Skip to main content
Journal of Occupational Health logoLink to Journal of Occupational Health
. 2015 Dec 25;57(6):548–554. doi: 10.1539/joh.15-0085-OA

A trial to find appropriate animal models of dichloropropane‐induced cholangiocarcinoma based on the hepatic distribution of glutathione S‐transferases

Lingyi Zhang 1, Cai Zong 1,2, Sahoko Ichihara 3, Hisao Naito 2, Shinya Toyokuni 4, Shinji Kumagai 5, Gaku Ichihara 1,
PMCID: PMC6706214  PMID: 26423826

Abstract

A trial to find appropriate animal models of dichloropropane‐induced cholangiocarcinoma based on the hepatic distribution of glutathione Stransferases: Lingyi Zhang, et al. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science

Objective

It has been reported that 1,2‐Dichloropropane (DCP) induced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) in offset color proof‐printing workers. However, exposure to DCP by inhalation or gavage for 2 year did not induce CCA in mice and rats. The present study mapped the hepatic distribution of GST, which is known to activate dihalogenated alkanes, and proliferative and fibrotic changes in bile ducts in various species to find the most appropriate animal model of DCP‐induced CCA.

Methods

First, 12 each of C57BL/6J mice, Balb/cA mice, F344 rats, Syrian hamsters, and guinea pigs were divided into four equal groups and exposed to DCP at 0, 300, 1,000, or 3,000 ppm 8 hours/day for 7 days. Second, 32 Balb/cA mice and 32 Syrian hamsters were each divided into four equal groups and exposed to DCP at 0, 200, 400, and 800 ppm 6 hours/ day for 14 days. After the last exposure, the animals were decapitated, and the livers were dissected out for histopathological evaluation. Immunostaining was conducted to determine the distribution of GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTPi, as well as the expression of proliferation marker Ki67.

Results

GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTPi were expressed in both hepatocytes and bile duct cells in all control and exposed animals. There was no clear difference in the expression of Ki67 between the exposed groups and the control. No fibrotic changes were observed in any species or strains examined.

Conclusions

Expression of GSTT1 or other GST isozymes might not explain the difference in sensitivity of hepatocytes and the bile duct to DCP between humans and rodents

Keywords: 1,2‐Dichloropropane; Animal model; Cholangiocarcinoma; Glutathione S‐transferase

Abbreviations: CCA: cholangiocarcinoma. DCP: 1,2 dichloropropane. GSH: glutathione. GST: glutathione Stransferase.

References

  • 1. Kumagai S, Kurumatani N, Arimoto A, Ichihara G. Cholangiocarcinoma among offset colour proof‐printing workers exposed to 1,2‐dichloropropane and/or dichloromethane. Occup Environ Med 2013; 70: 508–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Benbrahim‐Tallaa L, Benbrahim‐Tallaa L, Lauby‐Secretan B, et al. International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15: 924–5. No abstract available. PMID: 2522568.25225686 [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Matsumoto M, Umeda Y, Take M, Nishizawa T, Fukushima S. Subchronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies of 1,2‐dichloropropane inhalation to mice. Inhal Toxicol 2013; 25: 435–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Umeda Y, Matsumoto M, Aiso S, Nishizawa T, Nagano K, Arito H, Fukushima S. Inhalation carcinogenicity and toxicity of 1,2‐dichloropropane in rats. Inhal Toxicol 2010; 22: 1116–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. National Toxicology Program (NTP) . Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 1,2‐Dichloropropane (propylene dichloride) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (Gavage studies). 1986. NTP Technical Report Series No. 263. Bethesda: NTP; [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Guengerich FP, Crawford WM Jr, Domoradzki JY, Macdonald TL, Watanabe PG. In vitro activation of 1,2‐dichloroethane by microsomal and cytosolic enzymes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1980; 55: 303–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Meyer DJ, Coles B, Pemble SE, Gilmore KS, Fraser GM, Ketterer B. Theta, a new class of glutathione transferases purified from rat and man. Biochem J 1991; 274 (Pt 2): 409–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hallier E, Schröder KR, Asmuth K, Dommermuth A, Aust B, Goergens HW. Metabolism of dichloromethane (methylene chloride) to formaldehyde in human erythrocytes: influence of polymorphism of glutathione transferase theta (GST T1‐1). Arch Toxicol 1994; 68: 423–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Thier R, Taylor JB, Pemble SE, Humphreys WG, Persmark M, Ketterer B, Guengerich FP. Expression of mammalian glutathione S‐transferase 5‐5 in Salmonella typhimurium TA1535 leads to base‐pair mutations upon exposure to dihalomethanes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 8576–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ploemen JP, Wormhoudt LW, Haenen GR, et al. The use of human in vitro metabolic parameters to explore the risk assessment of hazardous compounds: the case of ethylene dibromide. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1997; 143: 56–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Oda Y, Yamazaki H, Thier R, Ketterer B, Guengerich FP, Shimada T. A new Salmonella typhimurium NM5004 strain expressing rat glutathione S‐transferase 5‐5: use in detection of genotoxicity of dihaloalkanes using an SOS/umu test system. Carcinogenesis 1996; 17: 297–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Shimada T, Yamazaki H, Oda Y, Hiratsuka A, Watabe T, Guengerich FP. Activation and inactivation of carcinogenic dihaloalkanes and other compounds by glutathione S‐transferase 5‐5 in Salmonella typhimurium tester strain NM5004. Chem Res Toxicol 1996; 9: 333–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Thier R, Pemble SE, Kramer H, Taylor JB, Guengerich FP, Ketterer B. Human glutathione S‐transferase T1‐1 enhances mutagenicity of 1,2‐dibromoethane, dibromomethane and 1,2,3,4‐diepoxybutane in Salmonella typhimurium. Carcinogenesis 1996; 17: 163–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Thier R, Wiebel FA, Hinkel A, et al. Species differences in the glutathione transferase GSTT1‐1 activity towards the model substrates methyl chloride and dichloromethane in liver and kidney. Arch Toxicol 1998; 72: 622–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Sherratt PJ, Williams S, Foster J, Kernohan N, Green T, Hayes JD. Direct comparison of the nature of mouse and human GST T1‐1 and the implications on dichloromethane carcinogenicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2002; 179: 89–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sobue T, Utada M, Makiuchi T, et al. Risk of bile duct cancer among printing workers exposed to 1,2‐dichloropropane and/or dichloromethane. J Occup Health 2015; 57: 230–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kubo S, Nakanuma Y, Takemura S, et al. Case series of 17 patients with cholangiocarcinoma among young adult workers of a printing company in Japan. J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci 2014; 21: 479–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sato Y, Kubo S, Takemura S. Different carcinogenic process in cholangiocarcinoma cases epidemically developing among workers of a printing company in Japan. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014; 7: 4745–54. eCollection 2014. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bartels MJ, Timchalk C. 1,2‐Dicholoropopane: investigation of the mechanism of mercapturic acid formation in the rat. Xenobiotica 1990; 20: 1035–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Trevisan A, Meneghetti P, Maso S, Troso O. In‐vitro mechanisms of 1,2‐dichloropropane nephrotoxicity using the renal cortical slice model. Hum Exp Toxicol 1993; 12: 117–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Yanagiba Y, Suzuki T1, Suda M, et al. Cytochrome P450 2E1 is responsible for the initiation of 1,2‐dichloropropane‐induced liver damage. Toxicol Ind Health 2015. pii: 0748233714568801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yamada K, Kumagai S, Nagoya T, Endo G. Chemical exposure levels in printing workers with cholangiocarcinoma. J Occup Health 2014; 56: 332–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Occupational Health are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES