Abstract
Background
Reactive oxygen species (ROS), including hydrogen peroxide, drive differentiation of normal fibroblasts into activated fibroblasts, which can generate high amounts of hydrogen peroxide themselves, thereby increasing oxidative stress in the microenvironment. This way, activated fibroblasts can transition into cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs).
Methods
Mammary fibroblasts from either female 8 weeks old PRDX1 knockout and wildtype mice or Balb/c mice were studied for characteristic protein expression using immunofluorescence and immunoblotting. Cancer-associated fibroblasts was examined by transwell migration and invasion assays. The binding of PRDX1 to JNK1 was assessed by co-immuneprecipitation and JNK regulation of CAF phenotypes was examined using the JNK inhibitor SP600125. Extracellular hydrogen peroxide levels were measured by chemiluminescence via the reaction between hypochlorite and luminol. Statistical analyses were done using Students t-test.
Results
We show here PRDX1 activity as an essential switch in regulating the activated phenotype as loss of PRDX1 results in the development of a CAF-like phenotype in mammary fibroblasts. We also show that PRDX1 regulates JNK kinase signaling thereby inhibiting CAF-like markers and CAF invasion. Inhibition of JNK activity reduced these behaviors.
Conclusions
These data suggest that PRDX1 repressed the activated phenotype of fibroblasts in part through JNK inhibition which may present a novel therapeutic option for CAF-enriched cancers such as breast cancer.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-6031-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: peroxiredoxin1, Mammary fibroblasts, Cancer-associated fibroblasts, Breast cancer, Hydrogen peroxide, JNK, Breast tumorigenesis
Background
Breast cancer is the most commonly occurring cancer in US women, as 1 in 8 will develop breast cancer in her lifetime. While hormonal therapies have proven effective, many cases are not responsive, develop drug resistance, or relapse at a later point, focusing a need for better prevention of later stage disease and metastasis. Breast cancer progression and metastasis include not only cell-autonomous properties of cancer epithelial cells but also the influence of the neighboring tumor stromal cells. In breast cancer, almost 80% of mammary fibroblasts (MFs) acquire a cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF)-like “activated phenotype”. This includes enhanced expression of growth factors, cytokines, enzymes degrading the extracellular matrix such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), fibroblast activated protein (FAP) and mesenchymal markers such as alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) that render target cells highly mobile. Although it is known that the CAF-activated phenotype is associated with elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are also linked with tumor spreading, exact mechanisms on how ROS promote CAFs are unknown [1–4].
Fibroblasts are the most abundant cell type in connective tissue. There, they form the structural network by secreting extracellular matrix components. During tissue remodeling, quiescent fibroblasts undergo activation and transition into activated fibroblasts, also termed myofibroblasts, which during wound healing and fibrosis gain contractile fibers by expressing α-SMA and form cell-cell contacts through gap junctions. Once the wound is closed, activated fibroblasts or myofibrobalsts undergo cell death in the form of apoptosis. In processes of fibrosis or cancer, however, activated fibroblasts fail to undergo apoptosis resulting in excess of ECM (desmoplasia) that promotes fibrosis and tumorigenesis. Oxidation processes induced by oxidants such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) have been identified as an essential contributor in the progression of normal fibroblasts into activated fibroblasts and importantly, promote the transition into CAFs [2–8]. Mechanistic details on how oxidants promote the CAF phenotype are still unclear though, therefore, as the mammary gland is a stroma rich organ, elucidation of signaling proteins regulated by H2O2 is essential to combat CAF function in breast cancer.
Peroxiredoxin (PRDX) family members (typical 2-Cys: PRDX1–4, atypical 2-Cys: PRDX5 and 1-Cys: PRDX6) are antioxidant enzymes that reduce peroxides via catalytic cysteine oxidation to sulfenic acid. 2-Cys PRDXs are important redox sensors in signaling through two unique mechanisms: a) they possess a highly reactive catalytic cysteine that converts to a protein sulfenic acid moiety resulting in a disulfide bond with a resolving cysteine, which can be reduced via thioredoxin to reset catalytic function [9]; and b) during recycling where the catalytic cysteine of PRDX can be further oxidized, which promotes in turn formation of PRDX decamers that display chaperone functionality, but lack peroxidase activity [10]. These features enable PRDX1 to sense and react to changes in redox signaling by controlling protein-binding partners. Research suggests that PRDXs play roles in cancer prevention and progression, however, their functions may be isoform and tissue-specific [11].
The family of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases comprises three family members (JNK1–3), where JNK1 and JNK2 are ubiquitously expressed, and JNK3 is predominantly found in the brain [12]. Like other MAP kinases, JNKs are activated by reactive oxygen species and signal to a complex protein network inducing apoptosis, as well as cell survival, migration and invasion depending on cellular context [13]. PRDX1 associates with the Glutathione S-Transferase Pi/JNK complex, thereby suppressing JNK activation during ionizing radiation [14]. JNK signaling regulates apoptosis, proliferation and as other recent studies report cell motility. JNK activation by various growth factors induces cell migration in many cell types, which is repressed by the JNK-inhibitor SP600125 [reviewed in [15]]. JNKs phosphorylate and regulate the transcription factor and proto-oncogene c-jun that when deleted, reduces migration and invasiveness of different cell types [16, 17]. Supporting a role for JNK in stromal tissues, JNK1 has been shown to promote lung fibrosis in vivo, and to control ROS production through NADPH oxidase 4 (NOX4) thus inducing myofibroblast differentiation and upregulation of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in human breast stromal cells [18, 19]. Hyperactive JNK1 signaling is also associated with high breast density which is characterized by increases in glandular and fibrous mammary tissue [20].
A recent study placed JNK downstream of the PTEN tumor suppressor in mammary fibroblasts. Accordingly, targeted loss of PTEN in mammary fibroblasts promoted phenotypes of CAFs and breast cancer development in mice correlating with increased activation of JNK [21]. Both, PTEN and JNK are PRDX1-interacting proteins, and while PRDX1 promotes PTEN activity, it inhibits JNK activity under conditions of ionizing radiation [14, 21]. Therefore, as loss of PRDX1 peroxidase activity has been implicated in fibroblast wound closure [22], we hypothesized that PRDX1 might play a role in mammary fibroblast signaling through PTEN. Here, we show that the lack of PRDX1 promotes characteristics found in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Also, our data suggest PRDX1 inhibits JNK, in turn decreasing the expression of α-SMA and invasive phenotypes of mammary CAFs. While these novel data imply that targeting JNK may be a strategy to inhibit tumor desmoplasia, they also suggest that targeting PRDX1 in cancer could promote unwanted tumor desmoplasia.
Methods
Cell culture
All MF cell lines were cultured in DMEM (Mediatech) supplied with 5% FBS (HyClone), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Mediatech) and 2 mM l-glutamine (Mediatech) (complete DMEM) at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 and 5% oxygen. 293 T (HEK 293 T) cells were obtained from ATCC and grown in DMEM (Mediatech) supplied with 10% FBS (HyClone), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Mediatech) and 2 mM l-glutamine (Mediatech) (complete DMEM) in a 37 °C incubator supplied with 5% CO2 in atmospheric oxygen.
Plasmids
pcDNA3-FLAG-JNK1a1 has previously been described [23] and was purchased from Addgene. Human shPRDX1 expression constructs were recently described [24], and the murine shPRDX1 expression constructs were either designed using GPP Web Portal of the Broad Institute (http://portals.broadinstitute.org/gpp/public/) or purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
Isolation of murine mammary fibroblasts
Prdx1−/− and Prdx1+/+ control mice of the same genetic background (C57BL6/N × 129/sV) were produced as previously described [25]. Female BALB/c mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory. Animals used for this study were approved by and conducted according to the guidelines of the University of Pittsburgh IACUC. Mammary fibroblasts (MFs) were isolated from 8 to12-week old virgin female mice of each genotype (Prdx1−/− and Prdx1+/+ mice) or BALB/c wild-type. Briefly, mice were sacrificed using a CO2 overdose, and the mammary glands quickly removed, washed twice in wash solution (46 mL Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) (Sigma), 2.5 mL FBS (Gibco), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Mediatech) and 400 μL Fungizone (Thermofisher), and finely minced. Tissues were then disaggregated by repeated aspiration using a 10 ml syringe (no needle). Tissues were then centrifuged and digested at 37 °C for 2 h in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Mediatech), 3500 units/ml collagenase followed by a 10 min trypsin digestion step that was neutralized with FBS. Cells were then washed twice in PBS and plated in complete DMEM with 5% FBS. After 2 h, non-adherent cells were removed, and the remaining fibroblasts were cultured for several weeks at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 and 5% oxygen until spontaneously immortalized.
Immunofluorescence
MEFs or MFs seeded on glass coverslips were fixed for 15 min in 3.7% paraformaldehyde, rinsed twice in cold PBS pH 7.4 for 10 min and permeabilized in blocking solution (PBS with 5% BSA and 0.3% Triton™ X-100) for 30 min. Coverslips were then washed twice in chilled PBS pH 7.4 for 10 min and specific primary antibodies (anti-collagen-1 (Calbiochem), α-smooth muscle actin - Cy5 (Sigma-Aldrich), vimentin (Cell Signaling) were diluted 1:250 in antibody dilution buffer: (PBS with 5% BSA and 0.3% Triton™ X-100) were applied overnight at 4 °C. Cells were washed twice in cold PBS pH 7.4 for 10 min, and fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibody (mouse or rabbit) Alexa Fluor® (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies) diluted 1:2000 in antibody dilution buffer were applied for 2 h at RT in the dark. To visualize DNA, after two 10-min washes, cells were stained with Hoechst 33258 (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies) for 15 min at RT in the dark. The slides were again rinsed in PBS and then the coverslips were mounted on microscope slides using Prolong® Gold Anti-Fade Reagent (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies). Slides were imaged on a BD Biosciences CARV II Confocal Imager.
Immune precipitations
HEK 293 T cells (5 × 105) were transiently transfected with 2 μg pcDNA3-FLAG-JNK1a1 or control plasmid, using the Fugene 6 system for 48 h. Cells were serum starved for 30 min, then treated with 0, 25 or 250 μM H2O2 for 30 min. Before lysis, cells were washed one time with PBS containing 20 mM NEM (N-ethylmaleimide) to avoid oxidation of free thiols. Samples were lysed using a Tris lysis buffer (50 mM Tris; 2% Triton X-100; 0.5 mM EDTA; 0.5 mM EGTA; 150 mM NaCl; 10% glycerol; 50 mM NaF; 1 mM NaVO4; 40 mM β-glycerophosphate), supplemented with 30 μg/ml catalase from bovine liver (Sigma), and proteinase inhibitors. Protein concentrations were quantified using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo). 1 mg of cell lysate was incubated with 20 μL of acid treated Anti-FLAG M2 Affinity Gel (Sigma) and 400 μL lysis buffer, at 25 °C for 3 h, with rotation. Immunoadsorbed samples were collected and washed four times with lysis buffer, and once with TBS. Beads were boiled in Laemmli sample buffer (BioRad) in the presence or absence of β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma) for 10 min. 20 μg of whole cell lysate input was prepared in Laemmli sample buffer as above for 5 min.
Immunoblotting
Prepared, immunoprecipitated (IP) samples and corresponding whole cell lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane according to the manufacturer’s (BioRad) instructions. Membranes were blocked with 5% BSA in TBS for 30 min, and incubated with primary antibodies against JNK1/2 (1:1000)(Invitrogen), P-SAPK/JNK (1:1000) (Cell Signaling), P-c-jun (1:1000) (Cell Signaling), P-ATF2(1:1000) (Cell Signaling), PRDX1 (1:4000)(Abcam), PRDX-SO3 (1:1000)(Abcam), and actin (1:1000) (Oncogene), overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were washed four times for 5 min each in TBST (0.05% Tween-20) and visualized by IR or chemiluminescent detection. For IR processing, membranes were incubated with a 1:15000 dilution of anti-goat, anti-rabbit, or anti-mouse IRDye (LI-COR), for 30 min at 25 °C. Blots were washed three times with TBST, once with TBS, and imaged on an Odyssey (LI-COR) imager. Membranes processed by chemiluminescence were incubated in a 1:10000 dilution of HRP-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies for 1 h at 25 °C. Blots were washed four times with TBST for 5 min and exposed to ECL for 1 min.
Cell treatment with H2O2 and JNK inhibitors
Before the individual experiments, cells were starved for 48 h in 0.25% FBS DMEM and pretreated for 1–2 h with 25 μM JNK inhibitor, SP600125 (Tocris Bioscience), 2 μM JNK-IN-8 (a kind gift from Dr. Nathanial Grey, DFCI, Boston) or 10 μM API-1 (Tocris Bioscience). Hydrogen peroxide was added for 10 min or 48 h depending on the experiment.
Migration assay
MFs were starved in 0.25% FBS DMEM for 24 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cells were trypsinized, centrifuged for 5 min at 1500 g and suspended in 0.25% FBS DMEM. Cells were counted, and 3 × 104 fibroblasts in 0.25% FBS DMEM were seeded in the self-standing Millicell Culture Plate Inserts (Millipore). 2 ml of 10% FBS DMEM was added to the plate. The migration assay was allowed to proceed for 24 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. A damp cotton swab was used to wipe the non-migrated cells from the top of the transwell membrane. Cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, washed twice with PBS and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The number of migrating MFs was counted by light microscopy using 10X magnification.
Invasion assay
A BioCoat™ Matrigel™ plate with invasion assay inserts (BD Biosciences) was thawed and incubated at RT for 1 h, then 300 μl 0.25% FBS DMEM was applied to the matrigel-coated transwell, and the plate was incubated for 2 h (37 °C, 5% CO2). MFs were starved in 0.25% FBS DMEM for 24 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cells were trypsinized, centrifuged for 5 min, 1500 x g and suspended in 0.25% FBS DMEM. Cells were counted, and 3 × 104 fibroblasts in 0.25% FBS DMEM were seeded in prepared BD BioCoat™ Matrigel™ transwells, and 0.5 ml of 10% FBS DMEM was added to each well of the plate. The invasion assay was carried out for 24 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. A damp cotton swab was used to wipe the non-invaded cells and matrigel from the top of the transwell membrane. Cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, washed twice with PBS, and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The number of invading MFs was counted by light microscopy using 4X or 10X magnification.
Luminol hypochlorite assay
Hydrogen peroxide was measured using a GloMax (Promega) microplate reader with injectors, from 200,000 MFs in a 12-well plate in 1 ml of serum-free DMEM utilizing a modified luminol/hypochlorite assay. This assay is based on the oxidation of luminol (5-amino-2,3-dihydro-1,4-phthalazinedione) by sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and measures extracellular H2O2 up to micromolar concentrations [26]. Briefly, DMEM diluted with PBS to 25% was added to a 96-well plate, and luminescence was measured by injecting luminol (Sigma) and sodium hypochlorite (Sigma) to final concentrations of 120 μM and 250 μM, respectively. Hydrogen peroxide concentrations were determined by comparison to experimental standard curves (0 to 100 μM).
Results
Murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and mammary fibroblasts (MFs) deficient in PRDX1 display activated fibroblast and CAF-like characteristics
To define a potential role for PRDX1 in regulating the activated phenotype in fibroblasts, we investigated MEFs isolated from PRDX1 knockout (Prdx1−/−) and wild-type (Prdx1+/+) embryos [25] for characteristic expression of activated fibroblast and CAF biomarkers. Immunofluorescence (IF) and immunoblotting (IB) experiments showed that loss of PRDX1 increased the levels of α-SMA, procollagen and fibroblast activation protein (FAP) (Fig. 1a and b). As α-SMA and the integral membrane gelatinase FAP participate in migration and invasion during the wound healing processes, we next tested whether the absence of PRDX1 augmented migration and invasion of fibroblasts. Prdx1−/− MEFs exhibited two-fold higher migration and invasion, which could be rescued by expressing PRDX1 wild-type protein in Prdx1−/− MEFs (Fig. 1c and d). In all, this suggests that PRDX1 suppresses signaling to promote the activated phenotype in fibroblasts.
We next examined whether loss of PRDX1 in mammary fibroblasts (MF) led to phenotypic characteristics that resemble cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) [3, 27]. MFs isolated from the mammary glands of 8-wk-old female mice (Prdx1−/− and Prdx1+/+) were examined by IF and IB. Primary non-immortalized MFs from Prdx1−/− mice showed increased α-SMA, stress fiber formation, FAP, collagen, and vimentin compared to Prdx1+/+ MFs (Fig. 2a-d and Additional file 1: Figure S1A and B). Activated fibroblasts, as well as CAFs, also display other pro-metastatic behaviors that include enhanced migratory and invasive properties [28]. Utilizing Transwell® migration and invasion assays, Prdx1−/− MFs exhibited not only higher migration and invasion under basal conditions compared to Prdx1+/+ MFs (1.7-fold and 2-fold, respectively), but H2O2 treatment increased this difference to 2.4-fold and 3-fold, respectively (Fig. 3a and b).
PRDX1 deficiency raises H2O2 levels and activates JNK in MFs
Oxidative stress has been implicated to play an essential role in the activated fibroblast phenotype associated with CAFs [3, 5–8]. To test first whether PRDX1 contributes to H2O2 homeostasis in MFs, the luminol hypochlorite assay was utilized. MFs were isolated from 8-wk-old female BALB/c mice and infected with retrovirus expressing PRDX1 targeting shRNAs. Two shPRDX1 were tested, shPRDX1–2 and shPRDX1–4, as they reduced PRDX1 expression compared to scramble shRNA 58 and 86%, respectively (Additional file 2: Figure S2A). As expected, shPRDX1–2 and shPRDX1–4 infected MFs exhibited features of the activated phenotype such as increased α-SMA expression and stress fiber formation (Additional file 2: Figure S2B). MFs were treated with low or high dose H2O2, and peroxide concentrations were measured over time. PRDX1 knockdown MFs decreased H2O2 levels induced by 100 μM similarly to control MFs, but more slowly when challenged with a lower dose of 10 μM H2O2 (Fig. 4c). This result implies that PRDX1 is active in MFs and essential for the removal of low dose H2O2. Accordingly, higher dose H2O2 was able to over-oxidize PRDX1 in MFs (Fig. 4b).
PTEN is a regulator of CAF activation, and its loss in mammary fibroblasts promotes breast carcinogenesis in mice [21]. Of note, we have recently shown that PRDX1 protects PTEN from H2O2-induced inactivating oxidation [29]. To test if PTEN intradisulfide formation is increased in MFs lacking PRDX1, shPRDX1–2 and shPRDX1–4 MFs were compared to scramble control cells for increased PTEN intradisulfide formation under non-reducing conditions by SDS-PAGE. As shown in Fig. 4c, both, shPRDX1–2 and shPRDX1–4 MFs displayed higher amounts of PTEN intradisulfides (faster-migrating band) compared to control cells after 100 μM H2O2 treatment (Fig. 4d). PTEN loss in CAFs activates JNK signaling, and JNK1 stress signaling has been characterized as “hyperactivated” in human fibroblasts isolated from high-density breast tissue samples and the cancer stroma [20, 21]. We, therefore, tested if JNK signaling is affected in MEFs and MFs deficient in PRDX1. Figure 4e and Additional file 2: Figure S2C show PRDX1-deficiency increased phosphorylation of JNK Thr183 and Tyr185 and the transcription factors c-Jun at Ser63 and ATF2 at Thr69 and 71, both of which are specific JNK substrates. Immunoblots of JNK phosphorylation in MFs showed that although knockdown of PRDX1 seemed to result in higher total JNK1 protein levels compared to scramble control (Fig. 4b), JNK phosphorylation was increased at the 30 min time point in the shPRDX1–4 cells compared to scramble control, suggesting that loss of PRDX1 prolongs JNK signaling.
PRDX1 associates with JNK1 under H2O2 treatment
JNK1 stress signaling is hyperactivated in the cancer stroma [20]. Under ionizing radiation, PRDX1 associates with the GST-pi/JNK1 complex in human lung cancer cells, thereby inhibiting JNK activity [14]. We examined if the PRDX1-JNK1 complex is affected by H2O2. Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-JNK1 from transfected 293 T cells indicated PRDX1 binding was induced with 25 μM H2O2 or greater treatment in the presence of lysis buffer containing N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) to reduce lysis induced binding artifacts (Fig. 5a). The binding of PRDX1 to JNK1 coincided with decreased phosphorylation of JNK1 on Thr183 and Tyr185, supporting the finding from Kim et al. where PRDX1 binding suppresses JNK activity [14]. Additionally, overoxidation of the catalytic Cys52 in PRDX1 observed following treatment with heightened H2O2 in cell lysates was not detected in PRDX1-JNK1 complexes (Fig. 5b), suggesting that JNK activity might increase with over-oxidized PRDX1 under H2O2 stress.
Inhibition of JNK signaling reduces CAF-like characteristics
We next examined if JNK inhibition can reduce the CAF-like phenotype in Prdx1−/− MFs. SP600125, a reversible ATP competitive JNK inhibitor, inhibited H2O2-induced phosphorylation of c-jun and JNK in Prdx1−/−MFs to levels found in Prdx1+/+MFs (Fig. 5c). Treatment of MFs with 100 μM H2O2 for 15 min increased expression of collagen, FAP, α-SMA and vimentin protein levels in 48 h in Prdx1+/+ MFs, but not in Prdx1−/− MFs (Fig. 5d). SP600125 treatment repressed this increased expression (Fig. 5d). As collagen, vimentin, α-SMA and FAP are involved in cell migration and invasion, the effect of JNK inhibition on invasion was assessed. Prdx1+/+ MFs and Prdx1−/− MFs were pretreated with 25 μM of SP600125 before exposure to 100 μM of H2O2 and analyzed by Transwell® invasion assay. JNK inhibition decreased invasion of non-peroxide treated Prdx1+/+ MFs by 48% and by 36% in H2O2-treated Prdx1−/− MFs (Fig. 5e). JNK inhibition similarly decreased invasion of non-peroxide treated Prdx1−/− MFs by 73 and 54% in H2O2-treated Prdx1−/− MFs (Fig. 5e and f). In conclusion, the data shown here suggest that PRDX1 controls the transition of benign fibroblasts into CAFs not only by promoting PTEN activity, thus decreasing JNK downstream signaling, but also by directly inhibiting JNK1 itself (Fig. 6).
Discussion
We show for the first time an involvement of the peroxidase PRDX1 in regulating the activated phenotype of mammary fibroblasts that resembles the transition from normal fibroblasts into CAFs. The involvement of oxidative stress in the form of H2O2 has long been implicated in the transition of normal fibroblasts into CAFs, thereby creating an oxidative stress field effect within the tumor [3, 5, 7, 32]. Inhibition of NOX4-derived H2O2 has been suggested as a method to block the activated phenotype in lung fibroblasts to reverse the molecular pathogenesis of fibrosis [33]. Oxidative stress is pathogenic in mammary fibroblasts as it promotes the transition from normal to cancer-associated fibroblast. Based on the present findings, we propose a model where oxidative stress-induced transition of normal MFs in to CAFs is protected by PRDX1. Under normal H2O2 homeostasis, JNK activation is prevented by PRDX1 binding to PTEN to protect it from oxidation-induced activation [29]. Once H2O2 levels rise, PRDX1 dissociates from PTEN which then can lead to JNK activation. However, since PRDX1 associates with JNK under these circumstances, JNK activation and thus the transition of normal MFs into CAFs is inhibited (Fig. 6).
c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation is intimately involved in regulating myofibroblast activation, and its role in MFs has started to emerge. For example, deletion of PTEN in MFs caused activation of AKT and JNK signaling, which is upstream of the ETS2 transcription factor [21, 34]. PTEN is a redox reactive lipid and tyrosine phosphatase that is sensitive to reversible inactivation by oxidation of cysteine 124 in its active site [30, 35]. As mutation, truncation or other genomic variations are rare in CAFs compared to epithelial cells, it is very likely that loss of PTEN function in CAFs stems from posttranslational modification such as oxidation of its catalytic cysteine, as we and others have shown [29, 30, 36]. High dose H2O2 results in dissociation of PRDX1 from PTEN and PTEN inactivation, which might occur more frequently in the microenvironment of breast cancer compared to the normal breast, since ROS are known to be higher in cancer tissues [37]. This suggests that under higher or constant oxidative stress, PTEN can be inactivated by oxidation in MFs thereby contributing to breast carcinogenesis. We recently demonstrated that PRDX1 regulates MAPK signaling by selectively modulating MKP1 and MKP5 phosphatases, which regulate JNK and p38 MAP kinases, respectively [24]. Like PTEN, MKP1 and MKP5, belong to the protein tyrosine phosphatase family, which transfer phosphates through a nucleophilic cysteine in their active sites [38]. PRDX1 protects MKP1 and MKP5 from oxidation-induced inactivation in an H2O2-dose-dependent manner. While PRDX1 protects MKP1 only under low H2O2 levels, PRDX1 supports MKP-5 activation under low and high doses of H2O2 [24, 29, 30]. As PRDX1-deficient MFs show increased JNK activation, this may reflect low MKP-1 activity, due to oxidation-induced inactivation. Future studies are required to determine if PRDX1 inactivation contributes to JNK signaling in CAFs through loss of MKP1 protection.
During cardiac overload-induced hypertrophy, JNK1 mediates α-SMA expression that is essential in cardiac remodeling and vascular smooth muscle activity [39–41]. In the heart, the infarct border zone is infiltrated with abundant stress fiber localized α-SMA-positive myofibroblasts resulting in scar contraction and synthesis of large amounts of extracellular matrix [42]. In the skin, α-SMA expression in fibroblasts induces contractility and tissue stiffness [43]. While JNK induced α-SMA is beneficial in wound healing, it has an opposite effect in breast cancer, where tissue stiffness, partially caused by CAF activities, leads to invasion and metastasis. JNK may, therefore, emerge as a therapeutic target in CAFs as it has in lung fibrosis [19]. In support of our findings shown here, JNK modulates H2O2 levels by regulating the NADPH oxidase 4 (NOX4) thereby promoting the activated phenotype in MFs [18]. Additional evidence for JNK’s active role in mammary stroma comes from a study interrogating the genome-wide transcriptional profiling of low and high-density human breast tissues. Comparison of specific gene set enrichment analysis from this study to breast tumor stroma revealed that JNK1 stress signaling is the single most significant biological process that is shared between these two data sets [20]. Taken together, this strongly suggests that JNK1 is a driver of stroma remodeling and supports our finding of reduced α-SMA, FAP and vimentin expression in the presence of the JNK inhibitor SP600125.
Similar to CAFs, activated fibroblasts that cause fibrosis exhibit different properties from myofibroblasts that promote wound healing, as the latter die after the wound has closed [44]. Therefore, fibrotic fibroblast and CAF-like phenotypes may be closely linked in some cancers. For example, 80% of all hepatocellular carcinomas originate from fibrotic livers [45]. Similarly, myofibroblasts found in wound healing and fibrosis, activated fibroblasts as well as CAFs express vimentin, α-SMA, and FAP, secrete collagen, form contractile stress fibers, remodel the ECM through proteolytic enzymes and their inhibitors and are motile as well as invasive [43–46]. However, differences in response to apoptotic stimuli, autophagy, and redox signaling have been suggested to account for the differenence between myofibroblasts and activated fibroblasts or tumor-associated fibroblasts [3]. Cancer is a wound that never heals. In that sense, future studies are needed to define the role of ROS in wound healing versus the CAF activated phenotype. Our data suggest that JNK signaling is involved in regulating the invasive nature of CAFs. Although studies suggest that α-SMA and collagen are direct targets of JNK signaling, the dipeptidyl peptidase and collagenase FAP has yet to be realized as activated by JNK signaling, although the promoter contains two AP-1 binding sites (http://genome.ucsc.edu) [19, 40, 41]. In fibroblasts as well as endothelial cells, chemical and genetic ablation of JNK controls a wide range of targets in metastasis signaling, including the expression of metalloproteinases, motility and invasion [47–57].
Conclusion
In summary, we demonstrate for the first time that JNK is regulated by PRDX1 in the transition of activated fibroblasts into CAFs and therefore may be a new potential drug target in stroma rich cancers such as breast cancer. Also, our data suggest that inhibiting PRDX1 as cancer therapeutic may inactivate PTEN and activate JNK thereby promoting the CAF phenotype.
Additional files
Acknowledgements
Not Applicable
Abbrevations
- JNK
Jun-c terminal kinase
- Prdx1
Peroxiredoxin1
- MEFs
Murine embryonic fibroblasts
- CAF
Cancer-associated fibroblast
- MF
Mammary fibroblast
- MMPs
Matrix metalloproteinases
- FAP
Fibroblast activation protein
- α-SMA
alpha smooth muscle actin
- ROS
Reactive oxygen species
- H2O2
Hydrogen peroxide
Authors’ contributions
AJD, SA, BLH, JJS contributed data acquisition and analysis, SAR and CAN wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approve the final manuscript.
Funding
R01 CA078887 (SAR); R01 CA131350 (CAN); P30-DK072506 (UPMC Hillman Cancer Center). This funding body had no role in the design of the study or collection analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval
All mouse work was done in accordance to the IACUC guidelines under the protocol 18,093,443. The cell lines used in our experiments do not require ethical approval.
Consent for publication
Not Applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Agnieszka Jezierska-Drutel and Shireen Attaran contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Agnieszka Jezierska-Drutel, Email: aga.jezierska@gmail.com.
Shireen Attaran, Email: SHA60@pitt.edu.
Barbara L. Hopkins, Email: BLH63@pitt.edu
John J. Skoko, Email: jskoko@pitt.edu
Steven A. Rosenzweig, Email: rosenzsa@musc.edu
Carola A. Neumann, Email: neumannc@upmc.edu
References
- 1.Cat B, Stuhlmann D, Steinbrenner H, Alili L, Holtkotter O, Sies H, Brenneisen P. Enhancement of tumor invasion depends on transdifferentiation of skin fibroblasts mediated by reactive oxygen species. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(Pt 13):2727–2738. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cirri P, Chiarugi P. Cancer-associated-fibroblasts and tumour cells: a diabolic liaison driving cancer progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012;31(1–2):195–208. doi: 10.1007/s10555-011-9340-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jezierska-Drutel A, Rosenzweig SA, Neumann CA. Role of oxidative stress and the microenvironment in breast cancer development and progression. Adv Cancer Res. 2013;119:107–125. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407190-2.00003-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Toullec A, Gerald D, Despouy G, Bourachot B, Cardon M, Lefort S, Richardson M, Rigaill G, Parrini MC, Lucchesi C, Bellanger D, Stern MH, Dubois T, Sastre-Garau X, Delattre O, Vincent-Salomon A, Mechta-Grigoriou F. Oxidative stress promotes myofibroblast differentiation and tumour spreading. EMBO Mol Med. 2010;2(6):211–230. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201000073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chan JS, Tan MJ, Sng MK, Teo Z, Phua T, Choo CC, Li L, Zhu P, Tan NS. Cancer-associated fibroblasts enact field cancerization by promoting extratumoral oxidative stress. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(1):e2562. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Giannoni E, Bianchini F, Calorini L, Chiarugi P. Cancer associated fibroblasts exploit reactive oxygen species through a proinflammatory signature leading to epithelial mesenchymal transition and stemness. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14(12):2361–2371. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Balliet RM, Rivadeneira DB, Chiavarina B, Pavlides S, Wang C, Whitaker-Menezes D, Daumer KM, Lin Z, Witkiewicz AK, Flomenberg N, Howell A, Pestell RG, Knudsen ES, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Oxidative stress in cancer associated fibroblasts drives tumor-stroma co-evolution: a new paradigm for understanding tumor metabolism, the field effect and genomic instability in cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 2010;9(16):3256–3276. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.16.12553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Scholer-Dahirel A, Costa A, Mechta-Grigoriou F. Control of cancer-associated fibroblast function by oxidative stress: a new piece in the puzzle. Cell Cycle. 2013;12(14):2169. doi: 10.4161/cc.25547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hall A, Karplus PA, Poole LB. Typical 2-Cys peroxiredoxins--structures, mechanisms and functions. FEBS J. 2009;276(9):2469–2477. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06985.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Neumann CA, Cao J, Manevich Y. Peroxiredoxin 1 and its role in cell signaling. Cell Cycle. 2009;8(24):4072–4078. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.24.10242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hampton MB, Vick KA, Skoko JJ, Neumann CA. Peroxiredoxin involvement in the initiation and progression of human Cancer. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;28(7):591–608. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bogoyevitch MA. The isoform-specific functions of the c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs): differences revealed by gene targeting. Bioessays. 2006;28(9):923–934. doi: 10.1002/bies.20458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Son Y, Kim S, Chung HT, Pae HO. Reactive oxygen species in the activation of MAP kinases. Methods Enzymol. 2013;528:27–48. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-405881-1.00002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim YJ, Lee WS, Ip C, Chae HZ, Park EM, Park YM. Prx1 suppresses radiation-induced c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase signaling in lung cancer cells through interaction with the glutathione S-transferase pi/c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase complex. Cancer Res. 2006;66(14):7136–7142. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang C, Jacobson K, Schaller MD. MAP kinases and cell migration. J Cell Sci. 2004;117(Pt 20):4619–4628. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jiao X, Katiyar S, Liu M, Mueller SC, Lisanti MP, Li A, Pestell TG, Wu K, Ju X, Li Z, Wagner EF, Takeya T, Wang C, Pestell RG. Disruption of c-Jun reduces cellular migration and invasion through inhibition of c-Src and hyperactivation of ROCK II kinase. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19(4):1378–1390. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-08-0753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sioletic S, Czaplinski J, Hu L, Fletcher JA, Fletcher CD, Wagner AJ, Loda M, Demetri GD, Sicinska ET, Snyder EL. c-Jun promotes cell migration and drives expression of the motility factor ENPP2 in soft tissue sarcomas. J Pathol. 2014;234(2):190–202. doi: 10.1002/path.4379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tobar N, Toyos M, Urra C, Mendez N, Arancibia R, Smith PC, Martinez J. c-Jun N terminal kinase modulates NOX-4 derived ROS production and myofibroblasts differentiation in human breast stromal cells. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:640. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Alcorn JF, van der Velden J, Brown AL, McElhinney B, Irvin CG, Janssen-Heininger YM. c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 is required for the development of pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2009;40(4):422–432. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0174OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lisanti MP, Tsirigos A, Pavlides S, Reeves KJ, Peiris-Pages M, Chadwick AL, Sanchez-Alvarez R, Lamb R, Howell A, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Sotgia F. JNK1 stress signaling is hyper-activated in high breast density and the tumor stroma: connecting fibrosis, inflammation, and stemness for cancer prevention. Cell Cycle. 2014;13(4):580–599. doi: 10.4161/cc.27379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Trimboli AJ, Cantemir-Stone CZ, Li F, Wallace JA, Merchant A, Creasap N, Thompson JC, Caserta E, Wang H, Chong JL, Naidu S, Wei G, Sharma SM, Stephens JA, Fernandez SA, Gurcan MN, Weinstein MB, Barsky SH, Yee L, Rosol TJ, Stromberg PC, Robinson ML, Pepin F, Hallett M, Park M, Ostrowski MC, Leone G. Pten in stromal fibroblasts suppresses mammary epithelial tumours. Nature. 2009;461(7267):1084–1091. doi: 10.1038/nature08486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Woo HA, Yim SH, Shin DH, Kang D, Yu DY, Rhee SG. Inactivation of peroxiredoxin I by phosphorylation allows localized H (2) O (2) accumulation for cell signaling. Cell. 2010;140(4):517–528. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Derijard B, Hibi M, Wu IH, Barrett T, Su B, Deng T, Karin M, Davis RJ. JNK1: a protein kinase stimulated by UV light and Ha-Ras that binds and phosphorylates the c-Jun activation domain. Cell. 1994;76(6):1025–1037. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90380-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Turner-Ivey B, Manevich Y, Schulte J, Kistner-Griffin E, Jezierska-Drutel A, Liu Y, Neumann CA. Role for Prdx1 as a specific sensor in redox-regulated senescence in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2013;32(45):5302–5314. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Neumann CA, Krause DS, Carman CV, Das S, Devendra D, Abraham JL, Bronson RT, Fujiwara Y, Orkin SH, Van Etten RA. Essential role for the peroxiredoxin Prdx1 in erythrocyte antioxidant defense and tumor suppression. Nature. 2003;424:561–565. doi: 10.1038/nature01819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mueller S. Sensitive and nonenzymatic measurement of hydrogen peroxide in biological systems. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000;29(5):410–415. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00261-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ohlund D, Elyada E, Tuveson D. Fibroblast heterogeneity in the cancer wound. J Exp Med. 2014;211(8):1503–1523. doi: 10.1084/jem.20140692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Garcia-Palmero I, Torres S, Bartolome RA, Pelaez-Garcia A, Larriba MJ, Lopez-Lucendo M, Pena C, Escudero-Paniagua B, Munoz A, Casal JI. Twist1-induced activation of human fibroblasts promotes matrix stiffness by upregulating palladin and collagen alpha1(VI) Oncogene. 2016;35(40):5224–5236. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cao J, Schulte J, Knight A, Leslie NR, Zagozdzon A, Bronson R, Manevich Y, Beeson C, Neumann CA. Prdx1 inhibits tumorigenesis via regulating PTEN/AKT activity. EMBO J. 2009;28(10):1505–1517. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kwon J, Lee SR, Yang KS, Ahn Y, Kim YJ, Stadtman ER, Rhee SG. Reversible oxidation and inactivation of the tumor suppressor PTEN in cells stimulated with peptide growth factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(47):16419–16424. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407396101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vivanco I, Palaskas N, Tran C, Finn SP, Getz G, Kennedy NJ, Jiao J, Rose J, Xie W, Loda M, Golub T, Mellinghoff IK, Davis RJ, Wu H, Sawyers CL. Identification of the JNK signaling pathway as a functional target of the tumor suppressor PTEN. Cancer Cell. 2007;11(6):555–569. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lisanti MP, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Chiavarina B, Pavlides S, Whitaker-Menezes D, Tsirigos A, Witkiewicz A, Lin Z, Balliet R, Howell A, Sotgia F. Understanding the “lethal” drivers of tumor-stroma co-evolution: emerging role(s) for hypoxia, oxidative stress and autophagy/mitophagy in the tumor micro-environment. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010;10(6):537–542. doi: 10.4161/cbt.10.6.13370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sampson N, Berger P, Zenzmaier C. Redox signaling as a therapeutic target to inhibit myofibroblast activation in degenerative fibrotic disease. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:131737. doi: 10.1155/2014/131737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bronisz A, Godlewski J, Wallace JA, Merchant AS, Nowicki MO, Mathsyaraja H, Srinivasan R, Trimboli AJ, Martin CK, Li F, Yu L, Fernandez SA, Pecot T, Rosol TJ, Cory S, Hallett M, Park M, Piper MG, Marsh CB, Yee LD, Jimenez RE, Nuovo G, Lawler SE, Chiocca EA, Leone G, Ostrowski MC. Reprogramming of the tumour microenvironment by stromal PTEN-regulated miR-320. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;14(2):159–167. doi: 10.1038/ncb2396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lee SR, Yang KS, Kwon J, Lee C, Jeong W, Rhee SG. Reversible inactivation of the tumor suppressor PTEN by H2O2. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(23):20336–20342. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111899200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Palumbo A, Jr, Da Costa Nde O, Bonamino MH, Pinto LF, Nasciutti LE. Genetic instability in the tumor microenvironment: a new look at an old neighbor. Mol Cancer. 2015;14:145. doi: 10.1186/s12943-015-0409-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liou GY, Storz P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic Res. 2010;44(5):479–496. doi: 10.3109/10715761003667554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cho SH, Lee CH, Ahn Y, Kim H, Kim H, Ahn CY, Yang KS, Lee SR. Redox regulation of PTEN and protein tyrosine phosphatases in H (2) O (2) mediated cell signaling. FEBS Lett. 2004;560(1–3):7–13. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00112-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Windak R, Muller J, Felley A, Akhmedov A, Wagner EF, Pedrazzini T, Sumara G, Ricci R. The AP-1 transcription factor c-Jun prevents stress-imposed maladaptive remodeling of the heart. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Garat C, Van Putten V, Refaat ZA, Dessev C, Han SY, Nemenoff RA. Induction of smooth muscle alpha-actin in vascular smooth muscle cells by arginine vasopressin is mediated by c-Jun amino-terminal kinases and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(29):22537–22543. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003000200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tock J, Van Putten V, Stenmark KR, Nemenoff RA. Induction of SM-alpha-actin expression by mechanical strain in adult vascular smooth muscle cells is mediated through activation of JNK and p38 MAP kinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;301(4):1116–1121. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00087-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shinde AV, Humeres C, Frangogiannis NG. The role of alpha-smooth muscle actin in fibroblast-mediated matrix contraction and remodeling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2017;1863(1):298–309. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hinz B, Celetta G, Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Chaponnier C. Alpha-smooth muscle actin expression upregulates fibroblast contractile activity. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12(9):2730–2741. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.9.2730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Darby IA, Laverdet B, Bonte F, Desmouliere A. Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in wound healing. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014;7:301–311. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S50046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Affo S, Yu LX, Schwabe RF. The role of Cancer-associated fibroblasts and fibrosis in liver Cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2017;12:153–186. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-052016-100322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tillmans LS, Vierkant RA, Wang AH, Samadder NJ, Lynch CF, Anderson KE, French AJ, Haile RW, Harnack LJ, Potter JD, Slager SL, Smyrk TC, Thibodeau SN, Cerhan JR, Limburg PJ. Associations between environmental exposures and incident colorectal Cancer by ESR2 protein expression level in a population-based cohort of older women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2015;24(4):713–719. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ispanovic E, Haas TL. JNK and PI3K differentially regulate MMP-2 and MT1-MMP mRNA and protein in response to actin cytoskeleton reorganization in endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006;291(4):C579–C588. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00300.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cheng CY, Hsieh HL, Hsiao LD, Yang CM. PI3-K/Akt/JNK/NF-kappaB is essential for MMP-9 expression and outgrowth in human limbal epithelial cells on intact amniotic membrane. Stem Cell Res. 2012;9(1):9–23. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2012.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nelson KK, Subbaram S, Connor KM, Dasgupta J, Ha XF, Meng TC, Tonks NK, Melendez JA. Redox-dependent matrix metalloproteinase-1 expression is regulated by JNK through Ets and AP-1 promoter motifs. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(20):14100–14110. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M601820200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kook SH, Jang YS, Lee JC. Involvement of JNK-AP-1 and ERK-NF-kappaB signaling in tension-stimulated expression of type I collagen and MMP-1 in human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2011;111(6):1575–1583. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00348.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Perlman H, Bradley K, Liu H, Cole S, Shamiyeh E, Smith RC, Walsh K, Fiore S, Koch AE, Firestein GS, Haines GK, 3rd, Pope RM. IL-6 and matrix metalloproteinase-1 are regulated by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 in synovial fibroblasts. J Immunol. 2003;170(2):838–845. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.2.838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yang SF, Lin CY, Yang PY, Chao SC, Ye YZ, Hu DN. Increased expression of gelatinase (MMP-2 and MMP-9) in pterygia and pterygium fibroblasts with disease progression and activation of protein kinase C. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(10):4588–4596. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Eto H, Suga H, Aoi N, Kato H, Doi K, Kuno S, Tabata Y, Yoshimura K. Therapeutic potential of fibroblast growth factor-2 for hypertrophic scars: upregulation of MMP-1 and HGF expression. Lab Investig. 2012;92(2):214–223. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2011.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Javelaud D, Laboureau J, Gabison E, Verrecchia F, Mauviel A. Disruption of basal JNK activity differentially affects key fibroblast functions important for wound healing. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(27):24624–24628. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301942200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rennefahrt UE, Illert B, Kerkhoff E, Troppmair J, Rapp UR. Constitutive JNK activation in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts induces a partially transformed phenotype. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(33):29510–29518. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203010200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chen JC, Lin BB, Hu HW, Lin C, Jin WY, Zhang FB, Zhu YA, Lu CJ, Wei XJ, Chen RJ. NGF accelerates cutaneous wound healing by promoting the migration of dermal fibroblasts via the PI3K/Akt-Rac1-JNK and ERK pathways. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:547187. doi: 10.1155/2014/547187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chan A, Akhtar M, Brenner M, Zheng Y, Gulko PS, Symons M. The GTPase Rac regulates the proliferation and invasion of fibroblast-like synoviocytes from rheumatoid arthritis patients. Mol Med. 2007;13(5–6):297–304. doi: 10.2119/2007-00025.Chan. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.