Abstract
BACKGROUND
The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of a self-care education (SCE) discharge program with telephone follow-ups in managing hypertension (HTN) in older patients.
METHODS
The study was conducted on 56 older patients with HTN who had recently been discharged from the cardiac wards of hospitals in Isfahan, Iran, in 2017. Participants were randomly allocated to the intervention and control groups. The intervention was a 60-minute SCE discharge program with 4 re-educative telephone follow-ups every 2 weeks based on 4 chapters of the designed SCE program and booklet. After coding the data and entering them into SPSS software, data were analyzed for the comparison of mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as well as frequency of managed HTN in the intervention and control groups at baseline (before discharge), and 2 and 3 months after discharge.
RESULTS
Statistical tests showed no significant difference in any of the demographic and confounding variables as well as baseline BPs (P > 0.050), but at post-intervention follow-ups, after Mauchly's sphericity test, repeated measurements ANOVA showed that the effect of time (P < 0.001) and group (P = 0.043) on SBP was significant. The effect of time (P = 0.036) and group (P = 0.047) on DBP was also significant. McNemar’s test showed that the frequency of managed HTN (normal BP), 3 months after discharge, was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group [87.5% (n = 21) vs. 23.1% (n = 6), respectively] (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
SCE discharge program with telephone re-educative follow-ups was effective in reducing mean BP. The use of this program as a discharged plan for older adults with HTN and comparison of readmission rates for a longer period are recommended.
Keywords: Elderly, Discharge Planning, Hypertension, Patient Education, Self-Care, Telenursing
Introduction
Hypertension (HTN) is one of the most prevalent diseases in older adults,1,2 with a prevalence rate of 61% in Iran.3 HTN is one of the preventable risk factors of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and cerebral accidents.4 Unmanaged HTN is accompanied with complications leading to disability in older adults. These complications increase in severity with age in older adults.5,6 Cardiac failure, one of these complications, alone accounts for 27% of the causes of these patients’ hospitalization.7 Poor blood pressure (BP) management in developing countries, compared to developed countries, explains the high prevalence of such complications, which in turn result in patients’ higher re-admission costs in such countries.2
HTN is defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mm Hg,4 and is accompanied with other unhealthy lifestyle risk factors.8 In 2010, the ratios of awareness of diagnosis, treatment, and disease control were 43.5%, 33.8%, and 12.3%, respectively.9
HTN management is associated with a reduction in complications10 and refers to controlling of BP (less than 140/90 mmHg). Experts believe that administration of self-care (including lifestyle modification), treatment compliance and regular BP rechecks are essential to achieve chronic diseases management. Lifestyle modification including weight reduction, compliance with Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension )DASH(, increased physical activity, reduced alcohol consumption, and smoking cessation can somehow result in reinforcement of medical method effect and better BP control.11,12 Considering the physical and mental limitations of older adults, only self-care education is inadequate in disease management, while continuing regular education along with follow-up for the patients and their families’ accompaniment seem to result in self-care improvement.13,14 It seems the missing ring in disease management in older adults with HTN is lack of re-education and post-discharge follow-ups.15 Studies show that discharge education planning effects readmission and hospitalization days;16 therefore, application of self-care education as a component of discharge education planning,17 together with nurses’ guidance and follow-up, can enhance self-care and BP control in older adults.18 This issue can also be investigated concerning HTN in older adults.
In recent years, telephone follow-up, as one of the tele-nursing methods, compared to the routine care treatment system, bridges the gap between patients’ discharge and home visit. It not only reduces patients’ treatment referrals, but also improves their quality of life (QOL).19,20 Therefore, with regard to the increased population of older adults, the importance of HTN managment2,4 and nurses’ role in education and management of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs),21 the present study was conducted to define the quarterly effectiveness of a self-care education program with telephone follow-ups on the management of HTN in older adults who were discharged from hospital.
Materials and Methods
This quasi-experimental study (controlled-trial) was conducted in three-stages in two educational medical centers in Isfahan, Iran.
The participants were 56 older adults (60-79 years old) who were diagnosed with HTN and were being discharged from the internal/cardiac wards of 2 major hospitals in Isfahan. Sample size was calculated as at least 25 subjects in each group (control and intervention) based on the following formula:
(80%) z2 = 0.84; z1 = 1.96; d = 0.8 S; n (sample size) = 25 subject in each group
In order to recruit subjects, 28 older adults were selected from the two hospitals (considering 10% drop out). Having obtained their informed consent, the subjects were allocated to intervention or control groups with random number assignment (1 or 2) at discharge.
The inclusion criteria consisted of positive history of HTN (recorded in patients’ file) and undergoing treatment with antihypertensive medication at least 1 year prior to the study or at least 2 blood pressures over 140/90 mmHg recorded in the vital signs sheet of the patients by staff nurses, and lack of cognitive impairment. In addition, they needed to have the ability to perform daily living activities independently and no acute HTN complications such as heart failure, stroke, renal failure, and visual impairment at sampling time. The exclusion criteria were unwillingness to cooperate, no telephone follow-ups in 2 weeks, or drop out which resulted from stressful events, or diagnosis of an acute disease by a specialist.
First, the researcher extracted the list of hospitalized elders with HTN on consecutive days within 2 weeks. After obtaining informed written consent, according to the study inclusion criteria and using r quota sampling, the patients were assigned to intervention and control groups.
A digital sphygmomanometer (model Alpk2 K2-232, Japan) was used as data collection tool to measure SBP and DBP and a researcher made 16-item questionnaire was used to record the subjects’ data in two sections:
A) Demographic characteristics form with 8 questions on age, sex, level of education, occupation, marital status, number of children, residence address, and people they live with.
B) Baseline information form about probable cofounding variables [number of years of HTN history, weight and height to calculate body mass index (BMI), history and dosage of anti-hypertension medications, history of contraceptive consumption )women), history and number of hospitalizations due to HTN 1 year prior to the study, history and amount of smoking, specific diet, physical activity, and major diseases] with 8 questions and matched in the two groups before analysis of dependent variables.
To confirm face and content validities of the questionnaire, it was reviewed and evaluated by 10 experts in various professions of nursing and medicine. After implementing their modifications, reliability was estimated at 80% correlation of test-retest on 10 subjects with a 3-day interval. To ensure the accuracy of the BP measurement device, it was calibrated using a mercury sphygmomanometer. As BP measurements were all conducted by the researcher, to confirm accuracy (reliability), SBP and DBP measurements were administrated twice with 2-5-minute interval in 10 subjects; a high correlation of 80% was observed in standard conditions. To maintain reliable results during the study, BP measurement was conducted only by the researcher and with a unique sphygmomanometer after confirmation of reliability.
SBP and DBP were measured and recorded for the subjects twice with an interval of 2-5 minutes in standard conditions (sitting position, sphygmomanometer cuff size appropriate to patients’ arm circumference, laying arm at the heart level, at least 5 minutes of rest before BP measurement, bladder voiding and no smoking and coffee 30 minutes before measurement, and folding patients’ sleeves up to arm).22
Primary discharge data form was filled for the patients at the time of discharge in the presence of accompanying persons. Having coordinated with the ward manager, a 60-minute self-care education (SCE) session was held based on the designed education program in the form of a booklet in 2-6 member groups through lecture and Teach Back method (a method of repeated question and answer for providing feedback and deep learning). An educational booklet had been designed prior to the study based on needs assessment conducted among the older adults with HTN23 with focus on disease control, secondary complications prevention, medicine education, appropriate diet, weight loss, increased physical activity, and smoking secession. This booklet was used as teaching aid not only to enhance their learning but as a source of information in telephone follow-ups. Subjects in the control group and their accompanying persons were recommended to have routine visits in health system. The primary outcomes of this study include:
Intergroup and intragroup comparison of mean SBP and DBP in the intervention and control groups before discharge, as well as 2 and 3 months after discharge
Intergroup and intragroup comparison of frequencies of managed HTN in the intervention and control groups before discharge, as well as 2 and 3 months after discharge
In addition to the above-mentioned educational intervention, the intervention group participants were followed up at their home by the researcher through phone calls every 2 weeks since the day of discharge. The 25-30-minute phone calls were aimed at reviewing the already presented materials and completing the educational program about HTN management in older adults and were presented based on 4 chapters of the SCE booklet. The SCE program and telephone follow-ups in the intervention group have been presented in table 1. The researcher conducted 4 telephone follow-ups for each older adult in the intervention group for 8 weeks. Then, the follow-ups were discontinued for 1 month and both groups were called back to the relevant center to undergo BP measurement by the researcher 2 and 3 months post discharge (The diagram of the study is showed in figure 1).
Table 1.
Educational subject | Summary of conversations and the outcome of the initial and final evaluation of the meeting Compliance with self-care recommendations related to in-person education at discharge | ||
---|---|---|---|
First telephone call: familiarity with medications | Help questions: | ||
1. What have you changed in your diet? | |||
The content: greeting | Evaluation: Patient can explain three changes in his/her diet that are related to blood pressure control. | ||
-Review previous session results; | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
□ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
-Review goals: | 2. Explain the amount of salt intake during the last week. |
||
1. Identifying and prescribing antihypertensive medications | Evaluation: Patient describes the amount of salt consumed by referring to the relevant principles in the previous class. | ||
2. Reporting the amount, frequency, time, and method of taking antihypertensive medication correctly in accordance with the latest prescription | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
□ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
Time: …./.…/2017 . . : . . am/pm | Recommendation / Referral / Consultant / Additional guidance: | ||
Second telephone call: Appropriate diet | Help questions: | ||
1. Explain the amount, timing, and frequency of taking two
consumable medicines. | |||
The content: greeting | Evaluation: Patient can explain the amount, timing, and frequency of taking two consumable medicines referring to the relevant principles in the previous call. | ||
-Review previous session results; | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
□ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
-Review goals: | 2. Explain the relationship between the hypertensive
medication and its three side effects experienced by the patient. |
||
1. Explaining at least three of the principles of appropriate diet in hypertension by simple and complete words | Evaluation: Patient can relate medicinal side effects to the type of hypertensive medication consumed. | ||
2. Identifying the four main food groups in the hypertension diet | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
□ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
Time: …./.…/2017 . . : . . am/pm | Recommendation / Referral / Consultant / Additional guidance: | ||
Third telephone call: Physical activity and weight loss | Help questions: | ||
1. Explain at least three main principles of appropriate
diet in hypertension by using own words. | |||
The content: greeting | Evaluation: Patient can explain three main principles of appropriate diet in hypertension referring to the relevant principles in the previous call. | ||
-Review previous session results; | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
□ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
-Review of goals: | 2. Describe the maximum amount of salt consumed. |
||
1. Explaining the type and required duration of physical activity to reduce blood pressure | Evaluation: Patient can describe the maximum amount of salt consumed referring to the relevant principles in the previous call. | ||
2. Explaining the importance of having physical activity regularly and its relationship with weight loss and blood pressure reduction in their own words | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
□ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
Time: …./.…/2017 . . : . . am/pm | Recommendation / Referral / Consultant / Additional guidance: | ||
Forth telephone call: Familiarity with hypertension symptoms and complications: | Help question: | ||
1. Explain the type and required duration of physical
activity for blood pressure reduction. | |||
The content: greeting | Evaluation: Patient can explain the type and required duration of physical activity for blood pressure reduction referring to the relevant principles in the previous call. | ||
-Review previous session results; | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
□ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
-Review goals: | 2. Explain the importance of having physical activity
regularly in reduced blood pressure in their own words. |
||
1. Explaining at least three symptoms of increased blood pressure in its self | Evaluation: Patient can explain the importance of having physical activity regularly in reduced blood pressure referring to the relevant principles in the previous call. | ||
2. Explaining at least three symptoms of decreased blood pressure in its self | Result: | □ No change (totally inappropriate ) | □ No change (relatively inappropriate) |
□ Change (proper proportion) | □ Change (complete) | ||
Time: …./.…/2017 . . : . . am/pm | Recommendation / Referral / Consultant / Additional guidance: |
After coding the data and entering them into the SPSS software (version 18, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous and categorical variables were reported as mean ± SD and absolute number (percent), respectively. The collected data were analyzed using independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and repeated measures ANOVA with Mauchly’s sphericity test, Cochran's Q, and McNemar’s tests. P-values of less than 0.050 were considered as significant.
Results
Statistical tests showed no significant difference in any of the demographic and confounding variables, age (71.5 ± 4.5 and 69 ± 4.9 years, respectively, in the intervention and control groups), history of HTN (9.9 ± 5.9 and 8.8 ± 8.2 years, respectively, in the intervention and control groups), BMI (29.1 ± 4.1 and 28.4 ± 3.1 kg/m2, respectively, in intervention and control groups), gender, marital, occupational, and life status, level of education, and number of hospitalizations for BP control, in the year prior to the study (P > 0.050) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Variable | Group |
P | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention group (n = 28) |
Control group (n = 28) |
|||
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
Age (year) | 71.5 ± 5.4 | 69.03 ± 4.9 | p1 = 0.100 | |
History of hypertension (year) | 9.9 ± 5.9 | 8.80 ± 8.2 | p1 = 0.570 | |
Body Mass Index | 29.1 ± 4.1 | 28.40 ± 3.1 | p1 = 0.540 | |
n (%) | n (%) | |||
Gender | Female | 10 (41.7) | 12 (46.2) | p2 = 0.750 |
Male | 14 (58.3) | 14 (53.8) | ||
Marital status | Married | 17 (70.8) | 20 (76.9) | p2 = 0.610 |
Widowed | 7 (29.2) | 6 (23.1) | ||
Occupational status | Employed | 2 (8.3) | 4 (15.4) | p2 = 0.860 |
Retired | 8 (33.3) | 9 (34.6) | ||
Insurance Recipient | 5 (20.8) | 4 (15.4) | ||
Housekeeper | 9 (37.6) | 9 (34.6) | ||
Living status | Alone | 3 (12.5) | 3 (11.5) | p2 = 0.650 |
With wife | 16 (66.7) | 20 (77.0) | ||
With children | 5 (20.8) | 3 (11.5) | ||
Level of Education | Illiterate | 3 (12.5) | 6 (23.1) | p3 = 0.920 |
pre-high school diploma | 15 (62.5) | 11 (42.3) | ||
High school diploma | 6 (25.0) | 8 (30.8) | ||
Academic education | 0 (0) | 1 (3.8) | ||
Hospitalization for HTN in the past year | less than once | 16 (66.7) | 20 (76.9) | p3 = 0.460 |
one to two times | 6 (25.0) | 4 (15.4) | ||
more than twice | 2 (8.3) | 2 (7.7) |
SD: Standard deviation; P1: Independent t-test; P2: Chi-Square test; P3: Mann-Whitney U test
Moreover, the other variables such as history of medication, concurrent diseases (CVDs, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and renal failure diseases), hormonal contraceptive methods, smoking, any special diets, and level of physical activities were similar in both groups before the study (P > 0.050).
From among 56 subjects, 4 subjects in the intervention group and 2 subjects in the control group were excluded from the study due to the exclusion criteria (lack of response to the telephone follow-ups twice consecutively and lack of referral for BP measurement in the third run).
After Mauchly's sphericity test, repeated measurements ANOVA showed that the effect of time (P < 0.001) and group (P = 0.043) on SBP was significant. The effect of time (P = 0.036) and group (P = 0.047) on DBP was also significant (Table 3).
Table 3.
Variable | Group | Time |
P1 | P2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (before discharge) |
2 months after discharge |
3 months after discharge |
||||
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||||
SBP | Intervention group (n = 24) | 153.4 ± 13.7 | 145.7 ± 11.3 | 137.2 ± 9.0 | 0.043* | < 0.001* |
Control group (n = 26) | 150.5 ± 15.6 | 151.3 ± 14.0 | 153.3 ± 13.7 | |||
DBP | Intervention group (n = 24) | 87.6 ± 9.3 | 85.7 ± 8.9 | 84.1 ± 8.3 | 0.047* | 0.036* |
Control group (n = 26) | 88.5 ± 10.5 | 89.4 ± 9.5 | 90.0 ± 7.9 |
SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; SD: Standard deviation
P1: Effect of group; P2: Effect of time;
P-value of less than 0.050 was considered as significant.
Frequency of normal range BP (managed HTN) before discharge was 33.3% (n = 8) and 30.8% (n = 8) in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P = 0.760). HTN crisis occurred in one subject in the control group who was excluded from the study because of lack of response in follow-ups. The frequency of managed HTN was 41.7% (n = 10) and 26.9% (n = 7) in the intervention and control groups, respectively, 2 months after discharge; this differences was not significant (P = 0.270). Furthermore, the frequency of managed HTN, 3 months after discharge, was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group [87.5% (n = 21) vs. 23.1% (n = 6)] (P < 0.001). In addition, Cochran's Q test showed that the frequency of managed HTN in the intervention group was significantly different between the three times (P < 0.001); however, in the control group, there was no significant difference between the three times (P = 0.470). McNemar test showed that the frequency of managed HTN in the intervention group did not differ significantly before discharge and 2 months after discharge (P = 0.620); however, 3 months after discharge, it was significantly higher than before discharge (P < 0.001) and 2 months after discharge (P = 0.001) (Table 4).
Table 4.
Group | Time |
P2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (before discharge) |
2 months after discharge |
3 months after discharge |
||
Frequency (%) | Frequency (%) | Frequency (%) | ||
Intervention group (n = 24) | 8 (30.8) | 7 (26.9) | 6 (23.1) | < 0.001* |
Control group (n = 26) | 8 (33.3) | 10 (41.7) | 21 (87.5) | 0.470 |
P1 | 0.76 | 0.27 | < 0.001* |
P1: McNemar’s test;
P2: Cochran's Q test;
P-value of less than 0.050 was considered as significant.
Discussion
Considering the decreased SBP in the intervention group 2 months after discharge and reduced mean SBP and DBP 3 months after discharge compared to the previous measurements in this group, and the increase in mean SBP and DBP in the control group during the same time interval, the SCE program together with telephone follow-ups was found to be effective.
Findings showed the effect of the intervention on the reduction of SBP and DBP in the intervention group at the end of the study compared to before the intervention. During the same time interval (i.e., before discharge until the end of the study), mean SBP and DBP showed an increase in the control group. Similarly, Chiu and Wong reported that mean SBP and DBP were significantly lower in their intervention group after educational session and counseling by phone calls for 8 weeks in older adults (mean age of 54 years) with HTN compared to the control group who only received nursing counseling at the clinic.24 Furthermore, Park et al. obtained similar results in older adults with HTN residing in nursing homes after SCE with 8-week follow-ups.10 Their results showed that SCE, especially with follow-ups and counseling, reduced BP of older adults with HTN. Their research was different from the present study in terms of the discharge planning protocol and administration of regular self-care education, which can lead to effectiveness of education and a behavior change in self-care by reinforcing follow-ups. In some other studies, the effectiveness of counseling and telephone follow-ups on self-care behaviors of patients with HTN has been evaluated differently. For example, Faraji showed that the intervention had a consistent positive effect on the patients’ SBP control after 8 weeks (P = 0.030), but it could not improve the patients’ adherence to treatment and lifestyle modification (P > 0.050).25 Researchers emphasized the necessity of long-term and regular follow-up to enhance the patients’ self-care behaviors in chronic conditions. The difference in the results of the above-mentioned research and the present study could be due to difference in the participants’ age group (18-65 vs. 60+ years).
Moreover, the frequency of managed HTN at the end of the study was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group. This variable was a little higher in the intervention group 2 months after discharge with no significant difference (P > 0.050). Furthermore, controlled HTN distribution was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group 3 months after discharge (P < 0.050). These results are consistent with those of Park et al. who reported a significant increase in the percentages of managed HTN in the intervention group compared with the control group (P = 0.03).10 Mohammadi et al. also reported a significant increase in the level of managed SBP (P < 0.001) and DBP (P < 0.004) in the intervention group after 3 months of follow-ups compared to the control group.26 Comparison of the aforementioned results show the importance of follow-up along with SCE in the reduction of the percentage of unmanaged HTN which is one of the main factors for readmission among older adults with HTN.
Conclusion
This program was designed with a holistic approach towards the educational needs of older adults considering their specific barriers of learning such as their physical and functional restrictions. Therefore, the positive changes observed in SBP and DBP and the increase in the percentage of controlled HTN seem to result directly from this program. Designing a discharge program for older adults with HTN and the holistic approach towards their educational needs and self-care behaviors along with telephone follow-ups aimed at providing continuous training are the outstanding points of the present study compared to previous research.
Research Constraints: Regarding the chronicity of the process of HTN management and the importance of long-term follow-up in these cases, the short duration of the study was one of the limitations of this research (because of the limitation of thesis protocols in MSc degrees). In addition, polypharmacy, comorbidities, and lack of permanent access to these patients or their relatives for telephone follow-up limited the obtaining of valuable information.
Acknowledgments
This project was conducted by sponsorship of the vice-chancellery for research in the School of Nursing and Midwifery of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences with ethics committee and research project number 39551. Researchers greatly appreciate the financial support of the vice-chancellery as well as the cooperation of the older patients and their relatives and responsible personnel participating in the study.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest
Authors have no conflict of interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sanderson WC, Scherbov S, Gerland P. Probabilistic population aging. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mills Katherine T, Bundy JD, Kelly TN, Reed JE, Kearney PM, Reynolds K. Global burden of hypertension: Analysis of population-based studies from 89 countries. J Hypertens. 2015;33:e2. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sharifi F, Mirarefin M, Fakhrzadeh H, Saadat S, Ghaderpanahi M, Badamchizade Z, et al. Prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in elderly residents of Kahrizak. Salmand Iran J Ageing. 2009;4(1):16–29. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Santulli G. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the 21st Century: Updated numbers and updated facts. J Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;1(1):1–2. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lionakis N, Mendrinos D, Sanidas E, Favatas G, Georgopoulou M. Hypertension in the elderly. World J Cardiol. 2012;4(5):135–47. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v4.i5.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Azizi F, Ghanbarian A, Madjid M, Rahmani M. Distribution of blood pressure and prevalence of hypertension in Tehran adult population: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS), 1999-2000. J Hum Hypertens. 2002;16(5):305–12. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1418–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0803563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stokes GS. Management of hypertension in the elderly patient. Clin Interv Aging. 2009;4:379–89. doi: 10.2147/cia.s5242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Malekzadeh MM, Etemadi A, Kamangar F, Khademi H, Golozar A, Islami F, et al. Prevalence, awareness and risk factors of hypertension in a large cohort of Iranian adult population. J Hypertens. 2013;31(7):1364–71. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283613053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Park YH, Chang H, Kim J, Kwak JS. Patient-tailored self-management intervention for older adults with hypertension in a nursing home. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(5-6):710–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Armstrong C. JNC8 guidelines for the management of hypertension in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2014;90(7):503–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kim SK, Park M. Effectiveness of person-centered care on people with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:381–97. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S117637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shahrani A, Daryabeigi R, Shahriari M, Khosravi A. Effect of Continuous cCare model on lifestyle modification in patients with hypertension: Randomized clinical trial study. J Res Health Sci. 2016;5(7):231–9. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shirani AK, Baghaei AM. The causes of failure to control hypertension in population aged over 65. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci. 2005;35(35):8–14. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gleason-Comstock J, Streater A, Ager J, Goodman A, Brody A, Kivell L, et al. Patient education and follow-up as an intervention for hypertensive patients discharged from an emergency department: A randomized control trial study protocol. BMC Emerg Med. 2015;15:38. doi: 10.1186/s12873-015-0052-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Parkes J, Shepperd S. Discharge planning from hospital to home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(4):CD000313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fox MT, Persaud M, Maimets I, Brooks D, O'Brien K, Tregunno D. Effectiveness of early discharge planning in acutely ill or injured hospitalized older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-13-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chow SK, Wong FK. A randomized controlled trial of a nurse-led case management programme for hospital-discharged older adults with co-morbidities. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(10):2257–71. doi: 10.1111/jan.12375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kazem S, Shahriari M, Eghbali M. Comparing the effects of two methods of self-monitoring and telenursing on the blood pressure of patients with hypertension. J Res Health Sci. 2016;5:213–22. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Courtney MD, Edwards HE, Chang AM, Parker AW, Finlayson K, Hamilton K. A randomised controlled trial to prevent hospital readmissions and loss of functional ability in high risk older adults: A study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:202. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Khorasani P, Rassouli M, Parvizy S, Zagheri-Tafreshi M, Nasr-Esfahani M. Nurse-led action research project for expanding nurses' role in patient education in Iran: Process, structure, and outcomes. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015;20(3):387–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hacihasanoglu R, Gozum S. The effect of patient education and home monitoring on medication compliance, hypertension management, healthy lifestyle behaviours and BMI in a primary health care setting. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(5-6):692–705. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03534.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Solomon JA. Needs Assessment of Hypertensive Patients. Journal of Morehouse School of Medicine. 2014;20(17):1–3. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chiu CW, Wong FK. Effects of 8 weeks sustained follow-up after a nurse consultation on hypertension: A randomised trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(11):1374–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Faraji M. The effect of sustained nursing consult by telephone (telenursing) on adherence to self- care and blood pressure in hypertensive patient referring to cardiovascular clinic affiliated Shiraz University of Medical Science [Thesis]. Shiraz, Iran: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences; 2012. In Persian. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mohammadi MA, Dadkhah B, Sazavar H, Mozaffari N. The effect of follow up on blood pressure control in hypertensive patients. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci. 2006;6(2):156–62. [Google Scholar]