Abstract
Hyperbaric oxygen therapies may have grown out of emergencies such as those for Decompression Sickness (DCS), but more commonly in the U.S., hyperbaric oxygen is used for much more elective problems. Wound healing applications lead this trend. Nationally many more hyperbaric centers exist to treat elective problems adjunctively, and this is a concise review of these indications as well as pointing out where even elective centers might be able to broaden their practices.
Introduction
Table 1 lists the HBO2 indications for elective problems. As opposed to many of the emergent indications where HBO2 is often a primary therapy and are highly time dependent in terms of getting HBO2 underway and repeated; many of these elective indications reflect where HBO2 is an adjunct to other therapies. Elective uses of HBO2 can be a way to improve the outcomes of patients who other wise are not responding to initial therapies. Additionally, some of these elective indications still derive some of their applications from emergent indications and are covered here so that clinicians do not miss these as opportunities for better care.
Table 1.
Elective Indictions for HBO2
|
For example, both CO and CN poisonings will be offset and more quickly eliminated by HBO2 if offered as opposed to allowing either or both of these to be off loaded at regular pressures. CO poisoning may present relatively obviously as an emergency as after closed space fire and loss of consciousness or other severe neurological sequelae or with ongoing fetal or cardiac ischemia necessitating HBO2. But CO poisoning can also be repetitive and low level with harder to define symptoms. A loading dock worker exposed to the exhaust of lifter-loading vehicle with headaches and fatigue may be suffering from CO poisoning and will get missed. HBO2 may offer better longer term neurologic outcomes than simple 100% oxygen therapy.1
Clearly delineated classes for emergent HBO2 include those that offset the effects of poor oxygenating arterial flow perfusing tissue beds, such as in a compromised flap. Many elective indications for of HBO2 extend these effects to small vessel perfusion defects. For example, medical radiation needed to improve cure rates for cancers, often results in progressive fibrosis and resultant non-healing of those previously irradiated tissues. In fact multimodality cancer care has improved outcomes such that most cancers have better longer term outcomes for more patients than patients needing amputations for diabetic foot ulcerations (DFUs);2 however patients are surviving to have other sequelae. Patients who often have had a complete cure of their head and neck tumors from a combination of surgery and radiation can have progressive fibrosis of their soft tissues and gums with loss of teeth, exposure of their jaw and even pathological fracture of their mandible—all of which will have better outcomes when HBO2 is added to their regimens.3 Patients with on going radiation effects after treatment for head and neck cancers should be referred for HBO2 4 and this should be coordinated with any planned further operation so that HBO2 supports optimal tissue healing before and after any procedures.
Therapeutic irradiation is also commonly used in other areas of the body and for other cancers like breast cancer and other soft tissue tumors and for neurologic, gynecologic, colorectal, urologic, and soft tissue cancers. These patients may also have later sequelae from delayed radiation effects such as enteritis, cystitis, bleeding and tissue fibrosis needing surgical resection or revision. All of these have been found to be responsive to HBO2. 5, 6 Elective hyperbaric when coordinated with other therapies may allow surgical reconstruction of these tissue feasible and protect both the patient and the surgeons from non-healing or other sub-optimal outcomes.
From Radiation Injury to Other More Common Wound Healing Classes
In the U.S., the most common indication to offer elective HBO2 is now to augment wound healing problems in certain settings. These elective wound healing indications in addition to radiation effects include necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections and their difficulties in healing, failing grafts or flaps, and thermal burns, but also ulcerations from complications from neuropathy and diabetes. Although varying levels of evidence exist across the broad category of enhancing healing in selected problematic wounds,7 this category shares a common theme that the wound and periwound is locally hypoxic as one of the primary reasons for it not to be healing, but response to supplemental oxygen indicating that it is not a large vessel (i.e. vascular) flow problem and not due to poor central cardiopulmonary mechanics either. Hyperbaric centers commonly employ measuring tissue concentration of oxygen to demonstrate this in the wounds or ulcers that are not healing by placing leads on the skin that measure oxygen partial pressure in the tissues of the wound. Tissue concentration of oxygen measurement is painless as the lead stick on, but does take some time, about an hour and sometimes longer if the patient is to be repositioned, to allow for the patient’s tissues to react. Should the patient have low oxygen levels that then improve when given supplemental oxygen is given at room pressures, then HBO2 could be beneficial. This process can also be repeated in the actual HBO2 chamber as well to document an adequate response at pressure. Each of the specific kind of wounds have varying levels of evidence and various requirements before HBO2 can be properly used. One of these is the use of HBO2 in the management of DFUs. As in radiation changes, diabetes mellitus (DM) over time narrows the small and microscopic vessels such that patient’s feet become neuropathic, develop characteristic deficiencies in blood flow and bony stability and develop ulcerations that threaten them with higher amputations and mortality.8 However, the key to be able to augment a DM patient’s healing with HBO2 is to properly take care of the basics first. Patients should be assisted in giving up smoking, losing weight and having a healthy lifestyle of diet and activity so that their DM is well controlled with an individually acceptable HA1C9 and frequent accuchecks. The patient’s ulceration should be cleaned and debrided and screened for surgically correctable bony arthropathy and arterial inflow augmentation. Any infection either from local necrotic debris or underlying osteomyelitis should be sought or removed. The patient’s ulceration should be having regular local wound care with a moist supportive dressing for healing. The patient should be off loaded with a good even custom shoe or total contact casting. Should all this be done and the ulceration be essentially middle grade, not to minor nor not so severe so as to be non-recoverable (Wagner Grade 3)10 and not be healing at 30 days then HBO2 can be added based upon the patient’s safety profile.11 Much of the data based recommendations both for and against adding HBO2 have challenges based upon the rigorousness of patients being screened and treated before adding HBO2 so that only appropriate patients are being included.
Chronic Refractory Osteomyelitis
Similarly, osteomyelitis may also respond very favorably to HBO2. Recall that some of the most compelling data for osteoradionecrosis began as if high tension oxygen would synergistically attack infection in the bone, but ultimately was found to generate neo-angiogenesis to allow the bone to heal. Although the mainstays for osteomyelitis remain surgical debridement of non-viable or infected bone and any sequestrum, culture driven antibiotics and protective coverage, osteomyelitis responds to HBO2 both acutely and electively. In the elective setting, HBO2 has requirements akin to DFUs such that the grossly infected bone needs to be surgically debrided first and that the patient should have failed their first round antibiotics before HBO2 is offered. Essentially the best data for elective use of HBO2 is for chronic, refractory osteomyelitis where fundamental care for the osteomyelitis isn’t working well. At that point the patient can be re-assessed and HBO2 added in a coordinated approach with further bone and soft tissue debridement, re-culturing, off-loading, dressings, nutritional optimization, screening for contractures and control of spasms, and a closure plan for the usually exposed bone.12
Severe Anemias not Transfusable
Severe anemia also remains an underutilized opportunity for hyperbaric oxygen to make more of an impact both in acute, if not emergent applications, as well as in subacute or more elective applications. The data behind its rationale is very straightforward and compelling at the basic science level where oxygen delivery goes from being dependent upon hemoglobin concentrations at sea level to near complete replacement of hemoglobin based oxygen delivery mechanisms with HBO2.13 Currently the mainstay of patients with conditions of oxygen debts is blood transfusion, both acutely and sub acutely. However, there are occasions where due to a patient’s beliefs, such as observant Jehovah’s Witnesses, where a patient may not accept blood transfusions or due to factors inherent in the patient’s blood where they cannot be safely transfused. There are also times where logistically blood may not be available for transfusion. In these cases, it can be overlooked that HBO2 has been shown to support the anemic patient14 as well as build up hemoglobin in concert with other hematinics.15 Pulsed HBO2 in concert with nutritional support and other hematinics will increase the circulating hemoglobin.16
In conclusion, HBO2 can be used electively as well as to transition patients from more acute problems—such as when it is added to limit tissue losses and improve resuscitation responses in necrotizing infections or crush injuries—to more elective ones. Often inpatient facilities transition patients from acute indications where patients are given HBO2 multiple times per day to a tail of treatments where the patient is being transitioned to an outpatient setting and now only needs once a day treatment Monday through Friday to allow better complete healing. Each individual center works with the treating clinicians to work out elective plans to support optimal healing. In this way HBO2 can improve healing and recovery for a variety of elective problems from radiation injury to the ravages of diabetes to even chronic presentations of some emergencies such as CO poisoning.
Figure 1.
Combined crush injury with chronic refractory osteomyelitis with non-union threatening amputation before hyperbaric. This patient had already failed initial surgical debridements, antibiotics, and stabilization, and had weeping non-healing ulcerations, and non-union of her bone over her internal fixator.
Figure 2.
Same patient after combined surgery, antibiotics, and HBO2.
Footnotes
John P. Kirby MD, FACS, is the Director of Wound Healing Programs, Associate Professor of Surgery, Section of Acute and Critical Care Surgery, at Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, in St. Louis, Missouri.
Contact: kirbyj@wustl.edu
Disclosure
None reported.
References
- 1.Weaver lk, Hopkins ro, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen for acte CO poisoning. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 3;347(14):1057–1067. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fortington P, Geertzen JHB, van Netten JJ, Postema K, Rommers GM, Dijkstra PU. Short and Long Term Mortality Rates after a Lower Limb Amputation. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2013 Jul;46(1):124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marx RE, Ames JR. The use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in bony reconstruction of the irradiated and tissue deficient patient. J Ora Maxillofac Surg. 1982;40:412–419. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(82)90076-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Feldmeier JJ, Hampson NB. A systematic review of the literature reporting the application of hyperbaric oxygen prevention and treatment of delayed radiation injuries: an evidence based approach. Undersea Hypb Med. 2002;29:4–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Marshall GT, Thirlby RC, Bredfeldt JE, Jampson NB. Treatment of gastrointestinal radiation injury with hyperbaric oxygen. Undersea Hypeb Med. 2007;34:35–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fink d, Chetty N, Lehun JP, Marsden DE, Hacker NF. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for delayed radiation injuries in gynecological cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:638–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00388.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Worth ER, Tettelbach WH, Hopf HW. Chapter 2B:Arterial insufficiencies: enhancement of healing in selected problem wounds. In: Weaver Lindell., editor. UHMS Indications. 13th Ed. UHMS Best Publishing; North Palm Beach Fla: 2014. Chapter 2a enhanced healing in selected problematic wounds. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Thorud JC, Plemmons B, Buckley CJ, Shibuya N, Jupiter DC. Mortality after nontraumatic major amputation among patients with diabetes and peripheral vascular disease: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55(3):591–9. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Microvascular Complications and Foot Care. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2019. Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Supplement 1):S124–138. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Oyeibo SO, Jude EB, Tarawneh I, Nguyen HC, Harkless LB, Boulton AJ. A comparison of two diabetic foot ulcer classification systems: the Wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(1):84–88. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.1.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/ncd-details
- 12.Hart BH. In: Chapter 12: Refractory osteomyelitis, UHMS Indications. 13th ed. Weaver Lindell., editor. UHMS Best Publishing; North Palm Beach Fla: 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Goodnough LT, Schander A, Brecher ME. Transfusion medicine: looking into the future. Lancet. 2003;361:161–169. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12195-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Van Meter KW. In: Chapter 13: Severe Anemia, UHMS Hyperbaric Indications. 13th Ed. Weaver Lindell., editor. Best Publishing; North Palm Beach Fla: 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hart GB. Hyperbaric oxygen and exceptional blood loss anemia. In: Kindwall EP, Whelan HT, editors. Hyperbaric medicine practice. 2nd Ed. Flagstaff, AZ; Best Publishing Co: 2002. pp. 741–751. Revised. [Google Scholar]
- 16.DeBets D, Theunissen S, Devriendt J. The normobaric oxygen paradox: does it increase hemoglobin. Diving and Hyperbar Med. 2012;42(2):67–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



