Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jun 1;106(4):1122–1128. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.04.084

The Association between Novel Biomarkers and 1-year Readmission or Mortality after Cardiac Surgery

Jeffrey P Jacobs 1,2, Shama S Alam 3, Sherry L Owens 3, Devin M Parker 3, Michael Rezaee 3, Donald S Likosky 4, David M Shahian 5, Marshall L Jacobs 1,2, Heather Thiessen-Philbrook 6, Moritz Wyler von Ballmoos 7, Kevin Lobdell 8, Todd MacKenzie 9, Allen D Everett 10, Chirag R Parikh 6, Jeremiah R Brown 3,9,11
PMCID: PMC6685203  NIHMSID: NIHMS1028561  PMID: 29864407

Abstract

Background

Novel cardiac biomarkers including sST2, Galectin-3 and NT-proBNP may be associated with long-term adverse outcomes following cardiac surgery. We sought to measure the association between cardiac biomarker levels and 1-year hospital readmission or mortality.

Methods

Plasma biomarkers from 1,047 patients discharged alive after isolated CABG surgery from eight medical centers were measured in a cohort from the NNE Cardiovascular Disease Study Group between 2004 and 2007. We evaluated the association between preoperative and postoperative biomarkers and 1-year readmission or mortality using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox’s Proportional Hazards modeling, adjusting for covariates used in the STS 30-day readmission model.

Results

The median follow-up time was 365 days. After adjustment for established risk factors, above median levels of postoperative Galectin-3 and NT-proBNP were each significantly associated with 1-year readmission or mortality: Galectin-3 (median = 10.35 ng/mL, HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.08–1.80, p=0.010); NT-proBNP (median = 15.21 ng/mL, HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.07–1.87, p=0.014).

Conclusions

In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, novel cardiac biomarkers were associated with readmission or mortality independent of established risk factors. Measurement of these biomarkers may improve our ability to identify patients at highest risk for readmission or mortality prior to discharge. This will also allow resource allocation accordingly, while implementing strategies for personalized medicine based on the biomarker profile of the patient.


Hospital readmission after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is common and unfortunately often associated with increased mortality. The 30-day all-cause readmission rate among CABG patients exceeds 17.0% [1]. Readmitted patients have a 3 to 11-fold higher rate of in-hospital mortality compared to those not readmitted [2]. Recognized risk factors for short term readmission after CABG include diabetes, mediastinitis, surgical site infections, heart failure (HF), chronic lung disease, female sex, and kidney injury [1,3]. In addition to these clinical and demographic variables, theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that biomarker measures offer additional utility in predicting readmission events [46]. However, few studies have evaluated the relationship between cardiac biomarkers and hospital readmission in CABG patients. Biomarkers have significant predictive value in HF and may also be used to identify patients at the highest risk of readmission and subsequent death after CABG [712].

A number of novel cardiac biomarkers, including soluble ST 2 (sST2), Galectin-3 (Gal-3), and N-terminal prohormone of BNP (NT-proBNP), may also have predictive utility [1315]. sST2, a member of the interleukin (IL)-1 family, is a protein up-regulated by cardiac myocytes in response to mechanical strain [16]. Similarly, Gal-3 is a beta-galactoside-binding lectin and a key mediator of cardiac fibrosis and remodeling [17]. Both sST2 and Gal-3 are representative of the ventricular remodeling process and have the potential to be surrogate markers for patients readmitted for HF, infection and inflammation [13,18,19]. NT-proBNP is up-regulated by cardiac myocytes during states of pressure and volume overload and is found in higher circulating concentrations compared to active BNP [20]. Research has demonstrated that sST2, Gal-3 and NT-proBNP are associated with worsening HF severity, and that they are independent predictors of mortality in HF patients [14,16,17,20].

Identifying CABG patients who may benefit from additional intervention is of interest to both cardiothoracic surgeons and hospitals. Novel cardiac biomarkers have been shown to significantly predict mortality in HF patients and may also have a predictive role in cardiac surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between sST2, Gal-3 and NT-proBNP levels and 1-year hospital readmission or death among patients undergoing isolated CABG.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Study Population

The Northern New England (NNE) Cardiovascular Disease Study Group directs a prospective registry of patients undergoing cardiac surgery at 8 hospitals located in New Hampshire, Maine and Vermont. Data from this registry is used to inform improvements in care for patients undergoing coronary revascularization and open-heart surgery both locally and across the United States. NNE data is also used continually to update and refine risk prediction models for cardiac surgery patients as new clinically relevant factors are identified. The NNE registry contains data on patient and clinical characteristics, procedural indications, and outcomes, and procedural and survival data is verified every two years. The institutional review boards at all hospitals approved the collection of NNE registry data as well as the conduct of this study.

The NNE Biomarker Study was carried out from 2004 to 2007 to identify biomarkers predictive of death in cardiac surgical patients (n = 1,690) [21]. Our current study population was comprised of a subset of patients who 1) underwent isolated CABG, 2) were discharged alive, and 3) had blood banked preoperatively (n=1393) and postoperatively (n=1047) on day one to measure levels of sST2, Gal-3, and NT-proBNP.

Biomarker Data Collection

Cardiac biomarkers sST2, Gal3, and NT-proBNP were the main exposures of interest in this study. We collected biomarker samples preoperatively prior to incision at each participating site and the postoperative samples (10mL) were collected approximately 24 hours after patient surgery. Biomarker levels were measured using custom made multiplex ELISA assays (Meso Scale Discovery, Rockville, MD). Blood samples were stored at room temperature for 20 minutes to allow clotting and separation. Tubes were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 20 minutes. Resulting sera samples were stored at the respective medical centers below −80°C until transportation on dry ice to the University of Vermont Laboratory for Clinical and Biochemical Research in Colchester, Vermont. Samples were then stored at −80°C until measurement where they were analyzed for cytokine measurement.

Patient Follow Up

The primary endpoint of this study was 1-year readmission or mortality after isolated CABG. A composite readmission/mortality outcome was used because it has been shown that CABG patients with elevated postoperative biomarker levels who are readmitted to the hospital are also at significantly increased risk of death [5,22]. Readmission status and all-cause mortality data were obtained for each patient by linking NNE registry data with Medicare claims, state all-payers claims, and the National Death Index using Social Security numbers and date of birth.

Statistical Analysis

Patient, clinical and procedural characteristics were compared by readmission/mortality status using descriptive statistics. Event rates and time-to-event analyses were conducted for 1-year readmission or mortality. Time zero was defined as the date of discharge after CABG and the follow-up period was predefined as 1 year. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank techniques were used to conduct a time-to-event analysis for each biomarker. Patients were stratified by biomarker levels above and below the population median. We elected to treat the biomarker levels as categorical rather than continuous variables due to the graded relationship of median categories and the incidence of readmission or mortality.

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess the relationship of biomarker levels and 1-year readmission or mortality, using biomarker median cut points. Adjustment was carried out using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) 30-day readmission model. The STS 30-day readmission model accounts for 21 different preoperative factors (Supplemental Table S1 in the Appendix) [23]. A competing risks regression analysis was performed for all biomarkers to account for patients experiencing death prior to readmission. Lastly, a multiple imputation regression sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess estimates after accounting for missing covariate values.

RESULTS

Patient, clinical, and procedural characteristics by 1-year readmission or mortality status can be viewed in Table 1. Out of the 1,047 patients included in the study, 39% (n = 405) experienced 1-year readmission or mortality. CABG patients who experienced 1-year readmission or mortality were significantly older (67.9 vs. 63.9 years; p < 0.001) and were more likely to have a history of atrial fibrillation, congestive HF, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and any vascular disease, compared to patients without an event. A significantly higher percentage of females comprised the event group (28.9 vs. 20.1%; p < 0.001).

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics by Readmission or Death Within 1 Year of Discharge

Patient Characteristics Readmitted or Dead p Value
No (n = 642) Yes (n = 405)
Age, years 63.91 ± 9.92 67.8 ± 9.98 <0.001
Female 20.14 28.89 <0.001
Body mass index, kg/m2 29.66 ± 5.39 29.81 ± 5.75 0.636
Body surface area, m2 2.04 ± 0.23 2.03 ± 0.26 0.534
Smoker 22.62 22.96 0.889
Atrial fibrillation 3.65 9.14 <0.001
CHF 7.69 13.86 <0.001
Last preoperative serum creatinine 1.13 ± 1.13 1.22 ± 0.84 0.115
Diabetes 36.23 40.49 0.136
Ejection fraction <40% 9.75 12.01 0.221
Hypertension 80.16 82.88 0.242
IABP preoperative 3.85 3.70 0.900
Prior MI
 No 57.89 51.36 0.132
 <24 hours preoperative 1.52 1.73
 >24 hours and <7 days preoperative 19.13 19.26
 >7 days and <365 days preoperative 9.31 12.35
 >365 days preoperative 12.15 15.31
Vascular disease 22.57 35.80 <0.001
Unstable angina 55.41 55.50 0.975
COPD 10.43 16.79 0.001
Left main, ≥50% stenosis 32.39 36.05 0.189
Prior CABG surgery 1.74 2.75 0.227
Prior PCI 18.93 21.48 0.276
Priority
 Emergent 2.33 1.23 0.385
 Urgent 66.30 68.15
 Nonurgent 31.38 30.62
Received pRBC units 31.91 45.93 <0.001
pRBC units given preoperative
 0 98.99 95.80 0.001
 1 0.30 0.99
 2 0.51 2.22
 ≥3 0.20 0.99

Values are mean ± SD or %.

CABG = coronary artery bypass graft; CHF = congestive heart failure; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IABP = intraaortic balloon pump; MI = myocardial infarction; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; pRBC = packed red blood cell.

Preoperative and Postoperative sST2 & 1-year Readmission or Mortality

The median preoperative sST2 level among CABG patients was 3.80 ng/mL with an interquartile range of 2.87 ng/mL to 5.17 ng/mL. The median postoperative sST2 level was 43.61 ng/mL with an interquartile range of 24.44 ng/mL to 72.69 ng/mL. Biomarker summary statistics can be viewed in Supplemental Table S4 in the appendix. Postoperative sST2 levels above the median were significantly associated with a greater hazard of 1-year readmission or mortality in unadjusted models (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.06 – 1.69; Table 2). After adjustment, the relationship was not significant (HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.89 – 1.47; Table 2).

Table 2.

Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model Analysis: Looking at Biomarkers with 1-year outcomes

Univariate Multivariate1

HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
sST2
(preop) log transformed 1.28 1.09 – 1.49 0.002 1.16 0.98 – 1.38 0.089
(preop) above median 1.15 0.95 – 1.40 0.154 1.03 0.84 – 1.27 0.783
(postop) log transformed 1.32 1.15 – 1.52 <0.001 1.19 1.02 – 1.38 0.026
(postop) above median 1.34 1.06 – 1.69 0.014 1.15 0.89 – 1.47 0.293

Galectin-3
(preop) log transformed 1.35 1.13 – 1.61 0.001 1.12 0.91 – 1.35 0.240
(preop) above median 1.36 1.12 – 1.66 0.002 1.16 0.94 – 1.43 0.165
(postop) log transformed 1.46 1.22 – 1.74 <0.001 1.26 1.03 – 1.56 0.027
(postop) above median 1.57 1.24 – 1.99 <0.001 1.40 1.08 – 1.80 0.010

NT-proBNP
(preop) log transformed 1.28 1.20 – 1.37 <0.001 1.19 1.07 – 1.32 0.001
(preop) above median 1.67 1.36 – 2.04 <0.001 1.18 0.91 – 1.52 0.214
(postop) log transformed 1.54 1.36 – 1.74 <0.001 1.32 1.10 – 1.58 0.003
(postop) above median 1.85 1.45 – 2.34 <0.001 1.42 1.07 – 1.87 0.014
1

Adjusted for the STS 30-day readmission model

Postoperative Gal-3 & 1-year Readmission or Mortality

The median preoperative Gal-3 level among CABG patients was 10.34 ng/mL with an interquartile range of 6.93 ng/mL to 14.79. The median postoperative Gal-3 level was 10.35 ng/mL with an interquartile range of 7.13 ng/mL to 15.23 ng/mL. Biomarker summary statistics can be viewed in Supplemental Table S4 in the appendix. Patients with Gal-3 levels above the median were significantly associated with a greater hazard of 1-year readmission or mortality in unadjusted models (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.24 – 1.99; Table 2). After adjustment, the relationship was still significant. (HR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.08 – 1.80).

Postoperative NT-proBNP & 1-year Readmission or Mortality

The median preoperative NT-proBNP level among CABG patients was 2.44 ng/mL with an interquartile range of 1.12 ng/mL to 5.95 ng/mL. The median postoperative NT-proBNP level was 13.2 ng/mL with an interquartile range of 7.8 ng/mL to 23.5 ng/mL. Biomarker summary statistics can be viewed in Supplemental Table S4 in the appendix. NT-proBNP levels above the median were associated with 1-year readmission or mortality in unadjusted (HR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.45 – 2.34; Table 2) and adjusted models (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.07 – 1.87; Table 2).

The Kaplan-Meier 1-year readmission or mortality curves for sST2, Gal-3 and NT-proBNP median cut points are presented in Figure 1AC, respectfully. The multiple imputations regression analysis for missing covariates revealed similar results for sST2, Gal-3 and NT-proBNP (Supplemental Table 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Probability of 1-year readmission or mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery at biomarker median cut points of (A) soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), (B) galectin-3, and (C) N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).

COMMENT

In patients undergoing isolated CABG, we found that postoperative Gal-3 and NT-proBNP levels are associated with readmission or mortality at 1-year, independent of established risk factors. Our findings demonstrate the utility of postoperative Gal-3 and NT-proBNP as biomarkers to identify CABG patients at increased risk of readmission or mortality at 1-year after discharge.

sST2 exhibits pro-cardiac remodeling effects by binding to and reducing levels of circulating IL-33, a cytokine that normally inhibits signaling pathways involved in inflammation and hypertrophic changes to the myocardium [24]. Attenuating this inhibition is believed to enhance cardiac remodeling and scarring resulting in increased cardiovascular risk in patients [25]. Multiple studies have shown that sST2 is an independent predictor of mortality in HF, myocardial infarction, and in healthy, asymptomatic adults [19,26]. To-date, only one published study, Lindman et al. found that preoperative sST2 levels above the median were significantly associated with a higher hazard of mortality in patients undergoing valve replacement surgery [27]. We examined both preoperative and postoperative sST2 levels and utilized a composite readmission/mortality outcome measure.

While much is still unknown regarding Gal-3 cardiac physiology, expression of this protein is up regulated by cardiac fibroblasts and macrophages during states of acute and chronic HF [10]. Meijers and colleagues found that Gal-3 concentrations above 17.8 (ng/mL) were significantly associated with HF re-hospitalization at 30, 60, 90 and 120 days [28]. Yu and colleagues also demonstrated that Gal-3 was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality or re-hospitalization in patients with coronary artery disease and chronic HF at one year follow up [29]. Not all studies have shown this relationship, and the utility of Gal-3 as a prognostic biomarker in HF is still being debated [30].

In our study, we examined the relationship between Gal-3 levels and patient outcomes after CABG. We found that postoperative Gal-3 levels above the median were significantly associated with readmission or mortality at one-year. Our median Gal-3 level was substantially lower than levels found to be predictive of poorer outcomes in HF patients. This finding may suggest that Gal-3 is a more specific biomarker for adverse outcomes in the cardiac surgery population.

NT-proBNP levels have been found to predict readmission and mortality among hospitalized HF patients at 6 months [31]. In a 2010 study by Schachner and colleagues, preoperative NT-proBNP levels were found to be an independent predictor of mortality at 18 months follow-up and were associated with numerous perioperative complications in patients undergoing isolated CABG [32]. Similar findings were observed among acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing CABG and in patients enduring CABG and/or valve surgery in both the immediate in-hospital setting and in long-term follow-up [33,34]. Vikholm et al found that cardiac surgery patients with preoperative BNP levels in the fourth quartile had significantly increased mortality compared to the first quartile, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.9 (95% CI: 1.6–5.1), however NT-proBNP did not predict hospital readmission (p = 0.11) [35].

We examined the relationship between NT-proBNP levels and patient outcomes after isolated CABG. Contrary to Vikholm et al, we observed that patients with postoperative NT-proBNP levels above the median had a significantly increased hazard of readmission or mortality at 1-year follow up in adjusted analyses (HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1–1.9).

The NNE Biomarker Study was a multicenter, regional investigation that prospectively enrolled patients across multiple hospitals, ensuring the generalizability of its subsequent findings. We conducted sensitivity analyses to account for competing risks and missing values to judge the accuracy of our main findings. We did not focus on preoperative biomarker measurements in our study. Biomarkers sST2 and NT-proBNP present at very low concentrations preoperatively, and their levels increase by several fold in patients who experience adverse cardiac events after surgery. It is possible that some of these patients have underlying pathology and chronically elevated biomarker levels. Elevated biomarkers may therefore be reflective of chronic illness rather than the operation itself; nevertheless, this finding is still important as the elevated biomarker still allows for the identification of patients at increased risk.

In our study, risk adjustment was performed using the STS 30-day readmission model [3], which likely reflects perioperative problems and complications. In contrast, readmissions at one year are more likely a reflection of underlying chronic disease processes. Given our composite endpoint, we performed additional analyses using a harmonized dataset of the STS 30-day readmission model and the STS ASCERT long-term mortality model (Table 3) [36]. This model is less parsimonious than the STS 30-day readmission model, but it does consider all potential cofounders. We did not observe a meaningful difference between the models. We repeated the analyses with left censoring at 30 days, therefore restricting the analyses to 30 to 365 days. We did not observe any significant changes in the association of readmission or mortality with postoperative biomarkers (Supplemental Table 3 and Supplemental Figure 1).

Table 3.

Multivariate1 Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model Analysis: Looking at Biomarkers with 1-year outcomes

HR 95% CI P-value
ST2
(preop) log transformed 1.14 0.95 – 1.36 0.166
(preop) above median 1.03 0.84 – 1.27 0.776
(postop) log transformed 1.20 1.03 – 1.40 0.018
(postop) above median 1.16 0.90 – 1.49 0.263
Galectin-3
(preop) log transformed 1.10 0.91 – 1.34 0.310
(preop) above median 1.15 0.93 – 1.42 0.205
(postop) log transformed 1.25 1.02 – 1.54 0.033
(postop) above median 1.38 1.07 – 1.78 0.014
NT-proBNP
(preop) log transformed 1.17 1.05 – 1.31 0.004
(preop) above median 1.16 0.89 – 1.51 0.269
(postop) log transformed 1.34 1.12 – 1.60 0.002
(postop) above median 1.45 1.09 – 1.93 0.010
1

Adjusted for the STS 30-day readmission model and the STS ASCERT long-term mortality risk model

A one-year follow up period may not be adequate to assess the relationship between these biomarkers and long-term patient outcomes. Further research should be conducted to examine these relationships beyond one year. We believe that it would be worthwhile to evaluate multiple time points and with additional funding, a prospective study could be conducted to evaluate multiple time points and validate on our current time points. We propose several strategies that could be used to take corrective action if cardiac biomarkers are elevated: 1) elevated preoperative levels could be reviewed by the surgeon to determine readiness for surgery; 2) responding to postoperative elevations in these biomarkers may signify undiagnosed low cardiac output or on-going ischemia indicating a need for the clinical care team to conduct postoperative testing, to modify medications, to address additional risk factors and to adapt a transitional care plan.

Supplementary Material

Figure S1
Table S4
Table S5
Table S6
Table S7
Figure S2
Figure S3
Figure S4
Figure S5
Table Legends
Table S1
Table S2
Table S3

Acknowledgments

To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to report that postoperative Gal-3 and NT-proBNP levels are significantly associated with readmission and/or mortality in CABG patients. Our findings indicate that these novel biomarkers can be used to identify patients at increased risk of readmission and death after CABG; and therefore, these biomarkers may facilitate strategies of personalized medicine in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

REFERENCES

  • [1].Hannan EL, Zhong Y, Lahey SJ, Culliford AT, Gold JP, Smith CR, et al. 30-day readmissions after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:569–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Litmathe J, Kurt M, Feindt P, Gams E, Boeken U. Predictors and outcome of ICU readmission after cardiac surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;57:391–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Shahian DM, He X, O’Brien SM, Grover FL, Jacobs JP, Edwards FH, et al. Development of a clinical registry-based 30-day readmission measure for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Circulation 2014;130:399–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Bignami E, Landoni G, Crescenzi G, Gonfalini M, Bruno G, Pappalardo F, et al. Role of cardiac biomarkers (troponin I and CK-MB) as predictors of quality of life and long-term outcome after cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 2009;12:22–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Llibre C, Zamora E, Caballero À, Lupón J, Ros A, Benito N, et al. The real-life value of ST2 monitoring during heart failure decompensation: impact on long-term readmission and mortality. Biomarkers Biochem Indic Expo Response, Susceptibility to Chem 2016;21:225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Sudharshan S, Novak E, Hock K, Scott MG, Geltman EM. Use of Biomarkers to Predict Readmission for Congestive Heart Failure. Am J Cardiol 2017;119:445–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Asphaug M, Skadberg Ø, Dalen I, Dickstein K. Natriuretic peptide levels taken following unplanned admission to a cardiology department predict the duration of hospitalization. Eur J Hear Fail 2016;18:1499–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].De Berardinis B, Gaggin HK, Magrini L, Belcher A, Zancla B, Femia A, et al. Comparison between admission natriuretic peptides, NGAL and sST2 testing for the prediction of worsening renal function in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:613–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Cleland JGF, Teerlink JR, Davison BA, Shoaib A, Metra M, Senger S, et al. Measurement of troponin and natriuretic peptides shortly after admission in patients with heart failuredoes it add useful prognostic information? An analysis of the Value of Endothelin Receptor Inhibition with Tezosentan in Acute heart failure Studies (VERITAS). Eur J Hear Fail 2017;19:739–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].de Boer RA, Yu L, van Veldhuisen DJ. Galectin-3 in cardiac remodeling and heart failure. Curr Hear Fail Rep 2010;7:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Escribano D, Santas E, Minana G, Mollar A, Garcia-Bias S, Valero E, et al. High-sensitivity troponin T and the risk of recurrent readmissions after hospitalisation for acute heart failure. Rev Clin Esp 2017;217:63–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].A.A. F, L. N, S.C. B, C.D. C, A.A. M, K.-Y. L, et al. Increased perioperative b-type natriuretic peptide associates with heart failure hospitalization or heart failure death after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesthesiology 2013;119:284–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].de Boer RA, Lok DJA, Jaarsma T, van der Meer P, Voors AA, Hillege HL, et al. Predictive value of plasma galectin-3 levels in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Ann Med 2011;43:60–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Gruson D, Ferracin B, Ahn SA, Rousseau MF. Comparison of fibroblast growth factor 23, soluble ST2 and Galectin-3 for prognostication of cardiovascular death in heart failure patients. Int J Cardiol 2015;189:185–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Karayannis G, Triposkiadis F, Skoularigis J, Georgoulias P, Butler J, Giamouzis G. The emerging role of galectin-3 and ST2 in heart failure: Practical considerations and pitfalls using novel biomarkers. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2013;10:441–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Januzzi JL. ST2 as a cardiovascular risk biomarker: From the bench to the bedside. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2013;6:493–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Ho JE, Liu C, Lyass A, Courchesne P, Pencina MJ, Vasan RS, et al. Galectin-3, a marker of cardiac fibrosis, predicts incident heart failure in the community. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1249–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Bayes-Genis A, De Antonio M, Galán A, Sanz H, Urrutia A, Cabanes R, et al. Combined use of high-sensitivity ST2 and NTproBNP to improve the prediction of death in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:32–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Wang TJ, Wollert KC, Larson MG, Coglianese E, McCabe EL, Cheng S, et al. Prognostic utility of novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress: The framingham heart study. Circulation 2012;126:1596–604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Kim HN, Januzzi JL. Natriuretic peptide testing in heart failure. Circulation 2011;123:2015–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Brown JR, MacKenzie TA, Dacey LJ, Leavitt BJ, Braxton JH, Westbrook BM, et al. Using biomarkers to improve the preoperative prediction of death in coronary artery bypass graft patients. J Extra Corpor Technol 2010;42:293–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Fried LP, Kronmal RA, Newman AB, Bild DE, Mittelmark MB, Polak JF, et al. Risk factors for 5-year mortality in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Jama 1998;279:585–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Shahian DM, Grover FL. Biomarkers and Risk Models in Cardiac Surgery. Circulation 2014;130:932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Ciccone MM, Cortese F, Gesualdo M, Riccardi R, Di Nunzio D, Moncelli M, et al. A novel cardiac bio-marker: ST2: a review. Molecules 2013;18:15314–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Sanada S, Hakuno D, Higgins LJ, Schreiter ER, McKenzie ANJ, Lee RT. IL-33 and ST2 comprise a critical biomechanically induced and cardioprotective signaling system. J Clin Invest 2007;117:1538–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Shimpo M, Morrow DA, Weinberg EO, Sabatine MS, Murphy SA, Antman EM, et al. Serum Levels of the Interleukin-1 Receptor Family Member ST2 Predict Mortality and Clinical Outcome in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2004;109:2186–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Lindman BR, Breyley JG, Schilling JD, Vatterott AM, Zajarias A, Maniar HS, et al. Prognostic utility of novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement. Heart 2015;101:1382–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Meijers WC, Januzzi JL, Defilippi C, Adourian AS, Shah SJ, Van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Elevated plasma galectin-3 is associated with near-term rehospitalization in heart failure: A pooled analysis of 3 clinical trials. Am Heart J 2014;167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Yu X, Sun Y, Zhao Y, Zhang W, Yang Z, Gao Y, et al. Prognostic value of plasma galectin-3 levels in patients with coronary heart disease and chronic heart failure. Int Hear J 2015;56:314–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Srivatsan V, George M, Shanmugam E. Utility of galectin-3 as a prognostic biomarker in heart failure: Where do we stand? Eur J Prev Cardiol 2015;22:1096–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Weber M, Hamm C. Role of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and NT-PROBNP in clinical routine. Heart 2006;92:843–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Schachner T, Wiedemann D, Fetz H, Laufer G, Kocher A, Bonaros N. Influence of preoperative serum N-terminal pro-brain type natriuretic peptide on the postoperative outcome and survival rates of coronary artery bypass patients. Clin (Sao Paulo) 2010;65:1239–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Holm J, Vidlund M, Vanky F, Friberg O, Hakanson E, Svedjeholm R. Preoperative NT-proBNP independently predicts outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing CABG. Scand Cardiovasc J Suppl 2013;47:28–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Liu H, Wang C, Liu L, Zhuang Y, Yang X, Zhang Y. Perioperative application of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].P. V, P.. S Preoperative brain natriuretic peptide predicts late mortality and functional class but not hospital readmission after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2014;28:520–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Shahian DM, O’Brien SM, Sheng S, Grover FL, Mayer JE, Jacobs JP, et al. Predictors of long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: Results from the society of thoracic surgeons adult cardiac surgery database (The ASCERT Study). Circulation 2012;125:1491–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1
Table S4
Table S5
Table S6
Table S7
Figure S2
Figure S3
Figure S4
Figure S5
Table Legends
Table S1
Table S2
Table S3

RESOURCES