Abstract
Background
Diagnosis is the most strenuous step in the evaluation of neonatal sepsis. No gold standard diagnostic method is available except for blood culture. We aimed to investigate the role of positive and negative acute phase reactants, namely presepsin and fetuin-A, in the diagnosis of culture-proven late-onset sepsis.
Methods
A prospective, case-control study with the infants ≤32 weeks of age with a diagnosis of culture-proven late-onset sepsis was designed. Twenty-nine preterm infants with similar gestational and postnatal ages without sepsis constituted the control group. Serum values of presepsin, fetuin-A, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 were evaluated at the enrollment, third and seventh days of the diagnosis in the infants with positive blood culture results.
Results
First-day presepsin values were significantly higher in the culture-positive infants than the control group [1583 ng/L (1023–1731) vs. 426 ng/L (287–589), p = < 0.0001]. Presepsin was found to have an 88.9% sensitivity and 88.9% specificity with a cut-off value of 823 ng/ml for culture-proven LOS in our study, and area under the receiver-operating curve was 0.939. Fetuin-A levels were similar between the study and control groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion
Presepsin may be an accurate marker for both diagnosis and monitoring of treatment response for culture-proven late-onset sepsis in preterm infants. However, fetuin-A does not seem to be a useful tool for the diagnosis of sepsis.
Keywords: Presepsin, Neonatal sepsis, Diagnosis
Background
Despite recent advances in neonatal medicine in the last years, sepsis is still a leading cause of mortality and morbidity among hospitalized infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) [1–3]. Nearly two-thirds of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants experience more than one episode of suspected or culture-proven late-onset sepsis (LOS) during hospitalization [1]. Neurodevelopmental impairment and mortality are substantially higher in ELBW infants with sepsis, even if without meningitis, compared with those not experienced infections [1]. Related to these high risks, if there is any clinical suspicion arised, empirical antibiotic treatment should be immediately.
Diagnosis is the most strenuous step in the assessment of sepsis beacuse of non-specific clinical signs and symptoms. Blood culture positivity is still the gold standard diagnostic tool. Blood culture technique difficulties, such as long waiting time, contamination and inability to produce microorganisms have led to a comprehensive search for biomarkers in addition to frequently used acute phase reactants like C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin for diagnosis of neonatal LOS [2–5]. Some inflammatory markers and cytokines have been investigated for the determination of an ongoing infection. However, the incidence at which each marker begins to show increasing and the time to normalization differs through each marker [6–8].
Cluster of differentiation (CD) 14 is the co-receptor of lipopolysaccharide-lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LPS-LBP) complexes, together with Toll-Like Receptor (TLR) 4 and MD-2. With stimulation by pathogen microorganisms, a soluble CD14 subtype called presepsin is released into the circulation from the surface of membranes of immune cells and also actively secreted from these tissues [9, 10]. This molecule transduces the endotoxin signal, thus leading to the release of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon-γ, interleukin-1β, interleukin-8, and interleukin-6(IL-6), causing systemic inflammatory response syndrome [9]. Although the function of presepsin is not precisely clear, it possibly regulates the immune response by interaction with lymphocytes. High levels of presepsin in blood circulation are thought to reflect systemic inflammation and therefore may be a reliable diagnostic marker in sepsis and systemic inflammatory response. Moderate diagnostic accuracy was demonstrated in the presence of sepsis by a meta-analysis in adult population [11]. Afterward, the diagnostic value in neonates was investigated in various reports [12–17]. Recently Bellos et al. demonstrated that presepsin was a sensitive biomarker in neonatal sepsis [18].
Fetuin-A (also termed alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein) functions as a negative acute-phase protein that is down-regulated in case of inflammation [19]. Most of the data about its function was obtained from animal studies. It was shown that fetuin-A levels decline in the early period of sepsis, but begin to increase again at 72 h of inflammation [20, 21]. It was demonstrated that fetuin-A supports the functioning of the immune system partially by inhibiting the release of late mediators of inflammation. Although it is still unclear how fetuin-A induces suppression of late mediators, it is believed to play a crucial role in the struggle against sepsis. There is limited data on whether fetuin-A is helpful in the diagnosis and follow-up of neonatal sepsis.
We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of presepsin and fetuin-A dyad as a diagnostic tool for LOS in preterm infants.
Methods
Patient population
This study was performed in the NICU between January and March 2018. Our unit is a huge perinatal center that has approximately 18,000 annual births, 4000 patient admissions, and 100 tertiary level NICU incubators. The local ethics committee confirmed this study. It was carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the parents of each patient.
Study design
Infants who were born ≤32 weeks gestational age and 4 to 60 days postnatal age with gram-positive and/or negative bacteria detected in blood culture were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were the presence of major congenital and/or chromosomal anomalies. Patients were matched in terms of gestational age, birth weight and gender. Newborn infants who had no signs or symptoms of sepsis were enrolled in the control group.
Laboratory tests included complete blood count, CRP, IL-6, Presepsin, Fetuin-A, blood, urine and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures. These tests were performed on the first evaluation day before antibiotic treatment and repeated after 48 and 120 h from the first sampling. Blood samples for Presepsin and Fetuin-A were stored at − 80 °C until blood culture results were gathered. Blood cultures were not taken from control group patients.
Infection definitions
Diagnosis of sepsis was put forward based on the report of the expert meeting on neonatal and pediatric sepsis [22]. Clinical signs were often subtle and insidious and include respiratory (tachypnea, apnea, increase in ventilatory support), metabolic (feeding problems, temperature irregularity, metabolic acidosis), circulatory (hypotension, poor perfusion and decrease in heart rate) and neurologic (lethargy, irritability) symptoms. The presence of at least two clinical findings and at least two laboratory signs with accompanying negative blood culture was defined as ‘probable sepsis’. Sepsis occurring after 72 h of life was diagnosed as late-onset sepsis. Patients were diagnosed with ‘culture-proven sepsis’ when the blood culture was positive in addition to clinical signs and abnormal acute phase reactants.
Infection biomarkers
Plasma sample of 0.5 ml was gathered in an ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) containing tube from venous puncture, and after centrifugation samples were stored at − 80 °C. Presepsin was detected in these samples simultaneously with the sepsis investigation. Presepsin was quantified by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay with the automated analyzer Human sCD14 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) Kit (Elabscience Biotechnology Co.®, Ltd., China). Serum fetuin-A levels were confirmed by a sandwich ELISA in sepsis and control groups (Human Fetuin-A ELISA kit, Biovendor®, Modrice, Czech Republic).
Tina-quant CRP (latex) high sensitive immunoturbidimetric assay on the Roche Modular P analyzer was used to measure plasma CRP concentrations according to the manufacturer’s instructions (CRP latex HS, Roche kit, Roche Diagnostics®, Mannheim, Germany). CRP was considered normal if it was in the 0–5 mg/L range. Serum levels of IL-6 were analyzed by IL-6 solid phase, enzyme labeled, chemiluminescent sequential immunometric assay on an IMMULITE 1000 analyzer, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Siemens Diagnostic Product Corporation®, Los Angeles, CA). IL-6 levels > 25 pg/ml were regarded as abnormal. The fully automated BACTEC method by BacT/Alert (Biomeriux®, France) was used for cultures.
Empirical penicillin G and gentamicin therapy are given to high-risk preterm newborns; including preterm premature rupture of the membranes, maternal chorioamnionitis, fetal/intrapartum stres, surfactant requirement admitted to our clinic. Initial antibiotic regimens included intravenous vancomycin and amikacin when there was suspicion of LOS. Antibiotic therapy protocol was assigned according to the most common infectious agents in our NICU and switched relying on isolated microorganisms in blood culture and antimicrobial susceptibility test results. The most common pathogens of LOS in preterm neonates were coagulase-negative staphylococci, Klebsiella pneumonia and Serratia marcescens. While the duration of therapy was 10 days in case of culture-proven LOS, 14 days of treatment was assured if there was a specific focus of infection such as meningitis.
Statistical analysis
SPSS for Windows® (version 20.0) statistical package was used for statistical analyses. The χ2 test was utilized for comparison of categorical variables between groups. The normal distribution assumption of numerical variables was evaluated with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.
T-test was used for normally distributed variables and Mann Whitney U test for abnormal distributed or non-parametric variables. ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for the evaluation of the difference in normally and abnormal distributed variables respectively if there were three or more variables. ROC curve was used for determination of the diagnostic ability of different variables. Best cut-off values were calculated with the Youden index. A standard P value of < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
Results
A total of 55 patients were included in the study. Of these, 26 had culture-proven LOS. Twenty-nine patients constituted the control group. Mean gestational ages and birth weights were 29.1 ± 3.7 and 29.7 ± 1.8, 1202 ± 698 and 1212 ± 268 g in sepsis and control groups, respectively. Gram-negative bacteria were detected in 17 of the 26 infants with sepsis. The demographic and clinical features of the study and control groups are shown in Table 1. There were no differences between the groups in terms of maternal, demographic or clinical properties.
Table 1.
Sepsis group (n = 26) |
Control group (n = 29) |
P | |
---|---|---|---|
Gestational age, w | 29.1 ± 3.7 | 29.7 ± 1.8 | > 0.05 |
Birth weight, g | 1201 ± 698 | 1212 ± 268 | > 0.05 |
Male gender n, (%) | 12 (66) | 15 (55) | > 0.05 |
Mode of delivery (Cesarean), (%) | 14 (77.7) | 17 (63) | > 0.05 |
PPROM (%) | 1 (5.5) | 2 (7.4) | > 0.05 |
Serum levels of presepsin, fetuin-A, CRP and IL-6 on three different days were compared. Initial CRP, IL-6 and presepsin concentrations were higher in septic neonates compared with the control group (Table 2, p = 0.001, p = 0.004 and p = 0.000 respectively). Fetuin-A levels were similar in sepsis and control groups (p = 0.423).
Table 2.
Sepsis group (n = 26) |
Control group (n = 29) |
P | |
---|---|---|---|
First day | |||
WBC1, (103/μL) | 12.6 ± 5.9 | 16.1 ± 5.3 | < 0.05 |
CRP1, (mg/L) | 24.84 ± 31.76 | 2.25 ± 2.09 | < 0.01 |
IL-61, (pg/ml)a | 190 (11–5000) | 13.6 (0–42) | < 0.01 |
Presepsin1, (ng/L) | 1583 (1023–1731) | 426 (287–589) | < 0.01 |
Fetuin-A1, (ng/ml) | 32.66 ± 6.05 | 31.33 ± 8.57 | 0.42 |
amedian (min-max)
Gram-negative bacteria were detected in 17 of 26 culture-proven LOS patients. The microorganisms were Klebsiella pneumonia in seven cases, Escherichia coli in five cases, Acinetobacter baumannii in three cases, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Serratia marcescens in one case each. Staphylococcus epidermidis was isolated from the blood cultures of nine infants with LOS. No difference was revealed concerning presepsin, fetuin-A, CRP, IL-6 and white blood cell (WBC) between gram negative and positive bacteria subgroups (Table 3).
Table 3.
Gram (+) sepsis (n = 9) |
Gram (−) sepsis (n = 17) |
P | |
---|---|---|---|
First day | |||
WBC1, (103/μL) | 12.85 ± 4.93 | 12.45 ± 6.65 | > 0.05 |
CRP1, (mg/L) | 13.95 ± 11.5 | 32.48 ± 28.35 | > 0.05 |
IL-61, (pg/ml)* | 173 (11–4879) | 212 (49–5000) | > 0.05 |
Presepsin1, (ng/L) | 1385 (988–1427) | 1471 (1088–1731) | > 0.05 |
Fetuin-A1, (ng/ml) | 35.20 ± 7.33 | 31.93 ± 4.39 | > 0.05 |
Third day | |||
WBC2, (103/μL) | 12.88 ± 4.29 | 13.62 ± 5.53 | > 0.05 |
CRP2, (mg/L) | 16.51 ± 9.00 | 22.80 ± 16.77 | > 0.05 |
IL62, (pg/ml)* | 41.3 (11.7–99.7) | 53 (8.4–103) | > 0.05 |
Presepsin2, (ng/L) | 1030 (826–1292) | 1101 (931–1315) | > 0.05 |
Fetuin-A2, (ng/ml) | 32.94 ± 5.89 | 31.12 ± 4.39 | > 0.05 |
Seventh day | |||
WBC3, (103/μL) | 14.65 ± 9.41 | 10.15 ± 2.22 | > 0.05 |
CRP3, (mg/L) | 5.92 ± 4.07 | 11.03 ± 5.36 | > 0.05 |
IL-63, (pg/ml)a | 12.5 (6–84) | 16 (2–44) | > 0.05 |
Presepsin3, (ng/L) | 608 (238–854) | 781 (452–873) | > 0.05 |
Fetuin-A3, (ng/ml) | 37.05 ± 4.69 | 32.50 ± 4.48 | > 0.05 |
amedian (min-max)
Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was utilized for the detection of the area under the curve (AUC) for CRP, IL-6 and presepsin. Cut-off values for both parameters were determined through ROC curve analysis. Positive and negative predictive values were both calculated. ROC curves of the two groups are shown in Fig. 1. The AUC was 0.939 for presepsin, and 0.959 and 0.850 for IL-6 and CRP, respectively (Table 4).
Table 4.
AUC | Cut-off level | Specificity (%) | Sensitivity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRP, mg/L | 0.850 | 3.90 | 81.5 | 72.2 | 73.6 | 81.4 |
IL-6, pg/ml | 0.959 | 23.22 | 78.2 | 94.4 | 75 | 95.4 |
Presepsin, ng/L | 0.939 | 823 | 88.9 | 88.9 | 72.7 | 87.5 |
Fetuin-A, ng/ml | 0.612 | 30.17 | 48.1 | 72.2 | 48.1 | 68.4 |
Discussion
We investigated the role of the presepsin and fetuin-A dyad for diagnosis and follow-up of culture-proven LOS in preterm infants. While we found significantly higher presepsin values in LOS, fetuin-A concentrations were almost similar between the groups.
Early diagnosis is often compelling due to the lack of overt and specific signs and symptoms [2, 3]. Moreover, identification is much more troublesome owing to the already sick state and accompanying morbidities. Nevertheless, high mortality rate and long-term adverse neurodevelopmental sequelae make prompt and exact diagnosis compulsive in LOS [1–3]. The only ‘gold standard’ diagnostic method is a positive blood culture in neonatal sepsis. But sample volume and bacterial load in blood influence the accuracy of the test result. The necessity of a long time for a blood culture result is another obstacle in diagnosis. Various markers have been identified so far, but an ideal marker has not yet been found [23, 24]. The dilemma associated with CRP is the poor sensitivity and delay in elevation after an infective stimulus [4]. These challenges necessitate the use of molecular-based techniques, like PCR, for diagnosis [2, 23, 24]. We planned to explore the diagnostic role of the presepsin and fetuin-A dyad in culture-proven LOS in preterm infants. Presepsin was demonstrated to be a valuable tool for early diagnosis of sepsis.
Presepsin was discovered as a hopeful diagnostic marker of sepsis for the first time in 2004 [25]. Consecutive studies concentrated on the strength and diagnostic value of presepsin compared with the most widely used sepsis markers such as CRP and procalcitonin. Two serial meta-analyses revealed that presepsin is a powerful diagnostic marker, but fails in the verification or exclusion of a diagnosis if used alone in the adult population [11, 26]. A very recent meta-analysis showed evidence of 0.91 sensitivity and 0.97 specificity of presepsin in neonatal sepsis, especially if the cut-off value is between 650 and 850 pg/ml [18].
Presepsin values were defined both in critical preterm and term neonates with/without sepsis in different studies [13, 14, 18]. Mussap et al. defined a mean value of 643.1 ng/L for presepsin in non-septic preterm neonates [27]. They also showed no link between gestational age and presepsin values and presented the ranges of presepsin in septic neonates. Later, the same researchers showed that presepsin was a useful marker for discrimination of bacterial sepsis from non-bacterial systemic inflammatory response syndrome with 100% sensitivity and 81.2% specificity with a cut-off value 548 ng/L in the presence of sepsis.
Presepsin was found to have 88.9% sensitivity and 88.9% specificity with a cut-off value of 823 ng/ml for culture-proven LOS in our study. This was similar to the literature. Poggi et al. demonstrated that presepsin was a successful marker in the early period of LOS with a cut-off value of 885 ng/l, having 100% specificity and 94% sensitivity [13]. Additionally, it was shown to be a valuable tool for follow-up of response to antibiotic therapy, even if used alone. However, ROC curves cannot be established for comparison due to the unavailability of CRP and procalcitonin in control groups.
Fetuin-A is a hepatic serum protein that inhibits pathological calcification [28]. Although the exact role is not yet thoroughly understood, fetuin-A is speculated to act as a negative acute phase reactant [19, 20]. Regulation of fetuin-A differs in the early and late periods of sepsis due to various proinflammatory cytokines. In animal studies, it was shown to decrease as a response to the early inflammatory process, reaching normal values with time, possibly due to late mediators [28]. This molecule was considered to be a hopeful marker for sepsis after proteomic studies of lipopolysaccharide-stimulated secretory proteins in endothelial cells [29]. A limited number of clinical studies supported this conclusion. Recently, Karampela et al. revealed an inverse relationship of CRP and IL-6 in adults, compatible with the findings of the previous studies [30].
Fetuin-A reaches peak serum concentrations in fetal life, possibly reflecting a crucial role in tissue formation [20]. Again, high levels of extremely preterm infants authenticated this hypothesis in a few studies. There are a limited number of studies defining the normal values of fetuin-A in neonates [31]. Häusler et al. measured serum values in healthy children of various ages, including preterm and term infants [20]. The concentrations reached peak values in premature infants with 23–30 gestational weeks (1 ± 0.33 mg/ml). Briana et al. investigated maternal, fetal and neonatal plasma levels simultaneously in term intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants [20]. No difference was seen between AGA and IUGR infants (43.2 + 15.7 ng/mL vs. 45.2 + 16.4 ng/mL, respectively). In a small number of studies, wide differences were present in fetuin-A plasma concentrations. Our values are similar to those detected in healthy term infants in the study of Briana et al. [30]. But there is no information on the range of fetuin-A in neonatal sepsis. Hence, we could not compare our values with that of others. We can only conclude that fetuin-A levels did not wax and wane during antibiotic treatment. Therefore, it does not appear to be a useful marker for follow-up based on our currently available data.
Our study has some limitations. First, the small sample size may have prohibited the emergence of an overt change in plasma fetuin-A concentration. Again, our study included preterm infants only with culture-proven sepsis. If the patients with clinical sepsis were incorporated into the study, we could compare values of the two groups. Future studies must focus on the diagnostic role of fetuin-A in neonatal sepsis with larger cohorts.
This study is original in terms of the analysis of two markers simultaneously. For low-resource settings with high admission and infection rates in NICU, presepsin may be promising with higher sensitivity and similar cost with interleukin-6, which is routinely used with the aim of sepsis work-up in our clinic. This study demonstrated that presepsin is a useful diagnostic marker of preterm LOS in comparison to CRP and IL-6. It may also be helpful in monitoring the antibiotic response. But no difference was seen in serum fetuin-A concentrations between groups.
Conclusion
This is the first study investigating the role of the dyad markers presepsin and fetuin-A simultaneously in the diagnosis and monitoring of the success of therapy in culture-proven LOS in preterm infants. Presepsin seems to be a useful marker for late-onset sepsis in preterm infants based on the results of our study. However, fetuin-A levels do not correspond with already used acute phase reactants or presepsin.
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- AGA
Appropriate for gestational age
- AUC
Area under the curve
- CRP
C-reactive protein
- CSF
Cerebrospinal fluid
- EDTA
Ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid
- ELBW
Extremely low birth weight
- ELISA
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- IL-6
Interleukin-6
- IUGR
Intrauterine growth retardation
- LOS
Late-onset sepsis
- NICU
Neonatal intensive care unit
- ROC
Receiver operating characteristic curve
- SPSS
Statistical package for the social sciences
- WBC
White blood cell
Authors’ contributions
HD and FEC designed the study; HD, TD, and BOB collected the data; MYO and FEC performed statistical analyses. BOB and FEC wrote the paper. CT made the language editing. HD and FEC had primary responsibility for final content. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by the Association of Health Research and Economics. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
Please contact the corresponding author for data requests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Local Ethical Committee of Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health and Research Hospital. Written informed consent for participation in the study was obtained from the parents of the infants.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Halil Değirmencioğlu, Email: hdegirmencioglu@gmail.com.
Buse Ozer Bekmez, Phone: +90-312-3065000, Email: ozerbuse@hotmail.com.
Turan Derme, Email: drturanderme@gmail.com.
Mehmet Yekta Öncel, Email: dryekta@gmail.com.
Fuat Emre Canpolat, Email: femrecan@gmail.com.
Cüneyt Tayman, Email: ctayman22@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Greenberg RG, Kandefer S, Do BT, Smith PB, Stoll BJ, Bell EF, et al. Late-onset sepsis in extremely premature infants 2000–2011. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(8):774–779. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dong Y, Speer CP. Late-onset neonatal sepsis: recent developments. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(3):F257–F263. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pammi M, Weisman LE. Late-onset sepsis in preterm infants: update on strategies for therapy and prevention. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2015;13(4):487–504. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1008450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Markanday A. Acute phase reactants in infections: evidence-based review and a guide for clinicians. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015;2(3):ofv098. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cortese F, Scicchitano P, Gesualdo M, Filaninno A, De Giorgi E, Schettini F, et al. Early and late infections in newborns: where Do we stand? A review. Pediatr Neonatol. 2016;57(4):265–273. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tzialla Chryssoula, Achille Cristian, Bollani Lina, Stronati Mauro, Borghesi Alessandro, Manzoni Paolo. New Diagnostic Possibilities for Neonatal Sepsis. American Journal of Perinatology. 2018;35(06):575–577. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1639361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ng PC, Lam HS. Biomarkers for late-onset neonatal sepsis: cytokines and beyond. Clin Perinatol. 2010;37(3):599–610. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2010.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oncel MY, Dilmen U, Erdeve O, Ozdemir R, Calisici E, Yurttutan S, et al. Proadrenomedullin as a prognostic marker in neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Res. 2012;72(5):507–512. doi: 10.1038/pr.2012.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zou Q, Wen W, Zhang X. Presepsin as a novel sepsis biomarker. World J Emerg Med. 2014;5(1):16–19. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2014.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kirkland TN, Viriyakosol S. Structure-function analysis of soluble and membrane-bound CD14. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1998;397:79–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zheng Z, Jiang L, Ye L, Gao Y, Tang L, Zhang M. The accuracy of presepsin for the diagnosis of sepsis from SIRS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care. 2015;5(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0089-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Montaldo P, Rosso R, Santantonio A, Chello G, Giliberti P. Presepsin for the detection of early-onset sepsis in preterm newborns. Pediatr Res. 2017;81(2):329–334. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Poggi C, Bianconi T, Gozzini E, Generoso M, Dani C. Presepsin for the detection of late-onset sepsis in preterm newborns. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1):68–75. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mussap M, Puxeddu E, Burrai P, Noto A, Cibecchini F, Tesla M, et al. Soluble CD14 subtype (sCD14-ST) presepsin in critically ill preterm newborns: preliminary reference ranges. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(Suppl 5):51–53. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.717462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pugni L, Pietrasanta C, Milani S, Vener C, Ronchi A, Falbo B, et al. Presepsin (soluble CD14 subtype): reference ranges of a new sepsis marker in term and preterm neonates. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0146020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ozdemir AA, Elgormus Y. Diagnostic value of Presepsin in detection of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34(6):550–556. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Topcuoglu S, Arslanbuga C, Gursoy T, Aktas A, Karatekin G, Uluhan R, et al. Role of Presepsin in the diagnosis of late-onset neonatal sepsis in preterm infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(11):1834–1839. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1064885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bellos I, Fitrou G, Pergialiotis V, Thomakos N, Perrea DN, Daskalakis G. The diagnostic accuracy of presepsin in neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr. 2018;177(5):625–632. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3114-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lebreton JP, Joisel F, Raoult JP, Lannuzel B, Rogez JP, Humbert G. Serum concentration of human alpha 2 HS glycoprotein during the inflammatory process: evidence that alpha 2 HS glycoprotein is a negative acute-phase reactant. J Clin Invest. 1979;64:1118–1129. doi: 10.1172/JCI109551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Häusler M, Schäfer C, Osterwinter C, Jahnen-Dechent W. The physiologic development of Fetuin-a serum concentrations in children. Pediatr Res. 2009;66(6):660–664. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181bc3f60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang H, Sama AE. Anti-inflammatory role of Fetuin-A in injury and infection. Curr Mol Med. 2012;12(5):625–633. doi: 10.2174/156652412800620039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.European Medicines Agency. Report on the expert meeting on neonatal and paediatric sepsis. London; 2010.
- 23.Sharma D, Farahbakhsh N, Shastri S, Sharma P. Biomarkers for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;7:1–14. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1322060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chauhan N, Tiwari S, Jain U. Potential biomarkers for effective screening of neonatal sepsis infections: an overview. Microb Pathog. 2017;107:234–242. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.03.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yaegashi Y, Shirakawa K, Sato N, Suzuki Y, Kojika M, Imai S, et al. Evaluation of a newly identified soluble CD14 subtype as a marker for sepsis. J Infect Chemother. 2005;11:234–238. doi: 10.1007/s10156-005-0400-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang J, Hu ZD, Song J, Shao J. Diagnostic value of presepsin for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94(47):e2158. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mussap M, Puxeddu E, Puddu M, Ottonello G, Coghe F, Comite P. Soluble CD14 subtype (sCD14-ST) presepsin in premature and full-term critically ill newborns with sepsis and SIRS. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;451(Pt A):65–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li W, Zhu S, Li J, Huang Y, Zhou R, Fan X, et al. A hepatic protein, Fetuin-A, occupies a protective role in lethal systemic inflammation. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e16945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kwon OK, Lee W, Kim SJ, Lee JY, Kim JY, Bae JS, et al. In-depth proteomics approach of secretome to identify novel biomarker for sepsis in LPS-stimulated endothelial cells. Electrophoresis. 2015;36(23):2851–2858. doi: 10.1002/elps.201500198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Karampela I, Kandri E, Antonakos G, et al. Kinetics of circulating fetuin-a may predict mortality independently from adiponectin, high molecular weight adiponectin, and prognostic factors in critically ill patients with sepsis: a prospective study. J Crit Care. 2017;41:78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Briana DD, Boutsikau M, Gourgiotis D, Vogiatzakis E, Christodoulatos GS, Nikolaidou A, et al. Serum fetuin-A/a2-HS-glycoprotein in human pregnancies with normal and restricted fetal growth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21(11):826–830. doi: 10.1080/14767050802326255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Please contact the corresponding author for data requests.