Abstract
Silicosis is pneumoconiosis of the lung, usually resulting from prolonged exposure to crystalline silica (CS). The hallmark of silicosis is excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition produced by activated fibroblasts. Recent work demonstrated that excessive ECM-forming mechanical cues play an essential role in promoting fibroblast activation and perpetuating fibrotic pathologies. However, the detailed molecular mechanism still needs to be uncovered.
Methods: NIH-3T3 fibroblasts were cultured on either 1 kappa (soft) or 60 kappa (stiff) gel-coated coverslips. A series of knockdown and reverse experiments in vitro were performed to establish the signaling for mechanics-induced fibroblast activation. An experimental model of silicosis was established by one-time intratracheal instillation of CS suspension. The cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44) antibody (IM7), dihydrotanshinone I (DHI) and verteporfin (VP) were used to explore the effect of CD44-RhoA-YAP signaling blockade on mechanics-induced fibroblast activation and CS-induced pulmonary fibrosis.
Results: Matrix stiffness could induce nuclear translocation of the Yes-associated protein (YAP) through CD44 in fibroblasts. This effect required RhoA activity and F-actin cytoskeleton polymerization but was independent of Hippo pathway kinases, Mst 1 and Lats 1, forming CD44-RhoA-YAP signaling pathway. Pharmacological upstream blocking by CD44 antibody or downstream blockade of YAP by DHI or VP could attenuate fibroblast migration, invasion, proliferation, and collagen deposition. Furthermore, CD44-RhoA-YAP signaling blockade could alleviate CS-induced fibrosis and improve pulmonary function in vivo.
Conclusion: CD44-RhoA-YAP signaling mediates mechanics-induced fibroblast activation. Targeting this pathway could ameliorate crystalline silica-induced silicosis and provide a potential therapeutic strategy to mitigate fibrosis.
Keywords: silicosis therapy, mechanics, fibroblast activation, Yes-associated protein
Introduction
Occupational exposure to crystalline silica (CS) occurs in many industries and occupations. Long- term inhalation of CS leads to silicosis, which is characterized by chronic lung inflammation and progressive fibrosis 1. Persistent inflammation results in tissue damage, fibroblast proliferation and activation, and abnormal collagen deposition eventually leading to loss of lung functions and disability even death. Excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition is the hallmark of silicosis. A major source of increased ECM is the dysregulated matrix synthesis by activated fibroblasts, which differentiate into myofibroblasts. At present, few effective therapies can reverse or even delay the progression of silicosis. Patients are usually provided supportive care with anti-inflammatory treatment to avoid complications. However, fibrogenesis-related research indicated that anti-inflammatory therapy alone has little effect on the progression of fibrogenesis even if the inflammation is well-controlled 2, 3. Thus, directly targeting fibroblasts or their differentiation into myofibroblasts may provide the clinical potential to mitigate fibrosis.
Fibroblasts can be activated by growth factor signaling, becoming α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)- positive cells 4. Recently, the extracellular matrix, with its most abundant component collagen, is emerging as a new crucial factor that influences cell behavior by imparting biochemical and mechanical cues. Tensional, compressive, and shear forces can be translated into biochemical signaling through a process known as mechano-transduction signaling 5. Mechanical cues can lead to fibroblast activation in multi-organs including lung, kidney, and liver 6-8. Yes-associated protein (YAP), the downstream effector of Hippo signaling cascade, known for influencing cell proliferation and apoptosis, can be regulated by matrix rigidity. Matrix stiffness-induced YAP activation contributes to fibroblast phenotypic conversion, increased collagen deposition, and cell proliferation by augmenting feed-forward cycles that enhance microenvironment stiffening. Although the cellular distribution of YAP has been reported to be positively regulated by matrix stiffness 9, 10, the underlying molecular mechanism by which YAP mechanically promotes the positive loop is still unclear and required to be further explored. Targeting the mechano-sensitivity or interrupting the cellular response may be a therapeutic approach with clinical potential.
Here, we investigated the upstream and downstream components of the YAP, making it a mechano-activation pathway and developed several strategies targeting the signaling cascade to block fibroblast activation. We demonstrated that cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44, a cell-surface glycoprotein) 11 might function as a sensor of matrix stiffness and play a crucial role in YAP-mediated fibroblast activation. A series of knockdown and reverse experiments in vitro, identified that the signaling transduction was dependent on RhoA activation and F-actin cytoskeleton polymerization, but not on Hippo pathway kinases Mst 1 and Lats 1. Furthermore, we utilized anti-CD44 antibody or gradient-dose dihydrotanshinone I (DHI, a lipophilic component of traditional Chinese medicine Salvia Miltiorrhiza Bunge) 12 as well as verteporfin (VP, a small molecule YAP inhibitor) 13 and verified that the CD44-RhoA-YAP signaling blockade could affect fibroblast function and postpone fibrosis progression in experimental silicosis. This thesis may shed light on a new molecular mechanism and a specific molecular target to postpone CS-induced fibrosis.
Materials and Methods
Animals and treatments
Male C57BL/6 mice (6-8 weeks) were purchased from SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All mice were raised in a pathogen-free facility, provided with a standard mice feedstuff and water ad libitum. The animals were acclimatized for a week before starting the experiments. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at China Medical University. The silicosis model mice were described previously 14-16.
Study 1: Male C57BL/6 mice received one-time intratracheal instillation of 50 μL CS suspension (10 mice per group). Mice were randomized to receive weekly intraperitoneal injection of rat anti-mouse CD44 antibody (IM7) or isotype control rat IgG2b (300 μg in 500 μL saline). As shown in Figure S1A, treatment in this study began at day 7 after CS instillation and all mice were sacrificed at indicated time points under anesthesia.
Study 2: Male C57BL/6 mice received one time either intratracheal instillation of 50 μL CS suspension or sterile saline (10 mice per group). Mice receiving CS suspension were randomized to receive I: DMSO vehicle control, II-IV: daily intragastrical administration of DHI at doses of 150, 75, or 37.5 mg/kg dissolved in DMSO, respectively, and V: intraperitoneal injection of verteporfin at the dose of 100 mg/kg dissolved in DMSO every other day. Treatments in this study began at day 7 after CS instillation and all mice were sacrificed at indicated times under anesthesia (Figure S1B-C). Lung tissues were obtained for further analyses.
Pulmonary function assay
Body weight as well as minute volume, tidal volume, and breathing frequency of the male C57BL/6 mice, which received sterile saline, CS, CS+anti-CD44, CS+VP, and CS+DHI150 mg/kg were recorded prior to administering different treatments. These parameters were recorded again at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. We used minute volume, tidal volume, and breathing frequency relative to body weight to describe the mice pulmonary function.
Cytotoxicity assay of DHI
The cytotoxicity of DHI was assessed by the MTT assay. NIH-3T3 fibroblasts cell line, purchased from the National Infrastructure of Cell Line Resource (Beijing, China) , were cultured in 96-well plates at an initial density of 5×104 cells/well in a serum-free Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) overnight. Subsequently, NIH-3T3 fibroblasts were treated with DHI at different concentrations for 24 hours. Then DMEM was removed and replaced with 20 µL MTT (0.5 mg/mL) for 4 hours followed by 150 μL DMSO for 10 minutes. The absorbance of the dissolved formazan crystals was measured at 570 nm by a 96-well multimode plate reader (Figure S2).
2D cell culture and treatments
The 2D Col-gel was acquired from Bioruo (Beijing, China). NIH-3T3 fibroblasts were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 and grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 10 mM HEPES. Following overnight serum deprivation (DMEM without FBS), NIH-3T3 cells were seeded on coverslips or plastic dishes coated with either 1 kappa (soft) or 60 kappa (stiff) polyacrylamide hydrogels with sterile collagen to create a uniform, thin layer of ECM protein according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells were treated with anti-CD44 antibody (IM7) 10μg/mL or isotype-matched control IgG antibody for 12 hours to block the upstream signaling pathway. Cells were treated with VP (250 nM) or DHI (37.5, 75 or 150 nM) for 12 hours for blocking the downstream signaling pathway.
Transfection
Cells were seeded on soft (1 kappa) or stiff (60 kappa) gel-coated coverslips or plastic dishes using DMEM medium with 1% FBS and without antibiotics overnight before transfection with I: targeting siRNAs or equivalent amount of non-targeting siRNA, II: constitutively active RhoA (Q63L) plasmid or pcDNA3.1 for 48 hours. The siRNAs and plasmid were transfected into cells using LipoFiterTM (Hanbio) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transfection efficiency of each siRNA target or plasmid was confirmed via Western blotting (Figure S3), and cells were used for subsequent experiments. The sequences of siRNAs were as follows:
si-NC: 5′-AAUUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUUU-3′; si-CD44: 5′-CGUGGAGAAAAAUGGUCGC-3′; si-RhoA: 5′-GACAUGCUUGCUCAUAGUCTT-3′; si-Rac1: 5′-GAUAACUCACCACUGUCCATT-3′; si-Cdc42: 5′-GACUCCUUUCUUGCUUGUUTT-3′; si-YAP: 5′-GACAUCUUCUGGUCAGAGA-3′.
The siRNAs were designed and synthesized by Ribobio (Guangzhou, China). The plasmid was designed and synthesized by Hanbio (Shanghai, China).
Total and nuclear-cytosol protein extraction and Western blot analysis
Total protein was extracted from lung tissues or cells by RIPA lysis buffer containing protease inhibitor (Beyotime, China). Nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins were extracted from fresh lung tissues by a Nuclear-Cytosol Extraction Kit (Applygen Technologies Inc., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For Western blot analysis, primary antibodies are specified in Table S1.
Immunofluorescence
The treated cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes followed by permeabilization with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes and blocked with 5% BSA for 30 minutes at room temperature. To visualize actin filaments, cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated phalloidine (Cytoskeleton, 70nM) for 30 minutes at room temperature. To visualize CD44 and YAP, cells were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. For immunofluorescence analysis, primary antibodies are specified in Table S1. Subsequently, the cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 546-conjugated secondary antibody (1:200) for 1 hour at room temperature and stained with 4',6'- diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 10 minutes to visualize nuclei. Fluorescent images were captured with an Olympus confocal microscope. YAP nuclear staining was quantified by counting the YAP staining-positive cells and then normalizing to the total cell number in each image. Three different fields were selected from a cell-cultured coverslip, and three parallel experiments for each treatment were performed. All data were evaluated to obtain a mean value for subsequent statistical analysis.
Wound healing assay
Cells were seeded on stiff (60 kappa) gel-coated plastic dishes and cultured until the cells reached 70%-80% confluence. The monolayers were wounded by scratching with a sterile 20 μL pipette tip to create a straight linear scratch and washed with PBS to remove the detached cells followed by the previously described procedure. Wound gap was captured with a microscope and quantitatively evaluated with the Image J software.
Transwell migration assay
1.5×104 cells suspended in 200 μL of serum-free DMEM were seeded into the upper chamber of a Transwell insert coated with stiff (60 kappa) Col-gel, and 500 μL of serum-free DMEM was placed in the lower chamber overnight. Then, cells cultured in the upper chamber received different treatments, and the medium in the lower chamber was replaced with fresh DMEM containing 10% FBS. Cells remaining on the upper chamber were scraped off using a cotton swab, while cells traversed to reverse face of the membrane were placed in 0.5 mg/mL MTT for 4 hours followed by 500 μL DMSO for 10 minutes. The absorbance of the dissolved formazan crystals was measured at 570 nm by a 96-well multimode plate reader.
Cell proliferation assay
The Cell Counting Kit-8 (MedChemExpress, China) was used to detect cell proliferation according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 5×104 cells suspended in 100 μL of serum-free DMEM were seeded into 96-well plates coated with stiff (60 kappa) Col-gel overnight. Then, the cells received different treatments followed by 10 μL CCK-8 for 4 hours. Absorbance was measured at 490 nm by a 96-well multimode plate reader.
Apoptosis assay
To detect cell apoptosis, Annexin V-PE and PI (BD Pharmingen, USA) staining were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, treated cells were incubated with Annexin V-FITC (5 μL) and Annexin V-PI (5 μL) for 10 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Expression of Annexin V and PI was detected by a flow cytometer (FACS). The Annexin V+/PI- represents early apoptotic cells and the Annexin V+/PI + represents late apoptotic cells.
Luciferase reporter assay
1×105 cells suspended in 100 μL of serum-free DMEM were seeded into 96-well plates coated with stiff (60 kappa) Col-gel overnight. Subsequently, cells were transfected with a Smad4-binding element luciferase reporter containing four repetitions of the GTCTAGAC using LipoFiterTM (Hanbio) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cell lysates were obtained, and luciferase activity was measured using a luciferase assay kit (Promega, USA).
Quantitative PCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted from treated cells using Trizol (Life Technologies, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol, and reverse transcribed into cDNA with the PrimeScript RT kit (Takara, China). Equivalent amounts of each cDNA sample were added to a SYBR Green Master Mix Kit (Takara, China). PCR primers used in this study are described in Table S2. The mRNA levels of Tgf-β1, Pai, Il-6, Il-8, Fibronectin, and Collagen-1a1 were determined using the 2 -ΔΔCT method.
ELISA assay
A tracheostomy was performed to obtain bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) by perfusing with 1ml sterile saline twice. The BALF was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 8 minutes at 4°C. Levels of TNFα, IL-6, and IL-1β were measured by ELISA kits (R&D Systems, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm and 570 nm by a 96-well multimode plate reader. Concentrations are expressed as pg/mL.
Hydroxyproline assay
To quantify lung collagen contents, the hydroxyproline (HYP) contents of the lungs were measured with a HYP kit (Nanjing Jian Cheng Institute, China) according to the manufacturer's instruction. The HYP contents were expressed as micrograms per gram (μg/g) of lung wet weight.
Histological analysis and immunochemistry
Lung samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and then sectioned (5 μm) to expose the main intrapulmonary bronchus. For histopathological analysis, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or Masson's trichrome staining were performed using a standard protocol to evaluate inflammation and fibrosis. For immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry analysis, primary antibodies are specified in Table S1. The images were captured with a microscope.
Statistical analysis
The data are presented as means ± SD. Differences between multiple groups were calculated using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The unpaired two-sided Student's t-test was used to calculate differences in measured variables. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result. Statistical analysis was performed using Origin Pro 8.0 or SPSS 19.0.
Results
Mechanics induces YAP nuclear localization and CD44 expression in fibroblasts
YAP, as a major effector of Hippo signaling pathway, is reported to translocate into nucleus induced by mechanical force 9. The hallmark of silicosis is the increased stiffness of the lung. To explore the relationship between YAP and fibrogenesis, we examined nuclear YAP expression in the lungs of silicosis model mice and their controls. As shown in Figure 1A-C, western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry staining confirmed upregulated expression and nuclear localization of YAP in the CS-injured lung tissues. Furthermore, YAP nuclear localization was more pronounced in spindle-shaped cells in silicotic lesions (Figure 1C) suggesting its crucial role in fibroblasts. To confirm whether matrix stiffness induced YAP nuclear localization in fibroblasts, we cultured NIH-3T3 fibroblasts with collagen-1-coated soft gel (1 kappa) and stiff gel (60 kappa) to mimic the normal and injured fibrotic lung tissues, respectively. YAP immunostaining showed dramatically increased nuclear localization in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts cultured on stiff (60 kappa) gel-coated coverslips compared with those cultured on coverslips coated with soft gel (1 kappa) (Figure 1D). These results indicated that matrix stiffness- induced YAP nuclear translocation in fibroblasts might play a role in the progression of silicosis.
We further investigated the underlying molecular mechanism for the nuclear localization of YAP. Bioinformatic analysis of protein-protein interactions in STRING v.10 provided a protein network associated with YAP and matrix proteins, which clearly showed that collagens might interact with CD44 activating cytoplasmic signaling protein cascade (Figure 1E). Relevant to this information, we detected an apparent increase in CD44 in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts cultured on stiff gel-coated coverslips compared with the soft gel-cultured counterparts (Figure 1F and Figure S4). Besides, double immunostaining indicated higher expression of CD44 in α-SMA-positive myofibroblasts in the CS-injured lung tissues with silicotic lesions than in saline-treated mice (Figure 1G). These data indicated that CD44- induced nuclear translocation of YAP in fibroblasts might be associated with silicotic fibrogenesis.
Mechanics regulates YAP activity through CD44-mediated RhoA activation rather than Rac and Cdc42
To explore the interaction between CD44 and activated YAP, we first knocked down CD44 in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts with CD44 siRNA and cultured the cells on stiff (60 kappa) or soft (1 kappa) gel-coated coverslips. Immunostaining and Western blot analysis revealed that CD44 knockdown reduced YAP nuclear localization and expression in the fibroblasts cultured on the stiff matrix (Figure 2A-C). The bioinformatic analysis had also predicted that three major Rho family members RhoA, Rac, and Cdc42, may be involved in YAP activation. Hence, we hypothesized that CD44 mediates YAP activity through Rho family members. To test our hypothesis, we first performed Western blotting in the CD44 knockdown NIH-3T3 fibroblasts and found RhoA, rather than Rac or Cdc42 expression to be significantly reduced (Figure 2B and D). Next, we verified that CD44 regulated YAP activity through RhoA by transfecting NIH-3T3 fibroblasts with RhoA, Rac1, or Cdc42 siRNAs. As shown in Figure 2E, only RhoA knockdown could depolymerize the F-actin cytoskeleton (a major mechanical cue) of NIH-3T3 fibroblasts. Immunostaining and Western blot analysis showed that only RhoA knockdown could reduce YAP nuclear localization and expression (Figure 2F-G). By comparison, F-actin cytoskeleton and YAP activity were only marginally affected by Rac1 or Cdc42 knockdown (Figure 2E-F and H-I). These results suggested that RhoA is involved in CD44 modulation of YAP activation by matrix stiffness stimuli.
RhoA regulates YAP activity through F-actin cytoskeleton polymerization/ depolymerization independent of Hippo pathway kinases
We next investigated how RhoA regulates YAP activity. First, we examined NIH-3T3 fibroblasts treated with Lat A (F-actin inhibitor) followed by culturing on stiff gel-coated coverslips. We found that inhibiting F-actin cytoskeleton polymerization could downregulate YAP nuclear localization and expression (Figure 3A-C) by immunostaining and Western blot analysis. Of note, YAP alteration occurred in as short as 4 hours after Lat A treatment. To investigate whether F-actin influenced YAP activity via Hippo pathway kinases, we performed Western blotting of Mst 1 and Lats 1 and found that their expression did not change by Lat A treatment (Figure 3B and D). Collectively, the results suggested that Hippo pathway kinases may not be indispensable mediators in F-actin regulation of YAP activity. Thus, our results indicated that CD44 modulates RhoA activation, which, in turn, influences F-actin polymerization/depolymerization and may be a primary signaling pathway in matrix stiffness regulation of YAP activity.
To sort out the upstream and downstream relationship, we did a series of reverse experiments. First, we co-transfected CD44 siRNA and constitutively activated RhoA-Q63L (ca-RhoA) plasmid in fibroblasts. Results showed that ca-RhoA could reverse the CD44 knockdown effects on F-actin cytoskeleton depolymerization, YAP cytoplasmic retention, and decreased expression (Figure 3E-G). We also treated ca-RhoA plasmid-transfected fibroblasts with Lat A. Figure 3H showed that Lat A could reverse the effect of RhoA activation on YAP nuclear localization. Importantly, these results revealed that CD44-induced YAP activation acts in parallel with Hippo pathway kinases and requires RhoA activity for F-actin cytoskeleton polymerization.
CD44-RhoA-YAP signaling pathway blockade affects fibroblast function imposed by matrix stiffness stimuli
Previous results demonstrated the upstream signaling of mechanics-induced nuclear translocation of YAP. Next, we explored whether the signaling played a vital role in matrix stiffness-induced fibroblast activation. The anti-CD44 antibody was used to block the upstream signaling, while DHI and VP were used to block nuclear translocation of YAP. Fibroblasts transfected with YAP siRNA were utilized as a positive control. DHI has been shown to inhibit nuclear translocation of YAP 17. Immunostaining analysis of the treated fibroblasts showed that regardless of upstream (Figure 4A and Figure S5A) or downstream (Figure 4B and Figure S5B) blocking, there was cytoplasmic retention of YAP.
Various functional assays of the treated fibroblasts were carried out. First, the wound-healing assay demonstrated that matrix stiffness induced a significant increase in fibroblast migration, which was inhibited by the pathway blockade (Figure 4C-D). Furthermore, the Transwell migration assay also indicated significantly increased inhibition of cell migration by the blockade (Figure 4E and Figure S5C-E). To extend these findings, we tested the protein levels of MMP2 and its inhibitor TIMP2, which play crucial roles in fibroblast proliferation, migration, and collagen deposition 18. As displayed in Figure 4F-H, there was a simultaneous decrease in the expression of MMP2 and increase in TIMP2 expression. The CCK8 assay showed no distinguishable effect on fibroblast proliferation with upstream blocking; however, downstream blocking could effectively inhibit cell proliferation (Figure 4I). Conversely, blockade of the upstream pathway rather than the downstream one could facilitate the apoptosis of NIH-3T3 fibroblasts (Figure 4J-K).
Since fibroblast activation is a major fibrogenic response to the progression of fibrosis, we measured the protein level of type I collagen, an indicator of fibroblast activation and fibrotic matrix synthesis, and found that it was decreased by pathway blockade (Figure 4L-N). It is reported that the Hippo pathway can be integrated with TGF-β-Smad signaling which is the central mediator of the fibrotic response 19. Nuclear YAP can form a complex with Smads to bind TEADs, which mediates pluripotency 20. We, therefore, tested the transcriptional activity of Smads by luciferase reporter assay. Results showed that Smads transcriptional activity was suppressed by the blockade (Figure 4O). Besides, qPCR analysis of the pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrogenic genes, such as Tgf-β1, Pai, Il-6, Il-8, Fibronectin, and Collagen-1a1, showed that their mRNA levels were also downregulated by upstream and downstream blocking (Figure 5). Taken together, these results confirm that the CD44-RhoA- YAP signaling pathway plays a vital role in mechanics-induced fibroblast activation by affecting migration, invasion, proliferation, apoptosis and cytokine production.
CD44-RhoA-YAP signaling pathway blockade suppresses CS-induced silicosis
Since the CD44-RhoA-YAP signaling pathway blockade could effectively protect matrix stiffness-triggered fibroblast activation in vitro, we examined whether it could provide a potential therapeutic benefit for postponing the development of silicosis in mice. To this end, we treated silicotic mice with anti-CD44 antibody or gradient-dose DHI as well as VP. We performed Western blot analysis of the nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts from whole lung tissues at day 14, 28 (Figure S6) and 56 to examine whether YAP was affected by the blockade. We found that the nuclear protein level of YAP was decreased while the cytoplasmic extract was increased after the blockade (Figure 6A-E). Thus, DHI could lead to decreased YAP nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, which was similar to the effect of VP. The decrease in the ratio of nuclear/cytoplasmic YAP may indicate its inactivation.
We next determined Smad signaling activity in the lung tissues after the blockade by monitoring Smad protein levels in total lung extracts at various times. We examined p-Smad2 and found that the pathway blockade could prevent Smad2 phosphorylation without affecting Smad2/3 expression (Figure 6F-H and Figure S7A-D). The expression of Smad7, the inhibitory Smad protein, was upregulated (Figure 6I-K and Figure S7E-H) showing that the blockade treatment could prevent YAP from nuclear translocation and Smads signaling activation.
To evaluate the therapeutic benefit of the blockade, we used pulmonary function, which was described by minute volume, tidal volume, and breathing frequency relative to the body weight. Remarkably, the results showed that the blocking treatment led to faster recovery of the impaired pulmonary function in mice observed after CS instillation as compared to the untreated mice (Figure 7A and Table 1). Also, as shown in Figure 7B, CS treatment resulted in an apparent granular lung surface, which was significantly attenuated by the blocking process. Furthermore, Masson's trichrome staining indicated that pulmonary collagen deposition was significantly decreased (Figure 7C) which was further supported by immunohistochemical analysis of fibronectin and type 1 collagen expressions (Figure 7D). HYP measurement was also consistent with Masson's trichrome staining (Figure 7E and Figure S8A-B). Furthermore, H&E staining showed that inflammatory infiltrate was dramatically suppressed (Figure 7F) which was supported by ELISA analysis of the pro-inflammation cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β expression in BALF (Figure 7G-H and Figure S8C-D). These observations demonstrate that the blockade not only affects CS-induced pulmonary fibrogenesis but also alleviates chronic pulmonary inflammation in vivo.
Table 1.
Minute volume relative to body weight (mL/min/g) | |||||
Saline | CS | anti-CD44 | VP | DHI 150 mg/kg | |
0 | 3.30±0.15 | 3.23±0.18 | 3.31±0.17 | 3.26±0.33 | 3.22±0.18 |
1 | 3.23±0.31 | 3.21±0.22 | 3.28±0.34 | 3.19±0.31 | 3.21±0.25 |
2 | 3.14±0.12 | 2.20±0.35 | 2.58±0.46 | 2.82±0.42# | 2.86±0.54# |
3 | 3.21±0.16 | 2.73±0.62 | 3.28±0.51* | 3.12±0.27NS | 3.12±0.41NS |
4 | 3.21±0.17 | 3.05±0.66 | 3.34±0.84 | 2.99±0.40 | 3.11±0.39 |
5 | 3.18±0.21 | 3.07±0.38 | 3.24±0.34 | 3.14±0.59 | 3.12±0.54 |
6 | 2.93±0.17 | 2.87±0.20 | 2.93±0.24 | 2.79±0.25 | 2.91±0.32 |
7 | 2.87±0.16 | 2.60±0.18 | 2.76±0.22 | 2.71±0.32 | 2.72±0.18 |
8 | 2.88±0.32 | 2.50±0.12 | 2.76±0.26 | 2.72±0.31 | 2.66±0.28 |
Vertical comparison: *, P < 0.05, week 3 compared to week 2 among anti-CD44 treated mice; NS, not significant, week 3 compared to week 2 among VP or DHI treated mice; Horizontal comparison: #, P < 0.05, VP or DHI treated mice compared to CS instillation mice after week 2. | |||||
Tidal volume relative to body weight *10-2 (mL/g) | |||||
Saline | CS | anti-CD44 | VP | DHI 150 mg/kg | |
0 | 1.17±9.77E-2 | 1.11±0.136 | 1.23±0.149 | 1.33±3.39E-2 | 1.13±0.224 |
1 | 1.20±5.50E-2 | 1.14±4.32E-2 | 1.04±7.96E-2 | 1.23±6.85E-2 | 1.13±9.05E-2 |
2 | 1.16±2.25E-2 | 1.13±6.83E-2 | 1.11±4.22E-2 | 1.04±8.38E-2 | 1.13±7.36E-2 |
3 | 1.15±8.26E-2 | 1.21±4.32E-2 | 1.19±5.12E-2 | 1.14±3.92E-2 | 1.21±0.309 |
4 | 1.15±9.11E-2 | 1.25±5.16E-2 | 1.10±0.167 | 1.15±7.11E-2 | 1.27±0.317 |
5 | 1.16±5.01E-2 | 1.47±0.337 | 1.07±7.14E-2* | 1.08±0.100* | 1.17±0.102NS |
6 | 1.00±1.94E-2 | 1.20±4.41E-2 | 1.04±2.76E-2 | 0.99±4.83E-2 | 1.10±0.106 |
7 | 0.98±5.08E-2 | 1.14±9.00E-2 | 1.00±4.63E-1 | 1.06±0.106 | 1.01±0.132 |
8 | 0.94±0.152 | 1.13±0.224 | 1.00±0.101 | 1.02±8.67E-2 | 0.98±0.124 |
Horizontal comparison: *, P < 0.05, anti-CD44 or VP treated mice compared to CS instillation mice after week 5; NS, not significant, DHI treated mice compared to CS instillation mice after week 5. | |||||
Breathing frequency relative to body weight (breaths/min/g) | |||||
Saline | CS | anti-CD44 | VP | DHI 150 mg/kg | |
0 | 12.80±0.87 | 12.13±0.79 | 11.18±0.86 | 11.97±1.20 | 11.91±0.98 |
1 | 11.39±0.75 | 15.48±1.42 | 13.27±1.57 | 15.75±1.60 | 16.29±0.80 |
2 | 9.11±1.19 | 11.34±1.37*** | 10.01±1.12NS** | 10.79±1.50NS*** | 10.74±1.37NS*** |
3 | 10.18±0.62 | 11.75±0.73 | 10.42±1.03 | 10.62±1.32 | 10.60±1.28 |
4 | 8.95±0.87 | 12.39±0.77 | 10.01±1.08 | 10.72±1.24 | 10.46±1.67 |
5 | 9.38±0.42 | 12.28±0.34 | 9.71±0.68 | 10.12±1.55 | 11.54±1.16 |
6 | 8.55±0.39 | 11.28±0.55 | 10.21±0.77 | 9.62±0.76 | 11.08±0.61 |
7 | 8.79±0.38 | 10.56±0.76 | 9.63±0.79 | 11.21±1.62 | 10.96±0.42 |
8 | 9.14±0.50 | 10.27±0.70 | 10.95±1.21 | 11.44±1.57 | 11.19±0.79 |
Vertical comparison: ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01, week 2 compared to week 1 among CS, anti-CD44, VP, or DHI treated mice; Horizontal comparison: NS, not significant, anti-CD44, VP, or DHI treated mice compared to CS instillation mice after week 2. |
Discussion
Silicosis is a non-reversible process ranging from chronic inflammation to progressive fibrosis that ultimately leads to lung destruction caused by excessive ECM deposition 21. Although silicosis maintains a significant inflammatory response throughout the course of the disease, a growing body of evidence suggests that once fibrosis has established, anti-inflammation therapy alone is not enough to postpone fibrosis 2, 22, 23. Furthermore, isolated anti-inflammatory therapy may worsen clinical outcomes in patients with lung fibrosis 24. Recent research demonstrated that excessive ECM- forming mechanical cues play an essential role in promoting fibroblast activation and perpetuating fibrotic pathologies 25-27. Hence, therapeutically targeting tissue mechanics, either by directly altering the mechanical cues presented to cells or by disrupting the cellular signaling to mechanics will provide a potential therapeutic strategy. Although it has previously been reported that mechano-signaling through YAP drives fibroblast activation, the upstream and downstream components of mechano- activation pathway remained to be elucidated. In this study, we demonstrated CD44-RhoA-YAP signaling could facilitate ECM-induced fibroblast activation (Figure 8) and blocking this signaling pathway could ameliorate CS-induced experimental silicosis in vivo.
YAP is the prime mediator of the Hippo pathway and its expression and cellular distribution were reported to be mechanically regulated by stiffness of the extracellular matrix 28-30. We demonstrated that YAP was upregulated and nuclear- localized in lungs of CS-injured mice, especially in spindle-shaped cells (fibroblasts), during fibrosis when mechanical forces were high (Figure 1). As an intracellular molecule, YAP is not a direct receptor for surrounding mechanical forces. Integrin receptors have been identified as cell surface receptors that regulate the Hippo-YAP pathway. As the ECM can activate integrin-mediated downstream signaling, targeting integrin is logically the first choice to interrupt ECM mechano-sensing, since these transmembrane adhesion proteins can directly connect to the extracellular matrix and transduce bidirectional signaling. However, a previous study indicated that integrin expression in fibroblasts does not alone drive the cellular response to increased mechanics 31. Besides, selecting which integrins to target to block matrix stiffness sensing is not straightforward, since there are diverse arrays of integrin heterodimers 32. Thus, identifying another sensor to blunt surrounding mechanical forces appears extremely significant.
In this study, we showed, for the first time, that CD44, a transmembrane adhesion receptor involved in the regulation of YAP, was upregulated in fibroblasts response to mechanical forces and matrix stiffness. CD44 is recognized as a receptor for hyaluronic acid (HA) 33, 34, and can also bind to a variety of other ECM components, including type I and type III collagens 35, fibronectin 36, and laminin 37. It is of note that a previous report indicated co-localization of CD44 and β1 integrins in the cell membrane 36 indicating they may function synergistically and affect fibroblast activation. Furthermore, the involvement of CD44 in an invasive phenotype of fibroblasts and promoting the progression of fibrosis has also been described 38 which is consistent with our results. We believe that our results may provide a deeper molecular understanding of the mechanisms underlying the phenotype switching.
The bioinformatic analysis provided clues for our present study that CD44 might act through Rho GTPases to regulate YAP activity. Rho GTPases, including RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42, are critical regulators of cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular force through the formation of actin stress fibers. We and others found that CD44 could activate RhoA, and, to a lesser extent, Rac1 and Cdc42 signaling 39, 40. However, other reports suggested that CD44 could affect all three Rho GTPases 41, 42. To resolve this issue, we performed siRNA-mediated knockdown of RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42. Remarkably, only RhoA could alter downstream signaling and RhoA activation could effectively reverse CD44 knockdown effects, which can, in turn, be reversed by F-actin inhibitor Lat A (Figure 3). Thus, CD44-RhoA-F-actin signaling may at least partially be involved in regulating YAP in mechanical stimuli-induced fibroblast activation. Canonical Hippo cascade indicated that upstream stimuli could promote phosphorylation of the kinase Mst1/2 and Lats1/2 further controlling the cytoplasmic retention and degradation of YAP/TAZ 43, 44. However, we found that CD44- RhoA modulated YAP activation directly via F-actin polymerization/ depolymerization independent of the Hippo kinase cascade, which was consistent with a previous investigation 9. To our knowledge, our study shows, for the first time, that mechanical stimuli may modulate YAP activation through CD44-RhoA- F-actin independent of canonical Hippo cascade.
Fibroblast activation is hypersensitive to multiple mediators 4, 45, among which TGF-β/Smad signaling plays a central role 46, 47. The cross talk between Hippo and TGF-β signaling has been shown to play a significant role in intracellular signaling and transcriptional regulation. TGF-β intracellular signaling proceeds through phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3, which interact with Smad4 and translocate to the nucleus. The nuclear Smad complexes then bind to various transcription factors regulating the transcription of profibrotic genes. In the cytoplasm, phosphorylated YAP sequesters Smad2/3 to prevent nuclear accumulation and inhibits TGF-β responsiveness, whereas, in the nucleus, YAP forms a p-Smad2/ 3-Smad4 complex and participates in fibroblast activation 19. In this context, our result of the luciferase reporter assay indicated that the blocking treatment significantly reduced Smad4 transcription in fibroblasts which resulted in the reduction of mechanics- induced fibroblast activation.
Recognizing the role of CD44-RhoA-YAP signaling in mechanics-induced fibroblast activation, we attempted to elucidate its potential therapeutic benefits by using the mouse model of silicosis. A recent study identified the stiffness-dependent role of the Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) in driving the conversion of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts during fibrosis 48. In this signaling pathway, we chose CD44 and YAP and not RhoA, as our molecular targets, since Rho is considered “undruggable” as its three-dimensional structure lacks hydrophobic clefts 49. Instead of ROCK, the major downstream effector of Rho was used as an alternative target. On this basis, we chose to treat mice with upstream blocking antibody and downstream blockers VP/DHI. We noticed that upstream blockade with anti-CD44 resulted in greater nuclear translocation of YAP compared with the downstream blockade, while the phosphorylation of Smad2 in the mice lungs was comparable between the two modalities. However, the upstream blocking with anti-CD44 manifested in more significant therapeutic effects with fewer collagen deposition and faster pulmonary function recovery. It was probably attributed to the fact that CD44 expression is not limited to fibroblasts. Other cell types, such as lymphocytes, macrophages, and endothelial cells 50, 51, also express CD44 in the lung, which can be targeted by the blocking antibody.
Interestingly, when comparing the two downstream blocking effects of DHI and VP, we found DHI exerted a lesser effect on YAP translocation, while the subsequent Smad2 signaling activity suppression, as well as the pulmonary function recovery, were almost identical between the two treatments.
It is possible DHI has multi-molecular targets that need to be further investigated. It should be noted that either treatment could reduce the pro-inflammatory cytokines in BALF. Thus, it is a disadvantage of the treatment that neither upstream nor downstream blockades directly target the fibroblasts. On the other hand, blocking multiple targets may be beneficial for better therapeutic efficacy.
In the future, specific localized therapeutics to the target organ or specific cell types for precise treatment are highly desirable to minimize the potentially deleterious side effects. Considering the chronic inflammation characteristic of silicosis, we believe that using combination therapies with anti- inflammatory and anti-mechanics directed at more than one specific target may provide a better therapeutic benefit. In summary, our study elucidates potential novel molecular mechanism to mechanics- induced fibroblast activation and proposes attractive new therapeutic strategies for intervening the progression of silicosis.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81803181) and LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC180283).
Author Contributions
SL, CL, and JC were responsible for the conception and design of the study. SL, CL, YZ, XH, XC, and XZ performed experiments. SL and CL analyzed results and interpreted data. JC supervised the study. SL and CL drafted the manuscript. FL, YC, and JC helped revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Abbreviations
- Cdc42
cell division control protein 42 homolog
- F-actin
filamentous actin
- Il-6
interleukin 6
- Il-8
interleukin 8
- Lat A
latrunculin A
- Lats
large tumor suppressor
- MMP2
matrix metalloprotein 2
- Mst
mammalian STE20-like protein kinase
- Pai
plasminogen activator inhibitor
- Rac1
ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1
- RhoA
ras homolog gene family member A
- siNC
negative control siRNA
- siRNA
small interfering RNA
- TAZ
PDZ-binding motif
- TEAD
TEA domain transcription factor
- Tgf-β
transforming growth factor beta
- TIMP2
tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2
References
- 1.Leung CC, Yu IT, Chen W. Silicosis. Lancet. 2012;379:2008–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60235-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lenti MV, Di Sabatino A. Intestinal fibrosis. Mol Aspects Med. 2019;65:100–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2018.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Johnson LA, Luke A, Sauder K, Moons DS, Horowitz JC, Higgins PD. Intestinal fibrosis is reduced by early elimination of inflammation in a mouse model of IBD: impact of a "Top-Down" approach to intestinal fibrosis in mice. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:460–71. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Weiskirchen R, Weiskirchen S, Tacke F. Organ and tissue fibrosis: Molecular signals, cellular mechanisms and translational implications. Mol Aspects Med. 2019;65:2–15. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2018.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Humphrey JD, Dufresne ER, Schwartz MA. Mechanotransduction and extracellular matrix homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:802–12. doi: 10.1038/nrm3896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li Y, Jiang D, Liang J, Meltzer EB, Gray A, Miura R. et al. Severe lung fibrosis requires an invasive fibroblast phenotype regulated by hyaluronan and CD44. J Exp Med. 2011;208:1459–71. doi: 10.1084/jem.20102510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liang M, Yu M, Xia R, Song K, Wang J, Luo J. et al. Yap/Taz Deletion in Gli(+) Cell-Derived Myofibroblasts Attenuates Fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:3278–90. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015121354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mannaerts I, Leite SB, Verhulst S, Claerhout S, Eysackers N, Thoen LF. et al. The Hippo pathway effector YAP controls mouse hepatic stellate cell activation. J Hepatol. 2015;63:679–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, Enzo E, Giulitti S, Cordenonsi M. et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature. 2011;474:179–83. doi: 10.1038/nature10137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mason DE, Collins JM, Dawahare JH, Nguyen TD, Lin Y, Voytik-Harbin SL, YAP and TAZ limit cytoskeletal and focal adhesion maturation to enable persistent cell motility. J Cell Biol; 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jordan AR, Racine RR, Hennig MJ, Lokeshwar VB. The Role of CD44 in Disease Pathophysiology and Targeted Treatment. Front Immunol. 2015;6:182. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhao W, Li C, Gao H, Wu Q, Shi J, Chen X. Dihydrotanshinone I Attenuates Atherosclerosis in ApoE-Deficient Mice: Role of NOX4/NF-kappaB Mediated Lectin-Like Oxidized LDL Receptor-1 (LOX-1) of the Endothelium. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:418. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Corvaisier M, Bauzone M, Corfiotti F, Renaud F, El Amrani M, Monte D. et al. Regulation of cellular quiescence by YAP/TAZ and Cyclin E1 in colon cancer cells: Implication in chemoresistance and cancer relapse. Oncotarget. 2016;7:56699–712. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li C, Lu Y, Du S, Li S, Zhang Y, Liu F. et al. Dioscin Exerts Protective Effects Against Crystalline Silica-induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice. Theranostics. 2017;7:4255–75. doi: 10.7150/thno.20270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li C, Du S, Lu Y, Lu X, Liu F, Chen Y. et al. Blocking the 4-1BB Pathway Ameliorates Crystalline Silica-induced Lung Inflammation and Fibrosis in Mice. Theranostics. 2016;6:2052–67. doi: 10.7150/thno.16180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Du S, Li C, Lu Y, Lei X, Zhang Y, Li S. et al. Dioscin Alleviates Crystalline Silica-Induced Pulmonary Inflammation and Fibrosis through Promoting Alveolar Macrophage Autophagy. Theranostics. 2019;9:1878–92. doi: 10.7150/thno.29682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ge M, Liu H, Zhang Y, Li N, Zhao S, Zhao W. et al. The anti-hepatic fibrosis effects of dihydrotanshinone I are mediated by disrupting the yes-associated protein and transcriptional enhancer factor D2 complex and stimulating autophagy. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174:1147–60. doi: 10.1111/bph.13766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bates AL, Pickup MW, Hallett MA, Dozier EA, Thomas S, Fingleton B. Stromal matrix metalloproteinase 2 regulates collagen expression and promotes the outgrowth of experimental metastases. J Pathol. 2015;235:773–83. doi: 10.1002/path.4493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Piersma B, Bank RA, Boersema M. Signaling in Fibrosis: TGF-beta, WNT, and YAP/TAZ Converge. Front Med (Lausanne) 2015;2:59. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hansen CG, Moroishi T, Guan KL. YAP and TAZ: a nexus for Hippo signaling and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25:499–513. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Steenland K, Ward E. Silica: a lung carcinogen. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:63–9. doi: 10.3322/caac.21214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lebleu VS, Sugimoto H, Miller CA, Gattone VH 2nd, Kalluri R. Lymphocytes are dispensable for glomerulonephritis but required for renal interstitial fibrosis in matrix defect-induced Alport renal disease. Lab Invest. 2008;88:284–92. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kanasaki K, Taduri G, Koya D. Diabetic nephropathy: the role of inflammation in fibroblast activation and kidney fibrosis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2013;4:7. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2013.00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wynn TA. Integrating mechanisms of pulmonary fibrosis. J Exp Med. 2011;208:1339–50. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pickup MW, Mouw JK, Weaver VM. The extracellular matrix modulates the hallmarks of cancer. EMBO Rep. 2014;15:1243–53. doi: 10.15252/embr.201439246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kaess BM, Rong J, Larson MG, Hamburg NM, Vita JA, Levy D. et al. Aortic stiffness, blood pressure progression, and incident hypertension. Jama. 2012;308:875–81. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.10503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Caliari SR, Perepelyuk M, Soulas EM, Lee GY, Wells RG, Burdick JA. Gradually softening hydrogels for modeling hepatic stellate cell behavior during fibrosis regression. Integr Biol (Camb) 2016;8:720–8. doi: 10.1039/c6ib00027d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Aragona M, Panciera T, Manfrin A, Giulitti S, Michielin F, Elvassore N. et al. A mechanical checkpoint controls multicellular growth through YAP/TAZ regulation by actin-processing factors. Cell. 2013;154:1047–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Maller O, DuFort CC, Weaver VM. YAP forces fibroblasts to feel the tension. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15:570–2. doi: 10.1038/ncb2777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu F, Lagares D, Choi KM, Stopfer L, Marinkovic A, Vrbanac V. et al. Mechanosignaling through YAP and TAZ drives fibroblast activation and fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2015;308:L344–57. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00300.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yeung T, Georges PC, Flanagan LA, Marg B, Ortiz M, Funaki M. et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2005;60:24–34. doi: 10.1002/cm.20041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lampi MC, Reinhart-King CA. Targeting extracellular matrix stiffness to attenuate disease: From molecular mechanisms to clinical trials. Science translational medicine. 2018;10:eaao0475. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao0475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Leng Y, Abdullah A, Wendt MK, Calve S. Hyaluronic acid, CD44 and RHAMM regulate myoblast behavior during embryogenesis. Matrix Biol; 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Branco da Cunha C, Klumpers DD, Koshy ST, Weaver JC, Chaudhuri O, Seruca R. et al. CD44 alternative splicing in gastric cancer cells is regulated by culture dimensionality and matrix stiffness. Biomaterials. 2016;98:152–62. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Colombaro V, Jadot I, Decleves AE, Voisin V, Giordano L, Habsch I. et al. Lack of hyaluronidases exacerbates renal post-ischemic injury, inflammation, and fibrosis. Kidney Int. 2015;88:61–71. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Evanko SP, Potter-Perigo S, Petty LJ, Workman GA, Wight TN. Hyaluronan Controls the Deposition of Fibronectin and Collagen and Modulates TGF-beta1 Induction of Lung Myofibroblasts. Matrix Biol. 2015;42:74–92. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2014.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hibino S, Shibuya M, Hoffman MP, Engbring JA, Hossain R, Mochizuki M. et al. Laminin alpha5 chain metastasis- and angiogenesis-inhibiting peptide blocks fibroblast growth factor 2 activity by binding to the heparan sulfate chains of CD44. Cancer Res. 2005;65:10494–501. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li Y, Jiang D, Liang J, Meltzer EB, Gray A, Miura R, Severe lung fibrosis requires an invasive fibroblast phenotype regulated by hyaluronan and CD44. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2011: jem; 2010. 2510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bourguignon LY. Matrix hyaluronan-activated CD44 signaling promotes keratinocyte activities and improves abnormal epidermal functions. Am J Pathol. 2014;184:1912–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang Y, Xia H, Ge X, Chen Q, Yuan D, Chen Q. et al. CD44 acts through RhoA to regulate YAP signaling. Cell Signal. 2014;26:2504–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Roszkowska M, Skupien A, Wojtowicz T, Konopka A, Gorlewicz A, Kisiel M. et al. CD44: a novel synaptic cell adhesion molecule regulating structural and functional plasticity of dendritic spines. Mol Biol Cell. 2016;27:4055–66. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E16-06-0423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bourguignon LY. Hyaluronan-mediated CD44 activation of RhoGTPase signaling and cytoskeleton function promotes tumor progression. Semin Cancer Biol. 2008;18:251–9. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pan D. The hippo signaling pathway in development and cancer. Dev Cell. 2010;19:491–505. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Varelas X. The Hippo pathway effectors TAZ and YAP in development, homeostasis and disease. Development. 2014;141:1614–26. doi: 10.1242/dev.102376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Balestrini JL, Chaudhry S, Sarrazy V, Koehler A, Hinz B. The mechanical memory of lung myofibroblasts. Integr Biol (Camb) 2012;4:410–21. doi: 10.1039/c2ib00149g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pohlers D, Brenmoehl J, Loffler I, Muller CK, Leipner C, Schultze-Mosgau S. et al. TGF-beta and fibrosis in different organs - molecular pathway imprints. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1792:746–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang S, Wilkes MC, Leof EB, Hirschberg R. Imatinib mesylate blocks a non-Smad TGF-beta pathway and reduces renal fibrogenesis in vivo. Faseb j. 2005;19:1–11. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-2370com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Htwe SS, Cha BH, Yue K, Khademhosseini A, Knox AJ, Ghaemmaghami AM. Role of Rho-Associated Coiled-Coil Forming Kinase Isoforms in Regulation of Stiffness-Induced Myofibroblast Differentiation in Lung Fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2017;56:772–83. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0306OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Verdine GL, Walensky LD. The challenge of drugging undruggable targets in cancer: lessons learned from targeting BCL-2 family members. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:7264–70. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-2184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dong Y, Poon GFT, Arif AA, Lee-Sayer SSM, Dosanjh M, Johnson P. The survival of fetal and bone marrow monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages is promoted by CD44 and its interaction with hyaluronan. Mucosal Immunol. 2018;11:601–14. doi: 10.1038/mi.2017.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wight TN, Frevert CW, Debley JS, Reeves SR, Parks WC, Ziegler SF. Interplay of extracellular matrix and leukocytes in lung inflammation. Cell Immunol. 2017;312:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.