Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical Case Reports logoLink to Clinical Case Reports
. 2019 Jul 10;7(8):1565–1572. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2287

The use of bidirectional barbed suture in the treatment of a complete common calcanean tendon rupture in a dog: Long‐term clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation

Kevin Frame 1, Oded Ben‐Amotz 2, Renee Simpler 1, Josh Zuckerman 1,3, Ron Ben‐Amotz 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6692997  PMID: 31428393

Abstract

The canine common calcanean tendon can be repaired successfully using a modified Kessler knotless barbed technique. A long‐term ultrasound follow‐up showed improved and increased normal tendon fibrillar echotexture and homogeneity.

Keywords: canid, veterinary, orthopaedics

1. INTRODUCTION

Use of bidirectional‐barbed suture for primary repair of a traumatic common calcanean tendon rupture in a 1 year‐old Pitbull allowed for an excellent outcome with progressive improvement in tendon morphology evident on ultrasound imaging at 12 and 48 months following surgery.

The common calcanean tendon (Achilles tendon) is comprised of the paired gastrocnemius tendons, the conjoined tendons of the gracilis, semitendinosus, and biceps femoris muscles, and the superficial digital flexor tendon. Partial or complete tears are typically seen following a traumatic incident and are classified based upon duration of the injury (acute vs chronic).1, 2 Affected animals are typically presented with a visible skin laceration and a plantigrade stance.2

The current treatment recommendation for an acute rupture of the common calcanean tendon is primary tenorrhaphy. During the first 4 to 5 days following repair, the tendon ends will lose holding power.3 This period is followed by a progressive increase in strength over the next 2 weeks, although it has been reported that the presence of suture material may prolong the inflammatory phase.4 The suture material selected must meet the need for strength during this period while also minimizing the potential for physical damage and tissue reactivity. The use of monofilament, synthetic, slowly absorbable, or nonabsorbable materials is recommended.3

The linear arrangement of collagen fibers in a normal tendon provides little holding strength for simple suture patterns. Specialized suture patterns are required to resist pullout when the tendon is placed under tension. The locking loop, 3‐loop pulley, Krackow, and double Bunnell‐Mayer suture patterns have all been used successfully for primary tenorrhaphy.5, 6, 7, 8 Additional procedures to augment the primary repair using the semitendinosus muscle and tensor fascia lata have also been reported.9, 10, 11 The presence of a knot in the suture increases cross‐sectional area at the repair site and serves as a weak point in the suture. These factors have also been shown to be associated with an increase in gliding resistance.12 The use of barbed suture material eliminates the need for a knot and the barb‐tendon interaction throughout the repair provides a more even load distribution.13

Ultrasound has been shown to be an excellent diagnostic method for imaging lesions of the common calcanean tendon and differentiation of total ruptures, partial ruptures, and those comprising muscular tears.14 On ultrasonographic examination, a normal common calcaneal tendon appears as a moderately echogenic, homogenous structure with parallel hyperechoic lines (fibrillar echotexture).15 Ultrasound also has been used to document the healing process and, in humans, has been suggested as a guide for physiotherapy in patients undergoing surgery for common calcanean tendon rupture.16 Eight weeks after surgery, replacement tissue begins to grow in the normal longitudinal direction and a decrease in diameter of the tendon is accompanied by the reappearance of the characteristic tendinous fibrillar echotexture. However, after the healing process is completed, the tendon remains less homogeneous in comparison with the unaffected tendon for long periods and nonabsorbable suture material remains visible as hyperechoic foci.15

The use of barbed suture in tendon repair may have several advantages over traditional suture materials including increased tensile strength, less repair‐site bunching, decreased cross‐sectional area, the absence of knots as weak points, decreased gliding resistance, and decreased adhesion formation.15 We propose the use of barbed suture for the repair of a common calcaneal tendon rupture will provide a favorable outcome in this case as documented by postoperative clinical and ultrasonographic findings.

2. CASE HISTORY

A one‐year‐old, 17 kg, spayed female Pitbull mix was presented with a chief complaint of left hind limb lameness following direct trauma involving sharp metal framing. The patient had no history of lameness in the affected limb prior to this event. At the time of admission, the dog was able to ambulate with a plantigrade stance. A deep skin laceration in the region of the common calcaneal tendon was observed, and a complete transverse tendon laceration was suspected. Orthogonal radiographs of the tarsal region revealed discontinuity of the opaque soft tissue margin of the calcaneal tendon with interspersed fat opacity. No bony abnormalities were identified. An acute, complete, transverse common calcaneal tendon laceration was diagnosed based on the clinical presentation, physical examination, and radiographic findings. A preoperative complete blood count and serum biochemical profile were within normal limits.

3. SURGICAL PROCEDURE

Exploration of the injured left common calcaneal tendon was performed via a lateral para‐tendon approach. The laceration was extended proximally and distally over the torn tendon to allow adequate exposure of the tendon ends (Figure 1). With the tarsocrural joint held in extension, an 0.062 k‐wire was placed temporarily from the proximal aspect of the calcaneal tuber to the distal aspect of the tibial diaphysis in a proximocranial direction. A 2.5 mm drill hole was made through the calcaneal tuber in a proximocranial direction, ending in the distal aspect of the tibial diaphysis just distal to the k‐wire. The hole was tapped using a 3.5 mm tap, and a 3.5 mm cortical screw was placed from the plantar aspect of the calcaneus ensuring that the tarsocrural joint was avoided. The k‐wire was removed.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Intraoperative exposure of the lacerated tendon ends

Repair of the damaged tendon was achieved using 2‐0 polypropylene bidirectional barbed suture (Quill™ 2‐0) in a modified Kessler suture pattern (Figure 2). The subcutaneous tissue was closed using 3‐0 Monoderm™ bidirectional barbed suture (Quill™ 3‐0).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Barbed suture method of common calcanean tendon repair using a modified Kessler pattern. (A) Bidirectional barb design of Quill SRS features sutures barbed placed in opposing direction on either side of the tendon segment. One segment of barbed suture is advanced transversely through the stump of the tendon until opposing barbs engage and prevent further advancement. (2) The first leg of the initial core suture is advanced longitudinally, exiting at the cut tendon end. (3) The second leg of the initial core suture is advanced longitudinally from the opposite side of the tendon stump. (4) Both sutures are then advanced longitudinally through and out of the distal stump. (5) The first leg is passed transversely through the stump, proximal to its exit site. (6) The second leg is also passed similarly in the opposite direction. (7) Both legs are passed longitudinally across the apposed tendon ends to exit from the opposite tendon stump. (8) Each end of the barbed suture makes an additional 3 subsequent transverse passes

4. OUTCOME

Following surgery, the limb was placed in a full bi‐valve cast (Vetcast™ Plus). Exercise was limited to controlled leash walks for the first 8 weeks at which point the bone screw was removed and the limb was placed in a lateral splint for an additional 4 weeks. This was followed by 4 weeks in a custom‐made hinged brace (Thera‐Paw™). Serial palpation revealed subjective focal improvement in tendon thickness throughout the healing period, with only mild to moderate thickening noted at the time of brace removal (16 weeks postoperatively). Four months postoperatively the dog had returned to full activity without appreciable lameness. Seven months postoperatively, palpation of the tendon revealed very mild focal thickening.

5. FOLLOW‐UP IMAGING

Ultrasound of the left common calcaneal tendon was performed at 7 months, 12 months, and 48 months postoperatively using a Siemens P300 Acuson (Siemens Healthcare Gmbh) and a 6‐18 MHz LA435 linear transducer (Figure 3). The left common calcaneal tendon was thicker compared to that of the contralateral limb (Figure 4), measuring 0.9 cm thick at 7 months, 0.8 cm thick at 12 months, and 0.7 cm thick at 48 months in the transverse plane (contralateral tendon: 0.2‐0.3 cm thick). In the longitudinal plane, the thickness of the affected tendon was 1.1 cm, 0.8 cm, and 0.8 cm, respectively. In all 3 examinations, the left common calcaneal tendon appeared inhomogeneous with loss of the normal fibrillar echotexture. However, progressive improvement was noted at 12 and 48 months, with increased normal fibrillar echotexture and improved homogeneity.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Transverse (A, B, C) and longitudinal (D, E, F) ultrasound images of the calcaneal tendon made at 7 mo (A, D), 12 mo (B, E), and 48 mo (C, F) postoperatively. Note the hyperechoic structure within the tendon in image C consistent with the nonabsorbable barbed suture. No suture material was observed outside of the healing tendon, eliminating a potential source interference with tendon gliding. Slight improvement in fibrillar echotexture of the tendon is evident in the longitudinal images made at 12 and 48 mo (E, F). CTT, common calcanean tendon

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Transverse (A) and longitudinal (B) ultrasound images of the uninjured contralateral calcaneal tendon. Note the moderately echogenic, homogenous structure with parallel hyperechoic lines (fibrillar echotexture). CTT, common calcanean tendon

6. DISCUSSION

The successful use of knotless barbed suture has been reported in the veterinary literature for use in laparoscopic gastropexy, enterotomy, gastrotomy, and intradermal wound closure.17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 Quill™ suture was introduced initially as a barbed monofilament suture made from polypropylene, nylon, or glycolic acid derivatives. The suture has a curved, diamond‐pointed needle on each end of the strand. The length of suture is divided into two halves, each of which contains barbs oriented in a spiral fashion away from the needle on the same side. The mid‐point of the suture length can be determined by identifying a segment that has no barbs, or by feeling for an increase in resistance as the suture is gently pulled through the tissue. This along with other commercially available barbed suture has been successfully tested in many biomechanical human and animal tendon models.12, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42

In the human literature, the use of at least four specialized barbed sutures for flexor tendon repair was described in several studies between 1945 and 1968 but were not widely adopted.27 Work by McKenzie28 in 1967 involving barbed suture for the repair of flexor tendons in cadaveric models established early data regarding tensile strength of barbed suture, finding it comparable to more traditional techniques. This was confirmed in a recent meta‐analysis of barbed suture in flexor tendon repair compared to conventional methods.43 Multiple studies have also demonstrated superior tensile strength, gap formation, and final failure force of knotless barbed suture techniques compared to conventional methods,27, 29, 30, 31 though this is also dependent on suture pattern and size.32, 33 One study found that use of a knotless barbed suture technique was biomechanically inferior to a 4‐strand modified Kessler technique in a chicken model.34 Regardless of repair technique, suture knots have been consistently found to be the point of tensile weakness in tendon repair.27, 35, 36 When located within the tendon repair site, knots may impede tendon healing, stimulate an inflammatory response, impede revascularization, induce a foreign body response, and hinder gliding by increasing tendon cross‐sectional area. Similarly, knots that are located external to the repair may also impair gliding within the tendon sheath and are a potential nidus for adhesion formation.12, 27, 34, 44

Barbed polypropylene sutures differ from their smooth counterparts in that the barbs are cut into the actual strand, thus decreasing overall suture diameter. It has been demonstrated that the breaking strength of 2‐0 barbed polypropylene suture is closest to, and not significantly different from, that of smooth 3‐0 polypropylene suture. The barbed suture was also significantly stiffer and had less elongation than any of the smooth suture sizes tested in that study.45 A recent in vitro veterinary study compared the ultimate tensile strength and load to 1 and 3 mm gap formation between smooth and knotless barbed polypropylene sutures for canine gastrocnemius tendon repair.37 Thirty‐three paired bone‐tendon units were repaired with either 3‐0 smooth or 0 knotless barbed polypropylene suture using a three‐loop pulley pattern and tested under single‐cycle tensile loading until failure occurred. The study found that smooth polypropylene suture exhibited a significantly higher ultimate tensile strength compared to the barbed suture. The barbed repairs also required significantly lower loads to induce 1 and 3 mm gaps.37

A study of human Achilles tendon repairs also reported a comparatively lower peak load to failure when barbed suture was used.38 Similar results were demonstrated in an ex vivo study evaluating performance and resistance to gap formation of nonabsorbable, barbed, monofilament suture compared to nonabsorbable, smooth, monofilament polypropylene suture.39 Three‐loop pulley and modified Bunnell‐Mayer patterns were used in transected cadaveric superficial digital flexor tendons, and the smooth polypropylene suture was consistently superior in load performance when compared to unidirectional barbed suture. This study also demonstrated that the three‐loop pulley pattern was more effective in resisting gap formation compared to the Bunnell‐Mayer pattern.39

In contrast to the recent studies,37, 39 our case report suggests that barbed suture can be used as an effective alternative to traditional suture for repair of a common calcaneal tendon rupture. In the current case report, a modified Kessler suture technique was used rather than a three‐loop pulley suture technique. The modified Kessler technique was chosen as it allows for an increased number of tendon‐suture anchor points. It functions by creating a loop that grasps longitudinal bundles of tendon fibers (Figure 2). This loop further tightens and pinches the fibers as load is increased. It has been reported that the primary mode of failure affecting the traditional modified Kessler suture technique is due to suture pullout rather than suture breakage or knot failure.34 It is possible that by increasing the size of each loop and by using a locking suture pattern, both the quantity of tendon fibers grasped as well as the interface between tendon fibers and suture material may be increased, ultimately resulting in an overall stronger repair and decreased risk of pullout. Further biomechanical studies would be necessary to validate this theory.

The size of the suture used in the present study differs from what has been previously reported. We used a 2‐metric polypropylene suture in contrast to the 4‐metric suture used in the in vitro study.37 Although the suture size in our study is smaller and therefore inherently weaker, this was an in vivo report and the patient's repair was protected by a calcaneotibial screw and variable external coaptation throughout the healing period that may explain the differences between the studies. A biomechanical study that performed cyclic testing under physiologic loads would have been more representative of the in vitro conditions under which our patient was subjected.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that a greater number of anchor points and suture strands significantly increase overall repair strength.12, 27, 31, 33, 46 Zeplin et al31, 33 showed that for two‐strand repairs the traditional modified Kirchmayr‐Kessler technique was stronger than the knotless technique; however, no difference in maximal load to failure was found between four‐strand techniques. McClellan et al40 showed that a four‐strand knotless technique had equivalent strength and reduced cross‐sectional area at the repair site compared to a traditional four‐strand technique and that this repair was significantly stronger than a traditional two‐strand Kessler technique. A four‐strand knotless barbed suture technique has also been shown to have higher resistance to gap formation and higher final force to failure compared to a conventional four‐strand cross‐locked cruciate (Adelaide) technique.30 Thus, it is likely that the use of more suture strands in knotless barbed suture techniques may further improve their strength and performance.

Postoperative immobilization of the tarsus is potentially more important than the specific suture pattern chosen for successful common calcanean tendon healing.3 Many different techniques have been described including the use of a calcaneotibial screw (CTS), transarticular external fixator (TESF), and/or external coaptation.3 In clinical use, it has been advised that a full cylinder cast or cranial half cast is used in combination with a CTS to decrease the risk of cyclic loading of the screw and premature screw breakage, especially in large dogs.47 Neilsen and Pluhar48 found no difference in outcome between TESF and the use of a splint or cast alone for common calcanean tendon injuries in dogs, though TESF resulted in longer surgical time and higher initial cost. In a small case series, Worth et al49 found that the use of a cast alone resulted in a poorer outcome than using a CTS with casting for common calcanean tendon injuries in working dogs. The authors observed fewer cast‐related complications when the CTS was combined with a cast, likely because rigid immobilization of the tarsocrural joint prevents hock motion within the cast thereby decreasing rubbing and the risk of secondary skin complications.

Use of a CTS provides a low‐cost option for short‐term immobilization, avoiding the complications associated with a TESF. Complications associated with a CTS include screw bending and/or breakage, potentially necessitating screw replacement. In one retrospective study of 38 dogs undergoing screw and cast immobilization following common calcanean tendon repair, 3 (8%) experienced complications associated with the screw.10 Almost all postoperative complications in the CTS group were associated with the external coaptation, and overall complication rates for CTS were significantly lower than for those stabilized with external fixation or a cast alone.

Traditionally, it has been recommended that a calcaneotibial screw be kept in place for 6‐8 weeks, at which time it can be removed and a splinted support bandage placed for an additional 2‐4 weeks.3 At 6 weeks after tenorrhaphy, a tendon has achieved 56% of its original strength and is therefore able to withstand the normal forces associated with limited exercise.3 Despite these findings, the optimal postoperative method and duration of tarsal immobilization in dogs is currently unknown. Research into ligamentous injuries in humans has suggested that prolonged rest or immobilization could in fact have adverse effects on tissue repair and healing and that early mobilization may actually stimulate repair and decrease the time required for adequate rehabilitation.50, 51, 52

An experimental study in dogs that compared postoperative management following knee ligament repair found that immobilization for longer than 6 weeks resulted in considerable damage to the articular cartilage.53 The ideal fixation method may be a hinged TESF which allows for controlled progressive increases in tendon loading and a gradual increase in tarsal flexion.54 However, a hinged TESF adds complexity and cost to the initial stabilization and is associated with a high complication rate.

Tendon and ligament healing directly benefits from early mobilization of the joint. New tendon collagen should ideally be exposed to certain amounts of strain or load 3 weeks following repair to encourage the fibers to develop in the appropriate orientation. Controlled load or strain starting at this time has been shown to result in more rapid return of tendon strength compared to longer periods of immobilization.55 This benefit however must be balanced against the risk of early disruption or elongation. Therefore, protection of the repair for a period greater than 3 weeks is still generally recommended.3

The immobilization method selected in this case was chosen based on the anticipated healing times following tendon repair, the concern regarding the dog and owner's compliance, as well as the reported lower complication rate when a calcaneotibial screw is used in conjunction with external coaptation compared to external coaptation alone. A hinged brace was also used later in the recovery period to allow a gradual increase in tendon loading and tarsal range of motion similar to that allowed by a hinged TESF. 56 The period of postoperative immobilization in this case was likely excessive, but was chosen based on historical recommendations and the use of a suture material not previously described in a clinical case. It is possible that earlier mobilization of the tarsus in this case may have resulted in improved or more rapid tendon healing evident on ultrasound examination. It is hoped that demonstrating the successful use and potential advantages of barbed suture in this case will encourage further investigation of its use followed by shorter postoperative immobilization periods, therefore minimizing the risks associated with prolonged joint immobilization.

A recent study evaluating the use of postoperative ultrasonography of the Achilles tendon in humans failed to identify a statistical correlation between long‐term ultrasonographic morphology and clinical outcome.57 However, a study in horses found that computerized ultrasonography was an effective tool for objective monitoring of healing superficial digital flexor tendons and provided reliable prognostication of repair quality.58 The ultrasonographic appearance of the common calcanean tendon in this report was observed to gradually trend toward that of the unaffected contralateral tendon over the 48‐month follow‐up period. At 48 months, the cross‐sectional diameter of the repaired tendon in the transverse plane remained much greater than that of the normal tendon (0.7 cm vs 0.2‐0.3 cm, respectively). Although they remained abnormal, inhomogeneity and fibrillar echotexture of the healed tendon were improved at 48 months. This is consistent with previous studies of Achilles tendon imaging following surgical repair in humans and canines in which the operated side exhibited a degree of thickening and inhomogeneity compared to the contralateral side for months to years postoperatively.14, 16, 56

One identified limitation of barbed suture material is that the barbs lock into tissue. Once the needle and suture are passed through the tendon, the suture and needle cannot be backed out. Recognizing this limitation, we recommend rehearsing the planned suture application and ensuring accurate needle positioning before completely pulling the needle through the tissue. We have demonstrated a successful repair of a canine common calcanean tendon with full return to function using a modified Kessler knotless barbed suture technique. By considering the different factors that influence the success of tendon repairs including suture size, suture pattern, and number of strands, the use of knotless barbed suture for canine common calcanean tendon repair could be a promising strategy and further clinical studies are indicated.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Kevin Frame, BVSc: involved in manuscript preparation, revision, and research.Oded Ben‐Amotz, MD: involved in concept and design, surgeon. Renee Simpler, VMD, DACVR: involved in ultrasonographer, data acquisition, prepared the manuscript, and revised the manuscript. Josh Zuckerman, VMD, DACVS: prepared and revision the manuscript. Ron Ben‐Amotz, DVM, MS, DACVS, DECVS: involved in concept and design, surgeon, manuscript revision.

Frame K, Ben‐Amotz O, Simpler R, Zuckerman J, Ben‐Amotz R. The use of bidirectional barbed suture in the treatment of a complete common calcanean tendon rupture in a dog: Long‐term clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation. Clin Case Rep. 2019;7:1565–1572. 10.1002/ccr3.2287

REFERENCES

  • 1. Meustage FJ. The classification of canine Achilles tendon lesions. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 1993;6:53‐55. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Reinke JD, Kus SP. Achilles mechanism injury in the dog. Compend Contin Educ. 1982;4:639. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Tobias KM, Johnston SA. (Eds). Veterinary Surgery Small Animal. vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wong JK, Alyouha S, Kadler KE, Ferguson M, McGrouther DA. The cell biology of suturing tendons. Matrix Biol. 2010;29:525‐536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Vaughan LC. Muscle and tendon injuries in dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 1979;20:711–736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Moores AP, Comerford EJ, Tarlton JF, Owen MR. Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of a modified 3‐loop pulley suture pattern for reattachment of canine tendons to bones. Vet Surg. 2004;33:391‐397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Berg JR, Egger EL. In vitro comparison of the three loop pulley and locking loop suture pattern for repair of canine weight bearing tendons and collateral ligaments. Vet Surg. 1986;15:107‐110. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Moores AP, Owen MR, Tarlton JF. The three‐loop pulley suture versus two locking–loop sutures for the repair of canine Achilles tendons. Vet Surg. 2004;33:131‐137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Baltzer WI, Rist P. Achilles tendon repair in dogs using the semitendinosus muscle: surgical technique and short‐tern outcome in five dogs. Vet Surg. 2009;38:770‐779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Corr SA, Draffan D, Kulendra E, Carmichael D, Brodbelt D. Retrospective study of Achilles mechanism disruption in 45 dogs. Vet Rec. 2010;167:407–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Shani J, Shahar R. Repair of chronic complete traumatic rupture of the common calcaneal tendon in a dog, using a fascia lata graft. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2000;13(02):104‐108. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Momose T, Amadio PC, Zhao C, Zobitz ME, An K. The effect of knot location, suture material, and suture size on the gliding resistance of flexor tendons. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:806‐811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Parikh PM, Davison SP, Higgins JP. Barbed suture tenorrhaphy: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1551‐1558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kramer M, Gerwing M, Michele U, Schimke E, Kindler S. Ultrasonographic examination of injuries to the Achilles tendon in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract. 2001;42:531‐535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Penninck D, d'Anjou M, eds. Atlas of Small Animal Ultrasonography. Hoboken, NJ:Wiley‐Blackwell; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Maffulli N, Dymond NP, Regine R. Surgical repair of ruptured achilles tendon in sportsmen and sedentary patients: a longitudinal ultrasound assessment. Int J Sports Med. 1990;11(1):78‐84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Arbaugh M, Case JB, Monnet E. Biomechanical comparison of glycomer 631 and glycomer 631 knotless for use in canine incisional gastropexy. Vet Surg. 2013;42:205‐209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Takacs JD, Singh A, Case JB, et al. Total laparoscopic gastropexy using 1 simple continuous barbed suture line in 63 dogs. Vet Surg. 2017;46:233‐241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ehrhart NP, Kaminskaya K, Miller JA, Zarby JF. In vivo assessment of absorbable knotless barbed suture for single layer gastrotomy and enterotomy closure. Vet Surg. 2013;42(2):210‐216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Miller J, Zaruby J, Kaminskaya K. Evaluation of a barbed suture device versus conventional suture in a canine enterotomy model. J Invest Surg. 2012;25(2):107‐111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hansen LA, Monnet EL. Evaluation of a novel suture material for closure of intestinal anastomoses in canine cadaver. Am J Vet Res. 2012;73(11):1819‐1823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Spah CE, Elkins AD, Wehrenberg A, et al. Evaluation of two novel self‐anchoring barbed sutures in a prophylactic laparoscopic gastropexy compared with intracorporeal tied knots. Vet Surg. 2013;42(8):932‐942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Coleman KA, Adams S, Smeak DD, Monnet E. Laparoscopic gastropexy using knotless unidirectional suture and an articulated endoscopic suturing device: seven cases. Vet Surg. 2016;45:O95‐O101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Imhoff DJ, Cohen A, Monnet E. Biomechanical analysis of laparoscopic incisional gastropexy with intracorporeal suturing using knotless polyglyconate. Vet Surg. 2015;44:O39‐O43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Regier PJ, Smeak DD, McGilvray KC. Security and biomechanical strength of three end‐pass configurations for the terminal end of intradermal closures performed with unidirectional barbed suture material in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2016;77:1392‐1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lin TE, Lakhiani C, Lee MR, Saint-Cyr M, Sammer DM. Biomechanical analysis of knotless flexor tendon repair using large-diameter unidirectional barbed suture. J Hand Surg. 2013;8(3):315–319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. McKenzie AR. An experimental multiple barbed suture for the long flexor tendons of the palms and fingers. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg. 1967;49:440‐447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Miller B, Dodds SD, deMars A, Zagoreas N, Waitayawinyu T, Trumble TE. Flexor tendon repairs: the impact of fiber wire on grasping and locking core sutures. J Hand Surg. 2007;32:591‐596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Peltz TS, Haddad R, Scougall PJ, Gianoutsos MP, Bertollo N, Walsh WR. Performance of a knotless four‐strand flexor tendon repair with a unidirectional barbed suture device: a dynamic ex vivo comparison. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014;39(1):30‐39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zeplin PH, Henle H, Zahn RK, Meffert RH, Schmidt K. Tensile strength of flexor tendon repair using barbed suture material in a dynamic ex vivo model. J Hand Microsurg. 2012;4(1):16‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. O'Brien FP, Parks BG, Tsai MA, Means KR Jr. A knotless bidirectional barbed tendon repair is inferior to conventional 4‐strand repairs in cyclic loading. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016;41(8):809‐814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Zeplin PH, Zahn RK, Meffert RH, Schmodt K. Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon repair using barbed suture material: a comparative ex vivo study. J Hand Surg. 2011;36A:446‐449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Maddox GE, Ludwig J, Craig ER, et al. Flexor tendon repair with a knotless, bidirectional barbed suture: an in vivo biomechanical analysis. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(5):963‐968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Waitayawinyu T. Comparative biomechanical study of flexor tendon repair using fiber wire. J Hand Surg. 2008;33:701‐708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. McCoy BW, Haddad SL. The strength of Achilles tendon repair: a comparison of three suture techniques in human cadaver tendons. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(8):701‐705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Perry BS, Harper TA, Mitchell M, McFadden M, Perry BH. Barbed versus smooth polypropylene three‐loop pulley sutures for the repair of canine gastrocnemius tendon. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2014;27(6):436‐440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kanz BN, Morris RP, Lewis T, Panchbhavi VK. Biomechanical evaluation of a knotless barbed suture repair in a human Achilles tendon rupture model. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014;7:176‐181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Duffy DJ, Main RP, Moore GE, Breur GJ, Millard RP. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of barbed suture and standard polypropylene suture for acute tendon laceration in a canine model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2015;28:263‐269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. McClellan WT, Schessler MJ, Ruch DS, Levin LS, Goldner RD. A knotless flexor tendon repair technique using a bidirectional barbed suture: an ex vivo comparison of three methods. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:322‐327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Joyce CW, Sugrue C, Chan JC, et al. A barbed suture repair for flexor tendons: a novel technique with no exposed barbs. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014;2(10):e237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Trocchia AM, Aho HN, Sobol G. A re‐exploration of the use of barbed sutures in flexor tendon repairs. Orthopedics. 2009;32(10):731–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Shin JY, Kim JS, Roh SG, Lee NH, Yang KM. Biomechanical analysis of barbed suture in flexor tendon repair versus conventional method: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(4):666e–674e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Jennings ER. Tendon sutures. Md State Med J. 1954;3:17‐19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Rashid R, Sartori M, White LE, Villa MT, Yoo SS, Alam M. Breaking strength of barbed polypropylene sutures. Rater‐blinded, controlled comparison with nonbarbed sutures of various calibers. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Rawson S, Cartmell S, Wong J. Suture techniques for tendon repair; a comparative review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;3(3):220‐228. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Houlton J, Collinson RW. (Eds). Manual of Small Animal Arthrology. Gloucestershire, UK: BSAVA; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Nielsen C, Pluhar GE. Outcome following surgical repair of achilles tendon rupture and comparison between postoperative tibiotarsal immobilization methods in dogs: 28 cases (1997–2004). Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2006;19(4):246‐249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Worth AJ, Danielsson F, Bray JP, Burbidge HM, Bruce WJ. Ability to work and owner satisfaction following surgical repair of common calcanean tendon injuries in working dogs in New Zealand. N Z Vet J. 2004;52(3):109‐116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hauser RA, Dolan EE. Ligament injury and healing: an overview of current clinical concepts. J Prolother. 2011;3(4):836‐846. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Karlsson J, Lundin O, Lind K, Styf J. Early mobilization versus immobilization after ankle ligament stabilization. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1999;9(5):299‐303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Mortensen HM, Skov O, Jensen PE. Early motion of the ankle after operative treatment of a rupture of the Achilles tendon. A prospective, randomized clinical and radiographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(7):983‐990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Ogata K, Whiteside LA, Anderson DA. The intra‐articular effect of various postoperative managements following knee ligament repair: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;150:271‐276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Jaeger GH, Wosar MA, Marcellin‐Little DJ, Lascelles BD. Use of hinged transarticular external fixation for adjunctive joint stabilization in dogs and cats: 14 cases (1999–2003). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005;227(4):586‐591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Garrett WE, Seaber AV, Boswick J, Urbaniak JR, Goldner JL. Recovery of skeletal muscle after laceration and repair. J Hand Surg Am. 1984;9:683–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Patrice MM. The emerging role of veterinary orthotics and prosthetics (V‐OP) in small animal rehabilitation and pain management. Topics in Compan An Med. 2014;29:10‐19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Rupp S, Tempelhof S, Fritsch E. Ultrasound of the Achilles tendon after surgical repair: morphology and function. Br J Radiol. 2014;68(809):454‐458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. van Schie H, Bakker EM, Cherdchutham W, Jonker AM, van de Lest C, van Weeren PR. Monitoring of the repair process of surgically created lesions in equine superficial digital flexor tendons by use of computerized ultrasonography. Am J Vet Res. 2009;70(1):37‐48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Kainberger FM, Engel A, Barton P, Huebsch P, Neuhold A, Salomonowitz E. Injury of Achilles tendon: diagnosis with sonography. Am J Res. 1990;155:1031‐1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES