Abstract
Introduction
One complication after scoliosis surgery is ileus; however, few reports have described the frequency of and risk factors for this complication. We conducted a retrospective clinical study with logistic regression analysis to confirm the frequency of and risk factors for ileus after scoliosis surgery.
Methods
After a retrospective review of data from patients who underwent surgical correction of spinal deformity from 2009 to 2014, 110 cases (age range, 4-73 yr; median, 14 yr) were included in the study. We defined postoperative ileus (POI) as a surgical complication characterized by decreased intestinal peristalsis and the absence of stool for more than 3 days postoperatively. Various parameters were compared between patients with POI and those without POI. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the risk factors associated with ileus; a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Fifteen of 110 (13.6%) cases developed POI. The median height, weight, operation time, and blood loss volume of the patients with versus without POI were 146 versus 152 cm, 39.0 versus 44.0 kg, 387 versus 359 min, and 1590 versus 1170 g, respectively. There were no significant differences between patients with versus without POI in the measured parameters, with the exception of patient height, bed rest period, and presence of neuromuscular scoliosis. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed neuromuscular scoliosis as a significant risk factor for POI (odds ratio, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.23-14.40).
Conclusions
Our findings indicate a high probability of POI after scoliosis surgery, with an incidence of 13.6%. Neurogenic scoliosis, but not lowest instrumented vertebra or correction rate, was a risk factor for POI after scoliosis surgery. Digestive symptoms should be carefully monitored after surgery, particularly in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis.
Keywords: Postoperative ileus, Scoliosis surgery, Neuromuscular scoliosis
Introduction
Scoliosis surgery is increasingly common, and the occurrence of associated postoperative complications has accordingly risen1). Some reports have described postoperative superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome following scoliosis surgery2,3), but few have described postoperative ileus (POI).
Distinguishing ileus from SMA syndrome is difficult because both are associated with vomiting and abdominal pain within 1 week postoperatively3). Therefore, it is important to identify risk factors for POI after scoliosis surgery. The actual incidence of and risk factors for POI after scoliosis surgery are unclear. In this study, we analyzed the incidence of and associated risk factors for POI after scoliosis surgery.
Materials and Methods
In this single-center study, we retrieved data from our hospital database for all patients who underwent surgical correction of spinal deformity at our institution from 2009 to 2014. A total of 110 cases underwent surgical correction of spinal deformity. All records were reviewed; patients who did not meet the criteria for POI were excluded from the study. Patients who underwent instrumentation removal or growing rod placement were excluded. We defined neurofibromatosis and its associated syndrome as syndromic scoliosis.
We evaluated the following variables: patient demographics (age, sex, height, weight, and body mass index), disease-related factors (according to the classification of scoliosis, curve type), surgery-related factors (preoperative Cobb angle, postoperative Cobb angle, surgical approach, correction rate, surgical time, anesthesia, and blood loss), postoperative factors (bed rest period and postoperative fentanyl administration period), and psychosocial factors. POI was defined as impairment of coordinated propulsive intestinal peristalsis occurring after surgery and lasting for more than 3 days. The main cardinal features of POI are nausea, vomiting, inability to tolerate an oral diet, abdominal distension, and delayed passage of flatus and stool. This study was approved by the ethics committee of our institution.
Statistical Analysis
Using Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U-test, we conducted an analysis to identify any differences between patients with versus without POI after scoliosis surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then performed to assess the risk factors identified among the patients with POI. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The software used for analyses was BellCurve for Excel (Social Survey Research Information Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), which is add-in software for statistical evaluation in Excel.
Results
In total, 110 cases underwent spine surgery procedures from December 2009 to March 2014. POI was documented in 15 (13.6%) of these patients. We compared each parameter in patients with versus without POI (Table 1). Analysis revealed that patients with POI had shorter height and longer bed rest than did those without POI. We evaluated the relationships between the lowest instrumented vertebra (from T5 to the sacroiliac region) and curve type and the occurrence of POI; there were no significant differences in these parameters between patients with versus without POI (Table 1).
Table 1.
Demographic Data.
| Factor | Ileus (+) | Ileus (-) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | 15 (13.6) | 95 (86.4) | |
| Age (years) | 14 (12-17) | 15 (12-20) | 0.45 |
| Height (m) | 1.46 (1.38-1.50) | 1.52 (1.42-1.59) | 0.04 |
| Weight (kg) | 39.0 (28.5-45.8) | 44.0 (34.1-51.3) | 0.13 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 17.1 (15.0-21.4) | 18.5 (16.4-20.6) | 0.60 |
| Preoperative Cobb angle (°) | 59.0 (49.5-97.0) | 58.0 (50.0-76.9) | 0.27 |
| Postoperative Cobb angle (°) | 20.0 (16.5-30.0) | 21.0 (12.0-38.7) | 0.99 |
| Correction rate (%) | 70.7 (56.4-73.9) | 60.0 (38.4-74.6) | 0.33 |
| Operation time (min) | 387 (300-452) | 359 (296-405) | 0.38 |
| Anesthetic time (min) | 592 (489-653) | 523 (450-600) | 0.11 |
| Blood loss (g) | 1590 (520-2790) | 1170 (480-2245) | 0.44 |
| Postoperative fentanyl administration period (days) | 7.0 (3.0-8.0) | 5.5 (3.0-7.8) | 0.30 |
| Bed rest period (days) | 10.0 (7.5-21.5) | 8.0 (5.0-12.0) | 0.04 |
| Male | 6 | 32 | 0.41 |
| Intellectual disability | 4 | 12 | 0.15 |
| Anterior operation | 2 | 19 | 0.42 |
| Epidural tube | 14 | 75 | 0.17 |
| Postoperative fentanyl administration | 13 | 73 | 0.46 |
| Thoracic single curve | 8 | 50 | 0.59 |
| Thoracolumbar/lumbar single curve | 5 | 28 | 0.49 |
| Double major curve | 2 | 17 | 0.50 |
| LIV T12-L2 | 5 | 34 | 0.55 |
| LIV L3-5 | 9 | 46 | 0.29 |
| LIV S1-iliac | 1 | 2 | 0.10 |
Data are presented as n (%), median (interquartile range), or n.
Boldface text indicates statistical significance.
Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher’s exact probability test. LIV, lowest instrumented vertebra
Table 2 compares the cases according to type of scoliosis. A statistically significant difference in the number of cases of neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) was present between patients with versus without POI (6 vs. 14, respectively; P = 0.029). Patients with NMS tended to have a more severe preoperative Cobb angle and lower correction rate (Table 2).
Table 2.
Comparison by Type of Scoliosis and Multiple Factors.
| Disease | Cases (n) |
Ileus (+) |
P* | Age (years) | Male | Height (m) | Preoperative Cobb angle |
Postoperative Cobb angle |
Correction rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Idiopathic scoliosis | 44 | 4 | 0.199 | 16.0 (13.0-20.0) | 5 | 1.54 (1.49-1.59) | 58.0 (51.8-71.0) | 15.5 (9.0-29.3) | 72.7 (58.2-82.4) |
| Congenital scoliosis | 19 | 1 | 0.219 | 11.0 (10.0-14.5) | 10 | 1.41 (1.35-1.56) | 52.0 (50.0-71.0) | 24.0 (16.5-51.0) | 53.7 (0.0-61.4) |
| Neuromuscular scoliosis | 20 | 6 | 0.029 | 14.0 (12.0-16.5) | 13 | 1.38 (1.27-1.49) | 80.0 (63.8-98.0) | 33.0 (22.0-49.3) | 56.3 (37.8-71.5) |
| Degenerative scoliosis | 7 | 1 | 0.653 | 57.0 (55.5-66.0) | 0 | 1.55 (1.49-1.56) | 36.0 (10.5-49.5) | 10.0 (4.5-18.5) | 64.6 (15.3-77.7) |
| Syndromic scoliosis | 20 | 3 | 0.542 | 16.0 (12.8-20.8) | 10 | 1.52 (1.47-1.62) | 47.0 (35.0-70.8) | 25.5 (16.3-30.8) | 54.6 (36.0-67.8) |
Data are presented as n or mean (range).
*Fisher’s exact probability test
Finally, we performed a multivariate analysis (Table 3). The results indicated that NMS was a risk factor for the development of POI after scoliosis surgery (odds ratio, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.23-14.40; P = 0.022).
Table 3.
Multivariate Analysis.
| Factor | OR (95% CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Neuromuscular scoliosis | 4.21 (1.23-14.40) | 0.022 |
| Bed rest period | 1.05 (0.99-1.12) | 0.133 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
Discussion
Scoliosis surgery is among the most complicated spine surgeries. Complications of this surgery are common and may be very serious. Several complications have been reported after scoliosis surgery, including infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, Clostridium difficile infection, sepsis, stroke, delirium, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, pneumothorax, atelectasis, adult respiratory distress syndrome, bowel obstruction, and renal failure1,4,5). POI is also a reported complication, although it is regarded as an early and minor complication following spine surgery. Early prediction and detection of POI is critical because of its severe consequences, including lengthy hospital stays, increased costs6,7), and effect on patients' quality of life.
Few studies have focused on the risk factors for POI following scoliosis surgery. Most have reported the incidence of POI following spine surgery, which ranges from 0.6% to 16.7%8-11). The present study is the first to identify the incidence of and risk factors for POI after scoliosis surgery, and it revealed two important findings. First, the incidence of POI following scoliosis surgery was 13.6%. Second, multivariable analysis showed that NMS was a risk factor for POI.
Multiple studies have evaluated the risk factors for POI following spine surgery. Such risk factors include a low body mass index, general anesthesia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, intraoperative administration of >2 L/day of crystalloid solutions, and severe constipation9,10,12,13). In the present study, the presence of NMS was identified as the main risk factor for POI following scoliosis surgery. Modi et al.14) reported that three of 50 patients with NMS who underwent surgery developed POI; two had a Cobb angle of <90° and one had an angle of >90°. NMS is closely associated with a high complication rate after correction surgery compared with other types of scoliosis14-16).
The mechanism underlying the association between NMS and POI remains unknown; however, the findings of previous studies indicate possible mechanisms. Following scoliosis surgery, the stretching of nerve roots caused by correction maneuvers for severe curves can activate inhibitory spinal and sympathetic reflexes, leading to POI17). Additionally, kyphosis is usually present in patients with NMS; hence, patients tend to have a more flexed than extended posture. A flexed posture in a lumbar kyphotic model was shown to inhibit stomach myoelectric activity18). Plasma catecholamines increase after surgery19), which can also lead to inhibition of gastrointestinal motility20). Gastric myoelectric activity increases after surgical correction of a poor, stooped spinal balance in patients with spastic NMS. However, this increase does not correlate with gastric emptying21).
Because the correction maneuvers needed to achieve a higher correction rate can cause stretching of the nerve roots, we hypothesized that the correction rate would be a risk factor for POI. However, no significant difference in the correction rate was found between patients with versus without POI (median, 70.7% vs. 60.0%, respectively; P = 0.33). The correction rate was not a risk factor for POI. This lack of association may have resulted from the fact that we performed the correction after adequate detachment.
SMA syndrome is defined as prolonged nausea lasting more than 1 week with vomiting. The condition is diagnosed by radiological confirmation of constriction of the third part of the duodenum and delayed gastric emptying on upper gastrointestinal series2). Gastroduodenal distension with a relative absence of gas in the distal bowel is occasionally found on plain radiographs.
In this study, three patients were unable to eat anything for more than 1 week after surgery. These patients did not have evidence of SMA on plain radiographs, and all three improved with conservative treatment. However, SMA syndrome might have been missed because an upper gastrointestinal series was not performed.
The main limitations of this study are its retrospective design, the lack of sagittal balance evaluation, and the small number of cases.
Conclusion
The main risk factor for POI after scoliosis surgery was NMS, not the correction rate. The present study provides evidence of the ability to predict a patient's risk for the development of POI, which may in turn improve medical optimization and make scoliosis surgery safer.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Author Contributions: Costansia Bureta, Hiroyuki Tominaga and Takuya Yamamoto wrote and prepared the manuscript, these three authors contributed equally to the manuscript. All of the authors participated in the study design. All authors have read, reviewed, and approved the article.
Acknowledgement
We thank Angela Morben, DVM, ELS, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
References
- 1.Sugawara R, Takeshita K, Arai Y, et al. Morbidity & Mortality Survey of Spinal Deformity Surgery in 2012-Report by the Japanese Scoliosis Society. Spine Surgery and Related Research. 2017;1(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Braun SV, Hedden DM, Howard AW. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome following spinal deformity correction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(10):2252-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lam DJ, Lee JZ, Chua JH, et al. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case series, review of the literature, and an algorithm for management. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2014;23(4):312-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Soroceanu A, Burton DC, Oren JH, et al. Medical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Impact. Spine. 2016;41(22):1718-23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Breusch SJ, Lavender CP. Acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon following left-sided total hip replacement: An analysis of five patients. Int J Clin Pract. 1997;51(5):327-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fineberg SJ, Nandyala SV, Kurd MF, et al. Incidence and risk factors for postoperative ileus following anterior, posterior, and circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine J. 2014;14(8):1680-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ali UA, Dunne T, Gurland B, Vogel JD, Kiran RP. Actual versus estimated length of stay after colorectal surgery: which factors influence a deviation? Am J Surg. 2014;208(4):663-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Al Maaieh MA, Du JY, Aichmair A, et al. Multivariate analysis on risk factors for postoperative ileus after lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(8):688-94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kiely PD, Mount LE, Du JY, et al. The incidence and risk factors for post-operative ileus after spinal fusion surgery: a multivariate analysis. Int Orthop. 2016;40(6):1067-74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee TH, Lee JS, Hong SJ, et al. Risk factors for postoperative ileus following orthopedic surgery: the role of chronic constipation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;21(1):121-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shah KN, Waryasz G, DePasse JM, et al. Prevention of Paralytic Ileus Utilizing Alvimopan Following Spine Surgery. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2015;7(3):6087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kehlet H, Holte K. Review of postoperative ileus. Am J Surg. 2001;182(5A Suppl):3S-10S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tarrant RC, Lynch S, Sheeran P, et al. Low body mass index in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: relationship with pre- and postsurgical factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(2):140-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Modi HN, Suh SW, Yang JH, et al. Surgical complications in neuromuscular scoliosis operated with posterior- only approach using pedicle screw fixation. Scoliosis. 2009;4: 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sharma S, Wu C, Andersen T, et al. Prevalence of complications in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: a literature meta-analysis from the past 15 years. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(6):1230-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mackenzie WG, Matsumoto H, Williams BA, et al. Surgical site infection following spinal instrumentation for scoliosis: a multicenter analysis of rates, risk factors, and pathogens. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(9):800-6, S801-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kalff JC, Schraut WH, Simmons RL, et al. Surgical manipulation of the gut elicits an intestinal muscularis inflammatory response resulting in postsurgical ileus. Ann Surg. 1998;228(5):652-663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tsuchie H, Fukata C, Takahashi K, et al. Impact of lumbar kyphosis on gastric myoelectrical activity and heart rate variability in a model using flexion posture in healthy young adults. Biomed Res. 2011;32(4):271-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Smith J, Kelly KA, Weinshilboum RM. Pathophysiology of postoperative ileus. Arch Surg. 1977;112(2):203-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bernstein A, Wright AC, Spencer D. Phaeochromocytoma as a cause of gastro-intestinal distension. Postgrad Med J. 1967;43(497):180-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jalanko T, Helenius I, Pakarinen M, et al. Effects of surgical correction of neuromuscular scoliosis on gastric myoelectrical activity, emptying, and upper gastrointestinal symptoms. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58(1):38-45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
