Skip to main content
PMC home page
MicrobiologyOpen logoLink to MicrobiologyOpen
. 2019 Mar 24;8(8):e00813. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.813

Antifungal and plant growth promotion activity of volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens

Yuncheng Wu 1,2,†, Jinyan Zhou 1,†, Chengguo Li 1, Yan Ma 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6692555  PMID: 30907064

Abstract

Fusarium wilt of watermelon, caused by F. oxysporum f.sp. niveum (FON), is a devastating disease that causes extensive losses throughout the world. Five bacterial strains (L3, h, β, b, and L) isolated from the watermelon rhizosphere showed antagonistic activity against FON during in vitro tests. Strain L3 produced diffusible and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which showed the strongest antifungal activity. Arabidopsis thaliana plantlets exposed to VOCs produced by strain L3 showed a 2.39‐fold increase in biomass, 1.40‐fold increase in primary root length, and 5.05‐fold increase in number of lateral roots. Confocal laser scanning microscope showed that the GFP‐labeled strain L3 could colonize along the elongation and differentiation zones of watermelon roots. In greenhouse pot experiments, the biocontrol efficiency of strain L3 against fusarium wilt of watermelon was up to 68.4% in comparison with the control treatment. In addition, inoculation of the strain L3 resulted in a 23.4% increase in plant fresh weight. Based on 16S rDNA sequence analysis, the strain L3 was identified as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens L3. Fourteen VOCs produced by strain L3 were identified through GC‐MS analysis. Of nine VOCs tested, 2‐nonanone and 2‐heptanone were proved to have strong antifungal properties. Acetoin and 2,3‐butanediol were found to promote plant growth. The results suggested B. amyloliquefaciens L3 was a potential biocontrol agent, and that VOCs produced by B. amyloliquefaciens L3 play important roles in the process of biocontrol and plant growth promotion.

Keywords: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, F. oxysporum f.sp. niveum, root colonization, volatile organic compounds, watermelon

1. INTRODUCTION

Watermelon is an important fruit crop that contributes to food and economic security in addition to human nutrition. In China, continuous mono‐cropping of watermelon has become a popular practice to meet the growing consumer demands. This continuous cultivation also led to the establishment of fusarium wilt and other soilborne diseases which threaten watermelon production. Fusarium wilt of watermelon is caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum (FON) (Ling, Deng, & Song, 2014; Zhang, Xu, & Liu, 2015). The pathogen can survive in soil in the absence of host for up to 10 years as chlamydospores that makes the traditional control method ineffective, such as crop rotation (Liu, Chen, & Zhao, 2018). There are no commercial resistant cultivars against Fusarium wilt. Chemical soil fumigation is one of the leading methods for controlling Fusarium wilts (Sun, Song, & Fu, 2015). However, soil fumigation with chemicals is known to have broad biocidal activity, and detrimental effects were found not only on target pathogens but also on non‐target microorganisms and the fumigation chemicals themselves could be extremely dangerous to humans (Yan, Wang, & Li, 2017). The application of biological control agents (BCA) has been recognized as an environmentally friendly and sustainable method to reduce the effects of plant diseases (Raza, Wang, Wang, & Wu, 2016; Raza, Wei, Wei, & Ling, 2016; Saravanakumar, Li, & Yu, 2013).

Rhizosphere soils from healthy plants which survived in a field infested with phytopathogens are a good source for the isolation of biocontrol agents (Huang, Wei, & Tan, 2013). In recent decades, many biocontrol agents have been successfully isolated from rhizosphere niches, such as Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Trichoderma spp., Streptomyces spp., and effectively used for the control of Fusarium wilt in many different commercial crops (Faheem, Raza, & Wei, 2015). Among these promising BCAs, Bacillus spp. are well‐known for their inherent property to produce spores and for their resistance to extreme conditions (Shafi, Tian, & Ji, 2017). Bacillus subtilis SQR9 isolated from the rhizosphere of cucumber, showed strong antagonism against F. oxysporum f.sp. cucumerinum (Cao, Zhang, & Ling, 2011). Akarm, Mahboob, and Javed (2013) showed that B. thuringiensis strain 199 can protect tomato plants against Fusarium wilt. The genus Bacillus spp. were found to be well adapted to the rhizosphere of watermelon. However, relative few biocontrol agents belonging to Bacillus spp. are used to control the Fusarium wilt of watermelon (Raza, Yuan, & Ling, 2015; Zhao, Wang, & Liang, 2018). Thus, more studies are still needed to explore biocontrol agents belonging genus Bacillus to strengthen the range of weapons available for the biocontrol of Fusarium wilt of watermelon.

Bacillus strains exhibit various biological control mechanisms, such as production of a wide spectrum of antibiotics, synthesis extracellular enzymes, competition for nutrients and niches, and induction of systemic resistance in plants against pathogens (Chowdhury, Hartmann, & Gao, 2015; Santoyo, Orozco‐Mosqueda, & Govindappa, 2012). Among these mechanisms, previous research has shown that root colonization ability is a prerequisite for biological control agent's activity (Mendis, Thomas, Schwientek, & Salamzade, 2018). Cavaglieri, Orlando, and Rodriguez (2005) reported that the biological control efficiency of plant pathogens was directly related to the root colonization ability of biological agents. Zhang, Wu, He, and Li (2011) demonstrated the critical importance of the colonization of B. subtilis N11 on banana roots to stop the pathogen invading by using a GFP‐tagged B. subtilis N11. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate root colonization ability when searching promising BCAs.

A variety of antifungal compounds, such as lipopeptides which belong to the iturin, surfactin, and fengycin group, are well‐documented as being produced by Bacillus spp. (Kim, Kang, Kwon, & Seo, 2015). In addition to these non‐volatile antimicrobial compounds, increased research effort has been devoted to revealing the function of VOCs in recent years (Jamalizadeh, Etebarian, Aminian, & Alizadeh, 2011; Raza, Wang et al., 2016; Raza, Wei et al., 2016). VOCs are low–‐molecular‐weight compounds that easily evaporate at normal temperature and pressure (Gotor‐Vila, Teixidó, Di, & Usall, 2017). Previous studies have reported that the VOCs produced by Bacillus spp. can inhibit the growth and spore germination of several plant fungal pathogens (Tahir, Gu, Wu, & Raza, 2017; Tahir, Gu, Wu, & Niu, 2017). In addition to antifungal activity, the VOCs produced by biocontrol strains can also improve plant growth and induce resistance in plants against plant pathogens (Gao, Zhang, Liu, & Han, 2017; Ryu, Farag, Hu, & Reddy, 2003). The effective components of VOCs vary between different biocontrol strains. For example, Gao et al. (2017) found four anti‐fungal VOCs, pyrzine017, benzothiazole, 4‐chloro‐3methyl, and phenol‐2,4‐bis (1,1‐dimethylethyl), released by B.velezensis ZSY‐1. Among the total of 36 VOCs detected from B. amyloliquefaciens NJN‐6, 11 compounds can completely inhibit fungal growth (Zou, Li, & Yu, 2010). Three compounds, Albuterol and 1,3‐propanediole produced by B. subtilis strain SYST2, and 2‐pentylfuran produced by B. megaterium XTBG34 each additionally demonstrate plant growth promotion activity (Tahir, Gu, Wu, & Raza, 2017; Tahir, Gu, Wu, & Niu, 2017; Wu, Yuan, Raza, & Shen, 2014).

In this study, five (L3, h, β, b, and L) potential biocontrol strains of Bacillus were isolated from the healthy watermelon plants which survived in a field heavily infested with FON. The objectives of the study were to: (a) isolate Bacillus with antifungal activity against FON, (b) evaluate antifungal and plant‐growth promotion effect of VOCs produced by the isolated strains, (c) evaluate the root colonization ability of the selected biocontrol strain, (d) evaluate the biocontrol efficiency and plant growth effect by performing greenhouse pot experiments, and (e) discover the components and functions of VOCs secreted by the selected strain.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Microorganisms and growth conditions

The culture of F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum (FON) used in this study was originally isolated from infected stems collected from watermelon fields located in Jiangsu, China by the method described by Chang, Ling, Chen, and Huang (2015). FON was pathogenic to watermelons in in vivo experiments. Stock cultures were maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates at 4°C. Pre‐cultures were established by transferring a stock agar plug containing mycelia onto fresh PDA plates and incubating for 4 days at 28°C.

2.2. Isolation and screening of bacteria for biocontrol activity

The rhizosphere soils were sampled from healthy watermelon plants that had survived in a field with a history of Fusarium wilt in Jiangsu province of China. The serial‐dilution‐pour method was used to isolate rhizosphere bacteria on nutrient agar (Beef extract 3.0 g/L, peptone 5.0 g/L, sodium chloride 3.0 g/L, and agar 20.0 g/L). The bacterial strains were further purified and then screened for antagonistic activity toward FON using dual culture technique. Briefly, a 3 mm agar plug from the edge of a 4‐day‐old culture of FON on PDA was placed in the middle of fresh PDA plate. The bacterial strains were spot inoculated in the edge of the plate and incubated at 28°C. The PDA plate inoculated only with FON was used as control treatment. Each treatment was repeated three times. The diameter of FON in each plate was then recorded after 5 and 10 days.

2.3. Antagonistic effects of VOCs on growth of FON

The antagonistic effects of VOCs produced by the selected bacterial strains (L3, h, β, L, and b) isolated above, were measured according to the method described by Wu et al. (2014). The Petri dish containing modified Murashige‐Skoog (MS) culture medium (0.5% TSB and 2% agar) inoculated with the isolated strains was covered with another Petri dish containing PDA inoculated with a 6 mm diameter plug of FON. Then the two dishes were sealed with Parafilm to obtain a double‐plate chamber. The average distance between MS and PDA agar surface was 1.5 cm. The double‐plate chamber was incubated at 28°C for 4 days. The double‐plate chamber without bacterial strains were used as control. The experiment was repeated three times.

2.4. Plant growth promotion by VOCs

Arabidopsis thaliana Col‐0 seeds were surface sterilized in 70% (v/v) ethanol for 30 s and afterwards incubated for 5 min in sodium hypochlorite solution, then rinsed with sterile water for four times. Seeds were placed on Petri dishes containing 0.5 × MS for 2 days at 4°C and then germinated for 2 days on Petri dishes containing 0.5 × MS, 0.8% sucrose and 0.6% bacto agar. Then, five plantlets were transferred to 90 mm diameter Petri dishes containing 0.5 × MS, 0.8% sucrose and 1% bacto agar. Each of the five selected bacterial strains was pre‐cultured in a 60 mm diameter Petri dish containing MS, 0.5% TSB, and 2% bacto agar for 24 hr at 30°C. Then two Petri dishes containing plantlets and bacterial strains were put into a 150 mm diameter plate and sealed with Parafilm and placed vertically in a growth chamber at 22°C, 16 hr light/8 hr dark (Appendix Figure A1). Each treatment had three replicates. Plant fresh weight, primary root length, and lateral root number were measured after 7 days incubation.

2.5. Construction of GFP‐tagged L3 and root colonization assay

Based on the results of 2.3–2.5 section, the strain L3 was chosen for further studies. The gfp‐marked shuttle vector, pHAPII (GenBank accession number HM151400), was used to construct the GFP‐tagged L3 by the method described by Cao et al. (2011). A GFP‐tagged L3 mutant that emitted green fluorescence was chosen and used in the root colonization assay.

Watermelon “Sumi 8” were surface‐sterilized by immersing in sodium hypochlorite solution (2%, v/v) for 15 min and rinsed five times in sterilized distilled water. The seeds were placed on moist filter papers in a petri dish under sterile conditions for germination at 28°C. After 3 days, the germinated seeds were then sown in soilless culture medium (3:2:3:2 mix of fermentation bed farming material; vermiculite; perlite; peat) at 28°C with 16 hr light/8 hr dark. Then the seedlings with 1–2 leaves were used for the subsequent studies.

A hydroponic system was used for colonization assays as described by Zhang et al. (2011). The watermelon seedlings were collected and gently washed to remove the adhered substrate. The seedlings were placed into 50‐ml flasks (one seedling in each flask) containing 50 ml of liquid 1/2 MS medium at 28°C. A 1 ml suspension of GFP‐tagged L3 (108 cfu/ml) was added to each flask of hydroponic medium. The culture conditions were the same as described above. The root samples were collected at 48 hr and 96 hr. Part of each root sample (0.1 g) was ground in a mortar with 0.9 ml sterilized distilled water until a fine homogenate was obtained. The suspension was diluted, then plated on modified LB medium (20 μg/ml, kanamycin) and colony‐forming units were counted after incubating at 37 ℃ for 2 days. The patterns of GFP‐tagged L3 colonization of watermelon roots were examined by a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (Leica Model TCS SP2, Heidelberg, Germany) as described by Huang, Zhang, Yong, and Yang (2012). Roots without inoculation with the GFP‐tagged L3 served as control. Each treatment was repeated three times.

2.6. Biological control and plant growth promotion activity of the strain L3

The ability of strain L3 to suppress Fusarium wilt of watermelon was investigated in an FON‐infested soilless growth substrate. Treatments included: a soilless growth substrate inoculated with FON as a control (CK), and soilless growth substrate inoculated with FON and the strain L3 (L3). Each treatment included 30 watermelon seedlings. The spore suspension of FON (106 CFU/ml) was first drenched into the growth substrate, followed by a suspension of strain L3 (109 CFU/ml). The final concentration of FON (105 CFU/g) and strain L3 (108 CFU/g) in the growth substrates. Watermelon seedlings were then transplanted in the substrate trays (450 × 20 cm), and then grown at 16 hr light/8 hr dark at 28°C. Plants were watered as required for plant growth and disease development. Disease incidence was recorded after 28 days when symptoms of Fusarium wilt was starting to appear on the watermelon plants, and continued for another 8 days. Incidence of Fusarium wilt was calculated by using the formula:

Diseaseincidence%=NumberofdiseasedplantsTotalnumberofplants×100

The growth substrate samples near to watermelon root rhizosphere were collected at 0, 20, and 36 days after transplanting and stored at −20°C. The population of FON in the growth substrate samples were determined by real‐time PCR following the method described by Zhao, Liu, and Ling (2014).

The plant‐growth promotion ability of the strain L3, was assessed in pot experiment with a non‐infested growth substrate as described above. Briefly, strain L3 was used as a drench treatment, and control pots received an equal volume of sterile distilled water. Each treatment consisted of three replicate pots (one plant per pot). After 20 days of transplanting, plant growth was determined by weighing individual plants.

2.7. Identification of VOCs by SPME‐GC‐MS

Solid‐phase micro‐extraction (SPME) technique was used to collect VOCs produced by the strain L3 (Wu et al., 2014). Briefly, a 150 ml vial containing 50 ml modified MS culture medium (1.5% sucrose, 0.4% TSB and 2% agar) was inoculated with 200 μl cells suspension of the strain L3 (108 CFU/ml) and incubated at 28 ℃ for 2 days. Vials with only 50 ml culture medium were used as control. Then the vial was placed in a water bath (50°C) for 30 min with the SPME fiber (divinylbenzene‐carboxene‐PDMS, 50/30 μm) inserted into the headspace. The SPME fiber was desorbed at 220°C for 1 min in the injection port of GC/MS with a RTX‐5MS column (30 m, 0.25‐mm inside diameter, 0.25 μm). GC‐MS run was performed for 24 min. The initial oven temperature was 33°C, held for 3 min, ramped up first at a rate of 10°C/min to 180°C, and then ramped up at a rate of 40°C/min to 240°C, and held for 4 min. The mass spectrometer was operated in the electron ionization mode at 70 eV, a source temperature of 220°C, and with a continuous scan from 50 m/z to 500 m/z. The retention time and mass spectra of VOCs were compared with those in the NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectrometry Library. Then the VOCs profiles of the strain L3 were compared with the respective control, and only the peaks resulted from the L3 inoculated vials were identified.

2.8. Verification of synthetic compounds against FON

Among the identified VOCs, nine standard compounds were purchased from the reagent company (Appendix Table A1). The antifungal activity of the standard compounds was assessed using the I‐plate system described by Yuan, Raza, Shen, and Huang (2012). The I‐plate was prepared with PDA on one side and inoculated with a FON plug (4 mm). Then 50 μl of each standard compound was added to the other side. The I‐plate was sealed with Parafilm and incubated at 28°C. The I‐plates added with methanol or distilled water were used as control. The colony diameter of FON was recorded after 4 days incubating. The experiment was repeated three times.

2.9. Plant growth promotion activities of synthetic compounds

The plant growth promotion activities of the nine compounds were measured by the modified method described by Ryu et al. (2003) and Zou et al. (2010). Briefly, three 2‐day‐old germinated Arabidopsis thaliana Col‐0 seedlings were transferred to the one side of the I‐plate containing 0.5 × MS, 0.8% sucrose and 1% bacto agar. Then, the nine synthetic compounds were diluted separately in alcohol, and 20 μl of the resulting suspension was applied to a sterile filter paper disk on the other side of the I‐plate. A total of 10 μg, 100 μg, 500 μg and 1,000 μg doses of each synthetic compounds were tested. Each treatment was repeated for three times. The fresh weight of the Arabidopsis thaliana Col‐0 seedlings was measured after 10 days.

2.10. Characterization of strain L3

The biochemical and physiological characteristics of strain L3 were tested according to the method described by Wu et al. (2014). The genomic DNA of the strain L3 was extracted by using the E.Z.N.A. Bacterial DNA kit (OMEGA Ltd.). The primer pair (F：5′‐ AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG‐3′; R：5′‐AAGTCGTAACAAGGTA‐3′) was used to amplify the 16S rRNA gene of the strain L3. Then the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced and Blast searched against the NCBI database. The sequences of its close relatives were used to construct a neighbor‐joining phylogenetic tree using MEGA 4.0.

2.11. Statistical analysis

The data were assessed with one‐way ANOVA. Duncan's multiple‐range test was applied when one‐way ANOVA revealed significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). All statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS ver. 13.0 statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

3. RESULTS

3.1. Isolation of bacteria for biocontrol activity

Among the bacteria isolated from the soil samples, five strains that showed antagonistic activity against FON were named as L3, h, β, L, and b (Figure 1), respectively. After 5 days of incubation, the antifungal activities of these five strains were similar. The inhibition rates were 48.71%, 49.35%, 43.37%, 43.80%, and 47.86%, respectively. After 10 days of incubation, the inhibition rates of these strains were 58.12%, 51.21%, 44.67%, 45.08%, and 44.91%, respectively. Strain L3 showed the strongest antifungal ability out of the five strains.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Antifungal activity of the bacteria (L3, h, β, L, and b) isolated from watermelon rhizosphere soil against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum (FON). (a) Antagonism pattern after 5 days dual culture assay. (b) Inhibition rate of the isolated strain after 5 days. (c) Antagonism pattern after 10 days dual culture assay. D: Inhibition rate of the isolated strain after 10 days. Lowercase letters above the columns indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05

3.2. Antagonistic effects of VOCs on growth of FON

All five strains showed significant inhibitory effects against FON mycelial growth during the bioassay without direct contact, although the VOCs produced by these strains could not completely inhibit the FON mycelia growth (Figure 2a). The morphology of the mycelial growth of FON was found abnormal in the VOCs treatment. Overall, mycelial growth inhibition was higher in the strain L3 treatment, the mycelial growth inhibition rate was 19.1% after 5 days incubation (Figure 2b).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Antifungal volatile activity of isolated strains (L3, h, β, L, and b) on double‐dish chamber. (a) Mycelial growth of FON was inhibited in the presence of the bacteria streaked in the bottom dish. (b) Diameter of mycelial growth in the presence of VOCs after culture for 120 hr. Lowercase letters above the columns indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05

3.3. Growth promotion of A. thaliana with VOCs

VOCs produced by five antagonistic strains (L3, h, β, L, and b) promoted growth of A. thaliana (Figure 3). VOCs emitted by the strain L3 enhanced fresh weights by 2.39‐fold and the number of lateral roots of A. thaliana plants by 5.05‐fold, compared to the control. However, no statistically significant effects were found on the primary root length.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Effect of the VOCs produced by the isolated strains (L3, h, β, L, and b) on the biomass of Arabidopsis thaliana Col‐0. (a) Representative photograph showing the effects of VOCs produced by isolated strains. (b) Plant fresh weight, (c) Length of primary root, (d) Number of lateral roots. Lowercase letters above the columns indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05

3.4. Root colonization ability of the strain L3

The strain L3 was found to form thick biofilm in a static culture medium (Appendix Figure A2). In a hydroponic system, the GFP‐tagged cells could easily be distinguished from the background fluorescence in different parts of watermelon roots (Figure 4). The population of the strain L3 colonized on the watermelon's root was approximately 4.65 × 106 CFU per gram of root after two days of incubation. However, the population of the strain L3 decreased to 1.47 × 106 CFU per gram of root after 4 days incubation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Fluorescence (GFP) micrographs of watermelon roots colonized by GFP‐tagged Bacillus amyloliquefaciens L3 in hydroponic system at 48 hr and 96 hr; (a, b) The control, which was not inoculated with GFP‐tagged L3. (c‐f) Root zones of primary root and lateral root junctions colonized by GFP‐tagged L3

3.5. Biological control and growth promotion activity of the strain L3

In the greenhouse experiment, the symptoms of Fusarium wilt of watermelon appeared 28 days after transplanting watermelon seedlings in the infested substrate and disease incidence increased rapidly during the next 8 days (Figure 5). Disease incidence of the L3 treatment (22.5%) was far lower than the control treatment (71.2%). The relative biocontrol efficiency of the strain L3 was up to 68.4%.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens L3 on the incidence of Fusarium wilt of watermelon in a greenhouse pot experiment. F: control, inoculated with FON, L3: inoculated with FON and the strain L3. “*” above the columns indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05

Based on real‐time PCR, the population of FON were similar in both treatments during the first 20 days (Figure 6). The populations of FON significantly increased in both two treatments after 36 days of planting in the infested substrate. The population of FON was significantly lower in the L3 treatment (2.90 × 105 copies/g) compared with the CK treatment (5.84 × 105 copies/g). These results corresponded to the disease incidence described above.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain L3 on the number of FON in the rhizosphere soil of watermelon at 0, 20, and 36 days after transplanting. CK: control, inoculated with FON, L3: inoculated with FON and the strain L3. “*” above the columns indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain L3 on the fresh weight of watermelon seedling grown for 20 days in a greenhouse. CK: control treatment, L3: strain L3 was inoculated in the soilless substrate (108 cfu/g). “*” above the columns indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05

In the pot experiment, the fresh weights of watermelon plants treated with strain L3 were significantly higher than the control treatment 20 days after transplanting in the non‐infested substrate. The strain L3 treatment showed an increase in 23.4% relative to the control treatment.

3.6. Identification of VOCs by SPME‐GC‐MS

Fourteen specific VOCs peaks were identified from the strain L3 (Appendix Figure A3). The identified VOCs included eight ketones (acetoin; 2‐heptanone; 2‐nonanone; 2‐nonadecanone; 2‐undecanone; 2‐dodecanone; 2‐tridecanone; and Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane, 2,2,3‐trimethyl‐), three alcohols (2,3‐butanediol; 2‐ethyl‐1‐hexanol; and 2‐undecanol), and three alkyls (2,3‐Dimethyldecane, 2,4,6‐trimethyl‐decane, and 2,6,11‐trimethyl‐dodecane).

Among the 14 identified compounds, nine standard VOCs were purchased for further individual testing of antifungal activities. As indicated by the peak areas of the GC‐MS profile, the relative content order of these nine compounds released by the strain L3 were as follows (Figure 8): acetoin (63.67%), 2‐nonanone (10.14%), 2‐heptanone (4.63%), 2‐undecanone (3.77%), 2‐undecanol (3.22%), 2,3‐butanediol (2.28%%), 2‐dodecanone (0.73%), 2‐tridecanone (0.40%), 2‐ethyl‐1‐hexanol (0.40%).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

The Relative content of identified volatile organic compounds released by strain L3 based on the peak area of GC‐MS data

3.7. Verification of standard VOCs against FON

All the nine pure compounds showed antifungal activity against FON; however, the inhibition rates between the nine compounds were significantly different (Figure 9). After four days of incubation, the 2‐heptanone, 2‐ethyl‐1‐hexano, and 2‐nonanone completely inhibited the growth of FON. The inhibition rate of the other six compounds were as follows: 2‐undecanone (46.8%), 2‐dodecanone (29.4%), 2‐undecanol (27.1%), acetoin (16.3%), 2‐tridecanone (8.91%), and 2,3‐butanediol (3.44%).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

The inhibition of FON mycelia growth by pure VOCs identified from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens L3. Lowercase letters above the columns indicate a significant difference at p <0 .05

3.8. Plant growth promotion activities of synthetic compounds

Of the nine pure compounds, visual inspection revealed that plant shoot and root growth, when compared with the control treatment (water and ethanol), was only enhanced by acetoin and 2,3‐butanediol. The fresh weight of Arabidopsis seedlings was increased approximately 1.34‐fold by the presence of acetoin (1,000 μg) and 1.88‐fold by 2,3‐butanediol (500 μg), compared to ethanol treatment respectively (Figure 10).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Growth promotion of Arabidopsis thaliana Col‐0 with exposure to pure VOCs. (a) Effect of acetoin (1,000 μg/plate) and 2,3‐butanediol (500 μg/plate) on A. thaliana Col‐0 growth. (b) Fresh weight of A. thaliana Col‐0 after expose to different concentrations of acetoin and 2,3‐ butanediol. Lowercase letters above the columns indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05

3.9. Identification of strain L3

Bio‐chemical tests showed that strain L3 was Gram‐positive. Microscopic examination revealed that the strain L3 cells are motile, rod‐shaped, and can form spores when grown on NB culture medium. The phylogenetic tree of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing of strain L3 revealed that it was clustered closely to B. amyloliquefaciens, with a sequence similarity score of 99% in NCBI sequence alignment (Appendix Figure A4). Thus, the strain L3 was identified as B. amyloliquefaciens after considering all taxonomic characteristics.

4. DISCUSSION

The application of biological control agents (BCA) and grafted plants are considered sustainable control approaches to manage Fusarium wilt of watermelon (Ge, Liu, Nwet, & Zhao, 2016; Keinath & Hassell, 2014). Isolation of BCA against phytopathogens, is usually based on initial screening using the dual‐culture plate assay (Hermosa, Grondona, & Iturriaga, 2000). However, the isolation method was mainly considered the ability of the isolated strains to produce diffusible antifungal compounds. Recent studies have demonstrated that VOCs as well as the diffusible antifungal compounds produced by PGPR have equally important functions in antifungal activities (Mao, Chen, & Xia, 2018; Ossowicki, Jafra, & Garbeva, 2017; Xie, Zang, & Wu, 2018). In this study, the dual‐culture and double‐plate chamber method were introduced to distinguish the ability of the isolated strains to produce diffusible and volatile antifungal compounds. Among the strains isolated from the rhizosphere soil samples of watermelon, five strains could produce diffusible and volatile antifungal compounds, though B. amyloliquefaciens L3 showed the strongest and consistent antifungal activity against FON.

In addition to the antifungal ability of VOCs, our results clearly showed the plant growth promotion activity of VOCs produced by the isolated strains. Among the five strains, the strain L3 also showed the best plant growth promotion activity. A 2.39‐fold increase in biomass, 1.40‐fold increase in primary root length, and 5.05‐fold increase in number of lateral roots of A. thaliana were detected after exposure to the VOCs produced by strain L3. Our results were in accordance with previous reports (Ryu et al., 2003; Vacheron, Desbrosses, & Bouffaud, 2013). However, Park, Dutta, Ann, and Raaijmakers (2015) reported the VOCs released by P. fluorescens SS101 increased the biomass of A. thaliana up to 8.8‐fold. The proportionately smaller increase in biomass observed in this study could be due to the larger volume of the culture plate and lower concentration of available VOCs to the seedlings in the test chamber. Overall, after considering the antifungal and plant growth promotion activity of the five isolated strains, the strain L3 was chosen for the further analysis.

Biofilm formation and root colonization ability have been recognized as essential factors for BCA to survive in the rhizosphere battlefield against phytopathogens (Bhattacharyya & Jha, 2012; Raaijmakers, Paulitz, & Steinberg, 2009). Based on the fact that the strain L3 could form a thick biofilm in a static culture medium, we expected the strain L3 could ensure good colonization of watermelon roots. Previous studies have shown the elongation and differentiation zones of the plant root, as well as in the lateral roots and the junctions between the roots are preferred by PGPR strains (Zhang et al., 2011). In our study, the GFP signals of GFP‐tagged B. amyloliquefaciens L3 were found on the root tips, primary roots, and lateral root junctions (Figure 4). These results are consistent with previous studies (Huang et al., 2012; Ji, Lu, Gai, & Zheng, 2008). Colonization of plant roots by BCA plays an important role in disease control. For instance, Cao et al. (2011) reported that B. subtilis SQR9 can provide control of Fusarium wilt of cucumber by root colonizing. Similarly, Li, Zhang, and Zhang (2013) reported that B. subtilis HJ5 can provide control of Verticillium wilt of cotton by root colonization and biofilm formation. In this study, we inoculated FON in the soilless culture medium to simulate FON infection, and inoculated B. amyloliquefaciens L3 to the rhizosphere of watermelon to prevent the FON infection. We also found B. amyloliquefaciens L3 decreased the number of FON that survived in the rhizosphere of watermelon, and the relative biocontrol efficiency was up to 68.4%. Previous results have shown 50% of biocontrol efficacy is acceptable in the pot biocontrol experiment (Minuto, Spadaro, & Garibaldi, 2006; Wang, Yuan, & Zhang, 2013). This evidence indicates that strain L3 is a potential biological control agent to control disease. However, unlike real soil environments, our biocontrol experiment was undertaken in soilless conditions. Different planting media could result in different biocontrol efficiency of the biocontrol agents. Thus, further experiments are needed to explore the biocontrol efficiency of B. amyloliquefaciens L3 in field conditions. Previous studies have proved that B. amyloliquefaciens can not only suppress Fusarium wilt, but also promote plant growth (Zhao et al., 2014). We found the biomass of watermelons was increased 23.4% by inoculating B. amyloliquefaciens L3 to the rhizosphere. This result was in accordance with other evidence that have shown plant growth promotion ability of B. amyloliquefaciens (Chowdhury, Dietel, & Rändler, 2013).

Species of Bacillus have well known versatile weapons for biocontrol of plant pathogens and promotion of plant growth. A variety of mechanisms were employed by Bacillus to fight with phytopathogens and promote plant growth, such as the synthesis of hydrolytic enzymes, antibiotics, hormones, VOCs, and induction systemic resistance of plant (Chowdhury et al., 2015). Bacillus also can produce plant growth promoting hormones and increase nutrient absorption by plants. Among these biocontrol and plant growth promotion mechanisms, less attention has been paid to VOCs. According to recent research, more and more evidence has confirmed the involvement and roles of VOCs in biocontrol and plant growth promotion activities.  Hernández‐León, Rojas‐Solís, and Contreras‐Pérez (2015) reported P. fluorescens UM270 could produce dimethylhexadecylamine, a VOC with antifungal and plant growth promotion activities. Pyrazine and benzothiazole released by B. velezensis ZSY‐1, inhibits mycelia growth of Botrytis cinereal (Yuan et al., 2012). In this study, a total of 14 volatile substances produced by strain L3 were identified. The components of VOCs produced by strain L3 partly overlapped with other Bacillus spp., which mainly included alcohol, ketones, and alkanes derivatives (Raza, Wang et al., 2016; Raza, Wei et al., 2016). Among the identified VOCs, 2‐heptanone, 1‐hexano,2‐ethyl‐, and 2‐nonanone exhibited 100% inhibition of mycelial growth of FON. However, 1‐hexano,2‐ethyl‐ was produced in low quantity. Acetoin was the main VOC released by strain L3, but demonstrated low antifungal activity. Considering their antifungal activity and relative peak area, 2‐nonanone and 2‐heptanone were potential candidates as effective antifungal VOCs produced by strain L3.

In previous research, acetoin and 2,3‐butanediol has been used in foods, cigarettes, cosmetics, detergents, and chemical synthesis (Xiao & Lu, 2014). Acetoin is a precursor of 2,3‐butanediol and can be bio‐transformed by plants and microorganisms to 2,3‐butanediol stereoisomers (Javidnia, Faghih‐Mirzaei, & Miri, 2016). In this study, we found that acetoin was the main component of VOCs produced by B. amyloliquefaciens L3. 2,3‐butanediol and acetoin, produced by B. subtilis GB03 and B. amyloliquefaciens IN937, could promote Arabidopsis growth and induce systemic resistance (Rudrappa, Biedrzycki, & Kunjeti, 2010; Ryu, Farag, & Hu, 2004). In our study, acetoin and 2,3‐butanediol were the only two VOCs found to promote plant growth. Ryu et al. (2003) reported 2,3‐butanediol could significantly improve the biomass of A. thaliana at a concentration of 100 μg/plate. However, a higher concentration (500 μg/plate) used in our study significantly enhanced A. thaliana growth. Plant growth promotion regulation by VOCs is dose‐dependent. This different result might be due to the different dilute solvent used in the two experiments, leading to different concentrations of the volatile form of 2,3‐butanediol.

In conclusion, our results demonstrated that B. amyloliquefaciens L3 isolated from watermelon's rhizosphere soil could be an excellent candidate for the development of biocontrol agents. We also reported here that VOCs produced by B. amyloliquefaciens L3 play important roles in disease control and in growth promoting processes. However, further studies are still needed to understand the role of VOCs produced by B. amyloliquefaciens L3 under field conditions.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION

YC Wu and Y Ma designed and supervised the study. CG Li was involved in the greenhouse pot experiment. JY Zhou was involved in verifying plant growth promotion activities of VOCs. All of the other experiments were performed by YC Wu.

ETHICS STATEMENT

None required.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology 973 project (No. 2015CB150500), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M621672), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41701339). We would like to express our deep gratitude to Mr. Rik Ludlow for improving the grammar of the manuscript.

APPENDIX 1.

Table A1.

Pure compounds purchased from reagent companies

Compound Name Chemical structure Source Purity (%)
Acetoin graphic file with name MBO3-8-e00813-g015.jpg A ≥96
2,3‐Butanediol graphic file with name MBO3-8-e00813-g016.jpg A ≥96
2‐Heptanone graphic file with name MBO3-8-e00813-g017.jpg A ≥98
1‐Hexanol, 2‐ethyl‐ graphic file with name MBO3-8-e00813-g018.jpg A ≥99
2‐Nonanone graphic file with name MBO3-8-e00813-g019.jpg A ≥96
2‐Undecanone graphic file with name MBO3-8-e00813-g020.jpg A ≥98
2‐Undecanol graphic file with name MBO3-8-e00813-g021.jpg A ≥97.0
2‐Dodecanone graphic file with name MBO3-8-e00813-g022.jpg A ≥97.0
2‐Tridecanone graphic file with name MBO3-8-e00813-g023.jpg A ≥96.0
Open in a new tab

A: Sigma‐aldrich LLC.

APPENDIX 2.

Figure A1.

Figure A1

Open in a new tab

Schematic representation of the experimental setup for Arabidopsis thaliana growth promotion by VOCs

Figure A2.

Figure A2

Open in a new tab

Biofilm formation of the strain L3 in static culture medium (LB)

Figure A3.

Figure A3

Open in a new tab

SPME chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) profile of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by the strain L3. Red arrow means the specific VOCs produced by strain L3

Figure A4.

Figure A4

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic analysis of strain L3 and related species using the neighbor‐joining approach. Bootstrap values obtained with 1,000 resamplings are indicated as percentages at all branches. The GenBank accession number for each microorganism is shown in parentheses after the species name

Wu Y, Zhou J, Li C, Ma Y. Antifungal and plant growth promotion activity of volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens . MicrobiologyOpen. 2019;8:e813 10.1002/mbo3.813

DATA ACCESSIBILITY

All data are provided in full in the results section of this article. The raw sequence data have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under the accession number MK394005.

REFERENCES

  1. Akarm, W. , Mahboob, A. , & Javed, A. A. (2013). Bacillus thuringiensis strain 199 can induce systemic resistance in tomato against Fusarium wilt. European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology, 3, 275–280. 10.1556/eujmi.3.2013.4.7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhattacharyya, P. N. , & Jha, D. K. (2012). Plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Emergence in agriculture. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 28, 1327–1350. 10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cao, Y. , Zhang, Z. H. , & Ling, N. (2011). Bacillus subtilis SQR9 can control Fusarium wilt in cucumber by colonizing plant roots. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 47, 495–506. 10.1007/s00374-011-0556-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cavaglieri, L. , Orlando, J. , & Rodriguez, M. I. (2005). Biocontrol of Bacillus subtilis against Fusarium verticillioides in vitro and at the maize root level. Research in Microbiology, 156, 748–754. 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang, T. H. , Ling, Y. H. , Chen, K. S. , & Huang, J. W. (2015). Cell wall reinforcement in watermelon shot base related to its resistance to Fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. niveum . The Journal of Agricultural Science, 153, 296–305. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chowdhury, S. P. , Dietel, K. , & Rändler, M. (2013). Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 on lettuce growth and health under pathogen pressure and its impact on the rhizosphere bacterial community. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e68818 10.1371/journal.pone.0068818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chowdhury, S. P. , Hartmann, A. , & Gao, X. W. (2015). Biocontrol mechanism by root‐associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42‐a review. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, 780 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Faheem, M. , Raza, W. , & Wei, Z. (2015). Evaluation of the biocontrol potential of Streptomyces goshikiensis YCXU against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum. Biological Control, 81, 101–110. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.11.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao, Z. F. , Zhang, B. J. , Liu, H. P. , & Han, J. C. (2017). Identification of endophytic Bacillus velezensis ZSY‐1 strain and antifungal activity of its volatile compounds against Alternaria solani and Botrytis cinerea . Biological Control, 105, 27–39. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.11.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ge, B. , Liu, B. , Nwet, T. T. , & Zhao, W. (2016). Bacillus methylotrophicus strain NKG‐1, isolated from Changbai Mountain, China, has potential applications as a biofertilizer or biocontrol agent. PLoS ONE, 11, e0166079 10.1371/journal.pone.0166079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gotor‐Vila, A. , Teixidó, N. , Di, F. A. , & Usall, J. (2017). Antifungal effect of volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CPA‐8 against fruit pathogen decays of cherry . Food Microbiology, 64, 219–225. 10.1016/j.fm.2017.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hermosa, M. R. , Grondona, I. , & Iturriaga, E. A. (2000). Molecular characterization and identification of biocontrol isolates of Trichoderma spp. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66(5), 1890–1898. 10.1128/AEM.66.5.1890-1898.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hernández‐León, R. , Rojas‐Solís, D. , & Contreras‐Pérez, M. (2015). Characterization of the antifungal and plant growth‐promoting effects of diffusible and volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens strains. Biological Control, 81, 83–92. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.11.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang, J. , Wei, Z. , & Tan, S. (2013). The rhizosphere soil of diseased tomato plants as a source for novel microorganisms to control bacterial wilt. Applied Soil Ecology, 72, 79–84. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.05.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, X. , Zhang, N. , Yong, X. , & Yang, X. (2012). Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani damping‐off disease in cucumber with Bacillus pumilus SQR‐N43. Microbiological Research, 167, 135–143. 10.1016/j.micres.2011.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jamalizadeh, M. , Etebarian, H. R. , Aminian, H. , & Alizadeh, A. (2011). A review of mechanisms of action of biological control organisms against post‐harvest fruit spoilage. OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 41, 65–71. 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2011.02438.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Javidnia, K. , Faghih‐Mirzaei, E. , & Miri, R. (2016). Biotransformation of acetoin to 2,3‐butanediol: Assessment of plant and microbial biocatalysts. Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 11(4), 349–354. 10.4103/1735-5362.189330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ji, X. , Lu, G. , Gai, Y. , & Zheng, C. (2008). Biological control against bacterial wilt and colonization of mulberry by an endophytic Bacillus subtilis strain. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 65, 565–573. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00543.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Keinath, A. P. , & Hassell, R. L. (2014). Control of Fusarium wilt of watermelon by grafting onto bottlegourd or interspecific hybrid squash despite colonization of rootstocks by fusarium. Plant Disease, 98, 255–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim, Y. G. , Kang, H. K. , Kwon, K. D. , & Seo, C. H. (2015). Antagonistic activities of novel peptides from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PT14 against Fusarium solani and Fusarium oxysporum . Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 63, 10380–10387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, S. , Zhang, N. , & Zhang, Z. (2013). Antagonist Bacillus subtilis HJ5 controls Verticillium wilt of cotton by root colonization and biofilm formation. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 49(3), 295–303. 10.1007/s00374-012-0718-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ling, N. , Deng, K. , & Song, Y. (2014). Variation of rhizosphere bacterial community in watermelon continuous mono‐cropping soil by long‐term application of a novel bioorganic fertilizer. Microbiological Research, 169, 570–578. 10.1016/j.micres.2013.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, L. , Chen, S. , & Zhao, J. (2018). Watermelon planting is capable to restructure the soil microbiome that regulated by reductive soil disinfection. Applied Soil Ecology, 129, 52–60. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.05.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mao, L. J. , Chen, J. J. , & Xia, C. Y. (2018). Identification and characterization of new Muscodor endophytes from gramineous plants in Xishuangbanna, China. MicrobiologyOpen, e666 10.1002/mbo3.666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mendis, H. C. , Thomas, V. P. , Schwientek, P. , & Salamzade, R. (2018). Strain‐specific quantification of root colonization by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus firmus I‐1582 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens QST713 in non‐sterile soil and field conditions. PLoS ONE, 13, e0193119 10.1371/journal.pone.0193119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Minuto, A. , Spadaro, D. , & Garibaldi, A. (2006). Control of soilborne pathogens of tomato using a commercial formulation of Streptomyces griseoviridis and solarization. Crop Protection, 25, 468–475. 10.1016/j.cropro.2005.08.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ossowicki, A. , Jafra, S. , & Garbeva, P. (2017). The antimicrobial volatile power of the rhizospheric isolate Pseudomonas donghuensis P482. PLoS ONE, 12(3), e0174362 10.1371/journal.pone.0174362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Park, Y. S. , Dutta, S. , Ann, M. , & Raaijmakers, J. M. (2015). Promotion of plant growth by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SS101 via novel volatile organic compounds. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 461, 361–365. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.04.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Raaijmakers, J. M. , Paulitz, T. C. , & Steinberg, C. (2009). The rhizosphere: A playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant and Soil, 321, 341–361. 10.1007/s11104-008-9568-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Raza, W. , Wang, J. , & Wu, Y. (2016). Effects of volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on the growth and virulence traits of tomato bacterial wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum . Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 100, 1–12. 10.1007/s00253-016-7584-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Raza, W. , Wei, Z. , & Ling, N. (2016). Effect of organic fertilizers prepared from organic waste materials on the production of antibacterial volatile organic compounds by two biocontrol Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains. Journal of Biotechnology, 227, 43–45. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.04.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Raza, W. , Yuan, J. , & Ling, N. (2015). Production of volatile organic compounds by an antagonistic strain Paenibacillus polymyxa WR‐2 in the presence of root exudates and organic fertilizer and their antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum . Biological Control, 80, 89–95. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.09.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rudrappa, T. , Biedrzycki, M. L. , & Kunjeti, S. G. (2010). The rhizobacterial elicitor acetoin induces systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana . Journal Communicative & Integrative Biology, 3(2), 130–138. 10.4161/cib.3.2.10584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ryu, C. M. , Farag, M. A. , & Hu, C. H. (2004). Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 134(3), 1017–1026. 10.1104/pp.103.026583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ryu, C. M. , Farag, M. A. , Hu, C. H. , & Reddy, M. S. (2003). Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 4927–4932. 10.1073/pnas.0730845100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Santoyo, G. , Orozco‐Mosqueda, M. C. , & Govindappa, M. (2012). Mechanisms of biocontrol and plant growth‐promoting activity in soil bacterial species of Bacillus and Pseudomonas: A review. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 22, 855–872. 10.1080/09583157.2012.694413 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Saravanakumar, K. , Li, Y. Q. , & Yu, C. J. (2013). Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on maize rhizosphere microbiome and biocontrol of Fusarium stalk rot. Scientific Reports, 7, 1771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shafi, J. , Tian, H. , & Ji, M. (2017). Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: A review. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 31, 446–459. 10.1080/13102818.2017.1286950 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sun, L. , Song, S. , & Fu, L. (2015). Exploring a soil fumigation strategy based on ammonium bicarbonate to control Fusarium wilts of cucurbits. Crop Protection, 70, 53–60. 10.1016/j.cropro.2015.01.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tahir, H. A. S. , Gu, G. , Wu, H. J. , & Raza, W. (2017). Plant growth promotion by volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus subtilis SYST2. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 171 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tahir, H. A. S. , Gu, Q. , Wu, H. J. , & Niu, Y. D. (2017). Bacillus volatiles adversely affect the physiology and ultra‐structure of Ralstonia solanacearum and induce systemic resistance in tobacco against bacterial wilt. Scientific Reports, 7, 40481 10.1038/srep40481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Vacheron, J. , Desbrosses, G. , & Bouffaud, M. L. (2013). Plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4, 356 10.3389/fpls.2013.00356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, B. B. , Yuan, J. , & Zhang, J. (2013). Effects of novel bioorganic fertilizer produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens W19 on antagonism of Fusarium wilt of banana. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 49, 435–446. 10.1007/s00374-012-0739-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wu, Y. , Yuan, J. , Raza, W. , & Shen, Q. (2014). Biocontrol traits and antagonistic potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain NJZJSB3 against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, a causal agent of canola stem rot. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24, 1327–1336. 10.4014/jmb.1402.02061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Xiao, Z. J. , & Lu, J. R. (2014). Strategies for enhancing fermentative production of acetoin: A review. Biotechnology Advances, 32(2), 492–503. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Xie, S. , Zang, H. , & Wu, H. (2018). Antibacterial effects of volatiles produced by Bacillus strain D13 against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae . Molecular Plant Pathology, 19, 49–58. 10.1111/mpp.12494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yan, D. D. , Wang, Q. X. , & Li, Y. (2017). Analysis of the inhibitory effects of chloropicrin fumigation on nitrification in various soil types. Chemosphere, 175, 459–464. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yuan, J. , Raza, W. , Shen, Q. R. , & Huang, Q. W. (2012). Antifungal activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN‐6 volatile compounds against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense . Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 78, 5942–5944. 10.1128/AEM.01357-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang, M. , Xu, J. H. , & Liu, G. (2015). Characterization of the watermelon seedling infection process by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum . Plant Pathology, 64(5), 1076–1084. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang, N. , Wu, K. , He, X. , & Li, S. Q. (2011). A new bioorganic fertilizer can effectively control banana wilt by strong colonization with Bacillus subtilis N11. Plant and Soil, 344, 87–97. 10.1007/s11104-011-0729-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhao, J. , Wang, Y. , & Liang, H. (2018). The rhizosphere microbial community response to a bio‐organic fertilizer: Finding the mechanisms behind the suppression of watermelon Fusarium wilt disease. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 40, 17 10.1007/s11738-017-2581-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhao, S. , Liu, D. Y. , & Ling, N. (2014). Bio‐organic fertilizer application significantly reduces the Fusarium oxysporum population and alters the composition of fungi communities of watermelon Fusarium wilt rhizosphere soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 50, 765–774. 10.1007/s00374-014-0898-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zou, C. , Li, Z. , & Yu, D. (2010). Bacillus megaterium strain XTBG34 promotes plant growth by producing 2‐pentylfuran. Journal of Microbiology, 48, 460–466. 10.1007/s12275-010-0068-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data are provided in full in the results section of this article. The raw sequence data have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under the accession number MK394005.

Articles from MicrobiologyOpen are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES