Abstract
Background
Chronic hepatitis B is a liver disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Chronic hepatitis B requires long‐term management aiming to reduce the risks of hepatocellular inflammatory necrosis, liver fibrosis, decompensated liver cirrhosis, liver failure, and liver cancer, as well as to improve health‐related quality of life. Acupuncture is being used to decrease discomfort and improve immune function in people with chronic hepatitis B. However, the benefits and harms of acupuncture still need to be established in a rigorous way.
Objectives
To assess the benefits and harms of acupuncture versus no intervention or sham acupuncture in people with chronic hepatitis B.
Search methods
We undertook electronic searches of the Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index ‐ Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP (CQVIP), Wanfang Data, and SinoMed to 1 March 2019. We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (www.who.int/ictrp), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov/), and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) for ongoing or unpublished trials until 1 March 2019.
Selection criteria
We included randomised clinical trials, irrespective of publication status, language, and blinding, comparing acupuncture versus no intervention or sham acupuncture in people with chronic hepatitis B. We included participants of any sex and age, diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B as defined by the trialists or according to guidelines. We allowed co‐interventions when the co‐interventions were administered equally to all intervention groups.
Data collection and analysis
Review authors in pairs individually retrieved data from reports and through correspondence with investigators. Primary outcomes were all‐cause mortality, proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events, and health‐related quality of life. Secondary outcomes were hepatitis B‐related mortality, hepatitis B‐related morbidity, and adverse events considered not to be serious. We presented the pooled results as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the risks of bias using risk of bias domains with predefined definitions. We put more weight on the estimate closest to zero effect when results with fixed‐effect and random‐effects models differed. We evaluated the certainty of evidence using GRADE.
Main results
We included eight randomised clinical trials with 555 randomised participants. All included trials compared acupuncture versus no intervention. These trials assessed heterogeneous acupuncture interventions. All trials used heterogeneous co‐interventions applied equally in the compared groups. Seven trials included participants with chronic hepatitis B, and one trial included participants with chronic hepatitis B with comorbid tuberculosis. All trials were assessed at overall high risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence for all outcomes was very low due to high risk of bias for each outcome, imprecision of results (the confidence intervals were wide), and publication bias (small sample size of the trials, and all trials were conducted in China). Additionally, 79 trials lacked the necessary methodological information to ensure their inclusion in our review.
None of the included trials aim to assess all‐cause mortality, serious adverse events, health‐related quality of life, hepatitis B‐related mortality, and hepatitis B‐related morbidity. We are uncertain whether acupuncture, compared with no intervention, has an effect regarding adverse events considered not to be serious (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.06; I² = 0%; 3 trials; 203 participants; very low‐certainty evidence) or detectable hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.68; I² = 98%; 2 trials; 158 participants; very low‐certainty evidence). Acupuncture showed a reduction in detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (a non‐validated surrogate outcome; RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.74; 1 trial, 58 participants; very low‐certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether acupuncture has an effect regarding the remaining separately reported adverse events considered not to be serious.
Three of the eight included trials received academic funding from government or hospital. None of the remaining five trials reported information on funding.
Authors' conclusions
The clinical effects of acupuncture for chronic hepatitis B remain unknown. The included trials lacked data on all‐cause mortality, health‐related quality of life, serious adverse events, hepatitis‐B related mortality, and hepatitis‐B related morbidity. The vast number of excluded trials lacked clear descriptions of their design and conduct. Whether acupuncture influences adverse events considered not to be serious is uncertain. It remains unclear if acupuncture affects HBeAg, and if it is associated with reduction in detectable HBV DNA. Based on available data from only one or two small trials on adverse events considered not to be serious and on the surrogate outcomes HBeAg and HBV DNA, the certainty of evidence is very low. In view of the wide usage of acupuncture, any conclusion that one might try to draw in the future should be based on data on patient and clinically relevant outcomes, assessed in large, high‐quality randomised sham‐controlled trials with homogeneous groups of participants and transparent funding.
Plain language summary
Acupuncture for chronic hepatitis B
Review question To assess the benefits and harms of acupuncture versus no intervention or sham acupuncture (not real acupuncture) in people with chronic hepatitis B.
Background Chronic hepatitis B infection has a substantial economic, psychological, and life impact on people with chronic hepatitis B and their families. Acupuncture has been used in treating people with chronic hepatitis B, as it is believed that it decreases discomfort and improves immune function in people with this disease. However, the benefits and harms of acupuncture have never been established in systematic reviews in a rigorous way.
Search date The review includes trials published by 1 March 2019.
Study characteristics We included eight randomised clinical trials with 555 participants. All trials compared acupuncture versus no intervention. Seven trials included participants with chronic hepatitis B. One trial included chronic hepatitis B participants with tuberculosis and ascites. These trials assessed heterogeneous acupuncture interventions (i.e. manual needle acupuncture, acupoint herbal patching, acupoint injection, and moxibustion). Acupoint is a specifically chosen site for acupuncture manipulation. All trials used heterogeneous co‐interventions applied equally in the compared groups.
Study funding sources Three of the eight included randomised clinical trials received academic funding. None of the remaining five trials reported information on support or funding.
Key results
None of the eight included trials reported data on clinically important outcomes such as all‐cause mortality, serious adverse events, health‐related quality of life, hepatitis B‐related mortality, or hepatitis B‐related morbidity. We are uncertain whether acupuncture compared with no intervention has a beneficial or harmful effect regarding adverse events considered not to be serious. Acupuncture compared with no intervention seems to reduce the proportion of people with detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (a non‐validated surrogate outcome; only one trial). We are uncertain whether acupuncture compared with no intervention has an effect on the proportion of people with detectable HBeAg (a non‐validated surrogate outcome; only two trials). Caution is needed in interpreting these findings as data are provided by only one or a few trials at high risk of bias, and these surrogate outcomes have not yet been proven relevant for people with chronic hepatitis B. We are uncertain whether acupuncture compared with no intervention has an effect on the remaining separately reported adverse events considered not to be serious. We could not use data from 79 other studies, of possible interest to our review, because study authors provided highly insufficient information on their study design and methods. Accordingly, we need more information from randomised clinical trials before benefits or harms of acupuncture for chronic hepatitis B can be determined.
Certainty of the evidence
Certainty of evidence means 'the extent of one's confidence that review results are correct in supporting or rejecting a finding'. The certainty of evidence on the use of acupuncture in people with chronic hepatitis B virus infection in terms of its beneficial or harmful effects on death, health‐related quality of life, risk of dying due to HBV infection, and serious adverse events cannot be determined, as data on these outcomes were lacking. The certainty of evidence on acupuncture, when compared with no intervention, in terms of adverse events considered not to be serious, the proportion of people with detectable HBV DNA, and the proportion of people with detectable HBeAg, is very low. Whether the last two outcomes are relevant to the well‐being of people with chronic hepatitis B is still not scientifically proven. The very low certainty of the evidence is due to insufficient data ensuing from one, two, or very few trials with insufficient reporting.
Summary of findings
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Acupuncture compared with no intervention for chronic hepatitis B.
| Acupuncture compared with no intervention for chronic hepatitis B | ||||||
| Patient or population: chronic hepatitis B Setting: outpatients or hospitalised patients Intervention: acupuncture Comparison: no intervention | ||||||
| Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | № of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
| Risk with no intervention | Risk with acupuncture | |||||
| All‐cause mortality | No data | |||||
| Proportion of participants with 1 or more serious adverse events | No data | |||||
| Health‐related quality of life | No data | |||||
| Hepatitis B‐related mortality | No data | |||||
| Hepatitis B‐related morbidity | No data | |||||
| Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered to be 'not serious' (at maximum follow‐up: 2 to 6 months; median: 3 months) | Study population | RR 0.67 (0.43 to 1.06) | 203 (3 RCTs) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ VERY LOWa,b,c | 2) The optimal information size criteria are not met and the sample is not very large (fewer than 4000 participants) | |
| 330 per 1000 | 221 per 1000 (142 to 350) | |||||
| Exploratory outcomes: Proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA (at maximum follow‐up: 6 months) Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (at maximum follow‐up: 3 to 6 months; median 4.5 months) |
Study population | |||||
| 821 per 1000 | 370 per 1000 (222 to 608) | RR 0.45 (0.27 to 0.74) | 58 (1 RCT) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ VERY LOWa,b,c | 2) The optimal information size criteria are not met and the sample is not very large (fewer than 4000 participants) | |
| Study population | ||||||
| 923 per 1000 | 591 per 1000 (102 to 1000) | RR 0.64 (0.11 to 3.68) | 158 (2 RCTs) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ VERY LOWa,b,c | 2) The number of events was less than 300 and the CI overlaps no effect and fails to exclude important benefit (RR < 0.75) and important harm (RR > 1.25) | |
| *The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval; HBV: hepatitis B virus; HBeAg: hepatitis B virus e‐antigen; RCT: randomised clinical trial; RR: risk ratio. | ||||||
| GRADE Working Group grades of evidence. High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. | ||||||
aDowngraded by one level for risk of bias because of some concerns with allocation concealment, blinding, and selective outcome reporting. bDowngraded by two levels (for the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg) or one level (for the proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious outcomes and the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA) because of imprecision of the result. cDowngraded by one level because of publication bias: all included studies were small.
Background
Description of the condition
Hepatitis B is caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV), a DNA virus enveloped by an icosahedral capsid replicated via reverse transcription (Bruss 2004). HBV belongs to the family of Hepadnaviridae and is commonly classified into 10 genotypes (A through J) (Sunbul 2014; Tong 2016). This virus is commonly spread through blood, body fluids, mother‐to‐child transmission, or sexual contact, or is induced unintentionally through medical procedures (WHO 2017). Approximately 257 million people around the world, or 3.5% of the world's population, are infected by HBV (Ott 2012; Schweitzer 2015; WHO 2017). The African and Western Pacific regions account for 68% of those infected (WHO 2017). In 2006, about 93 million people in China were carriers of HBV, accounting for 8% to 10% of the total population in China (Qi 2011). Mother‐to‐child transmission still accounts for the majority of HBV infection worldwide (Nelson 2016), and the risk of developing chronic hepatitis B infection is highest among children (Nelson 2016; WHO 2017). Annually, 650,000 people die, most often from complications of hepatitis B, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (WHO 2017). People with hepatitis B infection may have co‐infections, including HIV and other hepatitis viruses (hepatitis C and D) (Mallet 2017), and these co‐infections may increase the risk of all‐cause mortality (Puoti 2000; Mallet 2017). Chronic HBV infection imposes substantial economic and psychological lifelong burdens on people with this chronic infection, as well as on their families (Alizadeh 2008; Lu 2013; Keshavarz 2015; Ezbarami 2017).
The initial evaluation of people with chronic HBV infection includes a thorough history, physical examination, assessment of liver disease activity and severity (e.g. liver biopsy, abdominal hepatic ultrasound, alanine transaminase assessments), and markers of HBV infection (e.g. HBV DNA and hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg)) (AASLD 2016; EASL 2017). According to guidelines (AASLD 2016; EASL 2017), chronic hepatitis B is defined as HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity for longer than six months, serum HBV DNA positivity greater than 2000 IU/mL (i.e. 10⁴ copies/mL), persistent or intermittent elevation in levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and liver biopsy findings showing chronic HBV with moderate or severe necroinflammation. Hence, an immunological cure has been defined as HBeAg loss and sustained HBV DNA suppression, and a virological cure may be defined as eradication of the virus, including the cccDNA form, from the blood (EASL 2017). Reducing mortality and hepatitis B‐related morbidities, such as liver cirrhosis, liver failure, and liver cancer, prolonging survival, and improving quality of life are long‐term treatment aims (WHO 2015; EASL 2017).
Description of the intervention
Acupuncture, described as an organised system of interventions, was first documented in The Yellow Emperor's Classic of Internal Medicine, which dates back to 100 B.C. (YECIM 100BC). In ancient times, acupuncture was used to treat people with symptoms such as loss of appetite, nausea, and mild right upper quadrant discomfort. These symptoms are similar to the symptoms that characterise chronic hepatitis B. Nowadays, acupuncture, including manual needle acupuncture, electroacupuncture, laser acupuncture, acupressure, acupoint injection therapy, moxibustion, and acupoint herbal patching, is used most often in China, Korea, and Japan (Robinson 2000; Woo 2014); USA (Ying 2010a); UK (Hopton 2012); and Australia (Zheng 2014). Acupuncture for chronic hepatitis B is included in the Chinese medical system (Robinson 2000; Kong 2005; Lu 2010; Han 2011; He 2012; Ding 2013; Wang 2014a; Gao 2016). Westernised medical application of acupuncture involves mainly the usage of trigger points, segmental points, and formula points (Peter 2005; Biersack 2007).
Strict sterilisation of acupuncture needles or disposable acupuncture needles must be used in acupuncture practice to avoid infection caused by inadequate sterilisation of reusable acupuncture needles, lack of local official monitoring of acupuncture practice, and lack of a clear understanding of blood‐borne disease (Sulaiman 1995; Reynolds 2008; Cheng 2015). Other adverse events such as pneumothorax, injury to the central nervous system, infection, drowsiness (severe enough to cause a traffic hazard), and localised argyrosis have been reported as likely to be associated with acupuncture (Yamashita 2001; White 2004b). Although the risk of serious adverse events with acupuncture seems to be uncommon in standard practice (estimated as 0.55 per 10,000 individual patients; Yamashita 2001; White 2004b), training acupuncturists as well as developing further non‐physical invasive acupuncture methods is important.
How the intervention might work
Traditional Chinese medicine theory describes health as a state maintained by a balance of energy within the body (Longhurst 2010; Lin 2014). Energy circulation may become abnormal when organs or physiological systems act excessively or deficiently. Classical acupuncture is based on the theory of stimulating energy pathways through specific points (acupoints) to rebalance 'qi' (vital) within body and organ systems, to adjust blood circulation, and to influence physiological system function (Longhurst 2010; Yang 2011; Wang 2013a). Stimulation could be induced by needle, heat, drugs, laser, or electricity. Each acupoint may have its own specific therapeutic functions (Longhurst 2010; Yang 2011; Wang 2013a). Acupuncture as prescribed for different diseases mainly varies in terms of acupoints and manipulation approaches (Longhurst 2010; Yang 2011). Commonly used acupoints for chronic hepatitis B are Zusanli (Leg Three Miles, ST 36), Sanyinjiao (Three Yin Intersection, SP 6), Taichong (Supreme Rushing, Liv‐3), Ganshu (Liver Transporter, B1‐18), Neiguan (Inner Pass, Pc 6), Yanglingquan (Yang Mound Spring, GB 34), Jimen (Cyclic Gate, Liv‐14), Pishu (Spleen Transporter, B1‐20), and Shenshu (Kidney Transporter, Bi‐23) (Kong 2005; Han 2011; He 2012; Wang 2014a; Gao 2016). Acupuncture is widely used in clinical practice to relieve symptoms (Zhang 2005; Jin 2011; Lu 2011; Shao 2011; Chen 2013), as well as to improve immune function to slow the progression of chronic hepatitis B (Xu 2008; Xie 2010; Ding 2013). Clinical trials have suggested that acupuncture may improve immune function by increasing blood leukocyte count (Xu 2008; Zhou 2010), along with blood natural killer cell count and activity (Zhao 2010; Cao 2011; Zhang 2011), and by improving erythrocyte immune function (Xie 2010). Clinical trials have also suggested that acupuncture may regulate immune factors by increasing cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) level, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) level, and the ratio of T helper cells to cytotoxic T cells (CD4+/CD8+) in serum (Lu 2010; Ding 2013), or by reducing tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF‐α) and interleukin 1 beta (IL‐1β) in serum (He 2011).
Why it is important to do this review
We have identified two meta‐analyses on this topic (Wang 2015; Wu 2017), as well as several randomised clinical trials (Kong 2005; Han 2011; He 2012; Chen 2014; Wang 2014a; Gao 2016). The Wang 2015 meta‐analysis has shown that acupoint injection versus non‐acupoint injection might decrease transaminase levels in serum, but these authors drew attention to the high risk of bias of the included randomised clinical trials. The Wu 2017 meta‐analysis has shown that moxibustion might improve normalisation of transaminases and total bilirubin; however, these authors included only nine small randomised clinical trials, which they assessed at low methodological quality by using the Jadad scoring system (Jadad 1996). The listed randomised clinical trials and the two meta‐analyses focused primarily on assessing the effects of acupuncture on surrogate outcomes, rather than on clinically important patient‐centred outcomes, such as hepatitis B‐related mortality and morbidity and health‐related quality of life. It becomes questionable whether the surrogate outcomes assessed by these trial investigators would lead to improvement in clinically important outcomes, as validation of any clinically important outcomes should be carried out in randomised clinical trials (Gluud 2007; Flemming 2012; Ciani 2017; Jakobsen 2017; Kemp 2017; Jakobsen 2018). Therefore, we find our attempt to meta‐analyse available data on benefits and harms of acupuncture for chronic hepatitis B, in terms of patient‐centred outcomes, of high importance. The current review sought to assess the benefits and harms of acupuncture versus no intervention or sham acupuncture in people with chronic hepatitis B.
Objectives
To assess the benefits and harms of acupuncture versus no intervention or sham acupuncture in people with chronic hepatitis B.
Methods
Criteria for considering studies for this review
Types of studies
Randomised clinical trials irrespective of blinding, language, year, publication format, or publication status.
Types of participants
Inclusion criteria
Trial participants of any sex and age, diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B, as defined according to the trialists or according to guidelines (see Description of the condition; AASLD 2016; EASL 2017). In addition to chronic hepatitis B, trial participants could have had cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, concomitant HIV or AIDS, hepatitis C, hepatitis D, or any other concomitant disease.
Exclusion criteria
No exclusion criteria were applied.
Types of interventions
Experimental intervention
Acupuncture
Acupuncture, performed via any of the techniques below, regardless of the style used by the acupuncturist (e.g. traditional Chinese medicine; Japanese, Korean, Western medical) or the treatment regimens provided (e.g. numbers and names of acupoints, depth of insertion, stimulation retention time, times in a day).
Manual needle acupuncture: thin needles are inserted at a specific location of the body, known as 'acupoints'. Needling is usually performed perpendicularly or with a tilt of 15 to 45 degrees to a depth of 0.5 to 1 inch, accompanied with or without needle flicking or rotation. Needle retention is commonly allowed from 20 to 30 minutes after insertion of the last one. Manual needle acupuncture is usually administered once or twice a day (Wang 2012; Bardy 2015).
Electroacupuncture: the inserted needles are attached to an electric needle instrument (e.g. G6850‐type) that generates continuous electric pulses with small clips to adjust impulse frequency and intensity. Usually, stimulation lasts for 20 to 30 minutes under a continuous wave (e.g. 2 Hz) (NGC 2016; Xu 2018).
Laser acupuncture: this technique allows low‐level lasers to stimulate energy and blood circulation within the body. Continuous laser light at a set wavelength (e.g. 685 nm) is used as painless laser needles. Output power may vary from 20 mW to 90 mW per laser needle, and stimulation time may usually last 10 to 40 minutes (Litscher 2007; Jiang 2017).
Acupressure: acupressure uses a similar principle to acupuncture. Commonly, it is performed by physical pressure, which can be applied by hand, elbow, or other devices to acupoints and may last from 3 to 20 minutes, once to twice daily (Yazdanpanahi 2017; Ahmedov 2018).
Acupoint injection: a development of acupuncture, this treatment injects drugs into acupoints. Acupoint injection is usually implemented with antiviral injections (e.g. peginterferon alfa‐2b 180 μg once a week) (Liang 2011; Lee 2012; Zhang 2012; Jing 2016), or through traditional Chinese medicine injections (e.g. Xiang Dan injection 4 mL once daily) (Zhang 2005; Li 2008; Zhang 2015).
Moxibustion: this technique burns or places dry herb moxa (Folium Artemisia argy or mugwort) or another mixture of herbs or therapeutic materials directly or indirectly on acupoints of the body. For indirect moxibustion, an approximate 2‐cm‐long moxa stick is burned at 1 to 2 cm above the skin of the acupoint. A local warm feeling should be obtained (Wang 2017; Kuge 2018). For direct moxibustion, moxa cones are burned directly on the acupoints (Yun 2016; Schlaeger 2018).
Acupoint herbal patching: through herbal decoction made into a paste, or grinded herbal powders mixed with water, vinegar, wine, egg white, honey, and vegetable oil, or with solidified oil (e.g. vaseline) or with yellow vinegar into a paste, or ointment, or a small pie, acupoint herbal patching directly covers the acupoint or affected area (Ashi points) from three hours to 24 hours, once daily (Zhang 1990; Hsu 2010; Lee 2016).
Control intervention
No intervention or sham acupuncture
We allowed co‐interventions in both experimental and control intervention groups only if the co‐intervention was administered equally to all intervention groups.
Types of outcome measures
Primary outcomes
All‐cause mortality
Proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events, that is, any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life‐threatening, require hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, result in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or present as a congenital anomaly or birth defect (ICH‐E2A 1994; ICH‐GCP E6(R2) 2016)
Health‐related quality of life: any scale used by trialists to assess participants' reporting of their quality of life
Secondary outcomes
Hepatitis B‐related mortality
Hepatitis B‐related morbidity (proportion of participants with one or more of the following events: cirrhosis, ascites, variceal bleeding, hepato‐renal syndrome, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic encephalopathy, or needed liver transplantation, and who have not died)
Propotion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant that does not meet the above criteria for a serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event considered not to be serious (ICH‐E2A 1994; ICH‐GCP E6(R2) 2016)
Exploratory outcomes
Proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA in serum, plasma, or HBV DNA viral load
Proportion of participants with detectable hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) in serum or plasma
Separately reported serious adverse events
Separately reported hepatitis B‐related morbidity
Separately reported adverse events considered not to be serious
We assessed all outcomes at maximum follow‐up.
Search methods for identification of studies
Electronic searches
We searched the Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group Module); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE Ovid; Embase Ovid; Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS; Bireme); Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science); and Conference Proceedings Citation Index ‐ Science (Web of Science) (Royle 2003). We also searched four Chinese biomedical databases: China Network Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP (CQVIP), Wanfang Data, and SinoMed.
Appendix 1 provides the search strategies used along with expected time spans.
Searching other resources
We searched reference lists of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses on this topic and of the retrieved studies. We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (www.who.int/ictrp), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov/), and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (chictr.org.cn), for ongoing or unpublished trials.
Data collection and analysis
We conducted our review in accordance with the recommendations provided in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011), the Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group Module, and the Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR) guidelines (MECIR 2018).
We performed analyses using Review Manager 5 (Review Manager 2014), as well as Trial Sequential Analysis version 0.9.5.10 Beta (Thorlund 2011a; TSA 2011).
Selection of studies
Review authors (DZK, GLY, ZZ, YY, YXL, QGW) in pairs independently screened titles and abstracts for inclusion of potentially eligible trials. We listed multiple reports of the same trial under its main reference and ineligible studies with reasons for exclusion in the Characteristics of excluded studies table. We resolved disagreements through discussion, or we asked JPL to arbitrate. We recorded the selection process in a PRISMA flow diagram (PRISMA 2009).
Data extraction and management
Review authors (DZK, YL, FZ, HYZ) in pairs independently extracted data using a prepiloted electronic data collection form created in Microsoft Excel. In case of discrepancies, we rechecked the extracted data. When disagreements persisted, we tried to resolve disagreements through discussion. We contacted JPL to arbitrate if disagreements persisted, before proceeding with analyses.
In pairs we also extracted the following information: publication data (i.e. year, country, study authors); study characteristics and design; characteristics of trial participants; trial inclusion and exclusion criteria; interventions; outcomes; follow‐up; and types of data analyses (i.e. intention‐to‐treat, modified intention‐to‐treat, per‐protocol). We contacted trial authors to request missing information. We extracted data at maximum follow‐up.
Assessment of risk of bias in included studies
Review authors in pairs (DZK, YL, FZ, HYZ) independently assessed risk of bias in the included trials. We assessed risk of bias according to the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool (Higgins 2011), the Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group Module, and methodological studies (Schulz 1995; Moher 1998; Kjaergard 2001; Wood 2008; Savović 2012a; Savović 2012b; Lundh 2017; Savović 2018), using the following definitions within domains.
Allocation sequence generation
Low risk of bias: the study authors performed sequence generation using computer random number generation or a random numbers table. Drawing lots, tossing a coin, shuffling cards, and throwing dice were adequate if an independent person not otherwise involved in the study performed them
Unclear risk of bias: the study authors did not specify the method of sequence generation
High risk of bias: the sequence generation method was not random. We planned to include such studies only for assessment of harms
Allocation concealment
Low risk of bias: the participant allocations could not have been foreseen in advance of, or during, enrolment. A central and independent randomisation unit controlled allocation. The investigators were unaware of the allocation sequence (e.g. whether the allocation sequence was hidden in sequentially numbered, opaque, and sealed envelopes)
Unclear risk of bias: the study authors did not describe the method used to conceal the allocation, so the intervention allocations may have been foreseen before, or during, enrolment
High risk of bias: it is likely that investigators who assigned the participants knew the allocation sequence. We planned to include such studies only for assessment of harms
Blinding of participants and personnel
Low risk of bias: either of the following: blinding of participants and key study personnel ensured, and it was unlikely that the blinding could have been broken; or rarely, no blinding or incomplete blinding, but the review authors judged that the outcome was not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding, such as mortality
Unclear risk of bias: either of the following: insufficient information to permit judgement of 'low risk' or 'high risk'; or the study did not address this outcome
High risk of bias: either of the following: no blinding or incomplete blinding, and the outcome was likely to be influenced by lack of blinding; or blinding of key study participants and personnel attempted, but likely that the blinding could have been broken, and the outcome was likely to be influenced by lack of blinding.
Blinding of outcome assessment
Low risk of bias: either of the following: blinding of outcome assessment ensured, and unlikely that the blinding could have been broken; or rarely, no blinding of outcome assessment, but the review authors judged that the outcome measurement was not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding such as mortality
Unclear risk of bias: either of the following: insufficient information to permit judgement of 'low risk' or 'high risk'; or the study did not address this outcome
High risk of bias: either of the following: no blinding of outcome assessment, and the outcome measurement was likely to be influenced by lack of blinding; or blinding of outcome assessment, but likely that the blinding could have been broken, and the outcome measurement was likely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data
Low risk of bias: missing data were unlikely to make treatment effects depart from plausible values. The study used sufficient methods, such as multiple imputation, to handle missing data
Unclear risk of bias: information was insufficient for assessment of whether missing data in combination with the method used to handle missing data were likely to induce bias on the results
High risk of bias: the results were likely to be biased due to missing data
Selective outcome reporting
Low risk of bias: the trial reported the following predefined outcomes: all‐cause mortality; serious adverse events; and health‐related quality of life outcomes. If the original trial protocol was available, the outcomes should be those called for in that protocol. If the trial protocol was obtained from a trial registry (e.g. www.clinicaltrials.gov), the outcomes sought were those enumerated in the original protocol if the trial protocol was registered before or at the time that the trial was begun. If the trial protocol was registered after the trial was begun, those outcomes were not considered to be reliable
Unclear risk of bias: not all predefined outcomes were reported fully, or it was unclear whether or not data on these outcomes were recorded
High risk of bias: one or more predefined outcomes were not reported
Other bias
Low risk of bias: the study appeared to be free of other factors that could put it at risk of bias
Unclear risk of bias: the study may or may not have been free of other factors that could put it at risk of bias
High risk of bias: other factors in the study could put it at risk of bias
Overall risk of bias
Low risk of bias: we planned to classify the outcome result at overall 'low risk of bias' only if we could classify all of the bias sources described in the above paragraphs at 'low risk of bias'
High risk of bias: we planned to classify the outcome result at 'high risk of bias' if we could classify any of the risk of bias sources described above at 'unclear risk of bias' or 'high risk of bias'
We tried to reach consensus through discussion. We planned that JPL would arbitrate in cases of disagreement.
Measures of treatment effect
We used the risk ratio (RR) for measuring dichotomous outcomes, and we intended to use the mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for head‐to‐head comparison meta‐analysis. If different instruments were used to measure the same continuous outcome, we planned to calculate the standardised mean difference (SMD), with 95% CI.
Unit of analysis issues
We followed the guidelines set forth in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011).
The unit of analysis was participants randomised to the trial intervention groups. For trials with multiple intervention groups, we intended to include the groups in which our experimental and control interventions were compared. We intended to divide the control group into two to avoid double‐counting in case this was a common comparator.
For cluster‐randomised trials, we intended to directly extract from the analysis data that properly account for the cluster design. We intended to determine the inflated standard errors that account for clustering if there was no control of the clustering. We intended to use the inverse‐variance method in Review Manager 5 (Higgins 2011; Review Manager 2014).
For cross‐over trials, we intended to extract only data from the first period to avoid residual treatment effects (Higgins 2011).
Dealing with missing data
We attempted to contact trial authors to request missing data or clarification of unclearly presented information.
We performed our analysis using the intention‐to‐treat method whenever possible. If this was not possible, we used the data that were available to us. We planned to include participants with incomplete or missing data, for all outcomes, in sensitivity analyses by imputing them as follows.
For dichotomous outcomes.
Best‐worst‐case scenario: we planned to assume that all participants lost to follow‐up in the experimental group had survived, had improvement in clinical symptoms, had no serious adverse event, and had no morbidity (for all dichotomous variables); and that all participants lost to follow‐up in the control group had not survived, had no improvement in clinical symptoms, had a serious adverse event, and had morbidities (for all dichotomous variables).
Worst‐best‐case scenario: we planned to assume that all participants lost to follow‐up in the experimental group had not survived, had no improvement in clinical symptoms, had a serious adverse event, and had morbidities (for all dichotomous variables); and that all participants lost to follow‐up in the control group had survived, had improvement in clinical symptoms, had no serious adverse event, and had no morbidity (for all dichotomous variables).
For continuous outcomes.
We planned to base the 'beneficial' outcome for the group mean plus 2 standard deviations (SDs), or 1 SD, and the 'harmful' outcome for the group mean minus 2 SDs, or 1 SD (Jakobsen 2014).
We intended to request the information from trial authors or to calculate SDs using data from the trial, if not reported.
Assessment of heterogeneity
We assessed clinical and methodological heterogeneity by carefully examining trial participant characteristics and the design of included trials. We assessed the presence of clinical heterogeneity by comparing effect estimates in trial reports in terms of participants with different diagnostic criteria, participants diagnosed with only chronic hepatitis B, and participants diagnosed with concomitant diseases; participants with acupuncture response and participants with no acupuncture response; acupuncture approaches; different duration of the intervention; co‐interventions and different control interventions; and follow‐up (please see Subgroup analysis and investigation of heterogeneity). Different study designs and risk of bias can contribute to methodological heterogeneity. We assessed statistical heterogeneity by comparing the results of the fixed‐effect model meta‐analysis and the random‐effects model meta‐analysis. We primarily used visual inspection of forest plots to look for signs of statistical heterogeneity. We also used the Chi² test with significance threshold set at P < 0.10 and measured the amount of heterogeneity using the I² statistic to assess to what extent heterogeneity was present (Higgins 2002; Higgins 2003; Higgins 2011). We interpreted I² as suggested in Higgins 2011: 0% to 40%: might not be important; 30% to 60%: might represent moderate heterogeneity; 50% to 90%: might represent substantial heterogeneity; 75% to 100%: considerable heterogeneity.
For the heterogeneity adjustment of the diversity‐adjusted required information size (DARIS) in the Trial Sequential Analysis, we used diversity (D²) because the I² statistics used for this purpose might underestimate the required information size (Wetterslev 2009).
Assessment of reporting biases
We planned to assess reporting bias using funnel plots, provided that we had obtained data from at least 10 trials per comparison. To assess risk of bias, we intended to look for symmetry or asymmetry of each funnel plot. For dichotomous outcomes, we intended to assess asymmetry using the Harbord test (Harbord 2006). For continuous outcomes, we intended to apply the regression asymmetry test (Egger 1997).
Data synthesis
Meta‐analysis
We performed the analyses according to the instructions provided in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011), as well as the Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group Module. We analysed data using Review Manager 5 (Review Manager 2014).
We assessed our intervention effects via both fixed‐effect and random‐effects model meta‐analyses, and we reported results of both when results differed (e.g. one giving a significant intervention effect, the other no significant intervention effect). We put greater weight on the estimate closest to the zero effect (the highest P value) (Jakobsen 2014).
We assessed three primary outcomes with P ≤ 0.025 as significant, and three secondary outcomes with P ≤ 0.025 as significant to secure a family‐wise error rate below 0.05 (Jakobsen 2014). For exploratory outcomes, we considered P < 0.05 as significant because we view these outcomes as only hypothesis‐generating outcomes. Whether we presented our data synthesis as a meta‐analysis or in a narrative way depended on our assessment of the statistical and clinical heterogeneity of the meta‐analysed trial data per comparison.
We did not impute any missing data in our primary analysis; however, we planned to impute missing values in our sensitivity analysis of continuous and dichotomous data (see Sensitivity analysis; Jakobsen 2014).
We planned to use Fisher's exact test for dichotomous data (Fisher 1922), as well as Student's t‐test for continuous data when data from only one trial were available (Student 1908).
Trial Sequential Analysis
As cumulative meta‐analysis involves risk of producing random errors due to sparse data and repetitive testing, we performed Trial Sequential Analysis. To control random errors, we calculated the required information size (i.e. the number of participants needed in a meta‐analysis to detect or reject a certain intervention effect) (Wetterslev 2008; Thorlund 2011a; TSA 2011). The required information size calculation should also account for the diversity present in the meta‐analysis (Wetterslev 2008; Wetterslev 2009; Wetterslev 2017). A more detailed description of Trial Sequential Analysis can be found at www.ctu.dk/tsa (Thorlund 2011a; TSA 2011).
We controlled the risks of type I errors and type II errors for both dichotomous and continuous outcomes (Brok 2008; Wetterslev 2008; Brok 2009; Wetterslev 2009; Thorlund 2010; Castellini 2017; Wetterslev 2017). For dichotomous outcomes, we estimated the diversity‐adjusted required information size (DARIS) based on the event proportion in the control group, a relative risk reduction of 15%, an alpha of 2.5% for primary and secondary outcomes and 5.0% for exploratory outcomes, a beta of 10% (Castellini 2017), and diversity suggested by the trials in the meta‐analysis (Wetterslev 2009; Jakobsen 2014). We intended to include participants with different severity of chronic hepatitis B, but it happened that no participants in the control group died. Therefore, we conducted three post‐hoc Trial Sequential Analyses based on assumed proportions of participants dying being low (4%; young participants with mild disease), moderate (20%; middle‐aged participants with mild disease), and high (40%, middle‐aged participants with severe disease) within one year in the control group. For continuous outcomes, we intended to estimate the DARIS based on the SD observed in the control group, a minimal relevant difference of 50% of this SD, an alpha of 2.5%, a beta of 10% (Castellini 2017), and diversity suggested by the trials in the meta‐analysis (Wetterslev 2009; Jakobsen 2014).
We tested statistical significance using trial sequential monitoring boundaries for benefit and harm, along with futility using futility boundaries (Thorlund 2011a). If the Z‐curve crosses the trial sequential monitory boundaries for benefit or harm before reaching DARIS, the effect of the intervention is considered superior or inferior to that of the control intervention. If the Z‐curve crosses the futility monitoring boundaries before reaching the DARIS, this would mean that the intervention does not possess the postulated effect, and further randomised trials might be futile. Furthermore, if the trial sequential monitoring boundaries are not surpassed, and if the trial monitoring boundaries for futility are not crossed, it is probably necessary to continue conducting trials to detect or reject a certain intervention effect (Wetterslev 2008; Thorlund 2011b). In our cases where the monitoring boundaries were not reached, we also displayed the Trial Sequential Analysis‐adjusted CI.
Subgroup analysis and investigation of heterogeneity
In cases of available data, we planned to perform the following subgroup analyses.
Trials at low risk of bias compared to trials at high risk of bias (in terms of overall risk of bias, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, and selective outcome reporting).
Different control interventions stratified by no intervention or sham acupuncture (data were not available).
Different acupuncture approaches stratified by manual needle acupuncture, electroacupuncture, laser acupuncture, acupressure, acupoint injection therapy, moxibustion, or acupoint herbal patching.
Different duration of the intervention stratified according to the medians observed.
Trials with participants who had acupuncture response (e.g. de qi, muscle twitch response) compared to trials with participants who had no acupuncture response (data were not available).
Participants according to different diagnostic criteria.
Participants diagnosed only with chronic hepatitis B compared to participants diagnosed with concomitant disease (cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, HIV infection, AIDS, hepatitis C, hepatitis D, or any of these). We analysed each concomitant disease separately.
Sensitivity analysis
In addition to the sensitivity analysis described under Dealing with missing data, we compared our GRADE imprecision assessments versus those conducted via Trial Sequential Analysis (Jakobsen 2014; Castellini 2018; Gartlehner 2019). We deemed the conduct of further sensitivity analyses unnecessary.
Summary of findings
We constructed a 'Summary of findings' table to show our results and confidence in the evidence for Primary outcomes and Secondary outcomes. We displayed information on assumed control group risk, corresponding intervention group risk, relative effect, MD, CI, statistical significance of relative effect, number of participants, and quality of the evidence. We calculated the corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) using the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). Using GRADEpro GDT software (community.cochrane.org/help/tools‐and‐software/gradepro‐gdt), we assessed five factors of the evidence referring to limitations in the study design and implementation that suggested the quality of evidence: within‐study risk of bias, indirectness of the evidence (population, intervention, control, outcomes), unexplained heterogeneity or inconsistency of results (including problems with subgroup analyses), imprecision of results, and risk of publication bias (GRADEpro GDT; Balshem 2011; Guyatt 2011a; Guyatt 2011b; Guyatt 2011c; Guyatt 2011d; Guyatt 2011e; Guyatt 2011f; Guyatt 2011g; Guyatt 2011h; Guyatt 2013a; Guyatt 2013b; Guyatt 2013c; Guyatt 2013d; Mustafa 2013; Guyatt 2017).
We classified the evidence as follows.
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.
Results
Description of studies
Results of the search
Through our electronic searches, we identified a total of 1840 references (Figure 1). We found four additional references by searching the references of publications retrieved through the searches. After excluding 1651 duplicated or clearly irrelevant references, we read the full text of 199 publications. One hundred ten studies failed to fulfil the inclusion criteria. Seventy‐three studies failed to provide a clear description of the random sequence generation method, and another six studies provided highly insufficient information for review authors to judge whether or not the described studies were randomised clinical trials (Arya 1989; HBAAC 1994; Qian 1994; Manning 2000; Zhao 2004; Yao 2005). We could not obtain missing information from study authors. This is why we created a table listing the 79 studies in need of supplementary information on their design and methods (Appendix 2). We have not included any of these studies in our meta‐analysis. We found two ongoing studies ‐ ChiCTR‐IOR‐17011957; ChiCTR‐IOR‐17011962 ‐ and no unpublished studies.
1.

Study flow diagram: date of last search 1 March 2019.
Included studies
Eight randomised clinical trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria of our review (Wang 2002; Huang 2011; Liao 2011; Zou 2011; Wang 2013; Zhang 2014; Jing 2016; Zhu 2016). Four of these trials provided data for meta‐analyses. The remaining four trials did not study the outcomes of interest of our review, and hence, we used the provided information from these four trials only in a narrative way. All eight trials were conducted in China and were published as full paper articles in Mandarin. The eight trials seem to have been published only once, as we could not come across any other publications describing the same trials. For details on the included trials, see Characteristics of included studies.
Three of the eight trials reported that they were funded through academic projects (Zou 2011; Zhang 2014; Zhu 2016). The remaining five trials provided no information on support or sponsorship.
Characteristics of the studies
Participants
The eight included trials randomised a total of 555 participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B (Wang 2002; Huang 2011; Liao 2011; Zou 2011; Wang 2013; Zhang 2014; Jing 2016; Zhu 2016). The number of participants in these trials ranged from 60 to 160. The age of participants ranged between 26 and 43 years. The sex of participants was reported in seven trials, and the ratio of male to female participants was 263:131 (Huang 2011; Liao 2011; Wang 2013; Zhang 2014; Jing 2016; Zhu 2016).
Participants in seven trials were diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B according to diagnostic criteria described in guidelines (Huang 2011; Liao 2011; Zou 2011; Wang 2013; Zhang 2014; Jing 2016; Zhu 2016). The remaining trial did not report on the criteria used to establish the diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B (Wang 2002). In one trial, all 65 participants also had tuberculosis and ascites (Zhu 2016).
Participants with severe chronic hepatitis B were excluded from two trials (Liao 2011; Zou 2011); participants with liver cirrhosis were excluded from two trials (Liao 2011; Jing 2016); participants with other types of hepatitis were excluded from four trials (Liao 2011; Zou 2011; Wang 2013; Jing 2016); participants with co‐infection with other hepatitis virus or human immunodeficiency virus were excluded from six trials (Huang 2011; Liao 2011; Zou 2011; Wang 2013; Zhang 2014; Jing 2016); participants with other diseases such as cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, lung, kidney, endocrine, haematopoietic, and neural disease, as well as retinopathy, psoriasis, depression, or mental illness, were excluded from six trials (Huang 2011; Liao 2011; Wang 2013; Zhang 2014; Jing 2016; Zhu 2016); participants with liver cancer were excluded from three trials (Liao 2011; Wang 2013; Jing 2016); participants with hepatic encephalopathy or gastrointestinal bleeding were excluded from two trials (Liao 2011; Zhu 2016); participants with liver surgery were excluded from two trials (Huang 2011; Zhang 2014); participants with pregnancy or breastfeeding were excluded from two trials (Liao 2011; Jing 2016); participants with alcoholism or drug use were excluded from two trials (Jing 2016; Zhu 2016); participants who were allergic to trial drugs were excluded from three trials (Huang 2011; Liao 2011; Zhang 2014); and participants using antiviral drugs, immunomodulator drugs, or drugs that would influence the trial before enrolment were excluded from five trials (Wang 2002; Huang 2011; Liao 2011; Zhang 2014; Jing 2016).
Interventions and comparisons
All eight trials compared acupuncture plus co‐interventions versus equal co‐interventions. Two trials evaluated manual needle acupuncture (Wang 2002; Zhang 2014). Three trials evaluated acupoint herbal patching (Liao 2011; Zou 2011; Zhu 2016). Two trials evaluated acupoint Astragalus injection (Huang 2011; Jing 2016). One trial evaluated moxibustion (Wang 2013).
The same acupoints for manual needle acupuncture in the included trials were Zu San Li (ST36), San Yin Jiao (SP6), and Tai Chong (LV3) (Wang 2002; Zhang 2014), and the retention time for manual needle acupuncture was one hour (Wang 2002). The same acupoints for herbal patching in the included trials were Ji Men (SP11) and Ri Yue (GB 24) (Liao 2011; Zou 2011), and the retention time for herbal patching ranged from 3 hours to 36 hours, but the herbs used for herbal patching were different among trials. The dosage of Astragalus injection was 5 mL in each side of the acupoint Zu San Li (ST36) in one trial (Jing 2016), and 2 mL in each side of the acupoint Zu San Li (ST36) in the other trial (Huang 2011). The acupoint for moxibustion was umbilicus (Shen Que, CV 8), and the retention time was 30 minutes. Treatment duration ranged from 14 days to 12 months. Follow‐up of trial participants in four trials ranged from 1 month to 12 months after completion of treatment (Wang 2002; Huang 2011; Zou 2011; Zhu 2016), and follow‐up of trial participants in the remaining four trials ended with completion of treatment (Liao 2011; Wang 2013; Zhang 2014; Jing 2016).
Participants in eight trials received co‐interventions such as antiviral drugs, immunomodulatory drugs, antidepressants, and hepatoprotective drugs (reduced glutathione for injection and human albumin in Zhu 2016; interferon in Wang 2002, Huang 2011, and Jing 2016; and diammonium glycyrrhizinate in Liao 2011, Zou 2011, and Zhang 2014). Zhang 2014 used paroxetine for all 70 participants to relieve depressive symptoms.
Outcomes
None of the included randomised clinical trials reported data on mortality, serious adverse events, health‐related quality of life, hepatitis B‐related mortality, or hepatitis B‐related morbidity. Three trials reported adverse events considered to be 'not serious' (Wang 2002; Wang 2013; Zhu 2016); two trials reported the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg in serum (Wang 2002; Zou 2011); and only one trial reported the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA in serum (Wang 2002).
Seven trials also reported other biomarkers such as aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), and total bilirubin (TBIL) (Wang 2002; Liao 2011; Zou 2011; Wang 2013; Zhang 2014; Jing 2016; Zhu 2016). Huang 2011 also reported a composite outcome consisting of multiple surrogate outcomes.
Excluded studies
We excluded 110 studies after reading the full texts of these articles. We explained the reasons for their exclusion in Characteristics of excluded studies. Another 79 studies were listed in Appendix 2 because of insufficient information on study methods.
Risk of bias in included studies
We carried out the risk of bias assessment based on information retrieved from the publications (Figure 2; Figure 3).
2.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Allocation
All eight included trials reported that they used a computer or a random numbers table to generate allocation sequence. Only Liao 2011 reported that investigators had concealed the allocation information in opaque envelopes; we assessed this study as having low risk of selection bias and the remaining trials as having unclear risk of selection bias.
Blinding
None of the included trials reported blinding of participants and/or researchers. We assessed the eight included trials at high risk of performance bias. None of the included trials reported blinding of outcome assessments; therefore, these trials were at unclear risk of detection bias.
Incomplete outcome data
Six of eight trials reported having no missing outcome data and included all participants in data analyses (Liao 2011; Zou 2011; Wang 2013; Zhang 2014; Jing 2016; Zhu 2016). Therefore, we assessed these six trials as having low risk of bias. Huang 2011 excluded one of the 60 trial participants (i.e. only 1.7% proportion of participants), and Wang 2002 excluded two of the 60 trial participants from the analyses (i.e. only 3.3% proportion of participants). Therefore, we classified these two trials as having low risk of bias.
Selective reporting
All included trials may have high risk of reporting bias because of lack of prepublished trial protocols and lack of data on mortality, serious adverse events, and health‐related quality of life outcomes.
Other potential sources of bias
All included randomised clinical trials appeared to be free of other factors that could put them at risk of bias. We classified the included randomised clinical trials at low risk of other biases.
Overall risk of bias
We assessed the included randomised clinical trials as having high risk of bias.
Effects of interventions
See: Table 1
All eight included randomised clinical trials compared the effects of adding acupuncture to co‐interventions versus equally implemented co‐interventions. We could not find any trials comparing acupuncture with sham acupuncture.
Below, in accordance with our protocol (Kong 2018), all outcomes are presented with the random‐effects model meta‐analysis.
Primary outcomes
All‐cause mortality
None of the included trials reported data on all‐cause mortality.
Trial Sequential Analysis
Assuming that the proportion of participants in the control group dying within one year is low (4%), the diversity‐adjusted required information size (DARIS) obtained via Trial Sequential Analysis for all‐cause mortality is 41,599 trial participants. For calculation of DARIS, we used event proportion in the control group 4%, relative risk reduction 15%, alpha 2.5%, power 90%, and diversity 0% (Huang 2011; Jing 2016; Wang 2002; Zhang 2014). By looking at the accrued information size (247 participants) and the DARIS of 41,599 participants, we calculated the accrued proportion of participants to be 0.59%. We ignored the monitoring boundaries because only 0.59% (247/41599) of the information size was accrued.
Assuming that the proportion of participants in the control group dying within one year is moderate (20%), the DARIS obtained via Trial Sequential Analysis for all‐cause mortality is 7042 trial participants. For calculation of DARIS, we used event proportion in the control group 20%, relative risk reduction 15%, alpha 2.5%, power 90%, and diversity 0% (Liao 2011; Zou 2011). By looking at the accrued information size (160 participants) and the DARIS of 7042 participants, we calculated the accrued proportion of participants to be 2.27%. We ignored the monitoring boundaries because only 2.27% (160/7042) of the information size was accrued.
Assuming that the proportion of participants in the control group dying within one year is high (40%), the DARIS obtained via Trial Sequential Analysis for all‐cause mortality was 2722 trial participants. For calculation of DARIS, we used event proportion in the control group 40%, relative risk reduction 15%, alpha 2.5%, power 90%, and diversity 0% (Wang 2013; Zhu 2016). By looking at the accrued information size (145 participants) and the DARIS of 2722 participants, we calculated the accrued proportion of participants to be 5.32%. We ignored the monitoring boundaries because only 5.32% (145/2722) of the information size was accrued.
Proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events
None of the included trials reported data on participants with one or more serious adverse events.
Health‐related quality of life
None of the included trials reported data on health‐related quality of life.
Secondary outcomes
Hepatitis B‐related mortality
None of the included trials reported any data on hepatitis B‐related mortality.
Hepatitis B‐related morbidity
None of the included trials reported data on hepatitis B‐related morbidity.
Proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious
Only three trials with 203 randomised participants provided data on the proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious (Wang 2002; Wang 2013; Zhu 2016). We are uncertain whether acupuncture has an effect on the proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious (risk ratio (RR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43 to 1.06; P = 0.09; I² = 0%; Analysis 1.1).
1.1. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 1 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious (overall).
Trial Sequential Analysis
The diversity‐adjusted required information size (DARIS) obtained via Trial Sequential Analysis for the proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious was 4297 trial participants. For calculation of DARIS, we used event proportion in the control group 33%, relative risk reduction 15%, alpha 2.5%, power 90%, and diversity 0%. We ignored the monitoring boundaries because only 4.72% (203/4297) of the information size was accrued (Wang 2002; Wang 2013; Zhu 2016). Thus, the Trial Sequential Analysis found insufficient evidence to support or refute the effects of a 15% risk reduction in acupuncture on the proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious.
Subgroup analysis
We could not perform all prespecified subgroup analyses because information data were insufficient (see Subgroup analysis and investigation of heterogeneity).
Comparison trials with manual needle acupuncture, acupoint herbal patching, and moxibustion (test for subgroup differences: Chi² = 1.53, P = 0.47, I² = 0%; Analysis 1.2); comparison trials with treatment duration less than 12 weeks versus treatment duration longer than 12 weeks (test for subgroup differences: Chi² = 0.06, P = 0.81, I² = 0%; Analysis 1.3); comparison trials in which participants were diagnosed by trialists with chronic hepatitis B versus participants diagnosed according to guidelines (test for subgroup differences: Chi² = 0.06, P = 0.81, I² = 0%; Analysis 1.4); and comparison trials where participants had chronic hepatitis B plus a concomitant disease versus only chronic hepatitis B (test for subgroup differences: Chi² = 0.80, P = 0.37, I² = 0%, Analysis 1.5) revealed no statistically significant subgroup differences.
1.2. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 2 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious (acupuncture approach).
1.3. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 3 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious (duration).
1.4. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 4 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious (diagnosis).
1.5. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 5 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious (chronic hepatitis B plus a comitant disease and chronic hepatitis B).
Sensitivity analysis
Wang 2002 excluded from the data analysis two participants who had quit the trial because of unrecoverable white blood cell count after two weeks of medication. Both sensitivity analyses ('best‐worst' case scenario analysis: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.02; P = 0.04; 205 participants; 3 trials; Analysis 1.6; and 'worst‐best' case scenario analysis: RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.1; P = 0.12; 205 participants; 3 trials; Analysis 1.7) showed that the two were excluded from the final analysis, and that participants were unlikely to have influenced the results of our meta‐analysis on the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA.
1.6. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 6 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious in best‐worst case scenario.
1.7. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 7 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious in worst‐best case scenario.
Our assessments differed when we compared the GRADE assessment of imprecision to that conducted via Trial Sequential Analysis: we downgraded the evidence for imprecision by one level with GRADE because optimal information size criteria were not met, and the sample size was not sufficiently large (fewer than 4000 participants) (Schünemann 2016; GRADE 2013). Trial Sequential Analysis downgraded the evidence by two levels because none of the sequential boundaries for benefit, harm, or futility were crossed (Jakobsen 2014).
Exploratory outcomes
Proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA
Only one randomised clinical trial with 58 participants provided data on the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA (Wang 2002). Acupuncture was associated with a lower proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.74; Analysis 1.8).
1.8. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 8 Proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA (overall).
Trial Sequential Analysis
The Trial Sequential Analysis of the one trial (event proportion in the control group 82.1%, relative risk reduction 15%, alpha 5.0%, power 90%, and diversity 0%) showed that the Z‐curve neither reached the DARIS (506 trial participants) nor crossed the statistical monitoring boundaries for benefit, harm, or futility. The Trial Sequential Analysis found insufficient evidence to support or refute a 15% risk reduction in acupuncture on the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA (TSA‐adjusted RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.95; Figure 4).
4.

Proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA: Trial Sequential Analysis (relative risk random‐effects model) including randomised clinical trials comparing acupuncture versus no intervention for people with chronic hepatitis B. The pair‐wise meta‐analysis included 1 trial with 58 participants and found a risk ratio (RR) of 0.52 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.92). The Trial Sequential Analysis was made with event proportion in the control group 64.3%, alpha 5.0%, power 90%, model‐based diversity 0%, and RRR 15%. The TSA‐adjusted CI was 0.29 to 0.92.
Subgroup analysis
We could not perform subgroup analyses because only one trial provided data on the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA (Wang 2002).
Sensitivity analysis
Wang 2002 excluded from the data analysis two participants who had quit the trial because of unrecoverable white blood cell count after two weeks of medication. Both sensitivity analyses ('best‐worst' case scenario analysis: both sensitivity analyses showed that the two participants excluded from analysis in Wang 2002 did not potentially influence the results of our meta‐analysis on the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA; 'best‐worst' case scenario analysis: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.72; P = 0.001; 60 participants; 1 trial; Analysis 1.9; 'worst‐best' case scenario analysis: RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.80; P = 0.005; 60 participants; 1 trial; Analysis 1.10).
1.9. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 9 Proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA in best‐worst case scenario.
1.10. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 10 Proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA in worst‐best case scenario.
Our assessments differed when the GRADE assessment of imprecision was compared to that conducted via Trial Sequential Analysis for the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA outcome: we downgraded the evidence for imprecision by one level with GRADE because optimal information size criteria were not met and the sample size was not sufficiently large (fewer than 4000 participants) (GRADE 2013; Schünemann 2016). Trial Sequential Analysis downgraded the evidence by two levels because none of the sequential boundaries for benefit, harm, or futility were crossed (Jakobsen 2014).
Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg
Two randomised clinical trials with 158 participants provided data on the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (Wang 2002; Zou 2011). The fixed‐effect meta‐analysis showed that acupuncture versus no intervention reduced the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.91; P = 0.0007; I² = 98%; Analysis 1.9), but the random‐effects meta‐analysis showed no difference between acupuncture versus no intervention on detectable HBeAg (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.68; P = 0.61; I² = 98%; Analysis 1.12). As previously described, we put greater weight on the estimate closest to zero effect (i.e. RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.68; P = 0.61), which in this case comes from the random‐effects meta‐analysis.
1.12. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 12 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (random‐effects).
Trial Sequential Analysis
The Trial Sequential Analysis of two trials (event proportion in the control group 82.1%, relative risk reduction 15%, alpha 5.0%, power 90%, and diversity 99.85%) calculated the DARIS to be 332,116 trial participants. We ignored the monitoring boundary because only 0.05% (158/332,116) of the information size was accrued. Thus, the Trial Sequential Analysis found insufficient evidence to support or refute a 15% risk reduction in acupuncture on the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg.
Subgroup analysis
We could not perform all of the prespecified subgroup analyses because information data were insufficient (see Subgroup analysis and investigation of heterogeneity). Comparison trials with manual needle acupuncture versus acupoint herbal patching (test for subgroup differences: Chi² = 10.26, P = 0.001, I² = 90.3%; Analysis 1.13); comparison trials with treatment duration less than 12 weeks versus treatment duration longer than 12 weeks (test for subgroup differences: Chi² = 10.26, P = 0.001, I² = 90.3%; Analysis 1.14); and comparison trials where participants were diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B by trialists versus participants diagnosed according to guidelines (test for subgroup differences: Chi² = 10.26, P = 0.001, I² = 90.3%; Analysis 1.15) revealed no statistically significant subgroup differences. Manual needle acupuncture with treatment duration longer than 12 weeks, performed in participants with chronic hepatitis B (as diagnosed by the trialists), was associated with a lower proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.69; data from only one trial).
1.13. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 13 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (acupuncture approach).
1.14. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 14 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (duration).
1.15. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 15 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (diagnosis).
Sensitivity analysis
Wang 2002 excluded from the data analysis two participants who had quit the trial because of unrecoverable white blood cell count after two weeks of medication. Both sensitivity analyses ('best‐worst' case scenario analysis: RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.10 to 3.90; P = 0.62; 160 participants; 2 trials; Analysis 1.16; 'worst‐best' case scenario analysis: RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.13 to 3.39; P = 0.62; 160 participants; 2 trials; Analysis 1.17) showed that the two were excluded from the final analysis, and that participants were unlikely to have influenced the results of our meta‐analysis on detectable HBeAg.
1.16. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 16 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg in best‐worst case scenario.
1.17. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 17 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg in worst‐best case scenario.
Our assessments did not differ when the GRADE assessment of imprecision was compared to that conducted via Trial Sequential Analysis: we downgraded the evidence for imprecision by two levels with GRADE because the number of events was less than 300 and the CI overlaps no effect and fails to exclude important benefit (RR < 0.75) and important harm (RR > 1.25) (GRADE 2013; Schünemann 2016). Trial Sequential Analysis downgraded the evidence also by two levels because none of the sequential boundaries for benefit, harm, or futility were crossed (Jakobsen 2014).
Separately reported adverse events considered not to be serious
In accordance with our protocol, we planned to analyse dichotomous outcome data from one trial using Fisher's exact test. As the results of Fisher's exact test (not shown) did not differ from those obtained via RevMan analysis, and in view of future updates of this review, we present the analysis result obtained with RevMan only.
Proportion of participants with fatigue: only one trial with 80 participants reported the proportion of participants with fatigue (Wang 2013). We are uncertain whether acupuncture has an effect on the proportion of participants with fatigue (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.12 to 3.78; Analysis 1.18).
Proportion of participants with bloating: only one trial with 80 participants reported the proportion of participants with bloating (Wang 2013). The meta‐analysis showed that acupuncture was associated with a higher proportion of participants with bloating (RR 4.50, 95% CI 1.04 to 19.54; Analysis 1.19).
Proportion of participants with loss of appetite: only one trial with 80 participants reported the proportion of participants with loss of appetite (Wang 2013). We are uncertain whether acupuncture has an effect on the proportion of participants with loss of appetite (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.34; Analysis 1.20).
Proportion of participants with flank pain: only one trial with 80 participants reported the proportion of participants with flank pain (Wang 2013). We are uncertain whether acupuncture has an effect on the proportion of participants with flank pain (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.70; Analysis 1.21).
Proportion of participants with bradycardia: only one trial with 58 participants reported the proportion of participants with bradycardia (Wang 2002). We are uncertain whether acupuncture has an effect on the proportion of participants with bradycardia (RR 2.81, 95% CI 0.12 to 66.77; Analysis 1.22).
1.18. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 18 Proportion of participants with fatigue.
1.19. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 19 Proportion of participants with bloating.
1.20. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 20 Proportion of participants with loss of appetite.
1.21. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 21 Proportion of participants with flank pain.
1.22. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 22 Proportion of participants with bradycardia.
Sensitivity analysis
Wang 2002 excluded from the data analysis two participants who had quit the trial because of unrecoverable white blood cell count after two weeks of medication. Both sensitivity analyses ('best‐worst' case scenario analysis: RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.22; P = 0.56; 60 participants; 1 trial; Analysis 1.23; 'worst‐best' case scenario analysis: RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.13 to 70.83; P = 0.50; 60 participants; 1 trial; Analysis 1.24) showed that the two were excluded from the final analysis, and that participants were unlikely to have influenced the results of our meta‐analysis on the proportion of participants with bradycardia.
1.23. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 23 Proportion of participants with bradycardia in best‐worst case scenario.
1.24. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 24 Proportion of participants with bradycardia in worst‐best case scenario.
Proportion of participants with significant changes in blood routine tests: only one trial with 58 participants reported the proportion of participants with significant changes in routine blood tests (Wang 2002). We are uncertain whether acupuncture has an effect on the proportion of participants with significant changes in routine blood tests (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.29; Analysis 1.25).
1.25. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 25 Proportion of participants with significant changes in blood routine tests.
Wang 2002 excluded from the data analysis two participants who had quit the trial because of unrecoverable white blood cell count after two weeks of medication. Both sensitivity analyses ('best‐worst' case scenario analysis: RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.16; P = 0.12; 60 participants; 1 trial; Analysis 1.26; 'worst‐best' case scenario analysis: RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.39; P = 0.28; 60 participants; 1 trial; Analysis 1.27) showed that the two were excluded from the final analysis, and that participants were unlikely to have influenced the results of our meta‐analysis on the proportion of participants with significant changes in routine blood tests.
1.26. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 26 Proportion of participants with significant changes in blood routine tests in best‐worst case scenario.
1.27. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 27 Proportion of participants with significant changes in blood routine tests in worst‐best case scenario.
'Summary of findings' tables
We constructed a 'Summary of findings' table for the comparison 'acupuncture versus no intervention' with an intention to present assessments of all primary and secondary outcomes (Primary outcomes; Secondary outcomes). However, because of lack of trial data, we could present only GRADE assessments for the 'proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious'. The included data originate from three trials only (Wang 2002; Wang 2013; Zhu 2016; Table 1). Post hoc, we decided to present the results of our exploratory outcomes: the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA and the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg, because physicians consider administration of acupuncture helpful in decreasing discomfort and preventing replication of the virus in people with chronic hepatitis B. Table 1 presents details on how we have assessed the evidence. We defined the certainty of evidence as very low because we downgraded evidence by one level for each of the following factors: risk of bias, imprecision, and publication bias.
Discussion
Summary of main results
We included eight randomised clinical trials with 555 participants. We assessed all eight trials at overall high risk of bias. For our meta‐analyses, we could gather quantitative data information from four of the eight trials with 305 participants. None of the included randomised clinical trials reported data on our three primary outcomes and our two secondary outcomes (i.e. all‐cause mortality, proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events, health‐related quality of life, hepatitis B‐related mortality, and hepatitis B‐related morbidity). Accordingly, participants do not seem to be representative of all patients with chronic hepatitis B. We found no trial comparing acupuncture with sham acupuncture. All eight included randomised clinical trials compared the effects of acupuncture performed with co‐interventions versus equal co‐interventions. The co‐interventions were heterogeneous. Evidence assessing the proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious, based on only three randomised trials, was of very low quality and showed no difference in the effect of acupuncture. This result was also observed in subgroup analyses between trials with different acupuncture interventions, trials with various treatment duration, trials with different diagnostic criteria sources, and trials with clearly reported concomitant disease compared to trials without clearly reported concomitant disease. The Trial Sequential Analysis suggested that more information is needed. The 'best‐worst' and 'worst‐best' case scenario sensitivity analyses showed that incomplete outcome data bias did not potentially influence our meta‐analysis result on the proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious (Analysis 1.6; Analysis 1.7). A sensitivity analysis on imprecision showed that the GRADE imprecision assessment downgraded the evidence by one level, and the Trial Sequential Analysis imprecision assessment downgraded the evidence by two levels. Regarding our surrogate outcome on the proportion of participants with detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, our meta‐analysis, based on only one trial, found evidence of a difference in the decrease in the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA who were administered acupuncture. The Trial Sequential Analysis result showed insufficient evidence to support or reject any effects of acupuncture on this outcome. Two sensitivity analyses on 'best‐worst' case scenario and 'worst‐best' case scenario showed that incomplete outcome data bias did not potentially influence our meta‐analysis result on the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA (Wang 2002; Analysis 1.9; Analysis 1.10). Regarding our surrogate outcome on the proportion of participants with detectable hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg), we are uncertain whether there is a difference in the effect of acupuncture compared with the effect of no intervention. The Trial Sequential Analysis result showed insufficient evidence to support or reject any effects of acupuncture on this outcome. Remaining subgroup analyses found evidence of a difference in the beneficial effects of acupuncture on the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (Analysis 1.13; Analysis 1.14; Analysis 1.15). Manual needle acupuncture, with treatment duration longer than 12 weeks, was performed in participants with chronic hepatitis B (as diagnosed by trialists) and was associated with a lower proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (risk ratio (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24 to 0.69; data from only one trial). Two sensitivity analyses on 'best‐worst' case scenario and 'worst‐best' case scenario showed that excluding from trial analysis two participants in the control group who quit the trial did not potentially influence our meta‐analysis result on the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (Wang 2002; Analysis 1.16; Analysis 1.17). Regarding our surrogate outcomes on the proportion of participants with adverse events considered not to be serious, as analysed separately (i.e. fatigue, bloating, loss of appetite, flank pain, bradycardia, significant changes in routine blood tests) meta‐analysis of only one trial with 80 participants showed that acupuncture was associated with a higher proportion of participants with bloating (RR 4.50, 95% CI 1.04 to 19.54; Wang 2013; Analysis 1.19), and we are uncertain whether there is a difference in the effects of acupuncture on the remaining separately analysed adverse events considered not to be serious. Two sensitivity analyses on 'best‐worst' case scenario and 'worst‐best' case scenario showed that incomplete outcome data bias did not potentially influence the results on the proportion of participants with bradycardia and significant changes in routine blood tests (Wang 2002; Analysis 1.23; Analysis 1.24; Analysis 1.26; Analysis 1.27).
Overall completeness and applicability of evidence
By email or by phone, we contacted the authors of the 79 studies listed in Appendix 2, as well as the authors of the eight studies included in our review, to request more information related to trial design and methods; 73 studies lacked description of the random generation method used and six lacked sufficient information for review authors to judge their relevance to our review protocol. No study author provided information related to the trial methods. In addition, none of the 79 studies contained information on patient‐centred outcomes. We found two ongoing trials comparing adding acupuncture to co‐interventions versus equally implementing co‐interventions. We found no unpublished trials comparing acupuncture with no intervention or sham acupuncture that randomised people with chronic hepatitis B.
The participants included in each of the eight trials did not fully reflect the characteristics of the general chronic hepatitis B population. None of the trials included paediatric participants. Two of the eight trials included participants with cirrhosis (Wang 2013; Zhu 2016). The remaining six trials excluded participants with cirrhosis, infection of other hepatitis viruses, and other serious complications, for example, liver cancer (Wang 2002; Huang 2011; Liao 2011; Zou 2011; Zhang 2014; Jing 2016). The included studies were focused on a properly defined population, and thus the results may not be generalised. The included trials covered manual needle acupuncture, acupuncture injection, acupoint herbal patching, and moxibustion; these trials also covered commonly used retention time of acupuncture, commonly used treatment duration, and follow‐up duration of acupuncture. We could perform meta‐analysis on only one of our predefined secondary outcomes, namely, adverse events considered not to be serious, and data were presented in only three of the eight included trials. We could find no report on patient‐centred outcomes such as all‐cause mortality, health‐related quality of life, hepatitis B‐related mortality, and hepatitis B‐related morbidity. In contrast, trials reported data on surrogate outcomes such as detectable HBV DNA and detectable HBeAg in the blood.
Quality of the evidence
Lack of clinically relevant data is a serious limitation of our review and findings. Below, we describe our assessments of each of the five GRADE factors.
Within‐study risk of bias
Risk of bias is known to be responsible for overestimation and underestimation of intervention benefits and harms in randomised clinical trials with inadequate methodological quality (Schulz 1995; Moher 1998; Kjaergard 2001; Wood 2008; Lundh 2017). Of the eight included trials, eight (100%) reported adequate generation of the randomisation sequence; only one (12.5%) reported adequate allocation concealment; eight (100%) lacked blinding of participants, and it was unclear whether outcome assessors were blinded; eight trials (100%) appeared not to be influenced by incomplete outcome data; none of the trials (0%) appeared to be free from selective reporting; and all appeared to be free from other bias. Thus, we considered all trials at high risk of bias.
Indirectness of the evidence
As all of the trials included in our review assessed acupuncture in people with chronic hepatitis B, we find our results applicable for this group of people.
Heterogeneity or inconsistency of results
We explored statistical heterogeneity with the Chi² test and quantified heterogeneity using the I² statistic (Higgins 2002). Heterogeneity was not detected when outcome data from three trials on the proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious were analysed (I² = 0%). We identified considerable heterogeneity in the analysis of the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (I² = 98%). As only two trials reported data on this outcome, we analysed the clinical characteristics in an attempt to find the reason for heterogeneity (Wang 2002 ; Zou 2011). Zou 2011 treated people diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B according to a guideline with acupoint herbal patching for 12 weeks, and Wang 2002 treated people diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B with manual needle acupuncture for 24 weeks. However, Wang 2002 does not mention how trial participants were diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B. This could be a reason for the considerable heterogeneity observed. As only one trial provided data on analysis of the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA, we cannot report on heterogeneity (Wang 2002).
We applied both fixed‐effect and random‐effects meta‐analysis models, and we reported both models when we found differences. In our review, neither the fixed‐effect model nor the random‐effects model identified differences in the proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious. We could include only one trial in the analysis of detectable HBV DNA, so inconsistency of results from different models is irrelevant. The fixed‐effect model identified statistically significant differences in the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg, which were not identified by the random‐effects model. As planned in our protocol, we plan to put more weight on the estimate closest to the zero effect, and this is why, in this case, we consider the results from the random‐effects model.
Imprecision of results
In keeping with the GRADE criteria for assessing imprecision, we downgraded the evidence by one level for the outcome ‐ proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious. This was due to the fact that optimal information size criteria were not met and the sample size was not very large (fewer than 4000 participants). Regarding the outcome ‐ the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA ‐ we downgraded the evidence by one level because optimal information size criteria were not met and the sample size was not very large (fewer than 4000 participants). As for the outcome ‐ the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg outcome ‐ we downgraded the evidence by two levels because the number of events was less than 300 and the CI overlapped no effect, and the CI failed to exclude important benefit (RR < 0.75) and important harm (RR > 1.25) (GRADE 2013; Schünemann 2016).
Our sensitivity analysis comparing assessment of imprecision versus the Trial Sequential Analysis showed consistent results regarding the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg outcome. Our assessments differed when the GRADE assessment of imprecision was compared to that conducted via Trial Sequential Analysis for participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious outcome and the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA outcome.
Risk of publication bias
We could not construct funnel plots because data were derived from a maximum of three trials per outcome. We suspected publication bias because the included trials had small sample sizes ‐ GRADEpro GDT; Balshem 2011; Guyatt 2011a; Guyatt 2011b; Guyatt 2011c; Guyatt 2011d; Guyatt 2011e; Guyatt 2011f; Guyatt 2011g; Guyatt 2011h; Guyatt 2013a; Guyatt 2013b; Guyatt 2013c; Guyatt 2013d; Mustafa 2013; Guyatt 2017 ‐ and because five trials provided no information on support or sponsorship. Undisclosed funding may influence trial results and may lead to poor trial design.
Potential biases in the review process
We performed our systematic review based on recommended Cochrane methods (Higgins 2011; Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group Module). We followed our peer‐reviewed and published protocol with predefined participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and time to follow‐up to avoid biases during the review process (Kong 2018). We applied comprehensive search strategies, which covered published studies and registered study protocols. We searched manually the reference lists of all identified studies. We combined our electronic searches with manual data searches. We extracted all available data to perform our predefined analyses, including subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
Unpublished trials with negative results, which we did not identify during the preparation of this review, are a possible source of bias. We did not succeed in receiving replies from authors of the eight included trials and the 79 potential randomised clinical trials listed in Appendix 2 to our requests to obtain missing data of relevance to our review methods and to outcome data because we received no replies. It is not possible to differentiate between poor report and poor conduct of included trials, which may generate potential bias of this review.
All the trials we have found were carried out in China, possibly because acupuncture is most often used in Asian countries. Although we have made a broad strategy to identify all available trials, studies published in languages other than Chinese and English may not be found. If possible, Japanese and Korean medical databases should be added for the update of this review, and experts should be asked to find out if there are more studies on this topic.
Observational studies may provide information on rare late‐occurring adverse events and quality of life, which are outcomes of interest to this review. We planned to consider quasi‐randomised studies, controlled clinical studies, and other observational studies for data on harms of acupuncture, if retrieved through our searches for randomised clinical trials. The 79 studies listed in Appendix 2 could be a valuable source of data on adverse events. Our decision not to perform specific searches for observational studies and not to assess potential data on adverse events in the Characteristics of excluded studies, as well as the studies in Appendix 2, might have biased our review, causing us to overlook potential harms (late or rare harms) (Storebø 2018).
Huang 2011 and Jing 2016 were conducted to investigate whether an acupuncture intervention could improve the effects of other antiviral interventions (recombinant human interferon (IFN)‐alpha 2a and peginterferon‐alpha 2a) provided as a co‐intervention. Wang 2002, Liao 2011, Zou 2011, and Zhang 2014 were conducted to investigate the effect of acupuncture for chronic hepatitis B. Zhu 2016 was performed to investigate whether acupoint herbal patching, as a co‐intervention with tolvaptan, an aquaretic drug, could relieve refractory ascites for people with chronic hepatitis B and liver cirrhosis. Wang 2013 was conducted to investigate the effects of moxibustion for people with chronic hepatitis B and liver cirrhosis. Lack of reporting of serious adverse events and lack of conclusions in our review on patient‐centred outcomes are serious limitations of the applicability of this review to people with chronic hepatitis B who receive acupuncture. For trials reporting adverse events considered not to be serious, we selected the greatest number of events among the separately reported numbers of events that had occurred in experimental or control groups to calculate the proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious. This may have been problematic, as it might have led to an underestimation of the proportion of participants with one or more adverse events considered not to be serious. Furthermore, the different events of this composite outcome often have different severity, such as headache compared to hepatomegaly, so that even with a neutral result, there might be in reality a significant difference in severity between groups. Using composite outcomes increases power, but the limitations as mentioned above must be considered when results are interpreted.
We have included a substantial number of subgroup analyses and several surrogate outcomes. There could have been problems with multiplicity in terms of the seven subgroup analyses for each outcome (Imberger 2011). We did not adjust the thresholds for subgroup analyses because we considered these results only as exploratory and hypothesis‐generating.
We conducted Trial Sequential Analyses for the outcomes ‐ proportion of participants with adverse events considered not to be serious (secondary outcome), with detectable HBV DNA (exploratory outcome), and with detectable HBeAg (exploratory outcome) (Wetterslev 2008; Thorlund 2011b; TSA 2011; Wetterslev 2017). We calculated the DARIS on the basis of type I error of 2.5% for secondary outcomes, 5.0% for exploratory outcomes, type II error of 10%, and risk reduction of 15%, as well as the proportion of events in the control group (Wetterslev 2009). In the Trial Sequential Analysis, the cumulative Z‐curve did not cross trial sequential monitoring boundaries for benefit, harm, or futility, and the DARIS was not reached. Therefore, we cannot exclude the risk of random errors regarding our results on the aforementioned outcomes.
Our search was conducted on 1 March 2019. It is possible that further studies of relevance to our review could have been published since then. This must be dealt with in future updates.
Agreements and disagreements with other studies or reviews
Two non‐Cochrane meta‐analyses on acupuncture for people with chronic hepatitis B have been published (Wang 2015; Wu 2017). Wang 2015 included trials comparing acupoint injection versus non‐acupoint injection. Wu 2017 included trials comparing moxibustion plus co‐interventions versus co‐interventions, but the meta‐analysis excluded studies including participants with other types of hepatitis. Neither of the two meta‐analyses was reported to have assessed effects of acupuncture on patient‐centred outcomes such as mortality, adverse events, or health‐related quality of life. Compared with the risk of bias tool used in the three meta‐analyses identified, we found that our risk of bias assessment tool is much more rigorous. We did not use scores to assess risk of bias as the Jadad scoring system does (Jadad 1996), and we used eight predefined domains to assess the possible risk of reporting bias (Higgins 2011). We used Trial Sequential Analyses to control random errors and GRADE assessments to define the certainty of evidence.
Wang 2015 showed that acupoint injection reduced the surface antigen of the hepatitis B virus (HBsAg), the hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg), and the transaminase levels in serum. Wu 2017 showed that combination therapy improved transaminase and total bilirubin levels in the serum of participants. All three meta‐analyses assessed surrogate outcomes. In our review, we found no beneficial or harmful effects of acupuncture on adverse events considered not to be serious, nor on the proportion of participants with HBV DNA or the proportion of participants with HBeAg, when we compared acupuncture with no intervention. The quality of the evidence was very low.
Authors' conclusions
Implications for practice.
Data on patient‐related outcomes such as all‐cause mortality, serious adverse events, health‐related quality of life, hepatitis B‐related mortality, and hepatitis B‐related morbidity are lacking. We found no evidence of a difference in effect between acupuncture versus no intervention for the outcomes adverse events considered not to be serious and detectable HBeAg. Furthermore, it remains unclear if acupuncture versus no intervention is associated with a reduction in detectable HBV DNA because of data provided by only one trial, at high risk of bias, and with the non‐validated surrogate outcome. As we were unable to obtain information on a large number of trials regarding their design and conduct, we were deterred from including them in our review.
Implications for research.
In view of the worldwide use of acupuncture, we need large, high‐quality, randomised sham‐controlled trials with proper design and homogeneous groups of participants, in which patient‐related outcomes are assessed. We suggest the following implications for research (Brown 2006).
Evidence (what is the current state of the evidence)?
This review includes eight randomised clinical trials with 555 participants. These trials did not provide data on patient‐centred outcomes such as all‐cause mortality, proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events, health‐related quality of life, hepatitis B‐related mortality, and hepatitis B‐related morbidity. The diversity‐adjusted required information size (DARIS) has not been reached for any of the reported outcomes. Meta‐analysed evidence showed no beneficial or harmful effects of acupuncture on adverse events considered not to be serious nor on the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg. Data from one trial at high risk of bias showed beneficial effects of acupuncture on the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA. All mentioned laboratory outcomes still need validation in randomised clinical trials before we can consider these results as helpful indicators for the treatment of people with chronic hepatitis B. The certainty of the evidence identified so far is very low. Further high‐quality trials are needed, and additional trials should explicitly state their research questions. Further randomised clinical trials ought to be designed according to the SPIRIT standards and reported according to the CONSORT standards (Chan 2013; Moher 2001).
Participants (what is the population of interest)?
Our review focused on people diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B alone or those who were having concomitant disease. Only one trial included participants with concomitant disease (Zhu 2016). This is why further trials should include people with concomitant diseases and should define in sufficient detail the diagnostic criteria used in diagnosing trial participants. When a concomitant disease is present, stratified randomisation should be employed.
Interventions (what are the interventions of interest)?
Subgroup analyses showed no difference in the effects of acupuncture on the proportion of participants with non‐serious adverse events and the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg between trials with manual needle acupuncture and those with different treatment duration. However, because of the very few identified trials and the very low certainty of the evidence, future randomised clinical trials could be designed to look for differences in acupuncture interventions, different dosages of acupoint injection, and different treatment regimens of acupuncture. No data on follow‐up time span were reported. The duration of therapy ranged from 12 to 48 weeks, and one can assume that this might also have included the duration of follow‐up. This is too short a period for researchers to explore any effects on outcomes such as mortality. Thus, future randomised clinical trials should be designed with longer duration of follow‐up.
Comparisons (what are the comparisons of interest)?
We aimed to assess the benefits and harms of acupuncture compared with no intervention or sham acupuncture for patient‐relevant outcomes among people with chronic hepatitis B. In addition to the lack of data on patient‐centred outcomes, including all‐cause mortality, the outcomes proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events; health‐related quality of life; hepatitis B‐related mortality; hepatitis B‐related morbidity; and beneficial, harmful, or neutral effects of acupuncture on adverse events considered not to be serious could have been influenced by lack of placebo‐controlled trials and blinding. Future randomised clinical trials should include comparisons between acupuncture and sham acupuncture with or without co‐interventions, to be later included in systematic reviews.
Outcomes (what are the outcomes of interest)?
The primary outcome measures planned to be assessed in this review (all‐cause mortality, proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events, and health‐related quality of life) should be included as primary outcomes in all future trials. Future randomised clinical trials also need to validate the relationship between surrogate outcomes and patient‐centred outcomes.
Notes
Cochrane Reviews can be expected to have a high percentage of overlap in the methods section because of standardised methods. In addition, overlap may be observed across several of our protocols, as they share at least three common authors.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the great help of Sarah Louise Klingenberg, the Information Specialist for the Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group, for designing the search strategies. We also acknowledge Dr. L Susan Wieland of the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field (USA), who co‐ordinated the peer review process.
Review Peer reviewers: Zhaoxiang Bian, China; Liming Lu, China. Contact editor: Vanja Giljaca, UK Sign‐off editor: Agostino Colli, Italy Cochrane Abdomen and Endocrine Network Associate Editor: Rachel Richardson, UK
Cochrane Review Group funding acknowledgement: the Danish State is the largest single funder of the Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group through its investment in the Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this review are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Danish State, the Copenhagen Trial Unit, NCCIH, and the National Institutes of Health.
This work was partially funded by Grant Number R24 AT001293 from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH).
Appendices
Appendix 1. Search strategies
| Database | Time span | Search strategy |
| The Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register | March 2019 | (acupunct* or acupress* or acupoint* or electroacupunct* or auriculotherap* or auriculoacupunct* or moxibust* or meridian* or patch*) AND (hepatitis B or hep B or HBV) |
| Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library | March 2019 | #1 MeSH descriptor: [Acupuncture] explode all trees #2 MeSH descriptor: [Acupuncture Therapy] explode all trees #3 acupunct* or acupress* or acupoint* or electroacupunct* or auriculotherap* or auriculoacupunct* or moxibust* or meridian* or patch* #4 #1 or #2 or #3 #5 MeSH descriptor: [Hepatitis B] explode all trees #6 hepatitis B or hep B or HBV #7 #5 or #6 #8 #4 and #7 |
| MEDLINE Ovid | 1946 to March 2019 | 1. exp ACUPUNCTURE/ 2. exp ACUPUNCTURE THERAPY/ 3. (acupunct* or acupress* or acupoint* or electroacupunct* or auriculotherap* or auriculoacupunct* or moxibust* or meridian* or patch*).mp. [mp=title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, keyword heading word, protocol supplementary concept word, rare disease supplementary concept word, unique identifier, synonyms] 4. 1 or 2 or 3 5. exp Hepatitis B/ 6. (hepatitis B or hep B or HBV).mp. [mp=title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, keyword heading word, protocol supplementary concept word, rare disease supplementary concept word, unique identifier, synonyms] 7. 5 or 6 8. 4 and 7 |
| Embase Ovid | 1974 to March 2019 | 1. exp acupuncture/ 2. (acupunct* or acupress* or acupoint* or electroacupunct* or auriculotherap* or auriculoacupunct* or moxibust* or meridian* or patch*).mp. [mp=title, abstract, heading word, drug trade name, original title, device manufacturer, drug manufacturer, device trade name, keyword, floating subheading word, candidate term word] 3. 1 or 2 4. exp hepatitis B/ 5. (hepatitis B or hep B or HBV).mp. [mp=title, abstract, heading word, drug trade name, original title, device manufacturer, drug manufacturer, device trade name, keyword, floating subheading word, candidate term word] 6. 4 or 5 7. 3 and 6 |
| LILACS (Bireme) | 1982 to March 2019 | acupunct$ or acupress$ or acupoint$ or electroacupunct$ or auriculotherap$ or auriculoacupunct$ or moxibust$ or meridian$ or patch$ [Words] and hepatitis B or hep B or HBV [Words] |
| Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) | 1900 to March 2019 | #3 #2 AND #1 #2 TS=(hepatitis B or hep B or HBV) #1 TS=(acupunct* or acupress* or acupoint* or electroacupunct* or auriculotherap* or auriculoacupunct* or moxibust* or meridian* or patch*) |
| Conference Proceedings Citation Index – Science (Web of Science) | 1990 to March 2019 | #3 #2 AND #1 #2 TS=(hepatitis B or hep B or HBV) #1 TS=(acupunct* or acupress* or acupoint* or electroacupunct* or auriculotherap* or auriculoacupunct* or moxibust* or meridian* or patch*) |
| China Network Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) | 1979 to March 2019 | #1 hepatitis B in abstract #2 'acupuncture and moxibustion' or 'acupunture' or 'stimulation' or 'electroacupuncture' or 'laser acupuncture' or 'acupressure' or 'acupoint injection' or 'moxibustion' or 'patching' in abstract #3 random in abstract #4 randomly grouped in abstract #5 #3 OR #4 #6 #1 AND #2 AND #5 |
| Chongqing VIP (CQVIP) | 1989 to March 2019 | #1 hepatitis B in abstract #2 'acupuncture and moxibustion' or 'acupunture' or 'stimulation' or 'electroacupuncture' or 'laser acupuncture' or 'acupressure' or 'acupoint injection' or 'moxibustion' or 'patching' in abstract #3 random in abstract #4 randomly grouped in abstract #5 #3 OR #4 #6 #1 AND #2 AND #5 |
| Wanfang Data | 1990 to March 2019 | #1 hepatitis B in abstract #2 'acupuncture and moxibustion' or 'acupunture' or 'stimulation' or 'electroacupuncture' or 'laser acupuncture' or 'acupressure' or 'acupoint injection' or 'moxibustion' or 'patching' in abstract #3 random in abstract #4 randomly grouped in abstract #5 #3 OR #4 #6 #1 AND #2 AND #5 |
| SinoMed | 1860 to March 2019 | #1 hepatitis B in abstract #2 'acupuncture and moxibustion' or 'acupunture' or 'stimulation' or 'electroacupuncture' or 'laser acupuncture' or 'acupressure' or 'acupoint injection' or 'moxibustion' or 'patching' in abstract #3 random in abstract #4 randomly grouped in abstract #5 #3 OR #4 #6 #1 AND #2 AND #5 |
Appendix 2. Potential randomised clinical trials
| Trial ID | First author | Year | English title | Journal‐English name | Volume | Issue | Pages | Contact information |
| Cai 2016 | Cai CJ | 2016 | Efficacy of hepatic cirrhosis ascites treated with umbilical sticking of Zhuo Mai powder and moxibustion therapy | Chinese Archives of Tradtional Chinese Medicine | 34 | 4 | 1017‐1020 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Chen 1994 | Chen JF | 1994 | The treatment on 22 people with hepatitis B virus carriers with immunoglobulin ribonucleic acid of anti hepatitis B for injection combined with acupuncture | Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases | 14 | 11 | 677‐678 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Chen 1998a | Chen JJ | 1998 | Effect of purulent moxibustion combined with traditional Chinese medicine on serum IL‐2 and IFN‐γ concentrations in patients with chronic hepatitis B | Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases | S1 | ND | 84‐85 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Chen 1998b | Chen JF | 1998 | Comparative observation on the effect of acupuncture on immune function of HBV carriers | Hu Nan Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine | 5 | ND | 20‐21 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Chen 2005 | Chen L | 2005 | Treatment of 40 people with hepatitis B with intrahepatic cholestasis by acupuncture and moxibustion combined with western medicine: a comparison of 40 people treated with western medicine | Zhejiang Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine | 11 | 494 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses | |
| Chen 2014 | Chen JZ | 2014 | Clinical research of Chinese drug acupoint injection combined with PEG‐IFN a‐2a to treat chronic hepatitis B | Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine | 32 | 8 | 1965‐1967 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Chen 2015 | Chen S | 2015 | Early curative effect observation of treatment of thymic factor injection on Guan Yuan acupoint combined with entecavir | Data compilation of the third Jiangxi provincial conference on new progress in diagnosis and treatment of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine of common and emerging infectious diseases | ND | ND | 145‐149 | We contacted study authors on 10 May by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Cheng 2000 | Cheng QH | 2000 | The clinical observation on 32 people with hepatitis B and hypochondriac pain treated by acupuncture combined with Chinese Medicine | Summary of Papers on International Convention of Traditional Medicine | ND | ND | ND | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Cheng 2004 | Cheng JJ | 2004 | Observation on the effect of moxibustion on hyperbilirubinaemia in hepatitis B type cirrhosis patients | World Journal of Acupuncture Moxibustion | 14 | 4 | 12‐15 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Cheng 2016 | Cheng YF | 2016 | Clinical observation on 50 people with liver cirrhosis and bloating with moxibustion at the point of moxibustion | Inner Mongolia Traditional Chinese Medicine | 9 | ND | 123‐124 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Deng 2009 | Deng LH | 2009 | Clinical study on severe chronic hepatitis B treated with Zusanli acupoint injection of kushenin | Chinese Medicine External Governance Magazine | 18 | 2 | 9‐10 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Du 2004 | Du JX | 2004 | Acupoint injection of oxymatrine for treatment of chronic severe hepatitis B | Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy | 11 | 4 | 459‐460 | We tried to contact study authors on 30 April: we could not contact the people |
| Du 2005 | Du JX | 2005 | To investigate the clinical effect of intra‐acupoint injection of Ganyanlin on chronic hepatitis B | Chinese Journal of the Practical Chinese Modern Medicine | 18 | 18 | 947‐948 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Fang 2012 | Fang H | 2012 | Therapeutic effect of the method of separating moxibustion and moxibustion combined with acupoint application on chronic hepatitis B | CJGMCM | 27 | 6 | 1173‐1174 | The study author has changed his job. We could not get his current contact information |
| Ge 2012 | Ge Q | 2012 | Clinical study of dexamethasone by different administration pathways for HBV associated with (Sub) acute‐on‐chronic liver failure | Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine | ND | ND | ND | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Han 2011 | Han XH | 2011 | Clinical research of application of moxibustion on Ganshu (BL18) and Qimen (LR14) for chronic hepatitis B | China Modern Doctor | 49 | 19 | 86‐88 | We contacted study authors on 23 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Han 2012 | Han J | 2012 | Treatment on 15 people with Yin Yellow (hepatitis B cirrhosis) with umbilical fire therapy | Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion | 32 | 6 | 490 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| He 2013 | He YX | 2013 | Therapeutic effect of α‐interferon acupoint manipulation on chronic hepatitis B | Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine | 22 | 21 | 2358‐2360 | We contacted study authors on 23 April and 27 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Hu 2014 | Hu JH | 2014 | Clinical observation of entecavir combined with matrine acupoint injection in the treatment of HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B | Chinese Journal of Medicine Guide | 16 | 5 | 821‐822 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Hu 2015 | Hu XJ | 2015 | Clinical research of the bioinformatics infrared liver disease therapy instrument combined with Gan Shu acupoint sticking application on treating chronic hepatitis B | Medical Information | 28 | 35 | 173‐174 | We could not find any contact information about study authors |
| Huang 2004 | Huang F | 2004 | Clinical observation on 46 people with chronic hepatitis B virus carriers treated with Chinese medicine combined with interferon acupoint injection | Modern Chinese Medicine | ND | 2 | 18‐19 | We could not find any contact information about study authors |
| Huang 2005 | Huang JQ | 2005 | Protective actions of acupoint magnetic medicated plaster therapy on hepatic function in the patient of cirrhosis after hepatitis | Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion | 25 | 9 | 613‐615 | We contacted study authors on 10 May 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Ji 1999 | Ji S | 1999 | The treatment on 46 people with chronic hepatitis B with Chinese and western medicine combined with acupuncture points | Huaihai Medicine | 17 | 2 | ND | We contacted study authors on 23 April and 27 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Jiang 2010 | Jiang HM | 2008 | Clinical study of hepatocyte growth factor and salvia miltiorrhiza combined with acupoint injection in the treatment of hepatitis liver fibrosis | Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases | 18 | 1 | 18‐20 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Lei 2014 | Lei RG | 2014 | Clinical observation on 18 people with chronic hepatitis B treated with acupuncture and interferon | Nei Mongol Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine | ND | 30 | 58‐59 | We contacted study authors on 10 May 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Li 2000 | Li P | 2000 | Effect of triple therapy combined with acupoint injection of Hua Chan Su on liver function | Compilation of the twelfth national symposium on digestive diseases in the Chinese academy of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine | ND | ND | 210 | The study author has changed his job. We could not get his current contact information |
| Li 2003 | Li P | 2003 | Clinical study on treatment of chronic hepatitis B with Huachansu acupoint injection | Chinese Journal of Celiopathy | 3 | 11 | 800‐801 | The study author has changed his job. We could not get his current contact information |
| Li 2007 | Li YC | 2007 | 28 people with chronic severe hepatitis B jaundice treated with injection of dexamethasone in acupoint of Zusanli | Chinese Medicine External Governance Magazine | 16 | 6 | 31‐32 | We could not find any contact information for study authors |
| Li 2011b | Li Y | 2011 | 108 people with chronic hepatitis B treated with acupoint application | ND | ND | ND | 101‐103 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Li 2014 | Li XY | 2014 | Clinical observation of treatment of liver disease with acupoint application | Contemporary Medicine Forum | 12 | 4 | 140‐141 | We could not get any contact information for study authors |
| Li 2015 | Li SQ | 2015 | The effect observation of acupuncture combined with diammonium glycyrrhizinate injection in chronic hepatitis B | China Journal of Public Health | 31 | ND | 277‐278 | We could not find any contact information for study authors |
| Liu 1999 | Liu SJ | 1999 | Clinical analysis of 35 people with chronic hepatitis B treated with Chinese medicine repellent drug combined with interferon | Chinese Medicine Technology | 6 | 2 | 110‐111 | We could not find any contact information for study authors |
| Liu 2003 | Liu YL | 2003 | Therapeutic effect of wick moxibustion combined with thymosin on anti‐HBe positive chronic hepatitis B | JCAM | 19 | 9 | 39‐40 | We contacted study authors on 25 April and 27 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Liu 2006 | Liu WT | 2006 | Clinical observation of acupuncture combined with Chinese medicine in treating chronic hepatitis B | Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research | 17 | 8 | 1532‐1533 | We contacted study authors on 10 May 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Liu 2011 | Liu W | 2011 | Clinical study of acupoint application combined with Qinghua Jiedu decoction in treating damp heat syndrome of hepatitis B | Beijing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine | 30 | 10 | 726‐730 | The study author has changed his job. We could not get his current contact information |
| Liu 2015 | Liu CG | 2015 | Clinical observation of acupoint application combined with interferon on treating chronic hepatitis B | Inner Mongolia Traditional Chinese Medicine | 34 | 4 | 92‐93 | We tried to contact study authors on 28 April 2018 by phone: we could not contact the people |
| Lu 2011 | Lu Y | 2011 | Summary of 33 people with chronic hepatitis B hypochondriac pain treated with acupoint application of Shugan Huayu decoction | Hunan Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine | 27 | 6 | 21‐22 | We contacted study authors on 10 May 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Lu 2016a | Lu JP | 2016 | Clinical study on internal medicine combined with acupuncture and moxibustion for treatment of refractory cirrhosis ascites | Journal of Sichuan of Traditional Chinese Medicine | 34 | 8 | 160‐162 | We contacted study authors on 25 April and 27 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Lu 2016b | Lu LQ | 2016 | Effect of Yongquan acupoint application on chronic hepatitis B patients with insomnia | Journal of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine | 36 | S2 | 1383 | We contacted study authors on 10 May 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Ma 2001 | Ma HQ | 2001 | Treating chronic hepatitis‐B by massage at meridian | Chinese Journal of the Practical Chinese With Modern Medicine | 1 | 11 | 2480 | We contacted study authors on 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Miao 2007 | Miao AJ | 2007 | Lamivudine combined with thymosin injection in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a clinical observation of 94 people | Shandong Medical Journal | 47 | 26 | 81 | We contacted study authors on 30 September 2018 by phone: study authors refused to provide any further information |
| Peng 2002 | Peng CL | 2002 | Clinical observation of moxibustion and medicine in treating chronic hepatitis B in 32 people | Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine | 1 | ND | 27 | We contacted study authors on 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Peng 2003 | Peng PS | 2003 | Clinical research of modified formula 'Yi Guan Jiang' combine with acupuncture in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B | Hunan University of Chinese Medicine | ND | ND | ND | We could not find any contact information for study authors |
| Ruan 2009 | Ruan YD | 2009 | Clinical study on treatment of YMDD variant chronic hepatitis B by acupoint injection of hepatitis and Huangmao injection | Journal of New Chinese Medicine | 41 | 1 | 28‐29 | We contacted study authors on 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Shao 2009 | Shao ZL | 2009 | Clinical observations on reducing effect of midnight‐midday ebb flow acupuncture on chronic hepatitis B HBV‐YMDD mutation | Shanghai J Acu‐mox | 28 | 12 | 694‐695 | We contacted study authors on 28 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Shen 2004 | Shen JJ | 2004 | The observation of curative effect on chronic hepatitis B by point injection of thymosin | ND | ND | ND | ND | We contacted study authors on 28 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Sun 2000 | Sun MT | 2000 | Clinical observation on 84 people of asymptomatic hepatitis B virus carriers treated by acupoint injection | Journal of Nanjing TCM University | 16 | 3 | 174‐175 | We contacted study authors on 28 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Sun 2008 | Sun H | 2008 | Clinical research on 'Ganshu plaster' in treating hepatitis B liver cirrhosis with therapy of point sticking | Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine | We could not find any contact information for study authors | |||
| Tan 2009 | Tan SZ | 2009 | The effect of small dose dexamethasone injection in Zusanli point on treatment of early liver failure | Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases | 19 | 4 | 241‐243 | We tried to contact study authors on 30 April by phone: we could not contact the people |
| Tang 2001 | Tang JP | 2001 | The effect of acupoint electrical stimulation with low frequency on hepatitis B | Chinese Journal of International Medicine | 1 | 1 | 74 | We contacted study authors on 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Tang 2014 | Tang HL | 2014 | Clinical observation on 36 people with chronic hepatitis B treated by interventional interferon | Asia‐Pacific Traditional Medicine | 10 | 24 | 12—14 | We contacted study authors on 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Wang 2002 | Wang CJ | 2002 | Clinical observation on acupoint injection for chronic hepatitis B | Journal of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine | 18 | 4 | 14 | We contacted study authors on 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Wang 2014 | Wang YM | 2014 | Clinical study on treatment of chronic hepatitis B with adefovir dipivoxil combined with moxibustion and liver acupoints | China Practice of Medicine | 9 | 15 | 148‐149 | We contacted study authors on 23 April and 27 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Wang 2015 | Wang Y | 2015 | Effect of acupoint application of Chinese herbal medicine on hepatitis B cirrhosis with water dropsy | Clinical Practice of Combination of Chinese Traditional and Western Medicine | 15 | 7 | 72‐73 | We could not find any contact information for study authors |
| Wang 2017 | Wang LX | 2017 | Effect evaluation and nursing of adjuvant treatment of viral hepatitis by ginger moxibustion | Today Nurse | ND | 3 | 147‐148 | We contacted study authors on 23 April and 27 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Wei 2014 | Wei WD | 2014 | Preliminary clinical observation of moxibustion combined lamivudine for chronic hepatitis B liver and spleen deficiency | Master's thesis of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine | ND | ND | ND | We could not find any contact information for study authors |
| Wu 2012 | Wu YB | 2012 | Treatment of 30 people with chronic hepatitis B with acupoint injection of oxymatrine | Journal of Shanxi of Traditional Chinese Medicine | 33 | 1 | 12‐14 | We contacted study authors on 23 April and 27 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Xue 2007 | Xue YH | 2007 | Clinical observation on 60 people with chronic hepatitis B with liver fibrosis treated by combination therapy | Journal of Jiangsu of Traditional Chinese Medicine | 39 | 8 | 35‐36 | We contacted study authors on 23 April and 27 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Xue 2008 | Xue SK | 2008 | Clinical observation on 37 people with chronic hepatitis B treated with acupoint injection of oxymatrine | Shandong Medical Journal | 48 | 25 | 24 | We contacted study authors on 23 April and 27 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Yan 2002 | Yan YZ | 2002 | Curative effect observation of Ara‐AMP point injection in treating chronic hepatitis B | Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology | 16 | 3 | 292 | We could not find any contact information for study authors |
| Yang 2000 | Yang DQ | 2000 | Observation on the therapeutic effect of 'Tou tian liang' acupuncture combined with anti‐hepatitis B immunoribonucleic acid on 64 chronic HBV carriers with vertical infection | Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion | ND | 1 | 31‐32 | We contacted study authors on 23 April and 27 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Yang 2011 | Yang ZH | 2011 | Treatment of 64 people with HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B with α‐2b interferon combined with astragalus injection | Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine | 28 | 6 | 94‐95 | We contacted study authors on 23 April and 27 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Zhang 2005 | Zhang W | 2005 | Clinical observation of acupoint injection of interferon α‐2b combined with oxymatrine in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B | Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine | 14 | 15 | 1998‐1999 | We contacted study authors on 23 April and 27 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Zhang 2006 | Zhang B | 2006 | Therapeutic effect of intra‐acupoint injection of Cinobufacin on active cirrhosis | Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine | 5 | 8 | 1077‐1078 | The study author has changed his job. We could not get his current contact information |
| Zhang 2007 | Zhang Y | 2007 | Effect of injecting thymosin α1 at Zusanli point on T lymphocyte subset in chronic hepatitis B patient | Chinese Journal of Microecology | 19 | 2 | 189‐190 | We could not get any contact information for study authors |
| Zhang 2010 | Zhang SM | 2010 | Curative effect observation and nursing care on chronic hepatitis B by oxymatrine injection at Zusanli point | World Health Digest Medical Periodical | 7 | 7 | 245‐246 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Zhang 2012 | Zhang WW | 2012 | Effect of acupoint injection of interferon alpha on T lymphocyte subsets in patients with chronic hepatitis B | Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine | 21 | 21 | 2339‐2341 | We contacted the study author on 10 May by phone: the study author refused to provide any further information |
| Zhang 2014 | Zhang Q | 2014 | Effect of acupuncture combined with western medicine on cellular immune function in patients with cirrhosis after hepatitis B | ND | ND | 33 | 29 | The study author has changed his job. We could not get his current contact information |
| Zhang 2015 | Zhang SP | 2015 | Influence of acupoints injection with Xiang Dan injection on clinical effects of chronic hepatitis B | Traditional Chinese Medicine of Western Region | 28 | 11 | 115‐117 | The study author has changed his job. We could not get his current contact information |
| Zhang 2016 | Zhang L | 2016 | Curative effect observation on 23 people with chronic hepatitis B treated with acupoint injection of Polyporus polysaccharide combined with entecavir | Inner Mongolia Traditional Chinese Medicine | 35 | 6 | 471‐472 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Zhou 2008 | Zhou M | 2008 | Treatment of 50 people with chronic hepatitis B with Qinggan Jiedu paste | TCM Research | 21 | 11 | 27‐29 | We contacted study authors on 25 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Zhu 2011 | Zhu Q | 2011 | Clinical research of acupoint injection with Huangqi treating chronic hepatitis B and discussion of TCM external treatment | Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine | 29 | 12 | 2695‐2697 | We contacted study authors on 25 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Zhuo 2012 | Zhuo XY | 2012 | Therapeutic effect of lamivudine combined with meridian flow injection on chronic hepatitis B | Nurse Training Magazine | 27 | 11 | 1039‐1041 | We contacted study authors on 28 April and 30 April 2018 by phone: we received no reply. We could not find email addresses |
| Yao 2005 | Yao QY | 2008 | Clinical observation and nursing on Huachanshu acupoint injection therapy in treating patients with chronic hepatitis B and TAP‐positive | Conference Proceeding of the Clinic of the Second Hospital of Nanjing | 6 | ND | 62‐3 | We could not obtain the original full article |
| Zhao 2004 | Zhao QX | 2004 | Observation on acupuncture point irradiation of HeNe laser for the treatment of chronic B hepatitis | China Journal of Modern Medicine | 1 | 1 | 46‐7 | We could not obtain the original full article |
| Qian 1994 | Qian CF | 1994 | Clinical observation on increased acupoint injection for interdicting the replication of chronic hepatitis B virus | Zhejing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine | ND | ND | 155 | We could not obtain the original full article |
| HBBAC 1994 | Anonymous | 1994 | Hepatitis B associated with an acupuncture clinic | Communicable disease report | CDR Weekly 2 | 48 | 219 | We could not obtain the original full article |
| Arya 1989 | Arya SC | 1989 | Acupuncture in epidemic HBV hepatitis: other ritual surgical procedures in Africa as well | Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) | 9 | 3 | 511 | We could not obtain the original full article |
| Manning 2000 | Manning GL | 2000 | Hepatitis carriers and acupuncture | Acupuncture in Medicine | 18 | ND | 70 | We could not obtain the original full article |
Data and analyses
Comparison 1. Acupuncture versus no intervention.
| Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious (overall) | 3 | 203 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.67 [0.43, 1.06] |
| 2 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious (acupuncture approach) | 3 | 203 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.67 [0.43, 1.06] |
| 2.1 Participants with manual needle acupuncture | 1 | 58 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.62 [0.30, 1.29] |
| 2.2 Participants with acupoint herbal patching | 1 | 65 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.48 [0.21, 1.14] |
| 2.3 Participants with moxibustion | 1 | 80 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 1.0 [0.44, 2.26] |
| 3 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious (duration) | 3 | 203 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.67 [0.43, 1.06] |
| 3.1 Duration longer than 12 weeks | 1 | 58 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.62 [0.30, 1.29] |
| 3.2 Duration less than 12 weeks | 2 | 145 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.70 [0.35, 1.43] |
| 4 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious (diagnosis) | 3 | 203 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.67 [0.43, 1.06] |
| 4.1 Participants with diagnostic criteria according to guideline | 2 | 145 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.70 [0.35, 1.43] |
| 4.2 Participants with diagnosis by trialists | 1 | 58 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.62 [0.30, 1.29] |
| 5 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious (chronic hepatitis B plus a comitant disease and chronic hepatitis B) | 3 | 203 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.67 [0.43, 1.06] |
| 5.1 Participants with cirrhosis | 1 | 65 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.48 [0.21, 1.14] |
| 5.2 Unclear information on concomitant disease | 2 | 138 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.77 [0.45, 1.33] |
| 6 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious in best‐worst case scenario | 3 | 205 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.65 [0.41, 1.02] |
| 7 Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered not to be serious in worst‐best case scenario | 3 | 205 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.69 [0.44, 1.10] |
| 8 Proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA (overall) | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 9 Proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA in best‐worst case scenario | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 10 Proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA in worst‐best case scenario | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 11 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (fixed‐effect) | 2 | 158 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.79 [0.69, 0.91] |
| 12 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (random‐effects) | 2 | 158 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.64 [0.11, 3.68] |
| 13 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (acupuncture approach) | 2 | 158 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.64 [0.11, 3.68] |
| 13.1 Participants with manual needle acupuncture | 1 | 58 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.41 [0.24, 0.69] |
| 13.2 Participants with acupoint herbal patching | 1 | 100 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.98 [0.91, 1.05] |
| 14 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (duration) | 2 | 158 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.64 [0.11, 3.68] |
| 14.1 Duration longer than 12 weeks | 1 | 58 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.41 [0.24, 0.69] |
| 14.2 Duration less than 12 weeks | 1 | 100 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.98 [0.91, 1.05] |
| 15 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (diagnosis) | 2 | 158 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.64 [0.11, 3.68] |
| 15.1 Participants with diagnostic criteria according to guideline | 1 | 100 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.98 [0.91, 1.05] |
| 15.2 Participants with diagnosis by trialists | 1 | 58 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.41 [0.24, 0.69] |
| 16 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg in best‐worst case scenario | 2 | 160 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.63 [0.10, 3.90] |
| 17 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg in worst‐best case scenario | 2 | 160 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.66 [0.13, 3.39] |
| 18 Proportion of participants with fatigue | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 19 Proportion of participants with bloating | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 20 Proportion of participants with loss of appetite | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 21 Proportion of participants with flank pain | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 22 Proportion of participants with bradycardia | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 23 Proportion of participants with bradycardia in best‐worst case scenario | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 24 Proportion of participants with bradycardia in worst‐best case scenario | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 25 Proportion of participants with significant changes in blood routine tests | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 26 Proportion of participants with significant changes in blood routine tests in best‐worst case scenario | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 27 Proportion of participants with significant changes in blood routine tests in worst‐best case scenario | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected |
1.11. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Acupuncture versus no intervention, Outcome 11 Proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg (fixed‐effect).
Characteristics of studies
Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Huang 2011.
| Methods | Randomised clinical trial, China Parallel‐group design |
|
| Participants |
Included participants: 60 randomised participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B according to "The guideline of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B" (CSH‐CMA and SID‐CMA 2006); disease history of chronic hepatitis B or hepatitis B virus infection, 2 × ULN ≤ alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 10 × ULN, total bilirubin (TBil) ≤ 2 × ULN, positive HBsAg and HBeAg in serum, HBV‐DNA in serum ≥ 1 × 10⁵ copies/mL, 18 to 65 years old, and signing the informed consent form. One participant in the control group was excluded from data analysis because the participant quit the trial; study authors did not report why and when the participant quit the trial Male:Female = 47:12 Mean age: experimental group 25 years, control group 23 years Exclusion criteria: participants infected by hepatitis A virus, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus, hepatitis E virus, other hepatitis viruses, or other viral infections; participants with probable liver decompensation |
|
| Interventions | Experimental intervention: acupoint injection: Astragalus was injected into both sides of the Zu San Li (ST36) acupoints, 2 mL for each acupoint per time, once every other day, for 6 months (n = 30) Control intervention: no intervention (n = 29) Co‐intervention: recombinant human interferon (IFN)‐alpha 2a 6 million units subcutaneously, 3 times a week, for 6 months |
|
| Outcomes | Liver function bio markers, HbsAg, HbeAg, HbeAb, HbcAb, HBV‐DNA, and TC level in serum, response rate (a compound outcome measure defined by trialists) | |
| Notes |
Study dates: 2009.08 to 2009.11 We called the telephone number of the authors' hospital on 28 April 2018, but we could not contact the people. We could not obtain their email addresses or any other contact details |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random numbers table |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Except for equally implemented co‐interventions, the experimental group used acupuncture injection, and the control group used nothing, which can easily unseal the blinding |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | There was a small proportion of participants (1.7%) with missing data. One participant in the control group was excluded from data analysis |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | We could not find any protocols for this study, and this study did not report any outcomes that were defined as primary outcomes in our protocol |
| Other bias | Low risk | This study appeared to be free of other factors that could put it at risk of bias |
Jing 2016.
| Methods | Randomised clinical trial, China Parallel‐group design |
|
| Participants |
Included participants: 60 participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B according to "The guideline of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B: a 2010 update" (CSH‐CMA and SID‐CMA 2011): disease duration longer than 6 months; HBsAg, HBeAg, and HBV‐DNA positive in serum; ALT 80 to 200 U/L; HBV‐DNA ≥ 10⁵ copies/Ml; TBiL ≤ 34.2 U/L Male:Female = 33:27 Age: 20 to 40 years old Exclusion criteria: pregnant participants; participants with mental illness; participants with uncontrolled epilepsy; participants with unabated alcoholism and drug use; participants with uncontrolled autoimmunity disease, symptomatic heart disease, thyroid disease, retinopathy, and psoriasis; participants with depression, uncontrolled diabetes, and hypertension; participants with neutrophil < 1.0 × 10⁹/L and platelet < 50 × 10⁹/L before the trial; participants using other immunomodulators or other antiviral drugs 3 months before the trial; participants with hepatitis A, C, D, or E virus infection, alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune liver disease, and other liver diseases; participants with liver cirrhosis or suspected hepatocellular carcinoma; participants with creatinine level greater than normal level in serum; participants with human immunodeficiency virus infection |
|
| Interventions | Experimental intervention: acupoint injection: Astragalus (10 mL) was injected in the acupoint Zu San Li (ST 36), each side of 5 mL; compound Angelica injection (2 mL) in either side of the acupoint Zu San Li (ST 36); 3 times a week, once every other day, for 1 year (n = 30) Control intervention: no intervention (n = 30) Co‐intervention: peginterferon alpha‐2a 180 μg, subcutaneous injection, once a week for 1 year (n = 30) |
|
| Outcomes | Response rate (a compound outcome measure defined by the trialists) and the biomarkers CD4 level, CD8 level, and CD4/CD8 | |
| Notes |
Study dates: 2013.08 to 2014.06 We called the telephone number of the study authors' hospital on 23 April 2018, but we could not contact the people. We could not obtain their email addresses or any other contact details |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random numbers table |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Except for equally implemented co‐interventions, the experimental group used acupuncture injection, and the control group used nothing, which can easily unseal the blinding |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The number of participants included in the analysis was equal to the number of participants randomised |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | We could not find any protocols for this study, and this study did not report any outcomes that were defined as primary outcomes in our protocol |
| Other bias | Low risk | This study appeared to be free of other factors that could put it at risk of bias |
Liao 2011.
| Methods | Randomised clinical trial, China Parallel‐group design |
|
| Participants |
Included participants: 60 participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B according to "The guideline of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B" (CSH‐CMA and SID‐CMA 2006), in light or moderate disease degree (CSIP‐CMA and CSH‐CMA 2001): disease duration longer than 6 months, HBsAg and HBV‐DNA positive in serum, ALT persistent or repeated abnormal in serum, could not afford antiviral treatments, 18 to 65 years old, willing to participate in the trial Male:Female = 48:12 Mean age: experimental group 36.5 years, control group 35.4 years Exclusion criteria: participants who did not meet the inclusion criteria; participants with serious chronic hepatitis B (CSIP‐CMA and CSH‐CMA 2001); participants with hepatitis caused by factors such as drug poisoning and alcohol poisoning; participants with autoimmune hepatitis; participants with chronic hepatitis caused by other hepatitis viruses; participants with cirrhosis; participants with hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic encephalopathy, and serious cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease; participants with renal system, endocrine system, or hematopoietic system disease; pregnant, preparing for pregnancy, or lactating women; participants younger than 18 years or older than 65 years; participants with an allergic history of Yin Chen Hao (Herba artemisiae); participants taking antiviral drugs; participants unwilling to accept the intervention or who could not co‐ordinate with researchers (e.g. participants with mental disease) |
|
| Interventions | Experimental intervention: acupoint herbal patching: mixture of traditional Chinese herb Yin Chen Hao, Da Huang, Zhi Zi. Cover the acupoints Ji Men (SP 11) and Ri Yue (GB 24) on the right side, with patching for 4 hours to 8 hours, once daily, 3 weeks (n = 30) Control intervention: no intervention (n = 30) Co‐intervention: diammonium glycyrrihizinate injection 150 mg, once daily, 3 weeks (n = 30) |
|
| Outcomes | Liver biomarkers: AST, ALT, A/G, and TBIL; routine blood tests, routine urinalysis, and stool analysis; renal biomarkers | |
| Notes |
Study dates: 2010.08 to 2011.04 We called the telephone number of the study authors' hospital on 25 April 2018, but we could not contact the people. We could not obtain their email addresses or any other contact details |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random numbers table |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Information on random allocation was hidden in opaque envelopes |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Except for equally implemented co‐interventions, the experimental group used acupoint herbal patching, and the control group used nothing, which can easily unseal the blinding |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The number of participants included in the analysis was equal to the number of participants randomised |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | We could not find any protocols for this study, and this study did not report any outcomes that were defined as primary outcomes in our protocol |
| Other bias | Low risk | The study appeared to be free of other factors that could put it at risk of bias |
Wang 2002.
| Methods | Randomised clinical trial, China Parallel‐group design |
|
| Participants |
Included participants: 60 randomised participants diagnosed as people having chronic hepatitis B (detailed diagnostic criteria are not reported): 18 to 65 years old, with HBsAg, HBV DNA positive in serum longer than 6 months before enrolment, ALT persistent or repeated higher than 2 times normal level in serum, TBiL in serum less than 22 μmol/L. Two participants in the control group were excluded from data analysis because unrecoverable white blood cell count after 2 weeks medication and they had quit the trial Male:Female = unclear Mean age: experimental group 25.7 years, control group 29.5 years Exclusion criteria: participants with decompensate cirrhosis; participants with infection of other hepatitis viruses and other serious complications; pregnant and lactating women; participants with regular antiviral treatments in the 6 months before enrolment |
|
| Interventions | Experimental intervention: manual needle acupuncture: 1 hour for manipulating needles, once daily, 1 day off each week, for a total of 2 months. The main acupoints are Bai Hui (GV 20), Da Zhui (GV 14), Gan Shu (BL‐18), Shen Shu (BL 23), Zu San Li (ST 36), Yang Ling Quan (GB 34), San Yin Jiao (SP 6), and Tai Chong (LV 3). Acupoints can be added or subtracted according to the disease condition (n = 30) Control intervention: no intervention (n = 28) Co‐intervention: basic liver protective drugs: intravenous vitamin C, etc. (without detailed drugs, doses, and treatment duration). Interferon IFN‐α2b, 5 million units, intramuscular injection once a day for the first 2 weeks, followed by intramuscular injection 3 times a week for a total of 6 months |
|
| Outcomes | Lliver biomarkers: AST, etc.; negative conversion rate of biomarkers: HBsAg, HBsAb, HBeAg, HBeAb, HBcAb, and HBV DNA | |
| Notes | We called the telephone number of the study authors' hospital on 25 April 2018, but we could not contact the people. We could not obtain their email addresses or any other contact details | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random numbers table |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided; no such information |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Except for equally implemented co‐interventions, the experimental group used acupuncture, and the control group used nothing, which can easily unseal the blinding |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | There was a small proportion of participants (3.3%) with missing data. Two participants in the control group were excluded from data analysis because they had serious adverse events and had quit the trial, but study authors did not report what the adverse events were and when the participants experienced the adverse events |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | We could not find any protocols for this study, and this study did not report any outcomes that were defined as primary outcomes in our protocol |
| Other bias | Low risk | The study appeared to be free of other factors that could put it at risk of bias |
Wang 2013.
| Methods | Randomised clinical trial, China Parallel‐group design |
|
| Participants |
Included participants: 80 participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B according to "Liver disease diagnosis and treatment in traditional Chinese medicine" (KSWGLD 2005): disease duration longer than 6 months, HBsAg and HBV DNA positivity in serum, persistent or repeated abnormal ALT in serum Male:Female = 58:22 Mean age: 40.3 years Exclusion criteria: participants with other liver diseases such as drug‐induced hepatitis, alcoholic hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, etc.; participants with other hepatitis virus infection; participants with confirmed or suspected liver cancer; participants with severe cardiovascular, renal, or endocrine disease |
|
| Interventions | Experimental intervention: moxibustion: a small pill (consists of Huang Qi, Dang Shen, Bai Zhu, Dan Shen, Rou Gui, Yi Yi Ren) was placed on the umbilicus (Shen Que, CV 8); a moxa stick was burned at 2 to 3 cm above the skin of the umbilicus, which lasts for 20 to 30 minutes, once daily, for 3 months (n = 40) Control intervention: no intervention (n = 40) Co‐intervention: routine nursing and treatment methods for liver cirrhosis (without detail description) |
|
| Outcomes | Biomarkers: TBil, ALT, AST, ALB, HA, LN, PCⅢ, and Ⅳ‐C | |
| Notes |
Study dates: no information provided We called the telephone number of the authors' hospital on 24 April 2018, but we could not contact the people. We could not obtain their email addresses or any other contact details |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random numbers table |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Except for equally implemented co‐interventions, the experimental group used moxibustion, and the control group used nothing, which can easily unseal the blinding |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The number of participants included in the analysis was equal to the number of participants randomised |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | We could not find any protocols for this study, and this study did not report any outcomes that were defined as primary outcomes in our protocol |
| Other bias | Low risk | This study appeared to be free of other factors that could put it at risk of bias |
Zhang 2014.
| Methods | Randomised clinical trial, China | |
| Participants |
Included participants: 70 participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B according to "The guideline of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B" (CSH‐CMA and SID‐CMA 2006): disease duration longer than 6 to 36 months, HBsAg and HBV‐DNA positivity in serum, persistent or repeated abnormal ALT in serum, 18 to 58 years old, without using relevant drugs in the past 30 days Male:Female = 36:34 Mean age: experimental group 34.33 years, control group 36.85 years Exclusion criteria: participants not fulfilling the diagnostic criteria; patients with hepatitis; patients with heart disease; patients with mental disease or neurological disorders such as Parkinson; participants who have had liver surgery; participants allergic to the drugs used in this trial; participants allergic to anything; participants taking drugs that may have an effect on this trial |
|
| Interventions | Experimental intervention: manual needle acupuncture: on acupoints Zu San Li (ST 36), San Yin Jiao (SP 6), Zhi Yang (GV 9), Zhi Gou (SJ 6), and Tai Chong (LV 3), once daily, 3 months. Paroxetine, 10 mg, once daily, 3 months. If necessary, it can be combined with liver protective drugs such as diammonium glycyrrihizinate (n = 35) Control intervention: no intervention (n = 35) Co‐intervention: paroxetine, 10 mg, once daily, 3 months. If necessary, it can be combined with liver protective drugs such as diammonium glycyrrihizinate |
|
| Outcomes | Liver function biomarkers; indexes for drug safe testing: routine blood tests, routine urinalysis, stool analysis, renal function biomarkers, blood pressure, blood lipids, blood sugar, and electrocardiogram | |
| Notes |
Study dates: no information provided We called the telephone number of the study authors' hospital on 25 April 2018, but we could not contact the people. We could not obtain their email addresses or any other contact details |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random numbers table |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Except for equally implemented co‐interventions, the experimental group used acupuncture, and the control group used nothing, which can easily unseal the blinding |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The number of participants included in the analysis was equal to the number of participants randomised |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | We could not find any protocols for this study, and this study did not report any primary outcomes in our protocol |
| Other bias | Low risk | The study appeared to be free of other factors that could put it at risk of bias |
Zhu 2016.
| Methods | Randomised clinical trial, China Parallel‐group design |
|
| Participants |
Included participants: 65 participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B according to the "Modern liver disease treatment" (Wang JY 1999): disease duration longer than 6 months, HBsAg and HBV DNA positivity in serum, persistent or repeated abnormal ALT in serum, and liver cirrhosis with refractory ascites according to AASLD (AASLD 2009;Moore 2003) Male:Female = 41:24 Mean age = experimental group 39.3 years, control group 42.3 years Exclusion criteria: participants with serious complications such as gastrointestinal haemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, or hepatorenal syndrome; patients with ascites caused by infection or malignant tumour; participants with serious disease such as cardiovascular, renal, or hematopoietic system disease; patients with mental illness; participants with total bilirubin > 50 μmol/L and severe blood coagulation disorder (PTA < 30%); alcoholics |
|
| Interventions | Experimental intervention: acupuncture herbal patching: mixture of traditional Chinese herb Huang Qi, Rou Gui, Sha Ren, etc. Cover the acupoint Shen Que (CV 8) with the patching for 3 hours, once daily, 14 days (n = 33) Control intervention: no intervention (n = 32) Co‐intervention: tolvaptan (Otsuka Co., Ltd.) 15 mg, once daily for 7 days, then 7.5 mg once daily; reduced glutathione for injection, 1.8 g, once daily, intravenous drip; furosemide 80 to 160 mg per day and spironolactone 200 to 400 mg per day according to the condition, intravenous infusion; limited sodium intake (< 6 g/d); intermittent injection of human albumin |
|
| Outcomes | Color doppler: portal vein velocity/amount, splenic venous blood flow velocity/amount, and ascites dark zone depth; liver biomarkers: ALT, AST, GGT, TBIL, ALB, A/G; sodium level in blood and urine | |
| Notes |
Study dates: 2013. 12 to 2015. 07 We called the telephone number of the study authors' hospital on 23 April 2018, but we could not contact the people. We could not obtain their email addresses or any other contact details |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random numbers table |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Except for equally implemented co‐interventions, the experimental group used acupuncture herbal patching, and the control group used nothing, which can easily unseal the blinding |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The number of participants included in the analysis was equal to the number of participants randomised |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | We could not find any protocols for this study, and this study reported on only one of our primary outcomes ‐ serious adverse events |
| Other bias | Low risk | This study may or may not have been free of other factors that could put it at risk of bias |
Zou 2011.
| Methods | Randomised clinical trial, China Parallel‐group design |
|
| Participants |
Included participants: 100 participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B according to the "Diagnosis of viral hepatitis" (CMA‐SCH and CMA‐SID 2001): disease duration longer than 6 months, HBsAg positive in serum, ALT 2 to 10 times the upper limit of normal, total bilirubin lower than 5 times the upper limit of normal, and age between 18 and 65 years Male:Female = not reported Age: 13 to 65 years Exclusion criteria: participants with other hepatitis virus infection; participants with severe chronic hepatitis B, drug‐related hepatitis, alcoholic hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis |
|
| Interventions | Experimental intervention: acupuncture herbal patching: mixture of traditional Chinese herbs Ku Shen, Qing Hao, Huang Qin, Di Bie Chong, Lang Du, Chi Shao, Ru Xiang, Chang Pu, Bo He Nao. After cleaning and massaging local skin for 1 minute, cover the acupoints Ri Yue (GB 24), Ji Men (SP 11), and Zhang Men (LV 13), on the right side, with the patching. Gently press the patching for 3 minutes for each acupoint and then keep the patching for 36 hours, once for two days, 12 weeks (n = 50) Control intervention: no intervention (n = 50) Co‐intervention: glycyrrhizic acid diamine 100 to 150 mg, intravenous drip, once daily; Ku Huang injection 20 to 30 mL, intravenous drip, once daily, 12 weeks |
|
| Outcomes | Recovery rate of biomarkers: ALT, TBIL, ALB; negative rate of biomarkers: HBsAg, HBeAg, and HBV DNA; safety indicators (not reported in detail) | |
| Notes |
Study dates: 2008 to 2009 We called the telephone number of the study authors' hospital on 23 April 2018, but we could not contact the people. We could not obtain their email addresses or any other contact details |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random numbers table |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Except for equally implemented co‐interventions, the experimental group used acupuncture herbal patching, and the control group used nothing, which can easily unseal the blinding |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The number of participants included in the analysis was equal to the number of participants randomised |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | We could not find any protocols for this study, and this study did not report any primary outcomes in our protocol |
| Other bias | Low risk | This study appear to be free of other factors that could put it at risk of bias |
A/G: albumin/globulin ratio. ALT: alanine aminotransferase. AST: aspartate aminotransferase. CD4: cluster of differentiation 4. CD8: cluster of differentiation 8. GGT: gamma‐glutamyltransferase. HA: hyaluronic acid. HbcAb: hepatitis B core‐antibody. HbeAb: hepatitis B virus e‐antibody. HbeAg: hepatitis B virus e‐antigen. HbsAg: hepatitis B virus S‐antigen. HBV DNA: hepatitis B virus DNA. Ⅳ‐C: type Ⅳ collagen. LN: laminin. PCⅢ: type Ⅲ procollagen. PTA: plasma thromboplastin antecedent. ULN: upper limit of normal. TC: total cholesterol.
Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]
| Study | Reason for exclusion |
|---|---|
| Chang 1994 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Chen 1993 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Chen 1995 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Chen 1999 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Chen 2013 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Chen 2015 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Cui 2002 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Dai 2009 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Dai 2015 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Dong 1997 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Fu 1994 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Fu 2007 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Fu 2015 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Gao 2016 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Ge 2013 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Gu 1996 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Guo 2000 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Han 2005 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Han 2009 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Han 2012 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Hao 2014 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| He 2002 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Huang 2005 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Huang 2011b | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Jin 2011 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Kong 2005 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Kong 2008 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Lan 2001 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Li 1990 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Li 1992 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Li 2000a | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Li 2000b | Not chronic hepatitis B |
| Li 2005 | Self‐controlled clinical study |
| Li 2011 | Not a randomised clinical trial |
| Li 2013 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Li 2014 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Li 2015 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Li 2016 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Lian 1990 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Lian 1991 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Lin 2003 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Lin 2003b | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Lin 2011 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Liu 1999 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Liu 2003 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Liu 2003b | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Liu 2004 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Liu 2004b | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Liu 2005 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Liu 2006 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Lu 2004 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Lu 2004b | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Lu 2011 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Ma 2002 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Ma 2014 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Qin 2009 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Qiu 2006 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Ruan 2004 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Shao 2011 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Shi 1997 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Song 2008 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Sun 2000 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Sun 2003 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Tang 2007 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Tang 2013 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Tao 1988 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Tian 1998 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Tian 2005 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Wang 1990 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Wang 1993 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Wang 2003 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Wang 2010 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Wang 2011 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Wang 2013b | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Wang 2014 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Wang 2015 | Review |
| Wang 2016 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Wei 1989 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Wen 2003 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Wu 2002 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Xia 1988 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Xia 2015 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Xu 1988 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Xu 1994 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Xu 1996 | Not a randomised controlled trial |
| Xu 1999 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Xu 2011 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Xu 2016 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Xue 2012 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Yang 1992 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Yang 2002 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Yang 2007 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Ying 2010 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Yu 2015 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zeng 1994 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhang 1998 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhang 1998b | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhang 1999 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhang 2000 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhang 2003 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhang 2005 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhang 2008 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhang 2008b | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhang 2012 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhang 2016 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhao 2014 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhao 2014b | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhou 1998 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhou 2002 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
| Zhou 2015 | Does not fulfil the intervention inclusion criteria |
Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]
ChiCTR‐IOR‐17011957.
| Trial name or title | Therapeutic effect of acupoint application (Shu Gan Jian Pi plaster) combined with antiviral drugs on chronic hepatitis B with stagnation of liver qi and spleen deficiency |
| Methods | Randomised clinical trial, China Parallel‐group design |
| Participants |
Inclusion criteria: participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B; participants with positive HBsAg and HBV DNA in serum or participants with liver biopsy ≥ G2; participants with ALT level in serum greater than 2 times the normal value; participants with chronic hepatitis B and traditional Chinese medicine syndrome of liver stagnation and spleen deficiency Exclusion criteria: participants with infection of other type of hepatitis virus; participants with chronic severe hepatitis or cirrhosis; participants with heart, kidney, lung, endocrine, blood, metabolism, or gastrointestinal serious primary disease or participants with mental disease; pregnant women or lactating women; participants with allergic constitution |
| Interventions | Experimental intervention: acupuncture herbal patching (Shu Gan Jian Pi herbal patching) (n = 60) Control intervention: no intervention (n = 60) Co‐intervention: basic treatment (no detailed information provided) |
| Outcomes | Symptoms caused by implementation of Chinese medicine, liver function test, quantitative HBV DNA, quantitative HBsAg, SF‐36 concise health scale, cirrhosis incidence, coagulation function, routine blood test, renal function, routine urine test, fecal routine |
| Starting date | 2017.08.01 |
| Contact information | Infectious Disease Hospital of Shanghai Pudong District of Shanghai; contact author: Jianhua Xue; email address: 61512641@qq.com or hk5771@126.com; telephone number: +86 13585980751 |
| Notes | None |
ChiCTR‐IOR‐17011962.
| Trial name or title | Observation on the quality of life of chronic hepatitis B treated with acupoint magnetotherapy combined with Chinese Medicine |
| Methods | Randomised clinical trial, China Parallel‐group design |
| Participants |
Inclusion criteria: participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B; participants with positive HBsAg and HBV DNA in serum or participants with liver biopsy ≥ G2; participants with ALT level in serum greater than 2 times the normal value Exclusion criteria: participants with infection of other type of hepatitis virus; participants with chronic severe hepatitis or cirrhosis; participants with heart, kidney, lung, endocrine, blood, metabolism, or gastrointestinal serious primary disease or participants with mental disease; pregnant women or lactating women; participants with allergic constitution |
| Interventions | Experimental intervention: ear acupoint magnetotherapy (n = 36) Control intervention: no intervention (n = 36) Co‐intervention: basic treatment (no detailed information provided) |
| Outcomes | Symptoms caused by implementation of Chinese Medicine, SF‐36 concise health scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Scale, liver function test, coagulation function, routine blood test, ECG examination, renal function, routine urine test, fecal routine |
| Starting date | 2017.08.01 |
| Contact information | Infectious Disease Hospital of Shanghai Pudong District of Shanghai; contact author: Jianhua Xue; email address: 61512641@qq.com; telephone number: +86 13585980751 |
| Notes | None |
ALT: alanine aminotransferase. ECG: electrocardiography. HBsAg: hepatitis B virus S‐antigen. HBV DNA: hepatitis B virus DNA.
Differences between protocol and review
In the protocol, we planned to look at quasi‐randomised studies, controlled clinical studies, and other observational studies for data on harm, provided that they were retrieved through our searches for randomised clinical trials. This was our plan because adverse events are rarely reported in randomised clinical trials (Storebø 2018). Moreover, observational studies may provide information on rare or late‐occurring adverse events (Storebø 2018). However, due to the large number of studies retrieved and the large number of studies with insufficient information regarding their design, we decided to perform a separate systematic review on harms of acupuncture. This is why we did not extract data on harm from the identified non‐randomised studies (see Characteristics of excluded studies, as well as Appendix 2).
We performed 'best‐worst' case and 'worst‐best' case analyses for all outcomes instead of only for primary and secondary outcomes because we had very limited evidence for primary and secondary outcomes.
In case of one trial providing outcome data, we post hoc compared the results with Fisher's exact test and RevMan analysis, and we found no differences between them. Therefore, in view of future updates of the review, we kept and presented only results obtained through RevMan analysis.
Post hoc, we decided to present the results on our exploratory outcomes: the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA and the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg, because acupuncture is considered by physicians to decrease discomfort and prevent replication of the virus in people with chronic hepatitis B. We conducted three post‐hoc Trial Sequential Analyses assuming the following: proportions of participants dying was low (4%; young participants with mild disease), moderate (20%; middle‐aged participants with mild disease), and high (40%; middle‐aged participants with severe disease) within one year in the control group.
Post hoc, we decided to present the results on our surrogate outcomes: the proportion of participants with detectable HBV DNA and the proportion of participants with detectable HBeAg, in the 'Summary of findings' table, in the Abstract, and in the Plain language summary.
In keeping with Cochrane CENTRAL requirements, we have now excluded the risk of bias domain on 'for‐profit funding' from the risk of bias domains listed in the protocol part of the review, and instead, we have reported in a narrative way the information gathered from the trials. In addition, consistent with Cochrane CENTRAL requirements, we assessed imprecision via Trial Sequential Analysis in a separate assessment of imprecision with GRADE in a sensitivity analysis.
Contributions of authors
DZK: developed and drafted the protocol; selected trials for inclusion; extracted trial data; contacted study authors for missing data; performed the risk of bias assessment; interpreted data; drafted the final review. NL: developed and co‐ordinated the protocol; interpreted data; commented on the final review. GLY: selected trials for inclusion; commented on the final review. ZZ: selected trials for inclusion; commented on the final review. YY: selected trials for inclusion; commented on the final review. YXL: selected trials for inclusion; commented on the final review. QGW: selected trials for inclusion; commented on the final review. YL: extracted data from trials; contacted study authors for missing data; performed the risk of bias assessment; commented on the final review. FZ: extracted data from trials; contacted study authors for missing data; performed the risk of bias assessment; commented on the final review. HYZ: extracted data from trials; contacted study authors for missing data; performed the risk of bias assessment; commented on the final review. DN: developed, co‐ordinated, and advised on the protocol; advised on interpretation of data; commented on the final review. JCJ: developed, co‐ordinated, and advised on the protocol; advised on interpretation of data; commented on the final review. CG: developed, co‐ordinated, and advised on the protocol; advised on interpretation of data; commented on the final review. JPL: initiated the review; advised and commented on the protocol and the final review.
All review authors approved publication of the current version.
Sources of support
Internal sources
No sources of support supplied
External sources
2017 Open‐end Fund of Education Ministry Key Laboratory for Research and Application of 'Zang Xiang' Theory in Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (zyzx1702), China.
Science and Technology Research Project of Department of Education of Liaoning Province (L201713), China.
-
Grant Number R24 AT001293 from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), USA, USA.
- This work was partially funded by Grant Number R24 AT001293 from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH). The contents of this systematic review are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NCCIH or the National Institutes of Health.
Declarations of interest
DZK: none known. NL: none known. GLY: none known. ZZ: none known. YL: none known. YY: none known. YXL: none known. QGW: none known. FZ: none known HYZ: none known DN: none known. JCJ: none known. CG: none known. JPL: none known.
New
References
References to studies included in this review
Huang 2011 {published data only}
- Huang JJ, Huang HN, Wang ZC. Clinical observation on treatment of chronic hepatitis B with Zusanli acupoint injection combined with interferon [足三里穴位注射联合干扰素治疗慢性乙型肝炎临床观察]. Journal of New Chinese Medicine 2011;43(11):89‐91. [Google Scholar]
Jing 2016 {published data only}
- Jing DC, Zhong S, Ouyang HP, Gao S, Lu GL, Gao CY. Clinical observation on 30 cases of chronic hepatitis B treated by acupoint injection combined with peginterferon alpha‐2a [穴位注射联合聚乙二醇干扰素α‐2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎30 例临床观察]. Hunan Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2016;32(6):97‐9. [Google Scholar]
Liao 2011 {published data only}
- Liao FL. A study of Yin Chen Hao Tie on the chronic hepatitis B patients with liver and gallbladder damp‐heat syndrome. Guangzhou (China): Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 2011. [Google Scholar]
Wang 2002 {published data only}
- Wang ZH, Yue P, Lin LY, Xu J, Yu JB, Lv SL. Clinical study on treatment of chronic hepatitis B with acupuncture combined with α‐interferon [针刺联合α‐干扰素治疗慢性乙型肝炎临床研究]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2002;18(3):187‐8. [Google Scholar]
Wang 2013 {published data only}
- Wang B. Observation and nursing of umbilical moxibustion therapy for hepatitis B and liver cirrhosis [脐部艾灸疗法对乙肝肝硬化的疗效观察及护理]. Guangming Journal of Chinese Medicine 2013;28(2):368‐9. [Google Scholar]
Zhang 2014 {published data only}
- Zhang PJ, Guo JZ. Analysis of HBV patients treated with acupuncture therapy and Western medicine treatment [针刺联合西药治疗慢性乙型肝炎临床观察]. Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2014;16(4):107‐8. [Google Scholar]
Zhu 2016 {published data only}
- Zhu JF, Wang LT. Clinical research of 'Shuigu Cataplasm' umbilical compressing combined with Tolvaptan in treatment of refractory cirrhosis ascites [“水臌贴”敷脐联合托伐普坦等治疗慢性乙型肝炎肝硬化顽固性腹水的临床研究]. Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2016;50(4):37‐40. [Google Scholar]
Zou 2011 {published data only}
- Zou YT, Hua HQ, Zheng QX, Xu W, Ding XB, Zhang JX, et al. Clinical study on treatment of 50 cases of chronic hepatitis B with external application of Hu Gan Jie Du Ba Bu ointment and basic therapy [护肝拔毒巴布膏外敷联合基础疗法治疗慢性乙型肝炎50例临床研究]. Jiangsu Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2011;43(7):32‐3. [Google Scholar]
References to studies excluded from this review
Chang 1994 {published data only}
- Chang XZ, Huang DL, Chen LX, Li ZP, Tian YT. Anti‐hepatitis B immune ribonucleic acid acupoint closure for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B [抗乙肝免疫核糖核酸穴位封闭治疗慢性乙肝]. Qianwei Journal of Medicine & Pharmacy 1994;11(5):311‐2. [Google Scholar]
Chen 1993 {published data only}
- Chen YK, Song YH, Yan YH, Leng CH, Song HC, Zhang ZG. Effect of acupuncture and moxibustion on the immune function of HBsAg carriers [针灸足三里对HBsAg携带者免疫功能影响的研究]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 1993;85(2):33‐5. [Google Scholar]
Chen 1995 {published data only}
- Chen LP, Zhang SJ, Ma CY, Luo ZQ, Chen ZX. Treatment of 48 cases of chronic active hepatitis B with interferon and ligustrazine acupoint injection [干扰素、川芎嗪穴位注射治疗慢性乙型活动性肝炎48例]. Shizhen Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine Research 1995;02:10. [Google Scholar]
Chen 1999 {published data only}
- Chen JF, Chen M, Zhao M, Wang Y. Effects of acupuncture on the immunological functions in hepatitis B virus carriers. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 1999;19(4):268‐72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen 2013 {published data only}
- Chen Q. Observation on curative effect of acupoint application with Shugan stickers for hypochondriac pain in chronic hepatitis B patient [舒肝贴穴位贴敷治疗慢性乙型肝炎胁痛的疗效观察]. Chinese Nursing Research 2013;27(9):2890‐1. [Google Scholar]
Chen 2015 {published data only}
- Chen G, Luo JX, Hu XY. Tiaoshen acupuncture for diarrhea type IBS in patients with chronic hepatitis B (liver stagnation and spleen deficiency syndrome): curative effect and influence on plasma SP and VIP [调神针法对慢性乙型肝炎患者腹泻型IBS(肝郁脾虚证)疗效及血浆SP、VIP的影响]. World Chinese Journal of Digestology 2015;23(8):1303‐7. [Google Scholar]
Cui 2002 {published data only}
- Cui CY, Liu GH, Wang FR, Fan KM, Zhao HT. Clinical observation of interferon, thymosin and Jiaji acupoint injection combined with lamivudine and levamisole in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B [干扰素、胸腺肽夹脊穴注射联合拉米夫定、左旋咪唑治疗慢乙肝临床观察]. Shandong Medical Journal 2002;42(14):32‐3. [Google Scholar]
Dai 2009 {published data only}
- Dai BY, Xiong XT. Effect of acupuncture, moxibustion, and Chinese medicine on T lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood of patients with chronic hepatitis B [中医针、灸、药联合治疗对慢性乙型肝炎患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群的影响]. Jiangxi Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2009;40(324):28‐9. [Google Scholar]
Dai 2015 {published data only}
- Xai XR, Sun H, Yan SQ. Therapeutic effect of the combination of moxibustion, acupoint massage and foot bath on flu‐like symptoms caused by interferon in 120 patients with chronic hepatitis B [联合艾灸、指针穴位按摩、足浴对120例慢性乙型肝炎患者初次注射干扰素致流感样症状的疗效观察]. Strait Pharmaceutical Journal 2015;27(9):115‐7. [Google Scholar]
Dong 1997 {published data only}
- Dong HZ, Duan H, Tian BZ. Observation on the effect of acupoint injection of traditional Chinese medicine on human hepatitis B surface antigen [中药穴位注射对人体乙型肝炎表面抗原的作用观察]. Hebei Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 1997;19(5):5‐6. [Google Scholar]
Fu 1994 {published data only}
- Fu LL. Observation on the therapeutic effect of acupuncture on chronic active hepatitis B [针刺治疗慢性活动性乙型肝炎疗效观察]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 1994;65(2):9‐10. [Google Scholar]
Fu 2007 {published data only}
- Fu XP. Observation and nursing of 62 cases of chronic liver disease treated by intravenous injection of traditional Chinese medicine and hepatitis acupoint injection [中药静脉注射联合肝炎灵穴位注射治疗慢性肝病62例观察与护理]. Modern Nurse 2007;4(33):36. [Google Scholar]
Fu 2015 {published data only}
- Fu T. Nursing experience of chronic hepatitis B treated with acupoint injection combined with Chinese patent medicine [慢性乙型肝炎采用穴位注射联合中成药治疗的护理体会]. For All Health 2015;9(9):7‐8. [Google Scholar]
Gao 2016 {published data only}
- Gao TT, Hu DS. Therapeutic effect of moxibustion on insomnia in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis [艾灸治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化患者失眠的疗效观察]. Chinese Journal of Liver Diseases (Electronic Version) 2016;8(2):123‐6. [Google Scholar]
Ge 2013 {published data only}
- Ge FQ. The study of thymopentin with acupuncture point injection combined with entecavir treated chronic viral hepatitis B [胸腺五肽穴位注射联合恩替卡韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎的临床研究]. Journal of Heze Medical College 2013;25(2):21‐3. [Google Scholar]
Gu 1996 {published data only}
- Gu HH, Shi JP, He JJ. Observation on therapeutic effect of hydro‐acupuncture plus blistering applying in the treatment of 66 cases of chronic hepatitis B [穴位水针注射结合发泡治疗慢性乙型肝炎66例疗效观察]. Zhejiang Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 1996;31(6):274. [Google Scholar]
Guo 2000 {published data only}
- Guo JC, Chen SL, Li BR, Wu WY, Tu SX. Clinical study on treatment of chronic hepatitis with liver fibrosis by low‐dose interferon acupoint injection combined with traditional Chinese medicine [小剂量干扰素穴位注射联合中药治疗慢性肝炎肝纤维化临床研究]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2000;1:9‐11. [Google Scholar]
Han 2005 {published data only}
- Han LZ, Zhang YL, Mi LB. Therapeutic effect of acupoint injection of interleukin‐2 on chronic hepatitis B [白细胞介素‐2穴位注射治疗慢性乙肝疗效观察]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology 2005;12:1538. [Google Scholar]
Han 2009 {published data only}
- Han J, Gu YJ. Observation on the therapeutic effect of acupuncture combined with drug therapy on compensated liver cirrhosis [针刺配合药物治疗代偿期肝硬化疗效观察]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2009;29(12):970‐2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Han 2012 {published data only}
- Han J, Gu YJ. Treatment of 15 cases of people with Yin Huang syndrome (hepatitis B with cirrhosis) with umbilical fire therapy [脐火疗法治疗阴黄(乙肝肝硬化)5例]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2012;32(6):490. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hao 2014 {published data only}
- Hao Y. Study on the intervention of Qing Re Jie Du method in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B [清热解毒法治疗慢性乙型肝炎干预作用的研究]. Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application 2014;8(17):205‐6. [Google Scholar]
He 2002 {published data only}
- He H, Zhang YL, Yan YZ. Therapeutic effect of Baiying decoction and adenosine monophosphate on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B [百鹰汤合单磷酸阿糖腺苷穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎疗效观察]. Zhejiang Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2002;1:44. [Google Scholar]
Huang 2005 {published data only}
- Huang XQ, Li YT. Observation on 50 cases of recovery period of chronic hepatitis B treated with acupuncture [针刺治疗慢性乙型肝炎恢复期50例观察]. Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Medicine 2005;21(3):159. [Google Scholar]
Huang 2011b {published data only}
- Huang ZX, Qin J, Xiao Y. Clinical study on different methods of injection of hepatitis B immunoglobulin to block mother‐to‐child transmission of hepatitis B virus [不同方法注射乙型肝炎免疫球蛋白阻断乙型肝炎病毒母婴传播的临床研究]. Contemparary Medicine 2011;17(12):110‐1. [Google Scholar]
Jin 2011 {published data only}
- Jin JJ, Xu YL, Zheng Y, Xue YP. Effect of oxymatrine injection in Zu San Li acupoint on liver function in patients with chronic hepatitis B and liver fibrosis [苦参素注射液足三里穴位注射对慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化患者肝功能的影响]. Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine 2011;18(6):13‐5. [Google Scholar]
Kong 2005 {published data only}
- Kong SL, Zhang WB, Li CL, Mi X, Sun LX, Zhang RW, et al. Clinical study on high‐dose hepatitis B vaccine acupoint injection for HBV carriers [大剂量乙肝疫苗穴位注射治疗HBV携带者的临床研究]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases 2005;15(5):262‐3. [Google Scholar]
Kong 2008 {published data only}
- Kong SL, Li ZG, Sun LX. Therapeutic effect of acupoint injection combined with oxymatrine on chronic hepatitis C [穴位注射联合苦参素综合治疗慢性丙型肝炎疗效观察]. Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics 2008;8(31):7586‐7. [Google Scholar]
Lan 2001 {published data only}
- Lan CS. Observation on the therapeutic effect of acupoint injection of Ku Shen Su and combination of traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine on chronic hepatitis B [苦参素穴位注射、中西医结合治疗慢性乙型肝炎疗效观察]. Compilation of the 13th National Symposium on Digestive System Diseases of the Chinese Association of Integrative Medicine. 2001.
Li 1990 {published data only}
- Li DX, Zhu XQ, Wang BS. Treatment of 40 cases of chronic hepatitis B with acupoint application of Chinese medicine [中药穴位敷贴治疗慢性乙型肝炎40例]. Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion 1990;1:6. [Google Scholar]
Li 1992 {published data only}
- Li YP, Zhao K. 100 cases of hepatitis B treated by acupoint injection of Chinese and Western Medicine [中西药穴位注射治疗乙型肝炎100例]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases 1992;2(2):44. [Google Scholar]
Li 2000a {published data only}
- Li FS. Treatment of 48 cases of chronic hepatitis B with acupoint injection of hepatitis B vaccine combined with traditional Chinese medicine [乙肝疫苗穴位注射联合中药治疗慢性乙型肝炎48例]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases 2000;10(4):39‐40. [Google Scholar]
Li 2000b {published data only}
- Li XQ, Li ZG, Liao WW, Xu QS, Tan HM, Li SH, et al. Observation on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus carriers by oral administration of Yiganbao plus acupoint injection of Huangqi injection [口服乙肝宝加穴位注射黄芪注射液治疗慢性乙肝病毒携带者的观察]. Practical Preventive Medicine 2000;7(5):366‐7. [Google Scholar]
Li 2005 {published data only}
- Li XP, Gao YX, Chai YF, Qiu AG. Effect of acupuncture and moxibustion combined therapy on liver histopathology in patients with chronic hepatitis B [针灸药结合疗法对慢性乙型肝炎患者肝组织病理学的影响]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases 2005;15(2):79‐80. [Google Scholar]
Li 2011 {published data only}
- Li XJ, Liu XY. Treatment of 60 cases of chronic hepatitis B by intervention of moxibustion and interferon [督灸预防干扰素治疗慢性乙型肝炎副反应60例]. Global Traditional Chinese Medicine 2011;4(6):471‐2. [Google Scholar]
Li 2013 {published data only}
- Li YS, Zhao WS. Therapeutic effect of Ling Zhi Yang Gan pill combined with liver disease treatment instrument and lamivudine for chronic hepatitis B and liver fibrosis [灵芝养肝丸联合肝病治疗仪、拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化的疗效探讨]. Seek Medical and Ask the Medicine 2013;11(2):530‐1. [Google Scholar]
Li 2014 {published data only}
- Li YC. Clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese herbal patching in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B [中药贴敷干预治疗慢性乙型肝炎的临床疗效]. Drugs and Clinical 2014;11:69‐70. [Google Scholar]
Li 2015 {published data only}
- Li YF, Xie DM, Yang ZZ, Yao LH, Qi YP. Clinical research of chronic hepatitis B with combined therapy by acupoint catgut embedding and entecavir [穴位埋线联合恩替卡韦片治疗慢性乙型肝炎临床研究]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases 2015;25(4):203‐5. [Google Scholar]
Li 2016 {published data only}
- Li QZ, Song WG, Wu WW. Effect of Yishen Jianpi Shugan Huoluo method combined with heat‐sensitive moxibustion on serum Cys‐c in patients with hepatitis B virus‐associated nephritis [益肾健脾疏肝活络法联合热敏灸对乙型肝炎病毒相关性肾炎患者血清Cys‐c的影响]. Practical Clinical Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine 2016;16(8):16‐8. [Google Scholar]
Lian 1990 {published data only}
- Lian WZ. Acupoint injection of water needle for treatment of chronic hepatitis B [水针穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 1990;9:38‐40. [Google Scholar]
Lian 1991 {published data only}
- Lian WZ. Water needle in acupuncture point in treating patients with hepatitis A and B double infection [穴位水针治疗乙型甲型肝炎双重感染]. Zhejiang Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 1991;26(4):176‐7. [Google Scholar]
Lin 2003 {published data only}
- Lin CL, Zhang FY. Treatment of 100 cases of hepatitis B with acupoint injection of water needle and oral drugs [水针穴位注射联合口服药物治疗乙型肝炎100例]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases 2003;S1:126‐7. [Google Scholar]
Lin 2003b {published data only}
- Lin XM, Shi JP. Clinical observation on 47 cases of chronic hepatitis B treated by acupoint water needle [穴位水针治疗慢性乙型肝炎47例临床观察]. Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Science and Technology 2003;10(1):57. [Google Scholar]
Lin 2011 {published data only}
- Lin LP, Li AJ, Tan XY. Clinical study on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B with water acupuncture combined with liver disease treatment instrument [水针疗法配合肝病治疗仪辅助治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者的临床研究]. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Natural Medicine. 2011.
Liu 1999 {published data only}
- Liu YM, Chang XH, Han TY, Zhang LL, Zhou SF, Du ZP. Effect of acupuncture on hepatitis B serum virus markers [针刺对乙肝血清病毒标志物的影响]. Shanxi Journal of Traditional Chinese Meidicine 1999;15(1):30‐1. [Google Scholar]
Liu 2003 {published data only}
- Liu YL. Observation on therapeutic effect of combined treatment of acupoint injection, burning rush moxibustion and interferon on chronic hepatitis B [穴位注射灯芯灸联合干扰素治疗慢性乙型肝炎疗效观察]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2003;23(10):583‐4. [Google Scholar]
Liu 2003b {published data only}
- Liu YL, Lin HR. Therapeutic effect of wick moxibustion combined with thymus treatment on anti‐HBe positive chronic hepatitis B [灯芯灸联合胸腺治肽疗抗HBe阳性慢性乙型肝炎疗效观察]. Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion 2003;19(9):39‐40. [Google Scholar]
Liu 2004 {published data only}
- Liu ZL, He H, Bai JP, Zhou BH. Observation and nursing of patients with chronic hepatitis B treated by acupoint injection of adenosine monophosphate [单磷酸阿糖腺苷穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎的观察及护理]. Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine 2004;13(3):382. [Google Scholar]
Liu 2004b {published data only}
- Liu QY. Clinical observation of acupoint injection of IL‐2 in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B [IL‐2穴位注射治疗慢性乙肝的临床观察]. Journal of Changchun College of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2004;20(1):9‐10. [Google Scholar]
Liu 2005 {published data only}
- Liu CQ. Treatment of 351 cases of chronic hepatitis B with traditional Chinese medicine combined with acupoint injection, pricking, and cupping [中药结合穴位注射与刺络拔罐法治疗慢性乙肝351例]. Shanxi Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2005;21(2):38‐9. [Google Scholar]
Liu 2006 {published data only}
- Liu SJ, Wang X, Li XY, Liu ZF, Yao LH. Clinical study on blocking hepatitis B virus mother‐to‐child transmission by acupoint injection of hepatitis B immunoglobulin [穴位注射乙型肝炎免疫球蛋白阻断乙型肝炎病毒母婴传播的临床研究]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics 2006;22(1):47‐8. [Google Scholar]
Lu 2004 {published data only}
- Lu MS, Guo YW, Xu LH, Chen GH, Gan JE. Clinical study on treatment of chronic hepatitis B with Huang Bai Zhu Cao mixture combined with acupoint injection therapy [黄白珠草合剂联合穴位注射疗法治疗慢性乙型肝炎的临床研究]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases 2004;14(2):83‐4. [Google Scholar]
Lu 2004b {published data only}
- Lu HY, Wang CX, Zhou L. Clinical observation of acupoint injection of α‐1b interferon in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B [α‐1b干扰素穴位注射治疗慢性乙肝临床观察]. Chinese Medicine Study 2014;2(6):69‐70. [Google Scholar]
Lu 2011 {published data only}
- Lu HY. Therapeutic effect of low‐dose interferon α‐1b acupoint injection on elderly patients with chronic hepatitis B [小剂量干扰素α‐1b穴位注射治疗老年慢性乙型肝炎疗效观察]. China Practical Medicine 2011;6(28):166‐7. [Google Scholar]
Ma 2002 {published data only}
- Ma JM, Yu DD, Wang R, Ying Q. Acupoint injection for treatment of 15 cases of hepatitis B [穴位注射治疗乙型肝炎15例]. Journal of Changchun College of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2002;18(2):38. [Google Scholar]
Ma 2014 {published data only}
- Ma WQ. Therapeutic effect of traditional Chinese medicine enema combined with moxibustion on cirrhosis ascites [中药灌肠配合艾灸治疗肝硬化腹水疗效观察]. China Practical Medicine 2014;9(9):171. [Google Scholar]
Qin 2009 {published data only}
- Qin XL, Li SQ, Jiang YP, Zhong T, Cao Z. Treatment of 100 cases of chronic hepatitis B (liver stagnation and spleen deficiency syndrome) by acupuncture combined with medicine [针药并用治疗慢性乙型肝炎(肝郁脾虚型)100例]. Jiangxi Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2009;40(322):61. [Google Scholar]
Qiu 2006 {published data only}
- Qiu WW, Chang J, Shen SE, Shi BB, Pan XF. Clinical study on 30 cases of chronic hepatitis B treated with electroacupuncture [电针治疗慢性乙型肝炎30例临床研究]. Jiangsu Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2006;27(6):39‐40. [Google Scholar]
Ruan 2004 {published data only}
- Ruan YD, Mo BQ, Ning XJ, Liu P. Clinical observation on 60 cases of chronic hepatitis B treated by Gan Yan Ling injection and Huang Yin injection [肝炎灵加黄茵注射液穴注治疗慢性乙型肝炎60例临床观察]. Journal of New Chinese Medicine 2004;36(8):25‐6. [Google Scholar]
Shao 2011 {published data only}
- Shao FZ, Chen XY, Cao DH, Jiang XH. Clinical observation on 30 cases of chronic hepatitis B treated by Bushen granule combined with α‐2b interferon acupoint injection [补肾冲剂联合α一2b干扰素穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎30例临床观察]. The Inaugural Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Committee of the Jiangxi Association of Integrative Medicine and the Compilation of the First Academic Conference on Infectious Diseases of Integrative Medicine in Jiangxi Province. 2011.
Shi 1997 {published data only}
- Shi JP, Zhang BG. Effect of acupoint self‐blood therapy combined with natural moxibustion therapy on immune function in patients with chronic hepatitis B [腧穴自血疗法结合天灸疗法对慢性乙型肝炎患者免疫功能的影响]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases 1997;7(1):46‐7. [Google Scholar]
Song 2008 {published data only}
- Song LC, Zhang GH, Huai DG, Zhang LY, Zhao J. Treatment of 46 cases of chronic hepatitis B by acupoint injection of oxymatrine injection [苦参素注射液穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎46例]. China Foreign Medical Treatment 2008;23:66‐7. [Google Scholar]
Sun 2000 {published data only}
- Sun HX, Fan EX, Song XW, Yao S, Hu ML. Effect of autologous frozen blood acupoint injection on serological markers in patients with hepatitis B [自体冷冻血液穴位注射对乙肝病人血清学标志的影响]. Journal of Norman Bethune University of Medical Science 2000;26(2):181‐2. [Google Scholar]
Sun 2003 {published data only}
- Sun XN. Treatment of 120 cases of hepatitis B with anti‐hepatitis B immunoribonucleic acupoint injection [抗乙肝免疫核糖核酸穴注治疗乙型肝炎120例]. China's Naturopathy 2003;11(9):17. [Google Scholar]
Tang 2007 {published data only}
- Tang RG. Treatment of 62 cases of hepatic fibrosis caused by chronic hepatitis B with basic therapy combined with Ku Shen Su acupoint injection [基础治疗联合苦参素穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化62例]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases 2007;17(4):243‐4. [Google Scholar]
Tang 2013 {published data only}
- Tang RG. Clinical observation on treatment of chronic hepatitis B with acupoint injection of Ku Shen Su combined with peginterferon α‐2a [苦参素穴位注射联合聚乙二醇干扰素α‐2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎的临床观察]. Compilation of the 16th National Conference on Viral Hepatitis and Liver Diseases of the Chinese Medical Association. 2013.
Tao 1988 {published data only}
- Tao MZ, Zhang BS, Wang TY, Qiu ML. Efficacy evaluation of acupuncture treatment for asymptomatic hepatitis B virus carriers [针灸治疗无症状乙型肝炎病毒携带者疗效评价]. Acta Medica Sinica 1988;8(6):18‐20. [Google Scholar]
Tian 1998 {published data only}
- Tian YL. Effect of acupoint injection of Danshen on hepatitis B virus replication: a five‐year follow‐up record [丹参穴位注射对乙肝病毒复制的影响—附五年随访记录]. Journal of Nanjing Railway Medical College 1998;17(3):200‐1. [Google Scholar]
Tian 2005 {published data only}
- Tian FW. Observation on 36 cases of chronic hepatitis B treated by lamivudine, BCG‐PSN and compound Yi Gan Ling [贺普丁、卡提素、复方益肝灵联合治疗慢性乙肝36例观察]. Qilu Pharmaceutical Affairs 2005;24(12):752‐3. [Google Scholar]
Wang 1990 {published data only}
- Wang YL, Chen CW, Ni LD. Effect of He‐Ne laser acupoint irradiation and Gan Bi Fu on 38 cases of chronic hepatitis B on HBVM [He‐Ne激光穴位照射与肝必复治疗慢乙肝38例对HBVM的影响]. Laser Journal 1990;11(6):316. [Google Scholar]
Wang 1993 {published data only}
- Wang XY. Acupuncture and moxibustion in treatment of HBV carriers: clinical observation of 67 cases. International of Journal of Clinical Acupucnture 1993;4(4):365‐9. [Google Scholar]
Wang 2003 {published data only}
- Wang J, Wen R, Liu W, Liu XY, Shen L, Cao H. Study on anti‐chronic hepatitis B fibrosis by acupoint injection of Chinese herbal compound 989 [中药复方989穴位注射抗慢性乙型肝炎纤维化作用的研究]. Liaoning Pharmacy and Clinical Remedies 2003;6(1):12‐3. [Google Scholar]
Wang 2010 {published data only}
- Wang L. Observation on effect of acupoint needle to treat chronic hepatitis B patients complicated with sleep disorders [穴位指针法治疗慢性乙型肝炎病人睡眠障碍效果观察]. Chinese Nursing Research 2010;24(12):3237‐8. [Google Scholar]
Wang 2011 {published data only}
- Wang B, Xie J, Wu S. Clinical observation on treatment of chronic hepatitis B by acupoint injection of Huang Qi injection [黄芪注射液穴位注射治疗慢性病毒性乙型肝炎临床观察]. Hubei Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2011;33(11):15‐6. [Google Scholar]
Wang 2013b {published data only}
- Wang JH. Observation and nursing experience on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B with acupoint injection [自血穴位注射辅助治疗慢性乙型肝炎的疗效观察与护理体会]. Chinese Journal of Ethnomedicine and Ethnopharmacy 2013;22(13):94‐5. [Google Scholar]
Wang 2014 {published data only}
- Wang F, Lou J, Hou LF. Therapeutic effect of Xiaoji Sanjie Zhitong Ointment on 85 cases of hepatosplenomegaly after liver cirrhosis (compensation period) [消积散结止痛膏治疗肝炎后肝硬化(代偿期)肝脾肿大85例疗效观察]. Asia‐Pacific Traditional Medicine 2014;10(3):105‐6. [Google Scholar]
Wang 2015 {published data only}
- Wang LQ, Liang N, Yang GY, Feng S, Han M, Zhang K, et al. Systematic review of acupoint injection therapy versus non‐acupoint injection therapy for chronic hepatitis B [穴位注射疗法对照非穴位注射疗法治疗慢性乙型肝炎的系统综述]. Compilation of the 6th National Conference on Integrative Medicine and Infectious Diseases. 2015.
Wang 2016 {published data only}
- Wang AN, Li M, Dai Y, Gao J. Shugan Jianpi ointment acupoint sticking in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (syndrome of stagnation of liver qi and spleen deficiency) for 30 cases [疏肝健脾膏穴位贴敷治疗慢性乙型肝炎(肝郁脾虚证)30例]. Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China 2016;14(10):74‐6. [Google Scholar]
Wei 1989 {published data only}
- Wei YL, Kuang XF, Cao Z, Zhang F, Jiang DR, Yang MY, et al. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B by acupoint injection of HBAg‐iRNA [HBAg‐iRNA穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎]. Journal of Nantong University 1989;9(4):276‐9. [Google Scholar]
Wen 2003 {published data only}
- Wen HJ, Cheng JJ. Treatment of 104 cases of chronic hepatitis B with Yinhu decoction and moxibustion [茵虎汤联合灸法治疗慢性乙型肝炎104例]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases 2003;13(4):232‐3. [Google Scholar]
Wu 2002 {published data only}
- Wu PT. Clinical observation on 35 cases of chronic hepatitis B treated by acupoint injection [穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎35例疗效观察]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2002;22(6):377‐8. [Google Scholar]
Xia 1988 {published data only}
- Xia WJ, Chen HP, Gu HM, Zhao CY, Xu ZY, Wu GC, et al. Clinical study on moxibustion for treatment of chronic hepatitis B [艾灸治疗慢性乙型病毒性肝炎的临床研究]. Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion 1988;1:3‐5. [Google Scholar]
Xia 2015 {published data only}
- Xia P, Zou L, Qian W. Treatment of 150 cases of hepatitis B cirrhosis with Hua Chan Su combined with entecavir [乙肝肝硬化应用华蟾素联合恩替卡韦治疗150例]. Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application 2015;9(23):153‐4. [Google Scholar]
Xu 1988 {published data only}
- Xu Q, Yang YJ, Jiao JY, Gao YY, Bai H. Therapeutic effect of acupoint injection of VK1 on chronic active hepatitis [穴位注射VK1治疗慢性活动性肝炎疗效观察]. Jiangsu Medical Journal 1988;09:521. [Google Scholar]
Xu 1994 {published data only}
- Xu JS, Qiu GL. Observation on the therapeutic effect of Kudou mixture and α‐interferon acupoint blocking on chronic active hepatitis B [苦豆合剂伍α‐干扰素穴位封闭治疗慢性乙型活动性肝炎疗效观察]. Acta Academiae Medicinae Xuzhou 1994;14(4):370‐1. [Google Scholar]
Xu 1996 {published data only}
- Xu ZY. Treatment of 53 cases of hepatitis B with auricular point pressing bean [耳穴压豆治疗乙肝53例]. Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion 1996;12(4):30. [Google Scholar]
Xu 1999 {published data only}
- Xu JC. Therapeutic effect of acupoint injection on carriers of hepatitis B virus [穴位注射对乙肝病毒携带者疗效观察]. Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine 1999;8(8):1340‐1. [Google Scholar]
Xu 2011 {published data only}
- Xu YL, Jin JJ, Zheng Y, Xue YP. Treatment of 35 cases of chronic hepatitis B with liver fibrosis by Ku Shen Su injection in Zu San Li acupoint [苦参素足三里穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化35例]. Traditional Chinese Medicine Research 2011;24(10):67‐9. [Google Scholar]
Xu 2016 {published data only}
- Xu DJ. Clinical study of glutathione combined with interferon acupoint injection for chronic hepatitis B [谷胱甘肽联合干扰素穴位注射用于慢性乙型肝炎的临床研究]. China Health Care & Nutrition 2016;26:22‐3. [Google Scholar]
Xue 2012 {published data only}
- Xue F. Analysis of traditional Chinese medicine in treating chronic hepatitis B [中医治疗慢性乙型肝炎的分析研究薛芳]. China Practical Medicine 2012;7(33):126‐7. [Google Scholar]
Yang 1992 {published data only}
- Yang YZ, Duan AM, Wang MS, Ma YS. Observation on the short‐term curative effect of 30 cases of hepatitis B virus infection treated by Zhuan Yin decoction plus acupoint injection [转阴汤加穴位注射聚肌胞治疗乙肝病毒感染者30例近期疗效观察]. Zhong Yi Yao Yan Jiu 1992;3:34‐5. [Google Scholar]
Yang 2002 {published data only}
- Yang YJ, Zheng YZ, Hu W. Clinical observation on 100 cases of chronic hepatitis B treated with thymosin and Yigan No. 1 [胸腺肽配合益肝1号治疗慢性乙型病毒性肝炎100例临床观察]. Hebei Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2002;24(4):295‐7. [Google Scholar]
Yang 2007 {published data only}
- Yang YJ. Observation on the therapeutic effect of Yanggan oral liquid No.2 combined with thymosin acupoint injection on chronic hepatitis B [养肝口服液2号合胸腺肽穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎疗效观察]. Zhong Yi Zhong Yao 2007;4(14):85‐6. [Google Scholar]
Ying 2010 {published data only}
- Ying JM. Clinical observation of hepatitis B combination decompensated liver cirrhosis treated by acupuncture combined with drugs [针药合用治疗乙肝失代偿性肝硬化临床观察]. Journal of Liaoning University of Traditiona Chinese Medicine 2010;12(9):155‐7. [Google Scholar]
Yu 2015 {published data only}
- Yu J. Effect of comprehensive nursing intervention combined with moxibustion on quality of life in patients with chronic hepatitis B with liver stagnation and spleen deficiency syndrome [综合护理干预配合艾灸对肝郁脾虚型慢性乙肝患者生活质量的影响]. Journal of Qilu Nursing 2015;21(9):43‐4. [Google Scholar]
Zeng 1994 {published data only}
- Zeng L. Short‐term effect of acupoint injection on the negative conversion of hepatitis B surface antigen [穴位注射对乙型肝炎表面抗原阳转阴的近期疗效观察]. Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion 1994;13(2):65. [Google Scholar]
Zhang 1998 {published data only}
- Zhang GX. Therapeutic effect of low‐dose interferon acupoint injection on 31 cases of hepatitis B [小剂量干扰素穴位注射治疗乙型肝炎31例疗效观察]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 1998;12:377‐8. [Google Scholar]
Zhang 1998b {published data only}
- Zhang FY, Zhou DQ, Song YQ. Treatment of 31 cases of chronic hepatitis B with polyporus polysaccharide and hepatitis B vaccine [猪苓多糖与乙肝疫苗穴位封闭治疗慢性乙型肝炎31例]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases 1998;S1:329‐30. [Google Scholar]
Zhang 1999 {published data only}
- Zhang XH, Li YH. Treatment of 39 cases of chronic hepatitis B with adafen acupoint injection [安达芬穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎39例]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases 1999;9(6):36‐7. [Google Scholar]
Zhang 2000 {published data only}
- Zhang B, Niu JH, Fan YM, Song CL, He JT, Jin QY, et al. Clinical study of Ruan Gan paste in treating hepatic fibrosis after hepatitis [软肝膏敷贴治疗肝炎后肝纤维化的临床研究]. Journal of Hebei Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacology 2000;15(2):7‐10. [Google Scholar]
Zhang 2003 {published data only}
- Zhang L. Clinical observation on 32 cases of chronic hepatitis B treated by Bo Rr Tai Li acupoint injection combined with lamivudine [博尔泰力穴位注射联合贺普丁口服治疗慢性乙型肝炎32例临床观察]. Shandong Medical Journal 2003;43(14):71. [Google Scholar]
Zhang 2005 {published data only}
- Zhang AL, Wu Y, Jiang XL. Analysis on therapeutic effect of acupoint‐injection on chronic hepatitis B [穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎疗效分析]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2005;25(1):25‐6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang 2008 {published data only}
- Zhang XD. Treatment of 45 cases of hepatitis B with Yi Gan Zhuan Yin mixture combined with acupuncture injection [乙肝转阴合剂联合穴位注射治疗乙型肝炎45例]. Henan Traditional Chinese Medicine 2008;27(7):52‐3. [Google Scholar]
Zhang 2008b {published data only}
- Zhang GQ. Therapeutic effect of acupoint injection of hepatitis A vaccine on chronic hepatitis B [甲肝疫苗穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎疗效研究]. Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2008;10(2):120. [Google Scholar]
Zhang 2012 {published data only}
- Zhang WW, Han ZY. Expression of P‐glycoprotein and its significance in metastatic lymph nodes and primary lesions of gastric carcinoma [穴位注射α‐干扰素治疗慢性乙型肝炎临床疗效观察]. China Health Care & Nutrition 2012;7:1767‐8. [Google Scholar]
Zhang 2016 {published data only}
- Zhang J. Clinical Research on the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease by Acupuncture. Hubei: Hubei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2016. [Google Scholar]
Zhao 2014 {published data only}
- Zhao Y. The Research of Multi‐ways of Traditional Chinese Medicine Increase the Administration of Severe Hepatitis B Cirrhosis and Ascites with Routine Western Medicine Synergistic Effect. Henan: Henan University of Chinese Medicine, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Zhao 2014b {published data only}
- Zhao HX. Clinical observation of different ways of injecting hepatitis B immunoglobulin to block mother‐to‐child transmission of hepatitis B virus [不同方式注射乙型肝炎免疫球蛋白阻断乙型肝炎病毒母婴传播的临床观察]. Medical Frontier 2014;7:231‐2. [Google Scholar]
Zhou 1998 {published data only}
- Zhou L, Wang CJ, Liu YQ. Clinical observation on treatment of chronic hepatitis B by acupoint injection of polyporus polysaccharide [猪等多糖穴位注射治疗慢性乙型肝炎的临床观察]. Journal of Changchun College of Traditional Chinese Medicine 1998;14(72):13. [Google Scholar]
Zhou 2002 {published data only}
- Zhou Y, Xie RH, Du J. Therapeutic effect of acupoint injection of hepatitis A vaccine on 456 patients with chronic hepatitis B [甲肝疫苗穴位注射治疗456例慢性乙型肝炎患者疗效研究]. Infectious Disease Information 2002;15(2):91‐2. [Google Scholar]
Zhou 2015 {published data only}
- Zhou ZM, Li QY, Zhang JY, Lei HQ, Huang ZG. Randomized controlled study of traditional Chinese medicine fumigation combined with acupuncture on hepatitis B with jaundice [中药熏蒸联合针刺治疗黄疸型乙型肝炎随机平行对照研究]. Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Internal Medicine 2015;29(8):147‐8. [Google Scholar]
References to ongoing studies
ChiCTR‐IOR‐17011957 {published data only}
- ChiCTR‐IOR‐17011957. Therapeutic effect of acupoint application (Shugan Jianpi plaster) combined with antiviral drugs on chronic hepatitis B with stagnation of liver qi and spleen deficiency [穴位敷贴(疏肝健脾贴)联合抗病毒药物治疗肝郁脾虚型慢性乙型肝炎的疗效观察]. www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=20420 (first received 12 July 2017).
ChiCTR‐IOR‐17011962 {published data only}
- ChiCTR‐IOR‐17011962. Observation on the quality of life of chronic hepatitis B treated with acupoint magnetotherapy combined with Chinese Medicine [耳穴磁疗联合中药塌渍治疗慢性乙型肝炎生存质量观察]. www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=20433 (first received 12 July 2017).
Additional references
AASLD 2009
- American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Practice Guidelines: management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2009;49(6):2087‐107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
AASLD 2016
- Terrault NA, Bzowej NH, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, Murad MH. AASLD guidelines for treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2016;63(1):261‐83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ahmedov 2018
- Ahmedov S, Filiz B. Effect of meridian acupressure on aerobic performance of healthy young population: a randomized controlled study. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 2018;24(6):589‐96. [DOI: 10.1089/acm.2017.0089] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Alizadeh 2008
- Alizadeh AH, Ranjbar M, Yadollahzadeh M. Patient concerns regarding chronic hepatitis B and C infection. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 2008;14(5):1142‐7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Arya 1989
- Arya SC. Acupuncture in epidemic HBV hepatitis: other ritual surgical procedures in Africa as well. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 1989;9(3):511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Balshem 2011
- Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence ‐ introduction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64:401‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bardy 2015
- Bardy J, Finnegan JJ, Molassiotis A, Mackereth P. Providing acupuncture in a breast cancer and fatigue trial: the therapists' experience. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 2015;21(4):217‐22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Biersack 2007
- Biersack HJ, Freeman LM. Clinical Nuclear Medicine. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 2007. [Google Scholar]
Brok 2008
- Brok J, Thorlund K, Gluud C, Wetterslev J. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta‐analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61:763‐9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Brok 2009
- Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Apparently conclusive meta‐analyses may be inconclusive ‐ trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta‐analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):287‐98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Brown 2006
- Brown P, Brunnhuber K, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, Clarke M, Fenton M, et al. How to formulate research recommendations. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2006;333:804‐6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bruss 2004
- Bruss V. Envelopment of the hepatitis B virus nucleocapsid. Virus Research 2004;106(2):199‐209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cao 2011
- Cao QB, Liu Z, Geng QL, Zhang YM, Luo SR, Shi H. Effect of acupuncture on immune function after laparoscopic surgery. Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine 2011;20(1):1‐2. [Google Scholar]
Castellini 2017
- Castellini G, Nielsen EE, Gluud C. Comment on: "Cell therapy for heart disease: trial sequential analyses of two Cochrane Reviews". Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2017;102:21‐4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Castellini 2018
- Castellini G, Bruschettini M, Gianola S, Gluud C, Moja L. Assessing imprecision in Cochrane systematic reviews: a comparison of GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis. Systematic Reviews 2018;7(110):1‐10. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643‐018‐0770‐1] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chan 2013
- Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krle A‐Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013;158:200‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen 2014
- Chen ZJ, Chi XL, Wu SD, Tian GJ, Jiang JM, Xie YB, et al. Clinical research of Chinese drug acupoint injection combined PEG‐IFNα‐2a to treat chronic hepatitis B. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2014;32(8):1965‐7. [Google Scholar]
Cheng 2015
- Cheng J, Cao Y, Xia Y. From manual workshop to international standard maker: exploration on production standard of acupuncture needle by Chengjiang acupuncture school. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2015;35(2):189‐93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ciani 2017
- Ciani O, Buyse M, Drummond M, Rasi G, Saad ED, Taylor RS. Time to review the role of surrogate end points in health policy: state of the art and the way forward. Value Health 2017;20(3):487‐95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
CMA‐SCH and CMA‐SID 2001
- Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medicine Association and Society of Infectious Disease, Chinese Medicine Association. Diagnosis of viral hepatitis. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Liver Diseases 2001;11(1):56. [Google Scholar]
CSH‐CMA and SID‐CMA 2006
- Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medicine Association and Society of Infectious Disease, Chinese Medicine Association. The guideline of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B. Journal of Practical Hepatology 2006;11(10):608‐15. [Google Scholar]
CSH‐CMA and SID‐CMA 2011
- Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medicine Association and Society of Infectious Disease, Chinese Medicine Association. The guideline of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B: a 2010 update. Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies 2011;19(1):13‐34. [Google Scholar]
CSIP‐CMA and CSH‐CMA 2001
- Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases and Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Medicine Association and Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medicine Association. Viral hepatitis prevention and treatment program. Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine 2001;40(1):62‐8. [Google Scholar]
Ding 2013
- Ding YH, Gu CY, Shen LR, Chen YL, Shi Z. Effect of acupuncture combined with general anesthesia on perioperative T lymphocyte immunity in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Jilin Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2011;31(01):80‐8. [Google Scholar]
EASL 2017
- European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. Journal of Hepatology 2017;67(2):370‐98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Egger 1997
- Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta‐analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 1997;315:629‐34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ezbarami 2017
- Ezbarami ZT, Hassani P, Tafreshi MZ, Majd HA. A qualitative study on individual experiences of chronic hepatitis B patients. Nursing Open 2017;4(4):310‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Fisher 1922
- Fisher RA. On the interpretation of X2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1922;85(1):87‐94. [Google Scholar]
Flemming 2012
- Fleming TR, Powers JH. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 2012;31(25):2973‐84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gartlehner 2019
Gluud 2007
- Gluud C, Brok J, Gong Y, Koretz RL. Hepatology may have problems with putative surrogate outcome measures. Journal of Hepatology 2007;46(4):734‐42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
GRADE 2013
- The GRADE Working Group 2013. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. guidelinedevelopment.org/handbook 2017 (accessed 15 November 2018).
GRADEpro GDT [Computer program]
- McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime). GRADEpro GDT. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime), 2015.
Guyatt 2011a
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso‐Coello P, Rind D, et al. GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence ‐ imprecision. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(12):1283‐93. [PUBMED: 21839614] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guyatt 2011b
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence ‐ publication bias. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(12):1277‐82. [PUBMED: 21802904] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guyatt 2011c
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso‐Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(12):1311‐6. [PUBMED: 21802902] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guyatt 2011d
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence ‐ inconsistency. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(12):1294‐302. [PUBMED: 21803546] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guyatt 2011e
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence ‐ indirectness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(12):1303‐10. [PUBMED: 21802903] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guyatt 2011f
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(4):395‐400. [PUBMED: 21194891] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guyatt 2011g
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso‐Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence ‐ study limitations (risk of bias). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(4):407‐15. [PUBMED: 21247734] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guyatt 2011h
- Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction ‐ GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(4):383‐94. [PUBMED: 21195583] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guyatt 2013a
- Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Alonso‐Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013;66(2):151‐7. [PUBMED: 22542023] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guyatt 2013b
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Santesso N, Helfand M, Vist G, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables ‐ binary outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013;66(2):158‐72. [PUBMED: 22609141] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guyatt 2013c
- Guyatt GH, Thorlund K, Oxman AD, Walter SD, Patrick D, Furukawa TA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles ‐ continuous outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013;66(2):173‐83. [PUBMED: 23116689] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guyatt 2013d
- Guyatt G, Andrews J, Oxman AD, Alderson P, Dahm P, Falck‐Ytter Y, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013;66(7):719‐25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guyatt 2017
- Guyatt GH, Ebrahim S, Alonso‐Coello P, Johnston BC, Mathioudakis AG, Briel M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 17. Assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2017;87:14‐22. [PUBMED: 28529188] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Han 2011
- Han XH, Wang MY, Song SJ, Wang ZL, Li ZS. Clinical research of application of moxibustion on Ganshu (BL18) and Qimen (LR14) for chronic hepatitis B. Zhong Yi Zhong Yao 2011;49(19):86‐8. [Google Scholar]
Harbord 2006
- Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JA. A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 2006;25:3443‐57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
HBAAC 1994
- Anonymous. Hepatitis B associated with an acupuncture clinic. Communicable Disease Report. CDR Weekly 1992;2(48):219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
He 2011
- He CG, Cai CS. Clinical study on treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with acupuncture and moxibustion. Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion 2010;26(10):43‐4. [Google Scholar]
He 2012
- He YX, Cui N, Li YY. Interferon acupoint manipulation for treatment chronic hepatitis B. Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine 2013;22:2358‐60. [Google Scholar]
Higgins 2002
- Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21(11):1539‐58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Higgins 2003
- Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2003;327(7414):557‐60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Higgins 2011
- Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Hopton 2012
- Hopton AK, Curnoe S, Kanaan M, Macpherson H. Acupuncture in practice: mapping the providers, the patients and the settings in a national cross‐sectional survey. BMJ Open 2012;2(1):e000456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hsu 2010
- Hsu WH, Ho TJ, Huang CY, Ho HC, Liu YL, Liu HJ, et al. Chinese medicine acupoint herbal patching for allergic rhinitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. American Journal of Chinese Medicine 2010;38(4):661‐73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
ICH‐E2A 1994
- International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Clinical safety data management: definitions and standards for expedited reporting E2A. www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E2A/Step4/E2A_Guideline.pdf 1994 (accessed 2 November 2018).
ICH‐GCP E6(R2) 2016
- International Council on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH harmonised guideline. Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1): Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2). www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6/E6_R2__Step_4_2016_1109.pdf 2016 (accessed 02 October 2018).
Imberger 2011
- Imberger G, Vejlby AD, Hansen SB, Møller AM, Wetterslev J. Statistical multiplicity in systematic reviews of anaesthesia interventions: a quantification and comparison between Cochrane and non‐Cochrane reviews. Plos One 2011;6(12):e28422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jadad 1996
- Jadad AR, Moore RA, Dawn C, Crispin J, Reynolds D, John M, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17:1‐12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jakobsen 2014
- Jakobsen J, Wetterslev J, Winkel P, Lange T, Gluud C. Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta‐analytic methods. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2014;14:120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jakobsen 2017
- Jakobsen JC, Nielsen EE, Feinberg J, Katakam KK, Fobian K, Hauser G, et al. Direct‐acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub3] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jakobsen 2018
- Jakobsen JC, Nielsen EE, Koretz RL, Gluud C. Do direct acting antivirals cure chronic hepatitis C?. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2018;10(361):k1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jiang 2017
- Jiang WL, Wei HJ, Guo ZY, Ni YR, Yang HQ, Xie SS. Changes in nitric oxide releases of the contralateral acupoint during and after laser acupuncture at bilateral same‐name acupoints in human. Evidence‐based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: eCAM 2017;2017:5763458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kemp 2017
- Kemp R, Prasad V. Surrogate endpoints in oncology: when are they acceptable for regulatory and clinical decisions, and are they currently overused?. BMC Medicine 2017;15(1):134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Keshavarz 2015
- Keshavarz K, Kebriaeezadeh A, Alavian SM, Sari AA, Dorkoosh FA, Keshvari M, et al. Economic burden of hepatitis B virus‐related diseases: evidence from Iran. Hepatitis Monthly 2015;15(4):e25854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kjaergard 2001
- Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta‐analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001;135(11):982‐9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
KSWGLD 2005
- Key specialist writing group of liver disease of Chinese medicine in state administration of traditional Chinese medicine of the People's Republic of China. Liver disease diagnosis and treatment guidance in traditional Chinese medicine. State administration of traditional Chinese medicine of the People's Republic of China 2005; Vol. 10:35‐9.
Kuge 2018
- Kuge H, Mori H, Morisawa T, Hanyu K, Miyazaki J, Watanabe M, et al. Effect of different dosages of ST36 indirect moxibustion on the skin temperature of the lower legs and feet. Medicines 2018;5(2):57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lee 2012
- Lee SH, Kwon GS, Kang MS, Yoon HM, Kim CH. Comparative study on the effects of bee venom pharmacopuncture according to the treatment method for knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Pharmacopuncture 2012;15(4):7‐14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lee 2016
- Lee SH, Chang GT, Zhang X, Lee H. Acupoint herbal patching for asthma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95(2):e2439. [DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002439] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Li 2008
- Li K, Wei D, Li JK. Acupuncture plus acupoint‐injection for treatment of cervical spondylosis of vertebroarterial type. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2008;28(4):243‐4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Liang 2011
- Liang S, Christner D, Laux SD, Laurent D. Significant neurological improvement in two patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis after 4 weeks of treatment with acupuncture injection point therapy using enercel. Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies 2011;4:257‐61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lin 2014
- Lin YC, Hsu SE. Acupuncture for Pain Management. Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Litscher 2007
- Litscher G. Ten years evidence‐based high‐tech acupuncture ‐ a short review of peripherally measured effects. Evidence‐based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: eCAM 2009;6(2):153‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Longhurst 2010
- Longhurst JC. Defining meridians: a modern basis of understanding. Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies 2010;3(2):67‐74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lu 2010
- Lu DJ. Effect of moxibustion on peripheral blood T lymphocytes and NK cells in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Yunnan Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Materia Medica 2010;31(4):42‐3. [Google Scholar]
Lu 2013
- Lu JJ, Xu AQ, Wang J, Zhang L, Song LZ, Li RP, et al. Direct economic burden of hepatitis B virus related diseases: evidence from Shandong, China. BMC Health Services Research 2013;13:37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lundh 2017
- Lundh A, Lexchin J, Mintzes B, Schroll JB, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub3] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mallet 2017
- Mallet V, Hamed K, Schwarzinger M. Prognosis of patients with chronic hepatitis B in France (2008‐2013): a nationwide, observational and hospital‐based study. Journal of Hepatology 2017;66(3):514‐20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Manning 2000
- Manning GL, Walsh B. Hepatitis carriers and acupuncture. Acupuncture in Medicine 2000;18:70. [Google Scholar]
MECIR 2018
- Higgins J, Lasserson T, Chandler J, Tovey D, Churchill R. Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR). Version 1.06. Cochrane Community, 2018. [https://community.cochrane.org/mecir‐manual] [Google Scholar]
Moher 1998
- Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta‐analyses?. Lancet 1998;352(9128):609‐13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Moher 2001
- Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel‐group randomized trials. Journal of the American Medical Association 2001;285:987‐1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Moore 2003
- Moore KP, Wong F, Gines P, Bernardi M, Ochs A, Salerno F, et al. The management of ascites in cirrhosis: report on the consensus conference of the International Ascites Club. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2003;38(1):258‐66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mustafa 2013
- Mustafa RA, Santesso N, Brozek J, Akl EA, Walter SD, Norman G, et al. The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013;66(7):736‐42. [PUBMED: 23623694] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nelson 2016
- Nelson NP, Easterbrook PJ, McMahon BJ. Epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection and impact of vaccination on disease. Clinics in Liver Disease 2017;20(4):607‐28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
NGC 2016
- National Guideline Centre (UK). Low Back Pain and Sciatica in Over 16s: Assessment and Management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK), 2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ott 2012
- Ott JJ, Stevens GA, Groeger J, Wiersma ST. Global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection: new estimates of age‐specific HBsAg seroprevalence and endemicity. Vaccine 2012;30:2212‐9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Peter 2005
- Baldry P. Acupuncture, Trigger Points and Musculoskeletal Pain: a Scientific Approach to Acupuncture for Use by Doctors and Physiotherapists in the Diagnosis and Management of Myofascial Trigger Point Pain. Churchill Livingstone: Elsevier, 2005. [Google Scholar]
PRISMA 2009
- Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2009;339:b2700. [DOI: ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Puoti 2000
- Puoti M, Spinetti A, Ghezzi A, Donato F, Zaltron S, Putzolu V, et al. Mortality for liver disease in patients with HIV infection: a cohort study. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2000;24:211‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Qi 2011
- Qi XQ, Wang Y. Sero‐epidemiological Investigation Report on Hepatitis B in the National Population. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House (PMPH), 2011. [Google Scholar]
Qian 1994
- Qian CF. Clinical observation on increased acupoint injection for interdicting the replication of chronic hepatitis B virus. Zhejing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 1994;02:155. [Google Scholar]
Review Manager 2014 [Computer program]
- Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Reynolds 2008
- Reynolds L, McKee M. Possible risks of transmission of bloodborne infection via acupuncture needles in Guizhou province, southwest China. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine: Research on Paradigm, Practice, and Policy 2008;14(10):1281‐5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Robinson 2000
- Robinson N, Lorenc A, Ding W, Jia J, Bovey M, Wang XM. Exploring practice characteristics and research priorities of practitioners of traditional acupuncture in China and the EU‐A survey. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2012;140:458‐68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Royle 2003
- Royle P, Milne R. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003;19(4):591‐603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Savović 2012a
- Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Juni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012;157(6):429‐38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Savović 2012b
- Savović J, Jones H, Altman D, Harris R, Juni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta‐epidemiological studies. Health Technology Assessment 2012;16(35):1‐82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Savović 2018
- Savović J, Turner RM, Mawdsley D, Jones HE, Beynon R, Higgins JPT, et al. Association between risk‐of‐bias assessments and results of randomized trials in Cochrane reviews: the ROBES meta‐epidemiologic study. American Journal of Epidemiology 2018;187(5):1113‐22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Schlaeger 2018
- Schlaeger JM, Stoffel CL, Bussell JL, Cai HY, Takayama M, Yajima H, et al. Moxibustion for cephalic version of breech presentation. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2018;63(3):309‐22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Schulz 1995
- Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273(5):408‐12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Schweitzer 2015
- Schweitzer A, Horn J, Mikolajczyk RT, Krause G, Ott JJ. Estimations of worldwide prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review of data published between 1965 and 2013. Lancet 2015;386:1546–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Schünemann 2016
- Schünemann HJ. Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2016;75:6‐15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Storebø 2018
- Storebø OJ, Pedersen N, Ramstad E, Kielsholm ML, Nielsen SS, Krogh HB, et al. Methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents – assessment of adverse events in non‐randomised studies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, Issue 5. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012069.pub2] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Student 1908
- Student. The probable error of a mean. Biometrika 1908;6(1):1‐25. [Google Scholar]
Sulaiman 1995
- Sulaiman HA, Julitasari, Sie A, Rustam M, Melani W, Corwin A, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis B and C viruses in healthy Indonesian blood donors. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1995;89(2):167‐70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Sunbul 2014
- Sunbul M. Hepatitis B virus genotypes: global distribution and clinical importance. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2014;20(18):5427‐34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Thorlund 2010
- Thorlund K, Anema A, Mills E. Interpreting meta‐analysis according to the adequacy of sample size. An example using isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV‐infected individuals. Clinical Epidemiology 2010;2:57‐66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Thorlund 2011a
- Thorlund K, Engstrøm J, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Imberger G, Gluud C. User manual for Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA), 2011. ctu.dk/tsa/files/tsa_manual.pdf (accessed 16 January 2017).
Thorlund 2011b
- Thorlund K, Imberger G, Walsh M, Chu R, Gluud C, Wetterslev J, et al. The number of patients and events required to limit the risk of overestimation of intervention effects in meta‐analysis ‐ a simulation study. PLoS One 2011; Vol. 6, issue 10:e25491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Tong 2016
- Tong SP, Revill P. Overview of viral replication and genetic variability. Journal of Hepatology 2016;64(1 Suppl):S1‐16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
TSA 2011 [Computer program]
- Copenhagen Trial Unit. TSA ‐ Trial Sequential Analysis. Version 0.9.5.10 Beta. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Trial Unit, 2011.
Wang 2012
- Wang H, Du YH. Acupuncture and Moxibustion. Beijing: China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2012. [Google Scholar]
Wang 2013a
- Wang H, Du Y. Acupuncture. Beijing: Chinese Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2013. [Google Scholar]
Wang 2014a
- Wang YM, Yao LL, Han XH, Sun JH. Clinical study on treatment of chronic hepatitis B with adefovir diptergent combined with moxibustion liver Yuhe Xuemen point. China Practical Medical 2014;9(15):148‐9. [Google Scholar]
Wang 2017
- Wang LQ, Wang WB, Fan JH. Evaluation and nursing of effect of Ginger moxibustion in the treatment of viral hepatitis. Dang Dai Hu Shi 2017;3:147‐8. [Google Scholar]
Wang JY 1999
- Wang JY. Modern Liver Disease Treatment. Shanghai: Fudan University Shanghai Medical College Press, 1999. [Google Scholar]
Wetterslev 2008
- Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta‐analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61:64‐75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wetterslev 2009
- Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in a random‐effects meta‐analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2009;9:86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wetterslev 2017
- Wetterslev J, Jakobsen JC, Gluud C. Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta‐analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2017;17(1):39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
White 2004b
- White A. A cumulative review of the range and incidence of significant adverse events associated with acupuncture. Acupuncture in Medicine 2004;22(3):122‐33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
WHO 2015
- World Health Organization. Guidelines for the prevention, care and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis B infection. www.who.int/hiv/pub/hepatitis/hepatitis‐b‐guidelines/en/ 2015 (accessed 13 July 2018). [PubMed]
WHO 2017
- World Health Organization. Global hepatitis report, 2017. www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/global‐hepatitis‐report2017/en/ 2017 (accessed 13 July 2018).
Woo 2014
- Woo JM, Park EJ, Lee M, Ahn M, Kwon S, Koo KH. Changes in attitudes toward and patterns in traditional Korean medicine among the general population in South Korea: a comparison between 2008 and 2011. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2014;14:436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wood 2008
- Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Juni P, Altman DG, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta‐epidemiological study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2008;336(7644):601‐5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wu 2017
- Wu Y, Zhang XY, Zhou XL, Qi CC, Li Z. Systematic evaluation on the effectiveness of acupoint application in treating chronic hepatitis B. Jiangxi Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2017;48(412):64‐7. [Google Scholar]
Xie 2010
- Xie FX, Tian YF. Effect of medicinal cake‐partitioned moxibustion on SOD and MDA in monoerythrocytic cells of middle‐aged and elderly people. Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion 2010;26(10):43‐4. [Google Scholar]
Xu 2008
- Xu LF, Yu ZC, Shen MH, Tian DL, Dong Q, Song YG, et al. Effect of moxibustion on immune function of 60 patients with esophageal carcinoma after radiotherapy. Journal of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine 2008;01:12‐4. [Google Scholar]
Xu 2018
- Xu LL, Wan YX, Huang J, Xu FY. Clinical analysis of electroacupuncture and multiple acupoint stimulation in relieving cancer pain in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics 2018;14(1):99‐102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yamashita 2001
- Yamashita H, Tsukayama H, White AR, Tanno Y, Sugishita C, Ernst E. Systematic review of adverse events following acupuncture: the Japanese literature. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2001;9(2):98‐104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yang 2011
- Yang ES, Li PW, Nilius B, Li G. Ancient Chinese medicine and mechanistic evidence of acupuncture physiology. Pflügers Archive: European Journal of Physiology 2011;462(5):645‐53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yao 2005
- Yao QY, Chen W, Chen XL. Clinical observation and nursing on Huachanshu acupoint injection therapy in treating patients with chronic hepatitis B and TAP‐positive. Conference Proceeding of the Clinic of the Second Hospital of Nanjing 2005;6:62‐3. [Google Scholar]
Yazdanpanahi 2017
- Yazdanpanahi Z, Ghaemmaghami M, Akbarzadeh M, Zare N, Azisi A. Comparison of the effects of dry cupping and acupressure at acupuncture point (BL23) on the women with postpartum low back pain (PLBP) based on short form McGill Pain Questionnaires in Iran: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Family & Reproductive Health 2017;11(2):82‐9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
YECIM 100BC
- Anonymous. The Yellow Emperor's Classic of Internal Medicine. Phoenix Publishing House, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Ying 2010a
- Xia Y, Cao XD, Wu GC, Cheng JS. Acupuncture Therapy for Neurological Diseases: A Neurobiological View. Beijing: TsingHua University Press, 2010. [Google Scholar]
Yun 2016
- Yun Y, Shin S, Kim KS, Ko SG, Choi I. Three cases of cutaneous warts treated with moxibustion. Explore (NY) 2016;12(4):277‐81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang 1990
- Zhang L. Zhang Shi Yi Tong. Shanghai: Shanghai Science Technology Publications, 1990. [Google Scholar]
Zhang 2011
- Zhang SY, Du YQ. Effect of warm acupuncture on gastrointestinal function and immune function in postoperative patients with colon cancer. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2011;31(06):513‐7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhang 2015
- Zhang SP, Yang GY, Deng ZW, Gu WM, Yang J. Influence of acupoints injection with XiangDan on clinical effects of chronic hepatitis B. Xi Bu Zhong Yi Yao 2015;28(11):115‐7. [Google Scholar]
Zhao 2004
- Zhao QX. Observation on acupuncture point irradiation of HeNe laser for the treatment of chronic B hepatitis. China Journal of Modern Medicine 2004;1(1):46‐7. [Google Scholar]
Zhao 2010
- Zhao CL, Peng LJ, Zhang ZL, Zhang T, Li HM. Effect of acupuncture and moxibustion on peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets and NK cell activity in patients with colon cancer liver metastases. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2010;30(1):10‐2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zheng 2014
- Zhen Z. Acupuncture in Australia: regulation, education, practice, and research. Integrative Medicine Research 2014;3:103‐10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhou 2010
- Zhou F, Huang JY, Xue L. Observation on the efficacy of combined acupuncture and drugs for leukopenia after chemotherapy. Practical Preventive Medicine 2010;17(06):1168‐70. [Google Scholar]
References to other published versions of this review
Kong 2018
- Kong DZ, Liang N, Yang GL, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Yang Y, et al. Acupuncture for chronic hepatitis B. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013107] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
