Abstract
Sunitinib (ST), a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of renal carcinoma. It has been reported that ST is involved in the mediation of autophagy; however, its regulatory role in the autophagic process remains controversial. Furthermore, the mechanism by which activated AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) negatively regulates autophagy remains nearly unexplored. In the present study, we revealed that ST inhibited AMPK activity and regulated autophagy in a cell type- and dose-dependent manner. In a number of cell lines, ST was demonstrated to inhibit H2O2-induced autophagy and the phosphorylation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC), whereas alone it could block the autophagic flux concurrent with increased expression of p62. An immunoprecipitation assay revealed that LC3 directly interacted with p62, whereas ST increased punctate LC3 staining, which was well colocalized with p62. Taken together, we reveal a previously unnoticed pathway for ST to regulate the autophagic process, and p62, although often utilized as a substrate in autophagy, plays a critical role in regulating the inhibition of ST in both basal and induced autophagy.
Subject terms: Macroautophagy, Cytoskeletal proteins
Introduction
Macroautophagy (herein referred to as autophagy) is a process involving the bulk degradation of cytosolic components by autophagolysosomes1. It occurs in most eukaryotic cells at basal levels and is activated in response to the number of stimuli. It is well recognized that autophagy fulfills two major cellular functions: detoxification via waste removal and provision of protection in response to nutrient stress. Although often used as a substrate of autophagy, p62 was initially found as a signaling mediator residing in the late endosome and lysosome2. Accumulating evidence has indicated that p62 is a multifunctional adaptor protein that participates in the regulation of a series cellular functions, such as nutrient sensing, survival/apoptosis modulation, and signaling pathway activation3,4. Moreover, it is known to link the cellular degradation pathways, ubiquitin system, and autophagic machinery5–7. In vertebrates, p62 regulates the autophagic removal of protein aggregates and damaged organelles, including mitochondria, through its interaction with ubiquitin and the LC3 component of autophagy8,9. Although it is recognized to play an essential role in mediating selective autophagy, p62 is required for the unselected autophagic process, and its loss inhibits resveratrol (RSV)–induced autophagy10.
ST is a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and it inhibits the activity of PDGFRs, c-KIT, FLT-3, and VEGFRs, all of which have been demonstrated to be important for cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis11. ST can induce both cell viability loss and cell senescence, and it can cause G1-S cell cycle arrest and the DNA damage response in OS-RC-2 cells12,13. Recently, ST has been demonstrated to mediate autophagy depending on the cell type. In both cardiac and PC12 cells, ST increases autophagic flux, whereas it induces incomplete autophagy in either renal or bladder cancer cells. In RCC 786-O cells, ST increases the level of phosphorylated EGFR, which may cause resistance to ST treatment in RCC14. In endometrial carcinoma, ST decreases either the basal or EGF-activated NFkB transcription15. Additionally, ST has been demonstrated to inhibit AMPK and cause myocyte cytotoxicity16,17.
AMPK, a key energy-surveillance kinase complex, contains three subunits: a catalytic, one scaffolding and a regulatory. Energy stress increased the levels of either ADP or AMP (compared with ATP), and their augment functioned as an index of energy deprivation. AMPK was firstly found to be a kinase that directly inhibited ACC through increasing its phosphorylation; it also functions in multiple ways to influence cellular metabolism, and its activation is upregulated responsive to various stress conditions with an increased ratio of AMP to ATP. Through enhancing Thr172 phosphorylation of the catalytic subunit and inhibiting dephosphorylation of Thr172, AMP binding was found to increase the activity of AMPK. Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is a multiprotein complex consisting of mTOR, raptor, mLST8, and PRAS40, and AMPK demonstrated to inhibit mTORC1 via activating tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2) and directly reducing the phosphorylation of raptor18,19. Therefore, AMPK has been thought to trigger autophagy through an indirect mechanism by inhibiting mTORC1 activity or directly binding to ULK1, which is a serine/threonine kinase and also known as ATG120,21. However, Shang et al. observed that nutrient starvation simulates the autophagic response mediated by ULK1 dephosphorylation and its dissociation from AMPK22. They further suggested that AMPK might have dual roles in the regulation of autophagy depending on the nutrient condition. Indeed, compound C, a pharmacological AMPK inhibitor that efficiently blocks the metabolic actions of AMPK, has been demonstrated to induce the autophagic process in different cancer cell lines23.
Here, we show that ST treatment alone can either inhibit or induce autophagy depending on the cell type and its concentration. ST was demonstrated to inhibit AMPK activity, upregulated p62 expression and abolished the H2O2-induced autophagic flux. While deprivation of p62 reversed the inhibitory effect of ST on basal autophagy, it no longer blocked the H2O2-activated autophagic flux in p62-depleted cells.
Results
Inhibition of autophagy increases the cleavage of PARP-1 induced by ST
As an approved drug for RCC treatment24, ST expectedly reduced the cell viability of both 786-O and ACHN in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. S1a). The cytotoxic effect of ST was further confirmed by the observation that the cleavage of PARP-1, which serves as a marker of cells undergoing apoptosis25, was induced by ST (Fig. S1b). The addition of 3-MA, a widely used inhibitor of early autophagy26, increased PARP-1 cleavage, while the usage of CQ, which inhibited the fusion between autophagosomes and lysosomes27, further augmented ST/3-MA-induced caspase-dependent apoptosis (Fig. S1b). Moreover, deprivation of either LC3 or Beclin 1 increased the cleavage of PARP-1 (Fig. S1c–e), suggesting that autophagy is involved in the ST-induced apoptotic process. Two different LC3 or Beclin 1 small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were used to independently knock down the expression of either LC3 or Beclin 1 (Fig. S3a,b). In addition, p62, a substrate of autophagic degradation with increased expression during autophagy inhibition28, appeared to be upregulated in both LC3- and Beclin 1-depleted cells (Fig. S1c–e).
A high dose of ST inhibits the autophagic flux and increases p62 expression
Recent studies have revealed contradictory results about the involvement of ST in autophagy29; thus, we subsequently examined the autophagic flux upon ST challenge in both 786-O and ACHN cells. Through electron microscopy, we observed an obvious accrual of membrane vacuoles in either ST-treated ACHN or 786-O cells, and cytosolic components were sequestered in some of those vacuoles in comparison to the control (Fig. 1a–c). The immunoblotting analysis revealed that ST treatment increased the ratio of LC3-II to actin relative to control cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1d,e). Unexpectedly, we found that a high dose of ST (8 μM/L) appeared to completely inhibit the autophagic flux since CQ failed to further accumulate LC3-II in both cell lines (Fig. 1d,e), whereas treatment with 4 μM/L ST abolished the autophagic flux only in 786-O cells (Fig. 1e). In contrast to ACHN cells, in which it either increased or decreased the level of p62 (Fig. 1d), ST solely augmented the expression of p62 in 786-O cells (Fig. 1e). Additionally, a high dose of ST (8 μM/L) also blocked autophagy in HeLa cells (Fig. 1f). Similar to ACHN cells, ST could increase or decrease the level of p62 in HeLa cells. However, ST at a dose of 8 μM/L was found to increase the expression of p62 in all three cell lines (Fig. 1d–f). The aforementioned results indicated that ST regulated autophagy in a dose- and cell type-dependent manner, and it could inhibit the autophagic flux under certain conditions.
ST inhibits H2O2-induced autophagy concurrent with the downregulation of AMPK activity
Former studies have been revealed that ST inhibits the phosphorylation of AMPK and causes myocyte cytotoxicity16,17. Consistently, we observed that ST markedly decreased AMPK phosphorylation in all three tested cell lines (Figs 2a, S2a). In contrast, H2O2 markedly increased the phosphorylation of ACC, the AMPK substrate and indicator of AMPK activity30 (Figs 2b, S2b), and ST abolished the H2O2-induced phosphorylation of ACC (Figs 2b,e, S2b,e). To investigate the inhibitory mechanism of ST on autophagy, we determined the autophagic flux following treatment of the cells with H2O2 in the presence or absence of ST. Although either H2O2 or ST induced autophagy, their combination failed to further stimulate the autophagic process in ACHN cells (Fig. 2c). In 786-O cells, ST abolished the H2O2-activated autophagic flux as CQ was unable to accumulate LC3-II in H2O2/ST-treated cells (Fig. 2d). In HeLa cells, ST also completely inhibited H2O2-induced autophagy (Fig. S2c). The 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide1-β-D-ribofuranoside (AICAR), an agonist of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), enhanced H2O2-induced autophagy in 786-O cells (Fig. 2d). Notably, ST abolished H2O2-activated phosphorylation of ACC (Figs 2e,f, S2d), whereas AICAR increased the activity of AMPK (Fig. 2f). Therefore, ST was able to mediate the H2O2-activated autophagic process through AMPK/ACC signaling. Given that ST alone can activate autophagy, ST is likely to play a dual role in the regulation of autophagy in a dose-, cell type- and context-dependent manner.
ST increases the expression of p62 and enhances its colocalization with LC3
Generally, p62 is considered to be a substrate in autophagic degradation, and the activation of autophagy usually causes a decrease in the p62 level. In comparison to ACHN cells, ST consistently increased the expression of p62 in 786-O cells (Fig. 3a,b). Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) results demonstrated that ST increased the transcriptional expression of p62 at both the 2 and 4 h time points (Fig. 3c and Table 1). The immunostaining assay revealed that ST increased punctate LC3 staining, which colocalized well with p62, and CQ addition further increased punctate LC3 staining in ST-treated cells and enlarged the dot staining of p62 (Fig. 3d). Consistent with a former report31, we observed a direct interaction between LC3 and p62 (Fig. 3e), whereas IgG, which was used as a negative control, failed to pull-down p62 (Fig. 3e). Moreover, the immunoprecipitation results displayed that either ST or H2O2 regulated the interaction between LC3 and p62 (Fig. 3f).
Table 1.
Gene | Primer | Nucleotide |
---|---|---|
p62 | Forward (5′ → 3′) | CATCGGAGGATCCGAGTGTG |
Reverse (5′ → 3′) | TTCTTTTCCCTCCGTGCTCC | |
β-actin | Forward (5′ → 3′) | GCCTGACGGCCAGGTCATCAC |
Reverse (5′ → 3′) | CGGATGTCCACGTCACACTTC |
Deprivation of p62 reverses the inhibitory effect of ST on autophagy
Since the knockdown of p62 was shown to inhibit resveratrol (RSV)–induced autophagy10 and ST increased the levels of p62, we speculated that p62 might be required for ST-activated autophagy. Unexpectedly, knockdown of p62 did not inhibit the ST (2 μM/L)-induced autophagic flux in 786-O cells (Fig. 4a). In contrast, its loss reversed the inhibitory effect of ST (8 μM/L) on autophagy (Fig. 4a). Similar results were also obtained in p62-depleted ACHN and HeLa cells (Fig. 4b,c).
To confirm the inhibitory effect of p62 on ST-induced autophagy, we transfected HEK293T cells with either wild type (WT) or mutated p62 plasmid (Fig. 4d). As expected, overexpression of WT p62 completely inhibited the ST-induced autophagic flux, as CQ failed to accumulate LC3-II in these cells (Fig. 4d), whereas the mutated p62, which lacks the ubiquitin (UB) binding domain, displayed less inhibition of ST-activated autophagy compared with WT p62 (Fig. 4d).
ST fails to abolish the H2O2-autophagic flux in p62-depleted cells
As the depletion of p62 could reverse the inhibitory effect of ST on autophagy, we next determined whether p62 also played a regulatory role in the inhibitory effect of ST on H2O2-induced autophagy. Compared with the Mock-control, H2O2-induced autophagic flux was greatly inhibited in p62-depleted 786-O cells (Fig. 5a), suggesting the likely requirement for p62 in H2O2-induced autophagy under these circumstances. In contrast to the Mock-control, ST failed to completely inhibit the H2O2-activated autophagic flux in p62-depleted 786-O cells (Fig. 5a). Similar results were also obtained in HeLa cells (Fig. 5b). Notably, H2O2 combined with ST induced normal autophagy in p62-deprived HeLa cells compared with the Mock-control ones (Fig. 5b). Using a different siRNA, we obtained similar results in 786-O cells (Fig. S3c,d). Moreover, we observed that ST was able to abolish H2O2-increased phosphorylation of ACC in either Mock-control or p62-depleted cells (Fig. 5c,d). In p62-depleted HeLa cells, H2O2 at a dose of 0.5 mM/L failed to induce autophagy concurrent with an increase in the phosphorylation of ACC (Fig. 5e,f), suggesting that p62 could mediate H2O2-induced autophagy in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5b,e). Together with the findings shown in Fig. 5c,d, these results indicated that p62 could function downstream of AMPK signaling to regulate the autophagic process. While p62 silencing alone increased H2O2-induced phosphorylation of both extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 and AMPK, its loss mediated basal ACC phosphorylation in a cell type-dependent manner (Fig. 5d,e). In 786-O cells, the deprivation of p62 decreased basal phosphorylation of ACC (Fig. 5d), whereas p62 loss increased the phosphorylated ACC in HeLa cells (Fig. 5e). Uncoupling between the phosphorylation of AMPK and ACC was clearly present. For example, while ST blocked the H2O2-induced phosphorylation of ACC in both cell lines (Fig. 5d,e), its presence increased H2O2-induced AMPK phosphorylation in HeLa cells (Fig. 5e). Given that p62 loss increased the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (Fig. 5d,e), we speculated that mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) signaling might play a role in either ST- or H2O2-induced autophagy.
To further explore the regulatory role of p62 in H2O2/ST-mediated autophagy, we prolonged the treatment of 786-O cells with H2O2 up to 4 h. As shown in Fig. 6a, ST failed to inhibit H2O2-activated autophagy in the p62-depleted cells, whereas it still abolished the H2O2-induced autophagic flux in Mock-control ones (Fig. 6a). In contrast to the 2 h time point, loss of p62 alone increased the phosphorylation of ACC and decreased the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 at the 4 h time point (Fig. 6b), suggesting that p62 regulated both activities of AMPK and ERK1/2 in a time-dependent manner.
Inhibition of MEK/ERK signaling abolishes the ST-induced autophagic flux
Consistent with the aforementioned results (Fig. 4a), knockdown of p62 reversed the inhibitory effect of ST (8 μM/L) on autophagy in 786-O cells (Fig. 7a). A former study has shown that p62 loss leads to enhanced ERK activity32, and here we also found that p62 depletion increased both basal and ST-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (Fig. 7b). Therefore, we speculated that p62 loss reversed the inhibitory effect of ST on autophagy by upregulating ERK1/2 signaling. To test this hypothesis, we employed U0126, a specific inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase(MEK)/ERK signaling33, in the following experiments. While either ST or U0126 activated the autophagic process, their combination failed to induce autophagy because CQ was unable to accumulate LC3-II in ST/U0126-treated cells (Fig. 7c). As expected, U0126 inhibited both basal and ST-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (Fig. 7d). Furthermore, U0126 suppressed the H2O2-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation and attenuated the autophagic flux induced by H2O2 (Fig. 7e,f). Although U0126 attenuated the phosphorylation of ACC (Fig. 7d), it enhanced H2O2-induced ACC phosphorylation (Fig. 7f), suggesting the presence of a crosstalk between AMPK and ERK1/2.
ST mediates the interaction between p62 and ERK1/2
Consistent with a former report32, we found that p62 could mediate the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, and thus we next examined whether MEK/ERK could regulate the expression of p62. Not only U0126 alone increased the levels of p62 but it further increased the levels of p62 in ST-treated cells (Fig. 8a). Although CQ alone increased the levels of p62 (Fig. 8a), it failed to further enhance the expression of p62 in ST- but not U0126-treated cells. CQ clearly failed to accumulate p62 in ST-challenged cells in relation to ERK1/2 signaling, as U0126 prevented the decrease in p62 in ST/CQ-treated cells (Fig. 8a,b). While CQ decreased the expression of p62 in ST-treated cells concurrent with a marked increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation, U0126 inhibited the ST/CQ-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and increased p62 levels in those cells (Fig. 8a,b). Consequently, these results may indicate a mutual regulatory relationship between p62 and phosphorylated ERK signaling, which may be related to the direct interaction between p62 and ERK1/234.
To investigate whether p62 could interact with ERK1/2, we next carried out an immunoprecipitation assay using p62 antibody. Although we failed to pull-down phosphorylated-ERK1/2 in both HeLa and 786-O cells (data not shown), p62 interacted with total ERK1/2 (tERK1/2) in either 786-O or HeLa cells (Fig. 8c,d). Interestingly, while ST decreased the interaction between p62 and tERK1/2 in 786-O cells (Fig. 8c), its treatment increased the binding between these proteins in HeLa cells (Fig. 8d).
Discussion
A new finding of the present study is that ST can either inhibit or induce autophagy even in the same cell line, depending on the expression of p62. Although ST was shown to suppress the induced phosphorylation of ACC, it failed to block H2O2-induced autophagic flux in p62-depleted cells. Therefore, p62 likely played a regulatory role in the inhibitory effect of activated AMPK on autophagy. Moreover, we revealed that ST regulated the interaction between p62 and ERK1/2 in a cell type-dependent manner.
It is well established that AMPK triggers autophagy through an indirect mechanism by inhibiting mTORC1 signaling or through direct binding to ULK120,21. However, a recent study has shown that compound C, a commonly used inhibitor of AMPK, induces autophagy by blocking the Akt/mTOR pathway in a number of cancer cell lines. AMPK has also been reported to inhibit autophagy in isolated rat hepatocytes. Shang and Wang et al. revealed that nutrient starvation induces an acute autophagic process through ULK1 dephosphorylation and its dissociation from AMPK. They considered AMPK to have dual roles in the regulation of autophagy. Consistently, we found that ST (low dose) was able to induce autophagy concurrent with an inhibition of AMPK/ACC signaling, whereas H2O2 increased AMPK activity and triggered the autophagic process. Moreover, ST inhibited both H2O2-induced AMPK activity and autophagy. The aforementioned results confirmed that AMPK could have dual roles in regulating the autophagic process. Unexpectedly, we found that p62 loss reversed the inhibitory effect of ST on basal and H2O2-induced autophagy. Therefore, we reasoned that p62 was required for the activated AMPK to inhibit autophagy under certain conditions.
Despite its common use as a substrate in autophagy, growing evidence has indicated that p62 plays more active roles in the regulation of autophagy35. It has been demonstrated that p62 is required for RSV-induced autophagy, and RSV increases the expression of p62 mRNA and protein by mediating the activation of JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinase)10. In addition, it has been reported that, to prevent oxidative liver damage, p62-dependent autophagy is required during the activation of Nrf2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2) by sestrins36. Consistently, we found that p62 was needed for H2O2 to stimulate the autophagic process, especially in 786-O cells. In p62-depleted HeLa cells, H2O2 at a dose of 0.5 mM/L failed to stimulate autophagy. Thus, p62 was able to regulate H2O2-induced autophagy relative to the stimulus dose. In contrast, p62 was unlikely to be required for ST-dependent autophagy, in which it actually appeared to play a negative regulatory role. Consequently, p62 could regulate autophagy in a stimulus- and cell-type dependent manner.
Consistent with former reports37,38, we found that p62 was able to mediate the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, which is a key member of the MAPK family and well established for its regulatory role in the autophagic process39–41. In the human colon cancer cell line HT29, ERK1/2 activation has been shown to promote macroautophagy and induce autophagic vacuolation42, and ERK activation is also needed for the starvation-induced autophagic process43. Lindane, a widely used environmental carcinogen, induces sustained phosphorylation of ERK and enhances the persistent formation of large autolysosomal vesicles, which can be inhibited by pretreatment with MEK1/2 inhibitors44. However, other studies have shown that oncogenic activation of Ras, the upstream activator of ERK, reduces autophagy in transformed cell lines45,46.
Our data showed that U0126 alone failed to inhibit the autophagic flux, whereas its treatment blocked or attenuated autophagy induced by either ST or H2O2. Thus, we considered MEK/ERK to potentially have differential regulatory roles in basal and induced autophagic processes. In fact, we observed that H2O2 treatment alone could induce autophagy concurrent with a downregulation of MEK/ERK signaling in HeLa cells, whereas ST blocked the H2O2-induced autophagic flux concomitantly with an increase in the phosphorylation of ERK1/2. Therefore, we speculated that a coordination might exist between AMPK and MAPK in the regulation of autophagy. This phenomenon is often found in various signaling pathways. For example, it is well known that Ras-ERK and PI3K-mTOR signaling can be either interplayed or compensated47. While AMPK enhances autophagy via directly phosphorylating ULK148, however, a recent study has revealed that, through a negative feedback loop, the latter demonstrated to influence AMPK phosphorylation49. Additionally, one study showed that AMPK was able to either inhibit or enhance the PI3K signaling50. The data presented here clearly revealed that p62 could regulate the function of AMPK relating to the cell type, and it appeared to regulate ERK1/2 signaling in a time-dependent manner, implying that p62 could function either downstream or upstream of ERK signaling in a context-dependent manner. While ST together with CQ markedly increased the level of phosphorylated ERK1/2, their combination demonstrated to inhibit the expression of p62, whereas U0126 suppressed ERK1/2 phosphorylation and prevented p62 from loss in ST/CQ-treated cells. In contrast to former reports34, we failed to observe p62 pulled down with phosphorylated ERK; instead, p62 interacted almost equally with both ERK1 and ERK2 in 786-O cells. While ST increased the interaction between p62 and ERK1/2 in HeLa cells, it decreased the binding between these proteins in 786-O cells. Thus, the relationship between ERK1/2 and p62 may be much more complicated than previously understood.
Conclusions
In summary, we show that p62 is responsible for the inhibition of ST in basal and H2O2-induced autophagy and reveal a previously unknown link between the activation of AMPK and the inhibition of autophagy. Future work in this direction will enable us to better understand the regulatory mechanism of autophagy, illuminate the molecular mechanism of ST resistance in cancer treatment and provide a resolution to dealing with the devastating effects of anti-angiogenesis resistance.
Methods
Chemicals and antibodies
Sunitinib (ST; S126061) was purchased from Aladdin (Seattle, WA, USA). 3-methyladenine (3-MA; M9281), chloroquine diphosphate salt (CQ; C6628), U0126 monoethanolate (u120), AICAR (A9978) and polyclonal antibodies against LC3 (L7543) were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). H2O2 (E882) was purchased from Amresco (WA, USA). The antibodies against PARP- (9542), Phospho-AMPKα (Thr172; 2535), AMPKα (2532), Phospho-p44/42MAPK (ERK1/2; Thr202/Tyr204; 9106), Phospho-Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase (Ser79; 3661), p44/42 MAPK (total-ERK1/2; 9102) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, MA, USA). The antibody against LC3 (M152-3) for immunoprecipitation was purchased from Medical & Biological Laboratories (Naka-ku, Nagoya, Japan). The antibody against p62 (18420-1-AP) was bought from Proteintech (Wuhan, Hubei, China). The antibody against actin (TA-09) was acquired from ZhongShanJinQiao Biocompany (Beijing, China). MTS reagent powder (G1111) was obtained from Promega Corporation (Madision, WI, USA). Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (R37117) and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (A-11001) were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR, USA).
siRNAs
The siRNA specific for human MAP LC3α (sc-106197), SQSTM1/p62 (sc-29679), and BECN1 (sc-29797) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA), along with the control siRNA (sc-37007). The siRNA specific for human MAP1LC3B (81631), SQSTM1/p62 (8878), and BECN1 (8678) were purchased from Dharmacon Biotechnology (Lafayette, CO, USA), along with the control siRNA (D-001136-01).
Cell culture and immunoblotting analysis
786-O, ACHN, and HeLa cells were grown in DMEM media containing 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA) with 1% antibiotics. Cells were cultured overnight to grow about 70–80% confluency before treated with compounds. For siRNA interference, about 30% confluence cells in the media without antibiotics were transfected using DharmaFECT (Dharmacon, T2001) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After transfection for 48 h, Cells were split and cultured overnight before treatments. Whole cell lysate was prepared with lysis using Triton X-100/glycerol buffer, containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 4 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol, supplemented with 1% Triton X-100, 1% SDS, and protease inhibitors, and then separated on a SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to PVDF membrane. Immunoblotting was performed using appropriate primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated suitable secondary antibodies, followed by detection with enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce Chemical Rockford, IL, USA)51–53.
Immunoprecipitation
Whole cell lysate was prepared with lysis using Triton X-100/glycerol buffer as mentioned above. LC3 or p62 was immunoprecipitated using the corresponding antibody at 4 °C for 3 h, and then incubated with Protein G-Sepharose (Vigorous Biotechnology Beijing, China) for 1 h. Immunoprecipitates and cell lysates were electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblotting analysis53.
Cell viability assay (MTS)
Cells were cultured in 96-well plates (7,500 cells per well) with 100 µL complete culture media. After overnight culturing, cells were replaced with Phenol red free complete medium which was added with either drug-free or ST or other chemicals. Cells were cultured for indicated period and the cell viability was detected by CellTiter 96 Aqueous Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega)51,52.
Electron microscopy
Wash the samples three times with PBS, trypsinize, and then centrifuge to collect them. Fix the cell pellets with 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C overnight, post-fix them with 1% OsO4 in cacodylate buffer at RT for 1 h, and then dehydrate stepwise with ethanol. Rinse the dehydrated pellets with propylene oxide at RT for 30 min and embed them in Spurr resin for sectioning. Finally, use a transmission electron microscope (JEM1230 Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) to observe the images of the thin sections51,53.
RNA extraction and qPCR analysis
The total cellular RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA; 15596-018) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and 1 μg of RNA was reversely transcribed at 42 °C for 60 min in 20 μL PrimeScriptTM RT reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, Liaoning, China; DRR037A). Reactions were stopped by heat inactivation at 85 °C for 5 s51–53. Primer sequences used for amplification were as follows (Table 1):
qPCR (CFX96TM; Bio-Rad) was initiated with a 10 min denaturation at 95 °C in a final volume of 20 μL. The cycle profile was 95 °C (15 s), 60 °C (45 s) and 72 °C (1 min.) for up to 40 cycles. The data were calculated based on the internal control of β-actin.
Fluorescence microscopy
Cells were plated on glass cover slips and the indicated treatments were performed. Cells were washed with Ca2+- and Mg2+-free PBS (CMF-PBS), fixed with freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 30 min and permeabilized incubation with CMF-PBS containing 0.1% TritoX-100 and 0.5% BSA at RT for 5 min. Cells were then washed three times with CMF-PBS, blocked in CMF-PBS containing 3% BSA for 1 h, and incubated with the indicated antibodies in the presence of 0.1% TritoX-100 and 0.5% BSA. After washing three times, cells were then stained with Alex Fluor 488 or 594 secondary antibodies for 1 h. Cells were then immersed in VECTASHIELD with DAPI (H1200) to visualize the nuclei after washing three times. Images were acquired via Fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss Heidenheim, Germany)53.
Statistical analysis
The images were analyzed to verify the linear range of chemiluminescence signals and quantifications were carried out using densitometry. The normally distributed data are shown as mean ± SD and analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and the Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test. Data are shown as Mean ± SD in Graphs. A P-value < 0.05 was considered to have significant differences.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31171329, 31371403, 81272829 and 31370202).
Author Contributions
X.J. and Z.X. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. B.H. and G.W. conducted the research and carried out the immunoprecipitation. Q.G. and Y.W. prepared the cell samples for immunoblot assays. C.Z. and Y.W. performed the electron microscopy picture. Y.H. and H.Y. prepared and stained the samples for immunofluorescence and took the picture. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data Availability
All data and materials are available.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Bolin Hou, Gang Wang and Quan Gao contributed equally.
Contributor Information
Xuejun Jiang, Email: jiangxj@im.ac.cn.
Zhijun Xi, Email: xizhijun@hsc.pku.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-47597-4.
References
- 1.Klionsky DJ. A human autophagy interaction network. Autophagy. 2012;8:439–441. doi: 10.4161/auto.19926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu, S. M., Dong, Y. J. & Liu, B. Progress of study on p62 and protein degradation pathways. Sheng Li Xue Bao67, 48-58 (2015). [PubMed]
- 3.Duran A, et al. p62 is a key regulator of nutrient sensing in the mTORC1 pathway. Molecular cell. 2011;44:134–146. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Linares JF, et al. K63 polyubiquitination and activation of mTOR by the p62-TRAF6 complex in nutrient-activated cells. Mol Cell. 2013;51:283–296. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bitto A, et al. P62/SQSTM1 at the interface of aging, autophagy, and disease. Age (Dordr) 2014;36:9626. doi: 10.1007/s11357-014-9626-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lin X, et al. Interaction domains of p62: a bridge between p62 and selective autophagy. DNA Cell Biol. 2013;32:220–227. doi: 10.1089/dna.2012.1915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lippai M, Low P. The role of the selective adaptor p62 and ubiquitin-like proteins in autophagy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:832704. doi: 10.1155/2014/832704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Johansen T, Lamark T. Selective autophagy mediated by autophagic adapter proteins. Autophagy. 2011;7:279–296. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.3.14487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pankiv S, et al. p62/SQSTM1 binds directly to Atg8/LC3 to facilitate degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates by autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:24131–24145. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702824200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Puissant A, et al. Resveratrol promotes autophagic cell death in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells via JNK-mediated p62/SQSTM1 expression and AMPK activation. Cancer Res. 2010;70:1042–1052. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schmid TA, Gore ME. Sunitinib in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Ther Adv Urol. 2016;8:348–371. doi: 10.1177/1756287216663979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Teng CL, et al. Effector mechanisms of sunitinib-induced G1 cell cycle arrest, differentiation, and apoptosis in human acute myeloid leukaemia HL60 and KG-1 cells. Ann Hematol. 2013;92:301–313. doi: 10.1007/s00277-012-1627-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhu Y, et al. Sunitinib induces cellular senescence via p53/Dec1 activation in renal cell carcinoma cells. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:1052–1061. doi: 10.1111/cas.12176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mizumoto A, et al. Induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition via activation of epidermal growth factor receptor contributes to sunitinib resistance in human renal cell carcinoma cell lines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2015;355:152–158. doi: 10.1124/jpet.115.226639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sorolla A, et al. Blockade of NFkappaB activity by Sunitinib increases cell death in Bortezomib-treated endometrial carcinoma cells. Mol Oncol. 2012;6:530–541. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2012.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kerkela R, et al. Sunitinib-induced cardiotoxicity is mediated by off-target inhibition of AMP-activated protein kinase. Clin Transl Sci. 2009;2:15–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2008.00090.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Laderoute KR, Calaoagan JM, Madrid PB, Klon AE, Ehrlich PJ. SU11248 (sunitinib) directly inhibits the activity of mammalian 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) Cancer Biol Ther. 2010;10:68–76. doi: 10.4161/cbt.10.1.12162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gwinn DM, et al. AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint. Mol Cell. 2008;30:214–226. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Inoki K, Zhu T, Guan KL. TSC2 mediates cellular energy response to control cell growth and survival. Cell. 2003;115:577–590. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00929-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Egan D, Kim J, Shaw RJ, Guan KL. The autophagy initiating kinase ULK1 is regulated via opposing phosphorylation by AMPK and mTOR. Autophagy. 2011;7:643–644. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.6.15123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim J, Kundu M, Viollet B, Guan KL. AMPK and mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:132–141. doi: 10.1038/ncb2152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shang L, et al. Nutrient starvation elicits an acute autophagic response mediated by Ulk1 dephosphorylation and its subsequent dissociation from AMPK. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:4788–4793. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100844108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vucicevic L, et al. Compound C induces protective autophagy in cancer cells through AMPK inhibition-independent blockade of Akt/mTOR pathway. Autophagy. 2011;7:40–50. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.1.13883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Giuliano S, et al. Resistance to sunitinib in renal clear cell carcinoma results from sequestration in lysosomes and inhibition of the autophagic flux. Autophagy. 2015;11:1891–1904. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1085742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ame JC, Spenlehauer C, de Murcia G. The PARP superfamily. Bioessays. 2004;26:882–893. doi: 10.1002/bies.20085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Seglen PO, Gordon PB. 3-Methyladenine: specific inhibitor of autophagic/lysosomal protein degradation in isolated rat hepatocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:1889–1892. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.6.1889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Klionsky DJ, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) Autophagy. 2016;12:1–222. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Katsuragi Y, Ichimura Y, Komatsu M. p62/SQSTM1 functions as a signaling hub and an autophagy adaptor. FEBS J. 2015;282:4672–4678. doi: 10.1111/febs.13540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Elgendy M. The yin yang of sunitinib: One drug, two doses, and multiple outcomes. Mol Cell Oncol. 2017;4:e1285385. doi: 10.1080/23723556.2017.1285385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hardie, D. G. & Pan, D. A. Regulation of fatty acid synthesis and oxidation by the AMP-activated protein kinase. Biochem Soc Trans30, 1064–1070, 10.1042/(2002). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 31.Gao W, Chen Z, Wang W, Stang MT. E1-like activating enzyme Atg7 is preferentially sequestered into p62 aggregates via its interaction with LC3-I. PloS one. 2013;8:e73229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rodriguez A, et al. Mature-onset obesity and insulin resistance in mice deficient in the signaling adapter p62. Cell metabolism. 2006;3:211–222. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ong Q, Guo S, Zhang K, Cui B. U0126 protects cells against oxidative stress independent of its function as a MEK inhibitor. ACS chemical neuroscience. 2015;6:130–137. doi: 10.1021/cn500288n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lee SJ, et al. A functional role for the p62-ERK1 axis in the control of energy homeostasis and adipogenesis. EMBO reports. 2010;11:226–232. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ren F, et al. Knockdown of p62/sequestosome 1 attenuates autophagy and inhibits colorectal cancer cell growth. Mol Cell Biochem. 2014;385:95–102. doi: 10.1007/s11010-013-1818-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bae SH, et al. Sestrins activate Nrf2 by promoting p62-dependent autophagic degradation of Keap1 and prevent oxidative liver damage. Cell Metab. 2013;17:73–84. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ishii T, Warabi E, Siow RC, Mann GE. Sequestosome1/p62: a regulator of redox-sensitive voltage-activated potassium channels, arterial remodeling, inflammation, and neurite outgrowth. Free radical biology & medicine. 2013;65:102–116. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xu H, et al. GBP3 promotes glioma cell proliferation via SQSTM1/p62-ERK1/2 axis. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2018;495:446–453. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.11.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li Xiaodong, Feng Kai, Li Jiang, Yu Degang, Fan Qiming, Tang Tingting, Yao Xiao, Wang Xiaoqing. Curcumin Inhibits Apoptosis of Chondrocytes through Activation ERK1/2 Signaling Pathways Induced Autophagy. Nutrients. 2017;9(4):414. doi: 10.3390/nu9040414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kyriakakis E, et al. T-cadherin promotes autophagy and survival in vascular smooth muscle cells through MEK1/2/Erk1/2 axis activation. Cellular signalling. 2017;35:163–175. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cea M, et al. Targeting NAD+ salvage pathway induces autophagy in multiple myeloma cells via mTORC1 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) inhibition. Blood. 2012;120:3519–3529. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-416776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pattingre S, Bauvy C, Codogno P. Amino acids interfere with the ERK1/2-dependent control of macroautophagy by controlling the activation of Raf-1 in human colon cancer HT-29 cells. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:16667–16674. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210998200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ogier-Denis E, Pattingre S, El Benna J, Codogno P. Erk1/2-dependent phosphorylation of Galpha-interacting protein stimulates its GTPase accelerating activity and autophagy in human colon cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:39090–39095. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006198200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Corcelle E, et al. Disruption of autophagy at the maturation step by the carcinogen lindane is associated with the sustained mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase activity. Cancer Res. 2006;66:6861–6870. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chi S, et al. Oncogenic Ras triggers cell suicide through the activation of a caspase-independent cell death program in human cancer cells. Oncogene. 1999;18:2281–2290. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Furuta S, Hidaka E, Ogata A, Yokota S, Kamata T. Ras is involved in the negative control of autophagy through the class I PI3-kinase. Oncogene. 2004;23:3898–3904. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mendoza MC, Er EE, Blenis J. The Ras-ERK and PI3K-mTOR pathways: cross-talk and compensation. Trends in biochemical sciences. 2011;36:320–328. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Egan DF, et al. Phosphorylation of ULK1 (hATG1) by AMP-activated protein kinase connects energy sensing to mitophagy. Science. 2011;331:456–461. doi: 10.1126/science.1196371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Loffler AS, et al. Ulk1-mediated phosphorylation of AMPK constitutes a negative regulatory feedback loop. Autophagy. 2011;7:696–706. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.7.15451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tao R, et al. AMPK exerts dual regulatory effects on the PI3K pathway. Journal of molecular signaling. 2010;5:1. doi: 10.1186/1750-2187-5-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang N, et al. PARP and RIP-1 are required for autophagy induced by 11′-deoxyverticillin A, which precedes caspase-dependent apoptosis. Autophagy. 2011;7:598–612. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.6.15103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lu Q, et al. Akt inhibition attenuates rasfonin-induced autophagy and apoptosis through the glycolytic pathway in renal cancer cells. Cell death & disease. 2015;6:e2005. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yan S, et al. Sunitinib induces genomic instability of renal carcinoma cells through affecting the interaction of LC3-II and PARP-1. Cell death & disease. 2017;8:e2988. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data and materials are available.