Skip to main content
Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences logoLink to Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
. 2017 Jan 13;12(4):360–363. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2016.11.006

Spectrophotometric determination of the total phenolic content, spectral and fluorescence study of the herbal Unani drug Gul-e-Zoofa (Nepeta bracteata Benth)

Nazish Siddiqui 1,, Abdur Rauf 1, Abdul Latif 1, Zeenat Mahmood 1
PMCID: PMC6694887  PMID: 31435264

Abstract

Objectives

This study quantitatively determined the total phenolic contents in ethanolic and aqueous extracts of Gul-e-Zoofa (flowers of Nepeta bracteata Benth) using a spectrophotometric method. We also performed a spectral study (UV and IR) of the ethanolic extract and a fluorescence study of the powdered drug and successive extracts to identify and characterize the genuine herbal drug, which has not been previously performed.

Methods

The total phenolic content was determined quantitatively using the Folin Ciocalteu reagent, with Gallic acid as the standard. The fluorescence characteristics of the powdered drug and successive extracts with and without chemical treatment during the day and under a UV light were recorded. The UV and IR spectra of the alcoholic extract of Gul-e-Zoofa were recorded using a spectrometer.

Results

The total phenolic contents of the alcoholic and aqueous extracts were found to be 326.28 and 319.14 mg/g of the Gallic acid equivalent (GAE), respectively. The wavelength of the maximum absorption in the UV spectrum was 320 nm, and the characteristic frequencies in the IR spectrum were 3465.31, 3220.07, 2927.3, 2856.1, 1709.07, 1610.19, 1404.5, 1250.2, 1056.42, 823.04, 775.58, 577.81, and 463.10 cm−1. The fluorescence characteristics of the powdered drug were also observed.

Conclusion

This spectral and fluorescence study of the drug will be helpful for confirming the identity and purity of the genuine drug. The total phenolic content will be helpful for developing new drugs and standardizing the drug. The presence of a high total phenolic content shows that the flowers of N. bracteata Benth may possess antioxidant properties, which could lead to a new field of research in the future.

Keywords: Fluorescence study, Gul-e-Zoofa, Spectrophotometer, Total phenolic content, UV and IR spectral study

Introduction

Gul-e-Zoofa belongs to the Lamiaceae family and is indigenous to Iran.1, 2, 3, 4 It is a brightly coloured shrub or sub shrub that ranges from 30 to 100 cm in height. It is found in the western temperate Himalayas from Garhwal to Kashmir at an altitude of 1800–2400 m. The leaves are ovate-obtuse. During summer, the plant produces bunches of pink, blue and, more rarely, white fragrant flowers. The flowers are bisexual, zygomorphic, rarely sub-actinomorphic and bracteolate.5, 6 The flower is described as a stimulant, demulcent, expectorant and resolvent and an effective emmenagogue, cleanser, laxative, antihelminthic, anti-inflammatory and diaphoretic drug.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 It has been claimed that the plant material can cure chronic cough, chronic bronchitis,15 sore throat, asthma,16 tooth aches, uterine or vesicle infections, and indurations of the liver or spleen.5 It has been medicinally used for pneumonia, influenza, diphtheria, eye ailments, diarrhoea and sciatica.9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17 Gul-e-Zoofa is easily available at affordable prices; thus, the physicochemical standardization of this drug has already been performed in our previous work in which preliminary phytochemical screening showed the presence of carbohydrates, flavonoids, glycosides, proteins, phenols and sterols.18 According to the literature, there is a positive relationship between total phenolic content and antioxidant potential of a compound.19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 Thus, due to this and the medicinal importance of Nepeta bracteata Benth, to continue our previous work, the current study was undertaken to estimate the total phenolic content of the ethanolic and aqueous extracts of N. bracteata flowers with expected antioxidant activity. Additionally, a UV, IR, and fluorescence study of the drug were performed to provide a standard for the correct identification, authentication and quality of the genuine drug.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

The flowers of Gul-e-Zoofa (N. bracteata Benth) were procured from the local market in Baradari, Aligarh, UP, India, and identified by the National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources (NISCAIR) (Reference No. NISCAIR/RHMD/Consult/2011-12/1931/23).

Preparation of the extract

The aqueous and alcoholic extracts of the drug were obtained by refluxing 10 g of powdered drug with 150 ml of distilled water and absolute alcohol for six hours and then filtered and freeze dried in a lyophilizer. Stock solutions were prepared at a concentration of 1 gm/100 ml and subjected to spectrophotometric measurements to determine the total phenolic content.

Determination of the total phenolic content

The total phenolic contents of the aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Gul-e-Zoofa were estimated using the Folin Ciocalteau reagent as described by Singleton and Rossi.25 The calibration curve (Figure 1) was plotted by mixing 1 ml aliquots of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400 and 450 μg/ml Gallic acid solutions with 5.0 ml of Folin Ciocalteu reagent (diluted tenfold) and 4.0 ml of sodium carbonate solution (75 g/l). The absorbance was measured after 30 min at 765 nm. For both of the aqueous and ethanolic extracts (1 gm/100 ml), 1 ml was mixed separately with the same reagents, as performed for constructing the calibration curve. After 1 h, the absorbance was measured to determine the total phenolic contents in both extracts separately using the formula,

C = C1 × V/m

where C = total phenolic content in mg/g, in GAE (Gallic acid equivalent), C1 = concentration of Gallic acid established from the calibration curve in mg/ml, V = volume of extract in ml, and m = the weight of the plant extract in g.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Standard curve of Gallic acid.

UV spectral study

The UV spectrum of the alcoholic extract was recorded using a Hitachi Ratio Beam U-1800 spectrometer, EVISA. The UV spectrum of the alcoholic extract of Gul-e-Zoofa was plotted according to the light absorbed as a function of the wavelength, and the drug showed a maximum absorption (λmax), which is characteristic of a particular drug and aids the identification of herbal drugs.

IR spectral study

The IR spectrum of the alcoholic extract of Gul-e-Zoofa was determined in Nujol with a Perkin Elmer 1600 FTIR spectrometer, Spectro lab. The IR spectrum of the drug was recorded, and the major bands were noted.26

Fluorescence study

The fluorescence characteristics of the powdered drug and successive extracts with and without chemical treatment under day light and under UV light at short (253 nm) and long (360 nm) wavelengths27, 28, 29 were observed on UV Fluorescence Analysis Cabinet, S.M. Scientific Industries Ltd, India according to the method described by Kokoski et al.30, 31

Results

Total phenolic content

Phytochemical screening of the ethanolic and aqueous extracts of Gul-e-Zoofa was conducted, and both the extracts showed the presence of phenolics.18 The total phenolic contents were determined using the Folin Ciocalteu method in terms of the Gallic acid equivalent (GAE) in mg/g of the extract. The total phenolic content was calculated with the help of the graph shown in Figure 1, and the standard curve equation was y = 0.007x + 0.186, where R2 = 0.992. The total phenolic contents (Gallic acid equivalents, mg/g) in the ethanolic and aqueous extracts were calculated to be 326.28 and 319.14 mg/g, respectively.

UV spectral study

The UV spectrum of the ethanolic extract of Gul-e-Zoofa was plotted in terms of the light absorbed as a function of the wavelength, and the drug showed a characteristic wavelength for the maximum absorption (λmax) at 320 nm (Table 1).

Table 1.

UV and IR spectral data of the ethanolic extract of Nepeta bracteata Benth.

1. In UV spectral region (λmax) 320 nm
2. In IR spectral region (ν, cm−1) (3465.31), (3220.07), (2927.36), (2856.16), (1709.07), (1610.19), (1404.50), (1250.24), (1056.42), (823.04), (775.58), (577.81), (463.10)

IR spectral study

FTIR spectral analysis confirmed the presence of various chemical functional groups in the ethanolic extract. The major bands were observed at 3465.31, 3220.07, 2927.3, 2856.1, 1709.07, 1610.19, 1404.5, 1250.2, 1056.42, 823.04, 775.58, 577.81, and 463.10 cm−1 (Table 1).

Fluorescence study

The powder and successive extracts of N. bracteata Benth were subjected to fluorescence analysis using different reagents. The behaviour of the drug was observed under day light, UV light at 254 nm and UV light at 360 nm as per the standard procedure, and the results are reported Table 2, Table 3.

Table 2.

Fluorescence analysis of the powdered drug (Nepeta bracteata Benth) with various chemical reagents.

S. No Chemical reagent Day light Short UV Long UV
1 Conc. sulphuric acid Brown Black Black
2 Conc. hydrochloric acid Dark brown Dark green Dark blue
3 Conc. nitric acid Orange Light green Dark blue
4 Iodine solution (2%) Brown Dark green Black
5 Ferric chloride solution (5%) Brownish green black Dark green
6 Sodium hydroxide solution (10%) Yellow Grey Black
7 Acetic acid + Sulphuric acid Dark brown Dark green Bluish black
8 10% NaOH+ CuSO4 sol. Bluish green Blackish green Green
9 10% NaOH+ Lead acetate sol. Yellowish white Grey Off white
10 Acetic acid Straw colour Light green Dark green

Table 3.

Fluorescence analysis of successive extracts of Nepeta bracteata Benth.

S. No Extracts Day light Short UV Long UV
1 Pet. ether Green Dull green Green
2 Diethyl ether Straw colour Purple Light green
3 Ethyl acetate Transparent Transparent Transparent
4 Chloroform Transparent Transparent Transparent
5 Alcohol Transparent Transparent Transparent
6 Water Transparent Transparent Transparent

Discussion

Currently, plant materials rich in phenolics are used in the food industry because they decrease the oxidative degradation of lipids and maintain the quality and nutritional value of food.32 Phenolic compounds in plants are also very important because their groups have scavenging abilities. For Gul-e-Zoofa, we determined that the total phenolic content was slightly more in the ethanolic extract compared to the aqueous extract. Thus, Gul-e-Zoofa could be a potent source of natural antioxidants.

There are a number of parameters given by WHO and AYUSH to check for genuine drugs. Here, we have conducted a UV and IR spectral study to standardize N. bracteata Benth. Every drug has its own characteristic wavelength for the maximum absorption (λmax) in the UV spectrum and characteristic frequencies in the IR spectrum, and the finger print region of the IR spectrum is especially different for each drug species and even for different extracts of the same species. Thus, this UV and IR spectral study of the alcoholic and aqueous extracts will be helpful for authentication and identification of the genuine drug of N. bracteata Benth (Table 1).

The powdered drug and successive extracts of the drug were screened qualitatively under day light and under a mercury vapour lamp at UV wavelengths of 254 and 360 nm to determine the fluorescence characteristics using different acids and reagents. The results are provided in Table 2, Table 3, which provide further information for identification of this herbal drug.

Conclusion

This spectral study of N. bracteata Benth will be helpful for confirming the identity and purity of the drug. By observing the powder and extracts under UV light, contamination may be detected. The colour of the drug in powder form and upon treatment with different chemicals under day light and UV light is a helpful diagnostic feature for the identification of the genuine drug. The total phenolic content will be helpful for developing new drugs and standardization of the drug. In addition, our results show that the flowers of N. bracteata Benth may possess antioxidant properties, which could lead to a new field of research in future.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Authors' contributions

The design of the study, experiments, interpretation of the data, writing of the paper, and all correspondences and revisions were performed by NS. The literature review and experiments were performed by ZM under the guidance and supervision of NS. The drug was suggested by AL, and the section related to Unani medicine was examined by AL and AR.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the DRS-I (UGC) programme of the Department of Ilmul Advia (3-55/2011(SAP-II)) for providing financial assistance for the study.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Taibah University.

References

  • 1.Hamedi S.H. Determination of the scientific name of Zoufa: a traditional Persian medicinal plant. Trad Integr Med. 2016;1(2):79–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Amin G.R. Iranian Ministry of Health Publications; Tehran: 1991. Popular medicinal plants of Iran; pp. 40–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Joharchi M.R., Amiri S.M. Taxonomic evaluation of misidentification of crude herbal drugs marketed in Iran. Avicenna J Phytomed. 2012;2:105–112. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Faraz M., Nickavar B., Tehrani H.H. Essential oil analysis of Nepetacrispa and N. menthoides from Iran. Iran J Pharm Sci. 2009;5(1):43–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kiritikar K.R., Basu B.D. International Book Distributers; Dehradun, India: 1990. Indian medicinal plants. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Avicenna . National Printing Co; Aligarh: 1956. Kitabul Adviyatul Qalbia. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bhatt J., Qudsia N., Aslam M., Ahmad S., Tanveer S. Pharmacognostical and phytochemical evaluation of Nepetabractaeta and hptlc finger printing of its extracts. Int J Univers Pharm Life Sci. 2012;2(1):147–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Said H.M. Hamdard Foundation Pakistan; 1996. Medicinal herbs; pp. 29–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nadkarni A.K. Popular book Depot; India Bombay: 1954. Indian materia medica; p. 673. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Baitar Ibn. 1999. Al Jamiul Mufradatul Adviawal Aghzia; p. 185. (Urdu) [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ibn-e-Sina . Matba Nawal Kishore; Lucknow: 1887. Al Qanoon Fit Tibb; p. 288. (Urdu translation by Ghulam Hussain Kantoori) [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hakeem . Idara Taraqqi Urdu Publication; Lucknow, India: 1893. Bustanul Mufradat; p. 188. (Urdu translation) [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lubhaya R.H. Goswami Kutub Khana Gali Qasim; Delhi: 1977. Goswami, Bayanul Advia; pp. 303–304. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ghani M.N. Sheikh Mohd Bashir and Sons; Urdu Bazar Lahore, Pakistan: 1921. Khazainul Advia; p. 768. (Urdu translation) [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vohora S.B. Unanijoshandah drugs for common cold, catarrh, cough, and associated fevers. J Ethnopharmacol. 1986;16:201. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(86)90090-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang J., Li F., Pang N., Tian G., Jiang M., Zhang H.P., Ding J.B. Inhibition of asthma in OVA sensitized mice model by a traditional Uygur herb Nepeta bracteata Benth. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2016;2016:8. doi: 10.1155/2016/5769897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ahmadi B.B., Bahmani M., Tajeddini P., Naghdi N., Kopaei M.R. An ethno-medicinal study of medicinal plants used for the treatment of diabetes. J Nephropathol. 2016;5(1):44–50. doi: 10.15171/jnp.2016.08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Latif A., Zeenat, Siddiqui N., Rauf A. Physiochemical standardization of market sample of Gul-e-Zoofa. Int J Drug Formul Res. 2013;83 [online] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rahman K. Studies on free radicals, antioxidants, and co-factors. Clin Interv Aging. 2007;2(2):219–236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Piluzza G., Bullitta S. Correlations between phenolic content and antioxidant properties in twenty-four plant species of traditional ethnoveterinary use in the Mediterranean area. Pharm Boil. 2011;49(3):240. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2010.501083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fecka I., Raj D., Krauze-Baranowska M. Quantitative determination of four water-soluble compounds in herbal drug from Lamiaceae using different chromatographic techniques. Chromatographia. 2007;66:87–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Saeed L.N., Khan M.R., Shabbir M. Antioxidant activity, total phenolic and total flavonoid contents of whole plant extracts Toriliseptophylla. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012;12:221. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kumar S., Sandhir R., Ojha S. Evaluation of antioxidant activity and total phenol in different varieties of Lantana camara leaves. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:560. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Esmaeili A.K., Taha R.M., Mohajer S., Banisalam B. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic and flavonoid content of various solvent extracts from in vivo and in vitro grown Trifolium pratense L. (Red Clover) BioMed Res Int. 2015:11. doi: 10.1155/2015/643285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Singleton V.L., Rossi J.A. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic. 1965;16:144–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jain M.K., Sharma S.C. Vishal Publishing Co; Jalandhar, India: 2004. Modern organic chemistry; pp. 1036–1099. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kumar D., Kumar K., Kumar S., Kumar T., Kumar A., Prakash O. Pharmacognostic evaluation of leaf and root bark of Olopteleaintegrifolia Roxb. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012:169–175. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60036-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arya V., Gupta R., Gupta V.K. Pharmacognostic and phytochemical investigations on PyruspashiaBuch.-Ham.ex D. Don stem bark. J Chem Pharm Res. 2011;3(3):447–456. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ansari S.H. 1st ed. Birla Publications Pvt. Ltd; New Delhi: 2007. Essential of pharmacognosy. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kokoski C.J., Kokoski R.J., Sharma P.J. Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs under ultra-violet radiation. J Am Pharm Assoc. 1958;47:715–717. doi: 10.1002/jps.3030471010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chase C.R., Pratt R.J. Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs with particular reference to development of a system of identification. J Am Pharm Assoc. 1949;38:324–331. doi: 10.1002/jps.3030380612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kahkonen M.P., Hopia A.I., Vuorela H.J., Rauha J.P., Pihlaja K., Kujala T.S., Heinonen M. Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem. 1999;47:3954–3962. doi: 10.1021/jf990146l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Taibah University

RESOURCES