Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Occupational Health logoLink to Journal of Occupational Health
. 2015 Oct 31;57(5):427–437. doi: 10.1539/joh.14-0270-OA

Gender and educational level modify the relationship between workplace mistreatment and health problems: a comparison between South Korea and EU countries

Minsang Yoo 1, Saerom Lee 2, Mo‐Yeol Kang 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC6706210  PMID: 26119208

Abstract

Gender and educational level modify the relationship between workplace mistreatment and health problems: a comparison between South Korea and EU countries: Minsang Yoo, et al. Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea

Objective

This study investigated effects of workers’ cultural and personal characteristics on the relationship between workplace mistreatment and health problems in both South Korea and EU Countries.

Methods

Data were obtained from nationally representative interview surveys: the third Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS) in 2011 (50,032 participants) and fifth European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS) in 2010 (41,302 participants). The Pressure‐State‐Response model was adapted to explore differences in the relationship between mistreatment and health problems according to country, and logistic regression analysis was used after stratification of moderating factors. Workplace mistreatment, such as discrimination, violence, harassment, and self‐reported health problems, were assessed by gender and educational level.

Results

Among KWCS participants, there were 4,321 victims (14.70%) of workplace mistreatment; among EWCS participants, there were 5,927 victims (17.89%). There was a significant positive association between workplace mistreatment and self‐reported health problems. A stronger association was found among workers with higher educational levels in Korea (2‐ to 4‐fold higher odds for mental and physical health problems), but there was no significant difference by education level in workers of EU Countries. Female Koreans who worked alone had a higher risk of health problems related to workplace mistreatment than other gender compositions in the workplace (the OR for psychological symptoms reached 6.631). In contrast, the gender composition of the workplace did not significantly affect EU workers.

Conclusions

Workplace mistreatment is significantly associated with physical and mental health problems, especially among workers with higher educational levels and females who work alone in Korea.

Keywords: Cross‐cultural, Educational levels, Gender difference, Job stress, Workplace mistreatment

Supporting information

Supplementary Material

Click here for additional data file. (73KB, pdf)

References

  • 1. Hodgins M, MacCurtain S, Mannix‐McNamara P. Workplace bullying and incivility: a systematic review of interventions. International Journal of Workplace Health Management 2014; 7: 54–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hills D, Joyce C. A review of research on the prevalence, antecedents, consequences and prevention of workplace aggression in clinical medical practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior 2013; 18: 554–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper C. Bullying and harassment in the workplace: developments in theory, research, and practice. Crc Press: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Moayed FA, Daraiseh N, Shell R, Salem S. Workplace bullying: a systematic review of risk factors and outcomes. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 2006; 7: 311–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kim S‐S, Williams DR. Perceived discrimination and self‐rated health in South Korea: a nationally representative survey. PloS One 2012; 7: e30501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lim JJC. A Cross‐cultural Comparison and Examination of Workplace Bullying in Singapore and the United States. University of Houston; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Okechukwu CA, Souza K, Davis KD, de Castro AB. Discrimination, harassment, abuse, and bullying in the workplace: contribution of workplace injustice to occupational health disparities. Am J Ind Med 2014; 57: 573–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Grubb PL, Roberts RK, Grosch JW, Brightwell WS. Workplace bullying: what organizations are saying. Empl Rts & Employ Pol'y J 2004; 8: 407–523. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Escartín J, Zapf D, Arrieta C, Rodriguez‐Carballeira A. Workers' perception of workplace bullying: a cross‐cultural study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 2011; 20: 178–205. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Escartín J, Rodríguez‐Carballeira A, Zapf D, Porrúa C, Martin‐Pena J. Perceived severity of various bullying behaviours at work and the relevance of exposure to bullying. Work & Stress 2009; 23: 191–205. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Rodríguez‐Muñoz A, Moreno‐Jiménez B, Sanz Vergel AI, Garrosa Hernández E. Posttraumatic symptoms among victims of workplace bullying: exploring gender differences and shattered assumptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2010; 40: 2616–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Salin D. Ways of explaining workplace bullying: a review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human relations 2003; 56: 1213–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hoel H, Cooper CL. Destructive conflict and bullying at work. Manchester (UK): Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hansen ÅM, Hogh A, Mikkelsen EG. Physiological Response as Biomarkers of Adverse Effects of the Psychosocial Work Environment 2012; 565–80.
  • 15. Vartia MA. Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the wellbeing of its targets and the observers of bullying. Scand J Work Environ Health 2001: 63–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hansen ÅM, Hogh A, Persson R, Karlson B, Garde AH, Ørbæk P. Bullying at work, health outcomes, and physiological stress response. J Psychosom Res 2006; 60: 63–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Niedhammer I, David S, Degioanni S. Association between workplace bullying and depressive symptoms in the French working population. J Psychosom Res 2006; 61: 251–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Vie TL, Glasø L, Einarsen S. How does it feel? Workplace bullying, emotions and musculoskeletal complaints. Scand J Psychol 2012; 53: 165–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Nielsen MB, Hetland J, Matthiesen SB, Einarsen S. Longitudinal relationships between workplace bullying and psychological distress. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012; 38: 38–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Finne LB, Knardahl S, Lau B. Workplace bullying and mental distress—a prospective study of Norwegian employees. Scand J Work Environ Health 2011: 276–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. McCarthy P, Mayhew C. Safeguarding the organization against violence and bullying: an international perspective. NY: Macmillan; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. McTernan WP, Dollard MF, LaMontagne AD. Depression in the workplace: an economic cost analysis of depression‐related productivity loss attributable to job strain and bullying. Work & Stress 2013; 27: 321–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kanetsuna T, Smith PK. Pupil insights into bullying, and coping with bullying: a bi‐national study in Japan and England. Journal of School Violence 2002; 1: 5–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Farioli A, Mattioli S, Quaglieri A, Curti S, Violante FS, Coggon D. Musculoskeletal pain in Europe: the role of personal, occupational, and social risk factors. Scand J Work Environ Health 2014; 40: 36–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. OECD Environmental Indicators : Development, Measurement and Use. Paris: OECD; 2330. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. World Health Organization (2006) World Health Report 2006: Working Together for Health. WHO, Geneva: [Online]. 2006. [cited 2014 Jul 7]; Available from: URL: http://www.who.int/whr/2006/en [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Liefooghe AP, Davey KM. 11 Explaining bullying at work. Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International Perspectives in Research and Practice 2003: 219. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Janoff‐Bulman R. Posttraumatic growth: three explanatory models. Psychological Inquiry 2004: 30–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Mruk CJ. Self‐esteem research, theory, and practice: Toward a positive psychology of self‐esteem. NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Tedeschi R, Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. Trauma and transformation: Growing in the aftermath of suffering. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high‐effort/ low‐reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1996; 1: 27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Kivimäki M, Virtanen M, Vartia M, Elovainio M, Vahtera J, Keltikangas‐Järvinen L. Workplace bullying and the risk of cardiovascular disease and depression. Occup Environ Med 2003; 60: 779–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ferrie JE, Head J, Shipley MJ, Vahtera J, Marmot MG, Kivimäki M. Injustice at work and incidence of psychiatric morbidity: the Whitehall II study. Occup Environ Med 2006; 63: 443–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Stansfeld SA, Bosma H, Hemingway H, Marmot MG. Psychosocial work characteristics and social support as predictors of SF‐36 health functioning: the Whitehall II study. Psychosomatic Medicine 1998; 60: 247–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Rodríguez‐Muñoz A, Notelaers G, Moreno‐Jiménez B. Workplace bullying and sleep quality: the mediating role of worry and need for recovery. Behavioral Psychology 2011; 19: 453–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Fox S, Stallworth LE. Racial/ethnic bullying: Exploring links between bullying and racism in the US workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2005; 66: 438–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Cheng Y, Kawachi I, Coakley EH, Schwartz J, Colditz G. Association between psychosocial work characteristics and health functioning in American women: prospective study. Bmj 2000; 320: 1432–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Crick NR, Grotpeter JK. Relational aggression, gender, and social‐psychological adjustment. Child Development 1995; 66: 710–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Cahill L, Uncapher M, Kilpatrick L, Alkire MT, Turner J. Sex‐related hemispheric lateralization of amygdala function in emotionally influenced memory: an FMRI investigation. Learning & Memory 2004; 11: 261–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Olff M, Langeland W, Draijer N, Gersons BP. Gender differences in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological bulletin 2007; 133: 183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Hong D‐S. Social change and stratification. Social Indicators Research 2003; 62: 39–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Koo H. The changing faces of inequality in South Korea in the age of globalization. Korean Studies 2007; 31: 1–18. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

Click here for additional data file. (73KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Occupational Health are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES