Abstract
Most bilaterian animals excrete toxic metabolites through specialized organs, such as nephridia and kidneys, which share morphological and functional correspondences. In contrast, excretion in non-nephrozoans is largely unknown, and therefore the reconstruction of ancestral excretory mechanisms is problematic. Here, we investigated the excretory mode of members of the Xenacoelomorpha, the sister group to Nephrozoa, and Cnidaria, the sister group to Bilateria. By combining gene expression, inhibitor experiments, and exposure to varying environmental ammonia conditions, we show that both Xenacoelomorpha and Cnidaria are able to excrete across digestive-associated tissues. However, although the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis seems to use diffusion as its main excretory mode, the two xenacoelomorphs use both active transport and diffusion mechanisms. Based on these results, we propose that digestive-associated tissues functioned as excretory sites before the evolution of specialized organs in nephrozoans. We conclude that the emergence of a compact, multiple-layered bilaterian body plan necessitated the evolution of active transport mechanisms, which were later recruited into the specialized excretory organs.
Most animals possess specialized excretory organs to deposit toxic waste products from their body; others are assumed to use passive diffusion via the skin. However, investigation of one cnidarian and two acoelomorph species, which do not possess excretory organs, shows that the gut tissue is the most active excretory site and that acoelomorphs use active transport.
Introduction
Excretory organs are specialized organs that remove toxic metabolic waste products and control water and ion balance in animals based on the principles of ultrafiltration, active transport, and passive transport/diffusion [1]. They are only present in Nephrozoa (Deuterostomia + Protostomia) [2] (Fig 1a) and, based on morphological correspondences, can be grouped into two major architectural units: the protonephridia, only found in Protostomia, and the metanephridia, present in both Deuterostomia and Protostomia [3,4]. Both organs are organized into functionally similar compartments: the terminal cells of protonephridia and the podocytes associated to metanephridial systems conduct ultrafiltration, and the tubule and duct cells modify the filtrate through a series of selective reabsorption and secretion, via passive and active transport mechanisms [5] (Fig 1b). There exist also other, taxon-specific excretory organs and excretory sites, which perform either ultrafiltration (such as the nephrocytes of insects [6] and the rhogocytes of gastropods [7]) or absorption and secretion (such as the malpighian tubules of various tardigrades, arachnids, and insects [8]; the excretory cells of nematodes [9]; the gills of fish, shore crabs, and annelids [10,11]; and the epidermis of planarians [12]).
Molecular studies have shown that a suite of orthologous genes is involved in the excretory mechanisms of different nephrozoan species, regardless of whether they possess specialized excretory organs [9–12,14–31] (see also S1 Table). The passive ammonia transporters Rhesus/AMTs, the active transporter Na+/K+[NH4+] ATPase (NKA), the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated K+[NH4+] channels (HCN), the vacuolar H+-ATPase (v-ATPase subunits A and B), members of the alpha-carbonic anhydrase (CA) group, and the water/glycerol/ammonia channels (aquaporins) are commonly used for excreting ammonia, the most toxic metabolite (Fig 1c) (summarized in [5,32]). Also, a group of orthologous slit diaphragm structural components (nephrin/kirre, CD2-associated protein [cd2ap], zonula occludens 1 [zo1], stomatin/podocin), whose function is associated with the maintenance of the ultrafiltration apparatus by interacting with the actin cytoskeleton and forming tight junctions [33], is localized at the ultrafiltration site of the podocytes of the rodent kidney [34] (Fig 1b) as well as at the Drosophila nephrocytes [35] and the rhogocytes of gastropods [7]. Finally, a number of ion transporters (solute carrier transporters [SLCs]) are spatially expressed in the corresponding compartments of protonephridia of planarians and metanephridia (e.g., kidneys) of vertebrates [36–38] (Fig 1b).
The excretory sites and mechanisms in non-nephrozoans, however, are largely unknown. It is commonly stated that excretion is presumably occurring via diffusion across the body wall because of the loose (e.g., sponges) or single-epithelial (cnidarians and ctenophores) cellular organization of these animals [1,39,40] (Fig 1a) (herein stated as “diffusion hypothesis”). Based on this idea, it was hypothesized that the emergence of the first excretory organs coincided with the evolution of multilayered, solid parenchymes and increased body sizes because of the need of more elaborate excretory mechanisms [41,42]. However, because excretion in non-nephrozoans was never investigated in detail, the ancestral mechanisms of excretion and the evolutionary origin of excretory organs remain unresolved [1,41–46].
An important animal group for our understanding nephrozoan evolution is their bilaterian sister group [2,13,47], the Xenacoelomorpha (Xenoturbella + [Nemertodermatida + Acoela]). These small, worm-like animals exhibit a bilaterally symmetric, multilayered body plan, but except for a special cell type with a putative excretory function (dermonephridia) [48] that seems unique to the acoel Paratomella, xenacoelomorphs lack excretory organs and no defined excretory sites have yet been described. To understand the excretory mechanisms outside Nephrozoa and gain insights into ancient excretory mechanisms, we therefore investigated the excretory modes of two xenacoelomorph species and compared our findings with the non-bilaterian cnidarian Nematostella vectensis.
Results
Most genes involved in excretion in nephrozoa are already present in non-nephrozoan and non-bilaterian animals
To get an overview of the presence of excretion-related genes in xenacoelomorphs and non-bilaterian animals, we first searched for the orthologous sequences of 20 nephrozoan candidate genes in the available transcriptomes and draft genomes of 13 xenacoelomorph species as well as in representatives of cnidarians, placozoans, and sponges (S1a and S2 Figs). We found that most of these genes were present in almost all groups with the exceptions of slc5 (a sodium glucose cotransporter), which was only present in Cnidaria and Bilateria, and the ultrafiltration component nephrin/kirre, which was only present in Bilateria (S1 Table, S1a Fig). This analysis also revealed that the last common ancestor of placozoans, cnidarians, and bilaterians already had at least two paralogs of amts (amt2/3 and am1/4) and one rhesus, with independent duplications of one or both of these genes in various animal lineages (S2 Fig). To identify potential excretory sites in xenacoelomorphs, we examined the expression of the entire set of these candidate excretion-related genes in the acoel Isodiametra pulchra and the nemertodermatid Meara stichopi, which differ in their digestive system composition (I. pulchra has a syncytial, lumenless gut, whereas M. stichopi has an epithelia-lined, cellular gut [49] (S1b Fig).
Genes encoding slit diaphragm–related components and SLCs are expressed broadly in I. pulchra and M. stichopi
Genes related to ultrafiltration sites (nephrin/kirre, cd2ap, zo1, stomatin/podocin) and SLCs (slc1, slc4, slc5, slc8, slc9, slc12, slc13, slc26) were broadly expressed within neural (brain and nerve cords), parenchymal/subepidermal, digestive, and gonadal-associated cells in both animals (S3 and S4 Figs). A summary of these expression patterns is summarized in Table 1. The broad expression of ultrafiltration-related components and SLCs in acoelomorphs shows that they are not part of defined excretory domains, as in nephrozoans, thus suggesting that the spatial arrangement of these genes resulting in the formation of specialized excretory compartments (e.g., nephridial compartments) took place in the nephrozoan lineage.
Table 1. Summary of expression patterns of excretion-related genes in I. pulchra and M. stichopi.
I. pulchra | M. stichopi | |
---|---|---|
nephrin/kirre | nephrin/kirre1: brain, male gonopore | nephrin/kirre1: proximal lateral rows (nerve cords?) |
nephrin/kirre2: scattered cells (neurons?) | nephrin/kirre2: proximal lateral rows (nerve cords?) | |
nephrin/kirre3: scattered cells (neurons?) | nephrin/kirre3: proximal lateral rows (nerve cords?) | |
cd2ap | scattered cells (neurons?) | subepidermal cells, mouth, posterior lateral rows of cells |
zo1 | scattered cells (neurons?), mouth, anterior cells (brain?) | gut-affiliated cells, mouth |
stom/pod | stom/pod a: brain | stom/pod a: subepidermal cells, proximal lateral rows (nerve cords?) |
stom/pod b: digestive syncytium | stom/pod b: subepidermal cells, mouth | |
stom/pod c: brain | stom/pod c: subepidermal cells | |
stom/pod d: subepidermal cells | ||
stom/pod e: proximal lateral rows (nerve cords?) | ||
rhesus | anterior cells, gut-affiliated cells, posterior ventral epidermis | |
hcn | brain | gut-affiliated cells |
amts | amt-like: brain | epidermis |
amt1/4 a: brain, mouth | ||
amt1/4 b: parenchymal cells | ||
amt2/3 a: scattered cells (neurons?) | ||
amt2/3 b: brain, parenchyme | ||
amt2/3 c: scattered cells (neurons?) | ||
nka | nka a: gut-wrapping cells | gut-affiliated cells |
nka b: gut-wrapping cells | ||
v-ATPase B | digestive syncytium | v-ATPase B1: gut-affiliated cells, proximal lateral rows (nerve cords?) |
v-ATPase B2: gut-affiliated cells, subepidermal cells | ||
alpha-ca | ca a: anterior cells, male gonopore, mouth, parenchymal cells | ca a: gut-affiliated cells |
ca b: scattered cells (neurons?) | ca b: gut-wrapping cells | |
ca c: scattered cells (neurons?) | ca c: gut-affiliated cells | |
ca d: anterior cells, parenchymal cells | ca d: scattered cells (neurons?), posterior epidermis | |
ca h: scattered cells (neurons?) | ||
ca x: brain | ||
aqs | aq a: brain | aq a: proximal lateral rows (nerve cords?) |
aq b: digestive syncytium | aq b: scattered cells (neurons?) | |
aq c: gut-wrapping cells, scattered cells (neurons?) | aq c: proximal lateral rows (nerve cords?) | |
aq e: parenchymal cells | aq d: gut-wrapping cells | |
aq f: gut-wrapping cells, scattered cells (neurons?) | aq e: anterior cells, scattered cells (neurons?) | |
aq g: gut-wrapping cells, female gonads | aq f: gut-wrapping cells | |
slc1 | slc1a: brain | scattered cells (neurons?) |
slc1b: male gonopore | ||
slc1c: brain, male gonopore | ||
slc4 | slc4a: anterior cells | slc4a: gut-wrapping cells, mouth |
slc4b: brain, parenchymal cells | slc4b: nerve cords | |
slc4c: anterior cells, parenchymal cells | slc4c: subepidermal cells, female gonads | |
slc5 | slc5a: male gonopore | subepidermal cells, posterior lateral rows of cells |
slc5b: brain, parenchymal cells | ||
slc8 | anterior cells | gut epithelium, mouth, posterior lateral rows of cells |
slc9 | mouth | proximal lateral rows (nerve cords?) |
slc12 | slc12a: brain, parenchymal cells | slc12a: male gonads, female gonads |
slc12b: brain, parenchymal cells | slc12b: male gonads | |
slc13 | brain, parenchymal cells | slc13b: scattered cells (neurons?) |
slc13c: scattered cells (neurons?) | ||
slc13d: scattered cells (neurons?) | ||
slc26 | no expression revealed | slc26a: female gonads |
slc26b: gut-wrapping cells |
Abbreviations: amt, ammonia transporter; aq, aquaporin; ca, carbonic anhydrase; cd2ap, CD2-associated protein; hcn, K+[NH4+] channel; pod, podocin; slc, solute carrier transporter; stom, stomatin; v-ATPase, vacuolar H+-ATPase proton pump; zo1, zonula occludens 1
The expression of a number of ammonia excretion–related genes and aquaporins suggests digestive-associated domains as putative excretion sites in I. pulchra and M. stichopi
Genes involved in ammonia excretion (rhesus/amts, nka, v-ATPase B, ca, hcn) and aquaporins were mainly demarcating neural, digestive-associated, and other parenchymal/subepidermal cells, as well as epidermal cells (Fig 2a, S4 and S5 Figs). A summary of these expression patterns is summarized in Table 1. The expression of ammonia excretion–related genes and aquaporins shows that these genes do not label demarcated excretory domains. However, because transcripts of the ammonium transporters rhesus, nka, and hcn (only in M. stichopi), the proton exchanger v-ATPase, as well as a number of cas and aquaporins, were found in association with the digestion system, the possibility that digestive-associated tissues could act as excretory sites was raised.
High environmental ammonia exposure indicates a diffusion mechanism in I. pulchra
To reveal the excretory mechanism in xenacoelomorphs, we conducted high environmental ammonia (HEA) incubation experiments, as previously performed in a large array of animals (summarized in [5,50]), using I. pulchra because of its availability in sufficient numbers. We first measured the pH of incubation mediums with different HEA concentrations (up to 1 mM) and found no difference in pH, which could otherwise have influenced any excretion rates. We then exposed animals to different HEA concentrations for a short period (2 hours) and measured the ammonia excretion during the following 2 hours, after bringing them back into normal conditions, to test excretion via diffusion. The ammonia excretion rates of exposed animals remained unchanged after exposure to 50 and 100 μM NH4Cl, compared with the control conditions, but increased gradually after exposure to NH4Cl concentrations of 200 and 500 μM NH4Cl (Fig 2b). The increase in ammonia excretion rate could be explained by a concentration-dependent ammonia uptake during the HEA exposure and a subsequent release in normal conditions. These results suggest that ammonia excretion is concentration-dependent, which is indicative of a diffusion mechanism.
HEA exposure influences the expression of some excretion-related genes in I. pulchra
To test for a possible involvement of the excretion-related genes in the excretory mechanism of xenacoelomorphs, we tested for alteration of mRNA expression levels in chronically HEA-exposed animals by quantitative relative expression experiments (quantitative PCR [qPCR]) in I. pulchra. We first exposed animals to 1 mM HEA for 7 days, similar to conditions used in previous studies (summarized in [5,50]), and measured the ammonia excretion over 2 hours after bringing the animals into normal conditions. As expected, the ammonia excretion rates were strongly increased, in line with the short-term HEA-exposure experiments (Fig 2b). When we tested the expression level of excretion-related genes, we found that the expression of the passive ammonia transporters rhesus and three amts, as well as the active ammonia transporter nka, altered significantly (Fig 2c). Other differentially expressed genes were four aquaporins, the v-ATPase, and three cas (Fig 2c). These results indicate a putative role of these genes in ammonia excretion and suggest that acoels might not only excrete by diffusion and via passive transporters (rhesus, amts) but also by an alternative active transport mechanism (nka).
Inhibitor experiments support an active excretion mechanism via NKA transporter, as well as a passive vesicular transport mode, possibly mediated by Rhesus transporter
We further tested the involvement of NKA, V-ATPase A/B, and CA proteins in excretion, as well as a possible involvement of a vesicular transport mechanism, by conducting pharmacological inhibitor assays in I. pulchra, as previously demonstrated in other animals (summarized in [5,50]). Inhibition of the CA by azetazolamide did not show any significant change in ammonia excretion. Inhibition of the V-ATPase by concanamycin C seemed to lead to a decrease in ammonia excretion, although a 2-tailed t test did not support a significant change. In contrast, when perturbing the function of NKA with quabain, the ammonia excretion dropped significantly (Fig 2d), which further supports an active excretion mechanism via NKA, similar to what is described for many nephrozoans [10–12,14,17,19,20,25–27,31,51–53]. Interference with the vesicular transport using colchicine also led to a significant decrease in ammonia excretion, indicating a possible vesicular ammonia-trapping excretion mode (Fig 1c), as demonstrated in the midgut epithelium of the tobacco hornworm [26], the gills of the shore crab [27], and the integument of the nematode [14]. To test whether vesicular transport might occur through Rhesus transporter as shown in other studies (summarized in [5,50]), we revealed Rhesus protein localization by immunohistochemistry (Fig 2e). The protein localization mimicked the gene expression and revealed, apart from cells at the anterior tip and cells of the posterior epidermis, individual parenchymal cells affiliated with the digestive syncytium that extend ventrally. Higher magnification showed that the transporter was present in cytoplasmic vesicles and not on the cellular membrane (Fig 2e). This further indicated the presence of a vesicular transport mechanism, in which cellular ammonia moves via Rhesus transporters into vesicles and gets transferred to the membrane through the microtubule network [54] (Fig 1c). The antibody specificity was confirmed by an alignment of the epitope and the endogenous protein, as a well as a western blot analysis (S6 Fig). Similar vesicular protein localization was also observed in M. stichopi, suggesting a similar cytoplasmic–vesicular role of Rhesus transporter in gut-affiliated cells, also in nemertodermatids (Fig 2e). These data further supported the involvement of NKA and Rhesus transporters in ammonia excretion and also indicated the presence of a putative vesicular transport mode in I. pulchra.
Double fluorescent whole-mount in situ hybridization of differentially expressed genes shows similar spatial arrangement in gut-associated domains in I. pulchra and M. stichopi
To obtain a better resolution and understanding of the relative topology of the differentially expressed genes, double fluorescent whole-mount in situ hybridization (WMISH) was conducted for v-ATPase, nka, aquaporins b and c, and rhesus (Fig 2f, S4 Fig). Nka and v-ATPase were expressed in a mutually exclusive manner, with v-ATPase to be restricted in the ventral region digestive syncytium and nka in an adjacent parenchymal, distal sac-shaped gut-wrapping domain (Fig 2fA, S4C Fig). The expression of nka was not extending to the male gonads (testes) (S4A Fig). Aquaporin c was coexpressed with nka (Fig 2fB), and aquaporin b was partially overlapping with v-ATPase, with aquaporin b expression extending into the posterior region of the digestive syncytium (Fig 2fC). Finally, rhesus was partly coexpressed with v-ATPase in the ventral region of the digestive syncytium (Fig 2fD). Similar coexpression analysis of the orthologous genes was also conducted for M. stichopi and revealed striking similarities in their spatial arrangement to I. pulchra (S4 and S7 Figs). v-ATPase expression was not overlapping with nka, as v-ATPase was restricted to the gut epithelium and in two proximal lateral rows of subepidermal cells, whereas nka was limited to cells lining the distal part of the epithelial branches of the gut extending toward the subepidermis (S4E and S7 Figs). v-ATPase was partly coexpressed with rhesus in ventral gut-affiliated cells (S7 Fig). Overall, these data revealed a similar spatial arrangement in gut-associated domains in both animals, which seems to be unrelated to the presence of an epithelial gut or a syncytium. However, given the fact that I. pulchra has a lumenless digestive tissue, ammonia is probably accumulated intracellularly in the syncytium before it gets expelled via the mouth, whereas in the case of M. stichopi, ammonia gets released in the gut lumen.
Taken together, our findings suggest that I. pulchra uses different mechanisms for ammonia excretion that are also known from nephrozoans; an active ammonia excretion mechanism via NKA through the digestive system, as suggested by in situ hybridization, and a passive vesicular transport mechanism likely mediated by Rhesus, through digestive and likely also epidermal tissues. Given the commonalities in the expression of the involved genes in both animals, these excretory mechanisms could be plesiomorphic for acoelomorphs.
HEA experiments suggest a diffusion mechanism also in the cnidarian N. vectensis
Because our results showed the involvement of active and passive transport mechanisms across digestive tissues outside Nephrozoa, we also investigated a non-bilaterian species, the cnidarian N. vectensis (S1b Fig), to test whether this excretion mode might also be present outside Bilateria. The only available excretion studies in cnidarians are few morphological studies, which suggested that the septa filaments of the anthozoan mesenteries and the radial canals of medusozoans could serve as putative excretory sites [55], as well as some isotopic exchange experiments in Hydra oligactis that have shown that the gastrodermis seems to be involved in osmoregulation [56]. Moreover, there is evidence that Rh and AMT transporters are generally involved in ammonium excretion in corals [57], but localization studies that would suggest excretion sites are missing.
We first tested whether N. vectensis excretes via diffusion by exposing early-juvenile animals to HEA for 2 hours and measuring their ammonia excretion rates afterward, similar to the experiments performed with I. pulchra. We found that, also in N. vectensis, ammonia excretion increased significantly after HEA exposure starting at 200 and 500 μM NH4Cl (Fig 3a). Measurements of the pH of each incubation medium showed that the pH dropped by 0.2 when the medium contained 500 μM NH4Cl. However, when we measured the excretion of animals over 2 hours in a medium with an accordingly lowered pH, we found that a difference of 0.2 did not change the excretion rates (S2 Table). Therefore, the increase in ammonia excretion rates at 200 and 500 μM NH4Cl indicates that ammonia excretion is concentration-dependent, supporting a diffusion mechanism also in N. vectensis.
Quantitative gene expression and inhibitor experiments indicates an involvement of passive but not active transport mechanisms in N. vectensis
We then exposed animals to 1 mM HEA for 7 days and tested the expression of the orthologous genes altered in I. pulchra treatments (rh/amt, nka, v-ATPase B, and ca) by qPCR. As expected from the short-term HEA-exposure experiment, specimens exposed for 7 days in the HEA condition showed increased ammonia excretion rates (Fig 3a). In contrast to I. pulchra, none of the two nka transporters showed a significant change in gene expression in animals exposed to HEA for 7 days (Fig 3b). However, the expression of the passive transporters rhesus1, rhesus2, amt1/4b, and amt2/3e, as well as v-ATPase, altered significantly (Fig 3b), indicating the putative involvement of these transporters in excretion of N. vectensis. To test whether Rhesus acts via a vesicular transport mechanism, we conducted the same pharmacological experiment as in I. pulchra. Contrary to the results from acoels, we found that inhibition of vesicular transport did not alter the ammonia excretion (Fig 3c). We also inhibited the excretory function of V-ATPase and CA proteins and found that none of them showed any significant change in ammonia excretion rates (Fig 3c). Finally, when we perturbed the function of NKA, the ammonia excretion rates did not alter (Fig 3c), confirming the qPCR results (Fig 3b) and further supporting the non-involvement of the NKA transporter in excretion. These results suggest that the ammonia excretion of N. vectensis is likely mediated by the passive Rhesus and AMT transporters, but neither relies on active transport mechanism mediated by NKA or on vesicular ammonia-trapping excretion mode.
Gene expression of excretion-related genes reveals the gastrodermis as excretory site in N. vectensis
To understand whether these genes were expressed in gastrodermal or epidermal cells, we revealed the spatial expression of rhesus, amts, nka, and v-ATPase B by WMISH in feeding primary polyps. All genes were mainly demarcating gastrodermal domains, such as the endodermal body wall, the directive mesenteries, septal filaments, and the pharynx (Fig 3d, S8 Fig). Rhesus 1 was additionally expressed in the tentacular ectoderm (Fig 3dA). Protein localization of Rh, NKA, and V-ATPase B reflected the transcript expression patterns (Fig 3e, S9 Fig). High magnification of Rhesus antibody staining further revealed that the transporter was not expressed in cytoplasmic vesicles, supporting a non-vesicular transport mechanism, in agreement with the inhibitor experiments. Also, it showed that Rhesus was localized in individual cells of the tentacular ectoderm with clumped structures at the tentacle surface, which resembled gland cells [58] (Fig 3e). The NKA antibody was localized in endodermal neurons and individual cells of the mesenteries, likely neural precursors (S9 Fig), thus suggesting a non-excretory function of this transporter, as indicated already from the qPCR and inhibitor experiments. These data imply that gastrodermis-affiliated domains likely serve as excretory sites in N. vectensis.
Discussion
Overall, our findings show that acoelomorphs use, in addition to diffusion, active transport mechanisms, in contrast to what has been previously assumed for non-nephrozoans [1,39,40]. Our results also suggest that excretion takes place across digestive tissues and likely also across the epidermis, as indicated from the rhesus (both animals) and amt (only in M. stichopi) expression. N. vectensis also seem to use gastrodermal tissues as excretory sites, but we were not able to detect any active transport mechanism. However, we do not know whether the absence of active transport we find in N. vectensis is true for all cnidarians. It has been shown that differences in morphology and ecology (e.g., size and activity) are related with interspecific differences in excretion rates [59,60]. Therefore, bigger and more active cnidarian species might require more efficient modes of excretion, such as an active transport, in order to fulfill their metabolic requirements. Only more studies in other cnidarian species can elucidate this issue.
Digestive tissues with additional or assigned excretory roles have also been reported in several nephrozoans (e.g., vertebrates, annelids, insects, nematodes, tunicates, chaetognaths) [16,26,31,61–67]. In the light of our results, this excretion mechanism likely reflects an ancient mechanism, before the evolution of specialized organs, such as nephridia (S10 Fig). The molecular spatial arrangement of the excretion sites in non-nephrozoans, however, is not sharing topological arrangements with common nephridial domains of nephrozoans (Fig 1b), suggesting that they are evolutionarily unrelated to nephridia. It still remains unclear whether these domains are multifunctional or consist of specialized excretory subdomains; however, a degree of cell subfunctionalization seems to be present, as indicated by the localized gene expression in different groups of gut-wrapping and gut epithelial cells. We can, however, exclude the presence of ultrafiltration sites, in agreement with previous ultrastructure studies in acoelomorphs [68], because the homologous essential molecular components of the ultrafiltration sites of nephridia and nephrocytes are mostly expressed in neural domains in acoelomorphs and are absent in non-bilaterians (nephrins), suggesting their later recruitment in the nephrozoan filtration apparatus (Fig 4).
Recently, a new study was published suggesting the non-monophyly of Deuterostomia and a placement of Ambulacraria (Echinodermata + Hemichordata) as the sister group of Nemertodermatida + (Acoela + Xenoturbella) [69]. If true, this novel topology has vast consequences for our understanding of the evolution of all major bilaterian organ systems including the excretory organs [70]. Based on this phylogeny, either excretory organs have been independently evolved in Ambulacraria and (Chordata + Protostomia) or they have been already present in the last common ancestor of Bilateria and got lost secondarily in nemertodermatids, acoels, and Xenoturbella. Ambulacraria possesses a metanephridial type of excretory organ, which, according to some authors, is independently evolved [43,71]; therefore, excretory organs of Ambulacraria, Chordata, and Protostomia might not be homologous. In the scenario of the presence of an excretory organ in the last common ancestor of Bilateria, one would have to assume a complete reduction of excretory organs in the lineage to Nemertodermatida + (Acoela + Xenoturbella) without morphological or molecular traces. However, the support values for the main branches of Bilateria in the [69] study are low, and the study also does not recover the Xenacoelomorpha as clade. In-depth analyses are necessary to test whether the new topology is not an artifact that is based on the new approach the study uses for the phylogenomic analyses.
To conclude, our study shows that active transport mechanism and excretion through digestive tissues predates the evolution of specialized excretory systems. Whether this is based on a convergent recruitment or reflects an ancestral state for Bilateria remains unclear. However, if the latter is true, it correlates with the emergence of multilayered body plans and solid internal parenchymes that separate the body wall from their digestive tract, as seen in xenacoelomorphs and nephrozoans. We thus propose that diffusion mechanisms were the major excretory modes present in animals with single-layered epithelial organization (Fig 4). The emergence of more complex, multilayered body plan necessitated an active transport of excretes, which was later recruited in specific compartments of the complex excretory organs in the lineage of Nephrozoa.
Methods
No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. The experiments were not randomized. The investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.
Gene cloning and orthology assignment
Putative orthologous sequences of genes of interest were identified by tBLASTx search against the transcriptome (SRR2681926) of I. pulchra, the transcriptome (SRR2681155) and draft genome of M. stichopi, and the genome of N. vectensis (http://genome.jgi.doe.gov). Additional transcriptomes of Xenacoelomorpha species investigated were as follows: Childia submaculatum (Acoela) (SRX1534054), Convolutriloba macropyga (Acoela) (SRX1343815), Diopisthoporus gymnopharyngeus (Acoela) (SRX1534055), Diopisthoporus longitubus (Acoela) (SRX1534056), Eumecynostomum macrobursalium (Acoela) (SRX1534057), Hofstenia miamia (Acoela) (PRJNA241459), Ascoparia sp. (Nemertodermatida) (SRX1343822), Nemertoderma westbladi (Nemertodermatida) (SRX1343819), Sterreria sp. (Nemertodermatida) (SRX1343821), Xenoturbella bocki (Xenoturbella) (SRX1343818), and Xenoturbella profunda (Xenoturbella) (SRP064117). Data were deposited in the Dryad repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bq068jr [72].
Sequences for the placozoan Trichoplax adhaerens, the sponge Amphimedon queenslandica, the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidy, the protist Capsaspora owczarzaki, the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum, and the nephrozoans Homo sapiens. Saccoglossus kowalevskii, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, Xenopus laevis, Branchiostoma lanceolatum, Capitella teleta, Crassostrea gigas, Lottia gigantea, Schmidtea mediterranea, Tribolium castaneum, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Drosophila melanogaster were obtained from Uniprot and NCBI public databases. Gene orthology of genes of interest identified by tBLASTx was tested by reciprocal BLAST against NCBI Genbank and followed by phylogenetic analyses. Amino acid alignments were made with MUSCLE [73]. RAxML (version 8.2.9) [74] was used to conduct a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis. Fragments of the genes of interest were amplified from cDNA of I. pulchra, M. stichopi, and N. vectensis by PCR using gene-specific primers. PCR products were purified and cloned into a pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the identity of inserts was confirmed by sequencing. Gene accession numbers of the gene sequences are listed in the S3 Table.
Animal systems
Adult specimens of I. pulchra (Smith & Bush, 1991), M. stichopi Westblad, 1949, and N. vectensis Stephenson, 1935 were kept and handled as previously described [75–78].
WMISH
Animals were manually collected, fixed, and processed for in situ hybridization as described [79,80]. Labeled antisense RNA probes were transcribed from linearized DNA using digoxigenin-11-UTP (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) or labeled with DNP (Mirus Bio, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For I. pulchra and M. stichopi, colorimetric WMISH was performed according to the protocol outlined in [79]. For N. vectensis, we followed the protocol described by [81]. Double fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed as the colorimetric WMISH with the following modifications: after the posthybridization steps, animals were incubated overnight with peroxidase-conjugated antibodies at 4 °C (anti-DIG-POD [Roche, Basel, Switzerland], 1:500 dilution, and anti-DNP [Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA], 1:200 dilution) followed by the amplification of the signal with fluorophore-conjugated tyramides (1:100 TSA reagent diluents [Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA] TSA Plus Cy3 or Cy5 Kit). Residual enzyme activity was inhibited via 45-minute incubation in 0.1% hydrogen peroxide in PTW followed by four PTW washes prior to addition and development of the second peroxidase-conjugated antibody [82].
Whole-mount immunohistochemistry
Animals were collected manually, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in SW for 50 minutes, washed 3 times in PBT, and incubated in 4% sheep serum in PBT for 30 minutes. The animals were then incubated with commercially available primary antibodies (anti-RhAG [ab55911] rabbit polyclonal antibody, dilution 1:50 [Abcam, Cambridge, UK], anti-Na+/K+ ATPase a1 subunit rat monoclonal antibody, dilution 1:100 [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA], and anti-V-ATPase B1/2 [L-20] goat polyclonal antibody, dilution 1:50 [Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA]) overnight at 4 °C, washed 5 times in PBT, and followed by incubation in 4% sheep serum in PBT for 30 minutes. Specimens were then incubated with a secondary antibody (anti-rabbit-AlexaFluor 555 [Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA] or anti-rat-AlexaFluor 555 and anti-goat-AlexaFluor 555) diluted 1:1,000 overnight at 4 °C followed by 10 washes in PBT. Nuclei were stained by incubation of animals in DAPI 1:1,000, and f-actin was stained by incubation in BODIPY-labeled phallacidin (5 U/ml) overnight.
Inhibitor and HEA experiments
For excretion experiments, approximately 300 I. pulchra (the number varied slightly between the biological replica but was similar in the corresponding controls and treatments) and 10 N. vectensis were placed into glass vials with 2 ml UV-sterilized natural seawater (1:4 diluted with distilled water for N. vectensis) containing the appropriate inhibitor or ammonia concentration. Animals were given 10 minutes to adjust to the medium before the solution was exchanged with 2 ml of fresh medium with the same appropriate condition. For the inhibitor experiment, the medium was removed after 2 hours and stored at −80 °C for later measurements. Animals from the short-term HEA experiments were incubated for 2 hours, rinsed five times over 20–30 minutes, and incubated for another 2 hours in fresh medium without additional ammonia, after which the medium was removed and frozen at −80 °C. We tested different inhibitor concentrations that were used in previous studies in other invertebrates [10,12,14,19,27]. The concentrations of 5–15 μM concanamycin C for inhibiting V-ATPase A/B, 1–3 mM azetazolamide as an inhibitor of the CA, 1–5 mM quabain to inhibit the NKA, and 2–10 mM colchicine for inhibiting the microtubule network were selected, as no other effects like shrinking or obvious changes in morphology or behavior were observed. After the inhibitor incubations, the animals were washed several times and monitored in normal conditions for several days to ensure that the inhibitors did not cause any unspecific permanent effects. Concanamycin C was diluted in DMSO with a final concentration of 0.5% DMSO per sample, for which we used an appropriate control with 0.5% DMSO. For the HEA experiments, we enriched seawater with NH4Cl to the final ammonia concentrations of 50 μM, 100 μM, 200 μM, 500 μM, and 1 mM. We also measured the pH of both incubation mediums (HEA and control), and we found no difference. All experiments were independently repeated at least three times at different time points, and each repeat was divided into two samples. The values are provided in S6 Table.
Determination of ammonia excretion
Ammonia concentrations were measured with an ammonia-sensitive electrode (Orion, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to [52]. Samples were diluted 1:4 with distilled water to prevent salt precipitation (900 μl sample + 2.7 ml water), and total ammonia was transformed into gaseous NH3 by adding 54 μl ionic strength adjusting solution (1.36 ml/l trisodiumcitrate dihydrate, 1 M NaOH). Because of the small ammonia concentrations, the electrode-filling solution was diluted to 10% with distilled water, as suggested in the electrode manual. In control conditions, we determined an average excretion of 44 pmol per adult animal per hour, although the excretion varied between different biological replicates from different generations (minimum 32 pmol/animal/hour, maximum 52 pmol/animal/hour), possibly because of slightly fluctuating conditions during long-term animal rearing. Solutions with defined concentrations of NH4Cl for the standard curves were made together with the solutions used in the experiments and stored in a similar way at −80 °C. The differences in excretion rates were tested for significance with an unpaired, 2-tailed t test with unequal variance, and a p-value < 0.02 was seen as significant. Boxplots were created with “R.”
Quantitative gene expression
In total, 100 treated I. pulchra and 5 N. vectensis were collected after 7 days of incubation in HEA conditions (1 mM NH4Cl) and tested for quantitative gene expression using the BIORAD CFX96 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) Real-time PCR detection system. ddCt values were calculated between treated and control animals and converted to fold differences. All experiments were repeated three to five times with different specimens (three biological replicates for I. pulchra and five biological replicates for N. vectensis), and two to four technical replicates were tested for each biological replicate (four biological replicates for I. pulchra and three biological replicates for N. vectensis). Fold changes were calculated using polyubiquitin, actin, and 18S as references for I. pulchra and ATPsynthase and EF1b as references for N. vectensis [83], and a threshold of 2-fold difference was chosen as a significant change. The Ct values are provided in S4 Table, and the primer sequences used are provided in S5 Table.
Western blot
Whole-animal extracts (50 I. pulchra adults and 5 N. vectensis juveniles) were fractionated by SDS-PAGE, loaded on Mini-PROTEAN TGX Stain-Free Precast Gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using a transfer apparatus according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). After incubation with 5% nonfat milk in TBST (10 mM Tris, [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Tween 20) for 60 minutes, the membrane was washed once with TBST and incubated with antibodies against Rhesus (1:1,000) and NKA (1:500) at 4 °C for 12 hours. Membranes were washed three times for 10 minutes and incubated with a 1:5,000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase–conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies for 2 hours. Blots were washed with TBST three times and developed with the ECL system (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK) according to the manufacturer’s protocols.
Documentation
Colorimetric WMISH specimens were imaged with a Zeiss AxioCam HRc mounted on a Zeiss Axioscope A1 equipped with Nomarski optics and processed through Photoshop CS6 (Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA). Fluorescent-labeled specimens were analyzed with a Leica SP5 confocal laser microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and processed by the Fiji software version 2.0.0-rc-42/1.50d [84]. Figure plates were arranged with Illustrator CS6 (Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA). Data were deposited in the Dryad repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bq068jr [72].
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Fabian Rentzsch, Patrick Steinmetz, and Hanna Kraus (Sars Centre, University of Bergen, Norway) for providing N. vectensis animals and cDNA. Peter Ladurner provided the I. pulchra cultures that were kept in the animal facility at the Sars Centre. We thank all S9 lab members for the help with the collections of M. stichopi.
Abbreviations
- AMT
ammonia transporter
- CA
carbonic anhydrase
- cd2ap
CD2-associated protein
- cu
cuticle
- HCN
K+[NH4+] channel
- HEA
high environmental ammonia
- NKA
Na+/K+[NH4+] ATPase
- qPCR
quantitative PCR
- Rh
Rhesus glycoprotein
- SLC
solute carrier transporter
- v-ATPase
vacuolar H+-ATPase proton pump
- WMISH
whole-mount in situ hybridization
- zo1
zonula occludens 1
Data Availability
All newly determined sequences have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MN101600—MN101702. The assembled xenacoelomorph transcriptomes used for the gene orthology assessment are deposited on Dryad Digital Depository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bq068jr [72].
Funding Statement
The study was supported by the European Research Council Community’s Framework Program Horizon 2020 (2014–2020) ERC grant agreement 648861 (EVOMESODERM) (https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/197107/factsheet/en) and FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN grant no. 317172 (NEPTUNE) (https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/104658/factsheet/en) to AH and Coca-Cola Foundation (https://www.coca-colacompany.com/our-company/the-coca-cola-foundation) to JAR-S. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Schmidt-Rhaesa A. The evolution of organ systems. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jondelius U, Ruiz-Trillo I, Baguñà J, Riutort M. The Nemertodermatida are basal bilaterians and not members of the Platyhelminthes. Zool Scr. 2002;31(2):201–15. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ichimura K, Sakai T. Evolutionary morphology of podocytes and primary urine-producing apparatus. Anat Sci Int. 2017;92(2):161–72. 10.1007/s12565-015-0317-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ruppert EE, Smith PR. The functional-organization of filtration nephridia. Biol Rev. 1988;63(2):231–58. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Larsen EH, Deaton LE, Onken H, O’Donnell M, Grosell M, Dantzler WH, et al. Osmoregulation and Excretion. Compr Physiol. 2014;4(2):405–573. 10.1002/cphy.c130004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Locke M, Russell VW. Pericardial cells or athrocytes In: Harrison FW, Locke M, editors. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates. 11B:Insecta. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1998. p. 687–709. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kokkinopoulou M, Guler MA, Lieb B, Barbeck M, Ghanaati S, Markl J. 3D-ultrastructure, functions and stress responses of gastropod (Biomphalaria glabrata) rhogocytes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e101078 10.1371/journal.pone.0101078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wessing A, Eichelberg D. Ultrastructural aspects of transport and accumulation of substances in the malpighian tubules. Fortschr Zoologie. 1975;23:148–72. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Adlimoghaddam A, Weihrauch D, O’Donnell MJ. Localization of K(+), H(+), Na(+) and Ca(2)(+) fluxes to the excretory pore in Caenorhabditis elegans: application of scanning ion-selective microelectrodes. J Exp Biol. 2014;217(Pt 23):4119–22. 10.1242/jeb.112441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Thiel D, Hugenschutt M, Meyer H, Paululat A, Quijada-Rodriguez AR, Purschke G, et al. Ammonia excretion in the marine polychaete Eurythoe complanata (Annelida). J Exp Biol. 2016;220(Pt 3):425–36. 10.1242/jeb.145615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Weihrauch D, Wilkie MP, Walsh PJ. Ammonia and urea transporters in gills of fish and aquatic crustaceans. J Exp Biol. 2009;212(Pt 11):1716–30. 10.1242/jeb.024851 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Weihrauch D, Chan AC, Meyer H, Doring C, Sourial M, O’Donnell MJ. Ammonia excretion in the freshwater planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. J Exp Biol. 2012;215(Pt 18):3242–53. 10.1242/jeb.067942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cannon JT, Vellutini BC, Smith J 3rd, Ronquist F, Jondelius U, Hejnol A. Xenacoelomorpha is the sister group to Nephrozoa. Nature. 2016;530(7588):89–93. 10.1038/nature16520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Adlimoghaddam A, Boeckstaens M, Marini AM, Treberg JR, Brassinga AKC, Weihrauch D. Ammonia excretion in Caenorhabditis elegans: mechanism and evidence of ammonia transport of the Rhesus protein CeRhr-1. J Exp Biol. 2015;218(5):675–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adlimoghaddam A, O’Donnell MJ, Kormish J, Banh S, Treberg JR, Merz D, et al. Ammonia excretion in Caenorhabditis elegans: Physiological and molecular characterization of the rhr-2 knock-out mutant. Comp Biochem Physiol A. 2016;195:46–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Blaesse AK, Broehan G, Meyer H, Merzendorfer H, Weihrauch D. Ammonia uptake in Manduca sexta midgut is mediated by an amiloride sensitive cation/proton exchanger: Transport studies and mRNA expression analysis of NHE7, 9, NHE8, and V-ATPase (subunit D). Comp Biochem Phys A. 2010;157(4):364–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cruz MJ, Sourial MM, Treberg JR, Fehsenfeld S, Adlimoghaddam A, Weihrauch D. Cutaneous nitrogen excretion in the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis: effects of high environmental ammonia (HEA). Aquatic toxicology. 2013;136–137:1–12. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fehsenfeld S, Weihrauch D. The role of an ancestral hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated K+ channel in branchial acid-base regulation in the green crab, Carcinus maenas. J Exp Biol. 2016;219(Pt 6):887–96. 10.1242/jeb.134502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gerber L, Lee CE, Grousset E, Blondeau-Bidet E, Boucheker NB, Lorin-Nebel C, et al. The Legs Have It: In Situ Expression of Ion Transporters V-Type H(+)-ATPase and Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase in the Osmoregulatory Leg Organs of the Invading Copepod Eurytemora affinis. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2016;89(3):233–50. 10.1086/686323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hu MY, Lee JR, Lin LY, Shih TH, Stumpp M, Lee MF, et al. Development in a naturally acidified environment: Na+/H+-exchanger 3-based proton secretion leads to CO2 tolerance in cephalopod embryos. Front Zool. 2013;10(1):51 10.1186/1742-9994-10-51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mak DO, Dang B, Weiner ID, Foskett JK, Westhoff CM. Characterization of ammonia transport by the kidney Rh glycoproteins RhBG and RhCG. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290(2):F297–305. 10.1152/ajprenal.00147.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Patrick ML, Aimanova K, Sanders HR, Gill SS. P-type Na+/K+-ATPase and V-type H+-ATPase expression patterns in the osmoregulatory organs of larval and adult mosquito Aedes aegypti. J Exp Biol. 2006;209(Pt 23):4638–51. 10.1242/jeb.02551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Quijada-Rodriguez AR, Schultz AG, Wilson JM, He Y, Allen GJP, Goss GG, et al. Ammonia-independent sodium uptake mediated by Na(+) channels and NHEs in the freshwater ribbon leech Nephelopsis obscura. J Exp Biol. 2017;220(Pt 18):3270–9. 10.1242/jeb.159459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Quijada-Rodriguez AR, Treberg JR, Weihrauch D. Mechanism of ammonia excretion in the freshwater leech Nephelopsis obscura: characterization of a primitive Rh protein and effects of high environmental ammonia. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2015;309(6):R692–705. 10.1152/ajpregu.00482.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shih TH, Horng JL, Hwang PP, Lin LY. Ammonia excretion by the skin of zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008;295(6):C1625–32. 10.1152/ajpcell.00255.2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Weihrauch D. Active ammonia absorption in the midgut of the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta L.: Transport studies and mRNA expression analysis of a Rhesus-like ammonia transporter. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;36(10):808–21. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2006.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Weihrauch D, Ziegler A, Siebers D, Towle DW. Active ammonia excretion across the gills of the green shore crab Carcinus maenas: participation of Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase, V-type H(+)-ATPase and functional microtubules. J Exp Biol. 2002;205(Pt 18):2765–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Weiner ID, Verlander JW. Role of NH3 and NH4+ transporters in renal acid-base transport. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011;300(1):F11–23. 10.1152/ajprenal.00554.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Weiner ID, Verlander JW. Ammonia transport in the kidney by Rhesus glycoproteins. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2014;306(10):F1107–20. 10.1152/ajprenal.00013.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wood CM, Nawata CM, Wilson JM, Laurent P, Chevalier C, Bergman HL, et al. Rh proteins and NH4(+)-activated Na+-ATPase in the Magadi tilapia (Alcolapia grahami), a 100% ureotelic teleost fish. J Exp Biol. 2013;216(Pt 16):2998–3007. 10.1242/jeb.078634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Worrell RT, Merk L, Matthews JB. Ammonium transport in the colonic crypt cell line, T84: role for Rhesus glycoproteins and NKCC1. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;294(2):G429–40. 10.1152/ajpgi.00251.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gomes D, Agasse A, Thiébaud P, Delrot S, Geros H, Chaumont F. Aquaporins are multifunctional water and solute transporters highly divergent in living organisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1788(6):1213–28. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fukasawa H, Bornheimer S, Kudlicka K, Farquhar MG. Slit diaphragms contain tight junction proteins. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(7):1491–503. 10.1681/ASN.2008101117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Patari-Sampo A, Ihalmo P, Holthofer H. Molecular basis of the glomerular filtration: nephrin and the emerging protein complex at the podocyte slit diaphragm. Ann Med. 2006;38(7):483–92. 10.1080/07853890600978149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Weavers H, Prieto-Sanchez S, Grawe F, Garcia-Lopez A, Artero R, Wilsch-Brauninger M, et al. The insect nephrocyte is a podocyte-like cell with a filtration slit diaphragm. Nature. 2009;457(7227):322–6. 10.1038/nature07526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Raciti D, Reggiani L, Geffers L, Jiang Q, Bacchion F, Subrizi AE, et al. Organization of the pronephric kidney revealed by large-scale gene expression mapping. Genome Biol. 2008;9(5):R84 10.1186/gb-2008-9-5-r84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Scimone ML, Srivastava M, Bell GW, Reddien PW. A regulatory program for excretory system regeneration in planarians. Development. 2011;138(20):4387–98. 10.1242/dev.068098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Thi-Kim Vu H, Rink JC, McKinney SA, McClain M, Lakshmanaperumal N, Alexander R, et al. Stem cells and fluid flow drive cyst formation in an invertebrate excretory organ. eLife. 2015;4:e07405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Greenberg JM. Ex Bouillabaisse Lux: The Charm of Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry. Amer Zool. 1985;(25):737–49. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ruppert EE, Fox SF, Barnes DR. Invertebrate Zoology, a functional evolutionary approach. 7th ed Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole—Thomsen Learning; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wilson RA, Webster LA. Protonephridia. Biol Rev. 1974;49(2):127–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Willmer EN. Cytology and Evolution. 2nd ed New York, London: Academic Press; 1970. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bartolomaeus T, Ax P. Protonephridia and Metanephridia—Their relation within the Bilateria. Z Zool Syst Evol. 1992;30(1):21–45. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Goodrich ES. The study of nephridia and genital ducts since 1895. Q J Microsc Sci. 1945;86:113–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kümmel G. Zwei neue Formen von Cyrtocyten. Vergleich der bisher bekannten Cyrtocyten und Erörterung des Begriffes ‘Zelltyp’. Zeitschr f Zellforsch. 1962;57:172–201. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ruppert EE. Evolutionary Origin of the Vertebrate Nephron. Am Zool. 1994;34(4):542–53. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rouse GW, Wilson NG, Carvajal JI, Vrijenhoek RC. New deep-sea species of Xenoturbella and the position of Xenacoelomorpha. Nature. 2016;530(7588):94–7. 10.1038/nature16545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ehlers U. Dermonephridia—modified epidermal cells with a probable excretory function in Paratomella rubra (Acoela, Plathelminthes). Microfauna March 1992;7:253–64. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Smith J III, Tyler S. The acoel turbellarians: kingpins of metazoan evolution or a specialized offshoot? In: Conway Morris S, George JD, Gibson R, Platt HM, editors. The origins and relationships of lower invertebrates. Oxford: Calderon Press; 1985. p. 123–42. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Weihrauch D, Allen GJP. Ammonia excretion in aquatic invertebrates: new insights and questions. J Exp Biol. 2018;221(Pt 3):jeb169219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wall SM, Koger LM. NH+4 transport mediated by Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase in rat inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol. 1994;267(4 Pt 2):F660–70. 10.1152/ajprenal.1994.267.4.F660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Weihrauch D, Becker W, Postel U, Riestenpatt S, Siebers D. Active excretion of ammonia across the gills of the shore crab Carcinus maenas and its relation to osmoregulatory ion uptake. Journal of comparative physiology B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology. 1998;168(5):364–76. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Weihrauch D, O’Donnell MJ. Links between Osmoregulation and Nitrogen-Excretion in Insects and Crustaceans. Integ Comp Biol. 2015;55(5):816–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kim HY, Verlander JW, Bishop JM, Cain BD, Han KH, Igarashi P, et al. Basolateral expression of the ammonia transporter family member Rh C glycoprotein in the mouse kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009;296(3):F543–55. 10.1152/ajprenal.90637.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pütter A. Vergleichende Physiologie. Jena: G. Fischer; 1911. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Macklin M. Osmotic regulation in Hydra: sodium and calcium localization and source of electrical potential. J Cell Physiol. 1967;70(2):191–6. 10.1002/jcp.1040700209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lehnert EM, Mouchka ME, Burriesci MS, Gallo ND, Schwarz JA, Pringle JR. Extensive differences in gene expression between symbiotic and aposymbiotic cnidarians. G3. 2014;4(2):277–95. 10.1534/g3.113.009084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Moran Y, Genikhovich G, Gordon D, Wienkoop S, Zenkert C, Ozbek S, et al. Neurotoxin localization to ectodermal gland cells uncovers an alternative mechanism of venom delivery in sea anemones. Proceedings B. 2012;279(1732):1351–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Biggs DC. Respiration and ammonium excretion by open ocean gelatinous zooplankton. Limn Oceanog. 1977;22(1):108–17. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Matsakis S. Ammonia excretion rate of Clytia spp. hydromedusae (Cnidaria, Thecata): effects of individual dry weight, temperature and food availability. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1992;87:55–63. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Burighel P, Cloney RA. Urochordata: Ascidiacea In: Harrison FW, Ruppert EE, editors. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates 15. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1997. p. 221–347. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Butt AG, Taylor HH. Salt and Water-Balance in the Spider, Porrhothele antipodiana (Mygalomorpha, Dipluridae)—Effects of Feeding Upon Hydrated Animals. J Exp Biol. 1986;125:85–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Harpur RP. The nematode intestine and organic acid excretion: volatile acids in Ascaris lumbricoides faeces. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1969;28(2):865–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Nijhout HF. Excretory Role of Midgut in Larvae of Tobacco Hornworm, Manduca-Sexta (L). J Exp Biol. 1975;62(1):221–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Parry D. A. Habits, structure and development of Spadella cephaloptera and Sagitta setosa. J Mar Biol Assoc. 1944;(UK 26):16–36. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Phillips JE, Hanrahan J, Chamberlin M, Thomson B. Mechanisms and Control of Reabsorption in Insect Hindgut. Adv Insect Physiol. 1986;19:329–422. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tillinghast EK. Excretory pathways of ammonia and urea in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. J Exp Zool. 1967;166(2):295–300. 10.1002/jez.1401660213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Smith J III, Tyler S. The acoel turbellarians: kingpins of metazoan evolution or a specialized offshoot? In: Conway-Morris S, George JD, Gibson R, Platt HM, editors. The origins and relationships of lower invertebrates. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1985. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Philippe H, Poustka AJ, Chiodin M, Hoff KJ, Dessimoz C, Tomiczek B, et al. Mitigating anticipated effects of systematic errors supports sister-group relationship between Xenacoelomorpha and Ambulacraria. Curr Biol. 2019;29(11):1818–26 e6. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hejnol A, Martindale MQ. Acoel development supports a simple planula-like urbilaterian. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences. 2008;363(1496):1493–501. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Koch M, Quast B, Bartolomaeus T. Coeloms and nephridia in annelids and arthropods In: Wägele W, Bartolomaeus T, editors. Deep Metazoan Phylogeny: The Backbone of the Tree of Life. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2014. p. 173–284. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Andrikou C, Thiel D, Ruiz-Santiesteban JA, Hejnol A. Active mode of excretion across digestive tissues predates the origin of excretory organs. 2019. Dryad Digital Repository. 10.5061/dryad.bq068jr. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–7. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–3. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Børve A, Hejnol A. Development and juvenile anatomy of the nemertodermatid Meara stichopi (Bock) Westblad 1949 (Acoelomorpha). Front Zool. 2014;11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.De Mulder K, Kuales G, Pfister D, Willems M, Egger B, Salvenmoser W, et al. Characterization of the stem cell system of the acoel Isodiametra pulchra. BMC Dev Biol. 2009;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Fritzenwanker JH, Technau U. Induction of gametogenesis in the basal cnidarian Nematostella vectensis (Anthozoa). Dev Genes Evol. 2002;212(2):99–103. 10.1007/s00427-002-0214-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Stephenson TA. The British Sea Anemones. London: The Ray Society; 1935. [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hejnol A, Martindale MQ. Acoel development indicates the independent evolution of the bilaterian mouth and anus. Nature. 2008;456(7220):382–6. 10.1038/nature07309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Martín-Durán JM, Pang K, Børve A, Semmler Lê H, Furu A, Cannon JT, et al. Convergent evolution of bilaterian nerve cords. Nature. 2018;553(7686):45–50. 10.1038/nature25030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Genikhovich G, Technau U. In situ hybridization of starlet sea anemone (Nematostella vectensis) embryos, larvae, and polyps. Cold Spring Harbor protocols. 2009;2009(9):pdb prot5282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Chiodin M, Børve A, Berezikov E, Ladurner P, Martinez P, Hejnol A. Mesodermal gene expression in the acoel Isodiametra pulchra indicates a low number of mesodermal cell types and the endomesodermal origin of the gonads. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e55499 10.1371/journal.pone.0055499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Sinigaglia C, Busengdal H, Leclere L, Technau U, Rentzsch F. The bilaterian head patterning gene six3/6 controls aboral domain development in a cnidarian. PLoS Biol. 2013;11(2):e1001488 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All newly determined sequences have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MN101600—MN101702. The assembled xenacoelomorph transcriptomes used for the gene orthology assessment are deposited on Dryad Digital Depository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bq068jr [72].