of patients on dapagliflozin showed that female gender and a previous history of infections were independent risk factors for genital fungal infections.15 Higher urinary glucose level could provide the yeast with more available nutrients, which can increase urine acidity and facilitate their overgrowth on natural surfaces.16 There is no current literature on the risks of postoperative UTI rates while patients are on SGLT-2 inhibitors.
Any urological intervention has a potential risk of UTI due to the effect of instrumentation, changes in the host defensive mechanisms, the breakdown of natural barriers, and the introduction of bacteria into the urinary tract.17 Ureteroscopy is one of the most common urological procedures, and with a growing number of diabetic patients on new antihyperglycemic medications, urologists should be aware of the higher risk of postoperative infections, including fungal infections.
In our case, the patient had diabetes and urinary tract disease, which are two risk factors for funguria, although the blood glucose level was within the normal range. The optimal strategy to prevent this situation is not clear. Current Canadian guidelines recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for ureteroscopy and other endoscopic procedures, but there is no current recommended prophylaxis with antifungals.4 However, we believe, given the higher concentration of urinary glucose in patients on SGLT-2 inhibitors, it may be reasonable to consider hydration perioperatively and antifungal prophylaxis. The risk-benefit ratio of this decision needs to be borne out in future studies. Our case highlights the importance of being aware of the side effects of all medications our urological surgical patients are taking and what risks they can pose preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. This will allow us as urologists to maximize our patients’ outcomes and better identify and appropriately treat any complications that occur.
Conclusions
SGLT-2 inhibitors, a new generation of antihyperglycemic medications, may put our patients at higher risk of UTIs and urologists should consider this while planning for endoscopic procedures. Future well-designed studies are needed to show the best preventative measures before urological procedures in patients taking this class of medication.
Footnotes
Competing interests: The authors report no competing personal or financial interests related to this work.
This paper has been peer-reviewed.
References
- 1.Canadian Diabetes Association. Report on diabetes: Driving change. Toronto, ON: CDA; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gallo L, Wright E, Vallon V. Probing SGLT2 as a therapeutic target for diabetes: Basic physiology and consequences. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2015;12:78–89. doi: 10.1177/1479164114561992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Halimi S, Verges B. Adverse effects and safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors. Diabetes Metab J. 2014;40:28–34. doi: 10.1016/S1262-3636(14)72693-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mrkobrada M, Ying I, Mokrycke S, et al. CUA guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis for urologic procedures. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9:13–22. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Campbell R. Fate of the beta-cell in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. J A Pharm Assoc. 2009;49:10–5. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.09076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grempler R, Thomas L, Eckhardt M, et al. Empagliflozin, a novel selective sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor: Characterisation and comparison with other SGLT-2 inhibitors. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14:83–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01517.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin J, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2117–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Haring H, Merker L, Seewaldt-Becker E, et al. Empagliflozin as add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3396–404. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Singh M, Kumar A. Risks associated with SGLT2 inhibitors: An overview. Current Drug Safety. 2018;13:84–91. doi: 10.2174/1574886313666180226103408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Arakaki R. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and genital and urinary tract infections in type 2 diabetes. Postgraduate Med. 2016;128:409–17. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1167570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li D, Wang T, Shen S, et al. Urinary tract and genital infections in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:348–55. doi: 10.1111/dom.12825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Levine J. Empagliflozin for type 2 diabetes mellitus: An overview of phase 3 clinical trials. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2017;13:405–23. doi: 10.2174/1573399812666160613113556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Perlroth J, Choi B, Spellberg B. Nosocomial fungal infections: Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Medical Mycology. 2007;45:321–46. doi: 10.1080/13693780701218689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rao P. Aspergillus infection in urinary tract post-ureteric stenting. Indian J of Med Microbiol. 2015;33:316–8. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.154895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thong K, Yadagiri M, Barnes D, et al. ABCD Nationwide Dapagliflozin Audit contributors. Clinical risk factors predicting genital fungal infections with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor treatment: The ABCD nationwide dapagliflozin audit. Primary Care Diabetes. 2018;12:45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2017.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Maalouf NM, Cameron MA, Moe OW, Sakhaee K. Metabolic Basis for Low Urine pH in Type 2 Diabetes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:1277–81. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08331109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Grabe M, Botto H, Cek M, et al. Preoperative assessment of the patient and risk factors for infectious complications and tentative classification of surgical field contamination of urological procedures. World J Urol. 2012;30:39–50. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0722-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
