Skip to main content
In Vivo logoLink to In Vivo
. 2019 Jul 3;33(4):1103–1108. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11579

Identification of Myoferlin Expression for Prediction of Subsequent Primary Malignancy in Patients With Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

MIN HYUN KOH 1, JUNG HYO AN 1, HYUCK GYUNG KO 2,3,4, HEE JEONG LEE 2,3,4, JONG SIL LEE 2,3,4, CHUL DONG KIM 2,3,4, HA DEOK SEO 5, HYUN DAE SONG 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC6689344  PMID: 31280198

Abstract

 Background/Aim: Multiple primary malignant tumors are common in patients with renal cell carcinoma. However, reports on the factors that can identify patients with a risk for subsequent primary malignancies have been lacking. This study aimed to investigate whether myoferlin expression can be used as a potential marker to predict subsequent primary malignancies in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Materials and Methods: We evaluated the relationship of subsequent primary malignancies with clinicopathological factors and myoferlin expression in 152 patients with ccRCC, and we analyzed the strength of the association with myoferlin expression. Results: The development of subsequent primary malignancies exhibited significant correlation with patient age (p=0.029), sex (p=0.015), T stage (p<0.001), and myoferlin expression (p=0.017). Furthermore, myoferlin hyperexpression was determined as an independent risk factor for developing a subsequent primary malignant tumor in patients with ccRCC (odds ratio(OR), 2.485, 95% Confidence Interval(CI)=1.052-5.870, p=0.038). Conclusion: Myoferlin hyperexpression can be a useful marker for predicting the development of subsequent primary malignancies in patients with ccRCC.

Keywords: Carcinoma, clear cell, kidney, myoferlin, subsequent primary malignancy


Multiple primary malignant tumors are generally defined as two or more discrete cancers that are not the result of metastasis or recurrence, but are independent of each other (1,2). According to the International Association of Cancer Registries and International Agency for Research on Cancer (IACR/IARC), one site is regarded as multiple primary malignancies (IARC 2004), not a single tumor of different parts of one site, and a 6-month period is recommended to distinguish between synchronous and metachronous multiple primaries (3).

Previous reports have shown that multiple primary malignant tumors are more common in patients with urogenital cancer, and a much higher prevalence of multiple tumors is associated with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (4,5). Moreover, Beisland et al. (2) have suggested that patients with RCC should be followed-up with examinations that are more general, due to their increased risk of developing other subsequent primary malignancies. However, little is known regarding the factors that can identify patients with a risk for subsequent primary malignancies.

Myoferlin is a member of the ferlin family, and it has been associated with cell membrane repair (6). Myoferlin is expressed in muscle cells and is involved in musculopathy (7). During the embryonic development of muscle or the regeneration of mature muscle cells following damage, myoblasts come together and form large syncytial myofibers (8). Myoferlin is highly expressed during myoblast fusion (8), however, the physiological functions of myoferlin remain to be determined (6).

Myoferlin hyper-expression has been studied in many cancers, such as gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancers, as well as in cancers of the female reproductive organs (9). Moreover, several reports have shown that myoferlin hyper-expression correlates with poor prognosis in pancreatic and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (6,10,11). In the same context, we have previously found that myoferlin hyperexpression significantly correlates with high Fuhrman nuclear grade and poorer disease-free survival in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) (6). Furthermore, Blomme et al. (12) have reported that myoferlin can be considered as a valuable cancer-derived exosomal protein, and myoferlin-lacking exosomes do not contribute as much to tumor cell migration and proliferation as exosomes that have myoferlin. As cancer-derived exosomes are considered to be released, not only in the vicinity of the cancer, but in the systemic areas as well, we hypothesized that systemically released myoferlin from cancer-derived exosomes affects host immunity and contributes to a pro-cancer microenvironment with epidemiological factors of cancers, resulting in an increased risk of developing cancer (3,13).

Therefore, in this study, we evaluated whether myoferlin expression can be used as a potential marker for predicting subsequent primary malignancies in patients with ccRCC.

Materials and Methods

Patients and clinicopathological data. Samples from 152 consecutive patients who underwent treatment for sporadic ccRCC between January 2000 and December 2009 at Gyeongsang National University Hospital (Jinju, Korea) were examined by two experienced pathologists. All of the included patients had undergone nephrectomy. Staging was performed according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, eighth edition (7). Clinical data from the patients were collected retrospectively through examination of their medical records. Subsequent primary malignancies were defined as metachronous tumors detected in an interval of more than 6 months arising at different sites, according to the IACR/IARC, and were diagnosed by pathological or radiological confirmation.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gyeongsang National University Hospital (2015-12-001) and was conducted in accordance with the principles embodied in the Declaration of Helsinki (6).

Tissue microarray construction. Hematoxylin and eosin -stained slides as well as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were reviewed, and the most representative tumor area was marked. Two cores (2 mm in diameter) of the tumor area were obtained from each specimen of representative Fuhrman nuclear grades (6).

Immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 4-μm-thick sections from tissue microarray (TMA) blocks. Tissues were stained with anti-myoferlin primary antibody at a dilution of 1:100 (7D6, Abcam, UK) as described previously (7), using an automated immunostainer (Benchmark Ultra, Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA). The endothelial cells of intratumoral vascular channels were used as positive control (14).

Myoferlin expression. Immunoreactivity of the tumor cells was evaluated in both the membrane and cytoplasm by visual counting (Figure 1). The stained tumor cells were graded as either hypoexpression or hyperexpression. Tumor cells that displayed stronger myoferlin expression compared to the membrane or the cytoplasm of the endothelial cells and stained more than 50% of tumor cells were graded as hyperexpression (6), otherwise, they were graded as hypoexpression. If tumor cells revealed heterogeneous expression of myoferlin in the same core, the representative value was decided according to the majority of tumor cells (6). To confirm reproducibility, all samples were graded by two independent pathologists in a blinded manner. If discrepancies occurred, a consensus was reached.

Figure 1. Myoferlin expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The tumor cells show hypoexpression of Myoferlin (light brown color, arrows) (A), and hyperexpression of Myoferlin (brown color, arrows) (B). Scale bars: 100 μm.

Figure 1

Statistical analysis. To determine the correlation of subsequent primary malignancy with clinicopathological factors and myoferlin expression, Pearson’s chi-square test was used. To evaluate the strength of the association between myoferlin expression and the development of subsequent primary malignancies, a logistic regression analysis was performed (15). A p-value of equal or less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Clinicopathological information of patients with ccRCC. Clinicopathological information of the patients with ccRCC is shown in Table I. The mean age of the patients was 59.9 years (range: 32 to 83 years). T stages of the tumors of the patients were as follows: i) 1a in 91 (59.9%), ii) 1b in 24 (15.8%), iii) 2a in 9 (5.9%), iv) 2b in 3 (2.0%), v) 3a in 21 (13.8%), vi) 3b in 2 (1.3%), and vii) 4 in 2 (1.3%). The Fuhrman nuclear grades were as follows: i) 26 (17.1%) were grade 1, ii) 102 (67.1%) were grade 2, iii) 19 (12.5%) were grade 3, and iv) 5 (3.3%) were grade 4. The myoferlin expression profiles were as follows: 233 cores (76.6%) displayed hypoexpression, while the remaining 71 cores (23.4%) displayed hyperexpression (6). Among all patients recruited, 13 patients (8.6%) had subsequent primary malignancies.

Table I. Clinicopathological information of patients.

graphic file with name in_vivo-33-1104-i0001.jpg

Clinicopathological information of ccRCC patients with subsequent primary malignancy. Clinicopathological information of the patients with subsequent primary malignancy is shown in Table II. The mean age of the patients was 66.5 years (range: 50 to 81 years). Most of the patients were male (12, 92.3%). T stages of the tumors of the patients were as follows: i) 1a in 5 (38.5%), ii) 1b in 1 (7.7%), iii) 2a in 1 (7.7%), iv) 2b in 1 (7.7%), and v) 3a in 5 (38.5%). The Fuhrman nuclear grades were as follows: i) 1 (7.7%) was grade 1, ii) 9 (69.2%) were grade 2, and iii) 3 (23.1%) were grade 3. The myoferlin expression profiles were as follows: 15 cores (57.7%) displayed hypoexpression, while the remaining 11 cores (42.3%) displayed hyperexpression. Among the subsequent primary tumors, 3 (23.1%) were hepatocellular carcinoma, 2 (15.4%) were lung cancer, and the remaining 8 cases were adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, common bile duct, stomach, colon and prostate, neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas, adenocarcinoma in situ of the stomach, and urothelial carcinoma of the ureter. The mean duration between ccRCC and subsequent primary malignancy was 3.6 years (range: 1 to 10.5 years).

Table II. Clinicopathological information of patients with a subsequent primary malignancy (n=13).

graphic file with name in_vivo-33-1106-i0001.jpg

*Duration means the diagnostic period between clear cell renal cell carcinoma and subsequent primary malignancy. NA, not applicable.

Relationship of subsequent primary malignancy with clinicopathological factors and myoferlin expression. The relationship of subsequent primary malignancy with clinicopathological factors and myoferlin expression is shown in Table III. Subsequent primary malignancy significantly correlated with patient age (p=0.029), sex (p=0.015), and T stage (p<0.001), but not with Fuhrman nuclear grade (p=0.313). Moreover, increased myoferlin expression showed a significant association with subsequent primary malignancy (p=0.017).

Table III. Relationship of subsequent primary malignancy with clinicopathological factors and myoferlin expression (n=304 cores).

graphic file with name in_vivo-33-1106-i0002.jpg

Values are presented as number (%).

Logistic regression analysis of subsequent primary malignancy. The univariate analysis demonstrated that age [odds ratio (OR), 2.763; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.077-7.090], T stage (OR=4.239, 95%CI=1.863-9.646), and myoferlin expression (OR=2.664, 95%CI=1.163-6.103) had a significant contribution to the occurrence of subsequent primary malignancy in patients with ccRCC. A multivariate analysis confirmed that myoferlin hyperexpression was an independent and significant risk factor for developing a subsequent primary malignant tumor in patients with ccRCC (OR=2.485, 95%CI=1.052-5.870, p=0.038) (Table IV). Moreover, higher T stage (stage ≥2) was determined to be a risk factor for developing subsequent primary malignancies (OR=3.674, 95%CI=1.584-8.523, p=0.002) (Table IV).

Table IV. Logistic regression model of subsequent primary malignancy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

graphic file with name in_vivo-33-1107-i0001.jpg

CI: Confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.

Discussion

This study investigated whether myoferlin expression can be used to predict the occurrence of a subsequent primary malignant tumor in patients with ccRCC. The development of subsequent primary malignancy revealed a significant correlation with patient age (p=0.029), sex (p=0.015), T stage (p<0.001), and myoferlin expression (p=0.017), but not with Fuhrman nuclear grade (p=0.313). Furthermore, myoferlin hyperexpression was determined to be an independent risk factor for developing a subsequent primary malignant tumor in patients with ccRCC. This is the first report to associate myoferlin hyperexpression with a higher risk for developing subsequent primary malignancies in patients with ccRCC. Consequently, we assert that the ccRCC patients with myoferlin hyperexpression should be followed up with more meticulous examinations for subsequent primary malignancies to provide early detection and treatment.

Based on these results, we presume that systemically released myoferlin affects host immunity and contributes to a pro-cancer microenvironment with epidemiologic factors of cancers, resulting in the increased risk for developing cancer (3,13). However, further research is still needed for a more definitive answer.

Interestingly, higher T stage (stage ≥2) was determined to be a risk factor for developing subsequent primary malignancies in patients with ccRCC. This may be related to various predisposing factors, including the treatment of a previous malignancy, and the increased checkup frequency of cancer patients (3). However, herein we emphasize that the ccRCC patients with higher T stage should also be followed up in the same manner as patients with myoferlin hyperexpression because T stage was not significantly associated with myoferlin expression according to our previous study (6).

Previous reports have shown that multiple primary malignant tumors related to RCC can develop in various organs, including prostate, bladder, lung, breast, and colon (2,4,16,18). Several researchers have advocated that malignant melanoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma are also associated with RCC (19). The rate of occurrence of multiple primary malignancies with RCC, including antecedent, synchronous, and subsequent tumors has been found at 4.5-26.9%, and a quarter to almost half of these tumors were detected subsequently (2,16,17,19). In this study, the incidence of subsequent primary malignancies with ccRCC was at 8.6%, and the mean diagnostic period between ccRCC and subsequent primary malignancy was 3.6 years. The two most common subsequent primary tumors were hepatocellular carcinoma and lung cancer, and the higher incidence rate was shown for the hepatobiliary system, followed by the gastrointestinal tract.

There are inevitable limitations to this study as a retrospective analysis from a single center. For example, we could not assess the survival probability related to developing subsequent primary malignancies due to the small sample size. Larger cohorts and an organized study design are recommended in future studies.

In conclusion, our study identified that myoferlin hyperexpression can be a useful marker for predicting subsequent primary malignancies, and higher T stage (stage ≥2) may be a risk factor for developing subsequent primary malignancies in patients with ccRCC.

Conflicts of Interest

The Authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Conception and design was performed by HMK, HJA and DHS. Development of methodology was done by HMK and HJA. Acquisition of data was done by HMK, GHK, JHL, JSL, DCK and DHS, while analysis and interpretation of data was done by HMK, HJA, GHK, JHL, JSL, DCK and DHS. Writing, review and/or revision of the manuscript were done by HMK, HJA and DHS. Administrative, technical, or material support was provided by HMK, JHL, JSL and DHS. Study supervision was done by HMK, GHK, DCK, DHS.

Acknowledgements

The Authors received no financial support for the research.

References

  • 1.Howe HL. A review of the definition for multiple primary cancers in the United States. Workshop Proceedings from December 4-6, 2002, in Princeton, New Jersey. Springfield (IL): North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. May 2003 Available from:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.466.3479&rep=rep1&type=pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beisland C, Talleraas O, Bakke A, Norstein J. Multiple primary malignancies in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a national population-based cohort study. BJU Int. 2006;97:698–702. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06004.x. PMID: 16536756. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006. 06004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vogt A, Schmid S, Heinimann K, Frick H, Herrmann C, Cerny T, Omlin A. Multiple primary tumours: challenges and approaches, a review. ESMO open. 2017;2:e000172. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000172. PMID: 28761745. DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nakata S, Kato Y, Sato J, Mayuzumi T, Kumasaka F, Shimizu T. Analysis of multiple primary cancers in patients with urologic cancer. Inter J Clin Oncol. 1997;2:40–46. DOI: 10. 1007/BF024925965. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Matzkin H, Braf Z. Multiple primary malignant neoplasms in the genitourinary tract: occurrence and etiology. J Urol. 1989;142:1–12. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38649-4. PMID: 2659818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Song DH, Ko GH, Lee JH, Lee JS, Yang JW, Kim MH, An HJ, Kang MH, Jeon KN, Kim DC. Prognostic role of myoferlin expression in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:89033–89039. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21645. PMID: 29179496. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Song DH, Ko GH, Lee JH, Lee JS, Lee GW, Kim HC, Yang JW, Heo RW, Roh GS, Han SY, Kim DC. Myoferlin expression in non-small cell lung cancer: Prognostic role and correlation with VEGFR-2 expression. Oncol Lett. 2016;11:998–1006. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3988. PMID: 26893682. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Doherty KR, Cave A, Davis DB, Delmonte AJ, Posey A, Earley JU, Hadhazy M, McNally EM. Normal myoblast fusion requires myoferlin. Development. 2005;132:5565–5575. doi: 10.1242/dev.02155. PMID: 16280346. DOI: 10.1242/dev.02155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Eisenberg MC, Kim Y, Li R, Ackerman WE, Kniss DA, Friedman A. Mechanistic modeling of the effects of myoferlin on tumor cell invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:20078–20083. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116327108. PMID: 22135466. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1116327108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kumar B, Brown NV, Swanson BJ, Schmitt AC, Old M, Ozer E, Agrawal A, Schuller DE, Teknos TN, Kumar P. High expression of myoferlin is associated with poor outcome in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients and is inversely associated with HPV-status. Oncotarget. 2016;7:18665–18677. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7625. PMID: 26919244. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang WS, Liu XH, Liu LX, Lou WH, Jin DY, Yang PY, Wang XL. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics reveals myoferlin as a novel prognostic predictor in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J proteomics. 2013;91:453–465. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.06.032. PMID: 23851313. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.06.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Blomme A, Fahmy K, Peulen O, Costanza B, Fontaine M, Struman I, Baiwir D, de Pauw E, Thiry M, Bellahcene A, Castronovo V, Turtoi A. Myoferlin is a novel exosomal protein and functional regulator of cancer-derived exosomes. Oncotarget. 2016;7:83669–83683. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13276. PMID: 27845903. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Blackwell RH, Foreman KE, Gupta GN. The role of cancer-derived exosomes in tumorigenicity & epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Cancers. 2017;9:E105–E105. doi: 10.3390/cancers9080105. PMID: 28796 150. DOI: 10.3390/cancers9080105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bernatchez PN, Sharma A, Kodaman P, Sessa WC. Myoferlin is critical for endocytosis in endothelial cells. Am J of Physiol Cell Physiol. 2009;297:C484–92. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00498.2008. PMID: 19494235. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00498.200815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pestova K, Koch AJ, Quesenberry CP, Shan J, Zhang Y, Leimpeter AD, Blondin B, Sitailo S, Buckingham L, Du J, Fei H, Van Den Eeden SK. Identification of fluorescence in situ hybridization assay markers for prediction of disease progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:2–2. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3910-4. PMID: 29291731. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3910-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kantor AF, McLaughlin JK, Curtis RE, Flannery JT, Fraumeni JF Jr. Risk of second malignancy after cancers of the renal parenchyma, renal pelvis, and ureter. Cancer. 1986;58:1158–1161. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860901)58:5<1158::aid-cncr2820580530>3.0.co;2-v. PMID: 3731042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sato S, Shinohara N, Suzuki S, Harabayashi T, Koyanagi T. Multiple primary malignancies in Japanese patients with renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol. 2004;11:269–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00792.x. PMID: 15147541. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Di Silverio F, Sciarra A, Flammia GP, Mariani M, De Vico A. Multiple primary tumors: 17 cases of renal-cell carcinoma associated with primary tumors involving different steroid-hormone target tissues. World J Urol. 1997;15:203–209. doi: 10.1007/BF02201858. PMID: 9228728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rabbani F, Grimaldi G, Russo P. Multiple primary malignancies in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1998;160:1255–1259. PMID: 9751330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from In Vivo are provided here courtesy of International Institute of Anticancer Research

RESOURCES