Skip to main content
Mycobiology logoLink to Mycobiology
. 2019 Jun 17;47(2):230–241. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2019.1623979

Isolation, Identification and Enzymatic Activity of Halotolerant and Halophilic Fungi from the Great Sebkha of Oran in Northwestern of Algeria

Rajaa Chamekh a,, Franck Deniel b, Christelle Donot b, Jean-Luc Jany b, Patrice Nodet b, Lakhder Belabid a
PMCID: PMC6691801  PMID: 31448143

Abstract

The Great Sebkha of Oran is a closed depression located in northwestern of Algeria. Despite the ranking of this sebkha among the wetlands of global importance by Ramsar Convention in 2002, no studies on the fungal community in this area have been carried out. In our study, samples were collected from two different regions. The first region is characterized by halophilic vegetation and cereal crops and the second by a total absence of vegetation. The isolated strains were identified morphologically then by molecular analysis. The biotechnological interest of the strains was evaluated by testing their ability to grow at different concentration of NaCl and to produce extracellular enzymes (i.e., lipase, amylase, protease, and cellulase) on solid medium. The results showed that the soil of sebkha is alkaline, with the exception of the soil of cereal crops that is neutral, and extremely saline. In this work, the species Gymnoascus halophilus, Trichoderma gamsii, the two phytopathogenic fungi, Fusarium brachygibbosum and Penicillium allii, and the teleomorphic form of P. longicatenatum observed for the first time in this species, were isolated for the first time in Algeria. The halotolerance test revealed that the majority of the isolated are halotolerant. Wallemia sp. and two strains of G. halophilus are the only obligate halophilic strains. All strains are capable to secrete at least one of the four tested enzymes. The most interesting species presenting the highest enzymatic index were Aspergillus sp. strain A4, Chaetomium sp. strain H1, P. vinaceum, G. halophilus, Wallemia sp. and Ustilago cynodontis.

Keywords: Fungal diversity, enzyme, salt tolerance, Sebkha, soil fungi

1. Introduction

Sebkha is an Arabic word referring to a closed depression temporarily occupied by a salt lake. It is characterized by an abundance of soluble salts concentrated on the surface that prevents any vegetation [1]. Halophilic vegetation appears in less salty soils that surround the sebkha. In Algeria, several sebkha or salt lakes stretch from the Algerian north coast to the Sahara. The Great Sebkha of Oran is the largest sebkha in northwestern of Algeria with an area of 1890 km2. It is temporarily occupied by a salt lake of 300 km2 whose salt concentration is estimated at more than 100 g.L−1 of dissolved salts [2].

A specific fauna and flora characterize saline ecosystems. Beside this population, several studies have shown that other organisms such as eubacteria, archaea, algae, and fungi can grow under salt stress and populate saline ecosystems [3,4]. Various research have been carried out on the fungal diversity of the saline environments in the world in particular the solar salterns [5–8], Dead Sea [9–13], arid desert [14,15], and some sebkha [16,17]. In general, fungal communities in hypersaline environments are dominated by Aspergillus, Penicillium and some of their related teleomorphic genera (formerly Eurotium, Emericella, and Eupenicillium). Other genera such as Alternaria, Cladosporium, Fusarium, Chaetomium, Wallemia, and Hortaea were also reported [18–20]. Some new species were also described from hypersaline environments including three species of the genus Wallemia [21], twelve species of the genus Cladosporium [22,23], two species of the genus Emericella [24] and three species of the genus Gymnoascus [25].

The main reasons for studying extremophiles including halophilic microorganisms are to understand their mechanisms involved in stress adaptation and for the biotechnological application of their metabolites capable of activity under extreme conditions. Low water activity and high salt concentration of hypersaline environments make these habitats an important source of halophilic microorganisms that can provide enzymes of industrial interest [26]. Several researches on halophilic hydrolases such as amylases, cellulases, lipases and proteases have been reported from halophilic bacteria and fungi [27,28] including few investigations on enzymes from obligate halophilic fungi [29]. In addition, the increasing need for bioremediation of hypersaline environments and for biocontrol agents that can be used in agriculture irrigated by saline water stimulate the search for these halophilic organisms [30,31].

Although the Great Sebkha of Oran is considered an extreme environment due to its high salt content, no studies on its fungal community have been published. In this present work, we report the first study on fungal diversity of the Great Sebkha of Oran by isolating halotolerant and halophilic fungi from the saline soil in two zones of the Great Sebkha. No isolation was done at the lake level because of the difficulty of access to the center of the sebkha. Fungal isolates were identified by morphological and microscopical observations and by the use of molecular techniques. In order to select strains of biotechnological interest, the salt tolerance of isolates and their ability to produce hydrolytic enzymes were evaluated.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Sampling site and isolation

Samples were collected from the soil of the Great Sebkha of Oran located in northwestern of Algeria at 12 km from the Mediterranean Sea (Figure 1). Sampling was carried out in an area of 5 km2 between Boutlelis and Al Amria in 9 sites divided in two zones: zone1 (Figure 1: sites B, C, D, R, G, S) is characterized by halophilic vegetation and cereal crops and zone2 (Figure 1: sites A, E, H) is characterized by a total absence of vegetation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Map of the Great Sebkha of Oran. Letters indicate sites of sampling. (Image ©2018 DigitalGlobe, CNES/Airbus, DigitalGlobe, Données cartographiques ©2018 Google.)

Soil samples were collected after removing the surface layer of the soil at a depth of 5 to 15 cm, placed in a sterile bottle and transported to the laboratory where fungi were isolated.

Fungal isolations were made by using the dilution plate method on potato dextrose agar medium (PDA) prepared with different concentrations of NaCl (5%, 10% and 15%). Plates were then incubated at 25 °C for a month.

After one month, small agar plugs containing fungal mycelium, identified as different species by macroscopic and microscopic observations, were transferred to different fresh PDA plate (containing the same salt concentration than the isolation plate) then incubated in the dark at 25 °C for 3–4 weeks to assess the purity of each obtained isolate.

2.2. Physicochemical analysis of soil

Soil suspensions were prepared for physicochemical analysis by mixing 10 g of the soil in 50 ml of distilled water. Electrical conductivity, salinity, and pH of soil suspensions were determined using a conductivity meter and a pH meter.

2.3. Morphological identification of fungal isolates

The morphological identification of the isolates was based on a macroscopic observation of the cultural characteristics and a microscopic study of the morphological characters of the mycelium and of sexual and asexual reproductive organs. The identification keys of Pitt [32], Barnett and Hunter [33], Samson et al. [34] and Samson and Frisvad [35] were used to classify isolates in different genera.

2.4. DNA extraction and molecular identification of isolates

30-days-old fungal mycelium was scraped from the surface of a PDA plate using a sterile scalpel and transferred into a sterile 2 mL tube. Genomic DNA was then extracted using the FastDNA® SPIN kit (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions with an initial homogenization step using the Retsch MM400 instrument (Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany) at 30 Hz for 30 sec, for two times. The DNA was re-suspended in 100 μL of sterile nuclease-free water, quantified and checked in quality using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). After extraction, all DNA extracts were stored at −20 °C.

In order to establish the species designation, different DNA regions were amplified according to the fungal genera. The 1α translation elongation factor gene (TEF-1α) was amplified for strains belonging to the genus Fusarium and Curvularia using primers EF1F/EF1R [36], β-tubulin for strains of Aspergillus, Penicillium, and their teleomorphic forms using primers Bt2a/Bt2b [37], actine for the genus Cladosporium using primers ACT-512F/ACT-783R [38]. The ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region of rDNA was amplified for the rest of genera using primers ITS4 and ITS5 [39]. Amplification reactions were performed in 25 μL volume using 0.025 U/μL of GoTaq Flexi DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI) and 1 × GoTaq Flexi buffer (Promega), 25–50 ng of template DNA, 0.08 μM of each primer, 2 mM of MgCl2 and 0.2 mM of 10 mM dNTP mix (Promega). Amplification products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1 × TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA) with 1% (w/v) agarose gel (LE, analytical grade agarose; Promega) prepared using 1 × TAE buffer and detected by UV fluorescence after GelRedTM (Biotium Inc., Fremont, CA) staining, according to manufacturer’s instructions. The BenchTop 100-bp DNA ladder (Promega) was used as molecular size marker. PCR products were sent to Eurofins MWG (Ebersberg, Germany) for purification and sequencing in forward and reverse, using the same primers used for PCR. The sequence obtained from each isolate was further analyzed by Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) at the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website.

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing were realized during two stays at Laboratory of Biodiversity and Microbial Ecology (LUBEM) Brest, UBO, France.

2.5. Halotolerance test

The halotolerance test was studied on PDA medium prepared with different concentrations of NaCl (from 0% to 20% with an interval of 2.5). Strains were inoculated at the center of the Petri dishes containing 15 ml of culture medium and incubated at 25 °C for 10 days. The measurement of the radial growth of each thallus was carried out every 48 h.

2.6. Extracellular enzymes production

Enzymes production was evaluated on solid medium. In order to visualize the enzymatic activity a specific substrate of each enzyme was added to the culture medium as a carbon source. After inoculation and incubation of cultures for 2–5 days depending on the growth rate of the strains, the appearance of a clear halo or precipitation around the thallus indicates enzyme production.

Amylase activity was evaluated on nutrient agar medium supplemented with 2 g.L−1 of soluble starch. After incubation, the cultures were flooded with a solution of iodine. The appearance of a clear zone around the thallus reveals the presence of amylase [40].

Cellulase activity was tested on medium supplemented with 1% cellulose (7.0 g.L−1 KH2PO4, 2.0 g.L−1 K2HPO4, 0.1 g.L−1 MgSO47 H2O, 1.0 g.L−1 (NH4)2SO4, 0.6 g.L−1 yeast extract, 10 g.L−1 microcrystalline cellulose and 15 g.L−1 agar) [41]. At the end of the incubation period, the cultures were incubated at 50 °C for 16 h to accelerate the action of the enzyme [42]. The cultures were then flooded with 5 ml of iodine and rinsed with distilled water to visualize the hydrolysis zone [43].

Protease activity was detected on milk agar medium containing 30% skim milk and 2% agar. After incubation, the degradation of casein was reflected by a clear zone around the thallus [44].

Lipase activity was determined on culture medium containing tween 80 as a lipid substrate (10 g.L−1 peptone, 5 g.L−1 NaCl, 0.1 g.L−1 CaCl22H2O, 17 g.L−1 agar and 10 mL.L−1 Tween 80). Tween 80 was sterilized separately then added to the sterile medium. After incubation, the cultures were put at 4 °C for 12 h to better visualize the appearance of an opaque precipitation around the thallus [40].

For each enzyme, the activity was evaluated by an enzymatic index (EI) where EI = R/r (R being the diameter of the halo and r the diameter of the thallus). Strains with an EI equal to or greater than 2 are considered as good producers of the studied enzyme [40].

3. Results

3.1. Physicochemical properties of soil samples

The results of the physicochemical analyses presented in Table 1 show that the soil of the zone1 (dominated by halophilic vegetation) and the soil of the zone2 (characterized by a total absence of vegetation) are alkaline and have a high salinity rate. Nevertheless, it should be noted that in the sites G &S (zone1) characterized by the presence of cereal crops, the soil is neutral and less saline. According to the scale of Durand [45], all these soils are classified as extremely saline (EC > 4 ms.cm−1).

Table 1.

Physicochemical analyses of soil samples.

Site sampling Strain code Date of sampling pH Electrical conductivity
ms.cm−1
Salinity
g.L−1
Zone1 Halophilic plants B, C, D, R December 2012 8.0 57.5 37
Cereal crops G, S January 2015 7.2 6 3.8
Zone2 Total absence of vegetation A, E December 2012 7.7 43 28
H July 2015 8.2 71.5 46

3.2. Strains identification

A total of 136 isolates were isolated from both zones. One hundred and twenty three isolates were identified to the genera level by macroscopic and microscopic observation of cultures while 13 isolates were not identified (sterile mycelia). Fifty isolates representing the different morphologically identified genera as well as the 13 unidentified isolates were selected for molecular identification.

For the majority of the 50 assayed strains, the obtained sequences showed high similarity (≥97%) with fungal species sequences deposited in GenBank database (Table 2); 33 strains have been affiliated to 29 species belonging to 14 genera of Ascomycota division and one species of Basidiomycota division, the other 17 strains were identified only at the genus level. Among those 17 unidentified strains, 6 belonging to the genera Penicillium (R32, R33), Trichoderma (G15), Alternaria (G5), Chaetomium (H1) and Wallemia (H15) showing high similarity (≥97%) with sequences of more than one species. The sequenced gene used to identify these 6 strains does not allow distinction between species. Therefore, other genes need to be studied to have a more precise identification of those species. Four others strains belonging to the genera Chrysosporium (H18), Tritirachium (B2), Lecanicillium (R29) and Pleospora (H43) showing a high similarity (100%) with unidentified species of these genera. The last 7 unidentified strains belonging to the genera Aspergillus (A4, E2, E7), Arachnomyces (H10), Fusarium (R1) and Chaetomium (H38, H42) but presented only low similarity with sequences of fungal species available in GenBank database. These strains could represent new species but more molecular and phylogenetic studies will be necessary to confirm their correct taxonomic position.

Table 2.

List of fungal isolates obtained from the sebkha and their closest match with the NCBI GenBank database.

Strains code Locus Closest match in GenBank Max ident / Query coverage Accession number
A1 β tubulin Aspergillus subramanianii 99/98 MK361155
A2 β tubulin Aspergillus subramanianii 99/97 MK361156
S11 β tubulin Aspergillus terreus 100/100 MK361157
S15 β tubulin Aspergillus calidoustus 99/100 MK361158
S20 β tubulin Aspergillus europaeus 99/100 MK361159
A4 β tubulin Aspergillus micronesiensis 95/97 MK361160
E2 β tubulin Aspergillus micronesiensis 96/98 MK361161
E7 β tubulin Aspergillus micronesiensis 95/98 MK361162
H12 β tubulin Aspergillus amstelodami 97/100 MK361163
S16 β tubulin Penicillium flavigenum 99/100 MK361164
S17 β tubulin Penicillium griseofulvum 100/99 MK361165
S18 β tubulin Penicillium canescens 98/98 MK361166
S19 β tubulin Penicillium mariae-crucis 100/93 MK361167
H22 β tubulin Penicillium allii 100/100 MK361168
R7 β tubulin Penicillium vinaceum 99/100 MK361169
E9 β tubulin Penicillium egyptiacum 99/100 MK361170
S12 β tubulin Penicillium longicatenatum 99/91 MK361171
R32 β tubulin Penicillium sinaicum
Penicillium egyptiacum
99/95 MK361172
R33 β tubulin Penicillium egyptiacum
Penicillium molle
98/100
97/100
MK361173
H2 ITS Gymnacelladankaliensis 100/98 MK361132
H18 ITS Chrysosporium sp. 100/99 MK361133
H10 ITS Arachnomycesperuvianus 93/99 MK361134
H19 ITS Gymnoascus halophilus 100/100 MK361135
H20 ITS Gymnoascus halophilus 100/100 MK361136
B8 TEF1 Fusarium oxysporum 99/100 MK361174
D3 TEF1 Fusarium equiseti 100/97 MK361175
R38 TEF1 Fusarium brachygibbosum 99/99 MK361176
S8 TEF1 Fusarium acuminatum 99/100 MK361177
S7 TEF1 Fusarium brachygibbosum 97/99 MK361178
R1 TEF1 Fusarium sp
Fusarium cf. dimerum
95/92
90/61
MK361179
R8 ITS Sarocladiumstrictum 100/100 MK361137
S2 ITS Trichoderma gamsii 100/100 MK361138
G15 ITS Trichoderma koningii
Trichoderma koningiopsis
Trichoderma hispanicum
Trichoderma sp.
99/100 MK361139
B2 ITS Tritirachium sp 100/100 MK361140
C3 ITS Gibellulopsisnigrescens 100/100 MK361141
R13 ITS Beauveriabassiana 100/100 MK361142
R29 ITS Lecanicillium sp. 100/100 MK361143
B1 ITS Purpureocilliumlilacinum 100/100 MK361144
R5 ITS Myrothecium verrucaria 99/100 MK361145
S3 ITS Clonostachysrosea 100/100 MK361146
H1 ITS Chaetomium piluliferum
Chaetomium murorum
98/100
98/100
MK361147
H38 ITS Chaetomium retardatum 93/100 MK361148
H42 ITS Chaetomium retardatum 93/100 MK361149
B5 ITS Microascusmanginii 99/100 MK361150
G5 ITS Alternaria sp.
Alternaria alternate
Alternaria tenuissema
Alternaria chartarum
100/100 MK361151
H43 ITS Pleospora sp. 100/100 MK361152
R20 TEF1 Curvulariaspicifera 100/97 MK361180
R36 ACT Cladosporium ramotenellum 100/100 MK361181
H14 ITS Ustilagocynodontis 99/100 MK361153
H15 ITS Wallemia sp.F53 (related to Wallemia sebi)
Wallemia Canadensis
Wallemia mellicola
98/100 MK361154

Strains not identified to the species level are mentioned in bold.

3.2.1. Strains isolated from zone1

A total of 83 isolates belonging to 17 genera and 26 identified species and 8 unidentified species were isolated from the soil of sebkha where halophilic plants and cereal crops dominate (Table 3). The most dominant genus was Fusarium (32.5%) represented by 5 species: F. oxysporum, F. equiseti, F. brachygibbosum, F. acuminatum and one unidentified species belonging to dimerum clade (Fusarium sp strain R1). The species F. equiseti was the most frequently isolated representing 18% of all isolates and 55.5% of Fusarium isolates. The genera Penicillium and Aspergillus were isolated with a frequency of 26.50% and 13.25% respectively. Their teleomorphic form were represented by at least four species: A. amstelodami, P. egyptiacum, which were the dominant species, P. longicatenatum and two unidentified species Penicillium sp. strain R32 showing high similarity with P. egyptiacum or P. sinaicum, and Penicillium sp. strain R33 showing high similarity with P. egyptiacum or P. molle that were isolated with low frequency.

Table 3.

Number of isolates in each site and their salt tolerance.

Strains identity Strains code Number of isolates
Salt tolerance (NaCl %)
Zone 1 Zone 2 growth interval optimal growth
Eurotiales          
 Aspergillus subramanianii A1 1 0–17.5 2.5
 Aspergillus subramanianii A2 2 0–15.0 2.5
 Aspergillus terreus S11 1 0–12.5 2.5
 Aspergillus calidoustus S15 3 2 0–12.5 2.5
 Aspergillus europaeus S20 1 0–12.5 5
 Aspergillus sp A4 1 0–17.5 2.5
 Aspergillus sp E2 1 0–15.0 2.5
 Aspergillus sp E7 1 0–15.0 [2.5–7.5]
 Aspergillus amstelodami H12 6 5 0–15.0 7.5
 Penicillium flavigenum S16 3 2 0–12.5 2.5
 Penicillium griseofulvum S17 4 3 0–12.5 2.5
 Penicilliumcanescens S18 2 0–12.5 2.5
 Penicillium mariae-crucis S19 2 0–12.5 2.5
 Penicillium allii H22 1 0–12.5 5
 Penicillium vinaceum R7 2 0–17.5 5
 Penicillium egyptiacum E9 5 6 0–15.0 2.5
 Penicillium longicatenatum S12 2 0–15.0 5
 Penicillium sp R32 1 0–15.0 5
 Penicillium sp R33 1 0–12.5 5
Onygenales          
 Gymnacelladankaliensis H2 6 0–12.5 2.5
 Chrysosporium sp. H18 1 0–7.50 2.5
 Arachnomyces sp. H10 1 0–12.5 2.5
 Gymnoascus halophilus H19 1 2.5–17.5 10
 Gymnoascus halophilus H20 1 2.5–17.5 10
Hypocreales          
 Fusarium oxysporum B8 6 0–12.5 2.5
 Fusarium equiseti D3 15 0–12.5 2.5
 Fusarium brachygibbosum R38 2 0–12.5 2.5
 Fusarium acuminatum S8 1 0–10.0 2.5
 Fusarium brachygibbosum S7 2 0–12.5 2.5
 Fusarium sp R1 1 0–12.5 2.5
 Sarocladiumstrictum R8 2 2 0–7.50 5
 Trichoderma gamsii S2 1 0–5.0 0
 Trichoderma sp. G15 1 0–5.0 0
 Tritirachium sp B2 1 0–12.5 [2.5–5.0]
 Gibellulopsisnigrescens C3 2 0–7.50 0
 Beauveriabassiana R13 1 0–7.50 0
 Lecanicillium sp. R29 1 0–12.5 2.5
 Purpureocilliumlilacinum B1 2 0–7.50 2.5
 Myrothecium verrucaria R5 1 0–7.50 0
 Clonostachysrosea S3 1 0–7.50 0
Sordariales          
 Chaetomium sp H1 1 0–7.50 2.5
 Chaetomium sp H38 1 0–10.0 [2.5–5.0]
 Chaetomium sp H42 1 0–12.5 5
Microascales          
 Microascusmanginii B5 1 0–15.0 2.5
Pleosporales          
 Alternaria sp. G5 3 5 0–12.5 0
 Pleospora sp. H43 1 1 0–12.5 2.5
 Curvulariaspicifera R20 1 1 0–12.5 0
Capnodiales          
 Cladosporium ramotenellum R36 4 3 0–12.5 5
Basidiomycètes          
 Ustilagocynodontis H14 2 0–5.0 0
 Wallemia sp. H15 1 2.5–20 [2.5–7.0]
Total number of isolates 136 83 53    
Total number of genera 24 17 14    
Total number of identified species 30 26 13    
Total number of unidentified species 14 8 8    

Two strains of Trichoderma, T. gamsii and Trichoderma sp., were isolated from the soil of cereal crops. These two species and the rest of the strains belonging to the orders of Hypocreales, Pleosporales, Microascales, and Capnodiales were the least frequently isolated in this area.

3.2.2. Strains isolated from zone2

A total of 53 isolates belonging to 14 genera and 13 identified species and 8 unidentified species were isolated from the soil of sebkha characterized by a total absence of vegetation (Table 3). Unlike zone1, where the genus Fusarium was the most frequently isolated, this genus and all the genera of the order of Hypocreales isolated from zone1 were not isolated from zone2 with the exception of the species Sarocladium strictum which has been isolated from both zones. The most frequently isolated species were A. amstelodami, P. egyptiacum, Alternaria sp. and Gymnacella denkaliensis. The species isolated with lower frequency belonged to the genera Penicillium: P. flavigenum, P. griseofulvum and P. alii, Aspergillus: A. subramanianii, A. calidoustus, and three strains of an unidentified species Aspergillus sp. strain A4, E2, and E7 having 95% to 96% similarity with the species A. micronesiensis. Unidentified species of Chaetomiaceae represented by three strains H1, H38 and H42 were also isolated, the strain H1 has a high similarity with the two species C. murorum and C. piluliferum, and, in GenBank database, the closest homologue species to strains H38 and H42 was C. retardatum with a similarity of 93%. The rest of the isolates belonged to 7 species or genus of Ascomycota division: Gymnoascus halophilus, Chrysosporium sp, Arachnomyces sp., S. strictum, Pleospora sp., Curvularia spicifera and Cladosporium ramotenellum, and two species of Basidiomycota division: Ustilago cynodontis and an unidentified species Wallemia sp. belonging to W. sebi complex.

3.3. Halotolerance test

The salt tolerance test represented in Table 3 showed that all strains could grow on PDA medium without NaCl with the exception of Wallemia sp.H15 and the two strains of G. halophilus H19 and H20 that are obligatorily halophilic. 74% of the strains could grow at 12.5% NaCl and 5 strains (A. subramanianii strain A1, Aspergillus sp. strain A4, P. vinaceum and the two strains of G. halophilus) at 17.5%. The only strain that could grow at 20% was Wallemia sp. The optimum growth of most strains is 2.5% or 5% NaCl. The concentration of 10% is optimal for the growth of G. halophilus.

3.4. Extracellular enzymes production

The 50 isolates previously selected for molecular analysis were assayed for extracellular enzyme activity. The secretion of the extracellular enzymes (lipase, amylase, protease, and cellulase) by the strains was detected on solid medium containing the specific substrate for each enzyme. The enzymatic index of strains is represented in Table 4.

Table 4.

Enzymes activities of fungal isolates.

Strains Strain code Enzymatic index (EI)
lipase amylase protéase cellulase
Aspergillus subramanianii A1 0.21 1
Aspergillus subramanianii A2 0.5 0.57 0.2 1.6
Aspergillus terreus S11 0.2 0.2 1.8
Aspergillus calidoustus S15 0.33 0.21 3
Aspergillus europaeus S20 0.3 1 2
Aspergillus sp A4 0.5 2.0 2.4 4.66
Aspergillus sp E2 0.5 1 3
Aspergillus sp E7 0.3 1.2
Aspergillusamstelodami H12 0.8 2.5
Penicillium flavigenum S16 0.2 0.28 0.3 0.8
Penicillium griseofulvum S17 1.4 0.8 1.42
Penicilliumcanescens S18 1 0.15 1 2
Penicillium mariae-crucis S19 0.5 0.08 0.87
Penicillium allii H22 0.28 0.6 0.23 2
Penicillium vinaceum R7 5 1.8 0.8 4.33
Penicillium egyptiacum E9 0.5 0.5 1.42 2
Penicillium longicatenatum S12 0.3 1.14 0.75 1
Penicillium sp R32 0.25 0.55 1.28 1.6
Penicillium sp R33 0.5 0.4 1.16 1.16
Gymnacelladankaliensis H2 0.25 0.5 0.2
Chrysosporium sp. H18 3 1 3
Arachnomyces sp. H10 0.8 3.33
Gymnoascus halophilus H19 2 4 5
Gymnoascus halophilus H20 1.6 4.33 6
Fusarium oxysporum B8 2.66
Fusarium equiseti D3 3.33
Fusarium brachygibbosum R38 3.33
Fusarium acuminatum S8 0.33 1.5
Fusarium brachygibbosum S7 3.66
Fusarium sp R1 0.33 0.3 0.1 3.33
Sarocladiumstrictum R8 0.8 0.5 0.83 3
Trichoderma gamsii S2 0.75
Trichoderma sp. G15 0.5
Tritirachium sp B2 1 2.5
Gibellulopsisnigrescens C3 0.83 0.37 1.4
Beauveriabassiana R13 0.2 0.36 2.5
Lecanicillium sp. R29 0.41 1.66
Purpureocilliumlilacinum B1 0.2 1.6
Myrothecium verrucaria R5 0.2 0.71
Clonostachysrosea S3 0.3 0.06 0.8
Chaetomium sp H1 4
Chaetomium sp H38 2 1.66
Chaetomium sp H42 0.5 3.5
Microascusmanginii B5 0.3 1.5
Alternaria sp. G5 1
Pleospora sp. H43 1.8
Curvulariaspicifera R20 0.46
Cladosporium ramotenellum R36 1.2 1.4 1.66
Ustilagocynodontis H14 5 4 4.66
Wallemia sp H15 5

All strains secrete at least one enzyme. The production of cellulase was observed in all strains except Gymnascella denkaliensis. The strains that have the highest cellulase activity were the two strains of G. halophilus H19 and H20 with an EI of 5 and 6 respectively, P. vinaceum, Aspergillus sp. strain A4, Chaetomium sp. strain H1 and Ustilago cynodontis with an EI between 4 and 4.66. A lower cellulase production was observed in Fusarium species, Chrysosporium sp., Arachnomyces sp., S. strictum, A. calidoustus, Aspergillus sp. strain E2 and Chaetomium sp. strain H42 with an EI around 3.

About 46.15% of the strains produce lipase enzyme. The highest lipolytic activity was observed in P. vinaceum, U. cynodontis and Wallemia sp. with an EI of 5.

67.30% of the strains secrete the enzyme protease and 48.07% the enzyme amylase. The two strains of G. halophilus and U. cynodontis have the highest proteolytic activity with an IE of 4. All amylase-producing strains showed a low activity, the higher production was by G. halophilus strain H19 with an EI of 2.

The production of lipase, protease, and amylase enzymes was not detected in 10 strains. However, a negative result does not confirm the inability of a strain to produce the enzyme. This may mean that the medium is inadequate for the detection of the enzyme or that the enzyme has not been released from the mycelium or the enzyme has been secreted into the medium but the mycelium predominated and covered the visualization area of the enzymatic activity.

4. Discussion

The sebkha of Oran is the greatest sebkha in western Algeria with a superficies of 1890 km2. Our study on fungal diversity was conducted at only 2 locations because of the difficulty of accessing the sebkha. Zone1 (Figure 1: sites B, C, D, R, G, S) is characterized by halophilic vegetation and cereal crops and zone2 (Figure 1: sites A, E, H) is characterized by a total absence of vegetation. Sampling was done in an area of 5 km2 representing only 0.26% of the total area of the sebkha. According to our results, 44 species (30 identified species and 14 unidentified species) belonging to 24 genera were isolated from both zones. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first report on the mycoflora of the Great Sebkha of Oran.

The most dominant genera found in the sebkha were Penicillium, Aspergillus, their teleomorphic forms and Fusarium. Several species of the genera Aspergillus and Penicillium have already been reported as the most frequently isolated species in hypersaline environments [16,17,19,46,47]. P. egyptiacum (formerly Eupenicillium egyptiacum) found among the dominant species in zone2 was also isolated from the soil of the western shore of the Dead Sea [10,12]. P. longicatenatum, a second teleomorphic form of the genus Penicillium isolated in our study, has not been previously isolated from saline soils. This species was described by Visagie et al. [48]; but these authors only described the asexual form, so this is the first observation of the sexual reproduction for this species. A third teleomorphic form was represented by an unidentified species Penicillium sp. Strains R32 and R33. In the blast analysis, these strains appear quite close to P. egyptiacum but other studies will be necessary to identify them in a definite way. The species P. allii previously found in hypersaline environments [49,50] was also isolated from garlic as a phytopathogenic fungus [51–53]. Although Algeria is a garlic producing country, P. allii has never been isolated or reported as a pathogen of garlic in Algeria. Moreover, this is the first isolation of this species in Algeria.

The genus Fusarium isolated only from zone1 was represented by the species F. oxysporum, F. equiseti, F. brachygibbosum, F. acuminatum and the unidentified species Fusarium sp. strain R1 belonging to dimerum clade. The two species F.oxysporum and F. equiseti were previously found in several hypersaline soils [9,14,47,54]. In the studies of Mandeel [18] on the biodiversity of the genus Fusarium in the saline soil of Bahrain and the one of Macià-Vicente et al. [55] on fungal root endophytes from Mediterranean environments, both species F. oxysporum and F. solani were found to be the most dominant and the frequency of isolation of F. equiseti was lower. These results do not agree with our result where the species F. equiseti was found to be the most dominant and where none F. solani has been isolated. The species F. acuminatum and Fusarium spp of dimerum clade were rarely isolated from hypersaline soil [54,56]. F. brachygibbosum has been isolated from saline soils such as salt marshes [57] and native desert flora of Oman [58]. This species has also been reported as a pathogen of palm trees in Oman [59] and olive trees in Tunisia [60]. In Algeria, this species has never been reported and this is the first strain of F. brachygibbosum isolated in Algeria. As Algeria is the 7th world producer of olive this species should be watched carefully.

Two strains of Trichoderma, T. gamsii and Trichoderma sp. were isolated from cereal crops soil where salinity is lower and the pH is neutral. The two strains are halotolerant growing at a salinity of 5% NaCl. The species T. gamsii, generally isolated as endophytic fungi having a high ability to be used as a biological control agent and as plant growth promoting [61–63], was also isolated from marine sediments [64]. No studies have shown that this species has been isolated from terrestrial saline soils or its use as a biocontrol agent under salt stress. Several studies have been conducted on the search for halotolerant strains of Trichoderma spp. that could be used as biological control agents under salt stress because of the use of saline water for irrigation in agriculture in arid zone [31,65,66]. This is the first isolation of T. gamsii in Algeria. This opens the way for their possible use as biological control agents in agriculture irrigated by saline water.

Three obligate halophilic strains (H15, H19 and H20) were isolated from the zone2. The two strains, H19 and H20, were identified as G. halophilus, the new obligate halophilic species isolated for the first time from the sediments of the Chaka salt lake in China by Zhou et al. [25]. The strain isolated in China is more tolerant to the salt concentration with a maximum growth at 22.5% NaCl while our two strains have a maximum growth at a NaCl concentration of 17.5%. This is the second isolation of this species in the world.

The other halophilic strain (i.e., H15) belongs to the genus Wallemia. This basidiomycetous genus is a xerophilic food borne fungi repeatedly isolated from hypersaline environments. Until some years the genus Wallemia included three species W. sebi, W. ichthyophaga and W. muriae [21] but its classification was recently revised. According to Jančič et al. [67], the species W. sebi presents a complex of four species: W. sebi sensu stricto, W. mellicola, W. canadensis and W. tropicalis. Moreover in 2016, Jančič et al. [68] added a new species to the genus: W. hederae, a phylogenetic sister of W. ichthyophaga, and recently, another new species was described: W. peruviensis that is closely related to W. hederae [69].

The two species W. ichthyophaga and W. muriae are obligate halophilic while the W. sebi species complex, W. hederae and W. peruviensis are halotolerants species. Despite the fact that our strain H15 is an obligate halophilic, it belongs to W. sebi species complex. Additional studies will be needed to determine the exact species of this strain.

U. cynodontis, another basidiomycetous fungus, was also isolated from zone2. This inflorescence smut fungus has never been reported from hypersaline environments, its presence in our isolation will require further studies.

The halotolerance test revealed that the majority of the strains isolated in our study are halotolerant as they can grow in the absence of NaCl and tolerate a salt concentration of 12.5% with a maximum growth at 17.5% for only four species, and one species, Wallemia sp., can grow at 20% NaCl. Fungi usually isolated from hypersaline environments have different levels of salinity tolerance, ranging from the low halotolerant to the extremely halotolerant growing at 25% NaCl or more [7]. Despite the large number of sebkha in Algeria, no study has been published on the mycoflora of these ecosystems or their rate of halotolerance. Wallemia sp. and the two strains of G. halophilus are the only obligate halophilic strains isolated during our study. These three strains were isolated from site H of zone2 characterized by the absence of any vegetation. Relative to the other two sites in zone2 (A and E), site H is the furthest from zone1 (where there is a halophilic vegetation) and this is also the one where the higher salinity was measured.

A few obligate halophilic fungi have been previously reported from extreme saline environments as Gymnascella marismortui [11], two species of Wallemia (W. muriae and W. ichthyophaga) [21], four species of Aspergillus (A. gracilis, A. penicillioides, A. restrictus, A. unguis) [13,70,71] and the yeast Sterigmatomyces halophilus [70].

Halophile and halotolerant fungi have adopted several adaptation mechanisms to be able to live in hypersaline environments. To adapt, the fungal cell must first be able to detect the evolution of salt concentration in the environment; the main mechanism involved in this detection is the high-osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway. This pathway is also involved in the response to salinity and osmoadaptation of fungal cells [72]. Under salt stress, most fungi accumulate solutes such as polyols and free amino acids to increase their internal osmolality and allow water to enter their cells. Other strategies are used by fungi such as changes in ion transport or plasma membrane fluidity that play an important role in adaptation to high salt concentration [72,73]. Moreover, one of the results obtained in the molecular studies of salt tolerance of the obligate halophile W. ichthyophaga was the observation of a significant increase in salt-responsive genes coding for hydrophobins. Compared to other fungi, the main difference in the amino-acid compositions of hydrophobins from W. ichthyophaga is the high number of acidic amino acids [74]. This property, which is considered to be a characteristic of proteins exposed to high salinity, could multiply the fields of biotechnological application of hydrophobins especially under high salt concentration. To summarize, all salinity adaptation strategies adopted by fungi are of great importance and it will be worthy to study in more detail the adaptation mechanisms of our halophilic strains.

The biotechnological interest of the 50 strains was evaluated by testing their ability to produce extracellular enzymes (i.e., lipase, amylase, protease, and cellulase) on solid medium. In general, halophilic fungi are an important source of polyextremophilic metabolites. Their thermotolerant and halophilic properties allow them to be stable and applicable in wide range of pH and temperature of industrial process [75,76].

In our study, the most interesting species presenting the highest enzymatic index were Aspergillus sp. strain A4, Chaetomium sp. strain H1, P. vinaceum, G. halophilus and the two basidiomycetous Wallemia sp. and U. cynodontis.

The two unidentified species Aspergillus sp. strain A4 and Chaetomium sp. strain H1 are good producers of cellulase. Further studies will be required to confirm the identification of these species and their biotechnological interest. Wallemia sp. has a high lipase activity with an EI of 5 and no cellulolytic, amylolytic or proteolytic activity was detected. This result was also obtained by Jančič et al. [68] who studied the enzymatic profile of the four species of Wallemia (W. sebi, W. ichthyophaga, W. muriaeand W. hederae). They found that Wallemia spp. secrete several enzymes including lipase and esterase but no cellulolytic, amylolytic, and proteolytic activities were observed. P. vinaceum secretes the four tested enzymes but have only a high lipase and cellulase activity with an EI of 5 and 4.33 respectively. P. vinaceum is studied the most as marine derived fungi and has rarely been isolated from the soil. Several studies indicated that this species is an important source of bioactive molecules [77,78]. The two strains of G. halophilus H19 and H20 secrete amylase (EI near of 2), protease (EI of 4), and cellulase (EI of 5 and 6). This species was isolated for the first time in 2016 [25] and no study was realized on the enzymatic profile of this species until now. Our study is the first enzymatic characterization of G. halophilus in which both strains H19 and H20 were found to have a high amylolytic, cellulolytic, and proteolytic activity. This species could prove to be an interesting source of enzymes. The yeast U. cynodontis secretes three enzymes cellulase, protease and lipase with an EI of 4.66, 4 and 5 respectively. Several studies conducted on yeasts from Ustilaginaceae family have shown that these yeasts are a promising source of molecules of industrial interest including enzymes [79–81], organic acids [82] and biosurfactants [83].

In conclusion, the results of our study are consistent with the studies already carried out on hypersaline environments and confirm once again that the fungal flora of these extreme environments is of remarkable diversity. A total of 24 genera and 30 identified species were isolated including four species isolated for the first time in Algeria: F. brachygibbosum, P. allii T. gamsii, G. halophilus, and a first isolation of the teleomorphic form of P. longicatenatum. We also have isolated 17 strains that have not been identified at the species level either by morphological study or in our molecular analysis. Further studies will be necessary to clarify their identification to the species level and to know if whether they are new species or not.

Our study also showed that six species Aspergillus sp.strain A4, Chaetomium sp. strain H1, P. vinaceum, G. halophilus and the two basidiomycetous Wallemia sp. and U. cynodontis have significant enzymatic activity requiring further studies to determine their biotechnological potential.

It must be pointed out that all these fungi were obtained from a region located at the margin of the sebkha representing only 0.26% of the total area of the Great Sebkha of Oran, which does not reflect the true fungal diversity preserved at the level of the central lake that has remained unscathed from any human activity and which should be very interesting to discover in our further studies.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  • 1.Moussa K. Study of a Sebkha: Sebkha of Oran (Western Algeria), doctoral thesis, University of Oran. 2006. 205p. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Benziane A. The aquifer system of the Great Sebkha of Oran: geological and hydrogeological considerations. Bulletin de L’Institut Scientifique, Rabat, Section Sciences de la Terre. 2013;35:77–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Oren A. Halophilic microorganisms and their environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gunde-Cimerman N, Zalar P, Petrovič U, et al. Fungi in the salterns In: Ventosa A, editor. Halophilic microorganisms. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2004. p. 103–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gunde-Cimerman N, Zalar P, de Hoog S, et al. Hypersaline waters in salterns natural ecological niches for halophilic black yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000;32:235–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Butinar L, Sonjak S, Zalar P, et al. Melanized halophilic fungi are eukaryotic members of microbial communities in hypersaline waters of solar salterns. Botanica Marina. 2005;48:73–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cantrell SA, Casillas-Martínez L, Molina M. Characterization of fungi from hypersaline environments of solar salterns using morphological and molecular techniques. Mycol Res. 2006;110:962–970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nayak SS, Gonsalves V, Nazareth SW. Isolation and salt tolerance of halophilic fungi from mangroves and solar salterns in Goa – India. Indian J Mar Sci. 2012;41:164–172. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guiraud P, Steiman R, Seigle-Murandi F, et al. Mycoflora of soil around the Dead Sea II – Deuteromycetes (except Aspergillus and Penicillium). System Appl Microbiol. 1995;18:318–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Steiman R, Guiraud P, Sage L, et al. Mycoflora of soil around the Dead Sea. I – Ascomycetes (including Aspergillus and Penicillium), Basidiomycetes, Zygomycetes. System Appl Microbiol. 1995;18:310–317. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Buchalo AS, Nevo E, Wasser SP, et al. Fungal life in the extremely hypersaline water of the Dead Sea: first records. Proc R Soc Lond. 1998;265:1461–1465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grishkan I, Nevo E, Wasser SP. Soil micromycete diversity in the hypersaline Dead Sea coastal area, Israel. Mycol Progress. 2003;2:19–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nazareth S, Gonsalves V, Nayak S. A first record of obligate halophilic Aspergilli from the Dead Sea. Indian J Microbiol. 2012;52:22–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abdel-Hafez S. Survey of the mycoflora of desert soils in Saudi Arabia. Mycopathologia. 1982;80:3–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sterflinger K, Tesei D, Zakharova K. Fungi in hot and cold deserts with particular reference to microcolonial fungi. Fungal Ecol. 2012;5:453–462. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Al-Musallam AAS, Al-Sammar HF, Al-Sane NA. Diversity and dominance of fungi inhabiting the sabkha area in Kuwait. Botanica Marina. 2011;54:83–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jaouani A, Neifar M, Prigione V, et al. Diversity and enzymatic profiling of halotolerant micromycetes from Sebkha El Melah, a Saharan salt flat in southern Tunisia. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mandeel QA. Biodiversity of the genus Fusarium in saline soil habitats. J Basic Microbiol. 2006;46:480–494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gunde-Cimerman N, Zalar P. Extremely halotolerant and halophilic fungi inhabit brine in solar salterns around the globe. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2001;4;170–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moubasher AH, Abdel-Sater MA, Soliman Z. Diversity of yeasts and filamentous fungi in mud from hypersaline and freshwater bodies in Egypt. Czech Mycol. 2018;70:1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zalar P, de Hoog GS, Schroers HJ, et al. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the xerophilic genus Wallemia (Wallemiomycetes and Wallemiales, cl. et ord. nov.). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2005;87:311–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zalar P, de Hoog GS, Schroers HJ, et al. Phylogeny and ecology of the ubiquitous saprobe Cladosporium sphaerospermum, with descriptions of seven new species from hypersaline environments. Stud Mycol. 2007;58:157–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schubert K, Groenewald JZ, Braun U, et al. Biodiversity in the Cladosporium herbarumcomplex (Davidiellaceae, Capnodiales), with standardization of methods for Cladosporium taxonomy and diagnostics. Stud Mycol. 2007;58:105–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zalar P, Frisvad JC, Gunde-Cimerman N, et al. Four new species of Emericella from the Mediterranean region of Europe. Mycologia. 2008;100:779–795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhou N, Zhang Y, Liu F, et al. Gymnoascus species from several special environments, China. Mycologia. 2016;108:179–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Oren A. Industrial and environmental applications of halophilic microorganisms. Environ Technol. 2010;31:825–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Moreno ML, Perez D, Garcia MT, et al. Halophilic bacteria as a source of novel hydrolytic enzymes. Life. 2013;3:38–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Damare S, Singh P. S. Raghukumar. Biotechnology of marine fungi In: Raghukumar C, editor. Biology of marine fungi. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Progress in Molecular and Subcellular Biology 53;2012. p. 278–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ali I, Siwarungson N, Punnapayak H, et al. Screening of potential biotechnological applications from obligate halophilic fungi, isolated from a man-made solar saltern located in Phetchaburi province, Thailand. Pak J Bot. 2014;46:983–988. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Edbeib MF, Wahab RA, Halophiles HF. Halophiles: biology, adaptation and their role in decontamination of hypersaline environments. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;32:1–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gal-Hemed I, Atanasova L, Komon-Zelazowska M, et al. Marine isolates of Trichoderma spp. as potential halotolerant agents of biological control for arid-zone agriculture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:5100–5109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pitt JI. The genus Penicillium and its teleomorphic states Eupenicillium and Talaromyces. London: Academic Press Inc; 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Barnett HL, Hunter BB. Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. Fourth edition Minnesota, USA: Burgess Publishing Company; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Samson RA, Hoekstra ES, Frisvad JC, et al. Introduction to food and airborne fungi. 6th Ed Utrecht: CentraalbureauvoorSchimmelcultures; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Samson RA, Frisvad JC. Penicillium subgenus Penicillium: new taxonomic schemes, mycotoxins and other extrolites. Utrecht: Studies in Mycology; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Brygoo Y, Gautier A Molecular polymorphism of Fusarium strains isolated from wheat and corn ears in France Collects 2003 and 2004. Paper presented at the « conférence sur les progrès et perspectives de la recherche sur les mycotoxines de Fusarium dans les céréales ». Arcachon, France, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Glass NL, Donaldson GC. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:1323–1330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Carbone I, Kohn LM. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia. 1999;91:553–556. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, et al. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New-York: Academic Press; 1990. p. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hankin L, Anagnostakis SL. The use of solid media for detection of enzyme production by fungi. Mycologia. 1975;67:597–607. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Abe CA, Faria CB, De Castro FF, et al. Fungi isolated from maize (Zea mays L.) grains and production of associated enzyme activities. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:15328–15346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Montenecourt BS, Eveleigh DE. Semi quantitative plate assay for determination of cellulose production by Trichoderma viride. Appl Environ Microb. 1977;33:178–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kasana RC, Salwan R, Dhar H, et al. A rapid and easy method for detection of microbial cellulases on agar plates using Gram's iodine. Curr Microbiol. 2008;57:503–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sarath G, De La Motte RS, Wagner FW. Protease assay methods In: Beynon RJ, Bonde JS, editors. Proteolytics enzymes: a pratical approach. Oxford, UK: University Press; 1989. p. 25–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Durand JH. Irrigable soil. Living techniques. (Les sols irrigables. Techniques vivantes). Paris: Univ Press; 1983. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.El-Said AHM, Saleem A. Ecological and physiological studies on soil fungi at Western Region, Libya. Mycobiology. 2008;36:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ismail MA, Moubasher AH, Ramadan MA, et al. Extremophilic fungi and chemical analysis of hypersaline, alkaline lakes of Wadi-El-Natrun, Egypt. Int J Tech Res Sci. 2017;1:345–363. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Houbraken J, Visagie CM, Meijer M, et al. A taxonomic and phylogenetic revision of Penicillium section Aspergilloides. Stud Mycol. 2014;78:373–451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hujslova M, Kubatova A, ChudiKova M, et al. Diversity of fungal communities in saline and acidic soils in the Soos National Reserve, Czech Repbulic. Mycol Prog. 2010;9:1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Park MS, Fong JJ, Oh SY, et al. Marine-derived Penicillium in Korea: diversity, enzyme activity, and antifungal properties. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2014;106:331–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Vincent MA, Pitt JI. Penicillium allii, a new species from Egyptian garlic. Mycologia. 1989;81:300–303. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Overy DP, Frisvad JC, Steinmeier U, et al. Clarification of the agents causing blue mould storage rot upon various flower and vegetable bulbs: implications for mycotoxin contamination. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2005;35:217–221. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Valdez JG, Makuch MA, Ordovini AF, et al. First report of Penicillium allii as a field pathogen of garlic (Allium sativum). Plant Pathol. 2006;55:583–583. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Moustafa AF, Al-Musallam AA. Contribution to the fungal flora of Kuwait. Trans Brit Mycol Soc. 1975;65:547–553. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Maciá-Vicente JG, Jansson HB, Abdullah SK, et al. Fungal root endophytes from natural vegetation in Mediterranean environments with special reference to Fusarium spp. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008;64:90–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lebogang L, Taylor JE, Mubyana-John T. A preliminary study of the fungi associated with saltpans in Botswana and their anti-microbial properties. Bioremediation, biodiversity and bioavailability. Global Sci Books. 2009;3:61–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gashgari R, Gherbawy Y, Ameen F, et al. Molecular characterization and analysis of antimicrobial activity of endophytic fungi from medicinal plants in Saudi Arabia. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016;9:e26157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Al-Mahmooli IH, Al-Bahri YS, Al-Sadi AM, et al. First report of Euphorbia larica dieback caused by Fusarium brachygibbosum in Oman. Plant Dis. 2013;97:687–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Al-Sadi AM, Al-Jabri AH, Al-Mazroui SS, et al. Characterization and pathogenicity of fungi and oomycetes associated with root diseases of date palms in Oman. Crop Prot. 2012;37:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Trabelsi R, Sellami H, Gharbi Y, et al. Morphological and molecular characterization of Fusarium spp. associated with olive trees dieback in Tunisia. 3 Biotech. 2017;7:28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.US EPA. Biopesticides registration action document. Trichoderma gamsii strain ICC 080 PC Code: 119207. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rinu K, Sati P, Pandey A. Trichoderma gamsii (NFCCI 2177): a newly isolated endophytic, psychrotolerant, plant growth promoting and antagonistic fungal strain. J Basic Microbiol. 2014;54:408–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chen JL, Sun SZ, Miao CP, et al. Endophytic Trichoderma gamsii YIM PH30019: a promising biocontrol agent with hyperosmolar, mycoparasitism, and antagonistic activities of induced volatile organic compounds on root-rot pathogenic fungi of Panax notoginseng. J Ginseng Res. 2015;40:315–324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Anand BG, Thomas CKN, Prakash S. In vitro cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of Talaromyces flavus SP5 inhabited in the marine sediment of Southern Coast of India. Chin J Nat Med. 2016;14:913–921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ouazzani Chahdi A, Chliyeh M, Mouria B, et al. In vitro and in vivo effect of salinity on the antagonist potential of Trichoderma harzianum and sensitivity of tomato to Verticillium wilt. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2014;5:780–791. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Guo R, Wang Z, Huang Y, et al. Biocontrol potential of saline- or alkaline-tolerant Trichoderma asperellum mutants against three pathogenic fungi under saline or alkaline stress conditions. Braz J Microbiol. 2018;49:236–245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jančič S, Nguyen HDT, Frisvad JC, et al. A taxonomic revision of the Wallemia sebi species complex. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Jančič S, Zalar P, Kocev D, et al. Halophily reloaded: new insights into the extremophilic life-style of Wallemia with the description of Wallemia hederae sp. nov. Fungal Divers. 2016;76:97–118. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Díaz-Valderrama JR, Nguyen HDT, Aime MC. Wallemia peruviensis sp. nov., a new xerophilic fungus from an agricultural setting in South America. Extremophiles. 2017;21:1017–1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ali I, Kanhayuwa L, Rachdawong S, et al. Identification, phylogenetic analysis and characterization of obligate halophilic fungi isolated from a man-made solar saltern in Phetchaburi province. Thailand Ann Microbiol. 2013;63:887–895. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gonsalves V, Nayak S, Nazareth S. Halophilic fungi in a polyhaline estuarine habitat. J Yeast Fungal Res. 2012;3:30–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hohmann S. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002; 66:300–372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gunde-Cimerman N, Ramos J, Plemenitaš A. Halotolerant and halophilic fungi. Mycol Res. 2009;113:1231–1241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zajc J, Liu YF, Dai WK, et al. Genome and transcriptome sequencing of the halophilic fungus Wallemia ichthyophaga: haloadaptations present and absent. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Setati ME. Diversity and industrial potential of hydrolase-producing halophilic/halotolerant Eubacteria. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9:1555–1560. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Dalboge H. Expression cloning of fungal enzyme genes: a novel approach for efficient isolation of enzyme genes of industrial relevance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1997;21:29–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Asiry IAM, Badr JM, Youssef D. Penicillivinacine, antimigratory diketopiperazine alkaloid from the marine-derived fungus Penicillium vinaceum. Phytochem Lett. 2015;13:53–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Liu S, Su M, Song SJ, et al. Marine-derived Penicillium species as producers of cytotoxic metabolites. Mar Drugs. 2017;15:329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bussamara R, Fuentefria AM, Oliveira ES, et al. Isolation of a lipase secreting yeast for enzyme production in a pilot-plant scale batch fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:268–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Alex D, Shainu A, Pandey A, et al. Esterase active in polar organic solvents from the yeast Pseudozyma sp. NII 08165. Enzyme Res. 2014;2014:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Isshiki S, Shitasue S, Mase T, et al. Characterization of an aminopeptidase from Pseudozymahubeiensis 31-B and potential applications. Mycoscience. 2017;58:60–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Guevarra ED, Tabuchi T. Production of 2-hydroxyparaconic and itatartaric acids by Ustilago cynodontis and simple recovery process of the acids. Agric Biol Chem. 1990;54:2359–2365. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Morita T, Ishibashi Y, Hirose N, et al. Production and characterization of a glycolipid biosurfactant, mannosylerythritol lipid B, from sugarcane juice by Ustilago scitaminea NBRC 32730. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2011;75:1371–1376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mycobiology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Mycology

RESOURCES