Skip to main content
Malawi Medical Journal logoLink to Malawi Medical Journal
. 2019 Jun;31(2):150–154. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v31i2.8

Evaluation of Impact of Perinatal Factors on Time to First Meconium Passage in Nigerian Neonates

Uchechukwu Obiora Ezomike 1,, Emmanuel Onyebuchi Ugwu 2, Nkeiruka Elsie Ezomike, Christopher Bismarck Eke, Sebastian Okwuchukwu Ekenze 1
PMCID: PMC6698621  PMID: 31452849

Abstract

Background

Delayed meconium passage is usually a signal to congenital distal bowel dysfunction. Timing of meconium passage may vary depending on race, sex and several perinatal factors. Understanding the timing and associated perinatal factors in any given population will help in prompt diagnosis and adequate management of cases in that population.

Objectives

To determine the timing of first meconium passage amongst Nigerian neonates, and evaluate the impact of various associated perinatal factors.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional study using interviewer-administered questionnaires to obtain data from mothers of apparently normal infants attending the postnatal clinic of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria. Data acquisition and analysis were done using SPSS version 20. A P-value of < 0.05 was adjudged statistically significant.

Results

There were 276 male and 277 female infants. Mean birth weight was 3.4kg and mean gestational age at delivery 38.8weeks. The median age at presentation was 42days. Preterm deliveries were in 6.3%(32/510) and 3.7%(20/536) weighed less than 2.5kg at birth. Sixty-five percent (339/519) had spontaneous vertex delivery and 35%(180/519) had caesarean delivery. Passage of first meconium was within 24hours in 56.6%(307/543) and in 48hours 91.3%(496/543) had passed meconium. Fifty-four percent (54%, 288/537) commenced breastfeeding within 24hours and 85% (n=456/537) within 48hours. Exclusive breastfeeding was done in 61.5%(326/533) of subjects. Timing of first meconium passage was significantly affected by gestational age at delivery (p<0.001), mode of delivery (p<0.01), birth weight (p=0.02), first minute APGAR score (p<0.001), timing of commencement of breastfeeding (p<0.001) and feeding before breastfeeding is commenced (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Compared to other studies, we found smaller proportion of neonates passing meconium in the first 24 hours. Term neonates, birth weight ≥ 2.5kg, spontaneous vertex delivery, high Apgar score, commencement of breastfeeding within 24 hours of birth, feeding before breastfeeding is commenced, are perinatal factors associated with earlier first meconium passage.

Keywords: Evaluation, Impact, Perinatal Factors, First meconium passage, Neonates

Introduction

Meconium is the odourless earliest stool passed by a neonate after delivery. It is composed of desquamated intestinal epithelial cells, exfoliated lanugo, mucus, amniotic fluid, bile, and water. Timing of first meconium passage is a good pointer to distal colonic function in a neonate and delayed passage of meconium usually is a signal to congenital distal bowel dysfunction like Hirschsprung's disease (HD), anorectal malformation, distal intestinal atresia, prematurity, hypothyroidism, etc. Various western studies have suggested that more than 90% of neonates pass meconium within the first 24 hours of life. In Sherry et al1 it was 94%, Clark et al2 98%, Loening-Baucke et al3 and Gommel et al4 99%. Hence, they defined delayed passage of meconium as passage of meconium beyond 24 hours of delivery. It has also been suggested that such term neonates with first passage of meconium beyond 24 hours should be monitored and investigated. Some studies from Africa, especially Nigeria, however, have shown that less proportion of neonates pass meconium in 24 hours. Ameh et al5 noted 76%, Okoro et al6 81% and Omoigberale et al7 88%. In these African studies 92%-99% have passed meconium by 48 hours without any adverse effects5,6. Definition of delayed meconium passage as first meconium passage beyond 48 hours of age instead of beyond 24 hours is therefore being proposed by some of these African researchers5. However, there is insufficient data to support this proposal for the African population. For the term and post-term neonates, this redefinition may help to avert unnecessary investigations which are costly and expose patients to various potential complications8, 9. Many factors have been purported to have impact on timing of first meconium passage and may include race, gestational age at birth, birth weight, method of delivery, respiratory distress syndrome, timing of commencement of breastfeeding, and timing of first feeds other than breast milk. Understanding the timing of first meconium passage and the impact of various perinatal factors on this timing in any given population will help in counseling parents and guardians as well as encourage prompt diagnosis and early appropriate management of cases of delayed first meconium passage. Furthermore over-diagnosis will be prevented and undergoing unnecessary investigations averted. In this study we aimed to evaluate the proportion of neonates who pass meconium in the first 48 hours of life, and also assess the effects of sex, ethnicity and various perinatal factors on the time to first meconium passage. We define early passage of meconium as passage of meconium within 48 hours of life and delayed passage of meconium as passage of meconium beyond 48 hours of life.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional study using interviewer-administered questionnaires was done to obtain data consecutively from mothers of apparently normal infants at the postnatal wards, immunization clinic, and postnatal clinics of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), Enugu, Nigeria from November 2014 to October 2016. Information on sex of the neonates, gestational age at birth, birth weight, mode of delivery, first and fifth minute APGAR scores, first time of passage of meconium, time of commencement of breastfeeding, any feeding before commencement of breastfeeding were obtained from the mother and the hospital's antenatal and postnatal records. The mothers were asked to recall timing of various events in 24 hour intervals as recall of smaller time intervals may be more difficult and less accurate. Data were initially acquired using the interviewer administered questionnaires and later transferred to SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc. Chicago Illinois) for analysis. Results were presented as means ± SD, ranges, percentages, tables and statistical analysis done using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. A p-value of <0.05 was adjudged statistically significant.

Results

There were 553 infants (276 males and 277 females). Birth weight ranged from 1.5kg to 6kg (mean: 3.37±0.53). Gestational age at birth ranged from 31–42 weeks (median: 39 weeks, mean: 38.8± 1.59 weeks). The median age at presentation was 42 days and the modal age was 42 days. Preterm deliveries were seen in 6.3% (32/510) and 3.7% (20/536) weighed less than 2.5kg at birth. Sixty-five percent (339/519) had spontaneous vertex delivery and 35% (180/519) had caesarean delivery. Passage of first meconium was within 24hours in 56.6%(307/543); within 48 hours in 91.3%(496/543) and within 72hours in 99.3% (539/543) had passed meconium. Fifty-four percent (54%, 288/537) commenced breastfeeding within 24 hours and 85% (n=456/537) within 48 hours. Exclusive breastfeeding was done in 61.5% (326/533) of subjects ) of subjects. Timing of first meconium passage was significantly affected by gestational age at delivery (p<0.001), mode of delivery (p<0.01), birth weight (p=0.02), first minute APGAR score (p<0.001), fifth minute APGAR score (p=0.006), timing of commencement of breastfeeding (p<0.001) and feeding before breastfeeding is commenced (0.02). The timing of first meconium passage was not significantly affected by sex (p=0.22) and ethnicity (p=0.84).

Discussion

In some African studies, delayed passage of meconium is being suggested as delay in meconium passage beyond 48 hours of delivery in term neonates6. This is because a large proportion of apparently normal neonates pass meconium after 24 hours but within 48 hours of delivery. The percentage of African infants passing meconium within 24 hours of birth ranged from 76%-88%5,6,7. This is opposed to Western studies mostly defining delay as passage of meconium beyond 24 hours and in these studies the percentage that passed meconium in 24 hours ranged from 94%-99%1,2,3,4. In the present study all apparently normal neonates, including preterm infants, were studied and only 56.6% of the neonates passed meconium in 24 hours and 91.3% in 48 hours. This supports other studies in Africa5, 6,7 and we believe that defining delayed passage of meconium, as passing meconium beyond 48 hours should be more plausible in our environment. The study also supports other Nigerian studies showing that the percentage of Nigerian newborns passing meconium in 24 hours is quite smaller than generally accepted Western figures and hence using 24 hours as bench mark may classify a large percentage of newborns as having delay in meconium passage leading to parental anxiety and instituting unnecessary investigations with attendant risks of procedural complications8, 9,10 . We therefore recommend that clinicians should only re-evaluate newborns for delayed meconium passage if they have not passed first meconiumbeyond 48hours.

Comparing the results of the present study with some previous reports is difficult because of heterogeneity in their study designs including category of infants (preterm and/or term), definition of delayed passage of meconium, birth weight categorization (less than 1kg, less than 2.5kg or ≥ 2.5kg), etc.

In preterm and low birth weight neonates many pass meconium beyond 24 hours. Similar to the present study, Jhaveri and colleagues11, while studying preterm infants weighing less than or equal to 1500g, defined delayed passage of meconium as passing meconium afterthe first48 hours of life.. Delayed passage was noted in 20.4% of preterm neonates in the study. On the other hand, Wang et al12 studying preterm neonates weighing ≤1500g defined delayed passage as not passing meconium beyond 24 hours of life and found that 22.5% of preterm neonates passed meconium beyond 24 hours. Furthermore, Verma et al13 studied preterm neonates weighing less than or equal to 1000g and found that median age at passage of the first stool was 3 days and 90% of the infants have passed stool by 12 days after birth.

In the present study, a significantly more number of neonates delivered by the spontaneous vaginal delivery passed meconium earlier than those delivered by caesarean section. This is supported by findings by Tateishi et al14 suggesting that infants born vaginally were more acidotic and passed first stool earlier when compared to those born by Caesarean section. However, Gulcan et al15 did not find a significant relationship between mode of delivery and time to passage of first meconium.

It was also observed in the present study that significantly more term and post-term neonates than preterm neonates passed meconium within 48 hours of delivery. Only sixty-five percent of those delivered at a GA <37weeks (preterm) passed meconium within 48 hours while 93.3% of those delivered at GA of ≥37weeks gestation passed meconium within 48hours (p < 0.001). This finding is corroborated by other authors4, 15,16 who documented that gestational age is significantly correlated with time of first stool passage. It is thought that term neonates pass stool earlier because there is increased gastrointestinal motility with advanced gestational age17. In preterm neonates there is immaturity of bowel function and absence of the triggering effect that enteral feeding has on gut hormones15. Metaj et al18 noted that gestational age was a significant factor in predicting time to first stool. Kumar SL et al19 also noted that the gestational age independently correlated with the timing of first stool.

In this study, significantly more neonates with birth weight ≥2.5kg passed meconium within 48 hours of birth when compared with those weighing less than 2.5kg (p=0.02). Also those weighing less than 2.5kg (low birth weight) were significantly more likely to have delayed passage of meconium beyond 48hours than those weighing 2.5kg or more (p=0.02). This is supported by Bekkali et al16 who suggested that delay in passage of meconium was significantly more in those with less than or equal to 2.5kg. Also Verma et al13 found that median age at passage of the first stool was 3 days in neonates weighing less than or equal to 1000g, and it took about 12 days for 90% of these neonates to pass meconium. Furthermore, Gommel et al4 noted an inverse relationship between birth weight and meconium passage while Okoro et al, in their study involving only term neonates emphasized that birth weight does not affect passage of meconium in term neonates. Gulcan15 also noted no significant relationship between birth weight and time to passage of first meconium. In very low birth weight infants, delay in the passage of the first stool is a common occurrence. This delay is probably due to physiological immaturity of the motor mechanisms of the gut, and lack of triggering effect of enteral feeds on gut hormones11, 12.

First minute APGAR score of less than 7 was significantly associated with delay in passage of meconium than those with first minute APGAR score of greater than or equal to 7(p<0.001). Furthermore fifth minute APGAR score of less than 7 was also significantly associated with delay in passage of meconium than those with fifth minute APGAR score greater than or equal to 7 (p<0.006). This may be related with the report by Gulcan15 which noted that time of first stool passage was significantly later in newborns with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) than in gestational-age-matched newborns without RDS. Newborns with RDS exhibit delayed gastric emptying and this can adversely affect gut motility20 and subsequently time to first meconium passage. Wang et al12 also noted significant differences between those with delayed passage and non-delayed groups for presence of severe respiratory distress syndrome. Jhaveri et al 11 noted that the presence of severe respiratory distress syndrome, may singly or in concert with other factors adversely affect gastrointestinal motility leading to delayed passage of meconium.

In the current study early commencement of breastfeeding within 24 hours of delivery was associated with earlier passage of meconium than those who commenced breastfeeding beyond 24hours of birth (p<0.001). Gulcan et al15 also noted that time to first enteral feeding was significantly correlated with time of first stool passage. In those who were fed with various feeds before the onset of breastfeeding meconium passage also occurred significantly earlier than in those who were not fed before breastfeeding (p=0.02). Enteral feeding is thought to trigger secretion of gut hormones that are critical to secretory function of target organs like stomach, pancreas, and small intestine15. Wang et al12 also noted significant differences between groups with delayed and non-delayed passage of the first stool in the time to first enteral feeding.

Various types of feeds were used before breast milk was introduced by the mothers including plain water, glucose water, artificial milk, coconut water. These feeds given before commencement of breastfeeding significantly improved meconium passage in this study (p=0.02). This finding is similar to report by Lucas21 which also observed that preterm newborns fed enterally were associated with significant postnatal rise in plasma motilin which might increase efficiency of intestinal motor function.

In the current study there was no significant difference in time to passage of meconium amongst the two sexes (p=0.22) and this is corroborated by other studies 6,13,15.

Limitations and strengths of the study

The major limitation of this study is maternal recall bias. Mothers who were interviewed at the postnatal clinic may not recall with certainty when their infants passed their first meconium and other perinatal events including initiation of breastfeeding and other feeds. Keeping all the mothers in the postnatal wards from birth till meconium is passed would have been a more objective and accurate way of obtaining these data but this would have prolonged the hospital admission with its attendant cost implications. Another limitation is the possibility of maternal use of some drugs which have been shown to affect neonatal gut motility and consequently timing of meconium passage e.g. magnesium sulphate, narcotics, and betamethasone15. This category of neonates ought to have been sought for and excluded from the study. Further limitation in this study is lack of follow-up of those infants with delayed passage of meconium.

A major strength of this study was its large sample size which allowed for sub-group analysis of certain variables such as preterm and term births, low and normal birth weights, etc. The data collection site included the postnatal wards and immunization clinics where data was obtained from mothers whose neonates were able to pass meconium before discharge or before attending the immunization clinics respectively. This no doubt reduced recall bias and increased the study's internal validity which was a major limitation of previous designs that limited data collection to the six weeks postnatal clinic visits.

Implications for further studies

Future studies should consider following up infants with delayed passage of meconium to see if there might be any future developments of adverse sequelae. Furthermore timing of first meconium passage should be studied in other African countries, as most of the quoted studies appear to be limited to the various regions of Nigeria5, 6,7.

Conclusion

Compared to other studies, we found smaller proportion of neonates passing meconium in the first 24 hours. Term neonates, birth weight ≥2.5kg, spontaneous vertex delivery, high APGAR score, early commencement of breastfeeding within 24 hours of birth, feeding before breastfeeding is commenced are perinatal factors associated with earlier first meconium passage. Clinicians should be aware of this low proportion passing meconium in 24hours and associated perinatal factors whenever confronted with cases of delayed passage of meconium. Mothers should be counseled on the effect of early commencement of breastfeeding in early passage of meconium.

Table 1.

Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Infants

Mean Birth Weight
Less than 2.5kg
Greater than or equal to
2.5kg
3.37±0.53kg
20
516

3.7%
96.3%
Mean Age
Median age
31.61±23.08 days
42 days
Mean gestational age at
delivery
Preterm
Term
38.8 ± 1.58 weeks
32
478

6.3%
93.7%
Mode of delivery
Spontaneous Vertex
Delivery
Caesarean section

339
180

65%
35%
First minute APGAR Score
<7
≥7

37
313

10.6%
89.4%
Fifth Minute APGAR
<7
≥7

10
234

4%
96%
Sex
Males
Females

275
276

49.9%
50.1%
Ethnicity
Igbos
Non-Igbos

442
97

82%
18%

Table 2.

Timing of first meconium Passage

Number Percentage
Within 24hours 313 56.6
24–48hours 192 34.7
48–72hours 44 8.0
≥72hours 4 0.7
Total 553 100

Table 3.

Association between some perinatal factors and timing of first meconium passage

First meconium
passage within
48hours
First meconium
passage after
48hours
p-value Odds
ratio
95% CI
Gestational Age
Preterm
Term

21
446

11
32

< 0.0001
0.14 0.06 – 031.
Mode of Delivery
Spontaneous
vertex Delivery
Caesarean
Section

320
155

19
25

< 0.01
2.72 1.45–5.-08
Birth Weight
< 2.5Kg
≥2.5Kg

15
466

5
40

0.01
0.26 0.09–0.75
APGAR Score
First Minute
<7
≥7

25
287

10
22

< 0.001
0.19 0.08–0.45
APGAR Score
fifth minute
<7
≥7


5
301


4
28


< 0.01
0.12 0.03–0.46
Feeding before
breastfeeding?
Feeding
No Feeding

264
205

35
12

0.02
0.44 0.22–0.87
Commencement
of Breastfeeding
Within 24hours
Beyond 24hours

277
207

10
36

< 0.0001
4.81 2.34–9.93
Ethnicity
Igbo
Non-Igbo

394
38

88
9

0.88
1.06 0.49–2.27
Sex
Male
Female

251
245

19
28

0.18
1.51 0.82–2.77

Acknowledgement

We sincerely acknowledge all the residents who were trained and helped in administering the questionnaires to the mothers. We are also grateful to all the mothers who responded positively and filled in the questionnaires without which this study could not have held. We also appreciate all the children whose information was used to make this study possible.

Funding

There was no external source of funding. The study was self-funded by the authors.

Availability of data

The primary data that give credence to the findings of this study could be obtained from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request within a reasonable time from the time of publication.

Ethical considerations

All the participants were adequately counseled and their informed consent obtained before administering the questionnaires. Participation in this study was voluntary and the patients' information were handled with utmost confidentiality

References

  • 1.Sherry SN, Kramer I. The time of passage of the first stool and first urine by the newborn infant. J Pediatr. 1955;46:158–159. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(55)80205-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clark DA. Times of first void and first stool in 500 newborns. Pediatrics. 1977;60:457–459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Loening-Baucke V, Kimura K. Failure to pass meconium: Diagnosing neonatal intestinal obstruction. Am Fam Physician. 1999;60:2043–2050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gomella TL, Cunningham MD, Eyal FG, Tuttle DJ, editors. Neonatology: Management, Procedures, On-Call Problems, Diseases, and Drugs. 7th Ed. New York: MacGraw Hill Companies; 2013. Chapter 67. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ameh N, Ameh EA. Timing of passage of first meconium and stooling pattern in normal Nigerian newborns. Ann Trop Pediatr. 2009;29:129–133. doi: 10.1179/146532809X440743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Okoro PE, Enyindah CE. Time of passage of first stool in newborns in a tertiary health facility in southern Nigeria. Niger J Surg. 2013;19(1):20–22. doi: 10.4103/1117-6806.111503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Omoigberale AI, Okolo AA. Time of passage of first stools (meconium) and serum levels of calcium and magnesium in Nigerian neonates (African neonates) Niger J Clin Pract. 2009;12(1):54–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ameh EA, Chom ND. Colorectal perforation following barium examination in children. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2003;10:64–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.de Lorijn F, Kremer LCM, Reitsma JB, Benninga MA. Diagnostic tests in HD: a systematic review. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;42:496–505. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000214164.90939.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rees BI, Azmy A, Nigam M, Lake BD. Complications of rectal suction biopsy. J Pediatr Surg. 1983;18:273–275. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(83)80098-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jhaveri MK, Kumar SP. Passage of the first stool in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 1987;79(6):1005–1007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang PA, Huang FY. Time of the first defaecation and urination in very low birth weight infants. Eur J Pediatr. 1994;153(4):279–283. doi: 10.1007/BF01954520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Verma A, Dhanireddy R. Time of first stool in extremely low birth weight (< or = 1000 grams) infants. J Pediatr. 1993;122(4):626–629. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83550-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tateishi H, Yamauchi Y, Yamanouchi I, Khashaba MT. Effect of mode of delivery, parity and umbilical blood gas on first meconium passage in full-term healthy neonates. Biol Neonate. 1994;66(2–3):146–149. doi: 10.1159/000244102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gulcan H, Gungor S, Tiker F, Kilicdag H. Effect of perinatal factors on time of first stool passage in preterm newborns: An open, prospective study. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2006;67(3):214–225. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2006.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bekkali N, Hamers SL, Schipperus MR, Reitsma JB, Valerio PG, van Toledo L, et al. Duration of meconium passage in preterm and term infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93:F376–F379. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.138024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McLain CR., Jr Amniography studies of the gastrointestinal motility of the human fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1963;86:1079–1087. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)35300-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Metaj M, Laroi IA, Lawrence RA, Ryan RM. Comparison of breast-and formula-fed normal newborns in time to first stool and urine. J Perinatol. 2003;23:624–628. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kumar SL, Dhanireddy R. Time of first stool in premature infants: effect of gestational age and illness severity. J Pediatr. 1995;127(6):971–974. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70041-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Victor H. Effect of body position on gastric emptying in the neonate. Arch Dis Child. 1975;50(7):500–504. doi: 10.1136/adc.50.7.500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lucas A, Adrian TE, Christofides N, Bloom SR, Aynsley-Green A. Plasma motilin, gastrin and enteroglucagon and feeding in the human newborn. Arch Dis Child. 1980;55(9):673–677. doi: 10.1136/adc.55.9.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The primary data that give credence to the findings of this study could be obtained from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request within a reasonable time from the time of publication.


Articles from Malawi Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Kamuzu University of Health Sciences and Medical Association of Malawi

RESOURCES