Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2019 Aug 21;87(9):e00457-19. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00457-19

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Encodes a VirB/VirD4 Type IV Secretion System That Modulates Apoptosis in Human Cells and Promotes Competition against Heterologous Bacteria, Including Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Megan Y Nas a, Richard C White a, Ashley L DuMont a, Alberto E Lopez a, Nicholas P Cianciotto a,
Editor: Manuela Raffatellub
PMCID: PMC6704607  PMID: 31235638

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging opportunistic and nosocomial pathogen. S. maltophilia is also a risk factor for lung exacerbations in cystic fibrosis patients. S. maltophilia attaches to various mammalian cells, and we recently documented that the bacterium encodes a type II secretion system which triggers detachment-induced apoptosis in lung epithelial cells.

KEYWORDS: Pseudomonas, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Xanthomonas, apoptosis, bacterial competition, epithelial cells, macrophages, type IV secretion

ABSTRACT

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging opportunistic and nosocomial pathogen. S. maltophilia is also a risk factor for lung exacerbations in cystic fibrosis patients. S. maltophilia attaches to various mammalian cells, and we recently documented that the bacterium encodes a type II secretion system which triggers detachment-induced apoptosis in lung epithelial cells. We have now confirmed that S. maltophilia also encodes a type IVA secretion system (VirB/VirD4 [VirB/D4] T4SS) that is highly conserved among S. maltophilia strains and, looking beyond the Stenotrophomonas genus, is most similar to the T4SS of Xanthomonas. To define the role(s) of this T4SS, we constructed a mutant of strain K279a that is devoid of secretion activity due to loss of the VirB10 component. The mutant induced a higher level of apoptosis upon infection of human lung epithelial cells, indicating that a T4SS effector(s) has antiapoptotic activity. However, when we infected human macrophages, the mutant triggered a lower level of apoptosis, implying that the T4SS also elaborates a proapoptotic factor(s). Moreover, when we cocultured K279a with strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the T4SS promoted the growth of S. maltophilia and reduced the numbers of heterologous bacteria, signaling that another effector(s) has antibacterial activity. In all cases, the effect of the T4SS required S. maltophilia contact with its target. Thus, S. maltophilia VirB/D4 T4SS appears to secrete multiple effectors capable of modulating death pathways. That a T4SS can have anti- and prokilling effects on different targets, including both human and bacterial cells, has, to our knowledge, not been seen before.

INTRODUCTION

Existing naturally in water, soil, and plants, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen within the hospital setting (13). Recent reports also document community-acquired S. maltophilia infections, including those in immunocompetent individuals (3, 4). Thus, the Gram-negative S. maltophilia is the best-studied member of the Stenotrophomonas genus, which currently has 17 species (5). Pneumonia and bloodstream infections are the most frequent form of S. maltophilia infection, with some of the risk factors for infection being mechanical ventilation, indwelling devices, exposure to broad-range antibiotics, and stays in the intensive-care unit (1, 3, 6, 7). The incidence of S. maltophilia is also rising in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients (1, 8, 9). Moreover, S. maltophilia infection is a documented risk factor for CF lung exacerbations, and S. maltophilia can be dominant in patients with severe disease (1, 2, 8, 1012). A key reason for the S. maltophilia problem is the inherent resistance of the bacterium to β-lactams, aminoglycosides, tetracycline, and fosfomycin and acquired resistance to fluoroquinolones, carbapenem, and colistin (3, 1316). We and others have shown that delivery of S. maltophilia into the lungs of mice results in bacterial outgrowth, tissue damage, and inflammation (1719). S. maltophilia is thought to be an extracellular pathogen binding to host cells, including lung and bronchial epithelia (2022). The organism also has other traits that are linked to virulence in a variety of bacteria, including biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and siderophore production (2327). We have shown that S. maltophilia encodes a type II protein secretion system (T2SS) which secretes, among other things, a protease that cleaves extracellular matrix and triggers apoptosis in epithelial cells (2830). Based on genome sequencing, S. maltophilia has type I, IV, V, and VI secretion systems in addition to T2SS (24, 3134).

Type IV secretion systems (T4SS) deliver DNA and/or proteins (effectors) into eukaryotic or bacterial targets (3537). The T4SS apparatus typically consists of 12 proteins (VirB1 to VirB11 and VirD4) that exist in four subcomplexes (36, 38, 39). The first subcomplex is the VirD4 ATPase that is a “coupling protein” (40) for the recruitment of substrates to an inner membrane complex made of VirB3, VirB6, VirB8, VirB4, and VirB11. After transfer across the inner membrane, substrates are translocated out via a periplasm-outer membrane-spanning subcomplex made of VirB7, VirB9, and VirB10. Finally, VirB2 and VirB5 form a “pilus” for contacting target membranes, with VirB1 promoting peptidoglycan degradation during apparatus assembly. The T4SS is important in a range of environmental bacteria, including species of Agrobacterium, Piscirickettsia, Sinorhizobium, Wolbachia, and Xanthomonas, promoting symbiotic or pathogenic relationships with plants, insects, and fish (35, 4143). In human and other mammal hosts, T4SS effectors are important for both extracellular pathogens such as Bordetella pertussis and Helicobacter pylori and intracellular pathogens, including species of Anaplasma, Bartonella, Brucella, Coxiella, Ehrlichia, Legionella, and Rickettsia (35, 36, 4458), and DNA release by T4SS is important for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (36, 59). A host process that is often targeted by T4SS is apoptosis. Indeed, the T4SS of Anaplasma, Bartonella, Brucella, Coxiella, Ehrlichia, Helicobacter, and Legionella all blunt apoptosis (6071), since maintaining host cell viability can be beneficial to pathogen persistence in intra- and/or extracellular spaces. T4SS also secrete proapoptotic effectors, as occurs for extracellular Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans; the induction of apoptosis helps a pathogen when directed toward cells that mediate host defense (7274). Nothing is known about the S. maltophilia T4SS, other than it being encoded by the genome (24, 3134, 75). Here, we document that the S. maltophilia T4SS promotes an antiapoptotic effect on lung epithelial cells but a proapoptotic effect on macrophages. Moreover, T4SS allows S. maltophilia to more effectively grow amid other bacteria, including Pseudomonas species that can coinfect the CF lung.

RESULTS

Strain K279a encodes a T4SS that is highly conserved among S. maltophilia strains.

Inspection of the genome of the S. maltophilia clinical isolate K279a (31) confirmed the presence of two T4SS loci in the bacterial chromosome (24, 32). The first set of genes (trb) was encoded by open reading frames (ORFs) RS06205 to RS06255 and the second set (virB-virD4) by RS14275 to RS14330. BLAST analysis of all available complete genomes of S. maltophilia strains revealed that the VirB/VirD4 (VirB/D4) T4SS genes are fully intact in 19/22 strains, being located in the same position within the chromosome (see Table S1A in the supplemental material). This indicates that the VirB/D4 T4SS is highly conserved within the S. maltophilia species, being prevalent in both clinical and environmental isolates. Upon further analysis of the three genomes lacking the VirB/D4 T4SS, we determined that strains ISMM3, AA1, and SJTL3 were likely misclassified as S. maltophilia, as their average nucleotide identities (ANI) to the completely sequenced S. maltophilia type strain (NCTC10257) were 90.97%, 87.94%, and 91.87%, respectively, which are well below the ANI cutoff of 94% for delineating Stenotrophomonas species (76). Thus, we report the intact VirB/D4 in all 19 completed S. maltophilia genomes. This finding updates an earlier analysis which had found these T4SS genes in 3/5 strains (24). The levels of amino acid identity shared among the different VirB/D4 T4SS proteins ranged from 100 to 92% for VirD4, VirB7, VirB9, VirB11, VirB3, and VirB4 to 28% for some of the VirB5 proteins (Table S1A). BLAST analysis revealed that the Trb T4SS is present in only 3/19 sequenced strains (Table S1B), indicating that this T4SS is not common within the S. maltophilia species. These data are compatible with earlier reports, which indicated the Trb genes are on a genomic island that is in <50% of S. maltophilia strains (24, 32). Given the high conservation of the VirB/D4 system, especially relative to the Trb system, we focused our efforts for the remainder of this study on the VirB/D4 system. The VirB1 to VirB11 proteins are encoded within a single operon, with the genes occurring in the order virB7, virB8, virB9, virB10, virB11, virB1, virB2, virB3, virB4, virB5, and virB6. The remaining T4SS gene, virD4, was monocistronic and mapped directly upstream of virB7 in the same transcriptional orientation. Based upon its components and the sequences of those constituents, this S. maltophilia T4SS was classified as a type IVA secretion system, which is exemplified by the VirB/D4 system of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (38, 77, 78). This stands in contrast to the type IVB secretion systems, which are typified by the Dot/Icm system of L. pneumophila (39). Further analysis of the database examined the presence of VirB/D4 T4SS in other species of Stenotrophomonas. We analyzed all currently sequenced type strain genomes for type strains representing 15/17 validated species and found that 9/15 had a complete or nearly complete T4SS (Fig. S1, blue clade). Six of the 9 clearly had a complete VirB/D4 T4SS, which was encoded by a single locus, as in strain K279a. Although two others, Stenotrophomonas ginsengisoli and Stenotrophomonas koreensis, appeared to lack a VirB5 homolog, they did possess a hypothetical protein encoded by a gene between virB4 and virB6 that had 21% and 23% identity to VirB5 of K279a. Due to the low sequence similarity, the E values for S. ginsengisoli and S. koreensis, 0.003E−5 and 4.31E−5, respectively, were below the cutoff for orthologs and were not included in the alignment for tree building (Fig. S1). For the 9th species, Stenotrophomonas pictorum, virD4, virB4, and virB6 were pseudogenized due to frameshift mutation, suggesting that its T4SS is not functional. Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila, Stenotrophomonas nitritireducens, Stenotrophomonas panacihumi, Stenotrophomonas rhizophila, and Stenotrophomonas terrae lacked all of the VirB/D4 T4SS proteins, whereas S. humi only had a homolog of VirB11, which had 34% identity to the K279a counterpart (E value of 2.6E−44). An earlier study comparing S. maltophilia and S. rhizophila had also reported a lack of T4SS in S. rhizophila (33). Looking beyond the genus, we determined that this S. maltophilia T4SS is most related in terms of amino acid similarity to one encoded by the chromosome of Xanthomonas spp. (41, 7981) (Fig. S1, blue and purple clades). We also confirmed that the arrangement of the VirB/D4 T4SS genes in S. maltophilia is identical to that in Xanthomonas (32). The Xanthomonas floridensis (82) T4SS was the one most related to that of S. maltophilia K279a, with its components having amino acid identities ranging from 89% for VirB11 to 31% for VirB5. After Xanthomonas, the genera in the order Xanthomonadales that had the T4SS next most related to that of S. maltophilia were Pseudoxanthomonas and Frateuria (Fig. S1). Bacteria that are in Xanthomonadales but did not encode a related T4SS are listed in Table S2.

Mutation of the VirB/D4 T4SS of S. maltophilia.

To begin to determine the roles of T4SS in S. maltophilia physiology and pathogenesis, we introduced an unmarked deletion into the virB10 gene (i.e., RS14310), using methods that we previously employed to construct a variety of strain K279a mutants (2730). We continued to use K279a as the parental strain for our mutational analyses, because it is representative of contemporary virulent strains of S. maltophilia (83, 84). Since VirB10 is part of the periplasm-outer membrane-spanning subcomplex that mediates ultimate secretion of substrates (36, 38, 39, 85), inactivation of virB10 abolishes T4SS function. The newly generated virB10 mutant (strain NUS15) survived normally in bacteriological media (Fig. S2A), indicating that the loss of the VirB/D4 T4SS does not result in a generalized growth defect in S. maltophilia. The T4SS mutant also had a typical colony morphology on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar (Fig. S2B). Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis determined that the virB-virD4 locus, though not required, is expressed when strain K279a is grown on or in LB media (data not shown).

S. maltophilia VirB/D4 T4SS inhibits apoptosis of human lung epithelial cells in a contact-dependent manner.

S. maltophilia strain K279a induces cell rounding and detachment and then death when it is added to monolayers of human A549 lung epithelial cells and other human and murine cell lines (28, 29). The A549 cell line is widely used for the study of lung pathogens, including S. maltophilia (8690). We previously linked the death of the A549 cells to an induction of apoptosis (i.e., caspase-3/7 activation) that is largely due to a protease released by the T2SS (2830). Such detachment-induced apoptosis is referred to as anoikis (30). Given this, coupled with the fact that T4SS in other bacteria often modulate apoptosis (6073, 91, 92), we infected A549 monolayers with the new virB10 mutant and monitored cell detachment and death. Infection with the VirB/D4 T4SS mutant first resulted in an increase in detachment (i.e., fewer remaining adherent A549 cells) relative to what occurred upon infection with parental, wild-type (WT) K279a (Fig. 1A). Subsequently, the mutant resulted in fewer viable A549 cells within the wells compared to the level in the wild type (Fig. 1B). Normal levels of detachment and death were restored when the mutant was complemented with plasmid-borne virB10 (Fig. 1A and B), confirming that the heightened death was due to the loss of VirB10 and, by extension, the VirB/D4 T4SS, as opposed to a second-site mutation(s). Compatible with this, RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that virB-virD4 locus genes are expressed when S. maltophilia is incubated with A549 cells (data not shown). Since the virB10 mutant did not exhibit altered growth/survival when incubated in the tissue culture medium (Fig. S2C), we surmised that the mutant phenotype was directly due to an altered interaction with the host cells. More specifically, we posited that the mutant had lost one or more secreted effectors that normally act to impede apoptosis. To test this hypothesis, we compared the wild type and the virB10 mutant for the ability to inhibit cell death caused by staurosporine, a well-known inducer of apoptosis (30). While exhibiting wild-type levels of association with the A549 cells (Fig. S3A), the virB10 mutant was still less able to inhibit staurosporine-induced cell death than its parent and the complemented mutant (Fig. 2A). Wild-type levels of induced host cell death were seen when the mutant infected the staurosporine-treated cells in the presence of a pan-caspase inhibitor (30) (Fig. 2A), further supporting the idea that the S. maltophilia T4SS inhibits apoptosis. Incidentally, the ability of S. maltophilia to inhibit staurosporine-induced cell death was similarly observed when we infected the A549 cells with other clinical isolates (Fig. 2B), indicating that we were not studying a peculiarity of K279a. Compared to infections with the wild type or the complemented mutant, infections with the virB10 mutant resulted in increased levels of caspase-3/7 activation, as measured by the CellEvent caspase-3/7 green detection reagent (Fig. 3A), further suggesting that the VirB/D4 T4SS normally inhibits S. maltophilia-induced caspase-dependent death. Confirmation of this result was obtained by Western blot analysis, which detected more of the two caspase-7 cleavage products that trigger cell death in the mutant-infected cells than in the wild-type-infected cells (Fig. 3B) (93). When we inactivated the T2SS in the virB10 mutant by mutating its xpsF gene and then infected the A549 cells, the virB10 xpsF mutant (i.e., strain NUS16) induced a lower level of death than the virB10 mutant (Fig. 1C), indicating that the antiapoptotic effect of the T4SS effector(s) acts in opposition to the proapoptotic effect caused by T2SS-dependent proteases (30). This is reminiscent of some other pathogens that deliver both pro- and antiapoptotic factors to a host cell target, presumably creating a situation that is most conducive to their survival (66, 67, 91, 92). Importantly, the ability of the S. maltophilia T4SS to inhibit the apoptotic pathway was also seen when we infected primary human bronchial/tracheal epithelial cells (Fig. 3C), showing that the effect was not an oddity of using A549 cells. Except for the secretion of pertussis toxin, the delivery of T4SS effectors typically requires contact between the T4SS apparatus and the target cell membrane (35, 85). Thus, we inoculated the S. maltophilia strains and A549 cells on opposite sides of a transwell apparatus, such that the bacteria were prevented by a membrane filter from contacting the host cells. As a result, the elevated level of cell death activation that had been seen for the virB10 mutant was lost (Fig. 4A). A similar result was obtained when we blocked contact between the bacteria and primary epithelial cells (Fig. 4B). These results documented that the antiapoptosis effect of T4SS is not due to a soluble factor that is secreted into the culture medium but requires contact between S. maltophilia and the host cell. We posit that, following S. maltophilia attachment to the epithelial surface by a mechanism that is yet to be determined, the T4SS apparatus penetrates the plasma membrane and delivers effectors into the epithelial cell cytoplasm, with one or more of those effectors inhibiting apoptosis.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Adherence and viability of A549 lung epithelial cells following infection with S. maltophilia wild-type, virB10 mutant, and virB10 xpsF mutant strains. (A and B) A549 cell monolayers were either uninfected (UI) or infected with parental strain K279a (WT), virB10 mutant NUS15 (virB10), or complemented mutant NUS15(pvirB10) (virB10/virB10+). At 8 h postinoculation, the amounts of adherent host cells were enumerated (A), and at 24 h postinoculation, the total numbers of viable A549 cells (both attached and detached) were determined (B). (C) A549 cells were uninfected or infected with either the virB10 xpsF double mutant NUS16 (virB10 xpsF) or one of the three other strains indicated in panels A and B, and at 24 h postinoculation, the numbers of viable host cells (both attached and detached) were determined. For panels A to C, the raw data appear in the left panels, and data normalized to the value for uninfected cells are in the right panels. Asterisks indicate significant differences in adherence or viability (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01). Data are presented as the means and standard deviations of results from three independent experiments (n = 3 each).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Effect of S. maltophilia wild-type and virB10 mutant strains on A549 cell monolayers that had been treated with apoptosis-inducing staurosporine. (A) A549 cells were either uninfected (UI) or infected with parental strain K279a (WT), virB10 mutant NUS15 (virB10), or complemented mutant NUS15(pvirB10) (virB10/virB10+), and at 6 h postinoculation, the amounts of viable host cells were enumerated. As indicated, one set of cells that had been infected with the virB10 mutant was also treated with the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK. UI cells and UI cells treated with the lysing agent Triton X-100 provided controls for cell death induced by staurosporine alone. (B) Staurosporine-treated A549 cells were infected with WT strains K279a, UPSm1, UPSm2, UPSm3, and UPSm5, and then the numbers of viable host cells were determined, as indicated for panel A. In panels A and B, raw data appear in the left panels, and data are normalized to the value for UI cells in the right panels. Asterisks indicate significant differences in death following infection with the strains or treatments (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01). Data are presented as the means and standard deviations of results from three independent experiments (n = 3 each).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Caspase-3/7 activation in A549 cells and primary lung epithelia following infection with S. maltophilia wild-type and virB10 mutant strains. Host cell monolayers were uninfected (UI) or infected with either parental strain K279a (WT), virB10 mutant NUS15 (virB10), or complemented mutant NUS15(pvirB10) (virB10/virB10+) for 24 h. (A and C) The levels of caspase-3/7 cleavage in A549 cells (A) and human bronchial/tracheal epithelial cells (ATCC PCS-300-010) (C) were determined by CellEvent caspase-3/7 green detection reagent that fluoresces upon binding the active caspase cleavage products. The raw data appear in the left panels, and data are normalized to the value for WT cells in the right panels. Asterisks indicate significant differences in the activation induced by the strains (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001). Data are presented as the means and standard deviations of results from three independent experiments (n = 3 each). (B) Cell lysates were collected and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and then immunoblotted using an anti-caspase-7 antibody. (Left) Immunoblot from a representative experiment, with the migration of molecular mass standards (in kDa) indicated to the left of the gel image and the migration of caspase-7 and its active 20- and 10-kDa cleaved products to the right of the gel image. Immunoblot analysis using anti-GAPDH antibodies was performed to confirm equal loading. (Right) Graph showing the levels of the active cleaved products relative to GAPDH pooled from three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences between strains (**, P < 0.01). Whereas the 20-kDa species was seen in all trials, the 10-kDa cleaved product was only visible in two of three immunoblots.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Effect of bacterial and host cell contact on the ability of VirB/D4 T4SS to inhibit caspase-3/7 activation in S. maltophilia-infected epithelial cells. Following the addition of A549 cells (A) or primary lung epithelial cells (B) into the lower chamber of a transwell apparatus, parental strain K279a (WT), virB10 mutant NUS15 (virB10), or complemented mutant NUS15(pvirB10) (virB10/virB10+) was added to the upper chamber of the transwell apparatus. A filter within the apparatus prevented contact between the bacterial inoculum and the host cells. At 24 h postinoculation, the levels of caspase-3/7 cleavage were determined by CellEvent caspase-3/7 green detection reagent. Uninfected (UI) A549 cells added to the lower chamber but not exposed to any bacteria served as a negative control. Asterisks indicate significant differences in the activation induced by the strains compared to that in UI cells (**, P < 0.01). As in Fig. 3, the data are normalized to the value for cells infected with the WT, which was set at 100% activation. Data are presented as the means and standard deviations of results from three independent experiments (n = 3 each).

S. maltophilia VirB/D4 T4SS triggers apoptosis of human macrophages in a contact-dependent manner.

When we extended our analysis to include infection of U937 cells, a human macrophage line that is widely used for infection studies (74, 9496), the virB10 mutant attached to the host cells at a wild-type level (Fig. S3B) but resulted in less cell death (i.e., more viable host cells) than did the wild-type strain (Fig. 5A). The mutant phenotype was also evident when we assayed for caspase-3/7 activation (Fig. 5B and C). The complemented mutant showed wild-type levels of U937 cell death and caspase activation (Fig. 5A to C), confirming that the reductions in macrophage death and caspase activation were due to the loss of VirB10 and its T4SS. Incidentally, other isolates of S. maltophilia showed a level of macrophage killing that was comparable to that of strain K279a (Fig. S4). When contact with the U937 cells was blocked, the parental K279a, virB10 mutant, and complemented mutant behaved alike (Fig. 5D). The ability of T4SS to promote host cell death in a contact-dependent manner was also apparent when the infections used primary macrophages derived from the bone marrow (BMDM) of A/J mice (Fig. S5). Not surprisingly, the death induced by wild-type strain K279a was more apparent with the primary cells than the cell line. Together, these data indicate that the S. maltophilia VirB/D4 T4SS imparts a contact-dependent, proapoptotic effect on macrophages. Presumably, upon S. maltophilia contact, the T4SS apparatus pierces the macrophage membrane and dispenses an effector(s) that then promotes death of the phagocyte.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Viability and caspase-3/7 activation in U937 cells following infection with S. maltophilia wild-type and virB10 mutant strains. (A) Macrophage monolayers were left uninfected (UI) or infected with either parental strain K279a (WT), virB10 mutant NUS15 (virB10), or complemented mutant NUS15(pvirB10) (virB10/virB10+), and at 24 h postinoculation, the amount of viable host cells was enumerated. The raw data appear in the left panel, and data normalized to the value for uninfected cells are in the right panel. (B) Cell lysates were collected and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and then immunoblotted using an anti-caspase-7 antibody. The left panel depicts the immunoblot from a representative experiment, with the migration of molecular mass standards (in kDa) indicated to the left of the gel image and the migration of caspase-7 and its active 20- and 10-kDa cleaved products to the right of the gel image. Immunoblot analysis using anti-GAPDH antibodies was performed to confirm equal loading. The graph in the right panel shows the levels of the active cleaved products relative to levels for GAPDH pooled from three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences between strains (*, P < 0.05). (C) U937 macrophages were infected with the strains indicated in panel A, and at 24 h postinoculation, levels of caspase-3/7 cleavage were determined by CellEvent caspase-3/7 green detection reagent. UI cells were included as a negative control. The data are normalized to the value for cells infected with the WT, which was set at 100% activation. (D) After the addition of U937 cells into the lower chamber of a transwell apparatus, the bacterial strains indicated in panel C were added to the upper chamber of the transwell apparatus with a filter preventing contact between the bacteria and the host cells, and at 24 h postinoculation, the levels of caspase-3/7 cleavage were determined and presented as described for panel C. In panels A, C, and D, asterisks indicate significant differences between the strains and/or relative to the UI control (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001), and data are presented as the means and standard deviations of results from three independent experiments (n = 3 each).

VirB/D4 T4SS enhances S. maltophilia growth in the presence of other bacteria.

As noted above, the S. maltophilia T4SS apparatus is most akin to that of Xanthomonas species, bacteria that infect plants (97). In Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri , T4SS does not target plants but kills other bacteria in a contact-dependent manner (81, 98). Compared to the attention given to the bactericidal effects of type VI secretion (99, 100), our appreciation for the role of T4SS and related systems in bacterial competition is limited to that X. axonopodis pv. citri paper and a recent Bartonella report (101). Thus, to judge the role of the S. maltophilia T4SS in interbacterial relationships, we performed the same assay used in the X. axonopodis pv. citri study as well as in many studies on type VI-mediated killing (98, 102, 103). More specifically, we spotted onto LB agar an aliquot of Escherichia coli DH5α together with wild-type S. maltophilia K279a, its virB10 mutant, or the complemented mutant using a starting S. maltophilia/E. coli ratio of ∼200, 150, 100, or 50 and then monitored changes in the S. maltophilia/E. coli ratio at 24 h. Whereas parental K279a either outcompeted E. coli or maintained its standing against E. coli with all starting ratios except 50, the virB10 mutant consistently showed a clear reduction in relative CFU (Fig. 6A), suggesting that the VirB/D4 T4SS helps S. maltophilia grow in the presence of other bacteria. This type of result was not seen when we cultured the S. maltophilia strains with Klebsiella pneumoniae strain KPPR1 (104) (Fig. 6B), signifying that there is some specificity to the effect of the VirB/D4 T4SS. Since a role for the T4SS in interbacterial competition may be important in infected lungs, especially the CF lung, where multiple genera usually coexist (105107), we coincubated our S. maltophilia strains with a P. aeruginosa strain. Wild-type K279a outcompeted P. aeruginosa strain 7700 (108, 109) at all starting ratios, including 50, and even more importantly, the virB10 mutant defect was much more dramatic than it had been with the E. coli cocultures (Fig. 6C), confirming that it was not an artifact of using E. coli as the competing organism. In this experiment as well as in the one using E. coli, the complemented virB10 mutant behaved like the wild type (Fig. 6A and C), indicating that the mutant defect was due to the loss of VirB10 and the T4SS. In considering changes in the CFU of each strain, it was clear that the S. maltophilia strains increased in number and to similar extents during the 24 h of incubation with P. aeruginosa (Fig. S6). The P. aeruginosa strain also increased its numbers during the cocultures; however, it increased significantly less in the presence of wild-type K279a than in the presence of the virB10 mutant (Fig. S6). This suggested that the VirB/D4 T4SS was promoting S. maltophilia growth in the coculture by impeding the growth and/or survival of the competing P. aeruginosa strain. A similar conclusion was made when considering the changes in the CFU of each bacterial strain included in the S. maltophilia-E. coli coculture experiment (data not shown). Overall, these data indicated that the VirB/D4 T4SS secretes factors that are antagonistic to heterologous bacteria, including P. aeruginosa strains that share ecological niches with S. maltophilia.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Survival of S. maltophilia wild-type and virB10 mutant strains when cocultured with heterologous bacteria. S. maltophilia (Sm) K279a (WT), virB10 mutant NUS15 (virB10), or complemented mutant NUS15(pvirB10) (virB10/virB10+) was mixed with E. coli strain DH5α (Ec) (A), K. pneumoniae strain KPPR1 (Kp) (B), or P. aeruginosa strain 7700 (Pa) (C) at ratios of ∼200:1, 150:1, 100:1, and 50:1, spotted onto LB agar. After 24 h of incubation, the numbers of each strain were determined by plating serial dilutions of the bacterial growth area on selective media. Results are presented as the ratios of S. maltophilia CFU to the CFU of other species at t = 0 and t =24 h. The dagger symbols indicate when the ending ratio was <5. Asterisks denote significant differences in the ratio at t = 0 h compared to the ratio at t = 24 h (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01). Data are presented as the means and standard deviations of results from three independent experiments (n = 3 each).

S. maltophilia VirB/D4 T4SS promotes the death of multiple P. aeruginosa strains in a contact-dependent manner.

In order to pursue the basis for the antibacterial role of the VirB/D4 system, we used P. aeruginosa as the competing organism rather than E. coli DH5α because of the greater clinical and ecological implications associated with it. We next performed a coculture using a transwell apparatus such that the S. maltophilia strains and P. aeruginosa strain 7700 could be physically separated from each other depending upon the pore size of the membrane filter within the transwell apparatus. When bacterial mixing and contact were not blocked, the wild type and the complemented virB10 mutant were, once again, more adept at competing against P. aeruginosa than was the virB10 mutant, indicating that the antibacterial effect of the VirB/D4 T4SS can occur when the bacteria are in a liquid phase as well as on a solid surface, as shown in Fig. 6. This finding was evident whether we monitored the changes in the ratio of S. maltophilia to P. aeruginosa (Fig. S7A, left) or the changes in the numbers of P. aeruginosa (Fig. S7B, left). In contrast, when the pore size of the membrane filter within the transwell apparatus precluded bacterial mixing and contact, wild-type K279a, the virB10 mutant, and the complemented mutant limited P. aeruginosa growth/survival to similar extents (Fig. S7A and B, right). Overall, these data demonstrated that the antibacterial effect of the VirB/D4 T4SS is contact dependent. Upon mixing wild-type K279a or the complemented virB10 mutant with strain 7700 for only 2 h, rather than the 24 h used in the earlier cocultures, we observed, for the first time, a reduction in the CFU of the P. aeruginosa strain (Fig. 7A, left). In contrast, when the virB10 mutant was combined with strain 7700, this reduction did not occur. These data indicated that the VirB/D4 system of strain K279a is capable of promoting the death of a P. aeruginosa strain. Indeed, many studies examining the bactericidal effects of type VI secretion systems utilized reductions in CFU during a 2-h incubation as evidence of interbacterial killing (110). Wild-type K279a and the complemented virB10 mutant, but not the virB10 mutant, were also able to reduce the numbers of P. aeruginosa strains PAO1 (Fig. 7B, left) and PAK (Fig. 7C, left), indicating that the anti-P. aeruginosa effect was not a peculiarity of using P. aeruginosa 7700. Moreover, these results documented that the VirB/D4 T4SS of strain K279a could lead to the death of both clinical (PAO1 and PAK) and environmental (7700) isolates of P. aeruginosa. During these short cocultures, the three S. maltophilia strains did not show an increase in CFU, except for a slight increase when incubated with strain 7700 (Fig. 7, right). Incidentally, four other isolates of S. maltophilia, but not a strain of Achromobacter xylosoxidans, could also reduce the CFU of P. aeruginosa (Fig. S8). Strain K279a and the complemented virB10 mutant, but not the virB10 mutant, were also able to reduce the P. mendocina CFU (Fig. 8A) but not the CFU of P. fluorescens, P. putida, or P. stutzeri (Fig. 8B and D). In the cocultures with other Pseudomonas species, the S. maltophilia strains did not increase in number of CFU or differ in survival (data not shown). These data showed that the bactericidal effect of the VirB/D4 T4SS extended to multiple but not all species of Pseudomonas. Based on this data set, we posit that the S. maltophilia VirB/D4 T4SS secretes an effector(s) that leads to the death of other bacteria, such as P. aeruginosa and other Pseudomonas species.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Bactericidal effect of S. maltophilia wild-type and virB10 mutant strains on various strains of P. aeruginosa. S. maltophilia K279a (WT), virB10 mutant NUS15 (virB10), or complemented mutant NUS15(pvirB10) (virB10/virB10+) was mixed with P. aeruginosa strain 7700 (A), PAO1 (B), and PAK (C) at a ratio of ∼100:1 and spotted onto LB agar, and after 2 h of incubation, the numbers of each strain were determined by plating dilutions of the entire bacterial growth area on selective media. The results presented are the CFU at t = 0 h and t = 2 h for each time that the P. aeruginosa strain had been coincubated with the S. maltophilia WT, mutant, or complemented mutant strain (A to C, left) as well as the CFU at t = 0 h and t = 24 h for the three S. maltophilia strains under each growth condition (A to C, right). Asterisks indicate significant differences in CFU obtained at t = 0 versus t = 2 h (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01). Data are presented as the means and standard deviations of results from three independent experiments (n = 3 each).

FIG 8.

FIG 8

Bactericidal effect of S. maltophilia wild-type and virB10 mutant strains on various species of Pseudomonas. S. maltophilia K279a (WT), virB10 mutant NUS15 (virB10), or complemented mutant NUS15(pvirB10) (virB10/virB10+) was mixed with P. mendocina (A), P. fluorescens (B), P. putida (C), and P. stutzeri (D) at a ratio of ∼100:1 and spotted onto LB agar, and after 2 h of incubation, the numbers of each strain were determined by plating on selective media. The results presented are the CFU at t = 0 h and t = 2 h for each of the P. aeruginosa strains that had been coincubated with the WT, mutant, and complemented mutant S. maltophilia (left) as well as the CFU for the S. maltophilia strains (right). Asterisks indicate significant differences in CFU obtained at t = 0 versus t = 2 h (*, P < 0.05). Data are presented as the means and standard deviations of results from three independent experiments (n = 3 each).

DISCUSSION

The current study represents the first genetic and functional analysis of S. maltophilia T4SS. After documenting that the VirB/D4 T4SS exemplified in strain K279a is well conserved among both clinical and environmental isolates of S. maltophilia, we determined that the T4SS (i) inhibits apoptosis in infected human epithelial cells, (ii) promotes apoptosis in infected mammalian macrophages, (iii) enhances the growth of S. maltophilia when it is cocultured with various genera of heterologous bacteria, and (iv) promotes the death of multiple strains of P. aeruginosa and at least one strain of P. mendocina. In all cases, the impact of the T4SS required S. maltophilia contact with its target, suggesting that the VirB/D4 apparatus is able to interact with a range of different membranes/receptors. We infer that the S. maltophilia VirB/D4 T4SS secretes multiple protein effectors that are injected into target cells. The finding that a single T4SS can have anti- and prokilling effects on disparate targets, including both human and bacterial cells, has, to our knowledge, not been reported before. We suspect that different secreted proteins are responsible for the different effects seen; e.g., in one possible scenario, one effector is antiapoptotic in epithelial cells, another is proapoptotic in macrophages, and yet another effector(s) is antagonistic toward heterologous bacteria. We intuit that the antiapoptotic effect of the T4SS on epithelial cells promotes S. maltophilia growth, perhaps by allowing prolonged bacterial attachment to an epithelial cell layer and/or nutrient assimilation from viable host cells. Given that macrophages are a key phagocytic cell of the innate immune system, we surmise that the proapoptotic effect we have observed helps S. maltophilia to resist being engulfed and killed and/or recognized by the immune system. Finally, it is probable that the anti-Pseudomonas effect of the VirB/D4 T4SS helps S. maltophilia to survive in a variety of niches, including perhaps the human host and the CF lung, which can be infected with P. mendocina in addition to the well-known P. aeruginosa (111, 112). Based upon the range of target cells utilized in this study, we strongly suspect that the S. maltophilia T4SS can modulate the death program of a wide range of cellular targets, including killing other mammalian cells that are part of the immune system (e.g., neutrophils) or other bacteria that inhabit its niches, whether planktonic in nature or coinfecting plant, animal, or human hosts. In regard to the proapoptotic effect that the K279a VirB/D4 T4SS has on macrophages, it is tempting to speculate that this function evolved as a result of S. maltophilia interacting with predatory protozoans (amoebae) in nature (113117). Despite demonstrating the importance of the S. maltophilia T4SS in influencing the death of other cells, we do not believe that this is the only function of this VirB/D4 T4SS, given what is known about T4SS in general (3537).

It is highly likely that the virB10 mutant phenotypes that we observed are due to the loss of T4SS effectors. A number of software programs have been designed for predicting the output of a T4SS (118124). These bioinformatic tools tag candidates based on a number of traits, including C-terminal features and the presence of eukaryotic-like domains. Thus, a recent bioinformatic study encompassing a very wide variety of organisms and their secretion systems suggested that S. maltophilia K279a encodes more than 25 putative T4SS effectors (125). Such a sized output is entirely compatible with the output of known T4SSs, which ranges from 1 (B. pertussis and H. pylori) to ∼7 to 25 (Bartonella, Brucella, Anaplasma, and Ehrlichia) to >140 (Coxiella and Legionella) (35, 45, 46, 49, 126). Moreover, it could account for the multiple effects of the VirB/D4 system that we have defined in our study as well as other potential functions. In contemplating the types of S. maltophilia effectors that might modulate death in mammalian cells and how they operate, it is helpful to consider the range of mechanisms that have already been defined in other T4SS-encoding pathogens. For example, in C. burnettii, the effector CaeB inhibits apoptosis at the level of mitochondria, whereas effector AnkG modulates p32 (63, 127). In L. pneumophila, some Dot/Icm effectors target proapoptotic members of the Bcl2 family within macrophages (69). In thinking about the bactericidal effects of the newly described S. maltophilia T4SS, it is instructive to reflect on the recently discovered antibacterial effect of the X. axonopodis pv. citri T4SS (98). In this case, the effector X-TfeXAC2609 is a peptidoglycan hydrolase that can promote the killing of both E. coli DH5α and a strain of Chromobacterium violaceum. Importantly, we used the same assay as that in this earlier study in order to measure the antibacterial effect of the S. maltophilia VirB/D4 T4SS on E. coli DH5α and P. aeruginosa 7700 (Fig. 6), and the magnitude of the effect that we observed was comparable to that found in the X. axonopodis pv. citri study. Interestingly, proteins with domains similar to those in protein X-TfeXAC2609 are encoded by the genomes of some S. maltophilia strains and other Xanthomonadaceae species (98). Finally, it is possible that the antibacterial effector(s) of the S. maltophilia VirB/D4 T4SS is (also) functionally similar to antibacterial proteins that are secreted by various type VI secretion systems, e.g., lipases, peptidases, and nucleases, in addition to muramidases (128).

Based upon our analysis of completed genomes, the VirB/D4 T4SS that exists in K279a and most, if not all, strains of S. maltophilia is also present in eight other species of Stenotrophomonas, i.e., S. chelatiphaga, S. daejeonensis, S. ginsengisoli, S. indicatrix, S. koreensis, S. lactitubi, S. pavanii, and S. pictorum (5, 129134). Thus, the impact of this VirB/D4 system is undoubtedly quite broad. That this Stenotrophomonas T4SS was most related to a T4SS in Xanthomonas is not surprising given that S. maltophilia was, until 1993, classified as a Xanthomonas species (135). Given the positions of the various genera encoding a T4SS in the phylogenetic tree that we generated using orthologous Vir T4SS proteins and the complete lack of T4SS in other closely related species, we posit that the VirB/D4 system typified in S. maltophilia strain K279a has been acquired horizontally after the divergence of the families Xanthomonadaceae and Rhodanobacteraceae. The fact that the %GC for the VirB/D4 locus is 61.5 whereas the overall %GC for S. maltophilia is 66.1 further suggests that the VirB/D4 system of S. maltophilia was acquired horizontally. Our genomic analysis also confirmed that some strains of S. maltophilia, including strain K279a, have two T4SS, i.e., Trb T4SS in addition to the VirB/D4 system (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) (24, 32). The function of the Trb T4SS in S. maltophilia is unknown, although it has been suggested that this T4SS has some similarities to one in a strain of P. aeruginosa (32). Based upon its genetic makeup (24, 32), the Trb T4SS, more so than the VirB/D4 system, may mediate conjugal transfer of plasmids between S. maltophilia strains.

In summary, our finding that the T4SS has a role in the interplay between S. maltophilia and mammalian hosts as well as against other bacteria that inhabit the human host is a novel development in our understanding of S. maltophilia. Although many advances have been made concerning antibiotic resistance in S. maltophilia, relatively few studies have defined aspects of S. maltophilia pathogenesis. Thus, the further study of S. maltophilia T4SS is significant when one considers the present state of the field. This effort will also have implications for the hundreds of uncharacterized T4SS that have been detected in the genomes of other bacteria (36, 136).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, media, and extracellular growth.

S. maltophilia K279a (American Type Culture Collection [ATCC] strain BAA-2423) served as both our main wild-type strain and the parent for mutants (17, 28, 29, 31). S. maltophilia isolates UPSm1, UPSm2, UPSm3, and UPSm5 were also examined (28). Other strains used in the bacterial competition assays were E. coli DH5α (Life Technologies); K. pneumoniae KPPR1, P. aeruginosa ATCC 7700, PAO1, and PAK, P. fluorescens ATCC 1759, P. putida ATCC 49128, P. mendocina, and P. stutzeri (obtained from Alan Hauser, Northwestern University); and A. xylosoxidans strain UPAx4 (28). E. coli DH5α was also used as the host for recombinant plasmids. All strains were cultured routinely at 37°C on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar or broth (Becton, Dickinson) (29). Bacterial growth in LB broth cultures was monitored by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of the cultures (30). Bacterial survival in RPMI media (Corning) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Atlanta Biologicals) was assessed by plating samples onto LB agar to enumerate CFU.

DNA, RNA, and protein analysis.

S. maltophilia K279a DNA and RNA were isolated as before (28, 29). DNA sequences were analyzed and primers were designed using Lasergene software (DNAStar). Primers (Integrated DNA Technology) are listed in Table S3 in the supplemental material. RT-PCR analysis was done as before (28), with the primers targeting virD4 (MN30 and MN31) and virB6 (MN32 and MN33) designed using the Primer-BLAST tool at NCBI. BLAST was done using the genome sequences in the GenBank database at NCBI. Pairwise ANI was calculated for selected genomes using OrthoANIu (137). A reciprocal best BLAST strategy was used to identify orthologs of the S. maltophilia K279a VirB/D4 T4SS within each of the analyzed genomes (138, 139). An E value cutoff of 1E−5 was used to filter highly divergent sequences out of subsequent analyses. The amino acid sequences of the orthologous proteins were concatenated, and an alignment was generated using MUSCLE (140). A maximum-likelihood tree was constructed with RaxML using the LG + gamma evolutionary model (141).

Mutant constructions and complementation analysis.

We introduced an unmarked deletion into virB10 of K279a, using previous methods (2730). The entire virB10 (SMLT_RS14310) coding region was deleted using a recombineering approach and FLP excision. The virB10 gene, including 600 bp of flanking DNA on both sides, was PCR amplified from K279a genomic DNA using primers AD116 and AD117 and then ligated into pGEM-T Easy (Promega), creating the plasmid pGvirB10. Primers AD118 and AD119 were used to PCR amplify an FLP recombination target (FRT)-flanked chloramphenicol cassette. Two micrograms of pGvirB10 DNA and 700 ng of the FRT-flanked cassette next were transformed into E. coli DY330 (142), and bacteria containing pGEMΔvirB10::frt-cat-frt were selected on chloramphenicol-containing agar. After PCR confirmation of the recombination event using M13 universal primers, mutated virB10 was PCR amplified using pGEMΔvirB10::frt-cat-frt as the template and primers AD120 and AD121. This PCR product was digested using BamHI and HindIII and ligated into pEX18Tc (28), yielding pEXΔvirB10::frt-cat-frt. This plasmid was transferred into E. coli S17-1 and mobilized from there into S. maltophilia K279a by conjugation (28). Tetracycline-, chloramphenicol-, and norfloxacin-resistant conjugants were streaked onto LB agar supplemented with 10% (wt/vol) sucrose and chloramphenicol to induce and select for loss of the pEX18Tc vector. FLP-mediated excision of the chloramphenicol cassette was achieved by electroporating pBSFlp (143) into the virB10 mutant and selecting transformants on LB agar containing gentamicin and 1 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside, incubated overnight at 37°C, and then incubated for 24 h at room temperature. Smaller colonies appeared after this second incubation, and these were patched onto LB containing either chloramphenicol, gentamicin, or no selection drug. Those that were either gentamicin or chloramphenicol sensitive were streaked onto sucrose-containing LB agar at 37°C overnight, and desired gene deletions were confirmed by PCR using the primers AD122 and AD123. The newly made virB10 mutant was designated NUS15. For trans-complementation of the virB10 mutant, a 2.2-kb PCR fragment containing the virB10 coding region and its promoter was PCR amplified from K279a DNA using primers MN13 and MN14. These fragments were digested by KpnI and XbaI and cloned into pBBR1MCS (30, 144), yielding pBvirB10, which was electroporated into the mutant. Transformants were selected on LB agar containing chloramphenicol, and clones were confirmed as carrying pBvirB10 by PCR using M13 primers. A mutant lacking both virB10 and xpsF was constructed by mobilizing pEXΔvirB10::frt-xpsF-frt carried by the E. coli S17-1 strain into mutant NUS15 containing the virB10 deletion. Transconjugants were selected as described above, and mutation of xpsF was confirmed by PCR using the primers SK213 and SK214. The virB10 xpsF mutant was designated NUS16.

Assays for host cell detachment, viability, and apoptosis.

The human A549 cell line (ATCC CCL-185) and U937 cell line (ATCC CRL-1593.2) were maintained by passage in RPMI medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (29, 145). Primary human bronchial/tracheal epithelial cells were obtained from the ATCC (PCS-300-010) and maintained according to their guidelines. BMDM from A/J mice (Jackson Laboratory) were cultured as before (145). Epithelial and macrophage cells were infected with S. maltophilia essentially as before (28). Monolayers of 5 × 105 A549 or PCS-300-010 cells or 1 × 106 U937 cells or BMDM were established in the wells of a 24-well tissue culture plate, and bacteria that had been grown overnight on LB agar and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were added at a multiplicity of infection of 50. The numbers of viable cells in infected wells, whether only those that are adherent or the combination of adherent and detached cells, were determined as before (28), except that cells were quantitated using a Scepter 2.0 cell counter (Millipore-Sigma) (146, 147). The ability of S. maltophilia to inhibit staurosporine-induced apoptosis was measured by first pretreating monolayers with 5 μM staurosporine (Santa Cruz Biotech) in the absence or presence of 200 μM caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (R&D Systems). Cells were then infected with S. maltophilia, and viability was measured using the Scepter cell counter. The ability of S. maltophilia to activate caspase-3/7 was measured as previously described (30). Mammalian cells were preloaded with 5 μM CellEvent caspase-3/7 green detection regent (Thermo Fisher) and infected with S. maltophilia or not infected but given 2 μM staurosporine. Caspase activation was revealed by measuring fluorescence at 503 nm and 530 nm. Western blot analysis was done to probe for the loss of intact caspase-7 and the appearance of its two cleavage products, as has been done by others (148, 149). Membranes were blocked for 1 h in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween (TBST) and 5% milk. Proteins were exposed to anti-caspase-7 (1:1,000; Cell Signaling) and anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (1:1,000; Santa Cruz) diluted in TBST with 5% milk and incubated at 4°C overnight. The secondary antibody, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (Santa Cruz), was diluted 1:10,000 in TBST plus milk and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Blots were developed by adding the enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (GE Healthcare). To judge the effect of bacterium-to-host cell contact on these phenomena, epithelial cells and macrophages were added to the bottom of a 24-well plate, and bacteria were added to a transwell insert (Corning) that was placed into the well. One set of transwells contained an 8-μm filter such that bacterial mixing and contact could occur, and the other set had a 0.4-μm filter such that mixing and contact was impeded (150, 151).

Assays for bacterial competition and killing.

Interbacterial competition was assessed using previously described methods (98, 102, 103, 110). Single colonies for each strain to be tested were resuspended in LB broth, and the bacteria were grown at 37°C to mid-log phase. Using fresh LB medium, each bacterial suspension was then diluted to an OD600 of 0.3, providing approximately equivalent CFU/ml. Aliquots of the cell suspensions were then combined so as to yield ratios of S. maltophilia to the heterologous bacterium approximating 200:1, 150:1, 100:1, and 50:1. Fifty microliters of the mixture was spotted on LB agar plates and incubated at 37°C either for 2 h in order to measure bactericidal effects (110) or for 24 h in order to gauge effects on bacterial growth (98, 102, 103). After incubation, the area of bacterial growth was removed and resuspended into 1 ml of PBS. The resultant cell suspensions were serially diluted and plated onto both standard LB agar and LB agar containing norfloxacin. The colonies formed on the antibiotic-containing plates represented the numbers of S. maltophilia in the cell mixture (29), whereas the colonies on the standard plates reflected the total cell population. Thus, the numbers of heterologous bacteria surviving in the coculture were determined by calculating the difference in CFU on the two plates. To measure the effect of cell-to-cell contact on interbacterial competition, P. aeruginosa was suspended in LB broth to 107 CFU/ml and 1 ml added to the bottom of a 24-well plate. S. maltophilia strains also resuspended in LB broth were added to the transwell insert such that an S. maltophilia/P. aeruginosa ratio of 100:1 was achieved. One set of inoculated transwells contained an 8-μm filter such that bacterial mixing and contact could occur, and the other contained a 0.4-μm filter such that mixing and contact were impeded. After 24 h of incubation, the liquids in the two chambers were combined, serially diluted, and plated on both LB plates and LB plates containing norfloxacin in order to calculate the numbers of each type of bacterium as described above.

Statistical procedures.

In all experiments, each sample or condition was assessed using at least three technical replicates. All experiments were repeated at least three times. The resultant values obtained were presented as the means and standard deviations from the three independent experiments, and statistical analysis was applied using the Student's t test as appropriate. P values are presented in the figure legends.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
IAI.00457-19-s0001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank past and present members of the Cianciotto laboratory, especially Brandi Cobe, for helpful advice. We acknowledge Corey Kennelly and Miranda Becker for assistance with U937 cell infections and RT-PCR experiments, respectively. Finally, we thank Alan Hauser for providing Pseudomonas strains.

M.Y.N. was supported in part by NIAID grant T32 AI007476. Overall support for this work came from NIAID grants AI117082 and AI139596, awarded to N.P.C.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00457-19.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Brooke JS. 2012. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging global opportunistic pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:2–41. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00019-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stanojevic S, Ratjen F, Stephens D, Lu A, Yau Y, Tullis E, Waters V. 2013. Factors influencing the acquisition of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in cystic fibrosis patients. J Cyst Fibros 12:575–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chang YT, Lin CY, Chen YH, Hsueh PR. 2015. Update on infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia with particular attention to resistance mechanisms and therapeutic options. Front Microbiol 6:893. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Trignano E, Manzo MJ, Fallico N, Maffei M, Marongiu F, Campus GV, Rubino C. 2014. First report of digital skin ulcer with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in an immunocompetent patient. In Vivo 28:259–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Weber M, Schünemann W, Fuß J, Kämpfer P, Lipski A. 2018. Stenotrophomonas lactitubi sp. nov. and Stenotrophomonas indicatrix sp. nov., isolated from surfaces with food contact. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:1830–1838. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sumida K, Chong Y, Miyake N, Akahoshi T, Yasuda M, Shimono N, Shimoda S, Maehara Y, Akashi K. 2015. Risk factors associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia: a matched case-control study. PLoS One 10:e0133731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Behnia M, Logan SC, Fallen L, Catalano P. 2014. Nosocomial and ventilator-associated pneumonia in a community hospital intensive care unit: a retrospective review and analysis. BMC Res Notes 7:232. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Salsgiver EL, Fink AK, Knapp EA, LiPuma JJ, Olivier KN, Marshall BC, Saiman L. 2016. Changing epidemiology of the respiratory bacteriology of patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest 149:390–400. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rutter WC, Burgess DR, Burgess DS. 2017. Increasing incidence of multidrug resistance among cystic fibrosis respiratory bacterial isolates. Microb Drug Resist 23:51–55. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2016.0048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Waters V, Yau Y, Prasad S, Lu A, Atenafu E, Crandall I, Tom S, Tullis E, Ratjen F. 2011. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in cystic fibrosis: serologic response and effect on lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 183:635–640. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201009-1392OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Barsky EE, Williams KA, Priebe GP, Sawicki GS. 2017. Incident Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection and lung function decline in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 52:1276–1282. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Berdah L, Taytard J, Leyronnas S, Clement A, Boelle PY, Corvol H. 2018. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a marker of lung disease severity. Pediatr Pulmonol 53:426–430. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sanchez MB, Martinez JL. 2018. Overexpression of the efflux pumps SmeVWX and SmeDEF is a major cause of resistance to co-trimoxazole in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00301-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Calvopina K, Avison MB. 2018. Disruption of mpl activates beta-lactamase production in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00638-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00638-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang HH, Lin YT, Chen PY, Li LH, Ning HC, Yang TC. 2018. ClpA and HtpX proteases are involved in intrinsic aminoglycoside resistance of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and are potential aminoglycoside adjuvant targets. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00554-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00554-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Martinez-Servat S, Yero D, Huedo P, Marquez R, Molina G, Daura X, Gibert I. 2018. Heterogeneous colistin-resistance phenotypes coexisting in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates influence colistin susceptibility testing. Front Microbiol 9:2871. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rouf R, Karaba SM, Dao J, Cianciotto NP. 2011. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains replicate and persist in the murine lung, but to significantly different degrees. Microbiology 157:2133–2142. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.048157-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Di Bonaventura G, Pompilio A, Zappacosta R, Petrucci F, Fiscarelli E, Rossi C, Piccolomini R. 2010. Role of excessive inflammatory response to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia lung infection in DBA/2 mice and implications for cystic fibrosis. Infect Immun 78:2466–2476. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01391-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zgair AK, Chhibber S. 2010. Immunological and pathological aspects of respiratory tract infection with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in BALB/c mice. J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:1585–1591. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1003.03013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.de Vidipo LA, de Marques EA, Puchelle E, Plotkowski MC. 2001. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia interaction with human epithelial respiratory cells in vitro. Microbiol Immunol 45:563–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2001.tb01287.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.de Oliveira-Garcia D, Dall'Agnol M, Rosales M, Azzuz ACGS, Alcántara N, Martinez MB, Girón JA. 2003. Fimbriae and adherence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to epithelial cells and to abiotic surfaces. Cell Microbiol 5:625–636. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00306.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pompilio A, Crocetta V, Confalone P, Nicoletti M, Petrucca A, Guarnieri S, Fiscarelli E, Savini V, Piccolomini R, Di Bonaventura G. 2010. Adhesion to and biofilm formation on IB3-1 bronchial cells by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. BMC Microbiol 10:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nicoletti M, Iacobino A, Prosseda G, Fiscarelli E, Zarrilli R, De Carolis E, Petrucca A, Nencioni L, Colonna B, Casalino M. 2011. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains from cystic fibrosis patients: genomic variability and molecular characterization of some virulence determinants. Int J Med Microbiol 301:34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Adamek M, Linke B, Schwartz T. 2014. Virulence genes in clinical and environmental Stenotrophomas maltophilia isolates: a genome sequencing and gene expression approach. Microb Pathog 67-68:20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pompilio A, Crocetta V, Ghosh D, Chakrabarti M, Gherardi G, Vitali LA, Fiscarelli E, Di Bonaventura G. 2016. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia phenotypic and genotypic diversity during a 10-year colonization in the lungs of a cystic fibrosis patient. Front Microbiol 7:1551. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.An SQ, Tang JL. 2018. The Ax21 protein influences virulence and biofilm formation in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Arch Microbiol 200:183–187. doi: 10.1007/s00203-017-1433-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nas MY, Cianciotto NP. 2017. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia produces an EntC-dependent catecholate siderophore that is distinct from enterobactin. Microbiology 163:1590–1603. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karaba SM, White RC, Cianciotto NP. 2013. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia encodes a type II protein secretion system that promotes detrimental effects on lung epithelial cells. Infect Immun 81:3210–3219. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00546-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.DuMont AL, Karaba SM, Cianciotto NP. 2015. Type II secretion-dependent degradative and cytotoxic activities mediated by the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia serine proteases StmPr1 and StmPr2. Infect Immun 83:3825–3837. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00672-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.DuMont AL, Cianciotto NP. 2017. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia serine protease StmPr1 induces matrilysis, anoikis, and protease-activated receptor-2 activation in human lung epithelial cells. Infect Immun 85:e00544-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Crossman LC, Gould VC, Dow JM, Vernikos GS, Okazaki A, Sebaihia M, Saunders D, Arrowsmith C, Carver T, Peters N, Adlem E, Kerhornou A, Lord A, Murphy L, Seeger K, Squares R, Rutter S, Quail MA, Rajandream MA, Harris D, Churcher C, Bentley SD, Parkhill J, Thomson NR, Avison MB. 2008. The complete genome, comparative and functional analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia reveals an organism heavily shielded by drug resistance determinants. Genome Biol 9:R74. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-4-r74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rocco F, De Gregorio E, Colonna B, Di Nocera PP. 2009. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia genomes: a start-up comparison. Int J Med Microbiol 299:535–546. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2009.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Alavi P, Starcher MR, Thallinger GG, Zachow C, Muller H, Berg G. 2014. Stenotrophomonas comparative genomics reveals genes and functions that differentiate beneficial and pathogenic bacteria. BMC Genomics 15:482. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhu B, Liu H, Tian WX, Fan XY, Li B, Zhou XP, Jin GL, Xie GL. 2012. Genome sequence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia RR-10, isolated as an endophyte from rice root. J Bacteriol 194:1280–1281. doi: 10.1128/JB.06702-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gonzalez-Rivera C, Bhatty M, Christie PJ. 2016. Mechanism and function of type IV secretion during infection of the human host. Microbiol Spectr 4:VMBF-0024-2015. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0024-2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Grohmann E, Christie PJ, Waksman G, Backert S. 2018. Type IV secretion in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Mol Microbiol 107:455–471. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Waksman G. 2019. From conjugation to T4S systems in Gram-negative bacteria: a mechanistic biology perspective. EMBO Rep 20:e47012. doi: 10.15252/embr.201847012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Christie PJ, Whitaker N, Gonzalez-Rivera C. 2014. Mechanism and structure of the bacterial type IV secretion systems. Biochim Biophys Acta 1843:1578–1591. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.12.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ghosal D, Chang YW, Jeong KC, Vogel JP, Jensen GJ. 2017. In situ structure of the Legionella Dot/Icm type IV secretion system by electron cryotomography. EMBO Rep 18:726–732. doi: 10.15252/embr.201643598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Redzej A, Ukleja M, Connery S, Trokter M, Felisberto-Rodrigues C, Cryar A, Thalassinos K, Hayward RD, Orlova EV, Waksman G. 2017. Structure of a VirD4 coupling protein bound to a VirB type IV secretion machinery. EMBO J 36:3080–3095. doi: 10.15252/embj.201796629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Oliveira LC, Souza DP, Oka GU, Lima FDS, Oliveira RJ, Favaro DC, Wienk H, Boelens R, Farah CS, Salinas RK. 2016. VirB7 and VirB9 interactions are required for the assembly and antibacterial activity of a type IV secretion system. Structure 24:1707–1718. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2016.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mancilla M, Saavedra J, Grandon M, Tapia E, Navas E, Grothusen H, Bustos P. 2018. The mutagenesis of a type IV secretion system locus of Piscirickettsia salmonis leads to the attenuation of the pathogen in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. J Fish Dis 41:625–634. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Roushan MR, de Zeeuw MAM, Hooykaas PJJ, van Heusden G. 2018. Application of phiLOV2.1 as a fluorescent marker for visualization of Agrobacterium effector protein translocation. Plant J 96:685–699. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chen C, Banga S, Mertens K, Weber MM, Gorbaslieva I, Tan Y, Luo ZQ, Samuel JE. 2010. Large-scale identification and translocation of type IV secretion substrates by Coxiella burnetii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:21755–21760. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010485107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Larson CL, Martinez E, Beare PA, Jeffrey B, Heinzen RA, Bonazzi M. 2016. Right on Q: genetics begin to unravel Coxiella burnetii host cell interactions. Future Microbiol 11:919–939. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2016-0044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Qiu J, Luo ZQ. 2017. Legionella and Coxiella effectors: strength in diversity and activity. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:591–605. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sankarasubramanian J, Vishnu US, Dinakaran V, Sridhar J, Gunasekaran P, Rajendhran J. 2016. Computational prediction of secretion systems and secretomes of Brucella: identification of novel type IV effectors and their interaction with the host. Mol Biosyst 12:178–190. doi: 10.1039/c5mb00607d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rikihisa Y, Lin M. 2010. Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia chaffeensis type IV secretion and Ank proteins. Curr Opin Microbiol 13:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2009.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lockwood S, Voth DE, Brayton KA, Beare PA, Brown WC, Heinzen RA, Broschat SL. 2011. Identification of Anaplasma marginale type IV secretion system effector proteins. PLoS One 6:e27724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tegtmeyer N, Neddermann M, Asche CI, Backert S. 2017. Subversion of host kinases: a key network in cellular signaling hijacked by Helicobacter pylori CagA. Mol Microbiol 105:358–372. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jeong KC, Ghosal D, Chang YW, Jensen GJ, Vogel JP. 2017. Polar delivery of Legionella type IV secretion system substrates is essential for virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:8077–8082. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1621438114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gillespie JJ, Phan IQ, Driscoll TP, Guillotte ML, Lehman SS, Rennoll-Bankert KE, Subramanian S, Beier-Sexton M, Myler PJ, Rahman MS, Azad AF. 2016. The Rickettsia type IV secretion system: unrealized complexity mired by gene family expansion. Pathog Dis 74:ftw058. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftw058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Miller CN, Smith EP, Cundiff JA, Knodler LA, Bailey Blackburn J, Lupashin V, Celli J. 2017. A Brucella type IV effector targets the COG tethering complex to remodel host secretory traffic and promote intracellular replication. Cell Host Microbe 22:317–329. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Escoll P, Song OR, Viana F, Steiner B, Lagache T, Olivo-Marin JC, Impens F, Brodin P, Hilbi H, Buchrieser C. 2017. Legionella pneumophila modulates mitochondrial dynamics to trigger metabolic repurposing of infected macrophages. Cell Host Microbe 22:302–316. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Crabill E, Schofield WB, Newton HJ, Goodman AL, Roy CR. 2018. Dot/Icm-translocated proteins important for biogenesis of the Coxiella burnetii-containing vacuole identified by screening of an effector mutant sublibrary. Infect Immun 86:e00758-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00758-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wagner A, Dehio C. 2019. Role of distinct type-IV-secretion systems and secreted effector sets in host adaptation by pathogenic Bartonella species. Cell Microbiol 21:e13004. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yan Q, Lin M, Huang W, Teymournejad O, Johnson JM, Hays FA, Liang Z, Li G, Rikihisa Y. 2018. Ehrlichia type IV secretion system effector Etf-2 binds to active RAB5 and delays endosome maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E8977–E8986. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806904115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lehman SS, Noriea NF, Aistleitner K, Clark TR, Dooley CA, Nair V, Kaur SJ, Rahman MS, Gillespie JJ, Azad AF, Hackstadt T. 2018. The rickettsial ankyrin repeat protein 2 is a type IV secreted effector that associates with the endoplasmic reticulum. mBio 9:e00975-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00975-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hamilton HL, Dominguez NM, Schwartz KJ, Hackett KT, Dillard JP. 2005. Neisseria gonorrhoeae secretes chromosomal DNA via a novel type IV secretion system. Mol Microbiol 55:1704–1721. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04521.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Niu H, Kozjak-Pavlovic V, Rudel T, Rikihisa Y. 2010. Anaplasma phagocytophilum Ats-1 is imported into host cell mitochondria and interferes with apoptosis induction. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000774. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Schmid MC, Scheidegger F, Dehio M, Balmelle-Devaux N, Schulein R, Guye P, Chennakesava CS, Biedermann B, Dehio C. 2006. A translocated bacterial protein protects vascular endothelial cells from apoptosis. PLoS Pathog 2:e115. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liu H, Bao W, Lin M, Niu H, Rikihisa Y. 2012. Ehrlichia type IV secretion effector ECH0825 is translocated to mitochondria and curbs ROS and apoptosis by upregulating host MnSOD. Cell Microbiol 14:1037–1050. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01775.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Klingenbeck L, Eckart RA, Berens C, Luhrmann A. 2013. The Coxiella burnetii type IV secretion system substrate CaeB inhibits intrinsic apoptosis at the mitochondrial level. Cell Microbiol 15:675–687. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Schafer W, Eckart RA, Schmid B, Cagkoylu H, Hof K, Muller YA, Amin B, Luhrmann A. 2017. Nuclear trafficking of the anti-apoptotic Coxiella burnetii effector protein AnkG requires binding to p32 and Importin-alpha1. Cell Microbiol 19:e12634. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Choy A, Dancourt J, Mugo B, O'Connor TJ, Isberg RR, Melia TJ, Roy CR. 2012. The Legionella effector RavZ inhibits host autophagy through irreversible Atg8 deconjugation. Science 338:1072–1076. doi: 10.1126/science.1227026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Oldani A, Cormont M, Hofman V, Chiozzi V, Oregioni O, Canonici A, Sciullo A, Sommi P, Fabbri A, Ricci V, Boquet P. 2009. Helicobacter pylori counteracts the apoptotic action of its VacA toxin by injecting the CagA protein into gastric epithelial cells. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000603. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Finsel I, Hilbi H. 2015. Formation of a pathogen vacuole according to Legionella pneumophila: how to kill one bird with many stones. Cell Microbiol 17:935–950. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Abu-Zant A, Jones S, Asare R, Suttles J, Price C, Graham J, Kwaik YA. 2007. Anti-apoptotic signalling by the Dot/Icm secretion system of Legionella pneumophila. Cell Microbiol 9:246–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00785.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Banga S, Gao P, Shen X, Fiscus V, Zong WX, Chen L, Luo ZQ. 2007. Legionella pneumophila inhibits macrophage apoptosis by targeting pro-death members of the Bcl2 protein family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:5121–5126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611030104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Cherla R, Zhang Y, Ledbetter L, Zhang G. 2018. Coxiella burnetii inhibits neutrophil apoptosis by exploiting survival pathways and antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1. Infect Immun 86:e00504-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00504-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhang J, Li M, Li Z, Shi J, Zhang Y, Deng X, Liu L, Wang Z, Qi Y, Zhang H. 2019. Deletion of the type IV secretion system effector VceA promotes autophagy and inhibits apoptosis in Brucella-infected human trophoblast cells. Curr Microbiol 76:510. doi: 10.1007/s00284-019-01651-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Teng YT, Hu W. 2003. Expression cloning of a periodontitis-associated apoptotic effector, cagE homologue, in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 303:1086–1094. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00471-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Teng YT, Zhang X. 2005. Apoptotic activity and sub-cellular localization of a T4SS-associated CagE-homologue in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Microb Pathog 38:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2004.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zhang Y, Sun H, Zhao H, Chen X, Li J, Li B. 2017. Early apoptosis of monocytes induced by Helicobacter pylori infection through multiple pathways. Dev Comp Immunol 73:46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2017.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ryan RP, Monchy S, Cardinale M, Taghavi S, Crossman L, Avison MB, Berg G, van der Lelie D, Dow JM. 2009. The versatility and adaptation of bacteria from the genus Stenotrophomonas. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:514–525. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Patil PP, Midha S, Kumar S, Patil PB. 2016. Genome sequence of type strains of genus Stenotrophomonas. Front Microbiol 7:309. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Christie PJ, Vogel JP. 2000. Bacterial type IV secretion: conjugation systems adapted to deliver effector molecules to host cells. Trends Microbiol 8:354–360. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01792-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wallden K, Rivera-Calzada A, Waksman G. 2010. Type IV secretion systems: versatility and diversity in function. Cell Microbiol 12:1203–1212. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01499.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Alegria MC, Souza DP, Andrade MO, Docena C, Khater L, Ramos CH, da Silva AC, Farah CS. 2005. Identification of new protein-protein interactions involving the products of the chromosome- and plasmid-encoded type IV secretion loci of the phytopathogen Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. J Bacteriol 187:2315–2325. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.7.2315-2325.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.He YQ, Zhang L, Jiang BL, Zhang ZC, Xu RQ, Tang DJ, Qin J, Jiang W, Zhang X, Liao J, Cao JR, Zhang SS, Wei ML, Liang XX, Lu GT, Feng JX, Chen B, Cheng J, Tang JL. 2007. Comparative and functional genomics reveals genetic diversity and determinants of host specificity among reference strains and a large collection of Chinese isolates of the phytopathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Genome Biol 8:R218. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Jacob TR, de Laia ML, Moreira LM, Goncalves JF, Carvalho FM, Ferro MI, Ferro JA. 2014. Type IV secretion system is not involved in infection process in citrus. Int J Microbiol 2014:763575. doi: 10.1155/2014/763575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Vicente JG, Rothwell S, Holub EB, Studholme DJ. 2017. Pathogenic, phenotypic and molecular characterisation of Xanthomonas nasturtii sp. nov. and Xanthomonas floridensis sp. nov., new species of Xanthomonas associated with watercress production in Florida. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:3645–3654. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Steinmann J, Mamat U, Abda EM, Kirchhoff L, Streit WR, Schaible UE, Niemann S, Kohl TA. 2018. Analysis of phylogenetic variation of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia reveals human-specific branches. Front Microbiol 9:806. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Vinuesa P, Ochoa-Sánchez LE, Contreras-Moreira B. 2018. GET_PHYLOMARKERS, a software package to select optimal orthologous clusters for phylogenomics and inferring pan-genome phylogenies, used for a critical geno-taxonomic revision of the genus Stenotrophomonas. Front Microbiol 9:771. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Chang YW, Shaffer CL, Rettberg LA, Ghosal D, Jensen GJ. 2018. In vivo structures of the Helicobacter pylori cag type IV secretion system. Cell Rep 23:673–681. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.McCoy-Simandle K, Stewart CR, Dao J, Debroy S, Rossier O, Bryce PJ, Cianciotto NP. 2011. Legionella pneumophila type II secretion dampens the cytokine response of infected macrophages and epithelia. Infect Immun 79:1984–1997. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01077-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kogan TV, Jadoun J, Mittelman L, Hirschberg K, Osherov N. 2004. Involvement of secreted Aspergillus fumigatus proteases in disruption of the actin fiber cytoskeleton and loss of focal adhesion sites in infected A549 lung pneumocytes. J Infect Dis 189:1965–1973. doi: 10.1086/420850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Cano V, Moranta D, Llobet-Brossa E, Bengoechea JA, Garmendia J. 2009. Klebsiella pneumoniae triggers a cytotoxic effect on airway epithelial cells. BMC Microbiol 9:156. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Comolli JC, Hauser AR, Waite L, Whitchurch CB, Mattick JS, Engel JN. 1999. Pseudomonas aeruginosa gene products PilT and PilU are required for cytotoxicity in vitro and virulence in a mouse model of acute pneumonia. Infect Immun 67:3625–3630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Di Bonaventura G, Prosseda G, Del Chierico F, Cannavacciuolo S, Cipriani P, Petrucca A, Superti F, Ammendolia MG, Concato C, Fiscarelli E, Casalino M, Piccolomini R, Nicoletti M, Colonna B. 2007. Molecular characterization of virulence determinants of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains isolated from patients affected by cystic fibrosis. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 20:529–537. doi: 10.1177/039463200702000311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zhu W, Hammad LA, Hsu F, Mao Y, Luo ZQ. 2013. Induction of caspase 3 activation by multiple Legionella pneumophila Dot/Icm substrates. Cell Microbiol 15:1783–1795. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Speir M, Vogrin A, Seidi A, Abraham G, Hunot S, Han Q, Dorn GW 2nd, Masters SL, Flavell RA, Vince JE, Naderer T. 2017. Legionella pneumophila strain 130b evades macrophage cell death independent of the effector SidF in the absence of flagellin. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Lamkanfi M, Kanneganti TD. 2010. Caspase-7: a protease involved in apoptosis and inflammation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 42:21–24. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Truchan HK, Christman HD, White RC, Rutledge NS, Cianciotto NP. 2017. Type II secretion substrates of Legionella pneumophila translocate out of the pathogen-occupied vauole via a semi-permeable membrane. mBio 8:e00870-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00870-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Kohler S, Teyssier J, Cloeckaert A, Rouot B, Liautard JP. 1996. Participation of the molecular chaperone DnaK in intracellular growth of Brucella suis within U937-derived phagocytes. Mol Microbiol 20:701–712. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02510.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Herdman BP, Paton JC, Wang H, Beddoe T, Paton AW. 2017. Vacuolation activity and intracellular trafficking of ArtB, the binding subunit of an AB5 toxin produced by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. Infect Immun 85:e00214-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00214-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Souza DP, Andrade MO, Alvarez-Martinez CE, Arantes GM, Farah CS, Salinas RK. 2011. A component of the Xanthomonadaceae type IV secretion system combines a VirB7 motif with a N0 domain found in outer membrane transport proteins. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002031. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Souza DP, Oka GU, Alvarez-Martinez CE, Bisson-Filho AW, Dunger G, Hobeika L, Cavalcante NS, Alegria MC, Barbosa LR, Salinas RK, Guzzo CR, Farah CS. 2015. Bacterial killing via a type IV secretion system. Nat Commun 6:6453. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Alteri CJ, Mobley HL. 2016. The versatile type VI secretion system. Microbiol Spectr 4:VMBF-0026-2015. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0026-2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Joshi A, Kostiuk B, Rogers A, Teschler J, Pukatzki S, Yildiz FH. 2017. Rules of engagement: the type VI secretion system in Vibrio cholerae. Trends Microbiol 25:267–279. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Harms A, Liesch M, Korner J, Quebatte M, Engel P, Dehio C. 2017. A bacterial toxin-antitoxin module is the origin of inter-bacterial and inter-kingdom effectors of Bartonella. PLoS Genet 13:e1007077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hood RD, Singh P, Hsu F, Guvener T, Carl MA, Trinidad RR, Silverman JM, Ohlson BB, Hicks KG, Plemel RL, Li M, Schwarz S, Wang WY, Merz AJ, Goodlett DR, Mougous JD. 2010. A type VI secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa targets a toxin to bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 7:25–37. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Schwarz S, West TE, Boyer F, Chiang WC, Carl MA, Hood RD, Rohmer L, Tolker-Nielsen T, Skerrett SJ, Mougous JD. 2010. Burkholderia type VI secretion systems have distinct roles in eukaryotic and bacterial cell interactions. PLoS Pathog 6:e1001068. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Henry CS, Rotman E, Lathem WW, Tyo KE, Hauser AR, Mandel MJ. 2017. Generation and validation of the iKp1289 metabolic model for Klebsiella pneumoniae KPPR1. J Infect Dis 215:S37–S43. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Parkins MD, Floto RA. 2015. Emerging bacterial pathogens and changing concepts of bacterial pathogenesis in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 14:293–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2015.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Coburn B, Wang PW, Diaz Caballero J, Clark ST, Brahma V, Donaldson S, Zhang Y, Surendra A, Gong Y, Elizabeth Tullis D, Yau YC, Waters VJ, Hwang DM, Guttman DS. 2015. Lung microbiota across age and disease stage in cystic fibrosis. Sci Rep 5:10241. doi: 10.1038/srep10241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Yin C, Yang W, Meng J, Lv Y, Wang J, Huang B. 2017. Co-infection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in hospitalised pneumonia patients has a synergic and significant impact on clinical outcomes. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 36:2231–2235. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3050-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Stewart CR, Muthye V, Cianciotto NP. 2012. Legionella pneumophila persists within biofilms formed by Klebsiella pneumoniae, Flavobacterium sp., and Pseudomonas fluorescens under dynamic flow conditions. PLoS One 7:e50560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Murga R, Forster TS, Brown E, Pruckler JM, Fields BS, Donlan RM. 2001. Role of biofilms in the survival of Legionella pneumophila in a model potable-water system. Microbiology 147:3121–3126. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-11-3121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Basler M, Pilhofer M, Henderson GP, Jensen GJ, Mekalanos JJ. 2012. Type VI secretion requires a dynamic contractile phage tail-like structure. Nature 483:182–186. doi: 10.1038/nature10846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Lagares A Jr, Agaras B, Bettiol MP, Gatti BM, Valverde C. 2015. A cultivation-independent PCR-RFLP assay targeting oprF gene for detection and identification of Pseudomonas spp. in samples from fibrocystic pediatric patients. J Microbiol Methods 114:66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Almuzara M, Montana S, Carulla M, Sly G, Fernandez J, Hernandez M, Moriano A, Traglia GM, Bakai R, Ramirez MS. 2018. Clinical cases of VIM-producing Pseudomonas mendocina from two burned patients. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 14:273–274. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Corsaro D, Muller KD, Michel R. 2013. Molecular characterization and ultrastructure of a new amoeba endoparasite belonging to the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex. Exp Parasitol 133:383–390. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Cateau E, Maisonneuve E, Peguilhan S, Quellard N, Hechard Y, Rodier MH. 2014. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Vermamoeba vermiformis relationships: bacterial multiplication and protection in amoebal-derived structures. Res Microbiol 165:847–851. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Pagnier I, Valles C, Raoult D, La Scola B. 2015. Isolation of Vermamoeba vermiformis and associated bacteria in hospital water. Microb Pathog 80:14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Delafont V, Bouchon D, Hechard Y, Moulin L. 2016. Environmental factors shaping cultured free-living amoebae and their associated bacterial community within drinking water network. Water Res 100:382–392. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Denet E, Vasselon V, Burdin B, Nazaret S, Favre-Bonté S. 2018. Survival and growth of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in free-living amoebae (FLA) and bacterial virulence properties. PLoS One 13:e0192308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Meyer DF, Noroy C, Moumene A, Raffaele S, Albina E, Vachiery N. 2013. Searching algorithm for type IV secretion system effectors 1.0: a tool for predicting type IV effectors and exploring their genomic context. Nucleic Acids Res 41:9218–9229. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Zou L, Nan C, Hu F. 2013. Accurate prediction of bacterial type IV secreted effectors using amino acid composition and PSSM profiles. Bioinformatics 29:3135–3142. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Wang Y, Wei X, Bao H, Liu SL. 2014. Prediction of bacterial type IV secreted effectors by C-terminal features. BMC Genomics 15:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.An Y, Wang J, Li C, Leier A, Marquez-Lago T, Wilksch J, Zhang Y, Webb GI, Song J, Lithgow T. 2016. Comprehensive assessment and performance improvement of effector protein predictors for bacterial secretion systems III, IV and VI. Brief Bioinform 19:148–161. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbw100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Han N, Yu W, Qiang Y, Zhang W. 2016. T4SP database 2.0: an improved database for type IV secretion systems in bacterial genomes with new online analysis tools. Comput Math Methods Med 2016:9415459. doi: 10.1155/2016/9415459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.An Y, Wang J, Li C, Revote J, Zhang Y, Naderer T, Hayashida M, Akutsu T, Webb GI, Lithgow T, Song J. 2017. SecretEPDB: a comprehensive web-based resource for secreted effector proteins of the bacterial types III, IV and VI secretion systems. Sci Rep 7:41031. doi: 10.1038/srep41031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Maffei B, Francetic O, Subtil A. 2017. Tracking proteins secreted by bacteria: what's in the toolbox? Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:221. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Zalguizuri A, Caetano-Anolles G, Lepek VC. 2018. Phylogenetic profiling, an untapped resource for the prediction of secreted proteins and its complementation with sequence-based classifiers in bacterial type III, IV and VI secretion systems. Brief Bioinform 2018:bby009. doi: 10.1093/bib/bby009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Ensminger AW. 2016. Legionella pneumophila, armed to the hilt: justifying the largest arsenal of effectors in the bacterial world. Curr Opin Microbiol 29:74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Luhrmann A, Nogueira CV, Carey KL, Roy CR. 2010. Inhibition of pathogen-induced apoptosis by a Coxiella burnetii type IV effector protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:18997–19001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004380107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Ho BT, Dong TG, Mekalanos JJ. 2014. A view to a kill: the bacterial type VI secretion system. Cell Host Microbe 15:9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Kaparullina E, Doronina N, Chistyakova T, Trotsenko Y. 2009. Stenotrophomonas chelatiphaga sp. nov., a new aerobic EDTA-degrading bacterium. Syst Appl Microbiol 32:157–162. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Lee M, Woo SG, Chae M, Shin MC, Jung HM, Ten LN. 2011. Stenotrophomonas daejeonensis sp. nov., isolated from sewage. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:598–604. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.017780-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Kim HB, Srinivasan S, Sathiyaraj G, Quan LH, Kim SH, Bui TP, Liang ZQ, Kim YJ, Yang DC. 2010. Stenotrophomonas ginsengisoli sp. nov., isolated from a ginseng field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:1522–1526. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.014662-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Yang HC, Im WT, Kang MS, Shin DY, Lee ST. 2006. Stenotrophomonas koreensis sp. nov., isolated from compost in South Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:81–84. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63826-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Ramos PL, Van Trappen S, Thompson FL, Rocha RC, Barbosa HR, De Vos P, Moreira-Filho CA. 2011. Screening for endophytic nitrogen-fixing bacteria in Brazilian sugar cane varieties used in organic farming and description of Stenotrophomonas pavanii sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:926–931. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.019372-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Ouattara AS, Le Mer J, Joseph M, Macarie H. 2017. Transfer of Pseudomonas pictorum Gray and Thornton 1928 to genus Stenotrophomonas as Stenotrophomonas pictorum comb. nov., and emended description of the genus Stenotrophomonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1894–1900. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Palleroni NJ, Bradbury JF. 1993. Stenotrophomonas, a new bacterial genus for Xanthomonas maltophilia (Hugh 1980) Swings et al. 1983. Int J Syst Bacteriol 43:606–609. doi: 10.1099/00207713-43-3-606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Abby SS, Cury J, Guglielmini J, Neron B, Touchon M, Rocha EP. 2016. Identification of protein secretion systems in bacterial genomes. Sci Rep 6:23080. doi: 10.1038/srep23080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. 2017. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110:1281–1286. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. 1997. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278:631–637. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5338.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.McWilliam H, Li W, Uludag M, Squizzato S, Park YM, Buso N, Cowley AP, Lopez R. 2013. Analysis tool web services from the EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res 41:W597–W600. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Bryan A, Harada K, Swanson MS. 2011. Efficient generation of unmarked deletions in Legionella pneumophila. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:2545–2548. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02904-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Bryan A, Swanson MS. 2011. Oligonucleotides stimulate genomic alterations of Legionella pneumophila. Mol Microbiol 80:231–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Kovach ME, Elzer PH, Hill DS, Robertson GT, Farris MA, Roop RM, Peterson KM. 1995. Four new derivatives of the broad-host-range cloning vector pBBR1MCS, carrying different antibiotic-resistance cassettes. Gene 166:175–176. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00584-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.White RC, Cianciotto NP. 2016. Type II secretion is necessary for optimal association of the Legionella-containing vacuole with macrophage Rab1B but enhances intracellular replication mainly by Rab1B-independent mechanisms. Infect Immun 84:3313–3327. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00750-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Inoue-Yamauchi A, Oda H. 2012. Depletion of mitochondrial fission factor DRP1 causes increased apoptosis in human colon cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 421:81–85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.03.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Kim H, Zamel R, Bai XH, Liu M. 2013. PKC activation induces inflammatory response and cell death in human bronchial epithelial cells. PLoS One 8:e64182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Jones RA, Johnson VL, Buck NR, Dobrota M, Hinton RH, Chow SC, Kass GE. 1998. Fas-mediated apoptosis in mouse hepatocytes involves the processing and activation of caspases. Hepatology 27:1632–1642. doi: 10.1002/hep.510270624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Reddy RK, Mao C, Baumeister P, Austin RC, Kaufman RJ, Lee AS. 2003. Endoplasmic reticulum chaperone protein GRP78 protects cells from apoptosis induced by topoisomerase inhibitors: role of ATP binding site in suppression of caspase-7 activation. J Biol Chem 278:20915–20924. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212328200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Conrad WH, Osman MM, Shanahan JK, Chu F, Takaki KK, Cameron J, Hopkinson-Woolley D, Brosch R, Ramakrishnan L. 2017. Mycobacterial ESX-1 secretion system mediates host cell lysis through bacterium contact-dependent gross membrane disruptions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:1371–1376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620133114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Bucior I, Tran C, Engel J. 2014. Assessing Pseudomonas virulence using host cells. Methods Mol Biol 1149:741–755. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0473-0_57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
IAI.00457-19-s0001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES