Neisseria gonorrhoeae Antimicrobial Resistance among Men who Have Sex with Men and Men who Have Sex with Women, the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, 2005–2010

Abstract

Background:

Gonorrhea treatment has been complicated by antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Gonococcal fluoroquinolone resistance emerged more rapidly among men who have sex with men (MSM) than among men who have sex exclusively with women (MSW).

Objective:

To determine whether N. gonorrhoeae urethral isolates from MSM were more likely than isolates from MSW to exhibit resistance to or elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antimicrobials used to treat gonorrhea.

Design:

Six years of surveillance data from the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP)

Setting:

Publicly-funded sexually transmitted disease clinics in 30 United States cities

Patients:

Men with a total of 34,600 episodes of symptomatic urethral gonorrhea

Measurements:

Primary outcomes included percentage of isolates exhibiting resistance or elevated MICs, and adjusted odds ratios for resistance or elevated MICs among isolates from MSM compared to isolates from MSW.

Funding Source:

GISP is funded by the CDC, an agency of the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Results:

Isolates from MSM were significantly more likely than isolates from MSW to exhibit elevated cephalosporin MICs (P <=0.028). Isolates from MSM had a high prevalence of resistance to ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline and were significantly more likely to exhibit antimicrobial resistance than isolates from MSW (P <0.001).

Limitations:

Sentinel surveillance might not be representative of all patients with gonorrhea. HIV status, travel history, and antimicrobial use data were missing for some patients.

Conclusions:

MSM are vulnerable to the emerging threat of multidrug-resistant N. gonorrhoeae. Because antimicrobial susceptibility testing is not routinely performed in clinical practice, clinicians should monitor for treatment failures among MSM diagnosed with gonorrhea. Strengthened prevention strategies for MSM and new antimicrobial treatment options are needed.

Introduction

Gonorrhea, caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae, is the second most commonly reported notifiable infection in the United States, with 309,341 cases reported in 2010. (1) Gonorrhea is associated with pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, infertility, and epididymitis, and may facilitate HIV transmission. (2–5) Prevention of sequelae and control of disease transmission rely on prompt treatment with effective antimicrobial therapy.

The introduction of antimicrobial therapy in the 1930s ushered in an era of effective treatment options for gonorrhea. Yet N. gonorrhoeae rapidly developed resistance to sulfonamides and proved adept at developing resistance to each antimicrobial subsequently recommended for treatment: penicillin, tetracycline, and fluoroquinolones. Gonococcal resistance to penicillin and tetracycline developed both through the stepwise accumulation of chromosomal mutations and through acquisition of plasmids conferring high-level resistance.(6–9) Quinolone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae (QRNG) emerged in East Asia during the 1990s and subsequently spread to Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, and the US West Coast.(10) In the US, the prevalence of QRNG initially rose rapidly among men who have sex with men (MSM) and by 2004, fluoroquinolones were no longer recommended for gonorrhea treatment in MSM.(11) Three years later, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) no longer recommended fluoroquinolones for treatment of gonorrhea in anyone in the US; third-generation cephalosporins were the only remaining recommended antimicrobial class.(12) CDC now recommends that gonorrhea be treated with combination antimicrobial therapy with ceftriaxone, an injectable cephalosporin, plus either azithromycin or doxycycline as the only remaining first-line treatment options for gonorrhea.(13) Recent data indicating that cephalosporin (particularly cefixime) minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for N. gonorrhoeae have increased in the US and are increasing rapidly among isolates from MSM are concerning.(13) The emergence of cephalosporin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae could greatly limit treatment options for gonorrhea.

In light of rapid emergence of QRNG among MSM and the current potential for emergence of cephalosporin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae, we investigated whether N. gonorrhoeae isolates from MSM were more likely than isolates from men who have sex exclusively with women (MSW) to exhibit elevated cephalosporin or azithromycin MICs or resistance to other antimicrobial classes previously recommended for treatment.

Methods

Data Source

We used data from the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP), a national sentinel surveillance system that includes participating sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics in US cities, reference laboratories, and the CDC. GISP was established in 1986 to monitor national trends in gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibilities. During 2005–2010, clinics in 30 cities participated in GISP (Figure). Each month, N. gonorrhoeae urethral isolates were collected from the first 25 men with symptomatic gonococcal urethritis attending participating STD clinics in each city and the isolates were submitted to reference laboratories for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Specified epidemiological data elements (see Statistical Analysis section below) were abstracted from STD clinic notes. Data collection methods varied according to local clinic practices.

Figure 1.

Gonococcal lsolate surveillance Project (GISP) —Location of Participating Sentinel Sites and Regional Laboratories,united states,2005–2010*

*Sites had continuous participation during 2005–2010 with the following exceptions (and years of participation): Kansas City (2007–2010); Long Beach (2005–2007); New York City (2006–2010); Richmond (2007–2010); Tripler AMC(2006, 2009–2010)

Human Subjects

As a disease control and surveillance activity, GISP was determined to be a non-research public health activity by CDC. Gonorrhea is a notifiable infection and health departments have authority to collect and transmit to CDC de-identified epidemiological data on patients with gonorrhea to assist with disease control. Antimicrobial and epidemiologic data from GISP are de-identified prior to transmission to CDC. Partner identification and notification are conducted as per local STD public health program policies.

Laboratory Methods

At the clinic laboratories, the isolates were sub-cultured on supplemented chocolate medium and frozen in trypticase soy broth with 20% glycerol. Isolates were shipped monthly to a participating reference laboratory where they were tested for ß-lactamase production and susceptibility by MICs to azithromycin, penicillin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, spectinomycin, cefixime, and ceftriaxone using the agar-dilution technique. Standardized bacterial suspensions were inoculated on Difco GC base medium supplemented with 1% IsoVitalex (Becton-Dickinson, Sparks, Maryland). Cefixime susceptibility testing was halted in 2007 due to lack of availability of cefixime in the United States and restarted in 2009. Control N. gonorrhoeae strains with known MICs of a variety of antimicrobials were included with each susceptibility run to ensure accuracy of the data. Twice yearly, CDC provided a panel of unidentified strains to each reference laboratory for testing; results were compared to assure inter-laboratory consistency.

Resistance criteria

We interpreted susceptibility results according to criteria for N. gonorrhoeae recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) when such criteria were available.(14) We used CLSI criteria to define resistance to penicillin (MIC ≥ 2 μg/ml), tetracycline (MIC ≥ 2 μg/ml), and ciprofloxacin, a quinolone antimicrobial (MIC ≥ 1 μg/ml). CLSI defines decreased susceptibility to cephalosporins ceftriaxone and cefixime (MICs ≥ 0.5 μg/ml) but does not define resistance. Increasing MICs can predict the emergence of resistance, so CDC uses lower MIC breakpoints, designated “elevated MICs”, to monitor trends in gonococcal susceptibility: ceftriaxone MICs ≥ 0.125 μg/ml and cefixime MICs ≥ 0.25 μg/ml. The breakpoints chosen for the 2 cephalosporins differ because ceftriaxone MICs in GISP isolates are generally 1–2 dilutions lower than cefixime MICs (1). CLSI does not define gonococcal susceptibility nor resistance breakpoints for azithromycin. We categorized isolates with azithromycin MICs ≥ 2.0 μg/ml as exhibiting elevated MICs of azithromycin. We defined penicillinase-producing N. gonorrhoeae by positive results on the nitrocefin β-lactamase test. Where not otherwise specified, we considered penicillin resistance to include either chromosomal resistance (MIC ≥ 2.0 μg/ml and β-lactamase-negative) or penicillinase-producing strains. We defined multidrug resistance as resistance to penicillin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin, and demonstration of elevated MICs of cefixime. We considered resistance phenotypes that have been prevalent in the US for ≥ 5 years, such as resistance to penicillin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin, to be “endemic,” and the other phenotypes to be “emerging”.

Statistical analysis

We included data from all cities that contributed to GISP during 2005–2010 and restricted the analytic sample to isolates for which we had data on gender of sex partner; we categorized men as either MSM or MSW. Gay and bisexual men were grouped together as MSM because we were interested in the possible association between resistance or elevated MICs and male same-sex sexual behavior, rather than self-identified sexual orientation. Clinical sites were categorized by US census region (Figure); the Northeast and South were combined due to the small number of sites in the Northeast and the history of similar timing of the emergence of resistance in the two regions. Gonococcal resistance in the United States tends to emerge initially in the West and spread eastward.(7, 10) Geographic region, age, race/ethnicity, HIV status, antimicrobial use in the past 60 days, prior gonococcal infection in the past 12 months, and travel outside of the state in which the isolate was collected in the past 60 days were pre-selected as potential confounders based on existing literature and biological plausibility. More detailed data about sexual behavior, such as the number of recent sex partners, are not routinely collected in GISP. To build a sustainable surveillance system, GISP attempts to minimize the data collection burden on sites and collect a small number of variables that can inform public health authorities about populations in which resistance may be emerging. We used the chi-square statistic to compare the frequency distributions of categorical variables. To evaluate the associations between antimicrobial resistance or elevated MICs and gender of sex partner after adjusting for potential confounders, we constructed separate multivariable logistic regression models, with antimicrobial resistance or elevated MICs as the dependent variable for each antimicrobial agent. In each multivariable model for the resistance phenotypes, we included gender of sex partner, other variables mentioned above as potential confounders, and the pre-specified interaction between gender of sex partner and geographic region. Missing values for HIV infection, travel history, antimicrobial use, and prior gonococcal infection were imputed using the logistic regression method in Proc MI from SAS 9.3. We generated 5 imputed datasets using this procedure and used the multivariable logistic regression method in Proc MIANALYZE to analyze these datasets. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS, version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).

Sensitivity Analyses

We performed sensitivity analyses in which missing values were handled two different ways. In the first method, we excluded observations with missing data and repeated the analyses. For the second method, we considered all missing values for HIV infection, travel history, antimicrobial use, and prior gonococcal infection to be negative and repeated the analyses. Results of these sensitivity analyses are available in the Appendix, Table B.

Because of small numbers of individuals with resistance or elevated MICs for azithromycin, cefixime, ceftriaxone, and multidrug resistance, we also constructed simple models to assess the relationship between gender of sex partner and emerging resistance phenotypes. In these models, we used antimicrobial resistance or elevated MICs as the dependent variable for each antimicrobial agent and only gender of sex partner, region, and the pre-specified interaction between gender of sex partner and geographic region as independent variables. Results of these sensitivity analyses are available in the Appendix, Table C.

Funding Source

GISP is funded by the CDC, an agency of the US Department of Health and Human Services. CDC staff were involved in the design and conduct of this surveillance activity and the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of GISP data.

Results

During 2005–2010, 35,343 isolates were collected from men in 30 cities (range per year: 5,630–6,199). This represents approximately 4% of all reported male gonorrhea cases in the US. Gender of sex partner data were available for 34,600 (97.9%) isolates: 8,117 (23.5%) were from MSM and 26,483 (76.5%) were from MSW. MSM were older than MSW, and more likely to be white and from the Western region of the US (Table 1). Prior N. gonorrhoeae infection, antimicrobial use, HIV infection, and recent travel were more frequent among MSM than MSW (P < 0.001). After stratifying by HIV status, MSM were still more likely to report recent antimicrobial use (for HIV-infected men: 15.0% in MSM versus 9.0% in MSW, P=0.017; for HIV-uninfected: 6.9% in MSM versus 5.0% in MSW, P <0.001). Isolates from MSM exhibited significantly (P <0.001) higher prevalence of resistance to or elevated MICs of each antimicrobial class, including cephalosporins, than isolates from MSW (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of men from whom urethral Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates were collected and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates, Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, 2005–2010

	Total		MSM		MSW
Characteristic	n=34,600	%	n=8,117	%	n=26,483	%	P value
Age > 24 years	20,359/34,591	58.9	5,793/8,114	71.4	14,566/26,477	55.0	<0.001
Race/ethnicity							<0.001
Black	24,214/34,419	70.4	2,150/8,038	26.8	22,064/26,381	83.6
White	5510/34,419	16.0	3,752/8,038	46.7	1,758/26,381	6.7
Other	4,695/34,419	13.6	2,136/8,038	26.6	2,559/26,381	9.7
Region							<0.001
Northeast/South	13,588/34,600	39.3	1,600/8,117	19.7	11,988/26,483	45.3
Midwest	8,114/34,600	23.5	909/8,117	11.2	7,205/26,483	27.2
West	12,898/34,600	37.3	5,608/8,117	69.1	7,290/26,483	27.5
Prior gonorrhea infection	16,101/33,092	48.7	4,303/7,799	55.2	11,798/25,293	46.7	<0.001
Antimicrobial use (past 60 days)	1,488/26,537	5.6	491/5,768	8.4	997/19,772	4.8	<0.001
HIV-infected	1,998/25,247	7.9	1,702/6,619	25.7	296/18,628	1.6	<0.001
Travel (past 60 days)	1,832/19,165	9.6	654/4,535	14.4	1,178/14,630	8.1	<0.001
Resistance Phenotypes
Azithromycin DS*	123/34,600	0.4	73/8,117	0.9	50/26,483	0.2	<0.001
Cefixime – elevated MICs†	133/23,151	0.6	98/5,628	1.7	35/17,523	0.2	<0.001
Ceftriaxone – elevated MICs‡	57/34,600	0.2	29/8,117	0.4	28/26,483	0.1	<0.001
Ciprofloxacin resistance§	4,253/34,600	12.3	2,423/8,117	29.9	1,830/26,483	6.9	<0.001
Penicillin resistance
Chromosomal║	3,550/34,109	10.4	1,806/7,936	22.8	1,744/26,173	6.7	<0.001
PPNG¶	491/34,600	1.4	181/8,117	2.2	310/26,483	1.2	<0.001
Tetracycline resistance#	6,529/34,600	18.9	3,033/8,177	37.4	3,496/26,483	13.2	<0.001
Multidrug resistance**	88/34,600	0.3	66/8,117	0.8	22/26,483	0.1	<0.001

MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration; MSM = Men who report sex with men; MSW = Men who report sex exclusively with women; PPNG = penicillinase-producing N. gonorrhoeae

Note: Denominators reflect the number of men for whom data are available. Differences in the denominators reflect missing data.

^*MIC ≥ 2 μg/ml

^†MIC ≥ 0.25 μg/ml

^‡MIC ≥ 0.125 μg/ml

^§MIC ≥ 1 μg/ml

^║MIC ≥ 2 μg/ml and beta-lactamase negative

^¶β-lactamase positive

^#MIC ≥ 2 μg/ml

^**Penicillin MICs ≥ 2 μg/ml or β-lactamase positive, tetracycline MICs ≥ 2 μg/ml, ciprofloxacin MICs ≥1 μg/ml, and cefixime MICs ≥ 0.25 μg/ml

Tables 2A and2B display adjusted odds ratios for resistance or elevated MICs among isolates from MSM compared to isolates from MSW, both for emerging resistance phenotypes (azithromycin, cefixime, ceftriaxone, and multidrug resistance) and endemic resistance phenotypes (ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline). Interaction effects by region are shown and indicate significant differences by region in the magnitude of the association between resistance/elevated MICs and gender of sex partner. The displayed results are the adjusted odds ratios of elevated MICs or resistance among isolates from MSM compared to isolates from MSW, for each specific region. For example, isolates from MSM in the West had 1.4 times greater odds of elevated azithromycin MICs than isolates from MSW in the West (although the difference was non-significant), whereas isolates from MSM in the Midwest had 7.9 times greater odds of elevated azithromycin MICs than isolates from MSW in the Midwest. Isolates from MSM were significantly more likely than isolates from MSW to exhibit elevated cefixime MICs, antimicrobial resistance to penicillin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin, and multidrug resistance, after adjusting for other covariates. In the Midwestern and Northeastern/Southern regions of the United States (but not the Western region), isolates from MSM were significantly more likely than isolates from MSW to exhibit elevated MICs of azithromycin or ceftriaxone. Complete results of the models are shown in appendix Table A.

Table 2A.

Adjusted odds ratios of emerging Neisseria gonorrhoeae antibiotic resistance or elevated MICs among MSM compared to MSW, GISP, 2005–2010

Emerging Resistance
Variable	aOR	95% CI
Azithromycin, elevated MICs*
West	1.4	0.8–2.2
Midwest	7.9	3.0–21.1
Northeast/South	3.7	1.3–10.5
Cefixime, elevated MICs†
West	2.7	1.7–4.4
Midwest	12.9	3.8–43.7
Northeast/South	33.1	3.8–286.4
Ceftriaxone, elevated MICs‡
West	1.3	0.6–3.0
Midwest	6.8	2.2–20.6
Northeast/South	3.6	1.1–11.0
Multidrug resistance§
West	2.6	1.5–4.7
Midwest	57.1	7.1–471.8
Northeast/South	36.4	4.2–315.5

aOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval;

GISP = the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project;

MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration; MSM = men

who have sex with men; MSW = men who report

having sex exclusively with women

All models adjusted for age, region, race/ethnicity, antimicrobial use, travel history, HIV infection, prior gonococcal infection, and the interaction between gender of sex partner & region.

^*MIC ≥ 2 μg/ml

^†MIC ≥ 0.25 μg/ml

^‡MIC ≥ 0.125 μg/ml

^§Penicillin MICs ≥ 2 μg/ml or β-lactamase positive, tetracycline MICs ≥ 2 μg/ml, ciprofloxacin MICs ≥1 μg/ml, and cefixime MICs ≥ 0.25 μg/ml

Table 2B.

Adjusted odds ratios of endemic Neisseria gonorrhoeae antibiotic resistance among MSM compared to MSW, GISP, 2005–2010

Endemic Resistance
Variable	aOR	95% CI
Ciprofloxacin, resistance║
West	2.6	2.4–2.9
Midwest	10.8	8.4–13.9
Northeast/South	2.5	2.2–2.9
Penicillin, resistance¶
West	2.1	1.9–2.4
Midwest	4.0	3.2–5.0
Northeast/South	2.3	2.0–2.6
Tetracycline, resistance#
West	2.5	2.3–2.8
Midwest	5.4	4.5–6.4
Northeast/South	2.1	1.9–2.4

aOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval;

GISP = the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project;

MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration; MSM = men

who have sex with men; MSW = men who report

having sex exclusively with women

All models adjusted for age, region, race/ethnicity, antimicrobial use, travel history, HIV infection, prior gonococcal infection, and the interaction between gender of sex partner & region.

^║MIC ≥ 1 μg/ml

^¶MIC ≥ 2 μg/ml or β-lactamase positive

^#MIC ≥ 2 μg/ml

Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of different approaches for handling missing data on the results displayed in Table 2B. The results obtained by excluding missing data or considering missing data to be negative were consistent with the primary analysis (Appendix, Table B). Results of the simple models examining the association between elevated MICs of azithromycin, cefixime, or ceftriaxone, or multidrug resistance and gender of sex partner, adjusted for region and the interaction of gender of sex partner & region, were consistent with the results of the primary analysis (Appendix, Table C).

Discussion

During the past seventy years, N. gonorrhoeae has developed resistance over time to antimicrobial agents recommended for the treatment of gonorrhea. Combination therapy with ceftriaxone (a third-generation cephalosporin) and either azithromycin or doxycycline is now the only remaining first-line therapeutic option.(13) However, gonococcal susceptibility to cephalosporins, the cornerstone of treatment, is declining. Failures of treatment with oral cephalosporins have been reported in Asia and Europe in the past several years and ceftriaxone-resistant isolates were identified in Japan in 2009 and France in 2010.(15–20) In the US, MICs of cefixime for N. gonorrhoeae increased during 2006–2010, most notably in the West and among MSM.(13) In addition, gonococcal strains with high azithromycin MICs have been identified in the US (21, 22) and a patient unsuccessfully treated with azithromycin 2 g as a single oral dose was recently identified.(23) The introduction and spread of cephalosporin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae, particularly if also exhibiting azithromycin resistance, would greatly limit treatment options for gonorrhea and could render some cases of gonorrhea untreatable with currently recommended drug regimens.

MSM are particularly vulnerable to this emerging public health threat. In geographic areas participating in the STD Surveillance Network, approximately 22% of reported gonorrhea cases occur in MSM, although with substantial geographic variability (CDC, unpublished data). Previously published reports have described a higher prevalence of resistance to or elevated MICs of individual antimicrobials among isolates from MSM (11,13,24,25), but this is the first report to describe such findings across a range of antimicrobial classes either currently or previously recommended for gonorrhea treatment.

During the emergence of QRNG in the US, the prevalence of QRNG increased more rapidly among MSM than MSW: from 2002 to 2003, the prevalence of QRNG increased among MSM from 1.8% to 4.9%, but only from 0.2% to 0.4% among MSW.(11) By 2004, CDC no longer recommended fluoroquinolones for treatment of gonorrhea among MSM, three years before the same change in recommendation was made for heterosexuals.(12) The prevalence of QRNG remains high among MSM, despite the change in treatment recommendations and decline in fluoroquinolone use for gonorrhea.(26) A similar pattern seems to be emerging for cephalosporins, as MICs of cephalosporins are increasing more rapidly among MSM than MSW in the US and United Kingdom.(13,27)

Antimicrobial resistance in other clinically important microbes has also been described more often for MSM than for MSW. In a sample of recently diagnosed HIV-1 infected persons enrolled during 1997–2001, the prevalence of antiretroviral resistance associated mutations was significantly higher among MSM (11.6%) than among MSW (4.7%), possibly due to greater exposure to antiretroviral therapy.(28) MSM have been noted to be at elevated risk for community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and an outbreak of ciprofloxacin-resistant Shigella sonnei among MSM has been described.(29,30)

The causes of the differences in gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility between MSM and MSW are not fully understood, but there are several possible explanations. First, MSM might be more likely to travel internationally: a high proportion of newly HIV-infected MSM in San Francisco reported recent international travel or foreign-born sex partners.(31) This may be relevant because some cases of penicillinase-producing N. gonorrhoeae and QRNG appeared to have been imported into the US in the past by travelers from East Asia.(7, 32) Second, events such as circuit parties may provide a nexus for sexual interaction among MSM from different geographic regions (33) and potentially facilitate spread of resistant strains among MSM in different geographic regions. Third, we found that MSM with gonorrhea were more likely than MSW to report antimicrobial use in the past 60 days, possibly resulting in greater antimicrobial selection pressure. Although this might not explain the emergence of a resistance phenotype, which may be imported from other regions of the world, differential antimicrobial use might contribute to the selection and persistence of resistance phenotypes in the US. Fourth, N. gonorrhoeae infections of the rectum and/or pharynx might be more prone to develop antimicrobial resistance than urogenital isolates; resistant gonococcal strains may thus have a selective advantage for survival in and transmission to and from these sites in MSM. Rectal isolates have been noted to have higher geometric mean MICs of penicillin and erythromycin than genital isolates, possibly due to mutations in the mtr locus that result in reduced outer membrane permeability to hydrophobic molecules that allow the organism to survive in the rectum.(24,25,34–36) It has also been hypothesized that genetic re-assortment in pharyngeal infections might contribute to cephalosporin resistance: mosaic penA mutants found in many N. gonorrhoeae isolates with decreased susceptibility to cefixime include genetic material from commensal Neisseria species often found in the pharynx.(37) Under-treatment of pharyngeal gonorrhea, which is difficult to eradicate and often asymptomatic, could also select for resistance. It thus might not be a coincidence that the recently described ceftriaxone-resistant isolate from Japan was isolated from the pharynx of a female commercial sex worker.(19)

Cephalosporins MICs increased earlier and more steeply in the West than other regions (13). However, the adjusted odds ratios of elevated cephalosporins MICs among isolates from MSM compared to MSW are consistently lower than for other regions. This seeming contradiction is most likely due to the early increase in MICs in the West, which started in MSM and are now also observed in MSW, thus decreasing the magnitude of the association.

This analysis has several limitations. An increasing proportion of cases of gonorrhea are diagnosed and reported from clinical settings other than public STD clinics.(1) Thus, it is possible that our results may not be representative of all men with gonorrhea in the US. However, this is unlikely to alter the relative differences in resistance patterns between isolates from MSM and MSW. The analysis aggregated gay and bisexual men as MSM. Further work could investigate possible differences between isolates from gay and bisexual men. The aggregation of isolates from the Northeast and South may mask finer differences in susceptibility by geographic locations. However, as a sentinel surveillance system, GISP cannot and is not designed to provide full geographic coverage. The breakpoints for cephalosporin susceptibility that we used in this analysis do not necessarily represent “clinical” resistance. However, it is likely that increasing cephalosporin MICs will precede the emergence of resistance, and resistance would emerge first in the populations infected with strains exhibiting increasing MICs. GISP does not collect detailed behavioral data. Further work could investigate whether specific antimicrobial usage patterns or sexual behaviors, such as the number of recent partners or the type of sex in which men engaged (e.g. insertive versus receptive), influence gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility. A substantial proportion of antimicrobial use, HIV, and travel history data were missing because some participating sites do not collect these data routinely. For instance, over 40% of travel data were missing. However, the results of the sensitivity analyses suggest that substantial bias was not introduced by missing data.

Strengthening prevention strategies for MSM is critical in this era of dwindling treatment options. The number of antimicrobials newly approved by the FDA has steadily declined,(38) and few new antimicrobials active against N. gonorrhoeae are being developed. New antimicrobials or antimicrobial combinations need to be developed and existing antimicrobials not yet used for gonorrhea should be evaluated for efficacy. The National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, in collaboration with CDC, has completed enrollment of a clinical trial of 2 combinations of existing drugs: azithromycin plus either gentamicin or gemifloxacin (NCT00926796). But additional antimicrobial agents should be studied. Clinicians are encouraged to screen sexually active MSM at all anatomic sites of exposure at least annually (39) and to treat those diagnosed with gonorrhea with ceftriaxone 250 mg as a single intramuscular dose plus either azithromycin 1 g orally or doxycycline 100 mg twice daily orally for 7 days.(13) Clinicians must remain vigilant for treatment failures, even among patients treated with recommended therapy, and should notify their local or state health department and CDC of possible treatment failures. Continued surveillance of N. gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility, particularly among MSM, is vital. Local surveillance can be enhanced by the maintenance or establishment of laboratory capacity to conduct culture for N. gonorrhoeae, a capacity lost in many places due to the widespread use of nucleic acid amplification testing. Sexually active MSM are encouraged to be in long-term mutually monogamous relationships with partners who have been tested and are known to be uninfected. Latex condoms, when used consistently and correctly, can reduce the risk of acquiring gonorrhea.(40)

The emergence of cephalosporin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae would substantially complicate the ability to treat gonorrhea. MSM at risk for gonorrhea are particularly vulnerable to this public health threat.