Abstract
Minimizing immunologic complications is critical for long-term patient survival in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients. Multiple factors distinguish pediatric from adult organ transplant recipients which may influence the risk and manifestations of immunologic responses. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) is a non-HLA antibody that has been has been associated with poor clinical outcomes in adult kidney transplant recipients. There is now limited evidence available to suggest that AT1R-Ab may be an important part of the immunologic milieu impacting pediatric organ transplant outcomes and that differences in this phenomenon may exist between pediatric and adult patients. The mechanisms by which autoimmunity is provoked and mediates organ dysfunction in childhood and effective treatment options require further research.
Keywords: angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody, transplantation, pediatric, non-human leukocyte antigen antibody
Introduction
Maximizing long-term allograft survival is critical in the pediatric population given that they have the highest number of expected life years of any age group [1], yet most will require re-transplantation in their lifetimes. The role of alloantibody responses against Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) in mediating antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been a primary focus in both adult and pediatric transplantation [2–5]. Non-HLA antibodies have recently been recognized as potential mediators of allograft injury [6, 7], but the pathogenesis of non-HLA antibody mediated AMR is poorly understood and evidence for routine non-HLA antibody testing remains insufficient [8]. AT1R-Ab, in particular, has been associated with rejection, vascular injury, decline in renal function, and allograft failure in adult kidney transplant recipients [9–16].
There are multiple factors specific to children hypothesized to impact immunologic complications and transplant outcomes including differences in the immature vs mature immune system, rates of primary viral infection, and variations in immunosuppression drug metabolism [17]. This review explores the current literature on the role of AT1R-Ab in pediatric solid organ transplant outcomes. Though available evidence remains limited, we aim to highlight possible differences in the adult and pediatric populations in this regard and emphasize areas in need of further investigation.
Discussion
Prevalence of AT1R-Ab in Pediatric Patients
There are many challenges hindering our understanding of the prevalence and clinical impact of AT1R-Ab in the pediatric transplant population. Firstly, cutoffs for determining AT1R-Ab positivity by ELISA range from 9-17 U/mL. This is typically determined by the laboratory, the kit used to conduct the testing, and, in some cases, a receiver operating curve analysis. Second, the potential variability between kits, lots of reagents, and manufacturers add an additional layer of challenges. Development of a standardized approach to reduce variation across AT1R-Ab ELISA assays is needed to define cutoff values (which may vary based on clinical context), to precisely measure prevalence and clinical utility in the population, and to translate this test into widespread clinical use.
With this limitation in mind, there are some data available to help estimate the prevalence of AT1R-Ab in the pediatric population (Table 1). Bjerre et al. found the median level of AT1R-Ab to be 6.5 and 13.3 U/mL in healthy adults and children respectively, lower than in both kidney transplant populations (11 and 40 U/mL respectively) [18]. The prevalence of pre-transplant AT1R-Ab in adult kidney transplant patients ranges from 8-47.2% [10–12, 14–16, 19–22] with cutoffs for positivity ranging from 9-17 U/mL. One study of 29 pediatric kidney transplant recipients [23] found no patients with pre-transplant AT1R-Ab. However, this finding is difficult to interpret because the cutoff is not reported. Similar to adult studies, another study found pre-transplant AT1R-Ab >17 U/mL in 23% of pediatric patients [24]. Less data exist on the post-transplant development of AT1R-Ab in patients known to be negative pre-transplant. In the adult kidney transplant population, development of AT1R-Ab post-transplant ranges from 3-13% [12, 21] (with mean follow up of approximately 5-9 years post-transplant), while in children the only available study with longitudinal samples suggests a rate of 26% in the first 2 years post-transplant [24]. In cross-sectional analyses of patients tested at the time of indication biopsy, 32% of adult [25] and 52% of pediatric [26] kidney transplant recipients have been reported to be AT1R-Ab positive. In pediatric liver transplant, 46% of patients on an immunosuppression withdrawal protocol were observed to have AT1R-Ab >17 U/mL at the time of indication biopsy [27], however, there are no adult data in liver transplantation available for comparison.
Table 1: Pediatric Cohort Studies Examining AT1R-Ab in Solid Organ transplant.
U, units; AMR, antibody-mediated rejection; m, months; tx, transplant; KTRs, kidney transplant recipients; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SBP, systolic blood pressure; LDLT, living donor liver transplant; IS, immunosuppression
| Cohort | Time of AT1R-Ab Testing | AT1R-Ab Cutoff | AT1R-Ab Prevalence | Key Findings | Synergy with HLA DSA | Ref No. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kidney | ||||||
| 30 pediatric and 28 adult stable KTRs as well as 51 pediatric and 199 adult healthy controls examined cross-sectionally | Median time of 5 and 18 years post-tx in the pediatric and adult KTRs respectively | N/A | N/A | Median AT1R-Ab levels were higher in pediatric [40 (14.48-40)] vs adult [10.95 (8.2-25.53)] KTRs. Both pediatric and adult KTRs had higher median AT1R-Ab levels than their respective control groups. | N/A | [18] |
| 29 pediatric KTRs followed for 12m | Pre-tx for 28 subjects and unspecified times from 0-12m post-tx for 20 subjects (144 samples) | >2 SD above the mean in control group (healthy adults). Number not provided. | - 0% pre-tx - 40% on at least one post-tx sample |
AT1R-Ab was a frequent finding post-tx in pediatric patients and was not associated with infection or rejection. | N/A | [23] |
| 65 pediatric KTRs followed longitudinally for 24m | Pre-tx, 6m, 12m, 24m, and at times of suspected rejection. | 17 U/mL | - 58% at any time from pre- to 24m post-tx -23% pre-formed -26% negative pre- and positive post-tx -9% positive post- and unknown pre-tx |
AT1R-Ab associated with allograft loss, decline in eGFR, elevated TNF-a, IL-1β, and IL-8, and glomerulitis or arteritis on biopsy. | No | [24] |
| 62 pediatric KTRs followed for 60m | At time of indication biopsy > 12m post-tx, median time post-tx 53.5m (33.8-75). | 9.5 U/mL | - 52% at time of indication biopsy | AT1R-Ab was associated with allograft loss, ≥ 50% decline in eGFR, HLA DSA Class II positivity, and elevated SBP. AT1R-Ab levels were higher in patients with AMR and ptc. | Yes | [26] |
| Liver | ||||||
| 81 pediatric LDLT patients who underwent IS withdrawal examined cross-sectionally | At time of protocol or indication biopsy, median time post-tx of 16.2 (5.1-22.5) years | 17 U/mL | - 46% in the entire cohort - 65% in the advanced fibrosis group vs 36% in the control group |
AT1R-Ab was significantly more frequent in the advanced fibrosis group vs. control. | Yes | [27] |
Taken together, there is some suggestion that pediatric patients (both healthy and post-transplant) have higher levels of AT1R-Ab and may be more likely to develop AT1R-Ab post-transplant. The reason for this finding remains unclear. The trigger for AT1R-Ab production is unknown. However, the development of AT1R-Ab in other diseases has been linked to organ ischemia [28] (Figure 1), and a possible role of ischemia reperfusion injury in kidney transplantation has been suggested [6]. It is therefore possible that the smaller size and therefore higher risk of hemodynamic instability and vascular injury at the time of transplant may put pediatric transplant patients at higher risk of developing AT1R Ab. The potential role of the maturing immune system and viral exposures in this interplay and risk for autoimmunity has also yet to be explored. Furthermore, more data are needed to better understand the possible need for age specific cutoffs for AT1R-Ab positivity.
Figure 1: Potential Relationship between AT1R-Ab, Allograft Dyfunction, and Treatment Options in Pediatric Transplantation:

The development of AT1R-Ab in pediatric transplant patients may be related to tissue injury. The presence of AT1R-Ab may provoke further injury, however, treatment options exist which could potentially disrupt this cycle. Removal of AT1R-Ab using plasmapheresis and IVIG in conjunction with the use of angiotensin receptor blockers to inhibit AT1R activation has been described in the succesful treatment of AT1R-Ab mediated antibody-mediated rejection. Activation of the AT1R has been associated with tissue factor release and elevated IL-6, therefore, anticoagulation and/or blockade of the IL-6 pathway may be considered therpeautic options in future investigations. AT1R, angiotensin II type 1 receptor; AT1R-Ab, angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody; IL-6, interleukin 6
AT1R-Ab and Allograft Injury in Pediatric Transplantation
The phenotype of AT1R-Ab associated allograft injury was initially reported in adult kidney transplantation as AMR with severe hypertension [9]. Since this first report, AT1R-Ab has been associated with C4d positive and negative AMR, acute cellular rejection, vascular injury, decline in renal function, and allograft failure in adult kidney transplant recipients [9–16, 22]. AT1R-Ab has also been associated with allograft rejection in adult heart [29] and lung [30, 31] transplant recipients.
In pediatric kidney transplantation, the 2 largest cohort studies have shown an association between AT1R-Ab and allograft loss and decline in eGFR [24, 26] (Table 1). Interestingly, this was true in both the longitudinal cohort study[24] and a cross-sectional examination of AT1R-Ab at the time of indication biopsy [26]. Furthermore, both studies showed an association between AT1R-Ab and vascular inflammation, but not necessarily with the diagnosis of rejection. No association with rejection was also noted in one other smaller study [23]. The 2 cohort studies differed in the association between AT1R-Ab positivity and hypertension and HLA DSA; The longitudinal study found no association with hypertension or HLA DSA[24], while the cross-sectional study found associations with HLA Class II DSA and higher systolic blood pressure[26]. These differences may be related to the evaluation time points (both protocol and at time of indication biopsy vs. time of indication biopsy alone) and require further investigation. In pediatric liver transplantation, a cross-sectional cohort study examined AT1R-Ab positivity in living donor liver transplant patients who underwent immunosuppression withdrawal. AT1R-Ab was more frequent in the advanced fibrosis group vs the control group [27] (Table 1). This finding is interesting given the known pro-fibrotic effects of AT1R activation and a recent study in kidney transplantation showing increased sub-intimal fibrosis in adult patients with AT1R-Ab [22]. In addition to the small number of available cohort studies, there are 3 case reports in kidney [32–34] and 1 in liver transplantation reporting on acute AMR associated with AT1R-Ab in pediatric patients (Table 2).
Table 2: Pediatric Case Reports describing AT1R-Ab in Solid Organ Transplant.
yo, years old; mo, months old; Cr, creatinine; POD, post op day; U, units; AMR, antibody-mediated rejection, IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; ACR, acute cellular rejection; m, months; HTN, hypertension; PP, plasmapheresis; OLT, orthotopic liver transplantation
| Case Report | Timing and Level of AT1R-Ab | HLA DSA | Biopsy Findings | HTN | Treatment | Outcome | Ref No. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kidney | |||||||
| 9yo Female with acute elevation in Cr on POD 5 | Pre-tx: >40 U/mL Time of Rejection biopsy >40 U/mL |
Yes, HLA DSA Class II | C4d positive AMR | Yes, severe causing encephalopathy | PP × 10, IVIG Rituximab Ramipril Irbesartan | Recovery. AT1R-Ab < 10 U/mL after treatment. | [32] |
| 7 yo male with acute elevation in Cr on POD 15 | Pre-Tx: 109.55 U/mL Time of rejection biopsy: 17 U/mL |
No | ACR 1B with endarteritis C4d Negative AMR | Yes, mild, normalized with losartan | Pre-TX: PP, IVIG, Rituximab Rejection: PP Eculizumab (×1) Steroid Pulse ATG Losartan started POD 2. |
Initially improving with treatment, but on POD 21 developed acute allograft thrombosis requiring allograft nephrectomy. | [33] |
| 13 yo male with elevation in Cr on POD 10 and 3m post-tx | During rejection of 1st Tx: 128 U/mL Time of 3m rejection: 37 U/mL |
No | POD 10: Weakly C4d positive AMR 3m post-tx: Weakly C4d positive AMR 8m post-tx: Weakly C4d positive AMR 11 m post-tx: No rejection |
Yes, mild, normal with medications including Losartan started at 3m post-tx | POD 10: PP Steroid Pulse 3 mo post-tx Rituximab Losartan 8 mo post-tx: Increased Losartan |
Stable at 3 years post-tx. | [34] |
| Liver | |||||||
| 6 mo with 2nd OLT with continued liver dysfunction | Throughout 2nd transplant course | Yes (weak HLA DSA on only 1 test) | Progressive injury suggestive of vascular compromise. Patient notably with history of severe hepatic artery stenosis | Not Discussed | IVIG Rituximab Bortezomib Plasmapheresis | Patient died on POD 144 from massive ascites and resulting respiratory compromise. | [36] |
The mechanisms of pathogenicity involved in AT1R-Ab mediated injury, particularly in pediatric patients, remain unclear. Current evidence, similar to adult data, suggests an association with endothelial cell injury and vascular inflammation. The involvement of complement activation appears inconsistent. Importantly, there may be multiple pathways of AT1R-Ab related injury given some patients develop classical cases of acute AMR with hypertension while others may have a more gradual decline of eGFR and allograft loss. Furthermore, given that even healthy pediatric patients may have higher AT1R-Ab levels than adults [18], understanding how to identify which patients are at risk for pathology is critical to determining appropriate screening and treatment protocols. Patients may be at highest risk at times of concomitant allograft injury, for example, peri-operatively or in the presence of other pathogenic antibodies such as HLA DSA. The role of additional potentially relevant factors, such as the regulation of expression of AT1R on the allograft or synergy with other non-HLA antibodies, remains to be determined.
Therapy for AT1R-Ab Mediated Allograft Injury
There is currently no standardized treatment strategy to address AT1R-Ab mediated injury in the transplant setting. In the original paper describing acute AMR and hypertension in kidney transplantation, a treatment strategy including plasmapheresis, IVIG, and angiotensin receptor blockade was effective in reducing AT1R-Ab activity and improving allograft pathology (Figure 1) [9]. One paper in adult patients, described a preemptive strategy of screening for AT1R-Ab pre-transplant and induction of patients with ATG, angiotensin receptor blocker, and peri-operative plasmapheresis (in patients with AT1R-Ab > 25 U/mL) with improved outcomes compared to historical controls [35]. There are no studies examining the role of angiotensin receptor blockade in patients with AT1R-Ab without acute AMR.
In pediatrics, the available case reports show mixed results with these treatment strategies (Table 2). In 2 cases, kidney transplant patients were treated for AT1R-Ab associated acute AMR successfully using angiotensin receptor blockade and various additional treatments [32, 34]. In one case, though the patient initially was improving with aggressive treatment, the allograft eventually failed from thrombosis [33]. Given AT1R activation is associated with tissue factor expression [9], the role of anticoagulation as an adjunctive treatment strategy in these cases also has yet to be explored (Figure 1). In the liver transplant case report, multiple AMR treatments were unsuccessful, however, this case was also complicated by additional vascular complications making the impact of treatment on the AT1R-Ab mediated component difficult to ascertain [36].
In children, the need for additional access for plasmapheresis in some cases can be technically challenging and is accompanied by higher risk of damaging future dialysis or total parenteral nutrition access options. Therefore, identification of appropriate candidates for preemptive peri-operative plasmapheresis in pediatrics is a critical question. Angiotensin receptor blockers are considered safe in pediatric patients for the treatment of hypertension, and therefore, are generally an attractive treatment option. However, the benefit of treatment in the context of AT1R-Ab positivity has not yet been adequately studied. Also of interest, AT1R-Ab has been associated with elevated cytokine levels in pediatric patients [24]. The role of blockade of these pathways in treatment of AT1R-Ab associated pathology with, for example, agents such as tocilizumab (anti-I L6 receptor antibody), has yet to be formally examined (Figure 1). Tocilizumab has been reported to have been used successfully in 3 adult patients with AT1R-Ab associated AMR in a recent case series [37]. Further studies are needed to understand the effectiveness of this approach.
Conclusions and Future Questions
AT1R-Ab positivity may be a frequent phenomenon in pediatric transplant recipients, however, many questions remain regarding its associated phenotypes, mechanisms of injury, synergy with HLA and other non-HLA antibodies, and determinants of pathogenicity. Studies in pediatric heart, lung, and multi-visceral transplant patients are currently lacking and additional work is needed in all fields of pediatric solid organ transplant. Further studies are necessary to effectively identify which pediatric patients are at highest risk for AT1R-Ab mediated allograft injury to create effective clinical screening and treatment protocols. Studies assessing serial AT1R-Ab levels at both protocol and indication time points using a standardized testing method in a multicenter group of pediatric transplant recipients would be a foundational first step in defining the natural history. Furthermore, an in depth examination of allograft pathology in patients with and without clinical allograft dysfunction, including AT1R expression and signaling, would be of great interest to better understand the role of AT1R-Ab in allograft pathophysiology. Additionally, the role of AT1R-Ab in pediatric pathology outside of organ transplantation, for example, in chronic kidney disease is of interest.
Acknowledgments:
The authors’ work is supported by the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award T32 DK104687 UCLA Translational Research Grant in Pediatric Nephrology Program (M.H.P); the National Kidney Foundation (M.H.P); the American Society of Nephrology (M.H.P); the Casey Lee Ball Foundation (M.H.P); the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Grant R01AI13520, NIH PO1AI120944; 5U19AI128913; 1U01AI124319 (E.F.R.);
Abbreviations:
- AT1R
angiotensin II type 1 receptor
- AT1R-Ab
angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody
- HLA
human leukocyte antigen
- AMR
antibody-mediated rejection
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES
- [1].System USRD: 2015 USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. vol 2 Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2015, p 219. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Wiebe C, Gibson IW, Blydt-Hansen TD, Karpinski M, Ho J, Storsley LJ et al. : Evolution and clinical pathologic correlations of de novo donor-specific HLA antibody post kidney transplant. Am J Transplant 2012;12:1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Sellares J, de Freitas DG, Mengel M, Reeve J, Einecke G, Sis B et al. : Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence. Am J Transplant 2012;12:388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Terasaki PI, Ozawa M: Predicting kidney graft failure by HLA antibodies: a prospective trial. Am J Transplant 2004;4:438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Jin YP, Jindra PT, Gong KW, Lepin EJ, Reed EF: Anti-HLA class I antibodies activate endothelial cells and promote chronic rejection. Transplantation 2005;79:S19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Zhang Q, Reed EF: The importance of non-HLA antibodies in transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol 2016;12:484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Dragun D, Catar R, Philippe A: Non-HLA antibodies against endothelial targets bridging alio- and autoimmunity. Kidney Int 2016;90:280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Tait BD, Susal C, Gebel HM, Nickerson PW, Zachary AA, Claas FH et al. : Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation. Transplantation 2013;95:19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Dragun D, Muller DN, Brasen JH, Fritsche L, Nieminen-Kelha M, Dechend R et al. : Angiotensin II type 1-receptor activating antibodies in renal-allograft rejection. N Engl J Med 2005;352:558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Reinsmoen NL, Lai CH, Heidecke H, Haas M, Cao K, Ong G et al. : Anti-angiotensin type 1 receptor antibodies associated with antibody mediated rejection in donor HLA antibody negative patients. Transplantation 2010;90:1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Banasik M, Boratynska M, Koscielska-Kasprzak K, Kaminska D, Bartoszek D, Zabinska M et al. : The influence of non-HLA antibodies directed against angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) on early renal transplant outcomes. Transpl Int 2014;27:1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Taniguchi M, Rebellato LM, Cai J, Hopfield J, Briley KP, Haisch CE et al. : Higher risk of kidney graft failure in the presence of anti-angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies. Am J Transplant 2013;13:2577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Cuevas E, Arreola-Guerra JM, Hernandez-Mendez EA, Salcedo I, Castelan N, Uribe-Uribe NO et al. : Pretransplant angiotensin II type 1-receptor antibodies are a risk factor for earlier detection of de novo HLA donor-specific antibodies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Giral M, Foucher Y, Dufay A, Van Huyen JP, Renaudin K, Moreau A et al. : Pretransplant sensitization against angiotensin II type 1 receptor is a risk factor for acute rejection and graft loss. Am J Transplant 2013;13:2567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Kim D, Gimferrer I, Warner P, Nelson K, Sibulesky L, Bakthavatsalam R et al. : Preformed Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Antibodies Are Associated With Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center, Cohort Study. Transplant Proc 2018;50:3467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Malheiro J, Tafulo S, Dias L, Martins S, Fonseca I, Beirão I et al. : Deleterious Effect of Anti-Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antibodies Detected Pretransplant on Kidney Graft Outcomes is Both Proper and Synergistic WITH DONOR-SPECIFIC ANTI-HLA ANTIBODIES. Nephrology (Carlton) 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Dharnidharka VR, Fiorina P, Harmon WE: Kidney transplantation in children. N Engl J Med 2014;371:549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Bjerre A, Tangeraas T, Heidecke H, Dragun D, Dechend R, Staff AC: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies in childhood kidney transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Philogene MC, Zhou S, Lonze BE, Bagnasco S, Alasfar S, Montgomery RA et al. : Pre-transplant Screening for Non-HLA Antibodies: Who should be Tested? Hum Immunol 2018;79:195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Deltombe C, Gillaizeau F, Anglicheau D, Morelon E, Trébern-Launay K, Le Borgne F et al. : Is pre-transplant sensitization against angiotensin II type 1 receptor still a risk factor of graft and patient outcome in kidney transplantation in the anti-HLA Luminex era? A retrospective study. Transpl Int 2017;30:1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Gareau AJ, Wiebe C, Pochinco D, Gibson IW, Ho J, Rush DN et al. : Pre-transplant AT. Transpl Immunol 2018;46:29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].González-Almada A, Arreola-Guerra JM, López-Sánchez JA, Cuevas E, Vilatoba M, Contreras AG et al. : Pretransplant angiotensin ii type 1-receptor antibodies point to an increase in renal graft sub-intimal fibrosis in living-donor kidney transplant recipients. Transpl Immunol 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Hesemann LE, Subramanian V, Mohanakumar T, Dharnidharka VR: De novo development of antibodies to kidney-associated self-antigens angiotensin II receptor type I, collagen IV, and fibronectin o ccurs at early time points after kidney transplantation in children. Pediatr Transplant 2015;19:499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Pearl MH, Zhang Q, Palma Diaz MF, Grotts J, Rossetti M, Elashoff D et al. : Angiotensin II Type 1 receptor antibodies are associated with inflammatory cytokines and poor clinical outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation. Kidney Int 2018;93:260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Philogene MC, Bagnasco S, Kraus ES, Montgomery RA, Dragun D, Leffell MS et al. : Anti-Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor and Anti-Endothelial Cell Antibodies: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Pathological Findings in Allograft Biopsies. Transplantation 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Fichtner A, Süsal C, Schröder C, Höcker B, Rieger S, Waldherr R et al. : Association of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies with graft histology, function and survival in paediatric renal transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Ohe H, Uchida Y, Yoshizawa A, Hirao H, Taniguchi M, Maruya E et al. : Association of anti-human leukocyte antigen and anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies with liver allograft fibrosis after immunosuppression withdrawal. Transplantation 2014;98:1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].LaMarca B, Wallukat G, Llinas M, Herse F, Dechend R, Granger JP: Autoantibodies to the angiotensin type I receptor in response to placental ischemia and tumor necrosis factor alpha in pregnant rats. Hypertension 2008;52:1168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Hiemann NE, Meyer R, Wellnhofer E, Schoenemann C, Heidecke H, Lachmann N et al. : Non-HLA antibodies targeting vascular receptors enhance alloimmune response and microvasculopathy after heart transplantation. Transplantation 2012;94:919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Cozzi E, Calabrese F, Schiavon M, Feltracco P, Seveso M, Carollo C et al. : Immediate and Catastrophic Antibody-Mediated Rejection in a Lung Transplant Recipient With Anti-Angiotensin II Receptor Type 1 and Anti-Endothelin-1 Receptor Type A Antibodies. Am J Transplant 2017;17:557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Reinsmoen NL, Mirocha J, Ensor CR, Marrari M, Chaux G, Levine DJ et al. : A 3-Center Study Reveals New Insights Into the Impact of Non-HLA Antibodies on Lung Transplantation Outcome. Transplantation 2017;101:1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Kelsch R, Everding AS, Kuwertz-Bröking E, Brand E, Spriewald BM, Sibrowski W et al. : Accelerated kidney transplant rejection and hypertensive encephalopathy in a pediatric patient associated with antibodies against angiotensin type 1 receptor and HLA class II. Transplantation 2011;92:e57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Pearl MH, Leuchter RK, Reed EF, Zhang Q, Ettenger RB, Tsai EW: Accelerated rejection, thrombosis, and graft failure with angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies. Pediatr Nephrol 2015;30:1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Guzzo I, Morolli F, Camassei FD, Piazza A, Poggi E, Dello Strologo L: Acute kidney transplant rejection mediated by angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies in a pediatric hyperimmune patient. Pediatr Nephrol 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Carroll RP, Riceman M, Hope CM, Zeng A, Deayton S, Bennett GD et al. : Angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibody (AT1Rab) associated humoral rejection and the effect of peri operative plasma exchange and candesartan. Hum Immunol 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Wozniak LJ, Naini BV, Hickey MJ, Bhattacharyya S, Reed EF, Busuttil RW, et al. : Acute antibody-mediated rejection in ABO-compatible pediatric liver transplant recipients: case series and review of the literature. Pediatr Transplant 2017;21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Choi J, Aubert O, Vo A, Loupy A, Haas M, Puliyanda D et al. : Assessment of Tocilizumab (Anti-Interleukin-6 Receptor Monoclonal) as a Potential Treatment for Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Transplant Glomerulopathy in HLA-Sensitized Renal Allograft Recipients. Am J Transplant 2017,’17:2381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
