Abstract
Three quarters of new HIV infections in the US are among men who have sex with men (MSM). In other populations, incarceration is a social determinant of elevations in viral load and HIV-related substance use and sex risk behavior. There has been limited research on incarceration and these HIV transmission risk determinants in HIV-positive MSM.
We used the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) 2011-2012 follow-up survey to measure associations between past year and prior (more than one year ago) incarceration and HIV viral load and substance use and sex risk behavior among HIV-positive MSM (N=532).
Approximately 40% had ever been incarcerated, including 9.4% in the past year. In analyses adjusting for sociodemographic factors, past year and prior incarceration were strongly associated with detectable viral load (HIV-1 RNA >500 copies/mL) (past year adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 3.50 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.59, 7.71; prior AOR: 2.48 95% CI: 1.44, 4.29) and past 12 month injection drug use (AORs>6), multiple sex partnerships (AORs>1.8), and condomless sex in the context of substance use (AORs>3). Past year incarceration also was strongly associated with alcohol and non-injection drug use (AOR>2.5). Less than one in five HIV-positive MSM recently released from incarceration took advantage of a jail/prison re-entry health care program available to veterans.
We need to reach HIV-positive MSM leaving jails and prisons to improve linkage to care and clinical outcomes and reduce transmission risk upon release.
Keywords: incarceration, HIV, men who have sex with men
Introduction
Men who have sex with men (MSM) account for 75% of new HIV infections in the US.1 Disproportionate rates are observed in minority MSM;2–6 it is projected that half of black MSM and one-quarter of Hispanic MSM will acquire HIV in their lifetime.7 HIV-positive minority MSM are less likely to achieve viral suppression than their white counterparts.8 Gay-related stigma, discrimination,9,10 and social isolation11,12 are thought to contribute to the elevated risk of HIV in MSM. Adverse social conditions may exacerbate social vulnerability and transmission risk in MSM groups.
Criminal justice involvement (CJI) may constitute an important social determinant of HIV transmission risk among MSM. CJI is strongly associated with HIV, with rates of HIV among inmates five times that of the general population.13,14 CJI is independently associated with unsuppressed viral load and drug and sex risk behavior, including among HIV-positive individuals.15–24 This may be the case in part because CJI is stressful and disempowering,25 disrupts social networks and support,15,16 and exacerbates poverty and interruptions in health care.26,27 Further, evidence suggests MSM experience high rates of physical and sexual abuse during detainment28 which may exacerbate stigma and discrimination in this population. CJI-related stress, social isolation, poverty, and stigma may increase psychopathology, substance use, and in turn HIV risk behavior among MSM. Syndemic theory has served as a useful construct for understanding HIV risk among MSM,29–31 given their disproportionate risk of multiple, co-occurring HIV risk factors including stress,32–36 depression,32,37–40 substance use,32,41–44 and intimate partner violence.32,45–48 CJI has been identified as an additional syndemic factor that works in tandem with other HIV determinants to drive risk in this group.49 However, to date research on the association between CJI and HIV risk among MSM has been sparse.
We have limited understanding of the impact of incarceration on viral load and HIV-related drug and sex risk behavior among MSM, in part as a result of little data on incarceration in HIV studies among MSM.50–52 Improved understanding may hold particular relevance for minority MSM, given disproportionate HIV infection and incarceration in this group.53,54 This study sought to address this gap and measure cross-sectional associations between past year and prior history of incarceration and viral load and HIV-related substance use and sex risk behavior in a national sample of HIV-positive MSM.
Methods
Study Sample
The Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) is an observational cohort of patients living with HIV and matched HIV-negative controls that began in 2002 and was designed to evaluate the role of alcohol and drug use in clinical outcomes.55 VACS includes clinical, administrative, and survey data on patients from eight Veterans Health Administration (VHA) sites (Atlanta, GA; Baltimore, MD; Bronx, NY; New York City, NY; Houston, TX; Los Angeles, CA; Pittsburgh, PA; and Washington, DC). Institutional review boards at each site approved all study activities. Among 6819 VACS participants enrolled, 3515 (1908 HIV+; 1607 uninfected) responded to the VACS follow-up 2011 survey, the first VACS survey that assessed CJI. Among HIV-positive participants, 538 were male participants who reported a history of sex with men in the year prior to the survey and, of these, we restricted our analyses to those who had non-missing data on incarceration (N=532 of 538).
Measures
Incarceration.
Participants were asked “Have you ever spent any time in a jail, prison, or juvenile correctional facility?” Those who affirmed prior incarceration were asked, “In the past year, how much time have you spent in a jail, prison, or juvenile correctional facility?” We used these measures to create a three-level categorical indicator of past year incarceration, prior incarceration (one year ago or more), and never incarcerated.
HIV Risk and Viral Load Outcomes.
HIV-related substance use outcomes included past year injection drug use (IDU); unhealthy alcohol use, defined as use consistent with risk or established harm,56 was measured by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C)57 with a score of ≥4 considered to indicate unhealthy use58; past year illicit drug use defined as use of cocaine, stimulants, heroin, non-medical use of prescription opioids, or injection drugs. HIV-related sex risk behavior in the past 12 months included multiple sex partners (two or more oral, vaginal, and/or anal partners); condomless oral, vaginal, and/or anal sex as a result of alcohol and/or drug use, indicated by participant self-reported perception that condomless sex occurred “because of” alcohol or drugs; oral, vaginal, or anal sex with non-monogamous partners; and vaginal or anal sex with partners who were HIV-negative or who did not know their HIV status. . HIV RNA-1 viral load closest to the 2011 follow-up survey, taken before the survey among 62% and after the survey among 38% of participants, was used to measure unsuppressed viral load, defined as >500 copies/mL.
Covariates.
Covariates included age; race/ethnicity; married/cohabiting versus unmarried/not cohabiting; education, defined as some college education versus none; income, defined as <$12,000/year versus ≥$12,000/year, given $12,000 represents the median household income of the sample and the cut-point for the federal poverty level for a family of one;59 and homelessness, defined as having spent at least one night in a shelter or on the street in the past 12 months.
Clinical Status.
Background clinical characteristics of the sample included median CD4, median log viral load, and hepatitis C virus infection (HCV). The VL and CD4 values used were those taken closest to the survey (before or after); 92% of values were within 3 months of the survey and 97% were within one year. HCV status as of November 2012 was used. Among those with a history of incarceration, we also evaluated levels of enrollment in the Health Care for Re-entry Veterans (HCRV), a program which helps veteran jail/prison releasees with pre-release planning, referrals and linkage to health, and social services upon release.60–62
Analyses
All analyses were conducted using Stata Version 14.0. We conducted bivariate analyses to describe the prevalence of sociodemographic factors by incarceration history assessing differences in the distribution of untransformed continuous variables by incarceration using the t-test and of categorical variables by incarceration using the chi-square test. In the total sample, we estimated logistic regression models to calculate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between history of incarceration and unsuppressed viral load and HIV-related substance use and sex risk behavior. In adjusted analyses, we controlled for age, marital status, income, and homelessness in the past 12 months. For each adjusted model, we tested an incarceration by race/ethnicity interaction term to evaluate whether differences in the association between incarceration and HIV risk outcomes differed significantly for white versus non-white MSM (p<0.10 level).
Results
The analytic sample of 532 HIV-positive MSM had a median age of 53 years, with ages ranging from 24-88 years (Inter-quartile Range: 46-59 years). Over half was African American, 20% were currently married, and the majority had some college education. Approximately 40% of participants had ever been incarcerated; 9% in the past year and an additional 31% more than one year ago (Table 1). Those with past year and prior incarceration were more likely than those with no history of incarceration to be African American (62.0% and 67.3% versus 54.3%; p=0.012), less likely to have some college education (68.0% and 75.0% versus 84.8%; p=0.003), more likely to report an annual household income of <$12,000 (66.0% and 43.7% versus 29.5%; p<0.001), and more likely to report homelessness in the past year (34.0% and 12.7% versus 1.3%; p<0.001). Incarceration history was not associated with marital status. Those with past year and prior incarceration had a significantly lower median CD4 cell count versus those with no prior history of incarceration (459 cells/µL and 479 cells/µL versus 513 cells/µL, p=0.025). Those who had been incarcerated in the past year had a higher median log viral load (3.99 copies/mL) than those with prior or no incarceration (3.87 copies/mL, p<0.001), a statistically significant though not clinically relevant difference. Over half (51.1%) of those with a past year incarceration were infected with HCV, followed by 38.2% of those with a prior incarceration and 27.3% of those never incarcerated (p=0.001). Eighteen percent of veterans with a history of past year incarceration and 7% of those with a prior incarceration had participated in the HCRV.
Table 1.
No Incarceration History N=317 | Prior Incarceration (More than One Year Ago) N=165 | Past Year Incarceration N=50 | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sociodemographic Factors | ||||
Years of Age (Mean, SD) | 53.1 | 52.5 | 51.7 | 0.567 |
N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
Race/Ethnicity | ||||
White | 102 (32.2) | 31 (18.8) | 9 (18.0) | 0.012 |
African American | 172 (54.3) | 111 (67.3) | 31 (62.0) | |
Hispanic | 28 (8.8) | 16 (9.7) | 9 (18.0) | |
Other | 15 (4.7) | 7 (4.2) | 1 (2.0) | |
Marital Status/Living with Partner | ||||
Yes | 69 (21.9) | 33 (20.1) | 9 (18.0) | 0.778 |
No | 246 (78.1) | 131 (79.9) | 41 (82.0) | |
Education | ||||
<College | 48 (15.2) | 41 (25.0) | 16 (32.0) | 0.003 |
Some College | 268 (84.8) | 123 (75.0) | 34 (68.0) | |
Income <$12,000/Year | ||||
Yes | 93 (29.5) | 69 (43.7) | 33 (66.0) | <0.001 |
No | 222 (70.5) | 89 (56.3) | 17 (34.0) | |
Homelessness in Past 12 Monthsb | ||||
Yes | 4 (1.3) | 21 (12.7) | 17 (34.0) | <0.001 |
No | 313 (98.7) | 144 (87.3) | 33 (66.0) | |
Clinical Status‡ | ||||
Median CD4 Lymphocytes (cells/μL) | 513 (361-733) | 479 (320-679) | 459 (320-558) | 0.025 |
CD4 <350 cells/μL | 68 (22.4%) | 50 (32.9%) | 15 (33.3%) | 0.031 |
Median Log HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL) | 3.87 (3.87-4.32) | 3.87 (3.87-6.20) | 3.99 (3.87-6.79) | <0.001 |
Current Hepatitis C Infection | 83 (27.3%) | 58 (38.2%) | 23 (51.1%) | 0.001 |
Ever Participated in Health Care for Re-entry Veterans Program | Not applicable | 12 (7.3%) | 9 (18.0%) | <0.001c |
In the entire MSM sample, 40.4% had ever been incarcerated: 50 (9.4%) had been incarcerated in the past year and additional 165 (31.0%) had an incarceration prior to the past year. Levels of past year and prior incarceration were more common among non-white (10.5% and 34.4%) than white participants (6.3% and 21.8%).
Spent night in shelter or on street
Compares levels of HCRV involvement among those with recent versus prior incarceration
Since no significant incarceration by race/ethnicity interactions in associations between incarceration and outcomes were observed, we report associations between incarceration and HIV viral load and risk behaviors in the combined sample of white and non-white MSM (Figure 1). Having an unsuppressed viral load was more commonly observed among those with past year (33%) and prior (25%) incarceration than those never incarcerated (11%). In multivariable models, incarceration remained strongly associated with having a detectable viral load (past year incarceration adjusted OR (AOR): 3.50, 95% CI: 1.59, 7.71; prior incarceration AOR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.44, 4.29). IDU was reported by 10% of individuals with past year incarceration versus 4% of individuals with prior incarceration and less than one percent with no prior history of incarceration. Associations between incarceration and IDU remained in adjusted models (past year incarceration AOR: 13.83, 95% CI: 2.21, 86.36; prior incarceration AOR: 6.61, 95% CI: 1.28, 34.12). Those with past year and prior incarceration had significantly greater odds of unhealthy alcohol use (past year incarceration: AOR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.35, 5.76; prior incarceration: AOR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.03-2.76) and past year illicit drug use (past year incarceration: AOR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.44, 6.25; prior incarceration: AOR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.53, 3.97) compared with those who were never incarcerated.
Incarceration also remained strongly associated with past 12 month sexual risk behaviors including multiple sex partners (past year incarceration AOR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.14, 4.69; prior incarceration AOR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.64) and engaging in condomless sex linked to alcohol use (past year incarceration AOR: 15.65, 95% CI: 3.61, 67.92; prior incarceration AOR: 8.69, 95% CI: 2.38, 31.71), drug use (past year incarceration AOR: 6.53, 95% CI: 2.18, 19.52; prior incarceration AOR: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.17, 7.53), or with a non-monogamous partner (past year incarceration AOR: 3.19, 95% CI: 1.40, 7.27; prior incarceration AOR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.49, 4.65). Incarceration was not significantly associated with condomless sex with an HIV-negative partner. Incarceration appeared to be moderately associated with condomless sex with a partner of unknown HIV status (past year incarceration AOR: 1.91, 95% CI: 0.96, 3.80; prior incarceration AOR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.10, 2.62), however the association between past year incarceration and the outcome was not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
Discussion
In this US national sample of HIV-positive MSM veterans in care, incarceration was common: 40% had ever been incarcerated, including nine percent who were incarcerated in the past year. One in three past year releasees and one-quarter with a prior incarceration had a detectable viral load compared with 11% of those with no incarceration history. These effect sizes are comparable to those observed in other studies indicating higher rates of detectable viral load among individuals recently released from incarceration compared with individuals not involved in the criminal justice system. 20, 63,64 Incarceration was linked with multiple transmission risk behaviors and substance use factors known to underlie HIV risk outcomes. These findings corroborate extant studies indicating the vulnerability of jail and prison releasees to transmission risk65–68 and the likely importance of CJI as one of multiple syndemic factors driving risk in this group.49 They provide further evidence for the call for transitional programs to ensure HIV care and drug treatment is sustained during the transition from jail/prison to the community.69 Our multivariable findings suggest the disruptive effects of incarceration and re-entry may contribute to HIV transmission to uninfected drug and sex partners and highlight the need for studies using longitudinal data to rigorously test the impact of incarceration on HIV transmission risk and mediating paths.
The observed associations are striking given the sample of veterans in care. While the quality of HIV care during incarceration is variable,70 HIV care in many prison settings achieves excellent viral suppression during incarceration71 that is often lost after release.72 Pre-release discharge planning and post-release case management and support is linked to improved retention in care and viral suppression.66,73,74 Veterans have access to additional re-entry resources not available to all releasees, including HCRV programming and primary care following release.60 HCRV programs link currently incarcerated, soon-to-be released veterans to an outreach specialist who assesses post-release service needs and develops a plan for linkage to VHA medical, psychiatric, and other social services. In addition, the program provides post-release case management to support engagement in services and substance use treatment. Unfortunately, we observed a minority of veteran releasees use this benefit. Delays in care upon release are particularly troubling given extant evidence indicating the high rates -- nearly 70% -- of mental and/or substance use disorders among releasees seeking HCRV services.62 Further research is needed to better understand barriers to accessing care among HIV-positive MSM, including whether stigma associated with sexual minority status may serve as an additional barrier to timely care.
Our study’s cross-sectional design limits interpretation of the degree to which incarceration contributes to HIV risk outcomes. An additional limitation includes self-report of drug and sex risk behaviors that are susceptible to recall/social desirability bias and hence may result in misclassification. Finally, the sample of veterans in care limits the generalizability. It is estimated that of the 1.1 million HIV-infected individuals in the US, approximately 50% are virally suppressed and 50% have a detectable viral load, with comparable levels observed among MSM, of whom 51% are virally suppressed.75 The finding of lower levels of a detectable viral load including among VACS participants recently released from incarceration highlights the difference between the study population of individuals engaged in care and the general population. However, the strong associations we observed in this sample are comparable those we have observed in other samples.
Despite the limitations, the study points to the continued need to support HIV-positive individuals during the stressful period of release from incarceration in accessing HIV care and highlights the need to further evaluate incarceration as a social determinant of HIV risk.
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest and Sources of Funding: COMpAAAS/Veterans Aging Cohort Study, a CHAART Cooperative Agreement, is supported by the National Institutes of Health: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U24-AA020794 (PI: A Justice), U01-AA020790, U01-AA020795 (PI: A Justice), U24-AA022001 (PI: A Justice), U10 AA013566-completed (PI: A Justice)) and in kind by the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Additional funding was provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R03DA031592, PI: E Wang) and by the Yale Clinical Center of Investigation’s CTSA Grant (UL1 RR024319). MR Khan was partially supported by P30DA011041. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Meeting Presentations: Preliminary results were presented at the 2017 SGIM Annual Meeting.
REFERENCES
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Among Men in the United States. 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk_gender_hiv_among_men.pdf (accessed August 2016).
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Among African American Gay and Bisexual Men. 2014. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/racialethnic/bmsm/facts/ (accessed August 2016).
- 3.Maulsby C, Millett G, Lindsey K, et al. HIV among Black men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States: a review of the literature. AIDS and behavior 2014; 18(1): 10–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.HIV/AIDS among racial/ethnic minority men who have sex with men - United States, 1989-1998. Jama-J Am Med Assoc 2000; 283(8): 996–7. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Catania JA, Osmond D, Stall RD, et al. The continuing HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health 2001; 91(6): 907–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Celentano DD, Sifakis F, Hylton J, Torian LV, Guillin V, Koblin BA. Race/ethnic differences in HIV prevalence and risks among adolescent and young adult men who have sex with men. J Urban Health 2005; 82(4): 610–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lifetime Risk of HIV Diagnosis. 2016. http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/2016/croi-press-release-risk.html (accessed August 2016).
- 8.Gordon KS, Edelman EJ, Justice AC, et al. Minority Men Who Have Sex with Men Demonstrate Increased Risk for HIV Transmission. AIDS Behav 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meyer IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin 2003; 129(5): 674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meyer IH. Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 1995: 38–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Haile R, Rowell-Cunsolo TL, Parker EA, Padilla MB, Hansen NB. An Empirical Test of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Perceived Racism and Affiliation with the Gay Community: Implications for HIV Risk. J Soc Issues 2014; 70(2): 342–59. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Crawford I, Allison KW, Zamboni BD, Soto T. The influence of dual-identity development on the psychosocial functioning of African-American gay and bisexual men. J Sex Res 2002; 39(3): 179–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Among Incarcerated Populations. 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/correctional.html (accessed September 2015).
- 14.Spaulding AC, Seals RM, Page MJ, Brzozowski AK, Rhodes W, Hammett TM. HIV/AIDS among Inmates of and Releasees from US Correctional Facilities, 2006: Declining Share of Epidemic but Persistent Public Health Opportunity. PloS one 2009; 4(11): e7558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Khan MR, Behrend L, Adimora AA, Weir SS, Tisdale C, Wohl DA. Dissolution of Primary Intimate Relationships During Incarceration and Associations With Post-Release STI/HIV Risk Behavior in a Southeastern City. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38(1): 43–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Khan MR, Behrend L, Adimora AA, Weir SS, White BL, Wohl DA. Dissolution of primary intimate relationships during incarceration and implications for post-release HIV transmission. J Urban Health 2011; 88(2): 365–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Khan MR, Doherty IA, Schoenbach VJ, Taylor EM, Epperson MW, Adimora AA. Incarceration and high-risk sex partnerships among men in the United States. Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 2009; 86(4): 584–601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khan MR. Longitudinal associations between the dissolution of committed partnerships that occurs during incarceration and post-release HIV risk among African American men released from prison in North Carolina. College on Problems of Drug Dependence 77th Annual Scientific Meeting Phoenix, AZ; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Milloy MJ, Kerr T, Buxton J, et al. Dose-response effect of incarceration events on nonadherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy among injection drug users. The Journal of infectious diseases 2011; 203(9): 1215–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Milloy MJ, Kerr T, Buxton J, et al. Social and environmental predictors of plasma HIV RNA rebound among injection drug users treated with antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012; 59(4): 393–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Khan MR, Epperson MW, Mateu-Gelabert P, Bolyard M, Sandoval M, Friedman SR. Incarceration, sex with an STI- or HIV-infected partner, and infection with an STI or HIV in Bushwick, Brooklyn, NY: a social network perspective. Am J Public Health 2011; 101(6): 1110–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Khan MR, Miller WC, Schoenbach VJ, et al. Timing and duration of incarceration and high-risk sexual partnerships among African Americans in North Carolina. Ann Epidemiol 2008; 18(5): 403–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Khan MR, Wohl DA, Weir SS, et al. Incarceration and risky sexual partnerships in a southern US city. Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 2008; 85(1): 100–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rogers SM, Khan MR, Tan S, Turner CF, Miller WC, Erbelding E. Incarceration, high-risk sexual partnerships and sexually transmitted infections in an urban population. Sex Transm Infect 2012; 88(1): 63–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sun IY, Wu YN. Citizens’ perceptions of the courts: The impact of race, gender, and recent experience. J Crim Just 2006; 34(5): 457–67. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Weaver VM, Hacker JS, Wildeman C. Detaining Democracy? Criminal Justice and American Civic Life INTRODUCTION. Ann Am Acad Polit Ss 2014; 651(1): 6–21. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pager D, Western B, Sugie N. Sequencing Disadvantage: Barriers to Employment Facing Young Black and White Men with Criminal Records. Ann Am Acad Polit Ss 2009; 623: 195–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Beck AJ, Berzofsky M, Caspar R, Krebs C. Sexual victimization in prisons and jails reported by inmates, 2011-12: National Inmate Survey, 2011-12, 2013.
- 29.Dyer TP, Shoptaw S, Guadamuz TE, et al. Application of syndemic theory to black men who have sex with men in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 2012; 89(4): 697–708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stall R, Mills TC, Williamson J, et al. Association of co-occurring psychosocial health problems and increased vulnerability to HIV/AIDS among urban men who have sex with men. American journal of public health 2003; 93(6): 939–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Halkitis PN, Moeller RW, Siconolfi DE, Storholm ED, Solomon TM, Bub KL. Measurement model exploring a syndemic in emerging adult gay and bisexual men. AIDS and behavior 2013; 17(2): 662–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dyer TP, Shoptaw S, Guadamuz TE, et al. Application of Syndemic Theory to Black Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Journal of Urban Health 2012: 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Malebranche DJ, Gvetadze R, Millett GA, Sutton MY. The relationship between gender role conflict and condom use among black MSM. AIDS and Behavior 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bingham TA, Harawa NT, Williams JK. Gender Role Conflict Among African American Men Who Have Sex With Men and Women: Associations With Mental Health and Sexual Risk and Disclosure Behaviors. American Journal of Public Health 2013; 103(1): 127–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jeffries WL, Marks G, Lauby J, Murrill CS, Millett GA. Homophobia is Associated with Sexual Behavior that Increases Risk of Acquiring and Transmitting HIV Infection Among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men. AIDS and Behavior 2012: 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bogart LM, Landrine H, Galvan FH, Wagner GJ, Klein DJ. Perceived Discrimination and Physical Health Among HIV-Positive Black and Latino Men Who Have Sex with Men. AIDS and Behavior 2013: 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Graham LF, Aronson RE, Nichols T, Stephens CF, Rhodes SD. Factors Influencing Depression and Anxiety among Black Sexual Minority Men. Depression research and treatment 2011; 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Reisner SL, Mimiaga MJ, Skeer M, et al. Clinically significant depressive symptoms as a risk factor for HIV infection among black MSM in Massachusetts. AIDS and Behavior 2009; 13(4): 798–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Safren SA, Heimberg RG. Depression, hopelessness, suicidality, and related factors in sexual minority and heterosexual adolescents. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 1999; 67(6): 859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Safren SA, Reisner SL, Herrick A, Mimiaga MJ, Stall R. Mental health and HIV risk in men who have sex with men. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 2010; 55(Suppl 2): S74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Poon C, Saewyc E, Chen W. Enacted Stigma, Problem Substance Use, and Protective Factors among Asian Sexual Minority Youth in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health (Revue canadienne de santé mentale communautaire) 2011; 30(2): 47–64. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Buttram ME, Kurtz SP, Surratt HL. Substance Use and Sexual Risk Mediated by Social Support Among Black Men. Journal of Community Health 2012: 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kelly JA, St. Lawrence JS, Amirkhanian YA, et al. Levels and Predictors of HIV Risk Behavior Among Black Men Who Have Sex With Men. AIDS Education and Prevention 2013; 25(1): 49–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Solomon TM, Halkitis PN, Moeller RW, Pappas MK. Levels of methamphetamine use and addiction among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Addiction Research & Theory 2012; 20(1): 21–9. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Li Y, Baker JJ, Korostyshevskiy VR, Slack RS, Plankey MW. The Association of Intimate Partner Violence, Recreational Drug Use with HIV Seroprevalence among MSM. AIDS and Behavior 2012: 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Peterson JL, Jones KT. HIV prevention for Black men who have sex with men in the United States. Journal Information 2009; 99(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Siemieniuk R, Miller P, Woodman K, Ko K, Krentz H, Gill M. Prevalence, clinical associations, and impact of intimate partner violence among HIV-infected gay and bisexual men: a population-based study. HIV medicine 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wheeler DP, Hadden BR, Lewis M, Van Sluytman LG, Parchment TM. HIV AND BLACK AND AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITIES IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY. Handbook of HIV and Social Work: Principles, Practice, and Populations 2010: 271. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kurtz SP. Arrest histories of high-risk gay and bisexual men in Miami: unexpected additional evidence for syndemic theory. Journal of psychoactive drugs 2008; 40(4): 513–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bland SE, Mimiaga MJ, Reisner SL, et al. Sentencing risk: history of incarceration and HIV/STD transmission risk behaviours among Black men who have sex with men in Massachusetts. Culture, health & sexuality 2012; 14(3): 329–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jones KT, Johnson WD, Wheeler DP, et al. Nonsupportive peer norms and incarceration as HIV risk correlates for young black men who have sex with men. AIDS and behavior 2008; 12(1): 41–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lim JR, Sullivan PS, Salazar L, Spaulding AC, Dinenno EA. History of arrest and associated factors among men who have sex with men. J Urban Health 2011; 88(4): 677–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bureau of Justice Statistics. Prisoners in 2014: U.S. Department of Justice, 2015.
- 54.United States Census Bureau. USA: State and county quickfacts. 2015. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html (accessed March 2015).
- 55.Justice AC, Dombrowski E, Conigliaro J, et al. Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS): Overview and description. Med Care 2006; 44(8 Suppl 2): S13–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Saitz R Clinical practice. Unhealthy alcohol use. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(6): 596–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158(16): 1789–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bradley KA, DeBenedetti AF, Volk RJ, Williams EC, Frank D, Kivlahan DR. AUDIT-C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research 2007; 31(7): 1208–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Services UDoHaH. Poverty Guidelines. 2018. https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty-guidelines (accessed May 2018).
- 60.US Department of Veterans Affairs. Homeless Veterans: Health Care for Reentry Veterans (HCRV). 2016. http://www.va.gov/homeless/reentry.asp (accessed December 2016).
- 61.Blue-Howells JH, Clark SC, van den Berk-Clark C, McGuire JF. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Justice programs and the sequential intercept model: case examples in national dissemination of intervention for justice-involved veterans. Psychol Serv 2013; 10(1): 48–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Finlay AK, Stimmel M, Blue-Howells J, et al. Use of Veterans Health Administration Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Treatment After Exiting Prison: The Health Care for Reentry Veterans Program. Administration and policy in mental health 2017; 44(2): 177–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Teixeira PA, Jordan AO, Zaller N, Shah D, Venters H. Health outcomes for HIV-infected persons released from the New York City jail system with a transitional care-coordination plan. Am J Public Health 2015; 105(2): 351–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wiewel EW, Braunstein SL, Xia Q, Shepard CW, Torian LV. Monitoring outcomes for newly diagnosed and prevalent HIV cases using a care continuum created with New York city surveillance data. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2015; 68(2): 217–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Springer SA, Pesanti E, Hodges J, Macura T, Doros G, Altice FL. Effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected prisoners: reincarceration and the lack of sustained benefit after release to the community. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38(12): 1754–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Althoff AL, Zelenev A, Meyer JP, et al. Correlates of retention in HIV care after release from jail: results from a multi-site study. AIDS and behavior 2013; 17 Suppl 2: S156–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Stephenson BL, Wohl DA, McKaig R, et al. Sexual behaviours of HIV-seropositive men and women following release from prison. Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17(2): 103–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Stephenson BL, Wohl DA, Golin CE, Tien HC, Stewart P, Kaplan AH. Effect of release from prison and re-incarceration on the viral loads of HIV-infected individuals. Public Health Rep 2005; 120(1): 84–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rich JD, Wohl DA, Beckwith CG, et al. HIV-related research in correctional populations: now is the time. Current HIV/AIDS reports 2011; 8(4): 288–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Belenko S, Hiller M, Visher C, et al. Policies and practices in the delivery of HIV services in correctional agencies and facilities: results from a multisite survey. Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care 2013; 19(4): 293–310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Meyer JP, Cepeda J, Springer SA, Wu J, Trestman RL, Altice FL. HIV in people reincarcerated in Connecticut prisons and jails: an observational cohort study. Lancet HIV 2014; 1(2): e77–e84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Meyer JP, Cepeda J, Wu J, Trestman RL, Altice FL, Springer SA. Optimization of human immunodeficiency virus treatment during incarceration: viral suppression at the prison gate. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174(5): 721–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Spaulding AC, Messina LC, Kim BI, et al. Planning for success predicts virus suppressed: results of a non-controlled, observational study of factors associated with viral suppression among HIV-positive persons following jail release. AIDS and behavior 2013; 17 Suppl 2: S203–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Cunningham WE, Weiss RE, Nakazono T, et al. Effectiveness of a Peer Navigation Intervention to Sustain Viral Suppression Among HIV-Positive Men and Transgender Women Released From Jail: The LINK LA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2018; 178(4): 542–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Continuum of Care, U.S., 2014, Overall and by Age, Race/Ethnicity, Transmission Route and Sex. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/2017/HIV-Continuum-of-Care.html (accessed May 2018).