The dynamic nature of FRET sensor Twitch-2B, as probed by x-ray, NMR, and modeling, reveals key information on how to tune FRET.
Abstract
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) between mutants of green fluorescent protein is widely used to monitor protein-protein interactions and as a readout mode in fluorescent biosensors. Despite the fundamental importance of distance and molecular angles of fluorophores to each other, structural details on fluorescent protein FRET have been missing. Here, we report the high-resolution x-ray structure of the fluorescent proteins mCerulean3 and cpVenus within the biosensor Twitch-2B, as they undergo FRET and characterize the dynamics of this biosensor with -dependent paramagnetic nuclear magnetic resonance at 900 MHz and 1.1 GHz. These structural data provide the unprecedented opportunity to calculate FRET from the x-ray structure and to compare it to experimental data in solution. We find that interdomain dynamics limits the FRET effect and show that a rigidification of the sensor further enhances FRET.
INTRODUCTION
Numerous genetically encoded Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) biosensors have been generated to study signaling inside living cells (1). In the prototypical Cameleons, calmodulin and its binding peptide M13 are sandwiched between Cyan and Yellow Fluorescent Proteins (2). Calmodulin wraps around M13 upon calcium binding, thereby changing the distance and orientation between the two fluorophores, resulting in FRET enhancement. Engineering of linker amino acids between the fluorescent proteins and calmodulin was shown to be crucial in optimizing calcium-induced FRET (3). The recently developed FRET-based calcium sensor Twitch-2B uses a minimal calcium-binding moiety derived from the C-terminal globular domain of toadfish Troponin C (TnC) fused between the mCerulean3 donor (4) and a circular permutation of the yellow fluorescent protein Venus (cpVenuscd) (5, 6), which acts as the acceptor. Large-scale diversification and screening, predominantly of the residues linking the minimal calcium-binding domain and the fluorescent proteins, has been used to optimize FRET changes in this indicator (7, 8). So far, only low-resolution structural data are available for any FRET biosensor (8–10). Here, we present the crystal structure of Twitch-2B (Fig. 1A) (8). It depicts the calcium-bound state and is, to our knowledge, the first crystal structure of any fluorescent protein FRET biosensor. We find that the structure-based prediction of FRET efficiency in Twitch-2B is significantly higher than the experimental efficiency. We address this issue with advanced nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods and show that intrinsic dynamics is the reason for this discrepancy. Putting all information together allows us to design a rigidified mutant of Twitch-2B with increased FRET efficiency in solution.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Crystal structure of Twitch-2B
We solved the structure at a resolution of 2.5 Å (table S1A). There are two monomers in the asymmetric unit (fig. S1A). They present identical conformations of the individual domains [root mean square deviations (RMSDs) below 0.2 Å] and a slightly different interdomain conformation (RMSD of 0.992 Å) while apparently not assembling as a symmetric homodimer. Their interface (fig. S1B), covering 630 Å2 (11), is actually considerably smaller than a stable dimer interface (12). In addition, small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) data show that, in solution, Twitch-2B is monomeric (fig. S2). Therefore, we focus our description here on monomer A. The crystal structure reveals the positioning of the donor and the acceptor relative to the minimal calcium-binding TnC domain as well as the structure of the optimized linkers (Fig. 1). The structure of the calcium-binding domain is highly similar to the C-terminal globular domain of chicken TnC (RMSD of 0.84 Å) (13), to the NMR structure solved previously (8), and to that of calmodulin (RMSD of 1.08 Å) (14). The major axes of the two fluorescent protein β barrel domains are oriented at a nearly perpendicular angle to each other. The β barrels barely make contact with each other (Fig. 2A), with a very small common interface (150 Å2). The interfaces of the minimal calcium-binding domain with mCerulean3 and cpVenuscd are also relatively small, covering only 257 and 351 Å2, respectively (see below). The interactions are mostly of hydrophilic character (Fig. 2A).
The linker between mCerulean3 and the calcium-binding domain (V232ADA) forms a 310 helix, which is tightly held in place by backbone hydrogen bonds from V232 and S236 in mCerulean3 to E301 and E239 of the calcium-binding domain (Fig. 2B). Next, the linker between the calcium-binding domain and cpVenuscd (P305IYPEL) forms one and a half α-helical turns (Fig. 2, B and C), the backbone carbonyls of E309 and L310 forming hydrogen bonds to the side chain of R551 (Fig. 2B) of cpVenuscd. The side chain of E309 also forms a hydrogen bond to Y152 of mCerulean3, tightly knitting the three domains together. Residues I306, Y307, and L310 of this short helix take part in a network of hydrophobic contacts (Fig. 2C). Obviously, the screening for optimal linkers (8) resulted in sequences with helical features integrating very well into the structure of the minimal TnC domain while these linkers hold in place the donor and acceptor domain mostly by polar interactions.
Calculation of structure-based FRET efficiency
The structure provided crucial information for FRET calculations. First, the distance between the centers of mass of the fluorophores is 3.65 nm (Fig. 1B). Next, within the structure, the fluorophores of mCerulean3 and cpVenuscd are aligned in a head-to-head configuration. Thus, we could exactly determine the relative orientation of the dipole moments of the fluorophores (Fig. 1C; see Materials and Methods) that are available from density functional theory calculations (15). With this combined information, we calculated an orientation factor, κ2, of 1.98 (Eq. 1; Materials and Methods) and a Förster distance, R0, of 6.9 nm for the mCerulean3/cpVenuscd FRET pair (Eq. 3; Materials and Methods). With these parameters, using the Förster equation, , the theoretical FRET efficiency, E, of Twitch-2B was determined to be 0.98. The FRET efficiency experimentally determined by donor dequenching is 0.78 (fig. S3A), significantly lower than that derived from the crystal structure.
The two Twitch-2B monomers in the asymmetric unit (fig. S1A) not only have a very similar conformation (backbone RMSD of 0.992 Å) but also make very similar crystal packing contacts (fig. S1C). Therefore, we conclude that the orientation of the domains in the monomer is not per se constrained by the crystal packing but mostly by the intramonomer interactions described above (Fig. 2A) and is very likely selected from a pool of preexisting conformations in solution. As the interdomain interfaces in the Twitch-2B monomer are relatively small (Fig. 2A), high flexibility in solution might be the reason for the observed decrease in FRET efficiency. To investigate this hypothesis, we turned our attention to advanced NMR methods next.
NMR investigation of biosensor dynamics
To gain insight into possible dynamics, we used paramagnetic NMR (16) with a Twitch-2B sample where the two TnC calcium-binding sites were loaded with dysprosium (Dy). The anisotropic magnetic susceptibility of the TnC-Dy2 complex induces a paramagnetic alignment tensor that can be determined from the structure (17) (see Materials and Methods). We used 900-MHz and 1.1-GHz spectrometers since the alignment tensor depends on the magnetic field quadratically. If a given fluorescent protein is rigid with respect to TnC, then the alignment tensor that it experiences is identical to that of TnC. If, however, the fluorescent protein is dynamic with respect to the TnC, then this motion will reduce the alignment tensor of the former (16, 18). This allows quantifying the dynamics of the fluorescent proteins with respect to TnC. While dipolar couplings average out in isotropic solution, due to random isotropic tumbling, the paramagnetically induced alignment tensors lead to an anisotropic orientation distribution of TnC and, subsequently, of the attached green fluorescent proteins in solution, which results in the incomplete averaging of the dipolar couplings, allowing the observation of residual dipolar couplings (RDCs). We determined the RDCs of the methyl groups of the paramagnetically aligned Twitch-2B (19) (see Materials and Methods). The range of RDCs observed is sufficient to measure the size of the alignment tensor (20) such that assignment of the methyl groups was not necessary.
We found the range of RDC values and thus the alignment tensor experienced by the fluorescent proteins to be 10 times smaller than those calculated from the rigid x-ray structure (Fig. 3; see Materials and Methods). Thus, dynamics must be the reason behind the mismatch between the calculated and experimental FRET efficiencies. The crystal structure can only be part of a dynamic conformational ensemble in solution.
Structure-based design of mutant with improved FRET efficiency
Assuming structural integrity of the single domains, we hypothesized that the linker regions are the pivot of those dynamics. The interfaces between the TnC domain and the donor and acceptor domains are dominated by polar interactions (Fig. 2A). We speculated that replacing those interactions by hydrophobic contacts would rigidify the linkers and increase the experimental FRET efficiency. Toward this goal, we designed the mutation N532F (Fig. 2, D and E) on the surface of cpVenuscd, creating a new interaction with F249 of the calcium-binding domain (Fig. 2D). As expected, this mutation effected a substantial increase in the maximal FRET ratio change from 800 to 1100% in vitro (fig. S4). In the crystal structure of this mutant (Twitch-6; table S2), the side chain of F532 indeed binds into a hydrophobic pocket formed by the side chains of F249, Asp262, and Y338 (Fig. 2E). Otherwise, the structures of Twitch-6 and Twitch-2B are very similar (RMSD of 0.25 Å), resulting in nearly identical theoretical FRET efficiencies (see the Supplementary Materials). With this design, the experimental FRET efficiency of Twitch-6 increased to 0.90, from 0.78 for Twitch-2B (fig. S3B), and the range of RDCs measured from Twitch-6 doubled from that of Twitch-2B (Fig. 3). This indicates the tightening of the interface between the TnC domain and cpVenuscd, and thus the reduction of the dynamics between the domains, is the reason for the increased FRET.
Conformational ensembles in solution
Having identified dynamics as the reason for the reduced FRET efficiency of Twitch-2B in solution, we wanted to gain insight into the conformational space resulting from this dynamics. For this purpose, we selected conformational ensembles exploring backbone dynamics solely on the dynamic linker regions between the fluorescent protein domains and the TnC domain (see Materials and Methods) by scoring over 1 million six-membered ensembles against the observed RDCs and FRET efficiency (Table 1, Fig. 4, and Materials and Methods). Among all possible ensembles, we selected the one best reproducing both the experimental FRET efficiency and the range of RDCs (Table 1). This ensemble fully explains how flexibility in the disordered residues of the linker regions results in the observed reduction of FRET efficiency and RDC range.
Table 1. Ensemble selection results.
Experimental | Ensemble* | ||||
RDC† | FRET | RDC† | FRET | Q factor‡ | |
Twitch-2B | 4.29 | 0.78 | 5.60 | 0.79 | 0.31 |
Twitch-6 | 11.43 | 0.90 | 9.29 | 0.88 | 0.07 |
*Results from the best-fitting ensembles of six structures selected with the protocol in Materials and Methods.
†RDCs shown are the distribution ranges of the experimental and ensemble parameters. The experimental (ensemble) RDC ranges from −2.01 to 2.27 Hz (−2.50 to +3.10 Hz) for Twitch-2B and from −3.48 to +7.95 Hz (−2.64 to +6.65 Hz) for Twitch-6.
‡An aggregated RMS score of RDC and FRET data (see Materials and Methods).
Implications for improved FRET sensor design
In summary, we obtained the crystal structure of the fluorescent calcium biosensor Twitch-2B, and together with the dynamics of the linkers determined from paramagnetic NMR, we quantified the FRET efficiency. As dynamics was limiting the FRET efficiency, we successfully designed a rigidified mutant with increased FRET. Thus, structural and dynamic characterization of ratiometric FRET sensors provided design principles that might be applicable to other systems where FRET effects are used to sense signals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cloning, expression, and purification of Twitch-2B and Twitch-6
The Twitch-2B construct has been described before (8). For the present study, the coding sequence of the three-domain fusion protein was cloned into a modified pET16b vector coding for a fusion protein with N-terminal His7-tag and tabac etch virus (TEV) recognition cleavage sequence. The Twitch-2B N532F mutant (Twitch-6) was generated using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent). The pET16bTEV-Twitch-2B and pET16bTEV-Twitch-6 expression constructs were transformed into Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3). Protein expression was carried out at 303 K by induction with 0.5 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside. The cells were harvested 7 hours after induction. Selenomethionine-labeled Twitch-2B protein was overexpressed in the methionine-auxotroph E. coli strain B834 in minimal medium supplemented with (+)-l-selenomethionine according to the EMBL (European Molecular Biology Laboratory) protein-expression group (www.embl.de).
The cell pellet from 1 liter of shaking culture was resuspended in 60 ml of lysis buffer [20 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, with one tablet of cOmplete EDTA-free inhibitors (Roche) per 100 ml of lysis buffer]. The cells were lysed by sonication followed by centrifugation at 27,000g and 277 K. From the supernatant, the recombinant protein was purified by immobilized metal-affinity chromatography on 3 ml of Ni–nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) agarose resin (Qiagen). The His7-fusion tag was cleaved off with TEV protease and removed by incubation with 1 ml of Ni-NTA agarose resin. The protein was dialyzed against 20 mM tris (pH 7.0) and 150 mM NaCl. After adjusting the ammonium sulfate concentration in the protein solution to 1 M, the protein was further purified by hydrophobic interaction chromatography on a 10-ml Phenyl Sepharose (GE Healthcare) column. The protein was eluted from this column with a 50-ml gradient from 1 to 0 M ammonium sulfate. Fractions containing the protein were pooled and concentrated to a volume of 2.5 ml with a 30-kDa MWCO (molecular weight cut-off) ultrafiltration concentrator (Vivascience). Last, the protein was purified by size exclusion chromatography on a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200-pg gel filtration column. The peak fractions were pooled, dialyzed against 20 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.0), 100 mM NaCl, and 5 mM CaCl2, and the protein concentration was adjusted to 20 mg/ml.
Fluorescence spectroscopy
For in vitro spectroscopy of recombinant Twitch-2B, the protein was purified from E. coli using Ni-NTA resin, as described (6). Spectroscopy was performed on a Cary Eclipse Spectrophotometer (Varian). Donor dequenching of Twitch-2B was performed by digesting Twitch-2B in a calcium-bound state overnight at room temperature with chymotrypsin (70 U/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) while recording FRET. A small remaining cpVenuscd emission after chymotrypsin digestion was selectively photobleached (5 min) with an array of six Luxeon Lumiled light-emitting diodes peaking at 530 nm, for a total power dissipation of 14.7 W and 870 lumen. A 500-nm LP (long-pass) filter was used to protect mCerulean3 from bleaching. Calcium-bound Twitch-6 was very resistant to protease digestion. Therefore, EGTA (final concentration, 5 mM) was added during chymotrypsin digestion to obtain the spectrum of dequenched mCerulean3.
Crystallization, data collection, and structure determination
Crystals of Twitch-2B and Twitch-6 were obtained by vapor diffusion mixing of 1 μl of protein solution with 1 μl of well solution [0.2 M Na-formiate (pH 7.0), 5 mM CaCl2, and 18 to 20% polyethylene glycol 3350]. Crystals were cryoprotected by transferring them to a well solution supplemented with 16 to 18% glycerol for 1 min and flash-cooled by plunging them into liquid nitrogen.
Data collection was performed at PXII, SLS, Switzerland, using a PILATUS 6M detector (Dectris). Native data were collected at 100 K at a wavelength of 1 Å. Selenomethionine derivative data were measured at 0.98 Å. All data were processed with x-ray detector software (XDS) (21) and scaled with SADABS (Bruker AXS). Space group determination and statistical analysis were carried out using XPREP (Bruker AXS). Phasing was performed with AutoSol (22).
The initial model was built with AutoBuild and refined twice with phenix.refine (23) with intermediate manual model building with Coot (24). The final model was obtained by combined manual tracing (Coot) and refinement using Refmac5 (25). In the Ramachandran plot, 96.69% of the residues were located in the favored region, 2.72% in the allowed region, and 0.58% of the residues were outliers. The crystal structure of Twitch-6 was solved with PHASER (26) using PDB (Protein Data Bank) entry 6GEL as the search model. Model building and refinement were performed as described for Twitch-2B. For this mutant, 96.68% of the residues fell into the favored region of the Ramachandran plot, 2.83% fell into the allowed region, and 0.49% were outliers.
FRET calculations
The orientation factor, κ2, can be extracted from structural information as follows
(1) |
where θT is the angle between the emission transition dipole of the donor and the absorption transition dipole of the acceptor; θD and θA are the angles between these dipoles and the vector, r, joining the donor and the acceptor fluorophores (27). The orientation of the transition dipole moments relative to the C → O bond vector (ω) in degrees
were taken from Ansbacher et al. (15), and the angular parameters were extracted from the crystallographic coordinates, in angular units
The detailed calculations are explained in data file S1. The overlap integral, J(λ), was calculated from the experimental absorbance and emission spectra of the isolated cpVenus and mCerulean3 domains, respectively (fig. S5), with a Python script included as supplementary information. The J(λ) was determined to be 2.052 × 1015 M−1 cm−1 nm4, as follows
(2) |
where FD(λ) is the normalized fluorescence intensity of the donor in the wavelength range λ to λ + Δλ. εA(λ) is the extinction coefficient of the acceptor at λ.
The Förster distance, R0, can be calculated from the previously derived experimental parameters
(3) |
where QD (0.87) is the quantum yield of the donor in the absence of acceptor (4) and n, (1.33) the refractive index of the aqueous medium.
Last, the efficiency of energy transfer, E, can be calculated as the ratio of the transfer rate to the total decay rate of the donor in the presence of acceptor
(4) |
Following this procedure, the FRET efficiency was determined to be E = 0.979, from the crystallographic structure of Twitch-2B. The equivalent calculation performed with the structure of the mutant Twitch-6 gives an E = 0.983 (see data files S1 and S2).
NMR spectroscopy
We expressed the proteins Twitch-2B and Twitch-6 in Toronto minimal medium prepared with 100% D2O and perdeuterated d-glucose and supplemented with the amino acid precursors α-ketobutyric acid (methyl-13C, 3,3-D2) and α-ketoisovaleric acid (3-methyl-13C, 3,4,4,4-D4), thus selectively labeling with 13C and 1H atoms only of the methyl groups of residues valine, leucine, and isoleucine while keeping the rest of the C atoms as 12C and protons as 2H (19).
First, the isotropic sample spectra were acquired in buffer A [20 mM Mops (pH 7.0), 100 mM NaCl, and 5 mM CaCl2 in 100% D2O]. Next, the proteins were dialyzed against buffer B [20 mM Mops (pH 7.0), 100 mM NaCl, and 10 mM EDTA] followed by dialysis against buffer C [20 mM Mops (pH 7.0) and 100 mM NaCl] and finally exchanged to buffer C prepared in 100% D2O containing three equivalents of dysprosium before NMR measurements. The protein concentration in the samples was approximately 0.5 mM.
The samples were tested with methyl-TROSY experiments (19, 28) (fig. S7) at 900 MHz and 1.1 GHz, and J couplings and J + RDC were determined using a J-modulated methyl-TROSY (29) experiment depicted in fig. S6 as matrices of 2048 × 128 complex data points with 96 transients per (t1) increment. The total J-modulation delays used were as follows: 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20 ms (fig. S8). NMR experiments were acquired using a 5-mm TCI (triple resonance cryoprobe with Inverse detection) on a 900-MHz spectrometer and a 3-mm TCI cryoprobe on a 1.1-GHz spectrometer, both equipped with NEO consoles (Bruker). The intensities (maximum amplitude) of the signals were extracted using CARA (computer aided resonance assignment) (30) on NMRPipe-processed experiments (31) and analyzed with Python scripts (fig. S8) following Pederson et al. (29).
Calculation of the paramagnetic tensor
We took the paramagnetic tensor from the calmodulin-IQ complex bound to dysprosium from (18) and calculated the total tensor of the doubly occupied TnC calcium-binding domain. The TnC calcium-binding site 1 overlaps with the lanthanide-binding site of calmodulin (CaM N60D). We rotated the alignment matrix from the calcium-binding site from CaM onto the second calcium-binding site of TnC and added it up to the calcium-binding site 1 tensor, thus obtaining the total TnC tensor. This tensor was then used to calculate the RDCs from the paramagnetic Twitch proteins
The tensors are given in m3 M−1.
Ensemble generation
First, we individually modeled all possible backbone dihedral angles (ϕ and ψ; sampling in steps of 60°) of the linker residues (Arg229 to Gln231 for mCerulean3 and Met311 to Gly313 for cpVenus), which did not result in a steric clash between one of the modified fluorescent protein domains and the TnC domain. Each of the two linker regions was modeled independently. Of all possible ϕ, ψ combinations (117,649), the rotation of mCerulean3 resulted in 477 possible conformations, while cpVenus allowed 84 conformations, providing altogether 40,086 possible conformations.
Second, we combined the possible structures for mCerulean-TnC and TnC-cpVenus at random in ensembles of six members. We sampled randomly 1 million six-membered ensembles out of the 40,068 possible ϕ, ψ combinations of the linkers between mCerulean and TnC and between TnC and cpVenus to ensure a proper exploration of the conformational space of Twitch.
Third, we calculated the RDC range (using the tensor derived as described above) and FRET of the ensembles and compared them with the experimental values by defining an ensemble quality factor
where RDCi are distribution ranges, the subindex e indicates an experimental value, and i indicates the value from an ensemble member. Such quality factor value is different from 0 if the agreements of the predicted RDC and FRET responses from the ensemble deviate from the experimental data and it is 0 in the case of complete agreement. Last, the ensembles were sorted by their Qens, and the lowest one was selected.
SAXS measurements
SAXS data were collected at beamline BM29 of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) in Grenoble, France, using the automatic sample changer (32). The protein was dialyzed either against buffer A [20 mM Mops (pH 7.0), 100 mM NaCl, and 5 mM CaCl2] (calcium-bound state) or against buffer B [20 mM Mops (pH 7.0), 100 mM NaCl, and 10 mM EDTA] (calcium-free state). Before measurement, the protein was centrifuged to remove any larger particles. Samples were measured at concentrations of 2.5, 10, and 20 mg/ml. The dialysis buffer was used for reference buffer correction. Data were collected at 293 K using a wavelength of 0.995 Å and a sample-to-detector distance of 2.867 m. One hundred microliters was loaded of each sample concentration, and 10 frames of were collected and merged. Samples were flowed constantly into the cell to minimize radiation damage effects. The detector images were integrated and reduced to one-dimensional scattering curves, and buffer contributions to scattering were subtracted using the beamline software BsxCuBE. Further data processing was performed automatically using the online EDNA pipeline (33) to assess sample quality and radiation damage effects. No protein aggregation or radiation damage was observed.
Data were further analyzed with the ATSAS software package (34). Briefly, primary data reduction and analysis were performed using the programs PRIMUS (35) and GNOM (36).
The theoretical scattering from the crystal structure was calculated using the program CRYSOL (37) (fig. S2), and the molecular weights were calculated using a bovine serum albumin sample as the standard.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the beamline staff at SLS, X10SA for support with x-ray data collection and at ESRF, BM29 for support with SAXS data collection. We thank M. Paulat, C. Schwiegk, and A. Moritz for technical help with protein production and K. Overkamp for electrospray mass spectra. S.B. thanks T. Gruene and G. Sheldrick for advice on crystal structure refinement and structure analysis. C.G. and P.T.-M. thank R. Kuemmerle (Bruker Biospin) for the NMR measurements at 1.1 GHz. Funding: This work was supported by the Max Planck Society and DFG SFB 870 (to O.G.). P.T.-M. was supported by a Humboldt Postdoctoral Fellowship. Author contributions: P.T.-M. performed NMR. P.T.-M. and C.G. designed the paramagnetic NMR approach. P.T.-M. calculated the structural ensembles. P.T.-M. and S.B. performed SAXS measurements. C.G. calculated FRET from the x-ray structures. T.T. and O.G. determined the experimental FRET efficiencies. S.B. crystallized Twitch-2B and Twitch-6 and solved the crystal structures. All authors wrote the manuscript. S.B. designed the project. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: Structures are deposited with code 6GEL for the Twitch-2B biosensor and 6GEZ for the Twitch-2B N532F mutant (Twitch-6). All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.Newman R. H., Fosbrink M. D., Zhang J., Genetically encodable fluorescent biosensors for tracking signaling dynamics in living cells. Chem. Rev. 111, 3614–3666 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Miyawaki A., Llopis J., Heim R., McCaffery J. M., Adams J. A., Ikura M., Tsien R. Y., Fluorescent indicators for Ca2+ based on green fluorescent proteins and calmodulin. Nature 388, 882–887 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Miyawaki A., Tsien R. Y., Monitoring protein conformations and interactions by fluorescence resonance energy transfer between mutants of green fluorescent protein. Methods Enzymol. 327, 472–500 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Markwardt M. L., Kremers G.-J., Kraft C. A., Ray K., Cranfill P. J. C., Wilson K. A., Day R. N., Wachter R. M., Davidson M. W., Rizzo M. A., An improved cerulean fluorescent protein with enhanced brightness and reduced reversible photoswitching. PLOS ONE 6, e17896 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nagai T., Yamada S., Tominaga T., Ichikawa M., Miyawaki A., Expanded dynamic range of fluorescent indicators for Ca2+ by circularly permuted yellow fluorescent proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 10554–10559 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mues M., Bartholomäus I., Thestrup T., Griesbeck O., Wekerle H., Kawakami N., Krishnamoorthy G., Real-time in vivo analysis of T cell activation in the central nervous system using a genetically encoded calcium indicator. Nat. Med. 19, 778–783 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Litzlbauer J., Schifferer M., Ng D., Fabritius A., Thestrup T., Griesbeck O., Large scale bacterial colony screening of diversified FRET biosensors. PLOS ONE 10, e0119860 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Thestrup T., Litzlbauer J., Bartholomäus I., Mues M., Russo L., Dana H., Kovalchuk Y., Liang Y., Kalamakis G., Laukat Y., Becker S., Witte G., Geiger A., Allen T., Rome L. C., Chen T.-W., Kim D. S., Garaschuk O., Griesinger C., Griesbeck O., Optimized ratiometric calcium sensors for functional in vivo imaging of neurons and T lymphocytes. Nat. Methods 11, 175–182 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Geiger A., Russo L., Gensch T., Thestrup T., Becker S., Hopfner K.-P., Griesinger C., Witte G., Griesbeck O., Correlating calcium binding, Förster resonance energy transfer, and conformational change in the biosensor TN-XXL. Biophys. J. 102, 2401–2410 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mertens H. D. T., Piljić A., Schultz C., Svergun D. I., Conformational analysis of a genetically encoded FRET biosensor by SAXS. Biophys. J. 102, 2866–2875 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Krissinel E., Henrick K., Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ponstingl H., Henrick K., Thornton J. M., Discriminating between homodimeric and monomeric proteins in the crystalline state. Proteins 41, 47–57 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Satyshur K. A., Pyzalska D., Greaser M., Rao S. T., Sundaralingam M., Structure of chicken skeletal muscle troponin C at 1.78 A resolution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 40–49 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Van Petegem F., Chatelain F. C., Minor D. L. Jr., Insights into voltage-gated calcium channel regulation from the structure of the CaV1.2 IQ domain-Ca2+/calmodulin complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 1108–1115 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ansbacher T., Srivastava H. K., Stein T., Baer R., Merkx M., Shurki A., Calculation of transition dipole moment in fluorescent proteins--towards efficient energy transfer. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 4109–4117 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bertini I., Bianco C. D., Gelis I., Katsaros N., Luchinat C., Parigi G., Peana M., Provenzani A., Zoroddu M. A., Experimentally exploring the conformational space sampled by domain reorientation in calmodulin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 6841–6846 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bertini I., Luchinat C., Parigi G., Magnetic susceptibility in paramagnetic NMR. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 40, 249–273 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Russo L., Maestre-Martinez M., Wolff S., Becker S., Griesinger C., Interdomain dynamics explored by paramagnetic NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 17111–17120 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tugarinov V., Hwang P. M., Ollerenshaw J. E., Kay L. E., Cross-correlated relaxation enhanced 1H[bond]13C NMR spectroscopy of methyl groups in very high molecular weight proteins and protein complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 10420–10428 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Clore G. M., Gronenborn A. M., Bax A., A robust method for determining the magnitude of the fully asymmetric alignment tensor of oriented macromolecules in the absence of structural information. J. Magn. Reson. 133, 216–221 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kabsch W., Xds. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Terwilliger T. C., Adams P. D., Read R. J., McCoy A. J., Moriarty N. W., Grosse-Kunstleve R. W., Afonine P. V., Zwartand P. H., Hung L.-W., Decision-making in structure solution using Bayesian estimates of map quality: The PHENIX AutoSol wizard. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 65, 582–601 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Afonine P. V., Grosse-Kunstleve R. W., Echols N., Headd J. J., Moriarty N. W., Mustyakimov M., Terwilliger T. C., Urzhumtsev A., Zwart P. H., Adams P. D., Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 68, 352–367 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Emsley P., Lohkamp B., Scott W. G., Cowtan K., Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Murshudov G. N., Skubák P., Lebedev A. A., Pannu N. S., Steiner R. A., Nicholls R. A., Winn M. D., Long F., Vagin A. A., REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 355–367 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McCoy A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve R. W., Adams P. D., Winn M. D., Storoni L. C., Read R. J., Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.J. R. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy (Springer, ed. 3, 2010). [Google Scholar]
- 28.Muller L., Sensitivity enhanced detection of weak nuclei using heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101, 4481–4484 (1979). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pederson K., Chalmers G. R., Gao Q., Elnatan D., Ramelot T. A., Ma L. C., Montelione G. T., Kennedy M. A., Agard D. A., Prestegard J. H., NMR characterization of HtpG, the E. coli Hsp90, using sparse labeling with (13)C-methyl alanine. J. Biomol. NMR 68, 225–236 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.R. L. J. Keller, The Computer Aided Resonance Assignment Tutorial (CANTINA Verlag, ed. 1, 2004). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Delaglio F., Grzesiek S., Vuister G. W., Zhu G., Pfeifer J., Bax A., NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 6, 277–293 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Round A., Felisaz F., Fodinger L., Gobbo A., Huet J., Villard C., Blanchet C. E., Pernot P., McSweeney S., Roessle M., Svergun D. I., Cipriani F., BioSAXS Sample Changer: A robotic sample changer for rapid and reliable high-throughput x-ray solution scattering experiments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 71, 67–75 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Incardona M. F., Bourenkov G. P., Levik K., Pieritz R. A., Popov A. N., Svensson O., EDNA: A framework for plugin-based applications applied to x-ray experiment online data analysis. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 16, 872–879 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Petoukhov M. V., Franke D., Shkumatov A. V., Tria G., Kikhney A. G., Gajda M., Gorba C., Mertens H. D., Konarev P. V., Svergun D. I., New developments in the program package for small-angle scattering data analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 342–350 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Konarev P. V., Volkov V. V., Sokolova A. V., Koch M. H. J., Svergun D. I., PRIMUS: A Windows PC-based system for small-angle scattering data analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 36, 1277–1282 (2003). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Svergun D. I., Determination of the regularization parameter in indirect-transform methods using perceptual criteria. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 25, 495–503 (1992). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Svergun D., Barberato C., Koch M. H. J., CRYSOL—A program to evaluate X-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 28, 768–773 (1995). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.