Abstract
Simple Summary
Litter size is one of the most important reproductive traits in sheep. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), g.70067210 T > C in SLC5A1, g.25350431 C > T and g.25360220 T > C in CCNA1, and g.14413132 C > T in ABCC1, were identified by mass spectrometry and may be associated with litter size in sheep. Four SNPs were genotyped in Small-Tail Han, Hu, Cele Black, Suffolk, Sunite, Prairie Tibetan, and Tan sheep, and the expression patterns of SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 were determined in Small-Tail Han sheep with different fecundities. Furthermore, we also studied the FecB mutation’s association with litter size in Small-Tail Han sheep. The results indicated that all genes included in this study were differentially expressed in the ovary and uterus of polytocous and monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep. Furthermore, association analysis indicated that both g.70067210 T > C in SLC5A1 and the FecB mutation in BMPR-IB were significantly associated with litter size in Small-Tail Han sheep. Linear regression analysis of the association of multiple markers (FecB and g.70067210 T > C in SCL5A1) with litter size indicated that homozygous ewes carrying the BB/TT genotype had a larger litter size than any other genotype.
Abstract
SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 have been extensively studied as candidate genes because of their great influence on the reproductive traits of animals. However, little is known about the association between polymorphisms of the SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 genes and litter size in Small-Tail Han sheep. In this study, the expression levels of SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 in HPG (hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal) axis tissues of polytocous and monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep were analyzed by qPCR. To better understand the effects of four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) comprising of g.70067210 T > C in SLC5A1, g.25350431 C > T and g.25360220 T > C in CCNA1, and g.14413132 C > T in ABCC1, a population genetic analysis was conducted using data obtained from genotyping in 728 sheep from seven breeds. The results indicated that all genes included in this study were differentially expressed in the pituitary and uterus of polytocous and monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep (p < 0.05). The associations of these four SNPs and the FecB mutation with litter size in 384 Small-Tail Han sheep were analyzed, therefore, and it was found that both g.70067210T > C and the FecB mutation were significantly associated with litter size (p < 0.05). The linear regression analysis of the association of multiple markers (FecB and g.70067210 T > C in SCL5A1) with litter size indicated that homozygous ewes carrying the BB/TT genotype had larger litter size than any ewes with any other genotype. In conclusion, the SLC5A1 SNPs significantly affect litter size in sheep and are useful as genetic marker for litter size.
Keywords: SLC5A1, CCNA1, ABCC1, expression, sheep
1. Introduction
Sheep breeding, as an integral part of the Chinese animal industry, has economic benefits, which are affected by fertility and reproductive efficiency [1]. Although numerous different sheep breeds have been found, most breeds are monotocous, and only a few breeds have two or more lambs [2]. Therefore, improving reproductive efficiency is the focus of sheep breeding studies. Litter size is associated with low heritability and is one of the most important reproductive traits in sheep, controlled by genetics and the environment [3,4]. To date, the FecB mutation (c.746 A > G) in BMPR-IB (bone morphogenetic protein receptor IB) was identified as the major gene controlling prolificacy in sheep [5,6,7]. In addition, many genes associated with prolificacy were identified, including BMP15 (bone morphogenetic protein 15) [8,9,10] and GDF9 (growth differentiation factor 9) [11,12,13].
Solute carrier family 5 member 1 (SLC5A1), also known as SGLT1, is a member of the sodium-dependent glucose transporter (SGLT) family, allowing the transfer of glucose and galactose to intracellular sodium [14]. Glucose is the primary source of energy for metabolism and development in fetal and placental tissue [15]. Since the fetus is critically dependent on the net transfer of glucose across the placenta [16], during the final third of pregnancy in mammals, the fetal demand for glucose necessitates the presence of a rapid, high-volume system for maternal–fetal glucose transfer. This is regulated by the membrane-spanning glycoproteins family glucose transporter (SLC2) and the sodium-dependent glucose transporter family [17,18]. During pig pregnancy, large amounts of glucose and arginine are transported across the porcine placental membrane, a process that relies on SLC5A1 to move glucose against its concentration gradient [19,20,21]. Studies have found that the porcine conceptuses begin to elongate and secrete E2, which increases the number of SLC5A1 transporters in the uterine luminal epithelium, thereby increasing the transport of glucose into the uterine lumen, and improving the growth and development of the porcine conceptus [22]. SLC5A1 has the same function in sheep. For example, in ewes, Arg and Gluc are significantly increased in the uterine lumen between days 10 and 15 of pregnancy, due to an increased expression of SLC5A1 in uterine epithelia [23]. Pisani et al. found that SLC5A1 plays an important role in the maturation of ovine oocytes [24]. Results of all these previous studies indicate that the SLC5A1 gene has important functions in female reproduction. Whether the mutations of the SLC5A1 gene affect sheep prolificacy, similar to what occurs as a result of mutations in the BMPRIB gene, remains to be elucidated.
Cyclin A1 (CCNA1) is an important cell-cycle regulator and a marker of late spermatocytes [25,26]. In animals, there are two types of cyclin A, CCNA1 and CCNA2, both of which are expressed in male germ cells, suggesting that they play an important role in animal reproduction [27,28]. The disruption of mouse Ccna1 results in male infertility and complete spermatogenic arrest prior to the first meiotic division [29]. Similar to mouse CCNA1, human CCNA1 is localized in late meiotic spermatocytes [30]. CCNA1 plays an important regulatory role in the M phase of the oocyte meiotic cell cycle [31]. ABCC1 (ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 1) is a member of the ABC (ATP-binding cassette) superfamily, whose role as the primary transporter of many organic anions has been largely characterized [32]. Early studies have shown that ABCC1 is directly involved in protecting fetal development from the deleterious consequences of xenobiotics [33,34]. Results of all these previous studies indicate that the CCNA1 and ABCC1 genes have important functions in female reproduction. However, few studies have investigated the effect of the CCNA1 and ABCC1 genes on litter size in sheep.
In the present study, the mRNA expression levels of SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 in HPG (hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal) axis tissues of Small-Tail Han sheep were measured by qPCR. Then, based on previous data from the whole-genome sequencing (WGS) previously performed, four SNPs of the SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 genes were detected in 99 experimental sheep [35,36]. We explored the frequency of the four SNPs in seven sheep breeds and studied their association with litter size in Small-Tail Han sheep. Furthermore, we also studied the FecB mutation’s association with litter size in Small-Tail Han sheep. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a novel gene involved in reproduction on the litter size of Small-Tail Han sheep and the effect of gene–gene combinations on litter size.
2. Materials and Methods
All the experimental procedures mentioned in the present study were approved by the Science Research Department (in charge of animal welfare issues) of the Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (IAS-CAAS) (Beijing, China). Ethical approval on animal survival was given by the animal ethics committee of IAS-CAAS (No. IASCAAS-AE-03, 12 December 2016).
2.1. Animals
Based on a TaqMan assay using FecB mutant probes and three lambing records, three BB ewes (polytocous sheep, n = 3, average litter size ≥ 2) and three ++ ewes (monotocous sheep, n = 3, average litter size = 1) were selected from nucleus flocks of Small-Tail Han sheep in the southwest region of Shandong Province, China. The six selected sheep were healthy, each aged three years old, similar in weight, and fed in an indoor setting under similar conditions of room temperature, illumination, feeding system, and nutrition level. The six female sheep were slaughtered in autumn, when they accepted the teasing behavior for the advent of oestrum. The six female sheep were slaughtered; tissues from the HPG axis (hypothalamus, pituitary, ovary and uterus) were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, then stored at −80 °C for RNA extraction.
Blood samples from 728 sheep of seven breeds were collected into EDTA-coated tubes and stored at −20 °C for DNA isolation. The seven sheep breeds in this study included Small-Tail Han (n = 384), Hu (n = 86), Cele Black (n = 71), Suffolk (n = 63), Sunite (n = 18), Prairie Tibetan (n = 82), and Tan sheep (n = 24).
2.2. Detection of SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 Expression by Real-Time PCR
RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and was treated with DNase using a TURBO DNA-free Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). The cDNA was generated by a PrimeScriptTM RT reagent kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China).
SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 primers (exon-span) for real-time PCR were designed according to NM_001009404.1, XM_027973608.1, and XM_027961611.1, using Primer-BLAST (NCBI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Real-time PCR was performed at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 60 s for 45 cycles, and 72 °C for 30 s. qPCR was performed on the LightCycler 480II (Roche, Basel, Sweden) using the SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix (TOYOBOCO, Ltd., Osaka, Japan). β-Actin was used as an internal reference to normalize target gene expression. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Table 1 lists the primers that were used for real-time PCR.
Table 1.
Primer Name | Primer Sequence | Product Size | Usage |
---|---|---|---|
SLC5A1-F1 | ACGTTGGATGTTTCAGGCTTAACCCGAGTG | 98 | PCR for g.70067210 T > C |
SLC5A1-R1 | ACGTTGGATGGGTAAAGCATATTCCCCCAG | ||
SLC5A1-E | TCCCCCAGAACCATTGCCTTG | Extension reaction | |
CCNA1-F1 | ACGTTGGATGGCTTCTCTAAGGTACTGATG | 112 | PCR for g.25360220 T > C |
CCNA1-R1 | ACGTTGGATGCACTCCCAGTCTGAAGATGC | ||
CCNA1-E1 | ACTGATGAATTTCTTCAGCATA | Extension reaction | |
CCNA1-F2 | ACGTTGGATGCTAGTTTGACACATCATCTC | 104 | PCR for g.25350431 C > T |
CCNA1-R2 | ACGTTGGATGACAATTCAGTGTGGCGGTTC | ||
CCNA1-E2 | TTTGACACATCATCTCAGTGTTA | Extension reaction | |
ABCC1-F1 | ACGTTGGATGCTAATGTGGCCGTGTCTCTG | 125 | PCR for g.14413132 C > T |
ABCC1-R1 | ACGTTGGATGTGCCGCCACTCATGACTATG | ||
ABCC1-E | CACGCATGGCATCAG | Extension reaction | |
BMPR-IB-F | GTCGCTATGGGGAAGTTTGGATG | 140 | TaqMan for A746G |
BMPR-IB-R | CAAGATGTTTTCATGCCTCATCAACACGGTC | ||
SLC5A1-F2 | TCAGCACAAAGTGGACAGCTC | 192 | qPCR |
SLC5A1-R2 | CCCGGTTCCATAGGCAAACTCG | ||
CCNA1-F3 | ACAGTTTCCCCTATGCTGGT | 164 | qPCR |
CCNA1-R3 | TTCCTCATGTAGTGTGCCTT | ||
ABCC1-F2 | ATGACGCATCTCAACAAAGCC | 101 | qPCR |
ABCC1-R2 | TTGCCCATACTTCTTTCCCAG | ||
β-Actin-F | CCAACCGTGAGAAGATGACC | 97 | qPCR |
β-Actin-R | CCCGAGGCGTACAGGGACAG |
2.3. Genotyping
The g.70067210 T > C locus in the SLC5A1 gene, g.25350431 C > T and g.25360220 T > C loci in the CCNA1 gene, and the g.14413132 C > T locus in the ABCC1 gene were selected for genotyping in 728 samples from Small-Tail Han, Hu, Cele Black, Suffolk, Sunite, Prairie Tibetan, and Tan sheep. The A > G locus in the BMPR-IB gene was selected for genotyping in 384 Small-Tail Han sheep. The single base extended primers used for detecting SNPs and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) programs were designed using MassARRAY Assay Design v.3.1, according to sheep SLC5A1, CCNA1, ABCC1, and BMPR-IB sequences available in the NCBI GenBank (Table 1). All sheep genomic DNA was subsequently genotyped using MassARRAY [37]. Genotyping was performed using PCR and primer extension and mass spectrometric analyses (iPlex assay, Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA) on a Sequenom MassArray, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (http://www.sequenom.com). Polymerase chain reactions were carried out in 5 µL, containing 1.0 µL 20–50 ng/µL genomic DNA, 0.5 µL 10 × PCR buffer, 0.4 µL 25 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.1 µL 25 µmol/L dNTP, 1.0 µL PCR Primer mix, 0.2 µL Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and ddH2O. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 60 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Primer extension reactions were carried out in 2 µL containing 0.2 µL iplex Buffer, 0.2 µL Terminator mix, 0.94 µL Extend primer mix, 0.04 µL iplex Enzyme, and ddH2O. Extension conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 5 s, annealing at 52 °C for 5 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 3 min. Only those samples with a >95% success rate and only those SNPs with a genotype success rate of >95% were included in the analysis.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Allele frequencies, genotype frequencies, p values, polymorphism information content (PIC), heterozygosity (HE), and number of effective alleles (NE) were calculated using the data obtained from genotyping results. Sheep populations with p > 0.05 (chi-square test) were considered to conform to the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium [38]. Tag mutations were selected using the general linear model (GLM) program of SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) to analyze the association between single markers and litter size, defined as follows:
yijn = μ + Pi + Gj + IPG + eijn. |
In this model, yijn represents phenotypic value (litter size); μ is the population mean; Pi shows the fixed effect of the ith parity (i = 1, 2, or 3); Gj represents the effect of the jth genotypes (j = 1, 2, or 3); IPG represents the interactive effect of parity and genotype; and eijn represents random error. All statistically significant single marker-traits associated with average litter size were initially included in further multiple-marker analysis of the combined effects of different genes on average litter size. The QTMs (quantitative trait modes) model is LSAa ≈ (LSAA + LSaa)/2, where LSAa is the least square means of heterozygous individuals, LSAA is the least square means of homozygous individuals with higher litter size performance, and LSaa is the least square means of homozygous individuals with lower litter size performance [39]. A linear regression analysis of QTM was performed using SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
3. Results
3.1. Expression of SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 in the HPG Axis of Small-Tail Han Sheep with Different Litter Sizes
The expression levels of SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 in the HPG axis tissues of polytocous and monotocous Small Tailed Han sheep were measured by qPCR. As shown in Figure 1, SLC5A1 was expressed in four tissues of polytocous and monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep, with the highest level in the pituitary, the lowest level in the ovary, with no significant difference between the hypothalamus and uterus. The expression of SLC5A1 in the hypothalamus and pituitary of polytocous Small-Tail Han sheep was higher than that in monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep, but in the uterus, expression was lower in polytocous Small-Tail Han sheep compared with that in monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep. However, except for the pituitary and uterus (p < 0.05), the expression of SLC5A1 was not significantly different between the polytocous and monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep (p > 0.05).
CCNA1 was expressed in four tissues of Small-Tail Han sheep, with the highest level in the uterus (p <0.01), followed by the ovary (p < 0.01), with no significant difference among the hypothalamus and pituitary, and uterus and ovary. The expression of CCNA1 in the HPG tissues of polytocous Small-Tail Han sheep was higher than that in monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep. Except for the hypothalamus, the expression of the CNNA1 gene was significantly different in the pituitary (p < 0.01), ovary (p < 0.05) and uterus (p < 0.01) of polytocous and monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep. The ABCC1 was expressed in four tissues of Small-Tail Han sheep, and there were no significant differences among the tissues. The expression of ABCC1 in the hypothalamus, pituitary and ovary of polytocous Small-Tail Han sheep was significantly lower than that in monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep, but in the uterus, expression was significantly higher in polytocous Small-Tail Han sheep compared with that in monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep (p < 0.05).
3.2. Population Genetic Analysis of Polymorphism in the SLC5A1, CCNA1 and ABCC1 Genes
Population genetic analyses of the g.70067210 T > C locus of the SLC5A1 gene in seven sheep breeds were performed. The results are shown in Table 2. The results show that the T allele was more frequent than the C allele, with the TT genotype predominating in all populations. The g.70067210 T > C locus was moderately polymorphic (0.25 < PIC < 0.5) in Small-Tail Han, Suffolk, Hu, and Cele black sheep, with a low rate of polymorphism (PIC < 0.25) in Tan, Sunite, and Prairie Tibetan sheep. The chi-square test indicated that the Tan, Sunite, and Prairie Tibetan sheep were under Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p > 0.05), while the Small-Tail Han, Hu, Suffolk, and Cele black sheep were not.
Table 2.
Gene Name | Locus | Breed | Genotype Frequency | Allele Frequency | PIC | HE | NE | Chi-Square Test (p-Value) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC5A1 | g.70067210T > C | TT | TC | CC | T | C | |||||
Small-Tail Han sheep | 0.72(275) | 0.20(75) | 0.08(34) | 0.81 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 1.43 | 0.00 | ||
Tan sheep | 0.71(17) | 0.29(7) | 0.00(0) | 0.85 | 0.15 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 1.33 | 0.70 | ||
Sunite sheep | 0.78 (14) | 0.22(4) | 0.00(0) | 0.89 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 1.25 | 0.87 | ||
Suffolk sheep | 0.73(46) | 0.16(10) | 0.11(7) | 0.81 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 1.45 | 0.00 | ||
Hu sheep | 0.72(62) | 0.21(18) | 0.07(6) | 0.83 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 1.40 | 0.04 | ||
Cele black sheep | 0.64(46) | 0.23(16) | 0.13(9) | 0.76 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 1.57 | 0.00 | ||
Prairie Tibetan sheep | 0.70(58) | 0.26(21) | 0.04(3) | 0.84 | 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 1.38 | 0.82 | ||
CCNA1 | g.25350431 C > T | CC | CT | TT | C | T | |||||
Small-Tail Han sheep | 0.02(7) | 0.24(91) | 0.74(277) | 0.14 | 0.86 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 1.32 | 0.99 | ||
Tan sheep | 0.05(1) | 0.19(4) | 0.76(16) | 0.14 | 0.86 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 1.32 | 0.60 | ||
Sunite sheep | 0.14(3) | 0.24(5) | 0.62(13) | 0.26 | 0.74 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 1.63 | 0.21 | ||
Suffolk sheep | 0.00(0) | 0.13(8) | 0.87(52) | 0.07 | 0.93 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 1.14 | 0.86 | ||
Hu sheep | 0.04(3) | 0.18 (15) | 0.78(62) | 0.13 | 0.87 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 1.30 | 0.28 | ||
Cele black sheep | 0.03(2) | 0.22(14) | 0.75(48) | 0.14 | 0.86 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 1.32 | 0.75 | ||
Prairie Tibetan sheep | 0.05(4) | 0.34 (27) | 0.61(48) | 0.22 | 0.78 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 1.53 | 0.99 | ||
g.25360220 T > C | TT | CT | CC | T | C | ||||||
Small-Tail Han sheep | 0.06(23) | 0.34(129) | 0.60(232) | 0.23 | 0.77 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 1.54 | 0.67 | ||
Tan sheep | 0.08(2) | 0.40(10) | 0.52(12) | 0.29 | 0.71 | 0.32 | 0.41 | 1.70 | 0.99 | ||
Sunite sheep | 0.05(0) | 0.53(10) | 0.42(8) | 0.28 | 0.72 | 0.32 | 0.40 | 1.67 | 0.26 | ||
Suffolk sheep | 0.14(9) | 0.30(19) | 0.56(35) | 0.29 | 0.71 | 0.33 | 0.41 | 1.71 | 0.10 | ||
Hu sheep | 0.08(7) | 0.33(28) | 0.59(51) | 0.24 | 0.76 | 0.30 | 0.37 | 1.59 | 0.55 | ||
Cele black sheep | 0.03(2) | 0.38(27) | 0.59(41) | 0.22 | 0.78 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 1.53 | 0.61 | ||
Prairie Tibetan sheep | 0.01(1) | 0.25(20) | 0.74(61) | 0.13 | 0.87 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 1.30 | 0.90 | ||
ABCC1 | g.14413132 C > T | CC | CT | TT | C | T | |||||
Small-Tail Han sheep | 0.71(270) | 0.24(94) | 0.05(20) | 0.83 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 1.40 | 0.01 | ||
Tan sheep | 0.96(23) | 0.04(1) | 0.00(0) | 0.98 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 1.04 | 0.99 | ||
Sunite sheep | 0.56(10) | 0.44(8) | 0.00(0) | 0.78 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 1.53 | 0.48 | ||
Suffolk sheep | 0.76(48) | 0.19(12) | 0.05(3) | 0.86 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 1.32 | 0.21 | ||
Hu sheep | 0.56(48) | 0.34(29) | 0.10(9) | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.40 | 1.66 | 0.38 | ||
Cele black sheep | 0.58(41) | 0.35(25) | 0.07(5) | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.37 | 1.59 | 0.91 | ||
Prairie Tibetan sheep | 0.76(62) | 0.20(17) | 0.04(3) | 0.86 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 1.31 | 0.43 |
Note: PIC, HE and NE represent polymorphic information content, heterozygosity and effective number of alleles, respectively; numbers in the parentheses represent the number of detected sheep of each genotype; p > 0.05 indicates the locus was under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Population genetic analyses of the g.25350431 C > T and g.25360220 T > C loci of the CCNA1 gene in seven sheep breeds were performed (Table 2). The results show that the g.25350431 C > T locus T allele was more frequent than the C allele, with the TT genotype predominating in all populations. The g.25350431 C > T locus was moderately polymorphic (0.25 < PIC < 0.5) in Sunite and Prairie Tibetan sheep, with a low rate of polymorphism (PIC < 0.25) in other sheep breeds. The results show that the g.25360220 T > C locus C allele was more frequent than the T allele, with the CC genotype predominating in all populations. In addition to Prairie Tibetan sheep, the g.25360220 T > C locus was moderately polymorphic (0.25 < PIC < 0.5) in other sheep breeds. The chi-square test for the g.25350431 C > T and g.25360220 T > C loci indicated that all sheep breeds were under the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p > 0.05).
Population genetic analyses of the g.14413132 C > T locus of the ABCC1 gene in seven sheep breeds were performed (Table 2). The results showed that the g.14413132 C > T locus C allele was more frequent than the T allele, with the CC genotype predominating in all populations. The g.25350431 C > T locus was moderately polymorphic (0.25 < PIC < 0.5) in Small-Tail Han, Hu, Sunite, and Cele black sheep, with a low rate of polymorphism (PIC < 0.25) in the Tan, Suffolk, and Prairie Tibetan breeds. The chi-square test indicated that all sheep breeds except Small-Tail Han sheep were under the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p > 0.05).
3.3. Association Analysis of SNPs with Litter Size in Small-Tail Han Sheep
To better understand the association of the g.70067210 T > C locus in the SLC5A1 gene, the g.25350431 C > T and g.25360220 T > C loci in the CCNA1 gene, the g.14413132 C > T locus in the ABCC1 gene, and the FecB mutation with litter size, an association analysis was performed for the SNPs in terms of litter size in 384 Small-Tail Han sheep. The least squares means and standard errors for litter size are shown in Table 3. In the g.70067210 T > C site, the mean litter sizes of the first, second, and third parities for TT and TC were significantly higher those of the CC genotype (p < 0.05). However, a comparison of litter size between TT and TC showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). Furthermore, a comparison of average litter sizes among TT, TC, and CC showed a significant difference (p < 0.05). The g.25350431 C > T, g.25360220 T > C and g.14413132 C > T sites were not significantly associated with any of the three parities of litter size (p > 0.05). The FecB mutation was significantly associated with litter size at all three parities, and sheep with the BB variant had the largest litters (p < 0.05).
Table 3.
Gene Name | Locus | Genotype | Litter Size (Means ± S.E.) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Parity (N) | Second Parity (N) | Third Parity (N) | Average (N) | |||
SLC5A1 | g.70067210 T > C | TT | 1.93 ± 0.04 a (275) | 2.19 ± 0.05 a (165) | 2.59 ± 0.11 a (64) | 2.29 ± 0.07 a (275) |
TC | 1.92 ± 0.08 a (75) | 2.16 ± 0.12 a (44) | 2.52 ± 0.21 a (18) | 1.96 ± 0.10 b (75) | ||
CC | 1.26 ± 0.12 b (34) | 1.50 ± 0.17 b (21) | 1.70 ± 0.28 b (10) | 1.34 ± 0.11 c (34) | ||
CCNA1 | g.25360220 C > T | TT | 1.89 ± 0.05 (23) | 2.27 ± 0.08 (9) | 2.00 ± 0.05 (4) | 1.96 ± 0.13 (23) |
CT | 1.77 ± 0.07 (129) | 1.93 ± 0.04 (89) | 2.28 ± 0.24 (25) | 1.87 ± 0.14 (129) | ||
CC | 1.90 ± 0.07 (232) | 2.17 ± 0.14 (160) | 2.56 ± 0.19 (59) | 1.98 ± 0.25 (232) | ||
g.25350431 C > T | TT | 2.00 ± 0.06 (7) | 2.25 ± 0.12 (5) | 2.50 ± 0.16 (3) | 2.17 ± 0.07 (7) | |
CT | 1.83 ± 0.06 (91) | 2.06 ± 0.09 (50) | 2.46 ± 0.18 (24) | 1.93 ± 0.27 (91) | ||
CC | 1.88 ± 0.08 (277) | 2.12 ± 0.15 (169) | 2.46 ± 0.26 (63) | 1.96 ± 0.16 (277) | ||
ABCC1 | g.14413132C > T | TT | 1.95 ± 0.12 (20) | 2.20 ± 0.29 (10) | 2.33 ± 0.08 (3) | 2.01 ± 0.19 (20) |
CT | 1.88 ± 0.14 (94) | 2.17 ± 0.16 (53) | 2.52 ± 0.20 (22) | 1.99 ± 0.13 (94) | ||
CC | 1.86 ± 0.08 (270) | 2.09 ± 0.16 (166) | 2.40 ± 0.15 (67) | 1.94 ± 0.25 (270) | ||
BMPR-IB | c.746 A > G | BB | 2.20 ± 0.05 a (147) | 2.53 ± 0.07 a (86) | 2.82 ± 0.12 a (39) | 2.33 ± 0.04 a (147) |
B+ | 1.88 ± 0.04 b (177) | 2.07 ± 0.06 b (110) | 2.35 ± 0.11 b (43) | 1.95 ± 0.04 b (177) | ||
++ | 1.03 ± 0.07 c (60) | 1.15 ± 0.11 c (33) | 1.33 ± 0.24 c (9) | 1.08 ± 0.06 c (60) |
Note: Numbers in the parentheses next to litter size represent the number of sheep of each genotype; Different lower-case letters in the same group indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
3.4. Regression Analysis of SLC5A1 and BMPR-IB Associated with Average Litter Size in Small-Tail Han Sheep
The linear regression analysis of SNPs and their QTMs associated with each single trait confirmed the SLC5A1 and BMPR-IB gene associations with litter size and revealed the SLC5A1/BMPR-IB gene network (Figure 2). SLC5A1/BMPR-IB was identified as an additive–additive combination in terms of the role of gene combinations in the two-gene network. This linear regression analysis also revealed a high correlation between predicted and actual performance values for the combined genotypes (0.923, p < 0.05). Among the nine genotypes of the SLC5A1/BMPR-IB network, the TT/BB and CC/++ genotypes were associated with the maximum and minimum average litter sizes, respectively.
4. Discussion
The tissue expression pattern of SLC5A1 has been examined in many animals, with high expression levels in the small intestine [40], ovary [41], and uterus [22]. Human CCNA1 is expressed most highly in the testis and, at lower levels, in the adult brain and in hematopoietic cells [42]. In mammalians, CCNA1 appears to be stage-specific and highly expressed in germ cells [31,43]. ABCC1 is widely expressed in various tissues and plays an important role in uteroplacental transport signaling [44,45]. In addition, it was reported that the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis (HPG) is the most important system for controlling mammalian reproduction [46]. In this study, SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 were expressed in four tissues of Small-Tail Han sheep. It was found that the expression levels of SLC5A1 in the hypothalamus and pituitary of polytocous Small-Tail Han sheep were higher than that in monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep, indicating that the expression of SLC5A1 can regulate the function of the hypothalamus and pituitary, which are especially important for mammalian reproduction. The expression level of CCNA1 in the HPG of polytocous Small-Tail Han sheep was higher than that in monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep, indicating that the expression of CCNA1 can positively regulate the function of the hypothalamus, pituitary, uterus, and ovary, thus affecting mammalian reproduction. The expression level of ABCC1 in the uterus of polytocous Small-Tail Han sheep was higher than that in monotocous Small-Tail Han sheep, indicating that ABCC1 may be associated with the prolificacy of Small-Tail Han sheep. These results preliminarily confirmed that SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 were closely associated with litter size in Small-Tail Han sheep.
In previous studies, BMPR-IB (the FecB mutation) was identified as the major gene affecting prolificacy in sheep [5,9]. According to previous reports, the FecB mutation was shown to be significantly associated with litter size in Small-Tail Han sheep [47,48,49], which is similar to the results of this study. Although it is reported that Small-Tail Han sheep carry a major mutation (FecB) for litter size [47,50], the existence of other major mutations related to litter size in this breed remains to be determined. However, the identification of other major or candidate genes associated with litter size is also important for further improving this characteristic in Small-Tail Han sheep. The SLC5A1 gene plays an important role in animal reproduction [51,52]. At present, only in humans has it been found that the SLC5A1 gene mutation can cause glucose and galactose malabsorption [53,54]. Steinhauser et al. reported SLC5A1 as an excellent candidate gene for placental transport of glucose during pregnancy to support the growth and development of the porcine conceptus [51]. Dorniak et al. also reported that SLC5A1 regulates sheep endometrial function, which is important for conceptual growth and development during gestational implantation [52]. CCNA1 is an important cell cycle regulator that plays an important regulatory role in germ cell meiosis, indicating that it plays an important role in animal reproduction [29,30,31,55]. ABCC1 is associated with the transport of several compounds or ions across biomembranes and is crucial for successful fertilization [56]. However, few studies have investigated the effect of the SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 genes on litter size in sheep.
In the present study, four SNPs from the candidate genes SLC5A1, CCNA1, and ABCC1 were selected for an analysis of the effects of single and multiple-marker combinations on litter size in Small-Tail Han sheep. The present study indicates that g.70067210 T > C, g.25360220 T > C, and g.25350431 C > T have a strong potential for selection in Small-Tail Han, Suffolk, Hu, and Cele black sheep, and that g.25350431 C > T has a strong potential for selection in Sunite and Prairie Tibetan sheep. Therefore, we conclude that the selection intensity of loci in different sheep breeds is different. Association analysis showed that g.25350431 C > T, g.25360220 T > C, and g.14413132 C > T mutations had no effect on the litter size of Small-Tail Han sheep, while the g.70067210 T > C mutation had a great effect on litter size in Small-Tail Han sheep. This suggests that the g.70067210 T > C mutation has potential functional significance in Small-Tail Han sheep reproduction, although its underlying mechanism remains to be elucidated.
Several studies using GLM for analysis have demonstrated the effect of multiple marker combinations on litter size in sheep, such as BMPRIB/BMP-15 [5,48]. In this study, the significant markers along with their QTMs were integrated into a linear regression model to explore the effect of combined genotypes on litter size. This analysis revealed a high correlation between the predicted and actual values of litter size, suggesting that the linear regression model can also be used to assess the association between litter size and non-quantitative traits in sheep. In addition, linear regression analysis showed that sheep with the BB/TT genotype had larger litter sizes compared to sheep with only one predominant genotype. This indicates that litter size in Small-Tail Han sheep is influenced by multiple markers. Furthermore, our results suggest that homozygous individuals with the BB/TT genotype should remain in the MAS (marker-assisted selection) breeding program to increase the frequency of favorable alleles in the Small-Tail Han sheep population.
5. Conclusions
In this study, we found that the expression levels of SLC5A, CCNA1, and ABCC1 may have a significant effect on litter size in Small-Tail Han sheep, and this preliminary result needs to be validated in further studies employing a large sample size. However, the g.70067210 T > C mutations had a significant effect on litter size for Small-Tail Han sheep, while the g.25350431 C > T, g.25360220 T > C, and g.14413132 C > T mutations did not. A linear regression analysis of the association of multiple markers with litter size indicated that homozygous ewes carrying the BB/TT genotype had a larger litter size than any other genotype; therefore, this genotype has important value for developing breeding programs to improve litter size in Small-Tail Han sheep.
Author Contributions
These studies were designed by Y.L., Q.L., L.Z. and M.C. Y.L. and M.C. performed all the experimental analyses and prepared all the figures and tables. Y.L. and Q.L. analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. L.Z. and M.C. contributed to revisions of the manuscript. Y.L., L.Z. and M.C. assisted in explaining the results and revised the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772580 and 31472078), the Fund Project of Gansu Agricultural University (GSAU-ZL-2015-027), the Genetically Modified Organisms Breeding Major Program of China (2016ZX08009-003-006 and 2016ZX08010-005-003), the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-38), the Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (2018-YWF-YB-1, Y2017JC24, 2017ywf-zd-13), the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of China (ASTIP-IAS13, CAAS-XTCX2016010-01-03, CAAS-XTCX2016010-03-03, CAAS-XTCX2016011-02-02), the China Agricultural Scientific Research Outstanding Talents and Their Innovative Teams Program, the China High-level Talents Special Support Plan Scientific and Technological Innovation Leading Talents Program (W02020274), and the Tianjin Agricultural Science and Technology Achievements Transformation and Popularization Program (201704020). The APC was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772580).
Conflicts of Interest
All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Chen H.Y., Shen H., Jia B., Zhang Y.S., Wang X.H., Zeng X.C. Differential gene expression in ovaries of Qira black sheep and Hetian sheep using RNA-Seq technique. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0120170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Miao X.Y., Luo Q.M., Zhao H.J., Qin X.Y. Co-expression analysis and identification of fecundity-related long non-coding RNAs in sheep ovaries. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:39398. doi: 10.1038/srep39398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bravo S., Larama G., Paz E., Inostroza K., Montaldo H.H., Sepulveda N. Polymorphism of the GDF9 gene associated with litter size in Araucana creole sheep. Anim. Genet. 2016;47:390–391. doi: 10.1111/age.12404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Davis G.H. Major genes affecting ovulation rate in sheep. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2005;37:S11–S23. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-37-S1-S11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chu M.X., Liu Z.H., Jiao C.L., He Y.Q., Fang L., Ye S.C., Chen G.H., Wang J.Y. Mutations in BMPR-IB and BMP-15 genes are associated with litter size in Small Tailed Han sheep (Ovis aries) J. Anim. Sci. 2007;85:598–603. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mulsant P., Lecerf F., Fabre S., Schibler L., Monget P., Lanneluc I., Pisselet C., Riquet J., Monniaux D., Callebaut I., et al. Mutation in bone morphogenetic protein Receptor-IB is associated with increased ovulation rate in Booroola Merino ewes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:5104–5109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091577598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Souza C.J.H., MacDougall C., Campbell B.K., McNeilly A.S., Baird D.T. The Booroola (FecB) phenotype is associated with a mutation in the bone morphogenetic receptor type 1B (BMPR1B) gene. J. Endocrinol. 2001;169:R1–R6. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.169r001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bodin L., Di Pasquale E., Fabre S., Bontoux M., Monget P., Persani L., Mulsant P. A novel mutation in the bone morphogenetic protein 15 gene causing defective protein secretion is associated with both increased ovulation rate and sterility in Lacaune sheep. Endocrinology. 2007;148:393–400. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Galloway S.M., McNatty K.P., Cambridge L.M., Laitinen M.P.E., Juengel J.L., Jokiranta T.S., McLaren R.J., Luiro K., Dodds K.G., Montgomery G.W., et al. Mutations in an oocyte-derived growth factor gene (BMP15) cause increased ovulation rate and infertility in a dosage-sensitive manner. Nat. Genet. 2000;25:279–283. doi: 10.1038/77033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hanrahan J.P., Gregan S.M., Mulsant P., Mullen M., Davis G.H., Powell R., Galloway S.M. Mutations in the genes for oocyte-derived growth factors GDF9 and BMP15 are associated with both increased ovulation rate and sterility in Cambridge and Belclare sheep (Ovis aries) Biol. Reprod. 2004;70:900–909. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.023093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chu M.X., Li B.X., Wang J.Y., Ye S.C., Fang L. Association between PCR-SSCP of growth differentiation factor 9 gene and high prolificacy in Small-Tail Han sheep. Anim. Biotechnol. 2004;15:111–120. doi: 10.1081/LABT-200032582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Silva B.D.M., Castro E.A., Souza C.J.H., Paiva S.R., Sartori R., Franco M.M., Azevedo H.C., Silva T.A.S.N., Vieira A.M.C., Neves J.P., et al. A new polymorphism in the Growth and Differentiation Factor 9 (GDF9) gene is associated with increased ovulation rate and prolificacy in homozygous sheep. Anim. Genet. 2011;42:89–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02078.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chu M.X., Yang J., Feng T., Cao G.L., Fang L., Di R., Huang D.W., Tang Q.Q., Ma Y.H., Li K., et al. GDF9 as a candidate gene for prolificacy of Small-Tail Han sheep. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011;38:5199–5204. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0670-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Al-Lawama M., Albaramki J., Altamimi M., El-Shanti H. Congenital glucose-galactose malabsorption: A case report with a novel SLC5A1 mutation. Clin. Case Rep. 2019;7:51–53. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kevorkova O., Ethier-Chiasson M., Lafond J. Differential expression of glucose transporters in rabbit placenta: Effect of hypercholesterolemia in dams. Biol. Reprod. 2007;76:487–495. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.055285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Girard J., Ferre P., Pegorier J.P., Duee P.H. Adaptations of glucose and fatty acid metabolism during perinatal period and suckling-weaning transition. Physiol. Rev. 1992;72:507–562. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1992.72.2.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li H., Gu Y., Zhang Y.P., Lucas M.J., Wang Y.P. High glucose levels down-regulate glucose transporter expression that correlates with increased oxidative stress in placental trophoblast cells in vitro. J. Soc. Gynecol. Investig. 2004;11:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jsgi.2003.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Joost H.G., Thorens B. The extended GLUT-family of sugar/polyol transport facilitators: Nomenclature, sequence characteristics, and potential function of its novel members (review) Mol. Membr. Biol. 2001;18:247–256. doi: 10.1080/09687680110090456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wu G.Y., Bazer F.W., Satterfield M.C., Li X.L., Wang X.Q., Johnson G.A., Burghardt R.C., Dai Z.L., Wang J.J., Wu Z.L. Impacts of arginine nutrition on embryonic and fetal development in mammals. Amino Acids. 2013;45:241–256. doi: 10.1007/s00726-013-1515-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Freking B.A., Leymaster K.A., Vallet J.L., Christenson R.K. Number of fetuses and conceptus growth throughout gestation in lines of pigs selected for ovulation rate or uterine capacity. J. Anim. Sci. 2007;85:2093–2103. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fotiadis D., Kanai Y., Palacin M. The SLC3 and SLC7 families of amino acid transporters. Mol. Asp. Med. 2013;34:139–158. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2012.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gao H.F., Chen L.Y., Cheng C.S., Chen H., Meng Z.Q., Chen Z. SLC5A1 promotes growth and proliferation of pancreatic carcinoma via glucose-dependent AMPK/mTOR signaling. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019;11:3171–3185. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S195424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bazer F.W., Kim J., Ka H., Johnson G.A., Wu G., Song G. Select nutrients in the uterine lumen of sheep and pigs affect conceptus development. J. Reprod. Dev. 2012;58:180–188. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2011-019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pisani L.F., Antonini S., Pocar P., Ferrari S., Brevini T.A., Rhind S.M., Gandolfi F. Effects of pre-mating nutrition on mRNA levels of developmentally relevant genes in sheep oocytes and granulosa cells. Reproduction. 2008;136:303–312. doi: 10.1530/REP-07-0394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Miftakhova R., Hedblom A., Semenas J., Robinson B., Simoulis A., Malm J., Rizvanov A., Heery D.M., Mongan N.P., Maitland N.J., et al. Cyclin A1 and P450 aromatase promote metastatic homing and growth of stem-like prostate cancer cells in the bone marrow. Cancer Res. 2016;76:2453–2464. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kawamata M., Nishimori K. Mice deficient in Dmrt7 show infertility with spermatogenic arrest at pachytene stage. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:6442–6446. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.10.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sweeney C., Murphy M., Kubelka M., Ravnik S.E., Hawkins C.F., Wolgemuth D.J., Carrington M. A distinct cyclin A is expressed in germ cells in the mouse. Development. 1996;122:53–64. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ravnik S.E., Wolgemuth D.J. Regulation of meiosis during mammalian spermatogenesis: The A-type cyclins and their associated cyclin-dependent kinases are differentially expressed in the germ-cell lineage. Dev. Biol. 1999;207:408–418. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu D., Matzuk M.M., Sung W.K., Guo Q.X., Wang P., Wolgemuth D.J. Cyclin A1 is required for meiosis in the male mouse. Nat. Genet. 1998;20:377–380. doi: 10.1038/3855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liao C., Li S.Q., Wang X.Y., Muhlrad S., Bjartell A., Wolgemuth D.J. Elevated levels and distinct patterns of expression of A-type cyclins and their associated cyclin-dependent kinases in male germ cell tumors. Int. J. Cancer. 2004;108:654–664. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fuchimoto D., Mizukoshi A., Schultz R.M., Sakai S., Aoki F. Posttranscriptional regulation of cyclin A1 and cyclin A2 during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation and preimplantation development. Biol. Reprod. 2001;65:986–993. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod65.4.986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hipfner D.R., Deeley R.G., Cole S.P. Structural, mechanistic and clinical aspects of MRP1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999;1461:359–376. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00168-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Weaver D.A., Crawford E.L., Warner K.A., Elkhairi F., Khuder S.A., Willey J.C. ABCC5, ERCC2, XPA and XRCC1 transcript abundance levels correlate with cisplatin chemoresistance in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Mol. Cancer. 2005;4:18. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-4-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wijnholds J., Mol C.A.A.M., van Deemter L., de Haas M., Scheffer G.L., Baas F., Beijnen J.H., Scheper R.J., Hatse S., De Clercq E., et al. Multidrug-resistance protein 5 is a multispecific organic anion transporter able to transport nucleotide analogs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:7476–7481. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120159197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pan Z., Li S., Liu Q., Wang Z., Zhou Z., Di R., Miao B., Hu W., Wang X., Hu X., et al. Whole-genome sequences of 89 Chinese sheep suggest role of RXFP2 in the development of unique horn phenotype as response to semi-feralization. GigaScience. 2018;7:1–15. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giy019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhou M., Pan Z., Cao X., Guo X., He X., Sun Q., Di R., Hu W., Wang X., Zhang X., et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the HIRA gene affect litter size in Small-Tail Han Sheep. Animals. 2018;8:71. doi: 10.3390/ani8050071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Johansen P., Andersen J.D., Borsting C., Morling N. Evaluation of the iPLEX (R) Sample ID Plus Panel designed for the Sequenom MassARRAY (R) system. A SNP typing assay developed for human identification and sample tracking based on the SNP for ID panel. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2013;7:482–487. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ortega M.S., Denicol A.C., Cole J.B., Null D.J., Hansen P.J. Use of single nucleotide polymorphisms in candidate genes associated with daughter pregnancy rate for prediction of genetic merit for reproduction in Holstein cows. Anim. Genet. 2016;47:288–297. doi: 10.1111/age.12420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jiang Z., Michal J.J., Chen J., Daniels T.F., Kunej T., Garcia M.D., Gaskins C.T., Busboom J.R., Alexander L.J., Wright R.W., et al. Discovery of novel genetic networks associated with 19 economically important traits in beef cattle. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2009;5:528–542. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.5.528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang N., Li S., Guo X.C., Li J.Y., Ren G.P., Li D.S. Fibroblast growth factor 21 improves glucose homeostasis partially via down-regulation of Na+-d-glucose cotransporter SGLT1 in the small intestine. Biomed. Pharm. 2019;109:1070–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.10.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lin J.T., Kormanec J., Wehner F., Wielert-Badt S., Kinne R.K.H. High-level expression of Na+/D-glucose cotransporter (SGLT1) in a stably transfected Chinese hamster ovary cell line. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998;1373:309–320. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(98)00116-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yang R., Morosetti R., Koeffler H.P. Characterization of a second human cyclin a that is highly expressed in testis and in several leukemic cell lines. Cancer Res. 1997;57:913–920. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lele K.A., Wolgemuth D.J. Distinct regions of the mouse cyclin A1 gene, Ccna1, confer male germ-cell specific expression and enhancer function. Biol. Reprod. 2004;71:1340–1347. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.030387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gao X., Sun L.H., Zhang N.Y., Li C., Zhang J.C., Xiao Z.H., Qi D.S. Gestational zearalenone exposure causes reproductive and developmental toxicity in pregnant rats and female offspring. Toxins. 2017;9:21. doi: 10.3390/toxins9010021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Loncar J., Popovic M., Zaja R., Smital T. Gene expression analysis of the ABC efflux transporters in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharm. 2010;151:209–215. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2009.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Camille Melon L., Maguire J. GABAergic regulation of the HPA and HPG axes and the impact of stress on reproductive function. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016;160:196–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hua G.H., Yang L.G. A review of research progress of FecB gene in Chinese breeds of sheep. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009;116:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang W.M., Liu S.J., Li F.D., Pan X.Y., Li C., Zhang X.X., Ma Y.J., La Y.F., Xi R., Li T.F. Polymorphisms of the ovine BMPR-IB, BMP-15 and FSHR and their associations with litter size in two Chinese indigenous sheep breeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015;16:11385–11397. doi: 10.3390/ijms160511385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Davis G.H., Balakrishnan L., Ross I.K., Wilson T., Galloway S.M., Lumsden B.M., Hanrahan J.P., Mullen M., Mao X.Z., Wang G.L., et al. Investigation of the Booroola (FecB) and Inverdale (FecXI) mutations in 21 prolific breeds and strains of sheep sampled in 13 countries. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2006;92:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chu M.X., Wang J.Z., Wang A.G., Li N., Fu J.L. Cloning and sequencing of four microsatellite loci in Small-Tail Han Sheep. Acta Genet. Sin. 2002;29:402–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Steinhauser C.B., Wing T.T., Gao H., Li X., Burghardt R.C., Wu G., Bazer F.W., Johnson G.A. Identification of appropriate reference genes for qPCR analyses of placental expression of SLC7A3 and induction of SLC5A1 in porcine endometrium. Placenta. 2017;52:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2017.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dorniak P., Bazer F.W., Wu G., Spencer T.E. Conceptus-derived prostaglandins regulate endometrial function in sheep. Biol. Reprod. 2012;87:1–7. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.100487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Al-Suyufi Y., ALSaleem K., Al-Mehaidib A., Banemai M., Aldekhail W.M., Al-Muhandes A., Mohammed M., Allam R., Jambi A., Ramzan K., et al. SLC5A1 Mutations in Saudi Arabian patients with congenital glucose-galactose malabsorption. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2018;66:250–252. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Atay F.Y., Derme T., Uras N., Ceylaner G., Ceylaner S., Sari F.N., Oguz S.S. Congenital glucose-galactose malabsorption in a Turkish newborn: A novel mutation of Na+/glucose cotransporter gene. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2017;62:280–281. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4348-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chen S.X., Wang F.G., Liu Z., Zhao Y., Jiang Y.W., Chen L., Li C.J., Zhou X. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor promotes proliferation and progesterone synthesis in bovine granulosa cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019;234:8776–8787. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Silva-Neta H.L., Torrezan E., de Araujo Leite J.C., Santi-Gadelha T., Marques-Santos L.F. Involvement of ABCB1 and ABCC1 transporters in sea urchin Echinometra lucunter fertilization. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2012;79:861–869. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]