Abstract
Background:
Higher levels of circulating 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) are associated with longer survival in several cancers, but the results have differed across cancer sites. The association between serum 25(OH)D levels and overall survival (OS) time in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) remains unclear.
Methods:
We utilized serum samples from 476 patients with primary EA, recruited from Massachusetts General Hospital between 1999 and 2015. We used logrank tests to test the difference in survival curves across quartiles of 25(OH)D levels and extended Cox modeling to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR). We tested for interactions between clinical stage or BMI on the association between 25(OH)D and overall survival. We additionally performed sensitivity analyses to determine if race or timing of blood draw (relative to treatment) affected these results.
Results:
We found no evidence that survival differed across quartiles of 25(OH)D (logrank p=0.48). Adjusting for confounders, we found no evidence the hazard of death among the highest quartile of 25(OH)D (Quartile 1) differed from any other quartile (Quartile2 HR 0.90, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.67–1.23; Quartile3 HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.76–1.38; Quartile4(lowest) HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72–1.33). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results when accounting for race or time between diagnosis and blood draw. Moreover, we did not find evidence of interaction between 25(OH)D and clinical stage or BMI on OS.
Conclusions:
Serum level of 25(OH)D near time of diagnosis was not associated with OS in EA patients.
Impact:
Screening 25(OH)D levels among EA patients at diagnosis is not clinically relevant to their cancer prognosis based on present evidence.
Keywords: Vitamin D, biomarker, esophageal cancer, survival, epidemiology
Introduction
Esophageal adenocarcinoma is the predominant subtype of esophageal cancer in western countries, with increasing incidence over the last five decades, particularly in White men.(1–6) Esophageal adenocarcinoma remains a deadly disease with an average 5-year survival of less than 20%.(2) The current best predictor of esophageal adenocarcinoma survival time is clinical stage at diagnosis.(1,2) Yet, even half of patients with stage I disease at diagnosis do not survive past five years.(2) Few, if any, modifiable factors are known to improve prognosis after diagnosis. Thus, markers of prognosis, especially modifiable factors, are in high demand to identify both patients at risk of poor clinical outcomes and interventions that can improve patient outcomes.
Recently, in vitro and in vivo studies of the vitamin D pathway have demonstrated its oncosupressive effects, including regulating pathways that inhibit proliferation, angiogenesis, and inflammation as well as pathways that promote cell adhesion and induce apoptosis.(7–11) Hypothetically, if the downstream metabolite of vitamin D, [1,25(OH) 2D], directly regulates oncosuppressive cell signaling, then more intake of vitamin D should generate more downstream regulation and have a protective effect on the development and progression of cancer. With supplements that are cheap and readily available, vitamin D makes a particularly attractive potential intervention. This, coupled with the biologically plausible mechanism, has generated widespread interest in the role of the vitamin D pathway in cancer initiation and progression.
Clinically and in epidemiological studies, 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], an upstream serum-circulating metabolite, reflective of both sun exposure and dietary intake (8,12), is used as a marker of bioavailable vitamin D because it is more stable and consistently measured over time compared to 1,25(OH)2D. Meta-analyses suggest that higher circulating 25(OH)D at diagnosis and vitamin D supplementation both protect against total cancer-specific mortality.(13–15) A large Mendelian randomization study of genetic variants in two genes (CYP2R1 and DHCR7) affecting plasma 25(OH)D levels also showed that genetically low 25(OH)D was associated with increased risk of total cancer mortality.(16) However, the results linking circulating 25(OH)D to cancer survival in specific cancer sites and across sites have been inconsistent.(17)
Higher serum 25(OH)D levels at diagnosis have been associated with longer overall survival in colorectal cancer, lung, pancreatic, breast, melanoma, and prostate cancer, among others (17–27), but null findings have also been reported in studies of these same cancer sites.(28–35) One recent study looked at the effect of 25(OH)D levels in esophageal cancer patients, half of whom had adenocarcinoma, and found no association with overall survival, but the blood was drawn on average 6 years before cancer diagnosis.(36) The role of circulating 25(OH)D at time of diagnosis on survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma is not established. There may be true variability in the effect of vitamin D on prognosis across cancer sites due to unique tumor biology at different cancer sites, or the effect of vitamin D on survival may be modified by cancer stage (18,37–39), subtype(40), or by other metabolic factors in patients, such as obesity. These potential effect modifiers may be contributing to the modest reproducibility of results of the same cancer site across studies.
In this study, we tested whether higher levels of circulating 25(OH)D are associated with better overall survival among patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. We additionally examined possible effect modification by clinical stage at diagnosis and BMI at diagnosis. Finally, we included several sensitivity analyses to assess whether timing of blood draw or race impacted our findings.
Methods
Study Population
The ongoing Molecular Epidemiology of Esophageal Cancers study consists of esophageal cancer patients recruited from Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA) since January 1999.(41,42) Patients were >18 years of age with histologically confirmed diagnosis. All patients provided written informed consent prior to study participation. At the time of enrollment, a trained interviewer obtains patients’ demographic and lifestyle information via baseline questionnaire. The study is conducted in accordance with recognized ethical guidelines was approved by the institutional review board at MGH and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. We used electronic medical records to determine patients’ clinical variables, including histology, treatment regimen, cancer stage, and relevant dates. The study population for this analysis was restricted to participants with histologically confirmed esophageal adenocarcinoma who were recruited at the time of their primary diagnosis between 1999 and September 2015 (N=587), which was when serum samples were sent for analysis. For this analysis, we excluded patients who were recruited at the time of cancer recurrence or cancer remission, who had a concurrent cancer, who only presented to MGH for a second opinion, or who were diagnosed with stage 0 disease. Of the eligible patient participants, 495 patients had serum samples available for analysis, and 476 patients with complete information on all confounders who were included in the analyses (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Flow chart of the study population:
Figure 1 shows a flow chart of patients included in the study and patients who were excluded from analysis.
Vitamin D collection and measurement
When patients provided serum samples, the samples were stored at 4°C until processing and were processed within 24 hours of blood draw. Serum was isolated by centrifugation at 2000 r.p.m. for 10min at 4°C. Serum samples were then aliquoted and stored in −80°C freezers. In the fall of 2015, serum levels of 25(OH)D were sent in two batches, seven weeks apart, to be measured in the laboratory of Dr. Bruce Hollis (Medical University of South Carolina) by radioimmunoassay method.(12,43) We randomly selected and included blinded within-batch duplicates (4% of samples) and between batch duplicates (5% samples) to be measured. Batch 1 had an intra-assay CV 9.3%, batch 2 had an intra-assay CV of 19.1%, and the between batch replicates had an inter-assay CV of 29.4%. Of the samples included in this analysis, 90% serum vitamin D levels were measured in Batch 1. Since serum levels of 25(OH)D fluctuate due to seasonal variability in sun exposure, we generated quartiles of 25(OH)D per month of blood draw. Simulations have shown that this adjustment reduces bias toward the null due to measurement misclassification without inducing bias away from the null, which can happen when adjusting for month of blood draw as a covariate in multivariable regression model.(44) We additionally modeled 25(OH)D by clinical cut points (<10ng/mL, 10–20ng/mL, 20–30ng/mL, 30–40ng/mL, and ≥40ng/mL) and continuously (ng/mL).
Outcome: overall survival
The outcome of interest in this study was overall survival, defined as the time from the date of blood draw until date of death or censored at date last known to be alive. We adjusted for the time between date of diagnosis and the date of blood draw. Data on outcome measures were collected from clinical records and hospital cancer registries.
Covariate collection and measurement
Cancer stage at diagnosis was defined by TNM staging system, where T refers to tumor size, N refers to lymph node status, and M refers to metastasis, for grouping esophageal adenocarcinoma into clinical stage I-IV and further categorized lymph node negative, lymph node positive, and metastatic. Date of diagnosis was considered date of pathology-confirmed cancer. In this study, treatment regimen was modeled as a series of binary variables: chemotherapy (yes/no), radiation (yes/no), and surgery (i.e. esophagectomy) (yes/no), with surgery modeled as a time-dependent covariate. We chose to model surgery as time-dependent for several reasons. First, the timing of the operation is related to cancer prognosis up to the point of surgery. Patients with early stage tumors receive esophagectomies as their first treatment whereas locally advanced patients will receive esophagectomies pending their response to chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment. Second, the successful completion of the procedure is the most beneficial form of treatment for esophageal adenocarcinoma patients and one of the best clinical indicators of prognosis. Third, the esophagectomy procedure has a huge impact on patients’ diets and weight, and thus likely also affects their vitamin D levels. We did not have the date of chemotherapy or radiation initiation; therefore, we did not model chemotherapy or radiation as time-dependent covariates. We adjusted for year of diagnosis as a continuous variable, to account for slight modifications to treatment protocols throughout the study period. We also adjusted for crude cigarette smoking history as an ordinal variable (never, former, current), age as a continuous variable, and sex as a dichotomous variable. BMI at diagnosis was calculated as weight at diagnosis(kg) divided by height squared(meters2). Once calculated, BMI was categorized into four groups: BMI<18.5, 18.5≤BMI<25, 25≤BMI<30, and BMI≥30 kg/m2.
Statistical Analyses
Main Analyses
We visualized survival time curves between quartiles of serum 25(OH)D and clinical stage using Kaplan-Meier plots. Univariate differences in survival curves were tested using logrank tests. We used multivariable extended Cox regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of death by quartiles of 25(OH)D, adjusting for sex, age at diagnosis, BMI, smoking history, year of diagnosis, treatment modality (chemotherapy, radiation, and/or surgery) with surgery modeled as a time-dependent covariate, and stratifying baseline hazard by stage at diagnosis. When estimating the continuous association of 25(OH)D, we included season of blood draw in the model. Interactions between serum levels of 25(OH)D quartiles and BMI categories (excluding underweight patients) and clinical stage at diagnosis were tested independently by adding interaction terms to the model, with significance tested by the joint Wald Test (BMI categories and 25(OH)D quartiles with 6DF, and clinical stage with 25(OH)D quartiles with 6DF).
Sensitivity Analyses
Most participants’ blood samples were drawn close to the time of diagnosis, but many subjects had already initiated treatment at the time of serum draw. We suspected that chemotherapy, radiation, and especially surgical esophagectomy prior to blood draw could affect 25(OH)D levels at the time blood is drawn. Since we did not have the dates of first chemotherapy or radiation treatment, we could not account perfectly for the initiation of neoadjuvant or definitive chemotherapy and radiation treatment. However, we could determine how many weeks after diagnosis a patient’s blood was drawn, and when blood was drawn in relation to surgery (for those patients who had surgery). We then assumed among patients who received chemotherapy and radiation, those whose blood was drawn >=4 weeks after diagnosis likely had received some treatment, and patients whose blood was drawn <4 weeks after diagnosis had not initiated treatment yet. We then classified patients as having no treatment at the time of serum draw, having some chemotherapy and radiation treatment but no surgery at the time of serum draw, having had surgery within 12 weeks of the serum draw, and having serum drawn ≥ 12 weeks after surgery (Supplementary Table 1). We tested mean differences in 25(OH)D levels between these groups using ANOVA, and we repeated our main analysis restricting to patients who had not received treatment at the time their serum was drawn.
As an additional sensitivity analysis, we crudely imputed 25(OH)D levels at the time of diagnosis. For this imputed analysis, we restricted our study population to subjects with 25(OH)D levels with 3 standard deviations (SD) of the mean, and who had their blood drawn sometime within the week of their diagnosis up to one year past the date of diagnosis because the linear regression coefficient estimates might be unduly influenced by outliers. We additionally excluded those who were missing information about race, given the potential effect of skin pigmentation on vitamin D formation and circulating levels. Using this subpopulation, we generated a predictive linear regression model of serum 25(OH)D level as a function of time that included time between diagnosis and blood draw and adjusted for age at blood draw, sex, race, smoking status, month of blood draw, year of diagnosis, BMI, chemotherapy treatment, radiation treatment, and surgery (if surgery had occurred before blood draw). We then modeled the HR of the estimated diagnosis 25(OH)D level on overall survival.
Though race, as a proxy for skin pigmentation, is expected to be associated with uptake of Vitamin D through sun exposure (45), >90% of our study population identified as White, and the remaining participants identified as a variety of races and ethnicities, with each group too small for meaningful statistical comparison. As a separate sensitivity analysis, we restricted our study population to patients who identified as non-Hispanic White to determine the potential effect of race on the effect of 25(OH)D and overall survival. All analyses were performed in SAS 9.4(SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). P-values were considered significant at an alpha-level of 0.05.
Results
Study population demographics
495 patients had a serum samples available for 25(OH)D level measurement. Median time to serum draw was 7.6 weeks after diagnosis (interquartile range: 2.3–15.7 weeks). Patients who did not have serum available were more likely to be female and were less likely to have metastatic disease at diagnosis than the group with serum available (Table 1). Of the 495 patients with serum samples available, 476 patients had complete information for relevant covariates and were included in the analyses (Figure 1). The overall mean 25(OH)D level was 20.6 ng/mL. The mean 25(OH)D level from highest(Q1) to lowest(Q4) quartile accounting for month of blood draw were 32.4 ng/mL (SD 11.0), 22.3 ng/mL (SD 2.5), 17.3 ng/mL (SD 2.8), and 10.8 ng/mL(SD 3.8). Median survival time (Kaplan-Meier) was 26.0 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 22.6–29.2)
Table 1:
Study population characteristics
| Serum Available (N=495) | Serum Not Available (N=92) | |
|---|---|---|
| Men | 440 (88.9%) | 73 (79.4%) |
| Age | 63.2 ± 11.0 | 64.8 ± 10.9 |
| Race | ||
| White | 461 (93.1%) | 85 (92.4%) |
| Black | 2 (0.4%) | |
| Hispanic | 6 (1.2%) | 2 (2.2%) |
| Asian | 4 (0.8%) | |
| Native American | 5 (1.0%) | 1 (1.1%) |
| Former Smoker | 313 (63.2%) | 62 (67.4%) |
| Current Smoker | 73 (14.8%) | 13 (14.2%) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.4 ± 5.0 | 27.9 ± 5.9 |
| Stage | ||
| Lymph node negative (I-IIA) | 157 (31.7%) | 30 (32.6%) |
| Lymph node positive (IIA-IVA) | 240 (48.5%) | 48 (52.2%) |
| Metastatic (IVB) | 98 (19.8%) | 14 (15.2%) |
| Treatmenta | ||
| Surgery | 358 (72.3%) | 66 (71.7%) |
| Chemotherapy | 392 (79.2%) | 66 (71.7%) |
| Radiation | 351 (70.9%) | 60 (65.2%) |
| 25(OH)D (ng/mL) | 20.7 ± 10.2 | |
| Death | 377 (76.2%) | 62 (67.4%) |
Values represent number(%) or mean ± SD.
Treatment values are not mutually exclusive.
1 patient with vitamin D available was missing information on treatment. Among participants with serum available, information was missing about race (N=16), smoking status (N=3), BMI (N=18), and treatment modality (N=1). Among participants with serum not available, information was missing about race (N=4) and BMI (N=2).
Serum 25(OH)D levels and overall survival
We found no difference in unadjusted overall survival time across quartiles of 25(OH)D levels (Figure 2; Logrank p=0.48; Q1(REF); Q2 HR=0.84, 95%CI 0.62–1.13; Q3 HR=0.89, 95%CI 0.67–1.19; Q4 HR=1.03, 95%CI 0.77–1.38). After adjusting for potential cofounders, we found no association between the highest quartile of 25(OH)D compared to the other quartiles of 25(OH)D and overall survival (Table 2; global p=0.86), nor did we find an association between clinical cut points of 25(OH)D levels with overall survival (global p=0.32) or continuous 25(OH)D levels with overall survival (Table 2; HR=1.00; 95%CI 0.99–1.01; p=0.47).
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier survival curve by quartiles of 25(OH)D accounting for month of blood draw.
Figure 2 shows the Kaplan-Meier survival curve, and corresponding Logrank test, of overall surival among esophageal adenocarcinoma patients stratified by quartiles of serum 25(OH)D levels, categorized accounting for month of blood draw. Quartile 1 represents the highest 25(OH)D levels, and quartile 4 includes the lowest 25(OH)D levels.
Table 2:
Serum levels of 25(OH)D and overall survivala among EA patients (N=476)
| 25(OH)D Quartilesb | N deaths/patients | Hazard Ratio | 95% CI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (highest) | 90/114 | REF | ||
| 2 | 82/120 | 0.90 | (0.67, 1.23) | 0.51 |
| 3 | 95/124 | 1.03 | (0.76, 1.38) | 0.87 |
| 4 (lowest) | 93/118 | 0.98 | (0.72, 1.33) | 0.90 |
| Global p-value=0.86 | ||||
| 25(OH)D Clinical Cut Pointsc | ||||
| ≥40 ng/mL (≥100 nmol/L) | 14/16 | REF | ||
| 30–40 ng/mL (75–100 nmol/L) | 31/39 | 1.29 | (0.68, 2.47) | 0.44 |
| 20–30 ng/mL (50–75 nmol/L) | 124/177 | 0.98 | (0.55, 1.73) | 0.93 |
| 10–20 ng/mL(25–50 nmol/L) | 159/201 | 1.22 | (0.69, 2.16) | 0.49 |
| <10 ng/mL (<25 nmol/L) | 32/43 | 0.98 | (0.50, 1.92) | 0.96 |
| Global p-value=0.32 | ||||
| 25(OH)D Continuous (ng/ml)c | 1.00 | (0.99, 1.01) | 0.54 |
Overall survival was calculated as time between date of blood draw and date of death or date last known to be alive.
Estimates come from model that additionally adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, BMI categories, year of diagnosis, time between diagnosis and blood draw, chemotherapy, radiation, time-dependent surgery, and baseline treatment was stratified by tumor stage by lymph node status. Quartiles of vitamin D were determined accounting for month of blood draw.
Estimates come from model that additionally adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, BMI categories, season of blood draw, year of diagnosis, time between diagnosis and blood draw, chemotherapy, radiation, time-dependent surgery, and baseline treatment was stratified by tumor stage by lymph node status.
Serum 25(OH)D level and clinical stage interaction with overall survival
Mean 25(OH)D levels for lymph node negative (19.4 ng/mL ± 8.1), lymph node positive (20.7 ng/mL ± 9.4), and metastatic disease (22.4 ng/mL ± 12.4) at time of diagnosis did not differ significantly (ANOVA p=0.10). In the multivariable extended Cox model, no significant interaction was found between lymph node status at diagnosis and 25(OH)D levels on the association with overall survival (Table 3; Wald (DF=6), joint test of interaction term, p=0.87).
Table 3:
Serum levels of 25(OH)D and overall survivala among EA patients, stratified by clinical stage (N=476)
| 25(OH)D Quartilesb | N deaths/patients | HRc | 95% Confidence Limits | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lymph node negative at diagnosis | Quartile 1 (Highest) | 19/28 | REF | ||
| Quartile 2 | 21/41 | 0.93 | 0.49 | 1.76 | |
| Quartile 3 | 25/41 | 0.95 | 0.51 | 1.74 | |
| Quartile 4 (lowest) | 27/41 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 1.82 | |
| Lymph node positive at diagnosis | Quartile 1 (Highest) | 44/59 | REF | ||
| Quartile 2 | 39/57 | 0.95 | 0.61 | 1.47 | |
| Quartile 3 | 48/60 | 1.12 | 0.74 | 1.70 | |
| Quartile 4 (lowest) | 42/53 | 1.19 | 0.77 | 1.83 | |
| Metastatic at diagnosis | Quartile 1 (Highest) | 27/27 | REF | ||
| Quartile 2 | 22/22 | 0.80 | 0.45 | 1.42 | |
| Quartile 3 | 22/23 | 0.95 | 0.52 | 1.73 | |
| Quartile 4 (lowest) | 24/24 | 0.69 | 0.39 | 1.24 | |
Overall survival was calculated as time between date of blood draw and date of death or date last known to be alive.
Quartiles of vitamin D were determined accounting for month of blood draw.
Model adjusted for the main effect of vitamin D, age, sex, smoking status, the main effect of BMI categories, year of diagnosis, chemotherapy, radiation, time-dependent surgery, and baseline treatment, and baseline hazard was stratified by tumor stage by lymph node status.
Serum 25(OH)D level and BMI interaction with overall survival
Mean 25(OH)D levels for patients with BMI at time of diagnosis <18.5 kg/m2 (15.8 ng/mL ± 5.9), 18.5≤BMI<25 kg/m2 (20.8 ng/mL ± 10.1), 25≤BMI<30 kg/m2 (21.6 ng/mL ± 10.5), and BMI≥30 kg/m2 (19.3 ng/mL ± 8.5) did not differ significantly (ANOVA p=0.10). We additionally ran a multivariable survival model that included the interaction terms for BMI categories, excluding underweight patients due to small numbers, and quartiles of vitamin D adjusted for month of blood draw and found no evidence to support BMI as a modifier of the effect of vitamin D quartile on overall survival (Table 4; Wald joint test of interaction term(DF=6), p=0.36).
Table 4:
Serum levels of 25(OH)D and overall survivala among EA patients, stratified by BMI (N=469)
| 25(OH)D Quartilesb | N deaths/patients | HRc | 95% Confidence Limits | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI (≥18.5 and <25) | Quartile 1 (Highest) | 30/37 | REF | ||
| Quartile 2 | 26/38 | 0.68 | 0.40 | 1.17 | |
| Quartile 3 | 34/38 | 1.08 | 0.65 | 1.79 | |
| Quartile 4 (lowest) | 33/36 | 0.74 | 0.44 | 1.25 | |
| BMI (≥25 and <30) | Quartile 1 (Highest) | 45/56 | REF | ||
| Quartile 2 | 37/51 | 0.98 | 0.62 | 1.54 | |
| Quartile 3 | 37/50 | 0.83 | 0.53 | 1.29 | |
| Quartile 4 (lowest) | 32/45 | 1.14 | 0.71 | 1.82 | |
| BMI (≥30) | Quartile 1 (Highest) | 15/21 | REF | ||
| Quartile 2 | 18/29 | 1.32 | 0.65 | 2.67 | |
| Quartile 3 | 23/34 | 1.51 | 0.77 | 2.96 | |
| Quartile 4 (lowest) | 25/34 | 1.22 | 0.63 | 2.36 | |
Overall survival was calculated as time between date of blood draw and date of death or date last known to be alive.
Quartiles of vitamin D were determined accounting for month of blood draw.
Model estimates adjusted for the main effect of vitamin D, age, sex, smoking status, the main effect of BMI categories, year of diagnosis, chemotherapy, radiation, time-dependent surgery, and baseline hazard was stratified by tumor stage by lymph node status.
Sensitivity analysis accounting for time of blood draw
Mean 25(OH)D levels differed among patients with no treatment at the time of serum draw (22.6 ng/mL ± 10.5), patients who some chemotherapy and radiation treatment but no surgery (20.7 ng/mL ± 9.8), patients whose serum was drawn <12 weeks after surgery (18.7 ng/mL ± 9.1), and patients whose serum was drawn ≥ 12 weeks after surgery (20.3ng/mL ± 8.4; ANOVA p=0.026).
Among the 108 patients without treatment at the time of serum draw, we found no association between overall survival and 25(OH)D modeled as quartiles or continuous (Supplementary Table 2). When considered by clinical cut points, serum levels <40 ng/mL of vitamin D were significantly associated with higher hazard of all-cause death, but there was not an obvious pattern of association across cut points, and the sample sizes for these categories were very small, so these results should be considered cautiously.
When we further crudely imputed patients’ 25(OH)D level at the time of diagnosis. We again did not see a significant association of the imputed diagnostic 25(OH)D levels on overall survival (Supplementary Table 3; p=0.30).
Sensitivity analysis restricting to White patients
We additionally repeated all analyses, restricting the population to patients who identified as non-Hispanic White. The results for all analyses did not differ from the models where we used all subjects (Supplementary Table 4).
Discussion
We did not find evidence that levels of serum 25(OH)D around diagnosis are associated with overall survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Nor did we find evidence that the association of 25(OH)D on overall survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients differs by stage at diagnosis or BMI at diagnosis. Though serum levels of 25(OH)D did appear to differ according to treatment status at the time of blood draw, treatment did not appear to alter the association between 25(OH)D levels and overall survival among esophageal adenocarcinoma patients.
To our knowledge, this is the first study that has assessed the association between diagnostic 25(OH)D levels and overall survival exclusively among esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. A pathologic study noted that high expression of vitamin D receptor (VDR) is common in esophageal adenocarcinoma tissues as well as the precancerous Barrett’s esophagus tissues, but expression was rare in squamous cell carcinoma tissues, lending evidence that the pathway may be more relevant to the tumor biology in adenocarcinoma.(46) Another recent study reported that tumor VDR expression was associated with longer overall survival among esophageal adenocarcinoma patients.(47) At least one study in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma reported patients with >10ng/mL 25(OH)D at time of diagnosis had longer overall survival than those with <10ng/mL, but they did not clearly report if or how they adjusted for the effects of seasonal variability of blood draw.(48) More recently, a study from the European Prospective Investigation in Cancer and Nutrition prospective cohort examined circulating 25(OH)D3 levels from blood drawn many years before diagnosis of cancer on mortality among head and neck and esophageal cancer patients.(36) In the 147 esophageal cancer patients included in the analysis (approximately 50% esophageal adenocarcinoma), they found no association between circulating 25(OH)D3 levels and overall survival or cancer specific survival (36), consistent with our findings.
Human observational studies, Mendelian randomization studies, and RCTs have reported that low levels of vitamin D are associated with increased risk of total cancer mortality.(13,14,16,49) Yet due to the unique biology of different cancers, we do not know whether the vitamin D pathway has the same prognostic impact in all cancer sites. There may also be a threshold effect of vitamin D. Several studies of various cancer sites have reported significantly shorter survival time among patients with very low levels of 25(OH)D (<12ng/mL) compared to patients with even moderate levels (≥12–20 ng/mL).(50–52) In our study, we found no evidence of association between overall survival and 25(OH)D, even at levels <10ng/mL, in the whole population. When looking only among patients who had not initiated treatment at the time of serum draw, we did see that levels <40ng/mL were associated with increased hazard of death. However, given the small sample sizes in these categories and extreme uncertainty of these estimates, coupled with the consistently null findings in other models, we cannot rule out that those associations are spurious.
Epidemiologic studies in lung and pancreatic cancers have reported differences by stage in the association of 25(OH)D level on overall survival.(18,37,38) Biologically, Vitamin D is thought to slow tumor growth and inhibit metastases, among other things, so we hypothesized that the association with 25(OH)D would be weaker among patients with metastatic disease. However, we found no evidence of interaction between 25(OH)D and clinical stage on overall survival in this population.
High BMI (>30kg/m2) is a known risk factor developing esophageal adenocarcinoma but associated with better prognosis after diagnosis.(53–56) BMI is also related to vitamin D, as vitamin D through sun exposure and diet can be stored in the fat cells of a person rather than being converted into circulating 25(OH)D. Thus people with more adiposity tend to have lower serum circulating 25(OH)D than someone with less body fat but the same intake of vitamin D.(57) We did not find evidence of BMI as an effect modifier in this study. In healthy individuals, BMI is an adequate measure of adiposity, but sick cancer patients potentially have underlying sarcopenia or cachexia, so low BMI may indicate low lean mass and not necessarily low adiposity. Thus, the relationship between BMI and vitamin D in esophageal adenocarcinoma survival may be more complex than we were able to capture here.
We acknowledge limitations to our study. First, we did not have information on EA-specific mortality, but due to the aggressive pattern of EA, we infer that the vast majority of patients in our study died from their cancer and not with it. Second, like many studies, we only have one measure of 25(OH)D from close to the time of diagnosis. Though we accounted for seasonal variability at the time of blood draw, we cannot account for intraindividual changes to 25(OH)D levels over follow-up time, including seasonally, during treatment, or after treatment is completed. In the absence of taking vitamin D supplementation, healthy adults’ 25(OH)D levels do not vary dramatically over a few years but tend to decrease notably across a decade. (58–60) However, this decrease in 25(OH)D levels tracks with age and does not modify the association with all-cause mortality.(61) Few studies have examined the impact of cancer treatment on 25(OH)D levels. Breast cancer patients have shown significantly decreased 25(OH)D levels after neoadjuvent chemotherapy, but even accounting for that change, neither baseline nor post treatment 25(OH)D levels have been associated with pathological response to treatment.(62,63) In contrast, another recent longitudinal study of melanoma patients found that baseline levels of 25(OH)D were not associated with risk of relapse but change in 25(OH)D during follow-up (both increased and decreased) was associated with worse prognosis, although they did not report change in vitamin D status per specific treatment modality.(64) Our findings cannot rule out that trajectories of 25(OH)D levels throughout treatment may be associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma survival. Longitudinal studies tracking 25(OH)D levels throughout the course of treatment would further inform recommendations for patients.
A third, related, limitation of our study is that the timing of the blood draw in relation to cancer diagnosis differed across patients, which means although blood draw occurred close to the time of diagnosis, patients were at varying points of their treatment regimen at the time of blood draw. This is a common problem in the study of prognostic biomarkers. We attempted to address this by considering numerous ways in which the timing of the blood draw might have affected measured levels of 25(OH)D. While mean 25(OH)D levels were statistically significantly different depending on the treatment patients had received at the time of blood draw, the levels across different groups actually did not deviate much from the overall population mean, and the timing of blood draw in relation to treatment does not appear to have impacted the main results. Moreover, the consistently null findings in almost all analysis and the p-values consistently close to 1 support the null hypothesis, and mean that potential residual confounding from the above mentioned factors is unlikely to change the results of our analyses.
There are several strengths to our study. To our knowledge, this is the largest study to examine the effect of 25(OH)D levels as a prognostic factor in esophageal adenocarcinoma, and the first to look exclusively at esophageal adenocarcinoma. We were able to consider possible effect modifiers and many relevant confounders in addition to the main effect. Additionally, our study population demographics are similar to the demographics of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients across the United States, supporting generalizability of our findings.
Despite the biologic evidence that the vitamin D pathway suppresses tumor progression via a number of mechanism and the epidemiologic evidence that higher levels of vitamin D are protective against total cancer mortality, the evidence for 25(OH)D serum levels as a marker of prognosis of specific cancer sites in humans has been equivocal. We found no evidence that circulating 25(OH)D levels are associated with overall survival among esophageal adenocarcinoma patients, accounting for a number of potential confounders and effect modifiers. A recent trial of vitamin D supplementation found those taking supplementation had reduced risk of cancer mortality, and the association was strongest after excluding the first 2 years of follow-up after cancer diagnosis.(49) Our consistently null associations between serum 25(OH)D levels and overall survival among esophageal adenocarcinoma patients may indicate that the aggressive nature of this cancer precludes any potential protective benefits of vitamin D.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
E. Loehrer was funded by the Harvard Education and Research Centers (ERC) training grant T42 OH008416 through NIOSH, L. Su was funded by grant U01CA209414 through the NIH(NCI), and D. Christiani was funded by grant #205830 from the American Institute for Cancer Research.
Abbreviations list:
- 25(OH)D
25-Hydroxyvitamin D
- OS
overall survival
- EA
esophageal adenocarcinoma
- HR
Hazard Ratio
- 95%CI
95% Confidence Interval
- SD
standard deviation
- VDR
vitamin D receptor
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interests to report
References
- 1.Rubenstein JH, Shaheen NJ. Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 2015;149(2):302–17 e1 doi 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang Y Epidemiology of esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19(34):5598–606 doi 10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Blot WJ, Devesa SS, Kneller RW, Fraumeni JF Jr. Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA 1991;265(10):1287–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cook MB, Chow WH, Devesa SS. Oesophageal cancer incidence in the United States by race, sex, and histologic type, 1977–2005. Br J Cancer 2009;101(5):855–9 doi 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brown LM, Devesa SS, Chow WH. Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus among white Americans by sex, stage, and age. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100(16):1184–7 doi 10.1093/jnci/djn211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.statistics FSAitfatSc. SEER Survival Data of Relative Survival By Survival Time of Esophageal Cancer between 1988–2013 (SEER 13) for all races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, and All Ages Surveilance Research Program, National Cancer Institute. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Berlanga-Taylor AJ, Knight JC. An integrated approach to defining genetic and environmental determinants for major clinical outcomes involving vitamin D. Mol Diagn Ther 2014;18(3):261–72 doi 10.1007/s40291-014-0087-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Picotto G, Liaudat AC, Bohl L, Tolosa de Talamoni N. Molecular aspects of vitamin D anticancer activity. Cancer Invest 2012;30(8):604–14 doi 10.3109/07357907.2012.721039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Engelman CD, Fingerlin TE, Langefeld CD, Hicks PJ, Rich SS, Wagenknecht LE, et al. Genetic and environmental determinants of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels in Hispanic and African Americans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93(9):3381–8 doi 10.1210/jc.2007-2702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang Q, Yang W, Uytingco MS, Christakos S, Wieder R. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and all-trans-retinoic acid sensitize breast cancer cells to chemotherapy-induced cell death. Cancer Res 2000;60(7):2040–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jiang F, Bao J, Li P, Nicosia SV, Bai W. Induction of ovarian cancer cell apoptosis by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 through the down-regulation of telomerase. J Biol Chem 2004;279(51):53213–21 doi 10.1074/jbc.M410395200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Holick MF. Vitamin D status: measurement, interpretation, and clinical application. Ann Epidemiol 2009;19(2):73–8 doi 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Keum N, Giovannucci E. Vitamin D supplements and cancer incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2014;111(5):976–80 doi 10.1038/bjc.2014.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chowdhury R, Kunutsor S, Vitezova A, Oliver-Williams C, Chowdhury S, Kiefte-de-Jong JC, et al. Vitamin D and risk of cause specific death: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort and randomised intervention studies. BMJ 2014;348:g1903 doi 10.1136/bmj.g1903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Weinstein SJ, Mondul AM, Yu K, Layne TM, Abnet CC, Freedman ND, et al. Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D up to 3 decades prior to diagnosis in relation to overall and organ-specific cancer survival. Eur J Epidemiol 2018;33(11):1087–99 doi 10.1007/s10654-018-0428-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Afzal S, Brondum-Jacobsen P, Bojesen SE, Nordestgaard BG. Genetically low vitamin D concentrations and increased mortality: Mendelian randomisation analysis in three large cohorts. BMJ 2014;349:g6330 doi 10.1136/bmj.g6330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mondul AM, Weinstein SJ, Layne TM, Albanes D. Vitamin D and Cancer Risk and Mortality: State of the Science, Gaps, and Challenges. Epidemiol Rev 2017;39(1):28–48 doi 10.1093/epirev/mxx005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Heist RS, Zhou W, Wang Z, Liu G, Neuberg D, Su L, et al. Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D, VDR polymorphisms, and survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(34):5596–602 doi 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.0406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yuan C, Qian ZR, Babic A, Morales-Oyarvide V, Rubinson DA, Kraft P, et al. Prediagnostic Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Pancreatic Cancer Survival. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(24):2899–905 doi 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.3005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lowe LC, Guy M, Mansi JL, Peckitt C, Bliss J, Wilson RG, et al. Plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentrations, vitamin D receptor genotype and breast cancer risk in a UK Caucasian population. Eur J Cancer 2005;41(8):1164–9 doi 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hu K, Callen DF, Li J, Zheng H. Circulating Vitamin D and Overall Survival in Breast Cancer Patients: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Integr Cancer Ther 2017:1534735417712007 doi 10.1177/1534735417712007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bade B, Zdebik A, Wagenpfeil S, Graber S, Geisel J, Vogt T, et al. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin d concentrations are associated with increased risk for melanoma and unfavourable prognosis. PLoS One 2014;9(12):e112863 doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0112863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shui IM, Mondul AM, Lindstrom S, Tsilidis KK, Travis RC, Gerke T, et al. Circulating vitamin D, vitamin D-related genetic variation, and risk of fatal prostate cancer in the National Cancer Institute Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium. Cancer 2015;121(12):1949–56 doi 10.1002/cncr.29320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mondul AM, Weinstein SJ, Moy KA, Mannisto S, Albanes D. Circulating 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Prostate Cancer Survival. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25(4):665–9 doi 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zgaga L, Theodoratou E, Farrington SM, Din FV, Ooi LY, Glodzik D, et al. Plasma vitamin D concentration influences survival outcome after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(23):2430–9 doi 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.5947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yao S, Kwan ML, Ergas IJ, Roh JM, Cheng TD, Hong CC, et al. Association of Serum Level of Vitamin D at Diagnosis With Breast Cancer Survival: A Case-Cohort Analysis in the Pathways Study. JAMA Oncol 2017;3(3):351–7 doi 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Song Z, Yao Q, Zhuo Z, Ma Z, Chen G. Circulating vitamin D level and mortality in prostate cancer patients: a dose-response meta-analysis. Endocr Connect 2018. doi 10.1530/EC-18-0283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lohmann AE, Chapman JA, Burnell MJ, Levine MN, Tsvetkova E, Pritchard KI, et al. Prognostic associations of 25 hydroxy vitamin D in NCIC CTG MA.21, a phase III adjuvant randomized clinical trial of three chemotherapy regimens in high-risk breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015;150(3):605–11 doi 10.1007/s10549-015-3355-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Anic GM, Weinstein SJ, Mondul AM, Mannisto S, Albanes D. Serum vitamin D, vitamin D binding protein, and lung cancer survival. Lung Cancer 2014;86(3):297–303 doi 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vashi PG, Edwin P, Popiel B, Gupta D. The relationship between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and survival in newly diagnosed advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 2015;15:1012 doi 10.1186/s12885-015-2043-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McGovern EM, Lewis ME, Niesley ML, Huynh N, Hoag JB. Retrospective analysis of the influence of 25-hydroxyvitamin D on disease progression and survival in pancreatic cancer. Nutr J 2016;15:17 doi 10.1186/s12937-016-0135-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu Y, Sarkissyan M, Clayton S, Chlebowski R, Vadgama JV. Association of Vitamin D3 Level with Breast Cancer Risk and Prognosis in African-American and Hispanic Women. Cancers (Basel) 2017;9(10) doi 10.3390/cancers9100144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gupta D, Trukova K, Popiel B, Lammersfeld C, Vashi PG. The association between pre-treatment serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and survival in newly diagnosed stage IV prostate cancer. PLoS One 2015;10(3):e0119690 doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0119690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ng K, Sargent DJ, Goldberg RM, Meyerhardt JA, Green EM, Pitot HC, et al. Vitamin D status in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: findings from Intergroup trial N9741. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(12):1599–606 doi 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.7255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Freedman DM, Looker AC, Abnet CC, Linet MS, Graubard BI. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and cancer mortality in the NHANES III study (1988–2006). Cancer Res 2010;70(21):8587–97 doi 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fanidi A, Muller DC, Midttun O, Ueland PM, Vollset SE, Relton C, et al. Circulating vitamin D in relation to cancer incidence and survival of the head and neck and oesophagus in the EPIC cohort. Sci Rep 2016;6:36017 doi 10.1038/srep36017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhou W, Heist RS, Liu G, Neuberg DS, Asomaning K, Su L, et al. Polymorphisms of vitamin D receptor and survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(11):2239–45 doi 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cho M, Peddi PF, Ding K, Chen L, Thomas D, Wang J, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and prognostics among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Transl Med 2013;11:206 doi 10.1186/1479-5876-11-206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fang F, Kasperzyk JL, Shui I, Hendrickson W, Hollis BW, Fall K, et al. Prediagnostic plasma vitamin D metabolites and mortality among patients with prostate cancer. PLoS One 2011;6(4):e18625 doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0018625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hamada T, Liu L, Nowak JA, Mima K, Cao Y, Ng K, et al. Vitamin D status after colorectal cancer diagnosis and patient survival according to immune response to tumour. Eur J Cancer 2018;103:98–107 doi 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhai R, Wei Y, Su L, Liu G, Kulke MH, Wain JC, et al. Whole-miRNome profiling identifies prognostic serum miRNAs in esophageal adenocarcinoma: the influence of Helicobacter pylori infection status. Carcinogenesis 2015;36(1):87–93 doi 10.1093/carcin/bgu228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhai R, Zhao Y, Liu G, Ter-Minassian M, Wu IC, Wang Z, et al. Interactions between environmental factors and polymorphisms in angiogenesis pathway genes in esophageal adenocarcinoma risk: a case-only study. Cancer 2012;118(3):804–11 doi 10.1002/cncr.26325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hollis BW, Kamerud JQ, Selvaag SR, Lorenz JD, Napoli JL. Determination of vitamin D status by radioimmunoassay with an 125I-labeled tracer. Clin Chem 1993;39(3):529–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang Y, Jacobs EJ, McCullough ML, Rodriguez C, Thun MJ, Calle EE, et al. Comparing methods for accounting for seasonal variability in a biomarker when only a single sample is available: insights from simulations based on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin d. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170(1):88–94 doi 10.1093/aje/kwp086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gutierrez OM, Farwell WR, Kermah D, Taylor EN. Racial differences in the relationship between vitamin D, bone mineral density, and parathyroid hormone in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Osteoporos Int 2011;22(6):1745–53 doi 10.1007/s00198-010-1383-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhou Z, Xia Y, Bandla S, Zakharov V, Wu S, Peters J, et al. Vitamin D receptor is highly expressed in precancerous lesions and esophageal adenocarcinoma with significant sex difference. Hum Pathol 2014;45(8):1744–51 doi 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.McCain S, Trainor J, McManus DT, McMenamin UC, McQuaid S, Bingham V, et al. Vitamin D receptor as a marker of prognosis in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study. Oncotarget 2018;9(76):34347–56 doi 10.18632/oncotarget.26151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gugatschka M, Kiesler K, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Groselj-Strele A, Griesbacher A, Friedrich G. Vitamin D status is associated with disease-free survival and overall survival time in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268(8):1201–4 doi 10.1007/s00405-010-1481-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Manson JE, Cook NR, Lee IM, Christen W, Bassuk SS, Mora S, et al. Vitamin D Supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med 2019;380(1):33–44 doi 10.1056/NEJMoa1809944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ma K, Xu W, Wang C, Li B, Su K, Li W. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a poor prognosis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. Cancer Biomark 2017;18(3):297–303 doi 10.3233/CBM-161687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Brenner H, Jansen L, Saum KU, Holleczek B, Schottker B. Vitamin D Supplementation Trials Aimed at Reducing Mortality Have Much Higher Power When Focusing on People with Low Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations. J Nutr 2017;147(7):1325–33 doi 10.3945/jn.117.250191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Maalmi H, Walter V, Jansen L, Chang-Claude J, Owen RW, Ulrich A, et al. Relationship of very low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels with long-term survival in a large cohort of colorectal cancer patients from Germany. Eur J Epidemiol 2017. doi 10.1007/s10654-017-0298-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Abnet CC, Freedman ND, Hollenbeck AR, Fraumeni JF Jr., Leitzmann M, Schatzkin A. A prospective study of BMI and risk of oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2008;44(3):465–71 doi 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yoon HH, Lewis MA, Shi Q, Khan M, Cassivi SD, Diasio RB, et al. Prognostic impact of body mass index stratified by smoking status in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(34):4561–7 doi 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.1260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kubo A, Corley DA. Body mass index and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus or gastric cardia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(5):872–8 doi 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lennon H, Sperrin M, Badrick E, Renehan AG. The Obesity Paradox in Cancer: a Review. Curr Oncol Rep 2016;18(9):56 doi 10.1007/s11912-016-0539-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wortsman J, Matsuoka LY, Chen TC, Lu Z, Holick MF. Decreased bioavailability of vitamin D in obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72(3):690–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Saliba W, Barnett O, Stein N, Kershenbaum A, Rennert G. The longitudinal variability of serum 25(OH)D levels. Eur J Intern Med 2012;23(4):e106–11 doi 10.1016/j.ejim.2012.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Berger C, Greene-Finestone LS, Langsetmo L, Kreiger N, Joseph L, Kovacs CS, et al. Temporal trends and determinants of longitudinal change in 25-hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone levels. J Bone Miner Res 2012;27(6):1381–9 doi 10.1002/jbmr.1587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mirfakhraee S, Ayers CR, McGuire DK, Maalouf NM. Longitudinal changes in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the Dallas Heart Study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2017;87(3):242–8 doi 10.1111/cen.13374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Schottker B, Hagen L, Zhang Y, Gao X, Holleczek B, Gao X, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels as an ageing marker. Strong associations with age and all-cause mortality independent from telomere length, epigenetic age acceleration and 8-isoprostane levels. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2018. doi 10.1093/gerona/gly253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Charehbili A, Hamdy NA, Smit VT, Kessels L, van Bochove A, van Laarhoven HW, et al. Vitamin D (25–0H D3) status and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer: Data from the NEOZOTAC trial (BOOG 10–01). Breast 2016;25:69–74 doi 10.1016/j.breast.2015.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kim JS, Haule CC, Kim JH, Lim SM, Yoon KH, Kim JY, et al. Association between Changes in Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Survival in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. J Breast Cancer 2018;21(2):134–41 doi 10.4048/jbc.2018.21.2.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Saiag P, Aegerter P, Vitoux D, Lebbe C, Wolkenstein P, Dupin N, et al. Prognostic Value of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 Levels at Diagnosis and During Follow-up in Melanoma Patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107(12):djv264 doi 10.1093/jnci/djv264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.