Skip to main content
NMC Case Report Journal logoLink to NMC Case Report Journal
. 2019 May 25;6(3):83–86. doi: 10.2176/nmccrj.cr.2018-0244

Aqueductal Developmental Venous Anomaly Presenting with Mimic Symptoms of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report

Daisuke Kita 1,, Cheho Park 1, Yasuhiko Hayashi 2
PMCID: PMC6692595  PMID: 31417837

Abstract

Developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) are generally asymptomatic; however, they can sometimes cause central nervous disorders. Aqueductal stenosis caused by DVAs is so rare that only 14 cases have been reported to date. Moreover, most patients are children or young adults, presenting with headaches or consciousness disturbances, associated with raised intracranial pressure. Here, we report on an 83-year-old man presenting with mimic symptoms of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (cognitive disorder, gait disturbance, and urinary urgency: Hakim’s triad) because of obstructive hydrocephalus caused by a DVA located in the aqueduct. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) was performed to relieve his symptoms, and the opening pressure of the lateral ventricle was recorded to be 10 cm-H2O. Endoscopic examination of the intraventricular system clearly revealed a vein within the aqueduct converging with the adjacent subependymal vessels. These findings were compatible with the characteristics of DVAs. His symptoms improved after the ETV. This case suggested that DVAs within the aqueduct, despite of their congenital nature, could give rise to decompensated obstructive hydrocephalus even in elderly patients, resulting in Hakim’s triad.

Keywords: developmental venous anomaly, aqueductal stenosis, obstructive hydrocephalus, endoscopic third ventriculostomy

Introduction

Developmental venous anomalies (DVAs), previously termed venous malformations, are currently considered congenital non-pathologic anatomical variants of normal deep parenchymal veins, which are composed of mature venous vessels that lack malformed or neoplastic elements.1,2) Although they are benign entities in nature, they occasionally cause headaches, seizures, and some focal neurological deficits.3,4) Obstructive hydrocephalus as a complication of DVAs is so rare that only 14 cases of aqueductal stenosis (AS) have been reported so far.5,6) The previously reported cases of AS induced by DVAs were mainly in children and young adults, manifesting as chronic or intermittent headaches or consciousness disturbances resulting from elevated intracranial pressure (ICP).5,7)

Here, we present a case of AS caused by a DVA in an 83-year-old man, manifesting symptoms of Hakim’s triad,8) with a normal ICP; this is the oldest patient reported upon so far. We present the radiological and endoscopic findings related to this uncommon entity, and then discuss the characteristics of clinical manifestations.

Case Presentation

An 83-year-old man, with Hakim’s triad, cognitive disorder, gait disturbance, and urinary urgency over the past 4 months, was referred to our hospital. His general condition was good, with neither nausea nor headaches.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment showed supratentorial ventricular dilatation with ballooning of the third ventricle floor, which was consistent with radiological findings observed in obstructive hydrocephalus caused by AS (Figs. 1A–1C). A faint gadolinium-enhanced lesion was found at the dorsal part of the aqueduct, although it was difficult to determine whether the lesion contributed to the hydrocephalus (Fig. 1B, magnified image).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(A) Axial image of T1 MRI revealed enlargement of the lateral ventricles with an Evans index of 0.39. (B) Axial image of gadolinium-enhanced T1 MRI revealed enlargement of the third ventricle (maximum diameter of 18.0 mm) and a faint enhancement at the posterior part of the aqueduct (magnified image). (C) Preoperative sagittal image of heavily T2-weighted MRI revealed aqueductal stenosis (arrow head) and ballooning of the third ventricle floor (arrow). (D) Intraoperative endoscopic view showed a vein within the aqueduct and adjacent accumulation of subependymal vessels. (E) Postoperative sagittal image of T2-weighted MRI showed the flow artifact (arrow), revealing the CSF flow through the stoma made by endoscopic third ventriculostomy.

To resolve the symptoms associated with hydrocephalus, as well as to investigate the causative lesion, endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) to inspect the ventricular system was carried out using a flexible neuro-fiber endoscope (VEF-V, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The right-side anterior horn of the lateral ventricle was punctured with least possible leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and an initial opening pressure of 10 cm-H2O was recorded. During endoscopy, we identified a vein accompanying the subependymal veins within the aqueduct (Fig. 1D). The appearance of this vascular lesion was compatible with the characteristics of a DVA, with an enlarged transcortical or subependymal collector vein draining radially arranged medullary veins. ETV was then performed in the conventional manner; his postoperative course was uneventful. His clinical symptoms remained good for 6 months after the operation, as summarized in Table 1. Follow-up MRI showed the flow void sign at the third ventricle floor, revealing patency of the stoma (Fig. 1E).

Table 1.

Clinical evaluation in pre- and post-ETV

Evaluations Pre-ETV Post-ETV
MMSE (full score; 30) 15 20
3 m TUG (s) 25 14
INPHGS total score 6 3
  Gait 2 0
  Cognition 3 2
  Incontinence 1 0
Modified Rankin Scale 2 1

ETV: endoscopic third ventriculostomy, INPHGS: idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus grading scale, TUG: timed up and go.

Discussion

Aqueductal stenosis may be induced by various central nervous system disorders, such as infection, hemorrhage, head trauma, tumors, cysts, or vascular lesions.9,10) AS caused by DVAs is so rare that only 14 cases have been reported previously, all of which involved infants and relatively young individuals (0–58 years) (Table 2).57,1120) Apart from mental deterioration in the case of a 58-year-old woman11) and seizure in the case of a 43-year-old woman,14) the main symptoms in the remaining 12 cases (0–42 years) were severe or intermittent headaches and consciousness disturbances, which were closely associated with raised ICP.

Table 2.

Previously reported cases of aqueductal stenosis due to developmental venous anomaly

Age (yr) Sex Symptoms Duration Location of DVA Findings of DVAs Diagnostic procedure Treatment References
58 M Mental deterioration 5 yr Aqueduct, 4th ventricle An angioma blocking the aqueduct and the 4th ventricle Autopsy No 11
35 F Headache 1 yr Aqueduct A venous element partially blocking the aqueduct Angiography, direct exploration Stenting 12
39 M Headache 1 yr Lower aqueduct An abnormal draining vein penetrating the lowest part of the tectum mesencephali MRI VP shunt 13
43 F Seizure 2 mo Periaqueduct An enlarged pulsatile vein protruding into the aqueduct on the left side MRI, angiography, endoscopy ETV 14
16 F Headache, behavior abnormalities 2 mo Periaqueduct Vascular channels partially surrounding the aqueduct MRI No 15
11 M Headache 5 mo Aqueduct A draining vein traversing the aqueduct MRI Shunting 16
28 F Headache, diplopia n.a. Ostial aqueduct, 3rd ventricle An abnormal vein passing through the orifice of the aqueduct MRI, endoscopy ETV 17
7 F None 1 mo Aqueduct An abnormal vein coursing through the aqueduct MRI No 18
42 M Headache, behavior abnormalities 1 yr Ostial aqueduct, 3rd ventricle Two draining veins passing near the orifice of the aqueduct MRI, endoscopy ETV 5
18 M Headache 6 yr Aqueduct (venous loop) A loop of the subependymal DVA protruding into the aqueduct MRI, endoscopy ETV 5
0 (10 mo) M Delayed psychomotor development 10 mo Ostial aqueduct Large veins of the DVA compressing the entry into the aqueduct MRI, endoscopy ETV 19
0 (Birth) F Increased head circumference Ostial aqueduct, 3rd ventricle A DVA passing through the orifice of the aqueduct MRI VP shunt 20
10 M Headache, nausea, vomiting 2 wk Aqueduct A supra- and infratentorial DVA coursing through the aqueduct MRI, endoscopy ETV 21
37 M Headache 1 yr Aqueduct A large collector vein coursing within the aqueduct MRI, angiography ETV 6
83 M Hakim’s triad 4 mo Aqueduct A DVA coursing within the aqueduct MRI, endoscopy ETV This case

DVA: developmental venous anomaly, ETV: endoscopic third ventriculostomy, mo: month(s), n.a.: not available, VP shunt: ventriculoperitoneal shunt, wk: week(s), yr: year(s).

Taking into consideration the congenital nature of DVAs, this case is quite unique, in that the intra-aqueductal DVA had been asymptomatic until he manifested with Hakim’s triad at the age of 83. Although the underlying mechanisms of very late onset obstructive hydrocephalus in this patient is unclear, the clinical characteristics in this case are consistent with a previous study on idiopathic AS. Younger patients tend to have headaches with raised ICP, whereas older patients tend to show partial or complete Hakim’s triad with normal ICP.21) Long-standing intra-aquedactal DVAs, together with senile changes in the craniospinal environment, such as decrease in brain compliance, might induce decompensated obstructive hydrocephalus.22,23)

In cases of obstructive hydrocephalus caused by AS, ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) with programmable pressure valves is another treatment choice. On the other hand, it was reported that the failure rate of initial VPS was much higher than ETV for adult patients with AS.24) Regarding the first-line treatment option for patients with adult AS whose CSF absorbable capacity is expected to be preserved, ETV may be recommended rather than VPS, because ETV can prevent various problems related to VPS, such as over-drainage, shunt malfunction, or infection.

Moreover, in this case, use of a flexible endoscope for ETV enabled us to identify the DVA within the aqueduct, which was difficult to detect on preoperative MRI. Together with the previous eight cases involving the use of endoscopes (Table 2),5,14,17,19,20) this case suggests that neuro-fiberscopes are not only useful for the treatment of AS but are also helpful in diagnostic exploration for AS with uncommon etiologies.

Conclusion

We presented a rare case of an elderly man with mimic symptoms of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) caused by a DVA within the aqueduct. This case was quite unique for the following reasons: (1) the patient was much older than those in previous reports, (2) he showed symptoms of Hakim’s triad, which were resolved by ETV, and (3) an intra-aqueductal DVA was clearly shown on endoscopy. Even in elderly patients manifesting Hakim’s triad, not only iNPH, but also obstructive AS caused by congenital lesions, such as DVAs shown in this case, should be considered as differential diagnosis.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. This work was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research from Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (# H26-NANCHITOU-IPPAN-052, to D.K.).

References

  • 1).Lasjaunias P, Burrows P, Planet C: Developmental venous anomalies (DVA): the so-called venous angioma. Neurosurg Rev 9: 233–242, 1986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2).Rammos SK, Maina R, Lanzino G: Developmental venous anomalies: current concepts and implications for management. Neurosurgery 65: 20–29; discussion 29–30, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3).Naff NJ, Wemmer J, Hoenig-Rigamonti K, Rigamonti DR: A longitudinal study of patients with venous malformations: documentation of a negligible hemorrhage risk and benign natural history. Neurology 50: 1709–1714, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4).Morioka T, Hashiguchi K, Nagata S, et al. : Epileptogenicity of supratentorial medullary venous malformation. Epilepsia 47: 365–370, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5).Giannetti AV, Rodrigues RB, Trivelato FP: Venous lesions as a cause of sylvian aqueductal obstruction: case report. Neurosurgery 62: E1167–E1168; discussion E1168, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6).Cavallo C, Faragò G, Broggi M, Ferroli P, Acerbi F: Developmental venous anomaly as a rare cause of obstructive hydrocephalus: literature review and a case report. J Neurosurg Sci: 06 October, 2015 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7).Paulson D, Hwang SW, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG, Jea A: Aqueductal developmental venous anomaly as an unusual cause of congenital hydrocephalus: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 6: 7, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8).Adams RD, Fischer CM, Hakim S, Ojemann RG, Sweet WH: Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal-fluid pressure. A treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 273: 117–126, 1965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9).Bennett RT, Allen PB, Miller JD: Non-tumoral stenosis of the aqueduct in adults. Surg Neurol 4: 523–527, 1975 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10).Little JR, Houser OW, MacCarty CS: Clinical manifestations of aqueductal stenosis in adults. J Neurosurg 43: 546–552, 1975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11).Rosenheck C: Venous angioma of the sylvian aqueduct and the fourth ventricle associated with internal hydrocephalus and mental deterioration. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 38: 428–438, 1937 [Google Scholar]
  • 12).Avman N, Dinçer C: Venous malformation of the aqueduct of Sylvius treated by interventriculostomy: 15 years follow-up. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 52: 219–224, 1980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13).Watanabe A, Ishii R, Kamada M, Suzuki Y, Hirano K, Okamura H: Obstructive hydrocephalus caused by an abnormal vein in the aqueduct. Case report. J Neurosurg 75: 960–962, 1991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14).Oka K, Kumate S, Kibe M, Tomonaga M, Maehara F, Higashi Y: Aqueductal stenosis due to mesencephalic venous malformation: case report. Surg Neurol 40: 230–235, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15).Blackmore CC, Mamourian AC: Aqueduct compression from venous angioma: MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17: 458–460, 1996 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16).Bannur U, Korah I, Chandy MJ: Midbrain venous angioma with obstructive hydrocephalus. Neurol India 50: 207–209, 2002 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17).Sato S, Sonoda Y, Kuroki R, Kayama T: [A rare case of aqueductal stenosis due to venous angioma]. No To Shinkei 56: 1042–1046, 2004. (Japanese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18).Yagmurlu B, Fitoz S, Atasoy C, Erden I, Deda G, Unal O: An unusual cause of hydrocephalus: aqueductal developmental venous anomaly. Eur Radiol 15: 1159–1162, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19).Guhl S, Kirsch M, Lauffer H, Fritsch M, Schroeder HW: Unusual mesencephalic developmental venous anomaly causing obstructive hydrocephalus due to aqueductal stenosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8: 407–410, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20).Inoue K, Yoshioka F, Nakahara Y, Kawashima M, Matsushima T: Obstructive hydrocephalus following aqueductal stenosis caused by supra- and infratentorial developmental venous anomaly: case report. Childs Nerv Syst 29: 329–334, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21).Fukuhara T, Luciano MG: Clinical features of late-onset idiopathic aqueductal stenosis. Surg Neurol 55: 132–135; discussion 136–137, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22).Czosnyka M, Czosnyka ZH, Whitfield PC, Donovan T, Pickard JD: Age dependence of cerebrospinal pressure-volume compensation in patients with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 94: 482–486, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23).Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Keong N, et al. : Pulse pressure waveform in hydrocephalus: what it is and what it isn’t. Neurosurg Focus 22: E2, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24).Oi S, Shimoda M, Shibata M, et al. : Pathophysiology of long-standing overt ventriculomegaly in adults. J Neurosurg 92: 933–940, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from NMC Case Report Journal are provided here courtesy of Japan Neurosurgical Society

RESOURCES