Abstract
Cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR) is a rare paraneoplastic disorder of the retina leading to blindness, associated with multiple cancers. It can lead to rapid progressive visual deterioration with retinal pathology ranging from retinitis pigmentosa to retinal degeneration. It is caused by antibodies directed against retinal antigens. This uncommon syndrome is a remote effect, independent of the primary tumor or metastatic lesion. We describe two cases of CAR, as well as pathophysiology, clinical manifestation, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of cancer-associated retinopathy.
Keywords: retinopathy, cancer, paraneoplastic
Introduction
Cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR) is a rare paraneoplastic disorder of the retina. It is associated with multiple cancers. It can present with sudden, progressive loss of vision associated with photosensitivity. Other findings include ring scotoma, attenuated retinal arteriole, visual field defects, abnormal electroretinogram (ERG), and the presence of circulating serum autoantibodies specific to retinal antigens.
This uncommon syndrome is a remote effect, independent of the primary tumor or metastatic lesion. It is heterogeneous with a wide variety of different ocular symptoms.
Case presentation
Case 1
A 39-year-old African American female presented to the clinic complaining of severe fatigue and increased urinary frequency. She had a past medical history of systemic lupus erythematosus - diagnosed based on arthritis, discoid rash, positive antinuclear antibody (ANA), ribonucleoprotein antibody (RNP), anti-Ro (SS-A) antibody, and controlled on hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil). Further evaluation revealed a normal complete blood count (CBC) with differential, complete metabolic panel, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), C3, C4, and double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Urinalysis showed 2+ blood, along with red blood cells, and was negative for casts. She later underwent cystoscopy which revealed papillary urothelial carcinoma and subsequently underwent a left nephrectomy. Three years after her diagnosis of urothelial cancer, she presented with the sudden onset of visual blurring in both eyes. After an evaluation by a neuro-ophthalmologist, she was found to have constricted central and peripheral visual fields. Fluorescein angiography showed dense hyperfluorescence of the right eye and slight macular dystrophy, raising the concern for CAR. The genetic testing for mitochondrial disorders was negative. She had multiple positive anti-retinal antibodies which included anti-enolase, anti-GAPDH (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase), and anti-aldolase. Her treatment involved intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the right eye and she was concomitantly started on immunosuppressive therapy with prednisone and cyclosporine. There was no improvement in her vision with this therapy and it was subsequently switched to mycophenolate mofetil. She underwent a steroid implant six months later. Despite aggressive therapy, she had increased photosensitivity and was started on IVIG (intravenous immunoglobulin), complicated by hospitalization for aseptic meningitis. In the interim, she was under the care of urology and oncology for treatment of the bladder cancer with mitomycin.
Case 2
A 58-year-old African American female with a past medical history of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and diabetes mellitus type 2 presented with blurred vision. She described it as floaters and blackness in front of her eyes which later progressed to bilateral peripheral vision loss over a week's time. The ocular exam revealed extensive inflammatory findings in the anterior chamber, the posterior chamber, and the retinas bilaterally. She was placed on 1% prednisolone acetate eye drops and was referred to a retinal specialist for further evaluation of the abnormal retinal findings. The dilated fundoscopic exam revealed bilateral panuveitis, vitritis, retinal sheathing, and attenuation of vessels which was concerning for retinal vasculitis (Table 1). An autoimmune workup, including HLAB27, ANA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA), antiphospholipid antibody panel, serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), and rheumatoid factor (RF), was negative. An infectious disease workup, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Lyme antibody titer, cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibodies, herpes simplex virus (HSV) antibodies, hepatitis serology, toxoplasmosis antibodies, Bartonella antibodies, syphilis rapid plasma reagin (RPR), and QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (Qiagen NV, Venlo, The Netherlands), were negative. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain/orbits with contrast, as well as computed tomography (CT) of the chest, was non-revealing for significant pathology. She also had a history of chronic vaginal bleeding and back pain. Further examination revealed a pelvic mass, and a biopsy of the mass revealed endometrial carcinoma. This raised suspicion for CAR and the patient was tested for anti-retinal antibodies. She tested positive for anti-recoverin autoantibodies. She was initially treated with pulse dose steroids and referred for further management of her endometrial cancer.
Table 1. Slit-lamp Examination.
OCULUS DEXTER (RIGHT EYE) | OCULUS SINISTER (LEFT EYE) |
Intraocular pressure 14 mm Hg | Intraocular pressure 16 mm Hg |
Pupil equal and reacting to light | Pupil equal and reacting to light |
No afferent pupillary defect | No afferent pupillary defect |
Conjunctiva: white and quiet | Conjunctiva: white and quiet |
Cornea: normal | Cornea: normal |
Iris: normal | Iris: normal |
Anterior chamber: deep, 1+ cell flare | Anterior chamber: deep, 1+ cell flare |
Lens: trace nuclear cataracts | Lens: trace nuclear cataracts |
Vitreous: 2+ vitritis | Vitreous: 2+ vitritis |
Optic nerve: flat, sharp, good color | Optic nerve: flat, sharp, good color |
Macula: blunted | Macula: blunted |
Retinal vessels: retinal sheathing, attenuated vessels 360 ° from the posterior pole to the periphery | Retinal vessels: retinal sheathing, attenuated vessels 360 ° from the posterior pole to the periphery |
Discussion
CAR is a rare paraneoplastic disorder of the retina leading to blindness and is associated with multiple cancers. It can lead to rapid progressive visual deterioration with retinal pathology ranging from retinitis pigmentosa to retinal degeneration. It is caused by antibodies directed against retinal antigens which include anti-recoverin, anti-α-enolase, anti-carbonic anhydrase II, heat shock cognate protein 70 (HSC70), anti-transducin-α autoantibodies, and anti-GADPH found months to years before cancer detection [1]. It was first described in 1976 by Sawyer et al. as vision loss and photoreceptor dysfunction [2].
It is a subtype of paraneoplastic visual syndromes which consists of four entities: CAR, melanoma-associated retinopathy (MAR), paraneoplastic optic neuropathy (PON), and bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation (BDUMP). In this review, we will focus on the pathophysiology, clinical manifestation, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of CAR.
Breast cancer, small-cell lung cancer, gynecological, and hematological malignancies are the most common tumors associated with CAR. Other less frequent cancers associated with CAR are hepatocellular carcinoma, thymoma, prostate cancer, and colon cancer. At least in 50% of the patients, the diagnosis of CAR precedes a cancer diagnosis (which also happened in our second patient) [3-5].
In the case series reported by Adamus involving 209 patients, women are more affected than men and the age group affected is 40 - 85 years [3]. Both cases described in our article are female patients. The onset of retinopathy from a cancer diagnosis can vary from weeks to months (lymphoma and lung cancer) to years (breast cancer and prostate cancer). The diagnosis may be preceded by the presence of anti-retinal antibodies [3].
Tumor antigens trigger an immune response which results in the development of autoantibodies that cross-react with a retinal protein that leads to retinal degeneration and cell death. The mechanism by which anti-retinal antibodies target retinal antigens causing photoreceptor damage is not entirely understood [6]. The postulated molecular mechanism is apoptotic death of photoreceptors mediated by caspase-dependent pathways, along with intracellular calcium influx [7-8].
The diagnosis of CAR is based on the signs and symptoms, as well as the diagnosis of systemic cancer. There are no standard diagnostic criteria for CAR. The diagnosis involves the detection of anti-retinal antibodies, electrophysiologic evidence of retinal degeneration (such as attenuated retinal vessels), degenerative and atrophic changes of the retinal pigment epithelium, and optic disc pallor with concurrent clinical manifestations [4, 9].
The clinical phenotype involves sudden, progressive, bilateral, painless visual deterioration with an acute, subacute, and rarely, chronic presentation. There is degeneration of the cones and rods with symptoms of photoaversion, prolonged glare after light exposure, reduced visual acuity, decreased color perception, and central scotoma. On ocular exam, the fundus usually appears normal; occasionally, some patients may show vascular attenuation, optic disc pallor, and retinal pigment abnormalities [4, 9].
ERG findings involve abnormal rods and cones. A multifocal and full-field electroretinogram is used, with distinct changes in the ERG. ERG is more sensitive than optical coherence tomography (OCT) which may only illustrate mild findings in early disease. Abnormalities of a and b waves may be evident on ERG. Other findings on ERG include arterial attenuation, arteriolar sheathing, and periphlebitis. Optic disc pallor is seen in late cases. Slit-lamp examination rarely shows cellular debris in the anterior vitreous associated with low-grade inflammation in certain stages. Sawyer et al. showed there was photoreceptor degeneration of rods and cones with melanophages scattered in the outer retina and sparing of the ganglion cells in the inner retinal layer [2]. On OCT, diagnostic changes for pathologic anti-retinal antibodies include the loss of the outer retinal layer, such as the ellipsoid layer, and often show cystic spaces or occasionally mild schisis-like changes [7].
Greater than 50% of the patients with CAR will have serum autoantibodies that target retinal antigens. These antibodies have also been described in healthy individuals, although the appropriateness of the control sera in the study has been questioned [3, 7, 10]. In our patients, Case 1 was positive for anti-enolase, anti-GAPDH, and anti-aldolase antibodies. Case 2 was positive for anti-recoverin autoantibodies.
There are a variety of lab techniques to detect these antibodies which include immunohistochemistry (IHC), Western blot, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). By using the Western blot technique, the serum from a CAR patient reacts with recoverin. Recoverin is a 23-kDa calcium-binding protein found on photoreceptors. It leads to the hypothesis that CAR is secondary to antibodies against tumor expressed recoverin that cross-reacts with photoreceptors [3, 7, 10].
The treatment of CAR involves treatment with corticosteroids associated with mild to moderate improvement in visual function based on anecdotal cases reports [4, 11]. Given the pathophysiology of the autoimmune process, early institution of immunosuppressive therapy appears to improve the chance of treatment response. A review of the literature shows that patients had responses to IV immunoglobulin [12], alemtuzumab [13], rituximab [14], and plasmapheresis [15]. Plasmapheresis is hypothesized to remove anti-retinal antibodies, circulating immune complexes, and cytokines which are contributing to the immunological response. However, since plasmapheresis is performed in combination with steroids, immunosuppressive medications response cannot be attributed entirely to plasmapheresis itself. Most recently, a naturally-occurring immunomodulator, Tolpa Torf preparation (Torf Corp. Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Wrocławskie, Poland), was found to be effective in reducing antibody levels [16].
Despite the above treatments, the visual prognosis remains poor. Treatment of the underlying cancer is unlikely to affect any visual prognosis. Overall survival depends on the underlying tumor and staging at diagnosis, as well as treatment options available [17].
Conclusions
CAR is paraneoplastic retinopathy which might develop before cancer becomes clinically evident.
Screening for anti-retinal antibodies should be considered as part of the diagnostic workup in patients presenting with retinopathy with high pre-test probability. If paraneoplastic anti-retinal antibodies are detected in the absence of a known cancer, workup for an occult neoplasm is appropriate.
There is no epidemiologic data available on CAR because it is infrequently encountered in clinical practice. There are also no guidelines for the treatment of CAR. Treatment mainly involves corticosteroids, immunosuppressive therapy, and IV immunoglobulin. Alemtuzumab, rituximab, and plasmapheresis can be considered in refractory cases.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained by all participants in this study
References
- 1.Clinical and immunologic aspects of cancer-associated retinopathy. Ohguro H, Yokoi Y, Ohguro I, et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:1117–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Blindness caused by photoreceptor degeneration as a remote effect of cancer. Sawyer RA, Selhorst JB, Zimmerman LE, Hoyt WF. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;81:606–613. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(76)90125-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Autoantibody targets and their cancer relationship in the pathogenicity of paraneoplastic retinopathy. Adamus G. Autoimmun Rev. 2009;8:410–414. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Paraneoplastic retinopathies and optic neuropathies. Chan JW. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48:12–38. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00416-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cancer-associated retinopathy associated with invasive thymoma. Katsuta H, Okada M, Nakauchi T, Takahashi Y, Yamao S, Uchida S. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:383–389. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01598-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Autoimmune retinopathy: a review and summary. Heckenlively JR, Ferreyra HA. Semin Immunopathol. 2008;30:127–134. doi: 10.1007/s00281-008-0114-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Autoimmune retinopathy and antiretinal antibodies: a review. Grewal DS, Fishman GA, Jampol LM. Retina. 2014;34:827–845. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mechanism of CAR syndrome: anti-recoverin antibodies are the inducers of retinal cell apoptotic death via the caspase 9- and caspase 3-dependent pathway. Shiraga S, Adamus G. J Neuroimmunol. 2002;132:72–82. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(02)00314-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.A clinical triad to diagnose paraneoplastic retinopathy. Jacobson DM, Thirkill CE, Tipping SJ. Ann Neurol. 1990;28:162–167. doi: 10.1002/ana.410280208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Autoantibodies against retinal proteins in paraneoplastic and autoimmune retinopathy. Adamus G, Ren G, Weleber RG. https://bmcophthalmol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2415-4-5. BMC Ophthalmol. 2004;4:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-4-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Management and monitoring of cancer-associated retinopathy. Keltner JL, Thirkill CE, Tyler NK, Roth AM. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:48–53. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080130050025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Treatment of paraneoplastic visual loss with intravenous immunoglobulin: report of 3 cases. Guy J, Aptsiauri N. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:471–477. doi: 10.1001/archopht.117.4.471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Successful treatment of cancer-associated retinopathy with alemtuzumab. Espandar L, O'Brien S, Thirkill C, Lubecki LA, Esmaeli B. J Neurooncol. 2007;83:295–302. doi: 10.1007/s11060-006-9326-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.A case of autoimmune retinopathy associated with thyroid carcinoma. Mahdi N, Faia LJ, Goodwin J, Nussenblatt RB, Sen HN. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2010;18:322–323. doi: 10.3109/09273941003802379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Paraneoplastic retinopathy: a novel autoantibody reaction associated with small-cell lung carcinoma. Murphy MA, Thirkill CE, Hart WM Jr. http://journals.lww.com/jneuro-ophthalmology/Abstract/1997/06000/Paraneoplastic_Retinopathy__A_Novel_Autoantibody.1.aspx. J Neuroophthalmol. 1997;17:77–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Long-term persistence of antirecoverin antibodies in endometrial cancer-associated retinopathy. Adamus G, Amundson D, MacKay C, Gouras P. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/261439. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:251–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cancer-associated retinopathy. Goldstein SM, Syed NA, Milam AH, Maguire AM, Lawton TJ, Nichols CW. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1641–1645. doi: 10.1001/archopht.117.12.1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]