Abstract
Rationale:
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease COPD) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by small airway abnormality and emphysema. We hypothesized that a voxel-wise CT analytic approach would identify patterns of disease progression in smokers.
Methods:
We analyzed 725 smokers with two chest CTs five years apart. Voxel-wise Parametric Response Mapping PRM) analysis was applied to baseline inspiration, follow-up inspiration and follow-up expiration images. PRM classifies lung as normal PRMNORM), functional small airway disease PRMfSAD) and emphysema PRMEMPH). These images were spatially registered to the baseline expiration image so that each voxel had correspondences across all time points and respiratory phases.
Results:
Subjects with low baseline PRMfSAD and PRMEMPH predominantly had an increase in PRMfSAD on follow-up; those with higher baseline PRMfSAD and PRMEMPH mostly had increases in PRMEMPH. For GOLD 0 participants n=419), mean increases in 5-year PRMfSAD and PRMEMPH were 0.3% for both; for GOLD 1–4 participants n=306), they were 0.6% and 1.6%, respectively. Eighty GOLD 0 subjects 19.1%) had overall radiologic progression 30.0% to PRMfSAD, 52.5% to PRMEMPH, 17.5% to both); 153 GOLD 1–4 subjects 50.0%) experienced progression 17.6% to PRMfSAD, 48.4% to PRMEMPH, 34.0% to both). In a multivariable model, both baseline PRMfSAD and PRMEMPH were associated with development of PRMEMPH on follow-up, although this relationship was diminished at higher levels of baseline PRMEMPH.
Conclusion:
A voxel-wise longitudinal PRM analytic approach can identify patterns of disease progression in smokers with and without COPD.
Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, computed tomography, Parametric Response Mapping, small airway disease, emphysema
INTRODUCTION
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease COPD) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by small airway abnormality and emphysema 1). While emphysema is a prominent feature of severe disease, little is known about the stages and timeline of its progression on a radiological level. Parametric Response Mapping PRM) analysis which incorporates information from both inspiratory and expiratory computed tomography CT) images is one way to quantitatively assess this data. PRM captures the change in lung density between matched inspiratory and expiratory images 2), thereby enabling the distinction between normal lung parenchyma PRMNORM), emphysema PRMEMPH) and non-emphysematous air trapping referred to as functional small airway disease PRMfSAD).
However, the analysis of longitudinal quantitative CT data is challenging and optimal methods have not been firmly established, particularly for PRM data. Here we conduct an analysis of a large multicenter study of current and former smokers to characterize changes in PRMfSAD and PRMEMPH over 5 years of follow-up using voxel-wise co-registration of the baseline and follow-up images to characterize patterns of progression in smokers with and without COPD. We limited this analysis to participants who had both their initial and follow-up chest CTs with identical scanning parameters and comparable lung volumes between the two scans to minimize variability in the data. We hypothesized that baseline PRMfSAD is a radiographic precursor to emphysema.
METHODS
Study participants and design
COPDGene is a multicenter longitudinal cohort study that enrolled more than 10,000 current and former smokers with at least a 10 pack-year smoking history, with and without airflow obstruction 3). We analyzed 725 subjects in GOLD Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) stages 0–4 who had chest CTs performed on two visits approximately 5 years apart with the same scanner make and model and ≤ 15% difference in inspiratory lung volumes between the two scans. Subjects with mismatches in other specific scanning parameters between the two visits were also excluded see Supplementary Figure 1). Data on demographics, smoking history, respiratory symptoms, comorbidities and exacerbation history were collected at the baseline visit. The modified Medical Research Council score was used to assess dyspnea severity 4) and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire was used to evaluate quality of life and respiratory impairment 5). Exacerbations were defined as acute worsening of respiratory symptoms necessitating treatment with antibiotics and/or systemic corticosteroids. Spirometry was performed at both visits before and after administration of 180 μg of albuterol. Airflow obstruction was defined as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC forced expiratory volume in the first second over forced vital capacity) less than 0.7 and staged according to the GOLD guidelines 6). GOLD 0 was defined by post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC greater than 0.7 with FEV1 greater than 80% predicted regardless of symptom burden. Bronchodilator reversibility was defined as an increase of at least 200 ml and 12% in FEV1 and/or FVC 7). The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of all participating centers and all subjects gave written informed consent.
Computed tomography protocol and Parametric Response Mapping analysis
For both study visits, paired inspiratory and expiratory chest CTs were obtained at maximal inspiration total lung capacity) and end-tidal expiration functional residual capacity) 3). An image processing workflow was designed for voxel-wise longitudinal analysis of PRM. The baseline inspiration, follow-up inspiration, and follow-up expiration images were spatially registered to the baseline expiration so that each voxel had correspondences across all time points and respiratory phases see Supplementary Figure 2). Following image registration, the Hounsfield Unit HU) values for lung voxels in the baseline scan were adjusted to account for differences in ventilation level across time points using a sponge model method based on lung volumes 8). The following equation was used:
where V represents the total lung volume obtained from a segmentation of the left and right lungs on the CT image. Parametric Response Maps were then generated for the baseline and follow-up time points by Imbio LLC Minneapolis, MN, USA) 2). Briefly, all voxels < -950 HU on the inspiration scan were classified as PRMEMPH, voxels ≥ -950 HU on the inspiration scan and < -856 HU on the expiration scan were classified as PRMfSAD, and voxels ≥ -950 HU on the inspiration scan and ≥ -856 HU on the expiration scan were classified as PRMNORM.
A metric was then devised to measure the net changes in PRM categories over time. Given two arbitrary PRM categories A and B e.g. normal and fSAD), PRMA→B change was defined as the number of individual voxels changing from category A to category B minus the number of individual voxels changing from category B to category A, normalized by the total number of voxels in the lung. This method allows for direct tracking of each voxel between the baseline and follow-up scans. Three types of net change were of interest to us: PRMNORM→fSAD, PRMNORM→EMPH and PRMfSAD→EMPH. Thresholds for categorizing meaningful net changes were calculated using 30-day repeat scans from 57 GOLD 0–4 subjects enrolled in the SPIROMICS repeatability sub-study 9, 10). These subjects met the same scanning parameter matching criteria that we applied to the COPDGene subjects in our analysis, acknowledging however that SPIROMICS and COPDGene have differences in their quantitative CT protocols 3, 11). PRMNORM→fSAD, PRMNORM→EMPH and PRMfSAD→EMPH changes were computed for each of the 57 subjects in the repeatability sub-study. Limits of agreement were used to define meaningful PRM changes i.e. not due to noise or measurement error) and were computed as 1.96 x standard deviation of each change category over all subjects. The following limits of agreement were found for each net change: PRMNORM→fSAD: 4.09%, PRM NORM→EMPH: 0.85% and PRMfSAD→EMPH: 1.35%. Using this model, subjects with PRM change greater than the limits of agreement were defined as progressors and classified into one of three types of longitudinal patterns: overall progression to fSAD, overall progression to emphysema or progression to both. Lungs were also segmented cranio-caudally into upper, middle and lower zones for regional analysis.
Statistical analyses
We first described baseline clinical characteristics of GOLD 0 and GOLD 1–4 participants. Continuous variables were reported as means and standard deviations and categorical ones as percentages. To compare these baseline characteristics between GOLD 0 and GOLD 1–4 subjects, a t-test was conducted for continuous variables and a Pearson’s chi-square test was performed for categorical ones. The association of baseline chest CT PRM metrics with change in total lung PRMEMPH between the two visits was tested using a multivariable linear regression model adjusted for age, gender, race, smoking history, current smoking status, FEV1, FVC, bronchodilator response and scanner type. Based on exploration of potential spline terms, a spline interpolation was included in the model at a PRMEMPH cutoff of 10% as any additional amount of baseline PRMEMPH beyond this threshold was found to be negatively associated with increase in follow-up PRMEMPH. Given the small amount of 5-year total emphysema change noted in GOLD 0 participants, we conducted additional analyses with the same multivariable model using PRM metrics of segmented lung zones upper, middle and lower). All analyses were performed in R software version 3.3. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Among the 725 participants included in our analysis, 419 57.8%) were in GOLD stage 0 and 306 42.2%) were in GOLD stages 1–4. A description of subject characteristics at the baseline visit is presented in Table 1. Compared to GOLD 0 participants, those with GOLD 1–4 spirometry were older, less likely to be African-American and had a greater smoking history, higher dyspnea scores, poorer quality of life, worse exertional capacity and more respiratory exacerbations in the preceding year. Among the 306 GOLD 1–4 subjects, mean PRMfSAD increased from to 24.6% to 25.2% and mean PRMEMPH increased from 9.6% to 11.2% after 5 years of follow-up Table 2); 153 individuals 50.0%) had overall progression to fSAD and/or emphysema based on the pre-specified thresholds. Compared to non-progressors, progressors had a higher baseline PRMfSAD 28.6% vs. 20.7%) and PRMEMPH 12.8 vs. 6.3%) as well as worse baseline lung function FEV1 % predicted 57.4% vs. 64.3%). Among the 419 GOLD 0 subjects, mean PRMfSAD increased from 9.5% to 9.8% and mean PRMEMPH increased from 2.0% to 2.3% after 5 years of follow-up Supplementary Table 1); 80 individuals 19.0%) had overall progression to fSAD and/or emphysema. Similar to GOLD 1–4, compared to non-progressors, GOLD 0 progressors had a higher baseline PRMfSAD 12.9% vs. 8.7%) and PRMEMPH 4.1% vs. 1.6%), but similar FEV1 % predicted.
Table 1 –
Baseline characteristics of study participants
GOLD 0 (n=419) | GOLD 1–4 (n=306) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Demographics | |||
Age | 57.4 (8.5) | 63.1 (8.3) | < 0.001 |
Female %) | 219 (52.3%) | 153 (50.0%) | 0.55 |
African-American %) | 153 (36.5%) | 86 (28.1%) | 0.02 |
Smoking exposure | |||
Smoking history pack-years) | 36.2 (19.4) | 47.2 (21.8) | <0.001 |
Current smoking %) | 210 (50.1%) | 133 (43.5%) | 0.07 |
Post-bronchodilator spirometry | |||
FEV1 L) | 2.84 (0.68) | 1.72 (0.73) | < 0.001 |
FEV1 % predicted | 97.7 (11.1) | 60.8 (21.8) | < 0.001 |
FVC L) | 3.62 (0.88) | 3.05 (0.95) | < 0.001 |
FVC % predicted | 96.5 (11.6) | 82.5 (19.2) | < 0.001 |
FEV1 / FVC | 0.79 (0.05) | 0.55 (0.11) | < 0.001 |
Markers of respiratory health | |||
mMRC score | 0.7 (1.2) | 1.6 (1.4) | < 0.001 |
Total SGRQ score | 14.8 (16.2) | 31.3 (21.3) | < 0.001 |
6-minute walking distance m) | 467.0 (109.4) | 400.8 (118.0) | < 0.001 |
Exacerbation frequency in past 12 months | 0.2 (0.5) | 0.5 (0.9) | < 0.001 |
Data are expressed as mean standard deviation) except when stated and represent parameters from the baseline visit. FEV1, forced expiratory volume in the first second; FVC, forced vital capacity; mMRC, modified medical research council; SGRQ, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire. The mMRC score ranges from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating worse dyspnea. The SGRQ score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a higher respiratory burden and worse quality of life.
Table 2 –
Spirometry and PRM chest CT metrics for GOLD 1–4 participants at the baseline and follow-up visits
ALL (n=306) | Non-progressors (n=153) | Progressors (n=153) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spirometry | Baseline | Follow-up | Baseline | Follow-up | Baseline | Follow-up |
FEV1 L) | 1.72 (0.73) | 1.56 (0.73) | 1.82 (0.70) | 1.71 (0.72) | 1.62 (0.75) | 1.42 (0.71) |
FEV1 % predicted | 60.8 (21.8) | 59.4 (23.7) | 64.3 (20.8) | 65.0 (22.8) | 57.4 (22.3) | 53.9 (23.3) |
FEV1 / FVC | 0.55 (0.11) | 0.55 (0.14) | 0.59 (0.10) | 0.59 (0.13) | 0.52 (0.11) | 0.50 (0.14) |
Chest CT metrics | Baseline | Follow-up | Baseline | Follow-up | Baseline | Follow-up |
% PRMfSAD | 24.6 (13.5) | 25.2 (12.6) | 20.7 (12.4) | 20.1 (12.0) | 28.4 (13.5) | 30.3 (11.0) |
% PRMEMPH | 9.6 (10.6) | 11.2 (11.7) | 6.3 (8.6) | 5.9 (7.9) | 12.8 (11.4) | 16.3 (12.4) |
Data are expressed as mean standard deviation). FEV1, forced expiratory volume in the first second; FVC, forced vital capacity; % PRMfSAD and % PRMEMPH, total lung percent of functional small airway disease and emphysema on chest CT Parametric Response Mapping analysis.
Figure 1 shows the trajectories of PRM metric changes between the baseline and follow-up visits by pattern of CT progression overall to fSAD, overall to emphysema or to both) for GOLD 0 and GOLD 1–4 progressors. For these subjects, progression to emphysema occurred almost equally in both groups 52.5% of GOLD 0 and 48.4% of GOLD 1–4 progressors). Progression to PRMfSAD was more frequent in GOLD 0 than GOLD 1–4 30.0% versus 17.6%, respectively). Progression to both PRMfSAD and PRMEMPH was more frequent in GOLD 1–4 than GOLD 0 34.0% versus 17.5%, respectively). GOLD 1–4 participants who had overall progression to PRMEMPH experienced a concurrent decline in PRMfSAD over the 5 years of follow-up trajectory B in Figure 1).
Figure 1: Five-year change of chest CT Parametric Response Mapping metrics in GOLD 0 and GOLD 1–4 progressors.
The center of each circle represents the mean coordinates % (PRMEMPH and % PRMfSAD) for each type of progression (to fSAD [A], emphysema [B] or both [C]) at the baseline and follow-up visits (identified by the direction of the arrows). The area of each circle is proportional to the number of subjects with a given type of progression (A, B or C) within their GOLD category (0 or 1–4).
In the multivariable model for all GOLD 1–4 participants, both baseline PRMfSAD and PRMEMPH below the 10% spline cutoff) were independent predictors of an increase in total lung PRMEMPH over 5 years of follow-up Table 3); every additional 1% in baseline PRMfSAD and PRMEMPH was associated with a 0.05% and 0.19% increase in follow-up total lung PRMEMPH, respectively. Currently smoking status at baseline was also significantly associated with a subsequent increase in total PRMEMPH. Our model also suggests that the impact of baseline PRMEMPH on the subsequent development of emphysema is attenuated at higher levels based on the effect of the spline term at the 10% cutoff. For example, suppose we examine a currently smoking, African-American woman with the same mean age, spirometry and pack-years smoked as our GOLD 1–4 cohort listed in Table 1) and no bronchodilator response. A fitted curve was used to estimate the amount of baseline fSAD for a given amount of baseline emphysema Supplementary Figure 3). For this hypothetical patient, baseline PRMEMPH of 10% with corresponding PRMfSAD of 29.0% would be associated with a predicted five-year increase in PRMEMPH of 4.0%. For that same patient, if baseline PRMEMPH is 20% with corresponding PRMfSAD of 32.9%, the predicted five-year increase in PRMEMPH would be 1.9%.
Table 3 –
Model showing the associations between clinical and radiological variables at baseline and the 5-year change in total lung PRMEMPH for all GOLD 1–4 participants
Estimate | 95% CI | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age, per 1-year | −0.007 | −0.05; 0.04 | 0.78 |
Female | 0.16 | −0.52; 0.84 | 0.64 |
African-American | 0.35 | −0.45; 1.14 | 0.40 |
Smoking history, per 1 pack-year | 0.02 | −0.0007; 0.03 | 0.06 |
Current smoking | 1.42 | 0.61; 2.22 | 0.0007 |
Post-bronchodilator FEV1 % predicted, per 1% | −0.02 | −0.06; 0.03 | 0.42 |
Post-bronchodilator FVC % predicted, per 1% | 0.03 | −0.01; 0.07 | 0.19 |
Bronchodilator response | −0.23 | −0.96; 0.50 | 0.53 |
Baseline PRMfSAD, per 1% | 0.05 | 0.01; 0.09 | 0.009 |
Baseline PRMEMPH < 10%, per 1% | 0.19 | 0.05; 0.33 | 0.007 |
Baseline PRMEMPH ≥ 10%, per 1% | −0.23 | −0.40; −0.06 | 0.007 |
FEV1, forced expiratory volume in the first second; FVC, forced vital capacity; PRMfSAD and PRMEMPH, total lung percent of functional small airway disease and emphysema on chest CT Parametric Response Mapping analysis. The model was also adjusted for scanner type. Spline term included at baseline PRMEMPH ≥ 10%.
To illustrate our findings radiographically, we show the 5-year interval PRM changes on chest CT of a 58-year old man with COPD in GOLD stage 2 Figure 2). This participant experienced progression of his COPD as reflected by decrease in his FEV1 from 57% to 30% predicted and increase in his PRMEMPH from 24% to 35% of total lung volume. Panel B of Figure 2 shows the conversion of individual voxels from PRMfSAD to PRMEMPH after 5 years, which supports the association we found in our model between baseline fSAD and increase in follow-up emphysema.
Figure 2: Illustration of Parametric Response Mapping (PRM) changes on chest CT of a 58-year old man with COPD.
(A) Longitudinal PRM changes on representative coronal CT slices showing normal lung parenchyma (green), functional small airway disease [fSAD] (yellow) and emphysema (red). (B) CT slices highlighting individual voxels that were classified as fSAD at baseline and became emphysema 5 years later in that same subject.
The overall mean 5-year change in PRMEMPH for the GOLD 0 group was quite small 0.29%). Therefore, for this group, we chose to model change in upper lung PRMEMPH where the 5-year change was greatest 0.39%, 0.27% and 0.21% for upper, middle and lower zones respectively; p-value = 0.02 for difference between upper and lower zones). In this model, both upper lung PRMfSAD and PRMEMPH were predictive of an increase in upper lung PRMEMPH after 5 years of follow-up Supplementary Table 2).
DISCUSSION
In a large prospective cohort of current and former smokers with and without COPD, we demonstrate the ability of a voxel-wise, longitudinal PRM approach to characterize patterns of radiologic progression. We show that progression is typified by increases in PRMfSAD, followed by increases in PRMEMPH with overall less progression among GOLD 0 individuals as compared to GOLD 1–4. Over the five-year period, progression for both GOLD 0 and GOLD 1–4 subjects was most frequently characterized by transition of normal or fSAD lung to emphysema. Our multivariable models support this finding by demonstrating that PRMfSAD and PRMEMPH are independent predictors of future emphysema development.
Multiple studies have suggested that small airway disease is a precursor to emphysema. In explanted lungs from COPD patients undergoing transplantation, micro CT and histologic examination of terminal bronchioles in areas with variable emphysema severity showed that the narrowing and loss of these airways occurred before emphysematous destruction 12). Our findings support the results of smaller, prior cross-sectional and short-term longitudinal studies 2, 13) by demonstrating that baseline PRMfSAD on chest CT is independently associated with an increase in emphysema 5 years later. Our study also suggests that the pattern of radiographic disease progression is marked by an increase in PRMfSAD that is attenuated as emphysema increases.
Emphysema is characterized by permanent dilatation of air spaces and destruction of their walls distal to terminal bronchioles 14), resulting in loss of elastic recoil, impaired gas exchange and lung hyperinflation. However, the negative impact of emphysema may extend beyond affected areas to involve adjacent normal lung parenchyma by subjecting it to significant mechanical stretch during respiration. Some proposed mechanisms of this effect include abnormal remodeling of the extracellular matrix and increased binding of elastase to elastin 15–17), thereby generating a positive feedback loop. By virtue of its presence, emphysema may predispose the surrounding lung to more emphysema. Bhatt and colleagues showed that the Jacobian determinant a biomechanical metric reflecting the degree of lung deformation) of normal voxels within 2 mm of emphysematous voxels was associated with lung function decline 18). In another analysis of the COPDGene cohort, the Jacobian determinant was also shown to be an independent predictor of increased respiratory impairment, worse exertional capacity and a higher BODE index in individuals with COPD 19). The results of our analysis are concordant with these findings and support the notion of “emphysema begetting emphysema” 20).
Our study extends the findings of a prior report demonstrating an association between baseline PRMfSAD and PRMEMPH with subsequent FEV1 decline in GOLD 1–4 subjects 21). From a histologic standpoint, one might hypothesize that earlier in the course of disease, PRMfSAD on chest CT represents a mixture of pathologic abnormalities ranging from inflamed airways with potentially reversible damage to fibrotic or even lost airways 22). The amount of PRMfSAD in a given individual may then represent the pool of lung at risk for transition to emphysema. However, the presence of even small amounts of emphysema may indicate the potential for irreversible transformation. Therefore, the susceptibility of each individual with COPD to experience disease progression depends, at least partially, on their biologic milieu of existing airway inflammation and alveolar loss. From a clinical perspective, early identification of subjects at risk for emphysema progression is important as emphysema has been independently associated with a number of adverse outcomes including lung function decline 23), respiratory exacerbations 24), lung cancer 25, 26) and all-cause mortality 27).
We also demonstrate that progression of emphysema among GOLD 0 individuals is greatest in the upper lobes. Furthermore, the presence of baseline PRMfSAD and PRMEMPH in the upper lung zones is independently predictive of an increase in upper lung emphysema over time. Similarly, in another study of the COPDGene cohort, Boueiz and colleagues performed a cluster analysis on CT subtypes and found that the cluster most characterized by upper-lobe predominant emphysema at baseline experienced faster overall progression of emphysema 28). This differential effect by baseline emphysema distribution may be related to variability in regional perfusion 29), mechanical stress 30) and clearance of smoking metabolites 31) between the upper and lower parts of the lung. It is well known that emphysema tends to establish itself in the upper lobes first, although the etiology of this is not well understood.
We acknowledge limitations to our study. We selected participants who had both of their chest CTs performed with the same scanning parameters and had ≤ 15% difference in inspiratory lung volumes between the two visits in order to maximize the sensitivity of the analysis. Further investigations are needed in order to understand how to adapt this method when additional variability is introduced such as changes in scanner type or more extreme differences in lung volumes. We also do not control for pharmacologic therapy received by participants during the study. It is difficult to estimate the actual effect of pharmacotherapy on our findings as subjects could have been on multiple varying combinations of therapies throughout the 5-year duration of follow-up. In summary, we demonstrate the ability of a voxel-wise, longitudinal PRM approach to characterize patterns of radiologic progression in smokers with and without COPD and show that PRMfSAD appears to be a radiologic precursor to emphysema.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
COPDGene is supported by U.S. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute grants R01HL089897 and R01HL089856. The COPDGene study [Grant NCT00608764] is also supported by theCOPD Foundation through contributions made to an Industry AdvisoryBoard comprised of AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis,Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Siemens, and Sunovion.
SPIROMICS was supported by contracts from the NIH/NHLBI HHSN268200900013C, HHSN268200900014C, HHSN268200900015C, HHSN268200900016C, HHSN268200900017C, HHSN268200900018C, HHSN268200900019C, HHSN268200900020C), and supplemented by contributions made through the Foundation for the NIH and the COPD Foundation from AstraZeneca/MedImmune; Bayer; Bellerophon Therapeutics; Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc..; Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.; Forest Research Institute, Inc.; GlaxoSmithKline; Grifols Therapeutics, Inc.; Ikaria, Inc.; Nycomed GmbH; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; ProterixBio; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Sanofi; and Sunovion.
This analysis was also supported by U.S. National Institutes of Health grants R01HL122438, R01HL126838, K24HL138188 and T32HL007749.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS in alphabetical order)
- COPD
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- CT
computed tomography
- EMPH
emphysema
- FEV1
forced expiratory volume in the first second
- fSAD
functional small airway disease
- FVC
forced vital capacity
- GOLD
Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
- HU
Hounsfield Units
- NORM
Normal
REFERENCES
- 1.Labaki WW, Martinez CH, Martinez FJ, Galban CJ, Ross BD, Washko GR, Barr RG, Regan EA, Coxson HO, Hoffman EA, Newell JD Jr., Curran-Everett D, Hogg JC, Crapo JD, Lynch DA, Kazerooni EA, Han MK. The Role of Chest Computed Tomography in the Evaluation and Management of the Patient with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 196: 1372–1379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Galban CJ, Han MK, Boes JL, Chughtai KA, Meyer CR, Johnson TD, Galban S, Rehemtulla A, Kazerooni EA, Martinez FJ, Ross BD. Computed tomography-based biomarker provides unique signature for diagnosis of COPD phenotypes and disease progression. Nat Med 2012; 18: 1711–1715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Regan EA, Hokanson JE, Murphy JR, Make B, Lynch DA, Beaty TH, Curran-Everett D, Silverman EK, Crapo JD. Genetic epidemiology of COPD COPDGene) study design. COPD 2010; 7: 32–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mahler DA, Wells CK. Evaluation of clinical methods for rating dyspnea. Chest 1988; 93: 580–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM, Littlejohns P. A self-complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limitation. The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145: 1321–1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vogelmeier CF, Criner GJ, Martinez FJ, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Bourbeau J, Celli BR, Chen R, Decramer M, Fabbri LM, Frith P, Halpin DM, Lopez Varela MV, Nishimura M, Roche N, Rodriguez-Roisin R, Sin DD, Singh D, Stockley R, Vestbo J, Wedzicha JA, Agusti A. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report. GOLD Executive Summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 557–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Wanger J, Force AET. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 319–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Staring M, Bakker ME, Stolk J, Shamonin DP, Reiber JH, Stoel BC. Towards local progression estimation of pulmonary emphysema using CT. Med Phys 2014; 41: 021905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Couper D, LaVange LM, Han M, Barr RG, Bleecker E, Hoffman EA, Kanner R, Kleerup E, Martinez FJ, Woodruff PG, Rennard S, Group SR. Design of the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcomes in COPD Study SPIROMICS). Thorax 2014; 69: 491–494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hatt CR, Fernandez-Baldera A, Hoffman EA, Martinez FJ, Galban CJ, Han MK, Investigators S. Reproducibility Of Parametric Response Mapping At 30 Days. Am J Resp Crit Care 2017; 195. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sieren JP, Newell JD Jr., Barr RG, Bleecker ER, Burnette N, Carretta EE, Couper D, Goldin J, Guo J, Han MK, Hansel NN, Kanner, Kazerooni EA, Martinez FJ, Rennard S, Woodruff PG, Hoffman EA, Group SR. SPIROMICS Protocol for Multicenter Quantitative Computed Tomography to Phenotype the Lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 194: 794–806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McDonough JE, Yuan R, Suzuki M, Seyednejad N, Elliott WM, Sanchez PG, Wright AC, Gefter WB, Litzky L, Coxson HO, Pare PD, Sin DD, Pierce RA, Woods JC, McWilliams AM, Mayo JR, Lam SC, Cooper JD, Hogg JC. Small-airway obstruction and emphysema in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1567–1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Boes JL, Hoff BA, Bule M, Johnson TD, Rehemtulla A, Chamberlain R, Hoffman EA, Kazerooni EA, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Ross BD, Galban CJ. Parametric response mapping monitors temporal changes on lung CT scans in the subpopulations and intermediate outcome measures in COPD Study SPIROMICS). Acad Radiol 2015; 22: 186–194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.The definition of emphysema. Report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Division of Lung Diseases workshop. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985; 132: 182–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kononov S, Brewer K, Sakai H, Cavalcante FS, Sabayanagam CR, Ingenito EP, Suki B. Roles of mechanical forces and collagen failure in the development of elastase-induced emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 1920–1926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ito S, Ingenito EP, Brewer KK, Black LD, Parameswaran H, Lutchen KR, Suki B. Mechanics, nonlinearity, and failure strength of lung tissue in a mouse model of emphysema: possible role of collagen remodeling. J Appl Physiol 1985) 2005; 98: 503–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Suki B, Jesudason R, Sato S, Parameswaran H, Araujo AD, Majumdar A, Allen PG, Bartolak-Suki E. Mechanical failure, stress redistribution, elastase activity and binding site availability on elastin during the progression of emphysema. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2012; 25: 268–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bhatt SP, Bodduluri S, Hoffman EA, Newell JD Jr., Sieren JC, Dransfield MT, Reinhardt JM, Investigators CO. Computed Tomography Measure of Lung at Risk and Lung Function Decline in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 196: 569–576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bodduluri S, Bhatt SP, Hoffman EA, Newell JD Jr., Martinez CH, Dransfield MT, Han MK, Reinhardt JM, Investigators CO. Biomechanical CT metrics are associated with patient outcomes in COPD. Thorax 2017; 72: 409–414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Parr DG. Quantifying the Lung at Risk in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Does Emphysema Beget Emphysema? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 196: 535–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bhatt SP, Soler X, Wang X, Murray S, Anzueto AR, Beaty TH, Boriek AM, Casaburi R, Criner GJ, Diaz AA, Dransfield MT, Curran-Everett D, Galban CJ, Hoffman EA, Hogg JC, Kazerooni EA, Kim V, Kinney GL, Lagstein A, Lynch DA, Make BJ, Martinez FJ, Ramsdell JW, Reddy R, Ross BD, Rossiter HB, Steiner RM, Strand MJ, van Beek EJ, Wan ES, Washko GR, Wells JM, Wendt CH, Wise RA, Silverman EK, Crapo JD, Bowler RP, Han MK, Investigators CO. Association between Functional Small Airway Disease and FEV1 Decline in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 194: 178–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kirby M, Tanabe N, Tan WC, Zhou G, Obeidat M, Hague CJ, Leipsic J, Bourbeau J, Sin DD, Hogg JC, Coxson HO, Can CCRG, Canadian Respiratory Research N, CanCold Collaborative Research Group tCRRN. Total Airway Count on Computed Tomography and the Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Progression. Findings from a Population-based Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 197: 56–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vestbo J, Edwards LD, Scanlon PD, Yates JC, Agusti A, Bakke P, Calverley PM, Celli B, Coxson HO, Crim C, Lomas DA, MacNee W, Miller BE, Silverman EK, Tal-Singer R, Wouters E, Rennard SI, Investigators E. Changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second over time in COPD. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1184–1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Han MK, Kazerooni EA, Lynch DA, Liu LX, Murray S, Curtis JL, Criner GJ, Kim V, Bowler RP, Hanania NA, Anzueto AR, Make BJ, Hokanson JE, Crapo JD, Silverman EK, Martinez FJ, Washko GR, Investigators CO. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations in the COPDGene study: associated radiologic phenotypes. Radiology 2011; 261: 274–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.de Torres JP, Bastarrika G, Wisnivesky JP, Alcaide AB, Campo A, Seijo LM, Pueyo JC, Villanueva A, Lozano MD, Montes U, Montuenga L, Zulueta JJ. Assessing the relationship between lung cancer risk and emphysema detected on low-dose CT of the chest. Chest 2007; 132: 1932–1938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wilson DO, Weissfeld JL, Balkan A, Schragin JG, Fuhrman CR, Fisher SN, Wilson J, Leader JK, Siegfried JM, Shapiro SD, Sciurba FC. Association of radiographic emphysema and airflow obstruction with lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178: 738–744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Johannessen A, Skorge TD, Bottai M, Grydeland TB, Nilsen RM, Coxson H, Dirksen A, Omenaas E, Gulsvik A, Bakke P. Mortality by level of emphysema and airway wall thickness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 602–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Boueiz A, Chang Y, Cho MH, Washko GR, San Jose Estepar R, Bowler RP, Crapo JD, DeMeo DL, Dy JG, Silverman EK, Castaldi PJ, Investigators CO. Lobar Emphysema Distribution Is Associated With 5-Year Radiological Disease Progression. Chest 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.West JB, Dollery CT, Naimark A. Distribution of Blood Flow in Isolated Lung; Relation to Vascular and Alveolar Pressures. J Appl Physiol 1964; 19: 713–724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.West JB. Distribution of mechanical stress in the lung, a possible factor in localisation of pulmonary disease. Lancet 1971; 1: 839–841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.DeMeo DL, Hersh CP, Hoffman EA, Litonjua AA, Lazarus R, Sparrow D, Benditt JO, Criner G, Make B, Martinez FJ, Scanlon PD, Sciurba FC, Utz JP, Reilly JJ, Silverman EK. Genetic determinants of emphysema distribution in the national emphysema treatment trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 176: 42–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.