Abstract
Frog model organisms have been appreciated for their utility in exploring physiological phenomena for nearly a century. Now, a vibrant community of biologists that utilize this model organism has poised Xenopus to serve as a high throughput vertebrate organism to model patient-driven genetic diseases. This has facilitated the investigation of effects of patient mutations on specific organs and signaling pathways. This approach promises a rapid investigation into novel mechanisms that disrupt normal organ morphology and function. Considering that many disease states are still interrogated in vitro to determine relevant biological processes for further study, the prospect of interrogating genetic disease in Xenopus in vivo is an attractive alternative. This model may more closely capture important aspects of the pathology under investigation such as cellular micro environments and local forces relevant to a specific organ’s development and homeostasis. This review aims to highlight recent methodological advances that allow investigation of genetic disease in organ-specific contexts in Xenopus as well as provide examples of how these methods have led to the identification of novel mechanisms and pathways important for understanding human disease.
Keywords: Xenopus, gene discovery, organogenesis, disease model, mechanism discovery, genetics of congenital malformations, birth defects
Introduction
The frog has served as a powerful tool for understanding human physiology dating back to early efforts in biomedical research. Many researchers found this model appealing due to its prevalence as a pregnancy test (Elkan, 1938). Injected human chorionic gonadotrophin induces ovulation and facilitates fertilization of a large number of embryos for experimentation. Subsequently, there has been an ongoing effort to develop methods to interrogate biology in the Xenopus embryo. Recently, next generation sequencing technologies have allowed researchers to rapidly amass a compendium of candidate gene variants that are putatively disease causing (Zaidi et al., 2013; Glessner et al., 2014; Homsy et al., 2015; Sifrim et al., 2016; Jin et al., 2017; Li et al., 2017; Manheimer et al., 2018). A major challenge is annotating these candidate genes with pathogenesis mechanisms. While statistical analysis of variants and computational approaches to predict mutational effect are necessary to identify putative disease-causing patient variants, many of the candidate genes have no known relevant biological function suggestive of its role in disease pathogenesis. Therefore, there is a pressing need for model systems to decipher these mechanisms. This is where patient driven gene discovery and disease modeling in Xenopus have proven fruitful.
Screening and Evaluation of Patient Variants
Xenopus tadpoles develop most organs in just 3 days and the cell fate map for each organ system is well defined, so rapid phenotyping in knockout animals is possible (Moody, 1987). In fact, several gene knockout Xenopus lines are available to researchers through the community resources Xenbase and the international Xenopus resource centers (Table 2). In addition, the ability to manipulate only one side of the embryos and use the un-injected side as an internal control by one of two cell injection strategy has rendered Xenopus as a useful model to decipher disease mechanisms of patient variants.
TABLE 2.
Organ of interest | Mutation | Species | Associated human disease |
Kidney | Pkhd1L | X. Laevis | Autosomal Recessive Polycystic Kidney Disease |
pkd2.L | X. Laevis | Polycystic Kidney Disease 2 | |
wdpcp.L | X. Laevis | Bardet-Biedl syndrome (ciliopathic genetic disorder that affects many parts of body including kidney failure) | |
eya1.L | X. Laevis | Branchio-oto-renal syndrome | |
Heart | tbx5 | X. Tropicalis | Hold-Oram syndrome (cardiac-limb syndrome) |
gdf1 | X.Tropicalis | Double outlet right ventricle, tetralogy of Fallot, Right atrial isomerism | |
Imna | X. Tropicalis | dilated cardiomyopathy | |
myh6 | X.Tropicalis | familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, atrial septal defect | |
Also, advances in CRISPR/Cas9 technology allow screening genes for disease relevance rapidly and inexpensively. The efficiency of knockout through CRISPR/Cas9 targeting is sufficient for screening in the F0 population of Xenopus embryos (Blitz et al., 2013; Bhattacharya et al., 2015). These F0 mosaic knockouts can also be used as founders to establish mutant lines. Community created resources such as CRISPR Scan (Moreno-Mateos et al., 2015) which can facilitate targeting specific loci and avoiding off target effects (Doench et al., 2014) have greatly simplified CRISPR based gene depletion experiments. Various tools are available to assess CRISPR genome editing efficiency, such as tracking of indels by decomposition (Etard et al., 2017). Off target effects can also be further evaluated by designing multiple non-overlapping sgRNAs to verify that multiple gene disruptions lead to similar phenotypes. Alternatively, complementary methods such as the use of morpholino oligos can similarly validate the phenotypic effects of CRISPR in F0 knockout screens. Subsequently, to test the specificity of targeted gene depletion strategies, human derived mRNA can be co-injected to rescue a mutated phenotype.
While results for CRISPR based knock-in technologies look promising in Xenopus (Aslan et al., 2017), knock-ins of human gene variants have not yet been fully utilized. On the other hand, to test patient variants for pathology, gene depletion followed by rescue with either wildtype human mRNA or patient variant mRNA has been effective and highly efficient (Braun et al., 2018; Kulkarni et al., 2018). Another limitation of the Xenopus model is a lack of antibodies available to detect Xenopus proteins, and there is an on-going concerted effort to produce monoclonal antibodies which will be freely shared with the Xenopus research community (personal communication D. Alfandari).
Emerging Methods in Evaluating Effects of Genetic Manipulations in Organogenesis
Cardiac Morphogenesis
Xenopus is well suited for studying heart development as, unlike mice, Xenopus embryos do not require functional blood circulation for early cardiac development. This permits analysis of mutations that would prove embryonic lethal in mice. Additionally, the optical transparency which persists throughout early organogenesis enables assessment of morphological heart defects via multiple live imaging strategies (Figure 1).
Through targeted genome editing and a fate mapping, early heart developmental processes are well outlined in Xenopus. Similar to mammals, Xenopus heart development begins with pre-cardiac mesoderm formation during gastrulation (Sater and Jacobson, 1989). Cardiac precursor cells then migrate toward the ventral midline where they subsequently become specified as cardiac progenitor cells in two lineages: the first and second heart fields. These two heart fields undergo further remodeling to become two-atria/one ventricle and the outflow tract, respectively (Buckingham et al., 2005; Gessert and Kuhl, 2009). Several transgenic Xenopus lines have been engineered with fluorescent proteins fused to promotor regions of relevant cardiac markers to examine these developmental processes in vivo. One Xenopus line harbors the promoter of NKX2 fused to GFP and serves as a suitable marker for the early heart field (Sparrow et al., 2000), while MLC1v-GFP and SMAD3-GFP lines prove useful for labeling the myocardium and endocardium, respectively (Smith et al., 2005; Smith and Mohun, 2011; Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Transgenic line | Development | Proposed utility |
Tg(nkx2.5:GFP) | Approx. 7.3 kb upstream of transcriptional start site of nkx2.5 (GU573788) fused to GFP. This region should contain the nkx2.5 promoter | Early heart field studies |
Tg(mlc3:GFP) | 8 kb of promoter of the X. laevis MLClv (myosin light chain 3) gene driving expression of EGFP (note MLClv synonym for = mlc3) | Myocardium studies |
Tg(smad3:eGFP) | 1.5 kb of promoter of the X. laevis smad3 gene driving expression of eGFP | Endocardium studies |
Tg(WntREs:dEGFP) | 7 copies of a TCF/LEF1 binding DNA element, a minimal TATA box and a reporter gene encoding destabilized eGFP and a polyA sequence | Wnt signaling in cardiogenesis |
Tg(Dre.cdhl7:eGFP) | Approximately a 4.3 kb genomic fragment upstream of the Danio rerio cdhl7 driving expression of EGFP | Pronephric development |
Another exciting model is the Wnt reporter line developed in Xenopus (7X LEF/TCF-GFP) (Tran et al., 2010; Tran and Vleminckx, 2014; Table 1). Both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling is spatiotemporally controlled to orchestrate proper cardiac development (Nakamura et al., 2003; Naito et al., 2006; Tzahor, 2007; Ueno et al., 2007; Gessert and Kuhl, 2010). In the context of left-right patterning, Wnt and serotonin signaling were found to be crucial for left-right organizer (LRO) specification and differentiation (Nascone and Mercola, 1997; Beyer et al., 2012). In particular, Wnt direct target gene, foxj1, expression is up-regulated in ATP4a dependent manner that consequently controls motile ciliogenesis in the LRO (Walentek et al., 2012). Left–right patterning in turn has far reaching consequences for cardiogenesis (Reviewed in Duncan and Khokha, 2016; Garfinkel and Khokha, 2017). Wnt action during cardiogenesis can be divided into four stages. First, high levels of Wnt/β-catenin activity is required for the formation of prospective heart mesoderm (Smith and Howard, 1992; Antin et al., 1994). Once cardiac mesodermal cells colonize the ventral midline, Wnt signaling is damped down allowing for cardiac specification and generation of multi-potent progenitor cells (Marvin et al., 2001; Schneider and Mercola, 2001). Shortly thereafter, Wnt signaling is up-regulated for the expansion and proliferation of cardiogenic progenitor cells and repressed again for terminal differentiation of cardiomyocytes (Ai et al., 2007; Kwon et al., 2007). As the role of Wnt signaling in cardiac development is both dynamic and complex, further investigation is warranted in this Xenopus Wnt reporter line. Exemplifying the utility of this model, recent work using this Wnt transgenic Xenopus line has comprehensively delineated the spatial and temporal dynamics of Wnt signaling through whole-mount in situ hybridization and cross-sectioning of embryos (Borday et al., 2018).
Lastly, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has recently been employed as a reliable and efficient imaging modality to assess cardiac structural anomalies in Xenopus tadpoles (Deniz et al., 2017). OCT uses coherent light waves to capture cross-sectional images of tissues in live embryos (Kagemann et al., 2008). OCT can thus comprehensively measure Xenopus cardiac structures including the atria, trabeculated ventricle, atrioventricular valve, and the diameter of outflow tract. As evidence of its utility, depletion of the myosin heavy chain 6 (myh6) gene which has been shown to have variants that cause human cardiomyopathy (Abu-Daya et al., 2009) was employed in Xenopus embryos. OCT imaging of these embryos yielded successful dynamic assessment of cardiac defects such as dysregulated AV valve excursion times (Deniz et al., 2017). Overall, OCT and cardiac fluorescent transgenic models maximize the power of the optical transparency in Xenopus embryos by allowing for dynamic live imaging and observation of cardiac development at both cellular and sub-cellular levels.
Kidney Morphogenesis
The embryonic kidney in Xenopus consists of a pronephros that is simplistic compared to human metanephroi (Fox and Hamilton, 1964; Vize et al., 1995); however, this provides a straightforward structure that can be readily interrogated (Figure 1). Additionally, regions of the pronephros correspond to regions of the human metanephros based on function and patterns of gene expression (Carroll and Vize, 1999; Carroll et al., 1999; Wild et al., 2000; Saulnier et al., 2002; Zhou and Vize, 2004; Alarcon et al., 2008; Raciti et al., 2008; Buisson et al., 2015). Although the whole mount in situ hybridization has been used to interrogate the pronephros based on expression, new tools allow kidney research to observe changes in vivo. Among these is a transgenic line with GFP fused to Cdh17 that facilitates visualization of the entire pronephros (Corkins et al., 2018; Table 1).
Recent efforts in kidney research in Xenopus have also yielded models of pronephric regeneration that show great promise (Caine and McLaughlin, 2013). These studies build upon work that has addressed pronephroi as in vitro explants (Moriya et al., 1993; Osafune et al., 2002; Asashima et al., 2009). As kidney tissue is susceptible to damage from genetic as well as acquired renal disease, understanding its regenerative potential may allow us to identify methods of recovering tissue function in the context of disease. Additionally, observing regeneration as opposed to organogenesis of the pronephros facilitates uncoupling signaling relevant for the generation of this specific organ from generalized processes of development. Such an approach may be essential for understanding the mechanisms of dysfunction observed due to patient-derived candidate gene variants.
The ability to target specific regions of the developing embryo is a powerful avenue to home in on factors relevant for specific pathways and tissues. Screening candidate genes based on patient variants in the Xenopus kidney is no exception. Although F0 CRISPR based knockout of genes is a powerful tool, this has been deployed largely in whole embryo approaches. Developing a tissue-specific targeting strategy is an important next step to screen for organ-specific dysfunction. Fortunately, this has been evaluated precisely in the context of the Xenopus pronephros wherein CRISPR/Cas9 was injected in a targeted manner to demonstrate that this technology could be applied in a subset of embryonic blastomeres that give rise to the pronephric tissue (DeLay et al., 2018). This advance shows that despite the mosaicism observed via the targeted use of CRISPR/Cas9 in the F0 generation, this technology can be used to observe downstream consequences of loss of function in particular regions of F0 embryos without the need to raise mutant lines. This may be particularly useful for studying the pronephroi in the context of gene knockout scenarios in which embryonic development is so severely affected as to preclude the study of later organ development. By adopting this approach to limit candidate gene screening to the embryonic kidney, we may be better equipped to answer what role a novel gene is playing in patient disease affecting this organ.
Recent Patient Driven Xenopus Studies in Organogenesis
Novel Mechanisms in Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most prevalent class of birth defects leading to high infant mortality in the United States and yet for the vast majority of cases, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain elusive (Van der Linde et al., 2011; Triedman and Newburger, 2016). However, by coupling cost-effective sequencing technologies to gene editing tools in animal model systems, novel genetic variants from patients can be quickly analyzed in vivo in a high-throughput manner. This has been a productive approach in Xenopus as candidate genes have been efficiently analyzed for their functional cardiac relevance in Xenopus embryos.
For example, RAPGEF5 which encodes a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rap-GTPase was found to have an internal duplication which would likely lead to a null allele in a heterotaxy patient. Depletion of Rapgef5 in Xenopus recapitulates the left-right patterning phenotype found in the patient. Unexpectedly, mechanistic studies established that RAPGEF5 regulates left-right patterning via Wnt signaling by regulating the nuclear localization of β-catenin (Griffin et al., 2018). As previously noted, Wnt signaling is critical for proper induction of dorsal mesoderm including cardiac precursors and the LRO. As such, dysregulation of Wnt signaling caused by Rapgef5 knockdown resulted in abnormal LRO formation and cardiac looping phenotypes. Moving beyond CHD, dysregulation of Wnt signaling is implicated in many human diseases especially colorectal cancers (Morin et al., 1997; Cancer Genome Atlas Network, 2012). Therefore, elucidating this transport machinery may lead to novel therapeutic targets for a host of diseases.
Another successful example of modeling heterotaxy candidate genes in Xenopus was demonstrated by identifying a novel functional role of inner-ring nucleoporins, Nup188 and Nup93 in the context of cilia. Nup188 and its interactant Nup93 were discovered to localize to the base of cilia suggesting a role outside of the nuclear envelope. Knockdown of these components results in the loss of cilia in the LRO subsequently leading to abnormal heart patterning (Del Viso et al., 2016). Cilia are key cellular structures necessary to generate and sense unidirectional fluid flow and induce asymmetric gene expression for proper organ situs (Wallingford and Mitchell, 2011; Boskovski et al., 2013; Blum et al., 2014; Yoshiba and Hamada, 2014). These studies demonstrate the complex genetic etiology of CHD and the successful use of Xenopus to identify and characterize disease mechanisms of pathogenic human variants.
Novel Mechanisms in Congenital Disease of the Kidney
Work utilizing the developing Xenopus kidney has led to new roles and mechanisms for candidate genes in kidney development and disease. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) include a wide variety of patient presentations ranging from abnormal kidney and urinary tract size and morphology to tumor growth within this organ system (Rodriguez, 2014). As these anomalies comprise the most common cause of childhood renal failure, high throughout models for candidate CAKUT genes are useful for testing candidate genes and exploring pathogenesis mechanisms.
For example, variants of NRIP1 were identified in patients with CAKUT (Vivante et al., 2017). These anomalies consisted of renal hypodysplasia and either vesicoureteral reflux or ectopia. Prior to this work, the mechanism of NRIP1 function in kidney development or even developmental at large was not established. This study also highlights the potential to investigate novel therapeutic pathways for patients in which variants are identified. Since retinoic acid signaling was downregulated by NRIP1 mutation in this instance, manipulation of retinoic acid dependent pathways is an appealing avenue for therapeutic studies.
Studies of ciliopathies are another excellent example of these efforts. Though ciliopathies affect a wide array of organ systems including the heart (Duncan and Khokha, 2016), the kidney is particularly susceptible to the loss of function of cilia-related proteins. Ciliopathies are a diverse array of diseases caused by disrupted formation and/or function of cilia (Bisgrove and Yost, 2006; Gerdes et al., 2009; Oh and Katsanis, 2012; Werner and Mitchell, 2013; Choksi et al., 2014). Cilia are cellular extensions that have been shown to serve as mediators of extracellular signals in the case of primary cilia (Nachury and Mick, 2019) or a means by which cells coordinate extracellular fluid flow in the case of motile cilia (Mitchison and Valente, 2017). In the kidney, cilia dysfunction often manifests itself as a cystic change in tissue morphology that renders the kidney unable to regulate the urine concentration and hemofiltration (Ma et al., 2017). The mechanisms by which cilia dysfunction leads to this tissue level dysfunction are still not well understood.
In another example of patient driven gene discovery, identifying a role for the DNA repair protein NME3 in cilia established another example for a growing list of ciliopathies (Hoff et al., 2018). Depletion of NME3 resulted in renal malformations and left–right patterning defects typical of ciliopathies in Xenopus along with a loss of cilia in complementary vertebrate and cell culture models. The association of NME3 with the ciliary nephronophthisis proteins NEK8, CEP164, and ANKS6 supports its role as a ciliopathy gene. This discovery adds to a growing number of ciliopathy related genes that have known roles away from the cilium but seem to also play an important role when recruited to the cilium. This has far reaching implications for kidney disease biology, as the discovery of new roles and/or localizations for gene products will allow us to harness previous knowledge about these components to understand the disease. Complementarily, subsequent discovery of the proteins’ role in kidney morphogenesis may lead to understanding its function in other contexts. In the case of NME3, this work has led to a still evolving connection between primary cilia function and DNA damage repair, which may constitute an even broader pathway important for kidney development and homeostasis.
Similarly, recent studies have implicated mutations in several components of the outer-ring of the nuclear pore complex (NPC) in steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) (Braun et al., 2018). SRNS is a broad category of disease in which the body excessively excretes proteins in the urine thus leading to systemic fluid distribution imbalances and swelling which is most often linked to disruption of the renal vascular interface that functions in podocyte mediated fluid filtration (Dogra and Kaskel, 2017). Variants of outer-ring NUPs were tested in Xenopus knockdown models to verify their deleterious status (Braun et al., 2018). This study went on to determine that this effect on kidney morphogenesis is mediated through Cdc42 signaling important for filopodia (Nobes and Hall, 1995). These findings highlight that proteins essential for the function of every cell such as NPC components can still give tissue specific phenotypes suggesting that we have a great deal to learn about the pathogenesis mechanisms of human disease.
Though these studies demonstrate the power that patient driven gene discovery has for assigning disease causing variants in human kidney disease, they also begin to show how this approach aids in discovering novel mechanisms important for kidney morphogenesis and function. Moving forward, the many congenital kidney malformations that affect patients early in life may be an efficient source of genetic information to direct the study of kidney morphogenesis.
Conclusion
Sequencing technologies continue to improve in speed, accuracy, and cost. Consequently, rather than phenotype driven therapy, patient genotype can be included in decision-making and treatment options tailored to individuals. However, one major challenge to this approach is determining the biological relevance of each variant as many candidate genes have no known role in disease. Therefore, each variant offers the opportunity for molecular function discovery in animal models. Studying organogenesis in Xenopus including that of the heart and kidney will allow us to unravel mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. Analysis of candidate genes in Xenopus will not only allow for assessing allele pathogenicity, but also promises to expand our understanding of developmental biology.
Author Contributions
All authors wrote and edited the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank the patients and families who are the inspiration for candidate gene and mechanism discovery. We also thank the many labs involved in developing Xenopus as an excellent model for human disease. We unfortunately lack sufficient space to cite all the great work carried out in this growing field.
Footnotes
Funding. WH and JM are supported by the Yale MSTP NIH T32GM07205 Training Grant, the Yale Predoctoral Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology T32GM007223 Training Grant, and the Paul and Daisy Soros Fellowship for New Americans. WH is also supported by the NIH F30HL143878. MK is supported by the NIH R01HD081379 and R01HL124402. MK was a Mallinckrodt Scholar.
References
- Abu-Daya A., Sater A. K., Wells D. E., Mohun T. J., Zimmerman L. B. (2009). Absence of heartbeat in the Xenopus tropicalis mutation muzak is caused by a nonsense mutation in cardiac myosin myh6. Dev. Biol. 336 20–29. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.09.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ai D., Fu X., Wang J., Lu M. F., Chen L., Baldini A., et al. (2007). Canonical Wnt signaling functions in second heart field to promote right ventricular growth. PNAS 104 9319–9324. 10.1073/pnas.0701212104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alarcon P., Rodriguez-Seguel E., Fernandez-Gonzalez A., Rubio R., Gomez-Skarmeta J. L. (2008). A dual requirement for Iroquois genes during Xenopus kidney development. Development 135 3197–3207. 10.1242/dev.023697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Antin P. B., Taylor R. G., Yatskievych T. (1994). Precardiac mesoderm is specified during gastrulation in quail. Dev. Dyn. 200 144–154. 10.1002/aja.1002000206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asashima M., Ito Y., Chan T., Michiue T., Nakanishi M., Suzuki K., et al. (2009). In vitro organogenesis from undifferentiated cells in Xenopus. Dev. Dyn. 238 1309–1320. 10.1002/dvdy.21979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aslan Y., Tadjuidje E., Zorn A. M., Cha S. W. (2017). High-efficiency non-mosaic CRISPR-mediated knock-in and indel mutation in F0 Xenopus. Development 144 2852–2858. 10.1242/dev.152967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beyer T., Danilchik M., Thumberger T., Vick P., Tisler M., Schneider I., et al. (2012). Serotonin signaling is required for Wnt-dependent GTP specification and leftward flow in Xenopus. Curr. Biol. 22 33–39. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhattacharya D., Marfo C. A., Li D., Lane M., Khokha M. K. (2015). CRISPR/Cas9: an inexpensive, efficient loss of function tool to screen human disease genes in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 408 196–204. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.11.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bisgrove B. W., Yost H. J. (2006). The roles of cilia in developmental disorders and disease. Development 133 4131–4143. 10.1242/dev.02595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blitz I. L., Biesinger J., Xie X., Cho K. W. (2013). Biallelic genome modification in F(0) Xenopus tropicalis embryos using the CRISPR/Cas system. Genesis 51 827–834. 10.1002/dvg.22719 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blum M., Schweickert A., Vick P., Wright C. V. E., Danilchik M. V. (2014). Symmetry breakage in the vertebrate embryo: when does it happen and how does it work? Dev. Biol. 393 109–123. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.06.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borday C., Parain K., Tran H. T., Vleminckx K., Perron M., Monsoro-Burq A. H. (2018). An atlas of Wnt activity during embryogenesis in Xenopus Tropicalis. PLoS One 13:e0193606. 10.1371/journal.pone.0193606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boskovski M. T., Yuan S., Pedersen N. B., Goth C. K., Makova S., Clausen H., et al. (2013). The heterotaxy gene GALNT11 glycosylates Notch to orchestrate cilia type and laterality. Nature 504 456–459. 10.1038/nature12723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Braun D. A., Lovric S., Schapiro D., Schneider R., Marquez J., Asif M., et al. (2018). Mutations in multiple components of the nuclear pore complex cause nephrotic syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 128 4313–4328. 10.1172/JCI98688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buckingham M., Meihac S., Zaffran S. (2005). Building the mammalian heart from two sources of myocardial cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6 826–835. 10.1038/nrg1710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buisson I., Le Bouffant R., Futel M., Riou J. F., Umbhauer M. (2015). Pax8 and Pax2 are specifically required at different steps of Xenopus pronephros development. Dev. Biol. 397 175–190. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.10.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caine S. T., McLaughlin K. A. (2013). Regeneration of functional pronephric proximal tubules after partial nephrectomy in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Dyn. 242 219–229. 10.1002/dvdy.23916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012). Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 487 330–337. 10.1038/nature11252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carroll T. J., Vize P. D. (1999). Synergism between Pax-8 and lim-1 in embryonic kidney development. Dev. Biol. 214 46–59. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carroll T. J., Wallingford J. B., Vize P. D. (1999). Dynamic patterns of gene expression in the developing pronephros of Xenopus laevis. Dev. Genet. 24 199–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choksi S. P., Lauter G., Swoboda P., Roy S. (2014). Switching on cilia: transcriptional networks regulating ciliogenesis. Development 141 1427–1441. 10.1242/dev.074666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corkins M. E., Hanania H. L., Krneta-Stankic V., DeLay B. D., Pearl E. J., Lee M., et al. (2018). Transgenic Xenopus laevis line for in vivo labeling of nephrons within the kidney. Genes 9:E197. 10.3390/genes9040197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Del Viso F., Huang F., Myers J., Chalfant M., Zhang Y., Reza N., et al. (2016). Congenital heart disease genetics uncovers context-dependent organization and function of nucleoporins at Cilia. Dev. Cell 38 478–492. 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeLay B. D., Corkins M. E., Hanania H. L., Salanga M., Deng J. M., Sudou N., et al. (2018). Tissue-specific gene inactivation in Xenopus laevis: knockout of lhx1 in the kidney with CRISPR/Cas9. Genetics 208 673–686. 10.1534/genetics.117.300468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deniz E., Jonas S., Hooper M., Griffin J. N., Choma M. A., Khokha M. K. (2017). Analysis of craniocardaic malformations in Xenopus using optical coherence tomography. Sci. Rep. 7:42506. 10.1038/srep42506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doench J. G., Hartenian E., Graham D. B., Tothova Z., Hegde M., Smith I., et al. (2014). Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat. Biotechnol. 32 1262–1267. 10.1038/nbt.3026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dogra S., Kaskel F. (2017). Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a persistent challenge for pediatric nephrology. Pediatr. Nephrol. 32 965–974. 10.1007/s00467-016-3459-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duncan A. R., Khokha M. K. (2016). Xenopus as a model organism for birth defects-congenital heart disease and heterotaxy. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 51 73–79. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.02.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elkan E. R. (1938). The Xenopus pregnancy test. Br. Med. J. 2 1253–1256, 1274–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Etard C., Joshi S., Stegmaier J., Mikut R., Strahle U. (2017). Tracking of indels by decomposition is a simple and effective method to assess efficiency of Guide RNAs in Zebrafish. Zebrafish 14 586–588. 10.1089/zeb.2017.1454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fox H., Hamilton L. (1964). Origin of the pronephric duct in Xenopus Laevis. Arch. Biol. 75 245–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garfinkel A. M., Khokha M. K. (2017). An interspecies heart to heart: using Xenopus to uncover the genetic basis of congenital heart disease. Curr. Pathobiol. Rep. 5 187–196. 10.1007/s40139-017-0142-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerdes J. M., Davis E. E., Katsanis N. (2009). The vertebrate primary cilium in development, homeostasis, and disease. Cell 137 32–45. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gessert S., Kuhl M. (2009). Comparative gene expression analysis and fate mapping studies suggest an early segregation of cardiogenic lineages in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 334 395–408. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.07.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gessert S., Kuhl M. (2010). The multiple phases and faces of Wnt signaling during cardiac differentiation and development. Circ. Res. 107 186–199. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.221531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glessner J. T., Bick A. G., Ito K., Homsy J., Rodriguez-Murillo L., Fromer M., et al. (2014). Increased frequency of de novo copy number variants in congenital heart disease by integrative analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism array and exome sequence data. Circ. Res. 115 884–896. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.304458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griffin J. N., Del Viso F., Duncan A. R., Robson A., Hwang W., Kulkarni S., et al. (2018). RAPGEF5 regulates nuclear translocation of beta-catenin. Dev. Cell 44 248–260. 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoff S., Epting D., Falk N., Schroda S., Braun D. A., Halbritter J., et al. (2018). The nucleoside diphosphate kinase NME3 associates with nephronophthisis proteins, and is required for ciliary function during renal development. J. Biol. Chem. 293 15243–15255. 10.1074/jbc.RA117.000847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Homsy J., Zaidi S., Shen Y., Ware J. S., Samocha K. E., Karczewski K. J., et al. (2015). De novo mutations in congenital heart disease with neurodevelopmental and other congenital anomalies. Science 350 1262–1266. 10.1126/science.aac9396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jin S. C., Homsy J., Zaidi S., Lu Q., Morton S., DePalma S. R., et al. (2017). Contribution of rare inherited and de novo variants in 2,871 congenital heart disease probands. Nat. Genet. 49 1593–1601. 10.1038/ng.3970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kagemann L., Ishikawa H., Zou J., Charukamnoetkanok P., Wollstein G., Townsend K. A., et al. (2008). Repeated noninvasive high resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging of zebrafish embryos. Mol. Vis. 14 2157–2170. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kulkarni S. S., Griffin J. N., Date P. P., Liem K. F., Khokha M. K. (2018). WDR5 stabilizes actin architecture to promote multiciliated cell formation. Dev. Cell 46 595–610. 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.08.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kwon C., Arnold J., Hsiao E. C., Taketo M. M., Conklin B. R., Srivastava D. (2007). Canonical Wnt signaling is a positive regulator of mammalian cardiac progenitors. PNAS 104 10894–10899. 10.1073/pnas.0704044104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li A. H., Hanchard N. A., Furthner D., Fernbach S., Azamian M., Nicosia A., et al. (2017). Whole exome sequencing in 342 congenital cardiac left sided lesion cases reveals extensive genetic heterogeneity and complex inheritance patterns. Genome Med. 9:95. 10.1186/s13073-017-0482-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma M., Gallagher A. R., Somlo S. (2017). Ciliary mechanisms of cyst formation in polycystic kidney disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 9:a028209. 10.1101/cshperspect.a028209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manheimer K. B., Richter F., Edelmann L. J., D’Souza S. L., Shi L., Shen Y., et al. (2018). Robust identification of mosaic variants in congenital heart disease. Hum. Genet. 137 183–193. 10.1007/s00439-018-1871-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marvin M. J., Di Rocco G., Gardiner A., Bush S. M., Lassar A. B. (2001). Inhibition of Wnt activity induces heart formation from posterior mesoderm. Genes Dev. 15 316–327. 10.1101/gad.855501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitchison H. M., Valente E. M. (2017). Motile and non-motile cilia in human pathology: from function to phenotypes. J. Pathol. 241 294–309. 10.1002/path.4843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moody S. A. (1987). Fates of the blastomeres of the 16-cell stage Xenopus embryo. Dev. Biol. 119 560–578. 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90059-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moreno-Mateos M. A., Vejnar C. E., Beaudoin J. D., Fernandez J. P., Mis E. K., Khokha M. K., et al. (2015). CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo. Nat. Methods 12 982–988. 10.1038/nmeth.3543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morin P. J., Sparks A. B., Korinek V., Barker N., Clevers H., Vogelstein B., et al. (1997). Activation of beta-catenin-Tcf signaling in colon cancer by mutations in beta-catenin or APC. Science 275 1787–1790. 10.1126/science.275.5307.1787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moriya N., Uchiyama H., Asashima M. (1993). Induction of pronephric tubules by activin and retinoic acid in presumptive ectoderm of Xenopus laevis. Dev. Growth Differ. 35 123–128. 10.1111/j.1440-169x.1993.00123.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nachury M. V., Mick D. U. (2019). Establishing and regulating the composition of cilia for signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mo. Cell Biol. 20 389–405. 10.1038/s41580-019-0116-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naito A. T., Shiojima I., Akazawa H., Hidaka K., Morisaki T., Kikuchi A., et al. (2006). Developmental stage-specific biphasic roles of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in cardiomyogenesis and hematopoiesis. PNAS 103 19812–19817. 10.1073/pnas.0605768103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura T., Sano M., Songyang Z., Schneider M. D. (2003). A Wnt and beta-catenin dependent pathway for mammalian cardiac myogenesis. PNSA 100 5834–5839. 10.1073/pnas.0935626100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nascone N., Mercola M. (1997). Organizer induction determines left-right asymmetry in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 189 68–78. 10.1006/dbio.1997.8635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nobes C. D., Hall A. (1995). Rho, rac and cdc42 GTPases: regulators of actin structures, cell adhesion and motility. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 23 456–459. 10.1042/bst0230456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oh E. C., Katsanis N. (2012). Cilia in vertebrate development and disease. Development 139 443–448. 10.1242/dev.050054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osafune K., Nishinakamura R., Komazaki S., Asashima M. (2002). In vitro induction of the pronephric duct in Xenopus explants. Dev. Growth Differ. 44 161–167. 10.1046/j.1440-169x.2002.00631.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raciti D., Reggiani L., Geffers L., Jiang Q., Bacchion F., Subrizi A. E., et al. (2008). Organization of the pronephric kidney revealed by large-scale gene expression mapping. Genome Biol 9:R84. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-5-r84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez M. M. (2014). Congenital anomalies of the kidney and the urinary tract (CAKUT). Fetal Pediatr. Pathol. 33 293–320. 10.3109/15513815.2014.959678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sater A. K., Jacobson A. G. (1989). The specification of heart mesoderm occurs during gastrulation in Xenopus laevis. Development 105 821–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saulnier D. M., Ghanbari H., Brandli A. W. (2002). Essential function of Wnt-4 for tubulogenesis in the Xenopus pronephric kidney. Dev. Biol. 248 13–28. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider V. A., Mercola M. (2001). Wnt antagonism initiates cardiogenesis in Xenopus laevis. Genes Dev. 15 304–315. 10.1101/gad.855601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sifrim A., Hitz M. P., Wilsdon A., Breckpot J., Turki S. H., Thienpont B., et al. (2016). Distinct genetic architectures for syndromic and nonsyndromic congenital heart defects identified by exome sequencing. Nat. Genet. 48 1060–1065. 10.1038/ng.3627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith J. C., Howard J. E. (1992). Mesoderm-inducing factors and the control of gastrulation. Development 116 127–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith S. J., Ataliotis P., Kotecha S., Towers N., Sparrow D. B., Mohun T. J. (2005). The MLC1v gene provides a transgenic marker of myocardium formation within developing chambers of the Xenopus Heart. Dev. Dyn. 232 1003–1012. 10.1002/dvdy.20274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith S. J., Mohun T. J. (2011). Early cardiac morphogenesis defects caused by loss of embryonic macrophage function in Xenopus. Mech. Dev. 128 5–6. 10.1016/j.mod.2011.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sparrow D. B., Cai C., Kotecha S., Latinkic B., Cooper B., Towers N., et al. (2000). Regulation of the tinman homologues in Xenopus embryos. Dev. Biol. 227 65–79. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9891 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tran H. T., Sekkali B., Imschoot G. V., Janssens S., Vleminckx K. (2010). Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is involved in the induction and maintenance of primitive hematopoiesis in the vertebrate embryo. PNAS 107 16160–16165. 10.1073/pnas.1007725107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tran H. T., Vleminckx K. (2014). Design and use of transgenic reporter strains for detecting activity of signaling pathways in Xenopus. Methods 3 422–432. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.06.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Triedman J. K., Newburger J. W. (2016). Trends in congenital heart disease: the next decade. Circulation 133 2716–2733. 10.1161/circulationaha.116.023544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tzahor E. (2007). Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and cardiogenesis: timing does matter. Dev. Cell 13 10–13. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ueno S., Weidinger G., Osugi T., Kohn A. D., Golob J. L., Pabon L., et al. (2007). Biphasic role for Wnt/β-catenin signaling in cardiac specification in zebrafish and embryonic stem cells. PNAS 104 9685–9690. 10.1073/pnas.0702859104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van der Linde D., Konings E. E., Slager M. A., Witsenburg M., Helbing W. A., Takkenberg J. J., et al. (2011). Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 58 2241–2247. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vivante A., Mann N., Yonath H., Weiss A. C., Getwan M., Kaminski M. M., et al. (2017). A dominant mutation in nuclear receptor interacting protein 1 causes urinary tract malformations via dysregulation of retinoic acid signaling. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 28 2364–2376. 10.1681/ASN.2016060694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vize P. D., Jones E. A., Pfister R. (1995). Development of the Xenopus pronephric system. Dev. Biol. 171 531–540. 10.1006/dbio.1995.1302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walentek P., Beyer T., Thumberger T., Schweickert A., Blum M. (2012). ATP4a is required for Wnt-dependent Foxj1 expression and leftward flow in Xenopus left-right development. Cell Rep. 1 516–527. 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wallingford J. B., Mitchell B. (2011). Strange as it may seem: the many links between Wnt signaling, planar cell polarity, and cilia. Genes Dev. 25 201–213. 10.1101/gad.2008011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Werner M. E., Mitchell B. J. (2013). Using Xenopus skin to study cilia development and function. Methods Enzymol. 525 191–217. 10.1016/B978-0-12-397944-5.00010-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wild W., Pogge von Strandmann E., Nastos A., Senkel S., Lingott-Frieg A., Bulman M., et al. (2000). The mutated human gene encoding hepatocyte nuclear factor 1beta inhibits kidney formation in developing Xenopus embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 4695–4700. 10.1073/pnas.080010897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshiba S., Hamada H. (2014). Roles of cilia, fluid flow, and Ca2+ signaling in breaking of left right symmetry. Trends Genet. 30 10–17. 10.1016/j.tig.2013.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zaidi S., Choi M., Wakimoto H., Ma L., Jiang J., Overton J. D., et al. (2013). De novo mutations in histone-modifying genes in congenital heart disease. Nature 498 220–223. 10.1038/nature12141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou X., Vize P. D. (2004). Proximo-distal specialization of epithelial transport processes within the Xenopus pronephric kidney tubules. Dev. Biol. 271 322–338. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.03.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]