Skip to main content
The Journal of International Medical Research logoLink to The Journal of International Medical Research
. 2019 May 23;47(7):2873–2880. doi: 10.1177/0300060519848928

Effect of intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before frozen–thawed embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis

Zhihui Xu 1, Wenming Chen 2, Chune Chen 3, Yikang Xiao 3, Xia Chen 1,
PMCID: PMC6683888  PMID: 31119991

Short abstract

Objective

To investigate the effect of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) intrauterine injection before frozen–thawed embryo transfer (FET) in women with endometriosis.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 45 women with endometriosis who underwent hCG intrauterine injection before FET; each woman was matched with three patients with endometriosis who did not receive hCG intrauterine injection (controls). Data on pregnancy and prenatal outcomes were extracted from medical records and compared.

Results

Patients in the hCG intrauterine injection group had significantly higher rates of pregnancy and clinical pregnancy (64.4% and 57.8%, respectively) than controls (47.4% and 39.3%, respectively). Neonatal birth weight for both singletons and twins was significantly higher in the hCG group (3486 ± 458 g and 2710 ± 437 g, respectively) than in the control group (3195 ± 401 g and 2419 ± 370 g, respectively).

Conclusion

Pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and birth weight were improved in women with endometriosis who underwent intrauterine hCG injection compared with those who did not receive hCG before FET.

Keywords: Frozen–thawed embryo transfer, endometriosis, hCG intrauterine injection, live birth rate, birth weight, in vitro fertilization

Introduction

Endometriosis (EM) is a chronic gynecological disorder that affects 7% to 10% of women of reproductive age.1,2 The prevalence of EM increases to 47% in infertile women.3 Evidence suggests that EM affects in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes through several mechanisms, including distorted pelvic anatomy, decreased oocyte quality, and impaired endometrial receptivity.2,4 The endometrium is dysfunctional in women with EM because endometrial receptivity biomarkers such as integrins, osteopontin, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), and homeo box A10 (HOXA10) are aberrantly expressed.5 Recent findings suggest that alteration in progesterone receptor expression, progesterone resistance, and stromal decidualization deficiency are also associated with implantation failure in women with EM.6,7

Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), as an early embryo-derived signal, initiates trophoblast invasion and regulates implantation. Intrauterine administration of hCG provokes a significant inhibition of intrauterine insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), whereas LIF, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 are significantly upregulated.8 The latest studies report that intrauterine injection of hCG before embryo transfer (ET) significantly improves pregnancy rates in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.9,10 It is suggested that hCG exerts multiple direct influences on the endometrium. However, little is known about the effect of intrauterine hCG infusion on pregnancy outcomes in women with EM. The aim of this study was to investigate the benefits of intrauterine hCG injection in women with EM before frozen–thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

Materials and methods

Subjects

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the reproductive medicine center of First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. This study was reviewed and approved by the research ethics committee of our institution (2018-045). All patients in the study provided written informed consent for use of their data.

We analyzed data of women who underwent their first cycle of frozen–thawed embryo transfer from January 2016 to March 2017 at our center. Women with hydrosalpinx, premature ovarian failure, polycystic ovary syndrome, uterine cavity abnormality, recurrent spontaneous abortion, or abnormal parental karyotypes were excluded. Data from 180 women diagnosed with infertility associated with EM were collected, and those who fulfilled the following three criteria were included in the study group: (1) diagnosis of EM confirmed either by laparoscopy and biopsy of the lesion or by ultrasound-guided cyst fluid drainage pathology examination; (2) age ≤40 years; and (3) underwent hCG intrauterine injection before FET. Forty-five women were enrolled into the study group (hCG group). Women with EM who did not receive intrauterine hCG were matched to the study group as controls at a ratio of 1:3, according to the following criteria: (1) age (±1 year of the study patients matched); (2) type of infertility (primary or secondary); and (3) maximal uterine size within 6 cm in cases of coexistence of adenomyoma or adenomyosis. Pregnancy outcomes were masked during matching.

Endometrial preparation

Hormone replacement therapy was adopted for endometrial preparation. The protocol was started with oral estradiol valerate (Progynova, Schering Pharmaceutical Ltd., Guangzhou, China) following a transvaginal ultrasound scan on cycle day 2 to 5 at a dose of 4 mg/day for 4 days, and then increased to 6 mg/day for 5 days. A second ultrasound scan was performed, serum estradiol and progesterone were checked, and the dose of estradiol valerate was adjusted up to 8 mg/day accordingly. Luteal support was started when endometrial thickness reached 8 mm or more, serum estradiol level ≥600 pmol/L, and progesterone level <5 nmol/L. Progestin (Utrogestan; Besins Manufacturing, Brussels, Belgium) was administered vaginally at 400 mg/day for 3 or 5 days before embryo transfer, depending on the cleavage stage of embryos. Progestin supplementation continued until pregnancy was confirmed at 10 weeks of pregnancy.

Intrauterine hCG injection and embryo transfer

Women in the study group underwent hCG intrauterine injection 1 day before FET. Briefly, the cervical mucous was wiped out using a cotton swab. The insemination cannula was attached to a 1-mL syringe and used in draw up recombinant (r-)hCG (Ovidrel; Merck Serono, Geneva, Switzerland). When the cannula passed through the cervical internal os, 0.04 mL of r-hCG was injected into the uterus.9,10 High-quality embryos were defined based on the Istanbul consensus as grade 1 or 2.11 Day 2 to 3 cleavage-stage embryos or blastocysts were transferred. No more than two embryos were replaced in the uterus.

Reproductive outcomes

Pregnancy was confirmed when serum β-hCG was ≥10 IU/L 2 weeks following embryo transfer. Clinical pregnancy was defined when the gestational sac(s) was observed by ultrasonography 4 weeks after embryo transfer. The miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy was defined as the proportion of patients who failed to progress to 28 gestational weeks in all clinical pregnancies. Biochemical pregnancy was diagnosed if β-hCG decreased before a gestational sac(s) was identified. Total pregnancy loss consisted of biochemical pregnancy and miscarriage. Live birth was defined as the birth of at least one living child.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were assessed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test and presented as mean ± standard deviations or median (interquartile range) according to normality. Differences between groups were assessed using the t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages within group. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test, when appropriate. Two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Eighteen women in the hCG group had 33 fresh embryos transferred and 55 women in the control group had 110 fresh embryos transferred in the ovarian stimulation cycle. All women underwent their first cycle of frozen–thawed embryo transfer. No significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics were detected between the two groups, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients in the hCG infusion and control groups (means ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range).

Variable hCG group (n = 45) Control group (n = 135) p value
Age (years) 31.69 ± 4.21 31.73 ± 4.12 0.958
BMI (kg/m2) 20.41 ± 2.58 20.90 ± 2.50 0.256
Infertility duration (years) 4 (2–5) 3 (2–4) 0.09
Basal E2 (pmol/L) 130 (94–187) 142 (79–193) 0.909
Basal P (nmol/L) 1.99 ± 0.96 1.85 ± 0.95 0.437
Progestin administration day
 Serum E2 (pmol/L) 1405 (826–2086) 1190 (814–1902) 0.697
 Serum P (nmol/L) 1.92 (1.23–2.97) 1.59 (0.72–2.80) 0.284
 En thickness (mm) 10 (8.8–10.6) 9 (8.5–10) 0.203
 En thickness on ET day (mm) 11 (9.5–11.7) 10 (9.1–11.3) 0.423
No. of embryos transferred 2 (2–2) 2 (2–2) 0.506
Embryo cultured in vitro (days) 3 (3–5) 3 (3–5) 0.846
High-quality embryos transferred 1 (1–2) 1 (1–2) 0.670

BMI, body mass index; E2, estradiol; P, progesterone; En, endometrium; ET, embryo transfer.

Pregnancy outcomes were improved in the hCG group. Patients treated with intrauterine hCG injection had a higher embryo implantation rate, pregnancy rate (p = 0.048), clinical pregnancy rate (p = 0.030), and live birth rate than their counterparts in the control group, with differences in pregnancy rate and clinical pregnancy rate being significant; details are given in Table 2. No statistical differences were identified with respect to pregnancy loss rate. Gestational age at delivery for singletons and twins was comparable between the two groups; however, significantly lower birth weights for both singletons (p = 0.032) and twins (p = 0.049) were observed in the control group.

Table 2.

Pregnancy outcomes [no./no. (%)] and prenatal outcomes (means ± standard deviation) in the hCG infusion and control groups.

Variable hCG group Control group p value
Stage at embryo transfer 0.705
 48 hours 1 (2.2) 1 (0.7)
 72 hours 28 (62.2) 87 (64.4)
 Blastocysts 16 (35.6) 47 (34.8)
Embryo implantation rate 36/82 (43.9) 73/224 (32.6) 0.067
Pregnancy rate 29/45 (64.4) 64/135 (47.4) 0.048
Clinical pregnancy rate 26/45 (57.8) 53/135 (39.3) 0.030
Live birth rate 21/45 (46.7) 43/135 (31.9) 0.072
Total pregnancy loss rate 8/45 (17.8) 21/135 (15.6) 0.725
 Biochemical pregnancy rate 3/29 (10.3) 11/65 (16.9) 0.538
 Miscarriage rate 5/26 (19.2) 10/53 (18.9) 1.000
Term delivery rate 17/21 (81.0) 32/43 (74.4) 0.755
Singleton delivery rate 16/21 (76.2) 29/43 (67.4) 0.472
GA for singleton (weeks) 39.88 ± 1.23 39.63 ± 1.57 0.582
GA for twins (weeks) 37.37 ± 0.79 36.31 ± 1.53 0.162
Birth weight for singleton (g) 3486 ± 458 3195 ± 401 0.032
Birth weight for twins (g) 2710 ± 437 2419 ± 370 0.049

GA, gestational age.

Discussion

In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to investigate whether intrauterine injection of hCG would benefit patients with EM undergoing FET. The main finding was that the intervention statistically improved pregnancy and prenatal outcomes. Although the increment in live birth rate did not reach statistical significance, patients with EM who received hCG intrauterine injection achieved significantly higher pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and neonatal birth weight compared with those who did not receive hCG infusion.

Women with EM have a significant reduction in peak estradiol (E2) concentration, mean number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, embryo implantation rate, and pregnancy rate during IVF compared with women affected by tubal factor or other infertility diagnoses.2,4,12 In contrast, other studies have reported comparable pregnancy results between women with and without EM.13,14 Discrepant conclusions were also found regarding the effect of the severity of EM in assisted reproductive outcomes.14,15 Herein, we report acceptable pregnancy outcomes in the control group compared with those in the abovementioned studies, with a clinical pregnancy rate of 39.3% and live birth rate of 31.9%.

The effect of EM on IVF outcomes continues to be investigated. Numerous studies have reported impaired endometrial receptivity and decidualization in patients with EM, including attenuated endometrial progesterone response and altered expression of integrins and interleukins, which adversely affect embryo implantation.5,6,16,17 Interestingly, hCG has been shown to promote human endometrial stromal cell decidualization and lead to a significantly stronger induction of decidualization when used in combination with progesterone.18,19 Luteinizing hormone (LH)/hCG receptors are expressed in human endometrium on glandular epithelium, mediating the effects of gonadotropins, and hCG acts on the intrauterine environment via LH/hCG receptor;20,21 therefore, the addition of LH/hCG to endometrium might play a paracrine role in control of endometrium physiology.22 Transcription of hCG is detected at the two-cell stage23 in human embryos, and preimplantation communication between hCG and the endometrium is crucial for establishment of pregnancy.20 Recently, researchers have reported that intramuscular infusion of hCG did not seem to be beneficial for pregnancy outcome in FET24 but that intrauterine infusion of hCG resulted in higher implantation rate, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rate, and delivery rate.9,10,2528 Many of these studies have demonstrated the beneficial effect of intrauterine hCG injection before cleavage-stage embryo transfer, whereas others found no evidence for improvement in blastocyst transfer cycles.29 The main reason was assumed to be that, with blastocyst transfer, there is not enough time for hCG to have any beneficial effect on the endometrium before implantation, and the effect is both time- and dose-dependent.8 On this basis, we planned to overcome this limitation by injecting hCG intrauterine 1 day before FET. However, most previous studies have excluded patients with EM; thus, it was unclear whether intrauterine injection of hCG would benefit these patients. Our results indicated that patients with EM in the hCG infusion group were more likely to achieve a higher pregnancy rate (64.4% versus 47.4%) and clinical pregnancy rate (57.8% versus 39.3%) compared with those in the control group. Although the improvement in the live birth rate (46.7% versus 31.9%) was not statistically significant, this might be because of an insufficient sample size.

We observed that birth weight at delivery was significantly higher in the hCG group for both singletons and twins. Birth weight is affected by numerous factors during pregnancy. Evidence shows that obstetrical complications occurring during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy may originate from local disturbances occurring at the time of implantation.30,31 Accumulating evidence suggests that the eutopic endometrium of women with EM differs from the endometrium of women without EM, with respect to stem cell content, hormone sensitivity, cellular proliferation, adhesion, invasiveness, angiogenesis, and immune modulation,32,33 and these abnormalities may lead to impairment in decidualization and placentation in the women affected. hCG forces the formation of villous trophoblast tissue, provokes the development and growth of uterine spiral arteries, and boosts the formation of the umbilical circulation in villous tissue and the formation of the umbilical cord.34 New data reveal that the LH/hCG receptor is present in fetal organs,35 and it is thought that hCG promotes organ growth and differentiation in the fetus,36 and hCG preimplantation signaling modulates immunotolerance and angiogenesis at the maternal–fetus interface.37 Thus, preimplantation hCG intrauterine infusion might create a fetus-friendly environment that favors early embryo implantation and later fetal growth.

There were some limitations to our study. The retrospective design lowered the power of the conclusion. The sample size of our study was small and hidden biases may be underestimated. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Declaration of conflicting interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research was supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. LQ19H040004), Wenzhou Bureau of Science and Technology program (grant no. Y20170593), and National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2017YFC1001604).

References

  • 1.Xavier P, Beires J, Barros H, et al. Subendometrial and intraendometrial blood flow during the menstrual cycle in patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 52–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Senapati S, Sammel MD, Morse C, et al. Impact of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization outcomes: an evaluation of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies Database. Fertil Steril 2016; 106: 164–171.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Meuleman C, Vandenabeele B, Fieuws S, et al. High prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women with normal ovulation and normospermic partners. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 68–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barnhart K, Dunsmoor-Su R, Coutifaris C. Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 1148–1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lessey BA. Implantation defects in infertile women with endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002; 955: 265–280; discussion 293-265, 396–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Burney RO, Talbi S, Hamilton AE, et al. Gene expression analysis of endometrium reveals progesterone resistance and candidate susceptibility genes in women with endometriosis. Endocrinology 2007; 148: 3814–3826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pei T, Liu C, Liu T, et al. miR-194-3p represses the progesterone receptor and decidualization in eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis. Endocrinology 2018; 159: 2554–2562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Licht P, Fluhr H, Neuwinger J, et al. Is human chorionic gonadotropin directly involved in the regulation of human implantation? Mol Cell Endocrinol 2007; 269: 85–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mansour R, Tawab N, Kamal O, et al. Intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before embryo transfer significantly improves the implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: 1370–1374.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huang P, Wei L, Li X. A study of intrauterine infusion of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) before frozen-thawed embryo transfer after two or more implantation failures. Gynecol Endocrinol 2017; 33: 67–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 1270–1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sharma S, Bathwal S, Agarwal N, et al. Does presence of adenomyosis affect reproductive outcome in IVF cycles? A retrospective analysis of 973 patients. Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 38: 13–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gonzalez-Comadran M, Schwarze JE, Zegers-Hochschild F, et al. The impact of endometriosis on the outcome of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2017; 15: 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Harb HM, Gallos ID, Chu J, et al. The effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilisation outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2013; 120: 1308–1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Barbosa MA, Teixeira DM, Navarro PA, et al. Impact of endometriosis and its staging on assisted reproduction outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 261–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Aghajanova L, Hamilton A, Kwintkiewicz J, et al. Steroidogenic enzyme and key decidualization marker dysregulation in endometrial stromal cells from women with versus without endometriosis. Biol Reprod 2009; 80: 105–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Klemmt PA, Carver JG, Kennedy SH, et al. Stromal cells from endometriotic lesions and endometrium from women with endometriosis have reduced decidualization capacity. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 564–572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bourdiec A, Bedard D, Rao CV, et al. Human chorionic gonadotropin regulates endothelial cell responsiveness to interleukin 1 and amplifies the cytokine-mediated effect on cell proliferation, migration and the release of angiogenic factors. Am J Reprod Immunol 2013; 70: 127–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Koch Y, Wimberger P, Grummer R. Human chorionic gonadotropin induces decidualization of ectopic human endometrium more effectively than forskolin in an in-vivo endometriosis model. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2018; 243: 953–962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bourdiec A, Calvo E, Rao CV, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals new insights into the modulation of endometrial stromal cell receptive phenotype by embryo-derived signals interleukin-1 and human chorionic gonadotropin: possible involvement in early embryo implantation. PLoS One 2013; 8: e64829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reshef E, Lei ZM, Rao CV, et al. The presence of gonadotropin receptors in nonpregnant human uterus, human placenta, fetal membranes, and decidua. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990; 70: 421–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sacchi S, Sena P, Degli Esposti C, et al. Evidence for expression and functionality of FSH and LH/hCG receptors in human endometrium. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35: 1703–1712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jurisicova A, Antenos M, Kapasi K, et al. Variability in the expression of trophectodermal markers beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin, human leukocyte antigen-G and pregnancy specific beta-1 glycoprotein by the human blastocyst. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1852–1858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shiotani M, Matsumoto Y, Okamoto E, et al. Is human chorionic gonadotropin supplementation beneficial for frozen and thawed embryo transfer in estrogen/progesterone replacement cycles?: a randomized clinical trial. Reprod Med Biol 2017; 16: 166–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zarei A, Parsanezhad ME, Younesi M, et al. Intrauterine administration of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin before embryo transfer on outcome of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Reprod Med 2014; 12: 1–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Aaleyasin A, Aghahosseini M, Rashidi M, et al. In vitro fertilization outcome following embryo transfer with or without preinstillation of human chorionic gonadotropin into the uterine cavity: a randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2015; 79: 201–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Laokirkkiat P, Thanaboonyawat I, Boonsuk S, et al. Increased implantation rate after intrauterine infusion of a small volume of human chorionic gonadotropin at the time of embryo transfer: a randomized, double-blind controlled study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 299: 267–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ye H, Hu J, He W, et al. The efficacy of intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before embryo transfer in assisted reproductive cycles: meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 2015; 43: 738–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wirleitner B, Schuff M, Vanderzwalmen P, et al. Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015; 13: 70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sharkey AM, Macklon NS. The science of implantation emerges blinking into the light. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 27: 453–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hsu P, Nanan R. Foetal immune programming: hormones, cytokines, microbes and regulatory T cells. J Reprod Immunol 2014; 104–105: 2–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Benaglia L, Candotti G, Papaleo E, et al. Pregnancy outcome in women with endometriosis achieving pregnancy with IVF. Hum Reprod 2016; 31: 2730–2736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Benagiano G, Brosens I, Habiba M. Structural and molecular features of the endomyometrium in endometriosis and adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update 2014; 20: 386–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rao CV, Lei ZM. The past, present and future of nongonadal LH/hCG actions in reproductive biology and medicine. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2007; 269: 2–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Abdallah MA, Lei ZM, Li X, et al. Human fetal nongonadal tissues contain human chorionic gonadotropin/luteinizing hormone receptors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 952–956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cole LA. hCG, the wonder of today's science. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2012; 10: 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tsampalas M, Gridelet V, Berndt S, et al. Human chorionic gonadotropin: a hormone with immunological and angiogenic properties. J Reprod Immunol 2010; 85: 93–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of International Medical Research are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES