Rapidly increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in older Ghanaian adults from 2007-2015: Evidence from WHO-SAGE Waves 1 & 2

Stella T Lartey; Costan G Magnussen; Lei Si; Godfred O Boateng; Barbara de Graaff; Richard Berko Biritwum; Nadia Minicuci; Paul Kowal; Leigh Blizzard; Andrew J Palmer

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215045

. 2019 Aug 19;14(8):e0215045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215045

Rapidly increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in older Ghanaian adults from 2007-2015: Evidence from WHO-SAGE Waves 1 & 2

Stella T Lartey ¹, Costan G Magnussen ^1,², Lei Si ^1,³, Godfred O Boateng ⁴, Barbara de Graaff ¹, Richard Berko Biritwum ⁵, Nadia Minicuci ⁶, Paul Kowal ^7,⁸, Leigh Blizzard ¹, Andrew J Palmer ^1,^9,^*

Editor: Rasheed Ahmad¹⁰

¹Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

²Research Centre of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

³The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia

⁴Department of Nutrition, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States of America

⁵Department of Community Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana

⁶National Research Council, Neuroscience Institute, Padova, Italy

⁷World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland

⁸University of Newcastle Research Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia

⁹Centre for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

¹⁰Dasman Diabetes Institute, KUWAIT

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

^✉

* E-mail: Andrew.Palmer@utas.edu.au

Roles

Stella T Lartey: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Costan G Magnussen: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Lei Si: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Godfred O Boateng: Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Barbara de Graaff: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Richard Berko Biritwum: Validation, Writing – review & editing

Nadia Minicuci: Project administration, Validation, Writing – review & editing

Paul Kowal: Project administration, Validation, Writing – review & editing

Leigh Blizzard: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Andrew J Palmer: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Rasheed Ahmad: Editor

PMCID: PMC6699701 PMID: 31425568

Abstract

Background

Studies on changes in the prevalence and determinants of obesity in older adults living in sub-Saharan Africa are scarce. We examined recent changes in obesity prevalence and associated factors for older adults in Ghana between 2007/08 and 2014/15.

Methods

Data on adults aged 50 years and older in Ghana were drawn from the WHO SAGE 2007/08 (Wave 1; n = 4158) and 2014/15 (Wave 2; n = 1663). The weighted prevalence of obesity, overweight, normal weight and underweight, and of high central adiposity were compared in 2007/08 and 2014/15. Multinomial and binomial logistic regressions were used to examine whether the determinants of weight status based on objectively measured body mass index and waist circumference changed between the two time periods.

Results

The prevalence of overweight (2007/08 = 19.6%, 95% CI: 18.0–21.4%; 2014/15 = 24.5%, 95% CI: 21.7–27.5%) and obesity (2007/08 = 10.2%, 95% CI: 8.9–11.7%; 2014/15 = 15.0%, 95% CI: 12.6–17.7%) was higher in 2014/15 than 2007/08 and more than half of the population had high central adiposity (2007/08 = 57.7%, 95% CI: 55.4–60.1%; 2014/15 = 66.9%, 95% CI: 63.7–70.0%) in both study periods. While the prevalence of overweight increased in both sexes, obesity prevalence was 16% lower in males and 55% higher in females comparing 2007/08 to 2014/15. Female sex, urban residence, and high household wealth were associated with higher odds of overweight/obesity and high central adiposity. Those aged 70+ years had lower odds of obesity in both study waves. In 2014/15, females who did not meet the recommended physical activity were more likely to be obese.

Conclusion

Over the 7-year period between the surveys, the prevalence of underweight decreased and overweight increased in both sexes, while obesity decreased in males but increased in females. The difference in obesity prevalence may point to differential impacts of past initiatives to reduce overweight and obesity, potential high-risk groups in Ghana, and the need to increase surveillance.

Introduction

Obesity is a significant global public health challenge because it is a major risk factor for most noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) and independently predicts overall mortality [1–3]. In adults 25 years or older, epidemiological data have been used to establish a causal relationship between high BMI (defined in this study as overweight and obesity) and some chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, many cancers and musculoskeletal disorders [3–5]; increased all-cause mortality; and reduced life expectancy [1, 6–9]. For instance, pooled data from four large cohort studies found that the relative risk for each 5 kg/m² higher body mass index (BMI) was 2.32 (2.04–2.63) for diabetes and 1.44 (1.40–1.48) for ischaemic heart disease among those aged 55–64 years [5]. Additionally, high BMI has been associated with poor mental health, reduction in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and a high economic burden due to the associated medical and treatment costs [10–16]. In 2015 alone, a total of 603.7 million adults globally were classified to be obese [3]. From 1980 to 2014, obesity has almost doubled among adults in most parts of the world including sub-Saharan Africa [2, 17–19]. Among urban residents in West Africa, the prevalence of obesity has doubled and has consistently increased in both men and women over a period of 15 years from 1992 to 2007 [19, 20].

In Ghana, the increasing prevalence of obesity from 1980 to 2014 among individuals aged 15–49 years has been well-documented [21, 22] and the Ministry of Health found the need to reduce obesity by 2% in the same age group within five years starting from 2008 [23]. However, little is known about the trends in the prevalence of obesity among populations of older adults aged 50 years and above. As a result of improved public health systems, faster fertility transitions, and increased life expectancy, Ghana’s population is rapidly transitioning into an ageing population [24]. This is occurring concurrently with improved nutrition but increased availability of energy-dense foods and increasing sedentary lifestyle that has led to recent increases in obesity prevalence and NCDs [22, 25]. The health and productivity of those in the 50–65 years age range are important as they mentor younger colleagues and form the majority labour force for agricultural productivity that is a key sector for sustainable development and poverty reduction in Ghana [26]. Monitoring trends and identifying factors that relate to obesity provide information that allows interventions to be appropriately and effectively targeted [27, 28] but such data among older adults are lacking in Ghana. Thus, this study aimed to investigate recent changes in the prevalence of obesity among Ghana’s older adult population and identify contributing factors.

Methods

Study population

Data from the World Health Organization’s (WHO) 2007/8 (Wave 1) and 2014/15 (Wave 2) Study on global AGEing and adult health (WHO-SAGE) were used. WHO-SAGE is a longitudinal study on the health and well-being of adult populations aged 50 years and older in six countries: China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russian Federation, and South Africa [29]. In Ghana, trained SAGE teams collected individual-level data from nationally representative households of adults using a stratified, multistage cluster design. The sampling method used in both 2007/08 and 2014/15 was based on the SAGE Wave 0 (2003) in which the primary sampling units were stratified by region and locality (urban/rural) [30, 31]. Weight, height and waist circumference were measured, exempting pregnant women from weight measurements in both surveys [28].

Data collected in 2007/08 had 5,573 and 2014/15 had 4,735 total survey respondents. The final analytical sample at each level of analysis is shown in Fig 1. The final samples for analysis were determined after missing and biologically implausible weight, height and waist circumference measurements were excluded. Biologically implausible values were height <100cm or >250 cm, weight <30.0 kg or >250.0 kg and waist circumference < 25.0 cm or > 220 cm, and were excluded [32, 33]. Additionally, to examine data in a repeated cross-sectional framework and to meet the assumption of independency, all individuals in 2014/15 who participated in 2007/08 were excluded from the analysis [34–36]. A comparison of the “dropped” subjects with the new respondents in terms of BMI and central adiposity was performed (data not shown) and results suggested that the issue of the representativeness should not represent a potential bias. Individuals aged 50+ years with complete responses were 4,158 (2007/08) and 1,663 (2014/15).

Fig 1 — Sample extracted from 2007/08 and 2014/15 of the WHO Study on Global AGEing and adult health.

Measures

Explanatory factors

The definition of explanatory variables used in this study followed the ecological framework developed by Scott et al [37] and adapts the causality continuum model for obesity in sub-Saharan Africa [38]. In their ecological framework, Scott et al indicated that factors influencing obesity could be situated in the distant, intermediate and proximate tiers. In the framework, the three tiers are found to interact and overlap with each other, and all influence the health outcome. Distant factors include globalization and urbanization, which affect factors such as lifestyle, food habits, and occupation. The intermediate factors include household and community level characteristics (e.g. household income and cultural perception about weight). Finally, the proximate factors include individual factors that directly affect the health outcome such as a genetic composition of the individual, food habits, and physical activity.

Distant factor: The distant factor included in this study was the location of participants’ residence, i.e. rural or urban residence. Rural or urban residency, the two main types of localities used were defined based on the populations size. A population size less than 5,000 was classified as rural, and larger than 5,000 classified as urban.

Intermediate factors: Household wealth, a proxy for household income representing the economic status of the household [39], was used as an intermediate factor. Even though household wealth is sometimes seen as a poor index for household consumption or expenditure, there has been a consistent lack of data in most low-and middle-income countries to measure the long-term economic status [39–42]. In this study, household wealth was constructed using principal component analysis from 22 items that considered assets and the derived variable was indexed into five quintiles [43].

Proximate factors: These included sex, age, level of education completed and marital status. We also included smoking status, alcohol consumption, fruit and vegetable servings per day and level of physical activity per week. For estimation of age-specific prevalence, age was classified into 10-year intervals. The level of education was grouped into high education (completion of secondary/high school or higher) and low education (highest level of education completed was less than secondary or high school). Marital status was categorized as (1) single, (2) married/cohabiting and (3) divorced/separated/widowed. Respondents' smoking status was coded as (1) "never smoked", (2) "quitter" and (3) "current smoker". Alcohol consumption status was coded as (1) "never", (2) "quitter" and (3) "current drinker". We categorized responses about fruit and vegetable intake according to international standards [44]. Respondents met the recommendation if they consumed ≥5 servings of fruits and/or vegetables per day (equivalent to 400 grams). The level of physical activity was categorised as meeting or not meeting the recommended level of total physical activity per week [45, 46]. Using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) instrument that was included in the SAGE, physical activity was estimated by the total metabolic equivalents of task (MET) minutes per week. The analysis guide and STATA syntax was provided by the WHO STEPwise approach to Chronic Disease Risk Factor Surveillance (STEPS) [45]. Meeting the recommended level of total physical activity was defined as engaging in activities including work, during transport and leisure-time for at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity per week [46].

Outcome variables

In WHO SAGE, anthropometric measurements of body weight, height, and waist circumference of respondents were taken by trained interviewers using a weighing scale, stadiometer and Gulick measuring tape following standard protocols [31]. BMI was calculated as a person’s weight in kilograms divided by the square of their height in meters and obesity was defined using cut-offs following the WHO classification. BMI was classified into four categories and weighted prevalence estimated: underweight, BMI<18.50 kg/m²; normal/healthy weight, BMI≥18.50<25.00 kg/m²; overweight, 25.00<30.00 kg/m²; and obese as BMI≥30.00 kg/m² [47]. From the measured waist circumference, high central adiposity was determined using sub-Saharan Africa standards as waist circumference ≥81.2 cm for men, and ≥80.0 cm for women [48].

Statistical analysis

Accounting for the complex survey design, survey weights were used to estimate age- and sex-specific prevalence of obesity and of high central adiposity. From the cross-sectional datasets, we tested whether the frequency of distribution of the categories of BMI and central adiposity were identical in each wave using the survey Pearson’s chi-squared (X²) test. The absolute and percentage differences in the frequency of each category of BMI and central adiposity between the two waves were calculated for males, females, and both sexes. The categories of BMI and central adiposity were cross-tabulated against the socio-demographic and behavioral factors in S1 and S2 Figs. We fitted survey multinomial and binomial logistic models to estimate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the weight status outcome with sociodemographic and behavioural factors.

The characteristics of the sample are presented in Table 1. Table 2 shows the prevalence, absolute and percentage differences in prevalence. In Tables 3 and 4, the univariable and multivariable regression results are presented in a corresponding manner. BMI categories and central adiposity were the outcome variables whiles the explanatory variables included were age, sex, educational and marital statuses, location of residence, household wealth, smoking and alcohol consumption statuses, fruit and vegetable intake, and total physical activities. Statistical analysis was performed in STATA 15, and a two-tailed p value<0.05 was determined as statistically significant.

Table 1. Characteristics of older people (50+ years) with complete responses in repeated cross-sectional data from WHO SAGE 2007/08 & 2014/15.

		Males	Females
2007/08 (n = 4158)
n		52.7% (2191)	47.3% (1967)
Mean age, y		64.3 (10.8)	64.2 (10.5)
Mean weight (kg)		62.5 (13.8)	59.7 (15.8)
Mean height (m)		1.66 (8.42)	1.58 (7.42)
Mean waist circumference (cm)		83.3 (12.0)	86.4 (13.5)
^‡Central Adiposity (WC ≥ optimal cut-point)		50.0% (1090)	66.6% (1317)
Mean BMI (kg/m²)		22.8 (5.1)	24.0 (6.0)
BMI Categories	Underweight	15.1% (329)	15.2% (301)
	Normal BMI	59.7% (1302)	49.8% (985)
	Overweight	18.3% (399)	21.1% (417)
	Obese	6.9% (150)	13.9% (275)
2014/15 (n = 1663)
n		41.0% (682)	59.0% (981)
Mean age, y		58.2 (8.4)	59.5 (9.1)
Mean weight (kg)		64.6 (11.5)	64.1 (16.3)
Mean height (m)		1.67 (7.78)	1.58 (7.51)
Mean waist circumference (cm)		82.4 (12.9)	89.7 (18.6)
^‡Central Adiposity (WC ≥ optimal cut-point)		54.4% (370)	75.6% (742)
Mean BMI (kg/m²)		23.1 (3.8)	25.8 (6.7)
BMI Categories	Underweight	9.7% (66)	7.9% (77)
	Normal BMI	61.2% (418)	45.4% (446)
	Overweight	23.5% (160)	25.2% (247)
	Obese	5.6% (38)	21.5% (211)

Open in a new tab

All are weighted estimates. Data are mean (standard deviation) for continuous variables and percentages (sample, n) for categorical variables. BMI indicates body mass index; and WC, waist circumference.

‡ sub-Sahara waist circumference optimal cut-off points for men (WC≥81.2cm) and women (WC≥80.0cm).

Table 2. Age- and sex-specific prevalence (95% confidence interval) of body mass index (BMI) categories and high central adiposity (WC ≥ optimal cut-off point) for older people in Ghana using data from 2007/08 (n = 4150) and 2014/15 (n = 1663) of SAGE (All subjects with complete responses used from the repeated cross-sections).

		Underweight	Normal weight	Overweight	Obese		^‡High Central Adiposity
		^*Pr (95% CI)	Pr (95% CI)	Pr (95% CI)	Pr (95% CI)	P Value	Pr (95% CI)	P Value
Total Sample	2007/08	15.2 (13.6, 16.8)	55.0 (52.8, 57.2)	19.6 (18.0, 21.4)	10.2 (8.9, 11.7)	<0.001	57.7 (55.4, 60.1)	<0.001
	2014/15	8.6 (7.1, 10.3)	51.9 (48.8, 55.0)	24.5 (21.7, 27.5)	15.0 (12.6, 17.7)	<0.001	66.9 (63.7, 70.0)	<0.001
Absolute difference (95% CI)		-6.6 (-8.6, -4.4)	-3.1 (-6.7, -1.0)	4.9 (1.6, 8.1)	4.8 (2.0, 7.6)		9.2 (5.5, 12.8)
% difference (95% CI)		-43.4 (-52.9, -31.2)	-5.6 (-11.8, 1.0)	25.0 (9.1, 42.7)	47.1 (21.6, 76.9)		15.9 (10.0, 22.0)
Males: Age, y -specific prevalence (2007/08, n = 2180; 2014/15, n = 682)
50–59	2007/08	11.2 (9.0, 13.9)	60.3 (56.3, 64.1)	21.0 (17.9, 24.5)	7.5 (5.8, 9.8)	0.155	51.0 (46.9, 55.1)	0.252
50–59	2014/15	6.7 (4.3, 10.5)	61.4 (54.9, 67.5)	25.5 (19.5, 32.7)	6.3 (3.6, 10.8)	0.155	55.0 (48.6, 61.3)	0.252
60–69	2007/08	14.1 (11.2, 17.7)	62.3 (57.8, 66.5)	16.7 (13.6, 20.4)	6.9 (4.9, 9.5)	0.326	48.7 (43.8, 53.7)	0.323
60–69	2014/15	18.2 (11.5, 27.6)	58.0 (48.1, 67.4)	20.3 (13.3, 29.6)	3.5 (1.5, 8.1)	0.326	54.2 (44.3, 63.8)	0.323
≥ 70	2007/08	21.0 (17.0, 25.5)	56.7 (51.9, 61.4)	16.3 (12.8, 20.4)	6.1 (4.0, 9.1)	0.607	49.2 (43.9, 54.7)	0.158
≥ 70	2014/15	16.0 (9.4, 25.9)	65.5 (54.4, 75.1)	14.8 (8.9, 23.5)	3.8 (1.6, 8.8)	0.607	50.9 (41.0, 60.7)	0.158
Total Male sample	2007/08	15.1 (13.3, 17.2)	59.7 (57.0, 62.3)	18.3 (16.2, 20.6)	6.7 (5.6, 8.4)	0.022	49.8 (46.8, 52.8)	0.117
Total Male sample	2014/15	9.7 (7.4, 12.8)	61.2 (56.2, 66.1)	23.5 (18.6, 29.2)	5.6 (3.4, 8.8)	0.022	54.4 (49.2, 59.5)	0.117
Absolute difference (95% CI)		-5.4 (-8.6, 2.2)	1.5 (-4.0, 7.1)	5.2 (-0.5, 10.8)	-1.1 (-4.4, 1.7)		4.6 (-1.1, 10.4)
% difference (95% CI)		-35.8 (-52.2, -13.4)	2.5 (-7.0, 13.3)	28.4 (2.4, 64.1)	-16.4 (-51.0, 33.0)		9.2 (-2.3, 22.1)
Females: Age, y -specific prevalence (2007/08, n = 1398; 2014/15, n = 981)
50–59	2007/08	9.7 (7.1, 13.2)	45.7 (40.8, 50.6)	24.7 (20.7, 29.1)	20.0 (16.0, 24.6)	0.012	70.6 (66.5, 74.5)	0.014
50–59	2014/15	5.2 (3.7, 7.2)	42.6 (38.2, 47.2)	26.3 (22.7, 30.3)	25.8 (21.6, 30.6)	0.012	77.7 (73.3, 81.5)	0.014
60–69	2007/08	12.2 (9.2, 16.1)	53.3 (48.1, 58.5)	22.1 (18.5, 26.2)	12.3 (9.8, 15.5)	0.125	69.6 (64.1, 74.6)	0.389
60–69	2014/15	8.5 (5.3, 13.2)	51.1 (43.6, 58.5)	21.5 (16.6, 27.3)	18.9 (13.0, 26.8)	0.125	73.5 (65.7, 80.1)	0.389
≥ 70	2007/08	24.3 (13.0, 19.3)	51.8 (47.4, 56.1)	15.9 (13.0, 19.3)	8.0 (5.8, 10.8)	0.042	59.1 (54.1, 63.9)	0.017
≥ 70	2014/15	17.9 (12.6, 24.7)	49.1 (41.4, 56.8)	25.5 (18.5, 33.9)	7.6 (4.3, 13.1)	0.042	69.8 (62.1, 76.6)	0.017
Total Female Sample	2007/08	15.2 (13.1, 17.5)	49.8 (46.7, 52.8)	21.1 (18.9, 23.5)	13.9 (11.8, 16.4)	<0.001	66.6 (63.6, 69.4)	<0.001
Total Female Sample	2014/15	7.9 (7.9, 10.8)	45.4 (41.7, 49.1)	25.2 (22.4, 28.2)	21.5 (18.3, 25.2)	<0.001	75.6 (71.9, 78.9)	<0.001
Absolute difference (95% CI)		-7.3 (-10.0, -4.7)	-4.4 (-8.9, 0.1)	4.1 (0.3, 7.9)	7.6 (3.7, 11.5)		9.0 (4.7, 13.3)
% difference (95% CI)		-48.0 (-59.4, -34.0)	-8.8 (-16.7, -0.1)	19.4 (2.5, 39.1)	54.7 (26.8, 88.3)		13.5 (7.7, 19.6)

Open in a new tab

*Pr (95% CI) means prevalence (95% confidence intervals). All are weighted estimates.

^‡High central adiposity measured using sub-Sahara high waist circumference cut-off point for men (WC≥81.2cm) and women (WC≥80.0cm)

Table 3. Univariable regressions: Factor associated with BMI categories and central adiposity in year WHO-SAGE 2007/08 and 2014/15.

		Year 2007/08			Year 2014/15			Year 2007/08	Year 2014/15
		Underweight	Overweight	Obese	Underweight	Overweight	Obese	High Central Adiposity	High Central Adiposity
		OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)
Age Groups, y	50–59	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	60–69	1.17 (0.88, 1.53)	0.78 (0.62, 0.98) ^*	0.66 (0.48, 0.89) ^**	1.95 (1.21, 3.16) ^**	0.77 (0.55, 1.07)	0.73 (0.45, 1.18)	0.94 (0.79, 1.12)	0.94 (0.70, 1.26)
	≥ 70	2.11 (1.66, 2.69) ^***	0.70, (0.56, 0.87) ^**	0.51 (0.36, 0.74) ^***	2.76 (1.70, 4.49) ^***	0.79 (0.53, 1.18)	0.35 (0.20, 0.60) ^***	0.77 (0.65, 0.93) ^**	0.84 (0.63, 1.12)
Sex	Male	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Sex	Female	1.20 (0.97, 1.49)	1.39 (1.13, 1.68) ^**	2.42 (1.84, 3.20) ^***	1.09 (0.75, 1.58)	1.45 (1.05, 2.00) ^*	4.22 (3.14, 8.70) ^***	2.01 (1.72, 2.34) ^***	2.59 (1.97, 3.40) ^***
Educational Status	Low	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Educational Status	High	0.80 (0.62, 1.03)	1.38 (1.10, 1.74)	2.14 (1.61, 2.84)	2.43 (1.42, 4.14) ^**	0.98 (0.67, 1.43)	0.80 (0.53, 1.21)	1.57 (1.30, 1.91)	0.76 (0.55, 1.06)
Marital status	Single	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Married/ cohabiting	0.56 (0.27, 1.17)	1.65 (0.78, 3.49)	1.11 (0.41, 2.98)	1.14 (0.21, 3.31)	1.84 (0.69, 4.85)	0.87 (0.28, 2.73)	1.07 (0.64, 1.80)	0.98 (0.49, 1.96)
	Widow/divorce	0.79 (0.39, 1.60)	1.59 (0.75, 3.38)	1.72 (0.69, 4.31)	1.65 (0.29, 4.45)	1.18 (0.44, 3.18)	0.95 (0.29, 3.08)	1.48 (0.89, 2.46)	0.98 (0.50, 1.93)
Location	Rural	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Location	Urban	0.62 (0.47, 0.82) ^**	2.32 (1.82, 2.97) ^***	4.06 (2.56, 7.20) ^***	0.47 (0.29, 0.78) ^**	1.89 (1.36, 2.61) ^***	3.47 (2.14, 5.62) ^***	2.61 (2.05, 3.32) ^***	2.35 (1.73, 3.19) ^***
Wealth Index	Lowest	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Low	0.84 (0.60, 1.16)	1.73 (1.20, 2.51) ^**	2.76 (1.29, 5.89) ^**	1.08 (0.65, 1.79)	1.13 (0.64, 1.99)	1.43 (0.43, 3.73)	1.60 (1.27, 2.02) ^***	1.49 (0.99, 2.23)
	Moderate	0.70 (0.52, 0.95) ^*	2.56 (1.76, 3.72) ^***	3.25 (2.04, 6.82) ^***	1.43 (0.78, 2.63)	2.00 (1.18, 3.40) ^*	3.72 (1.98, 6.87) ^**	2.06 (1.59, 2.66) ^***	2.24 (1.44, 3.48) ^***
	High	0.70 (0.48, 1.01)	2.66 (1.81, 3.91) ^***	3.92 (2.32, 7.44) ^***	0.88 (0.46, 1.65)	2.56 (1.53, 4.28) ^***	4.26 (2.81, 8.25) ^***	2.40 (1.84, 3.12) ^***	2.78 (1.75, 4.41) ^***
	Higher	0.34 (0.21, 0.54) ^***	4.26 (2.33, 7.05) ^***	4.94 (2.46, 9.54) ^***	0.28 (0.31, 0.60) ^**	3.27 (1.92, 5.58) ^***	5.17 (3.07, 10.10) ^***	3.95 (2.80, 6.90) ^***	3.84 (2.37, 6.22) ^***
Smoking status	Never Smoked	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Quitter	0.99 (0.71, 1.40)	0.77 (0.57, 1.05)	0.37 (0.23, 0.60) ^***	1.58 (0.50, 3.01)	1.08 (0.40, 2.92)	1.84 (0.31, 4.98)	0.97 (0.76, 1.25)	1.02 (0.36, 2.91)
	Currently smoke	1.78 (1.33, 2.38) ^***	0.32 (0.22, 0.47) ^***	0.34 (0.17, 0.68) ^**	1.87 (0.88, 3.97)	0.18 (0.07, 0.48) ^**	0.18 (0.04, 0.81) ^*	0.67 (0.55, 0.80) ^***	0.23 (0.13, 0.41) ^***
Alcohol Consumption Status	Never drunk alcohol	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Quitter	0.88 (0.64, 1.21)	0.76 (0.56, 1.03)	1.00 (0.70, 1.44)	0.90 (0.43, 1.91)	0.54 (0.30, 0.98) ^*	1.57 (0.82, 3.01)	0.59 (0.47, 0.73) ^***	1.84 (1.03, 3.27) ^*
	Currently Drinks	1.18 (0.93, 1.51)	0.57 (0.45, 0.71) ^***	0.75 (0.55, 1.02)	0.94 (0.58, 1.51)	0.64 (0.42, 0.97) ^*	0.69 (0.38, 1.26)	0.37 (0.28, 0.47) ^***	0.69 (0.49, 0.96) ^*
Fruit & Vegetable Intake	Below requirement	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Fruit & Vegetable Intake	Met requirement	0.86 (0.66, 1.12)	1.17 (0.95, 1.42)	1.32 (1.02, 1.72) ^*	0.57 (0.39, 0.84) ^**	1.23 (0.91, 1.67)	1.32 (0.91, 1.92)	1.61 (1.32, 1.96) ^***	1.27 (0.95, 1.71)
Total Physical Activity	Below requirement	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Total Physical Activity	Met requirement	0.85 (0.67, 1.08)	0.88 (0.71, 1.10)	0.64 (0.47, 0.87) ^**	1.05 (0.72, 1.54)	0.85 (0.62, 1.17)	0.81 (0.55, 1.19)	0.76 (0.63, 0.92) ^**	0.84 (0.63, 1.11)

Open in a new tab

*p<0.05

**p<0.01

***p<0.001; Fruit & Vegetable Intake (serving per day); Total Physical Activity (Minutes per week); Year is the year for completion of data collection

Table 4. Multivariable regressions: Predictors of overweight, obesity and central adiposity in year WHO-SAGE 2007/08 and 2014/15.

		Year 2007/08			Year 2014/15			Year 2007/08	Year 2014/15
		Underweight	Overweight	Obese	Underweight	Overweight	Obese	High Central Adiposity	High Central Adiposity
		OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)
Age Groups, y	50–59	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	60–69	1.17 (0.88, 1.55)	0.79 (0.61, 1.10)	0.67 (0.49, 0.91) ^*	1.94 (1.19, 3.18) ^**	0.77 (0.55, 1.09)	0.59 (0.36, 0.97) ^*	1.01 (0.83, 1.23)	0.93 (0.71, 1.22)
	≥ 70	2.21 (1.73, 2.84) ^***	0.70, (0.54, 0.90) ^**	0.54 (0.36, 0.80) ^**	2.45 (1.49, 4.04) ^***	0.87 (0.57, 1.31)	0.34 (0.18, 0.62) ^**	0.86 (0.70, 1.07)	0.94 (0.68, 1.29)
Sex	Male	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Sex	Female	1.23 (0.88, 1.71)	1.47 (1.15, 1.89) ^**	2.49 (1.74, 3.55) ^***	0.81 (0.52, 1.26)	1.70 (1.16, 2.49) ^**	4.65 (2.65, 9.09) ^***	2.03 (1.64, 2.51) ^***	3.36 (2.42, 4.68) ^***
Educational Status	Low	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Educational Status	High	1.34 (1.02, 1.78) ^*	0.97 (0.73, 1.28)	1.15 (0.83, 1.60)	1.86 (1.00, 3.42)	1.22 (0.80, 1.86)	0.94 (0.61, 1.46)	1.17 (0.93, 1.47)	0.74 (0.49, 1.14)
Marital status	Single	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Married/ cohabiting	0.60 (0.29, 1.23)	2.00 (0.92, 4.35)	1.60 (0.64, 3.96)	1.17 (0.17, 2.93)	2.25 (0.81, 4.21)	1.61 (0.63, 4.11)	1.25 (0.69, 2.25)	1.54 (0.69, 3.43)
	Widow/divorce	0.74 (0.37, 1.08)	1.50 (0.68, 3.31)	1.65 (0.69, 3.95)	1.39 (0.19, 3.94)	1.20 (0.44, 3.28)	1.11 (0.43, 2.84)	1.16 (0.67, 2.02)	1.10 (0.46, 2.23)
Location	Rural	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Location	Urban	0.79 (0.57, 1.08)	1.44 (1.08, 1.92) ^*	2.01 (1.41, 2.86) ^***	0.53 (0.32, 0.87) ^*	1.38 (0.96, 1.98)	1.73 (1.03, 2.89) ^*	1.51 (1.19, 1.92) ^**	1.91 (1.33, 2.74) ^**
Wealth Index	Lowest	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Low	0.87 (0.62, 1.21)	1.52 (1.05, 2.21) ^*	2.40 (1.13, 5.13) ^*	1.12 (0.65, 1.91)	1.13 (0.66, 1.95)	1.53 (0.45, 3.21)	1.31 (1.02, 1.69) ^*	1.43 (0.93, 2.20)
	Moderate	0.77 (0.51, 1.17)	2.01 (1.33, 3.04) ^**	3.17 (1.50, 6.68) ^**	1.91 (1.04, 3.50) ^*	2.03 (1.16, 3.55) ^*	3.17 (1.87, 6.31) ^**	1.56 (1.18, 2.07) ^**	1.66 (1.02, 2.69) ^*
	High	0.71 (0.51, 0.97) ^*	2.15 (1.46, 3.16) ^***	3.79 (1.96, 7.93) ^***	1.20 (0.68, 2.67)	2.57 (1.50, 4.42) ^**	3.76 (2.27, 7.28) ^***	1.57 (1.16, 2.11) ^**	2.33 (1.42, 3.81) ^**
	Higher	0.40 (0.23, 0.68) ^**	4.42 (2.84, 6.89) ^***	4.91 (2.41, 10.17) ^***	0.52 (0.22, 1.21)	3.29 (1.89, 5.74) ^***	4.67 (2.39, 8.53) ^***	3.70 (3.22, 6.85) ^***	2.45 (1.39, 4.32) ^**
Smoking status	Never Smoked	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Quitter	1.08 (0.74, 1.57)	0.92 (0.68, 1.26)	0.53 (0.30, 0.92) ^*	1.68 (0.50, 3.64)	1.73 (0.61, 4.95)	3.48 (0.86, 6.19)	0.77 (0.59, 0.10)	1.06 (0.43, 2.60)
	Currently smoke	1.63 (1.18, 2.25) ^**	0.54 (0.35, 0.83) ^**	0.88 (0.46, 1.69)	1.66 (0.69, 4.00)	0.31 (0.11, 0.90) ^*	0.48 (0.10, 2.23)	0.69 (0.53, 0.90) ^**	0.44 (0.22, 0.88) ^*
Alcohol Consumption Status	Never drunk alcohol	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Quitter	0.88 (0.63, 1.23)	0.71 (0.51, 0.97)^*	0.85 (0.57, 1.29)	0.68 (0.32, 1.43)	0.56 (0.30, 1.06)	1.47 (0.64, 3.38)	0.96 (0.74, 1.24)	2.52 (1.38, 4.59) ^**
	Currently Drinks	1.19 (0.93, 1.54)	0.64 (0.50, 0.82) ^***	0.95 (0.68, 1.31)	0.91 (0.56, 1.49)	0.78 (0.48, 1.27)	1.21 (0.70, 2.08)	0.86 (0.72, 1.03)	1.11 (0.78, 1.58)
Fruit & Vegetable Intake	Below requirement	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Fruit & Vegetable Intake	Met requirement	0.98 (0.75, 1.27)	1.05 (0.85, 1.29)	1.16 (0.90, 1.49)	0.57 (0.37, 0.86) ^**	1.16 (0.85, 1.60)	1.25 (0.82, 1.90)	1.51 (1.23, 1.84) ^***	1.27 (0.92, 1.72)
Total Physical Activity	Below requirement	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Total Physical Activity	Met requirement	0.81 (0.64, 1.02)	1.01 (0.80, 1.27)	0.78 (0.57, 1.08)	1.12 (0.73, 1.71)	0.82 (0.59, 1.14)	0.72 (0.49, 1.08)	0.82 (0.67, 0.99) ^*	0.89 (0.66, 1.20)

Open in a new tab

*p<0.05

**p<0.01

***p<0.001; Fruit & Vegetable Intake (serving per day); Total Physical Activity (Minutes per week); Year is the year for completion of data collection

Results

In total, 4,158 persons (52% males) provided complete data in 2007/08 whilst 1,663 new persons (41% males) did so in 2014/15. Table 1 presents the estimated frequencies of the characteristics of the study population in 2007/08 and 2014/15. The population in 2014/15 was estimated to be around five years younger and 3.1kg heavier. Particularly for women, the proportion in the overweight/obese and high central adiposity categories were also higher in 2014/15.

The overall age- and sex-specific weighted prevalence of each BMI category and of high central adiposity in the repeated cross-sectional data are shown in Table 2. Relative to 2007/08, the 2014/15 prevalence of overweight (2007/08 = 19.6%; 95% CI: 18.0–21.4%; 2014/15 = 24.5%; 95% CI: 21.7–27.5%) and obesity (2007/08 = 10.2%; 95% CI: 8.9–11.7%; 2014/15 = 15.0%; 95% CI: 12.6–17.7%) was higher. Obesity increased by about 47% while overweight increased by approximately 25% in the population. More than half of the population had high central adiposity in both waves (2007/08 = 57.7%; 95% CI: 55.4–60.1%; 2014/15 = 66.9%; 95% CI: 63.7–70.0%) with about a 16% increase over the 7 to 8-year period. Underweight reduced by about 43% in the population. In 2014/15, despite a decline in the prevalence of obesity for males (2007/08 = 6.7%; 95% CI: 5.6–8.4%; 2014/15 = 5.6%; 95% CI: 3.4–8.8%), the prevalence of overweight was high for males (2007/08 = 18.3%; 95% CI: 16.2–20.6%; 2014/15 = 23.5%; 95% CI: 18.6–29.2%); and the prevalence of both overweight (2007/08 = 21.1%; 95% CI: 18.9–23.5%; 2014/15 = 25.2%; 95% CI: 22.4–28.2%) and obesity (2007/08 = 13.9%; 95% CI: 11.8–16.4%; 2014/15 = 21.5%; 95% CI: 18.3–25.2%) were higher for females. The prevalence of high central adiposity was higher in 2014/15 for both males and females (Table 2).

The distribution of prevalence of the BMI categories by socio-demographic and behavioral factors in 2007/08 and 2014/15 are shown in S1 and S2 Figs. Generally, the prevalence of obesity was high in individuals who resided in urban areas and those from households with high/higher wealth status in both waves. While obesity was high in 2007/08 among those with high education, in 2014/15 it was rather high among both males and females with low education. Obesity was low among females who met the recommended physical activity level in both waves.

Results from the univariable analyses are presented in Table 3. In the multivariable analyses in 2007/08, being female (overweight: OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.15–1.89; obesity: OR = 2.49, 95% CI: 1.74–3.55; and high central adiposity: OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.64–2.51), living in an urban area (obesity: OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.41–2.86; and high central adiposity: OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.19–1.92) and those from households with moderate, higher or higher wealth (overweight: OR = 4.42, 95% CI: 2.84–6.89; obesity: OR = 4.91, 95% CI: 2.41–10.17; and high central adiposity: OR = 3.70, 95% CI: 1.22–6.85) were associated with higher odds of overweight, obesity and central adiposity (Table 4). However, being in age group 70+ years (overweight: OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54–0.90; obesity: OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36–0.80), currently smoking status (overweight: OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35–0.83; and high central adiposity: OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.53–0.90), and current alcohol drinking (overweight: OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.50–0.82) were associated with lower odds of overweight/obesity. Also, being in the 70+ years age group (underweight: OR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.73–2.84) and currently smoking status (underweight: OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.18–2.25) were associated with higher odds of underweight while the odds of underweight was low among those with high/higher household wealth. In 2014/15, most associations found in 2007/08 remained the same with minimal changes in magnitude.

An interaction term between the age categories and sex in a multivariable regression showed that the product of age and sex were not significantly associated with the BMI categories for all age groups in both 2007/08 and 2014/15 except for females between the age of 50–59 years in whom there was a significant association for higher odds of obesity (OR = 2.67; 95% CI: 1.34–5.30) in 2007/08. The same interaction using central adiposity as the outcome also revealed significantly higher odds of high central adiposity among females aged 50–59 years (OR = 1.69; 95% CI: 1.10–2.58) and 60–69 years (OR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.06–2.25) only in 2007/08. We also examined whether respondents sex modified the association between physical activity and BMI categories and central adiposity. No significant associations were found in 2007/08. However, in 2014/15, not meeting the recommended physical activity level among females was associated with higher odds of obesity (OR = 3.23; 95% CI: 1.13–6.23) and high central adiposity (OR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.32–3.63).

Discussion

This study estimated changes in the prevalence and determinants of BMI and central adiposity in the older adult population of Ghana between year and 2007/08 and 2014/15. We found that over the 7 to 8-year period the prevalence of obesity had increased by 47%, overweight by 25%, but underweight reduced by 43%. However, we found heterogeneity by sex with females showing a 55% increase in the prevalence of obesity compared with a 16% reduction among males over the same period. While we provide estimates of the temporal change in BMI categories and high central adiposity for the total population (males and females combined), there are reasons why the sex-stratified estimates should be prioritised. First, as the ratio of males to females reduced between waves, the estimates for the secular changes at the population level are weighted toward females. Second, we observed a sex difference in the temporal change in obesity where males decreased, and females increased from 2007/08 to 2014/15. Being female, living in an urban area and having high household wealth were associated with higher odds of obesity/high central adiposity while those aged 70+ years was associated with lower odds of obesity. Additionally, in 2014/15, not meeting the recommended physical activity among females was associated with higher odds of obesity and central adiposity.

Our findings show that while the prevalence of underweight reduced over the period, overweight, obesity and central adiposity increased over the same period. The increased prevalence of overweight, obesity (in females) and central adiposity could have a negative public health implication as obesity buttresses the increasing burden of NCDs in most low-and middle-income countries. Even though most previous studies in sub-Saharan Africa were cross-sectional studies, most of the studies found a higher prevalence of overweight/obesity in the female population compared to their male counterparts [19, 22, 49, 50]. This phenomenon has been attributed to the body preference of most females [19, 50–53]. However, a recent study of African-Americans suggested that being male with West-African ancestry genes could be protective against obesity specifically, high central adiposity and hence could be a reason for the male/female disparities [54]. Furthermore, high odds of overweight/obesity among African females in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa and elsewhere, have also been largely attributed to general cultural preference in which overweight/obesity is regarded as a source of beauty and a sign of affluence [49, 52]. In Ghana, this could also be attributed to generally low levels of physical activities in the population [49, 55]. This corroborates our finding that low physical activities in females was associated with higher odds of obesity and central adiposity suggesting that promotion of physical activity may support efforts to reduce obesity in females in Ghana as in other population [28, 56].

Overweight and obesity prevalence in both waves was high in females in all age groups with a decline noted after age 59 years. In males, we observed non-significant declines for obesity and increases for high central adiposity across all age groups. The observed difference in trends for obesity and high central adiposity in males was unexpected but could be attributed to the following reasons. First, the differences could reflect where the respective cut-offs for BMI and waist circumference lie on their distributions. As shown in Table 2, whereas about half of the male population had high central adiposity, less than 10% were obese in both waves. Second, this difference could also reaffirm that BMI may not be as sensitive to changes in excess adiposity compared with waist circumference [57].

While obesity prevalence was found to generally increase with age in some developed countries, in most developing countries, it was found to peak around age 50 years, then decline afterward [58]. In this study, a decline in obesity prevalence rates was found after age 59 years in females. Such trends may demand deliberate attention as those aged over 50 years supply the majority of the labour force for agricultural productivity, which has played a major role in sustainable development and poverty reduction in Ghana [26]. Increased obesity prevalence in this age group may lead to higher NCDs and consequently increase overall mortality as well as increasing the medical cost of care [12]. This can further lead to increased absenteeism from work and reduced work productivity, negatively impacting the economy [12, 59].

Urban residency was also associated with higher odds of overweight/obesity and central adiposity in both waves. Residing in an urban area has shown a similar association with obesity in previous studies in Africa and elsewhere [19]. Urban residency is mostly associated with changes in diets and food availability, increased dependence on mechanized transportation, especially in older people coupled with an increasingly sedentary lifestyle and the loss or lack of open and safe places for physical activities [37, 60]. Dietary transition from nutritious foods to the consumption of easily accessible cheap calorie-dense foods as well as longer hours spent on buses and in cars in traffic may have been key drivers of increasing obesity prevalence in urban areas [55, 60, 61], and this is likely to be the same in Ghana. Older people, especially those over the ages 65 years, tend to rely heavily on their children and grandchildren for activities of daily living [62]. These activities include food preparation and timely food supply. These children, who may be busy on the labour market, may be restricted in their ability to prepare home-made foods for them. They may, therefore, resort to purchasing calorie-dense fast-foods. It is also possible that the reliance on others for food sources/preparation amongst those aged over 70 years may contribute to loss of weight, which agrees with our finding that those aged 70+ years had higher odds of underweight.

The finding that high household wealth is associated with higher odds of overweight/obesity and central adiposity in both waves in this population concurs with findings in other low-and middle-income countries [49, 63]. Our finding is the opposite of what is observed in most developed countries where individuals from socioeconomic disadvantaged households tend to be at increased risk of obesity [64, 65]. Household wealth, a proxy for household income, was expected to have a positive impact resulting in good health outcomes for the individuals within a household as it has been in most developed countries [64]. Our findings support Philipson and Posner’s [63] argument that income has a positive impact on weight in less-developed economies; however, as economic development improves, this relationship tends to become negative in the long term. It is suspected that because rich households in LMICs can afford many varieties of foods, increased household wealth could potentially contribute to changes in food preference, increased food consumption and poor choices regarding dietary intake [66].

As part of lifestyle factors, our finding that smoking was associated with lower odds of overweight has been found in previous studies where current smokers were less likely to have increased body weight compared to those who have never smoked before [67]. In 2007/08 quitting smoking was associated with lower odds of obesity however in 2014/15, currently smoking was rather associated with lower odds of overweight which agrees with previous findings in a randomized control trial [68]. As our findings are from repeated cross-sectional studies, we are unable to confer causality. Further studies are necessary to confirm the strength and direction of the association.

This study has several strengths. First, missing from the extant literature is a study that tracks trends in obesity prevalence among older adults in Ghana. We used the most current data to measure prevalence, changes in prevalence and factors associated with overweight/obesity among older adults about whom little is known in sub-Saharan Africa. Second, the prevalence estimates will be useful in establishing and predicting the future economic burden of obesity on health in this population. Third, the inclusion of waist circumference, a marker of central adiposity and a prime marker of cardiometabolic diseases, provides added confirmation of our findings. Finally, the use of a population-based data that is representative of the older adult population, and uses objectively measured rather than self-reported weight, height, and waist circumference to determine obesity in the population are major strengths.

This study had some limitations. First, given that this study uses data from cross-sectional studies, results focused on associations and not causality [49]. Second, the study focuses only on those who were 50 years and above and does not cover the entire population. Therefore, conclusions from this study is limited to the population of 50 years and above. Finally, although the data is representative of the population aged 50 years and over, the analysis omits observations with missing data (13% in 2007/08 and 4.8% in 2014/15) on variables such as weight, height and waist circumference. Hence, there is a chance for selection bias to be introduced that might have affected external validity. However, the analytical sample was large, and the use of the post-stratified persons’ weight supported the analysis.

Conclusion

We found a decline in underweight among Ghanaian older adults, an increase in overweight among males and females, and an increase in obesity among females only. The Ghana NCDs management strategy 2012–2016 focused on reducing by 2% the overweight and obesity prevalence in females age 15-49years, neglecting those aged 50+ years. However, the exponential increase in the current estimates of overweight and obesity prevalence suggest the need for policy initiatives aimed at reducing overweight and obesity, especially among females aged 50+ years and the importance of advancing surveillance. This study also identifies some factors associated with high obesity prevalence such as being female, living in an urban area and having high household wealth that could inform prevention and intervention programs in improving the health and well-being of older adult populations in sub-Saharan Africa.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Distribution of underweight, overweight and obesity by socio-demographic factors in the older adult population of Ghana in 2007/08 and 2014/15.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(753.7KB, docx)}

S2 Fig. Distribution of underweight, overweight and obesity by behavioral factors in the older adult population of Ghana in 2007/08 and 2014/15.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(750.8KB, docx)}

S1 File. Prevalence STROBE statement.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(21.1KB, docx)}

Acknowledgments

We appreciate access to a preliminary version of SAGE Ghana 2014/15 Wave 2 data used for the analyses in this manuscript.

Data Availability

Data from SAGE Ghana Wave 2 was used for this study. WHO SAGE was approved by the WHO Ethics Review Committee (reference number RPC149) with local approval from the University of Ghana Medical School Ethics and Protocol Review Committee (Ghana). The necessary permission was obtained from the World Health Organization to use these data. All files were obtained from the World Health Organization Study on global AGEing and adult health (WHO-SAGE). Details on data can be found at http://www.who.int/healthinfo/sage/cohorts/en/. The authors used the GhanaINDDataW1, GhanaHHDataW1, GhanaINDDataW2 and GhanaHHDataW2. The codes for the measured weight and height used to calculate body mass index (BMI), as used in the data are q2506 for weight and q2507 for height. The authors confirm that they had no special access privileges to the data. Interested researchers will have to submit a licensed data request to WHO. Upon approval, the researchers will be granted access licensed data.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

1.Prospective Studies Collaboration, Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J, et al. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373:1083–96. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60318-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Mendis S, Armstrong T, Bettcher D, Branca F, Lauer J, Mace J, et al. Global Status Report on noncommunicable diseases 2014: attaining the nine global noncommunicable diseases targets; a shared responsibility. Switzerland: World Health Organization,; 2014. [Google Scholar]
3.GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377(1):13–27. 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016;388:1659–724. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Singh GM, Danaei G, Farzadfar F, Stevens GA, Woodward M, Wormser D, et al. The age-specific quantitative effects of metabolic risk factors on cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: a pooled analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):e65174 10.1371/journal.pone.0065174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Lung T, Jan S, Tan EJ, Killedar A, Hayes A. Impact of overweight, obesity and severe obesity on life expectancy of Australian adults. International Journal of Obesity. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Finkelstein EA, Brown DS, Wrage LA, Allaire BT, Hoerger TJ. Individual and aggregate years‐of‐life‐lost associated with overweight and obesity. Obesity. 2010;18:333–9. 10.1038/oby.2009.253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH. Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA. 2005;293:1861–7. 10.1001/jama.293.15.1861 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Peeters A, Barendregt J, Willekens F, Mackenbach JP, Mamun AA, Bonneux L, et al. Obesity in adulthood and its consequences for life expectancy: A life table analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:24–32. 10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Slagter S, Vliet-Ostaptchouk J, Beek A, JC K, Lutgers H, Klauw M, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life in Relation to Obesity Grade, Type 2 Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Inflammation. PLoS One. 2015;10(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Kortt MA, Clarke PM. Estimating Utility Values for Health States of Overweight and Obese Individuals Using the SF-36. Quality of Life Research. 2005;14:2177–85. 10.1007/s11136-005-8027-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Lehnert T, Sonntag D, Konnopka A, Riedel-Heller S, König H-H. Economic costs of overweight and obesity. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2013;27(106–115). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Kent S, Green J, Reeves G, Beral V, Gray A, Jebb SA, et al. Hospital costs in relation to body-mass index in 1·1 million women in England (the Million Women Study): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2:e214–22. 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30062-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Tremmel M, Gerdtham U-G, Nilsson PM, Saha S. Economic Burden of Obesity: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14(435). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Pickering RP, Goldstein RB, Hasin DS, Blanco C, Smith SM, Huang B, et al. Temporal relationships between overweight and obesity and DSM-IV substance use, mood, and anxiety disorders: results from a prospective study, the National epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2011;72(11):1494–502. 10.4088/JCP.10m06077gry [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Keating C, Peeters A, Swinburn B, Magliano D, Moodie M. Utility-Based Quality of Life Associated with Overweight and Obesity: The Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study. Obesity Journal. 2013;21(3):652–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Australian National Preventive Health Agency. Obesity: Prevalence trends in Australia- Promoting healthy Australia Australia: Australian National Preventive Health Agency; 2014. [Google Scholar]
18.Fryar C, Carroll M, Ogden C. Prevalence of Overweight, Obesity, and Extreme Obesity Among Adults Aged 20 and Over: United States, 1960–1962 Through 2013–2014. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Health Statistics, Surveys DoHaNE; 2016. [Google Scholar]
19.Agyemang C, Boatemaa S, Frempong GA, Aikins Ad-G. Obesity in Sub-Saharan Africa. Metabolic Syndrome Springer International Publishing; Switzerland: 2015:1–13. [Google Scholar]
20.Abubakari AR, Lauder W, Agyemang C, Jones M, Kirk A, Bhopal RS. Prevalence and time trends in obesity among adult West African populations: a meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews. 2008;9:297–311. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00462.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), Ghana II. Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Rockville, Maryland, USA: GSS, GHS, and ICF International; 2015. [Google Scholar]
22.Ofori-Asenso R, Agyeman AA, Laar A, Boateng D. Overweight and obesity epidemic in Ghana—a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1239):1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Ministry of Health. Strategy for the Management, Prevention and Control of Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases in Ghana 2012–2016. Ghana: Ministry of Health; 2012. [Google Scholar]
24.World Health Organization; Ghana country assessment report on ageing and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014. [Google Scholar]
25.Baldwin W. The burden of non-communicable diseases in the developing world: a role for social and behavioral research. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2015 July 2015. [Google Scholar]
26.Löwe A. Creating opportunities for young people in Ghana’s cocoa sector. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2017. [Google Scholar]
27.Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Marques MM, Rutter H, Oppert J-M, Bourdeaudhuij ID, et al. Successful behavior change in obesity interventions in adults: a systematic review of self-regulation mediators. BMC Medicine. 2015;13(84):2–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Felix HC, West DS. Effectiveness of weight loss interventions for obese older adults. American Journal Health Promotion. 2013;27(3):191–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Kowal P, Chatterji S, Naidoo N, Biritwum R, Fan W, Ridaura RL, et al. Data Resource Profile: The World Health Organization Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). International Journal of Epidemiology. 2012;41:1639–49. 10.1093/ije/dys210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Biritwum R, Mensah G, Yawson A, Minicuci N. Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE) Wave 1 The Ghana National Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. [Google Scholar]
31.World Health Organization. WHO SAGE Survey Manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. [Google Scholar]
32.Subramanian SV, Ozaltin E, Finlay JE. Height of Nations: A socioeconomic analysis of cohort differences and patterns among women in 54 low- to middle-income countries. PLOS ONE. 2011;6(4):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Cois A, Day C. Obesity trends and risk factors in the South African adult population. BMC Obesity. 2015;2(42):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.UK Data Service. Analysing change over time: repeated cross sectional and longitudinal survey data. United kingdom: UK Data Service; 2015. [Google Scholar]
35.Caplan LS, Lane DS, Grimson R. The use of cohort vs repeated cross-sectional sample survey data in monitoring changing breast cancer screening practices. Preventive Medicine 1995;24:553–6. 10.1006/pmed.1995.1088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Chen T-A, Baranowski T, Moreno JP, O'Connor TM, Hughes SO, Baranowski J, et al. Obesity status transitions across the elementary years: use of Markov chain modelling. World Obesity Pediatric Obesity 2015;11:88–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Scott A, Ejikeme C, Clottey E, Thomas J. Obesity in sub-Saharan Africa: development of an ecological theoretical framework. Health Promotion International. 2012;28(1):4–16. 10.1093/heapro/das038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Coreil J, Bryant C, Henderson J. Social and Behavioral Foundations of Public Health. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2001. [Google Scholar]
39.Rutstein SO, Staveteig S. Making the demographic and health surveys wealth index comparable. Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF International; 2014. [Google Scholar]
40.Sweeney S, Mukora R, Candfield S, Guinness L, Grant AD, Vassall A. Measuring income for catastrophic cost estimates: Limitations and policy implications of current approaches. Social Science & Medicine. 2018;215:7–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Howe LD, Hargreaves JR, Gabrysch S, Huttly SRA. Is the wealth index a proxy for consumption expenditure? A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2009;63:871–80. 10.1136/jech.2009.088021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Boateng GO, Adams EA, Boateng MO, Luginaah IN, Taabazuing M-M. Obesity and the burden of health risks among the elderly in Ghana: A population study. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0186947 10.1371/journal.pone.0186947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Lartey ST, Magnussen CG, Si L, Graaff Bd, Biritwum RB, Mensah G, et al. The role of intergenerational educational mobility and household wealth in adult obesity: Evidence from Wave 2 of the World Health Organization’s Study on global AGEing and adult health. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1)(e0208491). 10.1371/journal.pone.0208491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.World Health Organization. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization; 2003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.World Health Organization. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) Analysis Guide Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; [cited 2018 12 June]. [Google Scholar]
46.WHO Surveillance and Population-Based Prevention. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) Analysis Guide. Geneva: WHO, Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases Department; 2014. [Google Scholar]
47.World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Ekoru K, Murphy G, Young E, Delisle H, Jerome C, Assah F, et al. Deriving an optimal threshold of waist circumference for detecting cardiometabolic risk in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Obesity 2018;42:487–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Sartorius B, Veerman L, Manyema M, Chola L, Hofman K. Determinants of obesity and associated population attributability, South Africa: empirical evidence from a national panel survey, 2008–2012. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0130218 10.1371/journal.pone.0130218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Adeboye B, Bermano G, Rolland C. Obesity and its health impact in Africa: a systematic review. Cardivascular Journal of Africa. 2012;23(9):512–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.Boatemaa S, Badasu DM, Aikins Ad-G. Food beliefs and practices in urban poor communities in Accra: implications for health interventions. BMC Public Health 2018;18(434). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Neuman M, Finlay JE, Smith GD, Subramanian S. The poor stay thinner: stable socioeconomic gradients in BMI among women in lower- and middle-income countries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:1348–57. 10.3945/ajcn.111.018127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Case A, Menendez A. Sex Differences in Obesity Rates in Poor Countries: Evidence from South Africa. Economics & Human Biology. 2009;7(3):271–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Klimentidis YC, Arora A, Zhou J, Kittles R, Allison DB. The Genetic Contribution of West-African Ancestry to Protection against Central Obesity in African-American Men but Not Women: Results from the ARIC and MESA Studies. Frontiers in Genetics. 2016;7(99):1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Ardayfio-Schandorf E, Yankson P, Bertrand M. The Mobile City of Accra: Urban Families, Housing and Residential Practices. Dakar, Senegal: Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa; 2012. [Google Scholar]
56.Wiklund P. The role of physical activity and exercise in obesity and weight management: time for critical appraisal. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2016;5:151–4. 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Klein S, Allison DB, Heymsfield SB, Kelley DE, Leibel RL, Nonas C, et al. Waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk: a consensus statement from shaping America's health: Association for Weight Management and Obesity Prevention. Obesity 2007;15(5). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Hosseinpoor A, Bergen N, Kunst A, Harper S, Guthold R, Rekve D, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in risk factors for non communicable diseases in low-income and middle-income countries: results from the World Health Survey. BMC Public Health 2012;12(912):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Goettler A, Grosse A, Sonntag D. Productivity loss due to overweight and obesity: a systematic review of indirect costs. BMJ Open. 2017;7(e014632):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.Brody J. The global epidemic of childhood obesity: poverty, urbanization, and the nutrition transition. Nutrition Bytes. 2002;8(2):1–7. [Google Scholar]
61.The World Bank Group. Rising through Cities in Ghana: The time for action is now to fully benefit from the gains of urbanization. Washington DC: The World Bank Group; 2015. [Google Scholar]
62.Dosu GS. Elderly care in Ghana. 2014.
63.Posner RA, Philipson TM. The long-run growth in obesity as a function of technological change. Perspectives of Biology and Medicine. 2003;46(3):S87–S107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64.Low S, Chin M, Deurenberg-Yap M. Review on epidemic of obesity. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2009;38(57). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.Mendez MA, Popkin BM. Globalization, urbanization and nutritional change in the developing world. Journal of Agricultural Development Economics. 2004;1:220–41. [Google Scholar]
66.Tenkorang EY, Kuuire VZ. Noncommunicable Diseases in Ghana: Does the Theory of Social Gradient in Health Hold?. Health Education & Behavior. 2016;43(1 Suppl):25S–36S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67.Dare S, Mackay DF, Pell JP. Relationship between smoking and obesity: a cross-sectional study of 499,504 middle-aged adults in the UK general population. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(4):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.Courtemanchea C, Tchernisa R, Ukert B. The effect of smoking on obesity: Evidence from a randomized trial. Journal of Health Economics 2018;57:31–44. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Distribution of underweight, overweight and obesity by socio-demographic factors in the older adult population of Ghana in 2007/08 and 2014/15.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(753.7KB, docx)}

S2 Fig. Distribution of underweight, overweight and obesity by behavioral factors in the older adult population of Ghana in 2007/08 and 2014/15.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(750.8KB, docx)}

S1 File. Prevalence STROBE statement.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(21.1KB, docx)}

Data Availability Statement

[pone.0215045.ref001] 1.Prospective Studies Collaboration, Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J, et al. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373:1083–96. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60318-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref002] 2.Mendis S, Armstrong T, Bettcher D, Branca F, Lauer J, Mace J, et al. Global Status Report on noncommunicable diseases 2014: attaining the nine global noncommunicable diseases targets; a shared responsibility. Switzerland: World Health Organization,; 2014. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref003] 3.GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377(1):13–27. 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref004] 4.GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016;388:1659–724. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref005] 5.Singh GM, Danaei G, Farzadfar F, Stevens GA, Woodward M, Wormser D, et al. The age-specific quantitative effects of metabolic risk factors on cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: a pooled analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):e65174 10.1371/journal.pone.0065174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref006] 6.Lung T, Jan S, Tan EJ, Killedar A, Hayes A. Impact of overweight, obesity and severe obesity on life expectancy of Australian adults. International Journal of Obesity. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref007] 7.Finkelstein EA, Brown DS, Wrage LA, Allaire BT, Hoerger TJ. Individual and aggregate years‐of‐life‐lost associated with overweight and obesity. Obesity. 2010;18:333–9. 10.1038/oby.2009.253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref008] 8.Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH. Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA. 2005;293:1861–7. 10.1001/jama.293.15.1861 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref009] 9.Peeters A, Barendregt J, Willekens F, Mackenbach JP, Mamun AA, Bonneux L, et al. Obesity in adulthood and its consequences for life expectancy: A life table analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:24–32. 10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref010] 10.Slagter S, Vliet-Ostaptchouk J, Beek A, JC K, Lutgers H, Klauw M, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life in Relation to Obesity Grade, Type 2 Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Inflammation. PLoS One. 2015;10(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref011] 11.Kortt MA, Clarke PM. Estimating Utility Values for Health States of Overweight and Obese Individuals Using the SF-36. Quality of Life Research. 2005;14:2177–85. 10.1007/s11136-005-8027-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref012] 12.Lehnert T, Sonntag D, Konnopka A, Riedel-Heller S, König H-H. Economic costs of overweight and obesity. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2013;27(106–115). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref013] 13.Kent S, Green J, Reeves G, Beral V, Gray A, Jebb SA, et al. Hospital costs in relation to body-mass index in 1·1 million women in England (the Million Women Study): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2:e214–22. 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30062-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref014] 14.Tremmel M, Gerdtham U-G, Nilsson PM, Saha S. Economic Burden of Obesity: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14(435). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref015] 15.Pickering RP, Goldstein RB, Hasin DS, Blanco C, Smith SM, Huang B, et al. Temporal relationships between overweight and obesity and DSM-IV substance use, mood, and anxiety disorders: results from a prospective study, the National epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2011;72(11):1494–502. 10.4088/JCP.10m06077gry [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref016] 16.Keating C, Peeters A, Swinburn B, Magliano D, Moodie M. Utility-Based Quality of Life Associated with Overweight and Obesity: The Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study. Obesity Journal. 2013;21(3):652–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref017] 17.Australian National Preventive Health Agency. Obesity: Prevalence trends in Australia- Promoting healthy Australia Australia: Australian National Preventive Health Agency; 2014. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref018] 18.Fryar C, Carroll M, Ogden C. Prevalence of Overweight, Obesity, and Extreme Obesity Among Adults Aged 20 and Over: United States, 1960–1962 Through 2013–2014. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Health Statistics, Surveys DoHaNE; 2016. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref019] 19.Agyemang C, Boatemaa S, Frempong GA, Aikins Ad-G. Obesity in Sub-Saharan Africa. Metabolic Syndrome Springer International Publishing; Switzerland: 2015:1–13. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref020] 20.Abubakari AR, Lauder W, Agyemang C, Jones M, Kirk A, Bhopal RS. Prevalence and time trends in obesity among adult West African populations: a meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews. 2008;9:297–311. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00462.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref021] 21.Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), Ghana II. Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Rockville, Maryland, USA: GSS, GHS, and ICF International; 2015. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref022] 22.Ofori-Asenso R, Agyeman AA, Laar A, Boateng D. Overweight and obesity epidemic in Ghana—a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1239):1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref023] 23.Ministry of Health. Strategy for the Management, Prevention and Control of Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases in Ghana 2012–2016. Ghana: Ministry of Health; 2012. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref024] 24.World Health Organization; Ghana country assessment report on ageing and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref025] 25.Baldwin W. The burden of non-communicable diseases in the developing world: a role for social and behavioral research. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2015 July 2015. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref026] 26.Löwe A. Creating opportunities for young people in Ghana’s cocoa sector. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2017. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref027] 27.Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Marques MM, Rutter H, Oppert J-M, Bourdeaudhuij ID, et al. Successful behavior change in obesity interventions in adults: a systematic review of self-regulation mediators. BMC Medicine. 2015;13(84):2–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref028] 28.Felix HC, West DS. Effectiveness of weight loss interventions for obese older adults. American Journal Health Promotion. 2013;27(3):191–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref029] 29.Kowal P, Chatterji S, Naidoo N, Biritwum R, Fan W, Ridaura RL, et al. Data Resource Profile: The World Health Organization Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). International Journal of Epidemiology. 2012;41:1639–49. 10.1093/ije/dys210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref030] 30.Biritwum R, Mensah G, Yawson A, Minicuci N. Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE) Wave 1 The Ghana National Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref031] 31.World Health Organization. WHO SAGE Survey Manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref032] 32.Subramanian SV, Ozaltin E, Finlay JE. Height of Nations: A socioeconomic analysis of cohort differences and patterns among women in 54 low- to middle-income countries. PLOS ONE. 2011;6(4):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref033] 33.Cois A, Day C. Obesity trends and risk factors in the South African adult population. BMC Obesity. 2015;2(42):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref034] 34.UK Data Service. Analysing change over time: repeated cross sectional and longitudinal survey data. United kingdom: UK Data Service; 2015. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref035] 35.Caplan LS, Lane DS, Grimson R. The use of cohort vs repeated cross-sectional sample survey data in monitoring changing breast cancer screening practices. Preventive Medicine 1995;24:553–6. 10.1006/pmed.1995.1088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref036] 36.Chen T-A, Baranowski T, Moreno JP, O'Connor TM, Hughes SO, Baranowski J, et al. Obesity status transitions across the elementary years: use of Markov chain modelling. World Obesity Pediatric Obesity 2015;11:88–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref037] 37.Scott A, Ejikeme C, Clottey E, Thomas J. Obesity in sub-Saharan Africa: development of an ecological theoretical framework. Health Promotion International. 2012;28(1):4–16. 10.1093/heapro/das038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref038] 38.Coreil J, Bryant C, Henderson J. Social and Behavioral Foundations of Public Health. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2001. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref039] 39.Rutstein SO, Staveteig S. Making the demographic and health surveys wealth index comparable. Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF International; 2014. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref040] 40.Sweeney S, Mukora R, Candfield S, Guinness L, Grant AD, Vassall A. Measuring income for catastrophic cost estimates: Limitations and policy implications of current approaches. Social Science & Medicine. 2018;215:7–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref041] 41.Howe LD, Hargreaves JR, Gabrysch S, Huttly SRA. Is the wealth index a proxy for consumption expenditure? A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2009;63:871–80. 10.1136/jech.2009.088021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref042] 42.Boateng GO, Adams EA, Boateng MO, Luginaah IN, Taabazuing M-M. Obesity and the burden of health risks among the elderly in Ghana: A population study. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0186947 10.1371/journal.pone.0186947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref043] 43.Lartey ST, Magnussen CG, Si L, Graaff Bd, Biritwum RB, Mensah G, et al. The role of intergenerational educational mobility and household wealth in adult obesity: Evidence from Wave 2 of the World Health Organization’s Study on global AGEing and adult health. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1)(e0208491). 10.1371/journal.pone.0208491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref044] 44.World Health Organization. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization; 2003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref045] 45.World Health Organization. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) Analysis Guide Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; [cited 2018 12 June]. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref046] 46.WHO Surveillance and Population-Based Prevention. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) Analysis Guide. Geneva: WHO, Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases Department; 2014. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref047] 47.World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref048] 48.Ekoru K, Murphy G, Young E, Delisle H, Jerome C, Assah F, et al. Deriving an optimal threshold of waist circumference for detecting cardiometabolic risk in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Obesity 2018;42:487–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref049] 49.Sartorius B, Veerman L, Manyema M, Chola L, Hofman K. Determinants of obesity and associated population attributability, South Africa: empirical evidence from a national panel survey, 2008–2012. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0130218 10.1371/journal.pone.0130218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref050] 50.Adeboye B, Bermano G, Rolland C. Obesity and its health impact in Africa: a systematic review. Cardivascular Journal of Africa. 2012;23(9):512–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref051] 51.Boatemaa S, Badasu DM, Aikins Ad-G. Food beliefs and practices in urban poor communities in Accra: implications for health interventions. BMC Public Health 2018;18(434). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref052] 52.Neuman M, Finlay JE, Smith GD, Subramanian S. The poor stay thinner: stable socioeconomic gradients in BMI among women in lower- and middle-income countries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:1348–57. 10.3945/ajcn.111.018127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref053] 53.Case A, Menendez A. Sex Differences in Obesity Rates in Poor Countries: Evidence from South Africa. Economics & Human Biology. 2009;7(3):271–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref054] 54.Klimentidis YC, Arora A, Zhou J, Kittles R, Allison DB. The Genetic Contribution of West-African Ancestry to Protection against Central Obesity in African-American Men but Not Women: Results from the ARIC and MESA Studies. Frontiers in Genetics. 2016;7(99):1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref055] 55.Ardayfio-Schandorf E, Yankson P, Bertrand M. The Mobile City of Accra: Urban Families, Housing and Residential Practices. Dakar, Senegal: Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa; 2012. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref056] 56.Wiklund P. The role of physical activity and exercise in obesity and weight management: time for critical appraisal. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2016;5:151–4. 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref057] 57.Klein S, Allison DB, Heymsfield SB, Kelley DE, Leibel RL, Nonas C, et al. Waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk: a consensus statement from shaping America's health: Association for Weight Management and Obesity Prevention. Obesity 2007;15(5). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref058] 58.Hosseinpoor A, Bergen N, Kunst A, Harper S, Guthold R, Rekve D, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in risk factors for non communicable diseases in low-income and middle-income countries: results from the World Health Survey. BMC Public Health 2012;12(912):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref059] 59.Goettler A, Grosse A, Sonntag D. Productivity loss due to overweight and obesity: a systematic review of indirect costs. BMJ Open. 2017;7(e014632):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref060] 60.Brody J. The global epidemic of childhood obesity: poverty, urbanization, and the nutrition transition. Nutrition Bytes. 2002;8(2):1–7. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref061] 61.The World Bank Group. Rising through Cities in Ghana: The time for action is now to fully benefit from the gains of urbanization. Washington DC: The World Bank Group; 2015. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref062] 62.Dosu GS. Elderly care in Ghana. 2014.

[pone.0215045.ref063] 63.Posner RA, Philipson TM. The long-run growth in obesity as a function of technological change. Perspectives of Biology and Medicine. 2003;46(3):S87–S107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref064] 64.Low S, Chin M, Deurenberg-Yap M. Review on epidemic of obesity. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2009;38(57). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref065] 65.Mendez MA, Popkin BM. Globalization, urbanization and nutritional change in the developing world. Journal of Agricultural Development Economics. 2004;1:220–41. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref066] 66.Tenkorang EY, Kuuire VZ. Noncommunicable Diseases in Ghana: Does the Theory of Social Gradient in Health Hold?. Health Education & Behavior. 2016;43(1 Suppl):25S–36S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref067] 67.Dare S, Mackay DF, Pell JP. Relationship between smoking and obesity: a cross-sectional study of 499,504 middle-aged adults in the UK general population. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(4):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0215045.ref068] 68.Courtemanchea C, Tchernisa R, Ukert B. The effect of smoking on obesity: Evidence from a randomized trial. Journal of Health Economics 2018;57:31–44. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Rapidly increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in older Ghanaian adults from 2007-2015: Evidence from WHO-SAGE Waves 1 & 2

Stella T Lartey

Costan G Magnussen

Lei Si

Godfred O Boateng

Barbara de Graaff

Richard Berko Biritwum

Nadia Minicuci

Paul Kowal

Leigh Blizzard

Andrew J Palmer

Roles

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Introduction

Methods

Study population

Fig 1. Flowchart showing the analytical sample.

Measures

Explanatory factors

Outcome variables

Statistical analysis

Table 1. Characteristics of older people (50+ years) with complete responses in repeated cross-sectional data from WHO SAGE 2007/08 & 2014/15.

Table 3. Univariable regressions: Factor associated with BMI categories and central adiposity in year WHO-SAGE 2007/08 and 2014/15.

Table 4. Multivariable regressions: Predictors of overweight, obesity and central adiposity in year WHO-SAGE 2007/08 and 2014/15.

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

Data Availability

Funding Statement

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases