Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2019 Jul 27;25:104329. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104329

Data on unsafe riding behaviors among 1960 shared bicycle riders in urban China

Xiaolin Wu a,1, Wangxin Xiao b,1, Conghui Deng c, David C Schwebel d, Guoqing Hu b,
PMCID: PMC6700483  PMID: 31453300

Abstract

This data article quantifies the extent of shared bicycle riding risks for shared-bicycle riders in urban China. The data were collected through a WeChat-based online survey, with a valid sample of 1960 respondents. It reports the basic descriptive statistics through eight tables concerning various unsafe shared bicycle riding behaviors, and complete frequency data from riders concerning eight unsafe riding behaviors. The data can be used for comparisons with other studies using the same outcome measures, which are valuable to generate specialized and targeted solutions to reduce unsafe riding behaviors. For further information, please refer to the full article entitled “Unsafe riding behaviors of shared-bicycle riders in urban China: A retrospective survey”.(Wu et al., 2019).

Keywords: Shared bicycle, Riding behaviors, China, Urban area


Specifications Table

Subject Public health and health policy
Specific subject area Road traffic injury (RTI)
Type of data Tables
How data were acquired Self-report survey from researcher-designed electronic questionnaire
Data format Raw, filtered, analyzed, descriptive statistical data
Parameters for data collection Sample consisted of shared-bicycle users in urban China. The researchers used an electronic questionnaire to investigate whether participants self-report engaging in eight unsafe shared-bicycle riding behaviors in the past month.
Description of data collection We estimated a priori experimental needs for a one-month survey period and used an iterative sampling through a “snowball technique” recruitment strategy through a WeChat-based online survey for a month, from September 7, 2017 to October 6, 2017.
Data source location Urban China
Data accessibility Data are accessible with the article
Related research article The associated research article to this data set is[1].
Value of the data
  • The data provide the first published epidemiological report about eight unsafe bicycle riding behaviors and basic characteristics from a sample of 1960 shared bicycle riders in urban China.

  • The data allow anyone to duplicate the results of comparisons for each behavior across sex, age, education, city of shared bicycle use and shared bicycle travel-related information.

  • The data could be used for comparisons with other studies using the same or similar outcome measures.

1. Data

Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8 show the complete frequencies of eight unsafe riding behaviors: not wearing helmets, running red lights, cycling against the traffic flow, riding in a motor vehicle lane, riding in a pedestrian lane, carrying passengers, using a cell phone while riding and eating while riding, among 1960 surveyed shared-bicycle riders in the past month in urban China. The data allow researchers to conduct further analyses for specific research purposes. The sample had a mean age of 27.63 years (standard deviation: 9.50 years).

Table 1.

Proportion of riders not wearing helmets.

Variable Number (%) Frequency of behavior (%)
Always Often Sometimes Never
Total 1960 (100) 95.4 2.2 0.9 1.5
Sex
 Male 833 (43) 93.2 3.1 1.3 2.4
 Female 1127 (58) 97.0 1.6 0.5 0.9
Age group
 ≤25 years 1056 (54) 97.3 1.8 0.5 0.5
 26∼35 years 623 (32) 94.9 2.4 1.0 1.8
 ≥36 years 281 (14) 89.3 3.6 2.1 5.0
Level of education
 Postgraduate or higher 769 (39) 97.4 1.6 0.4 0.7
 Undergraduate 970 (50) 96.5 2.0 0.7 0.8
 All others 221 (11) 83.3 5.9 3.2 7.7
Type of urban area of bicycle use
 Central municipality 450 (23) 97.8 0.7 0.4 1.1
 Provincial capital 1092 (56) 96.9 1.7 0.6 0.7
 Deputy provincial city 90 (5) 93.3 3.3 1.1 2.2
 All others 328 (17) 87.5 5.8 2.1 4.6
Province/City of bicycle use
 Hunan 579 (30) 95.2 2.2 1.0 1.6
 Guangdong 230 (12) 96.1 1.7 0.9 1.3
 Beijing 164 (8) 98.8 0.0 0.6 0.6
 Tianjin 144 (7) 98.6 1.4 0.0 0.0
 All others 843 (43) 94.1 3.0 0.9 2.0
Reason for travel
 Commuting to work/school 1070 (55) 97.6 1.1 0.5 0.8
 Entertainment 544 (28) 94.9 3.3 0.7 1.1
 Physical exercise 180 (9) 82.8 7.2 3.3 6.7
 Others 166 (9) 96.4 0.6 1.2 1.8
Riding hours per week
 <1 hour 240 (12) 98.8 0.4 0.0 0.8
 1–2 hours 732 (37) 97.5 1.4 1.0 0.1
 3–5 hours 877 (45) 93.5 3.0 0.8 2.7
 >5 hours 111 (6) 88.3 6.3 2.7 2.7
Type of typical riding days
 Weekday 1105 (56) 97.2 1.4 0.6 0.7
 Weekend or holiday 855 (44) 93.0 3.3 1.2 2.6
Typical riding time
 Morning rush hours 399 (20) 93.7 2.5 1.3 2.5
 Evening rush hours 698 (36) 96.3 1.9 0.7 1.1
 Other times 863 (44) 95.4 2.4 0.8 1.4

Table 2.

Proportion of riders running red lights.

Variable Number (%) Frequency of behavior (%)
Always Often Sometimes Never
Total 1960 (100) 0.5 1.4 18.3 79.8
Sex
 Male 833 (43) 0.5 1.9 22.3 75.3
 Female 1127 (58) 0.5 1.1 15.3 83.1
Age group
 ≤25 years 1056 (54) 0.3 1.4 18.1 80.2
 26∼35 years 623 (32) 0.5 1.3 19.4 78.8
 ≥36 years 281 (14) 1.4 1.8 16.4 80.4
Level of education
 Postgraduate or higher 769 (39) 0.7 1.6 20.5 77.2
 Undergraduate 970 (50) 0.2 1.4 16.7 81.6
 All others 221 (11) 1.4 0.9 17.2 80.5
Type of urban area of bicycle use
 Central municipality 450 (23) 0.7 0.9 24.0 74.4
 Provincial capital 1092 (56) 0.2 1.5 17.1 81.2
 Deputy provincial city 90 (5) 1.1 1.1 14.4 83.3
 All others 328 (17) 1.2 2.1 15.2 81.4
Province/City of bicycle use
 Hunan 579 (30) 0.0 1.7 15.7 82.6
 Guangdong 230 (12) 0.4 0.4 20.9 78.3
 Beijing 164 (8) 1.2 1.2 31.7 65.9
 Tianjin 144 (7) 0.0 0.7 15.3 84.0
 All others 843 (43) 0.8 1.7 17.2 80.3
Reason for travel
 Commuting to work/school 1070 (55) 0.4 1.7 22.1 75.8
 Entertainment 544 (28) 0.4 1.5 11.9 86.2
 Physical exercise 180 (9) 1.7 1.1 16.1 81.1
 Others 166 (9) 0.6 0.0 16.3 83.1
Riding hours per week
 <1 hour 240 (12) 0.0 0.8 14.2 85.0
 1–2 hours 732 (37) 0.4 1.5 17.9 80.2
 3–5 hours 877 (45) 0.2 1.6 19.3 78.9
 >5 hours 111 (6) 4.5 0.9 21.6 73.0
Type of typical riding days
 Weekday 1105 (56) 0.5 1.6 21.6 76.3
 Weekend or holiday 855 (44) 0.6 1.2 13.9 84.3
Typical riding time
 Morning rush hours 399 (20) 0.3 1.8 23.8 74.2
 Evening rush hours 698 (36) 0.7 1.9 16.5 80.9
 Other times 863 (44) 0.5 0.9 17.1 81.5

Table 3.

Proportion of riders cycling against the traffic flow.

Variable Number (%) Frequency of behavior (%)
Always Often Sometimes Never
Total 1960 (100) 0.8 2.6 42.0 54.5
Sex
 Male 833 (43) 1.2 3.6 45.6 49.6
 Female 1127 (58) 0.5 1.9 39.4 58.2
Age group
 ≤25 years 1056 (54) 0.5 2.6 40.5 56.4
 26∼35 years 623 (32) 0.8 2.9 45.9 50.4
 ≥36 years 281 (14) 2.1 2.1 39.1 56.6
Level of education
 Postgraduate or higher 769 (39) 0.5 2.9 45.0 51.6
 Undergraduate 970 (50) 0.7 2.5 41.9 54.9
 All others 221 (11) 2.3 2.3 32.6 62.9
Type of urban area of bicycle use
 Central municipality 450 (23) 0.9 2.9 51.3 44.9
 Provincial capital 1092 (56) 0.5 2.3 41.8 55.4
 Deputy provincial city 90 (5) 0.0 4.4 33.3 62.2
 All others 328 (17) 1.8 2.7 32.6 62.8
Province/City of bicycle use
 Hunan 579 (30) 0.3 2.2 40.9 56.5
 Guangdong 230 (12) 0.9 3.0 41.3 54.8
 Beijing 164 (8) 1.2 4.9 64.6 29.3
 Tianjin 144 (7) 0.7 1.4 35.4 62.5
 All others 843 (43) 1.1 2.5 39.7 56.7
Reason for travel
 Commuting to work/school 1070 (55) 0.8 3.4 46.3 49.5
 Entertainment 544 (28) 0.7 1.5 35.7 62.1
 Physical exercise 180 (9) 1.7 2.2 33.3 62.8
 Others 166 (9) 0.0 1.8 45.2 53.0
Riding hours per week
 <1 hour 240 (12) 0.4 2.5 42.1 55.0
 1–2 hours 732 (37) 0.7 3.0 43.3 53.0
 3–5 hours 877 (45) 0.6 2.1 41.5 55.9
 >5 hours 111 (6) 4.5 4.5 37.8 53.2
Type of typical riding days
 Weekday 1105 (56) 0.7 3.3 45.7 50.2
 Weekend or holiday 855 (44) 0.9 1.6 37.3 60.1
Typical riding time
 Morning rush hours 399 (20) 0.5 5.5 45.1 48.9
 Evening rush hours 698 (36) 1.1 1.6 41.7 55.6
 Other times 863 (44) 0.7 2.1 40.9 56.3

Table 4.

Proportion of riders riding in a motor vehicle lane.

Variable Number (%) Frequency of behavior (%)
Always Often Sometimes Never
Total 1960 (100) 1.7 4.4 42.0 51.9
Sex
 Male 833 (43) 2.0 5.2 46.2 46.6
 Female 1127 (58) 1.4 3.8 39.0 55.8
Age group
 ≤25 years 1056 (54) 1.7 5.2 43.7 49.4
 26∼35 years 623 (32) 1.3 3.9 42.5 52.3
 ≥36 years 281 (14) 2.5 2.5 34.9 60.1
Level of education
 Postgraduate or higher 769 (39) 1.4 3.8 43.8 51.0
 Undergraduate 970 (50) 1.5 4.8 43.3 50.3
 All others 221 (11) 3.2 4.5 30.3 62.0
Type of urban area of bicycle use
 Central municipality 450 (23) 2.0 2.9 39.1 56.0
 Provincial capital 1092 (56) 1.5 4.7 44.5 49.4
 Deputy provincial city 90 (5) 1.1 5.6 52.2 41.1
 All others 328 (17) 2.1 5.2 35.1 57.6
Province/City of bicycle use
 Hunan 579 (30) 1.9 6.6 47.2 44.4
 Guangdong 230 (12) 0.9 6.1 50.0 43.0
 Beijing 164 (8) 1.2 2.4 49.4 47.0
 Tianjin 144 (7) 2.8 3.5 30.6 63.2
 All others 843 (43) 1.7 3.0 36.9 58.5
Reason for travel
 Commuting to work/school 1070 (55) 1.7 5.0 44.6 48.8
 Entertainment 544 (28) 1.3 3.5 40.8 54.4
 Physical exercise 180 (9) 3.9 2.8 30.0 63.3
 Others 166 (9) 0.6 5.4 42.8 51.2
Riding hours per week
 <1 hour 240 (12) 1.2 3.8 43.3 51.7
 1–2 hours 732 (37) 1.2 4.4 43.3 51.1
 3–5 hours 877 (45) 1.6 4.4 40.7 53.2
 >5 hours 111 (6) 6.3 5.4 41.4 46.8
Type of typical riding days
 Weekday 1105 (56) 2.0 5.0 43.4 49.6
 Weekend or holiday 855 (44) 1.3 3.6 40.2 54.9
Typical riding time
 Morning rush hours 399 (20) 2.3 4.5 43.1 50.1
 Evening rush hours 698 (36) 1.6 4.3 42.4 51.7
 Other times 863 (44) 1.5 4.4 41.3 52.8

Table 5.

Proportion of riders riding in a pedestrian lane.

Variable Number (%) Frequency of behavior (%)
Always Often Sometimes Never
Total 1960 (100) 7.9 17.1 52.1 23.0
Sex
 Male 833 (43) 7.1 19.6 53.4 19.9
 Female 1127 (58) 8.4 15.3 51.1 25.2
Age group
 ≤25 years 1056 (54) 7.4 17.1 51.9 23.6
 26∼35 years 623 (32) 6.3 18.3 53.1 22.3
 ≥36 years 281 (14) 13.2 14.2 50.5 22.1
Level of education
 Postgraduate or higher 769 (39) 6.9 16.6 54.9 21.6
 Undergraduate 970 (50) 7.6 18.5 51.2 22.7
 All others 221 (11) 12.2 12.7 46.2 29.0
Type of urban area of bicycle use
 Central municipality 450 (23) 6.7 11.3 55.8 26.2
 Provincial capital 1092 (56) 7.3 18.7 52.6 21.4
 Deputy provincial city 90 (5) 11.1 27.8 50.0 11.1
 All others 328 (17) 10.4 16.8 46.0 26.8
Province/City of bicycle use
 Hunan 579 (30) 7.4 18.5 55.1 19.0
 Guangdong 230 (12) 8.7 25.2 52.2 13.9
 Beijing 164 (8) 7.9 10.4 62.2 19.5
 Tianjin 144 (7) 7.6 9.0 50.0 33.3
 All others 843 (43) 7.9 16.6 48.4 27.0
Reason for travel
 Commuting to work/school 1070 (55) 6.9 17.0 53.9 22.1
 Entertainment 544 (28) 8.3 17.8 52.2 21.7
 Physical exercise 180 (9) 11.7 16.7 40.0 31.7
 Others 166 (9) 8.4 15.7 53.0 22.9
Riding hours per week
 <1 hour 240 (12) 4.2 20.4 51.7 23.8
 1–2 hours 732 (37) 8.1 17.1 53.3 21.6
 3–5 hours 877 (45) 7.6 17.1 51.3 23.9
 >5 hours 111 (6) 16.2 9.9 51.4 22.5
Type of typical riding days
 Weekday 1105 (56) 7.2 16.1 54.4 22.3
 Weekend or holiday 855 (44) 8.7 18.4 49.1 23.9
Typical riding time
 Morning rush hours 399 (20) 8.3 15.8 53.4 22.6
 Evening rush hours 698 (36) 8.3 17.0 53.3 21.3
 Other times 863 (44) 7.3 17.7 50.5 24.4

Table 6.

Proportion of riders carrying passengers.

Variable Number (%) Frequency of behavior (%)
Always Often Sometimes Never
Total 1960 (100) 0.5 0.7 4.3 94.6
Sex
 Male 833 (43) 0.6 0.7 5.6 93.0
 Female 1127 (58) 0.4 0.6 3.3 95.7
Age group
 ≤25 years 1056 (54) 0.2 0.8 3.3 95.7
 26∼35 years 623 (32) 0.8 0.8 5.5 92.9
 ≥36 years 281 (14) 0.7 0.0 5.3 94.0
Level of education
 Postgraduate or higher 769 (39) 0.1 0.4 3.3 96.2
 Undergraduate 970 (50) 0.3 0.7 3.7 95.3
 All others 221 (11) 2.3 1.4 10.4 86.0
Type of urban area of bicycle use
 Central municipality 450 (23) 0.9 1.3 3.6 94.2
 Provincial capital 1092 (56) 0.2 0.4 3.0 96.4
 Deputy provincial city 90 (5) 0.0 0.0 2.2 97.8
 All others 328 (17) 0.9 0.9 10.1 88.1
Province/City of bicycle use
 Hunan 579 (30) 0.5 0.7 3.6 95.2
 Guangdong 230 (12) 0.0 0.0 5.2 94.8
 Beijing 164 (8) 0.6 0.6 4.3 94.5
 Tianjin 144 (7) 0.0 0.7 3.5 95.8
 All others 843 (43) 0.6 0.8 4.6 94.0
Reason for travel
 Commuting to work/school 1070 (55) 0.5 0.6 3.6 95.3
 Entertainment 544 (28) 0.6 0.9 5.1 93.4
 Physical exercise 180 (9) 0.6 1.1 8.3 90.0
 Others 166 (9) 0.0 0.0 1.2 98.8
Riding hours per week
 <1 hour 240 (12) 0.0 0.0 2.5 97.5
 1–2 hours 732 (37) 0.3 0.7 4.1 94.9
 3–5 hours 877 (45) 0.5 0.8 4.6 94.2
 >5 hours 111 (6) 2.7 0.9 7.2 89.2
Type of typical riding days
 Weekday 1105 (56) 0.3 0.4 3.1 96.3
 Weekend or holiday 855 (44) 0.7 1.1 5.8 92.4
 Typical riding time
 Morning rush hours 399 (20) 0.5 0.3 6.8 92.5
 Evening rush hours 698 (36) 0.4 0.7 4.3 94.6
 Other times 863 (44) 0.5 0.8 3.1 95.6

Table 7.

Proportion of riders using a cell phone while riding.

Variable Number (%) Frequency of behavior (%)
Always Often Sometimes Never
Total 1960 (100) 1.2 4.2 37.6 57.0
Sex
 Male 833 (43) 1.8 6.5 44.5 47.2
 Female 1127 (58) 0.8 2.5 32.4 64.3
Age group
 ≤25 years 1056 (54) 0.9 5.1 38.7 55.2
 26∼35 years 623 (32) 1.8 4.0 39.6 54.6
 ≥36 years 281 (14) 1.1 1.1 28.5 69.4
Level of education
 Postgraduate or higher 769 (39) 1.3 3.8 38.2 56.7
 Undergraduate 970 (50) 0.8 4.8 36.9 57.4
 All others 221 (11) 2.7 2.7 38.0 56.6
Type of urban area of bicycle use
 Central municipality 450 (23) 1.6 4.9 40.2 53.3
 Provincial capital 1092 (56) 0.6 4.2 34.5 60.6
 Deputy provincial city 90 (5) 2.2 4.4 35.6 57.8
 All others 328 (17) 2.4 3.0 44.5 50.0
Province/City of bicycle use
 Hunan 579 (30) 0.9 2.6 32.0 64.6
 Guangdong 230 (12) 1.3 4.3 33.0 61.3
 Beijing 164 (8) 1.2 5.5 36.0 57.3
 Tianjin 144 (7) 2.8 6.9 38.9 51.4
 All others 843 (43) 1.2 4.5 42.7 51.6
Reason for travel
 Commuting to work/school 1070 (55) 1.2 5.4 39.3 54.0
 Entertainment 544 (28) 1.5 3.5 35.8 59.2
 Physical exercise 180 (9) 1.7 1.7 36.1 60.6
 Others 166 (9) 0.0 1.2 33.1 65.7
Riding hours per week
 <1 hour 240 (12) 0.4 3.8 26.7 69.2
 1–2 hours 732 (37) 1.1 3.8 41.8 53.3
 3–5 hours 877 (45) 1.3 4.7 36.8 57.2
 >5 hours 111 (6) 3.6 3.6 38.7 54.1
Type of typical riding days
 Weekday 1105 (56) 1.0 5.2 38.0 55.7
 Weekend or holiday 855 (44) 1.5 2.8 37.0 58.7
 Typical riding time
 Morning rush hours 399 (20) 1.3 4.0 41.4 53.4
 Evening rush hours 698 (36) 1.9 3.9 36.5 57.7
 Other times 863 (44) 0.7 4.5 36.6 58.2

Table 8.

Proportion of riders eating while riding.

Variable Number (%) Frequency of behavior (%)
Always Often Sometimes Never
Total 1960 (100) 0.8 1.4 20.1 77.8
Sex
 Male 833 (43) 1.1 2.8 25.0 71.2
 Female 1127 (58) 0.5 0.4 16.5 82.6
Age group
 ≤25 years 1056 (54) 0.6 1.6 20.9 76.9
 26∼35 years 623 (32) 0.6 1.4 22.3 75.6
 ≥36 years 281 (14) 1.8 0.4 12.1 85.8
Level of education
 Postgraduate or higher 769 (39) 0.8 0.8 20.2 78.3
 Undergraduate 970 (50) 0.4 1.9 20.7 77.0
 All others 221 (11) 2.3 1.4 17.2 79.2
Type of urban area of bicycle use
 Central municipality 450 (23) 0.9 1.1 18.7 79.3
 Provincial capital 1092 (56) 0.5 1.1 18.9 79.5
 Deputy provincial city 90 (5) 0.0 3.3 18.9 77.8
 All others 328 (17) 1.5 2.1 26.5 69.8
Province/City of bicycle use
 Hunan 579 (30) 0.5 1.2 18.5 79.8
 Guangdong 230 (12) 1.3 1.3 17.4 80.0
 Beijing 164 (8) 1.2 1.2 13.4 84.1
 Tianjin 144 (7) 0.0 2.1 19.4 78.5
 All others 843 (43) 0.8 1.4 23.4 74.4
Reason for travel
 Commuting to work/school 1070 (55) 0.9 1.1 21.0 76.9
 Entertainment 544 (28) 0.6 2.0 20.2 77.2
 Physical exercise 180 (9) 1.1 1.7 16.7 80.6
 Others 166 (9) 0.0 0.6 17.5 81.9
Riding hours per week
 <1 hour 240 (12) 0.0 0.8 12.9 86.2
 1–2 hours 732 (37) 0.5 1.4 23.1 75.0
 3–5 hours 877 (45) 0.7 1.6 20.0 77.8
 >5 hours 111 (6) 4.5 0.9 17.1 77.5
Type of typical riding days
 Weekday 1105 (56) 0.8 1.4 19.6 78.2
 Weekend or holiday 855 (44) 0.7 1.4 20.7 77.2
Typical riding time
 Morning rush hours 399 (20) 1.0 0.5 20.8 77.7
 Evening rush hours 698 (36) 1.0 2.1 19.8 77.1
 Other times 863 (44) 0.5 1.2 20.0 78.3

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

2.1. Study recruitment and participants

Almost all shared bicycles in urban China are rented from smartphone applications [2], so we used an iterative sampling process to recruit study participants through WeChat, the most popular smartphone-based social media program in China. Non-probability sampling has advantages in recruiting study samples compared to probability sampling when random samples are unlikely to be obtained [3]. Initial survey invitations were sent to a convenience sample of colleagues, family members, classmates, and friends who had WeChat contact with members of the research group. Many of these individuals chose to participate, and they then were asked to send information about the survey to people in their own WeChat contact list. This “snowball” recruitment process was iterated for a month, from September 7, 2017 to October 6, 2017, at which point the sample size was deemed sufficient and data collection was terminated.

In total, 1960 riders participated in the retrospective research survey. Of them, individuals aged ≤25 years old, 26–35 years old, and ≥36 years accounted for 54%, 32%, and 14% of participants, respectively. Males constituted 43% of participants. 50% and 39% of respondents respectively reported having received an undergraduate degree and postgraduate education or higher. The majority of respondents came from provincial capitals (56%) and central municipalities (23%). Geographically, the participants came primarily from Hunan Province (29.5%), Guangdong Province (11.7%), Beijing city (8.4%) and Tianjin city (7.3%), with the remainder spread across China.

2.2. Questionnaire

The questionnaire, which included three parts, was designed based on previous epidemiological surveys and empirical information from media reports. The first part of the survey questionnaire included variables concerning demographic traits (sex, age, level of education, type of city where they lived and rode shared bicycles). The second part consisted of shared bicycle travel-related information, such as typical purpose of shared bicycle travel, number of shared bicycle riding hours a week, and riding time for average shared bicycle rides. The third and final part of the survey asked about frequency of engaging in eight unsafe shared bicycle riding behaviors: (1) not wearing helmets [4], [5], [6], [7], (2) running red lights [8], (3) cycling against the traffic flow [9], (4) riding in a motor vehicle lane where bicycles are prohibited, (5) riding in a pedestrian lane where bicycles are prohibited, (6) carrying passengers on a shared bicycle with only one seat [10], (7) using a cell phone while riding a shared bicycle, and (8) eating while riding a shared bicycle [11], [12]. The eight risky behaviors were developed through a series of steps involving a thorough review of existing research literature and media reports, multi-round group discussions among the research team, and pilot testing. Participants responded to each survey item by identifying the frequency with which they engaged in each behavior over the past month using a 4-point scale (always, often, sometimes, never).

2.3. Statistical analysis

Data analysis involved computation of basic descriptive statistics presenting the frequency of each of the eight unsafe riding behaviors, which were derived through participant self-report. SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions) statistical software version 22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, US) was used to perform all statistical analyses.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81573260) and the National Natural Science Foundation of Hunan province (2018JJ3696) (No. 71774175). The funding bodies had no role in the design, collection, analysis or interpretation of this study.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104329.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

mmc1.docx (16.6KB, docx)
mmc2.xls (367.5KB, xls)

References

  • 1.Wu X., Xiao W., Deng C., Schwebel D.C., Hu G. Unsafe riding behaviors of shared-bicycle riders in urban China: a retrospective survey. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2019;131:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.002. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu H., Chen W. Electronic Technology & Software Engineering (06); 2018. Shared bicycle electronic fence system based on intelligent terminals; pp. 122–123. (in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sun Z., Xu Y. fourth ed. People’s Medical Publishing House; Beijing: 2014. Medical Statistics. ISBN 978-7-117-19109-8. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fischer C.M., Sanchez C.E., Pittman M., Milzman D., Volz K.A., Huang H., Gautam S., Sanchez L.D. Prevalence of bicycle helmet use by users of public bikeshare programs. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2012;60(2):228–231. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Goodman A., Green J., Woodcock J. The role of bicycle shared systems in normalising the image of cycling: an observational study of London cyclists. J Transp. Health. 2014;1(1):5–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2013.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kraemer J.D., Roffenbender J.S., Anderko L. Helmet wearing among users of a public bicycle-shared program in the District of Columbia and comparable riders on personal bicycles. Am. J. Public Health. 2012;102(8):e23–e25. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nanapragasam A. A public health dilemma: urban bicycle-shared schemes. Can. J. Public Health. 2014;105(3) doi: 10.17269/cjph.105.4525. e229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pai C.W., Jou R.C. Cyclists' red-light running behaviours: an examination of risk-taking, opportunistic, and law-obeying behaviours. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2014;62:191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Useche S.A., Montoro L., Tomas J.M., Cendales B. Validation of the Cycling Behavior Questionnaire: a tool for measuring cyclists' road behaviors. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2018;58:1021–1030. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.CCTV.COM . 2017. Shared Bicycles Can't Be Carried People, and We Must Attach Importance to the Travel Safety.http://news.cctv.com/2017/03/27/VIDEDRI6ae49QeDhQYgWeMtv170327.shtml (in chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wolfe E.S., Arabian S.S., Breeze J.L., Salzler M.J. Distracted biking: an observational study. J. Trauma Nurs. 2016;23(2):65–70. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Useche S.A., Alonso F., Montoro L., Esteban C. Distraction of cyclists: how does it influence their risky behaviors and traffic crashes? PeerJ. 2018;6 doi: 10.7717/peerj.5616. e5616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.docx (16.6KB, docx)
mmc2.xls (367.5KB, xls)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES