Skip to main content
The Oncologist logoLink to The Oncologist
. 2019 Apr 30;24(8):1031–e612. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0285

Concurrent EGFR‐TKI and Thoracic Radiotherapy as First‐Line Treatment for Stage IV Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Active Mutations

LinPeng Zheng a, Yanmei Wang c, Zihan Xu a, Qiao Yang a, Guangkuo Zhu a, Xing‐Yun Liao a, Xiewan Chen b, Bo Zhu a,*, Yuzhong Duan a,*, Jianguo Sun a,*
PMCID: PMC6693693  PMID: 31040256

Abstract

Lessons Learned.

  • This single‐arm, phase II study shows that concurrent EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus thoracic radiotherapy as the first‐line treatment for stage IV non‐small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR active mutations provides long‐term control for the primary lung lesion, and 1‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) rate and median PFS are numerically higher than those of the erlotinib monotherapy.

  • Serious adverse events are acceptable, although grade >3 radiation pneumonitis occurred in 20% of patients.

Background.

Studies show effective local control by EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with radiotherapy at metastatic sites in advanced lung cancer harboring EGFR active mutations. Salvage local radiotherapy is associated with prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS) in local disease during EGFR‐TKI treatment. However, no prospective study has been reported on concurrent EGFR‐TKI and radiotherapy for primary lung lesions. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of first‐line EGFR‐TKI combined with thoracic radiotherapy in treating stage IV non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR active mutations.

Methods.

We conducted a single‐arm, phase II clinical trial. Each patient received EGFR‐TKI (erlotinib 150 mg or gefitinib 250 mg per day) plus thoracic radiotherapy (54–60 Gy/27–30 F/5.5–6 w) within 2 weeks of beginning EGFR‐TKI therapy until either disease progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs) appeared.

Results.

From January 2015 to March 2018, 401 patients were screened, and 10 patients (5 male and 5 female) were eligible. These patients had a median age of 55 years (40–75) and median follow‐up of 19.8 months (5.8–34). The 1‐year PFS rate was 57.1%, median PFS was 13 months, and median time to progression of irradiated lesion (iTTP) was 20.5 months. Objective response rate (ORR), was 50% and disease control rate (DCR) was 100%. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were radiation pneumonitis (20%) and rash (10%). One patient died after rejecting treatment for pneumonitis. The others received a full, systematic course of glucocorticoid therapy. Pneumonitis was all well controlled and did not relapse.

Conclusion.

Concurrent EGFR‐TKI plus thoracic radiotherapy as the first‐line treatment for stage IV NSCLC harboring EGFR active mutations shows a long‐term control of primary lung lesion. The 1‐year PFS rate and median PFS of this combined therapy are numerically higher than those of the erlotinib monotherapy. The risk of serious adverse events is acceptable.

Discussion

Our previous study revealed that local radiation was associated with prolonged PFS in patients with EGFR‐mutant advanced lung cancer who experienced local progression. It was also reported that EGFR‐TKI could increase radiosensitivity and that radiotherapy could reduce EGFR‐TKI resistance. Therefore, EGFR‐TKI plus thoracic radiotherapy could be a promising strategy for treating patients with advanced NSCLC.

We conducted this prospective study to explore the efficacy and safety of concurrent EGFR‐TKI plus thoracic radiotherapy as the first‐line treatment for stage IV limited metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations (no more than ten distant lesions). The primary endpoint was 1‐year PFS rate. In the ENSURE study, the 1‐year PFS rate of patients treated with erlotinib monotherapy was 43%, and the median PFS was 11.0 months. In the current study, the estimated 1‐year PFS rate was 60%. Considering a 20% dropout rate and one‐sided α = .1, β = .2, a sample size of 47 patients was needed according to the Freedman rule from the Contract Research Organization of Brightech (Chengdu, China).

A total of 401 patients with NSCLC were screened. Ultimately, ten patients (five males and five females) with a median age of 55 (40–75) years were eligible. Tumors in four patients displayed an exon 21 L858R mutation, and six had exon 19 deletion. All patients had good baseline performance status (PS, 0–1). One patient received gefitinib, and the others received erlotinib. The radiotherapy design was 54–60 Gy/27–30 F/5.5–6 w. The median radiation dose to both lungs in all the recruited cases was as follows: normal bilateral lung volume receiving at least 20 Gy, 12% ± 4%; mean lung dose, 5.25 ± 3.75 Gy. All the patients completed radiotherapy. By October 8, 2018, the median follow‐up time for all ten patients was 19.8 months (5.8–34.0 months). By the last follow‐up, five patients were alive. One‐year PFS was 57.1%. Kaplan‐Meier analysis showed that the median PFS was 13.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.9–21.1 months), and the median iTTP was 20.5 months (95% CI, 10.6–25.5 months). Five patients were assessed as PR (50%), five as SD (50%), and no patient as PD. ORR was 50%, and DCR was 100%. Rash (5/10), radiation pneumonitis (4/10), and diarrhea (2/10) were the most common adverse events. Treatment‐related grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis occurred at a rate of 20% (2/10) and rash at 10% (1/10). Radiation pneumonitis occurred at an average 40 days after radiation. One patient died after rejecting any treatment for pneumonitis, whereas the others recovered after a full, systematic course of glucocorticoid therapy.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to focus on the efficacy and safety of concurrent EGFR‐TKI and thoracic radiotherapy as the first‐line treatment for stage IV NSCLC harboring EGFR active mutations. Our study found that combined therapy can achieve long‐term control of the primary lung lesion. The 1‐year PFS rate and median PFS of this combined therapy are numerically higher than those of erlotinib monotherapy. The risk of serious adverse events is acceptable.

Trial Information

Disease

Lung cancer – NSCLC

Stage of Disease/Treatment

Primary

Prior Therapy

None

Type of Study ‐ 1

Phase II

Type of Study ‐ 2

Single arm

Primary Endpoint

1‐year progression‐free survival rate

Secondary Endpoint

Progression‐free survival

Secondary Endpoint

Overall survival

Secondary Endpoint

Safety

Secondary Endpoint

Overall response rate

Secondary Endpoint

Time to progression of irradiated lesion

Additional Details of Endpoints or Study Design

The study recruited patients with pathologically confirmed stage IV NSCLC harboring active EGFR mutations. The patients should not have received previous systemic therapy or treatment with any other investigational agents or have participated in any other clinical trials. Patients between the ages of 18 and 75, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0~2, with no more than ten metastatic lesions, no brain metastases or serious functional damage of important organs were eligible. All patients signed an informed consent document after careful discussion of risk and potential benefit. Radiation therapy had to begin within 2 weeks of EGFR‐TKI therapy.

Investigator's Analysis

Active and should be pursued further

Drug Information

Drug 1

Generic/Working Name

Erlotinib

Drug Class

EGFR

Dose

150 milligrams (mg) per flat dose

Route

Oral (p.o.)

Schedule of Administration

150 mg per day until either disease progression or intolerable AEs appeared.

Drug 2

Generic/Working Name

Gefitinib

Drug Class

EGFR

Dose

250 milligrams (mg) per flat dose

Route

Oral (p.o.)

Schedule of Administration

250 mg per day until either disease progression or intolerable AEs appeared.

Patient Characteristics

Number of Patients, Male

5

Number of Patients, Female

5

Stage

Stage IV

Age

Median (range): 55 (40–75) years

Number of Prior Systemic Therapies

Median (range): 0

Performance Status: ECOG

0 — 6

1 — 4

2 — 0

3 — 0

Unknown — 0

Cancer Types or Histologic Subtypes

Lung adenocarcinoma, 10

Primary Assessment Method

Title

New assessment

Number of Patients Screened

401

Number of Patients Enrolled

10

Number of Patients Evaluable for Toxicity

10

Number of Patients Evaluated for Efficacy

10

Evaluation Method

RECIST version 1.1

Response Assessment CR

n = 0 (0%)

Response Assessment PR

n = 5 (50%)

Response Assessment SD

n = 5 (50%)

Response Assessment PD

n = 0 (0%)

(Median) Duration Assessments PFS

13 months; CI, 8.4–15.4

Outcome Notes

From January 2015 to March 2018, 401 patients were screened, and 10 patients (5 male and 5 female) were eligible with a median age of 55 years (40–75) and median follow‐up of 19.8 months (5.8–34). The 1‐year PFS rate was 57.1%; median PFS was 13 months, and median iTTP was 20.5 months. ORR was 50%, and DCR was 100%. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were radiation pneumonia (20%) and rash (10%).

Adverse Events

image

Adverse Events Legend

Rash (5/10), radiation pneumonitis (4/10), and diarrhea (2/10) were the most common adverse events.

Abbreviation: NC/NA, no change from baseline/no adverse event.

Serious Adverse Events

image

Serious Adverse Events Legend

Treatment‐related grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis occurred at a rate of 20% (2/10), and rash occurred in 10% (1/10).

Assessment, Analysis, and Discussion

Completion

Study terminated before completion

Investigator's Assessment

Active and should be pursued further

Most patients receiving first‐generation EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) undergo disease progression after 8.4 to 13.1 months of treatment, and the majority have local progression [1], [2], [3]. It has been reported that EGFR‐TKI could increase radiosensitivity and that radiotherapy could reduce EGFR‐TKI resistance [4], [5]. Moreover, several studies showed effective local control by EGFR‐TKI combined with radiotherapy in metastatic sites of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR active mutations [6], [7], [8]. Our previous study also revealed that local radiation prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR‐mutant advanced lung cancer who acquired local progression after EGFR‐TKI therapy [9]. Therefore, we hypothesized that there would be an improved efficacy in concurrent EGFR‐TKI and local radiotherapy. No prospective study of concurrent EGFR‐TKI and radiotherapy for primary lung cancer has yet been reported. Thus, we conducted this single‐arm phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of EGFR‐TKI with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in newly diagnosed stage IV NSCLC harboring EGFR active mutations

From January 2015 to March 2018, a total of 401 patients with NSCLC were screened, including sequencing tumors to determine mutation status. EGFR mutation analysis was performed by staff members from Pathology Department of our hospital during screening using the SuperARMS assay (AmoyDx, Xiamen, China). Finally, ten eligible patients (five male and five female) with a median age of 55 (40–75) years were enrolled (Fig. 1). The basic clinical characteristics of these ten cases are listed in Table 1. Nine patients had bone metastases, eight had lymph nodes metastases, and three had lung metastases. The trial was closed prematurely because of the low acceptance of thoracic radiotherapy plus EGFR‐TKI treatment in patients.

Figure 1.

image

Progression‐free survival.

Abbreviation: PFS, progression‐free survival.

Table 1. Basic clinical characteristics.

image

Abbreviations: PR; partial response; PS, performance status; SD; stable disease; TKI; tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

One patient received gefitinib, and the others received erlotinib. EGFR‐TKI was used until disease progression or intolerability of adverse events appeared. The plan of radiotherapy was 54–60 Gy/27–30 F/5.5–6 w. There was no limit to the maximum size of primary tumor, but normal bilateral lung volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20) was strictly controlled to be less than 20%. Usually, primary tumors smaller than 7 cm in diameter were suitable to deliver concurrent EGFR‐TKI plus thoracic radiotherapy. At the last follow‐up on October 8, 2018, five patients were alive. We compared our results with those in the ENSURE study, which randomized first‐line erlotinib against gemcitabine/cisplatin in stage IIIB/IV EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC. Concurrent EGFR‐TKI plus thoracic radiotherapy as the 1st‐line treatment for patients with stage IV NSCLC harboring EGFR active mutations showed numerically higher 1‐ year PFS rate (57.1% vs. 43%) and median PFS (13.0 vs. 11.0 months; Fig. 2). In addition to stage IV disease, patients with IIIB disease were enrolled into the ENSURE study, which may contribute to a longer PFS and therefore minimize the gain by the addition of radiation therapy. A spider plot was used to show the dynamic changes in the maximum diameter of primary lung lesion. Five patients were assessed as having partial response (50%), five as having stable disease (50%), and no patient as having progressive disease or complete response. Compared with the ENSURE study, there was no significant difference in objective response rate (50% vs. 62.7%, p = .43) or disease control rate (100% vs. 89.1%, p = .27; Fig. 3). Median time to progression of irradiated lesion in the current study was 20.5 months (95% confidence interval, 10.6–25.5 months). Similarly, Wang et al. [10] found that EGFR‐TKI concurrent with thoracic radiotherapy in treating stage IIIB/IV NSCLC had a local control rate of 96% for thoracic tumor, with 1‐year PFS rate of 42%. However, only one patient's EGFR mutation status was confirmed in that study.

Figure 2.

image

Tumor response. (A): Spider plot of dynamic changes in the maximum diameter of the tumor. (B): Best tumor response. (C): Compared with the ENSURE study, there was no significant difference in ORR (50%, p = .43) or DCR (100%, p = .27). ORR = CR + PR; local control rate = CR + PR + SD.

Abbreviations: CR, complete response; DCR, disease control rate; ORR, objective response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; TRT, thoracic radiotherapy.

Figure 3.

image

Flow chart of patient enrollment process.

Abbreviations: NSCLC, non‐small cell lung cancer; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

In the current study, rash (5/10), radiation pneumonitis (4/10) and diarrhea (2/10) were the most common adverse events at any grade. The incidence of treatment‐related grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis and rash was 20% (2/10) and 10% (1/10), respectively (Table 2). Radiation pneumonitis occurred at an average 40 days after radiation. Two patients were assessed as grade 2 adverse events and one as grade 3 adverse event. One patient (grade 5) died, rejecting any treatment, whereas the others recovered after receiving a full, systematic course of glucocorticoid therapy. Previous studies also reported that the risk of radiation pneumonitis reached 22–32% during concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, consistent with the current trial [11], [12]. The mean lung dose (MLD) and V20 were the two most important parameters of radiation pneumonitis [13], [14], which were strictly controlled in our study (MLD = 5.25 ± 3.75 Gy, V20 = 12 ± 4%). The incidence of rash in the current study was not higher than that in the study using erlotinib monotherapy [15]. Thus, the risk of serious adverse events is acceptable in concurrent EGFR‐TKI and radiotherapy. Yoshida et al. [16] reported that lung was the most frequent site of treatment failures during EGFR‐TKI treatment. Chen et al. [17] investigated the recurrence patterns of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer of 318 patients treated with gefitinib and found that lung (62.34%) was the most common initial failure site. And patients with failure in the lung had a shorter median PFS time. Wang et al. [10] found that EGFR‐TKI concurrent with thoracic radiotherapy in treating stage IIIB/IV NSCLC had a local control rate of 96% for thoracic tumor. We thus combined thoracic radiotherapy to control the primary lung lesions, finding that the median time to progression of irradiated lesion reached 20.5 months.

Table 2. Adverse events.

image

In conclusion, concurrent EGFR‐TKI plus thoracic radiotherapy as the first‐line treatment for stage IV NSCLC harboring EGFR active mutations shows a long‐term control of primary lung lesion. The 1‐year PFS rate and median PFS of this combined therapy are numerically higher than those of erlotinib monotherapy. The risk of serious adverse events is acceptable. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with a larger sample size is needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of first‐line concurrent EGFR‐TKI and thoracic radiotherapy for stage IV NSCLC.

Figure and Tables

Acknowledgments

We thank The National Key Research and Development Project, 2016YFC0106400; Clinical Innovation Foundation of Army Medical University, yclkt‐201408, and Wu Jieping Medical Foundation, 320.6799.15037. We thank the patients and investigators who were involved in this study. We also thank Brightech company (Chengdu, China) for being the Contract Research Organization, Zong‐Ren Xu (The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China) for generating charts, and Blake Wassom (University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX) for English language editing.

Footnotes

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02353741

Sponsor: Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing

Principal Investigators: Jianguo Sun, Yuzhong Duan, Bo Zhu

IRB Approved: Yes

Contributor Information

Bo Zhu, Email: bo.zhu@tmmu.edu.cn.

Yuzhong Duan, Email: duanyuzhong@sina.com.

Jianguo Sun, Email: sunjg09@aliyun.com.

Disclosures

The authors indicated no financial relationships.

References

  • 1.Wu YL, Zhou C, Liam CK et al. First‐line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced EGFR mutation‐positive non‐small‐cell lung cancer: Analyses from the phase III, randomized, open‐label, ENSURE study. Ann Oncol 2015;26:1883–1889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first‐line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation‐positive non‐small‐cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG‐0802): A multicentre, open‐label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:735–742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goto K, Nishio M, Yamamoto N et al. A prospective, phase II, open‐label study (JO22903) of first‐line erlotinib in Japanese patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation‐positive advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer 2013;82:109–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shintani S, Li C, Mihara M et al. Enhancement of tumor radioresponse by combined treatment with gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839), an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is accompanied by inhibition of DNA damage repair and cell growth in oral cancer. Int J Cancer 2003;107:1030–1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsai YC, Ho PY, Tzen KY et al. Synergistic blockade of EGFR and HER2 by new‐generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor enhances radiation effect in bladder cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14:810–820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu Y, Deng L, Zhou X et al. Concurrent brain radiotherapy and EGFR‐TKI may improve intracranial metastases control in non‐small cell lung cancer and have survival benefit in patients with low DS‐GPA score. Oncotarget 2017;8:111309–111317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jiang T, Min W, Li Y et al. Radiotherapy plus EGFR TKIs in non‐small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: An update meta‐analysis. Cancer Med 2016;5:1055–1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xu Q, Zhou F, Liu H et al. Consolidative local ablative therapy improves the survival of patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR activating mutation treated with first‐line EGFR‐TKIs. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13:1383–1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang Y, Li Y, Xia L et al. Continued EGFR‐TKI with concurrent radiotherapy to improve time to progression (TTP) in patients with locally progressive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after front‐line EGFR‐TKI treatment. Clin Transl Oncol 2018;20:366–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang J, Xia TY, Wang YJ et al. Prospective study of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors concurrent with individualized radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;81:e59–e65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang S, Liao Z, Wei X et al. Analysis of clinical and dosimetric factors associated with treatment‐related pneumonitis (TRP) in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with concurrent chemotherapy and three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D‐CRT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;66:1399–1407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Verma V, Simone CN, Werner‐Wasik M. Acute and late toxicities of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally‐advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2017;9:120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hernando ML, Marks LB, Bentel GC et al. Radiation‐induced pulmonary toxicity: A dose‐volume histogram analysis in 201 patients with lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;51:650–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Graham MV, Purdy JA, Emami B et al. Clinical dose‐volume histogram analysis for pneumonitis after 3D treatment for non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;45:323–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Takeda M, Okamoto I, Nakagawa K. Pooled safety analysis of EGFR‐TKI treatment for EGFR mutation‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2015;88:74–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yoshida T, Yoh K, Niho S et al. RECIST progression patterns during EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer patients harboring an EGFR mutation. Lung Cancer 2015;90:477–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen MZ, Zhong W, Zhang L et al. Recurrence patterns of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib. Chin Med J (Engl) 2013;126:2235–2241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Oncologist are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES