Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2019 Aug 15;8(33):e00601-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00601-19

Complete Genome Sequence of Hydrocarbon-Degrading Halotolerant Acinetobacter radioresistens DD78, Isolated from the Aconcagua River Mouth in Central Chile

Constanza C Macaya a, Valentina Méndez a, Roberto E Durán a, Patricia Aguila-Torres a,b, Francisco Salvà-Serra c,d,e,f, Daniel Jaén-Luchoro c,d,e, Edward R B Moore c,d,e, Michael Seeger a,
Editor: J Cameron Thrashg
PMCID: PMC6696643  PMID: 31416868

Acinetobacter radioresistens strain DD78 (= CCUG 69565) is a soil hydrocarbon-degrading and biosurfactant-producing bacterium isolated from chronically crude oil-polluted soil of the Aconcagua River mouth in Chile. The 3.25-Mb A. radioresistens DD78 genome (41.8% GC content) was completely sequenced, with 4 replicons, 2,970 coding sequences, and 77 tRNAs.

ABSTRACT

Acinetobacter radioresistens strain DD78 (= CCUG 69565) is a soil hydrocarbon-degrading and biosurfactant-producing bacterium isolated from chronically crude oil-polluted soil of the Aconcagua River mouth in Chile. The 3.25-Mb A. radioresistens DD78 genome (41.8% GC content) was completely sequenced, with 4 replicons, 2,970 coding sequences, and 77 tRNAs.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Acinetobacter species are aerobic Gram-negative coccobacilli present in soil, freshwater, sediment, polluted environments, and clinical samples (1, 2). A. baumannii, A. venetianus, and A. oleivorans degrade crude oil and alkanes (3, 4). A. radioresistens and A. calcoaceticus synthesize biosurfactants (e.g., alasan), improving hydrocarbon bioavailability (5, 6). Here, we report the complete genome sequence of A. radioresistens DD78 (CCUG_69565), a soil hydrocarbon-degrading and biosurfactant-producing bacterium from crude oil-polluted soil of the Aconcagua River mouth in Central Chile, which was isolated using enrichment in diesel (0.1% [vol/vol]) in Bushnell Hass mineral medium (7). Strain DD78 grew on n-hexadecane and diesel (7). DNA was extracted from Trypticase soy broth (TSB)-grown cells as described (8) and was purified using a Zymo Research DNA Clean & Concentrator-100 kit. Next-generation sequencing was performed using a PacBio Sequel v3 platform (Uppsala Genome Center, Sweden) with a SMRTbell library (average 20-kb insert library), obtaining 100,261 reads with an average length of 17,616 bp (raw read N50, 24,564 bp). The PacBio reads were trimmed and assembled into 5 contigs using SMRTLink v5 and the Hierarchical Genome Assembly Process v4.0 (HGAP4.0) with default parameters (9) and an expected 3.2-Mb genome size based on Acinetobacter genome sizes (10). The 5 contigs were reduced to 4 contigs with dotplot analysis using Gepard v1.40 with default settings (11). The DD78 genome (41.8% GC content, 246× coverage) consists of a 3,009,347-bp circular chromosome and three putative circular plasmids, pAr1 (88,584 bp), pAr2 (80,103 bp), and pAr3 (69,207 bp). Gene functional annotation using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v4.6 (12) identified 2,970 coding sequences, 77 tRNAs, 7 rRNA operons, 4 noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), and 1 CRISPR array. The Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) v3.0.0 (13) identified one antibiotic resistance gene (E3H47_05270), possessing 96.7% identity with oxacillinase OXA-239, from a clinical A. baumannii isolate (14). Genes encoding alasan protein components (alnA, alnB, and alnC: E3H47_11220, E3H47_09040, and E3H47_05485, respectively), proteins for osmoprotectant glycine betaine synthesis (betIBA: E3H47_10580, E3H47_10585, and E3H47_10590), and the osmoprotectant transporters osmo-dependent choline transporter, sodium/proline symporter, and aspartate/alanine antiporter (E3H47_06620, E3H47_06825, and E3H47_10585, respectively) were identified (>30% identity) with BLASTP using the Uniprot-KB/Swiss-Prot database. Arsenic and heavy metal (copper, cobalt, and cadmium) resistance genes are in pAr1. Catabolic genes encoding an alkane monooxygenase (alkM, E3H47_10210), a rubredoxin NAD(H) reductase/rubredoxin system (E3H47_10395 and E3H47_10400), and the catechol (catBCA: E3H47_07710, E3H47_07715, and E3H47_07720) and benzoate catabolic pathways (benABCDE: E3H47_07725, E3H47_07730, E3H47_07735, E3H47_07740, and E3H47_07745) are chromosomal. Comparative complete 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed a close relationship (99.7% identity) with A. radioresistens FO-1T (CIP 103788T; GenBank accession number X81666) and <97.5% identity with other Acinetobacter species (15). Genome sequence analysis using average nucleotide identity based on BLAST (ANIb) (16) and using JSpeciesWS v3.0.2 (17) with A. radioresistens CIP 103788T, A. lwoffii ATCC 9957T, and A. tandoii CIP 107469T showed ANIb values of 98.9%, 74.1%, and 73.6%, respectively, indicating that strain DD78 most likely belongs to the species A. radioresistens. The genome sequence of A. radioresistens DD78 provides essential data on alkane degradation, salt resistance, and biosurfactant production.

Data availability.

The Acinetobacter radioresistens DD78 genome sequences have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number GCA_005519305 and the SRA accession number SRX5548971. The version discussed here is the first version. The BioProject number for the publicly available raw data is PRJNA528312.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

C.C.M., R.E.D., V.M., and M.S. acknowledge CONICYT PIA Anillo GAMBIO ACT 172128, FONDECYT 1151174 grants, and the Programa de Incentivo a la Iniciación Científica PIIC (C.C.M.). F.S.-S., D.J.-L., and E.R.B.M. were supported by funding (project 5311_205314021) from CARe at the University of Gothenburg.

We acknowledge the support of the National Genomics Infrastructure (NGI)/Uppsala Genome Center and UPPMAX for providing assistance with massive parallel sequencing and computational infrastructure at the NGI/Uppsala Genome Center, funded by RFI/VR and Science for Life Laboratory, Sweden.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Jung J, Park W. 2015. Acinetobacter species as model microorganisms in environmental microbiology: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:2533–2548. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6439-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Domingues S, Rosário N, Cândido Â, Neto D, Nielsen KM, Da Silva GJ. 2019. Competence for natural transformation is common among clinical strains of resistant Acinetobacter spp. Microorganisms 7:30. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7020030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mishra S, Sarma PM, Lal B. 2004. Crude oil degradation efficiency of a recombinant Acinetobacter baumannii strain and its survival in crude oil-contaminated soil microcosm. FEMS Microbiol Lett 253:323–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2004.tb09606.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yamahira K, Hirota K, Nakajima K, Morita N, Nodasaka Y, Yumoto I. 2008. Acinetobacter sp. strain Ths, a novel psychrotolerant and alkalitolerant bacterium that utilizes hydrocarbon. Extremophiles 12:729–734. doi: 10.1007/s00792-008-0180-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Toren A, Navon-Venezia S, Ron EZ, Rosenberg E. 2001. Emulsifying activity of purified alasan proteins from Acinetobacter radioresistens KA53. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1102–1106. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.3.1102-1106.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mujumdar S, Joshi P, Karve N. 2019. Production, characterization, and applications of bioemulsifiers (BE) and biosurfactants (BS) produced by Acinetobacter spp.: a review. J Basic Microbiol 59:277–287. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201800364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Méndez V, Fuentes S, Morgante V, Hernández M, González M, Moore E, Seeger M. 2017. Novel hydrocarbonoclastic metal-tolerant Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas strains from Aconcagua river oil-polluted soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 17:1074–1087. doi: 10.4067/S0718-95162017000400017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Marmur J. 1961. A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from micro-organisms. J Mol Biol 3:208–218. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80047-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Touchon M, Cury J, Yoon EJ, Krizova L, Cerqueira GC, Murphy C, Feldgarden M, Wortman J, Clermont D, Lambert T, Grillot-Courvalin C, Nemec A, Courvalin P, Rocha EP. 2014. The genomic diversification of the whole Acinetobacter genus: origins, mechanisms, and consequences. Genome Biol Evol 6:2866–2882. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Krumsiek J, Arnold R, Rattei T. 2007. Gepard: a rapid and sensitive tool for creating dotplots on genome scale. Bioinformatics 23:1026–1028. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, Waglechner N, Guo P, Tsang KK, Lago BA, Dave BM, Pereira S, Sharma AN, Doshi S, Courtot M, Lo R, Williams LE, Frye JG, Elsayegh T, Sardar D, Westman EL, Pawlowski AC, Johnson TA, Brinkman FSL, Wright GD, McArthur AG. 2017. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D566–D573. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tamayo-Legorreta EM, Garza-Ramos U, Barrios-Camacho H, Sanchez-Perez A, Galicia-Paredes A, Meza-Chavez A, Silva-Sanchez J. 2014. Identification of OXA-23 carbapenemases: novel variant OXA-239 in Acinetobacter baumannii ST758 clinical isolates in Mexico. New Microbes New Infect 2:173–174. doi: 10.1002/nmi2.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. 2006. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 33:152–155. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. 2007. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. 2016. JSpeciesWS: a Web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The Acinetobacter radioresistens DD78 genome sequences have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number GCA_005519305 and the SRA accession number SRX5548971. The version discussed here is the first version. The BioProject number for the publicly available raw data is PRJNA528312.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES