Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: Biomol NMR Assign. 2011 Jun 7;6(1):35–38. doi: 10.1007/s12104-011-9320-7

1H, 13C, and 15N NMR Assignments for the Helicase Interaction Domain of Staphylococcus aureus DnaG Primase

Matthew D Shortridge 1, Mark A Griep 1, Robert Powers 1,*
PMCID: PMC6690350  NIHMSID: NIHMS1037476  PMID: 21644056

Abstract

The interaction between DnaG primase and DnaB helicase is essential for stimulating primer synthesis during bacterial DNA replication. The interaction occurs between the N-terminal domain of helicase and the C-terminal domain of primase. Here we present the 1H, 13C, and 15N backbone and side-chain resonance assignments for the C-terminal helicase interaction domain of Staphylococcus aureus primase.

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, DnaG, Primase, Helicase, NMR, resonance assignments

Biological context

Bacterial primase (DnaG) is a conserved and essential enzyme responsible for the synthesis of short RNA polymers during DNA replication (Frick and Richardson, 2001). The protein is composed of three domains: N-terminal domain responsible for DNA sequence-specific binding; the catalytic core responsible for RNA synthesis; and the C-terminal domain (CTD) responsible for its interaction with DnaB helicase (Bird, et al., 2000; Tougu and Marians, 1996). The bacterial primase sequence is conserved along its entire length of approximately 570 residues (Frick and Richardson, 2001; Pan and Wigley, 2000; Syson, et al., 2005). Conservation is highest in the N-terminal domain, intermediate in the catalytic core, and lowest in the CTD.

The solution structures of DnaG primase CTD show significant variability between Geobacillus stearothermophilus (PDB 1Z8S) and Escherichia coli (PDB 2HAJ) (Su, et al., 2006; Syson, et al., 2005). Generally, the DnaG primase CTD structure is composed of two sub-domains, an N-terminal six-helix bundle (sub-domain C1) essential for DnaB binding activity and a helical hairpin (sub-domain C2) that modulates the interaction with DnaB (Oakley, et al., 2005; Syson, et al., 2005). The two CTD solution structures share significant structure similarity in their C1 sub-domains, but there are sharp differences in their C2 sub-domains (Oakley, et al., 2005; Su, et al., 2006; Syson, et al., 2005). In E. coli primase, the CTD structure is composed of 7 helices, where the long, rigid helix 6 connects the two sub-domains (Su, et al., 2006). In contrast, the G. stearothermophilus structure has two helices connecting the two sub-domains, where a kink occurs at Pro556 (Syson, et al., 2005).

The biological significance of these structural differences may provide an explanation for the observed divergence in primase at the level of bacterial phyla. For instance, Firmicutes DnaB helicases have been shown to stimulate a range of Firmicutes primases, but not Proteobacterial primases, and vice versa (Koepsell, et al., 2006; Larson, et al., 2010). This appears to be a general principle since we recently demonstrated that a wide range of bacterial enzymes show structural and functional divergence at the level of phyla (Shortridge, et al., 2011). We undertook the determination of the solution structure of Staphylococcus aureus primase CTD because it belongs to the same phylum as G. stearothermophilus. We expect the S. aureus primase CTD structure to determine whether the bacterial primase CTD structure is also conserved within a phylum. Here we present the complete backbone and side chain assignments for the DnaG primase CTD of S. aureus to provide the basis for determining its solution structure.

Methods and Experiments

Expression and Purification of S. aureus DnaG Primase CTD

The amplicon for S. aureus primase CTD gene (143 aa) was generated by polymerase chain reaction from the genome reference strain in the American Tissue Culture Collection by Nature Technology, Inc., Lincoln, Nebraska. It was inserted into a vector that added 20 N-terminal residues (MGHNHNHNHNHNHNGGDDDD) comprising an HN metal affinity tag and a protease-sensitive DDDD sequence. After transformation, the resulting E. coli overexpression strain had a doubling time of 15 min. Since this was a “leaky” expression system, this fast growth rate indicated the protein was not toxic and actually beneficial.

The protein used in the NMR structure determination experiments was uniformly labeled with 13C and 15N by growing the overexpression strain in minimal media containing 13C-glucose and 15N-ammonia. The expression level was extremely high with a final yield of 229 mg from a 2-L preparation. After the cells were collected by centrifugation, resuspended, treated with lysozyme, and then re-centrifuged, the target protein was found entirely in the supernatant. The protein was affinity purified on a nickel-NTA column and eluted with 100 mM imidazole. A denaturing polyacrylamide gel showed the purified protein was primarily a single band of the expected size (19.6 kDa). Its concentration was determined by absorbance using the extinction coefficient, ε280, of 14,080 M−1 cm−1, derived from its 11 tyrosines.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy

Samples of [U-13C,15N] DnaG primase CTD for backbone resonance assignment by NMR spectroscopy were prepared at a protein concentration of 1.2 mM in 95% H2O/5% D2O solution containing 25 mM potassium phosphate, 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM glutamine and 50 mM arginine at pH 6.6 (uncorrected) in a sealed Shigemi tube (Shigemi Inc., Allison Park, PA). Samples of [U-13C,15N] DnaG primase CTD for side-chain resonance assignment by NMR spectroscopy were prepared at a protein concentration of 1.5 mM in 99% D2O solution containing 25 mM potassium phosphate, 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM glutamine and 50 mM arginine at pH 6.6 (uncorrected) in a sealed Shigemi tube (Shigemi Inc., Allison Park, PA). All NMR experiments used for the protein backbone assignments of DnaG primase CTD were collected at 298 K on a five-channel 600 MHz Bruker Avance spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm TXI probe. NMR experiments used for the protein side chain resonances were collected at the Rocky Mountain Regional 900 MHz NMR Facility on a four channel 900 MHz Varian INOVA spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm HCN probe. Assignments of the backbone and side chain resonances were obtained from the following spectra: 15N-HSQC, 13C-HSQC, HNCO, HNCA, CBCACONH, CBCANH, HNHA, HBHACONH, CCCONH, HCCCONH, H(CCH)-COSY, 3D 13C HSQC-edited NOESY and 3D 15N HSQC-edited NOESY (Ferentz and Wagner, 2000). The NMR data was processed using NMRpipe (Delaglio, et al., 1995) and analyzed using PIPP (Garrett, et al., 1991) and CcpNmr v.2.1.5 (Vranken, et al., 2005).

Assignments of Primase CTD and Data Deposition

The backbone resonance assignment was 93% complete with 133 amino acids of the 143 unambiguously assigned in the 2D 1H-15N HSQC spectrum (Figure 1). Unassigned residues include M1-H13, D19, E470, H479, L480, M481, T500, R536, E537, E543, P551, and Y552. Primase CTD residues are numbered relative to the complete DnaG primase sequence, but the N-terminal purification tag is simply numbered from residue 1 to 20. Residues M1-H13 and D19 comprise the majority of the unassigned residues and are all found within the N-terminal purification tag. The remaining unassigned residues were located within highly solvent-exposed regions. Residues H479, L480, and M481 were in a turn region between helix 1 and 2. Residue T500 was in an unstructured loop region between helix 2 and helix 3, whereas residues E543, P551 and Y552 were in an unstructured loop region between helix 5 and helix 6. The only residues that appear to be localized within secondary structure were R536 and E537. They are the second and third residues of helix 5. An exhaustive analysis of the NMR data set was unable to yield an assignment for these two residues, suggesting the end of the helix may undergo partial unfolding that leads to chemical shift exchange broadening.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

1 2D 1H–15N HSQC spectrum of uniformly 13C, 15N labeled S. aureus primase CTD at 1.2 mM in 95% H2O/5% D2O at pH 6.6 (uncorrected). The spectrum was collected on a Bruker Avance 600 MHz spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm TXI probe. The backbone amide resonances are assigned. The side-chain amide groups of Asn and Gln are connected by horizontal lines.

Aliphatic side chain carbon chemical shift assignments were completed using the CCCONH experiment that correlated the preceding (i-1) residue to the following (i) backbone amide chemical shift. Aliphatic side chain proton chemical shifts were completed with the HCCH-COSY and HCCCONH experiments. Aromatic side chain assignments were completed using the 3D 13C-edited NOESY experiment. The statistics for resonance assignment include, 139/163 HN, 139/201 N, 139/163 Cα, 134/168 Hα, 128/141 Cβ, 148/181 Hβ, 85/92 Cγ, 89/160 Hγ, 49/64, Cδ, 49/64 Hδ, 19/31 Cε, 19/31 Hε, 4/7 Cζ, 4/7 Hζ, and 132/143 CO. Figure 1 shows an annotated 2D 1H–15N HSQC spectrum of the S. aureus helicase interaction domain of primase.

The S. aureus primase CTD secondary structure was predicted using the 13C chemical shifts and a consensus chemical shift index (CSI) (Wishart and Sykes, 1994). CSI predicts an all α-helical protein with 8 helices (Figure 2). Helical structures in primase CTD include Helix 1 Arg468-Lys478, Helix 2 Met481-Asn489, Helix 3 Lys505-Phe514, Helix 4 Ser524-Tyr529, Helix 5 Asn533-Glu543, Helix 6 Ile556-Asn564, Helix 7 Ile571-Arg583, Helix 8 Val587-Lys602. The C1 sub-domain of primase CTD includes Helix 1–5 and the C2 sub-domain includes Helix 6–8. This is consistent with the S. aureus DnaG primase CTD homology modeling predicted from the Geobacillus stearothermophilus structure (Syson, et al., 2005).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The 13Cα and 13Cβ secondary structure chemical shifts are plotted as a function of sequence. The S. aureus primase CTD secondary structure is predicted based on the consensus chemical shift index (CSI) using the 13C chemical shift data (Wishart and Sykes, 1994). The secondary structure is shown above the chemical shift index where α–helices (bars) are numbered.

Of particular interest are the residues between the predicted helices 6 and 7 (residues K566-T570). This region is significantly different in G. stearothermophilus primase CTD compared to the E. coli primase CTD solution structures (PDB 1Z8S and 2HAJ, respectively) (Su, et al., 2006). In G. stearothermophilus, this region is a loop forming two distinct subdomains (C1, C2) of primase CTD. In E. coli, the region is a long and rigid α helix. For S. aureus, the consensus chemical shift index suggests this region is similar to the G. stearothermophilus structure with an extended loop starting at residue Gly567 (figure 2). The 13Cα and 13Cβ chemical shifts for residues in this region have chemical shift values that are similar to those found in random coil structures.

The sequence specific 1H, 13C, and 15N resonance assignments for S. aureus primase CTD were deposited in the BioMagResBank under accession number 17512.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by a grant from the UNL/UNMC Collaborative Research Fund to M.G. and grants from National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R21AI081154), Nebraska Tobacco Settlement Biomedical Research Development Funds, Nebraska EPSCoR, the Maude Hammond Fling Faculty Research Fellowship, and a Nebraska Research Council Interdisciplinary Research Grant to R.P. The research was performed in facilities renovated with support from the NIH (RR015468–01). The authors would like to thank the Rocky Mountain Regional 900 MHz NMR Facility for contributing NMR data to this project.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standards

The experiments comply with the current laws of the United States of America.

References

  1. Bird LE, Pan H, Soultanas P and Wigley DB (2000) Mapping Protein-Protein Interactions within a Stable Complex of DNA Primase and DnaB Helicase from Bacillus stearothermophilus, Biochemistry, 39:171–182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J and Bax A (1995) NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes, J. Biomol. NMR, 6:277–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ferentz AE and Wagner G (2000) NMR spectroscopy: a multifaceted approach to macromolecular structure, Q. Rev. Biophys, 33:29–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frick DN and Richardson CC (2001) DNA primases, Annu. Rev. Biochem, 70:39–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Garrett DS, Powers R, Gronenborn AM and Clore GM (1991) A common sense approach to peak picking in two-, three-, and four-dimensional spectra using automatic computer analysis of contour diagrams, J. Magn. Reson. (1969–1992), 95:214–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Koepsell SA, Larson MA, Griep MA and Hinrichs SH (2006) Staphylococcus aureus helicase but not Escherichia coli helicase stimulates S. aureus primase activity and maintains initiation specificity, J. Bacteriol, 188:4673–4680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Larson MA, Griep MA, Bressani R, Chintakayala K, Soultanas P and Hinrichs SH (2010) Class-specific restrictions define primase interactions with DNA template and replicative helicase, Nucleic Acids Res, 38:7167–7178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Oakley AJ, Loscha KV, Schaeffer PM, Liepinsh E, Pintacuda G, Wilce MCJ, Otting G and Dixon NE (2005) Crystal and Solution Structures of the Helicase-binding Domain of Escherichia coli Primase, J. Biol. Chem, 280:11495–11504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pan H and Wigley DB (2000) Structure of the zinc-binding domain of Bacillus stearothermophilus DNA primase, Structure, 8:231–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shortridge MD, Triplet T, Revesz P, Griep M and Powers R (2011) Bacterial Protein Structures Reveal Phylum Dependent Divergence, Comput. Biol. Chem, 35:24–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Su X-C, Schaeffer PM, Loscha KV, Gan PHP, Dixon NE and Otting G (2006) Monomeric solution structure of the helicase-binding domain of Escherichia coli DnaG primase, FEBS J, 273:4997–5009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Syson K, Thirlway J, Hounslow AM, Soultanas P and Waltho JP (2005) Solution structure of the helicase-interaction domain of the primase DnaG: a model for helicase activation, Structure, 13:609–616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tougu K and Marians KJ (1996) The interaction between helicase and primase sets the replication fork clock, J. Biol. Chem, 271:21398–21405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vranken WF, Boucher W, Stevens TJ, Fogh RH, Pajon A, Llinas M, Ulrich EL, Markley JL, Ionides J and Laue ED (2005) The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf, 59:687–696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wishart DS and Sykes BD (1994) The 13C chemical-shift index: a simple method for the identification of protein secondary structure using 13C chemical-shift data, J. Biomol. NMR, 4:171–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES