Summary
Objectives:
Localization of ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors causing Cushing syndrome (ECS) is essential for clinical management, yet often difficult. [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT ([68Ga]-DOTA-(Tyr3)-octreotate)] is an FDA-approved high-resolution diagnostic tool for imaging neuroendocrine tumors. Data on the clinical utility of [68Ga]-DOTATATE in patients with ECS, however, are scarce. The objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy for ECS localization and the clinical benefit of [68Ga]-DOTATATE imaging.
Method:
We conducted a retrospective review of all cases with ECS evaluated with [68Ga]-DOTATATE from November 2016 through October 2018 at three referral centers. The clinical benefit of [68Ga]-DOTATATE was based on detection of new tumors and resultant changes in management.
Results:
Over the study period, 28 patients with ECS underwent [68Ga]-DOTATATE: 17 for identification of the primary tumor and 11 during follow up. [68Ga]-DOTATATE identified the suspected primary ECS in 11/17 patients (65%). Of these, 9 patients underwent surgery: 8 with confirmed ECS (5 bronchial, 1 thymic, 1 pancreatic and 1 metastatic neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary origin) and 1 patient with a false positive scan (adrenal gland). Of the 11 patients with ECS who underwent [68Ga]-DOTATATE evaluation during follow-up, the study led to changes in clinical management in 7/11 (64%) patients.
Conclusions:
[68Ga]-DOTATATE is sensitive in detecting primary and metastatic ECS, often identifies occult tumors after conventional imaging, and impacts clinical care in the majority of patients.
Keywords: [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT, ectopic ACTH secretion, Cushing syndrome, tumor localization, somatostatin receptor
Introduction
Ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors often lead to fulminant Cushing syndrome (ECS) and are associated with higher mortality compared to other causes of cortisol excess.1 Prompt identification and treatment of ECS are imperative for optimal clinical outcomes. Surgical cure, however, is achieved in less than half of patients with ECS, partly due to unresectable metastases and also because many such tumors are small and difficult to localize.2–6
Cross-sectional anatomic imaging is commonly used as first-line radiographic investigation for identification of ECS, but its sensitivity for ECS detection is suboptimal, ranging from 52–66%.7,8 In a systematic review, various nuclear medicine functional imaging techniques identified 79% of ECS not detected by initial conventional anatomic imaging.8 Scintigraphy or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with [111In]-pentetreotide, a somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligand (SRL), and [131I]- or [123I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG), a catecholamine analog, are commonly used for NET detection, but these studies require prolonged time (imaging at 24 to 48 hours after radiotracer injection) and have relatively limited sensitivity for disease detection.9 Positron emission tomography (PET) offers significantly improved imaging quality and shorter protocols 10,11 using a variety of tracers, including [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), [18F]-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) and [68Ga]-DOTATATE (DOTA-(Tyr3)-octreotate).7,12,13 For SRL imaging, [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT has proven to be more sensitive than [111In]-pentetreotide SPECT in detecting various NETs.14–18 The advantages of [68Ga]-DOTATATE in patients with ECS, however, have only been described in isolated case reports or small case series.18,19 Here we retrospectively studied the use of [68Ga]-DOTATATE in localizing ECS and the resultant impact on clinical management beyond conventional imaging.
Patients and Methods
We conducted a retrospective study of all cases with ECS evaluated with [68Ga]-DOTATATE imaging in three tertiary referral centers (University of Michigan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center) since FDA approval (November 2016), through October 2018. Patient demographics, clinical evaluation, imaging modalities, laboratory, histopathological results and treatment data were reviewed. The study was conducted with approval and waiver of informed consent from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Michigan, Mayo Clinic (Rochester), and MD Anderson Cancer Center.
The diagnosis of Cushing syndrome was confirmed by clinical and hormonal evaluation, in accordance with the Endocrine Society practice guidelines (Table 1).9 Ectopic ACTH syndrome was defined by hormonal assessment compatible with ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome, in conjunction with absence of central gradient during bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling or known ECS.3,4 All cross-sectional imaging, [111In]-pentetreotide scintigraphy and SPECT, [68Ga]-DOTATATE and [18F]-FDG PET/CT images were reviewed by experienced radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians in each institution.
Table 1.
Characteristics of study participants
University of Michigan N=17 |
Mayo Clinic Rochester N=6 |
MD Anderson Cancer Center N=5 |
Total N=28 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 49 [33-49] | 50 [39-63] | 51 [43-64] | 50 [38-64] |
Sex (F/M) | 15/2 | 4/2 | 3/2 | 22/6 |
Clinical diagnosis of CS | ||||
- Moon face | 12 | 4 | 5 | 21 (75%) |
- Dorsocervical fat pad | 8 | 3 | 3 | 14 (50%) |
- Supraclavicular fat pad | 8 | 5 | 2 | 15 (54%) |
- Purplish striae | 9 | 3 | 0 | 12 (43%) |
- Facial plethora | 11 | 4 | 1 | 16 (57%) |
- Central obesity | 11 | 4 | 4 | 19 (68%) |
- Proximal muscle weakness | 16 | 5 | 5 | 26 (93%) |
- Hypokalemia | 13 | 4 | 3 | 20 (71%) |
- Hyperglycemia | 12 | 5 | 4 | 21 (75%) |
- Hypertension | 14 | 5 | 4 | 23 (82%) |
Biochemical diagnosis of CS | ||||
- Basal cortisol (μg/dL) | 61 [41-78] | 30 [19-44] | 64 [24-103] | 56 [28-70] |
- Basal ACTH (pg/mL) | 160 [101-294] | 112 [84-202] | 123 [92-167] | 127 [89-245] |
- Urine free cortisol (μg/24 h) | 1229 [315-3234] | 289 [167-3342] | 441 [404-3151] | 730 [225-3456] |
ECS diagnosis | ||||
- Bronchial NET | 5 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
- Pancreatic NET | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
- MTC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
- Ileal NET | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
- Thymic NET | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
- Non-small cell lung cancer | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
- NET-unknown primary* | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
NET of unknown primary origin included: 7 occult NETs (including 1 false positive lesion) and 3 metastatic NETs with unclear primary site.
Age and biochemical data were expressed as medians [interquartile range].
F, Female; CS, Cushing syndrome; ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; ECS, ectopic ACTH-secreting tumor causing Cushing syndrome; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; CS, Cushing syndrome.
The clinical impact of [68Ga]-DOTATATE was defined as the detection of primary ECS or new metastatic foci, along with consequent changes in clinical management.
Results
Over the study period, 28 patients (age 18–77 years, median 50, 78.6 % females) with ectopic ACTH syndrome underwent [68Ga]-DOTATATE scan, including 17 patients to localize the primary ECS (Table 1). Of these, the primary tumor was occult after previous imaging in 15 patients (cross-sectional imaging in all patients, [18F]-FDG PET/CT scan in 4 patients, and [111In]-pentetreotide in 3 other patients), and in 2 patients, [68Ga]-DOTATATE scan was the first localizing imaging study used (Figure 1). [68Ga]-DOTATATE scan identified an ECS in 11/17 (65%) patients, of which 7 were solitary and 4 metastatic. The diagnosis was confirmed by pathology in 8/11 patients: 5 bronchial NET, 1 thymic NET, 1 pancreatic NET and 1 metastatic NET of unknown primary origin. Surgical cure was achieved in 7 of these patients (Figures 2–3), while 1 remaining patient had widely metastatic disease. In this latter patient who was not cured, [68Ga]-DOTATATE identified bronchial and bone lesions but failed to identify liver metastases, which were apparent on MRI and confirmed by biopsy, illustrating false-negative metastases (Figure 4). In another patient with occult ECS, [68Ga]-DOTATATE demonstrated a nodular focus of uptake in the left adrenal gland (Figure 3). Clinical cure, however, was not achieved after left adrenalectomy, and pathology showed adrenocortical hyperplasia. This case illustrates a false-positive scan, which caused a delay in contralateral adrenalectomy and cure of the hypercortisolemia. Of the remaining 2 patients, one was lost to follow up, and the second is awaiting surgery. Of the 7 patients in whom the ECS source remained occult after [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT scan, 3 patients underwent bilateral adrenalectomy, 2 were treated with mifepristone, and 2 were treated with ketoconazole for management of hypercortisolemia.
Figure 1.
Patients with ECS evaluated at University of Michigan, Mayo Clinic Rochester and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center who underwent [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT between November 2016 to Oct 2018.
The dimensions of ECS detected by [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging ranged from 0.8 cm to 2.8 cm for primary tumor localization or 0.4 cm to 1.8 cm for newly found metastases. Pathology revealed poorly-differentiated NET in 2 patients and well-differentiated NET in 6.
ECS, ectopic ACTH-secreting tumor causing Cushing syndrome; NET, neuroendocrine tumor.
Figure 2.
[68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT demonstrated focal uptake in the upper lobe of the left lung (A, B, C), two foci of uptake in the left hilar region (A), and a left thoracic inlet lymph node (LN) (D).
Figure 3.
[68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT demonstrated uptake in the thymus (A, C) and mediastinal lymph node (A, B, C). Pathology revealed high-grade thymic NET with mediastinal lymph node metastasis.
[68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT revealed focal uptake in the left adrenal gland (D, E). CT abdomen showed left adrenal thickening (F). Left adrenalectomy was performed, but pathology demonstrated adrenal cortex hyperplasia but no malignant tumor, and hypercortisolism did not resolve.
NET, neuroendocrine tumor.
Figure 4.
[68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT demonstrated uptake in the right hilar area (A, B), 8th thoracic vertebra (C) and right iliac bone (D) but failed to identify three liver metastases, apparent on MRI, and confirmed by biopsy. Right liver lobe metastases (E, F) and left liver lobe metastasis (G) in a patient with NET of unclear primary origin.
NET, neuroendocrine tumor.
[68Ga]-DOTATATE was performed to assess disease burden or recurrence in 11 patients with known ECS (Figure 1): 4 pancreatic NETs; 2 unknown primary neuroendocrine carcinomas; 2 medullary thyroid cancers (MTC); 1 ileal NET; 1 bronchial NET, and 1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). [68Ga]-DOTATATE identified 9 new metastatic foci and 3 recurrent tumors: 5 solitary bone lesions, 3 pancreatic lesions, and 1 intra-abdominal lymph node. Of the 11 patients with known ECS, [68Ga]-DOTATATE evaluation during follow-up period led to changes in clinical management in 7 cases: in 3 patients with widely metastatic cancer previously treated with chemotherapy (2 MTC and 1 pancreatic NET), [68Ga]-DOTATATE uptake in numerous metastatic foci (Figure 5) led to treatment with [177Lu]- or [90Y]-labeled peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT); in 2 patients with prior surgical removal of primary ECS (one bronchial and one pancreatic NET), [68Ga]-DOTATATE identified single recurrent left upper lung and pancreatic bed lesions, respectively, which were subsequently removed; in 1 patient with NET of unknown primary origin, [68Ga]-DOTATATE demonstrated new focal bone lesions, which led to treatment with everolimus; and in the last patient with pancreatic NET, 2 metastatic foci were found in the pancreatic tail, which prompted treatment with a somatostatin analogue. In the remaining 4 cases (1 pancreatic NET, 1 ileal NET, 1 NSCLC and 1 NET of unclear primary origin; all metastatic), [68Ga]-DOTATATE findings were concordant with conventional imaging.
Figure 5.
[68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT demonstrated new bone metastatic lesions in the right humerus (B) 3rd thoracic vertebra (C) 4th lumbar vertebra (D) and right femur (E) in a patient with medullary thyroid cancer with liver and lymph node metastasis (A).
The dimensions of newly detected lesions with [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging, either primary or metastatic, ranged from 0.4 cm to 2.8 cm. Of the 8 patients with primary ECS confirmed by pathology, 6 were classified as well-differentiated NET (5 bronchial and 1 pancreatic) and 2 as poorly-differentiated NET (1 thymic and 1 of unknown primary origin). The majority of primary tumors identified by [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT were not recognized on cross-sectional imaging, especially tumors <1 cm. In 2 patients, [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT detected tumors in the right middle lung fields that were misidentified as vascular in origin. In retrospect, however, an anatomic correlate to all DOTATATE-avid tumors except bone metastases could be identified on cross-sectional imaging (Figures 2–5).
Discussion
In this retrospective series of 28 patients with ectopic ACTH production leading to Cushing syndrome, [68Ga]-DOTATATE localized the primary tumor and/or metastases in the majority of study patients. [68Ga]-DOTATATE is a recently approved advanced molecular imaging probe with high affinity for SSTR-type 2 (0.2 ±0.04 nM, as compared to 22 ± 3.6 nM for [111In]-pentetreotide)20, which when coupled with the advanced spatial resolution of PET/CT imaging systems, can result in successful detection and accurate localization of small tumors characterized by SSTR expression. A review of the literature found that [68Ga]-DOTATATE is highly sensitive (81.8%) in localization of ECS; however, only 23 of 231 patients assimilated from these studies received [68Ga]-DOTATATE imaging.8 Papadakis previously published a case of a ectopic Cushing and CRH co-secreting tumor, identified by [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/CT.21 ECS are often highly functional and associated with a fulminant clinical course and high mortality. Thus, ECS localization is critical for managing this aggressive form of Cushing syndrome. Despite extensive conventional cross-sectional and functional imaging, up to 19% of ECS remain occult.2–4 In our study, [68Ga]-DOTATATE identified the primary ECS in 11/17 (65%) of previously occult tumors. The somewhat lower overall accuracy of [68Ga]-DOTATATE-PET/CT in our series might reflect a selection bias for difficult cases at our referral centers, with a high prevalence of occult ECS.
Most of these ECS were located in the thorax, and some were smaller than 1 cm, which is near the limit of detection for other imaging modalities. Furthermore, [68Ga]-DOTATATE detected not only well-differentiated NET, but also a poorly differentiated ECS, which are composed of highly proliferative cells with low SSTR expression and high metabolic activity, as evidenced by [18F]-FDG PET/CT. 11,22 Hypercortisolemia can lower SSTR expression in EAS23 and result in false-negative scintigraphy, which can be reversed with glucocorticoid antagonist therapy.24 In our series of 10 patients with previously occult tumors that were located with [68Ga]-DOTATATE scans, 3 and 1 were treated with mifepristone and ketoconazole, respectively. Similarly, of the 7 patients with tumors that were not located with [68Ga]-DOTATATE scans, 3 each were treated with mifepristone or ketoconazole prior to scanning. Thus, 6 of 7 false-negative scans failed to identify the source of ACTH despite concomitant treatment of hypercortisolemia. [68Ga]-DOTATATE imaging was performed only once in all patients, which precludes any conclusions about longitudinal changes or comparisons with and without treatment of hypercortisolemia.
Of previously identified ECS, [68Ga]-DOTATATE impacted clinical management in 7/11 (64%) of patients. [68Ga]-DOTATATE allowed cure of recurrent disease in 2 patients and identified 3 other patients as candidates for PRRT with [177Lu]- or [90Y]-labeled somatostatin analogs. 10,11,25
Physiologic uptake of [68Ga]-DOTATATE in several locations such as liver, spleen, adrenal glands, thyroid, pancreas, and kidneys can confound image interpretation.26,27 A previous systematic review described one case of lung NET with a false-positive focus of uptake in the adrenal gland.28 Similarly, in our study, an ACTH-secreting pheochromocytoma was suspected in one patient with occult tumor who had atypical peripheral [68Ga]-DOTATATE uptake in the left adrenal gland and normal plasma metanephrines (Figure 3). Cushing syndrome was not resolved after left adrenalectomy, and histopathology showed adrenal cortical hyperplasia. Conversely, in another patient with metastatic NET of unknown primary origin, [68Ga]-DOTATATE-avid osseous and pulmonary metastatic lesions were found, but biopsy-proven liver metastases could not be detected (Figure 4), perhaps due to the high background activity of liver and/or poor SSTR-expression in certain clonal cell populations. One review of [68Ga]-DOTATATE imaging for detecting ECS reported 17.4% false-negative studies.8
Our study demonstrates the high sensitivity of [68Ga]-DOTATATE in the localization of ECS, for both occult primary tumors and metastatic lesions. Importantly, the use of [68Ga]-DOTATATE impacted clinical management in 64% patients with ECS overall. High cost and limited availability of PET/CT imaging, however, might preclude the widespread use of [68Ga]-DOTATATE for ECS imaging, experience with these scans, which were FDA-approved for clinical use in the USA to localize relatively rare tumors in June of 2016, is somewhat limited compared to other imaging studies. Limitations of our study include the small number of patients and the retrospective study design. In addition, the choice of imaging modalities, the management of hypercortisolemia, and the long-term plan of management were not pre-specified and were subject to many subjective and circumstantial influences. Nonetheless, combining the experience of three large referral centers, our study gathers the largest number of ECS imaged with [68Ga]-DOTATATE to date and provides a benchmark for the utility of this diagnostic modality for this rare but highly morbid condition. Further prospective investigations are needed to characterize the benefits and pitfalls of [68Ga]-DOTATATE in diagnosis and follow-up of patients with ECS.
Acknowledgements:
We thank the University of Michigan, Mayo Clinic Rochester and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center clinical team members who participated in the care of patients with ECS. The authors are all members of the American-Asian-Australian Adrenal Alliance (A5).
Funding: AFT was supported by grant 1K08DK109116.
Footnotes
Data sharing: The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflict of interest with this work.
References:
- 1.Pivonello R, Isidori AM, De Martino MC, Newell-Price J, Biller BM, Colao A. Complications of Cushing’s syndrome: state of the art. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(7):611–629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aniszewski JP, Young WF Jr., Thompson GB, Grant CS, van Heerden JA. Cushing syndrome due to ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion. World J Surg. 2001;25(7):934–940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ejaz S, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R, Busaidy NL, et al. Cushing syndrome secondary to ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion: the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience. Cancer. 2011;117(19):4381–4389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ilias I, Torpy DJ, Pacak K, Mullen N, Wesley RA, Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic corticotropin secretion: twenty years’ experience at the National Institutes of Health. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(8):4955–4962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Isidori AM, Kaltsas GA, Pozza C, et al. The ectopic adrenocorticotropin syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, management, and long-term follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(2):371–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Davi MV, Cosaro E, Piacentini S, et al. Prognostic factors in ectopic Cushing’s syndrome due to neuroendocrine tumors: a multicenter study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;176(4):451–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Santhanam P, Taieb D, Giovanella L, Treglia G. PET imaging in ectopic Cushing syndrome: a systematic review. Endocrine. 2015;50(2):297–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Isidori AM, Sbardella E, Zatelli MC, et al. Conventional and Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Ectopic Cushing’s Syndrome: A Systematic Review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(9):3231–3244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, et al. The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(5):1526–1540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hofman MS, Lau WF, Hicks RJ. Somatostatin receptor imaging with 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT: clinical utility, normal patterns, pearls, and pitfalls in interpretation. Radiographics. 2015;35(2):500–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tirosh A, Kebebew E. The utility of (68)Ga-DOTATATE positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis, management, follow-up and prognosis of neuroendocrine tumors. Future Oncol. 2018;14(2):111–122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zemskova MS, Gundabolu B, Sinaii N, et al. Utility of various functional and anatomic imaging modalities for detection of ectopic adrenocorticotropin-secreting tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(3):1207–1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Venkitaraman B, Karunanithi S, Kumar A, Bal C, Ammini AC, Kumar R. 68Ga-DOTATOC PET-CT in the localization of source of ectopic ACTH in patients with ectopic ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Clin Imaging. 2014;38(2):208–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Deppen SA, Blume J, Bobbey AJ, et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE Compared with 111In-DTPA-Octreotide and Conventional Imaging for Pulmonary and Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(6):872–878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hayes AR, Grossman AB. The Ectopic Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Syndrome: Rarely Easy, Always Challenging. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2018;47(2):409–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Merola E, Pavel ME, Panzuto F, et al. Functional Imaging in the Follow-Up of Enteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Clinical Usefulness and Indications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(5):1486–1494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Barrio M, Czernin J, Fanti S, et al. The Impact of Somatostatin Receptor-Directed PET/CT on the Management of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(5):756–761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ozkan ZG, Kuyumcu S, Balkose D, et al. The value of somatostatin receptor imaging with In-111 Octreotide and/or Ga-68 DOTATATE in localizing Ectopic ACTH producing tumors. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2013;22(2):49–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kakade HR, Kasaliwal R, Jagtap VS, et al. Ectopic ACTH-secreting syndrome: a single-center experience. Endocr Pract. 2013;19(6):1007–1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Reubi JC, Schar JC, Waser B, et al. Affinity profiles for human somatostatin receptor subtypes SST1-SST5 of somatostatin radiotracers selected for scintigraphic and radiotherapeutic use. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27(3):273–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Papadakis GZ, Bagci U, Sadowski SM, Patronas NJ, Stratakis CA. Ectopic ACTH and CRH Co-secreting Tumor Localized by 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40(7):576–578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sundin A, Arnold R, Baudin E, et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Radiological, Nuclear Medicine & Hybrid Imaging. Neuroendocrinology. 2017;105(3):212–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.de Bruin C, Feelders RA, Waaijers AM, et al. Differential regulation of human dopamine D2 and somatostatin receptor subtype expression by glucocorticoids in vitro. J Mol Endocrinol. 2009;42(1):47–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.de Bruin C, Hofland LJ, Nieman LK, et al. Mifepristone effects on tumor somatostatin receptor expression in two patients with Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic adrenocorticotropin secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(2):455–462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hicks RJ. Use of molecular targeted agents for the diagnosis, staging and therapy of neuroendocrine malignancy. Cancer Imaging. 2010;10 Spec no A:S83–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kuyumcu S, Ozkan ZG, Sanli Y, et al. Physiological and tumoral uptake of (68)Ga-DOTATATE: standardized uptake values and challenges in interpretation. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27(6):538–545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ambrosini V, Nanni C, Fanti S. The use of gallium-68 labeled somatostatin receptors in PET/CT imaging. PET Clin. 2014;9(3):323–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schalin-Jantti C, Ahonen A, Seppanen M. 18F-DOPA PET/CT but not 68Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT revealed the underlying cause of ectopic Cushing syndrome. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37(9):904–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]