Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2019 Aug 1;4(8):13114–13123. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01001

Microbial Conversion of Protopanaxadiol-Type Ginsenosides by the Edible and Medicinal Mushroom Schizophyllum commune: A Green Biotransformation Strategy

Zhi Liu †,‡,∥,*, Jia-Xin Li †, Chong-Zhi Wang ∥, Dan-Li Zhang †, Xin Wen †, Chang-Chun Ruan §, Yu Li ‡,*, Chun-Su Yuan ∥
PMCID: PMC6705088  PMID: 31460439

Abstract

graphic file with name ao9b01001_0007.jpg

Previous studies have shown that many kinds of microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts, and filamentous fungi, can convert parent ginsenosides into minor ginsenosides. However, most microorganisms used for ginsenoside transformations may not be safe for food consumption and drug development. In this study, 24 edible and medicinal mushrooms were screened by high-performance liquid chromatography analyses for their ability to microbiologically transform protopanaxadiol (PPD)-type ginsenosides. We observed that the degradation of ginsenosides by Schizophyllum commune was inhibited by high concentrations of sugar in the culture medium. However, the inhibition was avoided by maintaining sugar concentration below 15 g L–1. S. commune showed a strong ability to convert PPD-type ginsenosides (Rb1, Rc, Rb2, and Rd) into minor ginsenosides (F2, C–O, C–Y, C–Mc1, C–Mc, and C–K). The production and bioconversion rates of minor ginsenosides were significantly higher than those previously reported by food microorganisms. The fermentation process is efficient, nontoxic, eco-friendly, and economical, and the required biotransformation systems are readily available. This is the first report about the biotransformation of major ginsenosides into minor ginsenosides through fermentation by edible and medicinal mushrooms. Our results provide a green biodegradation strategy in transformation of ginsenosides using edible and medicinal mushrooms.

Introduction

Ginsenosides are the major active constituents in Asian ginseng, American ginseng, and Notoginseng and have been demonstrated to have a wide range of pharmacological properties, such as anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, antifatigue, antioxidant, antiobesity, and antitumor activities.1−4 They have been widely used in functional food, traditional medicine, and cosmetics industries with high economic value. Currently, more than 100 ginsenosides have been identified, isolated, and characterized.4,5 According to the sugar moieties at the C-3, -6, and -20 position of sapogenins, major ginsenosides can be classified into protopanaxadiol (PPD)-type ginsenosides (e.g., Rb1, Rc, Rb2, and Rd) and propanaxatriol-type ginsenosides (e.g., Rg1 and Re). They make up about 90% of the total ginsenosides in ginseng species.5 Minor ginsenosides, present at low concentrations in ginseng, include Rg3, Rh1, Rh2, F2, compound K, compound Mc, and compound Y. These compounds have attracted great interest because they are readily absorbed into the bloodstream, and these minor ginsenosides have better pharmacological activities than the major ginsenosides.6−9

Microbial transformation is considered to be the most promising method for the preparation of minor ginsenosides. Previous studies have shown that many kinds of microorganisms can convert major ginsenosides into minor ginsenosides, including bacteria, yeasts, and filamentous fungi.10,11 However, many microorganisms can produce toxic compounds such as biogenic amines, botulinum neurotoxins, aflatoxins, zearalenone, fumonisins, and ochratoxins. These toxins are of great concern due to their acute and long-term toxic, carcinogenic, nephrotoxic, mutagenic, teratogenic, hepatotoxic, and immunosuppressive effects.12,13 Therefore, most microorganisms used for ginsenoside transformations are not safe for food consumption and drug development.

The human intestinal bacteria can transform ginsenosides into more active forms and can be used safely in a variety of foods.14−17 However, human intestinal bacteria require an expensive medium and exhibit low yield and poor productivity. In addition, the fact that many filamentous fungi have been given generally regarded as safe (GRAS) status in many industrial applications could be questioned by mycotoxin production. For example, Aspergillus niger is one of the most important industrial filamentous fungal species used in biotechnology, where it is studied extensively for its ability to transform natural products. However, research data showed that A. niger has the potential to produce two groups of potentially carcinogenic mycotoxins.18−21 Thus, it is a great challenge to establish green biotransformation methods to identify the appropriate microorganism for ginsenoside biotransformation.

Mushrooms are defined as macrofungi with distinctive and visible fruiting bodies that may grow above or below ground. There are at least 15 000 species of fungi that can be considered as mushrooms, and at least 2000 species are edible and medicinal.22 Recently, edible and medicinal mushrooms have been widely consumed in many countries as food, nutraceuticals, and medicine. Their nutritional and health benefits come from their high protein, fiber, vitamin, and mineral contents, low-fat level, and bioactive secondary metabolites.23,24 Compared with extensively studied bacteria, yeasts, and filamentous fungi, edible and medicinal mushrooms are safely used as edible microorganisms for food consumption and drug development. The required biotransformation systems are readily available, and the fermentation process is green, nontoxic, eco-friendly, and economical. In addition, edible and medicinal mushrooms play a very important role in many biotechnological processes, such as biodegradation of raw plant materials, bioremediation of soil, and industrial waters, as well as biopulping and biobleaching of paper pulp.25,26 However, very little work has been carried out on the biotransformation of ginsenosides by edible and medicinal mushrooms.

The objective of this work was to study the role of edible and medicinal mushrooms in ginsenoside biotransformation. Special attention has been paid to their metabolic patterns and biotransformation pathways. The results highlight an important practical application of the green ginsenoside biotransformation strategy using edible and medicinal mushrooms.

Results and Discussion

Edible and Medicinal Mushroom Screening

In this study, 24 edible and medicinal mushrooms were screened for the ability to convert ginsenosides. Among the cultures screened, Schizophyllum commune showed a strong ability to convert ginsenosides into a less polar metabolite. Therefore, this fungus was selected for ginsenoside biotransformation. S. commune is a popular edible and medicinal mushroom and has been demonstrated to have various pharmacological properties, such as antibacterial, immunomodulatory, and antitumor activities.27−29S. commune is known to produce a variety of hydrolytic enzymes, such as cellulase, xylanase, and β-glucosidase.30,31 It has been studied for different industrial applications in areas like food, pharmacology, agro-industry, bioprocessing, and environmental technology. However, S. commune has rarely been investigated for the biotransformation of ginsenosides.

Identification of Metabolites

In recent years, high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESIMS) has been extensively used for the determination of ginsenoside structure. In this study, the metabolites of ginsenosides Rb1, Rc, Rb2, and Rd by S. commune were identified according to the standards and HPLC-ESIMS ion fragments. As shown in Figure S1, the [M – H]− ion at m/z = 945 was observed for compound 2, which confirmed its molecular mass as 946 Da. The major fragment ions at m/z 783[M – H – Glc]−, 621[M – H – 2Glc]−, and 459[M – H – 3Glc]− can be assigned to glycosidic cleavage fragments. The m/z = 459 ion corresponded to the characteristic ion of PPD-type aglycone. The MS of compounds 3 and 4 gave m/z of 783 and 621 as the deprotonated molecular ion [M – H]−, which confirmed the molecular mass to be 784 and 622, respectively. The metabolites corresponding to compounds 2, 3, and 4 were identified as Rd, F2, and C–K, respectively, by comparing the mass spectra and retention times with those of reference compounds. Similarly, the metabolites corresponding to compounds 6, 7, 9, and 10 were identified as C–Mc1, C–Mc, C–O, and C–Y, respectively. Characteristic fragment ions of ginsenoside are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Chromatographic Properties of Metabolites of Ginsenosides during Degradation by Schizophyllum communea.

peak no. identification retention time [M – H]− (m/z) MS/MS fragment ion (m/z)
1 Rb1 36.807 1107 945[M – H – Glc]−, 783[M – H – 2Glc]−, 621[M – H – 3Glc]−, 459[M – H – 4Glc]−
2 Rd 41.241 945 783[M – H – Glc]−, 621[M – H – 2Glc]−, 459[M – H – 3Glc]−
3 F2 49.716 783 621[M – H – Glc]−, 459[M – H – 2Glc]−
4 compound K 62.569 621 459[M – H – Glc]
5 Rc 37.761 1077 945[M – H – Araf]−, 915[M – H – Glc]−, 783[M – H – Araf – Glc]−, 621[M – H – Araf – 2Glc]−, 459[M – H – Araf – 3Glc]−
6 compound Mc1 44.665 915 783[M – H – Araf]−, 621[M – H – Araf – Glc]−, 459[M – H – Araf – 2Glc]−
7 compound Mc 55.890 753 621[M – H – Araf]−, 459[M – H – Araf – Glc]−
8 Rb2 38.771 1077 945[M – H – Arap]−, 915[M – H – Glc]−, 783[M – H – Arap – Glc]−, 621[M – H – Arap – 2Glc]−, 459[M – H – Arap – 3Glc]−
9 compound O 45.675 915 783[M – H – Arap]−, 621[M – H – Arap – Glc]−, 459[M – H – Arap – 2Glc]−
10 compound Y 56.395 753 621[M – H – Arap]−, 459[M – H – Arap – Glc]−
Open in a new tab
a

Glc: β-d-glucose, Arap: α-l-arabinose (pyranose), and Araf: α-l-arabinose (furanose).

Effects of Glucose Concentration on Ginsenoside Biotransformation

To study the effect of the initial glucose concentration on PPD-type ginsenoside (Rb1, Rb2, Rc, and Rd) biotransformations, various concentrations of glucose (ranging from 5 to 50 g L–1) were employed in the culture medium. As shown in Figures 1 and 2, when S. commune was grown in fermentation medium containing 25–50 g L–1 glucose, after 4 days of fermentation, only ginsenoside Rb1 was converted into Rd, whereas ginsenosides Rb2, Rc, and Rd did not undergo any degradation. In contrast, ginsenosides Rb1, Rb2, Rc, and Rd were converted to minor ginsenosides when the glucose concentration was in the range of 5–15 g L–1. These results indicate that the glucose level was the determining factor for the ginsenoside bioconversion by S. commune. The high glucose concentrations inhibited degradation of ginsenosides Rb2, Rc, and Rd, whereas low glucose concentrations promoted the degradation of these ginsenosides.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

HPLC profile of the metabolites of ginsenosides (A) Rb1, (B) Rd, (C) Rc, and (D) Rb2 converted by S. commune with liquid medium containing 15 and 30 g L–1 glucose. Peak numbers: (1) Rb1, (2) Rd, (3) F2, (4) compound K, (5) Rc, (6) compound Mc1, (7) compound Mc, (8) Rb2, (9) compound O, and (10) compound Y. Peaks were identified using both authentic standards and LC-ESIMS.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Effects of different glucose concentrations on biotransformation of ginsenosides (A) Rb1, (B) Rd, (C) Rc, and (D) Rb2 by S. commune with liquid medium containing 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, and 50 g L–1 glucose.

Table S1 shows the mean biomass accumulation of S. commune grown in the fermentation medium containing 5, 15, and 30 g L–1 glucose or a combination of both glucose and ginsenoside Rb1 (5 g L–1). When S. commune was grown in fermentation medium containing 5 or 15 g L–1 glucose, the mycelial biomass in the presence of ginsenoside Rb1 was higher than in the absence of ginsenoside Rb1. When S. commune was grown in fermentation medium containing 30 g L–1 glucose, the mycelial biomass was not statistically different between cultures grown in the presence and absence of ginsenoside Rb1 media. It was suggested that S. commune may use the sugars hydrolyzed from ginsenosides as a carbon source. Yousef and Bernards investigated and reported the metabolism of ginsenosides by the ginseng root pathogen Pythium irregulare.32 The results showed that ginsenosides could significantly promote the in vitro growth of P. irregulare. The growth of P. irregulare in the presence of ginsenosides was more than 2-fold of that in the control group (no ginsenosides).

Effects of Different Carbon Sources on Ginsenoside Biotransformation

The effects of different carbon sources on the conversion of ginsenosides were also investigated. Each carbon source (glucose, lactose, maltose, sucrose, and starch) was added to the initial medium at a concentration of 15 or 30 g L–1. Figure 3 shows that the effects of lactose, maltose, sucrose, and starch on the ginsenoside biotransformation were the same as the effects of glucose. The PPD-type ginsenosides (Rb1, Rb2, Rc, and Rd) could be degraded into minor ginsenosides by S. commune with liquid medium containing 15 g L–1 sugar. However, the degradation of ginsenosides Rb2, Rc, and Rd did not occur using 30 g L–1 sugar as the sole carbon source. This phenomenon is similar to carbon catabolite repression (CCR). CCR is a key regulatory system found in most microorganisms that ensures preferential utilization of energy-efficient carbon sources. CCR has been sometimes called a glucose effect because the presence of glucose often prevents the use of other carbon sources. This is usually achieved through the inhibition of expression of genes encoding for enzymes involved in the catabolism of nonglucose carbon sources.33 Therefore, it seemed that the degradation of ginsenosides by S. commune can be regulated by CCR.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Effects of different carbon sources on biotransformation of ginsenosides (A) Rb1, (B) Rd, (C) Rc, and (D) Rb2 by S. commune with liquid medium containing 15 and 30 g L–1 sugar.

Effects of Nitrogen Sources and Metal Ions on Ginsenoside Biotransformation

Nitrogen sources and metal ions are other two essential components for the growth and metabolism of microorganisms. Hence, we selected nitrogen sources and metal ions to investigate their influence on the biotransformation of ginsenosides. As shown in Figures S2 and S3, our results indicated that yeast powder was the most favorable for ginsenoside transformation in the fermentation medium with 15 g L–1 glucose as the carbon source. Out of all of the examined metal ions, MgSO4 and KH2PO4 most significantly increased ginsenoside bioconversion. However, neither the nitrogen source nor the metal ion had an effect on the degradation of ginsenosides Rb2, Rc, and Rd when S. commune was cultured in fermentation medium containing 30 g L–1 glucose as the sole carbon source. These results indicate that the nitrogen sources and metal ions were not the determining factors for the ginsenoside bioconversion by S. commune.

Transformation Pathways of Ginsenosides and Glucose Utilization

The profiles of glucose utilization and ginsenoside transformation during the fermentation processes are shown in Figure 4. When S. commune was cultured in fermentation medium containing 15 g L–1 glucose, the glucose was quickly utilized and almost completely metabolized within 96 h of fermentation. Using ginsenoside Rb1 as a substrate of S. commune, three transformation products, Rd, F2, and C–K, were detected throughout the transformation period. The results are presented in Figure 4A. Ginsenoside Rb1 was gradually transformed into Rd during 0–48 h, and ginsenosides F2 and C–K were produced very weakly. From 48 to 96 h of incubation, the content of ginsenoside Rb1 decreased rapidly. Ginsenoside Rd quickly approached its maximum production as long as the content of ginsenoside F2 and C–K accumulated gradually. Then, the amount of Rd decreased continuously after 96 h, leading to a significant increase in the amount of F2. These results indicate that F2 is the main transformation product of ginsenoside Rb1 and the biotransformation pathway of Rb1 by S. commune can be traced as follows: Rb1 → Rd → F2 → C–K (Figure 5A). However, the biotransformation pathway of Rb1 by S. commune was different from that by human gut bacteria. The intestinal bacteria can hydrolyze the ginsenoside Rb1 in two different pathways: Rb1 → G–XVII → G–LXXV → C–K and Rb1 → Rd → F2 → C–K.14 When ginsenoside Rd was tested as substrate of S. commune, the transformation products, F2 and C–K, were detected in the metabolites throughout the transformation period (Figure 4C). A similar result suggested that the transformation pathway of Rd was Rd → F2 → C–K.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Transformation kinetic curve of ginsenosides Rb1, Rb2, Rc, and Rd and glucose utilization by S. commune. (A) Rb1 transformation using 15 g L–1 glucose as a carbon source. (B) Rb1 transformation using 30 g L–1 glucose as a carbon source. (C) Rd transformation using 15 g L–1 glucose as a carbon source. (D) Rd transformation using 30 g L–1 glucose as a carbon source. (E) Rc transformation using 15 g L–1 glucose as a carbon source. (F) Rc transformation using 30 g L–1 glucose as a carbon source. (G) Rb2 transformation using 15 g L–1 glucose as a carbon source. (H) Rb2 transformation using 30 g L–1 glucose as a carbon source.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Biotransformation pathways of ginsenosides (A) Rb1, (B) Rb2, and (C) Rc by S. commune.

When ginsenoside Rc was used as a substrate, two major transformation products, C–Mc1 and C–Mc, were detected. As shown in Figure 4E, C–Mc1 and C–Mc were observed during 0–48 h and maintained at a low level, then increased gradually from 48 h until the end of the experimental period. The biotransformation pathway of Rc was Rc → C–Mc1 → C–Mc (Figure 5B). Ginsenoside C–Mc is the main transformation product of ginsenoside Rc. For ginsenoside Rb2, two major transformation products, C–O and C–Y, were detected. As shown in Figure 4G, the level of Rb2 decreased gradually throughout the transformation period. The amount of C–O and C–Y was relatively low during the first 48 h of incubation and then increased continuously from 48 h until the end of the experimental period. Our results showed that C–Y was the main transformation product of Rb2 and the biotransformation pathway of Rb2 can be traced as follows: Rb2 → C–O → C–Y (Figure 5C). The biotransformation pathways of Rb2 and Rc by S. commune were also different from that by human gut bacteria. The intestinal bacteria can transform the ginsenosides Rb2 and Rc with the pathway Rb2 → C–O → C–Y → C–K and Rc → C–Mc1 → C–Mc → C–K.15 However, S. commune is not able to hydrolyze the ginsenosides Rb2 and Rc to C–K.

When S. commune was grown in fermentation medium containing 30 g L–1 glucose, the glucose was rapidly utilized within 96 h of incubation, then metabolized slowly from 96 h until the end of the experimental period. Under high levels of glucose, ginsenoside Rb1 (Figure 4B) was gradually converted into Rd within 144 h of incubation, whereas the degradation of Rd (Figure 4D), Rc (Figure 4F), and Rb2 (Figure 4H) was not observed. These results indicate that the hydrolysis of the terminal glucose residues at C-20 of Rb1 was not affected by glucose levels, but the terminal and inner glucose residues at the C-3 of Rb1, Rb2, Rc, and Rd were inhibited by the high concentration of glucose. In addition, under the low glucose levels, the glucose and protopanaxadiol-type ginsenosides (Rb1, Rb2, Rc, and Rd) were simultaneously consumed by S. commune. However, the rate of glucose consumption was always higher than that of ginsenosides.

CCR is a universal regulatory phenomenon in many microorganisms. However, there are exceptions. For some pathogenic bacteria, such as Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma pneumoniae, glucose is only a secondary carbon source, which is referred to as reverse CCR.34,35 Another peculiarity is the co-fermentation of glucose and other carbon sources that occurs in Corynebacterium glutamicum and engineered Escherichia coli, although this co-fermentation is highly regulated.36,37 In our work, the degradation of ginsenosides Rb2, Rc, and Rd was inhibited by various carbon sources at high concentrations. The inhibition was avoided by maintaining sugar concentration below 15 g L–1. In addition, the utilization of sugar and biotransformation of ginsenosides Rb1 to Rd by S. commune occur simultaneously. The reason and mechanism behind these phenomena warrant further studies.

Optimization of Substrate Concentration and Cosolvent on Minor Ginsenoside Yield

The effect of different ginsenoside (Rb1, Rc, Rb2, and Rd) concentrations on the biotransformation for the production of minor ginsenosides was investigated under optimized culture conditions. The contents of minor ginsenosides in the media were detected by HPLC. As shown in Figure 6A, the bioconversion rate declined gradually following a rise in the ginsenoside concentration from 2.5 to 5 g L–1and decreased rapidly above this range. The results indicate that high ginsenoside concentration was not beneficial for the production of minor ginsenosides; it may be the poor aqueous solubility of ginsenoside that inhibited its utility by S. commune.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Effects of substrate concentration and cosolvent on ginsenoside degradation by S. commune. (A) Effect of different substrate concentrations. (B) Effect of various cosolvents.

Usually, a cosolvent can improve the aqueous solubility of ginsenoside substrates and promote the permeability of cell membrane and increase the bioconversion efficiency.38 Therefore, the effects of various cosolvents on the ginsenoside biotransformation were investigated in this study. As shown in Figure 6B, among the five different cosolvents, Tween 80 was found to be the optimal cosolvent to improve the ginsenoside solubility and enhance the production of minor ginsenosides. When the fermentation medium contained 5 g L–1 substrate and 0.1% (w/v) Tween 80, the bioconversion rates of ginsenosides Rb1, Rc, Rb2, and Rd were more than 90%. The maximum yields of ginsenosides F2, C–Y, and C–Mc were raised to 75.2, 62.7, and 64.9%, respectively. The production and bioconversion rates were significantly higher than those previously reported by food microorganisms.16,17,39

Effects of Glucose Concentration on Ginsenoside Biotransformation by Various Edible and Medicinal Mushrooms

On the basis of the experimental results, we further investigated the effect of initial glucose concentration on the ginsenoside biotransformation by various edible and medicinal mushrooms. Our results showed that many edible and medicinal mushrooms, including Ganoderma lucidum, Hericium erinaceus, Pleurotus ostreatus, Grifola frondosa, and Flammulina velutiper, were only able to convert ginsenoside Rb1 to Rd, which was not affected by sugar concentration. It has been shown that ginsenoside Rd possesses many pharmacological activities.40−42 However, the concentration of ginsenoside Rd is extremely low in most natural ginseng plants. Thus, many studies have been aimed at biotransformation of major ginsenosides (Rb1, Rb2, and Rc) to pharmacologically active Rd using enzymes or microorganisms.10 However, ginsenoside Rd is just an intermediate in the reaction and can further be transformed into other compounds. This leads to a low yield and bioconversion rate of ginsenoside Rd. Thus, edible and medicinal mushrooms are also an effective and green ginsenoside Rd producer.

Conclusions

In summary, this study investigated the role of edible and medicinal mushrooms in ginsenoside biotransformation. A total of 24 edible and medicinal mushrooms were selected and screened for their ability to microbiologically transform ginsenosides by HPLC analyses. Our results showed that the degradation of ginsenosides by S. commune was inhibited by high concentrations of sugar. However, the inhibition was avoided by maintaining sugar concentration below 15 g L–1. S. commune showed a strong ability to convert ginsenosides into minor ginsenosides. We found that S. commune may use the sugars hydrolyzed from ginsenosides as a carbon source. Under the low glucose levels, the glucose and ginsenosides (Rb1, Rb2, Rc, and Rd) were simultaneously consumed by S. commune. The production and bioconversion rates were significantly higher than those previously reported by food microorganisms. In addition, many edible and medicinal mushrooms were only able to convert ginsenoside Rb1 to Rd, which was not affected by the concentration of sugar. Thus, edible and medicinal mushrooms are also an effective and green ginsenoside Rd producer. This is the first report about the biotransformation of major ginsenosides into minor ginsenosides through fermentation by edible and medicinal mushrooms. The results indicate that edible and medicinal mushrooms would be potential food microorganisms for obtaining minor ginsenosides.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Ginsenosides Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Re, Rg1, F2, 20S-Rg3, 20R-Rg3, Rh2, and C–K were obtained from Norman Bethune College of Medicine, Jilin University (Changchun, China). Ginsenosides C–O, C–Y, C–Mc, and C–Mc1 were purchased from Dalian Green Bio Co Ltd (Dalian, China). Acetonitrile and methanol of HPLC grade were from Fisher (Fisher Scientific). Water was purified by a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA). All other chemicals used in this study were of analytical grade.

Microorganisms and Growth Conditions

A total of 24 mushroom species were obtained from the Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University (Jilin, China). They were stored at 4 °C on potato dextrose agar slants and subcultured once a month. The freshly inoculated slant was incubated at 25 °C for 7 days before use. The fermentation medium for the flask culture consisted of the following components: 15 g of glucose, 3 g of yeast powder, 1 g of KH2PO4, and 0.5 g of MgSO4·7H2O in 1 L of distilled water. Fermentations were carried out in 250 mL shake flasks on a rotary shaker (160 rpm) at 28 °C for 7 d. All media were sterilized at 121 °C for 30 min.

Screening of Microorganisms

Preliminary screening was performed in 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 30 mL of fermentation medium and 50 mg of protopanaxadiol-type ginsenosides. The flasks were placed on a rotary shaker operating at 160 rpm at 28 °C. After 7 days of incubation, the ginsenosides were extracted three times by sonification with aqueous saturated n-BuOH for 20 min. The n-BuOH extract was concentrated under reduced pressure to dryness, and the residue was dissolved in methanol and then analyzed by HPLC-UV.

Effects of Glucose Concentration

To study the effect of glucose concentration on ginsenoside transformation, the different concentrations of glucose (ranging from 5 to 50 g L–1) in the initial culture medium were tested. The biotransformation medium was composed of 3 g L–1 yeast powder, 1 g L–1 KH2PO4, and 0.5 g L–1 MgSO4·7H2O and a certain initial concentration of glucose as investigated. Fermentation was carried out on a rotary shaker (160 rpm) at 28 °C. After 2 d of culture, 2 mL of the substrate solution was added to each shake flask, and then the initial concentration of ginsenoside in the culture medium was diluted to 5 g L–1. Incubation was then allowed to proceed for 5 d. Finally, the ginsenosides were extracted by n-BuOH and analyzed by HPLC-UV.

Effects of Different Carbon Sources

Glucose, sucrose, maltose, lactose, and soluble starch were selected as alternative carbon sources in the fermentation medium to investigate influences on the ginsenoside biotransformation. The concentration of each carbohydrate as a sole carbon source in the culture medium was 15 or 30 g L–1 in these experiments. The biotransformation medium was composed of 3 g L–1 yeast powder, 1 g L–1 KH2PO4, and 0.5 g L–1 MgSO4·7H2O and a certain initial concentration of sugar (glucose, sucrose, maltose, lactose, or soluble starch) as investigated. The other fermentation conditions were the same as above.

Effects of Nitrogen Sources

The concentrations of 3 g L–1 yeast powder, soybean powder, peptone, corn steep powder, NaNO3, and (NH4)2SO4 were selected as alternative nitrogen sources in the fermentation medium to investigate influences on the ginsenoside biotransformation. The biotransformation medium was composed of 15 or 30 g L–1 glucose, 1 g L–1 KH2PO4, and 0.5 g L–1 MgSO4·7H2O and an alternative nitrogen source (yeast powder, soybean powder, peptone, corn steep powder, NaNO3 or (NH4)2SO4). The other fermentation conditions were the same as above.

Effects of Metal Ions

The concentrations of 1.5 g L–1 KH2PO4, NaH2PO4, CaCl2, MgSO4·7H2O, FeSO4, ZnSO4, and CuSO4 were selected as alternative metal ions in the fermentation medium to investigate influences on the ginsenoside biotransformation. The biotransformation medium was composed of 15 or 30 g L–1 glucose, 3 g L–1 yeast powder, and an alternative metal ion (KH2PO4, NaH2PO4, CaCl2, MgSO4·7H2O, FeSO4, ZnSO4, or CuSO4). The other fermentation conditions were the same as above.

Biotransformation Pathway and Glucose Utilization

Ginsenosides Rb1, Rb2, Rc, and Rd were dissolved in a 100 mL shake flask containing 30 mL fermentation medium. The initial concentration of each ginsenoside in the medium was diluted to 5 g L–1. Incubation was then allowed to proceed for 0–144 h. The dynamic profiles of the ginsenoside biotransformation and glucose utilization were monitored during the biotransformation process.

Effects of Substrate Concentration and Cosolvent

The effect of initial ginsenoside concentration on the biotransformation for production of minor ginsenosides by S. commune was investigated with its levels of 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 g L–1. Based on the above initial substrate concentration experiment result, the effect of five different cosolvents (glycerol, Tween 80, dimethyl sulfoxide, ethanol, and methanol) on the ginsenoside biotransformation was also investigated.

Analytical Methods

Ginsenoside analysis was carried out on an LC-20A liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with two LC-20AT pumps and an SPD-20A UV/Vis detector. Samples were separated on a Cosmosil C18 reverse-phase silica column (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm2) at 25 °C using acetonitrile (solvent A) and water (solvent B). A gradient elution program was performed according to the following profiles: 0–20 min, 22% (A), 78% (B); 20–25 min, 22–30% (A), 78–70% (B); 25–45 min, 30–46% (A), 70–54% (B); 45–55 min, 46–64% (A), 54–36% (B); 55–70 min, 64–66% (A), 36–34% (B). The injection volume was 20 μL. The flow rate was kept at 1.0 mL min–1. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 203 nm. Glucose was determined by HPLC (LC-20AT; Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with a refractive index detector and a Cosmosil Sugar-D column (250 × 4.6 mm2). The column was operated at 30 °C, and the mobile phase was acetonitrile/water (75:25 v/v) at 1 mL min–1.

The ginsenoside degradation products were analyzed and identified by a Finnigan LCQ ion trap mass spectrometer (MAT; San Jose, CA) equipped with an electrospray ion source in negative-ion mode. The ESI parameters were the following: ion source voltage, 5000 V; capillary voltage, −40.0 V; source temperature, 150 °C; capillary temperature, 280 °C; and sheath gas and auxiliary gas flow rates, 65 and 11 arbitrary units, respectively. Full scan spectra were recorded in the m/z range of 200–2000. The HPLC conditions for the HPLC/ESIMS analysis were the same as above mentioned for the analysis method of ginsenosides.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was conducted based on an SPSS20.0 system (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The ginsenoside contents of the two groups were analyzed by independent sample t-test. Differences between the groups were analyzed using analysis of variance ANOVA. A difference of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31770378), the Jilin Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 20180101183JC), and the Tang Foundation for Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01001.

  • Biomass accumulation of S. commune; LC/ESIMS analysis of metabolites; and effects of nitrogen sources and metal ions on biotransformation of ginsenosides (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao9b01001_si_001.pdf (275.6KB, pdf)

References

  1. Kim D. Y.; Park M. W.; Yuan H. D.; Lee H. J.; Kim S. H.; Chung S. H. Compound K induces apoptosis via CAMK-IV/AMPK pathways in HT-29 colon cancer cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 10573–10578. 10.1021/jf902700h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Xiong Y.; Shen L.; Liu K. J.; Tso P.; Xiong Y.; Wang G.; Woods S. C.; Liu M. Antiobesity and antihyperglycemic effects of ginsenoside Rb1 in rats. Diabetes 2010, 59, 2505–2512. 10.2337/db10-0315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Attele A. S.; Wu J. A.; Yuan C. S. Ginseng pharmacology: multiple constituents and multiple actions. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1999, 58, 1685–1693. 10.1016/S0006-2952(99)00212-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu Z. Q. Chemical insights into ginseng as a resource for natural antioxidants. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 3329–3355. 10.1021/cr100174k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Qi L. W.; Wang C. Z.; Yuan C. S. Isolation and analysis of ginseng: advances and challenges. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011, 28, 467–495. 10.1039/c0np00057d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Li X.; Wang G.; Sun J.; Hao H.; Xiong Y.; Yan B.; Zheng Y.; Sheng L. Pharmacokinetic and absolute bioavailability study of total Panax notoginsenoside, a typical multiple constituent traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in rats. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 30, 847–851. 10.1248/bpb.30.847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sun S.; Qi L. W.; Du G. J.; Mehendale S. R.; Wang C. Z.; Yuan C. S. Red notoginseng: higher ginsenoside content and stronger anticancer potential than Asian and American ginseng. Food Chem. 2011, 125, 1299–1305. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.10.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Joh E. H.; Lee I. A.; Jung I. H.; Kim D. H. Ginsenoside Rb1 and its metabolite compound K inhibit IRAK-1 activationd-the key step of inflammation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011, 82, 278–286. 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mai T. T.; Moon J.; Song Y.; Viet P. Q.; Phuc P. V.; Lee J. M.; Yi T. H.; Cho M.; Cho S. K. Ginsenoside F2 induces apoptosis accompanied by protective autophagy in breast cancer stem cells. Cancer Lett. 2012, 321, 144–153. 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.01.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Park C. S.; Yoo M. H.; Noh K. H.; Oh D. K. Biotransformation of ginsenosides by hydrolyzing the sugar moieties of ginsenosides using microbial glycosidases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 9–19. 10.1007/s00253-010-2567-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang X. D.; Yang Y. Y.; Ouyang D. S.; Yang G. P. A review of biotransformation and pharmacology of ginsenoside compound K. Fitoterapia 2015, 100, 208–220. 10.1016/j.fitote.2014.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. da Rocha M. E. B.; Freire F. C. O.; Maia F. E. F.; Guedes M. I. F.; Rondina D. Mycotoxins and their effects on human and animal health. Food Control 2014, 36, 159–165. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.08.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schmitt C. K.; Meysick K. C.; O’Brien A. D. Bacterial Toxins: Friends or Foes?. Emerging Infect. Dis. 1999, 5, 224–234. 10.3201/eid0502.990206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shen H.; Leung W. I.; Ruan J. Q.; Li S. L.; Lei J. P. C.; Wang Y. T.; Yan R. Biotransformation of ginsenoside Rb1 via the gypenoside pathway by human gut bacteria. Chin. Med. 2013, 8, 22. 10.1186/1749-8546-8-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang H. Y.; Hua H. Y.; Liu X. Y.; Liu J. H.; Yu B. Y. In vitro biotransformation of red ginseng extract by human intestinal microflora: Metabolites identification and metabolic profile elucidation using LC-Q-TOF/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2014, 98, 296–306. 10.1016/j.jpba.2014.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chi H.; Ji G. E. Transformation of ginsenosides Rb1 and Re from Panax ginseng by food microorganisms. Biotechnol. Lett. 2005, 27, 765–771. 10.1007/s10529-005-5632-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chi H.; Kim D. H.; Ji G. E. Transformation of ginsenosides Rb2 and Rc from Panax ginseng by food microorganisms. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 28, 2102–2105. 10.1248/bpb.28.2102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Blumenthal C. Z. Production of toxic metabolites in Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, and Trichoderma reesei: Justification of mycotoxin testing in food grade enzyme preparations derived from the three fungi. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2004, 39, 214–228. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2003.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mogensen J. M.; Frisvad J. C.; Thrane U.; Nielsen K. F. Production of fumonisin B2 and B4 by Aspergillus niger on grapes and raisins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 954–958. 10.1021/jf903116q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Noonim P.; Mahakarnchanakul W.; Nielsen K. F.; Frisvad J. C.; Samson R. A. Fumonisin B2 production by Aspergillus niger from Thai coffee beans. Food Addit. Contam., Part A 2009, 26, 94–100. 10.1080/02652030802366090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Frisvad J. C.; Larsen T. O.; Thrane U.; Meijer M.; Varga J.; Samson R. A.; Nielsen K. F. Fumonisin and Ochratoxin Production in Industrial Aspergillus niger Strains. PLoS One 2011, 6, e23496 10.1371/journal.pone.0023496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wasser S. Medicinal mushrooms as a source of antitumor and immunomodulating polysaccharides. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 60, 258–274. 10.1007/s00253-002-1076-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mattila P.; Könkö K.; Eurola M.; Pihlava J. M.; Astola J.; Vahteristo L.; Hietaniemi V.; Kumpulainen J.; Valtonen M.; Piironen V. Contents of vitamins, mineral elements, and some phenolic compounds in cultivated mushrooms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 2343–2348. 10.1021/jf001525d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang M.; Cui S. W.; Cheung P. C. K.; Wang Q. Antitumor polysaccharides from mushrooms: A review on their isolation process, structural characteristics and antitumor activity. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 18, 4–19. 10.1016/j.tifs.2006.07.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stajić M.; Vukojević J.; Duletić-Lauševic S. Biology of Pleurotus eryngii and role in biotechnological processes: a review. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2009, 29, 55–66. 10.1080/07388550802688821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Knop D.; Yarden O.; Hadar Y. The ligninolytic peroxidases in the genus Pleurotus: divergence in activities, expression, and potential applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 1025–1038. 10.1007/s00253-014-6256-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jayakumar G. C.; Kanth S. V.; Chandrasekaran B.; Rao J. R.; Nair B. U. Preparation and antimicrobial activity of scleraldehyde from Schizophyllum commune. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345, 2213–2219. 10.1016/j.carres.2010.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kumari M.; Survase S. A.; Singhal R. S. Production of schizophyllan using Schizophyllum commune NRCM. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 1036–1043. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhong K.; Tong L. T.; Liu L. Y.; Zhou X. R.; Liu X. X.; Zhang Q.; Zhou S. M. Immunoregulatory and antitumor activity of schizophyllan underultrasonic treatment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 80, 302–308. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.06.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leathers T.; Nunnally M.; Price N. Co-production of schizophyllan and arabinoxylan from corn fiber. Biotechnol. Lett. 2006, 28, 623–626. 10.1007/s10529-006-0028-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Horisawa S.; Ando H.; Ariga O.; Sakuma Y. Direct ethanol production from cellulosic materials by consolidated biological processing using the wood rot fungus Schizophyllum commune. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 197, 37–41. 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yousef L. F.; Bernards M. A. In vitro metabolism of ginsenosides by the ginseng root pathogen Pythium irregulare. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 1740–1749. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Görke B.; Stülke J. Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 613–624. 10.1038/nrmicro1932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. van den Bogaard P. T. C.; Kleerebezem M.; Kuipers O. P.; de Vos W. M. Control of lactose transport, β-galactosidase activity, and glycolysis by CcpA in Streptococcus thermophilus: evidence for carbon catabolite repression by a non-Phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system sugar. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 5982–5989. 10.1128/JB.182.21.5982-5989.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Collier D. N.; Hager P. W.; Phibbs P. V. Jr. Catabolite repression control in the Pseudomonads. Res. Microbiol. 1996, 147, 551–561. 10.1016/0923-2508(96)84011-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Frunzke J.; Engels V.; Hasenbein S.; Gätgens C.; Bott M. Co-ordinated regulation of gluconate catabolism and glucose uptake in Corynebacterium glutamicum by two functionally equivalent transcriptional regulators, GntR1 and GntR2. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 67, 305–322. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06020.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim S. M.; Choi B. Y.; Ryu Y. S.; Jung S. H.; Park J. M.; Kim G. H.; Lee S. K. Simultaneous utilization of glucose and xylose via novel mechanisms in engineered Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 2015, 30, 141–148. 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shao M. L.; Zhang X.; Rao Z. M.; Xu M. J.; Yang T. W.; Li H.; Xu Z. H.; Yang S. T. Efficient testosterone production by engineered Pichia pastoris co-expressing human 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase with NADPH regeneration. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 1774–1784. 10.1039/C5GC02353J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ruan C. C.; Zhang H.; Zhang L. X.; Liu Z.; Sun G. Z.; Lei J.; Qin Y. X.; Zheng Y. N.; Li X.; Pan H. Y. Biotransformation of ginsenoside Rf to Rh1 by recombinant beta-glucosidase. Molecules 2009, 14, 2043–2048. 10.3390/molecules14062043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim J. H.; Yi Y. S.; Kim M. Y.; Cho J. Y. Role of ginsenosides, the main active components of Panax ginseng, in inflammatory responses and diseases. J. Ginseng Res. 2017, 41, 435–443. 10.1016/j.jgr.2016.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Chen X. J.; Zhang X. J.; Shui Y. M.; Wan J. B.; Gao J. L. Anticancer activities of protopanaxadiol- and protopanaxatriol-type ginsenosides and their metabolites. J. Evidence-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2016, 2016, 1–19. 10.1155/2016/5738694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nabavi S. F.; Sureda A.; Habtemariam S.; Nabavi S. M. Ginsenoside Rd and ischemic stroke; a short review of literatures. J. Ginseng Res. 2015, 39, 299–303. 10.1016/j.jgr.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao9b01001_si_001.pdf (275.6KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES