Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Allergy. 2019 Mar 5;74(11):2220–2223. doi: 10.1111/all.13738

Nasal peanut + CpG immunotherapy enhances peanut-specific IFN-γ in Th2 cells and IL-10 in non-Th2 cells in mice.

Brandi T Johnson-Weaver 1, Gregory D Sempowski 1,2,3, Herman F Staats 1,3,4
PMCID: PMC6690810  NIHMSID: NIHMS1011316  PMID: 30746720

To the Editor:

Peanut-specific allergen immunotherapy reduces peanut-specific serum IgE, T helper 2 (Th2) cell cytokines, IL-5 and IL-13, and increases peanut-specific serum IgG, IgG4, mucosal IgA and T regulatory (Treg) cells(1, 2) in hypersensitive individuals. However, it is not well understood how peanut-specific Th2 cells change after immunotherapy. This study aims to evaluate potential mechanisms allergen-specific immunotherapy may use to reduce Th2 responses in peanut-hypersensitive mice.

Utilizing a mouse nasal allergen-specific immunotherapy (NIT) model, we confirmed the beneficial effects of including the toll-like receptor 9 ligand, CpG, as a Th1-enhancing adjuvant in peanut NIT(3, 4) to reduce allergic disease severity. The comparison of CpG-adjuvanted to unadjuvanted peanut-specific NIT was performed in IL-13 lineage-tracing mice to evaluate the contribution of CpG combined with peanut on peanut-specific Th2 cells in hypersensitive mice. This study tested the hypothesis that CpG-adjuvanted peanut NIT transitioned peanut-specific Th2 cells into peanut-specific Th1 and/or Treg cells.

Peanut-hypersensitivity was induced in C57BL/6J mice by gastric gavage with peanut extract (PN) and cholera toxin (CT) (Supporting Figure 1). PN-specific immunity induced by sensitization was similar amongst all peanut-hypersensitive mice since there were no differences in serum and fecal antibodies measured prior to immunotherapy (Supporting Figure 2). After a four-week rest, peanut-hypersensitive mice were nasally treated with saline (placebo), peanut alone (PN), CpG alone (CpG) or peanut + CpG (PN+CpG), three times a week for four weeks. Post-immunotherapy, PN and PN+CpG enhanced PN-specific serum and mucosal antibodies compared to placebo and CpG groups(Figure 1A,B).PN+CpG also increased PN-specific serum IgG2c and fecal IgA compared to PN. NIT was specific to PN responses since CT-specific antibodies were similar among all treatment groups after immunotherapy (Supporting Figure 3).

Figure 1: CpG enhances host responses influenced by peanut-specific immunotherapy and reduce allergen severity.

Figure 1:

Peanut-hypersensitive C57BL/6 mice received saline (placebo), PN, CpG or PN+CpG NIT. PN-specific A) serum and B) fecal antibodies reported as geometric mean titers (GMT) were measured after therapy (N=14–41). Systemic anaphylaxis was induced with PN. C) Core body temperature and D) allergy clinical symptom scores were measured for one hour after peanut-exposure (N=5–25) and reported as the mean + standard deviation. Statistical differences in antibodies were determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison (p<0.05). Numbers denote a significant increase compared to corresponding therapy group. Two-way ANOVA determine a significant reduction in disease severity compared to placebo indicated by * (p<0.05).

One-week post-immunotherapy, PN-induced anaphylaxis determined if NIT reduced allergy severity. Body temperature and allergy clinical symptoms were monitored for one hour post-challenge (Figure 1C, D).Unsensitized mice maintained stable body temperature after challenge; however, PN-hypersensitive mice rapidly displayed hypothermia post-PN exposure. Hypersensitive mice treated with PN+CpG began to recover from hypothermia and demonstrate improved allergic symptoms 60 minutes post-challenge compared to placebo-treated mice while neither PN nor CpG treatments were effective. Our model suggests both PN and CpG are required for NIT to reduce PN-induced anaphylaxis severity.

PN-specific T cell cytokines that may suggest disease severity after NIT (Figure 2) were evaluated. PN-induced IL-13, IFN-γ and IL-10 were measured to monitor Th2, Th1 and Treg responses, respectively. Cells from PN-sensitized mice secreted more IL-13 after PN-stimulation compared to unsensitized mice (Figure 2A); but, IL-13 secretion was significantly reduced by PN+CpG compared to placebo, PN and CpG. PN-induced IL-10 (Figure 2B) and IFN-γ (Figure 2C) secretion was increased in PN-sensitized mice compared to unsensitized mice but PN+CpG further enhanced IL-10 and IFN-γ compared to the other immunotherapy groups. Thus, PN+CpG therapy decreases IL-13 and increases IFN-γ and IL-10.

Figure 2: Allergen-specific immunotherapy modifies PN-induced cytokine responses.

Figure 2:

Peanut-induced responses were determined by subtracting values in unstimulated cells from peanut-stimulated cells. Significant differences in peanut-induced secreted A) IL-13 B) IL-10 and C) IFN-γ, measured post-immunotherapy was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons (p<0.05). Numbers above denote increased cytokine responses compared to corresponding treatment group below (n=9–17). IL-13 lineage-tracing mice revealed changes in peanut-induced cytokine positive cells (D-E) after PN or PN+CpG therapy (n=7–8). CD4+ splenocytes were monitored for IL-13 lineage by TdTomato (Tom) expression, D) IL-10 and E) IFN-γ. Mann-Whitney determined significant differences in peanut-induced cytokine positive cells between PN and PN+CpG-treated mice based on IL-13 expression. *indicates significant increase in cytokines compared to PN alone (p<0.05).

To test the hypothesis that CpG-adjuvanted peanut NIT induced the transition of peanut-specific Th2 cells into Th1 and/or Treg cells, CD4+ cells from PN-hypersensitive IL-13-lineage-tracing mice treated with PN or PN+CpG NIT were assessed for peanut-induced IL-10 and IFN-γ. PN+CpG increased PN-induced IL-10+ cells from non-Th2 cells (Tom-) (Figure 2D) and IFN-γ+ from Th2 cells (Tom+) (Figure 2E) compared to PN NIT. There was no difference in IL-13+ cells after PN+CpG and PN NIT. Our data suggest that PN+CpG enhances the number of IL-10+ and IFN-γ+ cells without effecting the number of IL-13+ cells compared to NIT with PN alone.

This study demonstrated enhanced PN-specific serum IgG2c, mucosal IgA, IL-10 and IFN-γ, and decreased IL-13 in mice with improved allergy severity after PN+CpG NIT. PN+CpG increased IFN-γ in CD4+ T cells that once produced IL-13 (i.e., Th2 cells) and IL-10 in non-Th2 cells (never produced IL-13) in IL-13 lineage-tracing mice. These results suggest, for the first time, that CpG-adjuvanted peanut NIT can modulate IL-13-producing Th2 cell cytokine profile to enhance IFN-γ and generate additional IL-10 producing cells, which may reduce anaphylaxis severity.

PN+CpG induced peanut-specific immune responses in PN-hypersenstive mice similar to peanut-allergic individuals who have achieved immunological tolerance, which reduces allergen-specific Th2 responses, after PN immunotherapy(1, 2). PN NIT enhanced sensitization-induced antibody responses compared to placebo or CpG. However, PN+CpG further boosted PN-specific serum IgG2c and mucosal IgA responses compared to NIT with PN alone and increased peanut-induced IFN-γ and IL-10 while decreasing peanut-induced IL-13 secretion, suggesting a shift from Th2 immunity towards Th1 and Treg immunity. Our results support clinical observations that also report decreased Th2-associated immunity and increased Th1 and/or Treg immunity(2).

Changes in secreted IL-13, IL-10 and IFN-γ after PN+CpG immunotherapy led us to investigate the cellular source of these cytokines. We hypothesized that adjuvanted-immunotherapy may change PN-specific T cell cytokines through at least two mechanisms including, 1) enhanced production of Th1 and Treg cytokines in Th2 cells and/or 2) generation of peanut-specific Th1 or Treg cells from naïve precursor T cells that reduce Th2 responses. Th2 cells produce several cytokines including, IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13; however, IL-13 is involved in tissue Th2 responses(5), and may contribute to allergic symptoms. Our study demonstrates reduced IL-13 secretion with PN+CpG NIT compared to PN NIT but similar numbers of IL-13+ CD4+ cells, which suggests that PN+CpG therapy decreases the amount of IL-13 produced without effecting the number of IL-13+ cells. One mechanism that may reduce IL-13 production is enhanced plasticity in Th2 cells to acquire cytokines that suppress Th2 cytokine responses. IL-13 may be produced by Th1 and Th17 cells(6); however, low Th1 transcription factor levels are observed in IL-13+/IFN-γ+ cells(6), suggesting that the IL-13+IFN-γ+ cells are plastic Th2 cells evolving to acquire a Th1 phenotype. We observed increased IFN-γ in CD4+IL-13+ T cells after IT, which may support Th2 cell plasticity. Th2 to Th2+Th1 cell plasticity is reported in mouse effector and memory Th2 cells that produce IFN-γ after in vivo activation with Th1-inducing stimuli(7). Therefore, it is possible that the addition of CpG to PN immunotherapy formulations increase IFN-γ in Th2 cells to reduce pro-allergy effector cytokines.

PN+CpG may also enhance cytokine responses from non-Th2 cells to suppress IL-13 secretion. Enhanced IL-10 in CD4+IL-13- T cells supports an important role for IL-10 in reducing allergic disease severity, since immunological tolerance to peanut is not achieved in the absence of IL-10(8). Naïve T cells exposed to PN+CpG may possibly differentiate into IL-10+ effector T cells to suppress allergic Th2 responses. Peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) reduces IL-4+ cells and increases IFN-γ+ cells in peanut-hypersensitive subjects(9). Since similar cytokine profiles in specific T cell clones were observed in subjects receiving OIT as placebo therapy, it is unlikely that OIT enhanced Th2 cell plasticity but instead increased non-Th2 cells that minimize the effects of the Th2 cells(9). While our data also agree with peanut immunotherapy generating non-Th2 cells such as, IL-10+ cells, to reduce allergic Th2 cell effects and desensitize or tolerize the host, it is possible that including potent Th1-enhancing adjuvants such as, CpG, to clinical peanut immunotherapy formulations will both generate new T cells and induce Th2 cell plasticity to, more effectively, reduce allergic disease severity compared to therapy with peanut allergens alone.

Collectively, our study suggests CpG-adjuvanted PN NIT may generate new IL-10+ T cells and induce Th2 cell plasticity to enhance IFN-γ to reduce allergy severity. This information may provide insight towards developing improved peanut allergy immunotherapy formulations.

Supplementary Material

Supp figS1-4

Funding Source:

This project was partially supported by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R03-ES021036)

References:

  • 1.Kulis M, Saba K, Kim EH, Bird JA, Kamilaris N, Vickery BP, Staats H, Burks AW. Increased peanut-specific IgA levels in saliva correlate with food challenge outcomes after peanut sublingual immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012. Epub 2012/01/13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.11.045. PubMed PMID: 22236732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yu W, Freeland DM, Nadeau KC. Food allergy: immune mechanisms, diagnosis and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(12):751–65. Epub 2016/11/01. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.111. PubMed PMID: 27795547; PMCID: PMC5123910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kulis M, Gorentla B, Burks AW, Zhong XP. Type B CpG oligodeoxynucleotides induce Th1 responses to peanut antigens: modulation of sensitization and utility in a truncated immunotherapy regimen in mice. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013;57(5):906–15. Epub 2013/02/07. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201200410. PubMed PMID: 23386314; PMCID: PMC3810026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Srivastava KD, Siefert A, Fahmy TM, Caplan MJ, Li XM, Sampson HA. Investigation of peanut oral immunotherapy with CpG/peanut nanoparticles in a murine model of peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016. Epub 2016/05/01. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.01.047. PubMed PMID: 27130858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liang HE, Reinhardt RL, Bando JK, Sullivan BM, Ho IC, Locksley RM. Divergent expression patterns of IL-4 and IL-13 define unique functions in allergic immunity. Nat Immunol. 2011;13(1):58–66. Epub 2011/12/06. doi: 10.1038/ni.2182. PubMed PMID: 22138715; PMCID: PMC3242938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gallo E, Katzman S, Villarino AV. IL-13-producing Th1 and Th17 cells characterize adaptive responses to both self and foreign antigens. European journal of immunology. 2012;42(9):10.1002/eji.201142227. doi: 10.1002/eji.201142227. PubMed PMID: PMC3811006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Krawczyk CM, Shen H, Pearce EJ. Functional plasticity in memory T helper cell responses. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md:1950). 2007;178(7):4080–8. Epub 2007/03/21. doi: 178/7/4080 [pii]. PubMed PMID: 17371962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.O’Konek JJ, Landers JJ, Janczak KW, Goel RR, Mondrusov AM, Wong PT, Baker JR. Nanoemulsion adjuvant–driven redirection of TH2 immunity inhibits allergic reactions in murine models of peanut allergy. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.01.042. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9.Wisniewski JA, Commins SP, Agrawal R, Hulse KE, Yu MD, Cronin J, Heymann PW, Pomes A, Platts-Mills TA, Workman L, Woodfolk JA. Analysis of cytokine production by peanut-reactive T cells identifies residual Th2 effectors in highly allergic children who received peanut oral immunotherapy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2015;45(7):1201–13. Epub 2015/04/01. doi: 10.1111/cea.12537. PubMed PMID: 25823600; PMCID: PMC4472497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp figS1-4

RESOURCES