The human pathogen Listeria monocytogenes is usually treated with high doses of β-lactam antibiotics, often combined with gentamicin. However, these antibiotics only act bacteriostatically on L. monocytogenes, and the immune system is needed to clear the infection. Therefore, individuals with a compromised immune system are at risk to develop a severe form of Listeria infection, which can be fatal in up to 30% of cases. The development of new strategies to treat Listeria infections is necessary. Here we show that the expression of some of the FtsW and RodA enzymes of L. monocytogenes is induced by the presence of β-lactam antibiotics, and the combined absence of these enzymes makes bacteria more susceptible to this class of antibiotics. The development of antimicrobial agents that inhibit the activity or production of FtsW and RodA enzymes might therefore help to improve the treatment of Listeria infections and thereby lead to a reduction in mortality.
KEYWORDS: FtsW, Listeria monocytogenes, RodA, SEDS, antibiotic resistance, cell division
ABSTRACT
Rod-shaped bacteria have two modes of peptidoglycan synthesis: lateral synthesis and synthesis at the cell division site. These two processes are controlled by two macromolecular protein complexes, the elongasome and divisome. Recently, it has been shown that the Bacillus subtilis RodA protein, which forms part of the elongasome, has peptidoglycan glycosyltransferase activity. The cell division-specific RodA homolog FtsW fulfils a similar role at the divisome. The human pathogen Listeria monocytogenes carries genes that encode up to six FtsW/RodA homologs; however, their functions have not yet been investigated. Analysis of deletion and depletion strains led to the identification of the essential cell division-specific FtsW protein, FtsW1. Interestingly, L. monocytogenes carries a gene that encodes a second FtsW protein, FtsW2, which can compensate for the lack of FtsW1, when expressed from an inducible promoter. L. monocytogenes also possesses three RodA homologs, RodA1, RodA2, and RodA3, and their combined absence is lethal. Cells of a rodA1 rodA3 double mutant are shorter and have increased antibiotic and lysozyme sensitivity, probably due to a weakened cell wall. Results from promoter activity assays revealed that expression of rodA3 and ftsW2 is induced in the presence of antibiotics targeting penicillin binding proteins. Consistent with this, a rodA3 mutant was more susceptible to the β-lactam antibiotic cefuroxime. Interestingly, overexpression of RodA3 also led to increased cefuroxime sensitivity. Our study highlights that L. monocytogenes genes encode a multitude of functional FtsW and RodA enzymes to produce its rigid cell wall and that their expression needs to be tightly regulated to maintain growth, cell division, and antibiotic resistance.
INTRODUCTION
Bacterial cells are surrounded by a mesh of peptidoglycan (PG) that determines their shape and also protects the cells from lysis due to their high internal turgor pressure (1–3). Peptidoglycan is comprised of glycan strands that are cross-linked by short peptides (4). The glycan strands are composed of alternating N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylmuramic acid residues that are connected by a β-1,4 glycosidic bond (5). The synthesis of peptidoglycan begins in the cytoplasm with the production of the PG precursor lipid II by the proteins MurABCDEF, MraY and MurG (6–9). Lipid II is then transported across the cytoplasmic membrane by the flippase MurJ and Amj (10–12) and subsequently incorporated in the growing glycan strand by glycosyltransferases. The polymerization and cross-linking of the glycan strands are facilitated by the activity of glycosyltransferases and transpeptidases, respectively. Class A penicillin binding proteins (PBPs) are bifunctional enzymes that possess glycosyltransferase and transpeptidase activity, whereas class B PBPs contain only a transpeptidase domain (13–15). In addition, some species such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae carry genes that encode monofunctional glycosyltransferases (MGTs) that can also incorporate lipid II into the growing glycan strand (16–20).
Bacillus subtilis contains genes that encode four class A PBPs and no MGT; however, deletion of all class A PBPs manifests in only small PG changes (21). Recently, it has been shown that members of the SEDS (shape, elongation, division, sporulation) family of proteins, namely, RodA and FtsW, also act as glycosyltransferases (22–25). Both RodA and FtsW form complexes with cognate class B PBPs to enable polymerization and cross-linking of glycan strands (23, 25–28). Interestingly, SEDS proteins and the class B PBPs are more conserved among different bacterial species than class A PBPs are (22).
In rod-shaped bacteria, peptidoglycan is synthesized by two multiprotein complexes, the elongasome that is essential for the cell elongation and the divisome that is crucial for the formation of the division septum (29–32). RodA is part of the elongasome and is essential in many bacteria, including B. subtilis and S. pneumoniae (33, 34). Depletion of RodA results in the production of enlarged, spherical cells in B. subtilis (34). In contrast, FtsW is essential for cell division, and cells depleted for FtsW grow as long filaments (35–37). B. subtilis harbors a sporulation-specific member of the SEDS family, SpoVE in addition to RodA and FtsW. SpoVE is dispensable for growth, but it is essential for the synthesis of the spore cortex peptidoglycan (38, 39). Other Bacillus species such as B. cereus and B. anthracis possess four or five FtsW/RodA proteins, and strains of different serotypes of the human pathogen Listeria monocytogenes carry genes that encode even up to six FtsW/RodA homologs in their genome. However, their functions have not yet been investigated.
Here, we determined the roles of the different FtsW and RodA homologs for the growth and cell morphology of L. monocytogenes. Our results show that L. monocytogenes carries genes that encode two FtsW enzymes and three RodA enzymes. The absence of either FtsW1 or of all three RodA proteins is lethal under standard laboratory conditions. L. monocytogenes infections are usually treated with high doses of β-lactam antibiotics such as ampicillin, which inhibit the transpeptidase activity of penicillin binding proteins (PBPs) (40). We demonstrate that the expression of two SEDS proteins, FtsW2 and RodA3, is induced in the presence of β-lactam antibiotics likely to compensate for the inhibition of PBPs and that a rodA3 mutant is more sensitive to the β-lactam antibiotic cefuroxime. Antimicrobial agents inhibiting the activity of proteins of the SEDS family could therefore potentially improve the treatment of Listeria infections in the future.
RESULTS
L. monocytogenes 10403S carries genes that encode six FtsW/RodA homologs.
So far, FtsW and RodA proteins of the human pathogen L. monocytogenes have not been studied. FtsW and RodA are members of the SEDS (shape, elongation, division, sporulation) family of proteins and are multispanning membrane proteins with 8 to 10 transmembrane helices and a large extracellular loop (Fig. 1A). Using BLAST, six proteins with homology to the B. subtilis FtsW and RodA proteins could be identified in the genome of L. monocytogenes 10403S (Table 1). The protein encoded by lmo0421 has the weakest homology to B. subtilis FtsW and RodA (Table 1; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). lmo0421 is part of the sigC operon, which is comprised of lmo0422 encoding the PadR-like repressor LstR and lmo0423 coding for the ECF-type sigma factor SigC (Fig. 1B). The sigC operon acts as a lineage II-specific heat shock system (41) and is therefore not present in all L. monocytogenes genomes. Due to the weak homology to FtsW and RodA and its absence in L. monocytogenes strains of lineage I and III, Lmo0421 was excluded from further analysis.
TABLE 1.
L. monocytogenes protein | B. subtilis FtsW (403 aa)b | B. subtilis RodA (393 aa)b |
---|---|---|
Lmo0421 (416 aa) | 46/128 aa (36%) [7e−14] | 77/350 aa (22%) [4e−09] |
FtsW1 (Lmo1071) (402 aa) | 195/403 aa (48%) [1e−122] | 100/333 aa (30%) [7e−35] |
RodA1 (Lmo2427) (391 aa) | 124/403 aa (31%) [9e−29] | 132/360 aa (37%) [1e−57] |
RodA2 (Lmo2428) (389 aa) | 112/374 aa (30%) [1e−33] | 159/402 aa (40%) [1e−66] |
RodA3 (Lmo2687) (369 aa) | 95/324 aa (29%) [3e−25] | 110/356 aa (31%) [3e−44] |
FtsW2 (Lmo2688) (376 aa) | 147/342 aa (43%) [5e−67] | 95/300 aa (32%) [6e−22] |
The L. monocytogenes proteins and their amino acid sizes (aa) are shown in the leftmost column, and the B. subtilis FtsW (403 aa) and RodA (393 aa) proteins used for the homology search are indicated at the top of the middle and right columns.
The number of amino acids, which were found to be identical between the respective L. monocytogenes and B. subtilis FtsW/RodA protein are denoted (before the slash) along with the number of amino acids that was utilized by the BLAST algorithm for this comparison (after the slash). The percent identity is given in parentheses, and the corresponding E values are indicated in brackets.
The L. monocytogenes protein Lmo1071 is the closest homolog to B. subtilis FtsW with a sequence identity of 48% (Table 1). Furthermore, L. monocytogenes lmo1071 and B. subtilis ftsW are found in the same chromosomal context. More specifically, lmo1071 is located between the lmo1070 gene, which encodes a protein with homology to the B. subtilis YlaN protein, and the pycA gene coding for the pyruvate carboxylase, which are also adjacent to ftsW in B. subtilis. This analysis suggests that the lmo1071 gene encodes the cell division protein FtsW. However, L. monocytogenes carries a gene that encodes a second protein, Lmo2688, which shares a higher degree of homology to the B. subtilis FtsW than to the B. subtilis RodA protein (Table 1). Due to these similarities and additional data presented in this study, we refer to Lmo1071 and Lmo2688 as FtsW1 and FtsW2, respectively.
The BLAST search with the B. subtilis RodA sequence as a query sequence yielded the L. monocytogenes protein Lmo2428 as the closest homolog with a sequence identity of 40% (Table 1). In addition to Lmo2428, two additional RodA homologs are present in L. monocytogenes, namely, Lmo2427 and Lmo2687. As presented below, Lmo2427, Lmo2428, and Lmo2687 are likely bona fide RodA homologs and were therefore renamed RodA1, RodA2, and RodA3, respectively. rodA1 is located adjacent to rodA2, but despite their proximity, rodA1 and rodA2 are likely not transcribed as part of the same operon (42). In contrast, rodA3 and ftsW2 are part of the four-gene operon lmo2689-lmo2686. Lmo2689 is similar to a Mg2+-type ATPase, whereas lmo2686 encodes a protein of unknown function. Analysis of around 2,000 genomes of L. monocytogenes strains presently available at NCBI revealed that the five FtsW/RodA homologs named here, FtsW1, FtsW2, RodA1, RodA2, and RodA3, are conserved in the different strains.
lmo1071 encodes FtsW1 and is essential for the survival of L. monocytogenes.
The cell division protein FtsW is essential for growth in the Gram-negative and Gram-positive model organisms E. coli and B. subtilis (35, 36, 39, 43). Depletion of FtsW in these organisms leads to a block in cell division and formation of elongated cells (36, 37). All our attempts to delete the ftsW1 gene in L. monocytogenes 10403S were unsuccessful, suggesting that FtsW1 is also essential for growth in Listeria. Next, strain 10403SΔftsW1 iftsW1 was constructed, in which the expression of ftsW1 is controlled by an IPTG-inducible promoter. While no difference in growth was observed between the wild-type and FtsW1 depletion strain (likely due to leakiness of the inducible promoter) (Fig. 2A), cells depleted of FtsW1 were significantly elongated (Fig. 2B and C). Bacteria depleted of FtsW1 had a median cell length of 3.41 ± 0.16 μm, while wild-type and 10403SΔftsW1 iftsW1 bacteria grown in the presence of 1 mM IPTG had a median cell length of 1.85 ± 0.16 μm and 1.93 ± 0.07 μm, respectively (Fig. 2C). These data indicate that lmo1071 encodes the cell division-specific SEDS protein FtsW.
L. monocytogenes carries a gene that encodes a second FtsW protein.
To our knowledge, all bacteria analyzed so far possess only one FtsW protein that is essential for cell survival. We identified a second potential FtsW protein, Lmo2688, in L. monocytogenes. In contrast to ftsW1, an L. monocytogenes ftsW2 deletion strain could be constructed, and no significant growth or cell morphology phenotypes could be observed for the ΔftsW2 deletion strain (Fig. S2). In a previous study, it was reported that the operon comprised of genes lmo2689-lmo2686 is only minimally expressed when L. monocytogenes 10403S is grown in BHI broth (44). We reasoned that if ftsW2 does indeed code for a second FtsW protein, it should be possible to delete ftsW1 in a strain in which ftsW2 is artificially expressed from an IPTG-inducible promoter. Indeed, strain 10403SΔftsW1 iftsW2 could be generated in the presence of IPTG. In contrast, we were unable to generate strain 10403SΔftsW1 when any of the other FtsW/RodA homologs Lmo2427 (RodA1), Lmo2428 (RodA2), or Lmo2687 (RodA3) were expressed from the same IPTG-inducible promoter system. While prolonged depletion of FtsW2 in strain 10403SΔftsW1 iftsW2 again had no impact on growth, the cells were significantly elongated in the absence of the inducer compared to the wild type or bacteria grown in the presence of inducer (Fig. 3). These data strongly suggest that ftsW2 encodes a second FtsW enzyme, while the remaining three proteins, Lmo2427, Lmo2428, and Lmo2687, likely function as RodA proteins.
L. monocytogenes carries genes that encode three RodA homologs.
We were able to assign roles for two of the FtsW/RodA homologs as FtsW-like proteins. However, L. monocytogenes carries genes that encode three additional homologs, which show a higher similarity to the B. subtilis RodA protein compared to the B. subtilis FtsW protein (Table 1). As described above, expression of none of the enzymes Lmo2427, Lmo2428, or Lmo2687 was able to rescue the growth of an ftsW1 deletion strain, indicating that these enzymes likely function as RodA proteins in L. monocytogenes, and hence, they were renamed RodA1, RodA2, and RodA3, respectively. All attempts to construct a rodA1 rodA2 rodA3 triple mutant failed, further corroborating that these proteins function as RodA proteins and that at least one of them needs to be present for cell viability. To determine whether the different RodA homologs have distinct functions or whether they are merely duplications, single and double mutant strains were generated. No significant differences with regard to growth and cell length could be observed between the wild-type strain 10403S and single rodA1, rodA2, or rodA3 deletion strains (Fig. S3). Similar observations were made with the rodA double mutant strains 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA2 and 10403SΔrodA2ΔrodA3 (Fig. 4). However, cells lacking RodA1 and RodA3 were shorter (1.3 ± 0.03 μm) than wild-type cells (1.9 ± 0.06 μm; Fig. 4B and C), indicating that either RodA1 or RodA3 needs to be present for L. monocytogenes to maintain its rod shape. RodA3 is part of the lmo2689-lmo2686 operon that is only minimally expressed when L. monocytogenes is grown in BHI broth (44). The fact that we observe differences in cell morphology between a rodA1 single mutant and the rodA1 rodA3 double mutant suggests that the function of the two proteins could be additive or that rodA3 expression, which is only minimally expressed in a wild-type strain under standard laboratory growth conditions, might increase upon deletion of rodA1. To test whether rodA3 expression is increased in the absence of other RodA proteins, we fused the promoter upstream of lmo2689 and driving rodA3 expression to lacZ and inserted this fusion into the chromosome of wild-type 10403S, the rodA1 and rodA1 rodA2 deletion strains. The promoter activity was indeed 1.5- to 2-fold higher in the rodA1 and rodA1 rodA2 mutant strains compared to the wild type, as assessed by the increase in the β-galactosidase activity (Fig. 4G). This result indicates that expression of the lmo2689-lmo2686 operon, which encodes FtsW2 and RodA3, is induced in the absence of RodA1, suggesting a coordination of the expression of the different RodA homologs.
To confirm that the decrease in cell length of the double mutant strain 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 depends on the absence of RodA1 and RodA3, complemented strains with IPTG-inducible expression of rodA1 or rodA3 were constructed. Expression of RodA1 restored the cell length to 1.84 ± 0.1 μm, which is comparable to the cell length of wild-type cells (1.76 ± 0.15 μm; Fig. 4E). On the other hand, expression of rodA3 from an ectopic locus and IPTG-inducible promoter in strain 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 led to the formation of longer cells with an average cell length of 2.47 ± 0.01 μm (Fig. 4D and E). These results indicate that induction of RodA3 from the IPTG-inducible promoter likely results in overproduction of the protein compared to expression from the native promoter. To confirm that rodA3 expression is increased when expressed from the IPTG-inducible promoter compared to its native promoter, rodA3 transcript levels were assessed by qRT-PCR in the wild-type strain, the 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 deletion strain, and strain 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 irodA3 grown in the presence of IPTG (Fig. 4H). Significant higher rodA3 transcript levels were detected in the inducible strain in the presence of IPTG compared to the wild-type strain. Similarly, expression of rodA3 from an IPTG-inducible promoter in wild-type 10403S led to the formation of elongated cells with an average cell length of 2.49 ± 0.08 μm, whereas additional expression of rodA1 or rodA2 using the same inducible system had no impact on the cell length of 10403S (Fig. S4). These results highlight that in particular fine-tuning of RodA3 production is essential for cell length determination in L. monocytogenes.
The observation that the rodA1 rodA3 double mutant forms shorter cells suggests that RodA2 is not sufficient to maintain the cell length of L. monocytogenes. There are several possible explanations for this. RodA2 might have a reduced activity compared to RodA1 or RodA3. RodA2 might have a function that is different from the functions of RodA1 and RodA3 or the protein levels of RodA2 might be sufficient to maintain cell viability but too low to maintain the rod shape. To investigate this further, a strain was constructed that lacks rodA1 and rodA3 but carries pIMK3-rodA2 to allow for IPTG-inducible expression of rodA2 in addition to the expression of rodA2 from its native locus (10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 irodA2). In the absence of the inducer, the cells had a median cell length of 1.2 ± 0.03 μm (data not shown). However, the cell length of strain 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 irodA2 increased to 1.71 ± 0.8 μm when the strain was grown in the presence of IPTG (Fig. 4F). Therefore, additional expression of rodA2, which was verified by qRT-PCR (Fig. 4I), can partially complement the cell length phenotype of the rodA1 rodA3 deletion strain, suggesting that RodA2 has a function similar to that of RodA1 and RodA3 but that it has either a lower activity or is not expressed in sufficient amounts from its native promoter for proper cell length maintenance.
As stated above, several attempts to construct a strain inactivated for all three RodA homologs remained unsuccessful, suggesting that at least one of the proteins RodA1, RodA2, or RodA3 needs to be present for the viability of L. monocytogenes. The results presented so far indicate that RodA1 is the most important RodA homolog considering that RodA2 alone is not sufficient to maintain the rod shape and that RodA3 is only minimally expressed under standard laboratory conditions (44). To understand the impact of RodA enzymes on cell growth and cell division in L. monocytogenes, a strain was constructed that lacks all three rodA genes from its genome but harbors pIMK3-rodA1 to enable IPTG-inducible expression of RodA1 (strain 10403SΔrodA1-3 irodA1). Prolonged depletion of RodA1 in strain 10403SΔrodA1-3 irodA1 led to a growth defect that was not seen when the strain was grown in the presence of the inducer (Fig. 5A). However, the depletion was not efficient enough to see a complete growth inhibition, which would be expected for a strain lacking all three RodA homologs. This is likely caused by residual rodA1 expression from the inducible promoter even in the absence of IPTG. Consistent with this notion, even after prolonged depletion, rodA1 transcripts could still be detected in strain 10403SΔrodA1-3 irodA1 as assessed by qRT-PCR (Fig. S5). However, cells of the L. monocytogenes strain 10403SΔrodA1-3 irodA1 that were grown without IPTG were significantly shorter with a cell length of 1.18 ± 0.08 μm compared to cells of the double mutant 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 or the wild-type strain 10403S (Fig. 5B and D). Interestingly, different cell morphologies could be observed for strain 10403SΔrodA1-3 irodA1 after prolonged RodA1 depletion (Fig. 5C). The placement of the division septum was affected in some cells and daughter cells of different sizes, or cells with two septa were observed (Fig. 5C). These morphological defects could be complemented, and the cell length increased to 1.95 ± 0.04 μm upon the addition of IPTG and expression of RodA1 (Fig. 5D). These data highlight that RodA1 alone is sufficient to maintain the cell shape of L. monocytogenes.
Decreased moenomycin and lysozyme resistance in the absence of RodA homologs.
Next, we wondered whether the absence of FtsW or RodA proteins affects the resistance of L. monocytogenes toward the antibiotics penicillin, bacitracin, and moenomycin, which target different steps in the peptidoglycan biosynthesis process. Penicillin binds to the transpeptidase domain of PBPs and inhibits their function, leading to a reduced cross-linking of the peptidoglycan (45, 46). Bacitracin inhibits the dephosphorylation of the bactoprenol carrier, leading to a block in lipid II synthesis (47). The phosphoglycolipid antibiotic moenomycin inhibits the glycosyltransferase activity of bifunctional PBPs and thereby prevents the polymerization of the glycan chain (48).
No significant differences could be observed in terms of resistance against penicillin, bacitracin, or moenomycin for the FtsW1 depletion strain 10403SΔftsW1 iftsW1. This is presumably due to basal level expression of ftsW1 even in the absence of the inducer. Simultaneous deletion of rodA1 and rodA3 resulted in a slight decrease in the MIC for penicillin; however, this difference was not significant (Fig. 6A). On the other hand, strain 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 was two- to fourfold more sensitive to the antibiotic bacitracin (Fig. 6B). This phenotype could be complemented by expressing either RodA1, RodA2, or RodA3 from an IPTG-inducible promoter (Fig. 6B).
As described above, moenomycin inhibits the transglycosylase activity of PBPs, leading to a decreased activity of these enzymes. In the absence of RodA1 and RodA3, cells are more susceptible to reduced activity of PBPs, manifesting in a fourfold-reduced resistance to moenomycin (Fig. 6C). Induction of RodA1 expression in strain 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 resulted in a significantly higher resistance to moenomycin compared to that of wild-type strain 10403S, and expression of RodA2 or RodA3 led to partial or complete complementation of the moenomycin sensitivity (Fig. 6C).
Moreover, resistance to lysozyme, an enzyme that cleaves the linkage between N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine residues of the peptidoglycan, was drastically decreased in strain 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 and could be fully restored by expression of RodA1, RodA2, or RodA3 (Fig. 6D). Lysozyme resistance in L. monocytogenes is mainly accomplished by two modifications of the peptidoglycan; deacetylation of N-acetylglucosamine residues by PgdA or O-acetylation of N-acetylmuramic acid residues by OatA (49, 50). To determine whether the activity of PgdA is changed in the absence of RodA1 and RodA3, peptidoglycan was purified from the 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 mutant strain and digested with mutanolysin, and the resulting muropeptides were analyzed by HPLC. Peptidoglycan samples isolated from the wild-type strain 10403S and the complementation strain 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 irodA1 that had been grown in the presence of IPTG were analyzed as controls (Fig. 6E). The main muropeptide peaks were assigned as described previously (51, 52). Peaks 1 and 2 correspond to the acetylated and deacetylated monomeric muropeptides, respectively, whereas peak 3 and peaks 4 to 6 are acetylated and deacetylated muropeptide dimers, respectively. Deletion of rodA1 and rodA3 led to a reduction of both monomeric muropeptides and therefore to an increase in cross-linked peptidoglycan fragments by approximately 2% compared to the wild-type strain 10403S, in which 65% of the peptidoglycan was cross-linked (Fig. 6F). However, no significant difference with regard to the deacetylated muropeptides could be observed between wild-type 10403S, strain 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3, and the 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 irodA1 complementation strain (Fig. 6F). These results suggest that the lysozyme sensitivity phenotype of strain 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 is not caused by changes in the peptidoglycan deacetylation but instead is due to general defects in the peptidoglycan structure.
Cell wall-acting antibiotics induce the promoter of lmo2689.
The operon lmo2689-lmo2686, which contains the genes encoding FtsW2 and RodA3, is only minimally expressed under standard laboratory conditions (44). A genome-wide transcriptional analysis performed in L. monocytogenes strain LO28 has shown that lmo2687, lmo2688, and lmo2689 are part of the CesR regulon (53). The cephalosporin sensitivity response regulator CesR is part of the CesRK two-component system that regulates the transcription of several cell envelope-related genes in response to changes in cell wall integrity, such as those caused by the presence of cell wall-acting antibiotics or alcohols, including ethanol (53–55). Therefore, we next used the lmo2689 promoter-lacZ fusion described above to assess whether expression of the lmo2689-lmo2686 operon is induced in the presence of antibiotics that target different processes of the PG biosynthesis or ethanol. Indeed, increased β-galactosidase activity could be measured for cells that had been grown in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of the β-lactam antibiotics ampicillin, penicillin, and cefuroxime and the phosphoglycolipid moenomycin (Fig. 7A). In contrast, no increase in β-galactosidase activity could be detected upon the addition of vancomycin, lysozyme, or ethanol compared to untreated control cells (Fig. 7A). We also tested whether the presence of MgSO4 or EDTA has an impact on lmo2689 promoter activity, since lmo2689 encodes a putative Mg2+-type ATPase. However, the β-galactosidase activity of cells grown in the presence of MgSO4 or EDTA was comparable to the β-galactosidase activity seen for untreated cells (Fig. 7A). These results indicate that the expression of ftsW2 and rodA3, which are part of the lmo2689-lmo2686 operon, are induced in the presence of various cell wall-acting antibiotics, suggesting that FtsW2 and RodA3 might be important for the intrinsic resistance of L. monocytogenes against these antibiotics. However, no significant differences in MICs for penicillin and moenomycin could be observed between wild-type 10403S, the ftsW2 or rodA3 single mutant strains, or the ftsW2 rodA3 double mutant (Fig. S6). However, there was a slight reduction in the resistance of the rodA3 single mutant against cefuroxime compared to the wild type (Fig. S6). To further assess whether there is a difference in the cefuroxime resistance between the L. monocytogenes wild-type strain 10403S and the rodA1, rodA2, and rodA3 single mutant strains, dilutions of overnight cultures were spotted on BHI agar plates with or without 1 μg/ml cefuroxime. Deletion of rodA1 or rodA2 results in a slightly reduced ability of these strains to grow on BHI plates supplemented with 1 μg/ml cefuroxime compared to the wild-type 10403S strain (Fig. 7B). However, deletion of rodA3 leads to a stronger reduction of growth on BHI plates containing 1 μg/ml cefuroxime compared to the growth of rodA1 and rodA2 single mutants (Fig. 7B). Interestingly, overexpression of RodA3, but not of RodA1 or RodA2, also resulted in decreased resistance toward cefuroxime compared to the wild-type strain 10403S (Fig. 7C). Our results therefore suggest that L. monocytogenes induces the expression of rodA3 and ftsW2 in the presence of β-lactam antibiotics and moenomycin to compensate for the inhibition of the glycosyltransferase and transpeptidase activity of PBPs. In particular, RodA3 seems to play an important function for the intrinsic cephalosporin resistance in L. monocytogenes, and its expression needs to be finely balanced, as both its absence as well as increased expression have detrimental effects on resistance against this antibiotic.
FtsW and RodA proteins interact with class B PBPs.
Previous studies have shown that members of the SEDS protein family act together with a cognate class B PBP to synthesize and cross-link peptidoglycan (28, 34, 56–58). L. monocytogenes carries genes that encode three class B PBPs, namely PBP B1, PBP B2, and PBP B3. To identify potential protein-protein interactions between the L. monocytogenes class B PBPs and the FtsW/RodA proteins, a bacterial adenylate cyclase two-hybrid (BACTH) analysis was performed. Interactions were detected between the three L. monocytogenes PBP B1, PBP B2, and PBP B3 and all FtsW and RodA homologs (Fig. 8). These results suggest that the FtsW and RodA proteins also form a complex with class B PBPs in L. monocytogenes. However, using this bacterial two-hybrid approach, it was not possible to determine specific SEDS protein and class B PBP pairs.
DISCUSSION
Bacterial cell elongation and cell division need to be tightly regulated to maintain cell shape. This is accomplished by two multiprotein complexes, the elongasome and divisome, which are coordinated by the actin homolog MreB and the tubulin homolog FtsZ, respectively (30–32, 59, 60). The SEDS protein FtsW is part of the divisome and essential for growth as shown for many bacteria, including E. coli, B. subtilis, and S. aureus (28, 35, 36, 39, 43). Our experiments suggested that FtsW1 is also essential in L. monocytogenes; however, a second FtsW protein, FtsW2, can compensate for the loss of FtsW1 if it is expressed from an inducible promoter. FtsW2 is encoded by a gene in the lmo2689-lmo2686 operon that appears to be only minimally expressed when L. monocytogenes 10403S is grown under standard laboratory conditions (44). The expression of the lmo2689-lmo2686 operon is regulated by the two-component system CesRK that is activated by cell envelope stress (53–55). Using an L. monocytogenes strain carrying a Plmo2689-lacZ promoter fusion, we could detect increased β-galactosidase activity after incubation with subinhibitory concentrations of different β-lactam antibiotics, including penicillin, cefuroxime, and moenomycin. However, expression of the lmo2689-lmo2686 operon was not induced by other cell wall-targeting antibiotics such as vancomycin or the hydrolase lysozyme. This suggests that inhibition of the glycosyltransferase or transpeptidase activity of PBPs leads to activation of the lmo2689-lmo2686 operon, and hence, to the expression of ftsW2 as well as rodA3.
The rod shape-determining protein RodA is part of the elongation machinery. The data presented in this study suggest that L. monocytogenes carries genes that encode not one but three RodA proteins and that depletion of the three RodA enzymes leads to a decreased cell length (Fig. 5). Simultaneous deletion of rodA1 and rodA3 already results in the formation of shorter cells, whereas cells of strains with rodA1 and rodA2 or rodA2 and rodA3 deleted have a cell length that is comparable to that of the wild-type strain 10403S. Taking into consideration that rodA3 is only minimally expressed under standard laboratory growth conditions in L. monocytogenes 10403S (44), the results presented in this study suggest that rodA3 expression becomes induced upon inactivation of RodA1, since we observed morphological differences between the rodA1 single mutant and rodA1 rodA3 double mutant strains. Indeed, β-galactosidase assays confirmed that deletion of rodA1 or rodA1 rodA2 increases the activity of the promoter from which rodA3 is expressed. The data presented in this study also indicate that RodA1 is the “main” RodA enzyme in L. monocytogenes, as no significant phenotypic changes with regard to growth and cell division could be observed as long as RodA1 was present. On the other hand, RodA2 was able to compensate for the loss of RodA1 and RodA3 only when it was overproduced from an inducible promoter. Interestingly, cells of strains 10403S and 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 in which rodA3 is overexpressed from an ectopic locus have an increased cell length compared to the wild type. An explanation for this could be that elevated levels of RodA3 lead to the depletion of proteins needed at the cell division site, resulting in an extended synthesis of PG on the lateral wall. Another possibility could be that RodA3 directly inhibits FtsW1 or displaces FtsW1 at the cell division site, leading to a block in cell division and therefore resulting in the formation of elongated cells.
Recent studies have shown that SEDS proteins act as glycosyltransferases (22, 24). The glycosyltransferase activity of PBPs and MGT can be inhibited by moenomycin, whereas RodA/FtsW enzymes are not affected by moenomycin and are therefore important for moenomycin resistance (24, 61). In good agreement with the importance of SEDS proteins for the intrinsic moenomycin resistance, deletion of the genes encoding two of the three RodA enzymes, RodA1 and RodA3, resulted in an increased moenomycin sensitivity of L. monocytogenes (Fig. 6C).
In B. subtilis, RodA is in a complex with the class B PBP, PBP 2A (also named PbpH), and these two proteins act together to polymerize and cross-link the glycan strands (34, 56). Similarly, FtsW and PBP 2B form a subcomplex as part of the divisome (57, 58). Recently, it was shown that RodA-PBP3 and FtsW-PBP1 act as cognate pairs in the coccoid bacterium S. aureus (28). Depletion of all three RodA enzymes in L. monocytogenes, RodA1, RodA2, and RodA3, leads to a drastic reduction in cell length (Fig. 5). A similar phenotype was observed for an L. monocytogenes strain depleted for the essential class B PBP, PBP B1 (51). In contrast, the absence of either FtsW1 (Fig. 2) or the class B PBP, PBP B2, in L. monocytogenes results in the formation of elongated cells (51). These observations suggest that RodA and FtsW might work in a complex with the cognate PBPs PBP B1 and PBP B2 during cell elongation and cell division, respectively. Indeed, protein-protein interactions between FtsW1 and FtsW2 with PBP B2 and between RodA1, RodA2, and RodA3 with the PBP B1 could be observed (Fig. 8). However, interactions were also detected between the FtsW proteins and PBP B1 and PBP B3 as well as between the RodA proteins and PBP B2 and PBP B3 (Fig. 8). While these data provide the first line of evidence that SEDS proteins and class B PBPs (bPBP) also form complexes in L. monocytogenes, additional work is necessary to determine whether specific SEDS-bPBP pairs are formed in L. monocytogenes.
Taken together, L. monocytogenes has a repertoire of PBPs and multiple members of the SEDS family of proteins to produce its rigid cell wall. The expression and activity of these enzymes need to be tightly regulated in L. monocytogenes to maintain its cell shape. Our results suggest that L. monocytogenes adapts the expression of a second set of FtsW/RodA enzymes, FtsW2 and RodA3, to environmental stresses such as the presence of β-lactam antibiotics, thereby preventing defects in the peptidoglycan synthesis and subsequent cell lysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
All strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Strain and plasmid constructions are described in Text S1 in the supplemental material, and all primers used in this study are listed in Table S2. E. coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium, and L. monocytogenes strains were grown in brain heart infusion (BHI) medium at 37°C unless otherwise stated. If necessary, antibiotics and supplements were added to the medium at the following concentrations: for E. coli cultures, ampicillin (Amp) at 100 μg/ml and kanamycin (Kan) at 30 μg/ml, and for L. monocytogenes cultures, chloramphenicol (Cam) at 10 μg/ml, kanamycin (Kan) at 30 μg/ml, and isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 1 mM. We used the L. monocytogenes strain 10403S and derivatives thereof. However, we refer to L. monocytogenes EGD-e gene and locus tag numbers, as this was the first fully sequenced L. monocytogenes strain.
Growth curves.
Overnight cultures of wild-type L. monocytogenes 10403S and the indicated deletion strains were diluted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.01 or 0.05 in 15 ml of BHI medium, and the cultures were incubated at 37°C with shaking. Growth was monitored by determining OD600 readings at hourly intervals. For growth curves with the IPTG-inducible depletion strains 10403SΔftsW1 iftsW (ANG4314), 10403SΔftsW1 iftsW2 (ANG5119), and 10403SΔrodA1-3 irodA1 (ANG5192), the strains were cultivated overnight in the presence of 1 mM IPTG. The next day, cells were washed once with fresh medium, diluted 1:50 in 5 ml BHI medium, and grown for 8 to 10 h in the absence of the inducer. The cultures were diluted 1:100 into fresh BHI medium and grown until the next morning at 37°C. The depleted cells were then diluted to an OD600 of 0.01 and grown in the presence or absence of 1 mM IPTG at 37°C. Averages and standard deviations from three independent experiments were plotted.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).
For the extraction of RNA from rodA complemented strains, overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes strains 10403S, 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3, 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 pIMK3-rodA1, 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 pIMK3-rodA2, and 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 pIMK3-rodA3 were diluted in BHI medium (with 1 mM IPTG for the plasmid-containing complemented strains) to an OD600 of 0.05 and incubated at 37°C until the cultures reached an OD600 of 1. For the extraction of RNA from strain 10403SΔrodA1-3 irodA1 (ANG5192), bacteria were grown as described for the growth curve assay to deplete RodA1. Next, strain 10403S and depleted cells of 10403SΔrodA1-3 irodA1 were diluted to an OD600 of 0.01 and grown in BHI medium in the presence or absence of IPTG until an OD600 of 0.5. Portions (20 ml) of the cultures were mixed with 47 ml guanidine thiocyanate (GTC) buffer (5 M GTC, 0.5% N-lauryl sarcosine, 0.1 M β-mercaptoethanol, 0.5% Tween 80, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5]), bacteria were harvested by centrifugation and subsequently lysed using the FastRNA Pro Blue kit (MP Biomedicals). Total RNA was isolated by chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation and further purified using the RNeasy minikit (Qiagen) and finally treated with Turbo DNase (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized from 10 ng of RNA using the Superscript III first strand synthesis kit (Invitrogen). The expression of rodA1, rodA2, and rodA3 in the different strains was assessed using the TaqMan probe-based gene expression assay (Applied Biosystems). Expression of gyrB was used as a control. The cycle threshold (CT) values obtained for rodA1, rodA2 and rodA3 were normalized to the values obtained for gyrB. The fold changes of gene expression for the different strains were calculated using the ΔΔCT method.
Determination of MICs.
The MICs for bacitracin, penicillin, moenomycin, and lysozyme were determined using a broth microdilution assay in 96-well plates. Approximately 104 L. monocytogenes cells were used to inoculate 200 μl BHI containing twofold dilutions of the different antimicrobials. The starting antibiotic concentrations were 1 mg/ml for bacitracin A, 1 μg/ml for penicillin G, 0.8 or 1.6 μg/ml for moenomycin, 8 μg/ml cefuroxime, and 10 mg/ml for lysozyme. The OD600 readings were determined after incubating the 96-well plates for 24 h at 37°C with shaking at 500 rpm in a plate incubator (Thermostar; BMG Labtech). The MIC value refers to the antibiotic concentration at which bacterial growth was inhibited by >90%.
Determination of antibiotic susceptibility using a spot plating assay.
Overnight cultures of the indicated L. monocytogenes strains were adjusted to an OD600 of 1, and 5-μl portions of serial dilutions were spotted on BHI agar plates or BHI agar plates containing 1 μg/ml cefuroxime and where indicated, 1 mM IPTG. Plates were photographed after incubation at 37°C for 24 h.
Fluorescence and phase-contrast microscopy.
For bacterial cell length measurements, 100-μl portions of mid-log cultures were mixed with 5 μl of 100 μg/ml Nile red solution to stain the cell membrane. Following incubation at 37°C for 20 min, the cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in 50 μl PBS. Portions (1.5 μl) of the different samples were spotted onto microscope slides covered with a thin agarose film (1.5% agarose in distilled water), air dried, and covered with a cover slip. Phase-contrast and fluorescence images were taken using a Zeiss Axio Imager.A1 microscope coupled to an AxioCam MRm and a 100× objective and processed using the Zen 2012 software (blue edition). For the detection of Nile red fluorescence signals, the Zeiss filter set 00 was used. For the cell length determinations, 300 cells were measured for each experiment, and the median cell length was calculated. Averages and standard deviations of the median cell length of three independent experiments were plotted.
Peptidoglycan isolation and analysis.
Overnight cultures of L. monocytogenes strains 10403S, 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3, and 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 pIMK3-rodA1 were used to inoculate 1 liter BHI broth (with 1 mM IPTG for the complementation strain 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA3 pIMK3-rodA1) to a starting OD600 of 0.06. The cultures were grown at 37°C until they reached an OD600 of 1, at which point the cultures were cooled on ice for 1 h. The bacteria were subsequently collected by centrifugation, and peptidoglycan was purified and digested with mutanolysin as described previously (62, 63). Digested muropeptides were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and recorded at an absorption of 205 nm as described previously (62). For quantification, the areas of the main muropeptide peaks were integrated using the Agilent Technology ChemStation software. The sum of the peak areas was set at 100%, and individual peak areas were determined. Averages and standard deviations from three independent extractions were calculated.
β-Galactosidase assay.
For determination of the β-galactosidase activity, overnight cultures of strains 10403S pPL3e-Plmo2689-lacZ, 10403SΔrodA1 pPL3e-Plmo2689-lacZ, and 10403SΔrodA1ΔrodA2 pPL3e-Plmo2689-lacZ were diluted 1:100 in fresh BHI medium and grown for 6 h at 37°C. Sample collection and preparation were performed as described previously (64). Briefly, OD600 readings were determined (for the final β-galactosidase unit calculations) for the different cultures after 6 h of growth, and cells from 1 ml culture were pelleted by centrifugation for 10 min at 13,200 × g, resuspended in 100 μl ABT buffer (60 mM K2HPO4, 40 mM KH2PO4, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100 [pH 7.0]), snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until use. For the identification of substances inducing the expression of the lmo2689-lmo2686 operon, an overnight culture of strain 10403S pPL3e-Plmo2689-lacZ was diluted 1:100 in fresh BHI medium, and the culture was incubated with shaking at 37°C until an OD600 of 0.5 to 0.6 was reached. The culture was divided into several flasks and incubated for 2 h at 37°C in the presence or absence of the following substances: 0.5 μg/ml ampicillin, 0.05 μg/ml penicillin, 0.5 μg/ml vancomycin, 4 μg/ml cefuroxime, 0.05 μg/ml moenomycin, 0.5 mg/ml lysozyme, 1% ethanol, 300 μg/ml MgSO4, or 300 μg/ml EDTA. Bacteria were pelleted, and samples were frozen as described above.
Samples were thawed, and 1:10 dilutions were prepared in ABT buffer. Fifty-microliter portions of the 1:10 diluted samples were mixed with 10 μl of 0.4 mg/ml 4-methyl-umbelliferyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (MUG) substrate prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and incubated for 60 min at room temperature (RT). A reaction with ABT buffer alone was used as a negative control. Following this incubation step, 20 μl of each reaction mixture was diluted into 180 μl of ABT buffer in a black 96-well plate, and fluorescence values were measured using an Hidex Sense microplate reader at 355-nm excitation and 460-nm emission wavelengths. Concentrations from 0.125 μM to 20 μM of the fluorescent 4-methylumbelliferone (MU) standard were used to obtain a standard curve. β-Galactosidase units were calculated as (picomoles of substrate hydrolyzed × dilution factor)/(culture volume [in milliliters] × OD600 × minute). The amount of hydrolyzed substrate was determined from the standard curve as (emission reading – y intercept)/slope.
Bacterial two-hybrid assays.
Protein-protein interactions between the different FtsW/RodA homologs and class B PBPs were analyzed using the bacterial adenylate cyclase two-hybrid (BACTH) assay (65). The indicated pUT18/pUT18c and pKT25 derivatives were cotransformed into E. coli strain BTH101. Transformants were selected on LB agar plates containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin, 30 μg/ml kanamycin, 0.1 mM IPTG, and 50 μg/ml X-Gal. Images were taken after incubation for 24 h and 48 h at 30°C.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust grants 100289/Z/12/Z and 210671/Z/18/Z to A.G. and the German research foundation (DFG) grants RI 2920/1-1 to J.R. and HA6830/1-1 to S.H.
Footnotes
Citation Rismondo J, Halbedel S, Gründling A. 2019. Cell shape and antibiotic resistance are maintained by the activity of multiple FtsW and RodA enzymes in Listeria monocytogenes. mBio 10:e01448-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01448-19.
REFERENCES
- 1.Weidel W, Pelzer H. 1964. Bagshaped macromolecules–a new outlook on bacterial cell walls. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 26:193–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vollmer W, Blanot D, de Pedro MA. 2008. Peptidoglycan structure and architecture. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:149–167. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00094.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.de Pedro MA, Cava F. 2015. Structural constraints and dynamics of bacterial cell wall architecture. Front Microbiol 6:449. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rogers HJ, Perkins HR, Ward JB. 1980. Microbial cell walls and membranes, p 33 Chapman and Hall, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ghuysen JM, Strominger JL. 1963. Structure of the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus, strain Copenhagen. II. Separation and structure of disaccharides. Biochemistry 2:1119–1125. doi: 10.1021/bi00905a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blumberg PM, Strominger JL. 1974. Interaction of penicillin with the bacterial cell: penicillin-binding proteins and penicillin-sensitive enzymes. Bacteriol Rev 38:291–335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.van Heijenoort J. 2001. Formation of the glycan chains in the synthesis of bacterial peptidoglycan. Glycobiology 11:25R–36R. doi: 10.1093/glycob/11.3.25r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Scheffers DJ, Pinho MG. 2005. Bacterial cell wall synthesis: new insights from localization studies. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69:585–607. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.69.4.585-607.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pinho MG, Kjos M, Veening JW. 2013. How to get (a)round: mechanisms controlling growth and division of coccoid bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:601–614. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meeske AJ, Sham LT, Kimsey H, Koo BM, Gross CA, Bernhardt TG, Rudner DZ. 2015. MurJ and a novel lipid II flippase are required for cell wall biogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:6437–6442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504967112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sham LT, Butler EK, Lebar MD, Kahne D, Bernhardt TG, Ruiz N. 2014. MurJ is the flippase of lipid-linked precursors for peptidoglycan biogenesis. Science 345:220–222. doi: 10.1126/science.1254522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ruiz N. 2008. Bioinformatics identification of MurJ (MviN) as the peptidoglycan lipid II flippase in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:15553–15557. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808352105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Höltje JV. 1998. Growth of the stress-bearing and shape-maintaining murein sacculus of Escherichia coli. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:181–203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sauvage E, Kerff F, Terrak M, Ayala JA, Charlier P. 2008. The penicillin-binding proteins: structure and role in peptidoglycan biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:234–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00105.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Goffin C, Ghuysen JM. 1998. Multimodular penicillin-binding proteins: an enigmatic family of orthologs and paralogs. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:1079–1093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Park W, Matsuhashi M. 1984. Staphylococcus aureus and Micrococcus luteus peptidoglycan transglycosylases that are not penicillin-binding proteins. J Bacteriol 157:538–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Park W, Seto H, Hakenbeck R, Matsuhashi M. 1985. Major peptidoglycan transglycosylase activity in Streptococcus pneumoniae that is not a penicillin-binding protein. FEMS Microbiol Lett 27:45–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1985.tb01635.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Karinou E, Schuster CF, Pazos M, Vollmer W, Gründling A. 2018. Inactivation of the monofunctional peptidoglycan glycosyltransferase SgtB allows Staphylococcus aureus to survive in the absence of lipoteichoic acid. J Bacteriol 201:e00574-18. doi: 10.1128/JB.00574-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang QM, Peery RB, Johnson RB, Alborn WE, Yeh WK, Skatrud PL. 2001. Identification and characterization of a monofunctional glycosyltransferase from Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 183:4779–4785. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.16.4779-4785.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hara H, Suzuki H. 1984. A novel glycan polymerase that synthesizes uncross-linked peptidoglycan in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 168:155–160. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(84)80226-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McPherson DC, Popham DL. 2003. Peptidoglycan synthesis in the absence of class A penicillin-binding proteins in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 185:1423–1431. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.4.1423-1431.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Meeske AJ, Riley EP, Robins WP, Uehara T, Mekalanos JJ, Kahne D, Walker S, Kruse AC, Bernhardt TG, Rudner DZ. 2016. SEDS proteins are a widespread family of bacterial cell wall polymerases. Nature 537:634–638. doi: 10.1038/nature19331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cho H, Wivagg CN, Kapoor M, Barry Z, Rohs PDA, Suh H, Marto JA, Garner EC, Bernhardt TG. 2016. Bacterial cell wall biogenesis is mediated by SEDS and PBP polymerase families functioning semi-autonomously. Nat Microbiol 1:16172. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Emami K, Guyet A, Kawai Y, Devi J, Wu LJ, Allenby N, Daniel RA, Errington J. 2017. RodA as the missing glycosyltransferase in Bacillus subtilis and antibiotic discovery for the peptidoglycan polymerase pathway. Nat Microbiol 2:16253. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Taguchi A, Welsh MA, Marmont LS, Lee W, Sjodt M, Kruse AC, Kahne D, Bernhardt TG, Walker S. 2019. FtsW is a peptidoglycan polymerase that is functional only in complex with its cognate penicillin-binding protein. Nat Microbiol 4:587–594. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0345-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Leclercq S, Derouaux A, Olatunji S, Fraipont C, Egan AJ, Vollmer W, Breukink E, Terrak M. 2017. Interplay between penicillin-binding proteins and SEDS proteins promotes bacterial cell wall synthesis. Sci Rep 7:43306. doi: 10.1038/srep43306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fraipont C, Alexeeva S, Wolf B, van der Ploeg R, Schloesser M, den Blaauwen T, Nguyen-Disteche M. 2011. The integral membrane FtsW protein and peptidoglycan synthase PBP3 form a subcomplex in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 157:251–259. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.040071-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Reichmann NT, Tavares AC, Saraiva BM, Jousselin A, Reed P, Pereira AR, Monteiro JM, Sobral RG, VanNieuwenhze MS, Fernandes F, Pinho MG. 2019. SEDS-bPBP pairs direct lateral and septal peptidoglycan synthesis in Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Microbiol doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0437-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nanninga N. 1991. Cell division and peptidoglycan assembly in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 5:791–795. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb00751.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Carballido-López R, Formstone A. 2007. Shape determination in Bacillus subtilis. Curr Opin Microbiol 10:611–616. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Typas A, Banzhaf M, Gross CA, Vollmer W. 2012. From the regulation of peptidoglycan synthesis to bacterial growth and morphology. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:123–136. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Errington J, Wu LJ. 2017. Cell cycle machinery in Bacillus subtilis, p 67–101. In Löwe J, Amos LA (ed), Prokaryotic cytoskeletons: filamentous protein polymers active in the cytoplasm of bacterial and archaeal cells. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-53047-5_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu X, Gallay C, Kjos M, Domenech A, Slager J, van Kessel SP, Knoops K, Sorg RA, Zhang JR, Veening JW. 2017. High-throughput CRISPRi phenotyping identifies new essential genes in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Syst Biol 13:931. doi: 10.15252/msb.20167449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Henriques AO, Glaser P, Piggot PJ, Moran CP Jr.. 1998. Control of cell shape and elongation by the rodA gene in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 28:235–247. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00766.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kobayashi K, Ehrlich SD, Albertini A, Amati G, Andersen KK, Arnaud M, Asai K, Ashikaga S, Aymerich S, Bessieres P, Boland F, Brignell SC, Bron S, Bunai K, Chapuis J, Christiansen LC, Danchin A, Débarbouille M, Dervyn E, Deuerling E, Devine K, Devine SK, Dreesen O, Errington J, Fillinger S, Foster SJ, Fujita Y, Galizzi A, Gardan R, Eschevins C, Fukushima T, Haga K, Harwood CR, Hecker M, Hosoya D, Hullo MF, Kakeshita H, Karamata D, Kasahara Y, Kawamura F, Koga K, Koski P, Kuwana R, Imamura D, Ishimaru M, Ishikawa S, Ishio I, Le Coq D, Masson A, Mauël C, Meima R, et al. 2003. Essential Bacillus subtilis genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:4678–4683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0730515100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Boyle DS, Khattar MM, Addinall SG, Lutkenhaus J, Donachie WD. 1997. ftsW is an essential cell-division gene in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 24:1263–1273. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4091773.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gamba P, Hamoen LW, Daniel RA. 2016. Cooperative recruitment of FtsW to the division site of Bacillus subtilis. Front Microbiol 7:1808. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Henriques AO, de Lencastre H, Piggot PJ. 1992. A Bacillus subtilis morphogene cluster that includes spoVE is homologous to the mra region of Escherichia coli. Biochimie 74:735–748. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(92)90146-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ikeda M, Sato T, Wachi M, Jung HK, Ishino F, Kobayashi Y, Matsuhashi M. 1989. Structural similarity among Escherichia coli FtsW and RodA proteins and Bacillus subtilis SpoVE protein, which function in cell division, cell elongation, and spore formation, respectively. J Bacteriol 171:6375–6378. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.11.6375-6378.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Swaminathan B, Gerner-Smidt P. 2007. The epidemiology of human listeriosis. Microbes Infect 9:1236–1243. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2007.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang C, Nietfeldt J, Zhang M, Benson AK. 2005. Functional consequences of genome evolution in Listeria monocytogenes: the lmo0423 and lmo0422 genes encode sigmaC and LstR, a lineage II-specific heat shock system. J Bacteriol 187:7243–7253. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.21.7243-7253.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Toledo-Arana A, Dussurget O, Nikitas G, Sesto N, Guet-Revillet H, Balestrino D, Loh E, Gripenland J, Tiensuu T, Vaitkevicius K, Barthelemy M, Vergassola M, Nahori M-A, Soubigou G, Régnault B, Coppée J-Y, Lecuit M, Johansson J, Cossart P. 2009. The Listeria transcriptional landscape from saprophytism to virulence. Nature 459:950–956. doi: 10.1038/nature08080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Khattar MM, Begg KJ, Donachie WD. 1994. Identification of FtsW and characterization of a new ftsW division mutant of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 176:7140–7147. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.23.7140-7147.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lobel L, Herskovits AA. 2016. Systems level analyses reveal multiple regulatory activities of CodY controlling metabolism, motility and virulence in Listeria monocytogenes. PLoS Genet 12:e1005870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nakagawa J, Tamaki S, Matsuhashi M. 1979. Purified penicillin binding proteins 1Bs from Escherichia coli membrane showing activities of both peptidoglycan polymerase and peptidoglycan crosslinking enzyme. Agric Biol Chem 43:1379–1380. doi: 10.1080/00021369.1979.10863634. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Korsak D, Markiewicz Z, Gutkind GO, Ayala JA. 2010. Identification of the full set of Listeria monocytogenes penicillin-binding proteins and characterization of PBPD2 (Lmo2812). BMC Microbiol 10:239. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Stone KJ, Strominger JL. 1971. Mechanism of action of bacitracin: complexation with metal ion and C55-isoprenyl pyrophosphate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 68:3223–3227. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.12.3223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.van Heijenoort Y, Leduc M, Singer H, van Heijenoort J. 1987. Effects of moenomycin on Escherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol 133:667–674. doi: 10.1099/00221287-133-3-667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Boneca IG, Dussurget O, Cabanes D, Nahori MA, Sousa S, Lecuit M, Psylinakis E, Bouriotis V, Hugot JP, Giovannini M, Coyle A, Bertin J, Namane A, Rousselle JC, Cayet N, Prevost MC, Balloy V, Chignard M, Philpott DJ, Cossart P, Girardin SE. 2007. A critical role for peptidoglycan N-deacetylation in Listeria evasion from the host innate immune system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:997–1002. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609672104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Aubry C, Goulard C, Nahori MA, Cayet N, Decalf J, Sachse M, Boneca IG, Cossart P, Dussurget O. 2011. OatA, a peptidoglycan O-acetyltransferase involved in Listeria monocytogenes immune escape, is critical for virulence. J Infect Dis 204:731–740. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rismondo J, Möller L, Aldridge C, Gray J, Vollmer W, Halbedel S. 2015. Discrete and overlapping functions of peptidoglycan synthases in growth, cell division and virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Mol Microbiol 95:332–351. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Burke TP, Loukitcheva A, Zemansky J, Wheeler R, Boneca IG, Portnoy DA. 2014. Listeria monocytogenes is resistant to lysozyme through the regulation, not the acquisition, of cell wall-modifying enzymes. J Bacteriol 196:3756–3767. doi: 10.1128/JB.02053-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nielsen PK, Andersen AZ, Mols M, van der Veen S, Abee T, Kallipolitis BH. 2012. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the cell envelope stress response and the role of LisRK and CesRK in Listeria monocytogenes. Microbiology 158:963–974. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.055467-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gottschalk S, Bygebjerg-Hove I, Bonde M, Nielsen PK, Nguyen TH, Gravesen A, Kallipolitis BH. 2008. The two-component system CesRK controls the transcriptional induction of cell envelope-related genes in Listeria monocytogenes in response to cell wall-acting antibiotics. J Bacteriol 190:4772–4776. doi: 10.1128/JB.00015-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kallipolitis BH, Ingmer H, Gahan CG, Hill C, Sogaard-Andersen L. 2003. CesRK, a two-component signal transduction system in Listeria monocytogenes, responds to the presence of cell wall-acting antibiotics and affects beta-lactam resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:3421–3429. doi: 10.1128/aac.47.11.3421-3429.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wei Y, Havasy T, McPherson DC, Popham DL. 2003. Rod shape determination by the Bacillus subtilis class B penicillin-binding proteins encoded by pbpA and pbpH. J Bacteriol 185:4717–4726. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.16.4717-4726.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gamba P, Veening JW, Saunders NJ, Hamoen LW, Daniel RA. 2009. Two-step assembly dynamics of the Bacillus subtilis divisome. J Bacteriol 191:4186–4194. doi: 10.1128/JB.01758-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Daniel RA, Williams AM, Errington J. 1996. A complex four-gene operon containing essential cell division gene pbpB in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 178:2343–2350. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.8.2343-2350.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jones LJ, Carballido-López R, Errington J. 2001. Control of cell shape in bacteria: helical, actin-like filaments in Bacillus subtilis. Cell 104:913–922. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00287-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.den Blaauwen T. 2018. Is longitudinal division in rod-shaped bacteria a matter of swapping axis? Front Microbiol 9:822. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tamura T, Suzuki H, Nishimura Y, Mizoguchi J, Hirota Y. 1980. On the process of cellular division in Escherichia coli: isolation and characterization of penicillin-binding proteins 1a, 1b, and 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77:4499–4503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.de Jonge BL, Chang YS, Gage D, Tomasz A. 1992. Peptidoglycan composition of a highly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain. The role of penicillin binding protein 2A. J Biol Chem 267:11248–11254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Corrigan RM, Abbott JC, Burhenne H, Kaever V, Gründling A. 2011. c-di-AMP is a new second messenger in Staphylococcus aureus with a role in controlling cell size and envelope stress. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002217. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gründling A, Burrack LS, Bouwer HG, Higgins DE. 2004. Listeria monocytogenes regulates flagellar motility gene expression through MogR, a transcriptional repressor required for virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:12318–12323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404924101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Karimova G, Pidoux J, Ullmann A, Ladant D. 1998. A bacterial two-hybrid system based on a reconstituted signal transduction pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:5752–5756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sonnhammer EL, von Heijne G, Krogh A. 1998. A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 6:175–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Soding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG. 2011. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.