Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Diversity logoLink to Plant Diversity
. 2019 Apr 26;41(3):153–165. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2019.04.006

Plant diversity of the Kangchenjunga Landscape, Eastern Himalayas

Pratikshya Kandel a, Nakul Chettri a,∗, Ram P Chaudhary b, Hemant Kumar Badola c,1, Kailash S Gaira c, Sonam Wangchuk d, Namgay Bidha d, Yadav Uprety b, Eklabya Sharma a
PMCID: PMC6702437  PMID: 31453415

Abstract

The Kangchenjunga Landscape (KL) in the Eastern Himalayas is a transboundary complex shared by Bhutan, India, and Nepal. It forms a part of the ‘Himalayan Biodiversity Hotspot’ and is one of the biologically richest landscapes in the Eastern Himalayas. In this paper, we use secondary information to review and consolidate the knowledge on the flora of the KL. We reviewed 215 journal articles, analysed the history of publications on the flora of the KL, their publication pattern in terms of temporal and spatial distribution and key research areas. Our review shows that the landscape has a long history of botanical research that dates back to the 1840s and progressed remarkably after the 1980s. Most of the studies have been carried out in India, followed by Nepal and Bhutan. The majority of these have been vegetation surveys, followed by research on ethnobotanical aspects and Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs). This paper describes the forest types and characteristic species of the KL and details the species richness, diversity and dominant families of seed plants. A total of 5198 species of seed plants belonging to 1548 genera and 216 families have been recorded from the landscape, including 3860 dicots, 1315 monocots and 23 gymnosperms. Among families, Orchidaceae is the most diversely represented family in terms of species richness. This paper also draws attention to the threatened and endemic flora of the KL, including 44 species that are threatened at national and global level and 182 species that are endemic. Finally, the paper reviews the major challenges facing the KL, the conservation efforts and practices that are currently in place and recommends systematic and comprehensive floral surveys, particularly long-term data collection and monitoring and transboundary collaboration, to address the existing knowledge gaps on floral diversity of the KL.

Keywords: Floral diversity, Transboundary landscape, Nepal, India, Bhutan, Biodiversity

1. Introduction

Plant diversity plays a key role in balancing ecosystems, protecting watersheds, regulating climate, providing habitats to animals and supporting livelihoods by providing food, fibre, medicines, and raw materials for many industries (Díaz et al., 2018). Plant species inventories are vast resources that provide an essential basis for designing conservation interventions at various scales: local, regional, and global (Brooks et al., 2006, Chettri et al., 2001, Basnet and Badola, 2012). Species listings or check lists, which contain primary and/or secondary species data, are critical to obtain information about the baseline condition, understand richness and distribution of species and analyse the pattern and changes in distribution, composition, and diversity. Such data have been used to study the taxonomy and biogeography of species for hundreds of years (Chapman, 2005). Lack of data restricts resource managers and decision makers from making accurate evaluations for interventions for the state of biodiversity of a targeted region or taking scientifically based conservation decisions (Proença et al., 2016). From a biodiversity conservation perspective, the importance of secondary data must not be underestimated, as acquiring new data is costly and time consuming. Using secondary data from the available literature facilitates comparison among and between different studies to reveal landscape-level changes in distribution and population trends. In this context, the importance of plant diversity data for the Kangchenjunga Landscape (KL) - one of the biologically richest landscapes in the Eastern Himalayas - cannot be overemphasized.

The Eastern Himalayas, located at the juncture of the Indo-Malayan, Palearctic and Sino-Japanese realms, stand out as being one of the biologically richest areas on Earth (CEPF, 2005). The considerable climatic variability associated with the topographic complexity and elevational gradient, makes it a repository of wide diversity of flora and fauna. Phytogeographically, the region represents a part of the Eastern Himalayan Province, which appears to be one of the youngest in the Eastern Asiatic Region and contains a number of endemic genera and species (Takhtajan, 1986). The Eastern Himalayas are a part of two biodiversity hotspots – Indo-Burma and Himalayan. Comprising 25 terrestrial ecoregions, the Eastern Himalayas are also known as the ‘cradle of flowering plants’ and is well known for its rich floral diversity, which includes both high species richness and endemism (Takhtajan, 1969, Olson et al., 2001).

The KL, situated between 26°21′40.49″ to 28°7′51.25″N latitudes and 87°30′30.67″ to 90°24′31.18″E longitudes and with an elevational range of 40 to 8586 m above sea level, is a transboundary landscape in the Eastern Himalayas that is shared by Bhutan, India and Nepal (Yonzon et al., 2000, Chettri et al., 2008, Kandel et al., 2016). Designated through a consultative process and approved by the governments of Bhutan, India and Nepal, the landscape includes an area of over 25,000 km2 around and to the south of Mount Kangchenjunga, also known as Khangchendzonga in Sikkim, the third highest mountain of the world. Of the total landscape area, the Bhutan portion covers 5834 km2 (23%), the Indian portion covers 14,062 km2 (56%) and the Nepal portion covers 5190 km2 (21%). The KL is one of 36 ‘Global Biodiversity Hotspots’ (Mittermeier et al., 2004). With 22 Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs), 19 protected areas (nine of which are transboundary in nature), one UNESCO World Heritage Site (Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve) and one Ramsar site (Mai Pokhari Ramsar site in Ilam, Nepal), the KL is recognized as one of the priority areas for biodiversity conservation in the Himalayan region (CEPF, 2005, ICIMOD et al., 2017, Kandel et al., 2016). Furthermore, the landscape exhibits great cultural diversity with approximately 7.2 million people representing various ethnic and social groups. Some of the ethnic groups that reside in the KL are found nowhere else in the world. They include the Lepcha community of Sikkim and Darjeeling in KL–India, eastern Nepal, and southwestern parts of KL–Bhutan; the Lhop (Doya) community of the Amo Chhu Valley in KL–Bhutan; and the Walungpas of Olangchung Gola of Taplejung district in KL–Nepal (ICIMOD et al., 2017).

The landscape is bestowed with lush vegetation and is a repository of globally significant plant species. It is home to several high-elevation species which are endemic to the region (Manish et al., 2017). Approximately 5200 species of plants, including orchids, rhododendrons, wild edible plants, non-timber forest products (NTFPs), and medicinal plants of high value are recorded from the region. Of particular significance is the occurrence of more than 40 species of rhododendron, which are native to the Eastern Himalayas (ICIMOD et al., 2017). The flora of the KL has been the subject of ecological investigations since the 1840s. Sir J.D. Hooker initiated the botanical exploration of the KL in Eastern Nepal in 1848. Other pioneering contributions have been made by Jacot-Guillarmod in the Yalung Glacier near Kangchenjunga in 1905; W. Griffith, a plant collector in Sikkim, and Smith and Cave who detailed the floral world of the high-elevation zone of KL–India in 1911; M.L. Banerji, between 1948 and 1957 from Koshi Basin, and Darjeeling via Ilam, Taplejung, Topkegola; Hara in 1963; Numata during 1963–1982; and, Grew-Wilson in 1973 and 1981 in Taplejung and adjoining areas (Rajbhandari, 2016). Over the past two decades, many surveys on flora of the KL (e.g., Badola and Pradhan, 2010a, Badola and Pradhan, 2010b, Chettri et al., 2009, Kholia, 2011; Manish and Pandit, 2018; Pala et al., 2019; Pradhan and Badola, 2008, Rai and Sharma, 1995, Saurav and Das, 2014, Shankar, 2001, Singh et al., 2003, Singh and Sundriyal, 2005, Sundriyal and Rai, 1996, Uprety et al., 2016) have been published. These publications have broadened our knowledge on species distribution, composition, abundance, biogeography and traditional knowledge for utilization and conservation of flora of the KL, and the field of botany in the Himalayas in general. The primary objective of many publications, except those pertaining to ecological research (Carpenter, 2005, Ohsawa et al., 1986, Tambe and Rawat, 2010, Pradhan and Badola, 2015; Manish and Pandit, 2018) and new records (Das and Verbeken, 2012, Sharma and Pandit, 2009, Thapa and Lama, 2015), included listing the floral species occurring in some parts of the landscape. However, except for scattered information often severely limited to certain parts of the landscape, no attempt has been made to provide cumulative data on the flora of the entire landscape. For instance, even the basic checklist of species for some areas, including protected areas (e.g., Mahananda Wildlife Sanctuary), are scanty, whereas some areas (e.g., Sikkim and Kanchenjunga Conservation Area) are intensively studied. Furthermore, often this information is not easily accessible because it is either unpublished or archived at various sources such as libraries or private collections. Thus, this paper is an attempt to consolidate the knowledge on flora reported and documented from the landscape, understand research trends and distribution, identify focused research areas, and document conservation and management challenges. The goal is to serve the needs of a range of stakeholders, including students, researchers, conservation institutions as well as the policy- and decision-makers and to provide valuable information on the flora of the KL that may strengthen conservation and development in an important transboundary landscape in the future.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study area

The Kangchenjunga Landscape encompasses eastern Nepal (parts of Taplejung, Panchthar, Ilam and Jhapa districts), Sikkim and North Bengal (Darjeeling and Jalpaiguri, and recently formed Alipurduar and Kalimpong districts) in India, and western Bhutan (portions of Haa, Chukha, Samtse, Dagana and Paro districts). Its elevational range extends from 40 m a.s.l. in Jalthal forest of Nepal to 8586 m a.s.l., the height of Mount Kangchenjunga. Given its extreme elevational variation, it is endowed with varied climatic conditions, complex topography and diverse vegetation. The vegetation of the KL is broadly divisible into the following groups: (1) tropical; (2) subtropical; (3) warm temperate; (4) cool temperate; (5) subalpine; and (6) alpine zones (Chaudhary et al., 2015, Kandel et al., 2016, Uprety et al., 2016). The varied forest types and rich habitat diversity of the KL support many threatened plant and animal species. It provides habitat to many charismatic mammals, including the snow leopard (Panthera uncia), Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris), Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), red panda (Ailurus fulgens), and takin (Budorcas taxicolor) (Chettri et al., 2008, Kandel et al., 2016). The landscape is home to many threatened species of Himalayan birds such as tragopans (e.g. Tragopan satyra) and hornbills (e.g. Aceros nipalensis). Similarly, the landscape is equally rich in flowering plants, including orchids and rhododendrons (Kandel et al., 2016). Several threatened and endangered plant species are recorded from the landscape, including Chiraito (Swertia chirayita, Roxb. ex Fleming, Karsten), Himalayan Yew (Taxus wallichiana Zucc.), Kutki (Neopicrorhiza scrophulariiflora, Hook. F. (Prain)), Marsh Orchid (Dactylorhiza hatagirea (D.Don) Soo) and Himalayan Mayapple (Sinopodophyllum hexandrum (Royle) T.S.Ying) (Uprety et al., 2016, O'Neill et al., 2017).

2.2. Data collection and analysis

We carried out a systematic review of accessible literature relating to the flora of the KL. We used ‘Google Scholar’ for the web based searches, using specific search terms ‘Darjeeling,’ ‘Sikkim,’ ‘Jalpaiguri,’ ‘Kalimpong,’ ‘Eastern Nepal,’ ‘Western Bhutan,’ ‘Eastern Himalaya,’ ‘Kangchenjunga Landscape,’ and ‘Flora,’ ‘Plants,’ ‘Vegetation,’ ‘Ethnobotany,’ ‘NTFPs.’ For those publications that did not appear with these search terms, we made additional searches using the name of the protected areas in the landscape. Altogether 314 publications were retrieved, which also included grey literature. However, to increase the practicality and reliability of our survey, we considered only 215 peer-reviewed English language journal articles for analyses. Because the literature searches were done in 2017, our list of publications included literature published until 2016. The list of publications on flora from the KL is provided as a supporting document (S1). Once collected, the peer-reviewed articles were chronologically listed in a Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet. The analyses included a review of publications for the following subcategories: study sites, including the name of countries and districts, publication year and subject focus of the publication.

In addition, for species richness and diversity, we transcribed species data into a working database from various published works (Chaudhary et al., 2015, ICIMOD et al., 2017; Lucksom, 2007; Maiti and Maiti, 2007; Pradhan and Lachungpa, 1990; Uprety et al., 2016; WCD, 2014). After examining the taxonomic information and records, an exhaustive checklist of seed plants (dicots, monocots and gymnosperms) was prepared and verified according to recent nomenclature. We used Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) IV for the classification and analyses of the seed plants (APG IV, 2016). The data were analysed to look into the taxonomic coverage of the floral species, including family, genera and species of the flowering plants, as well as endemic and threatened plants of the KL. The list of species is available on ICIMOD's Regional Database System (http://rds.icimod.org/Home/Data?group=9&&page=2).

3. Results

3.1. Pattern of publications

Our review included 215 publications related to flora from the KL. It revealed that the earliest studies on flora from the KL were published during the 1840s when the East India Company's regime was expanding across the Indian Subcontinent (Hooker, 1849). The first documented study in the KL is about the traditional knowledge of the Lepchas of Sikkim on plant species, which was authored by Sir Archibald Campbell, the first British army officer to Sikkim and Darjeeling (Campbell, 1840). In 1854, Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker, a notable British naturalist, published an account of his botanical expeditions in the Kangchenjunga region in two volumes entitled Himalayan Journals. Along these lines, much of the early publications from the KL are the records of naturalists during their travel and expeditions around Sikkim and Darjeeling. These include studies by Hooker, 1849, Hooker, 1852, and King and Pantling (1889). The mid-20th century witnessed a few generalist yet notable surveys, including preliminary exploration and surveys of forest vegetation, pteridophytic flora and wild edible plants of Bhutan, Sikkim, Darjeeling and eastern Nepal (Grierson and Long, 1983, Hajra and Chakraborty, 1981, Mehra and Bir, 1964, Numata, 1966, Yoda, 1967). There is a dearth of publications on the flora of the KL for 140 years after the first recorded publication by Campbell in 1840. Approximately 15% of the floristic studies from the KL were published between 1840 and 1990. During the late 20th century, there was an exponential increase in the number of studies across KL, with 85% of the total studies published between 1990 and 2016 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Temporal pattern of publications on flora of the Kangchenjunga Landscape.

3.2. Spatial distribution of publications

Based on country-specific documentation, India received the highest survey records (81%), followed by Nepal (13%) and Bhutan (6%) (Fig. 2). Location and state-specific analysis revealed that the majority of studies from India were carried out in the state of Sikkim (55%) followed by Darjeeling, including Kalimpong (33%), and Jalpaiguri (including Alipurduar) district (12%). Of the total studies, 14% were carried out in the protected areas of the KL.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Country specific distribution of publications in the Kangchenjunga Landscape.

3.3. Subject-wise distribution of publications

The majority of the 215 publications on flora from the KL focused on vegetation surveys (43%), followed by ethnobotanical studies (32%), and documentation of NTFPs (25%) (Fig. 3a). Among the vegetation surveys, 53% were related to diversity and distribution of flora, 40% were related to ecological research and 7% were about new records of floral species. Of the total vegetation surveys, only 16% were related to specific species found in the KL, e.g., rhododendrons and orchids (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Subject focus of publications in the Kangchenjunga landscape, with major thematic areas (a) and sub-thematic areas (b).

Among ethnobotanical studies, 70% were focused on ethnomedicine, of which the majority (71%) was related to use of particular species for specific ailments. Of the studies on traditional knowledge, 16% were related to bioresource utilization, 9% to the utilization of various wild edible plants, and 6% to traditional approaches of biodiversity conservation. Approximately 35% of the total ethnobotanical studies were focused on traditional knowledge of specific ethnic communities, e.g., Lepcha, Rabha, Satar, Limbu, Meche, Rajbanshi and Dhimal communities.

Of the studies on NTFPs in the KL, 35% were related to diversity and distribution, 31% to utilization, 20% to ecological research, 8% to trade, and 6% to new records of NTFP use in the KL.

3.4. Forest types and characteristic species

The types of forests in the KL are broadly divisible into the following groups based on the elevational range in which they occur: (i) tropical (below 1000 m) characterized by tropical moist and dry forests comprising Shorea, Bombax and Cycas species; (ii) subtropical (1000–2000 m a.s.l.) with various broadleaved species such as Schima and Castanopsis; (iii) warm temperate (2000–2500 m a.s.l.) dominated by broadleaved forests of Castanopsis, Quercus, Schima and Ilex; (iv) cool temperate (2500–3000 m a.s.l.) mostly dominated by Rhododendron, Abies and Acer species; (v) subalpine (3000–4000 m a.s.l.) dominated mostly by dwarf conifers, dwarf species of rhododendrons, Tsuga and Juniperus species; and (vi) alpine (>4000 m a.s.l.) with sparse vegetation but mostly dominated by Juniperus, Rosa and Rhododendron species (Table 1). Scrutiny of the literature revealed that the forests in the KL have high species diversity (Sundriyal and Sharma, 1996, Sundriyal et al., 1994, Singh and Sundriyal, 2005). Although the KL consists of only a small fraction of the total area of the Himalayas, it contains half of the 10,000 floral species of the Himalayas (Xu et al., 2019). Similarly, the number is close to the total flora of Nepal, viz. 6653 (Kunwar et al., 2010), that of Arunachal Pradesh of India, viz. 4117 (Arya and Sunny, 2016) and Kinabalu Mountain of Malaysia, viz. 5000 (Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, 2014). However, overexploitation of the forest resources for fuelwood, fodder and timber has impacted forest structure, composition, species regeneration, and woody biomass productivity (Chettri et al., 2002, Sundriyal and Sharma, 1996, Sundriyal et al., 1994).

Table 1.

Major forest types found in the Kangchenjunga Landscape.

Elevational Zone Forest type Characteristic species
Tropical (<1000 m)
  • -

    Tropical riverine evergreen/deciduous forest

  • -

    Tropical moist evergreen/deciduous forest

  • -

    Tropical moist mixed forest

  • -

    Tropical dry evergreen/deciduous forest

 Shorea robusta Gaertn, Lagerstroemia parviflora Roxb., Bombax ceiba L., Cycas pectinata Buch.- Ham., Dillenia pentagyna Roxb.
Subtropical (1000–2000 m)
  • -

    Subtropical riverine evergreen/deciduous forest

  • -

    Subtropical moist evergreen/deciduous forest

  • -

    Subtropical moist mixed forest

  • -

    Subtropical dry evergreen/deciduous forest

 Schima wallichi (DC.) Korth, Castanopsis tribuloides (Sm.) A. DC., Macaranga pustulata King ex Hook. F., Machilus odoratissima Nees
Warm temperate (2000–2500 m)
  • -

    Warm temperate riverine evergreen/deciduous forest

  • -

    Warm temperate moist evergreen/deciduous forest

  • -

    Warm temperate moist mixed forest

  • -

    Warm temperate dry evergreen/deciduous forest

 Castanopsis tribuloides (Sm.) A. DC., Ilex dipyrena Wall., Quercus lamellosa Sm., Quercus semecarpifolia Sm., Lithocarpus pachyphylla (Kurz) Rehder
Cool temperate (2500–3000 m)
  • -

    Cool temperate riverine deciduous forest

  • -

    Cool temperate moist evergreen forest

  • -

    Cool temperate moist mixed forest

  • -

    Cool temperate dry evergreen forest

 Abies spectabilis (D.Don) Mirbel, Betula utilis D.Don, Rhododendron arboreum Sm., Acer Campbellii Hook. f. & Thomson.
Subalpine (3000–4000 m)
  • -

    Subalpine riverine evergreen forest

  • -

    Subalpine deciduous forest

  • -

    Subalpine moist evergreen forest

  • -

    Subalpine moist deciduous forest

  • -

    Subalpine dry evergreen forest

 Abies spectabilis (D.Don) Mirbel, Tsuga dumosa D.Don, Betula utilis D.Don, Acer sp., Larix griffithiana Carriere, Rhododendron barbatum Wall. ex G. Don, Juniperus indica Bertol.
Alpine (>4000 m)
  • -

    Alpine riverine

  • -

    Alpine meadow

  • -

    Alpine scrub

 Rhododendron niveum Hook. f., Rosa spp, Juniperus indica Bertol.
Open in a new tab

Adapted from: Kandel et al. (2016).

3.5. Species diversity and richness

The systematic review of literature for the detailed inventory of seed plants of the KL revealed the presence of 5198 species (dicotyledons, monocotyledons and gymnosperms) belonging to 1548 genera and 216 families (Table 2). Among the documented species, 3860 are dicots, 1315 monocots and 23 gymnosperms. The ratio of monocots to dicots in respect to families, genera, and species is 1:5.7, 1:3.2 and 1:2.9, respectively. The most diverse families in the KL in terms of species richness include Orchidaceae (704 species in 152 genera), followed by Fabaceae (308 species in 105 genera), Asteraceae (255 species in 100 genera), Poaceae (233 species in 96 genera), and Rubiaceae (147 species in 50 genera). The ten dominant families of flowering plants in the KL are listed in Fig. 4. Our analysis shows that 42% of the total flowering plant species found in the KL belong to these ten major families. Among gymnosperms, six families are recorded in the KL, of which Pinaceae (10 species) and Cupressaceae (9 species) emerged as dominant. The Cycadaceae, Ephedraceae, Podocarpaceae and Taxaceae families are represented by one species each.

Table 2.

Detailed analysis of seed plants of the Kangchenjunga Landscape.

Plant groups Family Genus Species
Dicotyledons 179 1175 3860
Monocotyledons 31 357 1315
Gymnosperms 6 16 23
Total 216 1548 5198
Open in a new tab

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Dominant families of seed pants with number of genera and species in the Kangchenjunga Landscape.

3.6. Threatened taxa

The KL hosts at least 44 plant species that are threatened at the global or national level. Of these, one species is considered globally threatened under IUCN Red list status, viz. T. wallichiana (Endangered, IUCN, 2019). There are two species categorized as ‘Near Threatened’: Abies spectabilis and Juglans regia L. (Table 3). Additionally, the conservation policies of three countries in the KL have provided protection to a number of floral species (Sikkim Biodiversity Action Plan, 2012, ICIMOD et al., 2017). Among nationally threatened plant species of Bhutan, 14 species are found in the KL. Similarly, 20 plant species that are considered threatened by the Government of India and 25 species that are nationally threatened in Nepal are found in the KL.

Table 3.

Threatened plant species in the Kangchenjunga Landscape.

Family Species IUCNa CITES Threatened statusb
KL–Bhutan KL–India KL–Nepal
Cycadaceae Cycas pectinata Buch.- Ham. √ (V)
Pinaceae Abies spectabilis (D. Don) Mirb. NT √ (GoN-II)
Pinaceae Larix griffithii Hook. f. LC √ √ (R, T)
Pinaceae Pinus roxburghii Sarg. LC √ (T)
Taxaceae Taxus wallichiana Zucc. E II √ (V, GoN-II)
Magnoliaceae Magnolia campbelli Hook.f. & Thomson II √ √ (T)
Magnoliaceae Magnolia globosa Hook.f. & Thomson LC II √ (T)
Magnoliaceae Magnolia kisopa (Buch.-Ham. ex DC.) Figlar
Magnoliaceae Magnolia champaca (L.) Baill. ex Pierre II √ √ (E)
Magnoliaceae Magnolia lanuginosa (Wall.) Figlar & Noot. II √ (T)
Lauraceae Cinnamomum glaucescens (Nees) Hand.-Mazz. √ (T; GoN-II)
Dioscoreaceae Dioscorea deltoidea Wall. ex Griseb. II √ (T)
Dioscoreaceae Dioscorea prazeri Prain & Burkill II √ (T)
Melanthiaceae Paris polyphylla Sm. √ (V)
Orchidaceae Cymbidium eburneum Lindl. √ (V)
Orchidaceae Cymbidium hookerianum Rchb.f. √ (V)
Orchidaceae Cymbidium whiteae King & Pantl. √ (E)
Orchidaceae Tipularia cunninghamii (King & Prain) S.C.Chen, S.W.Gale & P.J.Cribb √ (E)
Orchidaceae Paphiopedilum venustum (Wall. ex Sims) Pfitzer √ (V)
Orchidaceae Zeuxine pulchra King & Pantl. √ (E)
Berberidaceae Sinopodophyllum hexandrum (Royle) T.S.Ying √ √ (V)
Saxifragaceae Bergenia ciliata (Haw.) Sternb. √ (T)
Ranunculaceae Aconitum ferox Wall. ex Ser. √ √ (E)
Ranunculaceae Aconitum napellus L. √ √ (T)
Trochodendraceae Tetracentron sinense Oliv. III √ (T)
Fagaceae Lithocarpus fenestratus (Roxb.) Rehder √ (T)
Juglandaceae Juglans regia L. NT √ √ (GoN-I, III)
Anacardiaceae Choerospondias axillaris (Roxb.) B.L.Burtt & A.W.Hill √ √ (V)
Sapindaceae Acer calcaratum Gagnep. √ (E)
Sapindaceae Calamus nambariensis Becc. √ (E)
Polygonaceae Rheum nobile Hook. f. & Thomson √ √ (T)
Ericaceae Rhododendron barbatum Wall. ex G. Don √ √ (V)
Ericaceae Rhododendron niveum Hook. f. √ (V)
Gentianaceae Swertia chirayita (Roxb.) Buch.-Ham. ex C.B.Clarke √ √ (V)
Apocynaceae Ceropegia hookerii C.B.Clarke ex Hook.f. II √ (T) √ (T)
Apocynaceae Ceropegia lucida Wall. √ (E)
Boraginaceae Maharanga emodi (Wall.) A. DC. √ (T)
Scrophulariaceae Picrorhiza kurrooa Royle √ √ (V)
Scrophulariaceae Neopicrorhiza scrophulariiflora (Pennell) D.Y.Hong II √ (V, GoN-I)
Asteraceae Tibetoseris depressa (Hook.f. & Thomson) Sennikov √ (E)
Caprifoliaceae Nardostachys jatamansi (D. Don) DC. II √ √ (V) √ (V)
Araliaceae Panax pseudoginseng Wall. √ √ (E)
Apiaceae Pimpinella tongloensis P.K. Mukherjee √ (E)
Apiaceae Pimpinella wallichiana (Miq.) Gandhi √ (E)
Open in a new tab
a

IUCN Categories: E = Endangered; V = Vulnerable; NT = Near Threatened; LC = Least Concern.

b

National categories: E = Endangered; V = Vulnerable; T = Threatened; R = Rare.

3.7. Endemic flowering plants of the Kangchenjunga Landscape

Based on our review of literature, the KL has 178 species and 4 subspecies of endemic flowering plants (Annex 1). These 182 species, including 4 subspecies, are from 105 genera and 38 families. Altogether, 8 families have one species each, and 6 families have 2 species each. Asteraceae had the highest number of endemic species, with 34 species from 18 genera (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Number of endemic genera and species per family in the Kangchenjunga Landscape.

4. Discussion

Preliminary assessment of the landscape through literature review (Majumdar et al., 1984, Shrestha and Ghimire, 1996, Maiti and Maiti, 2007, O'Neill et al., 2017) and analyses indicate that the KL harbours more than 5100 species of flora, which includes 700 + orchid species, 40 + rhododendron species and 700 + medicinal and aromatic plants. A substantial number of these plants are either endemic to the region or threatened nationally and globally.

Despite being an area of interest to botanists since the 19th Century, many parts of the KL still remain inadequately explored. Biological surveys are extremely difficult in many remote and inaccessible mountainous parts of the landscape. Thus, many floral taxa are inadequately studied and the degree of their richness is underestimated. Species richness in the KL is likely to increase with a systematic biodiversity inventory and scientific research on distribution patterns, especially in the remote and less explored areas. For instance, in the KL–Nepal, in the Kangchenjunga-Singhalila ridge bordering India, a preliminary survey of vascular plants recorded 598 species of flowering plants, of which 12 species were reported as being new to Nepal, and two species of Begonia (Begonia dolichoptera S. Rajbhandary & K.K. Shrestha, and Begonia panchtharensis S. Rajbhandary) were reported as being new to science (Shrestha et al., 2008). Similarly, in Sikkim alone in the KL–India, flowering plants are represented by about 4500 species belonging to 1371 genera of 197 families (Bhutia et al., 2002, Subba, 2002, Badola and Subba, 2012). The Darjeeling hills also have high floral diversity, representing an estimated one-seventh of the flora of India with about 4000 species of flowering plants under 160 families (Bhujel, 1996). Similarly, out of 736 recorded plant species in the KL–Bhutan, there are 427 species of flora under 115 families in the Jigme Khesar Strict Nature Reserve alone (Rai et al., 2008). This further underscores the importance of the KL in terms of biodiversity.

Our analysis indicates that most survey efforts have been in the KL–India. This could be attributed to the fact that the largest part of the KL is covered by the KL–India as compared to Nepal and Bhutan and also because 17 of the 19 protected areas of the KL are located in the KL–India, where, during the colonial period, a fairly substantial number of surveys were carried out. Furthermore, in Nepal botanical explorations have been slowed because foreigners were not allowed to travel outside of Kathmandu until after 1949 (Rajbhandari, 2016). Also, significant contributions to research in the KL-India have been expedited by the presence of two state level universities, i.e., North Bengal University and Sikkim University, and research institutes such as the Botanical Survey of India and the Govin Ballabh Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development (Kandel et al., 2016). However, only 14% of the publications are from protected areas of the KL. Although protected areas cover 30% of the total landscape, comprehensive documentation of the flora of these protected areas is scarce. Indeed, many protected areas lack even basic information such as species checklists. Moreover, in cases in which documentation is available, access to that information is limited.

Our analyses also reveal that the majority of publications are focused on vegetation survey followed by ethonobotanical studies and documentation of NTFPs. Among the vegetation surveys, the majority are related to diversity and distribution of floral species. This could be credited to the exploratory studies carried out in Sikkim and Darjeeling that are basically the checklists of flora prepared during excursions in the state's hills (For instance, Hooker, 1849, King and Pantling, 1889, Matthew, 1971, Mehra and Bir, 1964). More recently, ecological research is gaining momentum in the KL. Some representative ecological research on the flora of the KL include those by Acharya et al., 2010, Chettri et al., 2002, Dey et al., 2015, Moktan et al., 2009, Singh and Sundriyal, 2005, Subba et al., 2015, Pradhan and Badola, 2015, Tambe and Rawat, 2010. A small number of studies are related to new records of floral species (for instance, Chettri et al., 2012, Chettri et al., 2012, Chowdhury et al., 2013, Thapa and Lama, 2015) and exploration of newer populations of rare rhododendrons (Badola and Pradhan, 2010a, Badola and Pradhan, 2010b) and micro-habitat diversity and conservation aspects of threatened species (Pradhan and Badola, 2015). This indicates the high biodiversity value of the KL in terms of species richness, which may increase with more intensive and systematic exploration in the less explored areas. A substantial number of studies have focused on ethnobotanical aspects (Pradhan and Badola, 2008, Uprety et al., 2016, O'Neill et al., 2017), which indicates that the KL is rich in traditional knowledge and local people are not only aware of the valuable attributes of these species but also the community ecology and life histories of diverse floral species.

The substantial number of surveys on NTFPs indicates that they are particularly important in the KL because they contribute greatly to the livelihood and economy of a large proportion of rural communities (Badola and Pradhan, 2013, O'Neill et al., 2017, Uprety et al., 2016). Most commonly used NTFPs include medicinal plants and wild edibles (Chettri et al., 2005). Publications indicate that the domestic as well as cross-border trade of NTFPs is prevalent in the region since the historical times and trades are both legal and illegal (Chaudhary et al., 2015, Choudhary, 2008). Medicinal plants are the most traded NTFPs, followed by some wild edible plants and fibre-yielding plants. As previously alluded to, a substantial number of floral species in the KL are endemic and threatened nationally and globally. The number of endemic species from the region has been widely cited and reported (Myers, 1988, CEPF, 2005, CFPF, 2007; Chettri et al., 2010). The list prepared for this review exceeds the number recorded for the Eastern Himalayas by Behera et al. (2002). Myers (1988) has already reported that about 60% of the flora from Sikkim are endemic. Likewise, Bhutan and Nepal as expected to have 15% and 8% endemics, respectively (Anonymous, 1992). The high floristic diversity of the KL is attributed to contributions from the surrounding floristic regions such as Chinese, Malayan and Siberian elements (Hooker, 1904).

Like many biodiversity-rich landscapes in the world, the KL is also faced with numerous local and transboundary challenges, both natural and anthropogenic, which threaten its rich biological diversity. The evaluation of threats being faced by the biodiversity of the KL shows that rapid population growth has led to widespread logging, habitat fragmentation and extensive clearing of forests, and grasslands for cultivation and large scale infrastructural development, including construction of highways and large dams (Gurung, 2006, Grumbine and Pandit, 2013, Krishna et al., 2002, Pandit and Grumbine, 2012). Only one study in the KL assessed the disturbance indices of threatened herbs in Sikkim, which highlighted human movement and NTFP collection as top conservation threats (Pradhan and Badola, 2015). The geospatial analyses of land cover in the KL reveals the conversion of forests and rangeland to other land uses, particularly transformation of pristine habitats into extensive monocultures of tea and cardamom, which may greatly reduce the species richness of the landscape. Additional major threats to floral diversity throughout the KL include invasive species, livestock overgrazing, erosions and landslides caused by deforestation of extremely steep slopes, and unsustainable and/or illegal extraction and utilization of economically important species (Chaudhary et al., 2015, ICIMOD et al., 2017, Pradhan and Badola, 2015, Uprety et al., 2016, O'Neill et al., 2017).

In order to address various conservation and development opportunities and challenges that lie within this landscape, several conservation efforts are being made at the national and transboundary levels. The governments of Bhutan, India and Nepal have jointly initiated the Kangchenjunga Landscape Conservation and Development Initiative (KLCDI) which adopts transboundary ecosystem management approaches to ensure biodiversity conservation and sustainable development in the region (ICIMOD et al., 2017). Nine out of 19 protected areas in the KL are transboundary in nature (see Kandel et al., 2016 for details of the protected areas). Except for two protected areas (one in the KL–Bhutan and the other in the KL–Nepal), all other protected areas are located in KL–India. These protected areas are inhabited by many charismatic floral species. The Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve has recently been designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site for its outstanding natural/biodiversity and cultural values, becoming the first ‘Mixed Heritage’ site in India. There is only one Ramsar site, the Mai Pokhari in the KL, which was established on 28 October 2008. With the catchment area of around 12 ha, it is situated at an elevation of 2100 m a.s.l. in Ilam District, Nepal. It is located in the center of the Kangchenjunga-Singhalila Biodiversity Landscape Complex, a biological corridor that forms a part of the Himalayan biodiversity hotspot, which is also recognized as an endemic bird area and a center for plant species dispersal and diversity (CEPF, 2005). The dominant vegetation of this site is cloud forest and East-Himalayan oak-laurel forest. A total of 231 plant species belonging to 185 genera and 78 families has been recorded in this area. Of the recorded species, 62 are medicinal and aromatic plants, 17 are orchids, five rhododendrons and three magnolias. Among these, 22 species of flowering plants are globally threatened and are listed in the IUCN Red List and/or in CITES appendix (DFO, 2012).

In addition, eleven Important Plant Areas (IPAs) for medicinal plants have been identified in the KL (Hamilton and Radford, 2007, GWB, 2010) – 2 in KL–Bhutan, 7 in KL–India, and 18 in KL–Nepal. In KL–Bhutan, the IPAs are Chele La (2500–4000 m a.s.l.) and Toorsa (1600–3000 m a.s.l.). In KL–India, the IPAs are Dzongri-Phedang-Sandakphu (3600–4000 m a.s.l.); Lachen and Lachung (2750–3000 m a.s.l.); North Rajabhatkhawa in Buxa Tiger Reserve, Jalpaiguri; Sursuti in Jalpaiguri; and Dhotrey, North Sevoke and Tonglu in Darjeeling. In KL–Nepal, the IPAs are Yamphudin-Hellok, Gyapla-Ghunsa, Ghunsa-Khangbachen, SarjuPokhari- Olangchung Gola, Dorangdin-Ramje, and Chairam-Yalung in Taplejung District; Timbung Pokhari, Lam Pokhari- Suke Pokhari-Ose, Bhaise Pokhari, Mejartham-Chiwabhanjyang, and Tinsimana-Gorkhepani-Fokte in Panchthar District; Hangetham, Kala Pokhari, Chintapu, Sandakphu, and Dhupi-Guranse in Ilam District; and Ghorwa-Sanischare, Gauriganj-Kathgara, and Jalthal Forest in Jhapa District (ICIMOD et al., 2017). A rich diversity of floral species, many of which are of high botanical value, thrive in these natural and semi-natural sites.

5. Conclusion

The Kangchenjunga Landscape has been an area of interest to botanists since the mid-19th century and since then it has continued to gain attention from researchers around the world. One of the richest biodiversity repositories in the Eastern Himalayas, the landscape is home to many charismatic floral species of high botanical value. Our review shows that there are many species that are threatened at national and global levels and are endemic to the landscape. Furthermore, the unique ethnic and social groups residing in the landscape have rich traditional knowledge regarding utilization and conservation of these valuable species. Yet, conservation of biodiversity in the Kangchenjunga landscape faces many threats and challenges. In this regard, the KLCDI, which was established by India, Nepal, and Bhutan to conserve and sustainably develop the Kangchenjunga Landscape, is very timely and progressive.

Based on our findings, we recommend scientific and comprehensive floral surveys, particularly in the less explored areas. For instance, some protected areas (e.g., Mahananda Wildlife Sanctuary) and western Bhutan – excluding Jigme Khesar Strict Nature Reserve – have been inadequately studied. Although numerous scattered and one-time studies of the Kangchenjunga landscape exist, long-term data and monitoring are needed, especially to understand how natural and anthropogenic drivers cause changes in the landscape that affect abundance, phenology, and distribution of species. Comprehensive and systematic studies in the protected areas of the Kangchenjunga Landscape would provide important insights into the rich floral diversity of the region. Proper management of Important Plant Areas could provide a safety net for many threatened floral species in the landscape. We recommend that current policies and sustainable conservation interventions adopt transboundary landscape conservation programmes and joint activities that involve long-term regional cooperation, knowledge, and data sharing. Importantly, to bridge the existing gaps in our knowledge regarding biodiversity in the Kangchenjunga Landscape, conservation and development organizations, government agencies, academic institutions, and the private sector must join their efforts.

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr David Molden, Director General of ICIMOD, for his inspiration and support. The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by Mr Kabir Uddin, GIS and Remote Sensing Specialist, ICIMOD for providing the map used in the article. The continuous support and commitment from ICIMOD's eight regional member countries is also acknowledged, as is the support of the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development through its German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ), which made this publication possible. The authors would also like to thank Thomas Samuel Moloppomannil, Senior Editor, ICIMOD and Raymond Porter for English language editorial inputs. We are highly indebted to the two anonymous reviewers for their critical review and constructive suggestions to bring the paper in the present form. The views and interpretations in this publication are those of the authors and are not necessarily attributable to the affiliated organizations.

(Editors: Zhekun Zhou and Xuefei Yang)

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Office of Plant Diversity.

Appendix A
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2019.04.006.

Annex 1.

Endemic flowering plants of the Kangchenjunga Landscape.
Family Species KL-Bhutan KL-India KL-Nepal
Cupressaceae Juniperus indica Bertol √
Cupressaceae Juniperus recurva Ham. √
Annonaceae Uvaria lurida var. sikkimensis
Orchidaceae Ponerorchis chusua (D. Don) Soo. √
Orchidaceae Bhutanthera himalayana Renz √
Orchidaceae Coelogyne treutleri Hook. F. √
Amaryllidaceae Allium macranthum Baker. √
Amaryllidaceae Allium sikkimense Baker √
Arecaceae Calamus inermis T. Anderson √
Eriocaulaceae Eriocaulon exsertum Satake, in H. Hara, Fl. E. Himal. 2: 156, f. 9 (1971). √
Eriocaulaceae Eriocaulon obclavatum Satake √
Eriocaulaceae Eriocaulon trisectoides Satake √
Juncaceae Juncus sikkimensis Hook. F. √
Cyperaceae Carex kingiana Levl. & Vant. √
Cyperaceae Rhynchospora rugosa subsp. browni (Roem. & Schult.) T.Koyama √
Papaveraceae Corydalis staintonii Ludlow √
Papaveraceae Corydalis cashmeriana Royle. √
Papaveraceae Meconopsis horridula Hook. f. & Thomson √
Papaveraceae Meconopsis simplicifolia Walp. √
Papaveraceae Meconopsis superba King ex Prain √
Berberidaceae Berberis angulosa Wall. √
Berberidaceae Berberis concinna Hook. f. & Thomson √
Berberidaceae Berberis mucrifolia Ahrendt, J. RHS. 81: 135 (1956). √
Berberidaceae Berberis sikkimensis (C.K.Schneid.) Ahrendt 1942 √
Berberidaceae Mahonia sikkimensis Takeda √
Berberidaceae Podophyllum sikkimensis Chatterjee & Mukharjee √
Ranunculaceae Anemone demissa Hook. f. & Thomson √
Ranunculaceae Caltha scaposa Hook.f. √
Ranunculaceae Delphinium caeruleum Jacq. √
Ranunculaceae Delphinium glaciale Hook.f. √
Ranunculaceae Thalictrum alpinum Linn. √
Ranunculaceae Aconitum staintonii Lauener √
Ranunculaceae Ranunculus sikkimensis Hand.-Mazz. √
Saxifragaceae Saxifraga aristulata Hook. f. & Thomson √
Saxifragaceae Saxifraga flagellaris Willd. √
Saxifragaceae Saxifraga hemisphaerica Hook. f. & Thomson √
Saxifragaceae Saxifraga hirculus Linn. √
Saxifragaceae Saxifraga jacquemontiana Dene. √
Saxifragaceae Saxifraga lychinits aff. √
Saxifragaceae Saxifraga pallida Wall. √
Saxifragaceae Saxifraga ramulosa Wall. √
Saxifragaceae Saxifraga saginoides J. D. Hooker & Thomson √
Crassulaceae Rhodiola bupleuroides Wallich ex Hook.f. & Thomson √
Crassulaceae Sedum fischeri R.Hamet. √
Vitaceae Cissus spectabilis Planch. √
Fabaceae Astragalus zemuensis W.W. Sm. √
Fabaceae Caragana spinifera Kom. √
Fabaceae Astragalus confertus Benth √
Fabaceae Hedysarum sikkimense Benth. √
Fabaceae Stracheya tibetica Benth. √
Fabaceae Oxytropis tartarica Jacq. √
Rosaceae Cotoneaster microphylla Wall. √
Rosaceae Fragaria daltoniana J. Gay √
Rosaceae Potentilla fruticose L. √
Rosaceae Potentilla microphylla D. Don √
Rosaceae Potentilla sinonivea Hult,n √
Rosaceae Sibbaldia purpurea Hook.f. √
Rosaceae Cotoneaster staintonii Klotz √
Rosaceae Cotoneaster simonsi Hort. ex Baker √ √
Rosaceae Potentilla monanthes var. alata Sojak √
Begoniaceae Begonia dolichoptera S. Rajbhandary & KK Shrestha √
Begoniaceae Begonia leptoptera H. Hara √
Begoniaceae Begonia panchtharensis S Rajbhandary √
Violaceae Viola biflora Linn. √
Violaceae Viola bhutanica Hara √
Salicaceae Salix plectilis Kimura √
Salicaeae Salix calyculata Hook.f. √
Salicaeae Salix lindlyeana Wall. √
Euphorbiaceae Euphorbia stracheyi Boiss √
Euphorbiaceae Glochidion metanubigenum Hurus. & Ya. Tanaka √
Geraniaceae Geranium collinum M.Bieb. √
Brassicaceae Erysimum deflexum Hook. f. & Thomson √
Brassicaceae Lepidium capitatum Hook.f.&Thomson √
Brassicaceae Microgynaecium tibeticum Hook.f. √
Brassicaceae Thlaspi alpestre Linn. √
Polygonaceae Aconogonon hookeri √
Polygonaceae Polygonum sibiricum Laxm. √
Polygonaceae Rheum nobile Hook.f. & Thomson √
Polygonaceae Rheum spiciforme Royle √
Polygonaceae Bistorta diopetes H. Ohba & S. Akiyama √
Caryophyllaceae Arenaria ciliolata Edgew. √
Caryophyllaceae Arenaria densissima Wall. √
Caryophyllaceae Arenaria glanduligera Edgew √
Caryophyllaceae Arenaria monticola √
Caryophyllaceae Arenaria melandroyoides Edgew. √
Caryophyllaceae Arenaria musciformis Wall. √
Caryophyllaceae Arenaria polytrichoides Edgew √
Caryophyllaceae Arenaria thangoensis W.W. Sm. √
Caryophyllaceae Silene apetala Willd. √
Caryophyllaceae Silene caespitella F. N. Williams √
Caryophyllaceae Silene nigrescens (Edgeworth) Majumdar √
Caryophyllaceae Stellaria decumbens Edgew. √
Hydrangeaceae Ribes luridum Hook. f. & Thomson √
Primulaceae Androsace selago Klatt. √
Primulaceae Primula sikkimensis Hook.f. √
Primulaceae Primula tibetica Watt √
Primulaceae Bryocarpum himalaicum Hook. f. &Thomson √
Ericaceae Cassiope fastigata (Wallich).D.Don. √
Ericaceae Cassiope selaginoides Hook. f. &Thomson √
Ericaceae Gaultheria trichophylla Royle. √
Ericaceae Rhododendron nivale Hook.f. √
Ericaceae Rhdododendron sikkimense Pradhan & Lachungpa √
Ericaceae Rhododendron campanulatum subsp. aeruginosum (Hook.f.) Chamb. √
Ericaceae Rhododendron dalhousiae subsp. tashi Pradhan & Lachungpa √
Ericaceae Rhododendron niveum Hook.f. √
Gentianaceae Gentiana detonsa Fries √
Gentianaceae Gentiana ornata (G.Don).Griesb √
Gentianaceae Gentiana robusta King. √
Gentianaceae Swertia multicaulis Don. √
Boraginaceae Eritrichium pustulosum C. B. Clarke √
Boraginaceae Eritrichium pygmaeum Clarke √
Boraginaceae Microula pustulosa (C. B. Clarke) Duthie √
Boraginaceae Onosoma hookeri Clarke √
Boraginaceae Maharanga verruculosa (I. M. Johnst.) I. M. Johnst √
Plantaginaceae Lagotis glauca Gaertn. √
Scrophulariaceae Euphrasia officinalis Linn. √
Scrophulariaceae Lancea tibetica Hook. f. & Thomson √
Scrophulariaceae Oreosolen wattii Hook.f. √
Scrophulariaceae Parnassia nubicola Wall. √
Acanthaceae Justicia tukuchensis V. A. W. Graham √
Lamiaceae Dracocephalum heterophyllum Benth √
Lamiaceae Elsholtzia eriostachya Benth. √
Lamiaceae Nepeta discolor Royle. ex Bentham √
Lamiaceae Phlomis rotata Bentham ex J.D. Hooker √
Orobanchaceae Pedicularis integrifolia Hook.f. √
Orobanchaceae Pedicularis lachnoglossa Hook.f. √
Orobanchaceae Pedicularis longifolia Rudolph √
Orobanchaceae Pedicularis roylei Maxim. √
Orobanchaceae Pedicularis trichoglossa Hook. f. √
Orobanchaceae Pedicularis anserantha T. Yamaz. √
Orobanchaceae Pedicularis ingentoides T. Yamaz. √
Orobanchaceae Pedicularis terrenoflora T. Yamaz. √
Campanulaceae Campanula aristata Wall. √
Campanulaceae Campanula immodesta Hook. f. & Thomson √
Campanulaceae Codonopsis foetens Hook. f. & Thomson √
Campanulaceae Codonopsis thalictrifolia Wall. √
Campanulaceae Cyananthus incanus Hook. f. & Thomson √
Campanulaceae Codonopsis affinis Hook. f. & Thomson √
Asteraceae Anaphalis xylorhiza Schultz-Bip √
Asteraceae Artemisia biennis Willd. √
Asteraceae Artemisia campbelli Hook. f. & Thomson √
Asteraceae Artemsia salsoloides Willd. √
Asteraceae Aster diplostephoides Benth. √
Asteraceae Chionocharis hookeri (C. B. Clarke) I. M. Johnston √
Asteraceae Cremanthodium decaisnei Clarke √
Asteraceae Cremanthodium oblongatum Clarke √
Asteraceae Cremanthodium reniforme Benth √
Asteraceae Hippolytia gossypina Hook. f. & Thomson √
Asteraceae Leontopodium haastioides Hand.-Mazz √
Asteraceae Saussurea gossypiphora Don. √
Asteraceae Saussurea heiracioides Hook.f √
Asteraceae Saussurea katochaete √
Asteraceae Saussurea leontodontoides (DC.) √
Asteraceae Saussurea stella Maxim. √
Asteraceae Saussurea tridactyla Clarke √
Asteraceae Saussurea uniflora Wall. √
Asteraceae Saussurea werneroides Hook.f. √
Asteraceae Soroseris glomerata (Decne.) Stebb √
Asteraceae Waldheimia tridactylites √
Asteraceae Youngia depressa Hook. f. & Thomson √
Asteraceae Youngia gracilipes Hook.f. √
Asteraceae Anaphalis cavei Chatterjee √
Asteraceae Anaphalis hookeri C.B. Clarke √
Asteraceae Cacalia chola W. W. Sm. √
Asteraceae Cremanthodium palmatum subsp. benthamii √
Asteraceae Crepis atropappa Babcock √
Asteraceae Jurinea cooperi J. Anthony √
Asteraceae Ligularia kingiana (W. W. Smith) R. Mathur √
Asteraceae Ligularia yakla (C. B. Clarke) V. Singh & P. Singh √
Asteraceae Saussurea topkegolensis H. Ohba & S. Akiyama √
Asteraceae Senecio brunneo-villosus Kitam. √
Asteraceae Senecio topkegolensis Kitam. √
Caprifoliaceae Lonicera hispida Poll. √
Caprifoliaceae Pterocephalus hookeri (C. B. Clarke) Diels √
Caprifoliaceae Morina nepalensis D. Don. √
Caprifoliaceae Nardostachys jatamansi (D. Don) DC. √
Apiaceae Chamaesium novem-jugum √
Apiaceae Cortia hookeri Clarke √
Apiaceae Cortiella lamondiana Fullarton & M.F. Watson √
Apiaceae Acronema pseudotenera P.K. Mukh. √
Apiaceae Angelica harae Pimenov √
Apiaceae Angelica nubigena P.K. Mukh. √
Open in a new tab

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.xml (254B, xml)

References

  1. Acharya J., Acharya J., Mukharjee A. A contribution to the study of the Caprifoliaceae jussieu in West Bengal and Sikkim, India. Pleione. 2010;4(1):42–47. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anonymous . Chapman and Hall; London: 1992. World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Global Biodiversity. [Google Scholar]
  3. Arya S.C., Sunny N. Assessment of tree diversity and resource use pattern in bath Putu forest, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2016;5(3):166–172. [Google Scholar]
  4. APG An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 2016;181:1–20. doi: 10.1111/boj.12385. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Badola H.K., Pradhan B.K. Population exploration of Rhododendron maddenii in Sikkim, bordering Khangchendzonga biosphere reserve - questioning rarity and endangerment. NeBIO. 2010;1:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  6. Badola H.K., Pradhan B.K. Discovery of new populations of a rare species Rhododendron niveum in Khangchendzonga National Park, Sikkim. Rhododendron. 2010;50:41–49. [Google Scholar]
  7. Badola H.K., Pradhan B.K. Plants used in healthcare practices by Limboo tribe in south –west of Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve, Sikkim, India. Indian J. Trad. Knowl. 2013;12(3):355–369. [Google Scholar]
  8. Badola H.K., Subba J.B. Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve (Sikkim). Pp. 133–142. In: Palni L.M.S., Rawal R.S., Rai R.K., Reddy S.V., editors. Compendium on Indian Biosphere Reserves: Progression during Two Decades of Conservation, GBPIHED, Kosi-Almora and Ministry of Environment & Forests (Govt of India) 2012. [Google Scholar]
  9. Basnet K., Badola H.K. Birds of Fambonglho Wildlife Sanctuary, Sikkim, India: a baseline survey for conservation and area management. NeBIO. 2012;3(2):1–12. [Google Scholar]
  10. Behera M.D., Kushwaha S.P.S., Roy P.S. High plant endemism in an Indian hotspot–eastern Himalaya. Biodivers. Conserv. 2002;11(4):669–682. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bhujel R.B. North Bengal University; Darjeeling: 1996. Studies on the Dicotyledonous Flora of Darjeeling District. (PhD Thesis) [Google Scholar]
  12. Bhutia C., Chettri N., Tambe S. Khangchendzonga Conservation Committee; Yuksam, Sikkim: 2002. Khangchendzonga, the Sacred Mountain: A Biodiversity Handbook. [Google Scholar]
  13. Brooks T.M., Mittermeier R.A., da Fonseca G.A., Gerlach J., Hoffmann M., Lamoreux J.F., Mittermeier C.G., Pilgrim J.D., Rodrigues A.S. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science. 2006;313(5783):58–61. doi: 10.1126/science.1127609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Campbell A. Note on the Lepchas of Sikkim, with a vocabulary of their language. J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal. 1840;9:379–393. [Google Scholar]
  15. Carpenter C. The environmental control of plant species density on a Himalayan elevation gradient. J. Biogeogr. 2005;32:999–1018. [Google Scholar]
  16. CEPF . WWF, US-Asian Programme/Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund; Kathmandu: 2005. Ecosystem Profile: Indo- Burman Hotspot, Eastern Himalayan Region. [Google Scholar]
  17. CFPF . WWF US-Asian Program; 2007. Ecosystem Profile: Indo-Burma Hotspot, Indo-China Region. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chapman A.D. 2005. Uses of Primary Species-Occurrence Data Version 1.0. Report for the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Copenhagen.http://www.niobioinformatics.in/books/Uses%20of%20Primary%20Data.pdf Available at: Accessed on 12 May 2008. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chaudhary R.P., Uprety Y., Joshi S.P., Basnet K., Basnet G., Shrestha K.R., Bhatta K.P., Acharya K.P., Chettri N. Government of Nepal; Research Centre for Applied Science and Technology (RECAST), Tribhuvan University; and International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD); 2015. Kangchenjunga Landscape Nepal: from Conservation and Development Perspectives. Kathmandu: Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (MoFSC) [Google Scholar]
  20. Chettri A., Barik S.K., Lyngdoh M.K., Pandey H.N. Notes on geographic distribution. Plantae, magnoliophyta, gentianales, apocynaceae, asclepiadoideae, Ceropegia hookeri: distribution and rediscovery in eastern Himalayas, Sikkim, India. Check List. 2009;5(3):695–698. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chettri A., Barik S.K., Singh B., Adhikari D., Lyngdoh M.K. Cornus kousa F. Buerger ex Hance subsp. Kousa (Cornaceae): a new record from India. Taiwania. 2012;57(1):77–81. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chettri N., Sharma E., Shakya B., Thapa R., Bajracharya B., Uddin K., Oli K.P., Choudhary D. ICIMOD; Kathmandu, Nepal: 2010. Biodiversity in the Eastern Himalayas: Status, Trends and Vulnerability to Climate Change. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chettri N., Shakya B., Sharma E. ICIMOD; Kathmandu: 2008. Biodiversity Conservation in the Kangchenjunga Landscape. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chettri N., Sharma E., Deb D.C. Bird community structure along a trekking corridor of Sikkim Himalaya: a conservation perspective. Biol. Conserv. 2001;102(1):1–16. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chettri N., Sharma E., Deb D.C., Sundriyal R.C. Effect of firewood extraction on tree structure, regeneration, and woody biomass productivity in a trekking corridor of the Sikkim Himalaya. Mt. Res. Dev. 2002;22(2):150–158. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chettri N., Sharma E., Lama S.D. Non-timber forest produces utilization, distribution and status in a trekking corridor of Sikkim, India. Lyonia. 2005;8(1):89–101. [Google Scholar]
  27. Choudhary D. Potential micro-enterprises and income generating activities in the Kangchenjunga Landscape. In: Chettri N., Shakya B., Sharma E., editors. Biodiversity Conservation in the Kangchenjunga Landscape. ICIMOD; Kathmandu: 2008. pp. 133–140. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chowdhury A., Chowdhury M., Choudhury D., Das A.P. Ludwigia peruviana (Linnaeus) H. Hara [Onagraceae]: a new record for West Bengal, India. Pleione. 2013;7(1):286–289. [Google Scholar]
  29. Díaz S., Pascual U., Stenseke M., Martín-López B., Watson R.T., Molnár Z. Assessing nature's contributions to people. Science. 2018;359(6373):270–272. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Das K., Verbeken A. New species of Lactarius Subg. Plinthogalus and new records of Lactifluus Subg. Gerardii (Russulaceae) from Sikkim, India. Taiwania. 2012;57(1):37–48. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dey S.B., Ghosh R., Shekhar M., Mukherjee B., Bera S. What drives elevational pattern of phytolith diversity in Thysanolaena maxima (Roxb.) O. Ktze? A study from the Darjeeling Himalayas. Flora (JENA) 2015;211:51–61. [Google Scholar]
  32. DFO . District Forest Office; Ilam, Nepal: 2012. Management Plan of Mai Pokhari Ramsar Site, Ilam, Nepal. [Google Scholar]
  33. DPR . Department of Plant Resources, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation; Kathmandu, Nepal: 2012. Plants of Nepal: Fact Sheet. Kathmandu. [Google Scholar]
  34. ENVIS Centre Sikkim . Forest, Environment and Wildlife Management Department, Government of Sikkim; Gangtok, India: 2019. Endemic Plants.http://sikenvis.nic.in/WriteReadData/UserFiles/file/List%20of%20Endemic%20Plant%202015.pdf Downloaded from: Accessed on: 20 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
  35. GBPNIHESD . G B Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environmental and Sustainable development; Sikkim: 2015. Feasibility Assessment Report- Kangchenjunga Landscape- India. [Google Scholar]
  36. Grierson A.J., Long D.G. vol. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens Edinburgh; United Kingdom: 1983. (Flora of Bhutan, Including a Record of Plants from Sikkim). parts 1 and 2. [Google Scholar]
  37. Grumbine R.E., Pandit M.K. Threats from India's Himalaya dams. Science. 2013;339(6115):36–37. doi: 10.1126/science.1227211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gurung G.S. University of Zurich; Switzerland: 2006. Reconciling Biodiversity Conservation Priorities with Livelihood Needs in Kangchenjunga Conservation Area. Human Geography Series. [Google Scholar]
  39. GWB . Research Circle, Directorate of Forests, Government of West Bengal; Kolkata: 2010. State Report on National Programme on Promoting Medicinal Plants Conservation and Traditional Knowledge for Enhancing Health and Livelihood Security for West Bengal (UNDP-CCF-II Project No. 13047)http://www.westbengalforest.gov.in/publication_pdf/UNDP%20CCF%20II%20Report%20WBengal.pdf Accessed on 17 May 2015. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hajra P.K., Chakraborty P. A survey of wild plants sold in the Lal market of Gangtok. Ind. J. For. 1981;4(3):217–220. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hamilton A.C., Radford E.A. Ethnobotanical Society of Nepal; 2007. Identification and Conservation of Important Plant Areas for Medicinal Plants in the Himalaya. Salisbury: Plantlife International and Kathmandu. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hooker J.D. On the climate and vegetation of the temperate and cool regions of East Nepal and the Sikkim Himalayan mountains. J. Hort. Soc. Lond. 1852;7:69–131. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hooker S.J.D. J. Thomas at the Baptist Mission Press; 1849. Notes Chiefly Botanical, Made during an Excursion from Darjeeling to Tonglo: A Lofty Mountain on the Confines of Sikkim and Nepal. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hooker J.D. Oxford; 1904. A Sketch of the Flora of British India. [Google Scholar]
  45. ICIMOD, WCD, GBPNIHESD, RECAST . ICIMOD; Kathmandu: 2017. Kangchenjunga Landscape Conservation and Development Initiative Feasibility Assessment Report – Regional Synthesis. ICIMOD Working Paper 2017/9. [Google Scholar]
  46. IUCN . 2019. IUCN red list.https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/46171879/9730085 on 15 January 2019 Downloaded from. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kandel P., Gurung J., Chettri N., Ning W., Sharma E. Biodiversity research trends and gap analysis from a transboundary landscape, Eastern Himalayas. J. Asia Pac. Biodiv. 2016;9(1):1–10. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kholia B.S. Pteridophytic wealth of Sikkim Himalaya, pp43-65. In: Arrawatia M.L., Tambe S., editors. Biodiversity of Sikkim Exploring and Conserving a Global Hotspot. Information and Public Relations Department; Gangtok: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  49. King G., Pantling R. The orchids of the Sikkim Himalaya. Ann. Roy. Bot. Gard. Calcutta. 1889;8(2-4):1–448. [Google Scholar]
  50. Krishna A.P., Chhetri S., Singh K.K. Human dimensions of conservation in the Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve: the need for conflict prevention. Mt. Res. Dev. 2002;22(4):328–331. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kunwar R.M., Shrestha K., Dhungana S.K. Floral biodiversity of Nepal: an update. J. Nat. Hist. Mus. 2010;25:295–311. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lucksom S.Z. Jiwan Thing Marg; Gangtok, East Sikkim: 2007. The Orchids of Sikkim and North East Himalaya: Development Area; p. 984. [Google Scholar]
  53. Maiti D., Maiti G.G. Diversity of vascular plants of Kanchenjunga Biosphere Reserve, Sikkim, and its conservation. Ind. For. 2007:1416–1436. [Google Scholar]
  54. Majumdar N.C., Krishna B., Biswas M.C. Vegetation of Neora valley and adjacent regions in Kalimpong forest division, West Bengal. J. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 1984;5(5):1013–1025. [Google Scholar]
  55. Manish K., Pandit M.K. Phylogenetic diversity, structure and diversification patterns of endemic plants along the elevational gradient in the Eastern Himalaya. Plant Ecol. Divers. 2018;11(4):501–513. [Google Scholar]
  56. Manish K., Pandit M.K., Telwala Y., Nautiyal D.C., Koh L.P., Tiwari S. Elevational plant species richness patterns and their drivers across non-endemics, endemics and growth forms in the Eastern Himalaya. J. Plant Res. 2017;130(5):829–844. doi: 10.1007/s10265-017-0946-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Matthew K.M. The pteridophytes of the Darjeeling district. Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal. 1971;25:97–102. [Google Scholar]
  58. Mehra P.N., Bir S.S. Pteridophytic flora of Darjeeling and Sikkim Himalayas. Resour. Bull Punjab Univ. 1964;15(1–2):69–181. [Google Scholar]
  59. Mittermeier R.A., Gils P.R., Hoffman M., Pilgrim J., Brooks T., Mittermeier C.G. CEMEX/Agrupación Sierra Madre; Mexico City: 2004. Hotspots Eevisited. Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment . 2014. Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Malaysia.https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/my/my-nr-05-en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  61. Moktan M.R., Gratzer G., Richards W.H., Rai T.B., Dukpa D. Regeneration and structure of mixed conifer forests under single-tree harvest management in the western Bhutan Himalayas. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009;258(3):243–255. [Google Scholar]
  62. Myers N. Threatened biotas: ‘hotspots’ in tropical forestry. Environmentalist. 1988;8:1–20. doi: 10.1007/BF02240252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. NCD . Nature Conservation Division, Department of Forest and Park Services; Thimphu: 2015. Feasibility Assessment Report- Kangchenjunga Landscape- Bhutan. [Google Scholar]
  64. Numata M. Vegetation and conservation in eastern Nepal. J. Coll. Arts Sci. Chiba Univ. Nat. Sci. 1966;4:559–569. [Google Scholar]
  65. O'Neill A.R., Badola H.K., Dhyani P.P., Rana S.K. Integrating ethnobiological knowledge into biodiversity conservation in the Eastern Himalayas. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2017;13(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13002-017-0148-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ohsawa M., Shakya P.R., Numata M. Distribution and succession of west Himalayan forest types in the eastern part of the Nepal Himalaya. Mt. Res. Dev. 1986:143–157. [Google Scholar]
  67. Olson M., Dinerstein E., Wikramanayake E.D., Burgess N.D., Powell G.V.N., Underwood E.C., D'Amico J.A., Itoua I., Strand H.E., Morrison J.C., Loucks C.J., Allnutt T.F., Ricketts T.H., Kura Y., Lamoreux J.F., Wettengel W.W., Hedao P., Kassem K. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Biol. Sci. 2001;51(11):933–938. [Google Scholar]
  68. Pala N.A., Sarkar B.C., Shukla G., Chettri N., Deb S., Bhat J.A., Chakravarty S. Floristic composition and utilization of ethnomedicinal plant species in home gardens of the Eastern Himalaya. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2019;15(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13002-019-0293-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Pandit M.K., Grumbine R.E. Potential effects of ongoing and proposed hydropower development on terrestrial biological diversity in the Indian Himalaya. Conserv. Biol. 2012;26(6):1061–1071. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01918.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Pradhan B.K., Badola H.K. Swertia chirayta, a threatened high-value medicinal herb: Microhabitats and conservation challenges in Sikkim Himalaya, India. Mt. Res. Dev. 2015;35.4:374–381. [Google Scholar]
  71. Pradhan B.K., Badola H.K. Ethnomedicinal plant use by Lepcha tribe of Dzongu valley bordering Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve, in North Sikkim, India. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2008;4:22. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-4-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Pradhan K.C., Lachungpa S.T. Primulaceae Books; Kalimpong: 1990. Sikkim Himalayan Rhododendrons. [Google Scholar]
  73. Proença V., Martin L.J., Pereira H.M., Fernandez M., McRae L., Belnap J., Böhm M., Brummitt N., García-Moreno J., Gregory R.D., Honrado J.P. Global biodiversity monitoring: from data sources to essential biodiversity variables. Biol. Conserv. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Rai D.S., Tshering K., Gyeltshen K., Norbu N., Sherub, Ngawang R., Wangchuk S. Biodiversity of Toorsa Strict nature Reserve – Jigme Dorji national Park proposed conservation corridor, western Bhutan. In: Chettri N., Shakya B., Sharma E., editors. Biodiversity Conservation in the Kangchenjunga Landscape. ICIMOD; Kathmandu: 2008. pp. 39–56. [Google Scholar]
  75. Rai L.K., Sharma E. Bishen Singh, Mahendra Pal Singh; Dehra Dun, India: 1995. Medicinal Plants of Sikkim Himalaya: Status, Uses and Potential. [Google Scholar]
  76. Rajbhandari K.R. History of botanical exploration in Nepal: 1802–2015. In: Jha P.K., Siwakoti M., Rajbhandari S., editors. Frontiers of Botany. Central Department of Botany, Tribuvan University; Kirtipur: 2016. pp. 1–99. [Google Scholar]
  77. Rajbhandari K.R., Dhungana S.K. Department of Plant Resources; Kathmandu: 2010. Endemic Flowering Plants of Nepal Part 2. Department of Plant Resources Bulletin-Special Publication No. 2. [Google Scholar]
  78. Rajbhandari K.R., Dhungana S.K. Department of Plant Resources; Kathmandu: 2011. Endemic Flowering Plants of Nepal Part 3. Department of Plant Resources Bulletin-Special Publication No. 3. [Google Scholar]
  79. Rajbhandari K.R., Adhikari M.K. Department of Plant Resources; Kathmandu: 2009. Endemic Flowering Plants of Nepal Part I. Department of Plant Resources Bulletin-Special Publication No. 1. [Google Scholar]
  80. Rajbhandary S., Hughes M., Shrestha K.K. Three new species of Begonia Sect. Platycentrum from Nepal. Gard. Bull. (Singap.) 2010;62(1):151–162. [Google Scholar]
  81. Saurav M., Das A.P. Plant species richness and phytosociological attributes of the vegetation in the cold temperate zone of Darjiling Himalaya, India. Int. Res. J. Environ. Sci. 2014;3(10):14–19. [Google Scholar]
  82. Shankar U. A case of high tree diversity in a sal (Shorea robusta)-dominated lowland forest of Eastern Himalaya: floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Curr. Sci. 2001;81(7):776–786. [Google Scholar]
  83. Sharma S.K., Pandit M.K. A new species of Panax L. (Araliaceae) from Sikkim Himalaya, India. Syst. Bot. 2009;34(2):434–438. [Google Scholar]
  84. Shrestha K.K., Ghimire S.K. WWF Nepal; Kathmandu: 1996. Plant Diversity Inventory of the Proposed Kangchenjunga Conservation Area (Ghunsa and Simbua Khola Valleys) [Google Scholar]
  85. Shrestha K.K., Kunwar R.M., Dhamala M.K., Humagain K., Pandey J., Khatri N.B. Conservation of plant resources in Kangchenjungha- Singhalila ridge, eastern Nepal. J. Plant Sci. 2008;2:62–68. [Google Scholar]
  86. Sikkim Biodiversity Action Plan . FEWMD, Government of Sikkim, Printer at Concept; India: 2012. Sikkim Biodiversity Action Plan. Published by Sikkim Biodiversity Conservation and Forest Management Project; p. 44. [Google Scholar]
  87. Singh K.K., Kumar S., Rai L.K., Krishna A.P. Rhododendron conservation in Sikkim Himalayas. Curr. Sci. 2003;85(5):602–606. [Google Scholar]
  88. Singh H.B., Sundriyal S.C. Composition, economic use, and nutrient contents of alpine vegetation in the Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve, Sikkim Himalaya, India. Arctic Antarct. Alpine Res. 2005;37:591–601. [Google Scholar]
  89. Subba J.R. Ambica Printers; New Delhi, India: 2002. Biodiversity of Sikkim Himalayas. [Google Scholar]
  90. Subba S.J., Lachungpa D., Subba S., Nepal S. Analysis of vegetation in a representative temperate plant community in Lachung range of the Sikkim Himalaya. Int. J. Environ. Biodiv. 2015;6(3):18–24. [Google Scholar]
  91. Sundriyal M., Rai L.K. Wild edible plants of Sikkim Himalaya. J. Hill Res. 1996;9:267–278. [Google Scholar]
  92. Sundriyal R.C., Sharma E., Rai L.K., Rai S.C. Tree structure, regeneration and woody biomass removal in a sub-tropical forest of Mamlay watershed in the Sikkim Himalaya. Plant Ecol. 1994;113(1):53–63. [Google Scholar]
  93. Sundriyal R.C., Sharma D. Anthropogenic pressure on tree structure and biomass in the temperate forest of Mamlay watershed in Sikkim. For. Ecol. Manag. 1996;81(1):113–134. [Google Scholar]
  94. Takhtajan A.L. University of California Press; USA: 1986. Floristic Regions of the World. [Google Scholar]
  95. Takhtajan A. Oliver & Boyd; Edinburgh and London: 1969. Flowering Plants: Origin and Dispersal. [Google Scholar]
  96. Tambe S., Rawat G.S. The alpine vegetation of the Khangchendzonga landscape, Sikkim Himalaya: community characteristics, diversity, and aspects of ecology. Mt. Res. Dev. 2010;30(3):266–274. [Google Scholar]
  97. Telwala Y., Brook B.W., Manish K., Pandit M.K. Climate-induced elevational range shifts and increase in plant species richness in a Himalayan biodiversity epicentre. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Thapa N., Lama D. Occurrence of Pteris austrosinica (ching) ching [Pterideaceae] in Darjiling hills: a new record of endemic Chinese element in Indian sub-continent. Researcher. 2015;7(5):36–38. [Google Scholar]
  99. Uprety Y., Poudel R.C., Gurung J., Chettri N., Chaudhary R.P. Traditional use and management of NTFPs in Kangchenjunga Landscape: Implications for conservation and livelihoods. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2016;12(1):1–59. doi: 10.1186/s13002-016-0089-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. WCD . Wildlife Conservation Division, Department of Forests and Park Services, Ministry of Agriculture and Forests. Royal Government of Bhutan; KL-Bhutan: 2014. Feasibility assessment report. [Google Scholar]
  101. Xu J., Badola R., Chettri N., Chaudhary R.P., Zomer R., Pokhrel B., Hussain S.A., Pradhan S., Pradhan R. Sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem Services in the Hindu Kush Himalaya. Chapter 5. In: Wester P., Mishra A., Mukherji A., Shrestha A.B., editors. The Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment—Mountains, Climate Change, Sustainability and People. Springer Nature Switzerland; AG, Cham: 2019. [Google Scholar]
  102. Yoda K. A preliminary survey of the forest vegetation of eastern Nepal. II. General description, structure and floristic composition of sample plots chosen from different vegetation zones. J. Coll. Arts Sci. Chiba Univ. Natl. Sci. Ser. 1967;5:99–140. [Google Scholar]
  103. Yonzon P.B., Pradhan S., Bhujel R., Khaling S., Lachungpa U., Lachungpa C. WWF Nepal; Kathmandu: 2000. Kangchenjunga Mountain Complex: Biodiversity Assessment and Conservation Planning. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.xml (254B, xml)

Articles from Plant Diversity are provided here courtesy of Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES