Abstract
Arthonia ulleungdoensis Lee & Hur is described as a new lichen species from South Korea. The new species is distinguishable from Arthonia ruana A. Massal. by its large, rounded and non-punctiform apothecia, taller apothecial section, asci with fewer spores, and larger and permanently colorless spores. Molecular analyses employing mitochondrial small subunit (mtSSU) and RNA polymerase subunit II (RPB2) sequences strongly support Arthonia ulleungdoensis as a distinct species in the genus Arthonia. Overall, 22 Arthonia species are currently recorded in South Korea. A surrogate key is provided to assist in the identification of all 10 taxa of Arthonia/Arthothelium with muriform spores in Northeast Asia.
Keywords: Arthoniaceae, biodiversity, corticolous, phylogeny, taxonomy
1. Introduction
The genus Arthonia is one of the least explored species in lichen taxonomy although the genus is comprised of about five hundred species worldwide [1]. One of the main reasons for this challenging genus is its ‘paraphyletic origin’. The relationship between Arthonia and related genera is unclear, and many Arthonia species have synonyms for Arthothelium or other genera. Molecular phylogeny also showed that Arthonia species are arranged over genera and even families [2]. Another reason for Arthonia is the ‘unstable structure’ of the species. Many species in Arthonia are highly pioneering. They disperse rapidly but become sterile with a deformed structure after spore discharge and dispersal in a short term. Therefore, although Arthonia species are encountered in the field, they are useless for analysis in many cases by the old, unfilled and barren ascomata with no ascus and spore. The third reason for the demanding genus is a ‘poor description’ of previous references as old descriptions are insufficient to explain specific characteristics of microlichens in anatomy, such as genus Arthonia particularly. The deficient depiction in the past is due mainly to the poor quality of microscopes, and still discourages a comparison with other species/specimens.
Although the genus Arthonia received much less attention in Asia compared to Europe and America, several Asian countries have actively studied Arthonia. In particular, in Asia, India has explored the genus the most since 2000 and dynamic studies such as local detection, new species/records discovery, diversity assessment and ethnolichenological survey for Arthonia were reported [3,4,5,6]. Turkey disclosed new species and records and reported other Arthonia species which were detected locally [7,8,9]. South Korea intently studied Arthonia since 2013 and many new species and records, including lichenized and lichenicolous fungi, were discovered [10,11,12]. For other countries, some new species/records were announced from Japan and three new records of foliicolous Arthonia species were reported recently from China [13,14,15].
This study aimed to describe a new lichenized fungus in the genus Arthonia. A concentrated field study was achieved in Ulleung Island and Pohang, which are an eastern island and seashore region of South Korea, during the summer of 2017 (Figure 1) and 30 specimens of Arthonia were collected. Arthonia ulleungdoensis was identified as a new species from Ulleung Island and this discovery revolves around 22 species in the genus Arthonia from South Korea, including a report on 12 new species/records of Korean Arthonia in 2016 [12]. All specimens were deposited in the herbarium of the Korean Lichen Research Institute (KoLRI).
Figure 1.
Specific collection site (black star mark) for the new species Arthonia ulleungdoensis.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Morphological and Chemical Analyses
Hand-cut sections were prepared with a razor blade and examined under a stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ645; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and a compound microscope (Nikon Eclipse E200; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and imaged using a software program (AxioVison Release 4.8.2; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and an Axiocam ERc 5s camera (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) mounted on a Zeiss scope A1 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The ascospores were investigated at 1000× magnification in water. The length and width of the ascospores were measured and the range of spore sizes was shown with averages, standard deviation, and number of measured spores. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed using solvent systems A and C according to standard methods [16].
2.2. Isolation, DNA Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing
Hand-cut sections of ascomata or thallus from all collected specimens were prepared for DNA isolation and DNA was extracted in line with the manufacturer’s instructions (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). Two-way PCR amplification for the mitochondrial small subunit (mtSSU) and RNA polymerase subunit II (RPB2) genes was achieved using Bioneer’s AccuPower PCR Premix (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea) in 20-μL tubes and primers, mrSSU1 and mrSSU3R [17] and fRPB2-7cF and fRPB2-11aR [18], respectively. The PCR thermal cycling parameters used were previously described by Ekman [19]. Sequencing was accomplished by the genomic research company GenoTech (Daejeon, Korea).
2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis
All mtSSU and RPB2 sequences were aligned and edited manually using ClustalW in Bioedit (V7.2.5; Carlsbad, CA). The bootstrap values were obtained in RAxML GUI 1.5 beta (Heidelberg, Germany) [20] using the maximum likelihood method with a rapid bootstrap with 1000 bootstrap replications and GTR GAMMA for the substitution matrix. The posterior probabilities were obtained in BEAUti 1.8.0 and BEAST 1.8.0 [21] using the HKY (Hasegawa, Kishino and Yano) method for the substitution model, empirical base frequencies, gamma for the site heterogeneity model, four categories for gamma, and a 1,000,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo chain length with a 10,000-echo state screening and 200 log parameters. Then, the best tree was constructed in TreeAnnotator 1.8.0 [22] with a burn-in of 100, no posterior probability limit, a maximum clade credibility tree for the target tree type, and median node heights. All trees were displayed in FigTree 1.4.2 [23] and edited in Microsoft Paint.
3. Results and Discussion
A concatenated tree was produced from two different loci, which involved overall 70 sequences (35 sequences for each mtSSU and RPB2) (Table 1). This concatenation employing mtSSU and RPB2 sequences allows a more comprehensive classification on diverse and comparable Arthonia/Arthothelium taxa to show the position of the new species in molecular phylogeny. The integrated tree shows that the new species is classified in the genus Arthonia (Figure 2). Arthonia ulleungdoensis is positioned in a highly supported clade with Arthonia didyma Körb., Arthonia granitophila Tr.Fr., Arthonia physcidiicola Frisch & G. Thor, and Arthonia ruana, represented by a bootstrap value of 100 and a posterior probability of 95 for the branch. The new species is separately located in the group without any closely positioned taxa. All Arthothelium taxa including Arthothelium norvegicum Coppins & Tønsberg, Arthothelium spectabile A. Massal., and Arthothelium sp. are situated quite far from the new species in the tree although those taxa are similar to the new species mainly by the spore morphology (i.e., muriform spores). Arthonia ulleungdoensis exhibits important characteristics of the genus Arthonia, particularly A. sect. Arthonia, such as maculate ascomata, olive-brown ascomatal pigments, persistently colorless spores, and photophilous [24], although the epihymenium is brownish without a distinct olive color for the new species. Regarding the above analyses and characteristics for the new species, Arthonia ulleungdoensis is identified as a unique species in both morphology and molecular phylogeny, being positioned in the genus Arthonia.
Table 1.
Species list and DNA sequence information employed for phylogenetic analysis.
| Species | mtSSU | RPB2 | Voucher | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alyxoria varia | EU704075 | EU704039 | Ertz 7570 |
| 2 | Arthonia apotheciorum | KJ850970 | KJ851148 | UPS:Frisch 11/Se23 |
| 3 | Arthonia calcarea | EU704064 | EU704028 | Ertz 7539 |
| 4 | Arthonia calcarea | EU704065 | EU704029 | Ertz 7540 |
| 5 | Arthonia calcarea | KJ850974 | KJ851105 | UPS:Thor 11/6a |
| 6 | Arthonia coreana | KX913665 | KX913668 | KoLRI 037694 |
| 7 | Arthonia didyma | EU704047 | EU704010 | Ertz 7587 |
| 8 | Arthonia granitophila | KJ850981 | KJ851107 | UPS:Frisch 10/Se74 |
| 9 | Arthonia physcidiicola | KF707646 | KF707657 | UPS:Frisch 11/Ug318 |
| 10 | Arthonia punctiformis | KJ850973 | KJ851113 | UPS:Thor 26158 |
| 11 | Arthonia radiata | EU704048 | EU704011 | Ertz s.n. |
| 12 | Arthonia radiata | KJ850968 | KJ851108 | UPS:Frisch 10/Se29 |
| 13 | Arthonia radiata | KJ850969 | KJ851109 | UPS:Frisch 11/Se25 |
| 14 | Arthonia ruana | MG495135 | MG589416 | KoLRI 044331 |
| 15 | Arthonia ruana | MG495136 | MG589417 | KoLRI 044332 |
| 16 | Arthonia subfuscicola | KJ850971 | KJ851110 | UPS:Thor 11/1 |
| 17 | Arthonia subfuscicola | KJ850972 | KJ851111 | UPS:Thor 11/Se15 |
| 18 | Arthonia ulleungdoensis | MG495138 | MG589418 | KoLRI 044339 |
| 19 | Arthonia zelkovae | KX913667 | KX913669 | KoLRI 038382 |
| 20 | Arthothelium norvegicum | KJ851003 | KJ851114 | UPS:McCune 31061 |
| 21 | Arthothelium spectabile | KP870144 | KP870160 | TNS:Frisch12Jp179a |
| 22 | Chiodecton sorediatum | KF707648 | KF707661 | UPS:Frisch 11/Ug447 |
| 23 | Coniocarpon cinnabarinum | KJ850977 | KJ851104 | UPS:Frisch 11/Ug297 |
| 24 | Coniocarpon cinnabarinum | KJ850976 | KJ851103 | UPS:Johnsen 111003 |
| 25 | Coniocarpon cinnabarinum | EU704046 | EU704009 | Ertz 8730 |
| 26 | Opegrapha lithyrga | EU704068 | EU704032 | Ertz 8784 |
| 27 | Opegrapha vermicellifera | EU704077 | EU704041 | Ertz 7562 |
| 28 | Opegrapha vulgata | EU704080 | EU704044 | Ertz 7564 |
| 29 | Reichlingia zwackhii | KF707652 | KF707662 | UPS:Thor 11/3 |
| 30 | Zwackhia viridis | EU704078 | EU704042 | Ertz 7619 |
| 31 | Arthonia sp. | EU704049 | EU704012 | Ertz 7775 |
| 32 | Arthonia sp. | EU704050 | EU704013 | Ertz 9090 |
| 33 | Arthonia sp. | KJ851025 | KJ851100 | UPS:Frisch 11/Ug41 |
| 34 | Arthothelium sp. | KJ850958 | KJ851094 | UPS:Joensson Guyana 8 |
| 35 | Arthothelium sp. | KJ850957 | KJ851095 | UPS:Joensson Guyana 10 |
| Overall | 35 | 35 |
DNA sequences for the new species and Arthonia ruana (in bold) were generated in this study. All others were obtained from GenBank. The species names are followed by GenBank accession numbers and voucher information. mtSSU, mitochondrial small subunit; RPB2, RNA polymerase subunit II; Voucher, voucher information.
Figure 2.
Phylogenetic relationships among the closely related species in the genera Arthonia and Arthothelium based on a maximum likelihood analysis of the concatenated dataset of all mitochondrial small subunit (mtSSU) and RNA polymerase subunit II (RPB2) sequences. The tree was rooted with a Chiodecton sorediatum sequence. Maximum likelihood bootstrap values ≥70% and posterior probabilities ≥95% are shown above internal branches. Branches with bootstrap values ≥90% are shown in bold. The new species Arthonia ulleungdoensis is presented in bold, and all species names are followed by the voucher information. Reference Table 1 provides the species related to the specific GenBank accession numbers and voucher information.
New Species
Arthonia ulleungdoensis B.G.Lee & J.-S.Hur sp. nov. (Figure 3)
Figure 3.
Arthonia ulleungdoensis. (A,B) Habitus with rounded and erumpent apothecia; (C) adnate apothecial section; (D) asci and ascospores in an apothecial section; (E) 6-spored ascus; (F) 2-spored ascus; (G) ascospores; (H) old ascospores with dark septa (scale bars: A = 1 mm; B = 0.5 mm, C = 100 μm, D to F = 20 μm, G and H = 10 μm).
No.: MB823220
Type: South Korea, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Ulleung-gun, Ulleung-eup, Ulleung forest trail, 37° 31.20′ N; 130° 54.29′ E, 300 m alt., on Acer takesimense Nakai, 31 May 2017, B.G.Lee 170658 (holotype: KoLRI 044339!).
Thallus corticolous, crustose, hypophloedal, white to gray, without bleaching; epinecral layer 15–18 μm; medulla indistinct; photobiont trentepohlioid, forming a distinct algal layer, parallel to the substratum, between the epinecral layer and the brown bark layer or under apothecia, often in top layer of the brown bark, 45–54 μm thick, cells irregular, globose to angular, single or in chains, 4.5–6 × 6–9 μm, looking somewhat shrunken and supposed to be a little larger originally. Apothecia rounded, erumpent, black, epruinose, with or without epinecral bark layer on the surface of apothecia, 0.79–2.63 × 0.72–1.97 mm (length = 1.56, SD = 0.73, width = 1.32, SD = 0.51, n = 6); bark layer hyaline, 10–15 μm; apothecial section 100–130 μm thick; epihymenium brown to dark brown, 15–20 μm high; hymenium hyaline to light brown, 50–60 μm high, oil droplets near base of hymenium or in hypothecium; hypothecium brown to dirty brown, 25–35 μm high; paraphysoids septate, anticlinally arranged, 1–1.5 μm wide, somewhat branched at tips; tips swollen and pigmented, 1.5–2 μm wide. Asci wide to narrow clavate, 2-, 4- or 6-spored, 32–49 × 20–31 μm (n = 5); ascospores hyaline, muriform, 4- to 8-transverse and 0- to 3-longitudinal septa, without a gelatinous sheath, old spores with dark septum, 20.5–31 × 9–13 μm (length = 25.9, SD = 2.81, width = 11.4, SD = 2.60, n = 28). Pycnidia not detected.
Chemistry: K+ olive epihymenium and hypothecium, I+ light blue hymenium, and KI−. No substance detected by TLC (Thin Layer Chromatography).
Distribution and ecology: This species occur on the bark of Acer takesimense. It is currently known by a specimen in the type collection (Ulleung Island, South Korea).
Etymology: This species epithet is named for the collection locality, South Korea.
Notes: Arthonia ulleungdoensis can be confused with Arthonia ruana in having black and epruinose apothecia, brown epihymenium, hyaline to light brown hymenium, brown hypothecium, K+ olive green reaction on an apothecial section, and the presence of a trentepohlioid alga [25]. However, the new species is distinguishable from the latter by larger, rounded and non-punctiform apothecia (0.7–2.6 mm vs. up to 1.6 mm), a taller apothecial section (100–130 μm vs. 70–95 μm), taller hymenium (50–60 μm vs. 35–50 μm), 2- to 6-spored asci (vs. 8-spored asci), and larger spores (20.5–31 × 9–13 μm vs. 15–26 × 7–10.5 μm) without changing their colors when mature (vs. brown old spores) [25]. The new species is similar to Arthothelium norvegicum in having a white thallus, black and rounded apothecia without pruina, brownish epihymenium and hypothecium, colorless hymenium, K+ greenish apothecial section reaction, muriform spores, and the presence of a trentepohlioid alga [25]. However, the new species differs from the latter by two to four times larger apothecia (0.7–2.6 mm vs. 0.3–0.6 mm diam.), smaller spores (20.5–31 × 9–13 μm vs. 29–36 × 12–15 μm), and colorless spores when mature (vs. brown old spores) [25]. The new species can be compared with Arthothelium fecundum Zahlbr. in having black, rounded and epruinose apothecia, dark-colored epihymenium and hypothecium, permanently colorless spores, similar ascospore size (20.5–31 × 9–13 μm vs. 25–27 × 9–11 μm), and the presence of a trentepohlioid alga [26]. However, the new species is distinctive from the latter by larger apothecia (0.7–2.6 mm vs. up to 0.7 mm diam.), immersed thallus (vs. superficial thallus), no prothallus (vs. brown-black prothallus), 2- to 6-spored asci (vs. 8-spored asci), and I+ light blue hymenium (vs. I+ reddish hymenium) reaction [26].
Key to the species in Arthonia/Arthothelium with muriform spores from Northeast Asia (10 taxa): This key includes all Arthonia/Arthothelium species with muriform spores in Korea (4), Japan (4) and China (3). However, only one species, Arthothelium japonicum, is excluded from the key because its ascomata represent a perithecioid type [27] and may not be an Arthonia/ Arthothelium species.
1. Photobiont Protococcus ………………………………………………………….Arthothelium collosporum
- Photobiont absent or Trentepohlia ………………………………………………………………………… 2
2. Hypothecium dark-colored ………………………………………………………………………………. 3
- Hypothecium colorless or pale brownish ………………………………………………………………... 5
3. Ascospores over 10 transversely-septate ……………………………………….Arthothelium feduncum
- Ascospores less than 10 transversely-septate …………………………………………………………… 4
4. Ascospores permanently colorless but with dark septum when mature, 20.5–31 × 9–13 μm, 2–6-spored asci ……………………………………………………………………………Arthonia ulleungdoensis
- Ascospores brownish when mature, 15–26 × 7–10 um, 8-spored asci
……………………………………………………………………….Arthonia ruana (Arthothelium dispersum)
5. Ascospores up to 10 transversely-septate ……………………………………..Arthothelium punctatum
- Ascospores less than 10 transversely-septate …………………………………………………………… 6
6. Thallus usually delimited by a brown line ………………………………………Arthothelium spectabile
- Thallus effuse without a delimited line ………………………………………………………………….. 7
7. Ascospores smaller, 16–20 × 7 μm …………………………………………….. Arthothelium pertenerum
- Ascospores larger, over 20 × 10 μm ………………………………………………………………………. 8
8. Ascospores 19–27 × 10–15 μm, photobiont not seen, hypothecium colorless
…………………………………………………………………………………….Arthothelium scandinavicum
- Ascospores 28–36 × 12–14 μm, photobiont Trentepohlia, hypothecium colorless or pale brownish ……………………………………………………………………Arthothelium scandinavicum var. japonicum
Author Contributions
Funding acquisition, J.-S.H.; Writing—original draft, B.G.L.; Writing—review & editing, B.G.L. and J.-S.H.
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR201722202), funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) of Korea, the Korean National Research Resource Center Program (NRF-2017M3A9B8069471) and the Korean Forest Service Program through the Korea National Arboretum (KNA1-1-22, 17-2).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Grube M., Matzer M., Hafellner J. A preliminary account of the lichenicolous Arthonia species with reddish, K+ reactive pigments. Lichenologist. 1995;27:25–42. doi: 10.1006/lich.1995.9999. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Frisch A., Thor G., Ertz D., Grube M. The Arthonialean challenge: restructuring Arthoniaceae. Taxon. 2014;63:727–744. doi: 10.12705/634.20. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sahyadri E-News. [(accessed on 30 September 2018)]; Available online: http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/biodiversity/sahyadri_enews/newsletter/issue16/main_index.htm.
- 4.Sinha G.P., Ram T.A.M. Lichen diversity in Sikkim. In: Arrawatia M.L., Tambe S., editors. Biodiversity of Sikkim: Exploring and Conserving a Global Hotspot. Department of Information and Public Relations, Government of Sikkim; Sikkim, India: 2011. pp. 13–28. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Das P., Joshi S. Homegarden Lichens-A Prospective for Ethnolichenology in Barak Valley, Assam. J. Funct. Environ. Bot. 2014;4:77–86. doi: 10.5958/2231-1750.2014.00004.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Joseph S., Dudani S.N., Nayaka S. First report of lichens from St. Mary’s Islands, the south west coast, India. Stud. Fungal. 2018;3:264–270. doi: 10.5943/sif/3/1/27. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.John V., Seaward M.R., Beatty J.W. A neglected lichen collection from Turkey: Berkhamsted School Expedition 1971. Turk. J. Bot. 2000;24:239–248. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Halici M.G., Candan M. Arthonia anatolica sp. nov. (Arthoniaceae) on Aspicilia contorta subsp. hoffmanniana, a new lichenicolous species from Turkey. Mycotaxon. 2011;116:335–339. doi: 10.5248/116.335. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yavuz M., Çobanoğlu G. Lichen diversity of Gölcük Nature Park (Isparta), including new records for Turkey. Olten. J. Stud. Nat. Sci. 2018;34:57–66. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Joshi S., Kondratyuk S.Y., Crişan F., Jayalal U., Oh S.O., Hur J.S. New additions to lichen mycota of the Republic of Korea. Mycobiology. 2013;41:177–182. doi: 10.5941/MYCO.2013.41.4.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kondratyuk S.Y., Lőkös L., Farkas E., Oh S.O., Hur J.S. New and noteworthy lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi 2. Acta Bot. Hung. 2015;57:108–142. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee B.G., Hur J.S. Three new species and nine new records in the genus Arthonia from South Korea. Mycobiology. 2016;44:202–216. doi: 10.5941/MYCO.2016.44.4.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Frisch A., Thor G., Moon K.H., Ohmura Y. Arthonia incarnata (Arthoniaceae), a rare and poorly known old-growth forest lichen new to Asia. Nord. J. Bot. 2017;35:587–594. doi: 10.1111/njb.01560. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Frisch A., Grube M., Kashiwadani H., Ohmura Y. Arthoniaceae with reddish, K+ purple ascomata in Japan. Phytotaxa. 2018;356:19–33. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.356.1.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang W.C., Wei J.C. Arthonia, Byssoloma, Calenia, Chroodiscus, Coenogonium, Eremothecella, and Semigyalecta spp. new to China. Mycotaxon. 2018;133:487–497. doi: 10.5248/133.487. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Orange A., James P.W., White F.J. Microchemical Methods for the Identification of Lichens. British Lichen Society; London, UK: 2001. pp. 1–101. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zoller S., Scheidegger C., Sperisen C. PCR primers for the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA of lichen-forming ascomycetes. Lichenologist. 1999;31:511–516. doi: 10.1006/lich.1999.0220. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu Y.J., Whelen S., Hall B.D. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999;16:1799–1808. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ekman S. Molecular phylogeny of the Bacidiaceae (Lecanorales, lichenized Ascomycota) Mycol. Res. 2001;105:783–797. doi: 10.1017/S0953756201004269. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Silvestro D., Michalak I. RAxML GUI: A graphical front-end for RAxML. Org. Divers. Evol. 2012;12:335–337. doi: 10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Drummond A.J., Suchard M.A., Xie D., Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012;29:1969–1973. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Drummond A.J., Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008;7:214. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fig Tree, Molecular Evolution, Phylogenetics and Epidemiology. [(accessed on 4 June 2018)]; Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree.
- 24.Sundin R. Ph.D. Thesis. Stockholm University; Stockholm, Sweden: 1999. Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Studies within Arthonia Ach. (Ascomycetes, Arthoniales) [Google Scholar]
- 25.Coppins B.J. Arthothelium A. Massal. (1852) In: Smith C.W., Aptroot A., Coppins B.J., Fletcher A., Gilbert O.L., James P.W., Wolseley P.A., editors. The Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland. The British Lichen Society; London, UK: 2009. pp. 176–179. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zahlbruckner A. Lichenes (Übersicht über sämtliche bisher aus China bekannten Flechten) In: Handel-Mazetti H., editor. Symbolae Sinicae. Botanische Ergebnisse der Expedition der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien Nach Südwest-China 1914-1918. Springer; Wien, Germany: 1930. pp. 1–254. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wainio E.A. The Botanical Magazine Vol. XXXV. The Tokyo Botanical Society; Tokyo, Japan: 1921. Lichenes ab A. Yasuda in Japonia Collecti; pp. 63–79. [Google Scholar]



