Skip to main content
Primary Health Care Research & Development logoLink to Primary Health Care Research & Development
. 2019 Jul 24;20:e119. doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000069

Comparison of preventive health service provision before and after reorganization of primary care in Turkey: a community-based study

Çiğdem Apaydın Kaya 1,, Mehmet Akman 1, Pemra Cöbek Ünalan 1, Serap Çifçili 1, Arzu Uzuner 1, Esra Akdeniz 2
PMCID: PMC6692006  PMID: 32323643

Abstract

Aim

To investigate the changes in the provision of preventive health services in terms of woman and child health after reorganization of the primary health care services.

Background

The primary care system in Turkey has undergone fundamental changes as a part of Health Transformation Program during last decade. But there was no community-based study to evaluate these changes.

Method

This community-based and cross-sectional study was conducted in 2010, just before the reorganization of primary care services and in 2015, five year after the reforms. The 30×7 cluster sampling method was used in Zümrütevler quarter of Maltepe District. The socio-demographic characteristics of the participants, the presence of the physician who can be consulted for any health problem, the presence of smokers at home were questioned. The women aged 18 years or older and gave consent provided information about history of pregnancy and birth, the number of follow-ups during pregnancy, family planning method usage, cervical and breast cancer screening, breastfeeding duration, vaccinations, and prophylactic iron and vitamin D supplementation for their children.

Findings

After the reorganization of primary care, more people stated that they had physicians to whom they could consult for all kinds of health problems (27.8 versus 44.7%; P<0.001) and that physician was the primary care physician (30.2 versus 64.7%; P<0.001). The reported frequency of at least one smoker at home was decreased after reorganization of primary care (63.6 versus 53.1%; P=0.034). There were no significant differences in terms unplanned pregnancy, the use of family planning method, the number of pregnancy follow-ups and the frequency of Pap smears and mammography. There are no significant differences in terms of healthy children follow-ups, vaccination, vitamin D and iron supplementation (P>0.05). It was found that the duration of total breastfeeding increased after reorganization of primary care (P<0.001).

Key words: child health care, Family Health Center, Health Transformation Program, preventive services, primary health care, reproductive health

Background

The primary care (PC) system in Turkey has undergone fundamental changes during last decades (Health Transformation Program – HTP). In the first decade of the millennium family medicine scheme (FMS) was introduced to the Turkish PC sector. The new PC provision in Turkey had three main dimensions. First was replacing the regional health service delivery model to registered patient list based practice in the PC centers. Second in previous organization of PC services, PC centers were responsible for both individual and community-based preventive services. After introduction of FMS, population-based preventive services were assigned to community healthcare centers. Third, in the previous system physicians without any vocational training were thought to be competent for providing PHC services. After HTP, specialized family physicians with appropriate vocational training aimed to practice in PC, however, since there were not enough trained physicians available, all physicians who wanted to serve in PC were given the title ‘Family Physician’ after a short training period. Then they served as contracted PC physicians in Family Health Centers (FHCs). Within these centers, a population of 1000–4000 people was assigned to each family physician. According to Family Medicine Law in Turkey, a family physician is a physician who is obliged to give PC services to an individual with a comprehensive and continuous manner and without discrimination of age, sex and illness. Family physician also provides required mobile health services and works on a full day basis.

Another major change in PC service delivery was financing healthcare providers’ wages based on capitation and a few performance parameters. With these changes, patients were given the right to choose their physicians while the physicians were given the right to choose their patients. It was ensured that expenses such as rent, electricity, water, repair of the FHCs were financed through the payments under the title ‘current payment’. Moreover, the salary, insurance and severance payment of the employees except medical staff in FHCs have begun to be paid by physicians. In addition, at least one ‘Community Health Center’ was established in each district. The reorganization of PC started in 2004 with a pilot scheme in one province, other provinces were included in time and it was completed in late 2010 with the inclusion of Istanbul.

It is stated that with the HTP there have been mobilization in the PHC services, and also preventive maternal and child health services have been strengthened (Akdağ, 2012). In addition to introduction of FMS, series of ongoing focused programs related to preventive care, were also continued. Some of these are ‘Promotion of Breastfeeding and Baby-Friendly Hospitals’, ‘Turkey Strong as Iron’, ‘Prevention of Vitamin D Deficiency and Improvement of Bone Health among Infants’, ‘Iodine Deficiency Disorders and Iodizing Salt’, ‘Turkey Reproductive Health Program’ and ‘National Tobacco Control Program’ (Akdağ, 2008). It was also reported that the scope of preventive health services expanded with the FMS and the programs for promoting healthy life style were included into preventive health services (immunization, pregnancy and well-child follow-ups, health screenings etc.). In addition, it was stated that ‘the individual who benefits from the service’ should be placed at the center of the service, and in principle, the services were based on the needs, demands and expectations of these individuals (Akdağ, 2012).

Previous studies related to the effects of the HTP usually include health care workers’ and patient’s satisfaction and basic health indicators such as number of well-child care visits and maternal and infant mortality rates (Akıncı et al., 2012; Atun et al., 2013; Sönmez et al., 2013; Arslan et al., 2016; Bostan et al., 2016). Most of the data used in these studies were composed of data collected by the Ministry of Health and the Turkey Statistical Institute. But not much is known about other preventive services (e.g., vitamin D and iron supplementation, blood pressure measurement, etc.). It was reported that provision of preventive services decreased in general but antenatal care and routine childhood vaccines increased according to cross-sectional data reported by family physicians after HTP (Schafer et al., 2016; Akman et al., 2017). Since there is no referral chain in Turkey, the patients can apply to any health center. Therefore, patients can also receive preventive health care services from different centers and it is a challenge to differentiate received preventive care from different care levels. Our literature search showed the absence of any community-based study to evaluate the changes in the provision of preventive health services after the introduction of FMS.

The purpose of the present research is to investigate the changes in the provision of preventive health services in terms of women’s and children’s health on a community basis after reorganization of the PC services.

Methods

  • 1)

    The present community-based and cross-sectional research was carried out in 2010, just before the reorganization of the PHC services and in 2015, five years after FMS, using the 30×7 cluster sampling method (Henderson et al., 1982). The data, for both periods were collected in March in Zümrütevler quarter, located in the middle of the district of Maltepe in Istanbul. This quarter is the most crowded quarter of the district with a population of 54 597 in 2010 and 75 258 in 2015 (Turkey Statistical Institute, 2018). Thirty of 81 streets within the quarter selected randomly by lot, and seven households from each street have been allocated randomly. The decisions on starting from which end of the street and on deciding which apartments to be visited in a building were made with toss of a coin. The data were collected through a questionnaire by interviewing face-to-face with people over 18 years old who opened the door and accepted to participate in the study. If the responding person was male, in addition to the responder, a women older than 18 years from the household was invited to participate the study to collect the reproductive and child health information. The socio-demographic characteristics of participants, the presence of a physician who can be consulted for any kind of health problem, the place where this doctor works, the visit by a medical staff, and the presence of an individual smoking at home were questioned.

  • 2)

    The women were asked about pregnancy and delivery history, the number of follow-ups during her last pregnancy within the last five years, the use of any family planning method, vaccinations, prophylactic vitamin D and iron supplementation, age of supplementary food onset and breastfeeding duration for children aged two years and older. Also, cervical cancer screening with Pap smear test for women aged 35–69 years and mammography for women aged 40–69 years among the household were questioned.

All data were collected at the end of three consecutive weeks following a 3-h data collection training and a pilot study by the Faculty of Medicine students and researchers. A total of 210 households were targeted for both research periods, while 210 households and 875 people living in these were reached in 2010; the research was completed with 810 people living in 192 households in 2015 due to reasons such as, lack of volunteers and the small number of households on the streets and dead-end streets selected by lot. Each survey lasted ~20–30 min.

Analysis

The data for both years were compared. The fitness of quantitative variables to normal distribution was tested by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. For intergroup comparisons, t test was used for independent groups fitting normal distribution and Mann–Whitney U test for variables not fitting normal distribution. χ 2 test was used for intergroup comparison of categorical data. Pearson or Spearman correlation tests were used for continuous variables. Statistical analyzes were performed using the SPSS 16.0 package program. The value of P<0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Findings

According to 2010 data 875 people (52% female (F), 48% male (M)) were living in 210 households; and in 2015 810 people (51% F, 49% M) were living in 192 households. The comparison of the socio-demographic characteristics of the interviewed participants, utilization of PC services and the presence of a physician who can be consulted in any kind of health problem is presented in Table 1. Accordingly, after the FMS, more participants stated that they had a physician to whom they could consult for all kinds of health problems (27.8 versus 44.7%, P<0.001) and that physician served in the FHCs (30.2 versus 64.7%, P<0.001). In addition, participants reported a decrease in the number of households with at least one smoker after FMS. [n=131 (63.6%) versus n=102 (53.1%); P=0.034].

Table 1.

Comparison of participant characteristics and utilization of primary care services between 2010 and 2015

2010 (n=210) 2015 (n=192) P
Sex
Male 63 (30.0%) 66 (34.4%) 0.348
Female 147 (70.0%) 126 (65.6%)
Age (mean±SD) 43±14.43 45±12.55 0.167
Education
Secondary school and lower 146 (70.2%) 118 (63.1%) 0.135
High school and higher 62 (29.8%) 69 (36.9%)
n=208 n=187
Presence of a physician to consult for any kind of health problem
Yes 52 (27.8%) 67 (44.7%) <0.001
No 135 (72.2%) 83 (55.3%)
(n=187) (n=150)
The workplace of the physician who can be consulted for any kind of health problem
Primary Health Care Center/FHC 16 (30.2%) 44 (64.7%) <0.001
Other 37 (69.8%) 24 (35.3%)
(n=53) (n=68)
Home visits by a medical staff 37 (18.6%) 25 (14.5%) 0.285
(n=199) (n=156)

FHC=Family Health Center.

Data associated with women’s reproductive health

Data on socio-demographic characteristics and reproductive health of women are presented in Table 2. Accordingly, women in reproductive age are better educated in 2015; and there are no significant differences in terms of questioned indicators, such as the number of children, unplanned pregnancy, the use of family planning method, and the number of pregnancy follow-ups, and the frequency of Pap smears and mammography. In both periods, about one-third of the women reported having at least one unplanned pregnancy. More than half of the women who did not use family planning stated that they did not use the method because of reasons other than wanting children (Table 2).

Table 2.

Comparison of characteristics of women participants and utilization of reproductive health services between 2010 and 2015

2010 2015 P
Age (mean±SD) 32±9.3 32±9.1 0.390
(n=240) (n=230)
Education
Illiterate/literate 30 (12.6%) 12 (5.5%) 0.006
Primary school 77 (32.4%) 62 (28.3%)
Secondary school 28 (11.8%) 23 (10.5%)
High school 68 (28.6%) 65 (%29.7%)
Higher education 35 (14.7%) 57 (%26.0%)
(n=238) (n=219)
Social insurance
Yes 194 (88.2%) 208 (93.3%) 0.064
No 26 (11.8%) 14 (%6.7%)
(n=220) (=223)
Marital age 21±4.1 20±3.44 0.751
(n=126) (n=114)
First pregnancy age 22±3.9 22±3.56 0.134
(n=117) (n=112)
Number of follow-ups during last pregnancy 7±3.6 6±2.92 0.164
(n=57) (n=51)
Number of children 2±1.3 2±1.24 0.772
(n=109) (n=110)
Family planning
Yes 61 (57.5%) 76 (66.1%) 0.191
No 45 (42.5%) 39 (33.9%)
(n=106) (n=115)
Family planning method
Withdrawal 8 (13.1%) 9 (11.9) 0.146
Calendar 2 (3.28%) 5 (6.9)
Condom 15 (24.6%) 25 (32.9)
Oral contraceptive 8 (13.1%) 3 (3.95)
Intrauterine device 20 (32.8%) 18 (23.7)
Injection 3 (4.91%) 2 (2.63)
Tubal ligation 5 (8.21%) 13 (17.1)
Vasectomy 0 (0.0%) 1 (1.32)
(n=61) (n=76)
Reasons for not using family planning
Planning pregnancy 18 (40.0%) 17 (43.6%) 0.532
Fear of side effects 1 (2.2%) 2 (5.13%)
Not married/sexually active 3 (6.67%) 1 (2.56%)
Menopause 0 (0%) 2 (5.13%)
Other (unknown, spouse does not want, etc.) 23 (51.1%) 17 (43.6%)
(n=45) (n=39)
Number of pregnancy follow-ups (last pregnancy)
0 2 (3.6%) 0 (0.0%) 0.392
1–3 9 (16.,1%) 9 (17.6%)
≥4 45 (80.3%) 42 (82.4%)
(n=56) (n=51)
Unplanned pregnancy
Yes 16 (%7.6%) 36 (38.3%) 0.176
No 42 (72.4%) 58 (61.7%)
(n=58) (n=94)
Mammography (40–69 years)
Yes 38 (48.7%) 37 (43.5%) 0.507
No 40 (51.3%) 48 (56.5%)
(n=78) (n=85)
Pap smear (30–65 years)
Yes 59 (48.8%) 29 (55.8%) 0.398
No 59 (51.2%) 23 (44.2%)
(n=121) (n=52)

Data associated with preventive child health services

Data collected from mothers about children aged one to five years are presented in Table 3. There are no significant differences between two years in terms of healthy children follow-ups, vaccination, vitamin D and iron supplementation, which are pretty frequent for both periods. It was observed that well-child care visits of less than half of the children were done at PC. It was found that the duration of total breastfeeding increased after FMS (P<0.001).

Table 3.

Comparison of well child care services between 2010 and 2015

2010 2015 P
Receiving healthy child follow-up
Yes 32 (94.1%) 29 (96.7%) 0.630
No 2 (5.9%) 1 (3.3%)
n=34 n=30
Vaccination
Complete 34 (94.4%) 32 (94.1%) 0.953
Incomplete/cannot remember 2 (5.6%) 2 (5.9%)
n=36 n=34
Vitamin D supplement
Yes 31 (93.9%) 28 (84.8%) 0.230
No 2 (6.1%) 5 (15.2%)
(n=33) (n=33)
Iron supplement
Yes 24 (72.7%) 29 (90.6%) 0.108
No 9 (27.3%) 3 (9.4%)
(n=33) (n=32)
Follow-up at primary health center
Yes 9 (42.9%) 15 (45.5%) 0.851
No 12 (57.1%) 18 (54.5%)
(n=21) (n=33)
Onset for supplementary food (mean month±SD) 5.39±2.63 7.39±5.99 0.107
Median: 6 (IQR: 4–6) Median: 6 (IQR: 6–10)
(n=32) (n=33)
Breastfeeding duration (mean month±SD) 8.81±7.22 19.6±8.51 <0.001
(for children of 2–5 years old) Median: 6 (IQR: 3–14) Median: 23.5 (IQR: 12–24)
(n=26) (n=32)

IQR=interquartile range.

It was reported that blood pressure measurement of children between the ages of 2 and 15 was increased after FMS [n=20 (18.3%); n=38 (38.4%), respectively; P<0.001].

Discussion

The findings of the present community-based research which compared some preventive health services before and after the introduction of FMS in Turkey are as follows: (1) after the introduction of FMS more participants had a physician to whom they could apply for all kinds of health problems working in PC. (2) The number of households with a smoker decreased. (3) After the introduction of FMS, the total duration of breastfeeding increased significantly. (4) Blood pressure measurement among children between the ages of 2 and 15 was increased after the reorganization of the PHC. (5) In both periods, about half of the women had a screening test for cervical cancer and mammography, and there was no significant difference between two periods. (6) There is no difference between women in two periods in terms of using the family planning method, and about one-third of women had unplanned pregnancies in both periods. More than half of the women who did not use the family planning method had a cause other than wanting children. (7) ~80% of the pregnancies were followed at least four times in both periods. (8) Routine well-child visits for children aged one to five years, vaccination, vitamin D and iron supplement rates were similar in both periods, yet less than half of the children in both years were reported to receive well-child care visits in PC.

Although the referral chain has never been conducted in Turkey, increase in the presence of a physician who can be consulted for any kind of health problem is remarkable. What is more, this physician is mentioned to be the PC physician approximately two times more by the participants in 2015. Our findings are in concordance with a previous study comparing PC services in 1993 and 2012 in 28 European countries including Turkey which reported that utilization of PC as first contact of care has been increased but there was a decline in overall preventive services after health care reforms in Turkey (Schafer et al., 2016). Regarding maternal and child health, an increase in antenatal care and routine childhood vaccines was reported in 2012 in Turkey compared to 1993, and this increase was associated with performance criterion applied as wage cuts when the given target is not met (Akman et al., 2017). However, our results showed no significant difference between 2010 and 2015 in terms of vaccination rates and number of antenatal care visits.

Another positive result of the current research is the decrease of the percentage of households with a smoker (63.6 versus 53.1%). According to the results of the Global Adult Tobacco Survey, it was reported that there was a decrease in the frequency of smoking over the years, and tobacco use over age of 15 was 31.2% in 2008 and 23.2% in 2012. The same rate was 27.3% in 2014 (Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health, 2017). Within the scope of the ‘National Tobacco Control Program’ initiated in 2007 in Turkey, many attempts were made for tobacco control between 2010 and 2015: prohibition of tobacco use in public transportation vehicles, placement of illustrated health warnings on cigarette packs, operation of the ALO 171 Smoking Cessation Counseling Hotline, free delivery of 360 thousand boxes of smoking cessation medicine, tax increase etc. (TAÇESE, 2018). Observed reduction in smoking status may be a result of all these initiatives. However, existence of smoker in every other house suggests that smoking is still a major problem.

Approximately half of all women at recommended age for cancer screening had cervical Pap smear test and mammography at least once in both periods. Cervical cancer and breast cancer screening were not routinely performed in PC during the periods of the present research. However later, the Ministry of Health ensured that these screenings could be carried out at FHCs. According to 2013 data of Turkey Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS-2013), which has been conducted every five years since 1968 and has a sample of strong representation, the average number of children was 2.3 and pregnancy rate was 23.7% among women (Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, 2014). The average number of children per woman is about 2 for both years in which this research was conducted and about one-third of women had an unplanned pregnancy at any time of their lives. Nearly half of the women who did not use the family planning method reported that they had reasons other than ‘being sexually inactive, menopausal or wanting children’. This result suggests that there are other factors affecting the decision of using a family planning method. Considering that Turkey’s National Strategic Action Plan on sexual and reproductive health includes preventing unplanned pregnancies and family planning practices among priority response areas, more studies should be conducted on sexual and reproductive health and family physicians and nurses should be reinforced on the issue (General Directorate of Mother and Child Health and Family Planning, 2010). Since reproductive rights are considered as a subcomponent of human rights, it is necessary to ensure that individuals are informed not only in health settings but also in other settings, and that they have free access to reproductive health services (World Health Organization, 2017).

Breastfeeding has been reported to have many benefits for both maternal and infant health (Victora et al., 2016). The World Health Organization recommends that every baby should receive breastfeeding alone during the first six months period, supplementary food should be introduced at the sixth month, and breastfeeding should continue until the second year (World Health Organization, 2017). The duration of breastfeeding may vary between societies depending on social and cultural factors. The detection of this variation between different cultures is very important in terms of community health. Initiatives promoting breastfeeding in Turkey were initiated before FMS and continued after, by the Ministry of Health. Istanbul received ‘golden baby friendly province’ title in 2013. As of the end of 2014, more than 50% of family medicine units in Istanbul were baby friendly. In agreement with these improvements, the present research found that the duration of breastfeeding increased between 2010 and 2015, and the most important factor affecting this period was the introduction of FMS. This increase in the duration of breastfeeding may have resulted from the cumulative effect of numerous initiatives listed above. In addition, increased contact with the PC, which is another finding of the present research, may be a contributing factor to the increased duration of breastfeeding. According to the latest TDHS 2013 data, the duration of breastfeeding median in Turkey is 16.7 months.

This number is 23.5 according to the present research conducted in Istanbul in 2015. The discrepancy between studies might be due to the age of child assessed. In the TDHS, the duration of breastfeeding was assessed for the youngest child under three years of age, whereas in our study, the assessment was made for the youngest child between the ages of 2 and 5. The TDHS, which is carried out every five years, reported an increase in the duration of breastfeeding over the years (Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, 2014). Data of studies on breastfeeding other than the TDHS are scarce. Existing studies were in general conducted on the mothers who applied to the hospitals and in most of them breastfeeding in the first 12 months was explored. In a study conducted in Istanbul between 2011 and 2012, among mothers who applied to a hospital pediatric polyclinic for well-child care visit, the total duration of breastfeeding for the first two years was reported as 16.4±7.7 months (Bülbül et al., 2012). The present research found a reverse relationship between the duration of breastfeeding and the duration of the mother’s education. Similarly, according to TDHS-2013 data, the duration of breastfeeding for mothers with a shorter education period is longer than more educated mothers and male babies are breastfed longer (Yalçın et al., 2011; Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, 2014). Although this suggests a possible gender discrimination among infants, further study is required for clarification. According to the findings of the study conducted by Bülbül et al. (2012), there was a reverse relationship between the duration of breastfeeding and the duration of mother’s education, but there was no difference in terms of the gender of the baby and the number of siblings. Balcı et al. reported that breastfeeding duration of more than 6 months increased 1.021 fold as the maternal age increased one year. Also similarly to our study, they reported mothers with lower education levels breastfed their child for longer period (Balcı et al., 2012). The employment status of women was not analyzed as a variable in the present research. However, it is known that the increase in the duration of education increased the chance of employment among women. In this case, it is a fact that making arrangements at work to facilitate breastfeeding will increase the duration of breastfeeding for working mothers.

Since April 2004, ‘Turkey Strong as Iron’ program including prophylactic iron supplementation for infants aged 4–12 months and iron treatment for infants with anemia aged 4–24 months has been implemented (Akdağ, 2008); vitamin D is being provided for free and Turkey Reproductive Health Program is being carried out. The findings of the present research show that these national programs were very successful before and after continued to reach its targets after the introduction of FMS. According to the TDHS data, the percentage and frequency of receiving antenatal care has increased over the years, and according to 2013 data, the percentage of having four or more antenatal care visit per pregnant woman was 88.9%. This figure is higher in the urban area. These figures are similar to the ones obtained in the present research, and the percentages of having four or more antenatal care visit per pregnant woman for both years were lower than the average of Turkey (80.3 and 82.4%).

One of the main health indicators reflecting the condition of the health care system is the utilization of the PC centers. According to the findings of the present research, infant vaccination rates, prophylactic vitamin D and iron supplementation rates were significantly higher in both periods, although the frequency of admissions to FHCs was not analyzed. This finding suggests for both years well-child care visits were held in PC. Although the use of these services was very high for both periods and there was no difference between them, it is interesting to note that less than half of the children were reported to be followed up in PC. This finding suggests that understood by the mothers from PC follow-ups is not only vaccination and prophylactic medicine administration to children, but also follow-ups by the physicians, because, in FHCs, application of vaccines and giving some prophylactic medicines to children are usually performed by a medical staff except physician. However, this issue was not elaborated in the present research.

In a previous study on the factors affecting the working conditions of physicians after the reorganization of the PC services, most of the physicians reported to have increased workload (Ak, 2013). Indeed, although the number of physicians working in the PC increased by 11% from 2002 to 2010, the number of patients treated in the PC increased by 2.5 times (Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health, 2012). The frequency of referral to PC was 3.1 in 2011, while it was 1.1 in 2002 (Ministry of Health 2011 statistics yearbook). The high number of patients enrolled in PC and high frequency of referral may be an obstacle for preventive healthcare provision.

The strength of the present research is that it is community-based. The limitations are the sample is representative for regions of urban areas like Zümrütevler, but does not represent Istanbul or Turkey. So the results may not be generalizable to diverse populations. There is some missing data due to unanswered questions like reproductive health questions. However, we believe that the findings are important because the number of studies comparing before and after the reorganization of PC in Turkey is limited.

In conclusion, the findings of the present study suggest that preventive child health services such as vaccination and prophylactic drug supplementation used to be carried out before the reorganization of PC, are carried out equally well and breastfeeding duration increased. In addition, our study suggests that attempts should be performed to improve the reproductive health services for women.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Faculty of Medicine students to help gathering data and thank Onur Köksal for editing the English language of the manuscript.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors state that they have no conflict of interest. No any commercial relationship or other associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the manuscript.

Ethical standards

This study does not involve any human or animal experimentation. The verbal consent was obtained from all participants.

Cite this article: Kaya CA, Akman M, Ünalan PC, Çifçili S, Uzuner A, Akdeniz E. (2019). Comparison of preventive health service provision before and after reorganization of primary care in Turkey: a community-based study. Primary Health Care Research & Development page 1 of 8. doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000069

References

  1. Ak M Tekgöz İA (2013) Field based study: family medicine implementation and views of family physicians. Smyrna Tıp Dergisi 2, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akdağ R (2008) Türkiye Sağlıkta Dönüşüm Programı ve Temel Sağlık Hizmetleri Kasım 2002–2008. Ankara: T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın, No. 770. [Google Scholar]
  3. Akdağ R (2012) Turkey Health Transformation Program Evaluation Report (2003–2011). Ankara: Ministry of Health publications, 43-439. Retrieved 12 January 2018 from https://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/Ekutuphane/Yayin/453.
  4. Akıncı F, Mollahaliloğlu S, Gürsöz H Öğücü F (2012) Assesment of the Turkish health care system reforms: a stakeholder analysis. Health Policy Journal 107, 21–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Akman M, Sakarya S, Sargın M, Ünlüoğlu İ, Eğici MT, Boerma WG Schäfer WL (2017) Changes in primary care provision in Turkey: a comparison of 1993 and 2012. Health Policy 121, 197–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Arslan İ, Eren MV Kaynak S (2016) Asymmetric causality analysis of relationship between health and development. Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal 31, 287–310. [Google Scholar]
  7. Atun R, Aydın S, Chakraborty S, Sümer S, Aran M, Gürol I, Nazlıoğlu S, Ozgülcü S, Aydoğan U, Ayar B, Dilmen U Akdağ R (2013) Universal health coverage in Turkey: enhancement of equity. The Lancet 382, 65–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Balcı E, Kondolot M, Horoz D, Elmalı F, Çiçek B Demirtaş T (2012) The factors affecting the duration of breastfeeding: a cross-sectional study from Kayseri, Turkey. Turkish Archives of Pediatrics 47, 99–103. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bostan S Çiftçi F (2016) The changing effect of health transformation project on hospital services view of health professionals. SDU The Journal of Health Science 7, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bülbül LG, Özcan AG Hatipoğlu SH (2012) The factors that affect breastfeeding in children over two years and followed by the Child Health Surveillance Clinic. Ş.E.E.A.H. Tıp Bülteni 46, 101–107. [Google Scholar]
  11. General Directorate of Mother and Child Health and Family Planning (2010) National Strategic Action Plan for Health Sector 2005–2015. Retrieved 12 January 2018 from https://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/ekutuphane/kitaplar/a%c3%a7sap9.pdf.
  12. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (2014) 2013 Turkey demographic and health survey. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.R. Ministry of Development and TÜBİTAK, Ankara, Turkey. ISBN 978-975-491-389-7. Retrieved 15 January 2018 from http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/eng/TDHS_2013_main.report.pdf.
  13. Henderson RH Sundaresan T (1982) Cluster sampling to assess immunization coverage: a review of experience with a simplified sampling method. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 60, 253–260. Retrieved 16 March 2018 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc2535957/pdf/bullwho00104-0095.pdf. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health (2012) Health statistics yearbook 2011. Ankara: Ministry of Health, Pub no. 885. Retrieved 6 January 2014 from http://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/ekutuphane/kitaplar/siy_2011.pdf/.
  15. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health (2017) Health Statistics Yearbook 2016. Ankara: Ministry of Health, Pub no. 1084. [Google Scholar]
  16. Schäfer WLA, Wienke GWB, Spreeuwenberga P, Schellevis FG Groenewegen PP (2016) Two decades of change in European general practice service profiles: conditions associated with the developments in 28 countries between 1993 and 2012. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 34, 97–110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sönmez MO Sevindik F (2013) The effect of transformation in health on health personnel: to be family health personnel. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin 12, 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  18. TAÇESE (2018) Turkish Maternity, Child and Adolescent Health Institute. Retrieved 14 March 2018 from http://www.tuseb.gov.tr/tacese/ulkemizde-tutun-kontrol-calismalari.
  19. Turkey Statistical Institute (2017) Overall satisfaction with health services. Retrieved 15 January 2018 from https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=tr.
  20. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, França GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, Murch S, Sankar MJ, Walker N Rollins NC (2016) Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. The Lancet 387, 475–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. World Health Organization (2017) Developing sexual health programmes. Retrieved 25 October 2017 from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70501/1/WHO_RHR_HRP_10.22_eng.pdf.
  22. World Health Organization (2017) Guideline: protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and newborn services. Retrieved 25 October 2017 from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/259386/1/9789241550086-eng.pdf?ua=1. [PubMed]
  23. Yalcin S Kuskonmaz BB (2011) Relationship of lower breastfeeding score and problems in infancy. Breastfeeding Medicine 6, 205–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Primary Health Care Research & Development are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES