Skip to main content
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry logoLink to Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry
. 1971 Mar-Apr;75A(2):109–111. doi: 10.6028/jres.075A.010

Table of Spin-Orbit Energies for p-Electrons in Neutral Atomic (core)np Configurations

W C Martin 1
PMCID: PMC6706538  PMID: 34876717

Abstract

Data are given in support of the recently proposed formula ζnpn*3=0.450Z2.33 cm−1 (Z ⩾ 5). The table includes evaluations of this formula, which are probably accurate to ~ 15 percent for all atoms Z = 10 to 90. For many (core)np configurations, the accuracy of ζnp from the formula is greater than that to be expected from fitting the observed levels to intermediate coupling theory.

Keywords: Atomic spectra, atomic theory, spin-orbit interaction

1. Introduction

Values of the spin-orbit coupling parameter ζnp for configurations of the type (core)np in neutral atoms were recently shown to be fairly accurately reproduced for atomic numbers Z ⩾ 5 by the formula [1]1

ζnpn*3=0.450Z2.33cm1, (1)

where n* is the effective principal quantum number of the np electron. The relation of the Z-dependence of the spin-orbit interaction to its physical origin was discussed in [1]. This note gives in more detail some data supporting the formula, and evaluations of it for Z ⩽ 90.

2. Values of ζnpn*3

The dependence ζnp 1/n*3 is known to be a good approximation for simple spectra [2, 3, 4]. The change in n* corresponding to the fine structure splitting is thus approximately constant for a series with structure proportional to ζnp (np 2P and snp 3P2−0 intervals) [2, 4]. Observations of unperturbed series of this type usually show Δn* to be constant within ~ 2 percent, except for the lowest series member or two.

The constants in (1) were determined by graphically fitting the data from such series in ten spectra,2 indicated by stars after the element symbols in table 1. The series members that determined the value of ζpn*3 for each of these spectra are listed under the heading “np Data.” These ten spectra range in atomic number from 11 to 81, with an average disagreement of 6 percent between the observed value of ζpn*3 and the value from (1). The maximum disagreement is 12 percent.

Table 1. Values of ζn*3 for np-electrons in configurations of the type (core)np.

The data are from neutral atoms with the core-configurations shown. A core with electrons of different nl indicates that configuration interaction was included in the calculation. Where more than one np electron is shown in the fourth column, the value in the fifth column is an average. References for data or calculations are indicated by letters in parentheses in the fourth column. The other experimental values of ζn*3 are based on data from Atomic Energy Levels [C. E. Moore, Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.), Circ. 467, Vol. I (1949); Vol. II (1952); Vol. III (1958)].

z Atom Core np Data ζn*3 Data ζn*3 Formula
(cm−1) (cm−1)
1 H np 1.94 0.45
2 He 1s 2p 5.16 2.26
3 Li 1s2 2p 1.68 5.8
4 Be 2s 2p 6.00 11.4
5 B 2s2 2, 3p 19.3 19.1
6 C 2p 29.3
7 N 2p2 41.9
8 O 2p3 57
9 F 2p4 75
10 Ne 2p5 96
11 Na* 2p6 4–8p(a) 117 120
12 Mg* 3s 4–6p(b) 149 147
13 Al* 3s2 4–7p(c) 200 177
14 Si 3p 211
15 P 3p2 247
16 s 3p3 288
17 Cl 3p4 331
18 Ar 3p5 378
(102 cm−1) (102 cm−1)
19 K* 3p6 5–10p(a) 4.39 4.29
20 Ca* 4s 5–8p(d) 5.1 4.84
21 Sc (3d + 4s)2 5.4
22 Ti (3d+4s)3 6.0
23 V (3d + 4s)4 6.7
24 Cr (3d + 4s)r) 7.4
25 Mn (3d + 4s)6 8.1
26 Fe (3d + 4s)7 8.9
27 Co (3d + 4s)8 9.7
28 Ni (3d + 4s)9 4p(e) 13.0 10.6
29 Cu (3d + 4s)10 4p(f) 12.5 11.5
30 Zn* 4s 5–8p(g) 11.0 12.4
31 Ga* 4s2 5–7p(h) 14.0 13.4
32 Ge 4p 5p(i) 15.9 14.5
33 As 4p2 15.5
34 Se 4p3 16.7
35 Br 4p4 17.8
36 Kr 4p5 6p(i) 21.8 19.0
(103 cm−1) (103 cm−1)
37 Rb* 4p6 7–11p(j) 1.92 2.03
38 Sr 5s 5p 2.55 2.16
39 Y (4d + 5s)2 2.29
40 Zr (4d + 5s)3 2.43
41 Nb (4d + 5s)4 2.58
42 Mo (4d + 5s)5 2.73
43 Tc (4d + 5s)6 2.88
44 Ru (4d +5s)7 3.04
45 Rh (4d + 5s)8 3.20
(103 cm−1) (103 cm−1)
46 Pd (4d + 5s)9 3.37
47 Ag 4d10 6p 3.47 3.54
48 Cd 5s 6p 3.58 3.72
49 In 5s2 6, 7p(h) 3.99 3.90
50 Sn 5p 4.09
51 Sb 5p2 4.28
52 Te 5p3 4.48
53 I 5p4 4.69
54 Xe 5p5 6p(k) 4.79 4.89
55 Cs* 5p6 8–13p 4.74 5.1
56 Ba 6s 6p 6.1 5.3
57 La (5d + 6s)2 5.6
58 Ce 5.8
59 Pr 6.0
60 Nd 4f46s 6.3
61 Pm 4f56s 6.5
62 Sm 4f66s 6.8
63 Eu 4f76s 6p(l) 8.3 7.0
64 Gd 4f75d6s 7.3
65 Tb 7.5
66 Dy 4f106s 7.8
67 Ho 4f116s 8.1
68 Er 4f126s 8.4
69 Tm 4f136s 8.7
70 Yb 6s 6p 10.5 9.0
71 Lu (5d + 6s)2 9.3
72 Hf (5d + 6s)3 9.6
73 Ta (5d + 6s)4 9.9
74 W (5d + 6s)5 10.2
75 Re (5d + 6s)6 10.5
76 Os (5d + 6s)7 10.9
77 Tr (5d + 6s)8 11.2
78 Pt (5d + 6s)9 11.5
79 Au 5d10 6p 14.4 11.9
80 Hg 6s 6p 17.8 12.2
81 Tl* 6s2 7–11p 13.4 12.6
82 Pb 6p 13.0
83 Bi 6p2 13.3
84 Po 6p3 13.7
85 At 6p4 14.1
86 Rn 6p5 14.5
87 Fr 6p6 14.9
88 Ra 7s 7, 8p 18.2 15.3
89 Ac (6d + 7s)2 15.7
90 Th 16.1
a

Risberg, P., Arkiv Fysik 10, 583 (1956).

b

Risberg, G., Arkiv Fysik 28, 381 (1965).

c

Eriksson, K. B. S., and Isberg, H. B. S., Arkiv Fysik 23, 527 (1963).

d

Risberg, G., Arkiv Fysik 37, 231 (1968).

e

Roth, C., J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.), 74A (Phys. and Chem.) 715–722 (Sept.–Oct. 1970).

f

Landman, D. A., Levin, L. A., and Lurio, A., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 962 (1969).

g

Johansson, I., and Contreras, R., Arkiv Fysik 37, 513 (1968).

h

Johansson, I., and Litzén, U., Arkiv Fysik 34, 573 (1967).

i

Cowan, R. D., and Andrew, K. L., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 502 (1965).

j

Johansson, I., Arkiv Fysik 20, 135 (1961).

k

Liberman, S., J. phys. 30, 53 (1969).

l

Smith, G., and Wybourne, B. G., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 121 (1965).

The other data in the table are less reliable.3 Most configurations of the type (core)np with the core including a partly filled p or d subshell appear to be distorted by perturbations that are significant compared to ζnp. The data were usually taken from the lowest such configuration, to minimize the relative error in ζp. The ζpn*3 values for these lowest configurations are systematically larger than the limiting constant values (from eq (1)) by ~ 15 percent. At least part of this effect is understood [3, 1]. Part of the remaining scatter in these values is probably due to configuration interactions neglected in the calculations. In some spectra there may also be uncertainty in obtaining properly corresponding values of ζp and n* [1].

It seems likely that the formula values of ζpn*3 (table 1) are correct to ~ 15 percent for (core)np configurations (n greater than any principal quantum number in the core) in all atoms Z = 10 to 90. This accuracy must of course not be expected if perturbation has affected the value of n*3 by more than a few percent. Any other large percentage deviations from the formula are suspect and probably unphysical. In many cases rather complete and detailed calculations would be necessary to obtain values of ζp by the level-fitting method as accurate as the formula values. It would thus be advantageous in some instances to fix this parameter.

Some examples of these various points may be inferred from table 2, where values of ζp obtained by different methods for several rare-gas configurations are compared. The smaller values of ζp, as in Ne, are relatively more sensitive to distortion by perturbations in level-fitting determinations.

Table 2.

Values of spin-orbit energy for np electrons in some rare-gas configurations. The “formula” values of ζnp (from ζn*3 in table 1) are probably accurate to 15 percent.

Core np n* ζnp, cm−1
Formula Level-fitting Calculations
Ne 2p5 3p 2.154 9.6 a40.0,b13 ± 60
4p 3.163 3.0 b1 ± 12
5p 4.165 1.33 a8.1
6p 5.165 0.70 a 5.4
Ar 3p5 4p 2.279 32 b28 ± 29,c32.6
5p 3.306 10.5 a44.1,b16 ± 7,c13.2
6p 4.310 4.7 a 7.1
Kr 4p5 5p 2.322 152 a246,b159 ± 25
6p 3.356 50 a49.0,b58 ± 9
Xe 5p5 6p 2.383 361 a374,d353.7
a

Condon, E. U., and Shortley, G. H., The Theory of Atomic Spectra, pp. 306–312 (Cambridge, 1953). Some of these values were quoted from earlier calculations, with references given.

b

Cowan. R. D., and Andrew, K. L., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 502 (1965).

c

Garstang, R. H., and Van Blerkom, J., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1054 (1965).

d

Liberman, S., J. Phys. 30, 53 (1969). Calculation includes interaction with 5p57p.

The core configurations listed in table 1 are the lowest for each element. (A few of the cores that have low levels of both parities are not listed.) However, the value of ζnp is only weakly affected by core excitation for most configurations observed in optical spectroscopy. Values of n* for a particular np (n greater than for any core electron) but based on different core configurations will normally differ by fairly small amounts if the configurations involved are unperturbed. The most reliable experimental values of n* are usually obtained from terms based on the core configurations in the table.

The available data would probably yield useful relations for the Z-dependence of ζpn*3 in ionized spectra. Both this and the probably more troublesome extension to higher l [1] would merit investigation.

Footnotes

1

Figures in brackets indicate the literature references at the end of this paper.

2

It is notable that the data for eight of these spectra are from accurate observations made in Lund, Sweden, during the past 15 years.

3

Only a representative selection of the data available from complex spectra is given in the table. The ζpn*3 values listed for the first few elements following hydrogen are not accurate, since other interactions that contribute significantly to the term intervals were not allowed for. The results and discussion are not applicable for Z ⪝ 5.

3. References

  • [1].Fano U., and Martin W. C., in Topics in Modern Physics, A Tribute to E. U. Condon (Brittin W. E., and Odabasi H., eds., Colorado Associated University Press, 1971). [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Landé A., Z. Physik 25, 46 (1924). [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Casimir H. B. G., Arch. Musée Teyler, Series 3, 8, 201 (1936). [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Edlén B., “Atomic Spectra” in Encyclopedia of Physics, Flügge S., Ed., Vol. 27, pp. 129–130 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1964). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Standards and Technology

RESOURCES