Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Aug 15;9:11907. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48058-8

Development of anchialine cave habitats and karst subterranean estuaries since the last ice age

Peter J van Hengstum 1,2,, Jacque N Cresswell 3, Glenn A Milne 4, Thomas M Iliffe 3
PMCID: PMC6695480  PMID: 31417111

Abstract

Extinction models generally predict that coastal and neritic fauna benefit during sea-level rise (transgression), whereas sea-level retreat (regression) diminishes their suitable habitat area and promotes evolutionary bottlenecks. Sea-level change also impacts terrestrial island biogeography, but it remains a challenge to evidence how sea-level rise impacts aquatic island biogeography, especially in the subterranean realm. Karst subterranean estuaries (KSEs) occur globally on carbonate islands and platforms, and they are populated by globally-dispersed, ancient ecosystems (termed anchialine). Anchialine fauna currently exhibit a disjunct biogeography that cannot be completely explained by plate tectonic-imposed vicariance. Here we provide evidence that anchialine ecosystems can experience evolutionary bottlenecks caused by habitat reduction during transgression events. Marine-adapted anchialine fauna benefit from habitat expansion during transgressions, but fresh- and brackish-adapted fauna must emigrate, evolve to accommodate local habitat changes, or are regionally eliminated. Phanerozoic transgressions relative to long-term changes in subsidence and relief of regional lithology must be considered for explaining biogeography, evolution, local extirpation or complete extinction of anchialine fauna. Despite the omission of this entire category of environments and animals in climate change risk assessments, the results indicate that anchialine fauna on low-lying islands and platforms that depend upon meteoric groundwater are vulnerable to habitat changes caused by 21st century sea-level rise.

Subject terms: Ocean sciences, Biogeography, Speciation

Introduction

Sea-level oscillations during the last 500 million years (Phanerozic Eon) have impacted marine and terrestrial island biogeography and evolution by modifying habitat availability and opportunities for organismal gene flow13. It is generally thought that sea-level regressions can reduce the areal extent of coastal and neritic habitats and can cause bottlenecks in the marine realm46, whereas terrestrial island fauna and flora benefit from habitat expansion during regressions710. There is an elevated risk of coastal zone defaunation during the Anthropocene from several human-caused factors like habitat degradation and urbanization11, but disentangling how modest rates of current sea-level rise threatens aquatic island fauna remains difficult to assess12,13.

Worldwide on carbonate islands and platforms, subsurface mixing of rain and marine water creates karst subterranean estuaries (KSEs, Fig. 1). Hydrographically, subterranean estuaries are analogous to other coastal estuaries by having an upper meteoric water mass of varying salinity buoyed on a saline groundwater mass below14,15. These two groundwater bodies often destabilize in the subsurface to create mixing zones1619, and their oceanic discharge impacts global biogeochemical cycles15,20. Only in the late 20th century did technical scuba diving procedures allow human exploration of KSEs through flooded caves, which lead to the discovery of their unique ecosystems, fauna, and habitats that are now prefaced with the adjective ‘anchialine’21. The fossil record2224 and molecular phylogenetics2527 suggests that anchialine fauna and ecosystems persisted through the Phanerozoic and predate angiosperms, and their evolutionary history and biogeochemical functioning can inform early Paleozoic marine ecosystems and invertebrate evolution28,29. Steep environmental gradients create diverse benthic and pelagic sub-habitats in the subsurface from the ocean transecting inland (Fig. 1), such that aquatic coastal caves are often categorized as freshwater caves (meteoric water mass), anchialine caves (both water masses), or marine caves (saline water mass). Despite this segregation, some fauna have a modern distribution and evolutionary history in both water masses (e.g., atyid shrimps30, Hadziidae amphipods)31,32. If these habitats are also linked through allogenic succession, then it is perhaps more appropriate to consider these sub-habitats as part of an anchialine habitat continuum (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Conceptual model of a karst subterranean estuary and the anchialine habitat continuum created by subsurface groundwater variability. Western North Atlantic anchialine fauna (e.g., fish, shrimps, decapods, ostracodes, foraminifera, marine Porifera and Bryozoa) are positioned in their typical habitat in the karst subterranean estuary. Since most caves do not typically poses all potential sub-habitats, this model is based on observations from several localities, including. The Bahamas (★), Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico (●), and Bermuda (♦).

Pioneering cave ecologist Riedl first hypothesized that coastal cave habitats experienced allogenic succession from sea-level forced vertical migration of KSEs, which isolated subterranean aquatic fauna and promoted speciation through vicariance33. This process was subsequently termed the ‘regression model’34,35, which could be caused by either tectonic uplift or isostatic crustal adjustment, and was used to evaluate the disjunct biogeography of continental and coastal subterranean fauna. However, significant barriers exist for developing physical data on developmental succession in anchialine habitats and KSEs, during either regressions or transgressions. Instrumental records (e.g., decadal scale) of hydrographic change in KSEs are unavailable, and speleothems (e.g., stalagmites) do not document environmental change when caves are flooded36,37. Soft-bodied endemic cave fauna have a poor fossil preservation, and picturesque clean cave galleries are created by either poor sedimentation in caves38, or subsurface currents blowing-out cave sediment. Thus far, available sediment records of environmental change in KSEs are either temporally-fragmented39,40, or only document the hydrographic history of an individual groundwater mass38,41,42. These knowledge gaps mean that 21st century marine ecosystem risk assessments have little evidence to support forecasting how sea-level rise will impact global subterranean aquatic island fauna.

Here we present the most complete record yet known of developmental succession in anchialine habitats from concomitant relative sea-level rise and vertical migration of a KSE since the last ice age. The highest quality sediment record yet found in an underwater cave in Bermuda documents the turnover of anchialine habitats, and their sub-habitats, in response to vertical migration of the KSE. Sea-level rise during the early Holocene first flooded cave passages with a meteoric lens, followed by a paleo mixing zone, and finally saline groundwater to create modern marine cave habitats in western Bermuda. Developmental succession of anchialine habitats during a transgression is now resolved, and more significantly, the results illuminate how sea-level rise can force subsurface aquatic island fauna to experience bottleneck events. It is highly likely that this process impacted the evolutionary history of global subsurface aquatic island fauna during the Phanerozoic. More problematically, 21st century island-based marine ecosystem risk assessments are incomplete if the impact of sea-level rise on anchialine ecosystems is not regionally evaluated.

Study Site

Bermuda is a ~35 million year old volcanic seamount in the North Atlantic Ocean capped by Quaternary-aged carbonates (limestone) that were deposited during sea-level highstands, interspaced by paleosols that accumulated during the ice ages43. The limestone units are lithified wind-blown dunes of shallow marine carbonate particles44, which subsequently weathered into a mature karst landscape. Large caves in Bermuda were first dissolved by both rain and groundwater, which then experienced repetitive ceiling collapse events4547. There is no location in Bermuda’s underwater caves where the volcanic-limestone contact is currently exposed.

Bermuda is an ideal location for this study because the flooded caves are an established biodiversity hot spot of endemic anchialine fauna, and the region has served as a model for understanding the evolutionary history of anchialine fauna48. The ~30–80 m thick carbonate cap and its caves49,50 would have been dry during the last glacial maximum (~20,00 years ago) when local relative sea level and groundwater levels were ~120 m lower51. On the Bermuda carbonate platform, deglacial sea-level and groundwater-level rise first flooded topographic depressions to create freshwater lakes, which subsequently converted to marine carbonate lagoons with complete platform flooding52,53. Modern Bermudian flooded caves must have similarly developed by the upward displacement of the KSE, with endemic anchialine fauna migrating into newly created ecospace either from the volcanic lithology below or through oceanic dispersal from elsewhere48. Sediment has accumulated on Bermuda’s cave floors from minimal groundwater current velocities, and most caves in western Bermuda are at the final stage of oceanic flooding with active modern groundwater-seawater circulation.

On the northeastern margin of Harrington Sound in Bermuda, the Palm Cave System occurs to a maximum depth in the subsurface of 23 m below modern sea level (mbsl). There is no halocline in Palm Cave because a meteoric lens does not develop on the narrow isthmus between Harrington Sound and Castle Harbour, so the passages are all flooded by oxygenated saline groundwater (Fig. 2). Despite the absence of a local meteoric lens, Palm Cave is part of the anchialine habitat continuum, and can be colloquially referred to as a marine cave (Fig. 1). In summer 2015, the conditions of the saline groundwater mirrored the impact of strong summertime evaporative and radiative forcing on the adjacent Harrington Sound source water (pH of 7.8 ± 0.2, 28.5 ± 0.2 °C, 38.7 ± 0.4 psu, Fig. 2). Multiple physical openings from the coastal lagoon (i.e., Harrington Sound) and subaerial forest landscape (e.g., 32.34°, −64.71) allow terrestrial and marine organic matter to erode into the cave. Sediment push cores (n = 13) were collected using technical cave diving procedures (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S1) from the deepest parts of the cave that preserve sediment accumulations, and areas with representative sedimentary units. Multiple cores sampled the stratigraphy to limestone bedrock (Fig. 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Palm Cave System in Bermuda. (a) Digital elevation model of Bermuda93 in the North Atlantic Ocean with (b) detailed map of Harrington Sound52 plotted in ArcGIS. Yellow markers identify locations of geological sea-level indicators from Bermuda (peat, n = 113, Supplementary Dataset). (c) Detailed survey of Palm Cave (adapted after original survey of Jason Richards), with locations of sediment cores and cave entrances.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Preserved sedimentary and biological archives. The sediment and biological remains deposited into Palm Cave over the last 10,000 years. Inset is crossplot of δ13Corg and C:N values on sub-samples from cores marked with an asterisk to evaluate the relative contribution of terrestrial versus marine organic carbon to the sedimentary record, with 95% ellipse confidence intervals around the mean values for individual sedimentary units (except iron-rich deposits).

Sedimentaray Deposits and Habitats

The deposits from Palm Cave can be organized into four groups (paleosols, organic-rich deposits, iron-rich deposits, and carbonate deposits), and further subdivided into seven units (Fig. 3). These units correspond to hydrographic and environmental change in the cave from internal and external flooding of the Bermuda carbonate platform by concomitant groundwater and relative sea-level rise (Fig. 2). Limitations of the record include decreased sedimentation rates from ~8500 to ~7000 calibrated years before present (Cal yrs BP), and no one single location in the cave preserves a complete Holocene environmental history. However, the recovered deposits collectively provide the most detailed physical and biological picture yet known of Holocene environmental change in a KSE, and are described below from oldest to youngest.

Pre-Holocene vadose deposits

The oldest deposits are pre-Holocene (>11,600 years ago) terra rosa paleosols, which occur at the base of cores (core 13), in areas with negligible Holocene sedimentation (core 8), and near terrestrial openings. These coarser-grained sediments have a deep red color (Supplementary Fig. S1, Table S2 and Fig. S2), and they contain no fossil material (Fig. 3). Mineralogically, they are primarily crandallite (mean 52.6%), kaolinite (mean 16.5%), quartz (22.8%) and goethite (8.1%, Supplementary Table S4), which is similar to Bermudian Pleistocene-aged terra rosa paleosols54. African dust is an important contributor to Bermudian soils during Quaternary Ice Ages54, which helps create diagnostic terra rosa soils that are known to erode into Bermudian caves55. Similarly, paleosol eroded into Palm Cave prior to Holocene flooding.

Freshwater habitats in a meteoric lens

The preserved sedimentary and biological remains (e.g., fish bones, foraminifera, ostracodes) indicate that freshwater aquatic habitats were created in the Palm Cave from 9750 ± 210 (core 14) to 8370 ± 30 (core 3) Cal yrs BP when a fresh to oligohaline meteoric lens first flooded the cave. The modern marine anchialine ecosystem in Palm Cave could not have colonized these conditions. In contrast, these early Holocene freshwater conditions would have been suitable to Bermuda’s olighaline-adapted anchialine amphipods like Pseudoniphargus carpalis and P. grandimanus56. In eastern passages, grey sapropel (mean 16% organic matter) with calcium-rich layers was accumulating by ~9750 Cal yrs BP (cores 14 and 2, Supplementary Table S3). The organic carbon was primarily terrestrial in origin, based on the stable carbon isotopic content of the bulk organic matter (δ13Corg: −24.1 ± 0.6‰) and relative amounts of organic carbon and nitrogen (C:N ratios: 17.2 ± 1.1). The only meiofauna preserved in the grey sapropel were the benthic ostracodes Darwinula stevensoni and Cypridopsis vidua, which occur in global freshwater habitats and Yucatan freshwater caves. At ~9620 Cal yrs BP, the deepest cave areas (e.g., cores 4, 10) began accumulating dark brown sapropel (mean 31% organic matter, −24.1 ± 0.9‰, 16.8 ± 1.1, n = 43), which pass upcore into a lighter-hued light brown sapropel by ~9230 Cal yrs BP (mean 24% organic matter, δ13Corg: −23.5 ± 0.9‰, C:N: 14.9 ± 1.1, n = 39). The timing of the transion between light and dark brown sapropel varied slightly between the core sites, and likely reflect site-specific process impacting sedimentation at these different parts of the cave41. Biologically, the sapropel contains benthic foraminiferal assemblages that are dominated by Polyscammina iophalina, Entzia macrescens, Tiphotrocha comprimata (Supplementary Figs S2, S3). At the base of some cores (core 10), Bolivina sp. was dominant at first, but the high sedimentation rate at this site indicates these assemblages rapidly transitioned to Entzia-dominated assemblages. In modern settings, these benthic foraminifera dominate subtidal anchialine habitats that are flooded by a low salinity (oligohaline) meteoric lens on the Yucatan Peninsula (Tiphotrocha, Entzia)42,57, and subtidal marine settings in Bermuda dominated by terrestrial organic carbon (Bolivina)58. Calcite rafts occurred intermittently in the organic-rich deposits, which only form near freshwater-air interfaces in caves40,59, and their occurrence indicates the continual cave passage flooding. Previous work indicates that the shoreline of an early Holocene inland brackish pond in Harrington Sound was very close to Palm Cave by ~9500 years ago52, which likely provided a source of organic-rich sediment that was transported into the cave through a southern tunnel connecting Palm Cave to Harrington Sound (Fig. 2). Continual water-level rise in the cave or conduit collapse events likely decreased organic matter sedimentation at the core sites, as has been observed in Yucatan flooded caves38.

Mixing zone iron curtain deposits

The Iron-rich carbonate deposits provide evidence for benthic habitats becoming flooded with saline groundwater, whereby upwelling anoxic saline groundwater was mixing with the overlying freshwater in a paleo mixing zone [base of cores 3, 15 and 9, and intercalated within cores 4,10, 11 and 9 (Fig. 3)]. These deposits were not recovered from shallower sampling locales (Supplementary Table S1). Unlike the terra rosa paleosols, these iron-rich carbonate sediments have a distinctive orange-hue (Supplementary Fig. S1), have a fine texture, and they contain rare marine benthic foraminifera adapted to low-oxic environments (i.e., Bolivina spp.). The dominant minerals present were carbonates (mean 45% calcite and aragonite), quartz (mean 27.6%), Fe-based minerals (mean 13.4% goethite, woodhouseite, and lepidocrocite), and less crandallite and kaolinite than the paleosol deposits (Supplementary Table S4). Organic carbon was dominated by marine sources (δ13Corg: −21.2 ± 2.9‰, CN: 13.3 ± 2.9, n = 22, Fig. 2). The meiofuna and mineralogy differentiates these sediments from known Fe-oxide deposits produced by microbialites in anoxic saline groundwater60. A Saharan dust origin is also not likely, given the contemporaneously flooded cave would have hampered wind-borne dust accumulation (Fig. 4), and African dust export to the western tropical North Atlantic was diminished from ~11,000 to 5,000 years ago61.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Evidence for Holocene sea-level rise in Bermuda and the allogenic succession of anchialine habitats in Palm Cave, which is caused by the upward migration of the local karst subterranean estuary. Marine limiting sea level indicators from Palm Cave (this study) and Green Bay Cave40 (symbol size exceeds age and depth uncertainties), along with a new regional database of terrestrial limiting sea level indicators (freshwater peat, see methods) are compared to the output from two glacial isostatic adjustment models (purple91 and orange68 lines; see Methods and Supplementary Dataset). The L201668 model allows for marine limiting sea level indicators from Palm Cave and Green Bay Cave to be flooded, while coeval terrestrial limiting dates remain exposed.

Alternatively, these iron-rich deposits developed at the deepest elevations from the oxidative precipitation of Fe(II) in an ‘iron curtain’ at the sediment-water interface. On siliciclastic coastlines, the oxidative precipitation of dissolved Fe(II) from the mixing of seawater and groundwater generates a distinctive increase in iron oxide deposits in a subsurface zone62. This process is driven by pH gradients between the anoxic saline versus oxygenated freshwater above63, and the iron curtain can spatially migrate in response to sea-level64 or rainfall65 changes. It is likely that anoxic saline groundwater was displaced upwards under sea-level forcing, and iron oxide precipitated when anoxic water upwelled and mixed with an overlaying oxygenated water mass. The previously observed iron-oxide coatings on early Holocene calcite rafts in another Bermudian flooded cave likely formed through the same process40.

Oxygenated marine habitats in saline groundwater

By ~7000 years ago, the entirety of Palm Cave became a fully-oxygenated marine aquatic habitat, based on radiocarbon dates from core 2 (6680 ± 280, and 6600 ± 70 Cal yrs BP). This is demarcated by widespread carbonate deposition (fine-grained micrite and mixed carbonate), and the appearance of marine pelycopods (e.g., Barbatia domingensis), bryozoans (Cheilostomata), coral (Coenocyathus goreaui), brachiopods and marine ostracodes. The marine foraminifer Spirophthalmidium emaciatum also colonizes Palm Cave, which lives in marine caves in Bermuda and Cozumel with oxygenated saline groundwater66 (Supplementary Figs S2, S3). White- to brownish-hued micrite deposits often transition into mixed carbonate facies (e.g., cores 14, 2, 15) towards the top of cores, but the timing is site specific (e.g., core 12: ~2690 Cal yrs BP vs. core 15: ~3610 Cal yrs BP). The spatial and temporal variability of carbonate sedimentary units is perhaps related to conduit-specific physical or hydrodynamic processes (e.g., diffuse- vs. conduit-driven saline groundwater circulation). The carbonate deposits contained the highest proportion of marine organic matter based on the C:N and δ13Corg values (micrite: δ13Corg −20.4 ± 1.9‰; C:N 11.7 ± 2.0‰, n = 40, mixed carbonate facies: δ13Corg −19.4 ± 1.2‰; C:N 10.3 ± 1.2, n = 38). Occasionally, clasts of the terra rosa paleosol become eroded and re-worked into the carbonate deposits (cores 13 and 14). These deposits indicate that conditions in Palm Cave were finally suitable for colonization by the soft-bodied marine anchialine fauna, such as Parhippolyte sterreri and Procaris chacei sp.

Sea-Level Forcing of Successional Development

There is striking congruency between when aquatic ecosystems were emplaced in Palm Cave, subaerial indicators of sea-level change from the Bermuda carbonate platform, evidence for carbonate banktop oceanographic changes, and numerical models of relative sea-level rise (Fig. 4). Terrestrial and freshwater peat deposits recovered in contact with the carbonate platform from Bermuda provide maximum sea-level indicators (Fig. 4), which constrain glacioisotatic processes and past sea levels67. In contrast, cave sedimentary deposits are minimum sea-level indicators because groundwater must have achieved this elevation for aquatic habitats develop58. The sedimentary and meiofaunal remains in contact with the limestone indicates a meteoric lens flooded Palm Cave by 9750 ± 210 Cal yrs BP at core 14 (21.6 ± 0.3 mbsl), 9620 ± 80 Cal yrs BP at core 10 (22.5 ± 0.3 mbsl), and 9670 ± 120 Cal yrs BP at core 15 (22.7 ± 0.3 mbsl). A comparison with output from the ICE-5G model is within uncertainties of early Holocene minimum (cave-based) and maximum (terrestrial peat) sea-level indicators (Fig. 4, L201668 Model). From previous work in Green Bay Cave in Bermuda, there was a delayed onset in sedimentation to first document aquatic conditions at ~7,900 Cal yrs BP40. However, the estimated time for drowning of the ceiling in Green Bay Cave is very close to the anticipated position of relative sea level (Fig. 4, L201668 Model). By 7,000 years ago, both Harrington Sound52 and North Lagoon69 transitioned into marine carbonate lagoons from continual inundation of the Bermuda carbonate platform by Holocene sea-level rise. This allowed tidal exchange of seawater between the saline groundwater and adjacent marine carbonate lagoons, which initiated oxygenated saline groundwater habitats in Palm Cave. These results indicate that relative sea-level change is a principle driver of successional development of anchialine habitats through initial installation of anchialine habitats by from sea-level forced vertical migration of groundwater. Thereafter, sea-level forced changes to banktop oceanographic-groundwater circulation regimes secondarily modified Bermuda’s anchialine habitats into their current environmental state.

Global Implications

The successional development of anchialine habitats caused by sea-level rise has multiple implications for the biogeography, evolutionary history, and ecosystem functioning across the anchialine habitat continuum. Today, anchialine fauna include taxa that are adapted to habitats and environmental conditions created by specific groundwater masses in the KSE, in addition to taxa that have an evolutionary history in both water masses. For example, Bahamian remipedes remain in their ancestral marine-based habitat, whereas others like the Yucatan decapod Creaseria morleyi have become adapted to the low salinity habitat created by the meteoric lens. On geologic timescales, anchialine fauna and ecosystems must vertically migrate upwards (or downwards) with sea-level rise (or fall) with groundwater masses in the KSE to remain within their suitable ecological tolerance ranges. The sedimentary record from Palm Cave indicates that the available anchialine habitat in northeastern Bermuda associated with a meteoric lens (freshwater to brackish salinity) decreased with Holocene sea-level rise. This was coincident with regional reduction in the Holocene aerial extent of Bermuda, and ultimate potential for a meteoric lens to form in the antecedent limestone. The possibility of suitable aquatic habitat is first established by the sea level boundary condition, and thereafter, the subsurface hydrography is modified by other known secondary factors, such as changes in coastal circulation70, conduit morphology and connectivity to adjacent marine and terrestrial environments38,40, or changing rainfall7173.

On Phanerozoic timescales, transgressions cause bottlenecks to anchialine habitats and fauna dependent upon a meteoric lens, if carbonate platform areal extent and island relief are considered (Fig. 5). The earlier regression model first proposed by Riedl33,35 hypothesized how the draining of epicontinental seas on geologic timescales first promoted subsurface habitat colonization. However, the regression model did not evaluate or describe how sea-level oscillations can continuously drive adaptation, community evolution, and potential for regional extinctions. During the Quaternary alone, smaller carbonate platforms and islands were repetitively and completely flooded by sea level during interstadials from the ~100,000-year climate cycle74. As such, meteoric lenses contracted, fragmented, and potentially disappeared (e.g., Bermuda, or Cay Sal Bank in The Bahamas). The sediment and preserved meiofauna in Palm Cave clearly documents habitat reduction associated with a contracting meteoric lens in northwestern Bermuda from sea-level rise during the most recent deglaciation. There is little evidence to suggest that this process has not persisted through geologic time, or would have not impacted carbonate platforms elsewhere. This means that fauna and ecosystems in the anchialine habitat continuum that depend upon a meteoric lens must have faced recurrent habitat fragmentation and bottleneck events coincident with sea-level rise linked to the ~100,000-year climate cycle during the Quaternary74. Indeed, recently discovered anchialine food web dynamics and habitats that depend on terrestrial dissolved organic carbon and meteoric lenses could not exist on low-relief carbonate islands and platforms during transgressions17. The mechanism for carbon and energy transfer between anchialine fauna and ecosystems in saline groundwater devoid of meteoric lenses remains currently unknown. It is likely that global anchialine fauna in the meteoric lens of KSEs experienced increased extinction rates during Pliocene (+6 above present) or late Paleocene (+75 m above present) transgressions51,75. Subsurface defaunation on different types of carbonate platforms from transgression-related extinction events requires further evaluation.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Sea-level change over the last million years impacts anchialine habitat availability. Eustatic sea-level change based on global ice-volume changes94, the relative time spent below the modern sea level position, and the time spent at different eustatic sea level elevations spanning the last million years. This is compared to a single transgression event on three idealized carbonate platforms with different topographic relief and vertical migration of their karst subterranean estuaries, which in turn causes bottlenecking (expansion) of the meteoric lens (saline groundwater) anchialine habitats.

In contrast, carbonate platforms with higher elevation may have insulated the anchialine habitat continuum from transgression related bottlenecks during global ice volume, tectonic changes or isostatic changes (e.g., Yucatan Peninsula, Fig. 5). For example, the post-Pliocene migration and diversification history of Yucatan freshwater copepods Microcyclops and Diacyclops have benefited from the continuous presence of a meteoric lens on the Yucatan Peninsula during the Quaternary, and associated lack of regional bottlenecking during sea-level highstands76. Anchialine fauna in the saline groundwater mass of a KSE may actually benefit from habitat expansion during banktop inundation coincident with Quaternary interstadials, potentially favoring increased genetic exchange or speciation through the mixing-isolation-mixing mechanism77.

Looking forward, worldwide fauna in the anchialine habitat continuum remain omitted from 21st century marine ecosystem risk assessments78. The threat of habitat loss related to subsurface contaminants is now apparent79, along with potential impacts from increasing coastal sea surface temperatures80,81. However, recent groundwater modeling work indicates that <1 m of sea-level rise can reduce meteoric lens volumes by over 50%, and thus available area of brackish and freshwater ecological niches in the anchialine habitat continuum, when inherited topography and platform flooding are collectively considered82. The results presented here indicate that the effects of sea-level rise on the anchialine habitat continuum must also be regionally evaluated. It is likely that anchialine fauna on low-lying carbonate platforms and islands are the most vulnerable to potential bottlenecking during 21st century sea-level rise.

Methods

After collection (Supplementary Fig. S1 and Table S1), cores were transported back to the laboratory to be split lengthwise for x-radiography, photography, textural and micropaleontological analysis (Supplementary Fig. S2). Cores were sub-sampled at 1-cm intervals downcore for analysis of sedimentary bulk organic matter content using a standard Loss-on-Ignition procedure, whereby the mass lost during combustion at 550 °C for 4.5 hrs is expressed as a weight percent83. The textural variability in the coarse sedimentation deposition (e.g., coarse fraction) was quantified in contiguous 1-cm intervals downcore on separate sediment sub-samples using a Sieve-first Loss-on-Ignition procedure84. Contiguous 1-cm sediment sub-samples, with a standardized initial volume of 2.5 cm3, were first wet sieved over a 63-μm mesh, dried for 12 hours in an oven at 80 °C and weighed to determine the original sediment mass. Samples were the ignited for 4.5 hours at 550 °C in a muffle furnace to remove organic matter from the sediment samples to concentrate the remaining mineral residue (Fig. 5), and re-weighed to determine remaining mineral mass after combustion. The variability in coarse sediment was then expressed as mass per unit volume (D>63 um mg cm−3). Core 4 (n = 26) and core 10 (n = 23) were quantitatively analyzed for preserved subfossil benthic foraminiferal assemblages. Downcore sediment subsamples (2.5 cm3, 0.5 cm core width) were sieved over a 63 μm mesh, and wet-picked onto micropaleontological slides for taxonomic identification and assemblage analysis with Q-mode cluster analysis (Supplementary Fig. S4). The qualitative (presence vs. absence) preservation of meiofauna (e.g., ostracodes, foraminifera) and macrofauna (e.g., bivalves, gastropods, Supplementary Fig. S3 and Table S2) in all cores was assess by wet sieving bulk sediment over a 63 μm mesh at 3 to 5 cm downcore, with representative individuals imaged with a Hitachi desktop scanning electron microscope (Supplementary Fig. S4). To further understand the provenance of accumulating bulk organic matter, sediment samples (n = 215) from selected cores (3, 6, 10, 14, 15) were analyzed for the stable carbon isotopic value (δ13Corg) and C:N ratio of bulk organic matter. Samples were first treated with a 10% HCl digestion to remove carbonates, followed by geochemical measurements in a Costech 200 Elemental Analyzer connected to Thermo-Electron Delta V Advantage Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer. Final δ13Corg values are reported in per mil notation (‰) relative to the standard Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) for carbon (expressed as parts per mil, ‰), with analytical precision on δ13Corg better than ± 0.2‰ (1σ) and ± 0.1 on C:N. Age control is provided by radiocarbon dating (n = 51, Supplementary Table S3) on a combination of bulk organic matter from the organic-dominated facies, terrestrial plant macrofossils (when available), and marine bivalves. Twenty-seven samples were processed by accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon, with twenty-six dated using the Continuous Flow AMS (CFAMS) method. All radiocarbon dates were calibrated to sidereal years before 1950 AD (Cal Yrs BP1950) using IntCAL1385 (Supplementary Table S3). Samples from notably iron-rich carbonate and paleosols (cores 10 and 4) were subject to X-ray diffraction to determine dominant minerals (Table S4). Selected samples were analyzed on a Bruker-AXS D8 Advanced Bragg-Brentano X-ray powder diffractometer employing the standard XRD laboratory protocols. Final mineral determination was made by comparing the resultant diffractograms with the 2005 International Center for Diffraction Data material identification database to determine final mineralogy (Supplementary Table S4).

A new database of sea-level indicators from Bermuda was compiled from earlier work52,53,8689 that is mostly derived from basal peat in contact with limestone (Supplementary Dataset). This database is currently unavailable in other databases of global sea-level indicators67. The radiocarbon-dated sedimentary deposit is these earlier works is often designated simply peat, without any differentiation between brackish and freshwater peat using preserved microfossils (i.e., defined indicative meaning). Nevertheless, much of the new database compiled here is derived from peat collected at the limestone contact52,89, and thus can still be conservatively used as maximum sea-level indicators (terrestrial limiting)67.

The model results (Fig. 4) were determined using the same glacial isostatic adjustment model as described elsewhere90, but using different inputs. These inputs are: (1) a reconstruction of changes in grounded ice distribution and (2) solid Earth viscosity structure. In one case (purple line in Fig. 4), the ice model used was ICE-5G with a viscosity model that provides good fits to a global distribution of various data types (VM29191,92, with a 90 km thick lithosphere). The other model estimate (orange line in Fig. 4) is also based on the ICE-5G ice history, but with the North American component replaced with output from a calibrated glaciological model (L2016, model #989468). The Earth viscosity model was one found to produce an optimal fit to a regional Holocene sea-level data base that includes the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the US68. The main cause of the difference between the two curves are the higher Earth viscosity values found in L201668, which provides a modeled sea level curve that is most compatible with the Bermuda observations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Dataset 1 (69.8KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

Field support in Bermuda was provided by Bruce Williams, Gil Nolan, and S. Robbie Smith, with scientific permits approved by the Bermuda Department of Environmental Protection [2015: Special Permit 150301]. Additional technical support provided by Shawna Little, Richard Sullivan, Mandy Shailer and Michael Toomey.

Author Contributions

P.v.H. conceived of the research design and conducted the fieldwork, J.C. conducted the laboratory analysis, G.M. conducted the relative sea-level rise modeling, T.M.I. contributed to the regional biological and evolutionary interpretations, P.v.H. and J.C. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-48058-8.

References

  • 1.Hallam A, Wignall PB. Mass extinctions and sea-level changes. Earth-Science Reivews. 1999;48:217–250. doi: 10.1016/S0012-8252(99)00055-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Peters Shanan E. Environmental determinants of extinction selectivity in the fossil record. Nature. 2008;454(7204):626–629. doi: 10.1038/nature07032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pimiento C, et al. The Pliocene marine megafauna extinction and its impact on functional diversity. Nature Ecology and Evolution. 2017;1:1100–1106. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0223-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Valentine JW, Jablonski D. Biotic effects of sea level change: the Pleistocene test. J. Geophys. Res. 1991;96:6873–6878. doi: 10.1029/90JB00602. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Klaus JS, et al. Rise and fall of Pliocene free-living corals in the Caribbean. Geology. 2011;39:375–378. doi: 10.1130/G31704.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ludt WB, Rocha LA. Shifting seas: the impacts of Pleistocene sea-level fluctuations on the evolution of tropical marine taxa. J. Biogeog. 2015;42:25–38. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12416. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weigelt, P., Steinbauer, M. J., Cabral, J. S. & Kreft, H. Late Quaternary climate change shapes island biodiversity. Nature 532, 99–102 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Ali JR, Aitchison JC. Exploring the combined role of eustasy and oceanic island thermal subsidence in shaping biodiversity on the Galápagos. J. Biogeog. 2014;41:1227–1241. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fernández‐Palacios JM, et al. Towards a glacial‐sensitive model of island biogeography. Global Eoclogy and Biogeography. 2015;25:14. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Papadopoulou A, Knowles LL. Linking micro- and macroevolutionary perspectives to evaluate the role of Quaternary sea-level oscillations in island diversification. Evolution. 2017;71:2901–2917. doi: 10.1111/evo.13384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McCauely DJ, et al. Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean. Science. 2015;347:1255641. doi: 10.1126/science.1255641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Holland SM. Sea level change and the area of shallow-marine habitat: implications for marine biodiversity. Paleobiology. 2012;38:205–217. doi: 10.1666/11030.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Harnik PG, et al. Extinctions in ancient and modern seas. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2012;27:608–617. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moore WS. The subterranean estuary: a reaction zone of ground water and sea water. Mar. Chem. 1999;65:111–125. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00014-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gonneea ME, Charette MA, Liu Q, Herrera-Silveira JA, Morales-Ojeda SM. Trace element geochemistry of groundwater in a karst subterranean estuary (Yucatan Peninsuala, Mexico) Geochemica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2014;132:31–49. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2014.01.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Menning DM, Wynn JG, Garey JR. Karst estuaries are governed by interactions between inland hydrological conditions and sea level. J. Hydrol. 2015;527:718–733. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brankovits, D. et al. Methane- and dissolved organic carbon-fueled microbial loop supports a tropical subterranean estuary ecosystem. Nature Communications8, 1835, 10.1038/s41467-017-01776-x (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Beddows, P. A., Smart, P. L., Whitaker, F. F. & Smith, S. L. In Hydrogeology and Biology ofPost-PaleozoicCarbonate Aquifers (eds Martin, J. B., Wicks, C. M. & Sasowsky, I. D.) 129–134 (Karst Waters Institute, 2005).
  • 19.Whitaker FF, Smart PL. Active circulation of saline ground waters in carbonate platforms: evidence from the Great Bahama Bank. Geology. 1990;18:200–203. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1990)018&#x0003c;0200:ACOSGW&#x0003e;2.3.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Trezzi G, et al. Submarine groundwater discharge: a significant source of dissolved trace metals to the North Western Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Chem. 2016;186:90–100. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2016.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stock JH, Iliffe TM, Williams D. The concept “anchialine” reconsidered. Stygologia. 1986;2:90–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Steinthorsdottir M, Håkansson E. Endo- and epilithic fauna succession in a Pliocene-Pleistocene cave on Rhodes, Greece: record of a transgression. Palaeontology. 2017;60:663–681. doi: 10.1111/pala.12312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.van Hengstum PJ, Scott DB, Javaux JJ. Foraminifera in elevated Bermudian caves provide further evidence for +21 m eustatic sea level during Marine Isotope Stage 11. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2009;28:1850–1860. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.05.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rosso A, Sanfilipppo R, Ruggieri R, Maniscalco R, Vertino A. Exceptional record of submaine cave communities from the Pleistocene of Sicily (Italy) Lethaia. 2014;48:133–144. doi: 10.1111/let.12094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jurado-Rivera JA, et al. Phylogenetic evidence that both ancient viacariance and dispersal have contribed to the biogeographic patterns of anchialine cave shripms. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:2852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03107-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Legg DA, Sutton MD, Edgecombe GD. Athropod fossil data increase congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies. Nature Communications. 2013;4:2485. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gonzales BC, et al. Genetic spatial structure of an anchialine cave annelid indicates connectivity within - but not between - islands of the Great Bahama Bank. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2017;109:259–270. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Regier JC, et al. Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature. 2010;463:1079–1084. doi: 10.1038/nature08742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schwentner M, Combosch DJ, Nelson JP, Giribet G. A Phylogenomic Solution to the Origin of Insects by Resolving Crustacean-Hexapod Relationships. Current Biology. 2017;27:1818–1824. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Moritsch, M. M., Pakes, M. J. & Lindberg, D. R. How might sea level change affect arthropod biodiversity in anchialine caves: a comparison of Remipedia and Atyidae taxa (Arthropoda: Altocrustacea). Organisms, Diversity, and Evolution14 (2014).
  • 31.Angyal D, Chávez Solís E, Magaña B, Balázs G, Simoes N. Mayaweckelia troglomorpha, a new subterranean amphipod species from Yucatán state, México (Amphipoda, Hadziidae) Zookeys. 2018;735:1–25. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.735.21164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Stock JH. Two new amphipod crustaceans of the genus Bahadzia from ‘blue holes’ in the Bahamas and some remarks on the origin of insular stygofuans of the Atlantic. Journal of Natural History. 1986;20:921–933. doi: 10.1080/00222938600770681. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Riedl R, Ozretić B. Hydrobiology of marginal caves. Part 1: general problems and introduction. International Revue des gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie. 1969;54:661–683. doi: 10.1002/iroh.19690540503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Holsinger JR. Pattern and processes in the biogeography of subterranean amphipods. Hydrobiologia. 1994;287:131–145. doi: 10.1007/BF00006902. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stock JH. Regression model evolution as exemplified by the genus Pseudoniphargus (Amphipoda) Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde. 1980;50:105–144. doi: 10.1163/26660644-05002008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Richards DA, Smart PL, Edwards RL. Maximum sea levels for the last glacial period from U-series ages of submerged speleothems. Nature. 1994;367:357–360. doi: 10.1038/367357a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dutton A, et al. Phasing and amplitude of sea-level and climate change during the penultimate interglacial. Nat. Geosci. 2009;2:355–359. doi: 10.1038/ngeo470. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Collins SV, et al. Late Holocene mangrove development and onset of sedimentation in the Yax Chen cave system (Ox Bel Ha) Yucatan Mexico: implications for using cave sediments as a sea-level indicator. Palaeogeog. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2015;438:124–134. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.07.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fornós JJ, Ginés J, Gràcia F. Present-day sedimentary facies in the coastal karst caves of Mallorca island (western Mediterranean) Journal of Cave and Karst Studies. 2009;71:86–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.van Hengstum PJ, Scott DB, Gröcke DR, Charette MA. Sea level controls sedimentation and environments in coastal caves and sinkholes. Mar. Geol. 2011;286:35–50. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2011.05.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Collins SV, et al. Reconstructing water level in Hoyo Negro, Quintana Roo, Mexico, implications for early Paleoamerican and faunal access. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2015;438:124–134. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.van Hengstum PJ, Reinhardt EG, Beddows PA, Gabriel JJ. Investigating linkages between Holocene paleoclimate and paleohydrogeology preserved in a Yucatan underwater cave. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2010;29:2788–2798. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.06.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vacher, H. L., Hearty, P. J. & Rowe, M. P. In Terrestrial and Shallow Marine Geology of the Bahamas and Bermuda Geological Society of America Special Paper 300 (eds Curran, H. A. & White, B.) 271–294 (1995).
  • 44.Rouse, J., James, N. P. & Kyser, T. K. Aeolianites reveal Pleistocene marine history of Bermuda. Sedimentology, 20, 10.1111/sed.12544 (2018).
  • 45.Vacher, H. L. & Rowe, M. P. In Geology and Hydrogeology of Carbonate Islands Developments in Sedimentology 54 (eds Vacher, H. L. & Quinn, T. M.) 35–90 (Elsevier, 1997).
  • 46.Land LS, Mackenzie FT, Gould SJ. The Pleistocene history of Bermuda. GSA Bulletin. 1967;78:993–1006. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1967)78[993:PHOB]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Palmer, A. N., Palmer, M. V. & Queen, J. M. In Proceedings of the 7th International Speleological Congress (eds Tratman, E. K. et al.) 336–339 (Sheffield, United Kingdom, 1977).
  • 48.Iliffe TM, Hart CWJ, Manning RB. Biogeography and the caves of Bermuda. Nature. 1983;302:141–142. doi: 10.1038/302141a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pirsson LV. Geology of Bermuda Island: the igneous platform. Am. J. Sci. 1914;38:189–206. doi: 10.2475/ajs.s4-38.225.189. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mylroie, J. E., Carew, J. L. & Vacher, H. L. In Terrestrial and shallow marine geology of theBahamasand Bermuda (eds Curran, H. A. & White, B.) 251–267 (Geologic Society of America, 1995).
  • 51.Miller KG, et al. The Phanerozoic record of global sea-level change. Science. 2005;310:1293–1298. doi: 10.1126/science.1116412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vollbrecht, R. Postglazialer Anstieg des Meeresspiegels, paläoklima und hydrographie, aufgezeichnet in sedimenten der Bermuda inshore waters PhD thesis, Universität Göttingen, (1996).
  • 53.Ashmore S, Leatherman SP. Holocene sedimentation in Port Royal Bay, Bermuda. Mar. Geol. 1984;56:289–298. doi: 10.1016/0025-3227(84)90020-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Muhs DR, Budahn JR, Prospero JM, Skipp G, Herwitz SR. Soil genesis on the island of Bermuda in the Quaternary: The importance of African dust transport and deposition. J. Geophys. Res. 2012;117:F03025. doi: 10.1029/2012JF002366. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hearty PJ, Olson SL, Kaufman DS, Edwards RL, Cheng H. Stratigraphy and geochronology of pitfall accumulations in caves and fissures, Bermuda. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2004;23:1151–1171. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2003.09.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Stock JH, Holsinger JR, Sket B, Iliffe TM. Two new species of Pseudoniphargus (Amphipoda) in Bermudian groundwaters. Zoologica Scripta. 1986;15:237–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.1986.tb00226.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.van Hengstum PJ, Reinhardt EG, Beddows PA, Huang RJ, Gabriel JJ. Thecamoebians (testate amoebae) and foraminifera from three anchialine cenotes in Mexico: Low salinity (1.5–4.5 psu) faunal transitions. J. Foram. Res. 2008;38:305–317. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.38.4.305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Little SN, van Hengstum PJ. Intertidal and subtidal benthic foraminifera in flooded caves: Implications for reconstructing coastal karst aquifers and cave paleoenvironments. Mar. Micropaleontol. 2019;149:19–34. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2019.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kovacs SE, et al. Calcite raft geochemistry as a hydrological proxy for Holocene aquifer conditions in Hoyo Negro and Ich Balam (Sac Actun Cave System), Quintana Roo, Mexico. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2017;175:97–111. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.09.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Haas S, et al. Low-Light Anoxygenic Photosynthesis and Fe-S-Biogeochemistry in a Microbial Mat. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9:858. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.McGee D, deMenocal PB, Winckler G, Stuut JBW, Bradtmiller LI. The magnidtude, timing and abruptness of changes in North African dust deposition over the last 20,000 years. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2013;371–372:163–176. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.03.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Charette Matthew A., Sholkovitz Edward R. Oxidative precipitation of groundwater-derived ferrous iron in the subterranean estuary of a coastal bay. Geophysical Research Letters. 2002;29(10):85-1-85-4. doi: 10.1029/2001GL014512. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Spiteri C, Regnier P, Slomp CP, Charette MA. pH-Dependent iron oxide precipitation in a subterranean estuary. J. Geochem. Explor. 2006;88:399–403. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2005.08.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Roy M, Martin JB, Cherrier J, Cable JE, Smith CG. Influence of sea level rise on iron diagenesis in an east Florida subterranean estuary. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2010;74:5560–5573. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2010.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Roy M, Martin JB, Cable JE, Smith CG. Variations of iron flux and organic carbon remineralization in a subterranean estuary caused by inter-annual variations in recharge. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2013;103:301–315. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2012.10.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.van Hengstum PJ, Scott DB. Ecology of foraminifera and habitat variability in an underwater cave: distinguishing anchialine versus submarine cave environments. J. Foram. Res. 2011;41:201–229. doi: 10.2113/gsjfr.41.3.201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hibbert FD, Williams FH, Fallon SJ, Rohling EJ. A database of biological and geomorphological sea-level markers from the Last Glacial Maximum to present. Scientific Data. 2018;5:180088. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Love R, et al. The contribution of glacial isostatic adjustment to projections of sea level change along the East and Gulf coasts of North America. Earth’s Future. 2016;4:440–464. doi: 10.1002/2016EF000363. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gischler Eberhard, Kuhn Gerhard. Anatomy of the Holocene inundation of an isolated carbonate platform: Bermuda North Lagoon, western Atlantic. The Depositional Record. 2018;4(2):216–254. doi: 10.1002/dep2.48. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.van Hengstum PJ, Scott DB. Sea-level rise and coastal circulation controlled Holocene groundwater development and caused a meteoric lens to collapse 1600 years ago in Bermuda. Marine Micropaleonology. 2012;90–91:29–43. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2012.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cant RV, Weech PS. A review of the factors affecting the development of Ghyben-Hertzberg lenses in the Bahamas. J. Hydrol. 1986;84:333–343. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(86)90131-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Vacher HL, Wallis TN. Comparative hydrogeology of Fresh-water lenses of Bermuda and Great Exuma Island, Bahamas. Ground Water. 1992;30:15–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1992.tb00806.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Brankovits D, et al. Hydrologic controls of methane dynamics in karst subterranean estuaries. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 2018;32:1759–1775. doi: 10.1029/2018GB006026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lisiecki LE. Links between eccentricity forcing and the 100,000-year glacial cycle. Nat. Geosci. 2010;3:349–352. doi: 10.1038/ngeo828. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rohling EJ, et al. Sea-level and deep-sea-temperature variablity over the psat 5.3 million years. Nature. 2014;508:477–482. doi: 10.1038/nature13230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Suárez-Morales E, Reid JW, Fiers F, Iliffe TM. Historical biogeography and distribution of the freshwater cyclopine copepods (Copepoda, Cyclopoida, Cyclopinae) of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. J. Biogeog. 2004;31:1051–1063. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01053.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Price Trevor. Allo-parapatric speciation goes offshore. National Science Review. 2018;6(2):289–289. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwy110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Mammola, S. et al. Scientists’ warning on the conservation of subterranean ecosystems. Bioscience, 10, 641–650, 10.1093/biosci/biz064 (2019).
  • 79.Metcalfe CD, et al. Contaminants in the coastal aquifer system along the Caribbean coast of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Environmental Pollution. 2011;159:991–997. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Chevaldonné P, Lejeusne C. Regional warming-induced species shift in north-west Mediterranean caves. Ecology Letters. 2003;6:371–379. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00439.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Parravicini V, et al. Consequences of sea water temperature anomalies on a Mediterranean submarine cave ecosystem. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2010;86:276–282. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Gulley J. D., Mayer A. S., Martin J. B., Bedekar V. Sea level rise and inundation of island interiors: Assessing impacts of lake formation and evaporation on water resources in arid climates. Geophysical Research Letters. 2016;43(18):9712–9719. doi: 10.1002/2016GL070667. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Heiri O, Lotter AF, Lemcke G. Loss on ignition as a method for estimating organic and carbonate content in sediments: reproducibility and comparability of results. J. Paleolimnol. 2001;25:101–110. doi: 10.1023/A:1008119611481. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.van Hengstum PJ, et al. The intertropical convergence zone modulates intense hurricane strikes on the western North Atlantic margin. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:21728. doi: 10.1038/srep21728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Reimer PJ, et al. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years Cal BP. Radiocarbon. 2013;55:1869–1887. doi: 10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ellison JC. Mangrove retreat with rising sea level, Bermuda. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science. 1993;37:75–87. doi: 10.1006/ecss.1993.1042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Redfield AC. Postglacial change in sea level in the western North Atlantic. Ocean. Science. 1967;157:687–691. doi: 10.1126/science.157.3789.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Neumann AC. Quaternary sea-level data from Bermuda. Quaternaria. 1971;14:41–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kuhn, G. Sedimentations-geschichte der Bermuda North Lagoon im Holozän, Universität zu Göttingen (1984).
  • 90.Milne GA, Peros M. Data-model comparison of Holocene sea-level change in the circum-Caribbean region. Glob. Planet. Change. 2013;107:119–131. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.04.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Peltier WR. Global glacial isostacy and the surface of the ice-age Earth: The ICE-5G Model and GRACE. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 2004;32:111–149. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.32.082503.144359. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Tarasov, L., Dyke, A., Neal, R. & Peltier, W. A data-calibrated distribution of deglacial chronologies for the North American ice complex from glaciological modeling. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 315–316, 30-40 (2012).
  • 93.Center, N. N. G. D. (National Centers for Environmental Information, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, https://data.noaa.gov, 2013).
  • 94.Bintanja R, van de Wal RSW. North American ice-sheet dynamics and the onset of 100,000-yaer glacial cycles. Nature. 2008;454:869–872. doi: 10.1038/nature07158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Dataset 1 (69.8KB, xlsx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES