Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jul 27;48(12):934–942. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.8214

Rehabilitation of an adolescent equestrian athlete with a history of multiple concussions: a case report describing an adapted return to sport protocol

Kelli B Gunter 1,2, Christopher J Shields 3, Summer D Ott 3,4, Rogelio A Coronado 5
PMCID: PMC6671687  NIHMSID: NIHMS1039110  PMID: 30053793

Abstract

Study Design:

Case report

Background:

Equestrian riding is a sport with a high risk of concussion. Currently, the literature guiding rehabilitation for concussions in equestrian athletes is limited, especially for directing return to sport.

Case Description:

A 14-year-old female equestrian athlete presented to physical therapy following her third concussion in three years. Her primary complaints were headaches, dizziness, difficulty concentrating, light sensitivity, and neck pain. On examination, the patient demonstrated reproduction of symptoms during testing of vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR), showed a 3-line symptomatic loss on the Dynamic Visual Acuity Test (DVAT), and had impairments in the Joint Position Error (JPE) test (1/5 correct on the left; 4/5 correct on the right) and Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) (38/60 errors). A return to riding protocol was adapted from general return to sport guidelines and tailored to meet the unique demands of the patient’s equestrian sport. The protocol included phased progression through no activity, light aerobic activity, moderate aerobic activity, sport-specific non-jumping skills, sport-specific jumping skills, full practice, and return to competition. During the protocol, the patient participated in eight physical therapy sessions over four weeks for vestibular training, aerobic conditioning, and cervical and core exercises, as well as equestrian exercises at her stables.

Outcomes:

At the final evaluation, the patient reported no symptoms at rest, with exercise, or when testing VOR. Improvements were noted in the DVAT, JPE, and BESS, with changes in the BESS exceeding minimal detectable change. The patient completed the full return to riding protocol in eight weeks and was able to return to equestrian competition without complaints.

Discussion:

This case report describes the physical therapy management and an adapted return to sport protocol for an equestrian athlete with a history of multiple sport-related concussions.

Level of Evidence:

Therapy, level 5.

Keywords: concussion, pediatrics, post-concussion syndrome, horses, athletic injuries, return to sport

BACKGROUND

A concussion is a brain injury with a complex pathophysiological process that results from trauma to the head, neck or elsewhere on the body.3,9,32,33 In the United States, 1.6 – 3.8 million brain injuries, including concussions, occur during competitive sports and recreational activities.23 Equestrian athletes are at substantial risk of a concussion due to falls or being bucked from a horse.27,43 Rates of concussion range from 10 to 45% of all equestrian-related injuries.22,27,38,43,50 These estimates are conservative as rates of concussion in equestrian sports are likely underreported.14,27 Typically, individuals experience symptom resolution within 10 – 14 days post-concussion;32 however 10 – 30% of individuals report persistent symptoms beyond this time frame.39

Physical therapy can address post-concussion symptoms in order to facilitate symptomatic recovery and progress towards return to sport.11,36,39,40. Majerske et al.30 reported that adolescent athletes who sustained a concussion during sport participation performed better on neurocognitive tests when allowed to engage in moderate intensity physical and cognitive activities. Progressive subthreshold aerobic exercise has been shown to be an appropriate strategy for addressing post-concussion symptoms in athletes with persistent symptoms.25,26 Schneider et al.41 demonstrated benefits of physical therapy on return to sport. A combination of vestibular and cervical spine interventions within physical therapy, in addition to range of motion and postural education, resulted in decreased time to return to sport clearance in adolescent and young adult athletes with persistent post-concussion symptoms.41

General protocols guiding return to sport after concussion have been developed and presented in the literature. In 2010, the American Academy of Pediatrics adopted the International Conference on Concussion in Sport’s proposed 6-phase return to sport protocol that included periods of no activity, light aerobic activity, sport-specific exercise, non-contact training drills, full contact practice, and return to sport.31,33 A similar protocol was recommended in the recent Consensus Statement on Concussion.32 May et al.31 expanded on these 6-phase protocols by adding a moderate aerobic activity phase to bridge light activity and more demanding sport-specific tasks, as well as differentiating between limited and full contact drills. These general concussion guidelines can be used to tailor a sport-specific protocol for patients wanting to return to sport. Familiarity with the demands of each sport is vital because each sport has unique tasks that require different physical and cognitive skills.

To our knowledge there are no published cases describing the adaptation of general return to sport guidelines for equestrian athletes. Thus, the purpose of this case report was to describe the physical therapy management and adaptation of a return to sport protocol for an equestrian athlete with a history of multiple concussions.

CASE DESCRIPTION

History

The patient was a 14-year-old female competitive equestrian rider with a history of three concussions within a three-year span. The patient’s first two concussions occurred as a result of being thrown from her horse. She reported she recovered from these episodes and had no residual symptoms or deficits. Three years after the initial concussion, the patient sustained a third concussion when she was struck in the left frontal region of her face with a hockey stick during a floor hockey game in physical education class. The patient was referred to neuropsychology and physical therapy. She experienced post-concussion symptoms for two weeks before her physical therapy evaluation was conducted.

Two days prior to her initial physical therapy visit, a neuropsychologist performed a neurocognitive evaluation, which included the computerized administration of Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT; ImPACT Applications, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA).1,48 ImPACT results revealed normal scores on verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and reaction time.49 The patient scored a 27 on the 22-item Postconcussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) component of ImPACT, which is a “very high” normative score.29 The PCSS is a reliable and valid measure of post-concussion symptoms.29 An initial screen was conducted by a physical therapist at the neuropsychology visit to determine whether additional physical therapy was warranted. The quick screen involved assessment of the vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) and visual motion sensitivity, which were both positive for reproduction of the patient’s symptoms.

The patient self-reported symptoms of headache, dizziness, difficulty with balance, light sensitivity, neck pain, and concentration issues. Her past medical history was significant for myringotomy, tonsillectomy, and adenoidectomy. The patient was in the 9th grade and denied any history of learning disability, attention disorder, or failing grades. The patient’s goal for physical therapy was to return to equestrian competition participation as quickly and safely as possible.

Initial Examination

The initial physical therapy examination included cervical spine screening, vestibular testing, balance assessment, and aerobic capacity (Table 1). An initial cervical screen included alar ligament, transverse ligament, and vertebrobasilar insufficiency testing due to the traumatic mechanism of injury.45 The Sharp-Purser, Alar Ligament, and vertebrobasilar insufficiency tests are commonly used in physical therapy practice and were all negative.17,18 The patient demonstrated full cervical active range of motion with normal end-feels, but reported neck pain during cervical extension. Cervical segmental mobility and scapular mobility were not assessed during the initial evaluation. The patient was able to maintain the deep neck flexor (DNF) endurance test for four seconds, indicating weakness in the DNF muscle group. For the DNF endurance test, the established normative time for adolescent females is 31 seconds20 and the minimal detectable change (MDC) is 17.8 seconds.6 Joint position error (JPE) testing was used to assess proprioceptive awareness in the cervical spine. During JPE testing, a laser was attached to the patient’s head and focused toward the center of a target. The patient was asked to close her eyes, turn her head to the side, turn her head back to the center, and open her eyes when she thought she was back at the target center. Correct performance is within 4.5 cm from the center of the target and a normal result is at least 4/5 correct performances per side.3,46 The patient scored 4/5 correct on the right and a 1/5 correct on the left indicating impaired cervical proprioception when turning her head to the left. The MDC for JPE has not been established.

Table 1.

Examination findings at the initial physical therapy visit.

Examination tests Result
Cervical screening
 Sharp-Purser Negative
 Alar Ligament Negative
 Vertebrobasilar insufficiency Negative
Cervical range of motion
 Flexion WNL
 Extension WNL, but with pain
 Rotation WNL
 Side-flexion WNL
Deep neck flexor endurance 4 seconds
Cervical proprioception: Joint Position Error 4/5 correct to right side
1/5 correct to left side
Vestibular and oculomotor Screening
 Smooth Pursuit WNL
 Saccades WNL
 Near Point Convergence WNL
 VOR Symptomatic
 Visual Motion Sensitivity Symptomatic
 Head Impulse Test WNL
 Dynamic Visual Acuity Test Symptomatic
Balance: Balance Error Scoring System 38 errors
Aerobic: Balke Treadmill Protocol Negative

Abbreviations: VOR = vestibular-ocular reflex; WNL = within normal limits

Vestibular and oculomotor testing included a series of assessments for smooth pursuit, saccades, near point convergence (NPC), VOR, and visual motion sensitivity. These assessments were performed as described by Mucha et al.35, however item scoring were adapted and only symptomatic response (i.e., reproduction of patient symptoms) was recorded. Additional testing included the head impulse test and the Dynamic Visual Acuity Test (DVAT).2,28,37,42 During smooth pursuit, the patient’s eye movements were smooth and she was asymptomatic during horizontal and vertical movements. The saccades test, which examines a patient’s ability to focus on a target and quickly move to another, was negative indicating her symptoms were not reflective of a central oculomotor disorder. During the NPC test, the patient was able to converge to five centimeters before seeing double and did not experience any symptoms. Thus, the patient’s NPC was negative. During testing of VOR, the patient was unable to maintain a head speed of 180 beats per minute and experienced symptoms when the metronome was set to 120 beats per minute, indicating a symptomatic test. Moderate dizziness during the visual motion sensitivity test was provoked to 4/10 on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) with 0 meaning “no dizziness” and 10 meaning “worst possible dizziness.” The head impulse test was used to rule out a unilateral vestibular hypofunction and was negative. Finally, the DVAT was positive as the patient lost three lines and reported symptoms of dizziness and headache. Impairments in VOR and DVAT with a negative head impulse test indicate that VOR is likely affected by visual sensitivity, rather than a true deficit in VOR.

Balance was assessed using the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS). The BESS consists of six testing conditions and is scored on the total number of errors during each position.10,47 The positions are Romberg, tandem, and single leg on firm ground and foam. Each position was held for 20 seconds with the patient’s shoes off, hands placed on their hips and eyes closed. The maximum number of errors for each position is 10, with 60 total errors being the maximum score.47 The MDC for the BESS is 9.3 points.8 The patient scored 38 errors during her initial evaluation, which was above the normative value of 16 errors for healthy adolescents between 11 and 14 years old, indicating impaired balance.13

During the patient’s initial assessment with the neuropsychologist, it was recommended that the patient perform a graded exertion test during her initial physical therapy visit. The post-concussion syndrome submaximal symptom-limited threshold recovery protocol was administered. The submaximal symptom-limited threshold is determined by using the modified Balke Treadmill Protocol in which the patient wore a heart rate (HR) monitor while walking on a treadmill at a constant speed of 3.6 mph.25,26,44 The incline of the treadmill was increased 1% every minute until the patient reported an increase in symptoms. The patient’s maximum predicted HR was 206 bpm and she was able to perform 20 minutes of the modified Balke Treadmill Protocol with no increase in symptoms reaching a maximum HR of 180, which is above her 85% maximum HR, indicating no deficit in aerobic function.44

Guided Physical Therapy Management within a Return to Riding Protocol

Since there was no equestrian-specific return to sport guidelines available, a return to riding protocol was adapted from guidelines proposed by May et al.31 Table 2 depicts the 7-phase return to riding protocol. Specific physical therapy exercises from each session are outlined in Table 3. Due to factors such as the patient’s younger age, acuity of symptoms, and motivation, the patient was scheduled for physical therapy twice a week. The physical therapist and neuropsychologist collaborated with the patient’s equestrian trainer to ensure the protocol included necessary sport-specific skills. As the patient advanced through the return to riding protocol, exercises transitioned from the physical therapy clinic to the stables where the patient’s horses were maintained and her typical training occurred. The equestrian trainer supervised the stages of the return to riding protocol at the stables, while in communication with the physical therapist and neuropsychologist to ensure proper progression.

Table 2.

Novel adaptation of a graded return to sport protocol applied to an equestrian athlete.

Protocol Phase Phase Objective Phase Duration and PT Sessions Exercises Progression Criteria
I: No activity Symptom recovery 2 weeks
(from injury to initiation of PT)
Complete physical and cognitive rest Once medical clearance is provided, advance to phase II and begin rehabilitation
II: Light aerobic activity Increase HR and restore connection between rider and horse 1 week in duration (began on day 15)

PT sessions #1–2
PT Exercises*:
Walking or stationary bike keeping intensity < 70% MPHR for 10–15 minutes

Begin VOR exercises and cervical stabilization

No resistance training

Stable Exercises:
Memorize and walk course (rider only)

Walk (on horse) and focus on objects in the distance
If symptom-free for 24 hours following completion of phase II, progress to phase III
III: Moderate aerobic activity Increase HR and build cardiovascular endurance

Begin conditioning on horse

Build core and lower extremity strength
2 weeks in duration (began on day 22)

PT sessions #3–6
PT Exercises*:
Stationary bike, elliptical, jogging keeping intensity < 85% MPHR for 20–30 minutes

Begin light resistance training

Stable Exercises:
Trot

Riding in 2 point position for 1–2 minutes without stirrups
If symptom-free for 24 hours following completion of phase III, progress to phase IV
IV: Sport-specific, non-jumping drills Begin sport-specific drills on horse 1 week in duration
(began on day 36)

PT sessions #7–8
PT Exercises*:
General sport-specific drills

Light resistance training

Stable Exercises:
Sitting trot

Cantering

Ground pole and cavalettis work

Complete flat work
If symptom-free for 24 hours following completion of phase IV, progress to phase V
V: Sport-specific, jumping drills Advance sport-specific drills to prepare for return to full practice 1 week in duration (began on day 43) Stable Exercises:
Progression to multi-step training drills

Progressive return to normal resistance training

Small jumps with measuring lines

Progress to larger jumps
If symptom-free for 24 hours following completion of phase V, progress to phase VI
VI: Full Practice Restore confidence and assess functional skills by equestrian trainer 1 week in duration (began on day 50) Stable Exercises:
Participate in normal training activities but no competing

Full course with related distance
If symptom-free for 24 hours following completion of phase VI, progress to phase VII
VII: Return to Competition Patient cleared for full competition 8 weeks (day 57) after injury Normal competition as tolerated

Monitor symptoms
*

See Table 3 for specific exercises performed during each PT session

Abbreviations: HR = heart rate; MPHR = maximum predicted heart rate; PT = physical therapy; VOR = vestibular-ocular reflex

Table 3.

Detailed summary of physical therapy exercises at each session.

Session Exercise
Protocol Phase II: Light aerobic activity
1 Stationary bike for 20 minutes
VOR performed in sitting facing a blank wall in a quiet room at 120 bpm for 3 sets × 2 minutes
2 Stationary bike for 15 minutes
Supine chin tucks
VOR performed in standing facing blank wall in a quiet room at 170 bpm for 2 sets × 2 minutes
VOR weaving through cones for 2 minutes
Protocol Phase III: Moderate aerobic activity
3 Stationary bike for 15 minutes
Agility ladder drills
Prone planks
Supine chin tucks
VOR performed in standing facing a busy gym at 150 bpm for 2 sets × 2 minutes
VOR weaving through cones for 2 minutes
4 Stationary bike for 15 minutes
JPE tracing an object on wall
VOR performed standing on a Bosu Balance Trainer in busy gym at 230 bpm for 3 sets × 2 minutes
VOR weaving through cones at 230 bpm for 2 sets × 2 minutes
5 Elliptical for 15 minutes
Supine chin tucks
Prone planks
Quadruped exercises with a cuff weight on head and opposite extremity lifting
Agility ladder drills
VOR performed standing on a a Bosu Balance Trainer in busy gym at 230 bpm for 3 sets × 2 minutes
VOR weaving through cones at 230 bpm 2 sets × 2 minutes
6 Elliptical for 15 minutes
Supine chin tucks
Prone planks
Quadruped exercises with a cuff weight on head and opposite extremity lifting
VOR performed standing on a Bosu Balance Trainer in busy gym at 240 bpm for 3 sets × 2 minutes
VOR weaving through cones at 240 bpm for 2 sets × 2 minutes
Protocol Phase IV: Sport-specific, non-jumping drills
7 Supine chin tuck and lift
Prone plank with cuff weight on head
VOR performed standing on Bosu Balance Trainer in busy gym at 240 bpm for 3 sets × 2 minutes
VOR weaving through cones at 240 bpm for 2 sets × 2 minutes
Visual tracking of ball toss with 180 degrees turn for 3 sets × 1 minute
Elliptical with head movements, ON for 1 minute/OFF for 1 minute, for 20 minutes total
8 VOR performed standing on a Bosu Balance Trainer at 240 bpm for 3 sets × 2 minutes
VOR weaving through cones at 240 bpm for 2 sets × 2 minutes
Visual tracking of ball toss with 180 degrees turn for 3 sets × 1 minute
Agility ladder drills – memorize five exercises at once and then complete
Squatting on a Bosu Balance Trainer with perturbations

Abbreviations: bpm = beats per minute; JPE = joint position error; VOR = vestibular-ocular reflex

Phase I: No activity

The first phase of the return to riding protocol involved a period of no activity to provide physical and mental rest.33,39 This phase occurs during the acute injury period. In this case, Phase I occurred during the two weeks after the day of injury and prior to the patient starting physical therapy.

Phase II: Light aerobic activity

During the second phase, the patient began stationary biking at less than 70% maximum predicted HR for 10–15 minutes in the physical therapy clinc.33 Stationary biking was chosen initially as this limited visual perturbation compared to other modes of aerobic training and allowed the patient to perform exercise without provoking dizziness. Other in-clinic exercises included seated VOR exercises progressing to standing, and supine chin tucks.33 The initial VOR exercise performed was a replication of the VOR test. The goal of the exercise was to perform three sets of two minutes, while achieving moderate-level dizziness of 4–5/10 on the NRS. Reproducing dizziness during this exercise results in adaptation and habituation of the vestibular and visual system, respectively.40 The metronome was set between 120 and 240 beats per minute and was determined by reaching the appropriate level of dizziness. Prior to initiating the subsequent set, dizziness symptoms were monitored for a return to baseline.3 The VOR exercise was prescribed as part of her home exercise program where she performed three sets of two minutes three times per day. Clinical recommendations for unilateral vestibular hypofunction state VOR exercises should be performed 3 to 5 times per day for a total of 20 minutes.12 The patient was allowed to progress the intensity by increasing the beats per minute if 4–5/10 dizziness was not achieved. The goal of VOR exercises was to integrate the vestibular and visual systems so that functional stimulation of these systems no longer provoked symptoms.3,47 Balance was addressed by changing the surface of the VOR exercises.

During an equestrian competition, the athlete must memorize the course design immediately prior to riding the course. Therefore, in order to add a cognitive task to this phase of the protocol, the patient memorized the course and walked through the course at the stables. The horse-rider connection is extremely important during equestrian activities; therefore, as quickly and safely possible, the connection should be restored. The patient rebuilt this connection by walking and leading her horse through the course. No horseback riding or resistance training was allowed during this phase. For the remainder of the phases, if the patient was asymptomatic for 24 hours following a phase, she progressed to the next phase.39 Phase II began on day 15 and lasted for one week. Phase II consisted of two physical therapy sessions and one session at the stables.

Phase III: Moderate aerobic activity

The third phase of the return to riding protocol was moderate aerobic activity, which included performing aerobic exercise on a bike, elliptical and treadmill for 20–30 minutes at less than 85% maximum predicted HR.33 Elliptical and treadmill added a visual perturbation to challenge the vestibular system. VOR exercises were progressed to incorporate a busy background, unstable surface and walking. Light resistance training began during this phase including deep neck flexor and core stabilization exercises for addressing the patient’s cervical impairments.

During stable sessions, the patient was permitted to ride her horse beginning with a walk and progressing to a slow trot on the horse. To add gaze stabilization into this phase, the patient focused on an object in the distance while riding. Strengthening exercises on the horse included riding in the two-point position - a position required for jumps - and riding without stirrups for one to two minutes. The goal of this phase was to increase HR, build up cardiovascular endurance, and improve core and lower extremity strength. Phase III began on day 22 and lasted two weeks. Phase III included four physical therapy sessions and four sessions at the stables.

Phase IV: Sport-specific, non-jumping drills

The fourth phase of the return to riding protocol was sport specific, non-jumping skills. During physical therapy, the patient continued light resistance training exercises as well as progressing VOR exercises. The riding position was mimicked in the physical therapy clinic using a Bosu Balance Trainer (Bosu, Inc., Ashland, OH), requiring the patient to maintain balance with perturbations.

Non-jumping skills included cantering, complete flat work, and cavalettis work. Cantering is a three-beat horse gait where both front and rear legs on one side land further forward than those on the other side and is typically around 10 – 17 miles per hour. Complete flat work includes skill where the horse is on flat ground such as circles, turns and transitions from pace to pace. Cavaletti is a small jump that is no more than 12 inches off the ground that is designed for the horse to step rather than leap over. Cavaletti work helps the patient with counting strides for bigger jumps. The goal of this phase was to improve control and coordination on the horse as monitored by the equestrian trainer. Phase IV began on day 36 and lasted one week. Phase IV consisted of two physical therapy sessions and two sessions at the stables.

Phase V: Sport-specific, jumping drills

The fifth phase of the return to riding protocol was sport-specific, jumping skills. At this phase and subsequent phases, all training was conducted at the stables. The patient progressed to multi-step training drills, such as small jumps over obstacles and normal resistance training exercises on land as well as on horse. The jumping drills require measuring distance and counting steps to insure proper take off distance. Progressing to larger jumps began after mastering the small jumps. Mastery, as assessed by the equestrian trainer, was based off consistent counting of steps before the jump and proper takeoff and landing. Cognitive load was increased during this phase by increasing the demand of the jumps and course memorization. The goal of this phase was to provide cognitive load while introducing sport-specific forces related to jumping. This was a crucial step in the protocol and was gradual due to sensitivity of forceful movements after concussion.33 Phase V began on day 43 and was one week in duration. To ensure proper progression, the physical therapist was informed of patient performance and response to specific activities.

Phase VI: Full practice

The sixth phase of the return to riding protocol was full practice. The athlete participated in normal training activities (e.g., full course work), but no competitions. The goal of this phase was to restore confidence and allow the equestrian trainer to assess functional skills. Phase VI began on day 50 and lasted one week.

Phase VII: Return to Competition

The last phase of the return to riding protocol was return to competition. On post-concussion day 57, the neuropsychologist cleared the athlete for full competition based on symptom-free progression through the full protocol. The athlete competed in normal competition activities while monitoring symptoms.33

OUTCOMES

The patient was re-assessed six weeks after the initial physical therapy evaluation (eight weeks after injury) and at the completion of the return to riding protocol. She demonstrated pain-free cervical extension and an increase in DNF endurance from four seconds at baseline to 15 seconds, which did not exceed the MDC of 17.8 seconds. However, since this patient did not present with neck pain at the final physical therapy session, DNF endurance was not seen as an impediment for return to sport clearance. There was an increase in the number of correct performances on the JPE from 4/5 correct on the right and 1/5 correct on the left to 5/5 correct on both sides, indicating an improvement in cervical proprioception. The VOR test at initial evaluation provoked dizziness symptoms at 120 beats per minute on the metronome. At the final evaluation, the patient was able to perform the VOR test at 240 beats per minute without any symptoms present. The visual motion sensitivity test provoked dizziness symptoms of 4/10 on an NRS during the initial evaluation, but did not provoke dizziness at discharge (e.g., 0/10 on NRS). The patient improved from a three-line loss with symptoms during the DVAT at evaluation to a one-line loss with no symptoms at discharge, which is considered a normal result. The BESS Test improved from 38 errors at evaluation to 12 errors at discharge, which is also considered a normal result and exceeded the MDC of 9.3 errors. The patient did not experience an increase in symptoms during progression of phases in the return to riding protocol. The patient scored a 0 on the PCSS, which reflects no symptoms at discharge and is considered a “low-normal” normative score.29 She progressed through the full protocol in eight weeks and returned to competition without symptoms.

DISCUSSION

This case report describes the physical therapy management and successful return to sport of an equestrian athlete with a history of multiple concussions. The physical therapy program included an impairment-based approach that involved exercises for the cervical spine, vestibular system, and balance. Since there are no equestrian-specific return to sport guidelines, a protocol was adapted to direct the patient’s progression back to competition. The return to riding protocol was patterned after existing sport-specific guidelines and is an example of how guidelines can inform clinical application.

Concussion recovery timelines vary between individuals. McKeon et al.34 reported 88.8% of high school athletes return to sport within three weeks post-concussion. However, prior work has shown that younger high school athletes recover from a concussion slower than college-aged individuals.7,19 Additionally, females take longer to recover and are more likely to have symptoms longer than a month in duration.19 In this case report, the adolescent female patient had an increased risk for slow recovery and future concussion episodes due to her age, sex, and history of multiple concussions.19 At the time of the initial evaluation, she was still experiencing symptoms two weeks post-concussion. Brooks et al.4 showed that adolescents with previous history of concussions present with more baseline symptoms than those without a history of concussion. Another outcome consideration for patients with prior concussions is the risk of other musculoskeletal injuries. For example, recent preliminary evidence suggests that individuals with a history of previous concussion may be at risk for subsequent lower extremity injury after returning to sport.5,16,21,24 Although no research has yet demonstrated this, it is plausible that physical therapy may serve as a preventive strategy to reduce risk of future non-concussion injury during sport participation.

The return to riding protocol described in this case report was adapted from other return to sport protocols.33 The novel additions to the protocol include sport-specific tasks for equestrian athletes that were performed in the physical therapy setting and in the actual equestrian training environment. In the current case, a targeted rehabilitation approach directed interventions to the patient’s visual motion sensitivity, tracking deficits (e.g. impaired VOR) and cervical impairments with progression and adaptations to sport-specific tasks at the stables. In contrast to other sports, equestrian athletes not only have to control their own body but also must control the movements of the horse. A fundamental skill in equestrian athletes is the ability to be able to use their body to communicate with the horse during competition. The rider must be responsive to the horse’s character and movements in order to successfully complete the course.15. Therefore, we believe restoring the rider-horse connection early in the protocol in a controlled environment was critical to improving rider confidence and ensuring full return to competition. During equestrian competition, the rider must focus on the next jump in the distance. Adding in gaze stability on the horse to the protocol helped keep the rider-horse connection as well as improve VOR in order to decrease symptoms.

There are limitations to consider. This is a single patient case study that is limited in generalizability to other patients with potentially complex presentation. Sport-related concussions can involve different clinical subtypes that may require personalized treatment approaches.3 While the patient was able to return to competition 6 weeks after initiating physical therapy, long-term follow-up data are not available. Additionally, there was a lack of data on the quality of sport performance once the patient returned to riding. While a validated measure of post-concussion symptoms was included, the pre-to-post administration of the PCSS differed in format. At baseline, the PCSS was administered as part of the ImPACT computerized program, while at follow-up, a written form was used. Additionally, it is common for “healthy” non-concussed adolescents to report low-level symptoms that range from scores of 1–9 on the PCSS.29 The patient’s score of 0 is considered low-normal and it may not be representative of a typical outcome response. During the initial neuropsychologist visit, a quick screen was administered by a physical therapist to determine whether physical therapy was warranted. The choice of screening tests was based on the judgment and experience of the evaluating physical therapist; however, it is unknown whether the selected screening tests reflect the optimal set of tests for determining whether a patient will benefit from physical therapy. Cognition is commonly affected in concussions; however, cognition was not screened during the physical therapy evaluation, rather it was assessed by the neuropsychologist. It is important to note that not all concussed patients have access to a neuropsychologist in a primary care setting. In such cases, the physical therapist may be responsible for screening for cognitive deficits in this patient population.

In conclusion, this case report describes the physical therapy management of an adolescent equestrian athlete using an impairment-based approach. Moreover, this case depicts how existing return to sport guidelines can be adapted for use with patients with unique sport demands.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Barry Porter of Brookside Pine Farms for his assistance with this case report. Dr. Gunter completed this case report during her time as a student physical therapist at The University of Texas Medical Branch. During the time of manuscript development, Dr. Coronado was affiliated with the University of Texas Medical Branch and supported by a Rehabilitation Research Career Development Program grant (K12 HD055929) from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Statement of financial disclosure and conflict of interest: The authors affirm that they have no financial affiliation or involvement with any commercial organization that has a direct financial interest in any matter included in this manuscript.

Statement of grant funding: No funding support was received.

Statement of IRB approval: IRB approval was not required for this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Allen BJ, Gfeller JD. The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing battery and traditional neuropsychological measures: a construct and concurrent validity study. Brain Inj. 2011;25(2):179–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beynon GJ, Jani P, Baguley DM. A clinical evaluation of head impulse testing. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998;23(2):117–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Broglio SP, Collins MW, Williams RM, Mucha A, Kontos AP. Current and emerging rehabilitation for concussion: a review of the evidence. Clin Sports Med. 2015;34(2):213–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brooks BL, McKay CD, Mrazik M, Barlow KM, Meeuwisse WH, Emery CA. Subjective, but not objective, lingering effects of multiple past concussions in adolescents. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30(17):1469–1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dubose DF, Herman DC, Jones DL, et al. Lower Extremity Stiffness Changes after Concussion in Collegiate Football Players. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(1):167–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Edmondston SJ, Wallumrød ME, Macléid F, Kvamme LS, Joebges S, Brabham GC. Reliability of isometric muscle endurance tests in subjects with postural neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(5):348–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Field M, Collins MW, Lovell MR, Maroon J. Does age play a role in recovery from sports-related concussion? A comparison of high school and collegiate athletes. J Pediatr. 2003;142(5):546–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Finnoff JT, Peterson VJ, Hollman JH, Smith J. Intrarater and interrater reliability of the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS). PM R. 2009;1(1):50–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Giza CC, Hovda DA. The New Neurometabolic Cascade of Concussion. Neurosurgery. 2014;75(suppl_4):S24–S33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Giza CC, Kutcher JS, Ashwal S, et al. Summary of evidence-based guideline update: evaluation and management of concussion in sports: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2013;80(24):2250–2257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grabowski P, Wilson J, Walker A, Enz D, Wang S. Multimodal impairment-based physical therapy for the treatment of patients with post-concussion syndrome: A retrospective analysis on safety and feasibility. Phys Ther Sport. 2017;23:22–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hall CD, Herdman SJ, Whitney SL, et al. Vestibular Rehabilitation for Peripheral Vestibular Hypofunction: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: FROM THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION NEUROLOGY SECTION. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2016;40(2):124–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hansen C, Cushman D, Anderson N, et al. A Normative Dataset of the Balance Error Scoring System in Children Aged Between 5 and 14. Clin J Sport Med. 2016;26(6):497–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Harmon KG, Drezner J, Gammons M, et al. American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport. Clin J Sport Med. 2013;23(1):1–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hausberge M, Roche H, Henry S, Visser K. A review of the human–horse relationship. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2008;109(1):1–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Herman DC, Jones D, Harrison A, et al. Concussion May Increase the Risk of Subsequent Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Injury in Collegiate Athletes. Sports Med. 2017;47(5):1003–1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hutting N, Scholten-Peeters GG, Vijverman V, Keesenberg MD, Verhagen AP. Diagnostic accuracy of upper cervical spine instability tests: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2013;93(12):1686–1695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hutting N, Verhagen AP, Vijverman V, Keesenberg MD, Dixon G, Scholten-Peeters GG. Diagnostic accuracy of premanipulative vertebrobasilar insufficiency tests: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2013;18(3):177–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Iverson GL, Gardner AJ, Terry DP, et al. Predictors of clinical recovery from concussion: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(12):941–948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jarman NF, Brooks T, James CR, et al. Deep Neck Flexor Endurance in the Adolescent and Young Adult: Normative Data and Associated Attributes. PM R. 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kardouni JR, Shing TL, McKinnon CJ, Scofield DE, Proctor SP. Risk for Lower Extremity Injury After Concussion: A Matched Cohort Study in Soldiers. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018:1–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kuhl HN, Ritchie D, Taveira-Dick AC, Hoefling KA, Russo SA. Concussion history and knowledge base in competitive equestrian athletes. Sports Health. 2014;6(2):136–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Wald MM. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(5):375–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lapointe AP, Nolasco LA, Sosnowski A, et al. Kinematic differences during a jump cut maneuver between individuals with and without a concussion history. Int J Psychophysiol. 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Leddy JJ, Baker JG, Willer B. Active Rehabilitation of Concussion and Post-concussion Syndrome. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2016;27(2):437–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Leddy JJ, Kozlowski K, Donnelly JP, Pendergast DR, Epstein LH, Willer B. A preliminary study of subsymptom threshold exercise training for refractory post-concussion syndrome. Clin J Sport Med. 2010;20(1):21–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Loder RT. The demographics of equestrian-related injuries in the United States: injury patterns, orthopedic specific injuries, and avenues for injury prevention. J Trauma. 2008;65(2):447–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Longridge NS, Mallinson AI. The dynamic illegible E-test. A technique for assessing the vestibulo-ocular reflex. Acta Otolaryngol. 1987;103(3–4):273–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lovell MR, Iverson GL, Collins MW, et al. Measurement of symptoms following sports-related concussion: reliability and normative data for the post-concussion scale. Appl Neuropsychol. 2006;13(3):166–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Majerske CW, Mihalik JP, Ren D, et al. Concussion in sports: postconcussive activity levels, symptoms, and neurocognitive performance. J Athl Train. 2008;43(3):265–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.May KH, Marshall DL, Burns TG, Popoli DM, Polikandriotis JA. Pediatric sports specific return to play guidelines following concussion. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(2):242–255. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Dvorak J, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport-the 5(th) international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(11):838–847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Zurich, November 2012. J Athl Train. 2013;48(4):554–575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McKeon JM, Livingston SC, Reed A, Hosey RG, Black WS, Bush HM. Trends in concussion return-to-play timelines among high school athletes from 2007 through 2009. J Athl Train. 2013;48(6):836–843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mucha A, Collins MW, Elbin RJ, et al. A Brief Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) assessment to evaluate concussions: preliminary findings. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2479–2486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Reneker JC, Cook CE. Dizziness after sports-related concussion: can physiotherapists offer better treatment than just ‘physical and cognitive rest’? Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(8):491–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rine RM, Braswell J. A clinical test of dynamic visual acuity for children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;67(11):1195–1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ruchinskas RA, Francis JP, Barth JT. Mild head injury in sports. Appl Neuropsychol. 1997;4(1):43–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schneider KJ. Sport-Related Concussion: Optimizing Treatment Through Evidence-Informed Practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(8):613–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schneider KJ, Leddy JJ, Guskiewicz KM, et al. Rest and treatment/rehabilitation following sport-related concussion: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(12):930–934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schneider KJ, Meeuwisse WH, Nettel-Aguirre A, et al. Cervicovestibular rehabilitation in sport-related concussion: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(17):1294–1298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schubert MC, Tusa RJ, Grine LE, Herdman SJ. Optimizing the sensitivity of the head thrust test for identifying vestibular hypofunction. Phys Ther. 2004;84(2):151–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Srinivasan V, Pierre C, Plog B, Srinivasan K, Petraglia AL, Huang JH. Straight from the horse’s mouth: neurological injury in equestrian sports. Neurol Res. 2014;36(10):873–877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stewart GW, McQueen-Borden E, Bell RA, Barr T, Juengling J. Comprehensive assessment and management of athletes with sport concussion. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(4):433–447. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Thomas LC, Rivett DA, Attia JR, Parsons M, Levi C. Risk factors and clinical features of craniocervical arterial dissection. Man Ther. 2011;16(4):351–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Treleaven J, Jull G, LowChoy N. The relationship of cervical joint position error to balance and eye movement disturbances in persistent whiplash. Man Ther. 2006;11(2):99–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Valovich McLeod TC, Hale TD. Vestibular and balance issues following sport-related concussion. Brain Inj. 2015;29(2):175–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Van Kampen DA, Lovell MR, Pardini JE, Collins MW, Fu FH. The “value added” of neurocognitive testing after sports-related concussion. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(10):1630–1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zuckerman SL, Lee YM, Odom MJ, Solomon GS, Sills AK. Baseline neurocognitive scores in athletes with attention deficit-spectrum disorders and/or learning disability. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013;12(2):103–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zuckerman SL, Morgan CD, Burks S, et al. Functional and Structural Traumatic Brain Injury in Equestrian Sports: A Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg. 2015;83(6):1098–1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES