Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2019 Jul 8;8:e45257. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45257

The molecular architecture of engulfment during Bacillus subtilis sporulation

Kanika Khanna 1, Javier Lopez-Garrido 1, Ziyi Zhao 1, Reika Watanabe 1, Yuan Yuan 1, Joseph Sugie 1, Kit Pogliano 1,, Elizabeth Villa 1,
Editors: Tâm Mignot2, Gisela Storz3
PMCID: PMC6684271  PMID: 31282858

Abstract

The study of bacterial cell biology is limited by difficulties in visualizing cellular structures at high spatial resolution within their native milieu. Here, we visualize Bacillus subtilis sporulation using cryo-electron tomography coupled with cryo-focused ion beam milling, allowing the reconstruction of native-state cellular sections at molecular resolution. During sporulation, an asymmetrically-positioned septum generates a larger mother cell and a smaller forespore. Subsequently, the mother cell engulfs the forespore. We show that the septal peptidoglycan is not completely degraded at the onset of engulfment. Instead, the septum is uniformly and only slightly thinned as it curves towards the mother cell. Then, the mother cell membrane migrates around the forespore in tiny finger-like projections, whose formation requires the mother cell SpoIIDMP protein complex. We propose that a limited number of SpoIIDMP complexes tether to and degrade the peptidoglycan ahead of the engulfing membrane, generating an irregular membrane front.

Research organism: B. subtilis

eLife digest

Much of what happens in biology occurs at scales so small that the microscopy methods traditionally used by biologists cannot visualize them. One such process is bacterial sporulation: in stressful conditions, bacteria like Bacillus subtilis can divide to produce a smaller cell called a forespore, which the larger mother cell then engulfs. The forespore matures into a hardy spore, which is able to survive in harsh environments and only transform into an active bacterium when conditions improve.

Bacterial cells are surrounded by a stiff layer of a material called peptidoglycan. This wall sits outside of the bacterium’s thin flexible membrane and determines the bacterium’s shape. At the beginning of sporulation, the forespore is separated from the mother cell by a peptidoglycan wall. Engulfment of the spore by the mother cell requires a dramatic change in the shape of this partition. Microbiologists had thought that all the rigid peptidoglycan must be degraded to allow the partition to deform flexibly during engulfment; however, no one had yet observed the tiny structures involved.

Khanna et al. directly visualized sporulation in B. subtilis using a technique called cryo-electron tomography (or cryo-ET for short). In cryo-ET, samples are cooled to low temperatures and then imaged with a beam of electrons. Cryo-ET requires thin samples, thinner even than most bacteria. By combing cryo-ET with another methodology that allowed them to focus in on thin sections of their sample, Khanna et al. generated high resolution images, which provided a look at forespore engulfment in unprecedented detail.

These images revealed that the peptidoglycan wall separating the mother cell from forespore is not completely degraded: a thin layer of peptidoglycan persists. Comparing these images to cryo-ET images of cells treated with drugs that block the production of peptidoglycan suggested a new engulfment mechanism. This includes a cycle of peptidoglycan production and degradation that accompanies the advancing mother cell membrane as it surrounds the forespore during engulfment. Khanna et al. could also see that the mother cell’s membrane formed finger-like projections as it moved around the forespore, something that was not visible with previous techniques.

This detailed engulfment mechanism is an important advance in the understanding of bacterial spore formation. Additionally, Khanna et al. have generated a collection of images, methods and analyses that may prove useful to a wide community of biologists attempting to understand sporulation and other fundamental processes that occur on a small scale.

Introduction

From an architectural point of view, bacterial cells are among the simplest forms of life on the planet. Their cytoplasm is typically devoid of membrane bound organelles, and their cellular morphology relies upon a semi-rigid peptidoglycan (PG) cell wall that imposes its shape on the malleable cell membrane(s). Bacterial cells are inflated by their high internal turgor pressure, which pushes the membranes against the cell wall, causing the PG to stretch and the cell to adopt its appropriate shape. Despite the apparent simplicity, studies in the past few decades have demonstrated that bacterial cellular architecture is far more complex than previously thought, in terms of both its ultrastructure and dynamic capabilities (Hawver et al., 2016; Wagstaff and Löwe, 2018; Wang et al., 2013).

Endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis represents a striking example of the dynamic capabilities of bacterial cells, as it entails dramatic changes in cellular architecture. First, the division site shifts to polar position, generating a sporangium comprised of two cells: a larger mother cell and a smaller forespore (Figure 1A; Errington, 2003; Higgins and Dworkin, 2012; Tan and Ramamurthi, 2014). The polar septum traps the forespore chromosome, which is subsequently transported to the forespore by SpoIIIE, a membrane-anchored ATPase that assembles a translocation complex at septal midpoint (Bath et al., 2000; Yen Shin et al., 2015; Wu and Errington, 1994; Wu and Errington, 1997). Chromosome translocation increases the turgor pressure in the forespore, causing it to inflate and expand into the mother cell (Lopez-Garrido et al., 2018). Simultaneously, the mother cell engulfs the forespore in a process that resembles eukaryotic phagocytosis (Figure 1A). After engulfment, the forespore is fully enclosed within the cytoplasm of the mother cell, where it matures in a process that involves the synthesis of protective layers of cortex and coat, and the partial dehydration of the forespore cytoplasm. Finally, the mother cell lyses and the mature spore is released to the environment, where it remains dormant until the conditions are appropriate for germination.

Figure 1. Visualizing the 3D architecture of engulfment during sporulation in B. subtilis.

(A) Schematic illustrating the process of polar septation, chromosome translocation, engulfment and spore maturation. Membranes (red), PG (gray), chromosomes (blue), SpoIIIE (orange) and coat proteins (shades of brown) are highlighted. Outward arrows in the stage IIii forespore indicate increased turgor pressure due to chromosome translocation. (B) Revised engulfment model (Ojkic et al., 2016): new PG (purple) is synthesized ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane by forespore-associated PG biosynthetic enzymes (blue) and is subsequently degraded by DMP (yellow pacman), making room for the engulfing membrane to advance. The coordinated synthesis and degradation of PG at the leading edge of the engulfing membrane can move the junction between the septum (pink) and the lateral cell wall (gray) around the forespore. (C) Schematic illustrating cryo-FIB-ET methodology for bacterial samples (see Materials and methods). (D–I) Slices through cryo-electron tomograms representing different stages of engulfment: (D) flat polar septum (Stage IIi), (F) curved septum (Stage IIii) and (H) engulfing septum (Stage IIiii). Scale bar for (D,F,I): 200 nm. The corresponding forespore membrane (green) and the mother cell membrane (yellow) are annotated in (E,G,I) respectively. n indicates the number of tomograms acquired for each cell type. Scale bars have been omitted for (E,G,I) as cells are shown in perspective views . (J–N) Zoomed-in slices through cryo-electron tomograms showing (J) a large ellipsoidal complex adjacent to the forespore membrane (black arrow), (K) a putative SpoIIIE channel (brown arrow) and (L) another putative channel (brown arrow), (L,M) coat filaments (green arrows), (M) basement coat layer (maroon arrow) and (N) amorphous coat proteins (purple arrow). Scale bar for (J-N): 50 nm.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Slices through cryo-electron tomograms representing different stages of engulfment in wild type sporulating B. subtilis cells.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

The forespore (green) and the mother cell (yellow) membranes are annotated and shown adjacent to each tomogram. (A–D) represent flat septum (Stage IIi) sporangia, (E–H) represent curved septum (Stage IIii) sporangia and (I–L) represent engulfing septum (Stage IIiii) sporangia. Scale bar for the tomogram slices (A,C,E,G,I,K): 200 nm. Scale bars have been omitted for all segmented images as cells are displayed in perspective mode.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Slices through cryo-electron tomograms representing later stages of sporulation when the forespore is completely inside the mother cell.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

(A) represents an earlier stage than (B). A dense spore with coat and cortex layers is observed in (B). Scale bar: 200 nm.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Unidentified complexes during sporulation in B. subtilis.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

(A) Ellipsoidal structure (black arrow) seen in the forespore shortly after septum formation as shown in Figure 1J. Scale bar: 50 nm. (B,C) 2 different slices through the same cryo-electron tomogram shown in (A) depicting the 3D annotation of the ellipsoidal structures (maroon). The structure highlighted in (A) in black arrow is pointed out at in (C). (D) Slice through a cryo-electron tomogram with putative SpoIIIE channel (black arrow) highlighted as in Figure 1K and (E) shows the corresponding color-coded distance of the forespore membrane from the mother cell membrane. The putative channel corresponds to a septal thickness of ~14 nm. (F) Slice through a cryo-electron tomogram with coat filaments (green arrow) and amorphous dense coat layer (orange arrow) highlighted. (G) shows the corresponding 3D annotations of the filaments (green) and the coat layer (orange), along with the forespore membrane (green) and the mother cell membrane (yellow). Scale bar for (D,F): 50 nm. Scale bars have been omitted for all segmented images as cells are displayed in perspective mode.

Engulfment represents a major rearrangement of the sporangium, from two cells that lie side by side to a cell within a cell. Such rearrangement likely involves a profound remodeling of the PG cell wall around the forespore, which would otherwise constrain the movement of the engulfing membrane. At the onset of engulfment, the engulfing mother cell membrane must circumvent the physical barrier posed by the septal PG in order to migrate around the forespore. This has led to the logical proposal that engulfment must entail the complete dissolution of the septal PG, a process often referred to as ‘septal thinning’ (Chastanet and Losick, 2007; Illing and Errington, 1991; Perez et al., 2000). This proposal was supported by early electron microscopy studies of fixed and stained sporangia showing that engulfment-defective mutants had thicker septa than wild type sporangia (Holt et al., 1975; Illing and Errington, 1991; Rousseau and Hermier, 1975). Further studies showed that engulfment requires three mother cell proteins: SpoIID, SpoIIM and SpoIIP, which form a complex (DMP) with PG degradation activity (Abanes-De Mello et al., 2002; Aung et al., 2007; Chastanet and Losick, 2007; Morlot et al., 2010). In principle, DMP could mediate the complete dissolution of the septal PG to remove the steric block to the movement of the mother cell membrane around the forespore.

The idea that septal PG is completely degraded has been more recently challenged by cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) images showing that a thin PG layer is present between the forespore and the mother cell membranes throughout engulfment (Tocheva et al., 2013). It has also been shown that DMP-mediated PG degradation is required and rate-limiting for membrane migration even after the septal barrier has been bypassed, suggesting that DMP plays a role separate from the dissolution of septal PG (Abanes-De Mello et al., 2002; Gutierrez et al., 2010). In addition, the movement of the mother cell membrane also requires PG synthesis at the leading edge of the engulfing membrane (Meyer et al., 2010; Ojkic et al., 2016). Based on these observations, we proposed a revised model for engulfment membrane migration in which coordinated PG synthesis and degradation at the leading edge of the engulfing mother cell membrane moves the junction between the septum and the lateral cell wall around the forespore, making room for the engulfing membrane to advance (Figure 1B; Ojkic et al., 2016). This model eliminates the need for complete dissolution of the septal PG and predicts that PG synthesis happens ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane. Then, the mother cell DMP degrades this new PG to mediate membrane migration. However, due to the limited resolution of optical microscopy, conclusive evidence that PG synthesis occurs ahead of PG degradation is lacking.

Cryo-ET allows the visualization of three-dimensional (3D) architecture of bacterial membranes and cell wall in a hydrated near-native state that cannot be achieved by methods reliant on chemical fixation and staining (Ben-Harush et al., 2010; Matias and Beveridge, 2005; Oikonomou et al., 2016). However, a limitation of cryo-ET is that the samples must be less than ~500 nm thick to obtain high-resolution tomograms, constraining its application to only a handful of bacteria that are either naturally slender, or, as in the case of B. subtilis, for which slender mutant strains are available (Tocheva et al., 2013). But the latter typically contain mutations in genes involved in PG metabolism and may not be ideal to study cell wall remodeling. Recent application of cryo-focused ion beam (cryo-FIB) milling has produced artifact-free thin sample sections of ~100–300 nm, which allows the acquisition of high-resolution tomograms of sections of wild type cells (Figure 1C; Marko et al., 2007; Rigort et al., 2012; Villa et al., 2013). Cryo-FIB milling coupled with cryo-ET (or cryo-FIB-ET) is therefore becoming the method of choice for studies of cellular architecture of both eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells (Chaikeeratisak et al., 2017; Engel et al., 2015; Lopez-Garrido et al., 2018; Mahamid et al., 2016).

Here, we have used cryo-FIB-ET to study sporulation in B. subtilis, revealing the different stages of engulfment with a resolution that has not been achieved previously. We have analyzed wild type sporangia, engulfment mutants, and sporangia treated with PG synthesis inhibitors to obtain new mechanistic insights into the PG transformations that occur during engulfment. First, we provide evidence that septal PG is not degraded completely at the onset of engulfment. Second, we show that during membrane migration, the newly synthesized PG deforms the forespore membrane ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing mother cell membrane, indicating that PG synthesis precedes PG degradation. Third, we observe that the mother cell membrane migrates around the forespore by forming tiny finger-like projections, the formation of which depends on DMP complexes tethering to and degrading the PG ahead of the engulfing membrane. The methodology, images and analyses presented here will provide valuable resources for future studies of spore assembly and other fundamental cell biological processes.

Results

Visualizing sporulation in wild type B. subtilis at molecular resolution

Recently, we used cryo-FIB-ET to illustrate the role of DNA translocation in inflating the forespore (Lopez-Garrido et al., 2018). These data confirmed the presence of a thin layer of PG between the forespore and the mother cell membranes in the wild type strain, as previously visualized by cryo-ET of a slender ponA mutant of B. subtilis (Tocheva et al., 2013). We expanded our cryo-FIB-ET studies to investigate the architecture of B. subtilis cells during different stages of sporulation (Figure 1C; see Materials and methods). We acquired high-quality data of wild type cells during engulfment (Stage II, Figure 1D–I; Figure 1—figure supplement 1) and during later stages of sporulation, when cortex and coat were being assembled (Stages III-VI, Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Data of very late stages of sporulation failed to provide high-resolution information inside the forespore, likely due to the dehydration of this cell, which increases sensitivity of cryo-ET samples to the electron beam (Wu et al., 2012).

Our data showed that the external cell wall of sporulating cells was ~20–30 nm thick, consistent with other EM studies (Matias and Beveridge, 2005; Tocheva et al., 2013). The polar septum formed close (within 500 nm) to one cell pole, and was initially flat (Figure 1D,E, Figure 1—figure supplement 1A–D, Video 1). Eventually, the septum bent smoothly into the mother cell (Figure 1F,G, Figure 1—figure supplement 1E–H, Video 2) and the mother cell membrane moved forward to engulf the forespore, at which stage the forespore was roughly rounded (Figure 1H,I, Figure 1—figure supplement 1I–L, Video 3).

Video 1. Movie showing slices through a cryo-electron tomogram of B. subtilis wild type sporangium (flat septum, Stage IIi) shown in Figure 1D.

Download video file (10.3MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.007

Video 2. Movie showing slices through a cryo-electron tomogram of B. subtilis wild type sporangium (curved septum, Stage IIii) shown in Figure 1F.

Download video file (8.4MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.008

Video 3. Movie showing slices through a cryo-electron tomogram of B. subtilis wild type sporangium (engulfing septum, Stage IIiii) shown in Figure 1H.

Download video file (14.1MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.009

Visual inspection of tomograms also revealed several structures that have not been characterized previously. Immediately after polar septation, we observed ellipsoidal complexes that were present only in the forespore, adjacent to the membrane and often close to the intersection between the septum and the lateral cell wall (Figure 1J, Figure 1—figure supplement 3A–C). These structures were observed in 2 out of 7 tomograms of wild type sporangia with flat septa, with ~4 ellipsoidal complexes observed in ~200 nm slices. The 3D reconstruction of these complexes revealed that the ellipsoidal structures had a mean radius of ~45 nm (Figure 1—figure supplement 3A–C, see Materials and methods). The molecular identity of these structures remains undetermined. We also identified a region approximately in the center of a flat septum where the two membranes are closer together than elsewhere on the septum (14 nm vs. 23 nm, Figure 1K, Figure 1—figure supplement 3D,E). This constriction may correspond to paired hexameric SpoIIIE channels (Fleming et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2006; Yen Shin et al., 2015). We also observed structures that appear to be channels crossing the septum (Figure 1L) that may correspond to SpoIIIA-SpoIIQ complexes (Blaylock et al., 2004; Levdikov et al., 2012; Morlot and Rodrigues, 2018; Zeytuni et al., 2017). We observed this thin region in the polar septum and channel-like features (Figure 1K,L) in 2 out of 15 tomograms of wild type sporangia with flat and curved septa. The low frequency of observation could be attributed to the fact that we are imaging only ~150–250 nm slices of cells that are over 1 μm wide. So, many tomograms would not include low abundance structures such as SpoIIIE, which is comprised of two adjacent channels. Next, we observed a basement coat layer adjacent to the outer forespore membrane that is likely comprised of SpoVM and/or SpoIVA (Figure 1M; Ramamurthi and Losick, 2009). This layer is visible as an array of dots spaced ~4–6 nm apart, similar to that observed previously in Acetonema longum sporulating cells (Tocheva et al., 2011). Moving outward, we observed a dense amorphous layer and a filamentous layer (Figure 1L–N, Figure 1—figure supplement 3F,G) that may contain CotE, SpoIVA and other coat proteins that are recruited to the outer forespore membrane during engulfment (McKenney et al., 2013). Further studies are required to determine the molecular identity of these structures unambiguously.

Septal PG is not completely degraded at the onset of engulfment

The cryo-FIB-ET images provided high-resolution details of the septum and the engulfing membrane. Hence, we focused on those details to obtain mechanistic insights about engulfment. The complete degradation of the septal PG during septal thinning has been traditionally considered a prerequisite for engulfment (Abanes-De Mello et al., 2002; Chastanet and Losick, 2007; Eichenberger et al., 2001; Perez et al., 2000). However, we observed a thin PG layer between the mother cell and the forespore membranes throughout engulfment in both wild type (Figure 2A; Lopez-Garrido et al., 2018) and a slender ponA mutant (Tocheva et al., 2013), suggesting that the septal PG is either not completely degraded or is quickly resynthesized after degradation.

Figure 2. Septal PG is not completely degraded at the onset of engulfment.

(A–C) Slices through cryo-electron tomograms of wild type engulfing sporangia that are (A) untreated, (B) bacitracin-treated, (C) cephalexin-treated, (D) penicillin V-treated and (E) penicillin V- and cephalexin-treated. The thin layer of septal PG is indicated by yellow arrows in the zoom-in panels for each of the tomographic slices. n indicates the number of tomograms acquired for each cell type. Antibiotic concentrations used for the experiments are indicated in the bottom right. Scale bar: 200 nm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Quantification of cell length upon antibiotic treatment.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A–D) Time-lapse microscopy showing the growth of wild type vegetative B. subtilis cells that are (A) untreated, (B) cephalexin-treated, (C) penicillin V-treated and (D) treated with a combination of cephalexin and penicillin V. The cells at the top in panels (B–D) had initiated septation before imaging, but the formation of the septum is interrupted upon exposure to the antibiotics, indicating that the blockage of PG synthesis happens on a time scale of a few minutes. An abortive polar septum close to the upper cell pole is observed in the cell in top panel (B), and abortive vegetative septa in the middle of the cell are observed in top panels (C) and (D). The cells at the bottom in panels (B–D) have dotted lines plotted along the lower and the upper pole of the cell from where the time-lapse experiment starts (0 min time point) to provide visual cue for the change in cell length over the course of time. Scale bars for (A–D): 1 μm. (E) Average length of vegetative cells (normalized) plotted as a function of time for untreated and different antibiotic-treated cases. n indicates the number of cells analyzed for each case and antibiotic concentrations used in the study are indicated alongside.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Thin layer of septal peptidoglycan persists in wild type and antibiotic-treated sporangia.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

(A–C) Slices through cryo-electron tomograms of wild type untreated B. subtilis sporangia, (D–F) cephalexin-treated) sporangia, and (G,H) cephalexin- and penicillin V-treated sporangia. The thin layer of PG between the forespore and the mother cell membranes is indicated by yellow arrows in the zoom-in panels for each tomographic slice. Antibiotic concentrations used are indicated in the bottom right. Scale bars for (A–H): 200 nm.

To probe this, we imaged engulfing sporangia after treatment with antibiotics that block PG synthesis. When PG synthesis is inhibited, engulfment membrane migration does not continue, although the septum still stretches and curves into the mother cell (Ojkic et al., 2016). We reasoned that, if the septal PG was completely degraded, we would observe sporangia lacking PG between the mother cell and the forespore membranes after antibiotic treatment. However, if the septal PG was not completely degraded, the sporangia would show a layer of PG around the forespore, independent of antibiotic treatment.

To inhibit PG synthesis, we treated the cells with bacitracin, cephalexin, penicillin V or a combination of penicillin V and cephalexin (Figure 2). We previously assessed the extent of PG inhibition after antibiotic treatment by determining the frequency of division events, which rely on the synthesis of new PG (Ojkic et al., 2016). As expected, our results showed that untreated cells continued to grow and divide under the experimental conditions (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A) but when treated with cephalexin and penicillin V, cell division was completely blocked. These results also indicated that PG synthesis was inhibited within a few minutes of antibiotic treatment, because cells that were already undergoing septation were unable to complete septum formation (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B–D, top panels). To complement this analysis, we tested if these drugs also inhibited elongation, which also depends on PG synthesis (Spratt, 1975). To do so, we measured the elongation of vegetative cells present in sporulating cultures over a period of one hour after antibiotic treatment (Figure 2—figure supplement 1E, see Materials and methods). The length of wild type untreated vegetative cells increased by ~35% in an hour, but when treated with cephalexin or penicillin V alone, they elongated only ~10%. Furthermore, when treated with a combination of cephalexin and penicillin V, the cells elongated negligibly, indicating complete blockage of both septation and elongation (Figure 2—figure supplement 1, Videos 47).

Video 4. Time-lapse microscopy of untreated sporulating B. subtilis cells stained with the membrane dye FM4-64.

Download video file (537.4KB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.013

Pictures were taken every 5 minutes for 2 hours (related to Figure 2—figure supplement 1).

Video 5. Time-lapse microscopy of penicillin V-treated (500 μg/ml) sporulating B. subtilis cells stained with the membrane dye FM4-64.

Download video file (1,013.1KB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.014

Pictures were taken every 5 minutes for 2 hours (related to Figure 2—figure supplement 1).

Video 6. Time-lapse microscopy of cephalexin-treated (50 μg/ml) sporulating B. subtilis cells stained with the membrane dye FM4-64.

Download video file (1.2MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.015

Pictures were taken every 5 minutes for 2 hours (related to Figure 2—figure supplement 1).

Video 7. Time-lapse microscopy of cephalexin- (50 μg/ml) and penicillin V- (500 μg/ml) treated sporulating B. subtilis cells stained with the membrane dye FM4-64.

Download video file (1MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.016

Pictures were taken every 5 minutes for 2 hours (related to Figure 2—figure supplement 1).

For cryo-FIB-ET, we added the antibiotics two hours after inducing sporulation, when ~ 40–50% of the cells have undergone polar septation (Ojkic et al., 2016), and plunge froze the samples either one (for bacitracin) or two hours (for cephalexin, penicillin V, and combination of cephalexin and penicillin V) later. Indeed, we observed a thin PG layer in both untreated and antibiotic-treated sporangia (Figure 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 2), suggesting that septal PG is not completely degraded at the onset of engulfment.

Septal thickness decreases slightly and uniformly across the entire septum during engulfment

The above observation prompted us to re-evaluate the process of septal thinning. The current model for septal thinning proposes that DMP initially localizes to the septal midpoint, where it starts degrading the septal PG as it moves towards the edge of the septal disk (Abanes-De Mello et al., 2002; Chastanet and Losick, 2007; Illing and Errington, 1991; Meyer et al., 2010). This enzymatic septal thinning model predicts that, during the transition from flat to curved septa, the septum should be thinner in the middle than at the edges (Figure 3A). To test this, we measured the distance between the forespore and the mother cell membranes across the length of the septum (see Materials and methods) for cells with flat (Stage IIi), curved (Stage IIii) and engulfing (Stage IIiii) septa (Figure 3B–D, Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Sporangia with flat septa had an average septal thickness of ~23 nm±3.3 nm (Figure 3B,E,F) with 3 out of 5 septa being thicker at the middle (~28 nm) than at the edges (~22 nm) (Figure 3B,E, Figure 3—figure supplement 1A), contrary to what is proposed by the enzymatic septal thinning model. The septal thickness decreased by ~25% to~18 nm during later stages of engulfment (Figure 3C–F, Figure 3—figure supplement 1B,C) and a thin layer of PG was observed in all septa (Figure 2A, Figure 2—figure supplement 2A–C). Importantly, septal thickness was uniform across the entire septum during later stages (Figure 3C,D,E, Figure 3—figure supplement 1B,C) and no septum was thinner in the middle than in the edges. These results show that the transition from thick to thin septum is homogenous, contrary to the prediction of the enzymatic septal thinning model, and consistent with the model that DNA translocation dependent forespore growth stretches septal PG.

Figure 3. Septum is uniformly and only slightly thinned during engulfment and SpoIIDMP is required to maintain a thin flexible septum.

(A) Schematic illustrating the model of septal thinning driven by septal PG (black meshwork) degradation by the DMP complex (yellow pacman) with membranes (red) and lateral PG (gray) highlighted. (B–D) Septal disc is color-coded according to the distance between the forespore and the mother cell membranes in five wild type sporangia with (B) flat, (C) curved and (D) engulfing septa. Schematic representing the morphology of each cell type is shown on the far left. (E) Average thickness of the septum across the forespore surface for the cells shown in (B–D,G). Error bars indicate standard deviation. n indicates the number of tomograms used for calculating septal distances in each case. (F) Average septal thickness for wild type flat (Stage IIi), curved (Stage IIii) and engulfing (Stage IIiii) sporangia and spoIIDMP mutant sporangia. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n.s.: p>0.05; *: p≤0.05; **: p≤0.01; ***: p≤0.001, unpaired t-test). (G) Septal disc is color-coded according to the distance between the forespore and the mother cell membranes in seven spoIIDMP mutant sporangia. Scale bars have been omitted in distance plots as perspective views are shown. (H) Slice through a cryo-electron tomogram of spoIIDMP mutant sporangia. Scale bar: 200 nm. (I) Annotated forespore (green) and mother cell (yellow) membranes for the tomogram in (H). Excess membrane accumulation is highlighted by green arrows. (J) Schematic representing the role of DMP (yellow pacman) in septal thinning with membranes (red), lateral PG (gray) and septal PG (pink) highlighted. The rigid and thick septum in wild type can curve into the mother cell during engulfment but that of DMP becomes even thicker and does not curve into the mother cell.

Figure 3—source data 1. Raw data of septal distances in wild type B. subtilis sporangia and sporangia of engulfment-defective mutants used to plot the bar graph in Figure 3F.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.022

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Septal thickness during engulfment in wild type B. subtilis.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A) Average thickness of the septum across the forespore surface for five wild type Stage IIi sporangia shown in Figure 3B. (B) Average thickness of the septum across the forespore surface for five wild type Stage IIii sporangia shown in Figure 3C. (C) Average thickness of the septum across the forespore surface for five wild type Stage IIiii sporangia shown in Figure 3D.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. Septal thickness in spoIIP mutant sporangia.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

(A–D) Slices through cryo-electron tomograms of spoIIP sporangia with annotations of the forespore membrane (green) and the mother cell membrane (yellow) adjacent to each tomogram. Scale bars for tomogram slices in (A,C): 200 nm. Scale bars have been omitted in segmented images owing to their perspective nature. The septum of spoIIP sporangia typically contains a bulge in the middle, and a thicker, flat region at the edges that does not bulge towards the mother cell. The distance between the membranes was only determined for the part of the setum that bulges towards the mother cell, but not for the thicker part at the edges that does not bulge. (E) Color-coded distance of the forespore membrane from the mother cell membrane along the length of the septum for spoIIP mutant sporangia. (F) Average thickness of the septum across the forespore surface for five spoIIP mutant sporangia shown in (E). (G) Average septal thickness for wild type stages IIi-iii and spoIIDMP and spoIIP mutant sporangia. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n.s.: p>0.05; *: p≤0.05; **: p≤0.01; ***: p≤0.001, unpaired t-test).
Figure 3—figure supplement 3. Septal thickness in spoIIDMP sporangia.

Figure 3—figure supplement 3.

(A–D) Slices through cryo-electron tomograms of spoIIDMP mutant sporangia with annotations of the forespore membrane (green) and the mother cell membrane (yellow) adjacent to each tomogram. Bulges are indicated by green arrows in (A,B) and in red arrows in the middle of the septum in (C,D). Scale bars for tomogram slices in (A,C): 200 nm. Scale bars are omitted for all segmented images due to their perspective nature. (E) Average thickness of the septum across the forespore surface for seven spoIIDMP sporangia shown in Figure 3G.
Figure 3—figure supplement 4. Observing peptidoglycan synthesis using BOCILLIN-FL.

Figure 3—figure supplement 4.

(A) Wild type sporulating cells stained with a green fluorescent derivative of penicillin V (BOCILLIN-FL). Membranes were stained with FM 4–64 (red). White arrows indicate cells with enhanced fluorescent signal at the leading edges of the engulfing membrane. (B) spoIIDMP mutant sporangia stained with BOCILLIN-FL (green). Membranes were stained with FM 4–64 (red). White arrows indicate cells with enhanced fluorescent signal in variable regions of the septum. Scale bars: 1 μm. (C) Schematic to explain accumulation of PG synthases in the septum (blue circles) in the absence of DMP as opposed to being localized near the leading edges in wild type sporangia. Membranes (red), lateral PG (gray) and septal PG (pink circles) are also highlighted.

SpoIIDMP is essential to maintain a thin, flexible septum

Next, we tested whether DMP was required to mediate the slight thinning observed during the transition from flat to curved septum. To address this question, we measured septal thickness in DMP mutants. In single mutants lacking D, M or P, engulfment is blocked but the septum bulges towards the mother cell, which complicates the analysis (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). However, bulge formation is largely abolished in a triple mutant lacking functional versions of D, M and P simultaneously (Eichenberger et al., 2001). Therefore, we imaged the DMP triple mutant by cryo-FIB-ET and measured its septal thickness (Figure 3G–I, Figure 3—figure supplement 3).

Most sporulation septa of the DMP triple mutant were either flat or slightly curved into the mother cell (Figure 3G–I, Figure 3—figure supplement 3A–D). In some cells, we observed membrane accumulation in the mother cell (Figure 3H,I, Figure 3—figure supplement 3A,B) and small bulges approximately in the middle of the septum (Figure 3—figure supplement 3C,D, Video 8). Septal thickness ranged from ~25 nm to ~45 nm, with an average thickness of 28 nm ±2.09 nm (Figure 3E–G, Figure 3—figure supplement 3E), which is ~5 nm greater than that of wild type sporangia with flat septa. Importantly, there were no significant differences in septal thickness between flat and curved septa in DMP mutant sporangia (Figure 3G, Figure 3—figure supplement 3E), indicating that DMP is in fact necessary for the slight thinning of the septum observed in wild type sporangia.

Video 8. Movie showing slices through a cryo-electron tomogram of spoIIDMP mutant sporangium shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 3C.

Download video file (5.1MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.023

Surprisingly, the thickness of individual DMP mutant septum was irregular across the septal length, with thicker regions of more than 45 nm, that were not observed in wild type cells (Figure 3G, Figure 3—figure supplement 3E). One possible explanation for this finding is that in the absence of DMP, proteins involved in PG synthesis persist at the septum, and their continued activity leads to thicker and less flexible septal regions (Figure 3J). To test this model, we stained wild type and DMP mutant sporangia with BOCILLIN-FL, a fluorescent-derivative of penicillin V with affinity for multiple penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) (Zhao et al., 1999, see Materials and methods). We observed continuous fluorescent signal around the septa in both strains, but the signal was brightest at the leading edge in wild type sporangia (Ojkic et al., 2016) and at different positions across the septum in DMP mutant sporangia (Figure 3—figure supplement 4). This mislocalization might allow ongoing synthesis of septal PG, leading to abnormally thick sporulation septa.

PG is synthesized ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane

Once the septum curves, the mother cell membrane starts to migrate around the forespore. Since the PG is not completely degraded, it will represent a major obstacle for the advancement of the engulfing membrane. To explain how cells overcome this hurdle, we previously proposed a conceptually new model for engulfment in which coordinated PG synthesis and degradation at the leading edge of the engulfing membrane moves the junction between the septum and the lateral cell wall around the forespore, making room for the engulfing mother cell membrane to advance (Figure 1B; Ojkic et al., 2016). In this ‘make before break’ model, new PG would be synthesized ahead of the engulfing membrane by forespore-associated PG biosynthetic complexes and subsequently degraded by DMP. To test this model, we first focused on the shape of the forespore membrane opposing the leading edge of the engulfing mother cell membrane. In wild type sporangia, the forespore membrane was rounded immediately ahead of the engulfing membrane (Figure 4A). This could be due to accumulation of additional PG at this site, which might push and deform the forespore membrane, introducing a broader curve. To confirm this, we analyzed the shape of the forespore membrane of sporangia in which PG synthesis was blocked with either bacitracin or cephalexin (Figure 4B, Figure 4—figure supplement 1, see Materials and methods). The forespore membrane was less rounded and had a sharp corner with a radius of curvature that was four times smaller than that of untreated cells (~30 nm vs. ~120 nm, Figure 4C). These results indicate that new PG is indeed synthesized ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane, and that it deforms the forespore membrane at the junction between the septum and the lateral cell wall.

Figure 4. Architecture of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane.

(A,B) Slices through cryo-electron tomograms of wild type (A) untreated and (B) cephalexin-treated sporangia. The radius of curvature (orange circle) of the forespore membrane (blue spline) ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane is highlighted in the respective insets. (C) Plot showing the average radius of curvature (nm) of the forespore membrane ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane for untreated and antibiotic-treated sporangia. Blue dots indicate individual data points (as also indicated by n); black bars indicate the standard deviation (***: p<0.001, unpaired t-test). (D) Slice through a cryo-electron tomogram of wild type B. subtilis sporangium. (E,F) Annotated forespore (green) and mother cell (yellow) membranes for the tomogram shown in (D) as viewed from both the left (blue asterisk) and the right (maroon asterisk) sides respectively, with insets of zoomed-in views of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane of both sides. Similar labeling scheme is followed through (H–N). (G) Schematic showing the localization of DMP PG degradation machinery (yellow pacman) and PG synthases (blue circles). Membranes (red), lateral PG (gray), septal PG (pink) and new PG (purple) are also highlighted. (H) Slice through a cryo-electron tomogram of spoIIP mutant sporangium. (I,J) Annotated membranes for the tomogram shown in (H) with insets of zoomed-in views of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane of both sides. (K) Schematic representing a cell in which the DMP complex (yellow pacman) does not assemble. (L) Slice through a cryo-electron tomogram of cephalexin-treated sporangium. (M,N) Annotated membranes for the tomogram shown in (L) with insets of zoomed-in views of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane of both sides. (O) Schematic representing a cell in which PG synthesis (blue circles) has been inhibited. Scale bar for (D,H,L): 200 nm. Scale bars have been omitted for surface rendered images owing to their perspective nature. (P) Model for mother cell membrane migration. DMP complexes (yellow pacman) present at different positions on the mother cell membrane (red) tether the membrane to the PG (gray) synthesized ahead. Due to a limited number of DMP complexes, the engulfing membrane may move forward in finger-like projections. This is indicated by a representative annotated mother cell membrane (yellow) from Figure 4F.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Quantification of radius of curvature of the forespore membrane.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A) Slice through a cryo-electron tomogram of a wild type sporangium treated with bacitracin (50 μg/ml) with the radius of curvature of the forespore membrane ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane highlighted. Scale bar: 200 nm. (B) Raw data for radius of curvature of the forespore membrane of wild type sporangia and antibiotic (cephalexin and bacitracin) treated sporangia with mean and standard deviation indicated.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Graph depicting the septal thickness of wild type untreated and antibiotic-treated sporangia (cephalexin and a combination of cephalexin and penicillin V) according to concentrations specified in Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

n indicates the number of tomograms analysed. The mean and standard deviation for each case is indicated.
Figure 4—figure supplement 3. Membrane architecture in wild type.

Figure 4—figure supplement 3.

(A) Slice through a cryo-electron tomogram of a wild type sporangium. (B,C) Annotation of membranes for the tomogram shown in (A). Forespore membrane is shown in green and mother cell membrane in yellow and both sides of the engulfing mother cell membrane are indicated by blue and maroon asterisks respectively. Scale bar for (A): 200 nm. Scale bars are omitted for annotated panels that are shown in perspective mode.
Figure 4—figure supplement 4. Membrane architecture in spoIIP sporangia.

Figure 4—figure supplement 4.

(A) Slice through a cryo-electron tomogram of a spoIIP sporangium. (B,C) Annotation of membranes for the tomogram shown in (A). Forespore membrane is shown in green and mother cell membrane in yellow and both sides of the engulfing mother cell membrane are indicated by blue and maroon asterisks respectively. Scale bar for (A): 200 nm. Scale bars are omitted for annotated panels that are shown in perspective mode.
Figure 4—figure supplement 5. Membrane architecture in spoIIDMP sporangia.

Figure 4—figure supplement 5.

(A,D) Slices through cryo-electron tomograms of spoIIDMP sporangia. (B,C) Annotation of membranes for the tomogram shown in (A). (E,F) Annotation of membranes for the tomogram shown in (D). Forespore membrane is shown in green and mother cell membrane in yellow and both sides of the engulfing mother cell membrane are indicated by blue and maroon asterisks respectively. A bulge in the middle of the septum (orange arrow) in (D) is highlighted in orange in (E) and (F). Scale bars for (A,D): 200 nm. Scale bars are omitted for annotated panels that are shown in perspective mode.
Figure 4—figure supplement 6. Membrane architecture in antibiotic-treated sporangium.

Figure 4—figure supplement 6.

(A) Slice through a cryo-electron tomogram of a wild type sporangium treated with penicillin V. (B,C) Annotation of membranes for the tomogram shown in (A). Forespore membrane is shown in green and mother cell membrane in yellow and both sides of the engulfing mother cell membrane are indicated by blue and maroon asterisks respectively. Scale bar for (A): 200 nm. Scale bars are omitted for annotated panels that are shown in perspective mode.

To exclude the possibility that new PG synthesis also happened behind the leading edge of the engulfing membrane, we analyzed septal thickness in sporangia treated with cephalexin and a combination of cephalexin and penicillin V using cryo-FIB-ET. If the septum is thinner in the presence of antibiotics, it would suggest that additional septal PG is synthesized after the DMP complex advances and degrades the PG ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane. However, if septal thickness is independent of the presence of antibiotics, it would suggest that PG is not normally synthesized behind the DMP complex. Our data showed that the septal thickness of cells treated with cephalexin was comparable to that of untreated cells. Surprisingly, the septal thickness of cells treated with a combination of cephalexin and penicillin V was ~3 nm greater than that of untreated cells (Figure 4—figure supplement 2). This modest increase in septal thickness is of a magnitude that is consistent with recent molecular dynamics simulations which show that relaxed PG is thicker than stretched PG (Beeby et al., 2013). It is possible that treatment with antibiotics blocking PG synthesis inhibits the stretching of septal PG due to the absence of membrane migration which could pull the septal PG around the forespore. Alternatively, the residual DMP might partially cleave septal PG, releasing the tension and leading to slightly thicker septa. Taken together, in both cases of antibiotic treatment the septal thickness did not decrease compared to untreated sporangia, suggesting that PG is not synthesized behind the DMP complex.

3D architecture of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane

The new PG synthesized ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane might interfere with the movement of the engulfing membrane, until it is degraded by DMP. To obtain insights about the movement of the engulfing membrane, we annotated the forespore and the mother cell membranes in our tomograms to visualize the architecture of the leading edge in 3D. Our data showed that the leading edge of the engulfing membrane in wild type sporulating cells moved around the forespore in tiny finger-like projections (Figure 4D–G, Figure 4—figure supplement 3). The projections were ~10–30 nm wide and ~5–20 nm long, with significant variations from cell to cell. We hypothesized that those projections could be due to the uneven degradation of PG ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane. To test this possibility, we imaged spoIIP mutant sporangia, which lack a functional DMP complex. As expected, the septum bulged towards the mother cell cytoplasm, but the mother cell membrane did not move forward in these cells. No membrane projections anywhere were observed in the mother cell membrane in any of the tomograms that were annotated (Figure 4H–K, Figure 4—figure supplement 4, Video 9). Also, no projections were observed in the DMP triple mutant, most of which did not form bulges (Figure 4—figure supplement 5). These findings suggest that SpoIIDMP is necessary for the formation of finger-like projections in the engulfing mother cell membrane.

Video 9. Movie showing slices through a cryo-electron tomogram of spoIIP mutant sporangium shown in Figure 4H.

Download video file (6.6MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.031

We next tested whether PG synthesis was also required for the formation of finger-like projections. To study this possibility, we focused on sporangia in which PG synthesis was blocked using cephalexin (Figure 4L–O, Video 10). When treated with antibiotics that block PG synthesis, membrane migration is blocked although the forespore continues to grow into the mother cell (Ojkic et al., 2016). The case of cephalexin-treated cells is more complicated than other antibiotics, because after the septum curves into the mother cell, the leading edge sometimes retracts on one side while advancing slightly on the other (Video 10; Ojkic et al., 2016). This appears to consist of rotation of the ‘cup’ formed by the bulging septum relative to the lateral cell wall, rather than membrane migration, because the distance between the leading edges does not decrease during this process. Thus, rotation of the septal cup does not reflect the degree to which the forespore is engulfed. Cephalexin inhibits the earliest stages of cell division (Eberhardt et al., 2003; Kocaoglu and Carlson, 2015), and therefore we speculate that it might be required to tether the extending septum to the lateral cell wall. In the absence of these bridges, the septum might be free to rotate according to Brownian motion, perhaps anchored by the Q-AH ratchet that can also mediate engulfment in the absence of the cell wall (Broder and Pogliano, 2006). We used cryo-FIB-ET to compare the architecture of both sides of the engulfing membrane in cephalexin-treated sporangia (Figure 4L–O). We did not observe finger-like projections in the side of the membrane that retracts (Figure 4M) but observed a few projections in the opposite side (Figure 4N), which might remain tethered to PG ahead of the engulfing membrane. Also, when cells were treated with penicillin V, we observed fewer projections that were shorter compared to untreated cells (Figure 4—figure supplement 6). Taken together, these results suggest that the finger-like projections at the leading edge of the engulfing membrane might be caused by tethering of the engulfing membrane to the PG via DMP (Figure 4P).

Video 10. Movie showing slices through a cryo-electron tomogram of wildtype B. subtilis sporangium treated with cephalexin shown in Figure 4L.

Download video file (7.8MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.032

Discussion

In this study, we have visualized the developmental process of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis using cryo-FIB-ET. We have obtained images of cells during different stages of sporulation at a resolution of a few nanometers, revealing new details about the architecture of spore assembly, as well as several hitherto unknown structures inside and around the developing spore (Figure 1). Our results also provide mechanistic insights into engulfment, including the early step of septal thinning (Figures 2 and 3) and membrane migration (Figure 4) which are captured in the model presented in Figure 5.

Figure 5. Model for septal thinning and membrane migration.

Figure 5.

(A) Schematic of a sporulating cell with a flat septum and relaxed septal PG (pink). Membranes (red), lateral PG (gray), SpoIIIE (orange) and forespore chromosome (green) are also highlighted. (B) As SpoIIIE translocates the chromosome to the forespore, the septal PG is stretched which may contribute to septal thinning. (C) Top view of the sporulating cell wherein coordinated PG degradation by DMP (yellow pacman) and PG synthesis by PG biosynthetic enzymes (blue) at the leading edge provide room for the engulfing mother cell membrane migration. (D) Side view depicting the proposed membrane migration model with mother cell membrane (red), PG synthesized ahead of the membrane (purple) and lateral PG (gray) highlighted. During engulfment, DMP complexes present at different locations on the mother cell membrane may move forward by degrading the PG ahead and their rate-limiting activity may lead to the formation of tiny finger-like projections. FS: Forespore; MC: mother cell.

We provide evidence that the septal PG is not completely degraded at the onset of engulfment. Instead, the septum gets slightly (~25%) thinner as it curves into the mother cell, with PG continuously present between the mother cell and the forespore membranes. In addition, the whole septum transitions from thick to thin homogenously, contrary to previous results that suggested that septal thinning started in the middle and progressed towards the edges. The homogenous thinning of the septum can be explained by our previous finding that septal PG is stretched as the forespore grows towards the mother cell due to increased turgor pressure caused by SpoIIIE-mediated chromosome translocation (Lopez-Garrido et al., 2018). Thus, septal thinning could simply represent a change in the conformation of the septal PG, from a relaxed to a stretched state, triggered by the increased turgor pressure in the forespore. This is consistent with recent molecular dynamics simulations on Gram-positive cell walls, which show that relaxed PG fragments are ~25% thicker than those in a strained conformation (Beeby et al., 2013).

Our results also indicate that DMP is required to maintain a flexible septum that can curve as the forespore grows into the mother cell (Figure 3). We found that the septa of DMP triple mutants have irregular thickness and are on average thicker than wild type septa (Figure 3E–G). Since DMP is produced after polar septation, the septa of DMP mutant sporangia must have thickened after they have been formed. Thus, it is possible that DMP prevents septal thickening by clearing PG synthases from the septum, where they would accumulate after polar septation. This model is consistent with the increased localization of PBPs throughout the septum in DMP mutants (Figure 3—figure supplement 4). Nevertheless, we cannot rule out the possibility that DMP degrades the septal PG partially to generate a flexible septum. If this was the case, the partial degradation should happen simultaneously across the whole septum to enable the homogenous transition from thick to thin. However, since DMP is rate limiting for engulfment, it seems unlikely that there may be enough DMP complexes to mediate the homogeneous thinning of the septum. We therefore favor the model that septal thinning is primarily driven by stretching of septal peptidoglycan.

Our data also provide insights into the mechanism of membrane migration during engulfment. Using fluorescence microscopy, we previously observed that new PG is synthesized at the leading edge of the engulfing membrane (Ojkic et al., 2016; Tocheva et al., 2013). We also showed that many forespore penicillin binding proteins (PBPs) can track the leading edge of the engulfing mother cell membrane (Ojkic et al., 2016), suggesting that PG synthesis at the leading edge of the engulfing membrane is carried out by forespore PBPs. The cryo-FIB-ET images presented here provide further support to this idea: the comparison of the architecture of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane between native sporangia and sporangia in which PG synthesis is blocked by antibiotics shows that new PG deforms and rounds the forespore membrane ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane (Figure 4A–C), indicating that new PG is synthesized by forespore PBPs immediately ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing mother cell membrane. We propose that DMP complexes at the leading edge of the engulfing membrane target this new PG for degradation, making room for the engulfing membrane to advance (Figures 1B and 5C). This relatively simple model suggests that engulfment could have evolved by developing new mechanisms to spatially and temporally regulate the conserved protein machineries that synthesize and degrade peptidoglycan.

The 3D reconstruction of the leading edge of the engulfing mother cell membrane shows the presence of finger-like projections that resemble the filopodia of eukaryotic cells (Mattila and Lappalainen, 2008). In eukaryotic cells, these membrane projections are produced by cytoskeletal proteins, and the projections are typically a few micrometers wide. In contrast, no cytoskeletal elements contributing to engulfment have been described so far (or visualized in our tomograms) and the finger-like projections at the leading edge of the engulfing membrane are only a few nanometers wide. Instead, our results demonstrate that DMP is required for the formation of these finger-like projections. The simplest model to explain these data is that DMP tethers the engulfing membrane to the PG ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane, as it degrades the new PG to make room for the engulfing membrane to expand. DMP activity is rate limiting for membrane migration (Abanes-De Mello et al., 2002; Meyer et al., 2010), suggesting that there is a discrete number of DMP complexes to remove the steric barrier posed by the newly synthesized PG ahead of the leading edge. The limited number of DMP complexes might cause the PG to be degraded irregularly, generating an uneven membrane front in the form of finger-like projections. The distance between the tips of the finger-like projections is ~5–20 nm, which would require that some DMP complexes are ahead of others by 2 to 8 glycan strands (Turner et al., 2018). Our observations are consistent with the hypothesis that the finger-like projections are produced via the tethering of the DMP complex to existing peptidoglycan, since short fingers are observed when PG synthesis is inhibited, and that these fingers are either stabilized or enhanced by binding newly synthesized peptidoglycan, since longer fingers are observed in the presence of ongoing PG synthesis. This is supported by prior studies of the two enzymes that degrade peptidoglycan (D and P), which have shown that these comprise a processive enzyme complex in which P binds and cleaves PG first, allowing D to bind and cleave PG (Morlot et al., 2010). Our cell biological data showed that localization of P to the leading edge of the engulfing membrane is decreased but not completely absent when PG synthesis is inhibited (Ojkic et al., 2016), suggesting that P can bind to existing PG, but that high affinity binding requires newly synthesized peptidoglycan. This increased binding of P would likely allow the formation of longer finger-like projections. From a functional perspective, we speculate that the finger-like projections could be compared to ‘friction ridges’, the minutely raised ridges of the epidermis that provide a grasping surface on our fingers (Tomlinson et al., 2007). During engulfment, these membrane projections may provide the engulfing membrane a tighter lateral grip while moving around the forespore, hence serving as a ratchet that prevents backward movement of the membrane.

The application of cryo-FIB-ET has been instrumental in allowing us to visualize and accurately measure structural details of engulfing sporangia, which transpire at a scale of a few nanometers. Our studies support a mechanistic model for the enigmatic process of engulfment, while revealing novel architectural details about engulfment and spore assembly, including intriguing new molecular structures that will require further study to unambiguously identify them. Our findings reveal details about sporulation at an unprecedented resolution and further illustrate the potential of cryo-FIB-ET to reveal critical new information about dynamic biological processes.

Materials and methods

Key resources table.

Reagent
type (species)
or resource
Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional
information
Strain,
strain background (Bacillus subtilis PY79)
PY79 (Youngman et al., 1984) Tax. ID:1415167 Wild type
Strain, strain background (Bacillus subtilis PY79) ΔspoIIP::tet (Frandsen and Stragier, 1995) KP513
Strain, strain background (Bacillus subtilis PY79) spoIID298, spoIIM-mls, ΔspoIIP::tet (Broder and Pogliano, 2006) KP4188
Chemical compound, drug FM4-64 Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#T13320
Chemical compound, drug Bacitracin MilliporeSigma Cat#B0125 Conc. used: 50 μg/ml
Chemical compound, drug Penicillin V MilliporeSigma Cat#1504489 Conc. used: 500 μg/ml
Chemical compound, drug Cephalexin MilliporeSigma Cat#C4895 Conc. used: 50 μg/ml
Software, algorithm JFilament (Smith et al., 2010) http://athena.physics.lehigh.edu/jfilament/
Software, algorithm IMOD (Mastronarde, 1997) http://bio3d.colorado.edu/imod/;
RRID: SCR_003297
Software, algorithm TomoSegMemTV (Martinez-Sanchez et al., 2014) https://sites.google.com/site/3demimageprocessing/tomosegmemtv
Software, algorithm Amira Commercial software by Thermo Scientific (formerly FEI) https://www.fei.com/software/amira-3d-for-life-sciences/;
RRID: SCR_014305
Software, algorithm SerialEM (Mastronarde, 2005) http://bio3d.colorado.edu/SerialEM/
Software, algorithm Matlab code to calculate septal distances of sporangia This paper; Source code 1
Software, algorithm Matlab code to calculate cell length using fluorescence microscopy images This paper;
Source code 2

Strains and culture conditions

We used Bacillus subtilis PY79 background for all data acquisition. The strains (see Key Resources Table) were grown in LB plates at 30°C. The bacteria were first grown in ¼ diluted LB to OD600 ~0.5–0.7. Sporulation was then induced by resuspension in A + B media at 37°C. For cryo-FIB-ET, we collected wild type sporulating cells 1.5–3 hr after sporulation induction. For cells treated with antibiotics, 50 μg/ml of bacitracin, 50 μg/ml of cephalexin and 500 μg/ml of penicillin V were used. Antibiotics were added two hours after induction of sporulation and samples for cryo-FIB-ET were collected either one (for bacitracin) or two hours (for cephalexin, penicillin V and a combination of cephalexin and penicillin V) later. For spoIIP and spoIIDMP mutant sporangia, cells were collected 2.5 hr after induction of sporulation for cryo-ET.

Cryo-FIB-ET and image processing

7 μl of diluted liquid culture was deposited onto glow-discharged (using Pelco easyGlow) holey carbon coated QUANTIFOIL R 2/1 200 mesh copper grids. Manual blotting was performed using Whatman No. one filter paper from the reverse side to remove excess resuspension media such that cells form a monolayer on the grids. They were then immediately plunge-frozen into a liquid ethane/propane mixture cooled by liquid nitrogen using a custom-built vitrification device (Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Munich). These grids were then stored in storage boxes in liquid nitrogen until further use.

Vitrified bacterial samples forming a monolayer on the grids were mounted into modified autogrids (Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry) for milling inside a Thermo Scientific Scios DualBeam (cryo-FIB/SEM) (Materials and methods). 100–250 nm thin sections or lamellae (12–15 μm in width) were then prepared using rectangular milling patterns and beam current of 0.1 nA or 0.3 nA for rough milling and 10 pA or 30 pA for fine milling as described in Chaikeeratisak et al. (2017). Tilt series were collected in a 300-keV Tecnai G2 Polara (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a K2 Summit direct detection camera (Gatan) and a post-column Quantum energy filter (Gatan). The samples were usually tilted from −66° to +66° (the range per tilt series depending on the quality of the lamellae) with an increment of 1.5° or 2°. The tilt series were acquired using SerialEM (Mastronarde, 2005). The images were recorded at a defocus of −5 to −6 μm at nominal magnifications of 34,000 (pixel size: 0.61 nm) or 41,000 (pixel size: 0.49 nm) with a cumulative dose of ~60–130 e-2. Images for later stages of sporulation (Figure 1—figure supplement 2B) were acquired at nominal magnification of 22,500 (pixel size: 0.92 nm) as these samples were highly sensitive to radiation damage.

The patch-tracking feature of IMOD was used to reconstruct the tilt-series (Kremer et al., 1996). TomosegmemTV (Martinez-Sanchez et al., 2014) was used for semi-automatic segmentation of membranes followed by manual refinement in the Amira software package.

Measuring mean radius of ellipsoidal complexes

The mean radius (r) of an ellipse is given by:

r=a2+b22

where a is the semi-major axis of the ellipse and b is the semi-minor axis of the ellipse. For ellipsoidal complexes observed in our tomograms (Figure 1J, Figure 1—figure supplement 3A–C), average value of a is ~45 nm and that of b is ~42 nm.

Calculating septal distances

‘Surface distance’ feature of Amira was used to calculate the septal distances between the forespore and mother cell membranes. The septal-disc was color coded according to these values (Figure 3B–D,G, Figure 3—figure supplement 2E). Five tomograms each of wild type cells representing different stages of engulfment (flat, curved and engulfing septa) were used for analysis. For engulfment mutants, five spoIIP sporangia and seven spoIIDMP sporangia were analyzed. For antibiotic treated cells, six cephalexin-treated sporangia and five cephalexin- and penicillin V- combination treated sporangia were analyzed. To get the linear profiles of the distances, the data was grouped into smaller bins of approximately equal area for each tomogram. Then the average of the distance within a bin was used to represent the distance between the membranes at that location of the bin (see Source code 1). Figure 3E represents an average of all the profiles for each cell type in Figure 3—figure supplement 1 and Figure 3—figure supplement 3E.

Fluorescence microscopy

Cells were visualized on an Applied Precision DV Elite optical sectioning microscope equipped with a Photometrics CoolSNAP-HQ2 camera and deconvolved using SoftWoRx v5.5.1 (Applied Precision). For experiment outlined in Figure 3—figure supplement 4, the median focal plane of the image is shown. Membranes were stained with 0.5 μg/ml of FM4-64 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) that was added directly to 1.2% agarose pads prepared using sporulation resuspension medium. 10 μg/μl of BOCILLIN-FL was added to 1 ml of culture aliquoted ~2.5 hr after sporulation induction (at 37°C) and washed with sporulation resuspension medium three times. 12 μl of washed cells were then transferred to agarose pads for imaging.

For time-lapse microscopy, sporulation was induced at 30°C. 0.5 μg/ml FM4-64 was added to the cultures ~1.5 hr after sporulation induction and incubation continued for another hour. Composition of agarose pads for time-lapse microscopy is as follows: 2/3 vol of supernatant from the sporulation culture, 1/3 vol 3.6% agarose in fresh A + B sporulation medium, 0.17 μg/ml FM4-64, supplemented with antibiotics according to concentrations mentioned above in ‘Strains and culture conditions’. 12 μl samples were taken 3 hr after resuspension and transferred to the agarose pads. Pads were covered with a glass slide and sealed with petroleum jelly to avoid dehydration during time-lapse imaging. Pictures were taken in an environmental chamber at 30°C every 5 min for ~5 hr. Excitation/emission filters were TRITC/CY5 for membrane imaging. Excitation light transmission was set to 5% to minimize phototoxicity and exposure time was set to 0.1 s.

Calculating cell length using fluorescence microscopy images

To determine the length of vegetative cells over time (Figure 2—figure supplement 1E), membrane contours were extracted from microscopy images for each time frame (up to 60 min post treatment with antibiotics) using semi-automated active contour software JFilament, available as a Fiji plugin (Schindelin et al., 2012; Smith et al., 2010). The cell length was then calculated by measuring along the long axis of the contours using a custom-built MATLAB script (see Source code 2). To plot the average cell length, the data was normalized to the initial cell length for each of the cases.

Calculating radius of curvature

To calculate radius of curvature (Figure 4A–C, Figure 4—figure supplement 1), a slice was taken approximately from the center of the z-stack for each of the tomograms. ‘Measure spline curvature’ feature of sabl_mpl (Yao et al., 2017) was then used to plot radii of curvatures around the forespore membranes just ahead of the leading edge for seven native sporangia and five antibiotic-treated sporangia wherein membrane migration appears to be blocked.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Director’s New Innovator Award 1DP2GM123494 (EV), and the National Institutes of Health R01-GM057045 (EV and KP). We used the UC San Diego Cryo-EM Facility (partially supported by a gift from the Agouron Institute to Tim Baker), and the San Diego Nanotechnology Infrastructure of UC San Diego (supported by the NSF grant ECCS-1542148). The authors would like to thank Antonio Martínez-Sánchez for useful insights into data analysis.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Kit Pogliano, Email: kpogliano@ucsd.edu.

Elizabeth Villa, Email: evilla@ucsd.edu.

Tâm Mignot, CNRS-Aix Marseille University, France.

Gisela Storz, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Institutes of Health National Institute of Health's Director's New Innovator Award (1DP2GM123494) to Elizabeth Villa.

  • National Institutes of Health RO1-GM057045 to Kit Pogliano, Elizabeth Villa.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conception and design, Data acquisition, Data analysis, Writing—original draft.

Conception and design, Data acquisition, Data analysis, Writing—original draft.

Data analysis.

Assistance with cryo-EM.

Data analysis.

Data analysis.

Conception and design, Data analysis, Writing—review and editing.

Conception and design, Data analysis, Writing—review and editing.

Additional files

Source code 1. Matlab code to calculate septal distances of sporangia.
elife-45257-code1.zip (28.7MB, zip)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.034
Source code 2. Matlab code to calculate cell length using fluorescence microscopy images.
elife-45257-code2.zip (2.1KB, zip)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.035
Transparent reporting form
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.036

Data availability

The authors have created a library of B. subtilis tomograms accessible at: http://villalab.ucsd.edu/research/engulfment. The authors have also deposited three representative tilt-series to Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) in the form of 4x binned tomograms. The IDs are EMD-20335, EMD-20336, EMD-20337 for Figure 1D,F,H respectively.

The following datasets were generated:

Khanna K, Lopez-Garrido J, Zhao Z, Watanabe R, Yuan Y, Sugie J, Pogliano K, Villa E. 2019. Representative tilt-series. Electron Microscopy Data Bank. EMD-20335

Khanna K, Lopez-Garrido J, Zhao Z, Watanabe R, Yuan Y, Sugie J, Pogliano K, Villa E. 2019. Representative tilt-series. Electron Microscopy Data Bank. EMD-20336

Khanna K, Lopez-Garrido J, Zhao Z, Watanabe R, Yuan Y, Sugie J, Pogliano K, Villa E. 2019. Representative tilt-series. Electron Microscopy Data Bank. EMD-20337

References

  1. Abanes-De Mello A, Sun YL, Aung S, Pogliano K. A cytoskeleton-like role for the bacterial cell wall during engulfment of the Bacillus subtilis forespore. Genes & Development. 2002;16:3253–3264. doi: 10.1101/gad.1039902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aung S, Shum J, Abanes-De Mello A, Broder DH, Fredlund-Gutierrez J, Chiba S, Pogliano K. Dual localization pathways for the engulfment proteins during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. Molecular Microbiology. 2007;65:1534–1546. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05887.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bath J, Wu LJ, Errington J, Wang JC. Role of Bacillus subtilis SpoIIIE in DNA transport across the mother cell-prespore division septum. Science. 2000;290:995–997. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5493.995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beeby M, Gumbart JC, Roux B, Jensen GJ. Architecture and assembly of the Gram-positive cell wall. Molecular Microbiology. 2013;88:664–672. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ben-Harush K, Maimon T, Patla I, Villa E, Medalia O. Visualizing cellular processes at the molecular level by cryo-electron tomography. Journal of Cell Science. 2010;123:7–12. doi: 10.1242/jcs.060111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blaylock B, Jiang X, Rubio A, Moran CP, Pogliano K. Zipper-like interaction between proteins in adjacent daughter cells mediates protein localization. Genes & Development. 2004;18:2916–2928. doi: 10.1101/gad.1252704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Broder DH, Pogliano K. Forespore engulfment mediated by a ratchet-like mechanism. Cell. 2006;126:917–928. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chaikeeratisak V, Nguyen K, Khanna K, Brilot AF, Erb ML, Coker JK, Vavilina A, Newton GL, Buschauer R, Pogliano K, Villa E, Agard DA, Pogliano J. Assembly of a nucleus-like structure during viral replication in bacteria. Science. 2017;355:194–197. doi: 10.1126/science.aal2130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chastanet A, Losick R. Engulfment during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is governed by a multi-protein complex containing tandemly acting autolysins. Molecular Microbiology. 2007;64:139–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05652.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eberhardt C, Kuerschner L, Weiss DS. Probing the catalytic activity of a cell division-specific transpeptidase in vivo with beta-lactams. Journal of Bacteriology. 2003;185:3726–3734. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.13.3726-3734.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eichenberger P, Fawcett P, Losick R. A three-protein inhibitor of polar septation during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Molecular Microbiology. 2001;42:1147–1162. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02660.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Engel BD, Schaffer M, Kuhn Cuellar L, Villa E, Plitzko JM, Baumeister W. Native architecture of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast revealed by in situ cryo-electron tomography. eLife. 2015;4:e04889. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Errington J. Regulation of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2003;1:117–126. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fleming TC, Shin JY, Lee SH, Becker E, Huang KC, Bustamante C, Pogliano K. Dynamic SpoIIIE assembly mediates septal membrane fission during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. Genes & Development. 2010;24:1160–1172. doi: 10.1101/gad.1925210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Frandsen N, Stragier P. Identification and characterization of the Bacillus subtilis spoIIP locus. Journal of Bacteriology. 1995;177:716–722. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.3.716-722.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gutierrez J, Smith R, Pogliano K. SpoIID-mediated peptidoglycan degradation is required throughout engulfment during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. Journal of Bacteriology. 2010;192:3174–3186. doi: 10.1128/JB.00127-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hawver LA, Jung SA, Ng WL. Specificity and complexity in bacterial quorum-sensing systems. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2016;40:738–752. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuw014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Higgins D, Dworkin J. Recent progress in Bacillus subtilis sporulation. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2012;36:131–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00310.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Holt SC, Gauther JJ, Tipper DJ. Ultrastructural studies of sporulation in Bacillus sphaericus. Journal of Bacteriology. 1975;122:1322–1338. doi: 10.1128/jb.122.3.1322-1338.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Illing N, Errington J. Genetic regulation of morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis: roles of sigma E and sigma F in prespore engulfment. Journal of Bacteriology. 1991;173:3159–3169. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.10.3159-3169.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kocaoglu O, Carlson EE. Profiling of β-Lactam selectivity for Penicillin-Binding proteins in Escherichia coli strain DC2. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2015;59:2785–2790. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04552-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kremer JR, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. Journal of Structural Biology. 1996;116:71–76. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Levdikov VM, Blagova EV, McFeat A, Fogg MJ, Wilson KS, Wilkinson AJ. Structure of components of an intercellular channel complex in Sporulating Bacillus subtilis. PNAS. 2012;109:5441–5445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120087109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu NJ, Dutton RJ, Pogliano K. Evidence that the SpoIIIE DNA translocase participates in membrane fusion during cytokinesis and engulfment. Molecular Microbiology. 2006;59:1097–1113. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05004.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lopez-Garrido J, Ojkic N, Khanna K, Wagner FR, Villa E, Endres RG, Pogliano K. Chromosome translocation inflates Bacillus forespores and impacts cellular morphology. Cell. 2018;172:758–770. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mahamid J, Pfeffer S, Schaffer M, Villa E, Danev R, Cuellar LK, Förster F, Hyman AA, Plitzko JM, Baumeister W. Visualizing the molecular sociology at the HeLa cell nuclear periphery. Science. 2016;351:969–972. doi: 10.1126/science.aad8857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Marko M, Hsieh C, Schalek R, Frank J, Mannella C. Focused-ion-beam thinning of frozen-hydrated biological specimens for cryo-electron microscopy. Nature Methods. 2007;4:215–217. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Martinez-Sanchez A, Garcia I, Asano S, Lucic V, Fernandez JJ. Robust membrane detection based on tensor voting for electron tomography. Journal of Structural Biology. 2014;186:49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2014.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mastronarde DN. Dual-axis tomography: an approach with alignment methods that preserve resolution. Journal of Structural Biology. 1997;120:343–352. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1997.3919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mastronarde DN. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. Journal of Structural Biology. 2005;152:36–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Matias VR, Beveridge TJ. Cryo-electron microscopy reveals native polymeric cell wall structure in Bacillus subtilis 168 and the existence of a periplasmic space. Molecular Microbiology. 2005;56:240–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04535.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mattila PK, Lappalainen P. Filopodia: molecular architecture and cellular functions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2008;9:446–454. doi: 10.1038/nrm2406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McKenney PT, Driks A, Eichenberger P. The Bacillus subtilis endospore: assembly and functions of the multilayered coat. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2013;11:33–44. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Meyer P, Gutierrez J, Pogliano K, Dworkin J. Cell wall synthesis is necessary for membrane dynamics during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis. Molecular Microbiology. 2010;76:956–970. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07155.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Morlot C, Uehara T, Marquis KA, Bernhardt TG, Rudner DZ. A highly coordinated cell wall degradation machine governs spore morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. Genes & Development. 2010;24:411–422. doi: 10.1101/gad.1878110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Morlot C, Rodrigues CDA. The new kid on the block: a specialized secretion system during bacterial sporulation. Trends in Microbiology. 2018;26:663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Oikonomou CM, Chang YW, Jensen GJ. A new view into prokaryotic cell biology from electron cryotomography. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2016;14:205–220. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ojkic N, López-Garrido J, Pogliano K, Endres RG. Cell-wall remodeling drives engulfment during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. eLife. 2016;5:e18657. doi: 10.7554/eLife.18657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Perez AR, Abanes-De Mello A, Pogliano K. SpoIIB localizes to active sites of septal biogenesis and spatially regulates septal thinning during engulfment in Bacillus subtilis. Journal of Bacteriology. 2000;182:1096–1108. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.4.1096-1108.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ramamurthi KS, Losick R. Negative membrane curvature as a cue for subcellular localization of a bacterial protein. PNAS. 2009;106:13541–13545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906851106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rigort A, Bäuerlein FJ, Villa E, Eibauer M, Laugks T, Baumeister W, Plitzko JM. Focused ion beam micromachining of eukaryotic cells for cryoelectron tomography. PNAS. 2012;109:4449–4454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201333109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rousseau M, Hermier J. Wall polysaccharides in sporulating bacteria: localization by electron microscopy [Localisation en microscopie electronique des polysaccharides de la paroi chez les bacteries en sporulation] Journal de Microscopie et de Biologie Cellulaire. 1975;23:237–248. [Google Scholar]
  43. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Smith MB, Li H, Shen T, Huang X, Yusuf E, Vavylonis D. Segmentation and tracking of cytoskeletal filaments using open active contours. Cytoskeleton. 2010;67:693–705. doi: 10.1002/cm.20481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Spratt BG. Distinct penicillin binding proteins involved in the division, elongation, and shape of Escherichia coli K12. PNAS. 1975;72:2999–3003. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.8.2999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tan IS, Ramamurthi KS. Spore formation in Bacillus subtilis. Environmental Microbiology Reports. 2014;6:212–225. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tocheva EI, Matson EG, Morris DM, Moussavi F, Leadbetter JR, Jensen GJ. Peptidoglycan remodeling and conversion of an inner membrane into an outer membrane during sporulation. Cell. 2011;146:799–812. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tocheva EI, López-Garrido J, Hughes HV, Fredlund J, Kuru E, Vannieuwenhze MS, Brun YV, Pogliano K, Jensen GJ. Peptidoglycan transformations during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. Molecular Microbiology. 2013;88:673–686. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tomlinson SE, Lewis R, Carré MJ. Review of the frictional properties of finger-object contact when gripping. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology. 2007;221:841–850. doi: 10.1243/13506501JET313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Turner RD, Mesnage S, Hobbs JK, Foster SJ. Molecular imaging of glycan chains couples cell-wall polysaccharide architecture to bacterial cell morphology. Nature Communications. 2018;9:1263. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03551-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Villa E, Schaffer M, Plitzko JM, Baumeister W. Opening windows into the cell: focused-ion-beam milling for cryo-electron tomography. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2013;23:771–777. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wagstaff J, Löwe J. Prokaryotic cytoskeletons: protein filaments organizing small cells. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2018;16:187–201. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang X, Montero Llopis P, Rudner DZ. Organization and segregation of bacterial chromosomes. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2013;14:191–203. doi: 10.1038/nrg3375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu W, Thomas JA, Cheng N, Black LW, Steven AC. Bubblegrams reveal the inner body of bacteriophage φkz. Science. 2012;335:182. doi: 10.1126/science.1214120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wu LJ, Errington J. Bacillus subtilis SpoIIIE protein required for DNA segregation during asymmetric cell division. Science. 1994;264:572–575. doi: 10.1126/science.8160014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wu LJ, Errington J. Septal localization of the SpoIIIE chromosome partitioning protein in Bacillus subtilis. The EMBO Journal. 1997;16:2161–2169. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.8.2161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yao Q, Jewett AI, Chang YW, Oikonomou CM, Beeby M, Iancu CV, Briegel A, Ghosal D, Jensen GJ. Short FtsZ filaments can drive asymmetric cell envelope constriction at the onset of bacterial cytokinesis. The EMBO Journal. 2017;36:1577–1589. doi: 10.15252/embj.201696235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yen Shin J, Lopez-Garrido J, Lee SH, Diaz-Celis C, Fleming T, Bustamante C, Pogliano K. Visualization and functional dissection of coaxial paired SpoIIIE channels across the sporulation septum. eLife. 2015;4:e06474. doi: 10.7554/eLife.06474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Youngman P, Perkins JB, Losick R. A novel method for the rapid cloning in Escherichia coli of Bacillus subtilis chromosomal DNA adjacent to Tn917 insertions. MGG Molecular & General Genetics. 1984;195:424–433. doi: 10.1007/BF00341443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zeytuni N, Hong C, Flanagan KA, Worrall LJ, Theiltges KA, Vuckovic M, Huang RK, Massoni SC, Camp AH, Yu Z, Strynadka NC. Near-atomic resolution cryoelectron microscopy structure of the 30-fold homooligomeric SpoIIIAG channel essential to spore formation in Bacillus subtilis. PNAS. 2017;114:E7073–E7081. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704310114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhao G, Meier TI, Kahl SD, Gee KR, Blaszczak LC. BOCILLIN FL, a sensitive and commercially available reagent for detection of Penicillin-Binding proteins. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1999;43:1124–1128. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.5.1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision letter

Editor: Tâm Mignot1
Reviewed by: Cecile Morlot2

In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.

Thank you for sending your article entitled "The molecular architecture of engulfment during Bacillus subtilis sporulation" for peer review at eLife. Your article is being evaluated by two peer reviewers, and the evaluation is being overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Gisela Storz as the Senior Editor.

Engulfment is a phagocytic-like process that is essential for bacterial sporulation. During engulfment, the mother cell membrane migrates around the developing spore, generating a cell within a cell. Membrane migration involves cell wall synthesis and remodeling events that remain incompletely resolved. In this study, authors use state-of-the-art cryo-FIB-ET to investigate these unresolved aspects in Bacillus subtilis. Their data confirm earlier observations (obtained by ECT, Tocheva et al., 2013) that a layer of PG remains in the intermembrane space separating the mother cell and forespore. In addition, the unprecedented resolution of their images provides new insights into the thickness of this septal PG layer, as well as the morphology of the engulfing membranes at different stages of the engulfment process and upon impaired PG degradation or synthesis.

Essential revisions:

While their observations represent a significant contribution to the field, there are two major concerns regarding their conclusions, both based on the fact that the extend of PG inhibition in the presence of antibiotics is not clear:

- Authors observe finger-like projections associated with migrating membranes. They provide convincing evidence that these projections are associated with the DMP complex and they propose that they result from "tethering of the engulfing membrane to newly synthesized PG via DMP". However, these finger-like projections are still observed at the leading side of the engulfing membrane, although being less prominent, when PG synthesis is inhibited by cephalexin (Figure 4N and subsection “3D architecture of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane”, second paragraph).

Do authors really consider that PG synthesis is fully inhibited in the presence of cephalexin? If so, remnant finger-like projections and membrane migration still occurs when PG synthesis is inhibited. They might result from tethering of the engulfing membrane to old PG surrounding the forespore via DMP. In that case, finger-like projections may be stabilized/enhanced (rather than "caused") by tethering of the engulfing membrane to newly synthesized PG. To resolve this problem, the authors need to test the extent of PG synthesis inhibition by Cephalexin.

- Figure 4B shows a reduced rounding of the forespore membrane in the presence of antibiotics, providing evidence that PG is synthesized at the leading edge of the engulfing membrane. Based on this observation and a previous study (Ojkic et al., 2016), authors propose a model (Figure 5) in which PG is exclusively synthesized ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane. However, these data do not exclude the possibility that PG synthesis also happens behind the leading edge of the engulfing membrane, or in other words that PG is resynthesized after degradation by the DMP complex. Indeed, as pointed in the previous point, the fact that membrane migration still happens in the presence of antibiotics again questions whether PG synthesis is fully inhibited. In cells displaying incomplete or asymmetrical engulfment (such as those shown in Figure 2), PG synthesis might have continued for a while and stopped, resulting in septal disks containing newly synthesized PG and leading edges showing impaired PG synthesis. Analysis of septum thickness (as performed in Figure 3B-E) in the presence of antibiotics might shed light on this issue: a thinner septum (but not absent if DMP does not totally degrades septal PG) in the presence of antibiotics would suggest that PG is synthesized behind the DMP complex. If septum thickness is independent of the presence of antibiotics, it suggests that either PG is not synthesized behind the DMP complex or that PG is not fully inhibited in the presence of antibiotics. This uncertainty impacts the hypothesis proposed by the authors because PG synthesis happening behind the DMP complex might explain why a slight and homogenous septal thinning is observed (Figure 3); it might also contribute to the residual PG layer observed in the intermembrane space

eLife. 2019 Jul 8;8:e45257. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45257.045

Author response


This revised version includes additional experiments and analysis to address the reviewers’ comments. Here is a summary of the main points: We did additional experiments to more precisely test the extent of peptidoglycan (PG) synthesis inhibition upon antibiotic treatment to ensure that our results are representative. In addition to using septation as a readout for PG synthesis, we determined the rate of elongation of vegetative cells when treated with different antibiotics and tested two additional drug treatments – penicillin V and a combination of cephalexin and penicillin V. We found that a combination of cephalexin and penicillin V was most effective to ensure complete block of both septation and elongation (Figure 2—figure supplement 1, Videos 7-10). We also acquired cryo-electron tomography data of wild type sporangia treated with penicillin V and a combination of cephalexin and penicillin V (Figure 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 2), measured the septal thickness of sporangia treated with cephalexin and a combination of cephalexin and penicillin V, and compared it to untreated sporangia (Figure 4—figure supplement 2). The data showed that the septal thickness did not decrease upon antibiotic treatment which suggested that PG synthesis did not precede the mother cell DMP complex. In addition, we have modified the text wherever necessary to explain the impact of antibiotic treatment on septal architecture and engulfment in a more detailed and clear manner.

Essential revisions:

While their observations represent a significant contribution to the field, there are two major concerns regarding their conclusions, both based on the fact that the extend of PG inhibition in the presence of antibiotics is not clear:

We agree that determining the extent of PG inhibition in the presence of antibiotics is key for the interpretation of our results. We explain below the experiments we have already done to determine this, and propose additional experiments to more precisely test the extent of PG synthesis inhibition. We will also collect additional cryo-electron tomograms of sporulating cells treated with additional PG inhibitors to ensure that our results are representative.

We anticipate being able to submit a revised manuscript including the new experiments in less than two months. We expect that the cryo-EM experiments can be completed within 2-3 weeks. However, based on our experience with cryo-EM techniques that are not routine and require more than one high-end microscope to be online, we have learned to be conservative when making predictions about our timelines. We are confident that two months will suffice to perform the described experiments, regardless of potential instrument downtime.

- Authors observe finger-like projections associated with migrating membranes. They provide convincing evidence that these projections are associated with the DMP complex and they propose that they result from "tethering of the engulfing membrane to newly synthesized PG via DMP". However, these finger-like projections are still observed at the leading side of the engulfing membrane, although being less prominent, when PG synthesis is inhibited by cephalexin (Figure 4N and subsection “3D architecture of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane”, second paragraph).

Do authors really consider that PG synthesis is fully inhibited in the presence of cephalexin? If so, remnant finger-like projections and membrane migration still occurs when PG synthesis is inhibited. They might result from tethering of the engulfing membrane to old PG surrounding the forespore via DMP. In that case, finger-like projections may be stabilized/enhanced (rather than "caused") by tethering of the engulfing membrane to newly synthesized PG. To resolve this problem, the authors need to test the extent of PG synthesis inhibition by Cephalexin.

Thank you for this comment, which made us realize that some of our descriptions were imprecise.

First, we did not completely explain the impact of antibiotic treatment on septal architecture and engulfment. We previously showed that engulfment membrane migration does not continue when PG synthesis is inhibited (see Ojkic et al., 2016, Figure 1 and its supplements), although forespore growth causes the septum to stretch and curve into the mother cell, making it appear that membrane migration has occurred. Measurements of individual cells during timelapse microscopy shows that the distance between the leading edges of the engulfing membrane decreases during engulfment in untreated cells. However, after antibiotic treatment, this distance does not decrease, indicating that the mother cell membrane does not migrate around the forespore. The case of cephalexin-treated cells is more complicated than other antibiotics, because after the septum curves into the mother cell, the leading edge sometimes retracts on one side while advancing slightly on the other. This appears to consist of rotation of the ‘cup’ formed by the bulging septum relative to the lateral cell wall, rather than membrane migration, because the distance between the leading edges does not decrease during this process. Thus, rotation of the septal cup does not increase the degree to which the forespore is engulfed. We are uncertain as to the mechanistic basis for this rotation, but our timelapse experiments indicate that it is a consequence of cephalexin treatment, although it probably also happens after treatment with some penicillins (Ojkic et al. Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Cephalexin inhibits the earliest stages of cell division (Adam et al., 1997; Eberhardt et al., 2003; Kocaoglu et al., 2012), and therefore we speculate that it might be required to tether the extending septum to the lateral cell wall. In the absence of these bridges, the septum might be free to rotate according to Brownian motion, perhaps anchored by the Q-AH ratchet that can also mediate engulfment in the absence of the cell wall (Broder and Pogliano, 2006). We will describe the phenotypes produced by antibiotic treatment more precisely in the text. One area where this will clearly be necessary is where we refer to the side of the membrane that has retracted as the “lagging side” and the other one as the “leading side”, which may have created the misunderstanding that membrane migration happens in cephalexin-treated cells. A revision of this section, and expanded description of the phenotypes, will greatly improve our revised submission.

Second, the reviewers correctly point out that our observations are consistent with the hypothesis that the finger like projections are produced via the tethering of the DMP complex to existing peptidoglycan, since short fingers are observed when PG synthesis is inhibited, and that these fingers are either stabilized or enhanced by binding newly synthesized peptidoglycan, since longer fingers are observed in the presence of ongoing PG synthesis. This is supported by prior studies of the two enzymes that degrade peptidoglycan (D and P), which have shown that these comprise a processive enzyme complex in which P binds and cleaves PG first, allowing D to bind and cleave PG (Morlot and Rudner, 2010). Our cell biological data showed that localization of P to the leading edge of the engulfing membrane is decreased but not completely absent when PG synthesis is inhibited (Ojkic Figure 2F-G and associated supplementary figure), suggesting that P can bind to existing PG, but that high affinity binding requires newly synthesized peptidoglycan. This increased binding of P would likely allow the formation of longer finger like projections. Thus, we thank the reviewers for this suggestion, and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

We agree that it is critical to determine the extent of PG inhibition upon antibiotic treatment. The experiments in this manuscript were based on previously published results of time-lapse microscopy in which we assessed if new division events were blocked after antibiotic treatment, thereby using cell division as a read out for PG synthesis (Ojkic et al., Figure 1—figure supplement 2). These studies showed that cell division was completely blocked by cephalexin, indicating that septal PG synthesis was blocked, and that PG synthesis was inhibited within a few minutes of cephalexin treatment, because cells that were already undergoing septation were unable to complete septum formation. To complement this analysis, we will determine the elongation rate of the vegetative cells that are present in sporulating cultures under our experimental conditions, in order to identify an antibiotic or combination of antibiotics that inhibit both septation and elongation, and we will then collect additional cryo-FIB-ET of cells treated with this antibiotic(s). This will allow us to address the question of the extent of PG synthesis inhibition, and the second essential revision (see below). Our preferred antibiotic candidate is Penicillin V, which has a broad affinity for many B. subtilis PBPs (Lakaye et al., 1994; Zhao et al., 1999; Kocaoglu, 2012), and which our preliminary data indicates severely affects both septation and cell elongation.

- Figure 4B shows a reduced rounding of the forespore membrane in the presence of antibiotics, providing evidence that PG is synthesized at the leading edge of the engulfing membrane. Based on this observation and a previous study (Ojkic et al., 2016), authors propose a model (Figure 5) in which PG is exclusively synthesized ahead of the leading edge of the engulfing membrane. However, these data do not exclude the possibility that PG synthesis also happens behind the leading edge of the engulfing membrane, or in other words that PG is resynthesized after degradation by the DMP complex. Indeed, as pointed in the previous point, the fact that membrane migration still happens in the presence of antibiotics again questions whether PG synthesis is fully inhibited. In cells displaying incomplete or asymmetrical engulfment (such as those shown in Figure 2), PG synthesis might have continued for a while and stopped, resulting in septal disks containing newly synthesized PG and leading edges showing impaired PG synthesis. Analysis of septum thickness (as performed in Figure 3B-E) in the presence of antibiotics might shed light on this issue: a thinner septum (but not absent if DMP does not totally degrades septal PG) in the presence of antibiotics would suggest that PG is synthesized behind the DMP complex. If septum thickness is independent of the presence of antibiotics, it suggests that either PG is not synthesized behind the DMP complex or that PG is not fully inhibited in the presence of antibiotics. This uncertainty impacts the hypothesis proposed by the authors because PG synthesis happening behind the DMP complex might explain why a slight and homogenous septal thinning is observed (Figure 3); it might also contribute to the residual PG layer observed in the intermembrane space.

Thank you for raising this important point. As proposed by the reviewers, we have analyzed septal thickness in cephalexin-treated sporangia. As seen in Author response image 1, the septal thickness for untreated and cephalexin-treated wild type sporangia is comparable (17.46 ± 1.17 nm for untreated and 18.72 ± 1.13 nm for cephalexin-treated sporangia). This therefore suggests that either PG is not synthesized behind the DMP complex or that PG is not fully inhibited in the presence of antibiotics.

Author response image 1.

Author response image 1.

However, our published results (Ojkic et al., 2016) indicate that septal PG synthesis is completely inhibited in cephalexin treated cells, suggesting that PG synthesis does not happen behind DMP. To provide additional evidence on this important point, we will perform the additional experiments explained above to determine if both elongation and septal PG synthesis is completely inhibited by the antibiotics used in our experiments, and if not, to identify an antibiotic treatment or combinatorial treatment that blocks both processes. We will also collect cryo-electron tomograms of sporangia treated with at least one additional antibiotic (probably Penicillin V or a combination of Penicillin V and cephalexin) and perform a similar analysis to further test this point.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Khanna K, Lopez-Garrido J, Zhao Z, Watanabe R, Yuan Y, Sugie J, Pogliano K, Villa E. 2019. Representative tilt-series. Electron Microscopy Data Bank. EMD-20335
    2. Khanna K, Lopez-Garrido J, Zhao Z, Watanabe R, Yuan Y, Sugie J, Pogliano K, Villa E. 2019. Representative tilt-series. Electron Microscopy Data Bank. EMD-20336
    3. Khanna K, Lopez-Garrido J, Zhao Z, Watanabe R, Yuan Y, Sugie J, Pogliano K, Villa E. 2019. Representative tilt-series. Electron Microscopy Data Bank. EMD-20337

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 3—source data 1. Raw data of septal distances in wild type B. subtilis sporangia and sporangia of engulfment-defective mutants used to plot the bar graph in Figure 3F.
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.022
    Source code 1. Matlab code to calculate septal distances of sporangia.
    elife-45257-code1.zip (28.7MB, zip)
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.034
    Source code 2. Matlab code to calculate cell length using fluorescence microscopy images.
    elife-45257-code2.zip (2.1KB, zip)
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.035
    Transparent reporting form
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45257.036

    Data Availability Statement

    The authors have created a library of B. subtilis tomograms accessible at: http://villalab.ucsd.edu/research/engulfment. The authors have also deposited three representative tilt-series to Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) in the form of 4x binned tomograms. The IDs are EMD-20335, EMD-20336, EMD-20337 for Figure 1D,F,H respectively.

    The following datasets were generated:

    Khanna K, Lopez-Garrido J, Zhao Z, Watanabe R, Yuan Y, Sugie J, Pogliano K, Villa E. 2019. Representative tilt-series. Electron Microscopy Data Bank. EMD-20335

    Khanna K, Lopez-Garrido J, Zhao Z, Watanabe R, Yuan Y, Sugie J, Pogliano K, Villa E. 2019. Representative tilt-series. Electron Microscopy Data Bank. EMD-20336

    Khanna K, Lopez-Garrido J, Zhao Z, Watanabe R, Yuan Y, Sugie J, Pogliano K, Villa E. 2019. Representative tilt-series. Electron Microscopy Data Bank. EMD-20337


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES