Abstract
Although obesity represents a risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the link between these pathological conditions is not so clear. The manner in which the different elements of adipose tissue (AT) interplay in order to grow has been suggested to have a role in the genesis of metabolic complications, but this has not yet been fully addressed in humans. Through IHC, transmission electron microscopy, cytometry, and in vitro cultures, we described the morphological and functional changes of subcutaneous and visceral AT (SAT and VAT) in normoglycemic, prediabetic and T2DM patients with obesity compared to lean subjects. In both SAT and VAT we measured a hypertrophic and hyperplastic expansion, causing similar vascular rarefaction in obese patients with different degrees of metabolic complications. Capillaries display dysfunctional basement membrane thickening only in T2DM patients evidencing VAT as a new target of T2DM microangiopathy. The largest increase in adipocyte size and decrease in adipose stem cell number and adipogenic potential occur both in T2DM and in prediabetes. We showed that SAT and VAT remodeling with stemness deficit is associated with early glucose metabolism impairment suggesting the benefit of an AT-target therapy controlling hypertrophy and hyperplasia already in prediabetic obese patients.
Subject terms: Stem-cell niche, Obesity, Diabetes
Introduction
Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are closely linked global health care problems. Although the close relationship between weight gain and development of T2DM is well established, factors determining or accelerating the progression from the former to the latter continue to be debated1. The microvasculature seems to play a central role in glucose homeostasis; impaired capillary recruitment and tissue perfusion have been shown to reduce glucose uptake, leading to insulin resistance (IR) and metabolic alterations2. It has been demonstrated that low vascular density in adipose tissue (AT) is associated with an abnormal metabolic profile3–5. Furthermore, microangiopathy is a hallmark of diabetes complications. The cellular elements of the microvasculature appear to be particularly sensitive to injury from sustained hyperglycemia. The microvascular impairment or damage differs considerably between different tissues and organs, but it is possible to assume that all organs are affected simultaneously to a greater or lesser degree6. Moreover, there is now abundant evidence that microvascular dysfunction/disease is not restricted to the presence of Type 1 or 2 diabetes but is also present in many diseases which are, or represent, the first step in the progression toward diabetes itself, such as obesity. Therefore, we supposed that capillary density decrease and microangiopathy appear in AT with the worsening of glucose impairment; to this end, we examined AT vascularization in three groups of BMI-matched obese patients with different glycemic profiles, comparing them with non-diabetic normal weight subjects.
On the other hand, the existence of a metabolically protected but obese phenotype supports the paradox of the expandability of healthy AT7. In adulthood, AT, through the concomitant expansion of its capillary network, grows by hypertrophy and hyperplasia8,9. Thus, changes in adipocyte morphology and in adipose stem cells (ASCs) number and phenotype could play a key role in the metabolic complication development in obesity. Moreover, although ASCs, which are responsible for hyperplastic growth, have been investigated during recent years10, their origin and relationship with endothelial progenitors remain burning issues11.
Since human visceral AT (VAT) is less accessible than subcutaneous AT (SAT) our knowledge of the structural and functional features of this depot are still limited12, we studied both depots to assess whether they had similar features and roles in the presence of glucose impairment.
Considering different aspects of AT morphology, cell biology and the microvascular network we aimed to gain further knowledge about the role of AT remodeling as a function of the metabolic complication in obesity.
Results
Patients’ Clinical Characterization
The demographic, anthropometric and metabolic characteristics of the lean subjects and obese patients are detailed in Table 1. The lean subjects, who were age-matched with the obese patients, showed a lower incidence of comorbidities (Hypertension, Dyslipidemia, Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome). As expected, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was similar in the lean and obese normoglycemic (ob N) patients; BMI and blood leptin level were not statistically different in the three groups of obese patients. FPG levels and the HOMAIR were statistically different in the obese groups; they rose markedly as glycemic impairment increased (obese prediabetic and diabetic patients, ob preDM and T2DM). Ob T2DM patients displayed a mean glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) value of 66 ± 21 mmol/mol (8.2 ± 4.1%) and 56% of them presented microalbuminuria (181 ± 186 mg/g creatinine) (data not shown). Regarding the three most important microvascular complications (nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy) only 11/50 patients reported one or more of them (data from 7 patients were not available). This low rate of diabetic microvascular complications is probably due to the short duration of the diabetes. Indeed 58% (33/57) of our patients had had a recent disease diagnosis (less than 5 years). Thirty-eight percent of the ob preDM patients had impaired fasting glucose, 26% had impaired glucose tolerance, 36% had both. The glucose and insulin area under the curve (AUC) were thus lower in the ob N compared to the ob preDM patients. The incidence of comorbidities and the systemic inflammation markers (high sensitivity C-reactive protein, hs-CRP; tumor necrosis factor-alpha, TNF-α; interleukin-6, IL-6) were higher in the ob T2DM compared to the ob N patients.
Table 1.
Patient Groups | P value | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
lean (n = 18) |
ob N (n = 62) |
ob preDM (n = 58) |
ob T2DM (n = 57) |
lean vs. ob N |
lean vs. ob preDM |
lean vs. ob T2DM |
ob N vs. ob preDM |
ob N vs. ob T2DM |
ob preDM vs. ob T2DM |
|
Female sex-n°(%) | 11(61.1) | 50(80.6) | 45(77.6) | 32(56.1) | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.007 | 0.02 |
Age (y) | 48 ± 12 | 41 ± 9 | 45 ± 10 | 52 ± 9 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.16 | <0.001 | 0.001 |
Hypertension-n°(%) | 2(11.1) | 24(38.7) | 31(53.4) | 53(92.9) | 0.06 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.15 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Dyslipidemia- n°(%) | 1(5.5) | 33(53.2) | 32(55.2) | 45(78.9) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.98 | 0.006 | 0.01 |
OSAS- n°(%) | 0(0) | 8(12.9) | 16(27.6) | 25(43.8) | 0.19 | 0.009 | 0.002 | 0.07 | <0.001 | 0.10 |
BMI (kg/m2) * | 24 ± 2 | 46 ± 8 | 47 ± 7 | 48 ± 8 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.83 | 0.10 | 1.0 |
FPG (mmol/L) | 5.1 ± 0.7 | 5.0 ± 0.3 | 5.9 ± 0.5 | 9.4 ± 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.006 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Insulin (mU/L) | — | 16 ± 10 | 26 ± 20 | 33 ± 32 | — | — | — | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.43 |
HOMAIR † | — | 3.7 ± 2.4 | 6.9 ± 5.7 | 12.3 ± 12.5 | — | — | — | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.03 |
Glucose-AUC (mmol/L) min ‡ | — | 1165 ± 125 | 1490 ± 171 | — | — | — | — | <0.001 | — | — |
Insulin-AUC (mU/L) min ‡ | — | 13113 ± 6989 | 17858 ± 9843 | — | — | — | — | 0.007 | — | — |
Waist (cm) § | — | 127 ± 14 | 132 ± 11 | 137 ± 16 | — | — | — | 0.04 | <0.001 | 0.48 |
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) | — | 188 ± 30 | 192 ± 37 | 185 ± 39 | — | — | — | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.59 |
HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) | — | 48 ± 11 | 46 ± 13 | 43 ± 11 | — | — | — | 0.60 | 0.02 | 0.50 |
LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) | — | 119 ± 25 | 120 ± 36 | 113 ± 35 | — | — | — | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.55 |
Triglycerides (mg/dL) | — | 110 ± 47 | 137 ± 79 | 163 ± 81 | — | — | — | 0.23 | <0.001 | 0.06 |
hs-CRP (mg/L) | — | 5.1 ± 3.3 | 6.9 ± 3.2 | 7.6 ± 3.4 | — | — | — | 0.02 | 0.001 | 1.0 |
TNF-α (ng/L) | — | 7.6 ± 2.9 | 7.7 ± 2.9 | 9.1 ± 3.2 | — | — | — | 1.0 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
IL-6 (ng/L) | — | 3.4 ± 2.5 | 3.2 ± 1.3 | 4.4 ± 2.4 | — | — | — | 0.81 | 0.003 | 0.08 |
Leptin (µg/L) | — | 39 ± 15 | 39 ± 16 | 36 ± 15 | — | — | — | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.47 |
Clinical data of control subjects (lean), normoglycemic (ob N), prediabetic (ob preDM) and diabetic (ob T2DM) obese patients are presented as mean values ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was based on the One Way ANOVA test (age, total cholesterol, leptin) or a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test (BMI, FPG, waist, insulin, HOMAIR, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, hs-CRP, TNF-α, IL-6) followed, when statistically significant by, respectively, the Holm-Sidak test or Dunn’s multiple comparison post-test. The Wilcoxon Mann Whitney test was used to compare glucose- and insulin-AUC values. Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare dichotomous variables between groups.
*BMI was calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by the square of height in meters. †HOMAIR was calculated according to the following formula: [fasting serum insulin (mU/L) x fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)]/22.5. ‡AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal method. §Waist circumference was measured with a tailor-meter at the midpoint of the line connecting the inferior border of the lowest rib with the superior border of the iliac crest.
Clinical data of subgroups of subjects analyzed in each different experiment were reported in Supplementary Information (Supplementary Tables S1–S6).
Adipose tissue morphological and gene expression studies
For the immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis, we selected patients with similar age among the groups described in Table 1. Histomorphometric evaluations (Fig. 1) highlighted that the SAT adipocytes were larger than the VAT ones in all the groups studied (P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney test). The median adipocyte area in both the SAT and VAT of all the obese subgroups was significantly higher compared to that of the lean group. Interestingly, adipocytes of ob preDM were larger than those of ob N and the ob T2DM subgroup showed an adipocyte size comparable to ob preDM (Fig. 1A–C). This is an important result, considering that the ob preDM patients selected for IHC analysis were “early” prediabetic. Indeed even if their glucose AUC was similar to the whole prediabetic population, their insulin AUC and HOMAIR values were more similar to those of the ob N subgroup (ob preDM vs ob N IHC; HOMAIR: 3.6 ± 1.8 vs 3.3 ± 1.9, P = 1.0; insulin AUC: 15463 ± 12065 vs 10535 ± 4853 mU/L per min, P = 0.84) (Supplementary Table S1).
Capillary density was higher in the VAT than in the SAT in all of the groups (P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney test) (Fig. 1D,E). The density of vessels was lower in both fat depots in the obese patients compared to the lean, but there were no differences between the obese subgroups (Fig. 1A,D,E). IHC data obtained from SAT and VAT positively correlate (Fig. 2A,B). Moreover, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma isoform 2 (PPARG2) mRNA was significantly upregulated in the obese patients compared to the lean, and the ob T2DM group had the lowest levels of all three groups (Supplementary Fig. S1A,B).
Hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha subunit (HIF1A) was upregulated only in the SAT of the obese patients compared to that of the lean group; the ob T2DM subgroup exhibited the highest expression level in SAT (Supplementary Fig. S1C,D). The vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expression in the SAT and VAT was similar in all the patients analyzed (Supplementary Fig. S1E,F).
Capillary basement membrane (CBM) analysis of adipose tissue
In literature, CBM thickness is described as being correlated with age13, therefore in order to avoid this bias we selected the more possible age-matched patients to perform the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis (Supplementary Table S2). It is worth noting that no patients in the ob T2DM group selected for TEM analysis reported diabetic microvascular complications but 60% presented microalbuminuria. The CBM thickness of the VAT of these patients was measured to investigate AT microangiopathy (Fig. 3). Only the ob T2DM patients showed a significant increase in CBM thickness compared to the other 3 groups (Fig. 3C). No significant differences were observed between the lean, ob N and preDM patients, although a pattern of progressive thickening was noted.
The CBM thickness was strongly positively correlated with FPG (Fig. 3D) and HOMAIR (Fig. 3E) and not with age (data not shown).
The immunophenotype and adipogenic potential of stromal vascular fraction (SVF)
The percentage of SAT-ASCs (CD45−/31−/34+) on the SVFs was significantly higher in the ob N compared to that in the lean group (Fig. 4A,B). VAT (Fig. 4C) in all the obese patients showed a significant ASC enrichment compared to that in the controls. Both SAT- and VAT-ASCs percentage was lower in the ob preDM compared to the ob N subgroup; this reduction was observed also in the ob T2DM subgroup to the same extent (Fig. 4B,C). The VAT contained a higher number of ASCs than the SAT did in all the patients. The number of adipogenic precursors was not correlated with age (data not shown), though the ob T2DM patients analyzed were older than the ob N and preDM patients (Supplementary Tables S3, S4).
The ASC phenotype was further characterized in the attempt to evaluate the expression of typical mesenchymal stem cell markers such as CD73, CD90, CD105, CD271 and pericyte marker CD146 (Supplementary Table S7). More than 90% of the CD45−/31−/34+ cells expressed CD73 and CD90 in both depots and similar patterns occurred in all the patient subgroups. CD105 was, instead, expressed only by 30–70% of the CD45−/31−/34+ in both the SAT and VAT of the lean subjects and obese patients. More specifically, the percentage of CD45−/31−/34+/105+ cells was similar in the SAT of all the groups, but it had increased in the VAT of all the obese subgroups compared to the lean group. Similar results were obtained with regard to CD271 antigen expression. A small ASC percentage (<2%) expressed the pericyte marker CD146 and there were no differences between the patient groups or AT depots.
The percentage of endothelial progenitors (CD45−/31+/34+) was higher in the SAT of all the obese patients compared to that in the lean (Fig. 4D) and this trend was similar, even if not significant, in the VAT (Fig. 4E). Importantly, the percentage of stem cells in the SAT was positively correlated with that in the VAT (Fig. 2C,D). No differences in the number of endothelial mature cells (CD45−/31+/34−) were observed in the two AT depots of the various groups (Fig. 4F,G).
Lastly, the capacity to differentiate towards the adipogenic lineage was investigated in obese patients whose clinical characteristics are described in Supplementary Tables S5, S6. In vitro differentiation revealed a lower percentage of mature adipocytes from the SAT-SVF of ob preDM and T2DM compared to the ob N subgroup (Fig. 5A). SVFs isolated from the VAT displayed a very low adipogenic potential with no differences between the subgroups (Fig. 5B). These results were confirmed by the gene expression analysis of 3 adipose-specific genes (PPARG2, FABP4 and ADIPOQ), quantified in cell cultures upon in vitro adipogenic differentiation (Fig. 5C–H).
Discussion
Since AT plasticity contributes to the pathogenesis of obesity and related metabolic complications9,14, we aimed to explore AT remodeling in normoglycemic, prediabetic and diabetic patients with obesity.
Several lines of evidence suggested that AT vascularization changes could influence fat growth and its metabolic features4,5,15,16. Confirming and extending on previous studies, we showed the presence of capillary rarefaction in the SAT and VAT of the obese patients compared to the lean subjects3,4,17,18. Surprisingly, the degree of vascularization was similar in the obese subgroups independently of any further increase in adipocyte size or worsening in the metabolic profile (Fig. 1D,E). We demonstrated that among obese patients there are no differences in the number of AT capillaries, neither in VEGFA expression (Supplementary Fig. S1E,F) nor in the quantification of endothelial mature cells isolated from AT-SVFs (Fig. 4F,G). Thus, obesity-related T2DM did not seem to be triggered by vascular network defects. At the same time, the capillary rarefaction and the higher levels of the HIF1A we found in the SAT of the obese patients (Supplementary Fig. S1C) confirm the hypothesis that hypoxia could play a central role in AT dysfunction in obesity, as previously reported3,18–22. Our AT expression profile analysis showed that HIF1A upregulation is not associated with a parallel induction in VEGFA expression (Supplementary Fig. S1C,E). Although the endothelial precursors were higher in the AT of the obese patients compared to lean controls (Fig. 4D,E), they seemed to be unable to differentiate into mature endothelial cells or to form capillary structures (Figs 1D,E and 4F,G), suggesting that HIF1A upregulation during obesity induces only a detrimental transcriptional program contributing to AT dysfunction17,19,20,23.
Our TEM investigation in VAT highlighted a significant CBM thickening only in ob T2DM patients (Fig. 3A–C) and a positive correlation between this thickening and FPG and HOMAIR (Fig. 3D,E), but not with BMI values. These results support the hypothesis that obesity per se does not affect CBM structure and that thickening is mostly related to the exposure to chronic hyperglycemia. Our results suggested that the capillaries of VAT of obese T2DM patients could be functionally impaired contributing to the worsening of hypoxic conditions and AT inflammation leading to a more severe adiposopathy associated with long-term metabolic complications present in overt T2DM. CBM thickening of the retina and the kidney has long been known to be a crucial anatomic feature of microangiopathy in patients with Type 1 and 2 DM6 but this is the first study describing VAT microangiopathy as a function of glucose metabolic impairment in obese patients.
Regarding AT morphology, we observed a clear increase in adipocyte size in patients with obesity when compared to lean controls at the same extension in SAT and in VAT, but intriguingly the largest cell size observed in patients with obesity and T2DM was also detected in the prediabetic condition (Fig. 1A–C). Thus, alterations in AT morphology did not seem to be a result of prolonged hyperglicemia, hyperinsulinemia or elevated IR degree in the patients studied. We recently published that the insulin signalling pathway is similarly active in the AT of prediabetic and normoglycemic obese patients and it is downregulated in diabetic obese patients24. Therefore, the increase in adipocyte size seems pre-existent to insulin signalling alterations and could be linked to genetic or epigenetic characteristics of patients. The increasing size of adipocytes in the obese patients compared to the lean controls and the general observation that the adipocytes were larger in the SAT than in VAT (Figs 1A–C and 2A) also concur with previous reports25–27. The huge AT expansion in obesity was also confirmed by the marked up-regulation of PPARG2 expression in both depots (Supplementary Fig. S1A,B).
We observed an increase of ASCs, which could be considered a marker of AT hyperplastic growth, in the obese patients compared to lean controls and a shrinking of their number in the obese patients with glycemic impairment (Fig. 4A–C). Accordingly, the in vitro adipogenic potential of SAT-SVF cells from the ob preDM and T2DM patients was lower than that in the ob N (Fig. 5A,C,E,G), supporting the theory that the balance between hypertrophy and hyperplasia in AT growth contributes to metabolic impairment25,28–30. Despite the fact we only had the possibility to perform cross-sectional observations on our obese cohort, several of our results were consistent with previous findings obtained by a prospective longitudinal study on the Pima Indian population30.
Although SAT seems to conserve some beneficial features such as the higher amount of endothelial precursors and a greater in vitro adipogenic potential, many of our findings obtained in SAT correlate with those obtained in VAT (Fig. 2) suggesting that both AT depots could play a role in severe obesity and metabolic complications.
Figure 6 well represents all our data showing that AT in obesity grows both through hypertrophy and hyperplasia causing vascular rarefaction that is not related to glucose metabolism impairment. Mature adipocytes are enlarged and there are significantly fewer ASCs early in the prediabetic condition. These alterations in AT remodeling are also present into overt diabetes in association with the development of AT diabetic microangiopathy.
Our results suggest that the dynamic balance between AT hyperplasia and hypertrophy, rather than vascular network impairment, is the early crucial alteration triggering the pathogenesis of impaired glucose homeostasis in severe obesity. Future studies will be necessary to identify the mechanisms leading to these AT structural changes and to develop a specific AT targeting therapy for prediabetic obese patients.
Methods
Patients
In order to investigate AT architecture, paired SAT and VAT samples were collected from 177 obese patients and from 18 normal weight non-diabetic (lean) subjects considered the control group. The baseline clinical evaluation included a complete medical history and clinical examination. The patients’ anthropometric measurements were taken, and hematological and biochemical parameters were determined (Table 1). The study’s exclusion criteria were: a history of malignancy, chronic inflammatory diseases such as ulcerative colitis and/or Crohn’s disease, active infectious diseases, drug or alcohol abuse and, for the lean subjects, T2DM.
All the obese patients, attending the Center for the Study and the Integrated Treatment of Obesity (Ce.S.I.T.O) of Padua Hospital between January 2014 and June 2016, were selected with a matched BMI. In accordance with the American Diabetes Association criteria they were divided into 3 groups depending on their glycemic profile: 62 were ob N, 58 ob preDM and 57 ob T2DM31. One hundred sixty-nine obese patients underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and 8 underwent a gastric bypass.
The lean subjects (18.5 ≤ BMI ≤ 24.9 Kg/m2) were attending the Division of General Surgery or the Ce.S.I.T.O of Padua Hospital; AT samples were harvested from them during abdominal surgery (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, fundoplication, colic resection for diverticular disease, rectal prolapse reduction).
All adipose tissue samples were collected during laparoscopic surgery in the abdominal region. In particular, VAT was obtained harvesting at least 1 cm3 of omental fat, while SAT was obtained excising 1 cm3 of subcutaneous fat at trocar site, both in obese and lean subjects.
The incidence of the three principal obesity-related comorbidities (hypertension, dyslipidemia and obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome) was calculated for each group of patients. Patients were considered affected by one of the above-mentioned comorbidities when they were receiving specific treatment or when they met international criteria32–34.
Biochemical analysis
Blood biochemical analyses were performed after an 8-hour fast. FPG, insulin, lipid profile, hs-CRP, TNF-α, IL-6 and leptin levels were measured in all of the obese patients studied. The HOMAIR was used to calculate the insulin resistance index35. A 3-hour 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed for blood glucose and insulin plasma levels at baseline and 30, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes after glucose loading (180 mL of syrup with 82.5 g glucose monohydrate equal to 75 g of glucose). Glucose and insulin AUC was calculated. OGTT was not performed in obese patients with a history of diabetes, and fasting insulin was not measured in patients receiving insulin treatment, meaning that HOMAIR was not calculated in these patient categories. In patients with T2DM we also measured HbA1c (by high performance liquid chromatography) and microalbuminuria by the albumin/creatinine ratio (urinary albumin/creatinine ratio <30 mg/g creatinine was considered normal). Biochemical measurements were performed using diagnostic kits standardized according to the World Health Organization First International Reference Standard: glucose (Glucose HK Gen.3, Roche Diagnostic, USA), insulin, IL-6, TNF-α (IMMULITE 2000 Immunoassay, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Germany), hs-CRP (CardioPhase High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein, Siemens Healthcare) and leptin (Leptin-RIA-CT, Mediagnost, Germany).
IHC analysis
Paired SAT and VAT samples were fixed in 4% formaldehyde (Diapath S.p.A, Bergamo, Italy), paraffin embedded, cut into 5 µm thick sections and stained with monoclonal mouse anti-human CD31 (clone JC70A, 1:100; DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA). The selected patients were of similar age, while their main demographic, anthropometric and metabolic characteristics were comparable to the whole population (Supplementary Table S1). Indirect immunohistochemistry was performed with a Dako labeled streptavidin biotin-horseradish peroxidase kit. AT images were captured at 20X magnification with a Leica DFGC450 digital camera (Leica DM LB2 light microscope) in at least 10 different fields (up to a minimum of 200 random adipocytes) per specimen of each patient. The adipocytes’ sizes were measured using LAS Software (Leica Microsystems Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA). The median adipocyte area for each field was used to calculate the median adipocyte area for each subgroup of patients. The number of capillaries per mm2 was determined counting positive capillary lumens in the same fields in which the adipocytes’ areas were measured.
TEM analysis
VAT samples were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde-2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 7.4 for 1 hour at 4 °C, postfixed in osmium tetroxide 1% for 1 hour at 4 °C and embedded in an Epon-Araldite mixture. Ultrathin sections (60–70 nm) were obtained with an Ultratome V ultramicrotome (LKB, Stockholm, Sweden), counterstained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and viewed with a Tecnai G2 microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) operating at 100 KV. Images were captured with a Veleta (Olympus Soft Imaging System GmbH, Münster, Germany) digital camera.
Morphometric evaluation of CBM from TEM images at 93000X magnification was performed using Image J software, as described by Baum, on at least 45 capillaries for each group of patients36. Only images showing capillaries cut perpendicular to their long axes were used for analysis.
SVF extraction and flow cytometry analysis
Depending on tissue availability, SVF cells from AT were freshly isolated for ex vivo multiparametric flow cytometric analysis and/or primary adipocytes culture.
SAT and VAT biopsies were minced and digested in collagenase type II solution (1 mg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), centrifuged (350 xg, 10 min) and the red blood cells were removed using a standard lysis buffer, as previously described by Sanna et al.37.
1 × 105 SVF freshly isolated cells were washed with a cold FACS buffer (2% BSA/PBS) and simultaneously incubated in the dark for 10 min at room temperature with monoclonal mouse anti-human fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (BD Biosciences) in different combinations showen in Supplementary Table S8. After washing with the FACS buffer, labeled cells were resuspended in 200 µl of FACS buffer and acquired (30000 events/sample) by a FACSCantoTM Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences). Data acquisition and analysis were performed using BD FACSDiva™ software. Regions and gates were set by a negative control, isotype-matched PE-IgG1, FITC-IgG1, APC-IgG1 and PerCP-Cy5.5-IgG1 monoclonal antibodies (BD Biosciences). ASCs, identified as CD45−/31−/34+, were quantified as percentages in the SVF morphological gate. The endothelial progenitor and mature cells were identified, respectively as CD45−/31+/34+ and CD45−/31+/34−, and quantified using the same procedure11,38. The expression of additional mesenchymal stromal/stem cells markers (CD73, CD90, CD105, CD271) and of pericyte marker CD146 were quantified in the ASCs’ immunological gate by subtracting the FITC signal (CD31-FITC and CD45-FITC).
Adipogenic differentiation
1 × 105 SVF cells per well were seeded in duplicate in 96-well plates in a human standard medium and, when the cells reached confluence, adipogenic differentiation was induced using an adipogenic medium as described in Borgo et al.24. At the end of differentiation (12 days), RNA was extracted from the cell cultures (two 96-well replicates lysed together), as described in the paragraph below, and the cell cultures (two 96-well replicates) were fixed in 10% formalin/PBS and stained with Oil-Red O (Sigma-Aldrich) solution in 40% isopropanol. After 3 PBS washes, the percentage of mature adipocytes was estimated by observing the specific staining for lipid droplets during double blind observation with a Leica DM IL LED inverted microscope.
RNA extraction and real time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from paired SAT and VAT samples and from in vitro adipogenic differentiated cell cultures (12 days) using RNeasy Lipid Kits (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA), following the supplier’s instructions, and quantified using NanoDrop technology (Fisher Scientific SAS, Illkirch Cedex, France). Five hundred ng of RNA was treated with DNase Treatment and Removal Reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and reverse-transcribed for 1 h at 37 °C with 150 ng random hexamers, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 20 units of RNAsin Ribonuclease Inhibitor and 200 units of M-MLV RT (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Oligonucleotide sequences and amplification conditions are shown in Supplementary Table S9. Real Time PCR was carried out with Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix-UDG (Thermo Fisher) on a DNA Engine Opticon 2 Continuous Fluorescence Detection System (MJ Research, Waltham, MA, USA). Duplicate 5 ng cDNA samples were normalized by RNA18S content.
Statistical analysis
Mean values with standard deviations (SD) and percentages were used to describe the clinical parameters. All the variables were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test and, based on their distribution, the differences between the groups were evaluated using a parametric One Way ANOVA test or a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test; these were followed, respectively, by Fisher’s LSD/Holm-Sidak or by Dunn’s multiple comparison post-test. Pearson’s chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare dichotomous variables. Student’s t-test and the Mann-Whitney non parametric test were used when two groups were compared. All the P values were two-sided; a P value lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) and the relative P values were calculated to measure the strength of the statistical correlation between two variables. Statistical analyses were performed using STATISTICs Software (StatSoft 7.1).
Study approval
The Padua Ethical Committee for Clinical Research approved the study involving patients confirming that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations (2892 P approved 10/06/2013); each subject gave informed written consent for AT biopsies.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Italian Ministries of Health and MIUR (Ricerca Finalizzata 1526404, PRIN 2010329EKE_005 and 2017L8Z2EM to R.V.). We thank Dr. Alessandra Comin for her expert technical support and Dr. Pietro Maffei for his critical reading and helpful discussion.
Author Contributions
A.B., C.C., M.S., F.F., G.M. and R.V. designed the study and the experiments; A.B., C.C., M.S. and F.F. performed the experiments; A.B., R.F., L.B., C.D.P., R.S., S.C. and S.B. acquired clinical data; M.F., L.P., C.D.R., R.B., C.M. and M.R. provided human samples; A.B., C.C., M.S., F.F. and G.M. analyzed data; A.B. and C.C. wrote the original draft; A.B., C.C., M.S., F.F., L.B., P.F., S.C., G.M. and R.V. reviewed/edited the manuscript; G.M. and R.V. supervised all experiments. All authors confirmed the last version of the manuscript. R.V. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Data Availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Anna Belligoli and Chiara Compagnin contributed equally.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-47719-y.
References
- 1.Kahn SE, Cooper ME, Del Prato S. Pathophysiology and treatment of type 2 diabetes: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Lancet. 2014;383(9922):1068–83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62154-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Levy BI, et al. Impaired tissue perfusion: a pathology common to hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2008;118(9):968–76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.763730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pasarica M, et al. Reduced adipose tissue oxygenation in human obesity: evidence for rarefaction, macrophage chemotaxis, and inflammation without an angiogenic response. Diabetes. 2009;58(3):718–725. doi: 10.2337/db08-1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gealekman O, et al. Depot-specific differences and insufficient subcutaneous adipose tissue angiogenesis in human obesity. Circulation. 2011;123(2):186–94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sung HK, et al. Adipose Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Regulates Metabolic Homeostasis through Angiogenesis. Cell Metab. 2013;17(1):61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Orasanu G, Plutzky J. The pathologic continuum of diabetic vascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(5 Suppl):S35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Denis GV, Obin MS. Metabolically healthy obesity: origins and implications. Mol Aspects Med. 2013;34(1):59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pellegrinelli V, Carobbio S, Vidal-Puig A. Adipose tissue plasticity: how fat depots respond differently to pathophysiological cues. Diabetologia. 2016;59(6):1075–88. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-3933-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sun K, Kusminski CM, Scherer PE. Adipose tissue remodeling and obesity. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(6):2094–101. doi: 10.1172/JCI45887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tallone T, et al. Adult human adipose tissue contains several types of multipotent cells. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2011;4(2):200–10. doi: 10.1007/s12265-011-9257-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Guimarães-Camboa N, Evans SM. Are perivascular adipocyte progenitors mural cells or adventitial fibroblasts? Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20(5):587–9. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Després JP, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2006;444(7121):881–7. doi: 10.1038/nature05488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Xi Y, Nette EG, King DW, Rosen M. Age-related changes in normal human basement membrane. Mech Ageing Dev. 1982;19(4):315–24. doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(82)90015-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Berry R, Jeffery E, Rodeheffer MS. Weighing in on adipocyte precursors. Cell Metab. 2014;19(1):8–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hodson L, Humphreys SM, Karpe F, Frayn KN. Metabolic Signatures of Human Adipose Tissue Hypoxia in Obesity. Diabetes. 2013;62(5):1417–25. doi: 10.2337/db12-1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tinahones FJ, et al. Obesity-associated insulin resistance is correlated to adipose tissue vascular endothelial growth factors and metalloproteinase levels. BMC Physiol. 2012;12:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6793-12-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Corvera S, Gealekman O. Adipose tissue angiogenesis: impact on obesity and type-2 diabetes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1842(3):463–72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Goossens GH, Blaak EE. Adipose tissue oxygen tension: implications for chronic metabolic and inflammatory diseases. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2012;15(6):539–46. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328358fa87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Crewe C, An YA, Scherer PE. The ominous triad of adipose tissue dysfunction: inflammation, fibrosis, and impaired angiogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(1):74–82. doi: 10.1172/JCI88883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Halberg N, et al. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 Induces Fibrosis and Insulin Resistance in White Adipose Tissue. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29(16):4467–83. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00192-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hosogai N, et al. Adipose tissue hypoxia in obesity and its impact on adipocytokine dysregulation. Diabetes. 2007;56(4):901–11. doi: 10.2337/db06-0911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Trayhurn P, Wang B, Wood IS. Hypoxia in adipose tissue: a basis for the dysregulation of tissue function in obesity? Br J Nutr. 2008;100(2):227–35. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508971282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sun K, Tordjman J, Clément K, Scherer PE. Fibrosis and adipose tissue dysfunction. Cell Metab. 2013;18(4):470–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Borgo C, et al. CK2 modulates adipocyte insulin-signaling and is up-regulated in human obesity. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17569. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17809-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Muir LA, et al. Adipose tissue fibrosis, hypertrophy, and hyperplasia: Correlations with diabetes in human obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(3):597–605. doi: 10.1002/oby.21377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tchernof A, et al. Regional differences in adipose tissue metabolism in women: minor effect of obesity and body fat distribution. Diabetes. 2006;55(5):1353–60. doi: 10.2337/db05-1439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Villaret A, et al. Adipose tissue endothelial cells from obese human subjects: differences among depots in angiogenic, metabolic, and inflammatory gene expression and cellular senescence. Diabetes. 2010;59(11):2755–63. doi: 10.2337/db10-0398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Danforth E., Jr. Failure of adipocyte differentiation causes type II diabetes mellitus? Nat Genet. 2000;26(1):13. doi: 10.1038/79111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dubois SG, et al. Look AHEAD Adipose Research Group. Decreased Expression of Adipogenic Genes in Obese Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14(9):1543–52. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Weyer C, Foley JE, Bogardus C, Tataranni PA, Pratley RE. Enlarged subcutaneous abdominal adipocyte size, but not obesity itself, predicts type II diabetes independent of insulin resistance. Diabetologia. 2000;43(12):1498–506. doi: 10.1007/s001250051560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes-2017. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl 1):S11–24. doi: 10.2337/dc17-S005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mancia G, et al. ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) J Hypertens. 2013;31(7):1281–357. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Catapano AL, et al. ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(39):2999–3058. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sateia MJ. International classification of sleep disorders-third edition: highlights and modifications. Chest. 2014;146(5):1387–94. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Matthews DR, et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28(7):412–9. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Baum O, Bigler M. Pericapillary basement membrane thickening in human skeletal muscles. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2016;311(3):H654–66. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00048.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sanna M, et al. Adipogenic potential of skeletal muscle satellite cells. Clin Lipidol. 2009;4(2):245–65. doi: 10.2217/clp.09.8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zimmerlin L, Donnenberg VS, Rubin JP, Donnenberg AD. Mesenchymal markers on human adipose stem/progenitor cells. Cytometry A. 2013;83(1):134–40. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files.