Abstract
The corpus callosum (CC) is the biggest commissure that links cerebral hemispheres. Guidepost structures develop in the cortical midline during CC development and express axon guidance molecules that instruct neurons regarding the proper direction of axonal elongation toward and across the cortical midline. Neuropilin-1 (Npn1), a high affinity receptor for class 3 semaphorins (Sema3s) localized on cingulate pioneering axons, plays a crucial role in axon guidance to the midline through interactions with Sema3s. However, it remains unclear which type of Plexin is a component of Sema3 holoreceptors with Npn1 during the guidance of cingulate pioneering axons. To address the role of PlexinA1 in CC development, we examined with immunohistochemistry the localization of PlexinA1, Npn1, and Sema3s using embryonic brains from wild-type (WT) and PlexinA1-deficient (PlexinA1 knock-out (KO)) mice with a BALB/cAJ background. The immunohistochemistry confirmed the expression of PlexinA1 in callosal axons derived from the cingulate and neocortex of the WT mice on embryonic day 17.5 (E17.5) but not in the PlexinA1 KO mice. To examine the role of PlexinA1 in the navigation of callosal axons, the extension of callosal axons toward and across the midline was traced in brains of WT and PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5. As a result, callosal axons in the PlexinA1 KO brains had a significantly lower incidence of midline crossing at E17.5 compared with the WT brains. To further examine the role of PlexinA1 in CC development, the CC phenotype was examined in PlexinA1 KO mice at postnatal day 0.5 (P0.5). Most of the PlexinA1 KO mice at P0.5 showed agenesis of the CC. These results indicate the crucial involvement of PlexinA1 in the midline crossing of callosal axons during CC development in BALB/cAJ mice.
Introduction
Neuronal interhemispheric connections and commissures composed of midline traversing axons are needed for the mammalian brain to synchronize activities between contralateral regions [1]. The corpus callosum (CC) is the largest commissural tract and is composed of large bundles of axons interconnecting the two cerebral hemispheres [2]. The human CC contains 200–350 million axons [3] and represents a crucial pathway for the functional integration of cognitive and sensory information by mutually transferring information between the two cerebral hemispheres [4]. Some individuals with agenesis of CC (AgCC) are asymptomatic, but many cases are associated with hydrocephalus, mental retardation, microcephaly, seizures, and other abnormalities [5]. Individuals with AgCC experience various difficulties in physical, sensory, developmental, and motor aspects that cannot be easily explained by the existence of conditions such as low IQ scores, neurological disorder, and impairment of the age-level communication [6]. AgCC is also associated with major psychiatric disorders including autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and schizophrenia [7, 8, 9]. Thus, it is necessary to elucidate the mechanism of CC development to better understand the pathogenesis of disorders related to AgCC and to develop novel therapeutics according to its pathology [10, 11, 12, 13]. Many similarities in the developmental processes of CC have been observed in humans and mice, and structures of the midline glia as well as the expression profiles of genes involved in CC formation in humans have remarkable similarities with those in mice [14]. Mouse models are thus useful for investigating the mechanisms of CC development [15, 16]. In the midline region of the brain in mice, the CC begins to develop on approximately embryonic day 15 (E15) and continues developing until postnatal day 14 (P14) [15, 17, 18]. Many molecules are known to participate in the guidance of axons from the neocortex across to the CC [1, 19]. Axon guidance molecules involved in this process are Netrins [20, 21, 22], Slits [21, 23, 24], Semaphorins [19, 20, 21, 25, 26], Ephrins [21, 27, 28], and Draxin [29], while the implicated axon guidance receptors are DCC [30], Ryk [31], Robo [32], and Neuropilin [19]. Furthermore, guidepost structures including a glial wedge, indusium griseum glia, midline zipper glia, and subcallosal sling positioned laterally, dorsally, and ventrally to the CC may provide a guidance substratum for navigating the extension of callosal axons [1, 33, 34, 35].
The direction of neuronal axon elongation is determined by the actions of axon guidance molecules, which exert attractive or repulsive activities on the extension of axons through their receptors [20, 21]. Semaphorins (Semas) are involved in determining the direction of axonal extension. Among class3 semaphorins (Sema3s), Sema3C exhibits attractive activity toward growing axons and Sema3A displays repulsive activity toward extending axons [19, 36, 37]. Plexins and Neuropilin (Npn) have been identified as receptors for Semas [38, 39, 40, 41, 42]. Plexins function as principal bodies for transducing Semas’ signals intracellularly and consists of four classes, namely PlexinA, B, C, and D [38, 39, 40, 41]. Npn, a transmembrane receptor with high affinity to Sema3s, consists of Npn1 and Npn2 and interacts with plexins to transduce the signal of Sema3s [38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43]. PlexinA1 is considered to transduce signals of Sema3s by forming a receptor complex with Npn1 on the growth cone of the axon terminals of developing neurons [38, 39, 44, 45].
During guidance of the formation of axonal pathways in the nervous system, pioneer neurons first project their axons toward the direction of their target neurons along the neuronal pathway, and axon tracts are formed thereafter [19]. These axons are called pioneer or pioneering axons [19]. During CC development in mice, pioneer axons derived from the cingulate cortex extend toward the rostral midline on embryonic day 15.5 (E15.5), opening a path for later-arriving neocortical axons [46, 47, 48]. Cingulate pioneering axons, which cross the midline prior to axonal formation in the CC, are reported to express Npn1 [19]. These cingulate pioneering axons are misguided into the septum in the knock-in mice expressing mutant Npn1 to which Sema3s are unable to bind, proving that Npn1 is necessary for the guidance of these axons across the cortical midline [19]. Sema3C attracts cingulate axons toward the midline by binding Npn1 expressed on the axons [19, 25]. Calretinin (CR)-positive glutamatergic neurons (CR+ neurons) expressing the calcium-binding CR protein emerge in the cortical midline in the early stages of CC development and produce Sema3C [25]. Sema3C secreted by CR neurons stimulates the elongation of cingulate axons with the expression of the receptor neuropilin1 (Npn1) toward the midline [25]. Both CR neurons and Sema3C are colocalized to the same areas in the midline, and CR neurons with Sema3C greatly contribute to CC development by guiding callosal axons to the midline [25]. After Semas bind to Npn1, the signals are supposed to be transmitted intracellularly through class A plexins (PlexinA1, A3, and A4), PlexinD1, or L1CAM, a component of the Sema3 holoreceptor [19, 25, 49, 50]. However, it remains unclear which molecules transduce Semas signals intracellularly to guide pioneer and callosal axons to the midline [51].
To gain insight into the role of PlexinA1 in CC development, the present study was conducted to examine the expression of PlexinA1 and Npn1 as well as ligands such as Sema3A and Sema3C involved in the developmental stage of CC in WT and PlexinA1 knock-out (KO) mice. The status of the guidance of Npn1-positive (Npn1+) callosal axons to and across the midline on E17.5 was then compared between brains of WT and PlexinA1 KO mice. Furthermore, we compared the status of CC formation between WT and PlexinA1 KO brains at P0.5 by examining the midline crossing of L1CAM+ callosal axons. Based on the results, we discuss the role of PlexinA1 in the CC development of BALB/cAJ mice.
Materials and methods
Animals
Animals used in this study research were PlexinA1 WT and PlexinA1 KO mice with a BALB/cAJ genetic background. PlexinA1 KO mice were produced by gene targeting with E14.1 embryonic stem (ES) cells [52]. The gene targeting vector was constructed to replace the genomic region containing the initiation codon and the Sema domain-coding sequence with a neomycin-resistance gene, and then were transfected into E14.1 ES cells by electroporation. G418-and ganciclovir-resistant clones were selected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and confirmed by Southern blotting. Mutant ES cells were introduced into mouse blastocysts and transferred into pseudo-pregnant mice to generate chimeras. F1 heterozygous KO mice were generated by breeding the chimeras with BALB/cAJ mice (CLEA Japan, Inc. Japan) and were backcrossed 10 generations to BALB/cAJ mice. Pairs of the resultant heterozygous mice were bred to obtain homozygous KO mice and their WT littermates as controls [53]. The mice were reared in the animal center in the Faculty of Pharmacy at Meijo University. The care and use of mice as well as other experimental protocols were performed in accordance with the guidelines promulgated by the Physiological Society of Japan and the guidelines on animal experimentation of the Meijo University. The Animal Ethics Review Committee of Meijo University approved the experimental protocols (authorization number: 2019PE4).
Generation of Embryos and neonatal mice
PlexinA1 heterozygous mice were mated to obtain WT and PlexinA1 KO embryos and neonatal mice at postnatal day 0.5 (P0.5). Embryonic day 0.5 (E0.5) was specified as the day when the experimenter confirmed the presence of a vaginal plug. Embryos were obtained from the pregnant mice and neonatal mice were collected at P0.5 just after birth through the close monitoring of delivery.
Genotyping
The genotypes of both adult mice and their offspring were identified by PCR using mouse tail DNA and a PlexinA1 gene specific primer set as previously reported [52, 53].
Preparation of Embryos and neonatal mice
Embryos were collected from the uterus of the pregnant mice under anesthesia. The heart of the embryo was visualized after removal of the skin and thoracic muscles. Then, transcardial perfusion of phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) at pH 7.4 and successive perfusion of 4% paraformaldehyde solution (PFA) in PBS at pH 7.4 were conducted through an infusion into the left ventricle of the heart. After the perfusion, the brain was postfixed for 24 h in 4% PFA solution. Then, the brain was sequentially immersed in 10%, 20%, and 30% sucrose solution in PBS for three consecutive days. The fixed brain was embedded in O.C.T compound (Sakura Finetek Japan Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with hexane (cat no. 082–00426, Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Japan) and dry ice. Neonatal mice at P0.5 were anesthetized by cooling the body temperature with indirect contact with ice. Mice were then transcardially perfused with PBS, followed by perfusion with 4% PFA through infusion into the left ventricles. The skin of the head was separated from the body and the brain was collected. Thereafter, the fixed brain was postfixed for 24 h in 4% PFA and immersed for three consecutive days in 10%, 20%, and 30% sucrose solution. The brain was then embedded in O.C.T compound (Sakura Finetek Japan Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
Sample preparation for immunohistochemistry
Embedded brains were sectioned coronally at 20 μm thickness using CryoStar NX70 cryostat (Thermo Scientific, Yokohama, Japan). The sections were placed on adhesive micro glass slides (MAS-05, Matsunami Glass Industries Ltd. Osaka, Japan) and dried for 1 h. The glass slides were dipped into cold methanol (cat no. 137–01823, Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan) for 20 min and dried for 1 h. Finally, the slides were preserved at −85°C for further use. Sixteen coronal slices with 20 μm thickness were prepared for E16.5 and 24 coronal slices were prepared for E17.5. Slices were obtained starting from the line connecting both posterior edges of the orbitae. Slices situated in the middle of the collected samples (E16.5; slice numbers 7 to 10, E17.5; slice numbers 11 to 14) were used for immunohistochemistry. For P0.5 brains, 45 coronal slices with 20 μm thickness were prepared, starting from the line connecting both posterior edges of the orbitae. CC at P0.5 mostly started from the 15–17th slice (confirmed in 12 out of 16 WT mice) and terminated at the 65–73rd slice (confirmed in 5 WT and 1 KO). Thus, slices obtained from the anterior half of the middle portion of the CC (slice numbers 35 to 45) were used for the immunohistochemical analyses to evaluate the midline crossing of callosal axons.
Immunohistochemistry
The glass slides with sections were dried for 30 min and washed in PBS with 0.1% polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate (cat no.166-21213, Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan) for 15 min. The slides were washed in PBS for 15 min, heated in 10% HistoVT One (cat no. 06380–05, Nacalai Tesque Inc. Kyoto, Japan) solution for 30 min at 75°C, and left for 30 min at room temperature. The slides were then washed in PBS for 15 min and roundly marked around the sections with liquid-blocking pen (Pap pen, DAIDO SANGYO, Saitama, Japan). Sections were treated with blocking buffer containing 4% BSA (cat no. A8022, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 4% goat or donkey serum (cat no. 325285–4, Abcam; cat no. D9663, Sigma Aldrich), 10% sodium azide (cat no. 26628-22-8, Sigma Aldrich), and 0.02% Triton-X-100 (cat no.161-0407, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA94547), and were preserved for 1 h at room temperature. Alternatively, sections were treated with Blocking One Histo (cat no. 06349–64, nacalai tesque, Kyoto, Japan) for 10 min at room temperature. Sections were then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Primary antibodies used for the detection of the target proteins during immunostaining were anti-human/mouse PlexinA1 (1:400, AF4309, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA), anti-mouse/rat Neuropilin-1 (1:100, AF566, R&D Systems), anti-Semaphorin3A (1:100, PAB7888, Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan), anti-SEMA3C (C-term) (1:400, SAB1304782, Sigma Aldrich), anti-L1CAM (1:200, ab24345, Abcam), anti-CR (1:100, AF5065, R&D Systems), anti-CR (1:100, ab702, Abcam), and purified mouse anti-human DCC (1:800, 554223, BD Biosciences, New Jersey, USA). The samples were washed for 50 min in PBS exchanged five times. Sections were then incubated with secondary antibodies diluted in either the blocking buffer or Signal Enhancer HIKARI for Immunostain Solution A (cat no. 02373–54, nacalai tesque) for 1 h at room temperature. Secondary antibodies used for detection of the target proteins during immunostaining were Alexa flour 555 donkey anti-goat (1:500, A-21932, Life Technology), Alexa flour 555 donkey anti-rabbit (1:500, A31572, Thermo Fisher Scientific), Alexa flour 488 donkey anti-mouse (1:200, ab150105, Abcam), Alexa flour 488 goat anti-mouse (1:200, A-11057, Thermo Fisher Scientific), Alexa flour 488 donkey anti-rat (1:500, A21208, Life Technologies), Alexa flour 488 donkey anti-rabbit (1:200, A21206, Thermo Fisher Scientific), Alexa flour 488 donkey anti-goat (1:200, A21932, Life Technologies), and Alexa flour 488 F(ab)2 fragment of goat anti-mouse (1:200, A11017, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sections were washed in PBS exchanged five times for 50 min and finally covered with micro cover glasses (Matsunami Glass Industries Ltd.) using Mount-Quick Aqueous (Daido Sangyo Co., Ltd.) or Fluoro-KEEPER Antifade Reagent, Non-Hardening Type with DAPI (cat no. 12745–74, nacalai tesque). To visualize cellular nuclei of sections mounted with Mount-Quick Aqueous, bisBenzimide H 33258 (cat no. 14530, Sigma Aldrich, USA) was used. The samples were preserved overnight at 4°C and slices were imaged with an All-in-One Fluorescence Microscope (BZ-X710; Keyence, Osaka, Japan) controlled with BZ-X viewer version 1.3.1.1. Images were analyzed with BZ-X Analyzer version 1.4.0.1.
DiI anterograde axonal tracing
Transcardial perfusion of PBS into the mice at E17.5 was used to remove blood and successive perfusion of 4% PFA was performed to fix the brain tissues. Cerebella and olfactory bulbs were removed from the fixed brains. The brains were placed in 4% PFA for 24 h for postfixation. Skull fragments and meninges were carefully removed and the postfixed brain was coronally cut at both rostral and caudal sites using a neonatal mouse brain slicer (Zivic Instruments, Pittsburgh, PA15237) to obtain a brain sample with coronal cross-section planes. The brain samples were placed on slide glasses with the rostral cross-section plane facing upward. Then, 0.03 μl of 10% DiI (Invitrogen, NY, USA) solution in N, N-dimethylformamide was injected into the cingulate cortex of the right hemisphere with a Neuros Syringe (#7000.5, Hamilton, NEVADA, USA) or a DiI crystal was placed in the cingulate cortex under an operating microscope. The brain samples treated with DiI were drenched with 4% PFA in PBS in a wet box at 35°C for two weeks. The brain samples were sectioned at 200 μm with a MicroSlicer (DOSAKA EM CO., LTD., Kyoto, Japan). The sections were attached to glass slides (Matsunami Glass Industries Ltd.), covered in Mount-Quick Aqueous (Daido Sangyo Co., Ltd.), and viewed under the BZ-X710 All-in-One Fluorescence Microscope (Keyence).
Western blotting
The medial regions containing the cingulate gyrus, cingulate and neocortex-derived axons, and the CC at callosal axon pre-crossing (E16.5) and post-crossing (E17.5) stages were cut from the brain sample with coronal cross-section planes at both rostral and caudal sites using the neonatal mouse brain slicer (Zivic Instruments, Pittsburgh, PA15237). The dissected tissues were homogenized with T-PER Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent containing 25 mM bicine, 150 mM sodium chloride at pH 7.6 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. IL, USA), cOmplete ULTRA Tablets, Mini, EASYpack Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (05892970001, Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany), and PhosStop (4906845001, Roche applied Science). The homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C to obtain the supernatant. Protein concentrations in the sample were determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). The protein samples were prepared for electrophoresis by adjusting the protein concentration to 2 μg/μL with sample buffer (44.5% glycerol, 0.125 M Tris-HCL, pH 6.8, 4% SDS, Bromophenol Blue (optimal), and 10% β-mercaptoethanol) and boiled for 5 min at 95°C. An equal amount of protein (10–20 μg) was loaded into each well and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at 150 V for 60 min. The proteins were then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes at 100 V for 1 h. After transfer, the membranes were blocked for 1 h using the PVDF Blocking Reagent for Can Get Signal (NYPBR01, Toyobo Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature on the Labo Shaker (Model BC-730, BC Bio CRAFT, Tokyo, Japan). The membranes were washed for 30 min (3 times for 10 min each) in TBS-T (20 mM Tris Base, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20, PH 7.6). After washing, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C on the Labo Shaker with the following primary antibodies: β-Actin (1:10000, 13E5, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-mPlexinA1 (1:5000, AF4309, R & D Systems); anti-m/rNeuropilin-1 (1:20000, AF566, R& D Systems); anti-Semaphorin3A (1:10000, ab23393, Abcam); and anti-SEMA3C (C-term) (1:5000, SAB1304782, Sigma Aldrich) in Can Get Signal immunoreaction enhancer solution-1 (NKB-101, Toyobo Co. Ltd.). The membranes were washed again for 30 min (3 times for 10 min each) at room temperature with TBS-T, incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody in Can Get Signal immunoreaction enhancer solution-2 (NKB-101, Toyobo Co. Ltd.) for 1 h at room temperature on the Labo Shaker, and then were washed again in TBS-T for 30 min (3 times for 10 min each). The membranes were reacted with ECL prime reagents (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Analyses were performed using Image Quant LAS-4000 (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Sweden).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis in the present study was performed with Ekuseru-Toukei 2015 (Social Survey Research Information Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), which adds a statistical analysis menu to Excel. The midline crossing of WT and PlexinA1 KO callosal axons at E17.5 and P0.5 was evaluated using the χ2-test. The expression levels of the target protein detected by western blotting in the WT and PlexinA1 KO midline area at E16.5 and E17.5 were compared using the student’s t-test. P<0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Results
Expression of PlexinA1 in the developing cortical midline
Together with Npn1 and L1CAM, PlexinA1 is expressed in cingulate pioneer neurons of C57BL6/J mice from E15 to E17 [19]. The mRNAs of class 3 Semas (Sema3s) including Sema3A and Sema3C are also expressed in the developing cortical midline of C57BL6/J mice from E15 to E17 [19]. To confirm the localization of PlexinA1, Npn1, Sema3A, and Sema3C in BALB/cAJ mice at E16.5 and E17.5, we performed expression analysis using immunohistochemical staining and western blotting. As shown in Fig 1A-a, PlexinA1 was located both superficial to and deep within the cingulate cortex as well as in the septum in WT mice at E16.5 (Fig 1A-a). At E17.5, PlexinA1 was localized deep within the cortex, with the callosal axons traversing the midline and the septum of the WT mice (Fig 1A-b; S1 Fig). In contrast, PlexinA1 expression was not detected in any areas of the PlexinA1 KO mouse brain at both E16.5 and E17.5 (Fig 1A-c and 1d; S1 Fig), confirming the specificity of the anti-PlexinA1 antibodies used. Western blotting using tissue lysates derived from the cortical midline of WT and PlexinA1 KO mice at E16.5 and E17.5 revealed PlexinA1 in WT, but not in PlexinA1 KO mice (Fig 1B and 1C). The expression of Npn1 was confirmed in the cortical midline areas of WT and PlexinA1 KO at E16.5 and E17.5. In agreement with the study reporting the localization of Npn1 in the axons of the cingulate cortex [19], Npn1 was localized to cingulate axons of both genotypes at E16.5 and E17.5 (Fig 1D). In most of the WT mice at E17.5, Npn1 was localized to the cingulate axons crossing the midline (Fig 1D-b). In contrast, Npn1+ callosal axons did not cross the midline in most PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5 (Fig 1D-d).
Next, we tried to determine whether PlexinA1 is localized to Npn1+ pioneer axons in cingulate-derived callosal axons. Because both anti-PlexinA1 and anti-Npn1 antibodies were polyclonal goat IgG, we could not use these antibodies together for double immunofluorescence study. Thus, we first performed double immunofluorescence staining of PlexinA1 and deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC) as a substitute for Npn1 in WT and PlexinA1 KO mice at E16.5 to E17.5. DCC has been shown to be expressed in cingulate-derived axons [54]. At E16.5, PlexinA1 was colocalized with the DCC+ area in WT brains (Fig 2A). In the double immunofluorescence staining of Npn1 and DCC, the localization of Npn1 nearly overlapped with that of DCC in WT brain at E16.5 (Fig 2B). Thus, PlexinA1 was colocalized with Npn1+ cingulate-derived callosal axons in WT mice at E16.5. In WT mice at E17.5, PlexinA1 was colocalized with the DCC+ area deep within the cingulate cortex and with axons derived from the cingulate and neocortex crossing the midline (Fig 3A). Npn1 was colocalized with the dorsal side of the DCC+ area in cingulate-derived axons in WT and PlexinA1 KO brains at E17.5 (Fig 3B). Taken together, the localization of PlexinA1 was identified in the Npn1, DCC double+ cingulate, and DCC+ callosal axons at E17.5 in BALB/cAJ mice.
Expression of ligands for PlexinA1 in the developing cortical midline
Expression of Sema3A, one of the ligands for Sema3 holoreceptors, could be confirmed in the cortical midline of the brain of WT and PlexinA1 KO mice using immunohistochemical staining and western blotting. The expression of Sema3A was detected in the cingulate cortex of brains of WT and PlexinA1 KO mice at E16.5 (Fig 4A-a and 4c). In WT and PlexinA1 KO brains at E17.5, Sema3A was expressed in the guidepost structure known as the subcallosal sling, a band-like structure below the CC, additional to the cingulate cortex (Fig 4A-b and 4d). In the western blotting using tissue lysates derived from the cortical midline of WT and PlexinA1 KO mice at E16.5 and E17.5 (Fig 4B and 4C), there were no significant differences in the expression levels of Sema3A between both genotypes at either E16.5 or E17.5 (p > 0.05, Student’s t-test; Sema3A signal normalized with β-Actin from WT: n = 4 and KO: n = 4).
Sema3A mRNA is expressed in the developing neocortex following the gradient from lateral-high to medial-low, and Npn1, the receptor of Sema3A is expressed on callosal axons extending from upper layer neurons [55]. Because Sema3A expressed ectopically suppresses the extension of callosal axons orienting medially, the gradient of Sema3A expression in the developing neocortex may be a mechanism in which callosal axons initially extend toward the midline from the developing neocortex [55]. To ask if the gradient of Sema3A exists in the developing neocortex of WT and KO mice under BALB/cAJ background, we analyzed the expression of Seam3A and Npn1 along the mediolateral axis of developing neocortex on E15.5–17.5. Sema3A tended to be expressed in the gradient from lateral-high to medial-low in the neocortex positioned distantly from the midline of both genotypes on E17.5 (Fig 5). In contrast, Npn1 was expressed with the opposite gradient from lateral-low to medial-high in the brains of both genotypes on E17.5 (Fig 5). The specificity of the antibody against Sema3A was confirmed by positive staining in the hippocampus (S2 Fig), which was similar to the pattern shown in another report [56].
Expression of Sema3C, another ligand for Sema3 holoreceptors with chemoattractive activity, could be also confirmed in the cortical midline of WT and PlexinA1 KO brains by immunohistochemical staining and western blotting. Sema3C was expressed in the cingulate cortex of WT and PlexinA1 KO brains at E16.5 (Fig 6A-a and 6c). In WT and PlexinA1 KO brains at E17.5, Sema3C was expressed in guidepost structures including the indusium griseum and subcallosal sling additional to in the cingulate cortex (Fig 6A-b and 6d). In the western blotting using tissue lysates derived from the cortical midline of WT and PlexinA1 KO mice at E16.5 and E17.5 (Fig 6B and 6C), there were no significant differences in the expression levels of Sema3C between both genotypes at either E16.5 or E17.5 (p > 0.05, Student’s t-test; Sema3C signal normalized with β-Actin from WT: n = 4 and KO: n = 4). The specificity of the antibody against Sema3C was confirmed by positive staining in the intermediate zone (IMZ) and diffuse staining in the cortical plate and subventricular zone (S3 Fig), which supported the results of the article reporting on the expression of Sema3C mRNA in the developing neocortex [57].
CR+ glutamatergic neurons, which transiently emerge at the cortical midline, have been proposed to attract the extension of callosal axons to the midline by secreting Sema3C during CC development [25]. CR expression was confirmed at the cortical midline of WT and PlexinA1 KO brains at E17.5. CR was expressed in the indusium griseum, subcallosal sling, and the IMZ in both genotypes with similar expression patterns (Fig 7A-a and 7d). Double immunofluorescence staining of CR and Sema3C showed the overlap of CR and Sema3C in the indusium griseum, subcallosal sling, and the IMZ in both genotypes (Fig 7A-c and 7f), supporting a previous report of CR+ cells at the cortical midline as the guideposts secreting Sema3C [25]. To examine the extension of Npn1+ callosal axons toward the CR+ guideposts during CC development, we performed double immunofluorescence staining of Npn1 and CR in WT and PlexinA1 KO brains at E17.5. The results showed that Npn1+ callosal axons in both genotypes extended toward the CR+ cells residing at the midline (Fig 7B-c and 7f). Npn1+ callosal axons in WT mice crossed the midline but those in PlexinA1 KO mice stalled just anterior to the midline (Fig 7B-a and 7d).
Midline crossing of Npn1+ callosal axons was impaired in PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5
We analyzed the extension and the midline crossing of Npn1+ callosal axons in WT and PlexinA1 KO brains at E17.5 with Npn1 immunohistochemical staining (Fig 8). Midline crossing was confirmed in 18 out of 24 WT mice at E17.5, and was not detected in the other six WT mice. In contrast, midline crossing was confirmed in four out of 25 PlexinA1 KO mice, and was not detected in 21 KO mice. Thus, the incidence of midline crossing of Npn1+ callosal axons was significantly lower in PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5 than that in WT mice at E17.5 (χ2 test, P < 0.05, S1 Table). We observed the stalled end of Npn1+ callosal axons just anterior to the midline in most of the PlexinA1 KO mice without midline crossing at E17.5 (Fig 8D, 8E and 8F; 15 out of 21 KO). Results obtained from tracing the tract through the injection of DiI into the cingulate cortex of brain sections from WT and PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5 also supported the immunohistochemical staining results for Npn1 (S4 Fig). Midline crossing was confirmed in nine out of 10 WT mice. In contrast, midline crossing was confirmed in only two out of 16 PlexinA1 KO mice, and was not detected in the other 14 KO mice. Thus, the incidence of midline crossing of DiI-labeled callosal axons was significantly lower in PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5 than that in WT mice (χ2 test, P < 0.05, S2 Table). We did not detect mistargeting to any ectopic areas other than the midline in the DiI-labeled callosal axons of PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5.
PlexinA1 KO Mice at P0.5 display AgCC
To examine how the stalled state anterior to the midline of PlexinA1-deficient callosal axons at E17.5 changes at P0.5 approximately two days later, we visualized the callosal axons of WT and PlexinA1 KO mice at P0.5 with immunohistochemical staining using antibodies against L1CAM. L1CAM+ callosal axons crossed the midline in 16 out of 16 WT mice, but not in 10 out of 13 PlexinA1 KO mice at P0.5 (Fig 9). Thus, the incidence of midline crossing of callosal axons was significantly lower in PlexinA1 KO mice at P0.5 than that in WT mice (χ2 test, P < 0.05, S3 Table). Furthermore, in 10 out of 13 PlexinA1 KO mice, AgCC was detected in the anterior half of the CC. In contrast, AgCC was not detected in either of the 16 WT mice. The incidence of AgCC in the anterior half of the CC was significantly higher in PlexinA1 KO mice at P0.5 than in WT mice (χ2 test, P < 0.05, S4 Table).
Discussion
The present study using PlexinA1 KO mice with a BALB/cAJ background uncovered three crucial findings regarding the guidance of callosal axons to the midline during CC development. The results showed that: 1) PlexinA1 was expressed in cingulate and neocortex-derived callosal axons at E17.5 during CC development; 2) the midline crossing of callosal axons was significantly impaired in PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5 as compared with that in WT mice; and 3) AgCC in the anterior half of CC occurred in most of the PlexinA1 KO mice at P0.5.
The expression of PlexinA1 in axons derived from the cingulate and neocortex at embryonic stages during CC development in BALB/cAJ mice was confirmed by the combination of double immunofluorescence staining using anti-PlexinA1 and anti-DCC antibodies and double immunofluorescence staining with anti-Npn1 and anti-DCC antibodies. PlexinA1 was colocalized to Npn1+ cingulate-derived axons at E16.5 (Fig 2A and 2B). Npn1+ callosal axons had yet to cross the midline at E16.5 in BALB/cAJ WT mice and thus were still at the pre-crossing stage. In contrast to spinal commissural axons [58], PlexinA1 expression in axons and growth cones may not be lowered in Npn1+ callosal axons at the pre-crossing stage. Thus, PlexinA1 may function as a component of Sema3 holoreceptors that guide Npn1+ callosal axons to the cortical midline during CC development of BALB/cAJ mice. Accordingly, PlexinA1 together with other plexins like PlexinA3 and PlexinD1 or L1CAM [51] may be involved in the Sema3C and Npn1-mediated attraction of cingulate axons to the midline during CC development. The colocalization of PlexinA1 and Npn1 in cingulate axons is most evident in cingulate axons crossing the midline at E17.5 (Fig 3). The finding of the colocalization of PlexinA1 and Npn1 in cingulate axons of BALB/cAJ mice is consistent with the previous report indicating the expression of PlexinA1 and Npn1 in cingulate axons during CC development in C57BL/6J mice [19]. The expression of PlexinA1 was also detected in the neocortex-derived callosal axons traversing the cortical midline at E17.5 (Fig 3). Thus, PlexinA1 may have a crucial role in the guidance of cingulate and neocortex-derived callosal axons at the midline crossing and post-crossing stages as a component of Sema3 holoreceptors composed of neuropilins and plexins.
The gradient of Sema3A expression from lateral-high to medial-low in the developing neocortex was observed in the region from developing neocortex to the midline of both WT and PlexinA1 KO mice, and Npn1+ axons extended medially from the lateral side in the brains of both genotypes (Fig 5). Previous studies have revealed the crucial roles of the Sema3A/Npn1 signal in the extension of callosal axons from the neocortex and axonal positioning in the CC during CC development [55, 59]. When axons of callosal projection neurons in the developing cortex initially begin to extend toward the midline, the gradient from high to low concentration of Sema3A may orient axons from the lateral to medial direction [55]. As discussed in their work [55], callosal axons may come close to the midline following another mechanism including local guidance from several guideposts in addition to the Sema3A gradient. The Sema3A/Npn1 signal in the cortical midline operates for the axonal positioning within CC, in which axons derived from the cortex near the midline are located dorsally and those from the neocortex located far from the midline are positioned ventrally in the CC [59]. Several studies reported on callosal phenotypes related to PlexinA1 by investigating the association of PlexinA1 and its interacting molecules with CC development [26, 60, 61]. Wu et al. found the defasciculation of callosal fibers and mistargeting of callosal axons to different regions in the contralateral hemisphere by suppressing the function of PlexinA1 in callosal projection neurons of the rat somatosensory cortex (S1, S2) through in utero electroporation [26]. The study showed that Sema3A induced endocytosis in the growth cone of callosal axons during CC development and the Sema3A/Npn1 and PlexinA1-mediated signals are crucial for fasciculation of callosal fibers and correct topographical targeting of callosal fibers to homotopic regions of the contralateral hemisphere after crossing the midline of callosal axons [26]. Another study found defasciculation of callosal axons in the CC of KO mice deficient of Syb2, a synaptic vesicle protein which associates with PlexinA1 [60]. Thus, Sema3A signal through Npn1, PlexinA1, and Syb2 is crucial for fasciculation of callosal fibers by promoting Syb2-dependent vesicular transport [60]. Son et al. identified PlexinA1 as a protein with peak expression at postnatal day 7 (P7) in their proteome profiling to search molecules involved in postnatal CC development such as axon refinement [61]. To test if their molecular profiling is effective for the identification of molecules involved in the postnatal CC refinement, they examined the callosal phenotype of mice at P15 by inducing knockdown or overexpression of PlexinA1 in callosal projection neurons in the embryonic neocortex. More axons with PlexinA1 knockdown appeared to be contained in the postnatal CC compared with axons with control vectors, and axons with overexpressed PlexinA1 tended to decrease in the postnatal CC [61]. As in their discussion, PlexinA1 may be involved in the regulation of axon numbers by pruning excessive axons within CC around P7 [61]. Thus, it is conceivable that the number of axons with knockdown of PlexinA1 increases and that with overexpressed PlexinA1 decreases in the postnatal stage of CC refinement.
Previous studies have shown the crucial roles of PlexinA1 in various processes such as fasciculation of callosal fibers, homotopic projection of callosal axons to contralateral hemisphere, and axon refinement in postnatal CC [26, 60, 61]. In our study, the midline crossing rate of callosal axons was significantly lower in PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5 compared with midline crossing rate of callosal axons in WT mice, as determined by tracing the Npn1+ callosal axons using immunohistochemistry (Fig 8, S1 Table) and DiI anterograde tracing of callosal axons (S4 Fig., S2 Table). Impaired midline crossing of callosal axons has not yet been reported in PlexinA1 KO mice. Thus, the present study reports a callosal phenotype with a midline crossing defect of callosal axons in PlexinA1 KO mice. Sema3A and Sema3C were appropriately localized in the guideposts in the cortical midline in both WT and PlexinA1 KO mice at E16.5 and E17.5. The expression level of these ligands in the PlexinA1 KO midline was equivalent to that in the WT midline at E16.5 and E17.5 (Figs 4 and 6). Thus, the PlexinA1-mediated signaling defect in the cingulate and callosal axons may be the primary cause of the midline crossing defect in PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5. Severe misguidance of cingulate pioneering axons toward the septum and callosal defect was reported in Npn1Sema- knock-in mice expressing Npn1 that was unable to bind Semas [19, 62], and specific KO mice of Nrp1 in the cingulate cortex [16]. Since most class 3 Semas (Sema3s) bind to Nrp1 expressed on cingulate axons and properly guide cingulate axons toward the midline, loss of the Nrp1 functional response to Sema3s may cause severe misguidance of cingulate axons in these Nrp1 mutant mice. In contrast, mistargeting of cingulate axons to the septum was not detected in the PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5. With the DiI anterograde axonal tracing and immunohistochemistry we performed, we could not detect the mistargeting of cingulate axons toward the septum in the PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5. The extension of cingulate and callosal axons toward the midline in PlexinA1 KO mice may proceed to a location just anterior to the midline through the function of Sema3 holoreceptors containing Npn1 and other components like PlexinA3, PlexinD1, or L1CAM [19, 25, 49, 50]. Npn1+ callosal axons were stalled just anterior to the midline at E17.5 (15 of 21 KO mice) and could stay stalled for at least 48 h until P0.5, since the midline crossing defect was observed in most of the PlexinA1 KO mice at P0.5 (S3 Table). Since the stalling of callosal axons just anterior to the midline in PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5 implies the inability of callosal axons to traverse the midline plane, PlexinA1 on the axonal front may have the crucial role of responding to repulsive ligands such as Sema3A [19, 36, 37] when the cingulate axons begin to cross the cortical midline and enter the contralateral hemisphere. Thus, the present study reveals the potential role of PlexinA1 in axonal crossing at the cortical midline and axonal projection into the contralateral hemisphere after the appearance of cingulate and neocortical axons near the midline. To promote a better understanding of the role of PlexinA1 in CC development, further research making use of various approaches will be required to clarify if the callosal phenotype of PlexinA1 KO mice in the present study is directly owing to the lack of PlexinA1 in cingulate-derived pioneer axons or other causes such as dysplastic guideposts and midline fusion defect [63].
Our study confirmed a significantly higher incidence of AgCC in the anterior half of CC in PlexinA1 KO mice at P0.5 (Fig 9, S3 and S4 Tables). We observed the callosal phenotype in PlexinA1 KO mice with a BALB/cAJ background. The genetic background of the mouse strain is known to affect the severity of the callosal phenotype in several mutant mice [16, 64, 65, 66, 67]. Modifier genes may be responsible for the differences in the callosal phenotype in mutant mice of the same gene with a different genetic background [16]. Several substrains of BALB/c mice display callosal dysgenesis at a relatively high frequency [68, 69, 70, 71, 72]. Previous studies have reported that AgCC did not develop in 59 WT offspring derived from heterozygous transgenic mice with a BALB/cAJ genetic background [10]. In our study, AgCC was not detected in 16 WT offspring derived from heterozygous PlexinA1 KO mice with a BALB/cAJ genetic background that were examined at P0.5. Thus, the midline crossing defect of callosal axons observed in PlexinA1 KO mice is because of the absence of PlexinA1, even though the BALB/cAJ genetic background may modify the callosal phenotype.
Conclusions
Considering the genetic background of BALB/cAJ mice, the midline crossing of callosal axons was significantly impaired in PlexinA1 KO mice at E17.5, and the incidence of AgCC in the anterior half of CC was significantly higher in PlexinA1 KO mice at P0.5 compared with the incidence of AgCC in the anterior half of CC in WT mice.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Takayoshi Mamiya for the great help due to our use of his MicroSlicer and Dr. Norio Kaneda for his helpful suggestions to the first author. We sincerely acknowledge Dr. Hitoshi Kikutani in Osaka University for providing us an invaluable chance to conduct studies related to semaphorins.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
KY was supported by #16K08478 of the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (KAKENHI) (http://www.jsps.go.jp/j-grantsinaid/index.html). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Lindwall C, Fothergill T, Richards LJ. Commissure formation in the mammalian forebrain. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007; 17(1):3–14. 10.1016/j.conb.2007.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yorke CH Jr, Caviness VS Jr. Interhemispheric neocortical connections of the corpus callosum in the normal mouse: a study based on anterograde and retrograde methods. J Comp Neurol. 1975; 164(2):233–45. 10.1002/cne.901640206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aboitiz F, Scheibel AB, Fisher RS, Zaidel E. Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum. Brain Res. 1992; 598(1–2):143–53. 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90178-c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.van der Knaap LJ, van der Ham IJ. How does the corpus callosum mediate interhemispheric transfer? A review. Behav Brain Res. 2011; 223(1):211–21. 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jeret JS, Serur D, Wisniewski KE, Lubin RA. Clinicopathological findings associated with agenesis of the corpus callosum. Brain Dev. 1987; 9(3):255–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Moes P, Schilmoeller K, Schilmoeller G. Physical, motor, sensory and developmental features associated with agenesis of the corpus callosum. Child Care Health Dev. 2009; 35(5):656–72. 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00942.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Egaas B, Courchesne E, Saitoh O. Reduced size of corpus callosum in autism. Arch Neurol. 1995; 52(8):794–801. 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540320070014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lyoo IK, Noam GG, Lee CK, Lee HK, Kennedy BP, Renshaw PF. The corpus callosum and lateral ventricles in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a brain magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry. 1996; 40(19):1060–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lungu O, Stip E. Agenesis of corpus callosum and emotional information processing in schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry. 2012; 3:1 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mizuno S, Mizobuchi A, Iseki H, Iijima S, Matsuda Y, Kunita S, et al. A novel locus on proximal chromosome 18 associated with agenesis of the corpus callosum in mice. Mamm Genome. 2010; 21(11–12):525–33. 10.1007/s00335-010-9292-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nishikimi M, Oishi K, Nakajima K. Axon guidance mechanisms for establishment of callosal connections. Neural Plast. 2013; 2013:149060 10.1155/2013/149060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fenlon LR, Richards LJ. Contralateral targeting of the corpus callosum in normal and pathological brain function. Trends Neurosci. 2015; 38(5):264–72. 10.1016/j.tins.2015.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Van Battum EY, Brignani S, Pasterkamp RJ. Axon guidance proteins in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2015; 14(5):532–46. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70257-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kamnasaran D. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: lessons from humans and mice. Clin Invest Med. 2005; 28(5):267–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Plachez C, Richards LJ. Mechanisms of axon guidance in the developing nervous system. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2005; 69:267–346. 10.1016/S0070-2153(05)69010-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lim JW, Donahoo AL, Bunt J, Edwards TJ, Fenlon LR, Liu Y, et al. EMX1 regulates NRP1-mediated wiring of the mouse anterior cingulate cortex. Development. 2015; 142(21):3746–57. 10.1242/dev.119909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ozaki HS, Wahlsten D. Prenatal formation of the normal mouse corpus callosum: a quantitative study with carbocyanine dyes. J. Comp. Neurol.1992; 323(1), 81–90. 10.1002/cne.903230107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Richards LJ. Axonal pathfinding mechanisms at the cortical midline and in the development of the corpus callosum. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res.2002; 35(12), 1431–1439. 10.1590/s0100-879x2002001200004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Piper M, Plachez C, Zalucki O, Fothergill T, Goudreau G, Erzurumlu R, et al. Neuropilin 1-Sema Signaling Regulates Crossing of Cingulate Pioneering Axons during Development of the Corpus Callosum. Cerebral Cortex 2009; 1:i11–i21. 10.1093/cercor/bhp027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tessier Lavigne M, Goodman SC. The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science. 1996; 274(5290):1123–33. 10.1126/science.274.5290.1123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dickson BJ. Molecular Mechanisms of Axon Guidance. Science. 2002; 298(5600):1959–64. 10.1126/science.1072165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Serafini T, Colamarino SA, Leonardo ED, Wang H, Beddington R, Skarnes WC, et al. Netrin-1 is required for commissural axon guidance in the developing vertebrate nervous system. Cell. 1996; 87(6):1001–1014. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81795-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shu T, Richards LJ. Cortical axon guidance by the glial wedge during the development of the corpus callosum. J Neurosci. 2001; 21(8):2749–2758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bagri A., Marin O, Plump AS, Mak J, Pleasure SJ, Rubenstein JL, et al. Slit proteins prevent midline crossing and determine the dorsoventral position of major axonal pathways in the mammalian forebrain. Neuron. 2002; 33(2):233–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Niquille M, Garel S, Mann F, Hornung JP, Otsmane B, Chevalley S, et al. Transient neuronal populations are required to guide callosal axons: a role for semaphorin 3C. PLoS Biol. 2009; 7(10):e1000230 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wu KY, He M, Hou QQ, Sheng AL, Yuan L, Liu F, et al. Semaphorin 3A activates the guanosine triphosphatase Rab5 to promote growth cone collapse and organize callosal axon projections. Sci. Signal. 2014; 7(340):ra81 10.1126/scisignal.2005334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hu Z, Yue X, Shi G, Yue Y, Crockett DP, Blair-Flynn J, et al. Corpus callosum deficiency in transgenic mice expressing a truncated ephrin-A receptor. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(34):10963–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mendes SW, Henkemeyer M, Liebl DJ. Multiple Eph receptors and B-class ephrins regulate midline crossing of corpus callosum fibers in the developing mouse forebrain. J. Neurosci. 2006; 26(3):882–92. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3162-05.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Islam SM, Shinmyo Y, Okafuji T, Su Y, Naser IB, Ahmed G, et al. Draxin, a repulsive guidance protein for spinal cord and forebrain commissures. Science. 2009; 323(5912):388–93. 10.1126/science.1165187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fazeli A, Dickinson SL, Hermiston ML, Tighe RV, Steen RG, Small CG, et al. Phenotype of mice lacking functional Deleted in colorectal cancer (Dcc) gene. Nature. 1997; 386(6627):796–804. 10.1038/386796a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Keeble TR, Halford MM, Seaman C, Kee N, Macheda M, Anderson RB, et al. 2006. The Wnt receptor Ryk is required for Wnt5a-mediated axon guidance on the contralateral side of the corpus callosum. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(21):5840–8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1175-06.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Andrews W, Liapi A, Plachez C, Camurri L, Zhang J, Mori, et al. Robo1 regulates the development of major axon tracts and interneuron migration in the forebrain. Development.2006; 133(11):2243–52. 10.1242/dev.02379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Silver J, Lorenz SE, Wahlsten D, Coughlin J. Axonal guidance during development of the great cerebral commissures: descriptive and experimental studies, in vivo, on the role of preformed glial pathways. J Comp Neurol. 1982; 210(1):10–29. 10.1002/cne.902100103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shu T, Li Y, Keller A, Richards LJ. The glial sling is a migratory population of developing neurons. Development. 2003; 130(13):2929–37. 10.1242/dev.00514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Silver J., Edwards M.A., Levitt P. Immunocytochemical demonstration of early appearing astroglial structures that form boundaries and pathways along axon tracts in the fetal brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 1993; 328(3):415–36. 10.1002/cne.903280308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bagnard D, Lohrum M, Uziel D, Püschel AW, Bolz J. Semaphorins act as attractive and repulsive guidance signals during the development of cortical projections. Development. 1998; 125(24):5043–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bagnard D, Thomasset N, Lohrum M, Püschel AW, Bolz J. Spatial distributions of guidance molecules regulate chemorepulsion and chemoattraction of growth cones. J Neurosci. 2000; 20(3):1030–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Takahashi T., Fournier A., Nakamura F., Wang L.-H., Murakami Y., Kalb R.G., et al. Plexin-neuropilin-1 complexes form functional semaphorin-3A receptors. Cell.1999; 99(1):59–69. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80062-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tamagnone L, Artigiani S, Chen H, He Z, Ming GI, Song H, et al. Plexins are a large family of receptors for transmembrane, secreted, and GPI-anchored semaphorins in vertebrates. Cell. 1999; 99(1):71–80. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80063-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen H, Chédotal A, He Z, Goodman CS, Tessier-Lavigne M. Neuropilin-2, a novel member of the neuropilin family, is a high affinity receptor for the semaphorins Sema E and Sema IV but not Sema III. Neuron. 1997; 19(3):547–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.He Z, Tessier-Lavigne M. Neuropilin is a receptor for the axonal chemorepellent Semaphorin III. Cell. 1997; 90(4):739–51. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80534-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kolodkin AL, Levengood DV, Rowe EG, Tai YT, Giger RJ, Ginty DD. Neuropilin is a semaphorin III receptor. Cell. 1997; 90(4):753–62. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80535-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pasterkamp RJ, Kolodkin AL. Semaphorin junction making tracks toward neural connectivity, Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003; 13(1):79–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Takahashi T, Strittmatter SM. Plexina1 autoinhibition by the plexin sema domain. Neuron. 2001; 29(2):429–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rohm B, Ottemeyer A, Lohrum M, Püschel AW. Plexin/neuropilin complexes mediate repulsion by the axonal guidance signal semaphorin 3A. Mech Dev. 2000; 93(1–2):95–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Koester SE, O’Leary DD. Axons of early generated neurons in cingulate cortex pioneer the corpus callosum. J Neurosci. 1994; 14(11):6608–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ozaki HS, Wahlsten D. Timing and origin of the first cortical axons to project through the corpus callosum and the subsequent emergence of callosal projection cells in mouse. J Comp Neurol. 1998; 400(2):197–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rash BG, Richards LJ. A role for cingulate pioneering axons in the development of the corpus callosum. J Comp Neurol. 2001; 434(2):147–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Molyneaux BJ, Arlotta P, Fame RM, MacDonald JL, MacQuarrie KL, Macklis JD. Novel subtype-specific genes identify distinct subpopulations of callosal projection neurons. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(39):12343–54. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6108-08.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Castellani V, Chédotal A, Schachner M, Faivre-Sarrailh C, Rougon G. Analysis of the L1-deficient mouse phenotype reveals cross-talk between Sema3A and L1 signaling pathways in axonal guidance. Neuron. 2000; 27(2):237–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chédotal A. Further tales of the midline. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011; 21(1):68–75. 10.1016/j.conb.2010.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Takegahara N, Takamatsu H, Toyofuku T, Tsujimura T, Okuno T, Yukawa K et al. Plexin-A1 and its interaction with DAP12 in immune responses and bone homeostasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2006; 8(6):615–22. 10.1038/ncb1416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ito T, Yoshida K, Negishi T, Miyajima M, Takamatsu H, Kikutani H, et al. Plexin-A1 is required for Toll-like receptor-mediated microglial activation in the development of lipopolysaccharide-induced encephalopathy. Int J Mol Med. 2014; 33(5):1122–30. 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fothergill T, Donahoo AL, Douglass A, Zalucki O, Yuan J, Shu T, et al. Netrin-DCC signaling regulates corpus callosum formation through attraction of pioneering axons and by modulating Slit2-mediated repulsion. Cereb Cortex. 2014; 24(5):1138–51. 10.1093/cercor/bhs395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhao H, Maruyama T, Hattori Y, Sugo N, Takamatsu H, Kumanogoh A, et al. A molecular mechanism that regulates medially oriented axonal growth of upper layer neurons in the developing neocortex. J Comp Neurol. 2011; 519(5):834–48. 10.1002/cne.22536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Nakamura F, Ugajin K, Yamashita N, Okada T, Uchida Y, Taniguchi M, et al. Increased proximal bifurcation of CA1 pyramidal apical dendrites in sema3A mutant mice. J Comp Neurol. 2009; 516(5):360–75. 10.1002/cne.22125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ruediger T, Zimmer G, Barchmann S, Castellani V, Bagnard D, Bolz J. Integration of opposing semaphorin guidance cues in cortical axons. Cereb Cortex. 2013; 23(3):604–14. 10.1093/cercor/bhs044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nawabi H, Briançon-Marjollet A, Clark C, Sanyas I, Takamatsu H, Okuno T, et al. A midline switch of receptor processing regulates commissural axon guidance in vertebrates. Genes Dev. 2010; 24(4):396–410. 10.1101/gad.542510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhou J, Wen Y, She L, Sui YN, Liu L, Richards LJ, Poo MM. Axon position within the corpus callosum determines contralateral cortical projection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(29):E2714–23. 10.1073/pnas.1310233110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zylbersztejn K, Petkovic M, Burgo A, Deck M, Garel S, Marcos S, et al. The vesicular SNARE Synaptobrevin is required for Semaphorin 3A axonal repulsion. J Cell Biol. 2012; 196(1):37–46. 10.1083/jcb.201106113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Son AI, Fu X, Suto F, Liu JS, Hashimoto-Torii K, Torii M. Proteome dynamics during postnatal mouse corpus callosum development. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:45359 10.1038/srep45359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Gu C, Rodriguez ER, Reimert DV, Shu T, Fritzsch B, Richards LJ, et al. Neuropilin-1 conveys semaphorin and VEGF signaling during neural and cardiovascular development. Dev Cell. 2003; 5(1):45–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Donahoo AL, Richards LJ. Understanding the mechanisms of callosal development through the use of transgenic mouse models. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2009; 16(3):127–42. 10.1016/j.spen.2009.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Qiu M, Anderson S, Chen S, Meneses JJ, Hevner R, Kuwana E, et al. Mutation of the Emx-1 homeobox gene disrupts the corpus callosum. Dev Biol. 1996; 178(1):174–8. 10.1006/dbio.1996.0207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yoshida M, Suda Y, Matsuo I, Miyamoto N, Takeda N, Kuratani S, et al. Emx1 and Emx2 functions in development of dorsal telencephalon. Development. 1997; 124(1):101–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Guo H, Christoff JM, Campos VE, Jin XL, Li Y. Normal corpus callosum in Emx1 mutant mice with C57BL/6 background. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000; 276(2):649–53. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Magara F, Müller U, Li ZW, Lipp HP, Weissmann C, Stagljar M, et al. Genetic background changes the pattern of forebrain commissure defects in transgenic mice underexpressing the beta-amyloid-precursor protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(8):4656–61. 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wahlsten D. Deficiency of the corpus callosum: incomplete penetrance and substrain differentiation in BALB/c mice. J Neurogenet. 1989; 5(1):61–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wahlsten D. Heritable aspects of anomalous myelinated fibre tracts in the forebrain of the laboratory mouse. Brain Res. 1974; 68(1):1–18. 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90530-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wahlsten D. Genetic and developmental defects of the mouse corpus callosum. Experientia. 1989; 45(9):828–38. 10.1007/bf01954057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wahlsten D. Deficiency of the corpus callosum: incomplete penetrance and substrain differentiation in BALB/c mice. J Neurogenet. 1989; 5(1):61–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wahlsten D, Smith G. Inheritance of retarded forebrain commissure development in fetal mice: results from classical crosses and recombinant inbred strains. J Hered. 1989; 80(1):11–6. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.