Skip to main content
In Vivo logoLink to In Vivo
. 2019 Jul 3;33(4):999–1010. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11569

Potential Applications of Non-thermal Plasma in Animal Husbandry to Improve Infrastructure

TAEHO KWON 1, NISANSALA CHANDIMALI 2,3, DONG-HO LEE 1, YEONGHOON SON 1, SEUNG-BIN YOON 1, JA-RANG LEE 1, SANGIL LEE 1, KI JIN KIM 1, SANG-YONG LEE 1, SE-YONG KIM 1, YU-JIN JO 1, MINSEONG KIM 1, BYOUNG-JIN PARK 1, JUN-KI LEE 1, DONG KEE JEONG 3, JI-SU KIM 1
PMCID: PMC6689345  PMID: 31280188

Abstract

Infrastructure in animal husbandry refers to fundamental facilities and services necessary for better living conditions of animals and its economy to function through better productivity. Mainly, infrastructure can be divided into two categories: hard infrastructure and soft infrastructure. Physical infrastructure, such as buildings, roads, and water supplying systems, belongs to hard infrastructure. Soft infrastructure includes services which are required to maintain economic, health, cultural and social standards of animal husbandry. Therefore, the proper management of infrastructure in animal husbandry is necessary for animal welfare and its economy. Among various technologies to improve the quality of infrastructure, non-thermal plasma (NTP) technology is an effectively applicable technology in different stages of animal husbandry. NTP is mainly helpful in maintaining better health conditions of animals in several ways via decontamination from microorganisms present in air, water, food, instruments and surfaces of animal farming systems. Furthermore, NTP is used in the treatment of waste water, vaccine production, wound healing in animals, odor-free ventilation, and packaging of animal food or animal products. This review summarizes the recent studies of NTP which can be related to the infrastructure in animal husbandry.

Keywords: Animal husbandry, infrastructure, non-thermal plasma, technology, products, review


Animal husbandry, a component of modern agriculture, concerns with the animals that are raised for commodities such as meat, milk, eggs, fur, leather and wool. The well-being of animals in animal husbandry has ethical, scientific, political and aesthetic components which are required for a better animal management, welfare, handling, care and high productivity (1). Infrastructure is one of the major contributors to well-being of animals which usually associates with management issues regarding nutrition, health, transportation, mustering and handling and other special invasive practices (2). Infrastructure refers to the fundamental facilities in an animal husbandry which can be divided into hard infrastructure and soft infrastructure. Hard infrastructure includes systems such as buildings, roads, and water supplying systems. Soft infrastructure consists of cost-effective, health, social and cultural facilities. Therefore, the better management of infrastructure in animal husbandry leads to well-being of animals and higher financial profit through the higher productivity.

Non-thermal plasma (NTP) has been identified as a potential approach to improve the quality of infrastructure systems and facilities including buildings, medications, food, ventilation, water supply, instruments and other special management practices (3-7). NTP is partially ionized matters in gaseous state at low temperatures and energy is mostly stored in free electrons (8). Different devices have been introduced to generate NTP including dielectric barrier discharges (DBD), atmospheric plasma jets, coronas and, surface and microwave discharges for numerous applications in different fields (9). NTP is environment-friendly, free of toxicity and requires a low temperature. These characteristics of NTP do not put animals and environment in animal husbandry at risk (10,11). Therefore, NTP can be considered as an effective potential application to improve infrastructure, without disturbing animal well-being.

In this review, we summarized the already known applications of non-thermal plasma in the infrastructure sector of animal husbandry with regard to the well-being of animals and higher productivity which is necessary for its financially profitable function. We also highlighted the studies about the applications of NTP for improving infrastructure in other fields and hypothesized its use in animal husbandry. However, more systematic research is still required to bridge knowledge gaps particularly on NTP and the infrastructure of animal husbandry.

Role of NTP in Bio-decontamination to Provide a Healthy Environment for Farm Animals

The presence of various micro-organisms such as bacteria, biofilms, fungi, spores of fungi and protozoan parasites and their genes and metabolites in the environment increases the health risks to farm animals by causing and spreading numerous diseases (12,13). Therefore, bio-decontamination of surfaces, instruments and water is necessary in animal husbandry to maintain a healthy environment. Several methods have been introduced for this purpose including oven or autoclave sterilization processes, chemical sterilization such as ethylene oxide sterilization, Gamma irradiation, high hydrostatic pressure technique and microwave sterilization. The limitations of these techniques such as the possibility of chemicals to remain after sterilization, requirement of complex, expensive and high security equipment and the requirement of special conditions for operations have also been discussed (14,15). Therefore, NTP has been suggested as an effective, less toxic and low-cost method for bio-decontamination by several research groups. Also, none of the destructive effects on decontaminated surfaces were detected following NTP treatment (14,16,17). Furthermore, NTP can be used to decontaminate heat-sensitive surfaces and instruments as it is used at room temperature (18).

Commonly, most decontamination techniques target the membrane of a cell as it separates its inner compartments from the environment (14). NTP has general and specific effects on the cell surface of living organisms (14,19-21). In addition to cell membranes (14,22-26), NTP targets DNA (14,24,26,27) and proteins (14,26,28) to destroy living organisms (Table I).

Table I. Effects of NTP on microbial constituents to destroy micro-organisms.

graphic file with name in_vivo-33-1001-i0001.jpg

High-touch and Frequently-touched Surfaces and Instruments Can Be Decontaminated by NTP in Animal Farms

Poor health conditions of farm animals disturb animal well-being and result in poor productivity and economic losses. Therefore, health and hygiene of farm animals, which comes under the category of soft infrastructure, must be maintained properly. “High-touch” or frequently touched surfaces and instruments are easily contaminated and should be decontaminated for a pathogen-free environment (15,16).

To date, NTP has been identified as an effective, low-cost and non-toxic way to decontaminate surfaces, instruments and confined environments (15,16,29). It has been shown that NTP produced from single-jet system eradicates vegetative bacteria from different surfaces (16,30) and NTP from multi-jet system is capable of reducing surface pathogens such as methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium difficile, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii (16). Furthermore, other studies have also demonstrated the successful decontamination of surfaces and instruments from these pathogenic organisms by NTP treatment (6,15). Therefore, NTP can be used in the decontamination of animal farm environments as these pathogens are breeding health risks for animals (13,31-35). It has also been reported that exposure to NTP over a short period inactivates micro-organisms in confined environments such as airtight boxes and refrigerators, suggesting that NTP can be used to keep stored agricultural products fresh (29). Another study has suggested that NTP generated from pure oxygen is more effective for decontamination than that generated from oxygen-hydrogen gas mixture (18).

Moreover, NTP is able to inactivate micromycete species such as Cladosporium sphaerospermum, Aspergillus oryzae, Alternaria species and Byssochlamys mivea and micromycete spores (36,37). This fungicidal property of NTP also suggests its usefulness in decontaminating animal farms. The antibacterial efficacy of NTP has been further confirmed by several groups (4,30,38-40). NTP has been found to have antibacterial effects on a variety of bacteria (41,42), on ESKAPE pathogens in the environment (17), on multi-drug- resistant bacteria in surface environments (43). Moreover, NTP has been shown to suppress host-cell invasion and to deactivate cell motility of Salmonella Typhimurium (44). Other than vegetative cells, NTP has the ability to decontaminate surfaces from biofilms which are responsible for undesirable effects such as equipment damages and pipe plugging and cannot be destroyed by conventional sterilization methods. Moreover, NTP can destroy endotoxins, lipids and prions of microorganisms (45-50).

Even though, most of these studies were conducted in hospital environments and on medical devices, their results are applicable for all environments and instruments contaminated with above mentioned pathogenic microorganisms. Therefore, NTP is an effective and low-cost technology for surface and equipment decontamination in animal farms without any adverse effects to animals or farm environment.

NTP Increases the Microbiological, Physical and Chemical Quality of Water via Inactivating Micro- organisms

The quality of water can affect animal health and productivity directly and indirectly. Therefore, ensuring the microbiological, chemical and physical quality of water which is used for any purpose in a farm is an important management practice under the infrastructure section of animal farming (51).

As an effective method of water sterilization, NTP has been shown to successfully inactivate E. coli as a model bacterium in water (52). The same study has shown that bacteria cells enter to an active-but-nonculturable state after exposure to argon plasma jet-generated NTP. Membrane damages were also observed, suggesting that bacterial inactivation may be due to the peroxidation of cell membrane lipids by NTP-produced ROS (52). Another study has found that NTP is a cost-effective, environmentally friendly, sustainable and non-chemical-based promising candidate to destroy microcystins in water which cannot be destroyed by conventional methods. Microcystins are toxins produced by cyanobacteria, and can cause detrimental effects on farm animal health (53). Moreover, DBD-generate -NTP has been shown to inactivate residues of cyanobacteria which cause algal bloom in water (54). Another study has reported that pulsed plasma gas discharge destroys waterborn enteroparasites which infect both farm animals and humans. According to that study plasma treated water kills the parasite at the thick-walled oocyst stage which is highly resistant to chlorine (55). It has been reported from another research group that plasma has a selective impact on bacterial populations at lower doses and potent bactericidal effects at high doses (56).

Altogether, these studies have shown that NTP is an effective method to keep water quality in a standard level to maintain animal health in animal husbandry.

NTP Degrades the Organic Contaminants in Waste Water Effluents

Waste management is one of the key infrastructure facilities in the field of livestock. The release of waste water effluents without proper management from industries, agricultural systems and animal farms has gained attention as a major cause of aquatic environment pollution. Waste water effluents from animal farms contain animal slurry, milk, hormones, medication drugs, pharmaceutical compounds and food wastes (57). Even though, the conventional water treatment methods destroy some of these pollutants, fail to degrade most of persistent substances and micro pollutants in waste water (58).

Therefore, various advanced oxidation processes were introduced during the last decades for the treatment of waste water including electric discharge NTP technology (59). According to previous studies, active species of NTP such as ions, radicals, molecular species, atoms, UV light and shock waves are contributing to the removal of pollutants without requiring any additional chemicals. The efficiency of NTP treatment on waste water depends on the gas composition used to generate NTP, the power applied and the temperature of the solution (60-64). A study has shown that the application of NTP to degrade antibiotics of the penicillin class such as amoxicillin, oxacillin and ampicillin which are widely used in veterinary medicine for the treatment of bacterial infections in animals (65). NTP has also shown synergistic effects with micro pollutant adsorption in the decomposition of pesticides in waste water such as atrazine, which can be released from animal husbandry (58).

Moreover, NTP can be used to degrade sulfonamide antibiotics in waste water (66). Sulfonamides are widely used in veterinary medicine practices as effective chemotherapeutics for protozoan and bacterial infections. But, it has a maximum residue limit due to the carcinogenic potency of sulfonamide residues (67). Also, animal antibiotics are considered as non-biodegradable pollutants due to their adverse effects and toxicity to ecosystems (65). Therefore, it is necessary to degrade the sulfonamides in waste water. A previous study has introduced an aeration-assisted NTP to degrade these non-biodegradable sulfonamides (66). According to another study, NTP mineralizes organic pollutants in waste water such as Irgarol 1051 which is an algaecide found in antifouling paints (68). An NTP-ozonation system has been successfully tested for the degradation of herbicides and pesticides in waste water. Herbicides and pesticides are used to destroy unwanted vegetation and pests in farming systems (69). Farm waste water effluents may include significant amounts of palm oil, used in animal nutrition, and of its derivatives (70,71). Gliding arc discharge NTP has been shown to degrade palm oil pollutants in waste water (59)and to reduce more than 50% of total organic carbon (TOC) (59). Post-treatment of plasma to aryl containing water increased the effectiveness of biological removal (72).

All these studies provided great evidence showing that NTP alone or in combination with other operation systems has the ability to degrade organic contaminants in waste water effluents from indoor or outdoor animal farming systems.

NTP Abates the Emission of Harmful Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and Offensive Odors from Indoor and Outdoor Animal Farming Systems

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), organic chemicals which produce vapors at room temperature, are not acutely toxic. However, they cause short- or long-term adverse health effects to animals and humans (73). Many types of VOCs including carboxylic acids, alcohols, carbonyls, phenolic compounds and sulfur and nitrogen-containing compounds are emitted to the environment in animal husbandry mainly due to feeding operations such as storage and handling, animal wastes and exhalation (74-76).

Few technologies have been introduced to control the emission of VOCs and odors such as adsorption, absorption, condensation, thermal and catalytic incineration and biological oxidative filtering (77). Recent studies have suggested that NTP is a better treatment technology for VOC emission abatement (78-80) due to the advantages of requiring relatively low energy, having moderate cost, being easily operated, having short residence time and the ability to treat relatively low concentrations of VOCs at low operating temperatures (81,82). Furthermore, previous studies have tested the application of NTP for abatement of numerous hazardous air pollutants such as sulfur dioxide (SO2) (83), Nitrogen dioxide and nitric oxide (NO), odors (H2S, NH3) (84-86), chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and Mercury (87,88).

NTP generates strong oxidants in the gas phase and therefore, is a source of gas-phase reactive species and free radicals such as O, OH and H+ which are contributing to the elimination of air pollutants. These reactive species and radicals are able to react with odors, vapors and toxic gases and convert them into non-toxic molecules (89,90). Furthermore, some studies have introduced synergistic methods to abate VOCs like NTP coupled with F-TiO2/gamma-Al2O3 for the removal of toluene odor (91) and NTP combined with bio trickling filters (BTF) for the removal of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) (92).

Taken together, it has been demonstrated that NTP is an effective technology of care for the health of animals in confined indoor environments by abating VOC and offensive odors. It also controls the air pollution in outdoor environments. Therefore, it can be concluded that NTP is a helpful technology to manage animal health as one component of soft infrastructure and ventilation in buildings as a component of hard infrastructure.

NTP Is an Effective Inactivating Agent for Preparation of Conventional Inactivated Vaccines

Vaccines can be categorized under the section of health in soft infrastructure. Vaccines are considered a predominant method of controlling various diseases in livestock industry. Conventional inactivated vaccines, live attenuated vaccines and gene-mutated vaccines are the three types of vaccines used in animals (93,94). Among these vaccines, inactivated vaccines are considered the most popular vaccines in animal husbandry (95). Usually, the inactivated vaccines rely on inactivating agents. However, the deleterious effects of those agents such as formaldehyde and beta-propiolactone compromise safety and effectiveness of vaccines (11,96). Therefore, NTP has introduced as an effective and safe agent to produce inactivated vaccines (11).

It has already been reported the preparation of vaccines against Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and Avian influenza virus (AIV) using NTP as inactivating agent (11). Newcastle disease and Avian influenza are two common diseases which affect a variety of animal species and cause 100% mortality (97). A previous study has shown that treatment for a certain time period with NTP is suitable for these vaccine preparations (11). The same study has reported that overdose of NTP destroys virus morphology, decreases virulence, and causes loss of immunogenicity. Therefore, determination of the specific dose and time of NTP treatment is necessary for the preparation of inactivated vaccines (11). According to the above study, inactivation of virus by NTP treatment is due to increased oxidation reduction potential (ORP) through a series of chemical reactions among ROS and RNS in the allantoic fluid system of virus (11).

Taken together, these findings suggest that NTP can be used as a successful, effective and safe inactivating agent for inactivated vaccine preparation against viruses affecting animal husbandry. Therefore, NTP indirectly contributes to management of animal health which is a component of soft infrastructure.

NTP Is a Promising Approach to Preserve Fresh and Minimally Processed Animal Feed

Most of fresh or partially processed food products are perishable due to the higher concentration of moisture and ease to spoil specially during storage due to contamination with microorganisms or due to higher chemical/biochemical reactions (98). Most of the times, fresh and partially processed food is given to farm animals which consume it raw. Therefore, it is necessary to preserve the quality of the food and prevent food-borne diseases within animal herds.

NTP has been introduced as an effective treatment for this purpose by previous studies. They have shown the ability of NTP to decontaminate food and extend the shelf-life of food (98-102). NTP also inactivates thermophilic bacteria which cannot be destroyed by conventional methods. NTP achieves this by modifying the structure of thermophilic proteins (103). Few studies have shown that NTP inactivates bacteria on fresh food, with special focus on Salmonella species which can adversely affect farm animals and humans (104,105). Another study has specially shown the favorable effects of NTP on raw milk. Milk is a product which can easily get contaminated due to its fresh nature and high nutritious value. Therefore, the elimination of bacteria from milk is a serious problem for decades. However, NTP has been shown to be able to reduce bacteria in milk, using E. coli as model bacteria (106). This study demonstrated the applicability of NTP in animal husbandry as milk is used to feed new born and young animals such as cattle, goats, and humans. Thus, low-cost NTP can be used to produce good quality milk and provide financial benefits for animal husbandry. NTP also inactivates the spores including chemical and heat-resistant spores which are produced by spore-forming microorganisms (107).

Contamination of animal feed and feed raw materials by fungi, especially, during storage is also common in animal husbandry (108). A previous study has shown that NTP prolongs the shelf life of food by reducing the deterioration of food through inactivation of fungi (109,110). In addition to the inactivation of microorganisms, NTP also preserves food by removing pesticides and insecticides from food surfaces without harming it (111). Thus, NTP plays another important role in animal husbandry by removing toxic materials from raw plant materials which are consumed by farm animals.

Taken together, all studies have demonstrated that NTP treatment is an effective technology to preserve animal feed by increasing its quality, inactivating microbes, preventing spoilage and removing toxic materials. Therefore, NTP contributes to soft infrastructure indirectly via food preservation.

Roles of NTP in Skin Decontamination, Skin Renewal and Skin Wound Healing in Animals

NTP has a greater potential in efficient painless disinfection of skins, sterilization even in microscopic openings of the skin, wound healing, therapy of skin infections and tissue regeneration without damaging healthy tissues (112,113). Gaseous stage NTP allows it to penetrate even inhomogeneous surfaces, civilities and fissures up to micro scale. Therefore, NTP provides advantage over traditional fluids or chemicals used for the same purpose (113).

It has been reported that NTP generated from atmospheric pressure plasma jet and DBD has the ability to decontaminate skins (114) and to inactivate Chlamydia trachomatis, which causes different diseases in farm animals, especially in cattle (115). Moreover, several studies have demonstrated the wound healing ability of NTP. According to those studies, NTP supports wound healing by its antiseptic effects, by regulating integrin receptors on the surface of skin cells, by its pro-angiogenic effects, by promoting vascularization, by controlling blood coagulation, by boosting and prolonging the cutaneous microcirculation and by sterilizing the wounds without any observable side effects (116-122). Some of these studies have used skins from animals such as porcine and rat to show that NTP decontaminates animal skins or supports wound healing (120,122).

Continuous proliferation and differentiation of epidermal cells of the skin are required for maintaining healthy skin. They are also essential for a better and fast healing of wounds caused from injuries, ulcers or tumor removal (123,124). A study has demonstrated that NTP can be employed in skin regenerating (125). It was shown that NTP allows keratinocytes to escape from G1 cell cycle arrest, increases the cell proportion in S and G2 phases, causes translocation of beta-catenin to nucleus and induces the transcription of target genes without damaging DNA (125). Moreover, another study has tested the effects of cold argon plasma on eggs of blow fly (126). Larvae of this fly produce myiasis which is a parasitic infection where larvae grow inside the host while feeding on its tissues. According to that study, NTP treatment on blow fly egg shells supported healing of these wounds (126).

Taken together, NTP is a promising effective technique to decontaminate, treat wounds and renew skins of farm animals and provide better health and hygiene of animals as part of soft infrastructure management.

NTP Inactivates Bio-aerosols Rapidly and Facilitates a Disease-free Ventilation in Farm Environment

Particles of biological origin such as microorganisms (fungi, bacteria and virus), pollen, allergens, endotoxins, plant debris and skin scales are considered as bio-aerosols (127). These bio-aerosols are reported to have adverse health effects in animals and humans (128). Therefore, the maintenance of air without bio-aerosols is necessary for healthy environmental conditions in an animal farm. Commonly, the particulate filters inside heating, ventilating and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems are used to control bio-aerosols (129). However, the efficiency of these filters is doubtable as the collected bio-aerosols are not inactivated and accumulate on the surfaces of filters. In addition, bio-aerosols proliferate during long periods (128). Therefore, as another method of air-sterilization, NTP has been investigated in previous studies (3,128,130,131). It is more advantageous over other methods as it does not produce secondary environmental pollution and is cost effective (132).

One of those studies has reported that NTP generated from DBD deactivates indoor and outdoor bio-aerosols by reducing culturability, viability and diversity of micro-organisms. Bacteria inactivation reached 95% and that of fungi 85-98% (128). Another study has demonstrated that NTP efficiently inactivates airborne pathogens which are resistant to antibiotics. According to that study the efficacy of NTP depends on the load of microorganisms, and the generation rate and flow rate of bio-aerosols. As the underlying mechanism of this inactivation, they suggested two key regulatory oxidative stress pathways which are mediated by superoxide dismutase and catalase (133). Another study has introduced a reliable bio-aerosol filter which is not requiring any maintenance practices as it made by NTP (3).

NTP has also been demonstrated to inactivate various airborne viruses including MS2 virus and adenoviruses (8,132,134). This inactivation is primarily attributed to ROS released from NTP and the subsequent damage of virus proteins and genes (132).

According to this evidence, NTP is an applicable technology for indoor and outdoor air cleaning in animal farms as a cost-effective method to manage soft infrastructure.

Usage of NTP to Disinfect Packaging Materials and Inside of Sealed Packages

Food Packaging is an important aspect in animal husbandry as it uses packaged feed for feeding animals in farms and packages to pack their products for commercialization purposes. Therefore, usage of sterilized packing materials or disinfection of the inside of packages is essential to preserve food products from microorganisms and to extend the shelf-life of fresh products. NTP has been introduced as a sterilization method with numerous advantages over other conventional methods. Low operational cost, short treatment time, low temperatures, and non-toxicity make NTP an applicable disinfectant technique for variety of materials including heat and chemical sensitive materials (8,135).

Few studies have examined the use of NTP in disinfecting the inside of sealed packages (135-137). One of these studies demonstrated the inactivation of high concentration of E. coli within few seconds in liquids contained inside sealed bags by NTP (135). Another study has introduced a DBD system to generate NTP inside packages containing cherry tomatoes. In this set-up of DBD systems the package itself serves as the dielectric material. According to that study, this set-up helps to preserve food products without disturbing their quality (137). A device to generate NTP inside sealed bags has been introduced by another study to sterilize single-use medical devices (136). It has been shown that NTP increases the shelf-life of packaged chicken fillets without any adverse effects (138). In addition to disinfection of the insides of sealed bags, some studies have shown that NTP disinfects packaging materials. According to these studies, the physicochemical and biodegradable properties of food packaging materials such as polylactic acid films can be improved through NTP treatment without negatively affecting these materials (8,139).

Altogether, these studies indicate that NTP can be used to sterilize and disinfect the insides of sealed packages and improve the properties of packaging materials which are used to preserve food. Also, NTP protects the quality of foods inside packages without any adverse effects on packaging materials. Therefore, this can be considered as another application of NTP to manage soft infrastructure in animal husbandry.

Conclusion and Future Perspective

The studies highlighted in this review are focused on non-thermal plasma (NTP) technology as an emerging and effective technology in the field of infrastructure. NTP is produced from different devices such as DBD, plasma jet, coronas, and surface and microwave discharges. These studies were conducted in the field of animal husbandry as well as in other fields, such as medicine. Therefore, in this review we summarized the results of the application of NTP in the infrastructure of animal husbandry and we hypothesized the potential application of NTP in animal husbandry from the knowledge in other fields. Thus, further studies are needed on the application of NTP in the infrastructure of animal husbandry.

As a summary, NTP is a technology that can effectively be applied in infrastructure management over other technologies due to its environmentally friendly nature and low cost which is also a main part of infrastructure. Other than the economy, NTP provides better living conditions to animals by contributing to the maintenance of animal health, quality of nutrition and animal welfare. Better living conditions of animals also provides economic advantages through higher productivity. Therefore, NTP can be used for the proper management of infrastructure in animal husbandry.

Summary

Animal husbandry is one of the branches of agriculture which consists of animals that are raised for several commodities such as meat, milk, eggs, fiber or other products. Usually, it includes the day-to-day care of animals, rising of the livestock and selective breeding. A wide range of animal species such as cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, chickens, and rabbits are used in animal husbandry in different parts of the world. Moreover, insect farming and aquaculture are also considered part of animal husbandry. One of the main requirements in animal husbandry is the maintenance of better living conditions of animals for animal welfare and higher financial gains through higher productivity. Proper management of infrastructure is essential to provide those better living conditions of animals. Among various technologies, non-thermal plasma technology is gaining attention as an effective technology to improve the infrastructure at several stages of the production system in animal husbandry.

Conflicts of Interest

The Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author’s Contributions

T.K., N.C., D.K.J., and J.S.K., designed and wrote the whole manuscript; T.K., N.C, performed the figures; D.H.L., S.B.Y., J.R.L., Y.S., S.L., K.J.K., S.Y.L. S.Y.K., Y.J.J., M.K., B.J.P., J.K.L., contributed in the revision of the manuscript. All Authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the KRIBB Research Initiative Program (KGM5161914). This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2017R1D1A1B03028188), KRIBB-OGM5201922.

References

  • 1.Swanson JC. Farm animal well-being and intensive production systems. J Anim Sci. 1995;73(9):2744–2751. doi: 10.2527/1995.7392744x. PMID: 8582867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Petherick JC. Animal welfare provision for land-based livestock industries in australia. Aust Vet J. 2006;84(11):379–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2006.00064.x. PMID: 17092321. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2006.00064.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jidenko N, Borra JP. Self-cleaning, maintenance-free aerosol filter by non-thermal plasma at atmospheric pressure. J Hazard Mater. 2012;235-236:237–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.055. PMID: 22951224. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sung SJ, Huh JB, Yun MJ, Chang BM, Jeong CM, Jeon YC. Sterilization effect of atmospheric pressure non-thermal air plasma on dental instruments. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5(1):2–8. doi: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.2. PMID: 23508991. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Magureanu M, Piroi D, Mandache NB, David V, Medvedovici A, Parvulescu VI. Degradation of pharmaceutical compound pentoxifylline in water by non-thermal plasma treatment. Water Res. 2010;44(11):3445–3453. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.03.020. PMID: 20398913. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Burts ML, Alexeff I, Meek ET, McCullers JA. Use of atmospheric non-thermal plasma as a disinfectant for objects contaminated with methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(9):729–733. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.03.010. PMID: 19559504. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schnabel U, Handorf O, Yarova K, Zessin B, Zechlin S, Sydow D, Zellmer E, Stachowiak J, Andrasch M, Below H, Ehlbeck J. Plasma-treated air and water-assessment of synergistic antimicrobial effects for sanitation of food processing surfaces and environment. Foods. 2019;8(2) doi: 10.3390/foods8020055. PMID:30717375. DOI: 10.3390/foods8020055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Scholtz V, Pazlarova J, Souskova H, Khun J, Julak J. Nonthermal plasma – a tool for decontamination and disinfection. Biotechnol Adv . 2015;33(6 Pt 2):1108–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.01.002. PMID: 25595663. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang JJ, Wang XZ, Luong Do H, Chandimali N, Kang TY, Kim N, Ghosh M, Lee SB, Mok YS, Kim SB, Kwon T, Jeong DK. Microrna-7450 regulates non-thermal plasma-induced chicken sertoli cell apoptosis via adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase activation. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8761–8761. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27123-8. PMID: 29884805. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27123-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.El Roz M, Lakiss L, Valtchev V, Mintova S, Thibault-Starzyk F. Cold plasma as environmentally benign approach for activation of zeolite nanocrystals. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012;158:148–154. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso. 2012. 03.003. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang G, Zhu R, Yang L, Wang K, Zhang Q, Su X, Yang B, Zhang J, Fang J. Non-thermal plasma for inactivated-vaccine preparation. Vaccine. 2016;34(8):1126–1132. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.10.099. PMID: 26529075. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.10.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rodrigues Hoffmann A, Proctor LM, Surette MG, Suchodolski JS. The microbiome: The trillions of microorganisms that maintain health and cause disease in humans and companion animals. Vet Pathol. 2016;53(1):10–21. doi: 10.1177/0300985815595517. PMID: 26220947. DOI: 10.1177/0300985815595517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Holland RE. Some infectious causes of diarrhea in young farm animals. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990;3(4):345–375. doi: 10.1128/cmr.3.4.345. PMID: 2224836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moreau M, Orange N, Feuilloley MG. Non-thermal plasma technologies: New tools for bio-decontamination. Biotechnol Adv. 2008;26(6):610–617. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.08.001. PMID: 18775485. DOI: 10.1016/ j.biotechadv.2008.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cahill OJ, Claro T, O’Connor N, Cafolla AA, Stevens NT, Daniels S, Humphreys H. Cold air plasma to decontaminate inanimate surfaces of the hospital environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(6):2004–2010. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03480-13. PMID: 24441156. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03480-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cahill OJ, Claro T, Cafolla AA, Stevens NT, Daniels S, Humphreys H. Decontamination of hospital surfaces with multijet cold plasma: A method to enhance infection prevention and control. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38(10):1182–1187. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.168. PMID: 28793943. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Flynn PB, Higginbotham S, Alshraiedeh NH, Gorman SP, Graham WG, Gilmore BF. Bactericidal efficacy of atmospheric pressure non-thermal plasma (apntp) against the eskape pathogens. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;46(1):101–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.02.026. PMID: 25963338. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag. 2015.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Boscariol MR, Moreira AJ, Mansano RD, Kikuchi IS, Pinto TJ. Sterilization by pure oxygen plasma and by oxygen-hydrogen peroxide plasma: An efficacy study. Int J Pharm. 2008;353(1-2):170–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.11.059. PMID: 18207677. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ijpharm.2007.11.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pelletier J. La sterilization par le procede plasma. Aggressologie. 1993;33:105–110. PMID: 1340091. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Laroussi M, Leipold F. Evaluation of the roles of reactive species, heat, and uv radiation in the inactivation of bacterial cells by air plasmas at atmospheric pressure. Int J Mass Spec. 2004;233(1-3):81–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2003.11.016. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lerouge S, Wertheimer MR, Marchand R, Tabrizian M, Yahia LH. Effect of gas composition on spore mortality and etching during low- pressure plasma sterilization. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;51(1):128–135. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(200007)51:1<128::aid-jbm17>3.0.co;2-#. PMID: 10813754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ulmer HM, Heinz V, Gänzle MG, Knorr D, Vogel RF. Effects of pulsed electric fields on inactivation and metabolic activity of lactobacillus plantarum in model beer. J Applied Microbiol. 2002;93(2):326–335. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01699.x. PMID: 12147082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Spilimbergo S, Dehghani F, Bertucco A, Foster NR. Inactivation of bacteria and spores by pulse electric field and high pressure co2 at low temperature. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003;82(1):118–125. doi: 10.1002/bit.10554. PMID: 12569631. DOI: 10.1002/bit.10554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ohshima T, Sato M, Saito M. Selective release of intracellular protein using pulsed electric field. J Electrostat. 1995;35(1):103–112. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3886(95)00014-2. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moreau M, Feuilloley MGJ, Orange N, Brisset JL. Lethal effect of the gliding arc discharges on erwinia spp. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;98(5):1039–1046. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02535.x. PMID: 15836472. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02535.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moreau M, Feuilloley MGJ, Veron W, Meylheuc T, Chevalier S, Brisset JL, Orange N. Gliding arc discharge in the potato pathogen erwinia carotovora subsp. Atroseptica: Mechanism of lethal action and effect on membrane-associated molecules. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(18):5904–5910. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00662-07. PMID: 17644644. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00662-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Elmnasser N, Guillou S, Leroi F, Orange N, Bakhrouf A, Federighi M. Pulsed-light system as a novel food decontamination technology: A review. Can J Microbiol. 2007;53(7):813–821. doi: 10.1139/W07-042. PMID: 17898836. DOI: 10.1139/W07-042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Igumenov VL, Sharonov BP, Pasechnik VA. Aggregation of membrane proteins of e. Coli cells after treatment with singlet oxygen. Biokhimiya. 1988;53(6):925–930. PMID: 3052597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Heo NS, Lee MK, Kim GW, Lee SJ, Park JY, Park TJ. Microbial inactivation and pesticide removal by remote exposure of atmospheric air plasma in confined environments. J Biosci Bioeng. 2014;117(1):81–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.06.007. PMID: 23850266. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Galvin S, Cahill O, O’Connor N, Cafolla AA, Daniels S, Humphreys H. The antimicrobial effects of helium and helium-air plasma on staphylococcus aureus and clostridium difficile. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2013;57(2):83–90. doi: 10.1111/lam.12091. PMID: 23607860. DOI: 10.1111/lam.12091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hamza E, Dorgham SM, Hamza DA. Carbapenemase-producing klebsiella pneumoniae in broiler poultry farming in egypt. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2016;7:8–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2016.06.004. PMID: 27530998. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2016.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Aires-de-Sousa M. Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus among animals: Current overview. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(6):373–380. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.002. PMID: 27851997. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016. 11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Andres-Lasheras S, Bolea R, Mainar-Jaime RC, Kuijper E, Sevilla E, Martin-Burriel I, Chirino-Trejo M. Presence of clostridium difficile in pig faecal samples and wild animal species associated with pig farms. J Appl Microbiol. 2017;122(2):462–472. doi: 10.1111/jam.13343. PMID: 27990723. DOI: 10.1111/jam.13343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yuan YG, Peng QL, Gurunathan S. Effects of silver nanoparticles on multiple drug-resistant strains of staphylococcus aureus and pseudomonas aeruginosa from mastitis-infected goats: An alternative approach for antimicrobial therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(3) doi: 10.3390/ijms18030569. PMID: 28272303. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18030569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Al Bayssari C, Dabboussi F, Hamze M, Rolain JM. Emergence of carbapenemase-producing pseudomonas aeruginosa and acinetobacter baumannii in livestock animals in lebanon. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(3):950–951. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku469. PMID: 25406297. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dku469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Julak J, Souskova H, Scholtz V, Kvasnickova E, Savicka D, Kriha V. Comparison of fungicidal properties of non-thermal plasma produced by corona discharge and dielectric barrier discharge. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 2018;63(1):63–68. doi: 10.1007/s12223-017-0535-6. PMID: 28623536. DOI: 10.1007/s12223-017-0535-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Souskova H, Scholtz V, Julak J, Kommova L, Savicka D, Pazlarova J. The survival of micromycetes and yeasts under the low-temperature plasma generated in electrical discharge. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 2011;56(1):77–79. doi: 10.1007/s12223-011-0005-5. PMID: 21399943. DOI: 10.1007/s12223-011-0005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liao X, Xiang Q, Liu D, Chen S, Ye X, Ding T. Lethal and sublethal effect of a dielectric barrier discharge atmospheric cold plasma on staphylococcus aureus. J Food Prot. 2017;80(6):928–932. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-499. PMID: 28459615. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Joshi SG, Cooper M, Yost A, Paff M, Ercan UK, Fridman G, Friedman G, Fridman A, Brooks AD. Nonthermal dielectric-barrier discharge plasma-induced inactivation involves oxidative DNA damage and membrane lipid peroxidation in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(3):1053–1062. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01002-10. PMID: 21199923. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01002-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Moisan M, Barbeau J, Moreau S, Pelletier J, Tabrizian M, Yahia LH. Low-temperature sterilization using gas plasmas: A review of the experiments and an analysis of the inactivation mechanisms. Int J Pharm. 2001;226(1-2):1–21. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(01)00752-9. PMID: 11532565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Alkawareek MY, Gorman SP, Graham WG, Gilmore BF. Potential cellular targets and antibacterial efficacy of atmospheric pressure non-thermal plasma. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014;43(2):154–160. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.08.022. PMID: 24139886. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ijantimicag.2013.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sohbatzadeh F, Hosseinzadeh Colagar A, Mirzanejhad S, Mahmodi S. E. Coli, p. Aeruginosa, and b. Cereus bacteria sterilization using afterglow of non-thermal plasma at atmospheric pressure. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;160(7):1978–1984. doi: 10.1007/s12010-009-8817-3. PMID: 19882114. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-009-8817-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Park JH, Kumar N, Park DH, Yusupov M, Neyts EC, Verlackt CC, Bogaerts A, Kang MH, Uhm HS, Choi EH, Attri P. A comparative study for the inactivation of multidrug resistance bacteria using dielectric barrier discharge and nano-second pulsed plasma. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13849–13849. doi: 10.1038/srep13849. PMID: 26351132. DOI: 10.1038/srep13849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Park JS, Kim K, Han JH, Gweon B, Ko UH, Yoo SJ, Choe W, Shin JH. Effects of minimal exposures to atmospheric pressure plasma on the activity of salmonella typhimurium: Deactivation of bacterial motility and suppression of host-cell invasion. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2016;605:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2016.06.012. PMID: 27345896. DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2016.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cotter JJ, Maguire P, Soberon F, Daniels S, O’Gara JP, Casey E. Disinfection of meticillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms using a remote non-thermal gas plasma. J Hosp Infect. 2011;78(3):204–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.03.019. PMID: 21601949. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xu L, Tu Y, Yu Y, Tan M, Li J, Chen H. Augmented survival of neisseria gonorrhoeae within biofilms: Exposure to atmospheric pressure non-thermal plasmas. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30(1):25–31. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-1047-3. PMID: 20839022. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-010-1047-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fricke K, Koban I, Tresp H, Jablonowski L, Schroder K, Kramer A, Weltmann KD, von Woedtke T, Kocher T. Atmospheric pressure plasma: A high-performance tool for the efficient removal of biofilms. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42539–e42539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042539. PMID: 22880025. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Julak J, Scholtz V, Vankova E. Medically important biofilms and non-thermal plasma. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;34(12):178–178. doi: 10.1007/s11274-018-2560-2. PMID: 30456518. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-018-2560-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shintani H. Inactivation of bacterial spore, endotoxin, lipid a, normal prion and abnormal prion by exposures to several sorts of gases plasma. Biocontrol Sci. 2016;21(1):1–12. doi: 10.4265/bio.21.1. PMID: 27009504. DOI: 10.4265/bio.21.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Vandervoort KG, Brelles-Marino G. Plasma-mediated inactivation of pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms grown on borosilicate surfaces under continuous culture system. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e108512–e108512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108512. PMID: 25302815. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Di Martino G, Piccirillo A, Giacomelli M, Comin D, Gallina A, Capello K, Buniolo F, Montesissa C, Bonfanti L. Microbiological, chemical and physical quality of drinking water for commercial turkeys: A cross-sectional study. Poultry Sci. 2018;97(8):2880–2886. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey130. PMID: 29672773. DOI: 10.3382/ ps/pey130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dolezalova E, Lukes P. Membrane damage and active but nonculturable state in liquid cultures of Escherichia coli treated with an atmospheric pressure plasma jet. Bioelectrochemistry. 2015;103:7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.08.018. PMID: 25212700. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem. 2014.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jiang X, Lee S, Mok C, Lee J. Sustainable methods for decontamination of microcystin in water using cold plasma and uv with reusable tio(2) nanoparticle coating. Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2047;14(5) doi: 10.3390/ijerph14050480. PMID: 28475156. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14050480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Li L, Zhang H, Huang Q. New insight into the residual inactivation of microcystis aeruginosa by dielectric barrier discharge. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13683–13683. doi: 10.1038/srep13683. PMID: 26347270. DOI: 10.1038/srep13683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hayes J, Kirf D, Garvey M, Rowan N. Disinfection and toxicological assessments of pulsed uv and pulsed-plasma gas-discharge treated-water containing the waterborne protozoan enteroparasite cryptosporidium parvum. J Microbiol Methods. 2013;94(3):325–337. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.07.012. PMID: 23892042. DOI: 10.1016/ j.mimet.2013.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.El-Sayed WS, Ouf SA, Mohamed AA. Deterioration to extinction of wastewater bacteria by non-thermal atmospheric pressure air plasma as assessed by 16s rdna-dgge fingerprinting. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1098–1098. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01098. PMID: 26500637. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Trovó AG, Melo SAS, Nogueira RFP. Photodegradation of the pharmaceuticals amoxicillin, bezafibrate and paracetamol by the photo-fenton process-application to sewage treatment plant effluent. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 2008;198(2-3):215–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2008.03.011. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Vanraes P, Willems G, Daels N, Van Hulle SW, De Clerck K, Surmont P, Lynen F, Vandamme J, Van Durme J, Nikiforov A, Leys C. Decomposition of atrazine traces in water by combination of non-thermal electrical discharge and adsorption on nanofiber membrane. Water Res. 2015;72:361–371. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.009. PMID: 25482844. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mountapmbeme Kouotou P, Laminsi S, Acayanka E, Brisset JL. Degradation of palm oil refinery wastewaters by non-thermal gliding arc discharge at atmospheric pressure. Environ Monit Assess. 2013;185(7):5789–5800. doi: 10.1007/s10661-012-2984-3. PMID: 23229278. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-2984-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Benetoli LO, Cadorin BM, Baldissarelli VZ, Geremias R, de Souza IG, Debacher NA. Pyrite-enhanced methylene blue degradation in non-thermal plasma water treatment reactor. J Hazard Mater. 2012;237-238:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.067. PMID: 22980582. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Magureanu M, Mandache NB, Parvulescu VI. Degradation of pharmaceutical compounds in water by non-thermal plasma treatment. Water Res. 2015;81:124–136. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.037. PMID: 26057260. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Banaschik R, Lukes P, Jablonowski H, Hammer MU, Weltmann KD, Kolb JF. Potential of pulsed corona discharges generated in water for the degradation of persistent pharmaceutical residues. Water Res. 2015;84:127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.018. PMID: 26218466. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bansode AS, More SE, Siddiqui EA, Satpute S, Ahmad A, Bhoraskar SV, Mathe VL. Effective degradation of organic water pollutants by atmospheric non-thermal plasma torch and analysis of degradation process. Chemosphere. 2017;167:396–405. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.089. PMID: 27744197. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere. 2016.09. 089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Garcia MC, Mora M, Esquivel D, Foster JE, Rodero A, Jimenez-Sanchidrian C, Romero-Salguero FJ. Microwave atmospheric pressure plasma jets for wastewater treatment: Degradation of methylene blue as a model dye. Chemosphere. 2017;180:239–246. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.126. PMID: 28411539. DOI: 10.1016/j. chemosphere.2017.03.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Magureanu M, Piroi D, Mandache NB, David V, Medvedovici A, Bradu C, Parvulescu VI. Degradation of antibiotics in water by non-thermal plasma treatment. Water Res. 2011;45(11):3407–3416. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.03.057. PMID: 21514950. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres. 2011.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lee D, Lee JC, Nam JY, Kim HW. Degradation of sulfonamide antibiotics and their intermediates toxicity in an aeration-assisted non-thermal plasma while treating strong wastewater. Chemosphere. 2018;209:901–907. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.125. PMID: 30114739. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhao H, Ding M, Gao Y, Deng W. Determination of sulfonamides in pork, egg, and chicken using multiwalled carbon nanotubes as a solid-phase extraction sorbent followed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. J AOAC Int. 2014;97(5):1481–1488. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.13-133. PMID: 25903004. DOI: 10.5740/jaoacint.13-133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Giardina A, Tampieri F, Marotta E, Paradisi C. Air non-thermal plasma treatment of irgarol 1051 deposited on tio2. Chemosphere. 2018;210:653–661. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.012. PMID: 30031349. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bradu C, Magureanu M, Parvulescu VI. Degradation of the chlorophenoxyacetic herbicide 2,4-d by plasma-ozonation system. J Hazard Mater. 2017;336:52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.04.050. PMID: 28472708. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.04.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Vilarrasa E, Barroeta AC, Tres A, Esteve-Garcia E. Use of re-esterified palm oils, differing in their acylglycerol structure, in weaning-piglet diets. Animal. 2015;9(8):1304–1311. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115000622. PMID: 25912649. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731115000622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bianchi AE, Silva ASD, Biazus AH, Richards N, Pellegrini LG, Baldissera MD, Macedo VP, Silveira A. Adding palm oil to the diet of sheep alters fatty acids profile on yogurt: Benefits to consumers. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017;89(3 Suppl):2471–2478. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201720170468. PMID: 29091111. DOI: 10.1590/0001-376520172 0170468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Todorova Y, Yotinov I, Topalova Y, Benova E, Marinova P, Tsonev I, Bogdanov T. Evaluation of the effect of cold atmospheric plasma on oxygenases’ activities for application in water treatment technologies. Environ Technol. 2018:1–10. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2018.1491631. PMID: 29923777. DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2018.1491631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Niinemets U, Loreto F, Reichstein M. Physiological and physicochemical controls on foliar volatile organic compound emissions. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9(4):180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.02.006. PMID: 15063868. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yao Q, Torrents A, Li H, Buser MD, McConnell LL, Downey PM, Hapeman CJ. Using a vegetative environmental buffer to reduce the concentrations of volatile organic compounds in poultry-house atmospheric emissions. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(31):8231–8236. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b00088. PMID: 29957951. DOI: 10.1021/ acs.jafc.8b00088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ni JQ, Robarge WP, Xiao C, Heber AJ. Volatile organic compounds at swine facilities: A critical review. Chemosphere. 2012;89(7):769–788. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.061. PMID: 22682363. DOI: 10.1016/ j.chemosphere.2012.04.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Laor Y, Koziel JA, Cai L, Ravid U. Chemical-sensory characterization of dairy manure odor using headspace solid-phase microextraction and multidimensional gas chromatography mass spectrometry-olfactometry. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008;58(9):1187–1197. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.58.9.1187. PMID: 18817111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hirota K, Sakai H, Washio M, Kojima T. Application of electron beams for the treatment of voc streams. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2004;43(5):1185–1191. DOI: 10.1021/ie0340746. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Subrahmanyam C, Renken A, Kiwi-Minsker L. Novel catalytic non-thermal plasma reactor for the abatement of vocs. Chem Eng J. 2007;134(1):78–83. DOI: 10.1016/ j.cej.2007.03.063. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Urashima K, Jen-Shih C. Removal of volatile organic compounds from air streams and industrial flue gases by non-thermal plasma technology. IEEE T Dielect El In. 2000;7(5):602–614. DOI: 10.1109/94.879356. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Van Durme J, Dewulf J, Sysmans W, Leys C, Van Langenhove H. Efficient toluene abatement in indoor air by a plasma catalytic hybrid system. Appl Catal B. 2007;74(1):161–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.02.006. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Preis S, Klauson D, Gregor A. Potential of electric discharge plasma methods in abatement of volatile organic compounds originating from the food industry. J Environ Manage. 2013;114:125–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.042. PMID: 23238056. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jenvman.2012.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zhu T, Chen R, Xia N, Li X, He X, Zhao W, Carr T. Volatile organic compounds emission control in industrial pollution source using plasma technology coupled with f-tio2/gamma-al2o3. Environ Technol. 2015;36(9-12):1405–1413. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2014.992479. PMID: 25428439. DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2014.992479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chang MB, Balbach JH, Rood MJ, Kushner MJ. Removal of so2 from gas streams using a dielectric barrier discharge and combined plasma photolysis. J Appl Phys. 1991;69(8):4409–4417. DOI: 10.1063/1.348367. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chang KS, Peng X. No presence effects on the reduction of n2o by co over al–pd–co oxide catalyst. J Ind Eng Chem. 2010;16(3):455–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2010.01.046. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Young Sun M, Dors M, Mizerazcyk J. Effect of reaction temperature on no/sub x/ removal and formation of ammonium nitrate in nonthermal plasma process combined with selective catalytic reduction. IEEE T Plasma Sci. 2004;32(2):799–807. DOI: 10.1109/TPS.2004.826057. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Chang Moo B, Tseng Tian D. Gas-phase removal of h2s and nh3 with dielectric barrier discharges. J Environl Eng. 1996;122(1):41–46. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1996)122:1(41) [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Gal A, Ogata A, Futamura S, Mizuno K. Mechanism of the dissociation of chlorofluorocarbons during nonthermal plasma processing in nitrogen at atmospheric pressure. J Phys Chem A. 2003;107(42):8859–8866. DOI: 10.1021/jp0347769. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Radhakrishnan R, Oyama ST, Chen JG, Asakura K. Electron transfer effects in ozone decomposition on supported manganese oxide. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105(19):4245–4253. DOI: 10.1021/jp003246z. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Preis S, Klauson D, Gregor A. Potential of electric discharge plasma methods in abatement of volatile organic compounds originating from the food industry. J Environ Manage. 2013;114:125–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.042. PMID: 23238056. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012. 10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Shin S, Hwang HJ, Song J. A combined process of non-thermal plasma with sludge stabilization for the simultaneous reduction of odor and organic waste. Water Sci Technol. 2011;64(12):2389–2394. doi: 10.2166/wst.2011.807. PMID: 22170832. DOI: 10.2166/wst. 2011.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chen R, Xia N, Li X, He X, Zhao W, Carr T. Volatile organic compounds emission control in industrial pollution source using plasma technology coupled with f-tio2/γ-al2o3 au - zhu, tao. Environ Technol. 2015;36(11):1405–1413. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2014.992479. DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2014.992479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wei ZS, Li HQ, He JC, Ye QH, Huang QR, Luo YW. Removal of dimethyl sulfide by the combination of non-thermal plasma and biological process. Bioresour Technol. 2013;146:451–456. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.114. PMID: 23954717. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech. 2013.07.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ulmer JB, Valley U, Rappuoli R. Vaccine manufacturing: Challenges and solutions. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:1377–1377. doi: 10.1038/nbt1261. PMID: 17093488. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Laddy DJ, Weiner DB. From plasmids to protection: A review of DNA vaccines against infectious diseases. Int Rev Immunol. 2006;25(3-4):99–123. doi: 10.1080/08830180600785827. PMID: 16818367. DOI: 10.1080/08830180600785827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Tian G, Zeng X, Li Y, Shi J, Chen H. Protective efficacy of the h5 inactivated vaccine against different highly pathogenic h5n1 avian influenza viruses isolated in china and vietnam. Avian Dis. 2010;54(1 Suppl):287–289. doi: 10.1637/8707-031709-ResNote.1. PMID: 20521646. DOI: 10.1637/8707-031709-ResNote.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife – threats to biodiversity and human health. Science. 2000;287(5452):443–449. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5452.443. PMID: 10642539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Alexander DJ. The epidemiology and control of avian influenza and newcastle disease. J Comp Pathol. 1995;112(2):105–126. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9975(05)80054-4. PMID: 7769142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Qiu L, Zhang M, Tang J, Adhikari B, Cao P. Innovative technologies for producing and preserving intermediate moisture foods: A review. Food Res Int. 2019;116:90–102. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.12.055. PMID: 30717022. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.12.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Pankaj SK, Wan Z, Keener KM. Effects of cold plasma on food quality: A review. Foods. 2018;7(1) doi: 10.3390/foods7010004. PMID: 29301243. DOI: 10.3390/foods7010004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Afshari R, Hosseini H. Non-thermal plasma as a new food preservation method, its present and future prospect. J Paramed Sci. 2014; 5(1) DOI: 10.22037/jps.v5i1.5348. [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Van Impe J, Smet C, Tiwari B, Greiner R, Ojha S, Stulic V, Vukusic T, Rezek Jambrak A. State of the art of nonthermal and thermal processing for inactivation of micro-organisms. J Appl Microbiol. 2018;125(1):16–35. doi: 10.1111/jam.13751. PMID: 29502355. DOI: 10.1111/jam.13751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Calvo T, Alvarez-Ordonez A, Prieto M, Gonzalez Raurich M, Lopez M. Influence of processing parameters and stress adaptation on the inactivation of listeria monocytogenes by non-thermal atmospheric plasma (ntap) Food Res Int. 2016;89(Pt 1):631–637. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.014. PMID: 28460960. DOI: 10.1016/ j.foodres.2016.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Attri P, Han J, Choi S, Choi EH, Bogaerts A, Lee W. Cap modifies the structure of a model protein from thermophilic bacteria: Mechanisms of cap-mediated inactivation. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10218–10218. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28600-w. PMID: 29977069. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28600-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kilonzo-Nthenge A, Liu S, Yannam S, Patras A. Atmospheric cold plasma inactivation of salmonella and Escherichia coli on the surface of golden delicious apples. Front Nutr. 2018;5:120–120. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00120. PMID: 30619867. DOI: 10.3389/fnut. 2018.00120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Fernandez A, Noriega E, Thompson A. Inactivation of salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium on fresh produce by cold atmospheric gas plasma technology. Food Microbiol. 2013;33(1):24–29. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.08.007. PMID: 23122497. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Gurol C, Ekinci FY, Aslan N, Korachi M. Low temperature plasma for decontamination of e. Coli in milk. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;157(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.02.016. PMID: 22622128. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ijfoodmicro.2012.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.van Bokhorst-van de Veen H, Xie H, Esveld E, Abee T, Mastwijk H, Nierop Groot M. Inactivation of chemical and heat-resistant spores of bacillus and geobacillus by nitrogen cold atmospheric plasma evokes distinct changes in morphology and integrity of spores. Food Microbiol. 2015;45(Pt A):26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.03.018. PMID: 25481059. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Streit E, Naehrer K, Rodrigues I, Schatzmayr G. Mycotoxin occurrence in feed and feed raw materials worldwide: Long-term analysis with special focus on europe and asia. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2013;93(12):2892–2899. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6225. PMID: 23670211. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Basaran P, Basaran-Akgul N, Oksuz L. Elimination of aspergillus parasiticus from nut surface with low pressure cold plasma (LPCP) treatment. Food Microbiol. 2008;25(4):626–632. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2007.12.005. PMID: 18456118. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2007.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Herceg Z, Rezek Jambrak A, Vukusic T, Stulic V, Stanzer D, Milosevic S. The effect of high-power ultrasound and gas phase plasma treatment on aspergillus spp. And penicillium spp. Count in pure culture. J Appl Microbiol. 2015;118(1):132–141. doi: 10.1111/jam.12692. PMID: 25393164. DOI: 10.1111/jam.12692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Dorraki N, Mahdavi V, Ghomi H, Ghasempour A. Elimination of diazinon insecticide from cucumber surface by atmospheric pressure air-dielectric barrier discharge plasma. Biointerphases. 2016;11(4):041007–041007. doi: 10.1116/1.4971382. PMID: 27923272. DOI: 10.1116/1.4971382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Heinlin J, Morfill G, Landthaler M, Stolz W, Isbary G, Zimmermann JL, Shimizu T, Karrer S. Plasma medicine: Possible applications in dermatology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2010;8(12):968–976. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2010.07495.x. PMID: 20718902. DOI: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2010.07495.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Heinlin J, Isbary G, Stolz W, Morfill G, Landthaler M, Shimizu T, Steffes B, Nosenko T, Zimmermann J, Karrer S. Plasma applications in medicine with a special focus on dermatology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25(1):1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03702.x. PMID: 20497290. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03702.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Daeschlein G, Scholz S, Ahmed R, von Woedtke T, Haase H, Niggemeier M, Kindel E, Brandenburg R, Weltmann KD, Juenger M. Skin decontamination by low-temperature atmospheric pressure plasma jet and dielectric barrier discharge plasma. J Hosp Infect. 2012;81(3):177–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.02.012. PMID: 22682918. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Ermolaeva SA, Sysolyatina EV, Kolkova NI, Bortsov P, Tuhvatulin AI, Vasiliev MM, Mukhachev AY, Petrov OF, Tetsuji S, Naroditsky BS, Morfill GE, Fortov VE, Grigoriev AI, Zigangirova NA, Gintsburg AL. Non-thermal argon plasma is bactericidal for the intracellular bacterial pathogen chlamydia trachomatis. J Med Microbiol. 2012;61(Pt 6):793–799. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.038117-0. PMID: 22361459. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.038117-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Mohd Nasir N, Lee BK, Yap SS, Thong KL, Yap SL. Cold plasma inactivation of chronic wound bacteria. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2016;605:76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2016.03.033. PMID: 27046340. DOI: 10.1016/ j.abb.2016.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kisch T, Schleusser S, Helmke A, Mauss KL, Wenzel ET, Hasemann B, Mailaender P, Kraemer R. The repetitive use of non-thermal dielectric barrier discharge plasma boosts cutaneous microcirculatory effects. Microvasc Res. 2016;106:8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2016.02.008. PMID: 26944583. DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2016.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Nomura Y, Takamatsu T, Kawano H, Miyahara H, Okino A, Yoshida M, Azuma T. Investigation of blood coagulation effect of nonthermal multigas plasma jet in vitro and in vivo. J Surg Res. 2017;219:302–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.055. PMID: 29078897. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Arjunan KP, Friedman G, Fridman A, Clyne AM. Non-thermal dielectric barrier discharge plasma induces angiogenesis through reactive oxygen species. J R Soc Interface. 2012;9(66):147–157. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0220. PMID: 21653568. DOI: 10.1098/ rsif.2011.0220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Kubinova S, Zaviskova K, Uherkova L, Zablotskii V, Churpita O, Lunov O, Dejneka A. Non-thermal air plasma promotes the healing of acute skin wounds in rats. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45183–45183. doi: 10.1038/srep45183. PMID: 28338059. DOI: 10.1038/srep45183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Haertel B, von Woedtke T, Weltmann KD, Lindequist U. Non-thermal atmospheric-pressure plasma possible application in wound healing. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 2014;22(6):477–490. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2014.105. PMID: 25489414. DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2014.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Wu AS, Kalghatgi S, Dobrynin D, Sensenig R, Cerchar E, Podolsky E, Dulaimi E, Paff M, Wasko K, Arjunan KP, Garcia K, Fridman G, Balasubramanian M, Ownbey R, Barbee KA, Fridman A, Friedman G, Joshi SG, Brooks AD. Porcine intact and wounded skin responses to atmospheric nonthermal plasma. J Surg Res. 2013;179(1):e1–e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.039. PMID: 22480830. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Park YH, Kim HS, Lee JH, Choi SA, Kim JM, Oh GT, Kang SW, Kim SU, Yu DY. Peroxiredoxin i participates in the protection of reactive oxygen species-mediated cellular senescence. BMB Rep. 2017;50(10):528–533. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2017.50.10.121. PMID: 28893373. DOI: 10.5483/BMBRep.2017.50.10.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.West MD. The cellular and molecular biology of skin aging. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130(1):87–95. PMID: 8285746. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Choi JH, Song YS, Song K, Lee HJ, Hong JW, Kim GC. Skin renewal activity of non-thermal plasma through the activation of beta-catenin in keratinocytes. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6146–6146. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06661-7. PMID: 28733577. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06661-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Limsopatham K, Boonyawan D, Umongno C, Sukontason KL, Chaiwong T, Leksomboon R, Sukontason K. Effect of cold argon plasma on eggs of the blow fly, lucilia cuprina (diptera: Calliphoridae) Acta Trop. 2017;176:173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.08.005. PMID: 28802553. DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Rahman M, Tanino M, Hashimoto M, Nakano M, Yasuda H, Takashima K, Mizuno A. Fundamental study on quasi-real-time detection of airborne bio-particles using discharge plasma. Thin Solid Films. 2008;516(19):6699–6703. DOI: 10.1016/ j.tsf.2007.11.043. [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Liang Y, Wu Y, Sun K, Chen Q, Shen F, Zhang J, Yao M, Zhu T, Fang J. Rapid inactivation of biological species in the air using atmospheric pressure nonthermal plasma. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(6):3360–3368. doi: 10.1021/es203770q. PMID: 22385302. DOI: 10.1021/es203770q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Moritz M, Peters H, Nipko B, Ruden H. Capability of air filters to retain airborne bacteria and molds in heating, ventilating and air-conditioning (hvac) systems. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2001;203(5-6):401–409. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00054. PMID: 11556144. DOI: 10.1078/1438-4639-00054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Mizuno A. Destruction of biological particles using non-thermal plasma. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2017;60(1):12–24. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.16-64. PMID: 28163377. DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.16-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Park CW, Hwang J. Susceptibility constants of airborne bacteria to dielectric barrier discharge for antibacterial performance evaluation. J Hazard Mater. 2013;244-245:421–428. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.12.006. PMID: 23274942. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Wu Y, Liang Y, Wei K, Li W, Yao M, Zhang J, Grinshpun SA. Ms2 virus inactivation by atmospheric-pressure cold plasma using different gas carriers and power levels. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(3):996–1002. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03322-14. PMID: 25416775. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03322-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Vaze ND, Park S, Brooks AD, Fridman A, Joshi SG. Involvement of multiple stressors induced by non-thermal plasma-charged aerosols during inactivation of airborne bacteria. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(2):e0171434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171434. PMID: 28166240. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Bunz O, Mese K, Zhang W, Piwowarczyk A, Ehrhardt A. Effect of cold atmospheric plasma (cap) on human adenoviruses is adenovirus type-dependent. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0202352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202352. PMID: 30365500. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Ziuzina D, Patil S, Cullen PJ, Keener KM, Bourke P. Atmospheric cold plasma inactivation of Escherichia coli in liquid media inside a sealed package. J Appl Microbiol. 2013;114(3):778–787. doi: 10.1111/jam.12087. PMID: 23190122. DOI: 10.1111/jam.12087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Ben Belgacem Z, Carre G, Charpentier E, Le-Bras F, Maho T, Robert E, Pouvesle JM, Polidor F, Gangloff SC, Boudifa M, Gelle MP. Innovative non-thermal plasma disinfection process inside sealed bags: Assessment of bactericidal and sporicidal effectiveness in regard to current sterilization norms. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0180183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180183. PMID: 28662202. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0180183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Misra NN, Keener KM, Bourke P, Mosnier JP, Cullen PJ. In-package atmospheric pressure cold plasma treatment of cherry tomatoes. J Biosci Bioeng. 2014;118(2):177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.02.005. PMID: 24650730. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Wang J, Zhuang H, Hinton A Jr, Zhang J. Influence of in-package cold plasma treatment on microbiological shelf life and appearance of fresh chicken breast fillets. Food Microbiol. 2016;60:142–146. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.07.007. PMID: 27554156. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2016. 07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Song AY, Oh YA, Roh SH, Kim JH, Min SC. Cold oxygen plasma treatments for the improvement of the physicochemical and biodegradable properties of polylactic acid films for food packaging. J Food Sci. 2016;81(1):E86–E96. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13172. PMID: 26646616. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from In Vivo are provided here courtesy of International Institute of Anticancer Research

RESOURCES